Representative Payment Under Titles II, VIII and XVI of the Social Security Act, 12923-12925 [E8-4781]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules Donald S. Clark, Secretary [FR Doc. E8–4699 Filed 3–10–08: 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6751–01–S SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 20 CFR Parts 404 and 416 [Docket No. SSA 2008–0007] RIN 0960–AG70 Representative Payment Under Titles II, VIII and XVI of the Social Security Act Social Security Administration. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. AGENCY: sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS ACTION: SUMMARY: We propose to amend our rules governing how we investigate representative payee applicants. Under these proposed rules, any payee who has previously satisfied the payee investigation process including a faceto-face interview and is currently serving as a payee, need not appear for another face-to-face interview when making a subsequent application to become a payee, unless we determine, within our discretion, that a new faceto-face interview is necessary. This change would streamline our representative payee application process, thereby allowing payee applicants to become qualified in a shorter timeframe when they have already been investigated. This should expedite the payment of benefits in certain representative payee situations. It will also reduce the burden to the public and reduce traffic in our field offices when a payee applicant has already satisfied the face-to-face interview required by law. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:20 Mar 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 To be sure that we consider your comments, we must receive them no later than May 12, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of four methods—Internet, facsimile, regular mail, or handdelivery. Please do not submit the same comments multiple times or by more than one method. Regardless of which of the following methods you choose, please state that your comments refer to Docket No. SSA–2008–0007 to ensure that we can associate your comments with the correct regulation: 1. Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov. (This is the most expedient method for submitting your comments, and we strongly urge you to use it.) In the Comment or Submission section of the webpage, type ‘‘SSA–2008–0007’’, select ‘‘Go’’, and then click ‘‘Send a Comment or Submission.’’ The Federal eRulemaking portal issues you a tracking number when you submit a comment. 2. Telefax to (410) 966–2830. 3. Letter to the Commissioner of Social Security, P.O. Box 17703, Baltimore, Maryland 21235–7703. 4. Deliver your comments to the Office of Regulations, Social Security Administration, 922 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235–6401, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on regular business days. All comments are posted on the Federal eRulemaking portal, although they may not appear for several days after receipt of the comment. You may also inspect the comments on regular business days by making arrangements with the contact person shown in this preamble. Caution: Our policy for comments we receive from members of the public is to make them available for public viewing in their entirety on the Federal eRulemaking portal at https:// www.regulations.gov. Therefore, you DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 should be careful to include in your comments only information that you wish to make publicly available on the Internet. We strongly urge you not to include any personal information, such as your Social Security number or medical information, in your comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerome Albanese, Office of Regulations, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, (404) 562–1024, for information about this notice. For information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1–800–772–1213 or TTY 1– 800–325–0778, or visit our Internet site, Social Security Online, at https:// www.socialsecurity.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Version The electronic file of this document is available on the date of publication in the Federal Register at https:// www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/. Background Under the authority of sections 205(j), 807 and 1631(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (the Act), we select a representative payee for certain persons eligible for Social Security benefits under title II of Act, special veteran’s benefits (SVBs) under title VIII of the Act, or supplemental security income under title XVI of the Act. We select a representative payee if we believe that payment through a payee rather than direct payment of benefits is in the interest of that beneficiary. Subpart U of part 404, subpart F of part 408, and subpart F of part 416 of our regulations explain the procedures that we follow in determining whether to make representative payment and in selecting a representative payee under the title II, VIII and XVI programs. E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM 11MRP1 EP11mr08.000</GPH> By direction of the Commission. 12923 12924 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS Based on 205(j)(2), 807(b) and 1631(a)(2)(B) of the Act, our current rules at §§ 404.2024 and 416.624 require that, before selecting an individual or organization to act as a person’s representative payee, we will investigate a payee applicant to determine the applicant’s suitability. Section 408.624 adopts these investigatory requirements for SVBs by cross-reference to § 404.2024. An investigation includes, among other things, a face-to-face interview unless it is impracticable to do so. The Act at 205(j)(2)(A)(i), 807(b)(1)(A) and 1631(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) states that we conduct a face-to-face interview with a payee applicant to the extent practicable. Based on this authority, our current rules at §§ 404.2024 and 416.624 indicate that we generally conduct a face-to-face interview with a payee applicant each time they file to become a payee, regardless of whether the payee has already satisfied the investigation and undergone a prior face-to-face interview. Our current rules at §§ 404.2024(b) and 416.624(b) appear to provide only one exception to the requirement for holding a face-to-face interview, and that is when such an interview is impracticable. These sections explain that a face-to-face interview is impracticable if conducting one would cause undue hardship, such as when a payee applicant would have to travel a great distance to the field office. Our current rules also indicate that we may decide it is impracticable to require subsequent face-to-face interviews for organizational payees that are known by our field office as suitable payees. We base this decision on the organization’s past performance, recent contacts, and the organization’s knowledge of and compliance with our reporting requirements. Explanation of Changes We propose to eliminate the requirement that we conduct a face-toface interview before selecting an individual or organization to be a representative payee if we have already conducted a face-to-face with that payee and the payee is qualified and currently acting as a payee. However, we would retain discretionary authority to require a subsequent face-to-face interview of any payee applicant. In this notice of proposed rulemaking, we have proposed revisions to §§ 404.2024(b) and 416.624(b) that would accomplish these rule changes. We propose adding a new paragraph (c), ‘‘Impracticable,’’ to §§ 404.2024(c) and 416.624(c). This new paragraph would contain the first three sentences VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:20 Mar 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 of current §§ 404.2024(b) and 416.624(b), with editorial changes. We are not proposing any substantive changes to this text. Clarity of These Proposed Rules Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, as amended, requires each agency to write all rules in plain language. In addition to your substantive comments on these final rules, we invite your comments on how to make them easier to understand. For example: • Have we organized the material to suit your needs? • Are the requirements in the rules clearly stated? • Do the rules contain technical language or jargon that isn’t clear? • Would a different format (grouping and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing) make the rules easier to understand? • Would more (but shorter) sections be better? • Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or diagrams? • What else could we do to make the rules easier to understand? When Will We Start To Use These Rules? We will not use these rules until we evaluate the public comments we receive on them, determine whether they should be issued as final rules, and issue final rules in the Federal Register. If we publish final rules, we will explain in the preamble how we will apply them, and summarize and respond to the public comments. Until the effective date of any final rules, we will continue to use our current rules. Regulatory Procedures Executive Order 12866, as Amended We have consulted with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and determined that these proposed rules meet the criteria for a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866, as amended. Thus, they were subject to OMB review. Regulatory Flexibility Act We certify that these proposed rules would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis as provided in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, is not required. Paperwork Reduction Act These regulations impose no reporting or recordkeeping requirements subject to OMB clearance. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security— PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security—Retirement Insurance; 96.004, Social Security—Survivors Insurance; 96– 006, Supplemental Security Income; 96–020, Special Benefits for Certain World War II Veterans.) List of Subjects 20 CFR Part 404 Administrative practice and procedure; Blind; Disability benefits; Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance; Reporting and recordkeeping requirements; Social Security. 20 CFR Part 416 Administrative practice and procedure; Aged; Blind, Disability benefits; Public assistance programs; Reporting and recordkeeping requirements; Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Dated: March 3, 2008. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security. For the reasons set out in the preamble, we propose to amend subpart U of part 404 and subpart F of part 416 of chapter III of title 20 of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below: PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE (1950–) Subpart U—[Amended] 1. The authority citation for subpart U continues to read as follows: Authority: Secs. 205 (a), (j), and (k), and 702(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(a), (j), and (k), and 902(a)(5)). 2. Amend § 404.2024 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and by adding new paragraph (c) as follows: § 404.2024 How do we investigate a representative payee applicant? * * * * * (a) * * * (1) Conduct a face-to-face interview with the payee applicant unless it is impracticable as explained in paragraph (c) of this section. * * * * * (b) Subsequent face-to-face interviews. After holding a face-to-face interview with a payee applicant, subsequent faceto-face interviews are not required if that applicant continues to be qualified and currently is acting as a payee, unless we determine, within our discretion, that a new face-to-face interview is necessary. We base this decision on the payee’s past performance and knowledge of and compliance with our reporting requirements. (c) Impracticable. We may consider a face-to-face interview impracticable if it E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM 11MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 48 / Tuesday, March 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules would cause the payee applicant undue hardship. For example, the payee applicant would have to travel a great distance to the field office. In this situation, we may conduct the investigation to determine the payee applicant’s suitability to serve as a representative payee without a face-toface interview. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 110 [Docket No. USCG–2008–0006] RIN 1625–AA01 Seventh Coast Guard District, Captain of the Port Zone Jacksonville, Temporary Restricted Anchorage PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: Subpart F—[Amended] ACTION: SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishment of three, multi-purpose, temporary restricted anchorages with Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1631(a)(2) and associated safety/security zones to (d)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. service vessels intending to call on the 902(a)(5) and 1383(a)(2) and (d)(1)). ports of Jacksonville or Fernandina within the Captain of the Port Zone 2. Amend § 416.624 by revising Jacksonville as defined by 33 CFR 3.35– paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and by adding 20. The temporary restricted anchorages new paragraph (c) as follows: and safety/security zones identify clearly to all mariners the pre§ 416.624 How do we investigate a representative payee applicant? established area of the Captain of the Port Zone for geographic separation * * * * * and/or restriction of certain vessels that (a) * * * may pose a safety, public health, (1) Conduct a face-to-face interview environmental, or security threat to the with the payee applicant unless it is port. The proposed temporary restricted impracticable as explained in paragraph anchorages are necessary to protect the public, port infrastructure, maritime (c) of this section. environment, and viability of the * * * * * Marine Transportation System from (b) Subsequent face-to-face interviews. hazards associated with safety, public After holding a face-to-face interview health, environmental, and security with a payee applicant, subsequent face- threats. to-face interviews are not required if DATES: Comments and related material that applicant continues to be qualified must reach the Coast Guard on or before and currently is acting as a payee, April 10, 2008. unless we determine, within our ADDRESSES: You may submit comments discretion, that a new face-to-face identified by Coast Guard docket interview is necessary. We base this number USCG–2008–0006 to the Docket decision on the payee’s past Management Facility at the U.S. performance and knowledge of and Department of Transportation. To avoid compliance with our reporting duplication, please use only one of the requirements. following methods: (1) Online: https:// (c) Impracticable. We may consider a face-to-face interview impracticable if it www.regulations.gov. (2) Mail: Docket Management Facility would cause the payee applicant undue (M–30), U.S. Department of hardship. For example, the payee Transportation, West Building Ground applicant would have to travel a great Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey distance to the field office. In this Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– situation, we may conduct the 0001. investigation to determine the payee (3) Hand deliver: Room W12–140 on applicant’s suitability to serve as a the Ground Floor of the West Building, representative payee without a face-to1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., face interview. Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. [FR Doc. E8–4781 Filed 3–10–08; 8:45 am] and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, BILLING CODE 4191–02–P except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202–366–9329. (4) Fax: 202–493–2251. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS 1. The authority citation for subpart F continues to read as follows: VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:20 Mar 10, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 12925 rule, call Lieutenant Commander Austin Ives at Coast Guard Sector Jacksonville Prevention Department, Florida. Contact telephone is (904) 564–7563. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Participation and Request for Comments We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting comments and related material. All comments received will be posted, without change, to https:// www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management Facility. Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’ paragraph below. Submitting Comments If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG–2008–0006), indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. We recommend that you include your name and mailing address, an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission. You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them. Viewing Comments and Documents To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time, click on ‘‘Search for Dockets,’’ and enter the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG–2008–0006) in the Docket ID box, and click enter. You may also visit either the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM 11MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 11, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12923-12925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4781]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

20 CFR Parts 404 and 416

[Docket No. SSA 2008-0007]
RIN 0960-AG70


Representative Payment Under Titles II, VIII and XVI of the 
Social Security Act

AGENCY: Social Security Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to amend our rules governing how we investigate 
representative payee applicants. Under these proposed rules, any payee 
who has previously satisfied the payee investigation process including 
a face-to-face interview and is currently serving as a payee, need not 
appear for another face-to-face interview when making a subsequent 
application to become a payee, unless we determine, within our 
discretion, that a new face-to-face interview is necessary. This change 
would streamline our representative payee application process, thereby 
allowing payee applicants to become qualified in a shorter timeframe 
when they have already been investigated. This should expedite the 
payment of benefits in certain representative payee situations. It will 
also reduce the burden to the public and reduce traffic in our field 
offices when a payee applicant has already satisfied the face-to-face 
interview required by law.

DATES: To be sure that we consider your comments, we must receive them 
no later than May 12, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of four methods--Internet, 
facsimile, regular mail, or hand-delivery. Please do not submit the 
same comments multiple times or by more than one method. Regardless of 
which of the following methods you choose, please state that your 
comments refer to Docket No. SSA-2008-0007 to ensure that we can 
associate your comments with the correct regulation:
    1. Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov. (This 
is the most expedient method for submitting your comments, and we 
strongly urge you to use it.) In the Comment or Submission section of 
the webpage, type ``SSA-2008-0007'', select ``Go'', and then click 
``Send a Comment or Submission.'' The Federal eRulemaking portal issues 
you a tracking number when you submit a comment.
    2. Telefax to (410) 966-2830.
    3. Letter to the Commissioner of Social Security, P.O. Box 17703, 
Baltimore, Maryland 21235-7703.
    4. Deliver your comments to the Office of Regulations, Social 
Security Administration, 922 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security 
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. 
on regular business days.
    All comments are posted on the Federal eRulemaking portal, although 
they may not appear for several days after receipt of the comment. You 
may also inspect the comments on regular business days by making 
arrangements with the contact person shown in this preamble.
    Caution: Our policy for comments we receive from members of the 
public is to make them available for public viewing in their entirety 
on the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov. 
Therefore, you should be careful to include in your comments only 
information that you wish to make publicly available on the Internet. 
We strongly urge you not to include any personal information, such as 
your Social Security number or medical information, in your comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerome Albanese, Office of 
Regulations, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, 
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, (404) 562-1024, for information about this 
notice. For information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our 
national toll-free number, 1-800-772-1213 or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or 
visit our Internet site, Social Security Online, at https://
www.socialsecurity.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Version

    The electronic file of this document is available on the date of 
publication in the Federal Register at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/
index.html.

Background

    Under the authority of sections 205(j), 807 and 1631(a)(2) of the 
Social Security Act (the Act), we select a representative payee for 
certain persons eligible for Social Security benefits under title II of 
Act, special veteran's benefits (SVBs) under title VIII of the Act, or 
supplemental security income under title XVI of the Act. We select a 
representative payee if we believe that payment through a payee rather 
than direct payment of benefits is in the interest of that beneficiary. 
Subpart U of part 404, subpart F of part 408, and subpart F of part 416 
of our regulations explain the procedures that we follow in determining 
whether to make representative payment and in selecting a 
representative payee under the title II, VIII and XVI programs.

[[Page 12924]]

    Based on 205(j)(2), 807(b) and 1631(a)(2)(B) of the Act, our 
current rules at Sec. Sec.  404.2024 and 416.624 require that, before 
selecting an individual or organization to act as a person's 
representative payee, we will investigate a payee applicant to 
determine the applicant's suitability. Section 408.624 adopts these 
investigatory requirements for SVBs by cross-reference to Sec.  
404.2024.
    An investigation includes, among other things, a face-to-face 
interview unless it is impracticable to do so. The Act at 
205(j)(2)(A)(i), 807(b)(1)(A) and 1631(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) states that we 
conduct a face-to-face interview with a payee applicant to the extent 
practicable. Based on this authority, our current rules at Sec. Sec.  
404.2024 and 416.624 indicate that we generally conduct a face-to-face 
interview with a payee applicant each time they file to become a payee, 
regardless of whether the payee has already satisfied the investigation 
and undergone a prior face-to-face interview.
    Our current rules at Sec. Sec.  404.2024(b) and 416.624(b) appear 
to provide only one exception to the requirement for holding a face-to-
face interview, and that is when such an interview is impracticable. 
These sections explain that a face-to-face interview is impracticable 
if conducting one would cause undue hardship, such as when a payee 
applicant would have to travel a great distance to the field office. 
Our current rules also indicate that we may decide it is impracticable 
to require subsequent face-to-face interviews for organizational payees 
that are known by our field office as suitable payees. We base this 
decision on the organization's past performance, recent contacts, and 
the organization's knowledge of and compliance with our reporting 
requirements.

Explanation of Changes

    We propose to eliminate the requirement that we conduct a face-to-
face interview before selecting an individual or organization to be a 
representative payee if we have already conducted a face-to-face with 
that payee and the payee is qualified and currently acting as a payee. 
However, we would retain discretionary authority to require a 
subsequent face-to-face interview of any payee applicant. In this 
notice of proposed rulemaking, we have proposed revisions to Sec. Sec.  
404.2024(b) and 416.624(b) that would accomplish these rule changes.
    We propose adding a new paragraph (c), ``Impracticable,'' to 
Sec. Sec.  404.2024(c) and 416.624(c). This new paragraph would contain 
the first three sentences of current Sec. Sec.  404.2024(b) and 
416.624(b), with editorial changes. We are not proposing any 
substantive changes to this text.

Clarity of These Proposed Rules

    Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, as amended, requires each agency to 
write all rules in plain language. In addition to your substantive 
comments on these final rules, we invite your comments on how to make 
them easier to understand.
    For example:
     Have we organized the material to suit your needs?
     Are the requirements in the rules clearly stated?
     Do the rules contain technical language or jargon that 
isn't clear?
     Would a different format (grouping and order of sections, 
use of headings, paragraphing) make the rules easier to understand?
     Would more (but shorter) sections be better?
     Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or 
diagrams?
     What else could we do to make the rules easier to 
understand?

When Will We Start To Use These Rules?

    We will not use these rules until we evaluate the public comments 
we receive on them, determine whether they should be issued as final 
rules, and issue final rules in the Federal Register. If we publish 
final rules, we will explain in the preamble how we will apply them, 
and summarize and respond to the public comments. Until the effective 
date of any final rules, we will continue to use our current rules.

Regulatory Procedures

Executive Order 12866, as Amended

    We have consulted with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
and determined that these proposed rules meet the criteria for a 
significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866, as amended. Thus, they 
were subject to OMB review.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    We certify that these proposed rules would not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, a 
regulatory flexibility analysis as provided in the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, as amended, is not required.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    These regulations impose no reporting or recordkeeping requirements 
subject to OMB clearance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 96.001, Social 
Security--Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security--Retirement 
Insurance; 96.004, Social Security--Survivors Insurance; 96-006, 
Supplemental Security Income; 96-020, Special Benefits for Certain 
World War II Veterans.)

List of Subjects

20 CFR Part 404

    Administrative practice and procedure; Blind; Disability benefits; 
Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance; Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements; Social Security.

20 CFR Part 416

    Administrative practice and procedure; Aged; Blind, Disability 
benefits; Public assistance programs; Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements; Supplemental Security Income (SSI).

    Dated: March 3, 2008.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
    For the reasons set out in the preamble, we propose to amend 
subpart U of part 404 and subpart F of part 416 of chapter III of title 
20 of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below:

PART 404--FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE 
(1950-)

Subpart U--[Amended]

    1. The authority citation for subpart U continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: Secs. 205 (a), (j), and (k), and 702(a)(5) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(a), (j), and (k), and 902(a)(5)).
    2. Amend Sec.  404.2024 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and 
by adding new paragraph (c) as follows:


Sec.  404.2024  How do we investigate a representative payee applicant?

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (1) Conduct a face-to-face interview with the payee applicant 
unless it is impracticable as explained in paragraph (c) of this 
section.
* * * * *
    (b) Subsequent face-to-face interviews. After holding a face-to-
face interview with a payee applicant, subsequent face-to-face 
interviews are not required if that applicant continues to be qualified 
and currently is acting as a payee, unless we determine, within our 
discretion, that a new face-to-face interview is necessary. We base 
this decision on the payee's past performance and knowledge of and 
compliance with our reporting requirements.
    (c) Impracticable. We may consider a face-to-face interview 
impracticable if it

[[Page 12925]]

would cause the payee applicant undue hardship. For example, the payee 
applicant would have to travel a great distance to the field office. In 
this situation, we may conduct the investigation to determine the payee 
applicant's suitability to serve as a representative payee without a 
face-to-face interview.

PART 416--SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND 
DISABLED

Subpart F--[Amended]

    1. The authority citation for subpart F continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1631(a)(2) and (d)(1) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5) and 1383(a)(2) and (d)(1)).

    2. Amend Sec.  416.624 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) and by 
adding new paragraph (c) as follows:


Sec.  416.624  How do we investigate a representative payee applicant?

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (1) Conduct a face-to-face interview with the payee applicant 
unless it is impracticable as explained in paragraph (c) of this 
section.
* * * * *
    (b) Subsequent face-to-face interviews. After holding a face-to-
face interview with a payee applicant, subsequent face-to-face 
interviews are not required if that applicant continues to be qualified 
and currently is acting as a payee, unless we determine, within our 
discretion, that a new face-to-face interview is necessary. We base 
this decision on the payee's past performance and knowledge of and 
compliance with our reporting requirements.
    (c) Impracticable. We may consider a face-to-face interview 
impracticable if it would cause the payee applicant undue hardship. For 
example, the payee applicant would have to travel a great distance to 
the field office. In this situation, we may conduct the investigation 
to determine the payee applicant's suitability to serve as a 
representative payee without a face-to-face interview.
[FR Doc. E8-4781 Filed 3-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.