Quarterly Status Report of Water Service, Repayment, and Other Water-Related Contract Negotiations, 11669-11677 [E8-4089]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
Activity/Operator
Location
Stone Energy Corporation, Structure Removal, SEA ES/SR
07–133.
Maritech Resources, Inc., Structure Removal, SEA ES/SR
07–138, 07–139.
Energy Partners, Ltd, Structure Removal, SEA ES/SR 07–
090A.
Apache Corporation, Structure Removal, SEA ES/SR 07–
132A.
Maritech Resources, Inc., Structure Removal, SEA 06–D35A
Galveston, Block 213, Lease OCS–G 17120, located 12
miles from the nearest Texas shoreline.
South Marsh Island, Block 233, Lease OCS–G 11929, located 20 miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
High Island, Block 72, Lease OCS–G 22231, located 20
miles from the nearest Texas shoreline.
West Delta, Block 133, Lease OCS–G 01106, located 35
miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline Location.
High Island, Block A–325, Lease OCS–G 02416, located 97
miles from the nearest Texas shoreline.
West Cameron, Block 43, Lease OCS–G 16107, located 8
miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
West Delta, Block 58, Lease OCS–G 00146, located 13
miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
Located in the central Gulf of Mexico south of Fourchon,
Louisiana.
Located in the central Gulf of Mexico south of Fourchon,
Louisiana.
Eugene Island, Block 117, Lease OCS–G 24895, located 28
miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
Eugene Island, Block 76, Lease OCS–G 26022, located 21
miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
High Island, Block A538, Lease OCS–G 18957, located 73
miles from the nearest Texas shoreline.
South Marsh Island, Block 217, Lease OCS–G 00310, located 7 miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
Gryphon Exploration Company, Structure Removal, SEA ES/
SR 07–140.
ATP Oil & Gas Corporation, Structure Removal, SEA ES/SR
07–141.
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Geological & Geophysical Exploration
for Mineral Resources, SEA R–4761.
WesternGeco, LLC, Geological & Geophysical Exploration
for Mineral Resources, SEA L07–76.
LLOG Exploration Offshore, Inc., Structure Removal, SEA
ES/SR 07–156.
LLOG Exploration Offshore, Inc., Structure Removal, SEA
ES/SR 07–157.
Energy Partners, Ltd, Structure Removal, SEA ES/SR 07–
142.
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Structure Removal, SEA ES/SR 07–
158.
Persons interested in reviewing
environmental documents for the
proposals listed above or obtaining
information about SEAs and FONSIs
prepared for activities on the Gulf of
Mexico OCS are encouraged to contact
MMS at the address or telephone listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION section.
Dated: January 24, 2008.
Lars Herbst,
Regional Director, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region.
[FR Doc. E8–4064 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Quarterly Status Report of Water
Service, Repayment, and Other WaterRelated Contract Negotiations
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of
contractual actions that have been
proposed to the Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation) and were pending
through December 31, 2007, and
contract actions that have been
completed or discontinued since the last
publication of this notice on November
30, 2007. From the date of this
publication, future quarterly notices
during this calendar year will be limited
to new, modified, discontinued, or
completed contract actions. This annual
notice should be used as a point of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
reference to identify changes in future
notices. This notice is one of a variety
of means used to inform the public
about proposed contractual actions for
capital recovery and management of
project resources and facilities
consistent with section 9(f) of the
Reclamation Project Act of 1939.
Additional announcements of
individual contract actions may be
published in the Federal Register and in
newspapers of general circulation in the
areas determined by Reclamation to be
affected by the proposed action.
ADDRESSES: The identity of the
approving officer and other information
pertaining to a specific contract
proposal may be obtained by calling or
writing the appropriate regional office at
the address and telephone number given
for each region in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Kelly, Contract Services Office,
Bureau of Reclamation, PO Box 25007,
Denver, Colorado 80225–0007;
telephone 303–445–2888.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Consistent
with section 9(f) of the Reclamation
Project Act of 1939 and the rules and
regulations published in 52 FR 11954,
April 13, 1987 (43 CFR 426.22),
Reclamation will publish notice of
proposed or amendatory contract
actions for any contract for the delivery
of project water for authorized uses in
newspapers of general circulation in the
affected area at least 60 days prior to
contract execution. Announcements
may be in the form of news releases,
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11669
Date
12/06/2007
12/06/2007
12/07/2007
12/11/2007
12/14/2007
12/14/2007
12/14/2007
12/19/2007
12/19/2007
12/31/2007
12/31/2007
12/31/2007
12/31/2007
legal notices, official letters,
memorandums, or other forms of
written material. Meetings, workshops,
and/or hearings may also be used, as
appropriate, to provide local publicity.
The public participation procedures do
not apply to proposed contracts for the
sale of surplus or interim irrigation
water for a term of 1 year or less. Either
of the contracting parties may invite the
public to observe contract proceedings.
All public participation procedures will
be coordinated with those involved in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act. Pursuant to
the ‘‘Final Revised Public Participation
Procedures’’ for water resource-related
contract negotiations, published in 47
FR 7763, February 22, 1982, a tabulation
is provided of all proposed contractual
actions in each of the five Reclamation
regions. When contract negotiations are
completed, and prior to execution, each
proposed contract form must be
approved by the Secretary of the
Interior, or pursuant to delegated or
redelegated authority, the Commissioner
of Reclamation or one of the regional
directors. In some instances,
congressional review and approval of a
report, water rate, or other terms and
conditions of the contract may be
involved.
Public participation in and receipt of
comments on contract proposals will be
facilitated by adherence to the following
procedures:
1. Only persons authorized to act on
behalf of the contracting entities may
negotiate the terms and conditions of a
specific contract proposal.
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
11670
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
2. Advance notice of meetings or
hearings will be furnished to those
parties that have made a timely written
request for such notice to the
appropriate regional or project office of
Reclamation.
3. Written correspondence regarding
proposed contracts may be made
available to the general public pursuant
to the terms and procedures of the
Freedom of Information Act, as
amended.
4. Written comments on a proposed
contract or contract action must be
submitted to the appropriate regional
officials at the locations and within the
time limits set forth in the advance
public notices.
5. All written comments received and
testimony presented at any public
hearings will be reviewed and
summarized by the appropriate regional
office for use by the contract approving
authority.
6. Copies of specific proposed
contracts may be obtained from the
appropriate regional director or his
designated public contact as they
become available for review and
comment.
7. In the event modifications are made
in the form of a proposed contract, the
appropriate regional director shall
determine whether republication of the
notice and/or extension of the comment
period is necessary.
Factors considered in making such a
determination shall include, but are not
limited to (i) the significance of the
modification, and (ii) the degree of
public interest which has been
expressed over the course of the
negotiations. At a minimum, the
regional director shall furnish revised
contracts to all parties who requested
the contract in response to the initial
public notice.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Definitions of Abbreviations Used in
This Document
BCP Boulder Canyon Project.
Reclamation Bureau of Reclamation.
CAP Central Arizona Project.
CVP Central Valley Project.
CRSP Colorado River Storage Project.
FR Federal Register.
IDD Irrigation and Drainage District.
ID Irrigation District.
M&I Municipal and Industrial.
NMISC New Mexico Interstate Stream
Commission.
O&M Operation and Maintenance.
P–SMBP Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin
Program.
PPR Present Perfected Right.
RRA Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.
SOD Safety of Dams.
SRPA Small Reclamation Projects Act of
1956.
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
WD Water District.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
Pacific Northwest Region: Bureau of
Reclamation, 1150 North Curtis Road,
Suite 100, Boise, Idaho 83706–1234,
telephone 208–378–5344.
1. Irrigation, M&I, and miscellaneous
water users; Idaho, Oregon, Washington,
Montana, and Wyoming: Temporary or
interim water service contracts for
irrigation, M&I, or miscellaneous use to
provide up to 10,000 acre-feet of water
annually for terms of up to 5 years; longterm contracts for similar service for up
to 1,000 acre-feet of water annually.
2. Rogue River Basin Water Users,
Rogue River Basin Project, Oregon:
Water service contracts; $8 per acre-foot
per annum.
3. Willamette Basin Water Users,
Willamette Basin Project, Oregon: Water
service contracts; $8 per acre-foot per
annum.
4. Pioneer Ditch Company, Boise
Project, Idaho; Clark and Edwards
Canal and Irrigation Company,
Enterprise Canal Company, Ltd.,
Lenroot Canal Company, Liberty Park
Canal Company, Poplar ID, all in the
Minidoka Project, Idaho; and Juniper
Flat District Improvement Company,
Wapinitia Project, Oregon: Amendatory
repayment and water service contracts;
purpose is to conform to the RRA.
5. Palmer Creek Water District
Improvement Company, Willamette
Basin Project, Oregon: Irrigation water
service contract for approximately
13,000 acre-feet.
6. North Unit ID, Deschutes Project,
Oregon: Warren Act contract with cost
of service charge to allow for use of
project facilities to convey nonproject
water.
7. Queener Irrigation Improvement
District, Willamette Basin Project,
Oregon: Renewal of long-term water
service contract to provide up to 2,150
acre-feet of stored water from the
Willamette Basin Project (USACE
project) for the purpose of irrigation
within the district’s service area.
8. West Extension ID, Umatilla
Project, Oregon: Contract for long-term
boundary expansion to include lands
outside of federally recognized district
boundaries.
9. Greenberry ID, Willamette Basin
Project, Oregon: Irrigation water service
contract for approximately 7,500 acrefeet of project water.
10. Six water user entities of the
Arrowrock Division, Boise Project,
Idaho: Repayment agreements with
districts with spaceholder contracts for
repayment, per legislation, of the
reimbursable share of costs to
rehabilitate Arrowrock Dam Outlet
Gates under the O&M program.
11. Three irrigation water user
entities, Boise Project, Idaho:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Amendatory repayment contract with
New Union Ditch Company to reduce
contract by 500 acre-feet of Lucky Peak
Reservoir storage space and new
contracts with Wilderness Ranch
Owners’ Association for 200 acre-feet
and with Osprey Subdivision Project
Owners’ Association for 300 acre-feet of
Lucky Peak Reservoir storage space.
12. Six irrigation water user entities,
Rogue River Basin Project, Oregon:
Long-term contracts for exchange of
water service with six entities for the
provision of up to 2,634 acre-feet of
stored water from Applegate Reservoir
(USACE project) for irrigation use in
exchange for the transfer of out-ofstream water rights from the Little
Applegate River to instream flow rights
with the State of Oregon for instream
flow use.
13. Cowiche Creek Water Users
Association and Yakima-Tieton ID,
Yakima Project, Washington: Warren
Act contract to allow the use of excess
capacity in Yakima Project facilities to
convey up to 1,583.4 acre-feet of
nonproject water for the irrigation of
approximately 396 acres of nonproject
land.
The following action has been reported
as completed since the last publication
of this notice on November 30, 2007:
1. (11) Lake Lowell water users, Boise
Project, Idaho-Oregon: Repayment
contracts for the reimbursable cost of
SOD modifications to Deer Flat Dams.
The Contracts have been executed.
Mid-Pacific Region: Bureau of
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way,
Sacramento, California 95825–1898,
telephone 916–978–5250.
1. Irrigation water districts, individual
irrigators, M&I and miscellaneous water
users, California, Nevada, and Oregon:
Temporary (interim) water service
contracts for available project water for
irrigation, M&I, or fish and wildlife
purposes providing up to 10,000 acrefeet of water annually for terms up to 5
years; temporary Warren Act contracts
for use of project facilities for terms up
to 1 year; temporary conveyance
agreements with the State of California
for various purposes; long-term
contracts for similar service for up to
1,000 acre-feet annually.
2. Contractors from the American
River Division, Cross Valley Canal, San
Felipe Division, West San Joaquin
Division, and Elk Creek Community
Services District, CVP, California:
Renewal of 29 long-term water service
contracts; water quantities for these
contracts total in excess of 2.1M acrefeet. These contract actions will be
accomplished through long-term
renewal contracts pursuant to Public
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
Law 102–575. Prior to completion of
negotiation of long-term renewal
contracts, existing interim renewal
water service contracts may be renewed
through successive interim renewal of
contracts. Execution of long-term
renewal contracts has been completed
for the Friant, Delta, Shasta, and Trinity
River Divisions. Long-term renewal
contract execution is continuing for the
other contractors.
3. Redwood Valley County WD, SRPA,
California: Restructuring the repayment
schedule pursuant to Public Law 100–
516.
4. El Dorado County Water Agency,
CVP, California: M&I water service
contract to supplement existing water
supply: 15,000 acre-feet for El Dorado
County Water Agency authorized by
Public Law 101–514. The supply would
be subcontracted to El Dorado ID and
Georgetown Divide Public Utility
District.
5. Sutter Extension WD, DelanoEarlimart ID, and the State of California
Department of Water Resources, CVP,
California: Pursuant to Public Law 102–
575, cooperative agreements with nonFederal entities for the purpose of
providing funding for CVP refuge water
wheeling facility improvements to
provide water for refuge and private
wetlands.
6. CVP Service Area, California:
Temporary water purchase agreements
for acquisition of 20,000 to 200,000
acre-feet of water for fish and wildlife
purposes as authorized by Public Law
102–575 for terms of up to 3 years.
7. El Dorado ID, CVP, California:
Execution of long-term Warren Act
contracts for conveyance of nonproject
water (one contract for Weber Reservoir
and pre-1914 ditch rights in the amount
of 3,344 acre-feet, and one contract for
Project 184 water in the amount of
11,000 acre-feet). The contracts will
allow CVP facilities to be used to deliver
nonproject water to El Dorado ID for use
within its service area.
8. Horsefly, Klamath, Langell Valley,
and Tulelake IDs, Klamath Project,
Oregon: Repayment contracts for SOD
work on Clear Lake Dam. These districts
will share in the repayment of costs, and
each district will have a separate
contract.
9. Casitas Municipal WD, Ventura
Project, California: Repayment contract
for SOD work on Casitas Dam.
10. Warren Act Contracts, CVP,
California: Execution of long-term
Warren Act contracts (up to 25 years)
with various entities for conveyance of
nonproject water in the Delta Division,
the Friant Division, and the San Luis
Unit facilities.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
11. Tuolumne Utilities District
(formerly Tuolumne Regional WD), CVP,
California: Long-term water service
contract for up to 9,000 acre-feet from
New Melones Reservoir, and possibly
long-term contract for storage of
nonproject water in New Melones
Reservoir.
12. Banta Carbona ID, CVP,
California: Long-term Warren Act
contract for conveyance of nonproject
water in the Delta-Mendota Canal.
13. Byron-Bethany ID, CVP,
California: Long-term Warren Act
contract for conveyance of nonproject
water in the Delta-Mendota Canal.
14. Madera-Chowchilla Water and
Power Authority, CVP, California:
Agreement to transfer the operation,
maintenance, and replacement and
certain financial and administrative
activities related to the Madera Canal
and associated works.
15. Montecito WD, Cachuma Project,
California: Contract to transfer title of
distribution system to the Montecito
WD. Title transfer authorized by Public
Law 108–315, ‘‘Carpinteria and
Montecito Water Distribution
Conveyance Act of 2004.’’
16. Sacramento Suburban WD, CVP,
California: Execution of a long-term
Warren Act contract for conveyance of
nonproject water. The contract will
allow CVP facilities to be used to deliver
nonproject water provided from the
Placer County Water Agency to
Sacramento Suburban WD for use
within its service area.
17. Truckee Meadows Water
Authority, Town of Fernley, State of
California, City of Reno, City of Sparks,
Washoe County, State of Nevada,
Truckee-Carson ID, and any other local
interest or Native American Tribal
Interest who may have negotiated rights
under Public Law 101–618; Nevada and
California: Contract for the storage of
non-Federal water in Truckee River
reservoirs as authorized by Public Law
101–618 and the Preliminary Settlement
Agreement. The contracts shall be
consistent with the Truckee River Water
Quality Settlement Agreement and the
terms and conditions of the proposed
Truckee River Operating Agreement.
18. San Joaquin Valley National
Cemetery, U.S. Department of Veteran
Affairs, Delta Division, CVP, California:
Renewal of the long-term water service
contract for up to 850 acre-feet. The
contract was executed on February 28,
2005. The wheeling agreement for
conveyance through the California State
Aqueduct is pending.
19. A Canal Fish Screens, Klamath
Project, Oregon: Negotiation of an O&M
contract for the A Canal Fish Screen
with Klamath ID.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11671
20. Ady Canal Headgates, Klamath
Project, Oregon: Transfer of operational
control to Klamath Drainage District of
the headgates located at the railroad.
Reclamation does not own the land at
the headgates, only operational control
pursuant to a railroad agreement.
21. Delta Lands Reclamation District
No. 770, CVP, California: Long-term
Warren Act for conveying nonproject
flood flows.
22. Pershing County Water
Conservation District, Pershing County,
Lander County, and the State of
Nevada, Humboldt Project, Nevada:
Title transfer to lands and features of the
Humboldt Project.
23. PacifiCorp, Klamath Project,
Oregon: Execution of long-term
agreement for lease of power privilege
and the O&M of Link River Dam. This
agreement will provide for operations of
Link River Dam, coordinated operations
with the non-Federal Keno Dam, and
provision of power by PacifiCorp for
Klamath Project purposes to ensure
project water deliveries and to meet
ESA requirements.
24. Mendota Wildlife Area, CVP,
California: Reimbursement agreement
between the California Department of
Fish and Game and Reclamation for
conveyance service costs to deliver
Level 2 water to the Mendota Wildlife
Area during infrequent periods when
the Mendota Pool is down due to
unexpected but needed maintenance.
This action is taken pursuant to Public
Law 102–575, Title 34, section
3406(d)(1), to meet full Level 2 water
needs of the Mendota Wildlife Area.
25. Mercy Springs WD, CVP,
California: Proposed partial assignment
of 2,825 acre-feet of Mercy Springs WD’s
CVP supply to San Luis WD for
irrigation and M&I use.
26. Oro Loma WD, CVP, California:
Proposed partial assignment of 4,000
acre-feet of Oro Loma WD’s CVP supply
to Westlands WD for irrigation and M&I
use.
27. San Luis WD, CVP, California:
Proposed partial assignment of 2,400
acre-feet of San Luis WD’s CVP supply
to Santa Nella County Water District for
M&I use.
28. Placer County Water Agency, CVP,
California: Proposed exchange
agreement under section 14 of the 1939
Act to exchange up to 71,000 acre-feet
of Placer County Water Agency’s
American River Middle Fork Project
water for use by Reclamation, for a like
amount of Sacramento River for use by
Placer County Water Agency.
29. Eighteen contractors in the
Klamath Project, Oregon: Amendment
of 18 repayment contracts or negotiation
of new contracts to allow for recovery of
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
11672
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
additional capital costs to the Klamath
Project. These contract actions will be
accomplished through amendments to
the existing repayment contracts or
negotiation of new contracts.
30. Orland Unit Water User’s
Association, Orland Project, California:
Repayment contract for SOD costs
assigned to the irrigation purposes of
Stony Gorge Dam.
31. Contract for exchange of water
among the United States, San Luis WD,
and Meyers Farms Family Trust: The
contract will allow for an exchange with
Reclamation of previously banked water
for a like amount of project water made
available to San Luis WD on behalf of
Meyers Farms.
32. Goleta WD, Cachuma Project,
California: Agreement for title transfer
of a federally owned distribution system
subject to approved legislation.
33. Cawelo WD and LindsayStrathmore ID, CVP, California: Longterm Warren Act contract for conveying
nonproject water for a non-CVP
contractor.
The following actions have been
reported as discontinued or completed
since the last publication of this notice
on November 30, 2007:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Discontinued Contract Action
1. (39) City of Tracy, Sacramento
Municipal Utility District, Santa Clara
Valley WD, and San Benito County
Water Agency; all CVP; California:
Amend existing water service contracts
to conform to current Reclamation law.
Contracts with Santa Clara and San
Benito were executed March 28, 2007.
The two remaining contract actions
have discontinued.
2. (42) Elk Creek Community Services
District, CVP, California: Renewal of
long-term water service contract for up
to 100 acre-feet for a period of 40 years.
This action item has been combined
into item No. 2.
Completed Contract Actions
1. (21) Sacramento River Settlement
Contracts, CVP, California: Five
contracts remain to be executed out of
a total of 145 contracts; water quantities
for these contracts total 2.2M acre-feet.
These contracts will be renewed for a
period of 40 years. The contracts reflect
agreements to settle disputes over water
rights’ claims on the Sacramento River.
All contracts have been executed.
2. (30) Broadview WD, CVP,
California: Proposed assignment of
27,000 acre-feet of Broadview WD’s
entire CVP supply to Westlands WD for
irrigation and M&I use. Contract was
executed March 1, 2007.
3. (38) Elk Creek Community Services
District, California, CVP: Interim
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
renewal contract for up to 3 years to
continue project M&I water service
while the Operations Criteria and Plan
consultations continue. Contract was
executed August 20, 2007.
4. (39) City of Tracy, Sacramento
Municipal Utility District, Santa Clara
Valley WD, and San Benito County
Water Agency; all CVP; California:
Amend existing water service contracts
to conform to current Reclamation law.
Contracts with Santa Clara and San
Benito were executed March 28, 2007.
The two remaining contract actions
have discontinued.
5. (43) Westlands WD, CVP,
California: Interim renewal of water
service contract (Case No. CV–79–106–
EDP) for an initial period of 3 years,
with subsequent interim renewal
contracts of 2 years pursuant to section
3404(c) of the CVPIA. Contract was
executed December 27, 2007.
6. (44) Westlands WD, CVP,
California: Interim renewal of water
service contract (No. 14–06–200–495A)
for an initial period of 3 years, with
subsequent interim renewal contracts of
2 years pursuant to section 3404(c) of
the CVPIA. Contract was executed
December 27, 2007.
7. (49) Sacramento Municipal Utility
District, CVP, California: Amendment of
existing water service contract to allow
for additional points of diversion and
assignment of up to 30,000 acre-feet of
CVP water to the Sacramento County
Water Agency. The amended contract
will conform to current Reclamation
law. Contract was executed July 12,
2006.
8. (51) Sacramento Area Flood
Control Agency, CVP, California:
Execution of a long-term operations
agreement for flood control operations
of Folsom Dam and Reservoir to allow
for recovery of costs associated with
operating a variable flood control pool
of 400,000 to 670,000 acre-feet of water
during the flood control season. This
agreement is to conform to Federal law.
Contract was executed December 6,
2004.
Lower Colorado Region: Bureau of
Reclamation, PO Box 61470 (Nevada
Highway and Park Street), Boulder City,
Nevada 89006–1470, telephone 702–
293–8192.
1. Milton and Jean Phillips, BCP,
Arizona: Colorado River water delivery
contract for 60 acre-feet of Colorado
River water per year as recommended
by the Arizona Department of Water
Resources.
2. John J. Peach, BCP, Arizona:
Colorado River water delivery contracts
for 456 acre-feet of Colorado River water
per year as recommended by the
Arizona Department of Water Resources.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian
Community, CAP, Arizona: O&M
contract for its CAP water distribution
system.
4. Miscellaneous PPR No. 38, BCP,
California: Assign Schroeder’s portion
of the PPR to Murphy Broadcasting.
5. Gila Project Works, Gila Project,
Arizona: Title transfer of facilities and
certain lands in the Wellton-Mohawk
Division from the United States to the
Wellton-Mohawk IDD.
6. Shepard Water Company, Inc.,
BCP, Arizona: Contract for the annual
delivery of 50 acre-feet of fourth-priority
water per year for domestic use.
7. All-American Canal, BCP,
California: Agreement among
Reclamation, Imperial ID, Metropolitan
WD, and Coachella Valley WD for the
federally funded construction of a
reservoir(s) and associated facilities that
will improve the regulation and
management of Colorado River water.
8. Wellton-Mohawk IDD, BCP,
Arizona: Amend contract No. 1–07–30–
W0021 to revise the acre-foot amount
for delivery of domestic use water to
12,000 acre-feet per calendar year,
within the district’s current overall
Colorado River water entitlement.
9. System Conservation Agreements,
BCP, Arizona and California: Develop
and execute short-term agreements to
implement a demonstration system
conservation program to evaluate the
feasibility of acquiring water through a
voluntary land fallowing program to
replace drainage water currently being
bypassed to the Cienega de Santa Clara.
10. Chacha AZ, LLC, BCP, Arizona:
Contract for 2,100 acre-feet per year of
fourth-priority water for agricultural
purposes.
11. City of Yuma, BCP, Arizona:
Supplemental and amendatory contract
to provide for additional point of
delivery for a new pump station to be
constructed on the Gila Gravity Main
Canal, with initial intake capacity of 20
million gallons per day, building up to
40 million gallons per day at full design
capacity.
12. Basic Management, Inc., BCP,
Nevada: Amend contract to add
additional service areas where part of
the contractor’s entitlement can be used.
13. City of Yuma, BCP, Arizona:
Amendment to extend contract to allow
for the diversion of water through Yuma
Project facilities for an additional term
of 10 years.
14. Hopi Tribe, Arizona Game and
Fish Commission, BCP, Arizona:
Approval of an assignment and transfer
of 1,500 acre-feet of fourth-priority
water entitlement from the Hopi Tribe
to the Commission (MSCP Option).
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
15. Hopi Tribe, BCP, Arizona: Amend
contract to decrease the Hopi Tribe’s
fourth-priority water entitlement by
1,500 acre-feet per year (MSCP Option).
16. Arizona Game and Fish
Commission, BCP, Arizona: Amend
contract to increase the Commission’s
fourth-priority water entitlement by
1,500 acre-feet per year being assigned
from the Hopi Tribe (MSCP Option).
17. Mohave County Water Authority,
B&F Investment, LLC, Springs del Sol;
Domestic Water Improvement District,
DII-Emerald Springs; BCP; Arizona:
Approval of an assignment and transfer
of 300 acre-feet of fourth-priority water
entitlement from the Authority to B&F,
Springs del Sol, and Emerald Springs.
18. Mohave County Water Authority:
Amend contract to decrease the
Authority’s fourth-priority water
entitlement by 300 acre-feet per year (La
Paz County Option).
19. Hopi Tribe, B&F Investment,
Springs del Sol Domestic Water
Improvement District, DII-Emerald
Springs; BCP; Arizona: Approval of an
assignment and transfer of 300 acre-feet
of fourth-priority water entitlement from
the Hopi Tribe to B&F, Springs del Sol,
and Emerald Springs.
20. Hopi Tribe, BCP, Arizona: Amend
contract to decrease Hopi Tribe’s fourthpriority water entitlement by 300 acrefeet per year (La Paz County Option).
21. Ehrenberg Improvement
Association on behalf of B&F
Investment, BCP, Arizona: Amend
contract to increase Ehrenberg’s fourthpriority water entitlement by 100 acrefeet per year being assigned to B&F from
the Mohave County Water Authority (50
acre-feet) and from Hopi Tribe (50 acrefeet).
22. Springs del Sol Domestic Water
Improvement District, BCP, Arizona:
Enter into a new Section 5 contract with
Springs del Sol for 100 acre-feet per year
of fourth-priority water being assigned
to Springs del Sol from the Mohave
County Water Authority (50 acre-feet)
and from Hopi Tribe (50 acre-feet).
23. DII-Emerald Springs, BCP,
Arizona: Enter into a new Section 5
contract for 400 acre-feet per year of
fourth-priority water being assigned to
Emerald Springs by the Mohave County
Water Authority (200 acre-feet) and by
the Hopi Tribe (200 acre-feet).
24. Cibola Valley IDD, BCP, Arizona:
Amend contract to decrease the
district’s fourth-priority water
entitlement by 2,700 acre-feet per year
that is being assigned from the district
to Arizona Recreational Facilities, LLC.
25. Arizona Recreational Facilities,
LLC; BCP; Arizona: Enter into a new
Section 5 contract with Arizona
Recreational Facilities for 2,700 acre-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
feet per year of fourth-priority Colorado
River water that is being assigned to
them from the Cibola Valley IDD.
The following actions have been
reported as discontinued or completed
since the last publication of this notice
on November 30, 2007:
Discontinued Contract Action
1. (26) Cibola Valley IDD, BCP,
Arizona: Assign 396 acre-feet per year of
the District’s entitlement to fourth-,
fifth-, and sixth-priority water to The
Conservation Fund.
Completed Contract Actions
1. (4) Maricopa-Stanfield IDD, CAP,
Arizona: Amend distribution system
repayment contract No. 4–07–30–
W0047 to reschedule repayment
pursuant to June 28, 1996, agreement.
Contract was executed December 14,
2007.
2. (5) Indian and non-Indian
agricultural and M&I water users, CAP,
Arizona: New and amendatory contracts
for repayment of Federal expenditures
for construction of distribution systems.
Contract was executed December 14,
2007.
3. (6) Central Arizona IDD, CAP,
Arizona: Amend distribution system
repayment contract No. 4–07–30–
W0048 to modify repayment terms
pursuant to final order issued by U.S.
Bankruptcy Court, District of Arizona.
Contract was executed December 14,
2007.
4. (7) Coachella Valley WD and/or
The Metropolitan WD of Southern
California, BCP, California: Contract to
fund the Department of the Interior’s
expenses to conserve seepage water
from the Coachella Branch of the AllAmerican Canal in accordance with
Title II of the San Luis Rey Indian Water
Rights Settlement Act, dated November
17, 1988. The contract has been
executed.
5. (11) North Gila Valley IDD, Yuma
ID, and Yuma Mesa IDD; Yuma Mesa
Division, Gila Project; Arizona:
Administrative action to amend each
district’s Colorado River water delivery
contract to effectuate a change from a
‘‘pooled’’ water entitlement for the
Division to a quantified entitlement for
each district. The contracts have been
executed.
6. (12) Indian and/or non-Indian M&I
users, CAP, Arizona: New or
amendatory water service contracts or
subcontracts in accordance with an
anticipated final record of decision for
reallocation of CAP water, as discussed
in the Secretary of the Interior’s notice
published on page 41456 of the FR on
July 30, 1999. Contract was executed
December 14, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11673
7. (13) Litchfield Park Service
Company, CAP, Arizona: Proposed
partial assignments of subcontract for
5,590 acre-feet of CAP M&I water to the
Central Arizona Water Conservation
District, which is exercising its
authority as the Central Arizona
Groundwater Replenishment District,
and to the cities of Avondale, Carefree,
and Goodyear. Contract was executed
August 14, 2007.
8. (16) Various irrigation districts,
CAP, Arizona: Amend distribution
system repayment contracts to provide
for partial assumption of debt by the
Central Arizona Water Conservation
District and the United States upon
enactment of Federal legislation
providing for resolution of CAP issues.
Contract was executed December 14,
2007.
9. (17) Mohave County Water
Authority, BCP, Arizona: Amendatory
Colorado River water delivery contract
to include the delivery of 3,500 acre-feet
per year of fourth-priority water and to
delete the delivery of 3,500 acre-feet per
year of fifth-or sixth-priority water.
Contract was executed June 22, 2007.
10. (19) Sunrise Water Company,
CAP, Arizona: Proposed assignment of
subcontract for 944 acre-feet of CAP
M&I water per year to the Central
Arizona Water Conservation District,
which is exercising its authority as the
Central Arizona Groundwater
Replenishment District. Contract was
executed August 14, 2007.
11. (20) West End Water Company,
CAP, Arizona: Proposed assignment of
subcontract for 157 acre-feet of CAP
M&I water per year to the Central
Arizona Water Conservation District,
which is exercising its authority as the
Central Arizona Groundwater
Replenishment District. Contract was
executed August 14, 2007.
12. (21) New River Utilities Company,
CAP, Arizona: Proposed assignment of
subcontract for 1,885 acre-feet of CAP
M&I water to the Central Arizona Water
Conservation District, which is
exercising its authority as the Central
Arizona Groundwater Replenishment
District. Contract was executed August
14, 2007.
13. (22) Metropolitan WD and others,
BCP, Arizona and California: Contract
to provide for the recovery by
Metropolitan WD of interstate
underground storage credits previously
placed in underground storage in
Arizona by the Central Arizona Water
Conservation District under agreements
executed in 1992 and 1994, and to
document the Arizona Water Banking
Authority’s responsibility in agreeing to
Arizona’s forbearance in the use of
Colorado River water to permit the
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
11674
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
Secretary of the Interior to release that
quantity of water for diversion and use
by Metropolitan WD. Letter agreement
was executed December 20, 2006.
14. (25) Arizona Water Settlements
Act, CAP, Arizona: Implementation of
the contracting requirements of Title I
Central Arizona Project Settlement Act
of 2004, Title II Gila River Indian
Community Water Rights Settlement,
Title III Southern Arizona Water Rights
Settlement, and Title IV San Carlos
Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement.
Contracts were executed December 14,
2007.
15. (27) Mohave County Water
Authority, BCP, Arizona: Amend
contract No. 04-XX–30-W0431 to
provide for a change of type and place
of use of water. Contract was executed
July 6, 2007.
16. (34) Mohave County Water
Authority, BCP, Arizona: Assign a
portion of Mohave County’s Colorado
River water entitlement to the Arizona
Game and Fish Commission. Contract
was executed September 25, 2007.
Upper Colorado Region: Bureau of
Reclamation, 125 South State Street,
Room 6107, Salt Lake City, Utah 84138–
1102, telephone 801–524–3864.
1. Individual irrigators, M&I, and
miscellaneous water users; Initial Units,
CRSP; Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, and
New Mexico: Temporary (interim) water
service contracts for surplus project
water for irrigation or M&I use to
provide up to 10, 000 acre-feet of water
annually for terms up to 10 years; longterm contracts for similar service for up
to 1,000 acre-feet of water annually.
(a) Camp Id-Ra-Ha-Je West
Association, Aspinall Storage Unit,
CRSP: Camp Id-Ra-Ha-Je West
Association has requested a 40-year
water service contract for 1 acre-foot of
M&I water out of Blue Mesa Reservoir,
which requires Camp Id-Ra-Ha-Je West
Association to present a Plan of
Augmentation to the Division 4 Water
Court.
(b) Maureen A. Call, Aspinall Storage
Unit, CRSP: Ms. Call has requested a 40year water service contract for 1 acrefoot of M&I water out of Blue Mesa
Reservoir, which requires Ms. Call to
present a Plan of Augmentation to the
Division 4 Water Court.
(c) Vanessa Rueckert (Hidden Mesa
Estates), Aspinall Storage Unit, CRSP:
Ms. Rueckert has requested a 40-year
water service contract for 1 acre-foot of
M&I water out of Blue Mesa Reservoir,
which requires Ms. Rueckert to present
a Plan of Augmentation to the Division
4 Water Court.
(d) Thomas Alan Kay (North Fork
Reserve), Aspinall Storage Unit, CRSP:
Mr. Kay has requested a 40-year water
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
service contract for 11 acre-feet of M&I
water out of Blue Mesa Reservoir, which
requires them to present a Plan of
Augmentation to the Division 4 Water
Court.
2. San Juan-Chama Project, New
Mexico: The United States is holding the
remaining 2,990 acre-feet of project
water for potential use in Indian water
rights settlements in New Mexico.
3. Various Contactors, San JuanChama Project, New Mexico: The United
States proposes to lease water from
various contractors to stabilize flows in
a critical reach of the Rio Grande in
order to meet the needs of irrigators and
preserve habitat for the silvery minnow.
4. Uncompahgre Valley Water Users
Association, Upper Gunnison River
Water Conservancy District, and the
Colorado River Water Conservation
District; Uncompahgre Project;
Colorado: Water management agreement
for water stored at Taylor Park Reservoir
and the Wayne N. Aspinall Storage
Units to improve water management.
5. Southern Ute Indian Tribe, Florida
Project, Colorado: Supplement to
contract No. 14–06–400–3038, dated
May 7, 1963, for an additional 181 acrefeet of project water, plus 563 acre-feet
of project water pursuant to the 1986
Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Final
Settlement Agreement.
6. Individual Irrigators, Carlsbad
Project, New Mexico: The United States
proposes to enter into long-term
forbearance lease agreements with
individuals who have privately held
water rights to divert nonproject water
either directly from the Pecos River or
from shallow/artesian wells in the Pecos
River Watershed. This action will result
in additional water in the Pecos River to
make up for the water depletions caused
by changes in operations at Sumner
Dam which were made to improve
conditions for a threatened species, the
Pecos bluntnose shiner.
7. La Plata Conservancy District,
Animas-La Plata Project, New Mexico:
Cost-sharing/repayment contract for up
to 1,560 acre-feet per year of M&I water;
contract terms to be consistent with the
Colorado Ute Settlement Act
Amendments of 2000 (Title III of Pub.
L. 106–554).
8. LeChee Chapter of the Navajo
Nation, Glen Canyon Unit, CRSP,
Arizona: Long-term contract for 950
acre-feet of water for municipal
purposes.
9. City of Page, Arizona, Glen Canyon
Unit, CRSP, Arizona: Long-term contract
for 975 acre-feet of water for municipal
purposes.
10. El Paso County Water
Improvement District No. 1 and Isleta
del Sur Pueblo, Rio Grande Project,
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Texas: Contract to convert up to 1,000
acre-feet of the Pueblo’s project
irrigation water to use for tradition and
religious purposes.
11. Project Operator, Animas-La Plata
Project, Colorado: Contract to transfer
the operation, maintenance, and
replacement responsibilities of most
project facilities to the project operator,
pursuant to section 6 of the Reclamation
Act of June 17, 1902 and other Federal
reclamation laws.
12. Project Operations Committee,
Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado and
New Mexico: Agreement among the
United States and the project sponsors
to coordinate and oversee the necessary
operations, maintenance, and
replacement activities of the project
works.
13. Southern Ute Indian Tribe,
Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado:
Water delivery contract for 33,519 acrefeet of M&I water; contract terms to be
consistent with the Colorado Ute
Settlement Act Amendments of 2000
(Title III of Pub. L. 106–554).
14. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, AnimasLa Plata Project, Colorado: Water
delivery contract for 33,519 acre-feet of
M&I water; contract terms to be
consistent with the Colorado Ute
Settlement Act Amendments of 2000
(Title III of Pub. L. 106–554).
15. Navajo Nation, Animas-La Plata
Project, Colorado and New Mexico:
Water delivery contract for 4,680 acrefeet of M&I water; contract terms to be
consistent with the Colorado Ute
Settlement Act Amendments of 2000
(Title III of Pub. L. 106–554).
16. State of Colorado, Animas-La
Plata Project, Colorado and New
Mexico: Cost-sharing/repayment
contract for up to 10,440 acre-feet per
year of M&I water; contract terms to be
consistent with the Colorado Ute
Settlement Act Amendments of 2000
(Title III of Pub. L. 106–554).
17. Public Service Company of New
Mexico, Reclamation, and the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service; San Juan River
Basin Recovery Implementation
Program: The agreement identifies that
Reclamation may provide cost-share
funding for the recovery monitoring and
research, and O&M of the constructed
fish passage at the Public Service
Company’s site pursuant to Public Law
106–392, dated October 30, 2000, 114
Stat. 1602.
18. The Grand Valley Water Users
Association, Reclamation, and the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service: Construction
and O&M of a fish passage and fish
screen facilities at the Grand Valley
Diversion Dam and Government
Highline Canal Facilities to facilitate
recovery of endangered fish species in
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
the Colorado River Basin (October 30,
2000, 114 Stat. 1602, Pub. L. 106–392).
19. Central Utah Project, Utah:
Petition for project water among the
United States, the Central Utah Water
Conservancy District, and the Duchesne
County Water Conservancy District for
use of 2,500 acre-feet of irrigation water
from the Bonneville Unit of the Central
Utah Project.
20. Navajo Nation, San Juan River
Dineh Water Users, Reclamation, and
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; San Juan
River Basin Recovery Implementation
Program: The agreement identifies that
Reclamation may provide cost-share
funding for the recovery monitoring and
research, and O&M of the constructed
fish passage at the Hogback Diversion
Dam, pursuant to Public Law 106–392
dated October 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1602.
21. Jensen Unit, Central Utah Project,
Utah: The Uintah Water Conservancy
District has requested a contract with
provision to prepay at a discounted rate
the remaining 3,300 acre-feet of
unmarketed project M&I water.
22. Warren-Vosburg Ditch Company,
Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado and
New Mexico: Contract for payment of
O&M costs associated with the WarrenVosburg ditch.
23. Aaron Million, Million
Conservation Resource Group, Flaming
Gorge Storage Unit, CRSP: Mr. Million
has requested a Standby Contract to
secure the first right to contract for up
to 165,000 acre-feet annually of M&I
water service from Flaming Gorge
Reservoir for a proposed privately
financed and constructed transbasin
diversion project.
24. Weber Basin Water Conservancy
District, Weber Basin Project, Utah:
Contract providing for the district to
repay to the United States 15 percent of
the cost of Phase I SOD modifications to
the foundation at Arthur V. Watkins
Dam.
25. Weber Basin Water Conservancy
District, Weber Basin Project, Utah:
Contract providing for the district to
repay to the United States 15 percent of
the cost of Phase II SOD modifications
to the foundation at Arthur V. Watkins
Dam.
26. Cottonwood Creek Consolidated
Company, Emery County Project, Utah:
Cottonwood Creek Consolidated
Irrigation Company has requested a
contract for carriage of up to 5,600 acrefeet of nonproject water through
Cottonwood Creek-Huntington Canal.
27. Albuquerque Bernalillo County
Water Utility Authority and
Reclamation, San Juan-Chama Project,
New Mexico: Contract to store up to
50,000 acre-feet of project water in
Elephant Butte Reservoir. The proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
contract would have a 40-year
maximum term and would replace
existing contract No. 3–CS–53–01510
which expires on January 26, 2008. The
Act of December 29, 1981, Public Law.
97–140, 95 Stat. 1717 provides authority
to enter into this contract.
28. Dolores Water Conservancy
District, Dolores Project, Colorado: The
District has requested a water service
contract for 1,402 acre-feet of newly
identified project water for irrigation.
The proposed water service contract
will provide 417 acre-feet of project
water for irrigation of the Ute Enterprise
and 985 acre-feet for use by the
District’s full-service irrigators.
29. Carlsbad ID and New Mexico
Interstate Stream Commission, Carlsbad
Project, New Mexico: Contract, for a 5year term, for the District to perform
phreatophyte (Salt Cedar) control and
for the Commission to provide annual
funding of $150,000.
The following actions have been
reported as discontinued or completed
since the last publication of this notice
on November 30, 2007:
Discontinued Contract Action
1. (18) Carlsbad ID and the NMISC,
Carlsbad Project, New Mexico: Contract
for storage and delivery of water
produced by the NMISC’s River
Augmentation Program, among
Reclamation, Carlsbad ID, and the
NMISC. This will allow for storage of
NMISC water in project facilities
resulting in additional project water
supply.
Completed Contract Actions
1. (1)(e) Old Castle SW Group dba
United Companies, Aspinall Storage
Unit, CRSP: United Companies has
requested a 40-year water service
contract for 5 acre-feet of M&I water out
of Blue Mesa Reservoir, which requires
United Companies to present a Plan of
Augmentation to the Division 4 Water
Court. Contract was executed September
24, 2007.
2. (1)(f) Ward Creek LLC, Aspinall
Storage Unit, CRSP: Ward Creek LLC
has requested a 40-year water service
contract for 1 acre-foot of M&I water out
of the Blue Mesa Reservoir, which
requires Ward Creek LLC to present a
Plan of Augmentation to the Division 4
Water Court. Contract was executed
October 9, 2007.
3. (27) North Fork Water Conservancy
District and Ragged Mountain Water
Users Association, Paonia Project,
Colorado: North Fork and Ragged
Mountain have requested a contract for
supplemental water from the Paonia
Project. This contract is for municipal
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11675
uses. Contract was executed May 21,
2007.
Great Plains Region: Bureau of
Reclamation, P.O. Box 36900, Federal
Building, 316 North 26th Street,
Billings, Montana 59101, telephone
406–247–7752.
1. Individual irrigators, M&I, and
miscellaneous water users; Colorado,
Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North
Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota,
Texas, and Wyoming: Temporary
(interim) water service contracts for the
sale, conveyance, storage, and exchange
of surplus project water and nonproject
water for irrigation or M&I use to
provide up to 10,000 acre-feet of water
annually for a term of up to 1 year.
2. Green Mountain Reservoir,
Colorado-Big Thompson Project,
Colorado: Water service contracts for
irrigation and M&I; contracts for the sale
of water from the marketable yield to
water users within the Colorado River
Basin of western Colorado.
3. Ruedi Reservoir, FryingpanArkansas Project, Colorado: Second
round water sales from the regulatory
capacity of Ruedi Reservoir. Water
service and repayment contracts for up
to 17,000 acre-feet annually for M&I use.
4. Garrison Diversion Unit, P–SMBP,
North Dakota: Renegotiation of the
master repayment contract with
Garrison Diversion Conservancy District
to conform with the Dakota Water
Resources Act of 2000; negotiation of
repayment contracts with irrigators and
M&I users.
5. Highland-Hanover ID, HanoverBluff Unit, P–SMBP, Wyoming:
Negotiate long-term water service
contract.
6. Upper Bluff ID, Hanover-Bluff Unit,
P–SMBP, Wyoming: Negotiate long-term
water service contract.
7. Dickinson-Heart River Mutual Aid
Corporation, Dickinson Unit, P–SMBP,
North Dakota: Negotiate renewal of
water service contract for irrigation of
lands below Dickinson Dam in western
North Dakota.
8. Savage ID, P–SMBP, Montana: The
District is currently seeking title
transfer. The contract is subject to
renewal pending outcome of the title
transfer process. The existing interim
contract is due to expire in May 2008.
Preparing to renew a long term contract
upon request by the District.
9. Dickinson Parks and Recreation
District, Dickinson Unit, P–SMBP, North
Dakota: A temporary contract has been
negotiated with the District for minor
amounts of water from Dickinson
Reservoir. Negotiate a long-term water
service contract for minor amounts of
water from Dickinson Dam.
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
11676
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
10. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project,
Colorado: Consideration of excess
capacity contracts in the FryingpanArkansas Project.
11. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project,
Colorado: Consideration of requests for
long-term contracts for the use of excess
capacity in the Fryingpan-Arkansas
Project from the Southeastern Colorado
Water Conservancy District, the City of
Aurora, and the Colorado Springs
Utilities. The contract with the City of
Aurora was executed on September 12,
2007.
12. Individual irrigators, Heart Butte
Unit, P–SMBP, North Dakota: Renew
long-term water service contracts for
minor amounts of less than 1,000 acrefeet of irrigation water annually from
the Heart River below Heart Butte Dam.
13. Municipal Subdistrict of the
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
District, Colorado-Big Thompson
Project, Colorado: Consideration of a
new long-term contract or amendment
of contract No. 4–07–70–W0107 with
the Municipal Subdistrict and the
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
District for the proposed Windy Gap
Firming Project.
14. Northern Integrated Supply
Project, Colorado-Big Thompson Project,
Colorado: Consideration of a new longterm contract with approximately 14
regional water suppliers and the
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
District for the Northern Integrated
Supply Project.
15. Stutsman County Park Board,
Jamestown Unit, P–SMBP, North
Dakota: The Board is requesting a
contract for minor amounts of water
under a long-term contract to serve
domestic needs for cabin owners at
Jamestown Reservoir, North Dakota.
16. Security Water and Sanitation
District, Fryingpan-Arkansas Project,
Colorado: Consideration of a request for
a long-term contract for the use of
excess capacity in the FryingpanArkansas Project.
17. City of Fountain, FryingpanArkansas Project, Colorado:
Consideration of a request for a longterm contract for the use of excess
capacity in the Fryingpan-Arkansas
Project.
18. Colorado Springs Utilities,
Colorado-Big Thompson Project,
Colorado Springs, Colorado:
Consideration of a request for a longterm agreement for water substitution
and power interference in the ColoradoBig Thompson Project.
19. LeClair-Riverton ID, Boysen Unit,
P–SMBP, Wyoming: Contract renewal of
long-term water service contract.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
20. Riverton Valley ID, Boysen Unit,
P–SMBP, Wyoming: Contract renewal of
long-term water service contract.
21. ExxonMobil Corporation, Ruedi
Reservoir, Fryingpan–Arkansas Project,
Colorado: Consideration of ExxonMobil
Corporation’s request to amend its
Ruedi Round I contract to include
additional uses for the water.
22. Pueblo West Metropolitan District,
Pueblo West, Fryingpan-Arkansas
Project, Colorado: Consideration of a
request for a long-term contract for the
use of excess capacity in the FryingpanArkansas Project.
23. City of Golden, Colorado-Big
Thompson Project, Colorado:
Consideration of a request for a longterm agreement for power interference
in the Colorado-Big Thompson Project.
24. Colorado River Water
Conservation District, Ruedi Reservoir,
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado:
Consideration of a request for a second
round water sales or repayment contract
from the regulatory capacity of Ruedi
Reservoir for up to 5,000 acre-feet
annually for M&I uses and also
providing water to the endangered fish
and supplementing in-stream flows.
25. Colorado River Water
Conservation District, Colorado-Big
Thompson Project, Colorado: Long-term
exchange, conveyance, and storage
contract to implement the Exhibit B
Agreement of the Settlement Agreement
on Operating Procedures for Green
Mountain Reservoir Concerning
Operating Limitations and in Resolution
of the Petition Filed August 7, 2003, in
Case No. 49–CV–2782 (The United
States v. Northern Colorado Water
Conservancy District, et al., U.S. District
Court for the District of Colorado, Case
No. 2782 and Consolidated Case Nos.
5016 and 5017).
26. Colorado River Water
Conservation District, Colorado-Big
Thompson Project, Colorado:
Consideration of a request for a longterm contract for the use of excess
capacity for storage and exchange in
Green Mountain Reservoir in the
Colorado-Big Thompson Project.
27. Glendo Unit, P–SMBP, Wyoming:
Contract renewal for long-term water
service contracts with Burbank Ditch,
New Grattan Ditch Company,
Torrington ID, Lucerne Canal and Power
Company, and Wright and Murphy
Ditch Company.
28. Glendo Unit, P–SMBP, Nebraska:
Contract renewal for long-term water
service contracts with Bridgeport,
Enterprise, and Mitchell IDs, and
Central Nebraska Public Power and ID.
29. Glendo Unit, P–SMBP, Wyoming:
Contract renewal for long-term water
storage contract with Pacificorp.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30. Roger W. Evans (Individual),
Boysen Unit, P–SMBP, Wyoming:
Renewal of long-term water service
contracts.
31. City of Beloit, P–SMBP, Kansas:
Contract renewal for M&I contract.
32. Hamlin Construction, Inc., Helena
Valley Unit, P–SMBP, Montana: Request
for a long-term water service contract for
M&I purposes for up to 500 acre-feet per
year.
33. Richard Davis, Helena Valley
Unit, P–SMBP, Montana: Request for a
long-term water service contract for M&I
purposes for up to 24 acre-feet per year.
34. Individual Irrigators, Canyon Ferry
Unit, P–SMBP, Montana: Replace
temporary 1-year contracts with longterm water service contracts for minor
amounts of less than 1,000 acre-feet of
irrigation water annually from the
Missouri River below Canyon Ferry
Dam.
35. Individual Irrigators, Lower Marias
Unit, P–SMBP, Montana: Execute longterm water service contracts for
commercial irrigation from Lake Elwell
and the Marias River below Tiber Dam.
36. Turtle Lake ID, Garrison Diversion
Unit, North Dakota: Turtle Lake ID has
requested a water service contract under
the Dakota Water Resources Act of 2000
as part of the Garrison Diversion Unit.
37. Big Horn Canal ID, Boysen Unit,
P–SMBP, Wyoming: Big Horn Canal has
requested a renewal of their long-term
water service contract.
38. Treeline Springs, LLP., Canyon
Ferry Unit, P–SMBP, Montana: Request
for water service contract for up to 620
acre-feet of water per year for
replacement of water for senior water
rights.
The following actions have been
reported as discontinued or completed
since the last publication of this notice
on November 30, 2007:
Discontinued Contract Action
1. (33) Individual developer with
Angostura Unit, P–SMBP, South Dakota:
Negotiate M&I water service contract
with developer for up to ten, 10-acre
tracts of land within the Angostura ID.
Completed Contract Actions
1. (39) City of Grand Junction, City of
Fruita, and Town of Palisade (Municipal
Recreation Agreement) Colorado-Big
Thompson Project; Colorado:
Negotiation of renewal of the Municipal
Recreation Agreement to provide
historic users pool surplus water from
Green Mountain Reservoir for
nonconsumptive municipal recreation
uses. Contract was executed on August
29, 2007.
2. (43) Greenfields ID, Sun River
Project, Montana: Modification of
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
Gibson Dam will be required depending
on the outcome of the Corrective Action
Study, and will require a contract for
repayment of allocable SOD costs.
Contract was executed on May 21, 2007.
3. (51) Giant Springs, Inc., Canyon
Ferry Unit, P–SMBP, Montana: Request
for a long-term contract for up to 5,600
acre-feet of water per year to fulfill the
State requirement to replace water used
under private rights. Contract was
executed December 19, 2007.
Dated: February 1, 2008.
Roseann Gonzales,
Director, Office of Program and Policy
Services, Denver Office.
[FR Doc. E8–4089 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND
WATER COMMISSION; UNITED
STATES AND MEXICO
United States Section; Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement for Long-Term
Improvements to the USIBWC Rio
Grande Flood Control Projects Along
the Texas-Mexico Border
United States Section,
International Boundary and Water
Commission (USIBWC).
ACTION: Notice of availability for the
record of decision (ROD).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice is provided in
accordance with 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 1500–1508 of
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), and USIBWC procedures for
implementing NEPA. The USIBWC
anticipates the need to improve
functionality of three flood control
projects located in the Rio Grande along
the Texas-Mexico border. Potential
improvement measures are mainly
associated with the project core mission
of flood protection, boundary
stabilization, and water delivery.
Additional measures under
consideration are intended to improve
water use, quality, and conservation, as
well as measures supporting local or
regional initiatives for multipurpose use
of the projects for wildlife habitat
development, and improved
environmental conditions.
A Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement (PEIS) was prepared
to evaluate potential consequences of
three action alternatives under
consideration for long-term
improvement of the flood control
projects. The USIBWC will apply the
programmatic evaluation as an overall
guidance for future evaluations of
individual projects, including both
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
those currently envisioned at a
conceptual level and those whose
implementation is not currently
anticipated but would be possible
within a 20-year timeframe.
The Multipurpose Project
Management Alternative was adopted
among the three action alternatives as
the preferred option for long-term
improvements to the Rio Grande flood
control projects. In implementing the
preferred alternative, the USIBWC will
continue to improve functionality of the
flood control projects to meet its
mandate for flood control, water
delivery, and boundary stabilization,
while supporting initiatives for
improvement of environmental
conditions and water resources
utilization.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Daniel Borunda, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Environmental
Management Division, USIBWC, 4171
North Mesa Street, C–100, El Paso,
Texas 79902 or e-mail:
danielborunda@ibwc.state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
USIBWC anticipates the need to
improve capabilities or functionality of
three flood control projects (FCP)
located in the Rio Grande along the
Texas-Mexico border: The Rectification
FCP, extending 84.4 miles along the Rio
Grande, downstream from American
Diversion Dam in El Paso to Fort
Quitman, Texas; the Presidio-Ojinaga
FCP extending over 13.1 river miles of
the Rio Grande near Presidio, Texas;
and the Lower Rio Grande FCP that
extends 186 river miles on the Rio
˜
Grande, from Penitas, Texas to the Gulf
of Mexico, and includes 120 miles of
interior floodways. These projects were
constructed to provide flood protection
in urban, suburban, and agricultural
areas in the United States and Mexico,
facilitate water delivery, and stabilize
the international river boundary.
Measures identified for potential
implementation were organized into
three action alternatives focusing on
improvements in operation and
maintenance (O&M) practices and
project functionality; improvements in
water quality and water utilization; and
additional measures for multipurpose
use of the projects beyond their core
mission of flood control, water delivery
and boundary preservation.
Multipurpose use would include
regional initiatives for improvement of
habitat and environmental conditions
proposed by federal agencies, local
governments, and other organizations.
The USIBWC prepared a
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement, in cooperation with the
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11677
United States Bureau of Reclamation,
United States Fish and Wildlife Service,
and United States Army Corps of
Engineers, to analyze potential effects of
three action alternatives for
improvement of the three Rio Grande
FCPs. The programmatic evaluation will
be used as an overall guidance for
evaluation of future improvement
projects, both those already identified at
a conceptual level or those whose
implementation is possible within a 20year timeframe. Once an improvement
project is developed for
implementation, site-specific
environmental documentation will be
prepared on the basis of PEIS findings
and project specifications.
A Draft PEIS was released for a 45-day
public review period on August 10,
2007. Nineteen responses were received
during the review period, ten from
regulatory agencies, six from various
organizations, and three from individual
reviewers. Oral comments were also
received from 12 presenters during
public hearings held in the Cities of El
Paso, Presidio, and McAllen, Texas on
August 21, 22 and 28, 2007,
respectively. The Notice of Availability
of the Final PEIS was published in the
Federal Register by the Environmental
Protection Agency on January 4, 2008.
Finding: Because of its potential to
improve flood control and water
resources management, as well as a
greater potential for improvement of
biological resources and environmental
conditions, the MPM Alternative was
identified as the preferred option for
long-term improvements to the
Rectification FCP, Presidio FCP, and
Lower Rio Grande FCP. In
implementing this alternative, the
USIBWC will continue to improve
functionality and maintenance of the
three Rio Grande flood control projects
while supporting initiatives for
improvements in environmental
conditions and utilization of water
resources.
Availability: Single hard copies of the
Record of Decision may be obtained by
request at the above address. Electronic
copies may also be obtained from the
USIBWC Home Page at https://
www.ibwc.state.gov.
Dated: February 25, 2008.
Susan Daniel,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E8–3999 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7010–01–P
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11669-11677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4089]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Quarterly Status Report of Water Service, Repayment, and Other
Water-Related Contract Negotiations
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of contractual actions that have been
proposed to the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and were pending
through December 31, 2007, and contract actions that have been
completed or discontinued since the last publication of this notice on
November 30, 2007. From the date of this publication, future quarterly
notices during this calendar year will be limited to new, modified,
discontinued, or completed contract actions. This annual notice should
be used as a point of reference to identify changes in future notices.
This notice is one of a variety of means used to inform the public
about proposed contractual actions for capital recovery and management
of project resources and facilities consistent with section 9(f) of the
Reclamation Project Act of 1939. Additional announcements of individual
contract actions may be published in the Federal Register and in
newspapers of general circulation in the areas determined by
Reclamation to be affected by the proposed action.
ADDRESSES: The identity of the approving officer and other information
pertaining to a specific contract proposal may be obtained by calling
or writing the appropriate regional office at the address and telephone
number given for each region in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Kelly, Contract Services
Office, Bureau of Reclamation, PO Box 25007, Denver, Colorado 80225-
0007; telephone 303-445-2888.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Consistent with section 9(f) of the
Reclamation Project Act of 1939 and the rules and regulations published
in 52 FR 11954, April 13, 1987 (43 CFR 426.22), Reclamation will
publish notice of proposed or amendatory contract actions for any
contract for the delivery of project water for authorized uses in
newspapers of general circulation in the affected area at least 60 days
prior to contract execution. Announcements may be in the form of news
releases, legal notices, official letters, memorandums, or other forms
of written material. Meetings, workshops, and/or hearings may also be
used, as appropriate, to provide local publicity. The public
participation procedures do not apply to proposed contracts for the
sale of surplus or interim irrigation water for a term of 1 year or
less. Either of the contracting parties may invite the public to
observe contract proceedings. All public participation procedures will
be coordinated with those involved in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act. Pursuant to the ``Final Revised Public
Participation Procedures'' for water resource-related contract
negotiations, published in 47 FR 7763, February 22, 1982, a tabulation
is provided of all proposed contractual actions in each of the five
Reclamation regions. When contract negotiations are completed, and
prior to execution, each proposed contract form must be approved by the
Secretary of the Interior, or pursuant to delegated or redelegated
authority, the Commissioner of Reclamation or one of the regional
directors. In some instances, congressional review and approval of a
report, water rate, or other terms and conditions of the contract may
be involved.
Public participation in and receipt of comments on contract
proposals will be facilitated by adherence to the following procedures:
1. Only persons authorized to act on behalf of the contracting
entities may negotiate the terms and conditions of a specific contract
proposal.
[[Page 11670]]
2. Advance notice of meetings or hearings will be furnished to
those parties that have made a timely written request for such notice
to the appropriate regional or project office of Reclamation.
3. Written correspondence regarding proposed contracts may be made
available to the general public pursuant to the terms and procedures of
the Freedom of Information Act, as amended.
4. Written comments on a proposed contract or contract action must
be submitted to the appropriate regional officials at the locations and
within the time limits set forth in the advance public notices.
5. All written comments received and testimony presented at any
public hearings will be reviewed and summarized by the appropriate
regional office for use by the contract approving authority.
6. Copies of specific proposed contracts may be obtained from the
appropriate regional director or his designated public contact as they
become available for review and comment.
7. In the event modifications are made in the form of a proposed
contract, the appropriate regional director shall determine whether
republication of the notice and/or extension of the comment period is
necessary.
Factors considered in making such a determination shall include,
but are not limited to (i) the significance of the modification, and
(ii) the degree of public interest which has been expressed over the
course of the negotiations. At a minimum, the regional director shall
furnish revised contracts to all parties who requested the contract in
response to the initial public notice.
Definitions of Abbreviations Used in This Document
BCP Boulder Canyon Project.
Reclamation Bureau of Reclamation.
CAP Central Arizona Project.
CVP Central Valley Project.
CRSP Colorado River Storage Project.
FR Federal Register.
IDD Irrigation and Drainage District.
ID Irrigation District.
M&I Municipal and Industrial.
NMISC New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission.
O&M Operation and Maintenance.
P-SMBP Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program.
PPR Present Perfected Right.
RRA Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.
SOD Safety of Dams.
SRPA Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956.
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
WD Water District.
Pacific Northwest Region: Bureau of Reclamation, 1150 North Curtis
Road, Suite 100, Boise, Idaho 83706-1234, telephone 208-378-5344.
1. Irrigation, M&I, and miscellaneous water users; Idaho, Oregon,
Washington, Montana, and Wyoming: Temporary or interim water service
contracts for irrigation, M&I, or miscellaneous use to provide up to
10,000 acre-feet of water annually for terms of up to 5 years; long-
term contracts for similar service for up to 1,000 acre-feet of water
annually.
2. Rogue River Basin Water Users, Rogue River Basin Project,
Oregon: Water service contracts; $8 per acre-foot per annum.
3. Willamette Basin Water Users, Willamette Basin Project, Oregon:
Water service contracts; $8 per acre-foot per annum.
4. Pioneer Ditch Company, Boise Project, Idaho; Clark and Edwards
Canal and Irrigation Company, Enterprise Canal Company, Ltd., Lenroot
Canal Company, Liberty Park Canal Company, Poplar ID, all in the
Minidoka Project, Idaho; and Juniper Flat District Improvement Company,
Wapinitia Project, Oregon: Amendatory repayment and water service
contracts; purpose is to conform to the RRA.
5. Palmer Creek Water District Improvement Company, Willamette
Basin Project, Oregon: Irrigation water service contract for
approximately 13,000 acre-feet.
6. North Unit ID, Deschutes Project, Oregon: Warren Act contract
with cost of service charge to allow for use of project facilities to
convey nonproject water.
7. Queener Irrigation Improvement District, Willamette Basin
Project, Oregon: Renewal of long-term water service contract to provide
up to 2,150 acre-feet of stored water from the Willamette Basin Project
(USACE project) for the purpose of irrigation within the district's
service area.
8. West Extension ID, Umatilla Project, Oregon: Contract for long-
term boundary expansion to include lands outside of federally
recognized district boundaries.
9. Greenberry ID, Willamette Basin Project, Oregon: Irrigation
water service contract for approximately 7,500 acre-feet of project
water.
10. Six water user entities of the Arrowrock Division, Boise
Project, Idaho: Repayment agreements with districts with spaceholder
contracts for repayment, per legislation, of the reimbursable share of
costs to rehabilitate Arrowrock Dam Outlet Gates under the O&M program.
11. Three irrigation water user entities, Boise Project, Idaho:
Amendatory repayment contract with New Union Ditch Company to reduce
contract by 500 acre-feet of Lucky Peak Reservoir storage space and new
contracts with Wilderness Ranch Owners' Association for 200 acre-feet
and with Osprey Subdivision Project Owners' Association for 300 acre-
feet of Lucky Peak Reservoir storage space.
12. Six irrigation water user entities, Rogue River Basin Project,
Oregon: Long-term contracts for exchange of water service with six
entities for the provision of up to 2,634 acre-feet of stored water
from Applegate Reservoir (USACE project) for irrigation use in exchange
for the transfer of out-of-stream water rights from the Little
Applegate River to instream flow rights with the State of Oregon for
instream flow use.
13. Cowiche Creek Water Users Association and Yakima-Tieton ID,
Yakima Project, Washington: Warren Act contract to allow the use of
excess capacity in Yakima Project facilities to convey up to 1,583.4
acre-feet of nonproject water for the irrigation of approximately 396
acres of nonproject land.
The following action has been reported as completed since the last
publication of this notice on November 30, 2007:
1. (11) Lake Lowell water users, Boise Project, Idaho-Oregon:
Repayment contracts for the reimbursable cost of SOD modifications to
Deer Flat Dams. The Contracts have been executed.
Mid-Pacific Region: Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way,
Sacramento, California 95825-1898, telephone 916-978-5250.
1. Irrigation water districts, individual irrigators, M&I and
miscellaneous water users, California, Nevada, and Oregon: Temporary
(interim) water service contracts for available project water for
irrigation, M&I, or fish and wildlife purposes providing up to 10,000
acre-feet of water annually for terms up to 5 years; temporary Warren
Act contracts for use of project facilities for terms up to 1 year;
temporary conveyance agreements with the State of California for
various purposes; long-term contracts for similar service for up to
1,000 acre-feet annually.
2. Contractors from the American River Division, Cross Valley
Canal, San Felipe Division, West San Joaquin Division, and Elk Creek
Community Services District, CVP, California: Renewal of 29 long-term
water service contracts; water quantities for these contracts total in
excess of 2.1M acre-feet. These contract actions will be accomplished
through long-term renewal contracts pursuant to Public
[[Page 11671]]
Law 102-575. Prior to completion of negotiation of long-term renewal
contracts, existing interim renewal water service contracts may be
renewed through successive interim renewal of contracts. Execution of
long-term renewal contracts has been completed for the Friant, Delta,
Shasta, and Trinity River Divisions. Long-term renewal contract
execution is continuing for the other contractors.
3. Redwood Valley County WD, SRPA, California: Restructuring the
repayment schedule pursuant to Public Law 100-516.
4. El Dorado County Water Agency, CVP, California: M&I water
service contract to supplement existing water supply: 15,000 acre-feet
for El Dorado County Water Agency authorized by Public Law 101-514. The
supply would be subcontracted to El Dorado ID and Georgetown Divide
Public Utility District.
5. Sutter Extension WD, Delano-Earlimart ID, and the State of
California Department of Water Resources, CVP, California: Pursuant to
Public Law 102-575, cooperative agreements with non-Federal entities
for the purpose of providing funding for CVP refuge water wheeling
facility improvements to provide water for refuge and private wetlands.
6. CVP Service Area, California: Temporary water purchase
agreements for acquisition of 20,000 to 200,000 acre-feet of water for
fish and wildlife purposes as authorized by Public Law 102-575 for
terms of up to 3 years.
7. El Dorado ID, CVP, California: Execution of long-term Warren Act
contracts for conveyance of nonproject water (one contract for Weber
Reservoir and pre-1914 ditch rights in the amount of 3,344 acre-feet,
and one contract for Project 184 water in the amount of 11,000 acre-
feet). The contracts will allow CVP facilities to be used to deliver
nonproject water to El Dorado ID for use within its service area.
8. Horsefly, Klamath, Langell Valley, and Tulelake IDs, Klamath
Project, Oregon: Repayment contracts for SOD work on Clear Lake Dam.
These districts will share in the repayment of costs, and each district
will have a separate contract.
9. Casitas Municipal WD, Ventura Project, California: Repayment
contract for SOD work on Casitas Dam.
10. Warren Act Contracts, CVP, California: Execution of long-term
Warren Act contracts (up to 25 years) with various entities for
conveyance of nonproject water in the Delta Division, the Friant
Division, and the San Luis Unit facilities.
11. Tuolumne Utilities District (formerly Tuolumne Regional WD),
CVP, California: Long-term water service contract for up to 9,000 acre-
feet from New Melones Reservoir, and possibly long-term contract for
storage of nonproject water in New Melones Reservoir.
12. Banta Carbona ID, CVP, California: Long-term Warren Act
contract for conveyance of nonproject water in the Delta-Mendota Canal.
13. Byron-Bethany ID, CVP, California: Long-term Warren Act
contract for conveyance of nonproject water in the Delta-Mendota Canal.
14. Madera-Chowchilla Water and Power Authority, CVP, California:
Agreement to transfer the operation, maintenance, and replacement and
certain financial and administrative activities related to the Madera
Canal and associated works.
15. Montecito WD, Cachuma Project, California: Contract to transfer
title of distribution system to the Montecito WD. Title transfer
authorized by Public Law 108-315, ``Carpinteria and Montecito Water
Distribution Conveyance Act of 2004.''
16. Sacramento Suburban WD, CVP, California: Execution of a long-
term Warren Act contract for conveyance of nonproject water. The
contract will allow CVP facilities to be used to deliver nonproject
water provided from the Placer County Water Agency to Sacramento
Suburban WD for use within its service area.
17. Truckee Meadows Water Authority, Town of Fernley, State of
California, City of Reno, City of Sparks, Washoe County, State of
Nevada, Truckee-Carson ID, and any other local interest or Native
American Tribal Interest who may have negotiated rights under Public
Law 101-618; Nevada and California: Contract for the storage of non-
Federal water in Truckee River reservoirs as authorized by Public Law
101-618 and the Preliminary Settlement Agreement. The contracts shall
be consistent with the Truckee River Water Quality Settlement Agreement
and the terms and conditions of the proposed Truckee River Operating
Agreement.
18. San Joaquin Valley National Cemetery, U.S. Department of
Veteran Affairs, Delta Division, CVP, California: Renewal of the long-
term water service contract for up to 850 acre-feet. The contract was
executed on February 28, 2005. The wheeling agreement for conveyance
through the California State Aqueduct is pending.
19. A Canal Fish Screens, Klamath Project, Oregon: Negotiation of
an O&M contract for the A Canal Fish Screen with Klamath ID.
20. Ady Canal Headgates, Klamath Project, Oregon: Transfer of
operational control to Klamath Drainage District of the headgates
located at the railroad. Reclamation does not own the land at the
headgates, only operational control pursuant to a railroad agreement.
21. Delta Lands Reclamation District No. 770, CVP, California:
Long-term Warren Act for conveying nonproject flood flows.
22. Pershing County Water Conservation District, Pershing County,
Lander County, and the State of Nevada, Humboldt Project, Nevada: Title
transfer to lands and features of the Humboldt Project.
23. PacifiCorp, Klamath Project, Oregon: Execution of long-term
agreement for lease of power privilege and the O&M of Link River Dam.
This agreement will provide for operations of Link River Dam,
coordinated operations with the non-Federal Keno Dam, and provision of
power by PacifiCorp for Klamath Project purposes to ensure project
water deliveries and to meet ESA requirements.
24. Mendota Wildlife Area, CVP, California: Reimbursement agreement
between the California Department of Fish and Game and Reclamation for
conveyance service costs to deliver Level 2 water to the Mendota
Wildlife Area during infrequent periods when the Mendota Pool is down
due to unexpected but needed maintenance. This action is taken pursuant
to Public Law 102-575, Title 34, section 3406(d)(1), to meet full Level
2 water needs of the Mendota Wildlife Area.
25. Mercy Springs WD, CVP, California: Proposed partial assignment
of 2,825 acre-feet of Mercy Springs WD's CVP supply to San Luis WD for
irrigation and M&I use.
26. Oro Loma WD, CVP, California: Proposed partial assignment of
4,000 acre-feet of Oro Loma WD's CVP supply to Westlands WD for
irrigation and M&I use.
27. San Luis WD, CVP, California: Proposed partial assignment of
2,400 acre-feet of San Luis WD's CVP supply to Santa Nella County Water
District for M&I use.
28. Placer County Water Agency, CVP, California: Proposed exchange
agreement under section 14 of the 1939 Act to exchange up to 71,000
acre-feet of Placer County Water Agency's American River Middle Fork
Project water for use by Reclamation, for a like amount of Sacramento
River for use by Placer County Water Agency.
29. Eighteen contractors in the Klamath Project, Oregon: Amendment
of 18 repayment contracts or negotiation of new contracts to allow for
recovery of
[[Page 11672]]
additional capital costs to the Klamath Project. These contract actions
will be accomplished through amendments to the existing repayment
contracts or negotiation of new contracts.
30. Orland Unit Water User's Association, Orland Project,
California: Repayment contract for SOD costs assigned to the irrigation
purposes of Stony Gorge Dam.
31. Contract for exchange of water among the United States, San
Luis WD, and Meyers Farms Family Trust: The contract will allow for an
exchange with Reclamation of previously banked water for a like amount
of project water made available to San Luis WD on behalf of Meyers
Farms.
32. Goleta WD, Cachuma Project, California: Agreement for title
transfer of a federally owned distribution system subject to approved
legislation.
33. Cawelo WD and Lindsay-Strathmore ID, CVP, California: Long-term
Warren Act contract for conveying nonproject water for a non-CVP
contractor.
The following actions have been reported as discontinued or
completed since the last publication of this notice on November 30,
2007:
Discontinued Contract Action
1. (39) City of Tracy, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Santa
Clara Valley WD, and San Benito County Water Agency; all CVP;
California: Amend existing water service contracts to conform to
current Reclamation law. Contracts with Santa Clara and San Benito were
executed March 28, 2007. The two remaining contract actions have
discontinued.
2. (42) Elk Creek Community Services District, CVP, California:
Renewal of long-term water service contract for up to 100 acre-feet for
a period of 40 years. This action item has been combined into item No.
2.
Completed Contract Actions
1. (21) Sacramento River Settlement Contracts, CVP, California:
Five contracts remain to be executed out of a total of 145 contracts;
water quantities for these contracts total 2.2M acre-feet. These
contracts will be renewed for a period of 40 years. The contracts
reflect agreements to settle disputes over water rights' claims on the
Sacramento River. All contracts have been executed.
2. (30) Broadview WD, CVP, California: Proposed assignment of
27,000 acre-feet of Broadview WD's entire CVP supply to Westlands WD
for irrigation and M&I use. Contract was executed March 1, 2007.
3. (38) Elk Creek Community Services District, California, CVP:
Interim renewal contract for up to 3 years to continue project M&I
water service while the Operations Criteria and Plan consultations
continue. Contract was executed August 20, 2007.
4. (39) City of Tracy, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Santa
Clara Valley WD, and San Benito County Water Agency; all CVP;
California: Amend existing water service contracts to conform to
current Reclamation law. Contracts with Santa Clara and San Benito were
executed March 28, 2007. The two remaining contract actions have
discontinued.
5. (43) Westlands WD, CVP, California: Interim renewal of water
service contract (Case No. CV-79-106-EDP) for an initial period of 3
years, with subsequent interim renewal contracts of 2 years pursuant to
section 3404(c) of the CVPIA. Contract was executed December 27, 2007.
6. (44) Westlands WD, CVP, California: Interim renewal of water
service contract (No. 14-06-200-495A) for an initial period of 3 years,
with subsequent interim renewal contracts of 2 years pursuant to
section 3404(c) of the CVPIA. Contract was executed December 27, 2007.
7. (49) Sacramento Municipal Utility District, CVP, California:
Amendment of existing water service contract to allow for additional
points of diversion and assignment of up to 30,000 acre-feet of CVP
water to the Sacramento County Water Agency. The amended contract will
conform to current Reclamation law. Contract was executed July 12,
2006.
8. (51) Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, CVP, California:
Execution of a long-term operations agreement for flood control
operations of Folsom Dam and Reservoir to allow for recovery of costs
associated with operating a variable flood control pool of 400,000 to
670,000 acre-feet of water during the flood control season. This
agreement is to conform to Federal law. Contract was executed December
6, 2004.
Lower Colorado Region: Bureau of Reclamation, PO Box 61470 (Nevada
Highway and Park Street), Boulder City, Nevada 89006-1470, telephone
702-293-8192.
1. Milton and Jean Phillips, BCP, Arizona: Colorado River water
delivery contract for 60 acre-feet of Colorado River water per year as
recommended by the Arizona Department of Water Resources.
2. John J. Peach, BCP, Arizona: Colorado River water delivery
contracts for 456 acre-feet of Colorado River water per year as
recommended by the Arizona Department of Water Resources.
3. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, CAP, Arizona: O&M
contract for its CAP water distribution system.
4. Miscellaneous PPR No. 38, BCP, California: Assign Schroeder's
portion of the PPR to Murphy Broadcasting.
5. Gila Project Works, Gila Project, Arizona: Title transfer of
facilities and certain lands in the Wellton-Mohawk Division from the
United States to the Wellton-Mohawk IDD.
6. Shepard Water Company, Inc., BCP, Arizona: Contract for the
annual delivery of 50 acre-feet of fourth-priority water per year for
domestic use.
7. All-American Canal, BCP, California: Agreement among
Reclamation, Imperial ID, Metropolitan WD, and Coachella Valley WD for
the federally funded construction of a reservoir(s) and associated
facilities that will improve the regulation and management of Colorado
River water.
8. Wellton-Mohawk IDD, BCP, Arizona: Amend contract No. 1-07-30-
W0021 to revise the acre-foot amount for delivery of domestic use water
to 12,000 acre-feet per calendar year, within the district's current
overall Colorado River water entitlement.
9. System Conservation Agreements, BCP, Arizona and California:
Develop and execute short-term agreements to implement a demonstration
system conservation program to evaluate the feasibility of acquiring
water through a voluntary land fallowing program to replace drainage
water currently being bypassed to the Cienega de Santa Clara.
10. Chacha AZ, LLC, BCP, Arizona: Contract for 2,100 acre-feet per
year of fourth-priority water for agricultural purposes.
11. City of Yuma, BCP, Arizona: Supplemental and amendatory
contract to provide for additional point of delivery for a new pump
station to be constructed on the Gila Gravity Main Canal, with initial
intake capacity of 20 million gallons per day, building up to 40
million gallons per day at full design capacity.
12. Basic Management, Inc., BCP, Nevada: Amend contract to add
additional service areas where part of the contractor's entitlement can
be used.
13. City of Yuma, BCP, Arizona: Amendment to extend contract to
allow for the diversion of water through Yuma Project facilities for an
additional term of 10 years.
14. Hopi Tribe, Arizona Game and Fish Commission, BCP, Arizona:
Approval of an assignment and transfer of 1,500 acre-feet of fourth-
priority water entitlement from the Hopi Tribe to the Commission (MSCP
Option).
[[Page 11673]]
15. Hopi Tribe, BCP, Arizona: Amend contract to decrease the Hopi
Tribe's fourth-priority water entitlement by 1,500 acre-feet per year
(MSCP Option).
16. Arizona Game and Fish Commission, BCP, Arizona: Amend contract
to increase the Commission's fourth-priority water entitlement by 1,500
acre-feet per year being assigned from the Hopi Tribe (MSCP Option).
17. Mohave County Water Authority, B&F Investment, LLC, Springs del
Sol; Domestic Water Improvement District, DII-Emerald Springs; BCP;
Arizona: Approval of an assignment and transfer of 300 acre-feet of
fourth-priority water entitlement from the Authority to B&F, Springs
del Sol, and Emerald Springs.
18. Mohave County Water Authority: Amend contract to decrease the
Authority's fourth-priority water entitlement by 300 acre-feet per year
(La Paz County Option).
19. Hopi Tribe, B&F Investment, Springs del Sol Domestic Water
Improvement District, DII-Emerald Springs; BCP; Arizona: Approval of an
assignment and transfer of 300 acre-feet of fourth-priority water
entitlement from the Hopi Tribe to B&F, Springs del Sol, and Emerald
Springs.
20. Hopi Tribe, BCP, Arizona: Amend contract to decrease Hopi
Tribe's fourth-priority water entitlement by 300 acre-feet per year (La
Paz County Option).
21. Ehrenberg Improvement Association on behalf of B&F Investment,
BCP, Arizona: Amend contract to increase Ehrenberg's fourth-priority
water entitlement by 100 acre-feet per year being assigned to B&F from
the Mohave County Water Authority (50 acre-feet) and from Hopi Tribe
(50 acre-feet).
22. Springs del Sol Domestic Water Improvement District, BCP,
Arizona: Enter into a new Section 5 contract with Springs del Sol for
100 acre-feet per year of fourth-priority water being assigned to
Springs del Sol from the Mohave County Water Authority (50 acre-feet)
and from Hopi Tribe (50 acre-feet).
23. DII-Emerald Springs, BCP, Arizona: Enter into a new Section 5
contract for 400 acre-feet per year of fourth-priority water being
assigned to Emerald Springs by the Mohave County Water Authority (200
acre-feet) and by the Hopi Tribe (200 acre-feet).
24. Cibola Valley IDD, BCP, Arizona: Amend contract to decrease the
district's fourth-priority water entitlement by 2,700 acre-feet per
year that is being assigned from the district to Arizona Recreational
Facilities, LLC.
25. Arizona Recreational Facilities, LLC; BCP; Arizona: Enter into
a new Section 5 contract with Arizona Recreational Facilities for 2,700
acre-feet per year of fourth-priority Colorado River water that is
being assigned to them from the Cibola Valley IDD.
The following actions have been reported as discontinued or
completed since the last publication of this notice on November 30,
2007:
Discontinued Contract Action
1. (26) Cibola Valley IDD, BCP, Arizona: Assign 396 acre-feet per
year of the District's entitlement to fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-
priority water to The Conservation Fund.
Completed Contract Actions
1. (4) Maricopa-Stanfield IDD, CAP, Arizona: Amend distribution
system repayment contract No. 4-07-30-W0047 to reschedule repayment
pursuant to June 28, 1996, agreement. Contract was executed December
14, 2007.
2. (5) Indian and non-Indian agricultural and M&I water users, CAP,
Arizona: New and amendatory contracts for repayment of Federal
expenditures for construction of distribution systems. Contract was
executed December 14, 2007.
3. (6) Central Arizona IDD, CAP, Arizona: Amend distribution system
repayment contract No. 4-07-30-W0048 to modify repayment terms pursuant
to final order issued by U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Arizona.
Contract was executed December 14, 2007.
4. (7) Coachella Valley WD and/or The Metropolitan WD of Southern
California, BCP, California: Contract to fund the Department of the
Interior's expenses to conserve seepage water from the Coachella Branch
of the All-American Canal in accordance with Title II of the San Luis
Rey Indian Water Rights Settlement Act, dated November 17, 1988. The
contract has been executed.
5. (11) North Gila Valley IDD, Yuma ID, and Yuma Mesa IDD; Yuma
Mesa Division, Gila Project; Arizona: Administrative action to amend
each district's Colorado River water delivery contract to effectuate a
change from a ``pooled'' water entitlement for the Division to a
quantified entitlement for each district. The contracts have been
executed.
6. (12) Indian and/or non-Indian M&I users, CAP, Arizona: New or
amendatory water service contracts or subcontracts in accordance with
an anticipated final record of decision for reallocation of CAP water,
as discussed in the Secretary of the Interior's notice published on
page 41456 of the FR on July 30, 1999. Contract was executed December
14, 2007.
7. (13) Litchfield Park Service Company, CAP, Arizona: Proposed
partial assignments of subcontract for 5,590 acre-feet of CAP M&I water
to the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, which is exercising
its authority as the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment
District, and to the cities of Avondale, Carefree, and Goodyear.
Contract was executed August 14, 2007.
8. (16) Various irrigation districts, CAP, Arizona: Amend
distribution system repayment contracts to provide for partial
assumption of debt by the Central Arizona Water Conservation District
and the United States upon enactment of Federal legislation providing
for resolution of CAP issues. Contract was executed December 14, 2007.
9. (17) Mohave County Water Authority, BCP, Arizona: Amendatory
Colorado River water delivery contract to include the delivery of 3,500
acre-feet per year of fourth-priority water and to delete the delivery
of 3,500 acre-feet per year of fifth-or sixth-priority water. Contract
was executed June 22, 2007.
10. (19) Sunrise Water Company, CAP, Arizona: Proposed assignment
of subcontract for 944 acre-feet of CAP M&I water per year to the
Central Arizona Water Conservation District, which is exercising its
authority as the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District.
Contract was executed August 14, 2007.
11. (20) West End Water Company, CAP, Arizona: Proposed assignment
of subcontract for 157 acre-feet of CAP M&I water per year to the
Central Arizona Water Conservation District, which is exercising its
authority as the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District.
Contract was executed August 14, 2007.
12. (21) New River Utilities Company, CAP, Arizona: Proposed
assignment of subcontract for 1,885 acre-feet of CAP M&I water to the
Central Arizona Water Conservation District, which is exercising its
authority as the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District.
Contract was executed August 14, 2007.
13. (22) Metropolitan WD and others, BCP, Arizona and California:
Contract to provide for the recovery by Metropolitan WD of interstate
underground storage credits previously placed in underground storage in
Arizona by the Central Arizona Water Conservation District under
agreements executed in 1992 and 1994, and to document the Arizona Water
Banking Authority's responsibility in agreeing to Arizona's forbearance
in the use of Colorado River water to permit the
[[Page 11674]]
Secretary of the Interior to release that quantity of water for
diversion and use by Metropolitan WD. Letter agreement was executed
December 20, 2006.
14. (25) Arizona Water Settlements Act, CAP, Arizona:
Implementation of the contracting requirements of Title I Central
Arizona Project Settlement Act of 2004, Title II Gila River Indian
Community Water Rights Settlement, Title III Southern Arizona Water
Rights Settlement, and Title IV San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights
Settlement. Contracts were executed December 14, 2007.
15. (27) Mohave County Water Authority, BCP, Arizona: Amend
contract No. 04-XX-30-W0431 to provide for a change of type and place
of use of water. Contract was executed July 6, 2007.
16. (34) Mohave County Water Authority, BCP, Arizona: Assign a
portion of Mohave County's Colorado River water entitlement to the
Arizona Game and Fish Commission. Contract was executed September 25,
2007.
Upper Colorado Region: Bureau of Reclamation, 125 South State
Street, Room 6107, Salt Lake City, Utah 84138-1102, telephone 801-524-
3864.
1. Individual irrigators, M&I, and miscellaneous water users;
Initial Units, CRSP; Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico: Temporary
(interim) water service contracts for surplus project water for
irrigation or M&I use to provide up to 10, 000 acre-feet of water
annually for terms up to 10 years; long-term contracts for similar
service for up to 1,000 acre-feet of water annually.
(a) Camp Id-Ra-Ha-Je West Association, Aspinall Storage Unit, CRSP:
Camp Id-Ra-Ha-Je West Association has requested a 40-year water service
contract for 1 acre-foot of M&I water out of Blue Mesa Reservoir, which
requires Camp Id-Ra-Ha-Je West Association to present a Plan of
Augmentation to the Division 4 Water Court.
(b) Maureen A. Call, Aspinall Storage Unit, CRSP: Ms. Call has
requested a 40-year water service contract for 1 acre-foot of M&I water
out of Blue Mesa Reservoir, which requires Ms. Call to present a Plan
of Augmentation to the Division 4 Water Court.
(c) Vanessa Rueckert (Hidden Mesa Estates), Aspinall Storage Unit,
CRSP: Ms. Rueckert has requested a 40-year water service contract for 1
acre-foot of M&I water out of Blue Mesa Reservoir, which requires Ms.
Rueckert to present a Plan of Augmentation to the Division 4 Water
Court.
(d) Thomas Alan Kay (North Fork Reserve), Aspinall Storage Unit,
CRSP: Mr. Kay has requested a 40-year water service contract for 11
acre-feet of M&I water out of Blue Mesa Reservoir, which requires them
to present a Plan of Augmentation to the Division 4 Water Court.
2. San Juan-Chama Project, New Mexico: The United States is holding
the remaining 2,990 acre-feet of project water for potential use in
Indian water rights settlements in New Mexico.
3. Various Contactors, San Juan-Chama Project, New Mexico: The
United States proposes to lease water from various contractors to
stabilize flows in a critical reach of the Rio Grande in order to meet
the needs of irrigators and preserve habitat for the silvery minnow.
4. Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Association, Upper Gunnison River
Water Conservancy District, and the Colorado River Water Conservation
District; Uncompahgre Project; Colorado: Water management agreement for
water stored at Taylor Park Reservoir and the Wayne N. Aspinall Storage
Units to improve water management.
5. Southern Ute Indian Tribe, Florida Project, Colorado: Supplement
to contract No. 14-06-400-3038, dated May 7, 1963, for an additional
181 acre-feet of project water, plus 563 acre-feet of project water
pursuant to the 1986 Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Final Settlement
Agreement.
6. Individual Irrigators, Carlsbad Project, New Mexico: The United
States proposes to enter into long-term forbearance lease agreements
with individuals who have privately held water rights to divert
nonproject water either directly from the Pecos River or from shallow/
artesian wells in the Pecos River Watershed. This action will result in
additional water in the Pecos River to make up for the water depletions
caused by changes in operations at Sumner Dam which were made to
improve conditions for a threatened species, the Pecos bluntnose
shiner.
7. La Plata Conservancy District, Animas-La Plata Project, New
Mexico: Cost-sharing/repayment contract for up to 1,560 acre-feet per
year of M&I water; contract terms to be consistent with the Colorado
Ute Settlement Act Amendments of 2000 (Title III of Pub. L. 106-554).
8. LeChee Chapter of the Navajo Nation, Glen Canyon Unit, CRSP,
Arizona: Long-term contract for 950 acre-feet of water for municipal
purposes.
9. City of Page, Arizona, Glen Canyon Unit, CRSP, Arizona: Long-
term contract for 975 acre-feet of water for municipal purposes.
10. El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 and Isleta del
Sur Pueblo, Rio Grande Project, Texas: Contract to convert up to 1,000
acre-feet of the Pueblo's project irrigation water to use for tradition
and religious purposes.
11. Project Operator, Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado: Contract
to transfer the operation, maintenance, and replacement
responsibilities of most project facilities to the project operator,
pursuant to section 6 of the Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902 and other
Federal reclamation laws.
12. Project Operations Committee, Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado
and New Mexico: Agreement among the United States and the project
sponsors to coordinate and oversee the necessary operations,
maintenance, and replacement activities of the project works.
13. Southern Ute Indian Tribe, Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado:
Water delivery contract for 33,519 acre-feet of M&I water; contract
terms to be consistent with the Colorado Ute Settlement Act Amendments
of 2000 (Title III of Pub. L. 106-554).
14. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado:
Water delivery contract for 33,519 acre-feet of M&I water; contract
terms to be consistent with the Colorado Ute Settlement Act Amendments
of 2000 (Title III of Pub. L. 106-554).
15. Navajo Nation, Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado and New
Mexico: Water delivery contract for 4,680 acre-feet of M&I water;
contract terms to be consistent with the Colorado Ute Settlement Act
Amendments of 2000 (Title III of Pub. L. 106-554).
16. State of Colorado, Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado and New
Mexico: Cost-sharing/repayment contract for up to 10,440 acre-feet per
year of M&I water; contract terms to be consistent with the Colorado
Ute Settlement Act Amendments of 2000 (Title III of Pub. L. 106-554).
17. Public Service Company of New Mexico, Reclamation, and the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation
Program: The agreement identifies that Reclamation may provide cost-
share funding for the recovery monitoring and research, and O&M of the
constructed fish passage at the Public Service Company's site pursuant
to Public Law 106-392, dated October 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1602.
18. The Grand Valley Water Users Association, Reclamation, and the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Construction and O&M of a fish passage
and fish screen facilities at the Grand Valley Diversion Dam and
Government Highline Canal Facilities to facilitate recovery of
endangered fish species in
[[Page 11675]]
the Colorado River Basin (October 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1602, Pub. L.
106-392).
19. Central Utah Project, Utah: Petition for project water among
the United States, the Central Utah Water Conservancy District, and the
Duchesne County Water Conservancy District for use of 2,500 acre-feet
of irrigation water from the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah
Project.
20. Navajo Nation, San Juan River Dineh Water Users, Reclamation,
and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; San Juan River Basin Recovery
Implementation Program: The agreement identifies that Reclamation may
provide cost-share funding for the recovery monitoring and research,
and O&M of the constructed fish passage at the Hogback Diversion Dam,
pursuant to Public Law 106-392 dated October 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1602.
21. Jensen Unit, Central Utah Project, Utah: The Uintah Water
Conservancy District has requested a contract with provision to prepay
at a discounted rate the remaining 3,300 acre-feet of unmarketed
project M&I water.
22. Warren-Vosburg Ditch Company, Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado
and New Mexico: Contract for payment of O&M costs associated with the
Warren-Vosburg ditch.
23. Aaron Million, Million Conservation Resource Group, Flaming
Gorge Storage Unit, CRSP: Mr. Million has requested a Standby Contract
to secure the first right to contract for up to 165,000 acre-feet
annually of M&I water service from Flaming Gorge Reservoir for a
proposed privately financed and constructed transbasin diversion
project.
24. Weber Basin Water Conservancy District, Weber Basin Project,
Utah: Contract providing for the district to repay to the United States
15 percent of the cost of Phase I SOD modifications to the foundation
at Arthur V. Watkins Dam.
25. Weber Basin Water Conservancy District, Weber Basin Project,
Utah: Contract providing for the district to repay to the United States
15 percent of the cost of Phase II SOD modifications to the foundation
at Arthur V. Watkins Dam.
26. Cottonwood Creek Consolidated Company, Emery County Project,
Utah: Cottonwood Creek Consolidated Irrigation Company has requested a
contract for carriage of up to 5,600 acre-feet of nonproject water
through Cottonwood Creek-Huntington Canal.
27. Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority and
Reclamation, San Juan-Chama Project, New Mexico: Contract to store up
to 50,000 acre-feet of project water in Elephant Butte Reservoir. The
proposed contract would have a 40-year maximum term and would replace
existing contract No. 3-CS-53-01510 which expires on January 26, 2008.
The Act of December 29, 1981, Public Law. 97-140, 95 Stat. 1717
provides authority to enter into this contract.
28. Dolores Water Conservancy District, Dolores Project, Colorado:
The District has requested a water service contract for 1,402 acre-feet
of newly identified project water for irrigation. The proposed water
service contract will provide 417 acre-feet of project water for
irrigation of the Ute Enterprise and 985 acre-feet for use by the
District's full-service irrigators.
29. Carlsbad ID and New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission,
Carlsbad Project, New Mexico: Contract, for a 5-year term, for the
District to perform phreatophyte (Salt Cedar) control and for the
Commission to provide annual funding of $150,000.
The following actions have been reported as discontinued or
completed since the last publication of this notice on November 30,
2007:
Discontinued Contract Action
1. (18) Carlsbad ID and the NMISC, Carlsbad Project, New Mexico:
Contract for storage and delivery of water produced by the NMISC's
River Augmentation Program, among Reclamation, Carlsbad ID, and the
NMISC. This will allow for storage of NMISC water in project facilities
resulting in additional project water supply.
Completed Contract Actions
1. (1)(e) Old Castle SW Group dba United Companies, Aspinall
Storage Unit, CRSP: United Companies has requested a 40-year water
service contract for 5 acre-feet of M&I water out of Blue Mesa
Reservoir, which requires United Companies to present a Plan of
Augmentation to the Division 4 Water Court. Contract was executed
September 24, 2007.
2. (1)(f) Ward Creek LLC, Aspinall Storage Unit, CRSP: Ward Creek
LLC has requested a 40-year water service contract for 1 acre-foot of
M&I water out of the Blue Mesa Reservoir, which requires Ward Creek LLC
to present a Plan of Augmentation to the Division 4 Water Court.
Contract was executed October 9, 2007.
3. (27) North Fork Water Conservancy District and Ragged Mountain
Water Users Association, Paonia Project, Colorado: North Fork and
Ragged Mountain have requested a contract for supplemental water from
the Paonia Project. This contract is for municipal uses. Contract was
executed May 21, 2007.
Great Plains Region: Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 36900, Federal
Building, 316 North 26th Street, Billings, Montana 59101, telephone
406-247-7752.
1. Individual irrigators, M&I, and miscellaneous water users;
Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South
Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming: Temporary (interim) water service contracts
for the sale, conveyance, storage, and exchange of surplus project
water and nonproject water for irrigation or M&I use to provide up to
10,000 acre-feet of water annually for a term of up to 1 year.
2. Green Mountain Reservoir, Colorado-Big Thompson Project,
Colorado: Water service contracts for irrigation and M&I; contracts for
the sale of water from the marketable yield to water users within the
Colorado River Basin of western Colorado.
3. Ruedi Reservoir, Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado: Second
round water sales from the regulatory capacity of Ruedi Reservoir.
Water service and repayment contracts for up to 17,000 acre-feet
annually for M&I use.
4. Garrison Diversion Unit, P-SMBP, North Dakota: Renegotiation of
the master repayment contract with Garrison Diversion Conservancy
District to conform with the Dakota Water Resources Act of 2000;
negotiation of repayment contracts with irrigators and M&I users.
5. Highland-Hanover ID, Hanover-Bluff Unit, P-SMBP, Wyoming:
Negotiate long-term water service contract.
6. Upper Bluff ID, Hanover-Bluff Unit, P-SMBP, Wyoming: Negotiate
long-term water service contract.
7. Dickinson-Heart River Mutual Aid Corporation, Dickinson Unit, P-
SMBP, North Dakota: Negotiate renewal of water service contract for
irrigation of lands below Dickinson Dam in western North Dakota.
8. Savage ID, P-SMBP, Montana: The District is currently seeking
title transfer. The contract is subject to renewal pending outcome of
the title transfer process. The existing interim contract is due to
expire in May 2008. Preparing to renew a long term contract upon
request by the District.
9. Dickinson Parks and Recreation District, Dickinson Unit, P-SMBP,
North Dakota: A temporary contract has been negotiated with the
District for minor amounts of water from Dickinson Reservoir. Negotiate
a long-term water service contract for minor amounts of water from
Dickinson Dam.
[[Page 11676]]
10. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado: Consideration of excess
capacity contracts in the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project.
11. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado: Consideration of requests
for long-term contracts for the use of excess capacity in the
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project from the Southeastern Colorado Water
Conservancy District, the City of Aurora, and the Colorado Springs
Utilities. The contract with the City of Aurora was executed on
September 12, 2007.
12. Individual irrigators, Heart Butte Unit, P-SMBP, North Dakota:
Renew long-term water service contracts for minor amounts of less than
1,000 acre-feet of irrigation water annually from the Heart River below
Heart Butte Dam.
13. Municipal Subdistrict of the Northern Colorado Water
Conservancy District, Colorado-Big Thompson Project, Colorado:
Consideration of a new long-term contract or amendment of contract No.
4-07-70-W0107 with the Municipal Subdistrict and the Northern Colorado
Water Conservancy District for the proposed Windy Gap Firming Project.
14. Northern Integrated Supply Project, Colorado-Big Thompson
Project, Colorado: Consideration of a new long-term contract with
approximately 14 regional water suppliers and the Northern Colorado
Water Conservancy District for the Northern Integrated Supply Project.
15. Stutsman County Park Board, Jamestown Unit, P-SMBP, North
Dakota: The Board is requesting a contract for minor amounts of water
under a long-term contract to serve domestic needs for cabin owners at
Jamestown Reservoir, North Dakota.
16. Security Water and Sanitation District, Fryingpan-Arkansas
Project, Colorado: Consideration of a request for a long-term contract
for the use of excess capacity in the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project.
17. City of Fountain, Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado:
Consideration of a request for a long-term contract for the use of
excess capacity in the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project.
18. Colorado Springs Utilities, Colorado-Big Thompson Project,
Colorado Springs, Colorado: Consideration of a request for a long-term
agreement for water substitution and power interference in the
Colorado-Big Thompson Project.
19. LeClair-Riverton ID, Boysen Unit, P-SMBP, Wyoming: Contract
renewal of long-term water service contract.
20. Riverton Valley ID, Boysen Unit, P-SMBP, Wyoming: Contract
renewal of long-term water service contract.
21. ExxonMobil Corporation, Ruedi Reservoir, Fryingpan-Arkansas
Project, Colorado: Consideration of ExxonMobil Corporation's request to
amend its Ruedi Round I contract to include additional uses for the
water.
22. Pueblo West Metropolitan District, Pueblo West, Fryingpan-
Arkansas Project, Colorado: Consideration of a request for a long-term
contract for the use of excess capacity in the Fryingpan-Arkansas
Project.
23. City of Golden, Colorado-Big Thompson Project, Colorado:
Consideration of a request for a long-term agreement for power
interference in the Colorado-Big Thompson Project.
24. Colorado River Water Conservation District, Ruedi Reservoir,
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado: Consideration of a request for a
second round water sales or repayment contract from the regulatory
capacity of Ruedi Reservoir for up to 5,000 acre-feet annually for M&I
uses and also providing water to the endangered fish and supplementing
in-stream flows.
25. Colorado River Water Conservation District, Colorado-Big
Thompson Project, Colorado: Long-term exchange, conveyance, and storage
contract to implement the Exhibit B Agreement of the Settlement
Agreement on Operating Procedures for Green Mountain Reservoir
Concerning Operating Limitations and in Resolution of the Petition
Filed August 7, 2003, in Case No. 49-CV-2782 (The United States v.
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, et al., U.S. District
Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 2782 and Consolidated Case
Nos. 5016 and 5017).
26. Colorado River Water Conservation District, Colorado-Big
Thompson Project, Colorado: Consideration of a request for a long-term
contract for the use of excess capacity for storage and exchange in
Green Mountain Reservoir in the Colorado-Big Thompson Project.
27. Glendo Unit, P-SMBP, Wyoming: Contract renewal for long-term
water service contracts with Burbank Ditch, New Grattan Ditch Company,
Torrington ID, Lucerne Canal and Power Company, and Wright and Murphy
Ditch Company.
28. Glendo Unit, P-SMBP, Nebraska: Contract renewal for long-term
water service contracts with Bridgeport, Enterprise, and Mitchell IDs,
and Central Nebraska Public Power and ID.
29. Glendo Unit, P-SMBP, Wyoming: Contract renewal for long-term
water storage contract with Pacificorp.
30. Roger W. Evans (Individual), Boysen Unit, P-SMBP, Wyoming:
Renewal of long-term water service contracts.
31. City of Beloit, P-SMBP, Kansas: Contract renewal for M&I
contract.
32. Hamlin Construction, Inc., Helena Valley Unit, P-SMBP, Montana:
Request for a long-term water service contract for M&I purposes for up
to 500 acre-feet per year.
33. Richard Davis, Helena Valley Unit, P-SMBP, Montana: Request for
a long-term water service contract for M&I purposes for up to 24 acre-
feet per year.
34. Individual Irrigators, Canyon Ferry Unit, P-SMBP, Montana:
Replace temporary 1-year contracts with long-term water service
contracts for minor amounts of less than 1,000 acre-feet of irrigation
water annually from the Missouri River below Canyon Ferry Dam.
35. Individual Irrigators, Lower Marias Unit, P-SMBP, Montana:
Execute long-term water service contracts for commercial irrigation
from Lake Elwell and the Marias River below Tiber Dam.
36. Turtle Lake ID, Garrison Diversion Unit, North Dakota: Turtle
Lake ID has requested a water service contract under the Dakota Water
Resources Act of 2000 as part of the Garrison Diversion Unit.
37. Big Horn Canal ID, Boysen Unit, P-SMBP, Wyoming: Big Horn Canal
has requested a renewal of their long-term water service contract.
38. Treeline Springs, LLP., Canyon Ferry Unit, P-SMBP, Montana:
Request for water service contract for up to 620 acre-feet of water per
year for replacement of water for senior water rights.
The following actions have been reported as discontinued or
completed since the last publication of this notice on November 30,
2007:
Discontinued Contract Action
1. (33) Individual developer with Angostura Unit, P-SMBP, South
Dakota: Negotiate M&I water service contract with developer for up to
ten, 10-acre tracts of land within the Angostura ID.
Completed Contract Actions
1. (39) City of Grand Junction, City of Fruita, and Town of
Palisade (Municipal Recreation Agreement) Colorado-Big Thompson
Project; Colorado: Negotiation of renewal of the Municipal Recreation
Agreement to provide historic users pool surplus water from Green
Mountain Reservoir for nonconsumptive municipal recreation uses.
Contract was executed on August 29, 2007.
2. (43) Greenfields ID, Sun River Project, Montana: Modification of
[[Page 11677]]
Gibson Dam will be required depending on the outcome of the Corrective
Action Study, and will require a contract for repayment of allocable
SOD costs. Contract was executed on May 21, 2007.
3. (51) Giant Springs, Inc., Canyon Ferry Unit, P-SMBP, Montana:
Request for a long-term contract for up to 5,600 acre-feet of water per
year to fulfill the State requirement to replace water used under
private rights. Contract was executed December 19, 2007.
Dated: February 1, 2008.
Roseann Gonzales,
Director, Office of Program and Policy Services, Denver Office.
[FR Doc. E8-4089 Filed 3-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P