Airworthiness Directives; Sandel Avionics Incorporated Model ST3400 Terrain Awareness Warning System/Radio Magnetic Indicator (TAWS/RMI) Units Approved Under Technical Standard Order(s) C113, C151a, or C151b; Installed on Various Small and Transport Category Airplanes, 13498-13500 [E8-5001]
Download as PDF
13498
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
service in accordance with Avions de
Transport Regional Service Bulletin ATR42–
30–0072 or ATR72–30–1042, both Revision l,
both dated June 1, 2005; as applicable.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 30: Ice and Rain Protection.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
A recent incident evidenced that some
failures of the Pitot probe heating resistance
may not be seen by the low current detection
system on aircraft not equipped with [ATR]
modification 05469 (SB (Service Bulletin)
ATR42–30–0072 or ATR72–30–1042). In
some conditions, an out of tolerance
resistance, failing to provide a proper Pitot
probe de-icing could not be detected.
To address this unsafe condition, this
Airworthiness Directive (AD) requires
repetitive verification of the Pitot probes’
resistance and replacement of any defective
probes, and ultimate replacement of the three
low current sensors for Captain, First Officer
and Standby Pitot probes.
The unsafe condition is that undetected
icing of the pitot probe could produce
incorrect airspeed readings, which could lead
to loss of control of the airplane.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) Within 550 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, measure the heating
resistance of the three pitot probes, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Avions de Transport Regional
Service Bulletin ATR42–30–0074 or ATR72–
30–1044, both dated May 14, 2007, as
applicable. If any resistance exceeds 50
ohms, before next flight, replace the pitot
probe in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin. Repeat the
measurement thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 550 flight hours, until the current
sensors have been replaced as required by
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD.
(2) Within 5,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, replace the three
pitot probe current sensors, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Avions de Transport Regional Service
Bulletin ATR42–30–0072 or ATR72–30–
1042, both Revision 1, both dated June 1,
2005; as applicable. Doing this paragraph
ends the repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2007–0179, dated July 31, 2007,
and the service information described in
Table 1 of this AD, for related information.
TABLE 1.—SERVICE INFORMATION
Avions de Transport Regional Service Bulletin
ATR42–30–0072
ATR42–30–0074
ATR72–30–1042
ATR72–30–1044
Revision level
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 3,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–5003 Filed 3–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0290; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–250–AD]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Sandel
Avionics Incorporated Model ST3400
Terrain Awareness Warning System/
Radio Magnetic Indicator (TAWS/RMI)
Units Approved Under Technical
Standard Order(s) C113, C151a, or
C151b; Installed on Various Small and
Transport Category Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:23 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1 ................................
Original ......................
1 ................................
Original ......................
Dated
June 1, 2005.
May 14, 2007.
June 1, 2005.
May 14, 2007.
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to revise
an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to Sandel Avionics
Incorporated Model ST3400 TAWS/RMI
units as described above. The existing
AD currently requires installing a
warning placard on the TAWS/RMI and
revising the Limitations section of the
airplane flight manual (AFM). The
existing AD also requires installing
upgraded software in the TAWS/RMI.
This proposed AD would allow
installing later revisions of the software
described in the existing AD. This
proposed AD results from a report that
an in-flight bearing error occurred in a
Model ST3400 TAWS/RMI configured
to receive bearing information from a
very high frequency omnidirectional
range (VOR) receiver interface via a
composite video signal, due to a
combination of input signal fault and
software error. We are proposing this
AD to prevent a bearing error, which
E:\FR\FM\13MRP1.SGM
13MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
could lead to an airplane departing from
its scheduled flight path, which could
result in a reduction in separation from,
and a possible collision with, other
aircraft or terrain.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Sandel Avionics
Incorporated (Sandel), 2401 Dogwood
Way, Vista, California 92081.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ha
A. Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–
130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712–4137; telephone (562) 627–5335;
fax (562) 627–5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to the address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2007–0290; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–250–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:23 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On August 3, 2006, we issued AD
2006–16–18, amendment 39–14718 (71
FR 48461, August 21, 2006), for Sandel
Avionics Incorporated Model ST3400
terrain awareness warning system/radio
magnetic indicator (TAWS/RMI) units
approved under Technical Standard
Order(s) C113, C151a, or C151b;
installed on various small and transport
category airplanes. That AD requires
installing a warning placard on the
TAWS/RMI and revising the Limitations
section of the airplane flight manual
(AFM). That AD also requires installing
upgraded software in the TAWS/RMI.
That AD resulted from a report that an
in-flight bearing error occurred in a
Model ST3400 TAWS/RMI configured
to receive bearing information from a
very high frequency omnidirectional
range (VOR) receiver interface via a
composite video signal, due to a
combination of input signal fault and
software error. We issued that AD to
prevent a bearing error, which could
lead to an airplane departing from its
scheduled flight path, which could
result in a reduction in separation from,
and a possible collision with, other
aircraft or terrain.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2006–16–18, we
have determined that later revisions of
the software described in Sandel
ST3400 Service Bulletin SB3400–01,
Revision B, dated September 15, 2004,
which is specified as the appropriate
source of service information for
accomplishing the requirements of the
existing AD, are acceptable for
installation in the TAWS/RMI without
needing our further approval.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would revise
AD 2006–16–18 to permit installing
later revisions of the software described
in the existing service information, and
would retain the requirements of the
existing AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13499
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD describes the
installation of later revisions of software
than those specified in AD 2006–16–18;
however, this change imposes no new
costs on operators. Costs are repeated
here for operator convenience only.
This proposed AD would affect about
300 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
proposed actions would take about 1
work hour per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of
the proposed AD for U.S. operators is
$24,000, or $80 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and place it in the AD
docket. See the ADDRESSES section for a
E:\FR\FM\13MRP1.SGM
13MRP1
13500
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
§ 39.13
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
(b) This AD revises AD 2006–16–18.
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by removing amendment 39–14718 (71
FR 48461, August 21, 2006) and adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2006–16–18 R1 Sandel Avionics
Incorporated: Docket No. FAA–2007–
0290; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–
250–AD.
Comments Due Date
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Affected ADs
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by April 28, 2008.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Sandel Avionics
Incorporated (Sandel) Model ST3400 terrain
awareness warning system/radio magnetic
indicator (TAWS/RMI) units approved under
Technical Standard Order(s) C113, C151a, or
C151b; as identified in Sandel ST3400
Service Bulletin SB3400–01, Revision B,
dated September 15, 2004; as installed on
various small and transport category
airplanes, certificated in any category,
including, but not limited, to the airplane
models listed in Table 1 of this AD.
TABLE 1.—MANUFACTURERS/AIRPLANE MODELS
Manufacturer
Airplane model(s)
Airbus ........................................................................................................
Avions Marcel Dassault—Breguet Aviation (AMD/BA) ............................
Boeing .......................................................................................................
Bombardier (LearJet) ................................................................................
British Aerospace (Operations) Limited ...................................................
Cessna ......................................................................................................
Embraer ....................................................................................................
Dassault-Aviation ......................................................................................
Gulfstream ................................................................................................
Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) ....................................................................
McDonnell Douglas ..................................................................................
Piper .........................................................................................................
Raytheon ..................................................................................................
A300
Falcon 10.
727, 737, 747.
24, 35, 36, 55.
Jetstream Series 3101.
208, 208B, 421C; 501, 525, 550, 560, 650, S550.
EMB–120.
Mystere-Falcon 50, Mystere-Falcon 200.
G–I, G–1159A (G–III).
1124, 1125 Westwind Astra.
DC–10.
PA–31T2.
58; 1900D, 400; A36; BAe.125 Series 800A; HS.125 Series 600A/
700A; Hawker 800–XP; 200, 300, 350; A200, B100, B200, B300,
C90, C90A, C90B, E90, F90; MU–300–10.
60 (NA–265–60).
500–A, 695A.
DHC–6.
Sabreliner .................................................................................................
Twin Commander .....................................................................................
Viking Air Limited ......................................................................................
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report that an
in-flight bearing error occurred in a Model
ST3400 TAWS/RMI unit configured to
receive bearing information from a very high
frequency omnidirectional range (VOR)
receiver interface via a composite video
signal, due to a combination of input signal
fault and software error. We are issuing this
AD to prevent a bearing error, which could
lead to an airplane departing from its
scheduled flight path, which could result in
a reduction in separation from, and a
possible collision with, other aircraft or
terrain.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Installing Placard
(f) Within 14 days after September 25, 2006
(the effective date of AD 2006–16–18): Install
a placard on the TAWS/RMI which states,
‘‘NOT FOR PRIMARY VOR NAVIGATION,’’
in accordance with Sandel ST3400 Service
Bulletin SB3400–01, Revision B, dated
September 15, 2004.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:23 Mar 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
Revising Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)
(g) Within 14 days after September 25,
2006: Revise the Limitations section of the
applicable AFM to include the following
statement: ‘‘Use of ST3400 TAWS/RMI for
primary VOR navigation is prohibited unless
the indicator has 3.07 or A3.06 software or
later.’’ This may be done by inserting a copy
of this AD into the AFM.
Updating Software
(h) Within 90 days after September 25,
2006, in accordance with Sandel ST3400
Service Bulletin SB3400–01, Revision B,
dated September 15, 2004: Field-load the
TAWS/RMI with updated software having
revision 3.07 (for units having serial numbers
(S/Ns) under 2000) or revision A3.06 (for
units having S/Ns 2000 and subsequent).
Revisions of software later than revision 3.07
or A3.06, as applicable, are considered
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of this paragraph. The placard
and AFM limitations revision installed as
required by paragraphs (f) and (g) of this AD
may be removed after the software upgrade
required by paragraph (h) of this AD has been
accomplished.
Parts Installation
(i) As of 90 days after September 25, 2006,
no person may install, on any airplane, a
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Model ST3400 TAWS/RMI unit, unless it has
been modified in accordance with Sandel
ST3400 Service Bulletin SB3400–01,
Revision B, dated September 15, 2004.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 3,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–5001 Filed 3–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\13MRP1.SGM
13MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 50 (Thursday, March 13, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13498-13500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-5001]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-0290; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-250-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Sandel Avionics Incorporated Model
ST3400 Terrain Awareness Warning System/Radio Magnetic Indicator (TAWS/
RMI) Units Approved Under Technical Standard Order(s) C113, C151a, or
C151b; Installed on Various Small and Transport Category Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to revise an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to Sandel Avionics Incorporated Model ST3400 TAWS/RMI
units as described above. The existing AD currently requires installing
a warning placard on the TAWS/RMI and revising the Limitations section
of the airplane flight manual (AFM). The existing AD also requires
installing upgraded software in the TAWS/RMI. This proposed AD would
allow installing later revisions of the software described in the
existing AD. This proposed AD results from a report that an in-flight
bearing error occurred in a Model ST3400 TAWS/RMI configured to receive
bearing information from a very high frequency omnidirectional range
(VOR) receiver interface via a composite video signal, due to a
combination of input signal fault and software error. We are proposing
this AD to prevent a bearing error, which
[[Page 13499]]
could lead to an airplane departing from its scheduled flight path,
which could result in a reduction in separation from, and a possible
collision with, other aircraft or terrain.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Sandel
Avionics Incorporated (Sandel), 2401 Dogwood Way, Vista, California
92081.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ha A. Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5335; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to the address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0290;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-250-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On August 3, 2006, we issued AD 2006-16-18, amendment 39-14718 (71
FR 48461, August 21, 2006), for Sandel Avionics Incorporated Model
ST3400 terrain awareness warning system/radio magnetic indicator (TAWS/
RMI) units approved under Technical Standard Order(s) C113, C151a, or
C151b; installed on various small and transport category airplanes.
That AD requires installing a warning placard on the TAWS/RMI and
revising the Limitations section of the airplane flight manual (AFM).
That AD also requires installing upgraded software in the TAWS/RMI.
That AD resulted from a report that an in-flight bearing error occurred
in a Model ST3400 TAWS/RMI configured to receive bearing information
from a very high frequency omnidirectional range (VOR) receiver
interface via a composite video signal, due to a combination of input
signal fault and software error. We issued that AD to prevent a bearing
error, which could lead to an airplane departing from its scheduled
flight path, which could result in a reduction in separation from, and
a possible collision with, other aircraft or terrain.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2006-16-18, we have determined that later
revisions of the software described in Sandel ST3400 Service Bulletin
SB3400-01, Revision B, dated September 15, 2004, which is specified as
the appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the
requirements of the existing AD, are acceptable for installation in the
TAWS/RMI without needing our further approval.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would revise AD 2006-16-18 to permit installing later revisions
of the software described in the existing service information, and
would retain the requirements of the existing AD.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD describes the installation of later revisions of
software than those specified in AD 2006-16-18; however, this change
imposes no new costs on operators. Costs are repeated here for operator
convenience only.
This proposed AD would affect about 300 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The proposed actions would take about 1 work hour per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S. operators is $24,000, or $80
per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and place it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a
[[Page 13500]]
location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
removing amendment 39-14718 (71 FR 48461, August 21, 2006) and adding
the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
2006-16-18 R1 Sandel Avionics Incorporated: Docket No. FAA-2007-
0290; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-250-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by April 28,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD revises AD 2006-16-18.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Sandel Avionics Incorporated (Sandel)
Model ST3400 terrain awareness warning system/radio magnetic
indicator (TAWS/RMI) units approved under Technical Standard
Order(s) C113, C151a, or C151b; as identified in Sandel ST3400
Service Bulletin SB3400-01, Revision B, dated September 15, 2004; as
installed on various small and transport category airplanes,
certificated in any category, including, but not limited, to the
airplane models listed in Table 1 of this AD.
Table 1.--Manufacturers/Airplane Models
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer Airplane model(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus................................. A300
Avions Marcel Dassault--Breguet Falcon 10.
Aviation (AMD/BA).
Boeing................................. 727, 737, 747.
Bombardier (LearJet)................... 24, 35, 36, 55.
British Aerospace (Operations) Limited. Jetstream Series 3101.
Cessna................................. 208, 208B, 421C; 501, 525, 550,
560, 650, S550.
Embraer................................ EMB-120.
Dassault-Aviation...................... Mystere-Falcon 50, Mystere-
Falcon 200.
Gulfstream............................. G-I, G-1159A (G-III).
Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI)....... 1124, 1125 Westwind Astra.
McDonnell Douglas...................... DC-10.
Piper.................................. PA-31T2.
Raytheon............................... 58; 1900D, 400; A36; BAe.125
Series 800A; HS.125 Series
600A/700A; Hawker 800-XP; 200,
300, 350; A200, B100, B200,
B300, C90, C90A, C90B, E90,
F90; MU-300-10.
Sabreliner............................. 60 (NA-265-60).
Twin Commander......................... 500-A, 695A.
Viking Air Limited..................... DHC-6.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report that an in-flight bearing
error occurred in a Model ST3400 TAWS/RMI unit configured to receive
bearing information from a very high frequency omnidirectional range
(VOR) receiver interface via a composite video signal, due to a
combination of input signal fault and software error. We are issuing
this AD to prevent a bearing error, which could lead to an airplane
departing from its scheduled flight path, which could result in a
reduction in separation from, and a possible collision with, other
aircraft or terrain.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Installing Placard
(f) Within 14 days after September 25, 2006 (the effective date
of AD 2006-16-18): Install a placard on the TAWS/RMI which states,
``NOT FOR PRIMARY VOR NAVIGATION,'' in accordance with Sandel ST3400
Service Bulletin SB3400-01, Revision B, dated September 15, 2004.
Revising Airplane Flight Manual (AFM)
(g) Within 14 days after September 25, 2006: Revise the
Limitations section of the applicable AFM to include the following
statement: ``Use of ST3400 TAWS/RMI for primary VOR navigation is
prohibited unless the indicator has 3.07 or A3.06 software or
later.'' This may be done by inserting a copy of this AD into the
AFM.
Updating Software
(h) Within 90 days after September 25, 2006, in accordance with
Sandel ST3400 Service Bulletin SB3400-01, Revision B, dated
September 15, 2004: Field-load the TAWS/RMI with updated software
having revision 3.07 (for units having serial numbers (S/Ns) under
2000) or revision A3.06 (for units having S/Ns 2000 and subsequent).
Revisions of software later than revision 3.07 or A3.06, as
applicable, are considered acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of this paragraph. The placard and AFM limitations
revision installed as required by paragraphs (f) and (g) of this AD
may be removed after the software upgrade required by paragraph (h)
of this AD has been accomplished.
Parts Installation
(i) As of 90 days after September 25, 2006, no person may
install, on any airplane, a Model ST3400 TAWS/RMI unit, unless it
has been modified in accordance with Sandel ST3400 Service Bulletin
SB3400-01, Revision B, dated September 15, 2004.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 3, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-5001 Filed 3-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P