Rural Safety Innovation Program, 11188-11190 [E8-3716]
Download as PDF
11188
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 41 / Friday, February 29, 2008 / Notices
Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514
Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality; E.O. 13112
Invasive Species.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Issued on: February 22, 2008.
Clarence W. Coleman,
Operations Engineer, Raleigh, North Carolina.
[FR Doc. E8–3878 Filed 2–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Rural Safety Innovation Program
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of solicitation for
applications to enter into agreements
with the U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT or the
‘‘Department’’) for funding to support
qualified Rural Safety Innovation
Program projects.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The goal of the Rural Safety
Innovation Program is to improve rural
road safety by assisting rural
communities in addressing highway
safety problems and by providing rural
communities the opportunity to
compete for project funding to address
these problems. The program will
encourage States and rural communities
to develop creative, locally crafted
solutions to roadway safety problems,
document their efforts and outcomes,
and share the results with other
communities across the country.
Through the Rural Safety Innovation
Program, the Department aims to
heighten awareness and interest in rural
safety issues, and promote the benefits
of rural safety countermeasures which
can reduce rural crashes and fatalities
nationwide. By providing technical
assistance and best practice guidance
from the program we will give States
and rural road owners better tools to
improve road safety in their
communities.
The primary objectives of the Rural
Safety Innovation Program are to:
i. Improve safety on local and rural
roads with innovative approaches in
which rural communities develop and
design local solutions to their roadway
safety problems.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:22 Feb 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
ii. Provide best practices and lessons
learned on innovative safety
technologies to assist local and rural
road owners and operators in the
development and implementation of
infrastructure-based rural safety
countermeasures that complement
behavioral safety efforts.
iii. Promote national awareness and
interest in addressing rural safety issues.
iv. Promote the use of Intelligent
Transportation Systems (ITS)
technologies to improve safety on rural
roads.
DATES: Applications must be received
on or before April 14, 2008. Proposals
for applications selected for potential
funding will be due in June 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties should
submit Applications to Mr. John E.
Dewar, State and Local Programs Team
Leader, Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Office of
Safety, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, electronically to
ruralsafetyinitiative@dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
John E. Dewar, Federal Highway
Administration, Office of Safety, (202)
366–2218, john.dewar2@dot.gov, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Office hours are from 8:30
a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing: An
electronic copy of this document may be
downloaded from the Office of the
Federal Register’s home page at: https://
www.archives.gov and the Government
Printing Office’s Web page at: https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
A. Background
Rural roads account for approximately
40 percent of the vehicle miles traveled
in the U.S., but almost 55 percent of
fatalities. According to the latest data,
23,339 people were killed in rural
crashes in 2006 and the fatality rate for
rural crashes is more than twice the
fatality rate in urban crashes. Over 75
percent of all U.S. road miles are rural,
and of the over 3 million miles of rural
roads, almost 80 percent are owned and
operated by local entities. Head-on
collisions are more frequent in rural
areas, occurring about twice as often as
in urban areas. Rural collector roads
account for 31 percent of all rural road
deaths, whereas urban collector roads
account for only 8 percent of urban road
deaths. Speeding is a common
contributor to rural road deaths. Over 70
percent of the fatal crashes on high
speed roadways (speed limit of 55 mph
or higher) occurred in rural areas. The
fatality rate per vehicle miles travel
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(VMT) on local roads is more than twice
that of Interstates.
Getting infrastructure safety
information and more effective
countermeasure tools to State and local
officials is critical to improving national
rural road safety. There are over 3,000
counties and more than 16,000 towns
and township governments in the U.S.
that vary widely in the size of the
engineering staff and their ability to
design and implement infrastructure
safety countermeasures on rural roads.
Rural safety continues to be a significant
national problem in the effort to reduce
highway fatalities. Successful efforts to
combat the rural safety problem require
an interdisciplinary approach including
engineering, enforcement, education
and emergency medical services.
B. Funding
Currently, FHWA is proposing to use
FY 2008 funds, drawn from available
portions of the Delta Region
Transportation Development Program,
as well as the U.S. Department of
Transportation Intelligent
Transportation System (ITS) program for
the Rural Safety Innovation Program.
Each Federal funding source has unique
criteria for eligible activities, eligible
facilities/locations, and cost sharing that
must be met. Awards will be made to
rural projects that meet the eligibility
criteria under one or both of these
funding sources. Potential Applicants
should review the eligibility
requirements for each of the potential
Federal funding sources described
below before submitting an Application.
The FHWA’s Delta Region
Transportation Development Program
supports and encourages multi-State
transportation planning and corridor
development, provides for
transportation project development,
facilitates transportation
decisionmaking, and supports
transportation construction on Federalaid highways in the portions of the eight
States comprising the Delta Regional
Authority’s region (Alabama, Arkansas,
Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee).
Eligible projects must have the
endorsement of the State Department of
Transportation. Detailed information on
Delta Region Transportation
Development Program requirements can
be found at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
planning/1308drtdp.htm.
The U.S. Department of
Transportation Intelligent
Transportation Systems Program focuses
on intelligent vehicles, intelligent
infrastructure and the creation of an
intelligent transportation system
through integration with and between
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 41 / Friday, February 29, 2008 / Notices
these two components. Further
information on potential safety
application of ITS in rural areas can be
found at:
Safety Applications of ITS in Rural
Areas—https://
www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov/jpodocs/
repts_te/13609_files/Contents.htm.
DOT ITS Web page—https://
www.its.dot.gov.
DOT Highway Safety Web page—https://
safety.fhwa.dot.gov/.
Benefits information—https://
www.itsbenefits.its.dot.gov/.
Cost information—https://
www.itscosts.its.dot.gov/.
Lessons learned—https://
www.itslessons.its.dot.gov/.
Deployment information—https://
www.itsdeployment.its.dot.gov/
SurveyOutline1.asp?SID=swcps.
FHWA research—https://www.tfhrc.gov/
research.htm.
We anticipate funding of $15 million
or more to be available for the Rural
Safety Innovation Program, drawn from
the programs described above.
Successful projects will demonstrate
application of innovative technologies
and approaches with significant
potential for improving safety on
eligible rural roads through
infrastructure and technology
improvements. Applicants must provide
the appropriate match for the Federal
funding source proposed.
It is estimated that competitive
awards will be made in the range of
$200 thousand to $2 million per project.
The range is established to allow
applicants the flexibility to respond as
quickly as possible with appropriate
new projects requiring modest funding
and resources, or higher cost projects
which may already be in development.
Given the great expanse of rural roads,
innovative approaches that may offer
possible safety benefits at low costs are
encouraged. Specific evaluation criteria
are identified below.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
C. Application Process
The selection process consists of two
phases: Submission of a Rural Safety
Innovation Program Application,
followed by an invitation to submit a
formal Proposal in Phase II. Each phase
is discussed below.
i. Phase I: The Rural Safety
Innovation Program is geared toward
entities responsible for rural roads and
highways such as counties, towns,
townships and Tribal governments
partnering with State departments of
transportation. Applicants interested in
the Rural Safety Innovation Program
should submit a Rural Safety Innovation
Program Application to the DOT. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:22 Feb 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
length of the Application should not
exceed ten, single-spaced pages. The
Application should, in general terms,
describe the proposed Rural Safety
Innovation Program Project including its
location, general project description,
design and implementation outline,
financial plan, management and staffing
plan as well as a proposed project
schedule. The Applicant may be
requested to submit additional
information if more information is
needed at this stage. The deadline for
submitting an Application is April 14,
2008.
If the Applicant is accepted for the
final competition (Phase II), the
Applicant will be invited to submit a
Rural Safety Innovation Program
Proposal, discussed below. The DOT
intends to announce qualified Phase I
candidates of the Rural Safety
Innovation Program in early April 2008.
ii. Phase II: Rural Safety Innovation
Program Proposal
If an Applicant is invited to submit a
Rural Safety Innovation Program
Proposal, the Proposal should be
received no later than June 20, 2008.
The Proposal should also reflect the
support of all Federal, State, Local, and
Tribal governments that operate
facilities which will be directly
impacted by the proposed rural safety
project. The DOT intends to announce
the Proposals selected for funding in
August 2008.
Applicants invited to participate in
Phase II will be given detailed
guidelines needed to develop their
Proposal. At a minimum, the Proposal
should include a detailed project
description including goals, objectives,
location, proposed countermeasures,
and expected benefits, a design and
implementation plan, a financial plan,
and a management and staffing plan
including a detailed project schedule/
timeline.
D. Eligibility Information
i. Eligible applicants—The Rural
Safety Innovation Program is geared
toward entities responsible for rural
roads and highways such as counties,
towns, townships and Tribal
governments partnering with State
departments of transportation.
Coordination of proposals with the State
Highway Safety Office is strongly
encouraged. Letters of commitment
should be submitted from the chief
executive from each participating
jurisdiction. Applicants must meet the
eligibility requirements for the Federal
funding source being proposed. Refer to
section B. for links to potential Federal
funding sources. If partnering with a
local jurisdiction, the DOT should
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11189
designate a local/rural safety
coordinator who should be identified in
the proposal. The coordinator should
leverage the knowledge gained from the
project with other safety initiatives,
resources and data to provide safety
assistance to local/rural communities
statewide. Funding for the coordinator
activities may be part of the match or
submitted as a cost of the project.
ii. Cost sharing or Matching—Federal
funds should not exceed 80 percent of
the total project costs. Each recipient is
responsible for identifying a minimum
20 percent matching share from other
non-Federal sources. Applicants are
encouraged to solicit matching funds
from multiple sources, including, State
and local governments and private
sector partners, as they will be
considered as evidence of local
partnership. Applicants must meet the
matching requirements for the Federal
funding source being proposed. Refer to
section B. for links to potential Federal
funding sources.
iii. Federal-aid Procedures—The
projects will be administered through
the FHWA Division Offices and the
State DOTs in accordance with their
stewardship and oversight agreements,
and the practices and procedures for
local Federal-aid projects in the State, as
applicable. Federal-aid requirements
will apply. Examples of Federal-aid
requirements include, but are not
limited to, the transportation planning
process, National Environmental Policy
Act, Uniform Relocation Assistance Act,
Equal Employment Opportunity, and
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
requirements.
E. Contents of Application for Phase I
The Application should address each
of the following:
i. Content and Form of Application
Submission—Each application should
include a brief Project Description,
Design and Implementation Plan,
Financial Plan, and Management Plan
that describes how the proposed
objectives will be met within the
specified time frame and budget.
These brief plans should contain the
following information:
A. Project Description
Describe local area/jurisdiction where
the project will take place as well as a
brief description of the project being
proposed to include: Goals, objectives,
proposed countermeasures, and
expected benefits. Project proposals
should include a strong rationale
supported by quantifiable, locationspecific data from either local, State, or
Federal sources that identify a clear
problem set and how the proposed
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
11190
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 41 / Friday, February 29, 2008 / Notices
countermeasures would contribute as a
potential solution.
The Department has identified a list
of potential project types (below), for
each crash category for consideration by
applicants. Applications are not limited
to these project types and innovative
approaches are encouraged. However,
projects should be consistent with the
objectives of the Rural Safety Innovation
Program.
1. Roadway Departure Crashes
• Dynamic curve warning systems.
• Advanced road departure warning
systems.
• Innovative safety infrastructure
improvements (i.e., cable guard rail,
rumble strips and stripes).
2. Intersection and Pedestrian Crashes
• Intersection collision avoidance
systems (i.e., sensors to provide
oncoming traffic gap alerts, merge safety
warnings, pedestrian and obstruction
detection, variable safety signage).
• Innovative intersection treatments
(i.e., roundabouts, continuous flow
intersections).
3. Speeding Related Crashes
• Variable speed limit systems (with
or without automated speed
enforcement).
• Coordinated speed management
systems.
4. Range of Crashes
• Roadway condition indicator/
traveler information systems (i.e., ice
detection/low friction, bridge deicing
systems, poor visibility systems, road
closure notification).
• Road side detection and warning
systems.
• Work zone safety systems.
• Corridor safety applications.
• Innovative roadway safety data
collection and analysis techniques.
• First Responder/Public Safety
Services applications: Fire, Emergency
Medical Services, Law Enforcement,
HazMat, Towing, etc., that include
vehicle tracking, automatic crash
notification, telemedicine, and Wireless
Enhanced 9–1–1 data transmission
technologies.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
B. Design and Implementation Outline
The Applicant should submit a brief
statement outlining their potential
Design and Implementation Plan. A
detailed plan will only be required by
those invited to submit a Proposal in
Phase II.
C. Financial Plan
The Applicant should submit an
initial plan that identifies potential
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:22 Feb 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
sources of financing including the
private partner’s role, if applicable.
Applicants must identify all funding
and match sources being proposed,
including the Federal funding source
under this program. More than one
Federal funding source may be
identified if applicable. Refer to section
B. for links to potential Federal funding
sources.
D. Management and Staffing Plan
Describe briefly which organizations
will lead the project, and how
responsibilities for task completion will
be shared among proposed project
partners. The Application should also
include a proposed project time-line
with estimated start and completion
dates for major elements of the proposed
Rural Safety Innovation Program
Project.
ii. Safety Benefits—The Applicant
should provide a brief description of the
potential safety benefits based on the
countermeasures proposed.
iii. Evaluation of Rural Safety
Innovation Program Projects—The
Department will also coordinate the
evaluation of the effectiveness of
projects. An independent evaluation
team will be hired by the Department to
develop an evaluation plan, and to
conduct and coordinate evaluation
efforts. Funding recipients will be
required to collect specified before and
after data and information as a
condition of receiving funding, and to
facilitate the Department’s evaluation
efforts. Depending on the number of
projects selected, the Department may
conduct evaluations of only a subset of
projects.
F. Evaluation Criteria
The Department has identified
evaluation criteria that will be used to
select Applications to advance to the
Phase II—Proposal stage.
Main Evaluation Criteria
i. An active High Risk Rural Roads
Program.
ii. An active Highway Safety Program
that complements the proposed project,
including enforcement, education and
emergency medical services.
iii. Participation by the State Highway
Safety Office.
iv. Ability to provide appropriate nonFederal match to Federal funds
requested.
v. Ability to meet the criteria and
requirements of the proposed Federal
funding source. Refer to section B. for
links to potential Federal funding
sources.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
vi. Sufficient data and analysis
procedures to identify problem areas
and appropriate countermeasures.
vii. Feasibility of proposal (risk level).
Additional Evaluation Criteria
i. Counties with highest number of
rural fatalities.
ii. Demonstration of cost share with
public and private sector partners to
develop innovative and creative Rural
Safety Innovation Program projects.
iii. Ability to demonstrate a
significant benefit/cost ratio that will
assist the Department in promoting rural
safety throughout the United Sates.
iv. Relationship between percentage
of rural roads owned and operated by
local agencies and participation by these
agencies.
v. Road Safety Audits used in project
development and solutions.
vi. Use of market ready technologies
(including ITS) and innovations for
improving roadway safety.
vii. Inclusion of outreach and
education plan (for both provider/user
agencies and the public).
viii. Clarity and specificity of
proposal.
ix. Qualifications and experience.
Issued on: February 21, 2008.
J. Richard Capka,
Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8–3716 Filed 2–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
Sunshine Act Meetings; Unified Carrier
Registration Plan Board of Directors
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
TIME AND DATE: March 26, 2008, 11 a.m.
to 2 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time.
PLACE: These meetings will take place
telephonically. Any interested person
may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505)
827–4565 to receive the toll free
numbers and pass codes needed to
participate in these meetings by
telephone.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The
Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board
of Directors (the Board) will continue its
work in developing and implementing
the Unified Carrier Registration Plan
and Agreement and to that end, may
consider matters properly before the
Board.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 41 (Friday, February 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11188-11190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Rural Safety Innovation Program
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of solicitation for applications to enter into
agreements with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT or the
``Department'') for funding to support qualified Rural Safety
Innovation Program projects.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The goal of the Rural Safety Innovation Program is to improve
rural road safety by assisting rural communities in addressing highway
safety problems and by providing rural communities the opportunity to
compete for project funding to address these problems. The program will
encourage States and rural communities to develop creative, locally
crafted solutions to roadway safety problems, document their efforts
and outcomes, and share the results with other communities across the
country.
Through the Rural Safety Innovation Program, the Department aims to
heighten awareness and interest in rural safety issues, and promote the
benefits of rural safety countermeasures which can reduce rural crashes
and fatalities nationwide. By providing technical assistance and best
practice guidance from the program we will give States and rural road
owners better tools to improve road safety in their communities.
The primary objectives of the Rural Safety Innovation Program are
to:
i. Improve safety on local and rural roads with innovative
approaches in which rural communities develop and design local
solutions to their roadway safety problems.
ii. Provide best practices and lessons learned on innovative safety
technologies to assist local and rural road owners and operators in the
development and implementation of infrastructure-based rural safety
countermeasures that complement behavioral safety efforts.
iii. Promote national awareness and interest in addressing rural
safety issues.
iv. Promote the use of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
technologies to improve safety on rural roads.
DATES: Applications must be received on or before April 14, 2008.
Proposals for applications selected for potential funding will be due
in June 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties should submit Applications to Mr. John E.
Dewar, State and Local Programs Team Leader, Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Office of Safety, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, electronically to ruralsafetyinitiative@dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John E. Dewar, Federal Highway
Administration, Office of Safety, (202) 366-2218, john.dewar2@dot.gov,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are
from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing: An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded from the Office of the Federal Register's home page
at: https://www.archives.gov and the Government Printing Office's Web
page at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
A. Background
Rural roads account for approximately 40 percent of the vehicle
miles traveled in the U.S., but almost 55 percent of fatalities.
According to the latest data, 23,339 people were killed in rural
crashes in 2006 and the fatality rate for rural crashes is more than
twice the fatality rate in urban crashes. Over 75 percent of all U.S.
road miles are rural, and of the over 3 million miles of rural roads,
almost 80 percent are owned and operated by local entities. Head-on
collisions are more frequent in rural areas, occurring about twice as
often as in urban areas. Rural collector roads account for 31 percent
of all rural road deaths, whereas urban collector roads account for
only 8 percent of urban road deaths. Speeding is a common contributor
to rural road deaths. Over 70 percent of the fatal crashes on high
speed roadways (speed limit of 55 mph or higher) occurred in rural
areas. The fatality rate per vehicle miles travel (VMT) on local roads
is more than twice that of Interstates.
Getting infrastructure safety information and more effective
countermeasure tools to State and local officials is critical to
improving national rural road safety. There are over 3,000 counties and
more than 16,000 towns and township governments in the U.S. that vary
widely in the size of the engineering staff and their ability to design
and implement infrastructure safety countermeasures on rural roads.
Rural safety continues to be a significant national problem in the
effort to reduce highway fatalities. Successful efforts to combat the
rural safety problem require an interdisciplinary approach including
engineering, enforcement, education and emergency medical services.
B. Funding
Currently, FHWA is proposing to use FY 2008 funds, drawn from
available portions of the Delta Region Transportation Development
Program, as well as the U.S. Department of Transportation Intelligent
Transportation System (ITS) program for the Rural Safety Innovation
Program. Each Federal funding source has unique criteria for eligible
activities, eligible facilities/locations, and cost sharing that must
be met. Awards will be made to rural projects that meet the eligibility
criteria under one or both of these funding sources. Potential
Applicants should review the eligibility requirements for each of the
potential Federal funding sources described below before submitting an
Application.
The FHWA's Delta Region Transportation Development Program supports
and encourages multi-State transportation planning and corridor
development, provides for transportation project development,
facilitates transportation decisionmaking, and supports transportation
construction on Federal-aid highways in the portions of the eight
States comprising the Delta Regional Authority's region (Alabama,
Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and
Tennessee). Eligible projects must have the endorsement of the State
Department of Transportation. Detailed information on Delta Region
Transportation Development Program requirements can be found at https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/1308drtdp.htm.
The U.S. Department of Transportation Intelligent Transportation
Systems Program focuses on intelligent vehicles, intelligent
infrastructure and the creation of an intelligent transportation system
through integration with and between
[[Page 11189]]
these two components. Further information on potential safety
application of ITS in rural areas can be found at:
Safety Applications of ITS in Rural Areas--https://
www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov/jpodocs/repts_te/13609_files/Contents.htm.
DOT ITS Web page--https://www.its.dot.gov.
DOT Highway Safety Web page--https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/.
Benefits information--https://www.itsbenefits.its.dot.gov/.
Cost information--https://www.itscosts.its.dot.gov/.
Lessons learned--https://www.itslessons.its.dot.gov/.
Deployment information--https://www.itsdeployment.its.dot.gov/
SurveyOutline1.asp?SID=swcps.
FHWA research--https://www.tfhrc.gov/research.htm.
We anticipate funding of $15 million or more to be available for
the Rural Safety Innovation Program, drawn from the programs described
above. Successful projects will demonstrate application of innovative
technologies and approaches with significant potential for improving
safety on eligible rural roads through infrastructure and technology
improvements. Applicants must provide the appropriate match for the
Federal funding source proposed.
It is estimated that competitive awards will be made in the range
of $200 thousand to $2 million per project. The range is established to
allow applicants the flexibility to respond as quickly as possible with
appropriate new projects requiring modest funding and resources, or
higher cost projects which may already be in development. Given the
great expanse of rural roads, innovative approaches that may offer
possible safety benefits at low costs are encouraged. Specific
evaluation criteria are identified below.
C. Application Process
The selection process consists of two phases: Submission of a Rural
Safety Innovation Program Application, followed by an invitation to
submit a formal Proposal in Phase II. Each phase is discussed below.
i. Phase I: The Rural Safety Innovation Program is geared toward
entities responsible for rural roads and highways such as counties,
towns, townships and Tribal governments partnering with State
departments of transportation. Applicants interested in the Rural
Safety Innovation Program should submit a Rural Safety Innovation
Program Application to the DOT. The length of the Application should
not exceed ten, single-spaced pages. The Application should, in general
terms, describe the proposed Rural Safety Innovation Program Project
including its location, general project description, design and
implementation outline, financial plan, management and staffing plan as
well as a proposed project schedule. The Applicant may be requested to
submit additional information if more information is needed at this
stage. The deadline for submitting an Application is April 14, 2008.
If the Applicant is accepted for the final competition (Phase II),
the Applicant will be invited to submit a Rural Safety Innovation
Program Proposal, discussed below. The DOT intends to announce
qualified Phase I candidates of the Rural Safety Innovation Program in
early April 2008.
ii. Phase II: Rural Safety Innovation Program Proposal
If an Applicant is invited to submit a Rural Safety Innovation
Program Proposal, the Proposal should be received no later than June
20, 2008. The Proposal should also reflect the support of all Federal,
State, Local, and Tribal governments that operate facilities which will
be directly impacted by the proposed rural safety project. The DOT
intends to announce the Proposals selected for funding in August 2008.
Applicants invited to participate in Phase II will be given
detailed guidelines needed to develop their Proposal. At a minimum, the
Proposal should include a detailed project description including goals,
objectives, location, proposed countermeasures, and expected benefits,
a design and implementation plan, a financial plan, and a management
and staffing plan including a detailed project schedule/timeline.
D. Eligibility Information
i. Eligible applicants--The Rural Safety Innovation Program is
geared toward entities responsible for rural roads and highways such as
counties, towns, townships and Tribal governments partnering with State
departments of transportation. Coordination of proposals with the State
Highway Safety Office is strongly encouraged. Letters of commitment
should be submitted from the chief executive from each participating
jurisdiction. Applicants must meet the eligibility requirements for the
Federal funding source being proposed. Refer to section B. for links to
potential Federal funding sources. If partnering with a local
jurisdiction, the DOT should designate a local/rural safety coordinator
who should be identified in the proposal. The coordinator should
leverage the knowledge gained from the project with other safety
initiatives, resources and data to provide safety assistance to local/
rural communities statewide. Funding for the coordinator activities may
be part of the match or submitted as a cost of the project.
ii. Cost sharing or Matching--Federal funds should not exceed 80
percent of the total project costs. Each recipient is responsible for
identifying a minimum 20 percent matching share from other non-Federal
sources. Applicants are encouraged to solicit matching funds from
multiple sources, including, State and local governments and private
sector partners, as they will be considered as evidence of local
partnership. Applicants must meet the matching requirements for the
Federal funding source being proposed. Refer to section B. for links to
potential Federal funding sources.
iii. Federal-aid Procedures--The projects will be administered
through the FHWA Division Offices and the State DOTs in accordance with
their stewardship and oversight agreements, and the practices and
procedures for local Federal-aid projects in the State, as applicable.
Federal-aid requirements will apply. Examples of Federal-aid
requirements include, but are not limited to, the transportation
planning process, National Environmental Policy Act, Uniform Relocation
Assistance Act, Equal Employment Opportunity, and Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise requirements.
E. Contents of Application for Phase I
The Application should address each of the following:
i. Content and Form of Application Submission--Each application
should include a brief Project Description, Design and Implementation
Plan, Financial Plan, and Management Plan that describes how the
proposed objectives will be met within the specified time frame and
budget.
These brief plans should contain the following information:
A. Project Description
Describe local area/jurisdiction where the project will take place
as well as a brief description of the project being proposed to
include: Goals, objectives, proposed countermeasures, and expected
benefits. Project proposals should include a strong rationale supported
by quantifiable, location-specific data from either local, State, or
Federal sources that identify a clear problem set and how the proposed
[[Page 11190]]
countermeasures would contribute as a potential solution.
The Department has identified a list of potential project types
(below), for each crash category for consideration by applicants.
Applications are not limited to these project types and innovative
approaches are encouraged. However, projects should be consistent with
the objectives of the Rural Safety Innovation Program.
1. Roadway Departure Crashes
Dynamic curve warning systems.
Advanced road departure warning systems.
Innovative safety infrastructure improvements (i.e., cable
guard rail, rumble strips and stripes).
2. Intersection and Pedestrian Crashes
Intersection collision avoidance systems (i.e., sensors to
provide oncoming traffic gap alerts, merge safety warnings, pedestrian
and obstruction detection, variable safety signage).
Innovative intersection treatments (i.e., roundabouts,
continuous flow intersections).
3. Speeding Related Crashes
Variable speed limit systems (with or without automated
speed enforcement).
Coordinated speed management systems.
4. Range of Crashes
Roadway condition indicator/traveler information systems
(i.e., ice detection/low friction, bridge deicing systems, poor
visibility systems, road closure notification).
Road side detection and warning systems.
Work zone safety systems.
Corridor safety applications.
Innovative roadway safety data collection and analysis
techniques.
First Responder/Public Safety Services applications: Fire,
Emergency Medical Services, Law Enforcement, HazMat, Towing, etc., that
include vehicle tracking, automatic crash notification, telemedicine,
and Wireless Enhanced 9-1-1 data transmission technologies.
B. Design and Implementation Outline
The Applicant should submit a brief statement outlining their
potential Design and Implementation Plan. A detailed plan will only be
required by those invited to submit a Proposal in Phase II.
C. Financial Plan
The Applicant should submit an initial plan that identifies
potential sources of financing including the private partner's role, if
applicable. Applicants must identify all funding and match sources
being proposed, including the Federal funding source under this
program. More than one Federal funding source may be identified if
applicable. Refer to section B. for links to potential Federal funding
sources.
D. Management and Staffing Plan
Describe briefly which organizations will lead the project, and how
responsibilities for task completion will be shared among proposed
project partners. The Application should also include a proposed
project time-line with estimated start and completion dates for major
elements of the proposed Rural Safety Innovation Program Project.
ii. Safety Benefits--The Applicant should provide a brief
description of the potential safety benefits based on the
countermeasures proposed.
iii. Evaluation of Rural Safety Innovation Program Projects--The
Department will also coordinate the evaluation of the effectiveness of
projects. An independent evaluation team will be hired by the
Department to develop an evaluation plan, and to conduct and coordinate
evaluation efforts. Funding recipients will be required to collect
specified before and after data and information as a condition of
receiving funding, and to facilitate the Department's evaluation
efforts. Depending on the number of projects selected, the Department
may conduct evaluations of only a subset of projects.
F. Evaluation Criteria
The Department has identified evaluation criteria that will be used
to select Applications to advance to the Phase II--Proposal stage.
Main Evaluation Criteria
i. An active High Risk Rural Roads Program.
ii. An active Highway Safety Program that complements the proposed
project, including enforcement, education and emergency medical
services.
iii. Participation by the State Highway Safety Office.
iv. Ability to provide appropriate non-Federal match to Federal
funds requested.
v. Ability to meet the criteria and requirements of the proposed
Federal funding source. Refer to section B. for links to potential
Federal funding sources.
vi. Sufficient data and analysis procedures to identify problem
areas and appropriate countermeasures.
vii. Feasibility of proposal (risk level).
Additional Evaluation Criteria
i. Counties with highest number of rural fatalities.
ii. Demonstration of cost share with public and private sector
partners to develop innovative and creative Rural Safety Innovation
Program projects.
iii. Ability to demonstrate a significant benefit/cost ratio that
will assist the Department in promoting rural safety throughout the
United Sates.
iv. Relationship between percentage of rural roads owned and
operated by local agencies and participation by these agencies.
v. Road Safety Audits used in project development and solutions.
vi. Use of market ready technologies (including ITS) and
innovations for improving roadway safety.
vii. Inclusion of outreach and education plan (for both provider/
user agencies and the public).
viii. Clarity and specificity of proposal.
ix. Qualifications and experience.
Issued on: February 21, 2008.
J. Richard Capka,
Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-3716 Filed 2-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P