Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan for Arrowwood National Wildlife Refuge, ND, 11660-11661 [E8-4087]
Download as PDF
11660
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
e-mail Lillian Deitzer at
Lillian_L_Deitzer@HUD.gov or
telephone (202) 402–8048. This is not a
toll-free number. Copies of available
documents submitted to OMB may be
obtained from Ms. Deitzer.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development has submitted to OMB a
request for approval of the Information
collection described below. This notice
is soliciting comments from members of
the public and affecting agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information to: (1) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (3) Enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) Minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond; including
through the use of appropriate
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
This notice also lists the following
information:
Title of Proposal: Application for
Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control Grant Programs and Quality
Assurance Plans.
OMB Approval Number: 2539–0015.
Form Numbers: SF–424, SF–424Suppl., HUD–424–CBW, 27061, 27300,
2880, 2990, 2991, 2993, 2994, 96008,
96010, 96011, 96012, 96013, 96014,
96015, SF–LLL.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Its Proposed Use: This
information collection is required in
conjunction with the issuance of Notice
of Funding Availability for Healthy
Homes and Lead Hazard Control
Programs that are authorized under Title
X of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1992, Public Law
102–550, Section 1011, and other
legislation. The quality Assurance Plan
is obtained after the award of grants.
Frequency of Submission: On
occasion, Other One time.
Number of
respondents
Annual
responses
×
Hours per
response
=
Burden
hours
250
1.32
....
65.93
....
21,760
Reporting Burden ..............................................................................
Total Estimated Burden Hours:
21,760.
Status: Revision of a currently
approved collection.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as
amended.
Dated: February 26, 2008.
Lillian L. Deitzer,
Departmental Paperwork Reduction Act
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–4057 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Final Comprehensive Conservation
Plan for Arrowwood National Wildlife
Refuge, ND
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) announce that
our Final Comprehensive Conservation
Plan (Plan) and finding of no significant
impact (FONSI) for Arrowwood national
wildlife refuge (Refuge) is available.
This Final Plan describes how the
Service intends to manage the refuge for
the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Plan may be
obtained by writing to U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Division of Refuge
Planning, P.O. Box 25486, Denver
Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
or by download from https://
mountain-prairie.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Spratt, 303–236–4366 (phone);
303–236–4792 (fax); or
Michael_Spratt@fws.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: President
Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive
Order 7168 on September 4, 1935,
‘‘establishing Arrowwood Migratory
Waterfowl Refuge.’’ Now known as
Arrowwood National Wildlife Refuge,
the 15,973-acre Refuge is in east-central
North Dakota. The Refuge covers 14
miles of the James River Valley in Foster
and Stutsman counties, approximately
30 miles north of Jamestown. The
purposes of the Refuge are for use by
migratory birds with emphasis on
waterfowl and other water birds; the
conservation of fish and wildlife
resources; use as an inviolate sanctuary;
or for any other management purposes,
for migratory birds; and a Refuge and
breeding ground for migratory birds and
other wildlife.
The Refuge lies on the Central Flyway
migratory corridor and is an important
stopover for many birds. The prairie
grassland and wetland complex habitats
provide nesting and feeding habitat for
waterfowl in the spring and summer.
Hundreds of thousands of waterfowl
migrate through the area and use the
wetlands in the spring and fall for
feeding and resting. The Refuge contains
approximately 6,000 acres of native
prairie; 5,340 acres of seed grasses;
3,850 acres of wetlands; 660 acres of
wooded ravines and riparian
woodlands; and 125 acres of planted
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
trees including shelterbelts. It is
important to note that 3,430 acres of
wetlands are managed impoundments
and pools. Public use and recreation at
the Refuge includes the six priority
wildlife-dependent uses: Hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, interpretation, and
environmental education.
The draft Plan and environmental
assessment (EA) was made available to
the public for review and comment
following the announcement in the
Federal Register on March 22, 2007 (72
FR 13508–13509). The draft Plan and
EA identified and evaluated three
alternatives for managing the Refuge for
the next 15 years. Under Alternative A,
the No Action alternative, the Service
would manage habitats, wildlife,
programs, and facilities at current levels
as time, staff, and funds allow. There
would be an emphasis on waterfowl
migration and reproduction habitat. The
Service would not develop any new
management, restoration, or education
programs at the Refuge. Target
elevations of each wetland
impoundment would be managed
independently to achieve optimal
habitat conditions.
Alternative B would maximize the
biological potential of the Refuge for
both wetland and upland habitats, and
support a well-balanced and diverse
flora and fauna representative of the
Prairie Pothole Region. A scientificbased monitoring program would be
developed as part of the habitat
management plan (HMP). Public use
opportunities would be expanded with
the construction of additional facilities
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 4, 2008 / Notices
and development of educational
programs.
Alternative C, the Proposed Action,
would include those features described
in Alternative B, as well as including a
plan to improve the water quality
entering the Refuge, and reducing peak
flows in the upper James River
watershed during spring runoff and
summer rainfall events. This watershed
management component would include
working with private landowners
through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service’s Partners for Fish and Wildlife
program and other federal, state, and
private conservation programs. The
focus would be to protect and restore
wetlands and grasslands, and reduce the
impact on water quality from cropland
and livestock operations. Improving the
health of the upper James River
watershed would not only benefit
wildlife habitat in the watershed and at
the Refuge, it would also benefit the
Jamestown Reservoir and all
downstream users.
The Service is furnishing this notice
to advise other agencies and the public
of the availability of the final Plan, to
provide information on the desired
conditions for the refuges, and to detail
how the Service will implement
management strategies. Based on the
review and evaluation of the
information contained in the EA, the
Regional Director has determined that
implementation of the Final Plan does
not constitute a major federal action that
would significantly affect the quality of
the human environment within the
meaning of Section 102(2)(c) of the
National Environmental Policy Act.
Therefore, an Environmental Impact
Statement will not be prepared.
Dated: February 26, 2008.
Gary G. Mowad,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8–4087 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal—
State Class III Gaming Amendment.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice publishes an
approval of Amendment II of the
Amended and Restated Class III Gaming
Compact between the Confederated
Tribes of the Umatilla Indian
Reservation and the State of Oregon.
DATES: Effective Date: March 4, 2008.
17:57 Mar 03, 2008
George T. Skibine, Director, Office of
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy
Assistant Secretary—Policy and
Economic Development, Washington,
DC 20240, (202) 219–4066.
Under
Section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) Public
Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal—State compacts for the purpose
of engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. This Amendment
revises the video lottery terminal
definition, removes some check cashing
restrictions, and addresses the proposed
new Oregon State Police billing plan.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: February 25, 2008.
Carl J. Artman,
Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. E8–4059 Filed 3–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
Notice of Intent To Prepare the
Caliente Resource Management Plan
and Environmental Impact Statement
for the Bakersfield Field Office, CA
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION:
Notice of Intent.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
Management’s (BLM’s) Bakersfield Field
Office intends to revise the Resource
Management Plan (RMP) for public
lands and mineral estate within the
Bakersfield Field Office, and prepare an
associated Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). The RMP revision will
update the existing Caliente Resource
Management Plan. This notice initiates
the public scoping process and provides
information regarding public scoping
meetings.
The public scoping process is
initiated upon the date of publication of
this notice. Formal scoping will end 60
days after publication of this notice;
however, collaboration with the public
will continue throughout the planning
process. The BLM will hold public
scoping meetings to identify relevant
issues, and will announce these
meetings at least 15 days in advance of
the meetings through local news media,
newsletters, and the BLM Web site:
https://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/
bakersfield.html. Formal opportunities
for public participation will also be
DATES:
Indian Gaming
VerDate Aug<31>2005
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11661
provided upon publication of the Draft
RMP/EIS.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Web Site: https://www.blm.gov/ca/
st/en/fo/bakersfield.html.
• E-mail: cacalrmp@ca.blm.gov.
• Fax: (661) 391–6041.
• Mail: Caliente RMP, Bureau of Land
Management, 3801 Pegasus Drive,
Bakersfield, CA 93308.
Documents pertinent to this proposal
may be examined at the Bakersfield
Field Office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information and/or to have your
name added to our mailing list, contact
Steve Larson: Telephone (661) 391–
6022; e-mail cacalrmp@ca.blm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document provides notice that the BLM
office in Bakersfield, California, intends
to revise an RMP and prepare an
associated EIS for the BLM managed
public lands and interests within the
Bakersfield Field Office—exclusive of
the California Coastal National
Monument and the Carrizo Plain
National Monument. This document
also announces public scoping
meetings.
The planning area is located in
Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, San Luis
Obispo, Santa Barbara, Tulare, and
Ventura Counties in California. This
planning area encompasses
approximately 400,000 acres of public
land and an additional 450,000 acres of
federal mineral estate. The plan will
fulfill the needs and obligations set forth
by the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), the Federal Land Policy
and Management Act (FLPMA), and
BLM management policies. The BLM
will work collaboratively with
interested parties to identify the
management decisions that are best
suited to local, regional, and national
needs and concerns.
The purpose of the public scoping
process is to determine relevant issues
that will influence the scope of the
environmental analysis and EIS
alternatives. These issues also guide the
planning process. You may submit
comments on issues and planning
criteria in writing to the BLM at any
public scoping meeting, or you may
submit them to the BLM using one of
the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section above. To be most helpful, you
should submit formal scoping
comments within 30 days after the last
public meeting. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11660-11661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4087]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan for Arrowwood National
Wildlife Refuge, ND
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announce that
our Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan (Plan) and finding of no
significant impact (FONSI) for Arrowwood national wildlife refuge
(Refuge) is available. This Final Plan describes how the Service
intends to manage the refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Plan may be obtained by writing to U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Division of Refuge Planning, P.O. Box 25486,
Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225; or by download from
https://mountain-prairie.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Spratt, 303-236-4366 (phone);
303-236-4792 (fax); or Michael_Spratt@fws.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed
Executive Order 7168 on September 4, 1935, ``establishing Arrowwood
Migratory Waterfowl Refuge.'' Now known as Arrowwood National Wildlife
Refuge, the 15,973-acre Refuge is in east-central North Dakota. The
Refuge covers 14 miles of the James River Valley in Foster and Stutsman
counties, approximately 30 miles north of Jamestown. The purposes of
the Refuge are for use by migratory birds with emphasis on waterfowl
and other water birds; the conservation of fish and wildlife resources;
use as an inviolate sanctuary; or for any other management purposes,
for migratory birds; and a Refuge and breeding ground for migratory
birds and other wildlife.
The Refuge lies on the Central Flyway migratory corridor and is an
important stopover for many birds. The prairie grassland and wetland
complex habitats provide nesting and feeding habitat for waterfowl in
the spring and summer. Hundreds of thousands of waterfowl migrate
through the area and use the wetlands in the spring and fall for
feeding and resting. The Refuge contains approximately 6,000 acres of
native prairie; 5,340 acres of seed grasses; 3,850 acres of wetlands;
660 acres of wooded ravines and riparian woodlands; and 125 acres of
planted trees including shelterbelts. It is important to note that
3,430 acres of wetlands are managed impoundments and pools. Public use
and recreation at the Refuge includes the six priority wildlife-
dependent uses: Hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, interpretation, and environmental education.
The draft Plan and environmental assessment (EA) was made available
to the public for review and comment following the announcement in the
Federal Register on March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13508-13509). The draft Plan
and EA identified and evaluated three alternatives for managing the
Refuge for the next 15 years. Under Alternative A, the No Action
alternative, the Service would manage habitats, wildlife, programs, and
facilities at current levels as time, staff, and funds allow. There
would be an emphasis on waterfowl migration and reproduction habitat.
The Service would not develop any new management, restoration, or
education programs at the Refuge. Target elevations of each wetland
impoundment would be managed independently to achieve optimal habitat
conditions.
Alternative B would maximize the biological potential of the Refuge
for both wetland and upland habitats, and support a well-balanced and
diverse flora and fauna representative of the Prairie Pothole Region. A
scientific-based monitoring program would be developed as part of the
habitat management plan (HMP). Public use opportunities would be
expanded with the construction of additional facilities
[[Page 11661]]
and development of educational programs.
Alternative C, the Proposed Action, would include those features
described in Alternative B, as well as including a plan to improve the
water quality entering the Refuge, and reducing peak flows in the upper
James River watershed during spring runoff and summer rainfall events.
This watershed management component would include working with private
landowners through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Partners for
Fish and Wildlife program and other federal, state, and private
conservation programs. The focus would be to protect and restore
wetlands and grasslands, and reduce the impact on water quality from
cropland and livestock operations. Improving the health of the upper
James River watershed would not only benefit wildlife habitat in the
watershed and at the Refuge, it would also benefit the Jamestown
Reservoir and all downstream users.
The Service is furnishing this notice to advise other agencies and
the public of the availability of the final Plan, to provide
information on the desired conditions for the refuges, and to detail
how the Service will implement management strategies. Based on the
review and evaluation of the information contained in the EA, the
Regional Director has determined that implementation of the Final Plan
does not constitute a major federal action that would significantly
affect the quality of the human environment within the meaning of
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore,
an Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Dated: February 26, 2008.
Gary G. Mowad,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8-4087 Filed 3-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P