Provision of Entire Aircraft With Crew to a U.S. Certificated Air Carrier by a Foreign Air Carrier, 10986-10987 [E8-3470]
Download as PDF
10986
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 41 / Friday, February 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Paperwork Reduction Act
OTS has determined that this
extension does not involve a change to
collections of information previously
approved under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
For the reasons stated in the interim
final rule,4 OTS has determined that
this extension will not result in
expenditures by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of more than $100
million of any one year.
Executive Order 12866
OTS has determined that this
extension is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866.
Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act (12 U.S.C. 4308) requires the
Agencies to use ‘‘plain language’’ in all
final rules published after January 1,
2000. OTS believes that the final rule
containing the extension is presented in
a clear and straightforward manner.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 585
Administrative practice and
procedure, Holding companies,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Savings associations.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons in the preamble, OTS
is amending part 585 of chapter V of
title 12 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below:
I
PART 585—PROHIBITED SERVICE AT
SAVINGS AND LOAN HOLDING
COMPANIES
1. The authority citation for 12 CFR
part 585 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1462, 1462a, 1463,
1464, 1467a, and 1829(e).
2. Amend § 585.100(b)(2) introductory
text to read as follows:
I
§ 585.100 Who is exempt from the
prohibition under this part?
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Temporary exemption. * * *
(2) This exemption expires on June 1,
2008, unless the savings and loan
holding company or the person files an
application seeking a case-by-case
exemption for the person under
§ 585.110 by that date. If the savings and
loan holding company or the person
files such an application, the temporary
exemption expires on:
*
*
*
*
*
4 72
FR 25954.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:40 Feb 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
Dated: February 25, 2008.
By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
John M. Reich,
Director.
[FR Doc. 08–887 Filed 2–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Chapter I
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Chapter II
[Docket DOT–OST–2008–0063]
Provision of Entire Aircraft With Crew
to a U.S. Certificated Air Carrier by a
Foreign Air Carrier
Department of Transportation,
Office of the Secretary; Department of
Transportation, Federal Aviation
Administration.
ACTION: Regulatory guidance.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This Notice sets forth the
conditions under which a foreign air
carrier may make an arrangement with
a U.S. air carrier for a flight or series of
flights, to be conducted with the foreign
air carrier’s aircraft and crew, for that
U.S. certificated air carrier’s-authorized
services in foreign air transportation.
This Notice also describes the regulatory
steps involved for seeking Department
approval for such an operation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Clarke, Federal Aviation
Administration, Air Carrier Operations
Branch, AFS–220, (202) 493–5581, or
George Wellington, Department of
Transportation, Office of International
Aviation, X–40, (202) 366–2391.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion: The Office of the Secretary
of Transportation (OST) and the
Department’s Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) have identified
the circumstances under which a
foreign air carrier may provide a U.S.
certificated air carrier with an entire
aircraft with crew without contravening
the FAA’s regulations that generally
prohibit a foreign air carrier from wet
leasing aircraft (i.e., providing legal
possession of a specific aircraft (in its
entirety) and at least one crewmember)
to a U.S. certificated air carrier. Such
transactions may occur, consistent with
FAA and OST regulations,1 where it is
1 See 14 CFR 121.153(c), § 135.25(d), § 119.53(b),
and § 212.4(b)(1) and § 212.9(b)(2). The cited
sections of the FAA’s regulations (parts 121, 135
and 119) generally prohibit a foreign air carrier from
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
clear that (i) operational control of the
flight or flights involved would rest
solely with the foreign air carrier and
not with the U.S. certificated air carrier;
(ii) legal and actual possession of the
aircraft at all times would remain with
the foreign air carrier; and (iii) OST
determines, in conjunction with FAA,
that such operations would otherwise be
in the public interest, as more fully
described below. Under those
circumstances, the FAA has
determined 2 that such transactions are
not leases subject to the foreign wet
lease prohibition in § 119.53(b),
regardless of whether the parties to the
transaction characterize the arrangement
as a wet lease.
To conduct an operation in this
manner, the foreign air carrier involved
would need to apply to the Department
for a statement of authorization under
14 CFR part 212 of the Department’s
regulations. Section 212.9 requires prior
Department approval for operations
involving the provision of aircraft and
crew by a foreign air carrier to another
air carrier where the operations
involved are in a fifth freedom market
for the foreign air carrier, and for any
such operations of 60 days or longer
duration. Section 212.9(d) also provides
that the Department may, at its
discretion and upon at least 30 days’
notice, require a statement of
authorization for these kinds of
operations in other cases (e.g., where
they are for less than 60 days’ duration).
Given our need to make the operational
control and public interest
determinations described above, we
will, in accordance with the provisions
of § 212.9(d), and effective 30 days from
the date of this Notice, require that
foreign air carriers desiring to conduct
the operations described in this Notice
obtain a statement of authorization
before conducting any such services.3
wet leasing aircraft to a U.S. certificated air carrier.
Part 212 of the Department’s Economic Regulations
provides for the wet leasing of aircraft without
regard to the identity of the wet lessor, and do not
explicitly prohibit wet lease operations by a foreign
air carrier on behalf of a U.S. carrier.
2 On May 18, 2004, the Chief Counsel of the FAA
issued an opinion that certain arrangements
characterized as wet leases by the parties to the
transaction were not true leases, because legal and
actual possession of the subject aircraft never
transferred from one party to the other. In addition,
the FAA concluded that, where a foreign air carrier
(identified as the lessor under such arrangements)
retained operational control of the aircraft, the
transaction was not subject to the wet lease
prohibition of § 119.53(b). We have placed a copy
of the FAA opinion in the Docket referenced above,
and have also attached a copy to the service copy
of this Notice.
3 We have in other instances required foreign air
carriers to seek statements of authorization under
§ 212.9(d) for various operations under that rule.
See, for example, Orders 98–4–2 and 91–5–25.
E:\FR\FM\29FER1.SGM
29FER1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 41 / Friday, February 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
In acting on a request by a foreign air
carrier for a statement of authorization
under part 212, OST must find that the
operation meets the requirements of that
rule and is in the public interest.4 The
applicant foreign air carrier must
demonstrate that its proposed
arrangement with the U.S. air carrier for
the foreign carrier to conduct a flight or
series of flights with the foreign air
carrier’s aircraft and crew in foreign air
transportation for an authorized U.S.
carrier meets these standards. In
particular, one way in which the public
interest standard of part 212 could be
met would be for the foreign air carrier
to show that (1) operational control of
the flight or flights rests with it and not
with the U.S. certificated air carrier; (2)
legal and actual possession of the
aircraft at all times will remain with the
foreign air carrier; (3) the country that
issued its air operator certificate (AOC)
has been rated as Category 1 under the
FAA’s International Aviation Safety
Assessment program; 5 and (4) the U.S.
certificated air carrier involved has
assessed the level of safety of the service
to be provided by the foreign air carrier
involved and has found it to be
satisfactory.
The foreign air carrier may provide
information on operational control by
submitting, with its application for a
statement of authorization, a copy of the
agreement for the aircraft with crew that
it has entered into with the U.S.
certificated air carrier. In making a
determination on operational control,
the FAA will consider the terms of that
agreement and all other relevant factors
to ensure that the foreign air carrier will
exercise authority over initiating,
conducting or terminating a flight
conducted under the agreement.
Likewise, in determining whether the
foreign air carrier retains actual and
legal possession of the aircraft, the FAA
will consider all relevant factors,
including the foreign air carrier’s right
to substitute other aircraft for the
aircraft identified in the agreement, or
its right to use the aircraft identified in
the agreement for its own purposes
when the aircraft is not needed by the
U.S. air carrier.
The U.S. certificated air carrier
involved in the arrangement may
demonstrate its assessment of the safety
of the service by conducting a safety
audit of the foreign air carrier under an
FAA-approved safety audit program,
comparable to the audits that U.S.
carriers now perform under the OST/
FAA Code-Share Safety Program. The
FAA would review the safety audit
along with the agreement for the aircraft
4 See
14 CFR § 212.11(a).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:40 Feb 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
with crew and provide the Department
with the results of that review.6
Because these applications are
handled on a case-by-case basis,
applicants may, of course, endeavor to
show that the foreign air carrier is in
operational control and that the
operation is in the public interest by
providing information and evidence
other than that outlined above, but the
burden of making that showing is on the
applicants.
To summarize applicable regulations,
one way that a foreign air carrier may
demonstrate a public interest basis
under which it could make an
arrangement (which may be
characterized by the parties as a wet
lease) to conduct a flight or series of
flights with the foreign carrier’s aircraft
and crew for a U.S. carrier authorized to
perform the relevant foreign air
transportation is to show that:
—The foreign air carrier involved holds
a foreign air carrier permit or
exemption authority from OST to
conduct charter operations;
—The country that issued the foreign air
carrier’s AOC is rated as Category 1
under the FAA’s International
Aviation Safety Assessment program;
—The operations to be conducted
represent foreign air transportation
and not prohibited cabotage, in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 41703;
—The foreign air carrier files an
application for a statement of
authorization for any such operation
proposed;
—The foreign air carrier demonstrates
that it will be in operational control
of the proposed operation, for
example, by providing with its
application, for review by the FAA,
copies of the agreement for the aircraft
with crew, that it has entered into
with the U.S. certificated air carrier;
—The foreign air carrier demonstrates
that it will retain legal and actual
possession of the aircraft;
—The foreign air carrier provides
evidence that the U.S. certificated air
carrier involved has conducted a
safety audit of the foreign carrier,
consistent with an FAA-approved
safety audit program, and has
submitted a report of that audit to the
FAA for review;
—The FAA notifies OST that it has
determined that operational control of
the proposed flights rest with the
foreign air carrier applicant, that the
oversight of the operation will remain
with the country that issued the
foreign air carrier’s AOC, and that the
safety audit meets the standards of the
U.S. certificated air carrier’s safety
audit program; and
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10987
—OST determines that the proposed
operations meet the requirements of
14 CFR part 212 and are in the public
interest, and grants the statement of
authorization requested by the foreign
air carrier.
We will publish this Notice in the
Federal Register, and will serve this
Notice on all U.S. certificated air
carriers and all foreign air carriers
holding OST authority.
Dated: February 15, 2008.
Michael W. Reynolds,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and
International Affairs, Department of
Transportation.
Nicholas A. Sabatini,
Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety,
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–3470 Filed 2–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 27 and 29
[Docket No.: FAA–2006–25414; Amendment
Nos. 27–44 and 29–51]
RIN 2120–AH87
Performance and Handling Qualities
Requirements for Rotorcraft
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule provides new
and revised airworthiness standards for
normal and transport category rotorcraft
due to technological advances in design
and operational trends in normal and
transport rotorcraft performance and
handling qualities. The changes
enhance the safety standards for
performance and handling qualities to
reflect the evolution of rotorcraft
capabilities. This rule harmonizes U.S.
and European airworthiness standards
for rotorcraft performance and handling
qualities.
DATES: These amendments become
effective on March 31, 2008. Affected
parties, however, do not have to comply
with the information collection
requirements of this rule until the OMB
approves the FAA’s request for this
information collection requirement. The
FAA will publish a separate document
notifying you of the OMB Control
Number and the compliance date(s) for
the information collection requirements
of this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions concerning this final
E:\FR\FM\29FER1.SGM
29FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 41 (Friday, February 29, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10986-10987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3470]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Chapter I
Office of the Secretary
14 CFR Chapter II
[Docket DOT-OST-2008-0063]
Provision of Entire Aircraft With Crew to a U.S. Certificated Air
Carrier by a Foreign Air Carrier
AGENCY: Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary;
Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
ACTION: Regulatory guidance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Notice sets forth the conditions under which a foreign
air carrier may make an arrangement with a U.S. air carrier for a
flight or series of flights, to be conducted with the foreign air
carrier's aircraft and crew, for that U.S. certificated air carrier's-
authorized services in foreign air transportation. This Notice also
describes the regulatory steps involved for seeking Department approval
for such an operation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Clarke, Federal Aviation
Administration, Air Carrier Operations Branch, AFS-220, (202) 493-5581,
or George Wellington, Department of Transportation, Office of
International Aviation, X-40, (202) 366-2391.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion: The Office of the Secretary of
Transportation (OST) and the Department's Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) have identified the circumstances under which a
foreign air carrier may provide a U.S. certificated air carrier with an
entire aircraft with crew without contravening the FAA's regulations
that generally prohibit a foreign air carrier from wet leasing aircraft
(i.e., providing legal possession of a specific aircraft (in its
entirety) and at least one crewmember) to a U.S. certificated air
carrier. Such transactions may occur, consistent with FAA and OST
regulations,\1\ where it is clear that (i) operational control of the
flight or flights involved would rest solely with the foreign air
carrier and not with the U.S. certificated air carrier; (ii) legal and
actual possession of the aircraft at all times would remain with the
foreign air carrier; and (iii) OST determines, in conjunction with FAA,
that such operations would otherwise be in the public interest, as more
fully described below. Under those circumstances, the FAA has
determined \2\ that such transactions are not leases subject to the
foreign wet lease prohibition in Sec. 119.53(b), regardless of whether
the parties to the transaction characterize the arrangement as a wet
lease.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 14 CFR 121.153(c), Sec. 135.25(d), Sec. 119.53(b), and
Sec. 212.4(b)(1) and Sec. 212.9(b)(2). The cited sections of the
FAA's regulations (parts 121, 135 and 119) generally prohibit a
foreign air carrier from wet leasing aircraft to a U.S. certificated
air carrier. Part 212 of the Department's Economic Regulations
provides for the wet leasing of aircraft without regard to the
identity of the wet lessor, and do not explicitly prohibit wet lease
operations by a foreign air carrier on behalf of a U.S. carrier.
\2\ On May 18, 2004, the Chief Counsel of the FAA issued an
opinion that certain arrangements characterized as wet leases by the
parties to the transaction were not true leases, because legal and
actual possession of the subject aircraft never transferred from one
party to the other. In addition, the FAA concluded that, where a
foreign air carrier (identified as the lessor under such
arrangements) retained operational control of the aircraft, the
transaction was not subject to the wet lease prohibition of Sec.
119.53(b). We have placed a copy of the FAA opinion in the Docket
referenced above, and have also attached a copy to the service copy
of this Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To conduct an operation in this manner, the foreign air carrier
involved would need to apply to the Department for a statement of
authorization under 14 CFR part 212 of the Department's regulations.
Section 212.9 requires prior Department approval for operations
involving the provision of aircraft and crew by a foreign air carrier
to another air carrier where the operations involved are in a fifth
freedom market for the foreign air carrier, and for any such operations
of 60 days or longer duration. Section 212.9(d) also provides that the
Department may, at its discretion and upon at least 30 days' notice,
require a statement of authorization for these kinds of operations in
other cases (e.g., where they are for less than 60 days' duration).
Given our need to make the operational control and public interest
determinations described above, we will, in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. 212.9(d), and effective 30 days from the date of
this Notice, require that foreign air carriers desiring to conduct the
operations described in this Notice obtain a statement of authorization
before conducting any such services.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ We have in other instances required foreign air carriers to
seek statements of authorization under Sec. 212.9(d) for various
operations under that rule. See, for example, Orders 98-4-2 and 91-
5-25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 10987]]
In acting on a request by a foreign air carrier for a statement of
authorization under part 212, OST must find that the operation meets
the requirements of that rule and is in the public interest.\4\ The
applicant foreign air carrier must demonstrate that its proposed
arrangement with the U.S. air carrier for the foreign carrier to
conduct a flight or series of flights with the foreign air carrier's
aircraft and crew in foreign air transportation for an authorized U.S.
carrier meets these standards. In particular, one way in which the
public interest standard of part 212 could be met would be for the
foreign air carrier to show that (1) operational control of the flight
or flights rests with it and not with the U.S. certificated air
carrier; (2) legal and actual possession of the aircraft at all times
will remain with the foreign air carrier; (3) the country that issued
its air operator certificate (AOC) has been rated as Category 1 under
the FAA's International Aviation Safety Assessment program; \5\ and (4)
the U.S. certificated air carrier involved has assessed the level of
safety of the service to be provided by the foreign air carrier
involved and has found it to be satisfactory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 14 CFR Sec. 212.11(a).
\5\ Because the foreign air carrier will retain operational
control, the regulatory oversight of the operation remains with the
civil aviation authority that issued an AOC to the foreign air
carrier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The foreign air carrier may provide information on operational
control by submitting, with its application for a statement of
authorization, a copy of the agreement for the aircraft with crew that
it has entered into with the U.S. certificated air carrier. In making a
determination on operational control, the FAA will consider the terms
of that agreement and all other relevant factors to ensure that the
foreign air carrier will exercise authority over initiating, conducting
or terminating a flight conducted under the agreement. Likewise, in
determining whether the foreign air carrier retains actual and legal
possession of the aircraft, the FAA will consider all relevant factors,
including the foreign air carrier's right to substitute other aircraft
for the aircraft identified in the agreement, or its right to use the
aircraft identified in the agreement for its own purposes when the
aircraft is not needed by the U.S. air carrier.
The U.S. certificated air carrier involved in the arrangement may
demonstrate its assessment of the safety of the service by conducting a
safety audit of the foreign air carrier under an FAA-approved safety
audit program, comparable to the audits that U.S. carriers now perform
under the OST/FAA Code-Share Safety Program. The FAA would review the
safety audit along with the agreement for the aircraft with crew and
provide the Department with the results of that review.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See ``Code-share Safety Program Guidelines,'' revised
December 21, 2006, at https://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_
industry/international_aviation/. We would expect that an audit for
operations described in this Notice would meet all the standards and
criteria set forth in these guidelines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because these applications are handled on a case-by-case basis,
applicants may, of course, endeavor to show that the foreign air
carrier is in operational control and that the operation is in the
public interest by providing information and evidence other than that
outlined above, but the burden of making that showing is on the
applicants.
To summarize applicable regulations, one way that a foreign air
carrier may demonstrate a public interest basis under which it could
make an arrangement (which may be characterized by the parties as a wet
lease) to conduct a flight or series of flights with the foreign
carrier's aircraft and crew for a U.S. carrier authorized to perform
the relevant foreign air transportation is to show that:
--The foreign air carrier involved holds a foreign air carrier permit
or exemption authority from OST to conduct charter operations;
--The country that issued the foreign air carrier's AOC is rated as
Category 1 under the FAA's International Aviation Safety Assessment
program;
--The operations to be conducted represent foreign air transportation
and not prohibited cabotage, in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 41703;
--The foreign air carrier files an application for a statement of
authorization for any such operation proposed;
--The foreign air carrier demonstrates that it will be in operational
control of the proposed operation, for example, by providing with its
application, for review by the FAA, copies of the agreement for the
aircraft with crew, that it has entered into with the U.S. certificated
air carrier;
--The foreign air carrier demonstrates that it will retain legal and
actual possession of the aircraft;
--The foreign air carrier provides evidence that the U.S. certificated
air carrier involved has conducted a safety audit of the foreign
carrier, consistent with an FAA-approved safety audit program, and has
submitted a report of that audit to the FAA for review;
--The FAA notifies OST that it has determined that operational control
of the proposed flights rest with the foreign air carrier applicant,
that the oversight of the operation will remain with the country that
issued the foreign air carrier's AOC, and that the safety audit meets
the standards of the U.S. certificated air carrier's safety audit
program; and
--OST determines that the proposed operations meet the requirements of
14 CFR part 212 and are in the public interest, and grants the
statement of authorization requested by the foreign air carrier.
We will publish this Notice in the Federal Register, and will serve
this Notice on all U.S. certificated air carriers and all foreign air
carriers holding OST authority.
Dated: February 15, 2008.
Michael W. Reynolds,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs,
Department of Transportation.
Nicholas A. Sabatini,
Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-3470 Filed 2-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P