Post-Employment Conflict of Interest Restrictions; Revision of Departmental Component Designations, 12007-12009 [E8-4282]
Download as PDF
12007
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 45
Thursday, March 6, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS
5 CFR Part 2641
RIN 3209–AA14
Post-Employment Conflict of Interest
Restrictions; Revision of Departmental
Component Designations
AGENCY:
Office of Government Ethics
(OGE).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Office of Government
Ethics is issuing this rule to revoke the
designation of a departmental
component and to designate two
additional departmental components for
purposes of the one-year postemployment conflict of interest
restriction at 18 U.S.C. 207(c), to change
the name of an existing departmental
component, and to correct a clerical
error in the name of another existing
departmental component.
DATES: The amendments to appendix B
to part 2641 (as set forth in amendatory
paragraph 2) are effective March 6,
2008. The additional removal of a
designated component from the listing
for the Department of Commerce in
appendix B to part 2641 (as set forth in
amendatory paragraph 3) is effective
June 4, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy E. Braud, Attorney-Advisor, or
William E. Gressman, Senior Associate
General Counsel, Office of General
Counsel and Legal Policy, Office of
Government Ethics, Telephone: 202–
482–9300; TDD: 202–482–9293; FAX:
202–482–9237.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
A. Substantive Discussion
Revocation and Addition of
Departmental Components
The Director of OGE (Director) is
authorized by 18 U.S.C. 207(h) to
designate distinct and separate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Mar 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
departmental or agency components in
the executive branch for purposes of 18
U.S.C. 207(c). The representational bar
of 18 U.S.C. 207(c) usually extends to
the whole of any department or agency
in which a former senior employee
served in any capacity during the year
prior to termination from a senior
employee position. However, 18 U.S.C.
207(h) provides that whenever the
Director of OGE determines that an
agency or bureau within a department
or agency in the executive branch
exercises functions which are distinct
and separate from the remaining
functions of the department or agency
and there exists no potential for use of
undue influence or unfair advantage
based on past Government service, the
Director shall by rule designate such
agency or bureau as a separate
component of that department or
agency. As a result, a former senior
employee who served in a ‘‘parent’’
department or agency is not barred by
18 U.S.C. 207(c) from making
communications to or appearances
before any employees of any designated
component of that parent, but is barred
as to employees of that parent or of
other components that have not been
separately designated. Moreover, a
former senior employee who served in
a designated component of a parent
department or agency is barred from
communicating to or making an
appearance before any employee of that
component, but is not barred as to any
employee of the parent or of any other
component.
Under 18 U.S.C 207(h)(2), component
designations do not apply to persons
employed at a rate of pay specified in
or fixed according to subchapter II of 5
U.S.C. chapter 53 (the Executive
Schedule). Component designations are
listed in appendix B to 5 CFR part 2641.
The Director of OGE regularly reviews
the component designations and
determinations and, in consultation
with the department or agency
concerned, makes such additions and
deletions as are necessary. Specifically,
the Director ‘‘shall by rule make or
revoke a component designation after
considering the recommendation of the
designated agency ethics official.’’ 5
CFR 2641.201(e)(3)(iii). Before
designating an agency component as
distinct and separate for purposes of 18
U.S.C. 207(c), the Director must find
that there exists no potential for use by
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
former senior employees of undue
influence or unfair advantage based on
past Government service, and that the
component is an agency or bureau
within a department or agency that
exercises functions which are distinct
and separate from the functions of the
parent department or agency and from
the functions of other components of
that parent. 5 CFR 2641.201(e)(6).
Department of Commerce
Pursuant to the procedures prescribed
in 5 CFR 2641.201(e), one department
has forwarded a written request to OGE
to amend its listing in appendix B. After
carefully reviewing the requested
changes in light of the criteria in 18
U.S.C. 207(h) as implemented in 5 CFR
2641.201(e)(6), the Director of OGE has
determined to grant this request and
amend appendix B to 5 CFR part 2641
as explained below.
The Department of Commerce has
requested that OGE remove the
Technology Administration from its list
of component designations and in its
place designate the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) and
the National Technical Information
Service (NTIS) as distinct and separate
components of the Department of
Commerce for purposes of 18 USC
207(c). These two entities formerly were
the two institutes within the
Technology Administration, which is
currently a designated component of the
Department of Commerce. The
Technology Administration was
abolished by the America COMPETES
Act, Public Law 110–69 (August 9,
2007). NIST and NTIS are the entities
that remain after the dissolution of the
Technology Administration.
NIST was the major component of the
Technology Administration during the
latter’s existence. NIST’s mission is to
promote U.S. innovation and industrial
competitiveness by advancing
measurement science, standards and
technology in ways that enhance
economic security and improve quality
of life. It functions as the lead national
laboratory for providing the
measurements, calibrations, and quality
assurance techniques which underpin
U.S. commerce, technological progress,
improved product reliability and
manufacturing processes, and public
safety. Because the Technology
Administration has been abolished, the
E:\FR\FM\06MRR1.SGM
06MRR1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
12008
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 45 / Thursday, March 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Director of NIST now reports directly to
the Secretary of Commerce.
NTIS is a small entity that performs
a Government function different from
that of NIST. NTIS collects information
on scientific, technical, engineering, and
business-related research conducted or
sponsored by the U.S. Government and
creates a permanent archive that the
public can access. Because the
Technology Administration has been
abolished, the Director of NTIS now
reports directly to the Secretary of
Commerce.
According to the Department of
Commerce, the functions of NIST and
NTIS are distinct and separate from
each other and distinct and separate
from every other agency within the
Department. This distinction was
previously recognized when OGE
designated their parent agency, the
Technology Administration, as a
component for purposes of 18 USC
207(c). The act that abolished the
Technology Administration left the
NIST and the NTIS in its place.
Accordingly, the Director is granting
the request of the Department of
Commerce and therefore is amending
the Department of Commerce listing in
appendix B to part 2641 to remove the
Technology Administration from the
component designation list and to
designate NIST and NTIS as new
components as discussed.
The Department of Commerce has
also advised that the name of one
component currently listed in appendix
B of part 2641 has been changed.
According to the Department of
Commerce, the ‘‘Patent and Trademark
Office’’ has been the ‘‘United States
Patent and Trademark Office’’ since
November 29, 1999. Accordingly, the
Director is amending the Department of
Commerce listing in appendix B to
reflect the current name of this
component.
The Department of Commerce has
further noted that the name of one of its
existing components is incorrect. One of
the existing components is listed as the
‘‘Minority Business Development
Administration.’’ According to the
Department of Commerce, this
component has never carried this name.
It has always been the ‘‘Minority
Business Development Agency.’’ The
Director is therefore amending the
listing in appendix B to reflect the
correct name of the component.
As indicated in 5 CFR 2641.201(e)(4),
a designation ‘‘shall be effective as of
the effective date of the rule that creates
the designation, but shall not be
effective as to employees who
terminated senior service prior to that
date.’’ Initial designations were effective
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Mar 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
as of January 1, 1991. The effective date
of subsequent designations is indicated
by means of parenthetical entries in
appendix B. The new component
designations made by this rulemaking
document, as well as the component
name change and the name correction
being reflected herein (which do not
affect their underlying component
designation dates), are effective March
6, 2008.
As also indicated in 2641.201(e)(4),
revocation is effective 90 days after the
effective date of the rule that revokes the
designation. Accordingly, the
component designation revocation made
in this rulemaking will take effect June
4, 2008. Revocations are not effective as
to any individual terminating senior
service prior to the expiration of the 90day period.
B. Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, as the
Director of the Office of Government
Ethics, I find that good cause exists for
waiving the general requirements for
notice of proposed rulemaking,
opportunity for public comment, and a
30-day delayed effective date. It is
important and in the public interest that
the designations herein by OGE of the
specified separate departmental
components, which reflect the current
organization of the concerned
department, as well as the component
name change, the component name
correction and the component
revocation, be published in the Federal
Register and take effect as promptly as
possible.
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more (as adjusted for inflation) in any
one year.
Congressional Review Act
The Office of Government Ethics has
determined that this rulemaking
involves a non-major rule under the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 8) and will submit a report
thereon to the U.S. Senate, House of
Representatives and Government
Accountability Office in accordance
with that law at the same time this
rulemaking document is sent to the
Office of the Federal Register for
publication in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866
In promulgating this final rule, the
Office of Government Ethics has
adhered to the regulatory philosophy
and the applicable principles of
regulation set forth in section 1 of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review. This rule has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under that
Executive order since it deals with
agency organization, management, and
personnel matters and is not
‘‘significant’’ under the order.
Executive Order 12988
As Director of the Office of
Government Ethics, I have reviewed this
rule in light of section 3 of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, and
certify that it meets the applicable
standards provided therein.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 2641
Regulatory Flexibility Act
As Director of the Office of
Government Ethics, I certify under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because it affects only Federal
departments and agencies and current
and former Federal employees.
Conflict of interests, Government
employees.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 35) does not apply to this
rule because it does not contain
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget.
PART 2641—POST-EMPLOYMENT
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
RESTRICTIONS
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
chapter 25, subchapter II), the final rule
will not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments and will not result in
increased expenditures by State, local
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Approved: February 24, 2008.
Robert I. Cusick,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, the Office of
Government Ethics is amending 5 CFR
part 2641 as follows:
I
I 1. The authority citation for part
2641 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. App. (Ethics in
Government Act of 1978); 18 U.S.C. 207; E.O.
12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p.
215, as modified by E.O. 12731, 55 FR 42547,
3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306.
I 2. Effective March 6, 2008,
appendix B to part 2641 is amended by
revising the listing for the Department of
Commerce to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\06MRR1.SGM
06MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 45 / Thursday, March 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Appendix B to Part 2641—Agency
Components for Purposes of 18 U.S.C.
207(c)
*
*
*
*
*
Parent: Department of Commerce
Components:
Bureau of the Census
Bureau of Industry and Security (formerly
Bureau of Export Administration)
(effective January 28, 1992)
Economic Development Administration
International Trade Administration
Minority Business Development Agency
(formerly listed as Minority Business
Development Administration)
National Institute of Standards and
Technology (effective March 6, 2008)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
National Technical Information Service
(effective March 6, 2008)
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
Technology Administration (effective
January 28, 1992; expiring June 4, 2008)
United States Patent and Trademark Office
(formerly Patent and Trademark Office)
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. Effective June 4, 2008, appendix B to
part 2641 is further amended by removing
the Technology Administration from the
listing for the Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. E8–4282 Filed 3–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6345–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Part 16
[Docket ID OCC–2008–0003]
RIN 1557–AD04
Securities Offering Disclosure Rules
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency (OCC) is amending its
securities offering disclosure rules to
eliminate the general requirement that a
national bank in organization include
audited financial statements as part of a
public offering of its securities. The
OCC has determined that, due to the
very limited nature of the activities of a
bank in the organizational phase, this
requirement typically adds little
information that is of benefit to
potential investors or of significance in
our review of an application for a
national bank charter. However, the
final rule enables the OCC to request
audited financial statements in
circumstances where doing so would be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Mar 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
in the best interest of investors or would
further the safe and sound operation of
the national bank.
DATES: Effective Date: April 7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee
Walzer, Counsel, Legislative and
Regulatory Activities Division, (202)
874–4487; Stuart Feldstein, Assistant
Director, Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division, (202) 874–5090; Ted
Dowd, Senior Attorney, Securities and
Corporate Practices, Division, (202)
874–5210; Beverly Evans, Director,
Licensing Activities, (202) 874–5060.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 18, 2007, the OCC
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to streamline the
process for applying for a new national
bank charter by eliminating, in most
cases, the requirement that a national
bank in organization submit audited
financial statements as part of a public
offering of its securities.1 The NPRM
further provided that the OCC would be
able to require such statements if their
inclusion would be in the best interests
of investors or would further the safe
and sound operation of a national bank.
By reference to rules issued by, and
forms required by, the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), the OCC’s
securities offering disclosure regulations
currently require national bank charter
applicants to provide audited financial
statements in connection with
registration statements filed with the
OCC for a public offering of securities.2
However, as we discussed in the
preamble to the NPRM, the requirement
for a national bank in organization to
submit audited financial statements is
not warranted in most cases.3 Obtaining
audited financial statements can be
time-consuming and costly for the
organizing group without resulting in
corresponding benefits. The statements
usually reflect little more than the bank
account of the organizing group and its
organizational expenses incurred and
there is no clear need for this
information to be subject to an
independent audit. The OCC also
typically does not rely on audited
financial statements in deciding
applications for de novo national bank
1 72
FR 59,039 (October 18, 2007).
CFR 16.15 (OCC rule referencing SEC rules
governing form and content of securities
registration statements). See Regulation S–X, 17
CFR 210.3–01(a) (SEC requirement to file
consolidated financial statements); Regulation S–B,
17 CFR 228.310(a) (SEC regulations governing
financial statements by small business issuers);
Rule 1–02(h), Regulation S–X, 17 CFR 210.1–02(h)
(SEC definition of developmental stage company).
3 72 FR at 59,040.
2 12
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12009
charters. The OCC’s process for
chartering de novo national banks is
comprehensive and includes extensive,
ongoing review of the proposed bank’s
management, financial resources, and
business plan. This process provides the
OCC the opportunity to carefully
consider, on the basis of detailed
information, whether the organizing
group has the expertise and resources to
operate a viable national bank. Audited
financial statements typically do not
add materially to the information
already available to the OCC through the
application process.
The OCC received no comments on
the NPRM and, accordingly, we are
adopting the regulatory changes as
proposed.
II. Description of the Final Rule
The final rule is substantively
identical to the proposal, with minor
wording changes to improve technical
descriptions. Specifically, part 16 is
amended to provide a waiver from the
requirement to use audited financial
statements as part of a registration
statement for the offering of securities
for a national bank in organization.
Under the final rule, the OCC will
retain the authority to require audited
financial statements if the OCC
determines that factors particular to the
proposal indicate that such statements
would be in the interest of investors or
would further the safe and sound
operation of a national bank. For
example, the OCC may require audited
financial statements where review of the
registration statement, or any other
aspect of the application to charter a
national bank, uncovers incomplete or
inaccurate information about the
proposed bank’s finances or capital, or
other material inaccuracies or
misstatements.
This final rule is part of the OCC’s
ongoing effort to reduce unnecessary
regulatory burden on national banks,
including applicants for national bank
charters. These efforts include an
internal review of OCC regulations,
which soon will be issued in final
form.4 In addition, the OCC together
with the other Federal banking, thrift,
and credit union regulators recently
concluded an interagency review of
regulations pursuant to the Economic
Growth and Regulatory Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1996 (EGRPRA), the
results of which are described in detail
in a report submitted to the Congress
late last year.5
4 See
proposed rule at 74 FR 36,550 (July 3, 2007).
2222 of the EGRPRA directed the OCC,
together with the Board of Governors of the Federal
5 Section
E:\FR\FM\06MRR1.SGM
Continued
06MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 45 (Thursday, March 6, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12007-12009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4282]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 45 / Thursday, March 6, 2008 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 12007]]
OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS
5 CFR Part 2641
RIN 3209-AA14
Post-Employment Conflict of Interest Restrictions; Revision of
Departmental Component Designations
AGENCY: Office of Government Ethics (OGE).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Government Ethics is issuing this rule to revoke
the designation of a departmental component and to designate two
additional departmental components for purposes of the one-year post-
employment conflict of interest restriction at 18 U.S.C. 207(c), to
change the name of an existing departmental component, and to correct a
clerical error in the name of another existing departmental component.
DATES: The amendments to appendix B to part 2641 (as set forth in
amendatory paragraph 2) are effective March 6, 2008. The additional
removal of a designated component from the listing for the Department
of Commerce in appendix B to part 2641 (as set forth in amendatory
paragraph 3) is effective June 4, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy E. Braud, Attorney-Advisor, or
William E. Gressman, Senior Associate General Counsel, Office of
General Counsel and Legal Policy, Office of Government Ethics,
Telephone: 202-482-9300; TDD: 202-482-9293; FAX: 202-482-9237.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Substantive Discussion
Revocation and Addition of Departmental Components
The Director of OGE (Director) is authorized by 18 U.S.C. 207(h) to
designate distinct and separate departmental or agency components in
the executive branch for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207(c). The
representational bar of 18 U.S.C. 207(c) usually extends to the whole
of any department or agency in which a former senior employee served in
any capacity during the year prior to termination from a senior
employee position. However, 18 U.S.C. 207(h) provides that whenever the
Director of OGE determines that an agency or bureau within a department
or agency in the executive branch exercises functions which are
distinct and separate from the remaining functions of the department or
agency and there exists no potential for use of undue influence or
unfair advantage based on past Government service, the Director shall
by rule designate such agency or bureau as a separate component of that
department or agency. As a result, a former senior employee who served
in a ``parent'' department or agency is not barred by 18 U.S.C. 207(c)
from making communications to or appearances before any employees of
any designated component of that parent, but is barred as to employees
of that parent or of other components that have not been separately
designated. Moreover, a former senior employee who served in a
designated component of a parent department or agency is barred from
communicating to or making an appearance before any employee of that
component, but is not barred as to any employee of the parent or of any
other component.
Under 18 U.S.C 207(h)(2), component designations do not apply to
persons employed at a rate of pay specified in or fixed according to
subchapter II of 5 U.S.C. chapter 53 (the Executive Schedule).
Component designations are listed in appendix B to 5 CFR part 2641.
The Director of OGE regularly reviews the component designations
and determinations and, in consultation with the department or agency
concerned, makes such additions and deletions as are necessary.
Specifically, the Director ``shall by rule make or revoke a component
designation after considering the recommendation of the designated
agency ethics official.'' 5 CFR 2641.201(e)(3)(iii). Before designating
an agency component as distinct and separate for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
207(c), the Director must find that there exists no potential for use
by former senior employees of undue influence or unfair advantage based
on past Government service, and that the component is an agency or
bureau within a department or agency that exercises functions which are
distinct and separate from the functions of the parent department or
agency and from the functions of other components of that parent. 5 CFR
2641.201(e)(6).
Department of Commerce
Pursuant to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 2641.201(e), one
department has forwarded a written request to OGE to amend its listing
in appendix B. After carefully reviewing the requested changes in light
of the criteria in 18 U.S.C. 207(h) as implemented in 5 CFR
2641.201(e)(6), the Director of OGE has determined to grant this
request and amend appendix B to 5 CFR part 2641 as explained below.
The Department of Commerce has requested that OGE remove the
Technology Administration from its list of component designations and
in its place designate the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) and the National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
as distinct and separate components of the Department of Commerce for
purposes of 18 USC 207(c). These two entities formerly were the two
institutes within the Technology Administration, which is currently a
designated component of the Department of Commerce. The Technology
Administration was abolished by the America COMPETES Act, Public Law
110-69 (August 9, 2007). NIST and NTIS are the entities that remain
after the dissolution of the Technology Administration.
NIST was the major component of the Technology Administration
during the latter's existence. NIST's mission is to promote U.S.
innovation and industrial competitiveness by advancing measurement
science, standards and technology in ways that enhance economic
security and improve quality of life. It functions as the lead national
laboratory for providing the measurements, calibrations, and quality
assurance techniques which underpin U.S. commerce, technological
progress, improved product reliability and manufacturing processes, and
public safety. Because the Technology Administration has been
abolished, the
[[Page 12008]]
Director of NIST now reports directly to the Secretary of Commerce.
NTIS is a small entity that performs a Government function
different from that of NIST. NTIS collects information on scientific,
technical, engineering, and business-related research conducted or
sponsored by the U.S. Government and creates a permanent archive that
the public can access. Because the Technology Administration has been
abolished, the Director of NTIS now reports directly to the Secretary
of Commerce.
According to the Department of Commerce, the functions of NIST and
NTIS are distinct and separate from each other and distinct and
separate from every other agency within the Department. This
distinction was previously recognized when OGE designated their parent
agency, the Technology Administration, as a component for purposes of
18 USC 207(c). The act that abolished the Technology Administration
left the NIST and the NTIS in its place.
Accordingly, the Director is granting the request of the Department
of Commerce and therefore is amending the Department of Commerce
listing in appendix B to part 2641 to remove the Technology
Administration from the component designation list and to designate
NIST and NTIS as new components as discussed.
The Department of Commerce has also advised that the name of one
component currently listed in appendix B of part 2641 has been changed.
According to the Department of Commerce, the ``Patent and Trademark
Office'' has been the ``United States Patent and Trademark Office''
since November 29, 1999. Accordingly, the Director is amending the
Department of Commerce listing in appendix B to reflect the current
name of this component.
The Department of Commerce has further noted that the name of one
of its existing components is incorrect. One of the existing components
is listed as the ``Minority Business Development Administration.''
According to the Department of Commerce, this component has never
carried this name. It has always been the ``Minority Business
Development Agency.'' The Director is therefore amending the listing in
appendix B to reflect the correct name of the component.
As indicated in 5 CFR 2641.201(e)(4), a designation ``shall be
effective as of the effective date of the rule that creates the
designation, but shall not be effective as to employees who terminated
senior service prior to that date.'' Initial designations were
effective as of January 1, 1991. The effective date of subsequent
designations is indicated by means of parenthetical entries in appendix
B. The new component designations made by this rulemaking document, as
well as the component name change and the name correction being
reflected herein (which do not affect their underlying component
designation dates), are effective March 6, 2008.
As also indicated in 2641.201(e)(4), revocation is effective 90
days after the effective date of the rule that revokes the designation.
Accordingly, the component designation revocation made in this
rulemaking will take effect June 4, 2008. Revocations are not effective
as to any individual terminating senior service prior to the expiration
of the 90-day period.
B. Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, as the Director of the Office of
Government Ethics, I find that good cause exists for waiving the
general requirements for notice of proposed rulemaking, opportunity for
public comment, and a 30-day delayed effective date. It is important
and in the public interest that the designations herein by OGE of the
specified separate departmental components, which reflect the current
organization of the concerned department, as well as the component name
change, the component name correction and the component revocation, be
published in the Federal Register and take effect as promptly as
possible.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
As Director of the Office of Government Ethics, I certify under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities because it affects only Federal departments and agencies and
current and former Federal employees.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) does not apply
to this rule because it does not contain information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
chapter 25, subchapter II), the final rule will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments and will not result in increased
expenditures by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (as adjusted for
inflation) in any one year.
Congressional Review Act
The Office of Government Ethics has determined that this rulemaking
involves a non-major rule under the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 8) and will submit a report thereon to the U.S. Senate, House
of Representatives and Government Accountability Office in accordance
with that law at the same time this rulemaking document is sent to the
Office of the Federal Register for publication in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866
In promulgating this final rule, the Office of Government Ethics
has adhered to the regulatory philosophy and the applicable principles
of regulation set forth in section 1 of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review. This rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget under that Executive order since it
deals with agency organization, management, and personnel matters and
is not ``significant'' under the order.
Executive Order 12988
As Director of the Office of Government Ethics, I have reviewed
this rule in light of section 3 of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, and certify that it meets the applicable standards provided
therein.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 2641
Conflict of interests, Government employees.
Approved: February 24, 2008.
Robert I. Cusick,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
0
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Office of
Government Ethics is amending 5 CFR part 2641 as follows:
PART 2641--POST-EMPLOYMENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST RESTRICTIONS
[squf] 1. The authority citation for part 2641 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. App. (Ethics in Government Act of 1978); 18
U.S.C. 207; E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p. 215, as
modified by E.O. 12731, 55 FR 42547, 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306.
[squf] 2. Effective March 6, 2008, appendix B to part 2641 is
amended by revising the listing for the Department of Commerce to read
as follows:
[[Page 12009]]
Appendix B to Part 2641--Agency Components for Purposes of 18 U.S.C.
207(c)
* * * * *
Parent: Department of Commerce
Components:
Bureau of the Census
Bureau of Industry and Security (formerly Bureau of Export
Administration) (effective January 28, 1992)
Economic Development Administration
International Trade Administration
Minority Business Development Agency (formerly listed as
Minority Business Development Administration)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (effective March
6, 2008)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Technical Information Service (effective March 6, 2008)
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
Technology Administration (effective January 28, 1992; expiring
June 4, 2008)
United States Patent and Trademark Office (formerly Patent and
Trademark Office)
* * * * *
[squf] 3. Effective June 4, 2008, appendix B to part 2641 is
further amended by removing the Technology Administration from the
listing for the Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. E8-4282 Filed 3-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6345-02-P