Representative Payment Under Titles II, VIII and XVI of the Social Security Act, 12923-12925 [E8-4781]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary
[FR Doc. E8–4699 Filed 3–10–08: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6751–01–S
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Parts 404 and 416
[Docket No. SSA 2008–0007]
RIN 0960–AG70
Representative Payment Under Titles
II, VIII and XVI of the Social Security
Act
Social Security Administration.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: We propose to amend our
rules governing how we investigate
representative payee applicants. Under
these proposed rules, any payee who
has previously satisfied the payee
investigation process including a faceto-face interview and is currently
serving as a payee, need not appear for
another face-to-face interview when
making a subsequent application to
become a payee, unless we determine,
within our discretion, that a new faceto-face interview is necessary. This
change would streamline our
representative payee application
process, thereby allowing payee
applicants to become qualified in a
shorter timeframe when they have
already been investigated. This should
expedite the payment of benefits in
certain representative payee situations.
It will also reduce the burden to the
public and reduce traffic in our field
offices when a payee applicant has
already satisfied the face-to-face
interview required by law.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:20 Mar 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
To be sure that we consider your
comments, we must receive them no
later than May 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of four methods—Internet,
facsimile, regular mail, or handdelivery. Please do not submit the same
comments multiple times or by more
than one method. Regardless of which
of the following methods you choose,
please state that your comments refer to
Docket No. SSA–2008–0007 to ensure
that we can associate your comments
with the correct regulation:
1. Federal eRulemaking portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. (This is the
most expedient method for submitting
your comments, and we strongly urge
you to use it.) In the Comment or
Submission section of the webpage, type
‘‘SSA–2008–0007’’, select ‘‘Go’’, and
then click ‘‘Send a Comment or
Submission.’’ The Federal eRulemaking
portal issues you a tracking number
when you submit a comment.
2. Telefax to (410) 966–2830.
3. Letter to the Commissioner of
Social Security, P.O. Box 17703,
Baltimore, Maryland 21235–7703.
4. Deliver your comments to the
Office of Regulations, Social Security
Administration, 922 Altmeyer Building,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21235–6401, between 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. on regular business days.
All comments are posted on the
Federal eRulemaking portal, although
they may not appear for several days
after receipt of the comment. You may
also inspect the comments on regular
business days by making arrangements
with the contact person shown in this
preamble.
Caution: Our policy for comments we
receive from members of the public is to
make them available for public viewing
in their entirety on the Federal
eRulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, you
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
should be careful to include in your
comments only information that you
wish to make publicly available on the
Internet. We strongly urge you not to
include any personal information, such
as your Social Security number or
medical information, in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jerome Albanese, Office of Regulations,
Social Security Administration, 6401
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21235–6401, (404) 562–1024, for
information about this notice. For
information on eligibility or filing for
benefits, call our national toll-free
number, 1–800–772–1213 or TTY 1–
800–325–0778, or visit our Internet site,
Social Security Online, at https://
www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Version
The electronic file of this document is
available on the date of publication in
the Federal Register at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
Background
Under the authority of sections 205(j),
807 and 1631(a)(2) of the Social Security
Act (the Act), we select a representative
payee for certain persons eligible for
Social Security benefits under title II of
Act, special veteran’s benefits (SVBs)
under title VIII of the Act, or
supplemental security income under
title XVI of the Act. We select a
representative payee if we believe that
payment through a payee rather than
direct payment of benefits is in the
interest of that beneficiary. Subpart U of
part 404, subpart F of part 408, and
subpart F of part 416 of our regulations
explain the procedures that we follow in
determining whether to make
representative payment and in selecting
a representative payee under the title II,
VIII and XVI programs.
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
EP11mr08.000
By direction of the Commission.
12923
12924
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Based on 205(j)(2), 807(b) and
1631(a)(2)(B) of the Act, our current
rules at §§ 404.2024 and 416.624 require
that, before selecting an individual or
organization to act as a person’s
representative payee, we will investigate
a payee applicant to determine the
applicant’s suitability. Section 408.624
adopts these investigatory requirements
for SVBs by cross-reference to
§ 404.2024.
An investigation includes, among
other things, a face-to-face interview
unless it is impracticable to do so. The
Act at 205(j)(2)(A)(i), 807(b)(1)(A) and
1631(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) states that we conduct
a face-to-face interview with a payee
applicant to the extent practicable.
Based on this authority, our current
rules at §§ 404.2024 and 416.624
indicate that we generally conduct a
face-to-face interview with a payee
applicant each time they file to become
a payee, regardless of whether the payee
has already satisfied the investigation
and undergone a prior face-to-face
interview.
Our current rules at §§ 404.2024(b)
and 416.624(b) appear to provide only
one exception to the requirement for
holding a face-to-face interview, and
that is when such an interview is
impracticable. These sections explain
that a face-to-face interview is
impracticable if conducting one would
cause undue hardship, such as when a
payee applicant would have to travel a
great distance to the field office. Our
current rules also indicate that we may
decide it is impracticable to require
subsequent face-to-face interviews for
organizational payees that are known by
our field office as suitable payees. We
base this decision on the organization’s
past performance, recent contacts, and
the organization’s knowledge of and
compliance with our reporting
requirements.
Explanation of Changes
We propose to eliminate the
requirement that we conduct a face-toface interview before selecting an
individual or organization to be a
representative payee if we have already
conducted a face-to-face with that payee
and the payee is qualified and currently
acting as a payee. However, we would
retain discretionary authority to require
a subsequent face-to-face interview of
any payee applicant. In this notice of
proposed rulemaking, we have proposed
revisions to §§ 404.2024(b) and
416.624(b) that would accomplish these
rule changes.
We propose adding a new paragraph
(c), ‘‘Impracticable,’’ to §§ 404.2024(c)
and 416.624(c). This new paragraph
would contain the first three sentences
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:20 Mar 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
of current §§ 404.2024(b) and
416.624(b), with editorial changes. We
are not proposing any substantive
changes to this text.
Clarity of These Proposed Rules
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, as
amended, requires each agency to write
all rules in plain language. In addition
to your substantive comments on these
final rules, we invite your comments on
how to make them easier to understand.
For example:
• Have we organized the material to
suit your needs?
• Are the requirements in the rules
clearly stated?
• Do the rules contain technical
language or jargon that isn’t clear?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the rules easier to
understand?
• Would more (but shorter) sections
be better?
• Could we improve clarity by adding
tables, lists, or diagrams?
• What else could we do to make the
rules easier to understand?
When Will We Start To Use These
Rules?
We will not use these rules until we
evaluate the public comments we
receive on them, determine whether
they should be issued as final rules, and
issue final rules in the Federal Register.
If we publish final rules, we will
explain in the preamble how we will
apply them, and summarize and
respond to the public comments. Until
the effective date of any final rules, we
will continue to use our current rules.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, as Amended
We have consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that these proposed rules
meet the criteria for a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866, as
amended. Thus, they were subject to
OMB review.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these proposed rules
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis as provided in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These regulations impose no reporting
or recordkeeping requirements subject
to OMB clearance.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security—
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social
Security—Retirement Insurance; 96.004,
Social Security—Survivors Insurance; 96–
006, Supplemental Security Income; 96–020,
Special Benefits for Certain World War II
Veterans.)
List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and
procedure; Blind; Disability benefits;
Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability
Insurance; Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements; Social Security.
20 CFR Part 416
Administrative practice and
procedure; Aged; Blind, Disability
benefits; Public assistance programs;
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements; Supplemental Security
Income (SSI).
Dated: March 3, 2008.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we propose to amend subpart
U of part 404 and subpart F of part 416
of chapter III of title 20 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE,
SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY
INSURANCE (1950–)
Subpart U—[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart U
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 205 (a), (j), and (k), and
702(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
405(a), (j), and (k), and 902(a)(5)).
2. Amend § 404.2024 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and by adding
new paragraph (c) as follows:
§ 404.2024 How do we investigate a
representative payee applicant?
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) Conduct a face-to-face interview
with the payee applicant unless it is
impracticable as explained in paragraph
(c) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Subsequent face-to-face interviews.
After holding a face-to-face interview
with a payee applicant, subsequent faceto-face interviews are not required if
that applicant continues to be qualified
and currently is acting as a payee,
unless we determine, within our
discretion, that a new face-to-face
interview is necessary. We base this
decision on the payee’s past
performance and knowledge of and
compliance with our reporting
requirements.
(c) Impracticable. We may consider a
face-to-face interview impracticable if it
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
would cause the payee applicant undue
hardship. For example, the payee
applicant would have to travel a great
distance to the field office. In this
situation, we may conduct the
investigation to determine the payee
applicant’s suitability to serve as a
representative payee without a face-toface interview.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0006]
RIN 1625–AA01
Seventh Coast Guard District, Captain
of the Port Zone Jacksonville,
Temporary Restricted Anchorage
PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL
SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED,
BLIND, AND DISABLED
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
Subpart F—[Amended]
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishment of three, multi-purpose,
temporary restricted anchorages with
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1631(a)(2) and
associated safety/security zones to
(d)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
service vessels intending to call on the
902(a)(5) and 1383(a)(2) and (d)(1)).
ports of Jacksonville or Fernandina
within the Captain of the Port Zone
2. Amend § 416.624 by revising
Jacksonville as defined by 33 CFR 3.35–
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and by adding
20. The temporary restricted anchorages
new paragraph (c) as follows:
and safety/security zones identify
clearly to all mariners the pre§ 416.624 How do we investigate a
representative payee applicant?
established area of the Captain of the
Port Zone for geographic separation
*
*
*
*
*
and/or restriction of certain vessels that
(a) * * *
may pose a safety, public health,
(1) Conduct a face-to-face interview
environmental, or security threat to the
with the payee applicant unless it is
port. The proposed temporary restricted
impracticable as explained in paragraph anchorages are necessary to protect the
public, port infrastructure, maritime
(c) of this section.
environment, and viability of the
*
*
*
*
*
Marine Transportation System from
(b) Subsequent face-to-face interviews. hazards associated with safety, public
After holding a face-to-face interview
health, environmental, and security
with a payee applicant, subsequent face- threats.
to-face interviews are not required if
DATES: Comments and related material
that applicant continues to be qualified
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
and currently is acting as a payee,
April 10, 2008.
unless we determine, within our
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
discretion, that a new face-to-face
identified by Coast Guard docket
interview is necessary. We base this
number USCG–2008–0006 to the Docket
decision on the payee’s past
Management Facility at the U.S.
performance and knowledge of and
Department of Transportation. To avoid
compliance with our reporting
duplication, please use only one of the
requirements.
following methods:
(1) Online: https://
(c) Impracticable. We may consider a
face-to-face interview impracticable if it www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
would cause the payee applicant undue
(M–30), U.S. Department of
hardship. For example, the payee
Transportation, West Building Ground
applicant would have to travel a great
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
distance to the field office. In this
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
situation, we may conduct the
0001.
investigation to determine the payee
(3) Hand deliver: Room W12–140 on
applicant’s suitability to serve as a
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
representative payee without a face-to1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
face interview.
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
[FR Doc. E8–4781 Filed 3–10–08; 8:45 am]
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
1. The authority citation for subpart F
continues to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:20 Mar 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12925
rule, call Lieutenant Commander Austin
Ives at Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville
Prevention Department, Florida. Contact
telephone is (904) 564–7563. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
to use the Docket Management Facility.
Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’
paragraph below.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–0006),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. We recommend that you
include your name and mailing address,
an e-mail address, or a phone number in
the body of your document so that we
can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission. You may
submit your comments and material by
electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery
to the Docket Management Facility at
the address under ADDRESSES; but
please submit your comments and
material by only one means. If you
submit them by mail or delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger
than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. We may
change this proposed rule in view of
them.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time,
click on ‘‘Search for Dockets,’’ and enter
the docket number for this rulemaking
(USCG–2008–0006) in the Docket ID
box, and click enter. You may also visit
either the Docket Management Facility
in Room W12–140 on the ground floor
of the DOT West Building, 1200 New
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 11, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12923-12925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4781]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Parts 404 and 416
[Docket No. SSA 2008-0007]
RIN 0960-AG70
Representative Payment Under Titles II, VIII and XVI of the
Social Security Act
AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to amend our rules governing how we investigate
representative payee applicants. Under these proposed rules, any payee
who has previously satisfied the payee investigation process including
a face-to-face interview and is currently serving as a payee, need not
appear for another face-to-face interview when making a subsequent
application to become a payee, unless we determine, within our
discretion, that a new face-to-face interview is necessary. This change
would streamline our representative payee application process, thereby
allowing payee applicants to become qualified in a shorter timeframe
when they have already been investigated. This should expedite the
payment of benefits in certain representative payee situations. It will
also reduce the burden to the public and reduce traffic in our field
offices when a payee applicant has already satisfied the face-to-face
interview required by law.
DATES: To be sure that we consider your comments, we must receive them
no later than May 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of four methods--Internet,
facsimile, regular mail, or hand-delivery. Please do not submit the
same comments multiple times or by more than one method. Regardless of
which of the following methods you choose, please state that your
comments refer to Docket No. SSA-2008-0007 to ensure that we can
associate your comments with the correct regulation:
1. Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov. (This
is the most expedient method for submitting your comments, and we
strongly urge you to use it.) In the Comment or Submission section of
the webpage, type ``SSA-2008-0007'', select ``Go'', and then click
``Send a Comment or Submission.'' The Federal eRulemaking portal issues
you a tracking number when you submit a comment.
2. Telefax to (410) 966-2830.
3. Letter to the Commissioner of Social Security, P.O. Box 17703,
Baltimore, Maryland 21235-7703.
4. Deliver your comments to the Office of Regulations, Social
Security Administration, 922 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
on regular business days.
All comments are posted on the Federal eRulemaking portal, although
they may not appear for several days after receipt of the comment. You
may also inspect the comments on regular business days by making
arrangements with the contact person shown in this preamble.
Caution: Our policy for comments we receive from members of the
public is to make them available for public viewing in their entirety
on the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Therefore, you should be careful to include in your comments only
information that you wish to make publicly available on the Internet.
We strongly urge you not to include any personal information, such as
your Social Security number or medical information, in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerome Albanese, Office of
Regulations, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, (404) 562-1024, for information about this
notice. For information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our
national toll-free number, 1-800-772-1213 or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or
visit our Internet site, Social Security Online, at https://
www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Version
The electronic file of this document is available on the date of
publication in the Federal Register at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/
index.html.
Background
Under the authority of sections 205(j), 807 and 1631(a)(2) of the
Social Security Act (the Act), we select a representative payee for
certain persons eligible for Social Security benefits under title II of
Act, special veteran's benefits (SVBs) under title VIII of the Act, or
supplemental security income under title XVI of the Act. We select a
representative payee if we believe that payment through a payee rather
than direct payment of benefits is in the interest of that beneficiary.
Subpart U of part 404, subpart F of part 408, and subpart F of part 416
of our regulations explain the procedures that we follow in determining
whether to make representative payment and in selecting a
representative payee under the title II, VIII and XVI programs.
[[Page 12924]]
Based on 205(j)(2), 807(b) and 1631(a)(2)(B) of the Act, our
current rules at Sec. Sec. 404.2024 and 416.624 require that, before
selecting an individual or organization to act as a person's
representative payee, we will investigate a payee applicant to
determine the applicant's suitability. Section 408.624 adopts these
investigatory requirements for SVBs by cross-reference to Sec.
404.2024.
An investigation includes, among other things, a face-to-face
interview unless it is impracticable to do so. The Act at
205(j)(2)(A)(i), 807(b)(1)(A) and 1631(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) states that we
conduct a face-to-face interview with a payee applicant to the extent
practicable. Based on this authority, our current rules at Sec. Sec.
404.2024 and 416.624 indicate that we generally conduct a face-to-face
interview with a payee applicant each time they file to become a payee,
regardless of whether the payee has already satisfied the investigation
and undergone a prior face-to-face interview.
Our current rules at Sec. Sec. 404.2024(b) and 416.624(b) appear
to provide only one exception to the requirement for holding a face-to-
face interview, and that is when such an interview is impracticable.
These sections explain that a face-to-face interview is impracticable
if conducting one would cause undue hardship, such as when a payee
applicant would have to travel a great distance to the field office.
Our current rules also indicate that we may decide it is impracticable
to require subsequent face-to-face interviews for organizational payees
that are known by our field office as suitable payees. We base this
decision on the organization's past performance, recent contacts, and
the organization's knowledge of and compliance with our reporting
requirements.
Explanation of Changes
We propose to eliminate the requirement that we conduct a face-to-
face interview before selecting an individual or organization to be a
representative payee if we have already conducted a face-to-face with
that payee and the payee is qualified and currently acting as a payee.
However, we would retain discretionary authority to require a
subsequent face-to-face interview of any payee applicant. In this
notice of proposed rulemaking, we have proposed revisions to Sec. Sec.
404.2024(b) and 416.624(b) that would accomplish these rule changes.
We propose adding a new paragraph (c), ``Impracticable,'' to
Sec. Sec. 404.2024(c) and 416.624(c). This new paragraph would contain
the first three sentences of current Sec. Sec. 404.2024(b) and
416.624(b), with editorial changes. We are not proposing any
substantive changes to this text.
Clarity of These Proposed Rules
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, as amended, requires each agency to
write all rules in plain language. In addition to your substantive
comments on these final rules, we invite your comments on how to make
them easier to understand.
For example:
Have we organized the material to suit your needs?
Are the requirements in the rules clearly stated?
Do the rules contain technical language or jargon that
isn't clear?
Would a different format (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing) make the rules easier to understand?
Would more (but shorter) sections be better?
Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or
diagrams?
What else could we do to make the rules easier to
understand?
When Will We Start To Use These Rules?
We will not use these rules until we evaluate the public comments
we receive on them, determine whether they should be issued as final
rules, and issue final rules in the Federal Register. If we publish
final rules, we will explain in the preamble how we will apply them,
and summarize and respond to the public comments. Until the effective
date of any final rules, we will continue to use our current rules.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, as Amended
We have consulted with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
and determined that these proposed rules meet the criteria for a
significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866, as amended. Thus, they
were subject to OMB review.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these proposed rules would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, a
regulatory flexibility analysis as provided in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, as amended, is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These regulations impose no reporting or recordkeeping requirements
subject to OMB clearance.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 96.001, Social
Security--Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security--Retirement
Insurance; 96.004, Social Security--Survivors Insurance; 96-006,
Supplemental Security Income; 96-020, Special Benefits for Certain
World War II Veterans.)
List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and procedure; Blind; Disability benefits;
Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance; Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements; Social Security.
20 CFR Part 416
Administrative practice and procedure; Aged; Blind, Disability
benefits; Public assistance programs; Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements; Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Dated: March 3, 2008.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we propose to amend
subpart U of part 404 and subpart F of part 416 of chapter III of title
20 of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 404--FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE
(1950-)
Subpart U--[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart U continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 205 (a), (j), and (k), and 702(a)(5) of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(a), (j), and (k), and 902(a)(5)).
2. Amend Sec. 404.2024 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and
by adding new paragraph (c) as follows:
Sec. 404.2024 How do we investigate a representative payee applicant?
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) Conduct a face-to-face interview with the payee applicant
unless it is impracticable as explained in paragraph (c) of this
section.
* * * * *
(b) Subsequent face-to-face interviews. After holding a face-to-
face interview with a payee applicant, subsequent face-to-face
interviews are not required if that applicant continues to be qualified
and currently is acting as a payee, unless we determine, within our
discretion, that a new face-to-face interview is necessary. We base
this decision on the payee's past performance and knowledge of and
compliance with our reporting requirements.
(c) Impracticable. We may consider a face-to-face interview
impracticable if it
[[Page 12925]]
would cause the payee applicant undue hardship. For example, the payee
applicant would have to travel a great distance to the field office. In
this situation, we may conduct the investigation to determine the payee
applicant's suitability to serve as a representative payee without a
face-to-face interview.
PART 416--SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND
DISABLED
Subpart F--[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart F continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1631(a)(2) and (d)(1) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5) and 1383(a)(2) and (d)(1)).
2. Amend Sec. 416.624 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and by
adding new paragraph (c) as follows:
Sec. 416.624 How do we investigate a representative payee applicant?
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) Conduct a face-to-face interview with the payee applicant
unless it is impracticable as explained in paragraph (c) of this
section.
* * * * *
(b) Subsequent face-to-face interviews. After holding a face-to-
face interview with a payee applicant, subsequent face-to-face
interviews are not required if that applicant continues to be qualified
and currently is acting as a payee, unless we determine, within our
discretion, that a new face-to-face interview is necessary. We base
this decision on the payee's past performance and knowledge of and
compliance with our reporting requirements.
(c) Impracticable. We may consider a face-to-face interview
impracticable if it would cause the payee applicant undue hardship. For
example, the payee applicant would have to travel a great distance to
the field office. In this situation, we may conduct the investigation
to determine the payee applicant's suitability to serve as a
representative payee without a face-to-face interview.
[FR Doc. E8-4781 Filed 3-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P