Utah: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 12277-12279 [E8-4251]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 46 / Friday, March 7, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R08–RCRA–2006–0127; FRL–8538–1]
Utah: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Solid Waste Disposal Act,
as amended, commonly referred to as
the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA), allows the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to authorize States to operate their
hazardous waste management programs
in lieu of the federal program. Utah has
applied to EPA for final authorization of
the changes to its hazardous waste
program under RCRA. EPA has
determined that these changes satisfy all
requirements needed to qualify for final
authorization and is authorizing the
State’s changes through this immediate
final action.
DATES: This final authorization will
become effective on May 6, 2008, unless
the EPA receives adverse written
comment by April 7, 2008. If adverse
comment is received, EPA will publish
a timely withdrawal of the immediate
final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
RCRA–2006–0127, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
• E-mail: daly.carl@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6341.
• Mail: Send written comments to
Carl Daly, Solid and Hazardous Waste
Program, EPA Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
HW, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to Carl Daly, Solid and
Hazardous Waste Program, EPA Region
8, Mailcode 8P–HW, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation. The public is
advised to call in advance to verify the
business hours. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–RCRA–2006–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:51 Mar 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
0127. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov, or e-mail. The
federal Web site, https://
www.regulations.gov, is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties, and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may
not be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters or any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information
may not be publicly available, e.g., CBI
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
EPA Region 8, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado, contact: Carl Daly, phone
number (303) 312–6416, or the Utah
Department of Environmental Quality
(UDEQ), from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., 288
North 1460 West, Salt Lake City, Utah
84114–4880, contact: Susan Toronto,
phone number (801) 538–6776. The
public is advised to call in advance to
verify the business hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Daly, Solid and Hazardous Waste
Program, EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12277
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, (303)
312–6416, daly.carl@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why Are Revisions to State
Programs Necessary?
States which have received final
authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the federal
program. As the federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may
be necessary when federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in
This Rule?
We conclude that Utah’s application
to revise its authorized program meets
all of the statutory and regulatory
requirements established by RCRA.
Therefore, we grant Utah final
authorization to operate its hazardous
waste program with the changes
described in the authorization
application. Utah has responsibility for
permitting Treatment, Storage, and
Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within its
borders, except in Indian country, and
for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA
program described in its revised
program application, subject to the
limitations of the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA).
New federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by federal
regulations that EPA promulgates under
the authority of HSWA take effect in
authorized States before they are
authorized for the requirements. Thus,
EPA will implement those requirements
and prohibitions in Utah, including
issuing permits, until Utah is authorized
to do so.
C. What Is the Effect of This
Authorization Decision?
This decision means that a facility in
Utah subject to RCRA will now have to
comply with the authorized state
requirements instead of the equivalent
federal requirements in order to comply
with RCRA. Utah has enforcement
responsibilities under its state
hazardous waste program for violations
of such program, but EPA retains its
authority under RCRA sections 3007,
3008, 3013, and 7003, which include,
among others, authority to: (1) Conduct
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
12278
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 46 / Friday, March 7, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
inspections; require monitoring, tests,
analyses, or reports; (2) enforce RCRA
requirements; suspend or revoke
permits; and, (3) take enforcement
actions regardless of whether Utah has
taken its own actions.
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations for which Utah is being
authorized by this action are already
effective and are not changed by this
action.
D. Why Wasn’t There a Proposed Rule
Before This Rule?
EPA did not publish a proposal before
this rule because we view this as a
routine program change. We are
providing an opportunity for the public
to comment now. In addition to this
rule, in the proposed rules section of
today’s Federal Register we are
publishing a separate document that
proposes to authorize the State program
changes.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
E. What Happens if EPA Receives
Comments That Oppose This Action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose
this authorization, we will withdraw
this rule by publishing a document in
the Federal Register before the rule
becomes effective. EPA will base any
further decision on the authorization of
the State program changes on the
proposal mentioned in the previous
paragraph. We will then address all
public comments in a later final rule.
You may not have another opportunity
to comment, therefore, if you want to
comment on this authorization, you
must do so at this time.
If we receive comments that oppose
only the authorization of a particular
change to the Utah hazardous waste
program, we will withdraw that part of
this rule but the authorization of the
program changes that the comments do
not oppose will become effective on the
date specified above. The Federal
Register withdrawal document will
specify which part of the authorization
will become effective and which part is
being withdrawn.
F. For What Has Utah Previously Been
Authorized?
Utah initially received final
authorization on October 10, 1984,
effective October 24, 1984 (49 FR 39683)
to implement its base hazardous waste
management program. Utah received
authorization for revisions to its
program on February 21, 1989 (54 FR
7417), effective March 7, 1989; May 23,
1991 (56 FR 23648) and August 6, 1991
(56 FR 37291), both effective July 22,
1991; May 15, 1992 (57 FR 20770),
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:51 Mar 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
effective July 14, 1992; February 12,
1993 (58 FR 8232) and May 5, 1993 (58
FR 26689), both effective April 13, 1993;
October 14, 1994 (59 FR 52084),
effective December 13, 1994; May 20,
1997 (62 FR 27501), effective July 21,
1997; January 13, 1999 (64 FR 02144),
effective March 15, 1999; October 16,
2000 (65 FR 61109), effective January
16, 2001, May 7, 2002 (67 FR 30599),
effective July 7, 2002; and June 11, 2003
(68 FR 34829), effective June 11, 2003.
Pollutant Standards for Combustors:
Corrections (67 FR 06968, 02/14/
02)(Checklist 198)/R315–3–4.3 and
R315–14–7; Vacatur of Mineral
Processing Spent Materials Being
Reclaimed as Solid Wastes and TCLP
Use with MGP waste (67 FR 11251, 03/
13/02)(Checklist 199)/R315–2–2(c)(3),
R315–2–4(a)(17), and R315–2–9(g)(1);
Treatment Variance for Radioactively
Contaminated Batteries (67 FR 62618,
10/07/02)(Checklist 201)/R315–13–1.
G. What Changes Are We Authorizing
With This Action?
On September 30, 2003, Utah
submitted a complete program revision
application, seeking authorization of
their changes in accordance with 40
CFR 271.21. We now make an
immediate final decision, subject to
receipt of written comments that oppose
this action, that Utah’s hazardous waste
program revision satisfies all of the
requirements necessary to qualify for
final authorization. Therefore, we grant
Utah final authorization for the
following program changes (the federal
citation followed by the analog from the
Utah Administrative Code (R315),
revised September 15, 2003): Hazardous
Air Pollutant Standards; Technical
Corrections (65 FR 42292, 07/10/
00)(Checklist 188), (66 FR 24270, 05/14/
01)(Checklist 188.1), and (66 FR 35087,
07/03/01)(Checklist 188.2)/R315–13–2–
26, R315–3–4.3, and R315–8–
15.1(b)(1)&(3); Chlorinated Aliphatics
Listing and LDRs for Newly Identified
Wastes (65 FR 67068, 11/08/
00)(Checklist 189)/R315–2–10(f), R315–
13–1, R315–50–9, and R315–50–10;
Mixture and Derived-From Rules
Revisions (66 FR 27266, 05/16/
01)(Checklist 192A)/R315–2–
3(a)(2)(iii)&(iv), R315–2–3(c)(2)(i),
R315–2–3(f); Land Disposal Restrictions
Correction (66 FR 27266, 05/16/
01)(Checklist 192B)/R315–13–1; Change
of Official EPA Mailing Address (66 FR
34374, 06/28/01)(Checklist 193)/R315–
1–2(a); Mixture and Derived-From Rules
Revision II (66 FR 50332, 10/03/
01)(Checklist 194)/R315–2–3(a)(2)(iv)
through (iv)(G); R315–2–3(f)(4);
Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing
Wastes Identification and Listing (66 FR
58258, 11/20/01)(Checklist 195)/R315–
2–4(b)(15), R315–2–10(f), R315–13–1;
and R315–50–9; CAMU Amendments
(67 FR 02962, 01/22/02)(Checklist 196)/
R315–1–1(b), and R315–8–21;
Hazardous Air Pollutant Standards for
Combustors: Interim Standards (67 FR
06792, 02/13/02)(Checklist 197)/R315–
3–2.10(e), R315–3–2.13, R315–3–6.3,
R315–3–6.6, R315–3–9.1(a)&(b), R315–
7–22.1(b)(1)&(3), R315–8–15.1(b)(1)&(4),
and R315–14–7; Hazardous Air
H. Where Are the Revised State Rules
Different From the Federal Rules?
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Utah did not adopt the exclusion for
hazardous waste containing radioactive
waste at 40 CFR 261.3(h) in this
rulemaking. This makes the State more
stringent. Utah did not change any
previously more stringent or broader-inscope provisions to be equivalent to the
federal rules.
I. Who Handles Permits After the
Authorization Takes Effect?
Utah will issue permits for all the
provisions for which it is authorized
and will administer the permits it
issues. EPA will continue to administer
any RCRA hazardous waste permits or
portions of permits which were issued
prior to the effective date of this
authorization until Utah has equivalent
instruments in place. We will not issue
any new permits or new portions of
permits for the provisions listed in
section G after the effective date of this
authorization. EPA previously
suspended issuance of permits for other
provisions on the effective date of
Utah’s final authorization for the RCRA
base program and each of the revisions
listed in Item F. EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA
requirements for which Utah is not yet
authorized.
J. How Does Today’s Action Affect
Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Utah?
This program revision does not
extend to ‘‘Indian country’’ as defined
in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Indian country
includes:
1. Lands within the exterior
boundaries of the following Indian
reservations located within or abutting
the State of Utah:
a. Goshute Indian Reservation
b. Navajo Indian Reservation
c. Northwestern Band of Shoshoni
Nation of Utah (Washakie) Indian
Reservation
d. Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Indian
Reservation
e. Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians
of Utah Indian Reservation
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 46 / Friday, March 7, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
f. Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation
(see below)
g. Ute Mountain Indian Reservation;
2. Any land held in trust by the
United States for an Indian tribe; and,
3. Any other areas which are ‘‘Indian
country’’ within the meaning of 18
U.S.C. 1151.
With respect to the Uintah and Ouray
Indian Reservation, federal courts have
determined that certain lands within the
exterior boundaries of the Reservation
do not constitute Indian country. This
State program revision approval will
extend to those lands which the courts
have determined are not Indian country.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
K. What Is Codification and Is EPA
Codifying Utah’s Hazardous Waste
Program as Authorized in This Rule?
Codification is the process of placing
a State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the CFR.
We do this by referencing the
authorized State rules in 40 CFR part
272. Utah’s rules, up to and including
those revised on February 2, 1996, have
previously been codified through the
incorporation-by-reference effective
March 15, 1999 (66 FR 58964,
November 26, 2001). We reserve the
amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart
TT for the codification of Utah’s
updated program until a later date.
L. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
The Office of Management and Budget
has exempted this action from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and
therefore this action is not subject to
review by OMB. This action authorizes
State requirements for the purpose of
RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, I certify that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this action authorizes
pre-existing requirements under state
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by state law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For
the same reason, this action also does
not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:51 Mar 06, 2008
Jkt 214001
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes state requirements as
part of the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a
State’s application for authorization as
long as the State meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary
steps to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the ‘‘Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12279
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective May 6, 2008.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Incorporation-byReference, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006 and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: February 22, 2008.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. E8–4251 Filed 3–6–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 76
[MB Docket No. 07–29; FCC 07–169]
Implementation of the Cable Television
Consumer Protection and Competition
Act of 1992 and Development of
Competition and Diversity in Video
Programming Distribution: Section
628(c)(5) of the Communications Act—
Sunset of Exclusive Contract
Prohibition
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; announcement of
effective date.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission adopted rules revising the
procedures applicable to program access
complaint proceedings. Certain changes
to the rules require Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval to become effective. This
document announces the effective date
of these rules.
DATES: The rules published on October
4, 2007, 72 FR 56645, amending 47 CFR
76.1003(e)(1) and (j) are effective March
7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information on this proceeding,
contact David Konczal,
David.Konczal@fcc.gov, of the Media
E:\FR\FM\07MRR1.SGM
07MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 46 (Friday, March 7, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12277-12279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4251]
[[Page 12277]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R08-RCRA-2006-0127; FRL-8538-1]
Utah: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended, commonly referred to
as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), allows the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to authorize States to operate
their hazardous waste management programs in lieu of the federal
program. Utah has applied to EPA for final authorization of the changes
to its hazardous waste program under RCRA. EPA has determined that
these changes satisfy all requirements needed to qualify for final
authorization and is authorizing the State's changes through this
immediate final action.
DATES: This final authorization will become effective on May 6, 2008,
unless the EPA receives adverse written comment by April 7, 2008. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the immediate final rule in the Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
RCRA-2006-0127, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: daly.carl@epa.gov.
Fax: (303) 312-6341.
Mail: Send written comments to Carl Daly, Solid and
Hazardous Waste Program, EPA Region 8, Mailcode 8P-HW, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to Carl
Daly, Solid and Hazardous Waste Program, EPA Region 8, Mailcode 8P-HW,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The public is advised to call in advance to verify the business hours.
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R08-RCRA-
2006-0127. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov, or e-mail. The federal Web site, https://
www.regulations.gov, is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA
will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide
it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties, and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters or any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only
in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at: EPA
Region 8, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado,
contact: Carl Daly, phone number (303) 312-6416, or the Utah Department
of Environmental Quality (UDEQ), from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., 288 North 1460
West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4880, contact: Susan Toronto, phone
number (801) 538-6776. The public is advised to call in advance to
verify the business hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Daly, Solid and Hazardous Waste
Program, EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202,
(303) 312-6416, daly.carl@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why Are Revisions to State Programs Necessary?
States which have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the federal program. As the federal program changes, States must
change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to
State programs may be necessary when federal or State statutory or
regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur.
Most commonly, States must change their programs because of changes to
EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in This Rule?
We conclude that Utah's application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements
established by RCRA. Therefore, we grant Utah final authorization to
operate its hazardous waste program with the changes described in the
authorization application. Utah has responsibility for permitting
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within its borders,
except in Indian country, and for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA
program described in its revised program application, subject to the
limitations of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA).
New federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by federal
regulations that EPA promulgates under the authority of HSWA take
effect in authorized States before they are authorized for the
requirements. Thus, EPA will implement those requirements and
prohibitions in Utah, including issuing permits, until Utah is
authorized to do so.
C. What Is the Effect of This Authorization Decision?
This decision means that a facility in Utah subject to RCRA will
now have to comply with the authorized state requirements instead of
the equivalent federal requirements in order to comply with RCRA. Utah
has enforcement responsibilities under its state hazardous waste
program for violations of such program, but EPA retains its authority
under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, which include, among
others, authority to: (1) Conduct
[[Page 12278]]
inspections; require monitoring, tests, analyses, or reports; (2)
enforce RCRA requirements; suspend or revoke permits; and, (3) take
enforcement actions regardless of whether Utah has taken its own
actions.
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which Utah is being
authorized by this action are already effective and are not changed by
this action.
D. Why Wasn't There a Proposed Rule Before This Rule?
EPA did not publish a proposal before this rule because we view
this as a routine program change. We are providing an opportunity for
the public to comment now. In addition to this rule, in the proposed
rules section of today's Federal Register we are publishing a separate
document that proposes to authorize the State program changes.
E. What Happens if EPA Receives Comments That Oppose This Action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose this authorization, we will
withdraw this rule by publishing a document in the Federal Register
before the rule becomes effective. EPA will base any further decision
on the authorization of the State program changes on the proposal
mentioned in the previous paragraph. We will then address all public
comments in a later final rule. You may not have another opportunity to
comment, therefore, if you want to comment on this authorization, you
must do so at this time.
If we receive comments that oppose only the authorization of a
particular change to the Utah hazardous waste program, we will withdraw
that part of this rule but the authorization of the program changes
that the comments do not oppose will become effective on the date
specified above. The Federal Register withdrawal document will specify
which part of the authorization will become effective and which part is
being withdrawn.
F. For What Has Utah Previously Been Authorized?
Utah initially received final authorization on October 10, 1984,
effective October 24, 1984 (49 FR 39683) to implement its base
hazardous waste management program. Utah received authorization for
revisions to its program on February 21, 1989 (54 FR 7417), effective
March 7, 1989; May 23, 1991 (56 FR 23648) and August 6, 1991 (56 FR
37291), both effective July 22, 1991; May 15, 1992 (57 FR 20770),
effective July 14, 1992; February 12, 1993 (58 FR 8232) and May 5, 1993
(58 FR 26689), both effective April 13, 1993; October 14, 1994 (59 FR
52084), effective December 13, 1994; May 20, 1997 (62 FR 27501),
effective July 21, 1997; January 13, 1999 (64 FR 02144), effective
March 15, 1999; October 16, 2000 (65 FR 61109), effective January 16,
2001, May 7, 2002 (67 FR 30599), effective July 7, 2002; and June 11,
2003 (68 FR 34829), effective June 11, 2003.
G. What Changes Are We Authorizing With This Action?
On September 30, 2003, Utah submitted a complete program revision
application, seeking authorization of their changes in accordance with
40 CFR 271.21. We now make an immediate final decision, subject to
receipt of written comments that oppose this action, that Utah's
hazardous waste program revision satisfies all of the requirements
necessary to qualify for final authorization. Therefore, we grant Utah
final authorization for the following program changes (the federal
citation followed by the analog from the Utah Administrative Code
(R315), revised September 15, 2003): Hazardous Air Pollutant Standards;
Technical Corrections (65 FR 42292, 07/10/00)(Checklist 188), (66 FR
24270, 05/14/01)(Checklist 188.1), and (66 FR 35087, 07/03/
01)(Checklist 188.2)/R315-13-2-26, R315-3-4.3, and R315-8-
15.1(b)(1)&(3); Chlorinated Aliphatics Listing and LDRs for Newly
Identified Wastes (65 FR 67068, 11/08/00)(Checklist 189)/R315-2-10(f),
R315-13-1, R315-50-9, and R315-50-10; Mixture and Derived-From Rules
Revisions (66 FR 27266, 05/16/01)(Checklist 192A)/R315-2-
3(a)(2)(iii)&(iv), R315-2-3(c)(2)(i), R315-2-3(f); Land Disposal
Restrictions Correction (66 FR 27266, 05/16/01)(Checklist 192B)/R315-
13-1; Change of Official EPA Mailing Address (66 FR 34374, 06/28/
01)(Checklist 193)/R315-1-2(a); Mixture and Derived-From Rules Revision
II (66 FR 50332, 10/03/01)(Checklist 194)/R315-2-3(a)(2)(iv) through
(iv)(G); R315-2-3(f)(4); Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing Wastes
Identification and Listing (66 FR 58258, 11/20/01)(Checklist 195)/R315-
2-4(b)(15), R315-2-10(f), R315-13-1; and R315-50-9; CAMU Amendments (67
FR 02962, 01/22/02)(Checklist 196)/R315-1-1(b), and R315-8-21;
Hazardous Air Pollutant Standards for Combustors: Interim Standards (67
FR 06792, 02/13/02)(Checklist 197)/R315-3-2.10(e), R315-3-2.13, R315-3-
6.3, R315-3-6.6, R315-3-9.1(a)&(b), R315-7-22.1(b)(1)&(3), R315-8-
15.1(b)(1)&(4), and R315-14-7; Hazardous Air Pollutant Standards for
Combustors: Corrections (67 FR 06968, 02/14/02)(Checklist 198)/R315-3-
4.3 and R315-14-7; Vacatur of Mineral Processing Spent Materials Being
Reclaimed as Solid Wastes and TCLP Use with MGP waste (67 FR 11251, 03/
13/02)(Checklist 199)/R315-2-2(c)(3), R315-2-4(a)(17), and R315-2-
9(g)(1); Treatment Variance for Radioactively Contaminated Batteries
(67 FR 62618, 10/07/02)(Checklist 201)/R315-13-1.
H. Where Are the Revised State Rules Different From the Federal Rules?
Utah did not adopt the exclusion for hazardous waste containing
radioactive waste at 40 CFR 261.3(h) in this rulemaking. This makes the
State more stringent. Utah did not change any previously more stringent
or broader-in-scope provisions to be equivalent to the federal rules.
I. Who Handles Permits After the Authorization Takes Effect?
Utah will issue permits for all the provisions for which it is
authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will continue
to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of permits
which were issued prior to the effective date of this authorization
until Utah has equivalent instruments in place. We will not issue any
new permits or new portions of permits for the provisions listed in
section G after the effective date of this authorization. EPA
previously suspended issuance of permits for other provisions on the
effective date of Utah's final authorization for the RCRA base program
and each of the revisions listed in Item F. EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which Utah is not
yet authorized.
J. How Does Today's Action Affect Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Utah?
This program revision does not extend to ``Indian country'' as
defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Indian country includes:
1. Lands within the exterior boundaries of the following Indian
reservations located within or abutting the State of Utah:
a. Goshute Indian Reservation
b. Navajo Indian Reservation
c. Northwestern Band of Shoshoni Nation of Utah (Washakie) Indian
Reservation
d. Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Indian Reservation
e. Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians of Utah Indian Reservation
[[Page 12279]]
f. Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (see below)
g. Ute Mountain Indian Reservation;
2. Any land held in trust by the United States for an Indian tribe;
and,
3. Any other areas which are ``Indian country'' within the meaning
of 18 U.S.C. 1151.
With respect to the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation, federal
courts have determined that certain lands within the exterior
boundaries of the Reservation do not constitute Indian country. This
State program revision approval will extend to those lands which the
courts have determined are not Indian country.
K. What Is Codification and Is EPA Codifying Utah's Hazardous Waste
Program as Authorized in This Rule?
Codification is the process of placing a State's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste
program into the CFR. We do this by referencing the authorized State
rules in 40 CFR part 272. Utah's rules, up to and including those
revised on February 2, 1996, have previously been codified through the
incorporation-by-reference effective March 15, 1999 (66 FR 58964,
November 26, 2001). We reserve the amendment of 40 CFR part 272,
subpart TT for the codification of Utah's updated program until a later
date.
L. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993), and therefore this action is not subject to review by OMB. This
action authorizes State requirements for the purpose of RCRA 3006 and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
authorizes pre-existing requirements under state law and does not
impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state
law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). For the same reason, this
action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities
of Tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes state requirements as part of the State RCRA
hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA. This
action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental health or safety risks. This rule
is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a State's application for
authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a State authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective May 6, 2008.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Incorporation-by-Reference, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 3006 and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended
42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: February 22, 2008.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8. 1
[FR Doc. E8-4251 Filed 3-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P