Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA), 13608-13615 [E8-5041]
Download as PDF
13608
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Notices
5. Follow-on and Alumni Activities:
ECA’s office of Alumni Affairs is the
leading agency for alumni activities and
as such, all suggested alumni activity for
participants should dovetail with
Alumni Affairs’ initiatives. Proposals
should provide a plan for continued
follow-on activity ensuring that the
English Language Educators Summer
Institute is not an isolated event.
Activities should include tracking and
maintaining updated lists of all alumni.
These lists should be available for the
Office of Alumni Affairs.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
activity’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program. A
draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives is
recommended.
7. Cost-effectiveness and Cost
Sharing: The overhead and
administrative components of the
proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as
possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate. Proposals
should maximize cost-sharing through
other private sector support as well as
institutional direct funding
contributions.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Federal Assistance Award
(FAA) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The FAA and the original cooperative
agreement proposal with subsequent
modifications (if applicable) shall be the
only binding authorizing document
between the recipient and the U.S.
Government. The FAA will be signed by
an authorized Grants Officer, and
mailed to the recipient’s responsible
officer identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following
reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award; and
(2) Quarterly program and financial
reports.
The recipient will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final Federal Assistance
Award.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Maria Snarski,
Office of English Language Programs,
ECA/A/L, Room 304, ECA/A/L–08–02,
U.S. Department of State, SA–44, 301
4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
telephone: 202–453–8841, fax 202–453–
8858, SnarskiME@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/L–
08–02. Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice:
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: March 4, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8–5040 Filed 3–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6132]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA)
Request for Grant Proposals: Teacher
Exchange Program
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/E–09–01
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.408
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 23, 2008.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Global Educational Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA), U.S. Department of State,
announces an open competition for
three assistance awards to administer
components of the Office’s Teacher
Exchange Program in Fiscal Year 2009.
Public and private non-profit
organizations or consortia of eligible
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 501(c)(3) may submit proposals
to cooperate with the Bureau in the
administration of the teacher exchange
programs as categorized below. To
facilitate effective communication
between ECA’s Teacher Exchange
Branch (ECA/A/S/X) and the
organization(s) cooperating on these
programs, applicant organizations
should have offices and staffs located in
Washington, DC at the time of
application.
In recent years, the Bureau has
expanded and diversified its
programming for teachers consistent
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Notices
with the Bureau’s emphasis on younger
and disadvantaged, non-elite
populations and with the influence
teachers can have on these populations
in school classrooms in the U.S. and
around the world. This Request for
Grant Proposals is part of an effort to
add synergies to the Bureau’s
engagement with primary and
secondary school educators and to
present a range of teacher program
opportunities to potential applicant
organizations, which may submit
proposals to administer and implement
one, two, or all three pairs of the
following FY 2009 Teacher Exchange
Programs as outlined below:
Pair A: the Fulbright Classroom
Teacher Exchanges and the
Distinguished Fulbright Awards in
Teaching; Pair B: the International
Leaders in Education Program and the
Teaching Excellence Awards Program;
and/or Pair C: the Educational Seminars
and the Teachers of Critical Languages
Program. Details about these program
components are provided under the
Funding Opportunity Description
section of this document and in the
Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI) document
associated with this solicitation.
Proposals should reflect a vision for the
program, interpreting the goals of the
Fulbright-Hays Act and the Teacher
Exchange Program with creativity, as
well as providing innovative ideas and
recommendations.
The cooperating organization(s) will
have responsibility for program
administration, which includes the
following broad categories: program
planning and management; placement;
orientation; enrichment activities;
participant supervision and support
services; fiscal management and
budgeting; and program reporting and
evaluation. Proposals should include
schedules and timelines for notifying
ECA, overseas partners, and grantees of
placements, travel arrangements and
cross-cultural and school information in
a timely manner. Programs must comply
with J–1 visa regulations. Teacher
exchange participants in the U.S. and
abroad should be identified through
open, merit-based competitions.
Although the amount that will be
available to support these programs in
FY 2009 has not yet been determined,
for planning purposes the total amount
of funding that may be available to
cover administrative and program costs
of these programs will be up to
$13,875,000. The amounts listed for
each program are provided to enable
applicant organizations to prepare
budgets for planning purposes, and are
subject to change. More specific
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
information for each program is
provided below and in the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI) document. All awards are
pending availability of FY 2009 funds.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations...and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose
To improve mutual understanding
among teachers, school administrators,
and their schools and communities in
the U.S. and abroad through
professional development and
exchange. Teacher exchanges support
the internationalization and increased
quality of schools and classrooms,
increase the knowledge of students and
communities about global issues and
cultures, and improve knowledge of
foreign languages. Teacher exchanges
also encourage the professional
development of teachers by broadening
their familiarity with and increasing
their understanding of approaches to
their subjects and pedagogical methods.
The Presidentially appointed J.
William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship
Board is responsible for two of the
programs described below (those in Pair
A), and has issued overall policy
guidelines and selection criteria which
are available at the following Web site:
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
fulbright. The Fulbright Foreign
Scholarship Board is responsible for the
final selection of Fulbright candidates.
Organizations cooperating with the
Bureau must ensure full and proper
identification of the Fulbright Program
with the U.S. government and the
Department of State.
Applicant organizations may propose
to administer and implement one, two,
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13609
or all three pairs of the following
teacher exchange programs.
Pair A
1. In Fulbright Classroom Teacher
Exchanges, a teacher from the U.S. and
a teacher from a participating foreign
country exchange teaching positions
and professional duties for a semester or
a year. In FY 2009, approximately 60
exchanges are anticipated. Countries
currently anticipated for participation
are France, Hungary, India, Mexico,
South Africa, Switzerland, Turkey, and
the United Kingdom, although
additional countries may be added,
depending on Bureau priorities.
Applicant organizations must
demonstrate flexibility in working in
countries which may not be identified at
the present time. In this program model,
U.S. teachers apply to participate in the
program through the cooperating
organization; international counterparts
apply through a Fulbright Commission
or U.S. Embassy overseas (in the case of
Switzerland and the United Kingdom,
the CH Youth Exchange and the British
Council, respectively). Recruitment of
U.S. participants for the FY 2009
program (academic year 2009–2010) is
being conducted by the organization
currently administering this program
component with FY 2008 resources; FY
2009 proposals should include the costs
of recruitment for grants to be funded
with FY 2010 resources for academic
year 2010–2011. In consultation with
the Bureau, the U.S. cooperating
organization and the nominating entity
overseas will facilitate the matching of
U.S. and international teacher
applicants with one another for the
consideration of relevant supervising
school administrators. The cooperating
U.S. organization will provide an
orientation program for all participants
and will monitor and support their
programs in consultation with overseas
counterparts. Amount available for
program and administration estimated
at up to approximately $2,950,000.
2. New for FY 2009, the Distinguished
Fulbright Awards in Teaching will
recognize and encourage excellence in
teaching in the U.S. and selected
countries abroad. Countries
participating in the program in FY 2009
may include Argentina, the Czech
Republic, Finland, Ghana, Greece,
Japan, Mexico, Senegal, Singapore, and
South Africa, although additional
countries may be added, depending on
Bureau priorities. Applicant
organizations must demonstrate
flexibility in working in countries
which may not be identified at the
present time. These awards will provide
a rich professional growth opportunity
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
13610
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
to the Distinguished Fulbright Teachers
while enhancing mutual understanding
among international and U.S. teachers,
administrators, their students, and host
communities. U.S. teachers will apply
to the U.S. cooperating organization to
pursue individual projects for a
semester or a summer in the
participating countries, and teachers
from participating countries will apply
through the U.S. Embassy or Fulbright
Commission to pursue projects in the
U.S. The Distinguished Fulbright
Teachers will conduct research, take
courses for professional development,
and lead master classes or seminars for
teachers and students in the countries of
exchange. Based on proposals submitted
by U.S. teachers to conduct these
activities in specific eligible countries,
the U.S. Embassy, Fulbright
Commission, or other organization as
applicable in each participating country
will facilitate a relevant academic or
professional affiliation in consultation
with each U.S. Distinguished Teacher.
The U.S. cooperating organization will
identify one U.S. university to provide
the international Distinguished
Teachers with broad-ranging access to
faculty resources, schools, and other
educational opportunities. In FY 2009, a
pilot program for approximately twelve
U.S. teachers and twelve international
teachers is anticipated. Amount
available for program and
administration estimated at up to
approximately $900,000.
Pair B
3. The International Leaders in
Education Program will bring
approximately 86 international
secondary school teachers to U.S.
universities for a semester to develop
their teaching skills, to increase their
subject-matter expertise, and to pursue
coursework and practical teaching
experiences in American high schools.
Fulbright Commissions and U.S.
Embassies will be responsible for
recruiting applicants and nominating
candidates. The cooperating U.S.
organization will be responsible for
convening independent committees to
select candidates for approval by ECA
for participation in the program. This
organization will also be responsible for
identifying approximately five
appropriate host universities through a
national competition, for organizing a
three-day orientation session and a
three-day end-of-program review in
Washington, DC, and for actively
monitoring program implementation in
the host universities and schools. In
cohorts of approximately 15–20
participants at each host university, the
participants will audit university-level
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
courses relevant to their teaching field
and expertise, attend professional
development seminars, workshops, and
conferences on education-related and
pedagogical topics, and teach or teamteach for eight weeks in U.S. secondary
schools in cooperation with experienced
U.S. partner teachers. The universities
and schools should also provide
opportunities for participants to share
information about their home countries
with U.S. audiences, and to prepare
training workshops for colleagues after
returning to their home countries. A
limited number of American host
teachers will also be selected to travel
to some of the international teachers’
home schools for two- to three-week
programs. Administrative and program
costs are estimated at up to
approximately $2,500,000.
4. Under the Teaching Excellence and
Achievement program component,
groups of educators from a variety of
countries will participate in three sixweek programs in FY 2009. Based in
clusters of 20 participants at
approximately five different U.S.
universities, a total of approximately
180 international educators will
participate in seminars, share
pedagogical practices, and engage in
classroom teaching, observation, and
curriculum development in the fields of
English, English as a Foreign Language,
math, science, social studies and civics.
Under this program, U.S. Embassies and
Fulbright Commissions will recruit and
select international participants. The
U.S. cooperating organization will
identify, through a national
competition, U.S. universities with
access to appropriate faculty and
community resources to administer the
three-week seminars and to arrange for
participants to teach or job-shadow in
U.S. secondary schools for
approximately three weeks under the
guidance of experienced mentor
teachers or administrators. The
universities and schools should also
provide opportunities for participants to
share information about their home
countries with U.S. audiences and to
prepare workshops for colleagues after
returning to their countries. The U.S.
cooperating organization will
administer a three-day orientation
session in Washington, DC and a threeday end-of-program review. The U.S.
cooperating organization will also
organize a competition to identify
approximately 105 U.S. educators to
make reciprocal visits in two groups (a
summer cohort and a fall cohort) to the
international teachers’ home countries
to gain a deeper understanding of the
educational systems and cultures of
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
these countries, and to establish or
strengthen cooperation with schools in
the participating countries. Amount
available for program and
administration estimated at up to
approximately $3,750,000.
Pair C
5. Educational Seminars
(a) We anticipate that approximately
100 teachers and other educators will
travel to the U.S. in country-specific
groups to learn about the U.S.
educational system in seminars of two
to three weeks, and through visits to
U.S. secondary schools. Currently
anticipated for participation in the
seminars are Argentina, Brazil, Jordan,
Mexico, Thailand and Uruguay,
although additional countries may be
added, depending on Bureau priorities.
Applicant organizations must
demonstrate flexibility in working in
countries which may not be identified at
the present time. These seminars will
provide an introduction to the U.S.
educational system and to U.S. society
and culture. Fulbright Commissions,
U.S. Embassies, or other educational
organizations in these countries will
recruit and select international
educators for the seminars, while the
U.S. cooperating agency will be
responsible for recruiting and selecting
U.S. candidates, for implementing a
three-day orientation in Washington,
DC, for arranging visits of participants
in groups to geographically and socially
diverse U.S. schools with an interest in
hosting the international educators, and
for overseeing an end-of-program
review. Some seminars will require
translation as noted in the POGI.
Approximately 45 selected U.S.
educators from the host schools will
make reciprocal exchange visits to these
countries in programs to be organized
by Fulbright Commissions (except in
Jordan, where there is not a reciprocal
component).
(b.) Approximately 20 U.S. secondary
school teachers of Greek, Latin, and the
classics will attend intensive summer
courses lasting from six to eight weeks
to be organized by the Fulbright
Commissions and U.S. non-profit
partner organizations in Greece and
Italy. The U.S. cooperating organization
will be responsible for notifying
participants of their selection, helping
arrange their transportation, and
providing them with a maintenance
allowance during the seminar. The nonprofit organizations will arrange
orientation meetings for the participants
upon their arrival in Greece and Italy.
(c.) Approximately 6 U.S. teachers
will travel to India for a four-week
summer program with Indian teachers
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
and schoolchildren. The U.S.
cooperating organization will be
responsible for administering an open
competition to select the participants,
and for administering their awards. The
Fulbright Commission in India will
organize a program of visits to Indian
schools for discussions and observation
of best practices with Indian counterpart
teachers.
Recruitment of U.S. participants for
the FY 2009 Educational Seminars is
being undertaken by an incumbent
organization with FY 2008 resources;
under this competition, proposals
should include the costs of recruitment
for the 2010 seminars, for which grants
to participants will be provided in FY
2010 (except Jordan which does not
have a program for U.S. educators).
Amount available for program and
administration of the seminars
estimated at up to approximately
$1,550,000.
6. Approximately 38 Teachers of
Critical Languages will come from
China and the Middle East to teach
Chinese and Arabic at U.S. elementary
and secondary schools for an academic
year. In FY 2009, we may also request
applicants to administer pilot initiatives
for two teachers from Russia and two
from Japan to teach their native
languages at K–12 schools for an
academic year. Applicant organizations
must demonstrate flexibility in working
in countries which may not be
identified at the present time. This
activity is a component of the National
Security Language Initiative announced
by President George W. Bush in January
2006 to encourage the study and
teaching of critical languages in the
United States. The cooperating U.S.
organization will recruit U.S. host
schools, oversee the placement of
Chinese and Arabic (and possibly
Russian, Japanese, and other) teachers,
provide an in-depth two-week
orientation session on relevant U.S.
pedagogical, educational, and social
issues, and monitor and support the
teachers and their engagement with the
U.S. host schools throughout the
program. International teachers will be
recruited and selected by U.S. embassies
or partner organizations in the
participating countries. Amount
available for program and
administration estimated at up to
approximately $2,225,000.
Program Administration
Bureau activities and responsibilities
for all 6 teacher exchange program
components (3 pairs) include:
(1) Participation in the design and
direction of program activities;
(2) Approval of key personnel;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
(3) Approval and input on program
timelines, agendas and administrative
procedures;
(4) Guidance in execution of all
program components;
(5) Review and approval of all
program publicity and recruitment
materials;
(6) Approval of participating teachers
and administrators, in cooperation with
Fulbright commissions, U.S. embassies,
and international non-governmental
organizations, (Fulbright program
candidates are also subject to final
selection by the Fulbright Board);
(7) Approval of decisions related to
special circumstances or problems
throughout the duration of program;
(8) Assistance with non-immigration
status and other SEVIS-related issues;
(9) Assistance with participant
emergencies;
(10) Liaison with relevant U.S.
embassies, Fulbright commissions and
country desk officers at the State
Department.
Programs must conform with Bureau
requirements and guidelines outlined in
the Solicitation Package which includes
the Request for Grant Proposals (RFGP),
the Project Objectives, Goals and
Implementation (POGI) and the
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI).
Cooperating Agency Responsibilities
The cooperating agency or agencies
is/are responsible for various aspects of
outreach, recruitment, and screening of
applicants; SEVIS duties and
preparation of form DS–2019 under a G
Program Number under the Bureau’s
responsibility on behalf of the Teacher
Exchange Branch; orientation programs,
professional in-service meetings, and
debriefings; placement and, as required
for the classroom teacher exchanges,
matching U.S. teachers with
international counterparts; monitoring,
supervision, and support of
participants; administering sub-award
competitions as necessary; and fiscal
management, evaluation, and follow-on
and alumni activities for the program
components described above. Please see
the POGI for details pertaining to these
activities for each program component.
The Bureau’s program office and the
cooperating agency or agencies will
meet regularly regarding program
implementation. The Bureau’s program
office and the cooperating agency or
agencies will also maintain regular
telephone, e-mail, and fax
communications with each other.
Additional Guidelines
Applicant organizations should
submit separate proposals with budgets
and narratives outlining a
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13611
comprehensive strategy for the
administration and implementation of
each pair of program components for
which they are applying: (Pair A:
Fulbright Classroom Teacher
Exchanges/Distinguished Fulbright
Awards in Teaching; Pair B:
International Leaders in Education/
Teaching Excellence and Achievement;
Pair C: Educational Seminars/Teachers
of Critical Languages). Organizations
may apply for more than one pair of
components, but may not apply to
administer program components except
in the combinations prescribed.
Proposals should reflect a vision for the
programs, interpreting the goals of the
Fulbright-Hays Act and the Teacher
Exchange Program with creativity, as
well as providing innovative ideas and
recommendations. The Bureau places a
priority on ensuring that the positive
impact of the Teacher Exchange
Program is visible to the public in U.S.
and host school communities. Applicant
organizations should outline a plan to
work with the media and other
organizations, in close consultation with
the Bureau, to ensure that the program
and its awards and achievements
receive appropriate publicity.
The narrative portion of the proposal
for each pair of program components
should not exceed 20 pages. Proposals
may utilize appendices to illustrate
elements of the narrative.
Applicants must also provide a
separate administrative and program
budget for each program pair. Where
possible, proposals should reflect
economies of scale and should
demonstrate administrative efficiencies.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for further information.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement(s). ECA’s level of
involvement in this program is listed
under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2009.
Approximate Total Funding:
$13,875,000 pending availability of
funds.
Approximate Number of Awards: 3
awards.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, October 1, 2008.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
September 30, 2011.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew the grants for a period
of two additional fiscal years, before
openly competing the programs again.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
13612
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations or consortia of
institutions meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
Consortia of eligible organizations
applying for grants should designate one
organization to be the recipient of the
cooperative agreement award. Proposals
from consortia should provide a
detailed description of the
responsibilities of each partner
organization.
Organizations with primary
responsibility for any of the six program
components must have a staff based in
Washington, DC at the time of
application.
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
The Bureau anticipates that proposals
will include significant amounts of costsharing in support of the Teacher
Exchange Program, and encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels
of funding in support of this initiative.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges be limited to $60,000 in
Bureau funding. ECA anticipates
awarding one or more cooperative
agreement awards in (an) amount(s)
over $60,000 to support program and
administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request
an Application Package: Please contact
Ms. Pat Mosley in the Teacher Exchange
Branch, ECA/A/S/X, Room 349, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, email: mosleypm@state.gov, telephone:
(202) 453–8897 and fax number: (202)
453–8890, to request a Solicitation
Package. Please refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number ECA/A/S/X–09–01
when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from https://www.grants.gov. Please see
section IV.3f. for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via the Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
rfgps/menu.htm, or from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call (1–
866) 705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF—424 which is
part of the formal application package.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, a proposal
narrative, and a budget for each program
within the program pair(s) for which the
applicant applies. The proposal
narrative for each program pair should
not exceed twenty (20) pages in length.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. The mandatory Proposal
Submission Instructions (PSI) document
and the Project Objectives, Goals and
Implementation (POGI) document
contain additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa: The Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs places
critically important emphases on the
secure and proper administration of
Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and
adherence by grantees and sponsors to
all regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Grantee will be responsible for
issuing DS–2019 forms to participants
in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203–5029, Fax: (202) 453–8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Notices
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ’Support for Diversity’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other instrument plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
grantee will be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including
participant satisfaction with the
program, learning as a result of the
program, and anticipated changes in
behavior as a result of the program. The
evaluation plan should include
indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive
knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
We encourage you to assess the
following three levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Anticipated Participant behavior,
anticipated actions to apply knowledge
in work or community; greater
participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and
explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts
between participants, community
members, and others.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. Grantees will be
required to submit ‘‘success stories’’ for
Bureau reporting purposes as well as
outreach. All data collected, including
survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for:
overall program management, staffing,
coordination with ECA and with U.S.
and international educational
institutions, Fulbright commissions and
PAS of U.S. embassies. Provide a
staffing plan which outlines the
responsibilities of each staff person and
explains which staff members will be
accountable for each program
responsibility. Whenever possible,
streamline administrative processes.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive line item administrative
budget for each program within the
program pairs which they are applying
to administer. It is anticipated that
funding for the cooperative agreement
awards for program administration of
the three pairs of teacher exchange
programs described here will be
approximately $13,875,000.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs and
additional budget guidance are outlined
in detail in the POGI document. Please
refer to the Solicitation Package for
complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13613
Application Deadline Date: May 23,
2008.
Reference Number: ECA/A/S/X–09–
01.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed
Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and 10 copies of the
application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/A/S/X–09–01, Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
13614
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Notices
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount
of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a
variety of factors including the size of
the application and the speed of your
Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you not wait
until the application deadline to begin
the submission process through
Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: (800) 518–
4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as Public
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
Affairs Sections overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative
agreements resides with the Bureau’s
Grants Officer.
V.2. Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission. Proposals should
demonstrate a commitment to
excellence and creativity in the
implementation and management of this
program in its various formats,
including the recruitment, matching,
and placement of U.S. and international
teachers and administrators, quality of
professional and pre-academic
workshops, and effectiveness of
program design.
2. Program planning: Proposals
should respond precisely to the
planning requirements outlined in the
RFGP and POGI. Planning should
demonstrate substantive rigor. Detailed
agendas and relevant work plans,
including timelines, should demonstrate
feasibility and the applicant’s logistical
capacity to implement the programs.
3. Ability to achieve program
objectives: Proposals should
demonstrate clearly how the applicant
will fulfill the programs’ objectives and
implement plans, while demonstrating
innovation and a commitment to
academic excellence and programmatic
impact. Proposals should demonstrate a
capacity for flexibility in the
management of the programs.
4. Institutional Capacity: Proposed
personnel and institutional resources
should be adequate and appropriate to
achieve program goals. Applicants
should demonstrate established links to
secondary schools and institutions of
higher education in the U.S. and
knowledge of the overseas educational
environment, particularly an awareness
of conditions in societies and
educational institutions outside the
United States as they apply to academic
exchange programs. Applicants should
demonstrate prior experience or the
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
capacity to negotiate significant cost
savings for international teachers from
American institutions. Applicants
should also demonstrate their capacity
to provide an information management/
database system that meets program
requirements, is compatible with the
Bureau’s systems, and provides for
electronic applications, electronic data
storage, and electronic payment of
maintenance allowances. In its review
of proposals, the Bureau will consider
the past performance of prior recipients
and the demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
5. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(recruitment and selection of
participants, placements, and program
evaluation) and program content
(orientation programs, professional
meetings, debriefings). Proposals should
articulate a diversity plan, not just a
statement of compliance.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
programs’ success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the programs.
The Bureau recommends that proposals
include a draft survey questionnaire or
other instrument plus description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original objectives.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries, should be kept as low as
possible while adequate and appropriate
to provide the required services.
Proposals should document plans to
realize innovative cost-sharing, costsavings and other efficiencies through
use of technology, administrative
streamlining, and other management
techniques.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an
Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau’s Grants Office. The
AAD and the original grant proposal
with subsequent modifications (if
applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Notices
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments.’’
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants;
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements:
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus two copies of the
following reports:
A final program and financial report
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award; quarterly
financial reports, and ad hoc program
and financial reports as requested by the
Teacher Exchange Branch.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Mr. Michael
Kuban, Fulbright Teacher Exchange
Branch, ECA/A/S/X, Room 349, ECA/A/
S/X–09–01, U.S. Department of State,
SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, e-mail:
Kubanmm@state.gov, phone: (202) 453–
8897, and fax: (202) 453–8890.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/S/X–
09–01.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. All inquiries
about the RFGP or any aspect of the
Teacher Exchange Program should be
submitted in writing via e-mail to Mr.
Kuban. Any questions or requests for
information from overseas Fulbright
commissions or Public Affairs Sections
of U.S. embassies should be submitted
in writing via e-mail to Ms. Mosley for
transmission to those overseas offices.
Once the RFGP deadline has passed,
Bureau staff may not discuss this
competition with applicants until the
proposal review process has been
completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: March 4, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E8–5041 Filed 3–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement: San
Joaquin County, CA
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this
notice to advise the public that the
Notice of Intent, to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the proposed South Stockton SixLane Project, on State Route 99, in San
Joaquin County, California will be
withdrawn; and an Environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13615
Assessment (EA) in lieu of an EIS is
being prepared for this proposed
highway project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dominic Hoang, Highway Engineer,
FHWA, California Division, 650 Capitol
Mall, Suite 4–100, Sacramento, CA
95814–4708; weekdays 7 a.m.–4 p.m.
(Pacific time); telephone: (916) 498–
5002; e-mail:
dominic.hoang@fhwa.dot.gov. Gail
Miller, Senior Environmental Planner,
Caltrans, 2015 E. Shields Avenue, #100,
Fresno, CA 93726; weekdays 8 a.m.–5
p.m. (Pacific time); telephone: (916)
243–8274; e-mail:
gail_miller@dot.ca.gov.
The
FHWA, in cooperation with Caltrans,
conducted studies of the potential
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed highway project to widen
a three-mile stretch of State Route 99
from four lanes to six lanes, from 0.4
mile north of the Arch Road Interchange
to 0.1 mile south of State Route 4 West
in Stockton, San Joaquin County,
California. During the course of
conducting these studies, it was
identified that many of the potential
costly environmental impacts that led to
issuing the Notice of Intent could be
avoided by adding the additional lanes
to the existing median, instead of to the
outside of the existing freeway where
residents and businesses are built up
close to the roadway. Additional design
changes were identified to avoid or
minimize potential impacts by further
reducing the amount of right-of-way
needed to construct the project.
Therefore, the FHWA has determined
that an EA would be the appropriate
environmental document for the project,
and that the Notice of Intent previously
issued on January 29, 2002 on the
Federal Register, should be withdrawn.
The EA will be available for public
inspection prior to a public hearing,
anticipated to be held in the Spring of
2008. Comments or questions
concerning this proposed action and the
determination that an EA is the proper
environmental document should be
directed to the FHWA or Caltrans at the
addresses provided above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Research
Planning and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 50 (Thursday, March 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13608-13615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-5041]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6132]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)
Request for Grant Proposals: Teacher Exchange Program
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/E-09-01
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.408
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 23, 2008.
Executive Summary: The Office of Global Educational Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA), U.S. Department of
State, announces an open competition for three assistance awards to
administer components of the Office's Teacher Exchange Program in
Fiscal Year 2009. Public and private non-profit organizations or
consortia of eligible organizations meeting the provisions described in
Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3) may submit proposals to
cooperate with the Bureau in the administration of the teacher exchange
programs as categorized below. To facilitate effective communication
between ECA's Teacher Exchange Branch (ECA/A/S/X) and the
organization(s) cooperating on these programs, applicant organizations
should have offices and staffs located in Washington, DC at the time of
application.
In recent years, the Bureau has expanded and diversified its
programming for teachers consistent
[[Page 13609]]
with the Bureau's emphasis on younger and disadvantaged, non-elite
populations and with the influence teachers can have on these
populations in school classrooms in the U.S. and around the world. This
Request for Grant Proposals is part of an effort to add synergies to
the Bureau's engagement with primary and secondary school educators and
to present a range of teacher program opportunities to potential
applicant organizations, which may submit proposals to administer and
implement one, two, or all three pairs of the following FY 2009 Teacher
Exchange Programs as outlined below:
Pair A: the Fulbright Classroom Teacher Exchanges and the
Distinguished Fulbright Awards in Teaching; Pair B: the International
Leaders in Education Program and the Teaching Excellence Awards
Program; and/or Pair C: the Educational Seminars and the Teachers of
Critical Languages Program. Details about these program components are
provided under the Funding Opportunity Description section of this
document and in the Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI) document associated with this solicitation. Proposals should
reflect a vision for the program, interpreting the goals of the
Fulbright-Hays Act and the Teacher Exchange Program with creativity, as
well as providing innovative ideas and recommendations.
The cooperating organization(s) will have responsibility for
program administration, which includes the following broad categories:
program planning and management; placement; orientation; enrichment
activities; participant supervision and support services; fiscal
management and budgeting; and program reporting and evaluation.
Proposals should include schedules and timelines for notifying ECA,
overseas partners, and grantees of placements, travel arrangements and
cross-cultural and school information in a timely manner. Programs must
comply with J-1 visa regulations. Teacher exchange participants in the
U.S. and abroad should be identified through open, merit-based
competitions.
Although the amount that will be available to support these
programs in FY 2009 has not yet been determined, for planning purposes
the total amount of funding that may be available to cover
administrative and program costs of these programs will be up to
$13,875,000. The amounts listed for each program are provided to enable
applicant organizations to prepare budgets for planning purposes, and
are subject to change. More specific information for each program is
provided below and in the Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI) document. All awards are pending availability of FY 2009 funds.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations...and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose
To improve mutual understanding among teachers, school
administrators, and their schools and communities in the U.S. and
abroad through professional development and exchange. Teacher exchanges
support the internationalization and increased quality of schools and
classrooms, increase the knowledge of students and communities about
global issues and cultures, and improve knowledge of foreign languages.
Teacher exchanges also encourage the professional development of
teachers by broadening their familiarity with and increasing their
understanding of approaches to their subjects and pedagogical methods.
The Presidentially appointed J. William Fulbright Foreign
Scholarship Board is responsible for two of the programs described
below (those in Pair A), and has issued overall policy guidelines and
selection criteria which are available at the following Web site:
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/fulbright. The Fulbright Foreign
Scholarship Board is responsible for the final selection of Fulbright
candidates. Organizations cooperating with the Bureau must ensure full
and proper identification of the Fulbright Program with the U.S.
government and the Department of State.
Applicant organizations may propose to administer and implement
one, two, or all three pairs of the following teacher exchange
programs.
Pair A
1. In Fulbright Classroom Teacher Exchanges, a teacher from the
U.S. and a teacher from a participating foreign country exchange
teaching positions and professional duties for a semester or a year. In
FY 2009, approximately 60 exchanges are anticipated. Countries
currently anticipated for participation are France, Hungary, India,
Mexico, South Africa, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United Kingdom,
although additional countries may be added, depending on Bureau
priorities. Applicant organizations must demonstrate flexibility in
working in countries which may not be identified at the present time.
In this program model, U.S. teachers apply to participate in the
program through the cooperating organization; international
counterparts apply through a Fulbright Commission or U.S. Embassy
overseas (in the case of Switzerland and the United Kingdom, the CH
Youth Exchange and the British Council, respectively). Recruitment of
U.S. participants for the FY 2009 program (academic year 2009-2010) is
being conducted by the organization currently administering this
program component with FY 2008 resources; FY 2009 proposals should
include the costs of recruitment for grants to be funded with FY 2010
resources for academic year 2010-2011. In consultation with the Bureau,
the U.S. cooperating organization and the nominating entity overseas
will facilitate the matching of U.S. and international teacher
applicants with one another for the consideration of relevant
supervising school administrators. The cooperating U.S. organization
will provide an orientation program for all participants and will
monitor and support their programs in consultation with overseas
counterparts. Amount available for program and administration estimated
at up to approximately $2,950,000.
2. New for FY 2009, the Distinguished Fulbright Awards in Teaching
will recognize and encourage excellence in teaching in the U.S. and
selected countries abroad. Countries participating in the program in FY
2009 may include Argentina, the Czech Republic, Finland, Ghana, Greece,
Japan, Mexico, Senegal, Singapore, and South Africa, although
additional countries may be added, depending on Bureau priorities.
Applicant organizations must demonstrate flexibility in working in
countries which may not be identified at the present time. These awards
will provide a rich professional growth opportunity
[[Page 13610]]
to the Distinguished Fulbright Teachers while enhancing mutual
understanding among international and U.S. teachers, administrators,
their students, and host communities. U.S. teachers will apply to the
U.S. cooperating organization to pursue individual projects for a
semester or a summer in the participating countries, and teachers from
participating countries will apply through the U.S. Embassy or
Fulbright Commission to pursue projects in the U.S. The Distinguished
Fulbright Teachers will conduct research, take courses for professional
development, and lead master classes or seminars for teachers and
students in the countries of exchange. Based on proposals submitted by
U.S. teachers to conduct these activities in specific eligible
countries, the U.S. Embassy, Fulbright Commission, or other
organization as applicable in each participating country will
facilitate a relevant academic or professional affiliation in
consultation with each U.S. Distinguished Teacher. The U.S. cooperating
organization will identify one U.S. university to provide the
international Distinguished Teachers with broad-ranging access to
faculty resources, schools, and other educational opportunities. In FY
2009, a pilot program for approximately twelve U.S. teachers and twelve
international teachers is anticipated. Amount available for program and
administration estimated at up to approximately $900,000.
Pair B
3. The International Leaders in Education Program will bring
approximately 86 international secondary school teachers to U.S.
universities for a semester to develop their teaching skills, to
increase their subject-matter expertise, and to pursue coursework and
practical teaching experiences in American high schools. Fulbright
Commissions and U.S. Embassies will be responsible for recruiting
applicants and nominating candidates. The cooperating U.S. organization
will be responsible for convening independent committees to select
candidates for approval by ECA for participation in the program. This
organization will also be responsible for identifying approximately
five appropriate host universities through a national competition, for
organizing a three-day orientation session and a three-day end-of-
program review in Washington, DC, and for actively monitoring program
implementation in the host universities and schools. In cohorts of
approximately 15-20 participants at each host university, the
participants will audit university-level courses relevant to their
teaching field and expertise, attend professional development seminars,
workshops, and conferences on education-related and pedagogical topics,
and teach or team-teach for eight weeks in U.S. secondary schools in
cooperation with experienced U.S. partner teachers. The universities
and schools should also provide opportunities for participants to share
information about their home countries with U.S. audiences, and to
prepare training workshops for colleagues after returning to their home
countries. A limited number of American host teachers will also be
selected to travel to some of the international teachers' home schools
for two- to three-week programs. Administrative and program costs are
estimated at up to approximately $2,500,000.
4. Under the Teaching Excellence and Achievement program component,
groups of educators from a variety of countries will participate in
three six-week programs in FY 2009. Based in clusters of 20
participants at approximately five different U.S. universities, a total
of approximately 180 international educators will participate in
seminars, share pedagogical practices, and engage in classroom
teaching, observation, and curriculum development in the fields of
English, English as a Foreign Language, math, science, social studies
and civics. Under this program, U.S. Embassies and Fulbright
Commissions will recruit and select international participants. The
U.S. cooperating organization will identify, through a national
competition, U.S. universities with access to appropriate faculty and
community resources to administer the three-week seminars and to
arrange for participants to teach or job-shadow in U.S. secondary
schools for approximately three weeks under the guidance of experienced
mentor teachers or administrators. The universities and schools should
also provide opportunities for participants to share information about
their home countries with U.S. audiences and to prepare workshops for
colleagues after returning to their countries. The U.S. cooperating
organization will administer a three-day orientation session in
Washington, DC and a three-day end-of-program review. The U.S.
cooperating organization will also organize a competition to identify
approximately 105 U.S. educators to make reciprocal visits in two
groups (a summer cohort and a fall cohort) to the international
teachers' home countries to gain a deeper understanding of the
educational systems and cultures of these countries, and to establish
or strengthen cooperation with schools in the participating countries.
Amount available for program and administration estimated at up to
approximately $3,750,000.
Pair C
5. Educational Seminars
(a) We anticipate that approximately 100 teachers and other
educators will travel to the U.S. in country-specific groups to learn
about the U.S. educational system in seminars of two to three weeks,
and through visits to U.S. secondary schools. Currently anticipated for
participation in the seminars are Argentina, Brazil, Jordan, Mexico,
Thailand and Uruguay, although additional countries may be added,
depending on Bureau priorities. Applicant organizations must
demonstrate flexibility in working in countries which may not be
identified at the present time. These seminars will provide an
introduction to the U.S. educational system and to U.S. society and
culture. Fulbright Commissions, U.S. Embassies, or other educational
organizations in these countries will recruit and select international
educators for the seminars, while the U.S. cooperating agency will be
responsible for recruiting and selecting U.S. candidates, for
implementing a three-day orientation in Washington, DC, for arranging
visits of participants in groups to geographically and socially diverse
U.S. schools with an interest in hosting the international educators,
and for overseeing an end-of-program review. Some seminars will require
translation as noted in the POGI. Approximately 45 selected U.S.
educators from the host schools will make reciprocal exchange visits to
these countries in programs to be organized by Fulbright Commissions
(except in Jordan, where there is not a reciprocal component).
(b.) Approximately 20 U.S. secondary school teachers of Greek,
Latin, and the classics will attend intensive summer courses lasting
from six to eight weeks to be organized by the Fulbright Commissions
and U.S. non-profit partner organizations in Greece and Italy. The U.S.
cooperating organization will be responsible for notifying participants
of their selection, helping arrange their transportation, and providing
them with a maintenance allowance during the seminar. The non-profit
organizations will arrange orientation meetings for the participants
upon their arrival in Greece and Italy.
(c.) Approximately 6 U.S. teachers will travel to India for a four-
week summer program with Indian teachers
[[Page 13611]]
and schoolchildren. The U.S. cooperating organization will be
responsible for administering an open competition to select the
participants, and for administering their awards. The Fulbright
Commission in India will organize a program of visits to Indian schools
for discussions and observation of best practices with Indian
counterpart teachers.
Recruitment of U.S. participants for the FY 2009 Educational
Seminars is being undertaken by an incumbent organization with FY 2008
resources; under this competition, proposals should include the costs
of recruitment for the 2010 seminars, for which grants to participants
will be provided in FY 2010 (except Jordan which does not have a
program for U.S. educators). Amount available for program and
administration of the seminars estimated at up to approximately
$1,550,000.
6. Approximately 38 Teachers of Critical Languages will come from
China and the Middle East to teach Chinese and Arabic at U.S.
elementary and secondary schools for an academic year. In FY 2009, we
may also request applicants to administer pilot initiatives for two
teachers from Russia and two from Japan to teach their native languages
at K-12 schools for an academic year. Applicant organizations must
demonstrate flexibility in working in countries which may not be
identified at the present time. This activity is a component of the
National Security Language Initiative announced by President George W.
Bush in January 2006 to encourage the study and teaching of critical
languages in the United States. The cooperating U.S. organization will
recruit U.S. host schools, oversee the placement of Chinese and Arabic
(and possibly Russian, Japanese, and other) teachers, provide an in-
depth two-week orientation session on relevant U.S. pedagogical,
educational, and social issues, and monitor and support the teachers
and their engagement with the U.S. host schools throughout the program.
International teachers will be recruited and selected by U.S. embassies
or partner organizations in the participating countries. Amount
available for program and administration estimated at up to
approximately $2,225,000.
Program Administration
Bureau activities and responsibilities for all 6 teacher exchange
program components (3 pairs) include:
(1) Participation in the design and direction of program
activities;
(2) Approval of key personnel;
(3) Approval and input on program timelines, agendas and
administrative procedures;
(4) Guidance in execution of all program components;
(5) Review and approval of all program publicity and recruitment
materials;
(6) Approval of participating teachers and administrators, in
cooperation with Fulbright commissions, U.S. embassies, and
international non-governmental organizations, (Fulbright program
candidates are also subject to final selection by the Fulbright Board);
(7) Approval of decisions related to special circumstances or
problems throughout the duration of program;
(8) Assistance with non-immigration status and other SEVIS-related
issues;
(9) Assistance with participant emergencies;
(10) Liaison with relevant U.S. embassies, Fulbright commissions
and country desk officers at the State Department.
Programs must conform with Bureau requirements and guidelines
outlined in the Solicitation Package which includes the Request for
Grant Proposals (RFGP), the Project Objectives, Goals and
Implementation (POGI) and the Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI).
Cooperating Agency Responsibilities
The cooperating agency or agencies is/are responsible for various
aspects of outreach, recruitment, and screening of applicants; SEVIS
duties and preparation of form DS-2019 under a G Program Number under
the Bureau's responsibility on behalf of the Teacher Exchange Branch;
orientation programs, professional in-service meetings, and
debriefings; placement and, as required for the classroom teacher
exchanges, matching U.S. teachers with international counterparts;
monitoring, supervision, and support of participants; administering
sub-award competitions as necessary; and fiscal management, evaluation,
and follow-on and alumni activities for the program components
described above. Please see the POGI for details pertaining to these
activities for each program component. The Bureau's program office and
the cooperating agency or agencies will meet regularly regarding
program implementation. The Bureau's program office and the cooperating
agency or agencies will also maintain regular telephone, e-mail, and
fax communications with each other.
Additional Guidelines
Applicant organizations should submit separate proposals with
budgets and narratives outlining a comprehensive strategy for the
administration and implementation of each pair of program components
for which they are applying: (Pair A: Fulbright Classroom Teacher
Exchanges/Distinguished Fulbright Awards in Teaching; Pair B:
International Leaders in Education/Teaching Excellence and Achievement;
Pair C: Educational Seminars/Teachers of Critical Languages).
Organizations may apply for more than one pair of components, but may
not apply to administer program components except in the combinations
prescribed. Proposals should reflect a vision for the programs,
interpreting the goals of the Fulbright-Hays Act and the Teacher
Exchange Program with creativity, as well as providing innovative ideas
and recommendations. The Bureau places a priority on ensuring that the
positive impact of the Teacher Exchange Program is visible to the
public in U.S. and host school communities. Applicant organizations
should outline a plan to work with the media and other organizations,
in close consultation with the Bureau, to ensure that the program and
its awards and achievements receive appropriate publicity.
The narrative portion of the proposal for each pair of program
components should not exceed 20 pages. Proposals may utilize appendices
to illustrate elements of the narrative.
Applicants must also provide a separate administrative and program
budget for each program pair. Where possible, proposals should reflect
economies of scale and should demonstrate administrative efficiencies.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for further information.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement(s). ECA's level of involvement
in this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2009.
Approximate Total Funding: $13,875,000 pending availability of
funds.
Approximate Number of Awards: 3 awards.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, October 1,
2008.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: September 30, 2011.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew the grants for a period of two additional fiscal
years, before openly competing the programs again.
[[Page 13612]]
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations or consortia of institutions
meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code section 26
U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
Consortia of eligible organizations applying for grants should
designate one organization to be the recipient of the cooperative
agreement award. Proposals from consortia should provide a detailed
description of the responsibilities of each partner organization.
Organizations with primary responsibility for any of the six
program components must have a staff based in Washington, DC at the
time of application.
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: The Bureau anticipates that
proposals will include significant amounts of cost-sharing in support
of the Teacher Exchange Program, and encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of funding in support of this initiative.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements: Bureau grant guidelines
require that organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau
funding. ECA anticipates awarding one or more cooperative agreement
awards in (an) amount(s) over $60,000 to support program and
administrative costs required to implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this
competition.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request an Application Package: Please
contact Ms. Pat Mosley in the Teacher Exchange Branch, ECA/A/S/X, Room
349, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20547, e-mail: mosleypm@state.gov, telephone: (202) 453-8897 and fax
number: (202) 453-8890, to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer
to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/S/X-09-01 when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from https://www.grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f. for further
information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via the Internet: The
entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from
the Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call (1-866)
705-5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF--424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, a proposal
narrative, and a budget for each program within the program pair(s) for
which the applicant applies. The proposal narrative for each program
pair should not exceed twenty (20) pages in length.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. The mandatory Proposal
Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI) document contain additional formatting
and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa: The
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically important
emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J
visa) Programs and adherence by grantees and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa. Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant's capacity to meet all requirements governing
the administration of the Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22
CFR 62, including the oversight of Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Grantee will be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms to
participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Telephone: (202) 203-5029,
Fax: (202) 453-8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the
[[Page 13613]]
Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the 'Support for Diversity' section
for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal.
Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
instrument plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee
will be able to respond to key evaluation questions, including
participant satisfaction with the program, learning as a result of the
program, and anticipated changes in behavior as a result of the
program. The evaluation plan should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
We encourage you to assess the following three levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Anticipated Participant behavior, anticipated actions to apply
knowledge in work or community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations; interpretation and explanation
of experiences and new knowledge gained; continued contacts between
participants, community members, and others.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
Grantees will be required to submit ``success stories'' for Bureau
reporting purposes as well as outreach. All data collected, including
survey responses and contact information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: overall program management,
staffing, coordination with ECA and with U.S. and international
educational institutions, Fulbright commissions and PAS of U.S.
embassies. Provide a staffing plan which outlines the responsibilities
of each staff person and explains which staff members will be
accountable for each program responsibility. Whenever possible,
streamline administrative processes.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive line item
administrative budget for each program within the program pairs which
they are applying to administer. It is anticipated that funding for the
cooperative agreement awards for program administration of the three
pairs of teacher exchange programs described here will be approximately
$13,875,000.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs and additional budget guidance are
outlined in detail in the POGI document. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for complete budget guidelines and formatting
instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: May 23, 2008.
Reference Number: ECA/A/S/X-09-01.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and 10 copies of the application should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/A/S/X-09-01, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room
534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
[[Page 13614]]
solicitation packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find''
portion of the system. Please follow the instructions available in the
`Get Started' portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov. Once
registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to
begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: (800) 518-4726.
Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as Public
Affairs Sections overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
V.2. Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's
mission. Proposals should demonstrate a commitment to excellence and
creativity in the implementation and management of this program in its
various formats, including the recruitment, matching, and placement of
U.S. and international teachers and administrators, quality of
professional and pre-academic workshops, and effectiveness of program
design.
2. Program planning: Proposals should respond precisely to the
planning requirements outlined in the RFGP and POGI. Planning should
demonstrate substantive rigor. Detailed agendas and relevant work
plans, including timelines, should demonstrate feasibility and the
applicant's logistical capacity to implement the programs.
3. Ability to achieve program objectives: Proposals should
demonstrate clearly how the applicant will fulfill the programs'
objectives and implement plans, while demonstrating innovation and a
commitment to academic excellence and programmatic impact. Proposals
should demonstrate a capacity for flexibility in the management of the
programs.
4. Institutional Capacity: Proposed personnel and institutional
resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve program goals.
Applicants should demonstrate established links to secondary schools
and institutions of higher education in the U.S. and knowledge of the
overseas educational environment, particularly an awareness of
conditions in societies and educational institutions outside the United
States as they apply to academic exchange programs. Applicants should
demonstrate prior experience or the capacity to negotiate significant
cost savings for international teachers from American institutions.
Applicants should also demonstrate their capacity to provide an
information management/database system that meets program requirements,
is compatible with the Bureau's systems, and provides for electronic
applications, electronic data storage, and electronic payment of
maintenance allowances. In its review of proposals, the Bureau will
consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated
potential of new applicants.
5. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (recruitment
and selection of participants, placements, and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation programs, professional meetings,
debriefings). Proposals should articulate a diversity plan, not just a
statement of compliance.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the programs' success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the programs. The Bureau recommends that proposals include a draft
survey questionnaire or other instrument plus description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to original objectives.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including salaries, should be kept as low
as possible while adequate and appropriate to provide the required
services. Proposals should document plans to realize innovative cost-
sharing, cost-savings and other efficiencies through use of technology,
administrative streamlining, and other management techniques.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the
only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S.
Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and
mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified in the
application.
[[Page 13615]]
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments.''
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants; https://
exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements:
You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus two copies of
the following reports:
A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award; quarterly financial reports, and ad hoc
program and financial reports as requested by the Teacher Exchange
Branch.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Mr. Michael Kuban,
Fulbright Teacher Exchange Branch, ECA/A/S/X, Room 349, ECA/A/S/X-09-
01, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20547, e-mail: Kubanmm@state.gov, phone: (202) 453-8897, and fax:
(202) 453-8890.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/A/S/X-09-01.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. All inquiries about the RFGP or any aspect of the
Teacher Exchange Program should be submitted in writing via e-mail to
Mr. Kuban. Any questions or requests for information from overseas
Fulbright commissions or Public Affairs Sections of U.S. embassies
should be submitted in writing via e-mail to Ms. Mosley for
transmission to those overseas offices. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: March 4, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-5041 Filed 3-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P