Office of Research and Development; Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of One New Equivalent Method, 13224-13225 [E8-4905]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
13224
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 12, 2008 / Notices
objectives of the previous fiscal year as
stated in the IUP and grant agreement.
The report provides information on loan
recipients, loan amounts, loan terms,
project categories, and similar data on
other forms of assistance. The report
describes the extent to which the
existing SRF financial operating
policies, alone or in combination with
other State financial assistance
programs, will provide for the long term
fiscal health of the Fund and carry out
other provisions specified in the grant
operating agreement.
(3) State Annual Audit: Most States
have agreed to conduct or have
conducted a separate financial audit of
the Capitalization Grant which will
provide opinions on the financial
statements, and a report on the internal
controls and compliance with program
requirements. The remaining States will
be covered by audits conducted under
the requirements of the Single Audit Act
and by EPA’s Office of Inspector
General.
(4) Application for SRF Financial
Assistance: Local communities and
other eligible entities have to prepare
and submit applications for SRF
assistance to their respective State
Agency which manages the SRF
program. The State reviews the
completed loan applications, and
verifies that the proposed projects will
comply with applicable Federal and
State requirements.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 108.73 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information. The ICR provides a
detailed explanation of the Agency’s
estimate, which is only briefly
summarized here:
Estimated Total Number of Potential
Respondents: 3,825.
Frequency of Response: Annually.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:30 Mar 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
Estimated Total Average Number of
Responses for Each Respondent: 1.0.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 415,905.
Estimated Total Annual Costs:
$11,118,000.
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD–
D205–03), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711. Phone:
(919) 541–3737, e-mail:
Hunike.Elizabeth@epa.gov.
Are There Changes in the Estimates
from the Last Approval?
There is an increase of 76,500 hours
in the total estimated respondent
burden compared with that identified in
the ICR currently approved by OMB.
This increase reflects EPA’s acceptance
of additional loan applicants for the
State SRF loan program. The increase in
burden hours is the time needed to
process and report on these loans on an
annual basis.
In
accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
Part 53, the EPA evaluates various
methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air
pollutants for which EPA has
established National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set
forth in 40 CFR Part 50. Monitoring
methods that are determined to meet
specific requirements for adequacy are
designated by the EPA as either
reference methods or equivalent
methods (as applicable), thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR Part
58 by States and other agencies for
determining attainment of the NAAQSs.
The EPA hereby announces the
designation of one new equivalent
method for measuring concentrations of
particulate matter as PM2.5 in the
ambient air. This designation is made
under the provisions of 40 CFR Part 53,
as amended on December 18, 2006 (71
FR 61271).
The new equivalent method for PM2.5
is an automated method (sampler) that
utilizes a measurement principle based
on filter sample collection and analysis
by beta-ray attenuation. The newly
designated equivalent method is
identified as follows: EQPM–0308–170,
‘‘Met One Instruments, Inc. BAM–1020
Beta Attenuation Mass Monitor—PM2.5
FEM Configuration, configured with a
PM2.5 particle size separator,’’ operated
for 24 hour average measurements with
firmware revision 3.2.4 or later, with or
without an inlet tube extension (BX–
823), with or without external
enclosures BX–902 or BX–903, in
accordance with the BAM 1020
Particulate Monitor operation manual,
revision F or later, and equipped with
BX–596 ambient temperature and
barometric pressure combination sensor,
internal BX–961 automatic flow
controller operated in Actual
(volumetric) flow control mode, the
standard BX–802 EPA PM10 inlet head
and a PM2.5 very sharp cut cyclone (BX–
808), BX–827 (110V) or BX–830 (230V)
Smart Inlet Heater, with the heater RH
set to 35% and the temperature control
set to ‘‘off’’, the 8470–1 revision D or
later tape control transport assembly
with close geometry beta source
configuration, used with standard glass
fiber filter tape, COUNT TIME
parameter set for 8 minutes, the
SAMPLE TIME parameter set for 42
What is the Next Step in the Process for
this ICR?
EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to
OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you
have any questions about this ICR or the
approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: March 5, 2008.
Judy Davis,
Acting Director, Office of Water, Office of
Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. E8–4997 Filed 3–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8541–1]
Office of Research and Development;
Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and
Equivalent Methods: Designation of
One New Equivalent Method
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of the designation of one
new equivalent method for monitoring
ambient air quality.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has designated, in accordance
with 40 CFR Part 53, one new
equivalent method for measuring
concentrations of particulate matter as
PM2.5 in the ambient air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Hunike, Human Exposure and
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 12, 2008 / Notices
minutes, BX–302 zero filter calibration
kit required.
An application for an equivalent
method determination for the candidate
method was received by the EPA on
September 19, 2007. The sampler is
commercially available from the
applicant, Met One Instruments, Inc.,
1600 Washington Boulevard, Grants
Pass, Oregon 07526 (https://
www.metone.com).
A test analyzer representative of this
method has been tested in accordance
with the applicable test procedures
specified in 40 CFR Part 53 (as amended
on December 18, 2006). After reviewing
the results of those tests and other
information submitted by the applicant
in the application, EPA has determined,
in accordance with Part 53, that this
method should be designated as an
equivalent method. The information
submitted by the applicant in the
application will be kept on file, either
at EPA’s National Exposure Research
Laboratory, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27711 or in an approved
archive storage facility, and will be
available for inspection (with advance
notice) to the extent consistent with 40
CFR Part 2 (EPA’s regulations
implementing the Freedom of
Information Act).
As a designated equivalent method,
this method is acceptable for use by
states and other air monitoring agencies
under the requirements of 40 CFR Part
58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance.
For such purposes, the method must be
used in strict accordance with the
operation or instruction manual
associated with the method and subject
to any specifications and limitations
(e.g., configuration or operational
settings) specified in the applicable
designation method description (see the
identifications of the method above).
Use of the method should also be in
general accordance with the guidance
and recommendations of applicable
sections of the ‘‘Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume I,’’ EPA/
600/R–94/038a and ‘‘Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume II, Part
1,’’ EPA–454/R–98–004 (available at:
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/
qabook.html). Vendor modifications of a
designated equivalent method used for
purposes of Part 58 are permitted only
with prior approval of the EPA, as
provided in Part 53. Provisions
concerning modification of such
methods by users are specified under
section 2.8 (Modifications of Methods
by Users) of Appendix C to 40 CFR Part
58.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:30 Mar 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
In general, a method designation
applies to any sampler or analyzer
which is identical to the sampler or
analyzer described in the application for
designation. In some cases, similar
samplers or analyzers manufactured
prior to the designation may be
upgraded or converted (e.g., by minor
modification or by substitution of the
approved operation or instruction
manual) so as to be identical to the
designated method and thus achieve
designated status. The manufacturer
should be consulted to determine the
feasibility of such upgrading or
conversion.
Part 53 requires that sellers of
designated reference or equivalent
method analyzers or samplers comply
with certain conditions. These
conditions are specified in 40 CFR 53.9
and are summarized below:
(a) A copy of the approved operation
or instruction manual must accompany
the sampler or analyzer when it is
delivered to the ultimate purchaser.
(b) The sampler or analyzer must not
generate any unreasonable hazard to
operators or to the environment.
(c) The sampler or analyzer must
function within the limits of the
applicable performance specifications
given in 40 CFR Parts 50 and 53 for at
least one year after delivery when
maintained and operated in accordance
with the operation or instruction
manual.
(d) Any sampler or analyzer offered
for sale as part of a reference or
equivalent method must bear a label or
sticker indicating that it has been
designated as part of a reference or
equivalent method in accordance with
Part 53 and showing its designated
method identification number.
(e) If such an analyzer has two or
more selectable ranges, the label or
sticker must be placed in close
proximity to the range selector and
indicate which range or ranges have
been included in the reference or
equivalent method designation.
(f) An applicant who offers samplers
or analyzers for sale as part of a
reference or equivalent method is
required to maintain a list of ultimate
purchasers of such samplers or
analyzers and to notify them within 30
days if a reference or equivalent method
designation applicable to the method
has been canceled or if adjustment of
the sampler or analyzer is necessary
under 40 CFR 53.11(b) to avoid a
cancellation.
(g) An applicant who modifies a
sampler or analyzer previously
designated as part of a reference or
equivalent method is not permitted to
sell the sampler or analyzer (as
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13225
modified) as part of a reference or
equivalent method (although it may be
sold without such representation), nor
to attach a designation label or sticker
to the sampler or analyzer (as modified)
under the provisions described above,
until the applicant has received notice
under 40 CFR 53.14(c) that the original
designation or a new designation
applies to the method as modified, or
until the applicant has applied for and
received notice under 40 CFR 53.8(b) of
a new reference or equivalent method
determination for the sampler or
analyzer as modified.
Aside from occasional breakdowns or
malfunctions, consistent or repeated
noncompliance with any of these
conditions should be reported to:
Director, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD–
E205–01), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711.
Designation of this new equivalent
method is intended to assist the States
in establishing and operating their air
quality surveillance systems under 40
CFR Part 58. Questions concerning the
commercial availability or technical
aspects of the method should be
directed to the applicant.
Jewel F. Morris,
Acting Director, National Exposure Research
Laboratory.
[FR Doc. E8–4905 Filed 3–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0046; FRL–8354–6]
Notice of Filing of Pesticide Petitions
for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in
or on Various Commodities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
initial filing of pesticide petitions
proposing the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues
of pesticide chemicals in or on various
commodities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 11, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0046 and
the pesticide petition number (PP) of
interest, by one of the following
methods:
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13224-13225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4905]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8541-1]
Office of Research and Development; Ambient Air Monitoring
Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of One New Equivalent
Method
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of the designation of one new equivalent method for
monitoring ambient air quality.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has designated, in accordance with 40 CFR Part 53, one new
equivalent method for measuring concentrations of particulate matter as
PM2.5 in the ambient air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Hunike, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-D205-03), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Phone: (919) 541-3737, e-mail: Hunike.Elizabeth@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
Part 53, the EPA evaluates various methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air pollutants for which EPA has
established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set
forth in 40 CFR Part 50. Monitoring methods that are determined to meet
specific requirements for adequacy are designated by the EPA as either
reference methods or equivalent methods (as applicable), thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR Part 58 by States and other agencies
for determining attainment of the NAAQSs.
The EPA hereby announces the designation of one new equivalent
method for measuring concentrations of particulate matter as
PM2.5 in the ambient air. This designation is made under the
provisions of 40 CFR Part 53, as amended on December 18, 2006 (71 FR
61271).
The new equivalent method for PM2.5 is an automated
method (sampler) that utilizes a measurement principle based on filter
sample collection and analysis by beta-ray attenuation. The newly
designated equivalent method is identified as follows: EQPM-0308-170,
``Met One Instruments, Inc. BAM-1020 Beta Attenuation Mass Monitor--
PM2.5 FEM Configuration, configured with a PM2.5
particle size separator,'' operated for 24 hour average measurements
with firmware revision 3.2.4 or later, with or without an inlet tube
extension (BX-823), with or without external enclosures BX-902 or BX-
903, in accordance with the BAM 1020 Particulate Monitor operation
manual, revision F or later, and equipped with BX-596 ambient
temperature and barometric pressure combination sensor, internal BX-961
automatic flow controller operated in Actual (volumetric) flow control
mode, the standard BX-802 EPA PM10 inlet head and a
PM2.5 very sharp cut cyclone (BX-808), BX-827 (110V) or BX-
830 (230V) Smart Inlet Heater, with the heater RH set to 35% and the
temperature control set to ``off'', the 8470-1 revision D or later tape
control transport assembly with close geometry beta source
configuration, used with standard glass fiber filter tape, COUNT TIME
parameter set for 8 minutes, the SAMPLE TIME parameter set for 42
[[Page 13225]]
minutes, BX-302 zero filter calibration kit required.
An application for an equivalent method determination for the
candidate method was received by the EPA on September 19, 2007. The
sampler is commercially available from the applicant, Met One
Instruments, Inc., 1600 Washington Boulevard, Grants Pass, Oregon 07526
(https://www.metone.com).
A test analyzer representative of this method has been tested in
accordance with the applicable test procedures specified in 40 CFR Part
53 (as amended on December 18, 2006). After reviewing the results of
those tests and other information submitted by the applicant in the
application, EPA has determined, in accordance with Part 53, that this
method should be designated as an equivalent method. The information
submitted by the applicant in the application will be kept on file,
either at EPA's National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 or in an approved archive storage
facility, and will be available for inspection (with advance notice) to
the extent consistent with 40 CFR Part 2 (EPA's regulations
implementing the Freedom of Information Act).
As a designated equivalent method, this method is acceptable for
use by states and other air monitoring agencies under the requirements
of 40 CFR Part 58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. For such purposes,
the method must be used in strict accordance with the operation or
instruction manual associated with the method and subject to any
specifications and limitations (e.g., configuration or operational
settings) specified in the applicable designation method description
(see the identifications of the method above).
Use of the method should also be in general accordance with the
guidance and recommendations of applicable sections of the ``Quality
Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume I,''
EPA/600/R-94/038a and ``Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume II, Part 1,'' EPA-454/R-98-004 (available
at: https://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/qabook.html). Vendor modifications of
a designated equivalent method used for purposes of Part 58 are
permitted only with prior approval of the EPA, as provided in Part 53.
Provisions concerning modification of such methods by users are
specified under section 2.8 (Modifications of Methods by Users) of
Appendix C to 40 CFR Part 58.
In general, a method designation applies to any sampler or analyzer
which is identical to the sampler or analyzer described in the
application for designation. In some cases, similar samplers or
analyzers manufactured prior to the designation may be upgraded or
converted (e.g., by minor modification or by substitution of the
approved operation or instruction manual) so as to be identical to the
designated method and thus achieve designated status. The manufacturer
should be consulted to determine the feasibility of such upgrading or
conversion.
Part 53 requires that sellers of designated reference or equivalent
method analyzers or samplers comply with certain conditions. These
conditions are specified in 40 CFR 53.9 and are summarized below:
(a) A copy of the approved operation or instruction manual must
accompany the sampler or analyzer when it is delivered to the ultimate
purchaser.
(b) The sampler or analyzer must not generate any unreasonable
hazard to operators or to the environment.
(c) The sampler or analyzer must function within the limits of the
applicable performance specifications given in 40 CFR Parts 50 and 53
for at least one year after delivery when maintained and operated in
accordance with the operation or instruction manual.
(d) Any sampler or analyzer offered for sale as part of a reference
or equivalent method must bear a label or sticker indicating that it
has been designated as part of a reference or equivalent method in
accordance with Part 53 and showing its designated method
identification number.
(e) If such an analyzer has two or more selectable ranges, the
label or sticker must be placed in close proximity to the range
selector and indicate which range or ranges have been included in the
reference or equivalent method designation.
(f) An applicant who offers samplers or analyzers for sale as part
of a reference or equivalent method is required to maintain a list of
ultimate purchasers of such samplers or analyzers and to notify them
within 30 days if a reference or equivalent method designation
applicable to the method has been canceled or if adjustment of the
sampler or analyzer is necessary under 40 CFR 53.11(b) to avoid a
cancellation.
(g) An applicant who modifies a sampler or analyzer previously
designated as part of a reference or equivalent method is not permitted
to sell the sampler or analyzer (as modified) as part of a reference or
equivalent method (although it may be sold without such
representation), nor to attach a designation label or sticker to the
sampler or analyzer (as modified) under the provisions described above,
until the applicant has received notice under 40 CFR 53.14(c) that the
original designation or a new designation applies to the method as
modified, or until the applicant has applied for and received notice
under 40 CFR 53.8(b) of a new reference or equivalent method
determination for the sampler or analyzer as modified.
Aside from occasional breakdowns or malfunctions, consistent or
repeated noncompliance with any of these conditions should be reported
to: Director, Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-
E205-01), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Designation of this new equivalent method is intended to assist the
States in establishing and operating their air quality surveillance
systems under 40 CFR Part 58. Questions concerning the commercial
availability or technical aspects of the method should be directed to
the applicant.
Jewel F. Morris,
Acting Director, National Exposure Research Laboratory.
[FR Doc. E8-4905 Filed 3-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P