Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Monkfish Fishery, 11606-11610 [E8-4124]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
11606
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
work; shifts emphasis among work areas
or tasks; and
(2) Evaluation and acceptance of
reports or other deliverables.
(c) Technical direction must be within
the scope of work of the contract and
any task order thereunder. The
contracting officer technical
representative(s) does not have the
authority to issue technical direction
which:
(1) Requires additional work outside
the scope of the contract or task order;
(2) Constitutes a change as defined in
the ‘‘Changes’’ clause;
(3) Causes an increase or decrease in
the estimated cost of the contract or task
order;
(4) Alters the period of performance of
the contract or task order; or
(5) Changes any of the other terms or
conditions of the contract or task order.
(d) Technical direction will be issued
in writing or confirmed in writing
within five (5) days after oral issuance.
The contracting officer will be copied
on any technical direction issued by the
contracting officer technical
representative.
(e) If, in the contractor’s opinion, any
instruction or direction by the
contracting officer technical
representative(s) falls within any of the
categories defined in paragraph (c) of
this clause, the contractor shall not
proceed but shall notify the contracting
officer in writing within 3 days after
receiving it and shall request that the
contracting officer take appropriate
action as described in this paragraph.
Upon receiving this notification, the
contracting officer shall:
(1) Advise the contractor in writing as
soon as practicable, but no later than 30
days after receipt of the contractor’s
notification, that the technical direction
is within the scope of the contract effort
and does not constitute a change under
the ‘‘Changes’’ clause of the contract;
(2) Advise the contractor within a
reasonable time that the government
will issue a written modification to the
contract; or
(3) Advise the contractor that the
technical direction is outside the scope
of the contract and is thereby rescinded.
(f) A failure of the contractor and
contracting officer to agree as to whether
the technical direction is within the
scope of the contract, or a failure to
agree upon the contract action to be
taken with respect thereto, shall be
subject to the provisions of the clause
entitled ‘‘Disputes’’ in this contract.
(g) Any action(s) taken by the
contractor, in response to any direction
given by any person acting on behalf of
the government or any government
official other than the contracting officer
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
or the contracting officer technical
representative, shall be at the
contractor’s risk.(End of clause)
[FR Doc. E8–4153 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No.071128763–7773–01]
RIN 0648–AW33
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Monkfish
Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS is proposing to
implement new management measures
for the monkfish fishery recommended
in Framework Adjustment 5
(Framework 5) to the Monkfish Fishery
Management Plan (FMP), which has
been submitted jointly by the New
England (NEFMC) and Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Councils
(Councils). This action would
implement revised biological reference
points in the FMP to be consistent with
the recommendations resulting from the
most recent stock assessment for this
fishery (Northeast Data Poor Stocks
Working Group (DPWG, July 2007)), and
implement revised management
measures to ensure that the monkfish
management program succeeds in
keeping landings within the target total
allowable catch (TAC) levels.
DATES: Written comments must be
received no later than 5 p.m. eastern
standard time, on March 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN number 0648–AW33,
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn: Allison
McHale.
• Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Northeast
Regional Office, One Blackburn Drive,
Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside
of the envelope: ‘‘Comments on
Monkfish Framework 5.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Instructions: All comments received
are part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted via
Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats
only.
Copies of the Environmental
Assessment (EA), including the
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) and
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA), prepared for Framework 5 are
available upon request from Paul
Howard, Executive Director, NEFMC, 50
Water Street, Newburyport, MA, 01950.
The document is also available online at
www.nefmc.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allison McHale, Fishery Policy Analyst,
e-mail Allison.McHale@noaa.gov, phone
(978) 281–9103, fax (978) 281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The monkfish fishery is jointly
managed by the Councils, with the
NEFMC having the administrative lead.
The fishery extends from Maine to
North Carolina, and is divided into two
management units: The Northern
Fishery Management Area (NFMA) and
the Southern Fishery Management Area
(SFMA).
In July 2007, the DPWG completed
and accepted a new monkfish
assessment. The results of this
assessment indicate that neither stock is
overfished, overfishing is no longer
occurring, and both stocks are rebuilt
based on a new modeling approach and
newly recommended biological
reference points. In addition to the fact
that this assessment was the first to use
a new analytical model, the July 2007
assessment report emphasizes the high
degree of uncertainty in the analyses
due to the dependence on assumptions
about natural mortality, growth rates,
and other model inputs. The report
concluded that the data-poor nature of
this species and the significant
uncertainty in assessing the stocks
should be considered when developing
management measures. Framework 5 is
needed to implement the revised
biological reference points
recommended by the DPWG and would
make other modifications to the
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
regulations to ensure that the
management program succeeds in
keeping landings within the target TACs
implemented in Framework Adjustment
4 (72 FR 53942; September 21, 2007).
The management measures contained in
Framework 5 are described in detail in
the following paragraphs.
Proposed Framework 5 Management
Measures
1. Revision to Biological Reference
Points
This action would revise the
biological reference points contained in
the FMP to be consistent with those
recommended in the July 2007
assessment report. In that report, the
DPWG recommended that Btarget for both
management areas be set equivalent to
the average of the total biomass from
1980 through 2006. This would
establish a Btarget of 92,200 mt for the
NFMA and 122,500 mt for the SFMA. In
addition, the DPWG recommended that
Bthreshold for both management areas be
set equivalent to the lowest value of
total biomass from 1980 through 2006.
This would establish a Bthreshold of
65,200 mt for the NFMA and 96,400 mt
for the SFMA. The most recent estimate
of biomass for each management area
(B2006) is 118,700 mt for the NFMA and
135,500 mt for the SFMA. Therefore,
under the revised biological reference
points contained in Framework 5, both
monkfish stocks would officially no
longer be considered overfished (B 2006
above Bthreshold), and would be rebuilt
(B2006 above Btarget).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
2. Reduction in Carryover Days-at-Sea
(DAS)
This action would reduce the number
of unused monkfish DAS that a limited
access monkfish vessel is allowed to
carry over from one fishing year into the
next from 10 to 4 DAS. Under this
management measure, the carryover
DAS allowance would represent 13
percent of the total annual DAS
allocated to monkfish vessels (31 DAS)
and 17 percent of the DAS allowed in
the SFMA (23 DAS).
Carryover DAS are intended to
enhance safety at sea by allowing a
vessel, at the end of a fishing year, to
avoid the predicament of using or losing
DAS in the event of bad weather or
mechanical problems. However, the use
of carryover DAS contributed to a
substantial overage (60 percent) in the
target TAC for the SFMA during FY
2006, when vessels in this area were
only allocated 12 DAS for the fishing
year. During that fishing year, carryover
DAS represented over an 80–percent
increase above a limited access
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
monkfish vessel’s base allocation of
monkfish DAS. Therefore, the Councils
are recommending that carryover DAS
be reduced to reflect an amount that is
more commensurate to a vessel’s base
DAS allocation to help ensure that the
target TACs are not exceeded.
3. Revision to DAS Accounting
Provision for Gillnet Vessels
This action would change the manner
in which DAS are counted for monkfish
gillnet vessels. The FMP currently states
that monkfish gillnet vessels are charged
actual time fished on trips less than 3
hours or greater than 15 hours in
duration, but are charged a minimum of
15 hours for trips from 3 to 15 hours in
duration. The intent of this regulation
was to adjust gillnet effort to be more
equivalent to trawl effort, but allow
vessels that run into bad weather or
experience mechanical difficulties at the
beginning of a trip to return to port and
only be charged actual time at sea (i.e.,
trips less than 3 hours in duration).
However, as monkfish DAS have been
reduced in recent years, some vessels
have begun to exploit this 3-hour
window and use it to catch and land
monkfish. As a result, an allocation of
23 monkfish DAS, for example, would
normally allow a vessel to take
approximately 36 15-hour trips. If that
vessel exploited the 3-hour provision,
the number of potential trips could
increase to as many as 184. It appears
that only a few vessels are currently
exploiting this provision, but there is
potential for increased usage, which
then increases the probability that the
target TACs will be exceeded. As a
result, the Councils are recommending
that the 3-hour provision be eliminated,
requiring all monkfish gillnet trips of
less than 15 hours in duration to be
charged 15 hours.
This action would also add a sentence
to the section of the regulations
concerning the monkfish gillnet
accounting rules, found at § 648.92
(b)(8)(v), to clarify that a monkfish
gillnet vessel fishing under a joint
monkfish and NE multispecies DAS,
that is declared as a trip gillnet vessel
under the NE Multispecies FMP, must
remove its gillnet gear from the water
prior to calling out of the DAS program.
The language contained in this section
was recently clarified in a letter from
the Regional Administrator to limited
access monkfish permit holders, dated
August 13, 2007.
4. Revision to the Incidental Catch Limit
in the SFMA
This action would revise the
monkfish incidental catch limit
applicable to large-mesh vessels fishing
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11607
in the Southern New England Regulated
Mesh Area (SNE RMA), as defined
under the Northeast (NE) multispecies
regulations, east of 72°30′ W long., but
not under a monkfish, NE multispecies,
or scallop DAS, or vessels fishing under
a Skate Bait Letter of Authorization
(LOA) in the SNE RMA east of 74°00′ W
long., to be 5 percent (tail weight) of the
total weight of fish on board, not to
exceed 50 lb (23 kg) tail weight per day,
up to 150 lb (68 kg) tail weight per trip.
The Councils are recommending this
change to the incidental catch limit in
response to reports that vessels fishing
for skate as bait in the SNE RMA, using
mesh larger than the multispecies
minimum mesh size (i.e., large mesh),
are targeting monkfish using the existing
incidental catch limit; which is 5
percent (tail weight) of the total weight
of fish on board with no limit on the
amount of monkfish that the vessel can
land. This behavior could undermine
the FMP’s ability to prevent overfishing.
The landings cap recommended by the
Councils in this action is equivalent to
the incidental catch limit applicable to
vessels not fishing under a DAS in the
SNE RMA with small-mesh, hook gear,
or dredge gear.
5. Revision to Monkfish LOA
Requirement
This action would eliminate the
requirement to obtain a Monkfish LOA
to fish under the less restrictive
management measures of the NFMA for
vessels using a vessel monitoring system
(VMS). Monkfish vessels using the
interactive voice response (IVR) call-in
system would still be required to obtain
a Monkfish LOA. The Councils are
considering this action because
requiring an LOA was determined to be
burdensome and unnecessary, given
that VMS screens were recently revised
to enable limited access monkfish
vessels to declare the management area
in which they are fishing when
declaring a monkfish DAS. In addition,
the VMS system enables NMFS to
monitor where these vessels are fishing.
Conversely, although vessels using the
IVR call-in system can now declare the
management area in which they are
fishing through this system, NMFS
cannot monitor where these vessels are
fishing in the same manner as VMS
vessels. Therefore, the Councils are
recommending that the Monkfish LOA
requirement be retained for vessels
using the IVR call-in system.
Technical Corrections to Monkfish FMP
Regulations
Two corrections to the regulations
implementing the Monkfish FMP are
included in this proposed rule. The first
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
11608
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
correction would remove a duplicate
paragraph concerning the impact of
leasing NE multispecies DAS on a
vessel’s monkfish DAS allocation
(§ 648.92(b)(2)(iii)). This paragraph
should have been removed in the final
rule implementing Framework 4. The
second set of corrections would correct
the cross-references to the regulations
implementing the Atlantic Sea Scallop
FMP concerning accrual of DAS and the
Good Samaritan credit found at
§ 648.92(b)(3) and (4). It appears that the
final rule implementing Amendment 10
to the Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP (69 FR
35215; June 23, 2004) revised § 648.53,
thereby inadvertently impacting these
cross-references in the monkfish
regulations.
Classification
NMFS has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the
FMP and has preliminarily determined
it is consistent with the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act and other applicable
laws.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An IRFA was prepared for Framework
5, as required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA consists of the discussion in the
preamble and this section, and the
analysis of impacts in Framework 5. The
IRFA describes the economic impact
this proposed rule, if adopted, would
have on small entities. A description of
the action, why it is being considered,
and the legal basis for this action are
contained in the preamble and in the
SUMMARY of this proposed rule. A copy
of this analysis is available from the
NEFMC (see ADDRESSES). A summary of
the analysis follows:
The primary reason for this action is
to adopt the revisions to the biological
reference points as recommended by the
DPWG. However, additional measures
were included to address comments
from the Regional Administrator and the
public that were raised during the
development and implementation of
Framework 4. As a result, three
additional measures aimed at reducing
the potential for monkfish landings to
exceed the TACs were added to
Framework 5. In addition, a measure to
eliminate the need for a Monkfish LOA
to fish for monkfish in the NFMA for
vessels with VMS was included to
reduce the administrative burden on
vessel operators.
The regulations implementing the
FMP, found at 50 CFR part 648, subpart
F, authorize the Council to adjust
management measures as needed to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
achieve FMP goals. The objective of this
action is to achieve the goals of the FMP
by using the best scientific information
available by adopting new biological
reference points, to reduce the
probability of monkfish landings
exceeding the target TACs by reducing
unanticipated opportunities for
additional landings, and to reduce the
administrative burden on vessels. Thus,
the proposed action is consistent with
the goals of the FMP and its
implementing regulations.
All of the entities (fishing vessels)
affected by this action are considered
small entities under the Small Business
Administration size standards for small
fishing businesses ($4.0 million in gross
sales). Therefore, there are no
differential impacts between large and
small vessels. As of November 30, 2007,
there were 765 limited access monkfish
permit holders and 2,142 vessels
holding an open access Category E
permit. In FY 2006, there were 616
limited access permits holders that
participated in the monkfish fishery
based on vessel trip report (VTR)
records. During the same period, 574
Category E permit holders reported
landing monkish. Based on VTR
information from FY 2006 (the most
recent FY for which complete
information is available) this action
would affect up to 194 limited access
monkfish vessels that would like to
carry over more than 4 monkfish DAS;
101 limited access monkfish gillnet
vessels landing monkfish on trips less
than 3 hours in duration; 21 vessels
using large mesh (and not on a DAS) or
under a Skate Bait LOA in the SNE
RMA and landing monkfish above the
proposed 50 lb (23 kg) per day, up to
150 lb (68 kg) per trip incidental catch
limit; and 105 vessels with a VMS that
fish in the NFMA.
This action does not introduce any
new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
compliance requirements. This
proposed rule does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with other Federal
rules.
Economic Impacts of Proposed
Framework 5 Measures
1. Revision to Biomass Reference Points
This measure would modify the
existing biomass reference points
(Bthreshold, Btarget) for monkfish, consistent
with the results of the most recent stock
assessment. The proposed revision to
the biological reference points does not
immediately affect any vessels because
it does not change any management
measures or otherwise modify vessel
level aspects of the management
program.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Reduction in Carryover DAS
This measure would reduce the
number of unused monkfish DAS that a
limited access monkfish vessel is
allowed to carry over from one fishing
year into the next from 10 to 4 DAS.
Reducing the number of unused DAS
that can be carried forward into the next
fishing year to 4 DAS would reduce the
economic opportunities for those
vessels that would like to carry forward
more DAS. In FY 2006, 186 vessels used
an average of between 8.4 and 9.3 DAS,
depending on management area fished,
in addition to their allocated DAS used,
while 8 vessels did not have carryover
DAS available. An additional 46 vessels
used only carryover DAS, suggesting
they were not constrained by available
DAS. Thus, based on FY 2006 data,
approximately 194 vessels may have
economic opportunities reduced by the
proposed reduction in carryover DAS. A
caveat with this information is that
carryover DAS are used prior to
allocated DAS, making it difficult to
fully assess the impact of carryover
DAS.
When permit holders are
unconstrained by their base allocation
of monkfish DAS, there is no economic
value associated with carryover DAS. In
FY 2006, 240 permit holders used
monkfish DAS, of which 5 permit
holders fished only in the SFMA and
used more than 23 DAS (base allocation
plus carryover), the amount allowed for
use in the SFMA during FY 2007. For
permit holders that fished only in the
NFMA, or both in the NFMA and
SFMA, during FY 2006, 15 had total
DAS usage above the 31 monkfish DAS
allocated to these vessels during FY
2007. In general, this analysis suggests
that 20 vessels would fully utilize their
current DAS allocation, and so could
have value for carryover DAS. However,
the results for the NFMA should be
viewed with caution since recent
revisions to the monkfish regulations
may require higher monkfish DAS usage
in the NFMA. As a result, more permit
holders may be constrained by the FY
2007 DAS allocation, and so have an
economic value for carryover DAS.
While a permit holder may associate
economic value with carryover DAS,
this information does not provide
guidance on how many carryover DAS
a permit holder would value, or the
value they would place on a carryover
DAS. Additionally, other measures in
Framework 5 (e.g. elimination of 3-hour
DAS use) would require higher DAS use
for some permit holders, particularly in
the SFMA. Combined, the information
suggests that while negative economic
impacts would be anticipated for
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Alternative 2 (4 carryover DAS) and
Alternative 1 (6 carryover DAS) relative
to Alternative 3 (no action), the number
of affected permit holders would be
small.
3. Revision to DAS Accounting
Provision for Gillnet Vessels
The proposed action would require
that all monkfish gillnet vessels be
charged a minimum of 15 hours for each
trip, even on trips less than 3 hours in
duration. In FY 2006, 101 gillnet vessels
had DAS charges of 3 hours (0.13 DAS)
or less on 447 trips. The estimated total
revenue generated by these trips was
$891,229. A portion of this revenue
would be lost as a result of this action
since vessels may not have sufficient
monkfish DAS available to convert all 3hour trips to 15-hour trips (i.e., DAS
allocation is constraining). It was
estimated that fewer than five vessels
would fall into this category. However,
it is difficult to estimate the portion of
total revenue lost, since it is not known
how vessels would modify their fishing
behavior to adjust for the elimination of
the 3-hour provision. In general, the
level of economic impact will depend
on future DAS allocations and the
degree to which these allocations are
constraining on limited access monkfish
vessels.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
4. Revision to the Incidental Catch Limit
in the SFMA
This measure would revise the
monkfish incidental catch limit
applicable to large-mesh vessels fishing
in the SNE RMA, but not under a
monkfish, NE multispecies, or scallop
DAS, or vessels fishing under a Skate
Bait Letter of Authorization (LOA) in
the SNE RMA east of 74°00′ W long., to
be 5 percent (tail weight) of the total
weight of fish on board, not to exceed
50 lb (23 kg) tail weight per day, up to
150 lb (68 kg) tail weight per trip. The
proposed action would affect vessels
fishing with large mesh in the SNE RMA
east of 72°30′W long., and vessels
fishing under a Skate Bait LOA
anywhere in the SNE RMA.
Approximately 12 vessels met these
criteria in FY 2006. Only trips that
exceed the proposed incidental landings
limit of 50 lb (23 kg) of monkfish (tail
weight) per day absent, or 150 lb (68 kg)
of monkfish (tail weight) per trip, would
see a reduction in trip revenues, and
thus net revenues. Based on FY 2006
VTR information, three trips taken by
three vessels would be affected with
average lost revenues of $588 per vessel.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:22 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
5. Revision to Monkfish LOA
Requirement
This measure would eliminate the
requirement to obtain a Monkfish LOA
to fish under the less restrictive
management measures of the NFMA for
vessels using VMS. This action would
reduce the administrative burden for
those vessels that have VMS and fish in
the NFMA at some time during the
fishing year, including vessels with a
monkfish incidental catch permit (i.e.
Category E). According to VTR data, in
FY 2006, 322 vessels fished only in the
NFMA, with 263 of those vessels using
VMS or a combination of VMS and IVR
to report DAS for some species.
Similarly, 282 vessels fished in both the
NFMA and SFMA, 262 of which
reported DAS with either only VMS or
a combination of VMS and IVR. This
suggests that at least 525 vessels, or 87
percent of those fishing in the NFMA,
would have the capacity to utilize VMS
to offset the need for a Monkfish LOA
to fish in theNFMA.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 27, 2008
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.92, paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(3),
(b)(4), and (b)(8)(v) are revised to read
as follows:
§ 648.92 Effort-control program for
monkfish limited access vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) End of year carryover. With the
exception of a vessel that held a
Confirmation of Permit History, as
described in § 648.4(a)(1)(i)(J), for the
entire fishing year preceding the
carryover year, a limited access
monkfish vessel that has unused
monkfish DAS on the last day of April
of any year may carry over a maximum
of 4 unused monkfish DAS into the next
fishing year. A vessel whose DAS have
been sanctioned through enforcement
proceedings shall be credited with
unused DAS based on its DAS
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11609
allocation minus any DAS that have
been sanctioned.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Accrual of DAS. Same as
§ 648.53(f).
(4) Good Samaritan credit. Same as
§ 648.53(g).
(8) * * *
(v) Method of counting DAS. A vessel
fishing with gillnet gear under a
monkfish DAS will accrue 15 hours
monkfish DAS for all trips less than or
equal to 15 hours in duration. Such
vessels will accrue monkfish DAS based
on actual time at sea for trips greater
than 15 hours in duration. A vessel
fishing with gillnet gear under only a
monkfish DAS is not required to remove
gillnet gear from the water upon
returning to the dock and calling out of
the DAS program, provided the vessel
complies with the requirements and
conditions of paragraphs (b)(8)(i)
through (v) of this section. A vessel
fishing with gillnet gear under a joint
monkfish and NE multispecies DAS, as
required under § 648.92(b)(2)(i), that is
declared as a trip gillnet vessel under
the NE Multispecies FMP, must remove
its gillnet gear from the water prior to
calling out of the DAS program, as
specified at § 648.82(j)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 648.94, paragraphs (c)(3) and (f)
are revised to read as follows:
§ 648.94 Monkfish possession and landing
restrictions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Vessels fishing with large mesh
and not fishing under a DAS—
(i) A vessel issued a valid monkfish
incidental catch limit (Category E)
permit or a limited access monkfish
permit (Category A, B, C, D, F, G, or H)
fishing in the GOM or GB RMAs with
mesh no smaller than specified at
§ 648.80(a)(3)(i) and (a)(4)(i),
respectively, while not on a monkfish,
NE multispecies, or scallop DAS, may
possess, retain, and land monkfish
(whole or tails) only up to 5 percent
(where the weight of all monkfish is
converted to tail weight) of the total
weight of fish on board. For the purpose
of converting whole weight to tail
weight, the amount of whole weight
possessed or landed is divided by 3.32.
(ii) A vessel issued a valid monkfish
incidental catch (Category E) permit or
a limited access monkfish permit
(Category A, B, C, D, F, G, or H) fishing
in the SNE RMA east of the MA
Exemption Area boundary with mesh no
smaller than specified at
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
11610
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
§ 648.80(b)(2)(i), while not on a
monkfish, NE multispecies, or scallop
DAS, may possess, retain, and land
monkfish (whole or tails) only up to 5
percent (where the weight of all
monkfish is converted to tail weight) of
the total weight of fish on board, not to
exceed 50 lb (23 kg) tail weight or 166
lb (75 kg) whole weight of monkfish per
day or partial day, up to a maximum of
150 lb (68 kg) tail weight or 498 lb (226
kg) whole weight per trip. For the
purpose of converting whole weight to
tail weight, the amount of whole weight
possessed or landed is divided by 3.32.
(iii) A vessel issued a valid monkfish
incidental catch (Category E) permit or
a limited access monkfish permit
(Category A, B, C, D, F, G, or H) fishing
in the SNE RMA under a Skate Bait
Letter of Authorization, as authorized
under § 648.322(b), while not on a
monkfish, NE multispecies, or scallop
DAS, may possess, retain, and land
monkfish (whole or tails) only up to 5
percent (where the weight of all
monkfish is converted to tail weight) of
the total weight of fish on board, not to
exceed 50 lb (23 kg) tail weight or 166
lb (75 kg) whole weight of monkfish per
day or partial day, up to a maximum of
150 lb (68 kg) tail weight or 498 lb (226
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
kg) whole weight per trip. For the
purpose of converting whole weight to
tail weight, the amount of whole weight
possessed or landed is divided by 3.32.
(iv) A vessel issued a valid monkfish
incidental catch (Category E) permit or
a limited access monkfish permit
(Category A, B, C, D, F, G, or H) fishing
in the SNE or MA RMAs west of the MA
Exemption Area boundary with mesh no
smaller than specified at § 648.104(a)(1)
while not on a monkfish, NE
multispecies, or scallop DAS, may
possess, retain, and land monkfish
(whole or tails) only up to 5 percent
(where the weight of all monkfish is
converted to tail weight) of the total
weight of fish on board, but not to
exceed 450 lb (204 kg) tail weight or
1,494 lb (678 kg) whole weight of
monkfish, unless that vessel is fishing
under a Skate Bait Letter of
Authorization in the SNE RMA. Such a
vessel is subject to the incidental catch
limit specified under paragraph
(c)(3)(iii) of this section. For the purpose
of converting whole weight to tail
weight, the amount of whole weight
possessed or landed is divided by 3.32.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Area declaration requirement for a
vessel fishing exclusively in the NFMA.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A vessel intending to fish for, or fishing
for, possessing or landing monkfish
under a multispecies, scallop, or
monkfish DAS under the less restrictive
management measures of the NFMA,
must fish exclusively in the NFMA for
the entire trip. In addition, a vessel
fishing under a monkfish DAS must
declare its intent to fish in the NFMA
through the vessel’s VMS unit. A vessel
that does not possess a VMS unit, such
as a vessel that declares DAS through
the call-in system, must declare its
intent to fish in the NFMA by obtaining
a letter of authorization from the
Regional Administrator, for a period of
not less than 7 days. A vessel that has
not declared into the NFMA under this
paragraph (f) shall be presumed to have
fished in the SFMA and shall be subject
to the more restrictive requirements of
that area. A vessel that has declared into
the NFMA may transit the SFMA,
providing that it complies with the
transiting and gear storage provision
described in paragraph (e) of this
section, and provided that it does not
fish for or catch monkfish, or any other
fish, in the SFMA.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–4124 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 4, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11606-11610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4124]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No.071128763-7773-01]
RIN 0648-AW33
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Monkfish
Fishery
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS is proposing to implement new management measures for the
monkfish fishery recommended in Framework Adjustment 5 (Framework 5) to
the Monkfish Fishery Management Plan (FMP), which has been submitted
jointly by the New England (NEFMC) and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Councils (Councils). This action would implement revised biological
reference points in the FMP to be consistent with the recommendations
resulting from the most recent stock assessment for this fishery
(Northeast Data Poor Stocks Working Group (DPWG, July 2007)), and
implement revised management measures to ensure that the monkfish
management program succeeds in keeping landings within the target total
allowable catch (TAC) levels.
DATES: Written comments must be received no later than 5 p.m. eastern
standard time, on March 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN number 0648-AW33,
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
Fax: (978) 281-9135, Attn: Allison McHale.
Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, NMFS,
Northeast Regional Office, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Mark the outside of the envelope: ``Comments on Monkfish Framework 5.''
Instructions: All comments received are part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted via Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of the Environmental Assessment (EA), including the
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) and Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA), prepared for Framework 5 are available upon request
from Paul Howard, Executive Director, NEFMC, 50 Water Street,
Newburyport, MA, 01950. The document is also available online at
www.nefmc.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison McHale, Fishery Policy
Analyst, e-mail Allison.McHale@noaa.gov, phone (978) 281-9103, fax
(978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The monkfish fishery is jointly managed by the Councils, with the
NEFMC having the administrative lead. The fishery extends from Maine to
North Carolina, and is divided into two management units: The Northern
Fishery Management Area (NFMA) and the Southern Fishery Management Area
(SFMA).
In July 2007, the DPWG completed and accepted a new monkfish
assessment. The results of this assessment indicate that neither stock
is overfished, overfishing is no longer occurring, and both stocks are
rebuilt based on a new modeling approach and newly recommended
biological reference points. In addition to the fact that this
assessment was the first to use a new analytical model, the July 2007
assessment report emphasizes the high degree of uncertainty in the
analyses due to the dependence on assumptions about natural mortality,
growth rates, and other model inputs. The report concluded that the
data-poor nature of this species and the significant uncertainty in
assessing the stocks should be considered when developing management
measures. Framework 5 is needed to implement the revised biological
reference points recommended by the DPWG and would make other
modifications to the
[[Page 11607]]
regulations to ensure that the management program succeeds in keeping
landings within the target TACs implemented in Framework Adjustment 4
(72 FR 53942; September 21, 2007). The management measures contained in
Framework 5 are described in detail in the following paragraphs.
Proposed Framework 5 Management Measures
1. Revision to Biological Reference Points
This action would revise the biological reference points contained
in the FMP to be consistent with those recommended in the July 2007
assessment report. In that report, the DPWG recommended that
Btarget for both management areas be set equivalent to the
average of the total biomass from 1980 through 2006. This would
establish a Btarget of 92,200 mt for the NFMA and 122,500 mt
for the SFMA. In addition, the DPWG recommended that Bthreshold
for both management areas be set equivalent to the lowest value of
total biomass from 1980 through 2006. This would establish a
Bthreshold of 65,200 mt for the NFMA and 96,400 mt for the
SFMA. The most recent estimate of biomass for each management area
(B2006) is 118,700 mt for the NFMA and 135,500 mt for the
SFMA. Therefore, under the revised biological reference points
contained in Framework 5, both monkfish stocks would officially no
longer be considered overfished (B 2006 above
Bthreshold), and would be rebuilt (B2006 above
Btarget).
2. Reduction in Carryover Days-at-Sea (DAS)
This action would reduce the number of unused monkfish DAS that a
limited access monkfish vessel is allowed to carry over from one
fishing year into the next from 10 to 4 DAS. Under this management
measure, the carryover DAS allowance would represent 13 percent of the
total annual DAS allocated to monkfish vessels (31 DAS) and 17 percent
of the DAS allowed in the SFMA (23 DAS).
Carryover DAS are intended to enhance safety at sea by allowing a
vessel, at the end of a fishing year, to avoid the predicament of using
or losing DAS in the event of bad weather or mechanical problems.
However, the use of carryover DAS contributed to a substantial overage
(60 percent) in the target TAC for the SFMA during FY 2006, when
vessels in this area were only allocated 12 DAS for the fishing year.
During that fishing year, carryover DAS represented over an 80-percent
increase above a limited access monkfish vessel's base allocation of
monkfish DAS. Therefore, the Councils are recommending that carryover
DAS be reduced to reflect an amount that is more commensurate to a
vessel's base DAS allocation to help ensure that the target TACs are
not exceeded.
3. Revision to DAS Accounting Provision for Gillnet Vessels
This action would change the manner in which DAS are counted for
monkfish gillnet vessels. The FMP currently states that monkfish
gillnet vessels are charged actual time fished on trips less than 3
hours or greater than 15 hours in duration, but are charged a minimum
of 15 hours for trips from 3 to 15 hours in duration. The intent of
this regulation was to adjust gillnet effort to be more equivalent to
trawl effort, but allow vessels that run into bad weather or experience
mechanical difficulties at the beginning of a trip to return to port
and only be charged actual time at sea (i.e., trips less than 3 hours
in duration). However, as monkfish DAS have been reduced in recent
years, some vessels have begun to exploit this 3-hour window and use it
to catch and land monkfish. As a result, an allocation of 23 monkfish
DAS, for example, would normally allow a vessel to take approximately
36 15-hour trips. If that vessel exploited the 3-hour provision, the
number of potential trips could increase to as many as 184. It appears
that only a few vessels are currently exploiting this provision, but
there is potential for increased usage, which then increases the
probability that the target TACs will be exceeded. As a result, the
Councils are recommending that the 3-hour provision be eliminated,
requiring all monkfish gillnet trips of less than 15 hours in duration
to be charged 15 hours.
This action would also add a sentence to the section of the
regulations concerning the monkfish gillnet accounting rules, found at
Sec. 648.92 (b)(8)(v), to clarify that a monkfish gillnet vessel
fishing under a joint monkfish and NE multispecies DAS, that is
declared as a trip gillnet vessel under the NE Multispecies FMP, must
remove its gillnet gear from the water prior to calling out of the DAS
program. The language contained in this section was recently clarified
in a letter from the Regional Administrator to limited access monkfish
permit holders, dated August 13, 2007.
4. Revision to the Incidental Catch Limit in the SFMA
This action would revise the monkfish incidental catch limit
applicable to large-mesh vessels fishing in the Southern New England
Regulated Mesh Area (SNE RMA), as defined under the Northeast (NE)
multispecies regulations, east of 72[deg]30' W long., but not under a
monkfish, NE multispecies, or scallop DAS, or vessels fishing under a
Skate Bait Letter of Authorization (LOA) in the SNE RMA east of
74[deg]00' W long., to be 5 percent (tail weight) of the total weight
of fish on board, not to exceed 50 lb (23 kg) tail weight per day, up
to 150 lb (68 kg) tail weight per trip. The Councils are recommending
this change to the incidental catch limit in response to reports that
vessels fishing for skate as bait in the SNE RMA, using mesh larger
than the multispecies minimum mesh size (i.e., large mesh), are
targeting monkfish using the existing incidental catch limit; which is
5 percent (tail weight) of the total weight of fish on board with no
limit on the amount of monkfish that the vessel can land. This behavior
could undermine the FMP's ability to prevent overfishing. The landings
cap recommended by the Councils in this action is equivalent to the
incidental catch limit applicable to vessels not fishing under a DAS in
the SNE RMA with small-mesh, hook gear, or dredge gear.
5. Revision to Monkfish LOA Requirement
This action would eliminate the requirement to obtain a Monkfish
LOA to fish under the less restrictive management measures of the NFMA
for vessels using a vessel monitoring system (VMS). Monkfish vessels
using the interactive voice response (IVR) call-in system would still
be required to obtain a Monkfish LOA. The Councils are considering this
action because requiring an LOA was determined to be burdensome and
unnecessary, given that VMS screens were recently revised to enable
limited access monkfish vessels to declare the management area in which
they are fishing when declaring a monkfish DAS. In addition, the VMS
system enables NMFS to monitor where these vessels are fishing.
Conversely, although vessels using the IVR call-in system can now
declare the management area in which they are fishing through this
system, NMFS cannot monitor where these vessels are fishing in the same
manner as VMS vessels. Therefore, the Councils are recommending that
the Monkfish LOA requirement be retained for vessels using the IVR
call-in system.
Technical Corrections to Monkfish FMP Regulations
Two corrections to the regulations implementing the Monkfish FMP
are included in this proposed rule. The first
[[Page 11608]]
correction would remove a duplicate paragraph concerning the impact of
leasing NE multispecies DAS on a vessel's monkfish DAS allocation
(Sec. 648.92(b)(2)(iii)). This paragraph should have been removed in
the final rule implementing Framework 4. The second set of corrections
would correct the cross-references to the regulations implementing the
Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP concerning accrual of DAS and the Good
Samaritan credit found at Sec. 648.92(b)(3) and (4). It appears that
the final rule implementing Amendment 10 to the Atlantic Sea Scallop
FMP (69 FR 35215; June 23, 2004) revised Sec. 648.53, thereby
inadvertently impacting these cross-references in the monkfish
regulations.
Classification
NMFS has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the
FMP and has preliminarily determined it is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and other
applicable laws.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An IRFA was prepared for Framework 5, as required by section 603 of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The IRFA consists of the
discussion in the preamble and this section, and the analysis of
impacts in Framework 5. The IRFA describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A description
of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this
action are contained in the preamble and in the SUMMARY of this
proposed rule. A copy of this analysis is available from the NEFMC (see
ADDRESSES). A summary of the analysis follows:
The primary reason for this action is to adopt the revisions to the
biological reference points as recommended by the DPWG. However,
additional measures were included to address comments from the Regional
Administrator and the public that were raised during the development
and implementation of Framework 4. As a result, three additional
measures aimed at reducing the potential for monkfish landings to
exceed the TACs were added to Framework 5. In addition, a measure to
eliminate the need for a Monkfish LOA to fish for monkfish in the NFMA
for vessels with VMS was included to reduce the administrative burden
on vessel operators.
The regulations implementing the FMP, found at 50 CFR part 648,
subpart F, authorize the Council to adjust management measures as
needed to achieve FMP goals. The objective of this action is to achieve
the goals of the FMP by using the best scientific information available
by adopting new biological reference points, to reduce the probability
of monkfish landings exceeding the target TACs by reducing
unanticipated opportunities for additional landings, and to reduce the
administrative burden on vessels. Thus, the proposed action is
consistent with the goals of the FMP and its implementing regulations.
All of the entities (fishing vessels) affected by this action are
considered small entities under the Small Business Administration size
standards for small fishing businesses ($4.0 million in gross sales).
Therefore, there are no differential impacts between large and small
vessels. As of November 30, 2007, there were 765 limited access
monkfish permit holders and 2,142 vessels holding an open access
Category E permit. In FY 2006, there were 616 limited access permits
holders that participated in the monkfish fishery based on vessel trip
report (VTR) records. During the same period, 574 Category E permit
holders reported landing monkish. Based on VTR information from FY 2006
(the most recent FY for which complete information is available) this
action would affect up to 194 limited access monkfish vessels that
would like to carry over more than 4 monkfish DAS; 101 limited access
monkfish gillnet vessels landing monkfish on trips less than 3 hours in
duration; 21 vessels using large mesh (and not on a DAS) or under a
Skate Bait LOA in the SNE RMA and landing monkfish above the proposed
50 lb (23 kg) per day, up to 150 lb (68 kg) per trip incidental catch
limit; and 105 vessels with a VMS that fish in the NFMA.
This action does not introduce any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements. This proposed rule does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with other Federal rules.
Economic Impacts of Proposed Framework 5 Measures
1. Revision to Biomass Reference Points
This measure would modify the existing biomass reference points
(Bthreshold, Btarget) for monkfish, consistent
with the results of the most recent stock assessment. The proposed
revision to the biological reference points does not immediately affect
any vessels because it does not change any management measures or
otherwise modify vessel level aspects of the management program.
2. Reduction in Carryover DAS
This measure would reduce the number of unused monkfish DAS that a
limited access monkfish vessel is allowed to carry over from one
fishing year into the next from 10 to 4 DAS. Reducing the number of
unused DAS that can be carried forward into the next fishing year to 4
DAS would reduce the economic opportunities for those vessels that
would like to carry forward more DAS. In FY 2006, 186 vessels used an
average of between 8.4 and 9.3 DAS, depending on management area
fished, in addition to their allocated DAS used, while 8 vessels did
not have carryover DAS available. An additional 46 vessels used only
carryover DAS, suggesting they were not constrained by available DAS.
Thus, based on FY 2006 data, approximately 194 vessels may have
economic opportunities reduced by the proposed reduction in carryover
DAS. A caveat with this information is that carryover DAS are used
prior to allocated DAS, making it difficult to fully assess the impact
of carryover DAS.
When permit holders are unconstrained by their base allocation of
monkfish DAS, there is no economic value associated with carryover DAS.
In FY 2006, 240 permit holders used monkfish DAS, of which 5 permit
holders fished only in the SFMA and used more than 23 DAS (base
allocation plus carryover), the amount allowed for use in the SFMA
during FY 2007. For permit holders that fished only in the NFMA, or
both in the NFMA and SFMA, during FY 2006, 15 had total DAS usage above
the 31 monkfish DAS allocated to these vessels during FY 2007. In
general, this analysis suggests that 20 vessels would fully utilize
their current DAS allocation, and so could have value for carryover
DAS. However, the results for the NFMA should be viewed with caution
since recent revisions to the monkfish regulations may require higher
monkfish DAS usage in the NFMA. As a result, more permit holders may be
constrained by the FY 2007 DAS allocation, and so have an economic
value for carryover DAS.
While a permit holder may associate economic value with carryover
DAS, this information does not provide guidance on how many carryover
DAS a permit holder would value, or the value they would place on a
carryover DAS. Additionally, other measures in Framework 5 (e.g.
elimination of 3-hour DAS use) would require higher DAS use for some
permit holders, particularly in the SFMA. Combined, the information
suggests that while negative economic impacts would be anticipated for
[[Page 11609]]
Alternative 2 (4 carryover DAS) and Alternative 1 (6 carryover DAS)
relative to Alternative 3 (no action), the number of affected permit
holders would be small.
3. Revision to DAS Accounting Provision for Gillnet Vessels
The proposed action would require that all monkfish gillnet vessels
be charged a minimum of 15 hours for each trip, even on trips less than
3 hours in duration. In FY 2006, 101 gillnet vessels had DAS charges of
3 hours (0.13 DAS) or less on 447 trips. The estimated total revenue
generated by these trips was $891,229. A portion of this revenue would
be lost as a result of this action since vessels may not have
sufficient monkfish DAS available to convert all 3-hour trips to 15-
hour trips (i.e., DAS allocation is constraining). It was estimated
that fewer than five vessels would fall into this category. However, it
is difficult to estimate the portion of total revenue lost, since it is
not known how vessels would modify their fishing behavior to adjust for
the elimination of the 3-hour provision. In general, the level of
economic impact will depend on future DAS allocations and the degree to
which these allocations are constraining on limited access monkfish
vessels.
4. Revision to the Incidental Catch Limit in the SFMA
This measure would revise the monkfish incidental catch limit
applicable to large-mesh vessels fishing in the SNE RMA, but not under
a monkfish, NE multispecies, or scallop DAS, or vessels fishing under a
Skate Bait Letter of Authorization (LOA) in the SNE RMA east of
74[deg]00' W long., to be 5 percent (tail weight) of the total weight
of fish on board, not to exceed 50 lb (23 kg) tail weight per day, up
to 150 lb (68 kg) tail weight per trip. The proposed action would
affect vessels fishing with large mesh in the SNE RMA east of
72[deg]30'W long., and vessels fishing under a Skate Bait LOA anywhere
in the SNE RMA. Approximately 12 vessels met these criteria in FY 2006.
Only trips that exceed the proposed incidental landings limit of 50 lb
(23 kg) of monkfish (tail weight) per day absent, or 150 lb (68 kg) of
monkfish (tail weight) per trip, would see a reduction in trip
revenues, and thus net revenues. Based on FY 2006 VTR information,
three trips taken by three vessels would be affected with average lost
revenues of $588 per vessel.
5. Revision to Monkfish LOA Requirement
This measure would eliminate the requirement to obtain a Monkfish
LOA to fish under the less restrictive management measures of the NFMA
for vessels using VMS. This action would reduce the administrative
burden for those vessels that have VMS and fish in the NFMA at some
time during the fishing year, including vessels with a monkfish
incidental catch permit (i.e. Category E). According to VTR data, in FY
2006, 322 vessels fished only in the NFMA, with 263 of those vessels
using VMS or a combination of VMS and IVR to report DAS for some
species. Similarly, 282 vessels fished in both the NFMA and SFMA, 262
of which reported DAS with either only VMS or a combination of VMS and
IVR. This suggests that at least 525 vessels, or 87 percent of those
fishing in the NFMA, would have the capacity to utilize VMS to offset
the need for a Monkfish LOA to fish in theNFMA.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 27, 2008
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 648.92, paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(3), (b)(4), and
(b)(8)(v) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.92 Effort-control program for monkfish limited access
vessels.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) End of year carryover. With the exception of a vessel that held
a Confirmation of Permit History, as described in Sec.
648.4(a)(1)(i)(J), for the entire fishing year preceding the carryover
year, a limited access monkfish vessel that has unused monkfish DAS on
the last day of April of any year may carry over a maximum of 4 unused
monkfish DAS into the next fishing year. A vessel whose DAS have been
sanctioned through enforcement proceedings shall be credited with
unused DAS based on its DAS allocation minus any DAS that have been
sanctioned.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Accrual of DAS. Same as Sec. 648.53(f).
(4) Good Samaritan credit. Same as Sec. 648.53(g).
(8) * * *
(v) Method of counting DAS. A vessel fishing with gillnet gear
under a monkfish DAS will accrue 15 hours monkfish DAS for all trips
less than or equal to 15 hours in duration. Such vessels will accrue
monkfish DAS based on actual time at sea for trips greater than 15
hours in duration. A vessel fishing with gillnet gear under only a
monkfish DAS is not required to remove gillnet gear from the water upon
returning to the dock and calling out of the DAS program, provided the
vessel complies with the requirements and conditions of paragraphs
(b)(8)(i) through (v) of this section. A vessel fishing with gillnet
gear under a joint monkfish and NE multispecies DAS, as required under
Sec. 648.92(b)(2)(i), that is declared as a trip gillnet vessel under
the NE Multispecies FMP, must remove its gillnet gear from the water
prior to calling out of the DAS program, as specified at Sec.
648.82(j)(2).
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 648.94, paragraphs (c)(3) and (f) are revised to read
as follows:
Sec. 648.94 Monkfish possession and landing restrictions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Vessels fishing with large mesh and not fishing under a DAS--
(i) A vessel issued a valid monkfish incidental catch limit
(Category E) permit or a limited access monkfish permit (Category A, B,
C, D, F, G, or H) fishing in the GOM or GB RMAs with mesh no smaller
than specified at Sec. 648.80(a)(3)(i) and (a)(4)(i), respectively,
while not on a monkfish, NE multispecies, or scallop DAS, may possess,
retain, and land monkfish (whole or tails) only up to 5 percent (where
the weight of all monkfish is converted to tail weight) of the total
weight of fish on board. For the purpose of converting whole weight to
tail weight, the amount of whole weight possessed or landed is divided
by 3.32.
(ii) A vessel issued a valid monkfish incidental catch (Category E)
permit or a limited access monkfish permit (Category A, B, C, D, F, G,
or H) fishing in the SNE RMA east of the MA Exemption Area boundary
with mesh no smaller than specified at
[[Page 11610]]
Sec. 648.80(b)(2)(i), while not on a monkfish, NE multispecies, or
scallop DAS, may possess, retain, and land monkfish (whole or tails)
only up to 5 percent (where the weight of all monkfish is converted to
tail weight) of the total weight of fish on board, not to exceed 50 lb
(23 kg) tail weight or 166 lb (75 kg) whole weight of monkfish per day
or partial day, up to a maximum of 150 lb (68 kg) tail weight or 498 lb
(226 kg) whole weight per trip. For the purpose of converting whole
weight to tail weight, the amount of whole weight possessed or landed
is divided by 3.32.
(iii) A vessel issued a valid monkfish incidental catch (Category
E) permit or a limited access monkfish permit (Category A, B, C, D, F,
G, or H) fishing in the SNE RMA under a Skate Bait Letter of
Authorization, as authorized under Sec. 648.322(b), while not on a
monkfish, NE multispecies, or scallop DAS, may possess, retain, and
land monkfish (whole or tails) only up to 5 percent (where the weight
of all monkfish is converted to tail weight) of the total weight of
fish on board, not to exceed 50 lb (23 kg) tail weight or 166 lb (75
kg) whole weight of monkfish per day or partial day, up to a maximum of
150 lb (68 kg) tail weight or 498 lb (226 kg) whole weight per trip.
For the purpose of converting whole weight to tail weight, the amount
of whole weight possessed or landed is divided by 3.32.
(iv) A vessel issued a valid monkfish incidental catch (Category E)
permit or a limited access monkfish permit (Category A, B, C, D, F, G,
or H) fishing in the SNE or MA RMAs west of the MA Exemption Area
boundary with mesh no smaller than specified at Sec. 648.104(a)(1)
while not on a monkfish, NE multispecies, or scallop DAS, may possess,
retain, and land monkfish (whole or tails) only up to 5 percent (where
the weight of all monkfish is converted to tail weight) of the total
weight of fish on board, but not to exceed 450 lb (204 kg) tail weight
or 1,494 lb (678 kg) whole weight of monkfish, unless that vessel is
fishing under a Skate Bait Letter of Authorization in the SNE RMA. Such
a vessel is subject to the incidental catch limit specified under
paragraph (c)(3)(iii) of this section. For the purpose of converting
whole weight to tail weight, the amount of whole weight possessed or
landed is divided by 3.32.
* * * * *
(f) Area declaration requirement for a vessel fishing exclusively
in the NFMA. A vessel intending to fish for, or fishing for, possessing
or landing monkfish under a multispecies, scallop, or monkfish DAS
under the less restrictive management measures of the NFMA, must fish
exclusively in the NFMA for the entire trip. In addition, a vessel
fishing under a monkfish DAS must declare its intent to fish in the
NFMA through the vessel's VMS unit. A vessel that does not possess a
VMS unit, such as a vessel that declares DAS through the call-in
system, must declare its intent to fish in the NFMA by obtaining a
letter of authorization from the Regional Administrator, for a period
of not less than 7 days. A vessel that has not declared into the NFMA
under this paragraph (f) shall be presumed to have fished in the SFMA
and shall be subject to the more restrictive requirements of that area.
A vessel that has declared into the NFMA may transit the SFMA,
providing that it complies with the transiting and gear storage
provision described in paragraph (e) of this section, and provided that
it does not fish for or catch monkfish, or any other fish, in the SFMA.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-4124 Filed 3-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S