Addition of San Antonio International Airport to List of Designated Landing Locations for Certain Aircraft, 12261-12262 [E8-4578]
Download as PDF
12261
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 46
Friday, March 7, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
19 CFR Part 122
[USCBP–2007–0017; CBP Dec. 08–01]
Addition of San Antonio International
Airport to List of Designated Landing
Locations for Certain Aircraft
Customs and Border Protection;
Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document amends the
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Regulations by adding the San Antonio
International Airport (SAT), located in
San Antonio, Texas, to the list of
designated airports at which certain
aircraft arriving in the continental
United States from certain areas south of
the United States must land for CBP
processing. This amendment is made to
improve the effectiveness of CBP
enforcement efforts to combat the
smuggling of contraband by air into the
United States from the south.
DATES: April 7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Ramos, Program Manager, Admissibility
and Passenger Programs, Office of Field
Operations, Customs and Border
Protection at (202) 344–3726.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Background
In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) published in the Federal
Register on September 11, 2007, CBP
proposed to amend its regulations by
adding the San Antonio International
Airport (SAT), located in San Antonio,
Texas, to the list of designated airports
at which certain aircraft arriving in the
continental United States from certain
areas south of the United States must
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:51 Mar 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
land for CBP processing. See 72 FR
51730.
As part of CBP’s efforts to combat
drug-smuggling activities, CBP air
commerce regulations were amended in
1975 by Treasury Decision (T.D.) 75–
201, to impose special reporting
requirements and control procedures on
certain aircraft arriving in the
continental United States via the U.S./
Mexican border, the Pacific Coast, the
Gulf of Mexico, or the Atlantic Coast
from certain locations in the southern
portion of the Western Hemisphere.
These special reporting requirements
apply to all aircraft except the
following: Public aircraft; those aircraft
operated on a regularly published
schedule, pursuant to a certificate of
public convenience and necessity or
foreign aircraft permit issued by the
Department of Transportation
authorizing interstate, overseas air
transportation; and those aircraft with a
seating capacity of more than 30
passengers or a maximum payload
capacity of more than 7,500 pounds
which are engaged in air transportation
for compensation or hire on demand.
See 19 CFR 122.23(a). Thus, since 1975,
commanders of such aircraft have been
required to furnish CBP with notice one
hour prior to crossing the coastline or
border, and to land at the nearest airport
to the point of crossing designated by
CBP for processing.
Specifically, the regulations provide
that subject aircraft arriving in the
continental United States from certain
areas south of the United States must
furnish a notice of intended arrival to
the designated airport located nearest
the point of crossing. 19 CFR 122.23.
Section 122.24(b) provides that, unless
exempt, such aircraft must land at
designated airports for CBP processing
and delineates the airports designated
for reporting and processing purposes
for these aircraft. 19 CFR 122.24(b).
During the previous six years, aircraft
subject to the special reporting
requirements entering the United States
from the specified foreign areas at a
point of crossing near San Antonio,
were required to land at San Antonio
International Airport (SAT) for
processing by CBP. These international
flights have been arriving at SAT since
November 2000, when SAT was
temporarily designated as an airport
where aircraft arriving from certain
southern areas could land pursuant to
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
section 1453 of the Tariff Suspension
and Trade Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–476,
Nov. 9, 2000). The Miscellaneous Trade
and Technical Corrections Act of 2004
(Pub. L. 108–429, Dec. 3, 2004)
effectively extended the airport’s
designation through November 9, 2006.
This statutory designation has now
expired. Community officials from San
Antonio, Texas and the surrounding
region have written CBP requesting that
SAT be designated by regulation as an
airport where aircraft arriving from
certain southern areas must land.
During the six years that SAT has
been statutorily designated as an airport
at which these aircraft arriving from the
south may land for customs processing,
CBP has reported no incidents or
problems arising from this designation.
Such a designation will impose no
additional burdens on CBP as CBP
already has a significant presence at
SAT, processing international
passengers arriving on scheduled
commercial airliners as a landing rights
airport. These same CBP personnel have
been processing passengers arriving
from the south since SAT was
temporarily designated as an airport
where aircraft arriving from the south
could land pursuant to the Tariff
Suspension and Trade Act of 2000. SAT
provides facilities and security and law
enforcement support services, at no
charge to CBP, to assist in the
processing of aircraft. Consequently,
CBP proposed in the NPRM to
permanently designate SAT as an
airport where certain aircraft, arriving in
the United States from south of the
United States, are authorized to land for
CBP processing.
Analysis of Comments and Conclusion
CBP received 34 comments in
response to the NPRM. These comments
were all in favor of the proposal. Each
comment was favorable in its entirety;
no alternate courses of action,
limitations or possible problems were
presented by the commenters. As CBP
continues to believe that this
amendment will improve the
effectiveness of CBP enforcement efforts
to combat the smuggling of contraband
by air into the United States from the
south, CBP is, as proposed, adding SAT
to the list of designated airports at
which certain aircraft arriving in the
continental United States from certain
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
12262
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 46 / Friday, March 7, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
areas south of the United States must
land for CBP processing.
same line, in the ‘‘Name’’ column, ‘‘San
Antonio International Airport.’’
Authority
Dated: March 3, 2008.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–4578 Filed 3–6–08; 8:45 am]
This change is made under the
authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 19 U.S.C.
1433, 1644a, 1624, and 6 U.S.C. 203.
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
The Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Executive Order 12866
This amendment expands the list of
designated airports at which certain
aircraft may land for customs
processing. As described in this
document, certain international flights
have been arriving at SAT, pursuant to
statute, from November 2000, through
November 9, 2006. The expansion of the
list of designated airports to include
SAT will not result in any new impact
on affected parties but will result in a
continuation of the previous situation.
Therefore, CBP certifies that this rule
will not have significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, the document is
not subject to the regulatory analysis or
other requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and
604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The Office of
Management and Budget has
determined that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
under Executive Order 12866.
Signing Authority
This amendment to the regulations is
being issued in accordance with 19 CFR
0.2(a) pertaining to the authority of the
Secretary of Homeland Security (or his
or her delegate) to prescribe regulations
not related to customs revenue
functions.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 122
Air carriers, Aircraft, Airports,
Customs duties and inspection, Freight.
Amendments to Regulations
Part 122, Code of Federal Regulations
(19 CFR part 122) is amended as set
forth below:
I
PART 122—AIR COMMERCE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 122,
19 CFR, continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58b, 66,
1431, 1433, 1436, 1448, 1459, 1590, 1594,
1623, 1624, 1644, 1644a, 2071 note.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
*
*
§ 122.24
*
*
*
[Amended]
2. In § 122.24(b) the chart is amended
by adding to the list of airports, in
alphabetical order in the ‘‘Location’’
column, ‘‘San Antonio Tex’’ and on the
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:51 Mar 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 526
Intramammary Dosage Forms;
Cephapirin Benzathine
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 526
Animal drugs.
I Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 526 is amended as follows:
PART 526—INTRAMAMMARY DOSAGE
FORMS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 526 continues to read as follows:
I
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
animal drug regulations to reflect
approval of a supplemental new animal
drug application (NADA) filed by Fort
Dodge Animal Health, Division of
Wyeth. The supplemental NADA
provides for a revision to the labeling of
cephapirin benzathine intramammary
infusion administered to dairy cows
entering their dry period for the
treatment of mastitis.
DATES: This rule is effective March 7,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy L. Burnsteel, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV–130), Food
and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish
Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–
8341, e-mail:
cindy.burnsteel@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fort
Dodge Animal Health, Division of
Wyeth, 800 Fifth St. NW., Fort Dodge,
IA 50501, filed a supplement to NADA
108–114 that revises labeling of CEFADRI (cephapirin benzathine)
Intramammary Infusion administered to
dairy cows entering their dry period for
the treatment of mastitis. The
application is approved as of February
7, 2008, and the regulations are
amended in 21 CFR 526.363 to reflect
the approval, an editorial change, and a
current format.
Approval of this supplemental NADA
did not require review of additional
safety or effectiveness data or
information. Therefore, a freedom of
information summary is not required.
FDA has determined under 21 CFR
25.33(a)(1) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
This rule does not meet the definition
of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because
it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’
Therefore, it is not subject to the
congressional review requirements in 5
U.S.C. 801–808.
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
§ 526.363
[Amended]
2. In § 526.363, at the end of
paragraph (d)(2), add ‘‘, including
penicillin-resistant strains’’; and in the
second sentence of paragraph (d)(3),
remove ‘‘use’’ and add in its place
‘‘used’’.
I
Dated: February 27, 2008.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. E8–4473 Filed 3–6–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 600
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0135] (formerly
Docket No. 2007N–0284]
Revision of the Requirements for Live
Vaccine Processing; Confirmation of
Effective Date
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is confirming the
effective date of March 18, 2008, for the
direct final rule that appeared in the
Federal Register of October 18, 2007 (72
FR 59000). The direct final rule amends
the biologics regulations by providing
options to the existing requirements for
the processing of live vaccines. This
document confirms the effective date of
the direct final rule.
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 46 (Friday, March 7, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12261-12262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4578]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 46 / Friday, March 7, 2008 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 12261]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 122
[USCBP-2007-0017; CBP Dec. 08-01]
Addition of San Antonio International Airport to List of
Designated Landing Locations for Certain Aircraft
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection; Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Regulations by adding the San Antonio International Airport (SAT),
located in San Antonio, Texas, to the list of designated airports at
which certain aircraft arriving in the continental United States from
certain areas south of the United States must land for CBP processing.
This amendment is made to improve the effectiveness of CBP enforcement
efforts to combat the smuggling of contraband by air into the United
States from the south.
DATES: April 7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Ramos, Program Manager,
Admissibility and Passenger Programs, Office of Field Operations,
Customs and Border Protection at (202) 344-3726.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal
Register on September 11, 2007, CBP proposed to amend its regulations
by adding the San Antonio International Airport (SAT), located in San
Antonio, Texas, to the list of designated airports at which certain
aircraft arriving in the continental United States from certain areas
south of the United States must land for CBP processing. See 72 FR
51730.
As part of CBP's efforts to combat drug-smuggling activities, CBP
air commerce regulations were amended in 1975 by Treasury Decision
(T.D.) 75-201, to impose special reporting requirements and control
procedures on certain aircraft arriving in the continental United
States via the U.S./Mexican border, the Pacific Coast, the Gulf of
Mexico, or the Atlantic Coast from certain locations in the southern
portion of the Western Hemisphere. These special reporting requirements
apply to all aircraft except the following: Public aircraft; those
aircraft operated on a regularly published schedule, pursuant to a
certificate of public convenience and necessity or foreign aircraft
permit issued by the Department of Transportation authorizing
interstate, overseas air transportation; and those aircraft with a
seating capacity of more than 30 passengers or a maximum payload
capacity of more than 7,500 pounds which are engaged in air
transportation for compensation or hire on demand. See 19 CFR
122.23(a). Thus, since 1975, commanders of such aircraft have been
required to furnish CBP with notice one hour prior to crossing the
coastline or border, and to land at the nearest airport to the point of
crossing designated by CBP for processing.
Specifically, the regulations provide that subject aircraft
arriving in the continental United States from certain areas south of
the United States must furnish a notice of intended arrival to the
designated airport located nearest the point of crossing. 19 CFR
122.23. Section 122.24(b) provides that, unless exempt, such aircraft
must land at designated airports for CBP processing and delineates the
airports designated for reporting and processing purposes for these
aircraft. 19 CFR 122.24(b).
During the previous six years, aircraft subject to the special
reporting requirements entering the United States from the specified
foreign areas at a point of crossing near San Antonio, were required to
land at San Antonio International Airport (SAT) for processing by CBP.
These international flights have been arriving at SAT since November
2000, when SAT was temporarily designated as an airport where aircraft
arriving from certain southern areas could land pursuant to section
1453 of the Tariff Suspension and Trade Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-476,
Nov. 9, 2000). The Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections Act of
2004 (Pub. L. 108-429, Dec. 3, 2004) effectively extended the airport's
designation through November 9, 2006.
This statutory designation has now expired. Community officials
from San Antonio, Texas and the surrounding region have written CBP
requesting that SAT be designated by regulation as an airport where
aircraft arriving from certain southern areas must land.
During the six years that SAT has been statutorily designated as an
airport at which these aircraft arriving from the south may land for
customs processing, CBP has reported no incidents or problems arising
from this designation. Such a designation will impose no additional
burdens on CBP as CBP already has a significant presence at SAT,
processing international passengers arriving on scheduled commercial
airliners as a landing rights airport. These same CBP personnel have
been processing passengers arriving from the south since SAT was
temporarily designated as an airport where aircraft arriving from the
south could land pursuant to the Tariff Suspension and Trade Act of
2000. SAT provides facilities and security and law enforcement support
services, at no charge to CBP, to assist in the processing of aircraft.
Consequently, CBP proposed in the NPRM to permanently designate SAT as
an airport where certain aircraft, arriving in the United States from
south of the United States, are authorized to land for CBP processing.
Analysis of Comments and Conclusion
CBP received 34 comments in response to the NPRM. These comments
were all in favor of the proposal. Each comment was favorable in its
entirety; no alternate courses of action, limitations or possible
problems were presented by the commenters. As CBP continues to believe
that this amendment will improve the effectiveness of CBP enforcement
efforts to combat the smuggling of contraband by air into the United
States from the south, CBP is, as proposed, adding SAT to the list of
designated airports at which certain aircraft arriving in the
continental United States from certain
[[Page 12262]]
areas south of the United States must land for CBP processing.
Authority
This change is made under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 19 U.S.C.
1433, 1644a, 1624, and 6 U.S.C. 203.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866
This amendment expands the list of designated airports at which
certain aircraft may land for customs processing. As described in this
document, certain international flights have been arriving at SAT,
pursuant to statute, from November 2000, through November 9, 2006. The
expansion of the list of designated airports to include SAT will not
result in any new impact on affected parties but will result in a
continuation of the previous situation. Therefore, CBP certifies that
this rule will not have significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Accordingly, the document is not subject to
the regulatory analysis or other requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The Office of
Management and Budget has determined that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action as defined under Executive Order 12866.
Signing Authority
This amendment to the regulations is being issued in accordance
with 19 CFR 0.2(a) pertaining to the authority of the Secretary of
Homeland Security (or his or her delegate) to prescribe regulations not
related to customs revenue functions.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 122
Air carriers, Aircraft, Airports, Customs duties and inspection,
Freight.
Amendments to Regulations
0
Part 122, Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR part 122) is amended as
set forth below:
PART 122--AIR COMMERCE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 122, 19 CFR, continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58b, 66, 1431, 1433, 1436,
1448, 1459, 1590, 1594, 1623, 1624, 1644, 1644a, 2071 note.
* * * * *
Sec. 122.24 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 122.24(b) the chart is amended by adding to the list of
airports, in alphabetical order in the ``Location'' column, ``San
Antonio Tex'' and on the same line, in the ``Name'' column, ``San
Antonio International Airport.''
Dated: March 3, 2008.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-4578 Filed 3-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P