Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Commonwealth of Virginia; Control of Particulate Matter From Pulp and Paper Mills; Correction, 12011-12013 [E8-4236]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 45 / Thursday, March 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by
amending the Class E airspace at
Hollister, CA. Additional controlled
airspace is necessary to accommodate
IFR aircraft executing a new RNAV
(GPS) approach procedure at Hollister
Municipal Airport, Hollister, CA.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAAs authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106 discusses the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it establishes
additional controlled airspace at
Hollister Municipal Airport, Hollister,
CA.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
I
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Mar 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E. O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9R, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
signed August 15, 2007, and effective
September 15, 2007 is amended as
follows:
I
12011
Dated: February 29, 2008.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. E8–4360 Filed 3–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
[EPA–R03–OAR–2005–VA–0011; FRL–8537–
6]
*
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Commonwealth of Virginia; Control of
Particulate Matter From Pulp and
Paper Mills; Correction
*
*
*
*
AWP CA E5 Hollister, CA [Amended]
Hollister Municipal Airport, CA
(Lat. 36°53′36″ N., long. 121°24′37″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile
radius of Hollister Municipal Airport and
within 2 miles each side of the 142° bearing
from the airport extending from the 6.5-mile
radius to 13.5 miles southeast of the airport.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on February
22, 2008.
Clark Desing,
Manager, System Support Group, Western
Service Center.
[FR Doc. E8–4276 Filed 3–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
RIN 0790–AH95
32 CFR Part 240
Financial Assistance to Local
Educational Agencies (LEAs)
Department of Defense.
Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is
correcting a final rule that appeared on
February 25, 2008 (72 FR 9949). The
document removed 32 CFR Part 240,
‘‘Financial Assistance to Local
Educational Agencies (LEAs).’’
DATES: Effective date February 25, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: L.M.
Bynum, 703–696–4970.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc.
E8–3479 appearing on page 9949 in the
Federal Register of Monday, February
25, 2008, the following correction is
made:
On page 9949, 3rd column, docket
number ‘‘DoD–2006–OS–0023’’ is
removed.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects errors
in the final rule chart listing Virginia
regulations governing kraft pulp and
paper mills which EPA has incorporated
by reference into the Virginia State
Implementation Plan (SIP).
DATES: Effective Date: March 6, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harold A. Frankford (215) 814–2108 or
by e-mail at frankford.harold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used we mean EPA.
On October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59207), we
published a final rulemaking action
announcing our approval of State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to
Virginia regulations governing kraft
pulp and paper mills (9 VAC 5, Chapter
40, Part II, Article 13). In that document,
in the rule chart for 40 CFR 52.2420(c),
for entry 5–40–1670 published on Page
59210, we inadvertently omitted two
‘‘added’’ definitions, listed two other
definitions that were not part of the SIP
revision, and removed language
providing the historical status of the
definitions not affected by this EPA
approval action. In addition, we
provided an incorrect amendatory
instruction on Page 15209 regarding the
revised compliance provisions (5–40–
1750, formerly entry 5–40–1750A). This
action (1) revises the list of definitions
described in the ‘‘Explanation [former
SIP citation]’’ column for entry 5–40–
1670, and (2) corrects the erroneous
amendatory instruction in part 52 for
entry 5–40–1750.
In the Rule document E7–20568
published in the Federal Register on
October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59207),
E:\FR\FM\06MRR1.SGM
06MRR1
12012
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 45 / Thursday, March 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Amendatory Instruction Number 2 on
Page 59209, Third Column is revised to
read: ‘‘In § 52.2420, the table in
paragraph (c) is amended by adding an
entry for 5–40–1750, removing the entry
for 5–40–1750A, and revising the entries
for Article 13 (title), 5–40–1660, 5–40–
1670, and 5–40–1810 to read as
follows:’’
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because this rule is not
substantive and imposes no regulatory
requirements, but merely corrects a
citation in a previous action. Thus,
notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. We find that this
constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
is therefore not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). Because the agency has made
a ‘‘good cause’’ finding that this action
is not subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as
indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C 601 et seq.), or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. This rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard.
This technical correction action does
not involve technical standards; thus
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, EPA had
made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date of March 6,
2008. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This correction to
the table in 40 CFR 52.2420(c) for
Virginia is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 25, 2008.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
I
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR
part 52 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV—Virginia
2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by adding an entry for 5–
40–1750, removing the entry for 5–40–
1750A, and revising the entries for
Article 13 (title), 5–40–1660, 5–40–
1670, and 5–40–1810 to read as follows:
I
§ 52.2420
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
State citation (9 VAC 5)
State effective date
Title/subject
*
*
*
Chapter 40
*
*
*
Part II
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Mar 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
EPA approval
date
Explanation [former SIP citation]
*
*
Existing Stationary Sources
*
Emission Standards
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\06MRR1.SGM
06MRR1
*
*
12013
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 45 / Thursday, March 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES—Continued
State citation (9 VAC 5)
*
State effective date
Title/subject
EPA approval
date
Explanation [former SIP citation]
*
*
*
*
*
*
Article 13 Emission Standards From Kraft Pulp and Paper Mills (Rule 4–13)
5–40–1660 ............................... Applicability and designa4/01/99
10/19/07, 72
tion of affected faciliFR 59207
ties.
5–40–1670 ............................... Definitions .......................
4/01/99
10/19/07, 72 Existing: Kraft pulp mill, Lime kiln, Recovery furFR 59207
nace, Smelt dissolving tank.
Added: Black liquor solids, Green liquor sulfidity,
Neutral sulfite semichemical pulping operation,
New design recovery furnace, Pulp and paper
mill, Semichemical pulping process;
Revised: Cross recovery furnace, Straight kraft recovery furnace.
Remaining definitions are Federally enforceable as
part of the Section 111(d) plan for kraft pulp
mills (see, § 62.11610).
*
*
5–40–1750 ...............................
*
Compliance .....................
*
4/01/99
*
*
5–40–1810 ...............................
*
Permits ............................
*
4/01/99
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–4236 Filed 3–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0958–200802; FRL–
8539–2]
Determination of Nonattainment and
Reclassification of the Atlanta, GA 8hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
15:33 Mar 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
10/19/07, 72
FR 59207
*
require continued progress towards
attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS
through development of a revision to
the Georgia State Implementation Plan
(SIP) addressing the CAA’s pollution
control requirements for moderate
ozone nonattainment areas. The SIP
revision is due as expeditiously as
practicable, but no later than December
31, 2008. The moderate area attainment
date for the Atlanta Area is as
expeditiously as practicable, but no later
than June 15, 2010. This determination
was proposed on October 16, 2007, and
no comments were received.
Effective Date: This rule will be
effective April 7, 2008.
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2007–0958. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
ADDRESSES:
This rule finalizes EPA’s
finding that the Atlanta, Georgia
marginal 8-hour ozone nonattainment
area (Atlanta Area) has failed to attain
the 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standard (‘‘NAAQS’’ or
‘‘standard’’) by June 15, 2007, the
attainment deadline set forth in the
Clean Air Act (CAA) and Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) for marginal
nonattainment areas. As a result of this
finding, the Atlanta Area will be
reclassified from a marginal to a
moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment
area by operation of law, on the effective
date of this rule. The effect of this
reclassification will be to change the
classification of the Atlanta Area, and to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
DATES:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
*
10/19/07, 72
FR 59207
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stacy Harder, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. EPA Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
8960. Phone: (404) 562–9042. E-mail:
harder.stacy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What is the Background for This Action?
II. What is the Effect of This Action?
III. What is the New Attainment Date for the
Atlanta Area and When Must Georgia
Submit a SIP Revision Fulfilling the
Requirements for Moderate Ozone
Nonattainment Areas?
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Is the Background for This
Action?
The CAA requires EPA to establish a
NAAQS for pollutants that ‘‘may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger
public health and welfare’’ and to
develop a primary and secondary
standard for each NAAQS. The primary
E:\FR\FM\06MRR1.SGM
06MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 45 (Thursday, March 6, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12011-12013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4236]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2005-VA-0011; FRL-8537-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Commonwealth of Virginia; Control of Particulate Matter From Pulp and
Paper Mills; Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects errors in the final rule chart listing
Virginia regulations governing kraft pulp and paper mills which EPA has
incorporated by reference into the Virginia State Implementation Plan
(SIP).
DATES: Effective Date: March 6, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harold A. Frankford (215) 814-2108 or
by e-mail at frankford.harold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we'' or
``our'' are used we mean EPA. On October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59207), we
published a final rulemaking action announcing our approval of State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to Virginia regulations governing
kraft pulp and paper mills (9 VAC 5, Chapter 40, Part II, Article 13).
In that document, in the rule chart for 40 CFR 52.2420(c), for entry 5-
40-1670 published on Page 59210, we inadvertently omitted two ``added''
definitions, listed two other definitions that were not part of the SIP
revision, and removed language providing the historical status of the
definitions not affected by this EPA approval action. In addition, we
provided an incorrect amendatory instruction on Page 15209 regarding
the revised compliance provisions (5-40-1750, formerly entry 5-40-
1750A). This action (1) revises the list of definitions described in
the ``Explanation [former SIP citation]'' column for entry 5-40-1670,
and (2) corrects the erroneous amendatory instruction in part 52 for
entry 5-40-1750.
In the Rule document E7-20568 published in the Federal Register on
October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59207),
[[Page 12012]]
Amendatory Instruction Number 2 on Page 59209, Third Column is revised
to read: ``In Sec. 52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by
adding an entry for 5-40-1750, removing the entry for 5-40-1750A, and
revising the entries for Article 13 (title), 5-40-1660, 5-40-1670, and
5-40-1810 to read as follows:''
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because this rule is not
substantive and imposes no regulatory requirements, but merely corrects
a citation in a previous action. Thus, notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because
the agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 601
et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
governments, as specified by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard.
This technical correction action does not involve technical
standards; thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. The rule also does not involve special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630
(53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings'' issued under the executive order. This rule does not impose
an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of March 6,
2008. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to the table in 40
CFR 52.2420(c) for Virginia is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 25, 2008.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV--Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by adding an
entry for 5-40-1750, removing the entry for 5-40-1750A, and revising
the entries for Article 13 (title), 5-40-1660, 5-40-1670, and 5-40-1810
to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2420 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Virginia Regulations and Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation (9 VAC 5) Title/subject effective EPA approval Explanation [former SIP
date date citation]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Chapter 40 Existing Stationary Sources
* * * * * * *
Part II Emission Standards
[[Page 12013]]
* * * * * * *
Article 13 Emission Standards From Kraft Pulp and Paper Mills (Rule 4-13)
5-40-1660......................... Applicability and 4/01/99 10/19/07, 72 .........................
designation of FR 59207
affected facilities.
5-40-1670......................... Definitions......... 4/01/99 10/19/07, 72 Existing: Kraft pulp
FR 59207 mill, Lime kiln,
Recovery furnace, Smelt
dissolving tank.
Added: Black liquor
solids, Green liquor
sulfidity, Neutral
sulfite semichemical
pulping operation, New
design recovery furnace,
Pulp and paper mill,
Semichemical pulping
process;
Revised: Cross recovery
furnace, Straight kraft
recovery furnace.
Remaining definitions are
Federally enforceable as
part of the Section
111(d) plan for kraft
pulp mills (see, Sec.
62.11610).
* * * * * * *
5-40-1750......................... Compliance.......... 4/01/99 10/19/07, 72 .........................
FR 59207
* * * * * * *
5-40-1810......................... Permits............. 4/01/99 10/19/07, 72 .........................
FR 59207
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-4236 Filed 3-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
