Listing Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Designating Critical Habitat; 90-day Finding for a Petition to Reclassify the Loggerhead Turtle in the Western North Atlantic Ocean, 11849-11851 [E8-4231]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 5, 2008 / Proposed Rules
registrant of an antimicrobial pesticide
product. Since other entities may also
be interested, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be interested in this
action. If you have any questions
regarding this action, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Dated: February 25, 2008.
Debra Edwards,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document and Other Related
Information?
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
In addition to using regulations.gov,
you may access this Federal Register
document electronically through the
EPA Internet under the ‘‘Federal
Register’’ listings at https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
II. What Action is EPA Taking?
Section 25(a)(2) of FIFRA requires the
Administrator to provide the Secretary
of Agriculture with a copy of any draft
proposed rule at least 60 days before
signing it for publication in the Federal
Register. Similarly, section 21(b) of
FIFRA requires the Administrator to
provide the Secretary of Health and
Human Services with a copy of any
draft proposed rule pertaining to a
public health pesticide at least 60 days
before signing it for publication in the
Federal Register. The draft proposed
rule is not available to the public until
after it has been signed by EPA. If either
Secretary comments in writing
regarding the draft proposed rule within
30 days after receiving it, the
Administrator shall include in the
proposed rule when published in the
Federal Register the comments of the
Secretary and the Administrator’s
response to those comments. If the
Secretary does not comment in writing
within 30 days after receiving the draft
proposed rule, the Administrator may
sign the proposed regulation for
publication in the Federal Register
anytime after the 30–day period.
III. Do Any Statutory and Executive
Order Reviews Apply to this
Notification?
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
No. This document is not a proposed
rule, it is merely a notification of
submission to the Secretaries of
Agriculture and Health and Human
Services. As such, none of the
regulatory assessment requirements
apply to this document.
List of Subjects in Parts 158 and 161
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and record keeping
requirements.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:23 Mar 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
[FR Doc. E8–4144 Filed 3–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Docket No. 080110038–8248–01]
RIN 0648–XF03
Listing Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife and Designating Critical
Habitat; 90–day Finding for a Petition
to Reclassify the Loggerhead Turtle in
the Western North Atlantic Ocean
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: 90–day petition finding; request
for information and comments.
AGENCY:
We, NMFS, announce the 90–
day finding for a petition to reclassify
loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) in
the western North Atlantic Ocean as a
Distinct Population Segment (DPS) with
endangered status and designate critical
habitat under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (ESA). The
loggerhead is currently listed as
threatened throughout its range. We find
that the petition presents substantial
scientific information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted.
We have initiated a review of the
status of the species to determine
whether the petitioned action is
warranted and to determine whether
any additional changes to the current
listing of the loggerhead turtle are
warranted. To ensure a comprehensive
review, we solicit information and
comments pertaining to this species
from any interested party.
DATES: Written comments and
information related to this petition
finding must be received [see
ADDRESSES] by May 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘0648–XF03’’, by any one
of the following methods:
• Electronic submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: 978–281–9394, Attention:
Barbara Schroeder
• Mail: Information on paper, disk, or
CD-ROM should be addressed to the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11849
Director of the Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Schroeder by phone 301–713–
2322, fax 301–427–2522, or e-mail
barbara.schroeder@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the ESA (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires us to make
a finding as to whether a petition to list,
delist, or reclassify a species presents
substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted. Our
implementing regulations (50 CFR
424.14) define ‘‘substantial information’’
as the amount of information that would
lead a reasonable person to believe that
the measure proposed in the petition
may be warranted. In determining
whether substantial information exists,
we take into account several factors,
including information submitted with,
and referenced in, the petition and all
other information readily available in
our files. To the maximum extent
practicable, this finding is to be made
within 90 days of the receipt of the
petition, and the finding is to be
published promptly in the Federal
Register. If we find that a petition
presents substantial information
indicating that the requested action may
be warranted, we are also required to
conduct a status review of the species.
The determination of whether the
petitioned action is warranted must be
made within 1 year of the receipt of the
petition.
Analysis of Petition
On November 16, 2007, we received
a petition from Oceana and the Center
for Biological Diversity requesting that
loggerhead turtles in the western North
Atlantic Ocean be reclassified as a DPS
(see Petition Finding section below for
discussion on Distinct Population
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
11850
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 5, 2008 / Proposed Rules
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Segments) with endangered status and
that critical habitat be designated.
The petition contains a detailed
description of the species’ natural
history and status, including
information on distribution and
movements, population structure,
behavior, population status and trends,
and factors contributing to the current
status of the species in the western
North Atlantic Ocean. The petitioners
assert that the western North Atlantic
loggerhead is discrete from loggerhead
populations found elsewhere due to
physical, genetic, physiological,
ecological, and behavioral factors, and
they provide information they believe
supports this assertion. The petitioners
further assert that the western North
Atlantic loggerhead population is both
biologically and ecologically significant
relative to the species. The petitioners
maintain that the western North
Atlantic loggerhead nesting population
has undergone a marked decline in
recent decades, and cite coastal
development, bycatch in fisheries,
marine pollution, and global warming as
primary threats to the population. The
petitioners provide information on the
western North Atlantic loggerhead
relative to the ESA section 4(a)(1)
factors and assert that the western North
Atlantic loggerhead population warrants
an endangered listing.
Finally, the petitioners request that, if
the western North Atlantic loggerhead is
not determined to meet the DPS criteria,
loggerheads throughout the Atlantic
Ocean be designated as a DPS and listed
as endangered.
Petition Finding
Based on the above information and
criteria specified in 50 CFR 424.14(b)(2),
we find the petitioners present
substantial scientific and commercial
information indicating that a
reclassification of the loggerhead in the
western North Atlantic Ocean as a DPS
and listing of that DPS as endangered
may be warranted. The ESA defines a
‘‘species’’ as ’’...any subspecies of fish or
wildlife or plants and any distinct
population segment of any species of
vertebrate fish or wildlife which
interbreeds when mature.’’ NMFS and
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (the
Services) published a joint policy
defining the phrase ‘‘distinct population
segment’’ on February 7, 1996 (61 FR
4722). Two elements are considered in
a decision on whether a population
segment qualifies as a DPS under the
ESA: discreteness of the population
segment in relation to the remainder of
the species and significance of the
population segment to the species. If a
population segment qualifies as a DPS,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:23 Mar 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
the conservation status of that DPS is
evaluated to determine whether it is
threatened or endangered. Under
section 4(b)(3) of the ESA, an affirmative
90–day finding requires that we
commence a status review on the
loggerhead turtle. The Services recently
completed a 5–year review of the
loggerhead turtle, as required under
section 4(c)(2) of the ESA (NMFS and
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2007).
This review recommended that a full
status review of the loggerhead be
conducted in accordance with the DPS
policy. We have initiated this review,
and, once it has been completed, we
will make a finding on whether
reclassification of the loggerhead in the
western North Atlantic Ocean as
endangered is warranted, warranted but
precluded by higher priority listing
actions, or not warranted, as required by
section 4(b)(3)(B) of the ESA. The
review will also consider whether any
additional changes to the current
globally threatened listing for the
loggerhead are warranted.
There is no critical habitat designated
for the loggerhead turtle. The ESA
currently requires us to make a critical
habitat determination concurrent with
listing determinations. The ESA defines
‘‘critical habitat’’ as
’’...the specific areas within the
geographical area occupied by the species, at
the time it is listed... on which are found
those physical or biological features (I)
essential to the conservation of the species
and (II) which may require special
management considerations or protection;
and... specific areas outside the geographical
area occupied by the species at the time it is
listed... upon a determination by the
Secretary that such areas are essential for the
conservation of the species.’’
Section 4(a)(1) Factors and Basis for
Determination
Under section 4(a)(1) of the ESA and
the implementing regulations at 50 CFR
424.11(c), a species shall be reclassified
if the Secretary of Commerce or the
Secretary of the Interior, as appropriate,
determines, based on the best scientific
and commercial data available after
conducting a review of the species’
status, that the species is threatened or
endangered because of any of the
following factors: (1) Present or
threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range; (2)
overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes; (3) disease or predation; (4)
inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; or (5) other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Information Solicited
To ensure that the status review is
complete and based on the best
available data, we solicit information
and comments on whether loggerhead
turtles in the western North Atlantic
Ocean, or any other area, qualify as a
DPS and, if so, whether it should be
classified as threatened or endangered.
Specifically, we are soliciting
information in the following areas
relative to loggerheads in the western
North Atlantic and elsewhere: (1)
Historical and current population status
and trends; (2) historical and current
distribution; (3) migratory movements
and behavior; (4) genetic population
structure; (5) current or planned
activities that may adversely impact
loggerheads; and (6) ongoing efforts to
protect loggerheads.
We also request information on areas
within U.S. jurisdiction that may qualify
as critical habitat for loggerhead turtles,
both in the western North Atlantic
Ocean and elsewhere within the
species’ range. Areas that include the
physical and biological features
essential to the conservation of the
species that may require special
management considerations or
protection should be identified. Areas
outside the present range should also be
identified if such areas are essential to
the conservation of the species.
Essential features include, but are not
limited to: (1) space for individual
growth and for normal behavior; (2)
food, water, air, light, minerals, or other
nutritional or physiological
requirements; (3) cover or shelter; (4)
sites for reproduction and development
of offspring; and (5) habitats that are
protected from disturbance or are
representative of the historical,
geographical and ecological
distributions of the species (50 CFR
424.12).
We request that all data, information,
and comments be accompanied by
supporting documentation such as
maps, bibliographic references, or
reprints of pertinent publications. All
submissions should contain the
submitter’s name, address, and any
association, institution, or business that
the person represents. Comments and
materials received will be available for
public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours at the
above address (see ADDRESSES).
Peer Review
For listings, delistings, and
reclassifications under the ESA, the
Services issued a joint policy for peer
review of the scientific data (59 FR
34270, July 1, 1994). On January 14,
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 5, 2008 / Proposed Rules
2005, the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) published its Final
Information Quality Bulletin for Peer
Review (70 FR 2664). The intent of the
peer review policy and the OMB
Information Quality Bulletin for Peer
Review is to ensure that listings are
based on the best scientific and
commercial data available. We are
soliciting the names of recognized
experts in the field that could serve as
peer reviewers for the loggerhead status
review. Independent peer reviewers will
be selected from the academic and
scientific community, applicable tribal
and other Native American groups,
Federal and state agencies, the private
sector, and public interest groups.
References Cited
National Marine Fisheries Service and
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007.
Loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta)
5–year review: summary and evaluation.
65 pp.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: February 28, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory
Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–4231 Filed 3–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 070717351–7373–01]
RIN 0648–AV64
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Individual Fishing
Quota Program; Community
Development Quota Program
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to
modify both the Individual Fishing
Quota (IFQ) Program and the
Community Development Quota (CDQ)
Program for the fixed-gear commercial
Pacific halibut and sablefish fisheries.
This action would amend current
regulations to remove a prohibition
against the use of longline pot fishing
gear in the Bering Sea sablefish IFQ and
sablefish CDQ fisheries in the month of
June. This action also would add
regulatory provisions to allow members
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:23 Mar 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
of the National Guard and military
reserves who are mobilized to active
duty to temporarily transfer their annual
halibut and sablefish IFQ to other
eligible IFQ recipients. This action is
necessary to increase the efficiency of
fishermen operating longline pot vessels
in the Bering Sea sablefish fishery and
to allow guardsmen and reservists to
accrue some economic benefit from
their annual IFQ if unable to harvest it
due to military service. This proposed
action is intended to promote the
conservation and management
provisions in the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Management Area
(FMP) and the Northern Pacific Halibut
Act of 1982 (Halibut Act).
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than April 4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit
comments, identified by ‘‘RIN 0648–
AV64’’ by any of the following methods:
• Webform at the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
• Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Hand Delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK.
• Fax: 907–586–7557.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments must be in Microsoft Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe portable
document file (pdf) file formats to be
accepted.
Copies of the Categorical Exclusion
(CE), Regulatory Impact Review (RIR),
and Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) prepared for this action
may be obtained from the North Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council)
at 605 West 4th, Suite 306, Anchorage,
Alaska 99501–2252, 907–271–2809, or
the NMFS Alaska Region, P.O. Box
21668, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn: Ellen
Sebastian, and on the NMFS Alaska
Region website at https://
www.fakr.noaa.gov.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this rule may
be submitted to NMFS at the above
address, and by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax
to 202–395–7285.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11851
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Obren Davis, 907–586–7228 or
obren.davis@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the U.S. groundfish fisheries of
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
(BSAI) in the Exclusive Economic Zone
(EEZ) under the BSAI FMP. The FMP
was prepared by the Council under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16
U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) (Magnuson-Stevens
Act) and is implemented by regulations
at 50 CFR part 679. General regulations
that pertain to U.S. fisheries appear at
subpart H of 50 CFR part 600. NMFS
manages fishing for sablefish
(Anoplopoma fimbria) through
regulations established under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Sablefish is managed as a groundfish
species under the FMP, as well as under
the IFQ Program (described below) that
allocates sablefish and Pacific halibut
(Hippoglossus stenolepis) harvesting
privileges among U.S. fishermen.
The International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC) and NMFS manage
fishing for Pacific halibut through
regulations established under the
authority of the Convention between the
United States and Canada for the
Preservation of the Halibut Fishery of
the Northern Pacific Ocean and Bering
Sea (Convention) and the Halibut Act.
The IPHC promulgates regulations
pursuant to the Convention. The IPHC’s
regulations are subject to approval by
the Secretary of State with concurrence
from the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary). After approval by these two
officials, the IPHC regulations are
published in the Federal Register as
annual management measures pursuant
to 50 CFR 300.62 (72 FR 11792; March
14, 2007). Federal regulations governing
the halibut fisheries in the BSAI
management area appear at 50 CFR parts
300 and 679.
Background and Need for Action
A. The IFQ Program
The Council, under the authority of
the Halibut Act (with respect to Pacific
halibut) and the Magnuson-Stevens Act
(with respect to sablefish), adopted the
IFQ Program in 1991. The Halibut and
Sablefish IFQ Program established a
limited access system for managing the
fixed gear Pacific halibut fishery in
Convention waters in and off Alaska
and sablefish fisheries in waters of the
EEZ, located between 3 and 200 miles
off Alaska. The IFQ Program was
approved by NMFS in January 1993,
and promulgated in Federal regulation
on November 9, 1993 (58 FR 59375).
Fishing under the Halibut and Sablefish
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 5, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11849-11851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4231]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
[Docket No. 080110038-8248-01]
RIN 0648-XF03
Listing Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Designating
Critical Habitat; 90-day Finding for a Petition to Reclassify the
Loggerhead Turtle in the Western North Atlantic Ocean
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: 90-day petition finding; request for information and comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, NMFS, announce the 90-day finding for a petition to
reclassify loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) in the western North
Atlantic Ocean as a Distinct Population Segment (DPS) with endangered
status and designate critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (ESA). The loggerhead is currently listed as
threatened throughout its range. We find that the petition presents
substantial scientific information indicating that the petitioned
action may be warranted.
We have initiated a review of the status of the species to
determine whether the petitioned action is warranted and to determine
whether any additional changes to the current listing of the loggerhead
turtle are warranted. To ensure a comprehensive review, we solicit
information and comments pertaining to this species from any interested
party.
DATES: Written comments and information related to this petition
finding must be received [see ADDRESSES] by May 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``0648-XF03'', by any
one of the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Fax: 978-281-9394, Attention: Barbara Schroeder
Mail: Information on paper, disk, or CD-ROM should be
addressed to the Director of the Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Schroeder by phone 301-713-
2322, fax 301-427-2522, or e-mail barbara.schroeder@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires us
to make a finding as to whether a petition to list, delist, or
reclassify a species presents substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted. Our
implementing regulations (50 CFR 424.14) define ``substantial
information'' as the amount of information that would lead a reasonable
person to believe that the measure proposed in the petition may be
warranted. In determining whether substantial information exists, we
take into account several factors, including information submitted
with, and referenced in, the petition and all other information readily
available in our files. To the maximum extent practicable, this finding
is to be made within 90 days of the receipt of the petition, and the
finding is to be published promptly in the Federal Register. If we find
that a petition presents substantial information indicating that the
requested action may be warranted, we are also required to conduct a
status review of the species. The determination of whether the
petitioned action is warranted must be made within 1 year of the
receipt of the petition.
Analysis of Petition
On November 16, 2007, we received a petition from Oceana and the
Center for Biological Diversity requesting that loggerhead turtles in
the western North Atlantic Ocean be reclassified as a DPS (see Petition
Finding section below for discussion on Distinct Population
[[Page 11850]]
Segments) with endangered status and that critical habitat be
designated.
The petition contains a detailed description of the species'
natural history and status, including information on distribution and
movements, population structure, behavior, population status and
trends, and factors contributing to the current status of the species
in the western North Atlantic Ocean. The petitioners assert that the
western North Atlantic loggerhead is discrete from loggerhead
populations found elsewhere due to physical, genetic, physiological,
ecological, and behavioral factors, and they provide information they
believe supports this assertion. The petitioners further assert that
the western North Atlantic loggerhead population is both biologically
and ecologically significant relative to the species. The petitioners
maintain that the western North Atlantic loggerhead nesting population
has undergone a marked decline in recent decades, and cite coastal
development, bycatch in fisheries, marine pollution, and global warming
as primary threats to the population. The petitioners provide
information on the western North Atlantic loggerhead relative to the
ESA section 4(a)(1) factors and assert that the western North Atlantic
loggerhead population warrants an endangered listing.
Finally, the petitioners request that, if the western North
Atlantic loggerhead is not determined to meet the DPS criteria,
loggerheads throughout the Atlantic Ocean be designated as a DPS and
listed as endangered.
Petition Finding
Based on the above information and criteria specified in 50 CFR
424.14(b)(2), we find the petitioners present substantial scientific
and commercial information indicating that a reclassification of the
loggerhead in the western North Atlantic Ocean as a DPS and listing of
that DPS as endangered may be warranted. The ESA defines a ``species''
as ''...any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants and any distinct
population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife which
interbreeds when mature.'' NMFS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(the Services) published a joint policy defining the phrase ``distinct
population segment'' on February 7, 1996 (61 FR 4722). Two elements are
considered in a decision on whether a population segment qualifies as a
DPS under the ESA: discreteness of the population segment in relation
to the remainder of the species and significance of the population
segment to the species. If a population segment qualifies as a DPS, the
conservation status of that DPS is evaluated to determine whether it is
threatened or endangered. Under section 4(b)(3) of the ESA, an
affirmative 90-day finding requires that we commence a status review on
the loggerhead turtle. The Services recently completed a 5-year review
of the loggerhead turtle, as required under section 4(c)(2) of the ESA
(NMFS and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2007). This review
recommended that a full status review of the loggerhead be conducted in
accordance with the DPS policy. We have initiated this review, and,
once it has been completed, we will make a finding on whether
reclassification of the loggerhead in the western North Atlantic Ocean
as endangered is warranted, warranted but precluded by higher priority
listing actions, or not warranted, as required by section 4(b)(3)(B) of
the ESA. The review will also consider whether any additional changes
to the current globally threatened listing for the loggerhead are
warranted.
There is no critical habitat designated for the loggerhead turtle.
The ESA currently requires us to make a critical habitat determination
concurrent with listing determinations. The ESA defines ``critical
habitat'' as
''...the specific areas within the geographical area occupied by
the species, at the time it is listed... on which are found those
physical or biological features (I) essential to the conservation of
the species and (II) which may require special management
considerations or protection; and... specific areas outside the
geographical area occupied by the species at the time it is
listed... upon a determination by the Secretary that such areas are
essential for the conservation of the species.''
Section 4(a)(1) Factors and Basis for Determination
Under section 4(a)(1) of the ESA and the implementing regulations
at 50 CFR 424.11(c), a species shall be reclassified if the Secretary
of Commerce or the Secretary of the Interior, as appropriate,
determines, based on the best scientific and commercial data available
after conducting a review of the species' status, that the species is
threatened or endangered because of any of the following factors: (1)
Present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range; (2) overutilization for commercial, recreational,
scientific, or educational purposes; (3) disease or predation; (4)
inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or (5) other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued existence.
Information Solicited
To ensure that the status review is complete and based on the best
available data, we solicit information and comments on whether
loggerhead turtles in the western North Atlantic Ocean, or any other
area, qualify as a DPS and, if so, whether it should be classified as
threatened or endangered. Specifically, we are soliciting information
in the following areas relative to loggerheads in the western North
Atlantic and elsewhere: (1) Historical and current population status
and trends; (2) historical and current distribution; (3) migratory
movements and behavior; (4) genetic population structure; (5) current
or planned activities that may adversely impact loggerheads; and (6)
ongoing efforts to protect loggerheads.
We also request information on areas within U.S. jurisdiction that
may qualify as critical habitat for loggerhead turtles, both in the
western North Atlantic Ocean and elsewhere within the species' range.
Areas that include the physical and biological features essential to
the conservation of the species that may require special management
considerations or protection should be identified. Areas outside the
present range should also be identified if such areas are essential to
the conservation of the species. Essential features include, but are
not limited to: (1) space for individual growth and for normal
behavior; (2) food, water, air, light, minerals, or other nutritional
or physiological requirements; (3) cover or shelter; (4) sites for
reproduction and development of offspring; and (5) habitats that are
protected from disturbance or are representative of the historical,
geographical and ecological distributions of the species (50 CFR
424.12).
We request that all data, information, and comments be accompanied
by supporting documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, or
reprints of pertinent publications. All submissions should contain the
submitter's name, address, and any association, institution, or
business that the person represents. Comments and materials received
will be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal
business hours at the above address (see ADDRESSES).
Peer Review
For listings, delistings, and reclassifications under the ESA, the
Services issued a joint policy for peer review of the scientific data
(59 FR 34270, July 1, 1994). On January 14,
[[Page 11851]]
2005, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published its Final
Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (70 FR 2664). The intent
of the peer review policy and the OMB Information Quality Bulletin for
Peer Review is to ensure that listings are based on the best scientific
and commercial data available. We are soliciting the names of
recognized experts in the field that could serve as peer reviewers for
the loggerhead status review. Independent peer reviewers will be
selected from the academic and scientific community, applicable tribal
and other Native American groups, Federal and state agencies, the
private sector, and public interest groups.
References Cited
National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service. 2007. Loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) 5-year review:
summary and evaluation. 65 pp.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: February 28, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-4231 Filed 3-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S