Airworthiness Directives; DORNIER LUFTFAHRT GmbH Models 228-200, 228-201, 228-202, and 228-212 Airplanes, 11841-11842 [08-929]

Agencies

• Federal Aviation Administration
• DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 5, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11841-11842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-929]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 5, 2008 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 11841]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0249; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-012-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; DORNIER LUFTFAHRT GmbH Models 228-200, 
228-201, 228-202, and 228-212 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory 
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation 
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe 
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 
condition as:

    During production testing of a batch of control cables, cracks 
inside the cable terminal were detected. Despite the specified 
strength at the date of delivery was achieved, it can not be 
excluded that the mechanical properties of the cable will degrade.

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the 
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 4, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory 
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street 
address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the 
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly 
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, 
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, 
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816) 329-4090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0249; 
Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-012-AD'' at the beginning of your 
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environment, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will 
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this 
proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The Luftfahrt-Bundesamt (LBA), which is the aviation authority for 
Germany, has issued AD No. D-2007-353, dated December 28, 2007 
(referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe 
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    During production testing of a batch of control cables, cracks 
inside the cable terminal were detected. Despite the specified 
strength at the date of delivery was achieved, it can not be 
excluded that the mechanical properties of the cable will degrade.

    This proposed AD would require you to replace rudder control 
cables, part number (P/N) B-422420A00F delivered with European Aviation 
Safety Agency (EASA) Form One tracking number RS52074/05 after January 
1, 2006 (also identified by production batch number 1141044, which is 
printed on the fork end next to the P/N), with FAA-approved serviceable 
rudder control cables.
    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD 
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    RUAG Aerospace Defence Technology has issued Dornier 228 Alert 
Service Bulletin No. ASB-228-269, dated March 23, 2007. The actions 
described in this service information are intended to correct the 
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant 
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they 
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and 
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because 
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists 
and is likely to exist to develop on other products of the same type 
design.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service 
Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in 
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it 
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the 
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these 
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information 
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those 
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are 
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

[[Page 11842]]

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect about 17 products of 
U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 15 work-hours 
per product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. 
The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on 
U.S. operators to be $20,400 or $1,200 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

DORNIER LUFTFAHRT GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2008-0249; Directorate 
Identifier 2008-CE-012-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by April 4, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Models 228-200, 228-201, 228-202, and 
228-212, all serial numbers that are:
    (1) Equipped with rudder control cables, part number (P/N) B-
422420A00F delivered with European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) 
Form One tracking number RS52074/05 after January 1, 2006 (also 
identified by production batch number 1141044, which is printed on 
the fork end next to the P/N); and
    (2) certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight 
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 
states:
    During production testing of a batch of control cables, cracks 
inside the cable terminal were detected. Despite the specified 
strength oat the date of delivery was achieved, it can not be 
excluded that the mechanical properties of the cable will degrade.
    This AD requires you to replace rudder control cables, P/N B-
422420A00F delivered with EASA Form One tracking number RS52074/05 
after January 1, 2006 (also identified by production batch number 
1141044, which is printed on the fork end next to the P/N), with 
FAA-approved serviceable rudder control cables.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Replace the rudder control cables identified in paragraph 
(c)(1) of this AD with FAA-approved serviceable rudder control 
cables following RUAG Aerospace Defence Technology Dornier 228 Alert 
Service Bulletin No. ASB-228-269, dated March 23, 2007, at whichever 
of the follow occurs first:
    (i) Upon reaching 1,200 total hours time-in-service (TIS) on the 
rudder control cables identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD or 
within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 
later; or
    (ii) Within the next 3 months after the effective date of this 
AD.
    (2) As of the effective date of this AD, do not install any 
rudder control cables, P/N B-422420A00F delivered with EASA Form One 
tracking number RS52074/05 after January 1, 2006 (also identified by 
production batch number 1141044, which is printed on the fork end 
next to the P/N).
    (3) Within 30 days after doing the replacement required in 
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, return the removed rudder control 
cables and any held as spares to the manufacturer at the address on 
RUAG Aerospace Defense Technology Dornier 228 Alert Service Bulletin 
No. ASB-228-269, dated March 23, 2007.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information 
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
Standards Staff, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send 
information to ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, 
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, 
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; fax: (816) 329-4090. 
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC 
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA 
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local 
FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain 
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these 
sections if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered 
FAA-approved if they are approved by the STate of Design Authority 
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product 
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in 
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned 
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Luftfahrt-Bundesamt (LBA) AD No. D-2007-353, 
dated December 28, 2007, and RUAG Aerospace Defence Technology 
Dornier 228 Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB-228-269, dated March 23, 
2007, for related information.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 26, 2008.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 08-929 Filed 3-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M