Almonds Grown in California; Secretary's Decision and Referendum Order on Proposed Amendment of Marketing Order No. 981, 11360-11363 [E8-4017]
Download as PDF
11360
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 42
Monday, March 3, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. AO–214–A7; AMS–FV–07–0050;
FV07–981–1]
Almonds Grown in California;
Secretary’s Decision and Referendum
Order on Proposed Amendment of
Marketing Order No. 981
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum
order.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This decision proposes
amendments to Marketing Order No.
981 (order), which regulates the
handling of almonds grown in
California, and provides growers with
the opportunity to vote in a referendum
to determine if they favor the changes.
The amendments are based on those
proposed by the Almond Board of
California (Board), which is responsible
for local administration of the order.
The amendments would authorize the
establishment of different outgoing
quality requirements for different
markets and would authorize the
establishment of bulk container marking
and labeling requirements. The
proposals are intended to provide
additional flexibility in administering
the quality control provisions of the
order and provide the industry with
additional tools for the marketing of
almonds.
The referendum will be
conducted from March 24 through April
11, 2008. The representative period for
the purpose of the referendum is August
1, 2006, through July 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Engeler, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, Suite 102-B, Fresno,
California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487–
5110, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Martin.Engeler@usda.gov; or Laurel
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Feb 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
May, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Laurel.May@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on this proceeding by
contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
Prior
documents in this proceeding: Notice of
Hearing issued on June 29, 2007, and
published in the July 6, 2007, issue of
the Federal Register (72 FR 36900), and
a Recommended Decision issued on
December 21, 2007, and published in
the December 28, 2007, issue of the
Federal Register (72 FR 73671).
This action is governed by the
provisions of sections 556 and 557 of
Title 5 of the United States Code and is
therefore excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Preliminary Statement
The proposed amendments are based
on the record of a public hearing held
August 2, 2007, in Modesto, California,
to consider such amendments to the
order. The hearing was held pursuant to
the provisions of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–612), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act,’’ and the
applicable rules of practice and
procedure governing the formulation of
marketing agreements and marketing
orders (7 CFR part 900). The Notice of
Hearing was published in the Federal
Register on July 6, 2007 (72 FR 36900),
and contained amendment proposals
submitted by the Board.
The amendments included in this
decision would:
1. Authorize the establishment of
different outgoing almond quality
requirements for different markets; and
2. Authorize the establishment of
container marking and labeling
requirements.
In addition, the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) proposed to
make changes as may be necessary to
the order, if any of the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
changes are adopted, so that all of the
order’s provisions conform to the
effectuated amendments.
Upon the basis of evidence
introduced at the hearing and the record
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on
December 21, 2007, filed with the
Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), a Recommended
Decision and Opportunity to File
Written Exceptions thereto by January
17, 2008. None were filed.
Small Business Consideration
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions so that
small businesses will not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened. Marketing
orders and amendments thereto are
unique in that they are normally
brought about through group action of
essentially small entities for their own
benefit.
Small agricultural service firms,
which include handlers regulated under
the order, have been defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $6,500,000. Small
agricultural producers have been
defined as those with annual receipts of
less than $750,000.
There are approximately 104 handlers
of almonds subject to regulation under
the order and approximately 6,000
producers of almonds in the regulated
area. Information provided at the
hearing indicates that approximately 50
percent of the handlers would be
considered small agricultural service
firms. According to data reported by the
National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS), the two-year average crop value
for 2005–06 and 2006–07 was $2.283
billion. Dividing that average by 6,000
producers yields average estimated
producer revenues of $380,500, which
suggests that the majority of almond
producers would also be considered
small entities according to the SBA’s
definition.
The order regulates the handling of
almonds grown in the state of
California. The California almond
bearing acreage increased nearly 40
E:\FR\FM\03MRP1.SGM
03MRP1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 42 / Monday, March 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules
percent between 1996 and 2006, from
418,000 to 585,000 acres.
Approximately 1.115 billion pounds
(shelled basis) of almonds were
produced during the 2006–07 season.
Bearing acreage for the 2007–08 season
is estimated to be 615,000 acres. NASS
has forecasted that the 2007–08 crop
will reach 1.330 billion pounds (shelled
basis). More than two thirds of
California’s almond crop is exported to
approximately 90 countries worldwide,
and comprises nearly 80 percent of the
world’s almond supply.
Under the order, incoming and
outgoing quality regulations are
established, statistical information is
collected, production research projects
are conducted, and marketing research
and generic promotion programs are
sponsored. Program activities
administered by the Board are designed
to support large and small almond
producers and handlers. The 10-member
Board is comprised of both producer
and handler representatives from the
production area. Board meetings where
regulatory recommendations and other
decisions are made are open to the
public. All members are able to
participate in Board deliberations, and
each Board member has an equal vote.
Others in attendance at meetings are
also allowed to express their views.
The Board’s Food Quality and Safety
Committee discussed the need for
amendments to the order at meetings
held on May 12, 2005; July 20, 2005;
and November 1, 2006. The Board
approved language for two proposed
amendments to the order at their
meeting on November 28, 2006. During
a conference call on February 27, 2007,
the Board confirmed that the two
amendments should be proposed to
USDA. The views of all participants
were considered throughout this
process.
In addition, the hearing to receive
evidence on the proposed changes was
open to the public and all interested
parties were invited and encouraged to
participate and provide their views.
The proposed amendments are
intended to provide the Board and the
industry with additional flexibility in
the marketing of California almonds.
Record evidence indicates that the
proposed amendments are intended to
benefit all producers and handlers
under the order, regardless of size.
There would be no cost implications for
handlers or growers from adding the
proposed order authorities. Costs of
implementation would be incurred only
if specific additional requirements were
established following future informal
rulemaking. All grower and handler
witnesses supported the proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Feb 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
amendments and commented on the
implications of implementing specific
requirements in the future. In that
context, witnesses stated that they
expected the benefits to be substantial
and the costs of any future requirements
to be minimal.
A description of the proposed
amendments and their anticipated
economic impact on small and large
entities is discussed below.
Proposal 1—Adding the Authority To
Establish Different Outgoing Quality
Requirements for Different Markets
The record shows that the proposal to
add authority to establish different
outgoing quality requirements for
different markets would, in itself, have
no economic impact on producers or
handlers of any size. Regulations
implemented under that authority could
impose additional costs on handlers
required to comply with them.
However, witnesses testified that
establishing mandatory regulations for
different markets could increase the
industry’s credibility and reduce the
risk that shipments of substandard
product could jeopardize the entire
industry’s reputation. Record evidence
shows that any additional costs are
likely to be offset by the benefits of
complying with those requirements.
Witnesses cited decreased delays and
demurrage charges, as well as fewer
rejected loads and increased customer
confidence, as expected benefits.
Recently, almonds have been rejected in
the EU due to aflatoxin levels exceeding
its importing tolerances. Information
provided at the hearing shows that the
rejection of a 44,000 pound container of
almonds in the EU costs about $10,000,
or 22.7 cents per pound. The cost
includes demurrage for unanticipated
delays at port, warehousing product
while awaiting official import testing
results, shipping rejected almonds back
to the U.S., and shipping a replacement
container back to the EU.
To reduce the risk of rejections, the
California almond industry developed a
voluntary aflatoxin testing protocol.
Witnesses estimated that the cost of the
pre-export testing, including the value
of the sample, analytical fees, courier
fees, and sampling labor is less than 2
cents per pound, which is less than 10
percent of the cost associated with a
rejection. Proponents testified that if a
requirement that all almonds destined
for the EU be tested prior to shipment
was established under authority
provided by the proposed order
amendment, handlers would incur the
cost of testing, but those costs would be
expected to be more than offset by the
reduced risk of rejections.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11361
It’s likely that most handlers are
already complying with their customers’
specific market requirements on a
voluntary basis as a part of doing
business, but witnesses explained that
mandatory requirements lend credibility
to the entire industry. In addition, such
requirements could reduce the risk that
one shipment of substandard product
would jeopardize the entire industry’s
reputation.
Currently, outgoing quality
requirements established under the
order apply to all handler entities
regardless of size. If the proposed
amendment and subsequent regulations
established thereunder are
implemented, distribution of any
increased costs between small and large
entities would depend on the
requirements established for the markets
to which individual handlers shipped
their almonds as well as the volume of
almonds shipped to those markets. But
increases in cost would be equitable to
all entities because requirements for
each market would be imposed
uniformly on all handlers shipping to
that market.
Witnesses explained that almonds are
used in many different ways by the
various markets. In Europe, almonds are
widely used as marzipan and
ingredients for baked goods, candy, and
other dishes. In India and the Middle
East, almonds are presented as gifts at
holidays and weddings, and play a part
in other cultural traditions. India
imports large quantities of inshell
almonds that are then processed by
hand. The wide range of uses leads to
a similarly wide array of customer
requirements.
According to record testimony,
handlers adapt their export methods to
satisfy customer requirements. One
witness explained that it is often
difficult for smaller handlers to stay
informed of rapidly changing import
regulations. The witness stated that
small handlers in particular would
benefit from the proposed authority to
establish different requirements for
different markets by avoiding costly
mistakes that could be associated with
not understanding various market and
import requirements. If regulations were
established under the proposed
authority, the Board would provide
information about updated requirements
to the industry.
Finally, one witness explained that
having the ability under the order to
establish different outgoing quality
requirements for different markets
would not restrict handlers’ choices
regarding which markets to supply.
Rather, the provision would ensure that
the important standards that
E:\FR\FM\03MRP1.SGM
03MRP1
11362
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 42 / Monday, March 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules
differentiate markets would be
consistently met by all handlers
shipping to those markets.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Proposal 2—Adding the Authority To
Establish Container Labeling and
Marking Requirements
The proposal described in Material
Issue No. 2 would add § 981.43 to the
order to provide general authority to
establish container marking and labeling
requirements. If implemented, the
proposed amendment would allow the
Board, through the informal rulemaking
process, to recommend and establish
uniform container marking and labeling
regulations in response to evolving
market requirements. Under current
order provisions, there is only very
limited authority for container marking
and labeling requirements.
Witnesses testified that the lack of
this authority has hindered them from
adapting quickly and appropriately to
recent market situations. In one case
described at the hearing, the industry
was unable to implement container
marking or labeling following recalls for
possible Salmonella contamination.
Witnesses stated that customer
confidence in almond quality could
have been reinforced if the necessary
authority to establish marking and
labeling requirements had been
available. Such authority would have
allowed the industry to prescribe
labeling to clearly indicate which
almonds had been treated to reduce risk
of contamination.
The proposed amendment would
allow the industry to respond to
evolving market needs as they develop
by establishing uniform and consistent
marking and labeling requirements.
According to proponents, the ability to
communicate important product
information to customers in a uniform
and consistent manner will be essential
as the industry strives to maintain its
position in the expanding global
marketplace.
If the proposed amendment is
implemented, costs of complying with
any regulations established thereunder
would not be disproportionate to small
businesses. Witnesses testified that
applying labels and marks to almond
containers is currently a common
practice, and industry handlers already
have container marking processes and
equipment in place. Therefore, the costs
associated with the addition of uniform
marking or labeling requirements would
be minimal for both small and large
entities. The record shows that any costs
would likely be offset by the benefits
derived from being more responsive to
market demands.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Feb 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
Interested persons were invited to
present evidence at the hearing on the
probable regulatory and informational
impact of the proposed amendments to
the order on small entities. The record
evidence indicates that the proposed
amendments are intended to benefit all
producers and handlers under the order,
regardless of size. Further, the record
shows that the costs associated with
implementing regulations would be
outweighed by the benefits expected to
accrue to the California almond
industry.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this proposed rule. These
amendments are designed to enhance
the administration and functioning of
the order to the benefit the California
almond industry.
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
no later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Information collection requirements
for Part 981 are currently approved by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), under OMB Number 0581–0178,
Vegetable and Specialty Crops.
Implementation of these proposed
amendments would not trigger any
changes to those requirements. Should
any such changes become necessary in
the future, they would be submitted to
OMB for approval.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the Government Paperwork Elimination
Act (GPEA), which requires Government
agencies in general to provide the public
the option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to
the maximum extent possible.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The findings and conclusions, rulings,
and general findings and determinations
included in the Recommended Decision
set forth in the December 28, 2007 issue
of the Federal Register are hereby
approved and adopted.
Civil Justice Reform
The amendments to Marketing Order
981 proposed herein have been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. They are not
intended to have retroactive effect. If
adopted, the proposed amendments
would not preempt any State or local
laws, regulations, or policies, unless
they present an irreconcilable conflict
with this proposal.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Findings and Conclusions
Marketing Order
Annexed hereto and made a part
hereof is the document entitled ‘‘Order
Amending the Order Regulating the
Handling of Almonds Grown in
California.’’ This document has been
decided upon as the detailed and
appropriate means of effectuating the
foregoing findings and conclusions.
It is hereby ordered, That this entire
decision be published in the Federal
Register.
Referendum Order
It is hereby directed that a referendum
be conducted in accordance with the
procedure for the conduct of referenda
(7 CFR part 900.400–407) to determine
whether the annexed order amending
the order regulating the handling of
almonds grown in California is
approved or favored by growers, as
defined under the terms of the order,
who during the representative period
were engaged in the production of
almonds in the production area.
The representative period for the
conduct of such referendum is hereby
determined to be August 1, 2006,
through July 31, 2007.
The agents of the Secretary to conduct
such referendum are hereby designated
to be Kurt Kimmel and Terry Vawter,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov or Terry
Vawter@usda.gov, respectively.
E:\FR\FM\03MRP1.SGM
03MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 42 / Monday, March 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements,
Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 27, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
Order Amending the Order Regulating
the Handling of Almonds Grown in
California 1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Findings and determinations
The findings and determinations
hereinafter set forth are supplementary
to the findings and determinations
which were previously made in
connection with the issuance of the
marketing order; and all said previous
findings and determinations are hereby
ratified and affirmed, except insofar as
such findings and determinations may
be in conflict with the findings and
determinations set forth herein.
(a) Findings and Determinations Upon
the Basis of the Hearing Record.
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–612),
and the applicable rules of practice and
procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR
part 900), a public hearing was held
upon the proposed amendments to the
Marketing Order No. 981 (7 CFR part
981), regulating the handling of almonds
grown in California. Upon the basis of
the evidence introduced at such hearing
and the record thereof, it is found that:
(1) The marketing order, as amended,
and as hereby proposed to be further
amended, and all of the terms and
conditions thereof, would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act;
(2) The marketing order, as amended,
and as hereby proposed to be further
amended, regulates the handling of
almonds grown in the production area
in the same manner as, and is applicable
only to, persons in the respective classes
of commercial and industrial activity
specified in the marketing order upon
which a hearing has been held;
(3) The marketing order, as amended,
and as hereby proposed to be further
amended, is limited to its application to
the smallest regional production area
which is practicable, consistent with
carrying out the declared policy of the
Act, and the issuance of several orders
applicable to subdivisions of the
production area would not effectively
carry out the declared policy of the Act;
1 This order shall not become effective unless and
until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of
practice and procedure governing proceedings to
formulate marketing agreements and marketing
orders have been met.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Feb 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
(4) The marketing order, as amended,
and as hereby proposed to be further
amended, prescribes, insofar as
practicable, such different terms
applicable to different parts of the
production area as are necessary to give
due recognition to the differences in the
production and marketing of almonds
grown in the production area; and
(5) All handling of almonds grown in
the production area as defined in the
marketing order is in the current of
interstate or foreign commerce or
directly burdens, obstructs, or affects
such commerce.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, That on and
after the effective date hereof, all
handling of almonds grown in
California shall be in conformity to, and
in compliance with, the terms and
conditions of the said order as hereby
proposed to be amended as follows:
The provisions of the proposed
marketing order amending the order
contained in the Recommended
Decision issued by the Administrator on
December 21, 2007, and published in
the Federal Register (72 FR 73671) on
December 28, 2007, will be and are the
terms and provisions of this order
amending the order and are set forth in
full herein.
PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 981 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Amend paragraph (b) of § 981.42 by
adding the following sentence before the
last sentence to read as follows:
§ 981.42
Quality control.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * The Board may, with the
approval of the Secretary, establish
different outgoing quality requirements
for different markets. * * *
3. Add a new § 981.43 to read as
follows:
§ 981.43
Marking or labeling of containers.
The Board may, with the approval of
the Secretary, establish regulations to
require handlers to mark or label their
containers that are used in packaging or
handling of bulk almonds. For purposes
of this section, container means a box,
bin, bag, carton, or any other type of
receptacle used in the packaging or
handling of bulk almonds.
[FR Doc. E8–4017 Filed 2–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11363
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0177; Directorate
Identifier 2007–CE–093–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Taylorcraft
Models A, B, and F Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document makes a
correction to a current notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which
was published in the Federal Register
on February 20, 2008 (73 FR 9239), and
applies to certain Taylorcraft Models A,
B, and F series airplanes. The NPRM
proposed to require inspection of the
wing strut attach fittings for corrosion or
cracks and would require repair or
replacement if corrosion or cracks are
found. The docket number was
incorrectly referenced at ‘‘FAA–2007–
0177’’ instead of ‘‘FAA–2008–0177.’’
The NPRM is posted in the FAA–2008–
0177 docket section of the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS).
This document corrects the docket
number and should further reduce the
confusion associated with the
inadvertent error.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 21, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andy McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer,
10100 Reunion Place, San Antonio,
Texas 78216; telephone: (210) 308–
3365; fax: (210) 308–3370.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On February 12, 2008, the FAA issued
an NPRM (73 FR 9239; February 20,
E:\FR\FM\03MRP1.SGM
03MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 42 (Monday, March 3, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11360-11363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-4017]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 42 / Monday, March 3, 2008 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 11360]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. AO-214-A7; AMS-FV-07-0050; FV07-981-1]
Almonds Grown in California; Secretary's Decision and Referendum
Order on Proposed Amendment of Marketing Order No. 981
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This decision proposes amendments to Marketing Order No. 981
(order), which regulates the handling of almonds grown in California,
and provides growers with the opportunity to vote in a referendum to
determine if they favor the changes. The amendments are based on those
proposed by the Almond Board of California (Board), which is
responsible for local administration of the order. The amendments would
authorize the establishment of different outgoing quality requirements
for different markets and would authorize the establishment of bulk
container marking and labeling requirements. The proposals are intended
to provide additional flexibility in administering the quality control
provisions of the order and provide the industry with additional tools
for the marketing of almonds.
DATES: The referendum will be conducted from March 24 through April 11,
2008. The representative period for the purpose of the referendum is
August 1, 2006, through July 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Engeler, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, Suite 102-B, Fresno, California 93721; Telephone:
(559) 487-5110, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail:
Martin.Engeler@usda.gov; or Laurel May, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Laurel.May@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on this proceeding by
contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202)
720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior documents in this proceeding: Notice
of Hearing issued on June 29, 2007, and published in the July 6, 2007,
issue of the Federal Register (72 FR 36900), and a Recommended Decision
issued on December 21, 2007, and published in the December 28, 2007,
issue of the Federal Register (72 FR 73671).
This action is governed by the provisions of sections 556 and 557
of Title 5 of the United States Code and is therefore excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
Preliminary Statement
The proposed amendments are based on the record of a public hearing
held August 2, 2007, in Modesto, California, to consider such
amendments to the order. The hearing was held pursuant to the
provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-612), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act,'' and
the applicable rules of practice and procedure governing the
formulation of marketing agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR part
900). The Notice of Hearing was published in the Federal Register on
July 6, 2007 (72 FR 36900), and contained amendment proposals submitted
by the Board.
The amendments included in this decision would:
1. Authorize the establishment of different outgoing almond quality
requirements for different markets; and
2. Authorize the establishment of container marking and labeling
requirements.
In addition, the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) proposed to
make changes as may be necessary to the order, if any of the proposed
changes are adopted, so that all of the order's provisions conform to
the effectuated amendments.
Upon the basis of evidence introduced at the hearing and the record
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on December 21, 2007, filed with the
Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), a Recommended
Decision and Opportunity to File Written Exceptions thereto by January
17, 2008. None were filed.
Small Business Consideration
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders and amendments
thereto are unique in that they are normally brought about through
group action of essentially small entities for their own benefit.
Small agricultural service firms, which include handlers regulated
under the order, have been defined by the Small Business Administration
(SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than
$6,500,000. Small agricultural producers have been defined as those
with annual receipts of less than $750,000.
There are approximately 104 handlers of almonds subject to
regulation under the order and approximately 6,000 producers of almonds
in the regulated area. Information provided at the hearing indicates
that approximately 50 percent of the handlers would be considered small
agricultural service firms. According to data reported by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), the two-year average crop value
for 2005-06 and 2006-07 was $2.283 billion. Dividing that average by
6,000 producers yields average estimated producer revenues of $380,500,
which suggests that the majority of almond producers would also be
considered small entities according to the SBA's definition.
The order regulates the handling of almonds grown in the state of
California. The California almond bearing acreage increased nearly 40
[[Page 11361]]
percent between 1996 and 2006, from 418,000 to 585,000 acres.
Approximately 1.115 billion pounds (shelled basis) of almonds were
produced during the 2006-07 season. Bearing acreage for the 2007-08
season is estimated to be 615,000 acres. NASS has forecasted that the
2007-08 crop will reach 1.330 billion pounds (shelled basis). More than
two thirds of California's almond crop is exported to approximately 90
countries worldwide, and comprises nearly 80 percent of the world's
almond supply.
Under the order, incoming and outgoing quality regulations are
established, statistical information is collected, production research
projects are conducted, and marketing research and generic promotion
programs are sponsored. Program activities administered by the Board
are designed to support large and small almond producers and handlers.
The 10-member Board is comprised of both producer and handler
representatives from the production area. Board meetings where
regulatory recommendations and other decisions are made are open to the
public. All members are able to participate in Board deliberations, and
each Board member has an equal vote. Others in attendance at meetings
are also allowed to express their views.
The Board's Food Quality and Safety Committee discussed the need
for amendments to the order at meetings held on May 12, 2005; July 20,
2005; and November 1, 2006. The Board approved language for two
proposed amendments to the order at their meeting on November 28, 2006.
During a conference call on February 27, 2007, the Board confirmed that
the two amendments should be proposed to USDA. The views of all
participants were considered throughout this process.
In addition, the hearing to receive evidence on the proposed
changes was open to the public and all interested parties were invited
and encouraged to participate and provide their views.
The proposed amendments are intended to provide the Board and the
industry with additional flexibility in the marketing of California
almonds. Record evidence indicates that the proposed amendments are
intended to benefit all producers and handlers under the order,
regardless of size. There would be no cost implications for handlers or
growers from adding the proposed order authorities. Costs of
implementation would be incurred only if specific additional
requirements were established following future informal rulemaking. All
grower and handler witnesses supported the proposed amendments and
commented on the implications of implementing specific requirements in
the future. In that context, witnesses stated that they expected the
benefits to be substantial and the costs of any future requirements to
be minimal.
A description of the proposed amendments and their anticipated
economic impact on small and large entities is discussed below.
Proposal 1--Adding the Authority To Establish Different Outgoing
Quality Requirements for Different Markets
The record shows that the proposal to add authority to establish
different outgoing quality requirements for different markets would, in
itself, have no economic impact on producers or handlers of any size.
Regulations implemented under that authority could impose additional
costs on handlers required to comply with them. However, witnesses
testified that establishing mandatory regulations for different markets
could increase the industry's credibility and reduce the risk that
shipments of substandard product could jeopardize the entire industry's
reputation. Record evidence shows that any additional costs are likely
to be offset by the benefits of complying with those requirements.
Witnesses cited decreased delays and demurrage charges, as well as
fewer rejected loads and increased customer confidence, as expected
benefits. Recently, almonds have been rejected in the EU due to
aflatoxin levels exceeding its importing tolerances. Information
provided at the hearing shows that the rejection of a 44,000 pound
container of almonds in the EU costs about $10,000, or 22.7 cents per
pound. The cost includes demurrage for unanticipated delays at port,
warehousing product while awaiting official import testing results,
shipping rejected almonds back to the U.S., and shipping a replacement
container back to the EU.
To reduce the risk of rejections, the California almond industry
developed a voluntary aflatoxin testing protocol. Witnesses estimated
that the cost of the pre-export testing, including the value of the
sample, analytical fees, courier fees, and sampling labor is less than
2 cents per pound, which is less than 10 percent of the cost associated
with a rejection. Proponents testified that if a requirement that all
almonds destined for the EU be tested prior to shipment was established
under authority provided by the proposed order amendment, handlers
would incur the cost of testing, but those costs would be expected to
be more than offset by the reduced risk of rejections.
It's likely that most handlers are already complying with their
customers' specific market requirements on a voluntary basis as a part
of doing business, but witnesses explained that mandatory requirements
lend credibility to the entire industry. In addition, such requirements
could reduce the risk that one shipment of substandard product would
jeopardize the entire industry's reputation.
Currently, outgoing quality requirements established under the
order apply to all handler entities regardless of size. If the proposed
amendment and subsequent regulations established thereunder are
implemented, distribution of any increased costs between small and
large entities would depend on the requirements established for the
markets to which individual handlers shipped their almonds as well as
the volume of almonds shipped to those markets. But increases in cost
would be equitable to all entities because requirements for each market
would be imposed uniformly on all handlers shipping to that market.
Witnesses explained that almonds are used in many different ways by
the various markets. In Europe, almonds are widely used as marzipan and
ingredients for baked goods, candy, and other dishes. In India and the
Middle East, almonds are presented as gifts at holidays and weddings,
and play a part in other cultural traditions. India imports large
quantities of inshell almonds that are then processed by hand. The wide
range of uses leads to a similarly wide array of customer requirements.
According to record testimony, handlers adapt their export methods
to satisfy customer requirements. One witness explained that it is
often difficult for smaller handlers to stay informed of rapidly
changing import regulations. The witness stated that small handlers in
particular would benefit from the proposed authority to establish
different requirements for different markets by avoiding costly
mistakes that could be associated with not understanding various market
and import requirements. If regulations were established under the
proposed authority, the Board would provide information about updated
requirements to the industry.
Finally, one witness explained that having the ability under the
order to establish different outgoing quality requirements for
different markets would not restrict handlers' choices regarding which
markets to supply. Rather, the provision would ensure that the
important standards that
[[Page 11362]]
differentiate markets would be consistently met by all handlers
shipping to those markets.
Proposal 2--Adding the Authority To Establish Container Labeling and
Marking Requirements
The proposal described in Material Issue No. 2 would add Sec.
981.43 to the order to provide general authority to establish container
marking and labeling requirements. If implemented, the proposed
amendment would allow the Board, through the informal rulemaking
process, to recommend and establish uniform container marking and
labeling regulations in response to evolving market requirements. Under
current order provisions, there is only very limited authority for
container marking and labeling requirements.
Witnesses testified that the lack of this authority has hindered
them from adapting quickly and appropriately to recent market
situations. In one case described at the hearing, the industry was
unable to implement container marking or labeling following recalls for
possible Salmonella contamination. Witnesses stated that customer
confidence in almond quality could have been reinforced if the
necessary authority to establish marking and labeling requirements had
been available. Such authority would have allowed the industry to
prescribe labeling to clearly indicate which almonds had been treated
to reduce risk of contamination.
The proposed amendment would allow the industry to respond to
evolving market needs as they develop by establishing uniform and
consistent marking and labeling requirements. According to proponents,
the ability to communicate important product information to customers
in a uniform and consistent manner will be essential as the industry
strives to maintain its position in the expanding global marketplace.
If the proposed amendment is implemented, costs of complying with
any regulations established thereunder would not be disproportionate to
small businesses. Witnesses testified that applying labels and marks to
almond containers is currently a common practice, and industry handlers
already have container marking processes and equipment in place.
Therefore, the costs associated with the addition of uniform marking or
labeling requirements would be minimal for both small and large
entities. The record shows that any costs would likely be offset by the
benefits derived from being more responsive to market demands.
Interested persons were invited to present evidence at the hearing
on the probable regulatory and informational impact of the proposed
amendments to the order on small entities. The record evidence
indicates that the proposed amendments are intended to benefit all
producers and handlers under the order, regardless of size. Further,
the record shows that the costs associated with implementing
regulations would be outweighed by the benefits expected to accrue to
the California almond industry.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this proposed rule. These amendments are
designed to enhance the administration and functioning of the order to
the benefit the California almond industry.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Information collection requirements for Part 981 are currently
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), under OMB Number
0581-0178, Vegetable and Specialty Crops. Implementation of these
proposed amendments would not trigger any changes to those
requirements. Should any such changes become necessary in the future,
they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), which requires Government agencies in general
to provide the public the option of submitting information or
transacting business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Civil Justice Reform
The amendments to Marketing Order 981 proposed herein have been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. They are
not intended to have retroactive effect. If adopted, the proposed
amendments would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
proposal.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed no later than 20 days after the date of the
entry of the ruling.
Findings and Conclusions
The findings and conclusions, rulings, and general findings and
determinations included in the Recommended Decision set forth in the
December 28, 2007 issue of the Federal Register are hereby approved and
adopted.
Marketing Order
Annexed hereto and made a part hereof is the document entitled
``Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Almonds Grown in
California.'' This document has been decided upon as the detailed and
appropriate means of effectuating the foregoing findings and
conclusions.
It is hereby ordered, That this entire decision be published in the
Federal Register.
Referendum Order
It is hereby directed that a referendum be conducted in accordance
with the procedure for the conduct of referenda (7 CFR part 900.400-
407) to determine whether the annexed order amending the order
regulating the handling of almonds grown in California is approved or
favored by growers, as defined under the terms of the order, who during
the representative period were engaged in the production of almonds in
the production area.
The representative period for the conduct of such referendum is
hereby determined to be August 1, 2006, through July 31, 2007.
The agents of the Secretary to conduct such referendum are hereby
designated to be Kurt Kimmel and Terry Vawter, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906, or E-mail: Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov or Terry Vawter@usda.gov,
respectively.
[[Page 11363]]
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 27, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Almonds Grown in
California \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the
requirements of Sec. 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure
governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and
marketing orders have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Findings and determinations
The findings and determinations hereinafter set forth are
supplementary to the findings and determinations which were previously
made in connection with the issuance of the marketing order; and all
said previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified and
affirmed, except insofar as such findings and determinations may be in
conflict with the findings and determinations set forth herein.
(a) Findings and Determinations Upon the Basis of the Hearing
Record.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-612), and the applicable rules of
practice and procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR part 900), a public
hearing was held upon the proposed amendments to the Marketing Order
No. 981 (7 CFR part 981), regulating the handling of almonds grown in
California. Upon the basis of the evidence introduced at such hearing
and the record thereof, it is found that:
(1) The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be
further amended, and all of the terms and conditions thereof, would
tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act;
(2) The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be
further amended, regulates the handling of almonds grown in the
production area in the same manner as, and is applicable only to,
persons in the respective classes of commercial and industrial activity
specified in the marketing order upon which a hearing has been held;
(3) The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be
further amended, is limited to its application to the smallest regional
production area which is practicable, consistent with carrying out the
declared policy of the Act, and the issuance of several orders
applicable to subdivisions of the production area would not effectively
carry out the declared policy of the Act;
(4) The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be
further amended, prescribes, insofar as practicable, such different
terms applicable to different parts of the production area as are
necessary to give due recognition to the differences in the production
and marketing of almonds grown in the production area; and
(5) All handling of almonds grown in the production area as defined
in the marketing order is in the current of interstate or foreign
commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, That on and after the effective date
hereof, all handling of almonds grown in California shall be in
conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of the
said order as hereby proposed to be amended as follows:
The provisions of the proposed marketing order amending the order
contained in the Recommended Decision issued by the Administrator on
December 21, 2007, and published in the Federal Register (72 FR 73671)
on December 28, 2007, will be and are the terms and provisions of this
order amending the order and are set forth in full herein.
PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. Amend paragraph (b) of Sec. 981.42 by adding the following
sentence before the last sentence to read as follows:
Sec. 981.42 Quality control.
* * * * *
(b) * * * The Board may, with the approval of the Secretary,
establish different outgoing quality requirements for different
markets. * * *
3. Add a new Sec. 981.43 to read as follows:
Sec. 981.43 Marking or labeling of containers.
The Board may, with the approval of the Secretary, establish
regulations to require handlers to mark or label their containers that
are used in packaging or handling of bulk almonds. For purposes of this
section, container means a box, bin, bag, carton, or any other type of
receptacle used in the packaging or handling of bulk almonds.
[FR Doc. E8-4017 Filed 2-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P