High-Cost Universal Service Support; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 11587-11591 [E8-4143]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Ordering Clauses
45. Accordingly, It is ordered that,
pursuant to the authority contained in
sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 201–205, 214,
254, and 403 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151,
152, 154(i)–(j), 201–205, 214, 254, 403
and §§ 1.1, 1.411–1.419, and 1.1200–
1.1216 of the Commission’s rules, 47
CFR 1.1, 1.411–1.419, 1.1200–1.1216,
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is
adopted.
46. It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
including the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–4148 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am]
Ted
Burmeister or Katie King, Wireline
Competition Bureau,
Telecommunications Access Policy
Division, 202–418–7400 or TTY: 202–
418–0484.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[WC Docket No. 05–337; CC Docket No. 96–
45; FCC 08–22]
High-Cost Universal Service Support;
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission seeks comment on the
Recommended Decision of the FederalState Joint Board on Universal Service,
released on November 20, 2007,
regarding comprehensive reform of
high-cost universal service. We also
incorporate by reference the Identical
Support NPRM and the Reverse
Auctions NPRM into this NPRM. In
addition, we will incorporate the
records developed in response to those
two items into this proceeding.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
April 3, 2008 and reply comments are
due on or before May 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WC Docket No. 05–337
and CC Docket No. 96–45, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
16:22 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in WC Docket No.
05–337, CC Docket No. 96–45, FCC 08–
22, adopted January 16, 2008, and
released January 29, 2008. The complete
text of this document is available for
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554.
The document may also be purchased
from the Commission’s duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800)
378–3160 or (202) 863–2893, facsimile
(202) 863–2898, or via e-mail at https://
www.bcpiweb.com. It is also available
on the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
47 CFR Parts 32, 36, 54 and 63
VerDate Aug<31>2005
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov, and include
the following words in the body of the
message, ‘‘get form.’’ A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
Include the docket number in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
This document does not contain
proposed information collection(s)
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13. In
addition, therefore, it does not contain
any new or modified ‘‘information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11587
Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
Introduction
1. In this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM), we seek comment
on ways to reform the high-cost
universal service program. Specifically,
we seek comment on the
recommendation of the Federal-State
Joint Board on Universal Service (Joint
Board) regarding comprehensive reform
of high-cost universal service support.
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service, Recommended Decision, 22
FCC Rcd 20477 (2007) (Recommended
Decision). We also incorporate into this
NPRM the following two Notices of
Proposed Rulemaking: (1) The Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking released by the
Commission on January 29, 2008, which
seeks comment on the Commission’s
rules governing the amount of high-cost
universal service support provided to
eligible telecommunications carriers
(ETCs), including elimination of the
‘‘identical support rule;’’ and (2) the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released
by the Commission on January 29, 2008,
which seeks comment on whether and
how to implement reverse auctions (a
form of competitive bidding) as the
disbursement mechanism for
determining the amount of high-cost
universal service support for ETCs
serving rural, insular, and high-cost
areas. High-Cost Universal Service
Support; Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, FCC 08–4 (rel. Jan. 29,
2008) (Identical Support Rule NPRM);
High-Cost Universal Service Support;
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
FCC 08–5 (rel. Jan. 29, 2008) (Reverse
Auctions NPRM). We also will
incorporate the records developed in
response to those NPRMs into this
proceeding. We note, however, that
such incorporation of these two NPRMs
does not change or otherwise affect, and
we expressly preserve, the positions of
the Commission members with regard to
those particular NPRMs and the Joint
Board’s recommendation.
Background
2. In the Telecommunications Act of
1996 (1996 Act), Congress sought to
preserve and advance universal service
while, at the same time, opening all
telecommunications markets to
competition. Telecommunications Act
of 1996, Public Law 104–104 (1996).
Section 254(b) of the Act, which was
added by the 1996 Act, directs the Joint
Board and the Commission to base
policies for the preservation and
advancement of universal service on
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
11588
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
several general principles, plus other
principles that the Commission may
establish. 47 U.S.C. 254(b). Among other
things, there should be specific,
predictable, and sufficient federal and
state universal service support
mechanisms; quality services should be
available at just, reasonable, and
affordable rates; and consumers in all
regions of the nation should have access
to telecommunications services that are
reasonably comparable to those services
provided in urban areas at reasonably
comparable rates. 47 U.S.C. 254(b)(1),
(3), (5). Section 254(e) of the Act
provides that only ETCs designated
under section 214(e) shall be eligible to
receive federal universal service
support, and that any such support
should be explicit and sufficient to
achieve the purposes of that section. 47
U.S.C. 214(e), 254(e).
3. In 2002, the Commission asked the
Joint Board to review certain of the
Commission’s rules related to the highcost universal service support
mechanisms. Federal-State Joint Board
on Universal Service, 67 FR 70703,
November 26, 2002. Among other
things, the Commission asked the Joint
Board to review the Commission’s rules
relating to high-cost universal service
support in study areas in which a
competitive ETC provides service. In
response, the Joint Board made a
number of recommendations concerning
the designation of ETCs in high-cost
areas, but declined to recommend that
the Commission modify the basis of
support (i.e., the methodology used to
calculate support) in study areas with
multiple ETCs. Federal-State Joint
Board on Universal Service,
Recommended Decision, 19 FCC Rcd
4257 (2004). Instead, the Joint Board
recommended that it and the
Commission continue to consider
possible modifications to the basis of
support for competitive ETCs as part of
an overall review of the high-cost
support mechanisms for rural and nonrural carriers.
4. In 2004, the Commission asked the
Joint Board to review the Commission’s
rules relating to the high-cost universal
service support mechanisms for rural
carriers and to determine the
appropriate rural mechanism to succeed
the plan adopted in the Rural Task
Force Order. Federal-State Joint Board
on Universal Service, Order, 69 FR
48232, August 9, 2004 (Rural Referral
Order); Rural Task Force Order, 66 FR
30080, June 5, 2001. In August 2004, the
Joint Board sought comment on issues
the Commission referred to it related to
the high-cost universal service support
mechanisms for rural carriers. FederalState Joint Board on Universal Service
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
Seeks Comment on Certain of the
Commission’s Rules Relating to HighCost Universal Service Support, Public
Notice, 69 FR 53917, September 3, 2004.
The Joint Board also specifically sought
comment on the methodology for
calculating support for ETCs in
competitive study areas. Since that time,
the Joint Board has sought comment on
a variety of specific proposals for
addressing the issues of universal
service support for rural carriers and the
basis of support for competitive ETCs,
including proposals developed by
members and staff of the Joint Board, as
well as the use of reverse auctions
(competitive bidding) to determine
high-cost universal service funding to
ETCs. Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service Seeks Comment on
Proposals to Modify the Commission’s
Rules Relating to High-Cost Universal
Service Support, 20 FCC Rcd 14267
(2005); Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service Seeks Comment on
the Merits of Using Auctions to
Determine High-Cost Universal Service
Support, 71 FR 50420, August 25, 2006.
5. On May 1, 2007, the Joint Board
recommended that the Commission
adopt an interim cap on high-cost
universal service support provided to
competitive ETCs to stem the dramatic
growth in high-cost support. High-Cost
Universal Service Support; FederalState Joint Board on Universal Service,
Recommended Decision, 22 FCC Rcd
8998 (2007). Specifically, the Joint
Board recommended that the
Commission cap the amount of support
that competitive ETCs may receive for
each state based on the average level of
competitive ETC support distributed in
that state in 2006. The Joint Board
further recommended that the interim
cap apply until one year from the date
that the Joint Board makes its
recommendation regarding
comprehensive and fundamental highcost universal service reform. The Joint
Board also recommended that the
Commission consider abandoning or
modifying the so-called ‘‘identical
support’’ rule in any reform it ultimately
adopts. On May 14, 2007, the
Commission released a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, seeking comment
on the Joint Board’s recommendation
regarding the interim cap on
competitive ETC support. Federal-State
Joint Board on Universal Service, Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd
9705 (2007).
6. In a companion Public Notice,
released May 1, 2007, the Joint Board
sought comment on various proposals to
reform the high-cost universal service
support mechanisms. Federal-State Joint
Board on Universal Service Seeks
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Comment on Long Term,
Comprehensive High-Cost Universal
Service Reform, Public Notice, 22 FCC
Rcd 9023 (2007). Specifically the Joint
Board sought comment on the following
issues and proposals: (1) The use of
reverse auctions to determine high-cost
universal service support; (2) the use of
GIS technology and network cost
modeling to better calculate and target
support at more granular levels; (3)
disaggregation of support; (4) the
methodology for calculating support for
competitive ETCs; and (5) whether
universal service funding should be
used to promote broadband deployment.
7. Finally, the Commission recently
adopted two Notices of Proposed
Rulemaking, which seek comment on
specific high-cost universal service
comprehensive reform proposals. First,
on January 9, 2008, the Commission
adopted the Identical Support NPRM,
which seeks comment on the
Commission’s rules governing the
amount of high-cost universal service
support provided to ETCs and
tentatively concludes that the
Commission should eliminate the
‘‘identical support’’ rule. Identical
Support Rule NPRM, FCC 08–4. Second,
on January 9, 2008, the Commission
adopted the Reverse Auctions NPRM,
which tentatively concludes that reverse
auctions should be used as the
disbursement mechanism to determine
the amount of high-cost universal
service for ETCs serving rural, insular,
and high-cost areas and seeks comment
on how to implement reverse auctions
for this purpose. Reverse Auctions
NPRM, FCC 08–5.
Discussion
8. On November 20, 2007, the
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service issued its Recommended
Decision regarding comprehensive
reform of high-cost universal service.
Recommended Decision, 22 FCC Rcd
20477 (2007). In this NPRM, we seek
comment on the Joint Board’s
recommendations contained in the
Recommended Decision.
9. We also incorporate by reference
the Identical Support NPRM and the
Reverse Auctions NPRM into this
NPRM. In addition, we will incorporate
the records developed in response to
those two items into this proceeding.
We thus request that parties who file
comments in response to either or both
of those items include those comments
as part of their filings in response to this
NPRM. We note, however, that such
incorporation of these two NPRMs does
not change or otherwise affect, and we
expressly preserve, the positions of the
Commission members with regard to
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
those particular NPRMs and the Joint
Board’s recommendation.
Procedural Matters
10. Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of
the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments on or before April 3, 2008
and reply comments are due on or
before May 5, 2008. Comments may be
filed using: (1) the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS), (2) the Federal Government’s
eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing
paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121, May 1, 1998.
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/
cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Filers should follow the instructions
provided on the Web site for submitting
comments.
• For ECFS filers, if multiple docket
or rulemaking numbers appear in the
caption of this proceeding, filers must
transmit one electronic copy of the
comments for each docket or
rulemaking number referenced in the
caption. In completing the transmittal
screen, filers should include their full
name, U.S. Postal Service mailing
address, and the applicable docket or
rulemaking number. Parties may also
submit an electronic comment by
Internet e-mail. To get filing
instructions, filers should send an email to ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the
following words in the body of the
message, ‘‘get form.’’ A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number.
• Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail
(although we continue to experience
delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service
mail). All filings must be addressed to
the Commission’s Secretary, Office of
the Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• The Commission’s contractor will
receive hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours
at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All
hand deliveries must be held together
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
Ex Parte Requirements
11. These matters shall be treated as
a ‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules. 47 CFR 1.1200 through
1.1216. Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentations must contain summaries
of the substance of the presentations
and not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one or two
sentence description of the views and
arguments presented is generally
required. 47 CFR 1.1206(b)(2). Other
requirements pertaining to oral and
written presentations are set forth in
§ 1.1206(b) of the Commission’s rules.
47 CFR 1.1206(b).
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
12. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 603, the
Commission has prepared this Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
of the possible significant economic
impact on small entities by the policies
and rules proposed in the NPRM.
Written public comments are requested
on this IRFA, which is set forth below.
Comments must be identified as
responses to the IRFA and must be filed
on or before April 3, 2008. The
Commission will send a copy of the
NPRM, including this IRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA). 5 U.S.C.
603(a).
Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules
13. In the Telecommunications Act of
1996 (1996 Act), Congress sought to
preserve and advance universal service
while, at the same time, opening all
telecommunications markets to
competition. Telecommunications Act
of 1996, Public Law 104–104 (1996).
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11589
Section 254(b) of the Act directs the
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service (Joint Board) and the
Commission to base policies for the
preservation and advancement of
universal service on several general
principles, plus other principles that the
Commission may establish. Section
254(e) provides that only eligible
telecommunications carriers (ETCs)
designated under section 214(e) shall be
eligible to receive federal universal
service support, and any such support
should be explicit and sufficient to
achieve the purposes of that section.
14. In this NPRM, we seek comment
on ways to reform the high-cost
universal service program. Specifically,
we seek comment on the
recommendation of the Joint Board
regarding comprehensive reform of
high-cost universal service support.
Recommended Decision, 22 FCC Rcd
20477 (2007). We also incorporate into
this NPRM the following two Notices of
Proposed Rulemaking: (1) The Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking released by the
Commission on January 29, 2008. which
seeks comment on the Commission’s
rules governing the amount of high-cost
universal service support provided to
eligible telecommunications carriers
(ETCs), including elimination of the
‘‘identical support rule;’’ and (2) the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released
by the Commission on January 29, 2008,
which seeks comment on whether and
how to implement reverse auctions (a
form of competitive bidding) as the
disbursement mechanism for
determining the amount of high-cost
universal service support for ETCs
serving rural, insular, and high-cost
areas. Identical Support Rule NPRM,
FCC 08–4; Reverse Auctions NPRM, FCC
08–5. We also will incorporate the
records developed in response to those
Notices of Proposed Rulemaking into
this proceeding. We note, however, that
such incorporation of these two NPRMs
does not change or otherwise affect, and
we expressly preserve, the positions of
the Commission members with regard to
those particular NPRMs and the Joint
Board’s recommendation.
Legal Basis
15. The legal basis for any action that
may be taken pursuant to the NPRM is
contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 201
through 205, 214, 254, and 403 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, and §§ 1.1, 1.411 through
1.419, and 1.1200 through 1.1216 of the
Commission’s rules. 47 U.S.C. 151, 152,
154(i) through (j), 201 through 205, 214,
254, 403; 47 CFR 1.1, 1.411 through
1.419, 1.1200 through 1.1216.
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
11590
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which Rules Will
Apply
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
16. The RFA directs agencies to
provide a description of, and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities that may be affected by
the rules, if adopted. 5 U.S.C. 604(a)(3).
The RFA generally defines the term
‘‘small entity,’’ 5 U.S.C. 601(6), as
having the same meaning as the terms
‘‘small business,’’ 5 U.S.C. 601(3),
‘‘small organization,’’ 5 U.S.C. 601(4),
and ‘‘small governmental jurisdiction.’’
5 U.S.C. 601(5). In addition, the term
‘‘small business’’ has the same meaning
as the term ‘‘small business concern’’
under the Small Business Act, unless
the Commission has developed one or
more definitions that are appropriate to
its activities. 5 U.S.C. 601(3). Under the
Small Business Act, a ‘‘small business
concern’’ is one that: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) meets any additional criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA). 15 U.S.C. 632.
Nationwide, there are a total of
approximately 22.4 million small
businesses, according to SBA data. A
small organization is generally ‘‘any notfor-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and
is not dominant in its field.’’ 5 U.S.C.
601(4). Nationwide, as of 2002, there
were approximately 1.6 million small
organizations.
17. The most reliable source of
information regarding the total numbers
of certain common carrier and related
providers nationwide, as well as the
number of commercial wireless entities,
is the data that the Commission
publishes in its Trends in Telephone
Service report. The SBA has developed
small business size standards for
wireline and wireless small businesses
within the three commercial census
categories of Wired
Telecommunications Carriers, Paging,
and Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications. 13 CFR 121.201.
Under these categories, a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.
Below, using the above size standards
and others, we discuss the total
estimated numbers of small businesses
that might be affected by our actions.
Wireline Carriers and Service
Providers
18. We have included small
incumbent local exchange carriers
(LECs) in this present RFA analysis. As
noted above, a ‘‘small business’’ under
the RFA is one that, inter alia, meets the
pertinent small business size standard
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
(e.g., a telephone communications
business having 1,500 or fewer
employees), and ‘‘is not dominant in its
field of operation.’’ 15 U.S.C. 632. The
SBA’s Office of Advocacy contends that,
for RFA purposes, small incumbent
LECs are not dominant in their field of
operation because any such dominance
is not ‘‘national’’ in scope. We have
therefore included small incumbent
LECs in this RFA analysis, although we
emphasize that this RFA action has no
effect on Commission analyses and
determinations in other, non-RFA
contexts.
19. Incumbent LECs. Neither the
Commission nor the SBA has developed
a size standard for small businesses
specifically applicable to incumbent
LECs. The closest applicable size
standard under SBA rules is for Wired
Telecommunications Carriers. Under
that size standard, such a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.
13 CFR 121.201. According to
Commission data, 1,307 carriers
reported that they were engaged in the
provision of local exchange services. Of
these 1,307 carriers, an estimated 1,019
have 1,500 or fewer employees, and 288
have more than 1,500 employees.
Consequently, the Commission
estimates that most providers of
incumbent local exchange service are
small businesses that may be affected by
our action.
20. Competitive LECs, Competitive
Access Providers (CAPs), ‘‘SharedTenant Service Providers,’’ and ‘‘Other
Local Service Providers.’’ Neither the
Commission nor the SBA has developed
a small business size standard
specifically for these service providers.
The appropriate size standard under
SBA rules is for the category Wired
Telecommunications Carriers. Under
that size standard, such a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.
13 CFR 121.201. According to
Commission data, 859 carriers reported
that they were engaged in the provision
of either competitive LEC or CAP
services. Of these 859 carriers, an
estimated 741 have 1,500 or fewer
employees, and 118 have more than
1,500 employees. In addition, 16
carriers have reported that they are
‘‘Shared-Tenant Service Providers,’’ and
all 16 are estimated to have 1,500 or
fewer employees. In addition, 44
carriers have reported that they are
‘‘Other Local Service Providers.’’ Of the
44, an estimated 43 have 1,500 or fewer
employees, and one has more than 1,500
employees. Consequently, the
Commission estimates that most
competitive LECs, CAPs, ‘‘SharedTenant Service Providers,’’ and ‘‘Other
Local Service Providers’’ are small
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
entities that may be affected by our
action.
Wireless Carriers and Service Providers
21. Wireless Service Providers. The
SBA has developed a small business
size standard for wireless firms within
the two broad economic census
categories of ‘‘Paging’’ and ‘‘Cellular and
Other Wireless Telecommunications.’’
13 CFR 121.201. Under both categories,
the SBA deems a wireless business to be
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.
For the census category of Paging,
Census Bureau data for 2002 show that
there were 807 firms in this category
that operated for the entire year. Of this
total, 804 firms had employment of 999
or fewer employees, and three firms had
employment of 1,000 employees or
more. Thus, under this category and
associated small business size standard,
the majority of firms can be considered
small. For the census category of
Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications, Census Bureau
data for 2002 show that there were 1,397
firms in this category that operated for
the entire year. Of this total, 1,378 firms
had employment of 999 or fewer
employees, and 19 firms had
employment of 1,000 employees or
more. Thus, under this second category
and size standard, the majority of firms
can, again, be considered small.
22. Wireless Telephony. Wireless
telephony includes cellular, personal
communications services (PCS), and
specialized mobile radio (SMR)
telephony carriers. As noted earlier, the
SBA has developed a small business
size standard for ‘‘Cellular and Other
Wireless Telecommunications’’ services.
13 CFR 121.201. Under that SBA small
business size standard, a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.
According to Commission data, 432
carriers reported that they were engaged
in the provision of wireless telephony.
We have estimated that 221 of these are
small under the SBA small business size
standard.
Satellite Service Providers
23. Satellite Telecommunications and
Other Telecommunications. There is no
small business size standard developed
specifically for providers of
international service. The appropriate
size standards under SBA rules are for
the two broad census categories of
‘‘Satellite Telecommunications’’ and
‘‘Other Telecommunications.’’ Under
both categories, such a business is small
if it has $13.5 million or less in average
annual receipts. 13 CFR 121.201.
24. The first category of Satellite
Telecommunications ‘‘comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
providing point-to-point
telecommunications services to other
establishments in the
telecommunications and broadcasting
industries by forwarding and receiving
communications signals via a system of
satellites or reselling satellite
telecommunications.’’ For this category,
Census Bureau data for 2002 show that
there were a total of 371 firms that
operated for the entire year. Of this
total, 307 firms had annual receipts of
under $10 million, and 26 firms had
receipts of $10 million to $24,999,999.
Consequently, we estimate that the
majority of Satellite
Telecommunications firms are small
entities that might be affected by our
action.
25. The second category of Other
Telecommunications ‘‘comprises
establishments primarily engaged in (1)
providing specialized
telecommunications applications, such
as satellite tracking, communications
telemetry, and radar station operations;
or (2) providing satellite terminal
stations and associated facilities
operationally connected with one or
more terrestrial communications
systems and capable of transmitting
telecommunications to or receiving
telecommunications from satellite
systems.’’ For this category, Census
Bureau data for 2002 show that there
were a total of 332 firms that operated
for the entire year. Of this total, 259
firms had annual receipts of under $10
million and 15 firms had annual
receipts of $10 million to $24,999,999.
Consequently, we estimate that the
majority of Other Telecommunications
firms are small entities that might be
affected by our action.
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
26. This NPRM seeks comment on
ways to reform the high-cost universal
service program. Specifically, the NPRM
seeks comment on the recommendation
of the Joint Board regarding
comprehensive reform of high-cost
universal service support. The Joint
Board recommended the creation of
three distinct high-cost funds; a
broadband fund, a mobility fund, and a
provider of last resort fund. If the
Commission ultimately adopts the Joint
Board’s recommendations, new or
additional reporting requirements may
be required for carriers to receive
support under a three-fund approach.
Additionally, the NPRM incorporates by
reference two NPRMs addressing the
adoption of a reverse auctions approach
for distributing high-cost support, and
the elimination of the identical support
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
rule for competitive eligible
telecommunications carriers. Projected
reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements are discussed
in the IRFAs of those NPRMs.
Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
27. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance and reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or part thereof, for
small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(c).
28. This NPRM seeks comment on
ways to reform the high-cost universal
service program, including
recommendations issued by the Joint
Board. The Commission expects to
consider the economic impact on small
entities, as identified in comments filed
in response to the NPRM, in reaching its
final conclusions and taking action in
this proceeding. To the degree that the
other NPRMs that the NPRM includes
by reference offer alternatives that may
minimize the significant economic
impact on small entities, those
alternatives will be considered as well.
Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rules
29. None.
Ordering Clauses
30. Accordingly, it is ordered that,
pursuant to the authority contained in
sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 201 through 205,
214, 254, and 403 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i)
through (j), 201 through 205, 214, 254,
403 and §§ 1.1, 1.411 through 1.419, and
1.1200 through 1.1216 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.1, 1.411
through 1.419, 1.1200 through 1.1216,
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Is
Adopted.
31. It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
including the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11591
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–4143 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 54 and 63
[WC Docket No. 05–337; CC Docket No. 96–
45; FCC 08–5]
High-Cost Universal Service Support;
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission seeks comment on the
merits of using reverse auctions (a form
of competitive bidding) to determine the
amount of high-cost universal service
support provided to eligible
telecommunications carriers serving
rural, insular, and high-cost areas.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
April 3, 2008 and reply comments are
due on or before May 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WC Docket No. 05–337
and CC Docket No. 96–45, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov, and include
the following words in the body of the
message, ‘‘get form.’’ A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
Include the docket number in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20544.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 4, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11587-11591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4143]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 32, 36, 54 and 63
[WC Docket No. 05-337; CC Docket No. 96-45; FCC 08-22]
High-Cost Universal Service Support; Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission seeks comment on the
Recommended Decision of the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service, released on November 20, 2007, regarding comprehensive reform
of high-cost universal service. We also incorporate by reference the
Identical Support NPRM and the Reverse Auctions NPRM into this NPRM. In
addition, we will incorporate the records developed in response to
those two items into this proceeding.
DATES: Comments are due on or before April 3, 2008 and reply comments
are due on or before May 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by WC Docket No. 05-337
and CC Docket No. 96-45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Federal Communications Commission's Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the following words in
the body of the message, ``get form.'' A sample form and directions
will be sent in response. Include the docket number in the subject line
of the message.
Mail: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445
12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: 202-418-
0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted Burmeister or Katie King, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-
7400 or TTY: 202-418-0484.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No.
96-45, FCC 08-22, adopted January 16, 2008, and released January 29,
2008. The complete text of this document is available for inspection
and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257,
Washington, DC 20554.
The document may also be purchased from the Commission's
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street,
SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800) 378-3160 or
(202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or via e-mail at https://
www.bcpiweb.com. It is also available on the Commission's Web site at
https://www.fcc.gov.
Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
This document does not contain proposed information collection(s)
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-
13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified
``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Introduction
1. In this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), we seek comment on
ways to reform the high-cost universal service program. Specifically,
we seek comment on the recommendation of the Federal-State Joint Board
on Universal Service (Joint Board) regarding comprehensive reform of
high-cost universal service support. Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service, Recommended Decision, 22 FCC Rcd 20477 (2007)
(Recommended Decision). We also incorporate into this NPRM the
following two Notices of Proposed Rulemaking: (1) The Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking released by the Commission on January 29, 2008,
which seeks comment on the Commission's rules governing the amount of
high-cost universal service support provided to eligible
telecommunications carriers (ETCs), including elimination of the
``identical support rule;'' and (2) the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
released by the Commission on January 29, 2008, which seeks comment on
whether and how to implement reverse auctions (a form of competitive
bidding) as the disbursement mechanism for determining the amount of
high-cost universal service support for ETCs serving rural, insular,
and high-cost areas. High-Cost Universal Service Support; Federal-State
Joint Board on Universal Service, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC
08-4 (rel. Jan. 29, 2008) (Identical Support Rule NPRM); High-Cost
Universal Service Support; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 08-5 (rel. Jan. 29, 2008)
(Reverse Auctions NPRM). We also will incorporate the records developed
in response to those NPRMs into this proceeding. We note, however, that
such incorporation of these two NPRMs does not change or otherwise
affect, and we expressly preserve, the positions of the Commission
members with regard to those particular NPRMs and the Joint Board's
recommendation.
Background
2. In the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act), Congress
sought to preserve and advance universal service while, at the same
time, opening all telecommunications markets to competition.
Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104 (1996). Section
254(b) of the Act, which was added by the 1996 Act, directs the Joint
Board and the Commission to base policies for the preservation and
advancement of universal service on
[[Page 11588]]
several general principles, plus other principles that the Commission
may establish. 47 U.S.C. 254(b). Among other things, there should be
specific, predictable, and sufficient federal and state universal
service support mechanisms; quality services should be available at
just, reasonable, and affordable rates; and consumers in all regions of
the nation should have access to telecommunications services that are
reasonably comparable to those services provided in urban areas at
reasonably comparable rates. 47 U.S.C. 254(b)(1), (3), (5). Section
254(e) of the Act provides that only ETCs designated under section
214(e) shall be eligible to receive federal universal service support,
and that any such support should be explicit and sufficient to achieve
the purposes of that section. 47 U.S.C. 214(e), 254(e).
3. In 2002, the Commission asked the Joint Board to review certain
of the Commission's rules related to the high-cost universal service
support mechanisms. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 67
FR 70703, November 26, 2002. Among other things, the Commission asked
the Joint Board to review the Commission's rules relating to high-cost
universal service support in study areas in which a competitive ETC
provides service. In response, the Joint Board made a number of
recommendations concerning the designation of ETCs in high-cost areas,
but declined to recommend that the Commission modify the basis of
support (i.e., the methodology used to calculate support) in study
areas with multiple ETCs. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service, Recommended Decision, 19 FCC Rcd 4257 (2004). Instead, the
Joint Board recommended that it and the Commission continue to consider
possible modifications to the basis of support for competitive ETCs as
part of an overall review of the high-cost support mechanisms for rural
and non-rural carriers.
4. In 2004, the Commission asked the Joint Board to review the
Commission's rules relating to the high-cost universal service support
mechanisms for rural carriers and to determine the appropriate rural
mechanism to succeed the plan adopted in the Rural Task Force Order.
Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Order, 69 FR 48232,
August 9, 2004 (Rural Referral Order); Rural Task Force Order, 66 FR
30080, June 5, 2001. In August 2004, the Joint Board sought comment on
issues the Commission referred to it related to the high-cost universal
service support mechanisms for rural carriers. Federal-State Joint
Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on Certain of the Commission's
Rules Relating to High-Cost Universal Service Support, Public Notice,
69 FR 53917, September 3, 2004. The Joint Board also specifically
sought comment on the methodology for calculating support for ETCs in
competitive study areas. Since that time, the Joint Board has sought
comment on a variety of specific proposals for addressing the issues of
universal service support for rural carriers and the basis of support
for competitive ETCs, including proposals developed by members and
staff of the Joint Board, as well as the use of reverse auctions
(competitive bidding) to determine high-cost universal service funding
to ETCs. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment
on Proposals to Modify the Commission's Rules Relating to High-Cost
Universal Service Support, 20 FCC Rcd 14267 (2005); Federal-State Joint
Board on Universal Service Seeks Comment on the Merits of Using
Auctions to Determine High-Cost Universal Service Support, 71 FR 50420,
August 25, 2006.
5. On May 1, 2007, the Joint Board recommended that the Commission
adopt an interim cap on high-cost universal service support provided to
competitive ETCs to stem the dramatic growth in high-cost support.
High-Cost Universal Service Support; Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service, Recommended Decision, 22 FCC Rcd 8998 (2007).
Specifically, the Joint Board recommended that the Commission cap the
amount of support that competitive ETCs may receive for each state
based on the average level of competitive ETC support distributed in
that state in 2006. The Joint Board further recommended that the
interim cap apply until one year from the date that the Joint Board
makes its recommendation regarding comprehensive and fundamental high-
cost universal service reform. The Joint Board also recommended that
the Commission consider abandoning or modifying the so-called
``identical support'' rule in any reform it ultimately adopts. On May
14, 2007, the Commission released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
seeking comment on the Joint Board's recommendation regarding the
interim cap on competitive ETC support. Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 9705
(2007).
6. In a companion Public Notice, released May 1, 2007, the Joint
Board sought comment on various proposals to reform the high-cost
universal service support mechanisms. Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service Seeks Comment on Long Term, Comprehensive High-Cost
Universal Service Reform, Public Notice, 22 FCC Rcd 9023 (2007).
Specifically the Joint Board sought comment on the following issues and
proposals: (1) The use of reverse auctions to determine high-cost
universal service support; (2) the use of GIS technology and network
cost modeling to better calculate and target support at more granular
levels; (3) disaggregation of support; (4) the methodology for
calculating support for competitive ETCs; and (5) whether universal
service funding should be used to promote broadband deployment.
7. Finally, the Commission recently adopted two Notices of Proposed
Rulemaking, which seek comment on specific high-cost universal service
comprehensive reform proposals. First, on January 9, 2008, the
Commission adopted the Identical Support NPRM, which seeks comment on
the Commission's rules governing the amount of high-cost universal
service support provided to ETCs and tentatively concludes that the
Commission should eliminate the ``identical support'' rule. Identical
Support Rule NPRM, FCC 08-4. Second, on January 9, 2008, the Commission
adopted the Reverse Auctions NPRM, which tentatively concludes that
reverse auctions should be used as the disbursement mechanism to
determine the amount of high-cost universal service for ETCs serving
rural, insular, and high-cost areas and seeks comment on how to
implement reverse auctions for this purpose. Reverse Auctions NPRM, FCC
08-5.
Discussion
8. On November 20, 2007, the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service issued its Recommended Decision regarding comprehensive reform
of high-cost universal service. Recommended Decision, 22 FCC Rcd 20477
(2007). In this NPRM, we seek comment on the Joint Board's
recommendations contained in the Recommended Decision.
9. We also incorporate by reference the Identical Support NPRM and
the Reverse Auctions NPRM into this NPRM. In addition, we will
incorporate the records developed in response to those two items into
this proceeding. We thus request that parties who file comments in
response to either or both of those items include those comments as
part of their filings in response to this NPRM. We note, however, that
such incorporation of these two NPRMs does not change or otherwise
affect, and we expressly preserve, the positions of the Commission
members with regard to
[[Page 11589]]
those particular NPRMs and the Joint Board's recommendation.
Procedural Matters
10. Pursuant to Sec. Sec. 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's
rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or
before April 3, 2008 and reply comments are due on or before May 5,
2008. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121, May 1, 1998.
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Filers
should follow the instructions provided on the Web site for submitting
comments.
For ECFS filers, if multiple docket or rulemaking numbers
appear in the caption of this proceeding, filers must transmit one
electronic copy of the comments for each docket or rulemaking number
referenced in the caption. In completing the transmittal screen, filers
should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address,
and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit
an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions,
filers should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the following
words in the body of the message, ``get form.'' A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding,
filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by
commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S.
Postal Service mail (although we continue to experience delays in
receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to
the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission.
The Commission's contractor will receive hand-delivered or
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. The filing
hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be
held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be
disposed of before entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic
files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-
418-0432 (tty).
Ex Parte Requirements
11. These matters shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose''
proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 CFR
1.1200 through 1.1216. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are
reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain
summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a
listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence
description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.
47 CFR 1.1206(b)(2). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
presentations are set forth in Sec. 1.1206(b) of the Commission's
rules. 47 CFR 1.1206(b).
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
12. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C.
603, the Commission has prepared this Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small
entities by the policies and rules proposed in the NPRM. Written public
comments are requested on this IRFA, which is set forth below. Comments
must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed on or
before April 3, 2008. The Commission will send a copy of the NPRM,
including this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA). 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
13. In the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act), Congress
sought to preserve and advance universal service while, at the same
time, opening all telecommunications markets to competition.
Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law 104-104 (1996). Section
254(b) of the Act directs the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service (Joint Board) and the Commission to base policies for the
preservation and advancement of universal service on several general
principles, plus other principles that the Commission may establish.
Section 254(e) provides that only eligible telecommunications carriers
(ETCs) designated under section 214(e) shall be eligible to receive
federal universal service support, and any such support should be
explicit and sufficient to achieve the purposes of that section.
14. In this NPRM, we seek comment on ways to reform the high-cost
universal service program. Specifically, we seek comment on the
recommendation of the Joint Board regarding comprehensive reform of
high-cost universal service support. Recommended Decision, 22 FCC Rcd
20477 (2007). We also incorporate into this NPRM the following two
Notices of Proposed Rulemaking: (1) The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
released by the Commission on January 29, 2008. which seeks comment on
the Commission's rules governing the amount of high-cost universal
service support provided to eligible telecommunications carriers
(ETCs), including elimination of the ``identical support rule;'' and
(2) the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released by the Commission on
January 29, 2008, which seeks comment on whether and how to implement
reverse auctions (a form of competitive bidding) as the disbursement
mechanism for determining the amount of high-cost universal service
support for ETCs serving rural, insular, and high-cost areas. Identical
Support Rule NPRM, FCC 08-4; Reverse Auctions NPRM, FCC 08-5. We also
will incorporate the records developed in response to those Notices of
Proposed Rulemaking into this proceeding. We note, however, that such
incorporation of these two NPRMs does not change or otherwise affect,
and we expressly preserve, the positions of the Commission members with
regard to those particular NPRMs and the Joint Board's recommendation.
Legal Basis
15. The legal basis for any action that may be taken pursuant to
the NPRM is contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 201 through 205,
214, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and
Sec. Sec. 1.1, 1.411 through 1.419, and 1.1200 through 1.1216 of the
Commission's rules. 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i) through (j), 201 through
205, 214, 254, 403; 47 CFR 1.1, 1.411 through 1.419, 1.1200 through
1.1216.
[[Page 11590]]
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which Rules
Will Apply
16. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and,
where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be
affected by the rules, if adopted. 5 U.S.C. 604(a)(3). The RFA
generally defines the term ``small entity,'' 5 U.S.C. 601(6), as having
the same meaning as the terms ``small business,'' 5 U.S.C. 601(3),
``small organization,'' 5 U.S.C. 601(4), and ``small governmental
jurisdiction.'' 5 U.S.C. 601(5). In addition, the term ``small
business'' has the same meaning as the term ``small business concern''
under the Small Business Act, unless the Commission has developed one
or more definitions that are appropriate to its activities. 5 U.S.C.
601(3). Under the Small Business Act, a ``small business concern'' is
one that: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant
in its field of operation; and (3) meets any additional criteria
established by the Small Business Administration (SBA). 15 U.S.C. 632.
Nationwide, there are a total of approximately 22.4 million small
businesses, according to SBA data. A small organization is generally
``any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and
operated and is not dominant in its field.'' 5 U.S.C. 601(4).
Nationwide, as of 2002, there were approximately 1.6 million small
organizations.
17. The most reliable source of information regarding the total
numbers of certain common carrier and related providers nationwide, as
well as the number of commercial wireless entities, is the data that
the Commission publishes in its Trends in Telephone Service report. The
SBA has developed small business size standards for wireline and
wireless small businesses within the three commercial census categories
of Wired Telecommunications Carriers, Paging, and Cellular and Other
Wireless Telecommunications. 13 CFR 121.201. Under these categories, a
business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. Below, using the
above size standards and others, we discuss the total estimated numbers
of small businesses that might be affected by our actions.
Wireline Carriers and Service Providers
18. We have included small incumbent local exchange carriers (LECs)
in this present RFA analysis. As noted above, a ``small business''
under the RFA is one that, inter alia, meets the pertinent small
business size standard (e.g., a telephone communications business
having 1,500 or fewer employees), and ``is not dominant in its field of
operation.'' 15 U.S.C. 632. The SBA's Office of Advocacy contends that,
for RFA purposes, small incumbent LECs are not dominant in their field
of operation because any such dominance is not ``national'' in scope.
We have therefore included small incumbent LECs in this RFA analysis,
although we emphasize that this RFA action has no effect on Commission
analyses and determinations in other, non-RFA contexts.
19. Incumbent LECs. Neither the Commission nor the SBA has
developed a size standard for small businesses specifically applicable
to incumbent LECs. The closest applicable size standard under SBA rules
is for Wired Telecommunications Carriers. Under that size standard,
such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. 13 CFR
121.201. According to Commission data, 1,307 carriers reported that
they were engaged in the provision of local exchange services. Of these
1,307 carriers, an estimated 1,019 have 1,500 or fewer employees, and
288 have more than 1,500 employees. Consequently, the Commission
estimates that most providers of incumbent local exchange service are
small businesses that may be affected by our action.
20. Competitive LECs, Competitive Access Providers (CAPs),
``Shared-Tenant Service Providers,'' and ``Other Local Service
Providers.'' Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small
business size standard specifically for these service providers. The
appropriate size standard under SBA rules is for the category Wired
Telecommunications Carriers. Under that size standard, such a business
is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. 13 CFR 121.201. According
to Commission data, 859 carriers reported that they were engaged in the
provision of either competitive LEC or CAP services. Of these 859
carriers, an estimated 741 have 1,500 or fewer employees, and 118 have
more than 1,500 employees. In addition, 16 carriers have reported that
they are ``Shared-Tenant Service Providers,'' and all 16 are estimated
to have 1,500 or fewer employees. In addition, 44 carriers have
reported that they are ``Other Local Service Providers.'' Of the 44, an
estimated 43 have 1,500 or fewer employees, and one has more than 1,500
employees. Consequently, the Commission estimates that most competitive
LECs, CAPs, ``Shared-Tenant Service Providers,'' and ``Other Local
Service Providers'' are small entities that may be affected by our
action.
Wireless Carriers and Service Providers
21. Wireless Service Providers. The SBA has developed a small
business size standard for wireless firms within the two broad economic
census categories of ``Paging'' and ``Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications.'' 13 CFR 121.201. Under both categories, the SBA
deems a wireless business to be small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees. For the census category of Paging, Census Bureau data for
2002 show that there were 807 firms in this category that operated for
the entire year. Of this total, 804 firms had employment of 999 or
fewer employees, and three firms had employment of 1,000 employees or
more. Thus, under this category and associated small business size
standard, the majority of firms can be considered small. For the census
category of Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications, Census
Bureau data for 2002 show that there were 1,397 firms in this category
that operated for the entire year. Of this total, 1,378 firms had
employment of 999 or fewer employees, and 19 firms had employment of
1,000 employees or more. Thus, under this second category and size
standard, the majority of firms can, again, be considered small.
22. Wireless Telephony. Wireless telephony includes cellular,
personal communications services (PCS), and specialized mobile radio
(SMR) telephony carriers. As noted earlier, the SBA has developed a
small business size standard for ``Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications'' services. 13 CFR 121.201. Under that SBA small
business size standard, a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees. According to Commission data, 432 carriers reported that
they were engaged in the provision of wireless telephony. We have
estimated that 221 of these are small under the SBA small business size
standard.
Satellite Service Providers
23. Satellite Telecommunications and Other Telecommunications.
There is no small business size standard developed specifically for
providers of international service. The appropriate size standards
under SBA rules are for the two broad census categories of ``Satellite
Telecommunications'' and ``Other Telecommunications.'' Under both
categories, such a business is small if it has $13.5 million or less in
average annual receipts. 13 CFR 121.201.
24. The first category of Satellite Telecommunications ``comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
[[Page 11591]]
providing point-to-point telecommunications services to other
establishments in the telecommunications and broadcasting industries by
forwarding and receiving communications signals via a system of
satellites or reselling satellite telecommunications.'' For this
category, Census Bureau data for 2002 show that there were a total of
371 firms that operated for the entire year. Of this total, 307 firms
had annual receipts of under $10 million, and 26 firms had receipts of
$10 million to $24,999,999. Consequently, we estimate that the majority
of Satellite Telecommunications firms are small entities that might be
affected by our action.
25. The second category of Other Telecommunications ``comprises
establishments primarily engaged in (1) providing specialized
telecommunications applications, such as satellite tracking,
communications telemetry, and radar station operations; or (2)
providing satellite terminal stations and associated facilities
operationally connected with one or more terrestrial communications
systems and capable of transmitting telecommunications to or receiving
telecommunications from satellite systems.'' For this category, Census
Bureau data for 2002 show that there were a total of 332 firms that
operated for the entire year. Of this total, 259 firms had annual
receipts of under $10 million and 15 firms had annual receipts of $10
million to $24,999,999. Consequently, we estimate that the majority of
Other Telecommunications firms are small entities that might be
affected by our action.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
26. This NPRM seeks comment on ways to reform the high-cost
universal service program. Specifically, the NPRM seeks comment on the
recommendation of the Joint Board regarding comprehensive reform of
high-cost universal service support. The Joint Board recommended the
creation of three distinct high-cost funds; a broadband fund, a
mobility fund, and a provider of last resort fund. If the Commission
ultimately adopts the Joint Board's recommendations, new or additional
reporting requirements may be required for carriers to receive support
under a three-fund approach. Additionally, the NPRM incorporates by
reference two NPRMs addressing the adoption of a reverse auctions
approach for distributing high-cost support, and the elimination of the
identical support rule for competitive eligible telecommunications
carriers. Projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance
requirements are discussed in the IRFAs of those NPRMs.
Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities,
and Significant Alternatives Considered
27. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1)
The establishment of differing compliance and reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an
exemption from coverage of the rule, or part thereof, for small
entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(c).
28. This NPRM seeks comment on ways to reform the high-cost
universal service program, including recommendations issued by the
Joint Board. The Commission expects to consider the economic impact on
small entities, as identified in comments filed in response to the
NPRM, in reaching its final conclusions and taking action in this
proceeding. To the degree that the other NPRMs that the NPRM includes
by reference offer alternatives that may minimize the significant
economic impact on small entities, those alternatives will be
considered as well.
Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the
Proposed Rules
29. None.
Ordering Clauses
30. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to the authority
contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 201 through 205, 214, 254, and
403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152,
154(i) through (j), 201 through 205, 214, 254, 403 and Sec. Sec. 1.1,
1.411 through 1.419, and 1.1200 through 1.1216 of the Commission's
rules, 47 CFR 1.1, 1.411 through 1.419, 1.1200 through 1.1216, this
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Is Adopted.
31. It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a
copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-4143 Filed 3-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P