Special Conditions: Boeing Model 787-8 Airplane; Operation Without Normal Electrical Power, 10379-10380 [E8-3714]
Download as PDF
10379
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 39
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
Background
On March 28, 2003, Boeing applied
for an FAA type certificate for its new
Boeing Model 787–8 passenger airplane.
The Boeing Model 787–8 airplane will
be an all-new, two-engine jet transport
airplane with a two-aisle cabin. The
maximum takeoff weight will be
476,000 pounds, with a maximum
passenger count of 381 passengers.
Type Certification Basis
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM378 Special Conditions No.
25–365–SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing Model 787–
8 Airplane; Operation Without Normal
Electrical Power
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final Special Conditions.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for the Boeing Model 787–8
airplane. This airplane will have novel
or unusual design features when
compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category
airplanes. The Boeing Model 787–8
airplane will have numerous electrically
operated systems whose function is
needed for continued safe flight and
landing of the airplane. For these design
features, the applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards. These
special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
standards. Additional special conditions
have been issued for other novel or
unusual design features of the Boeing
Model 787–8 airplanes.
DATES: Effective Date: March 28, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Slotte, FAA, Airplane & Flight
Crew Interface Branch, ANM–111,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2315;
facsimile (425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:57 Feb 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
Under provisions of 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) 21.17, Boeing
must show that Boeing Model 787–8
airplanes (hereafter referred to as ‘‘the
787’’) meet the applicable provisions of
14 CFR part 25, as amended by
Amendments 25–1 through 25–117,
except §§ 25.809(a) and 25.812, which
will remain at Amendment 25–115. If
the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for the 787 because of
a novel or unusual design feature,
special conditions are prescribed under
provisions of 14 CFR 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the 787 must comply with
the fuel vent and exhaust emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the
noise certification requirements of part
36. The FAA must also issue a finding
of regulatory adequacy pursuant to
section 611 of Public Law 92–574, the
‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38, and
they become part of the type
certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would also apply to the other
model under § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The 787 will incorporate a number of
novel or unusual design features, some
of which have not been previously
installed on large commercial aircraft.
Because of these design features, these
special conditions differ from similar
previous special conditions for other
airplane models. Because of rapid
improvements in airplane technology,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the applicable airworthiness regulations
do not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for these design
features. These special conditions for
the 787 contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
In addition to an electronic flight
control system, a number of systems
that have traditionally been
pneumatically or mechanically operated
have been implemented as electrically
powered systems on the 787. Examples
include the hydraulic power, equipment
cooling, wing anti-ice, and auxiliary
power unit (APU) and engine start
systems. The criticality of some of these
systems is such that their failure would
either reduce the capability of the
airplane or the ability of the crew to
cope with adverse operating conditions,
or prevent continued safe flight and
landing of the airplane. The
airworthiness standards of part 25 do
not contain adequate or appropriate
standards for protection of these
systems from the adverse effects of
operation without normal electrical
power.
The current rule, 14 CFR 25.1351(d),
Amendment 25–72, requires safe
operation under visual flight rules (VFR)
conditions for at least five minutes after
loss of all normal electrical power. This
rule was structured around traditional
airplane designs that used mechanical
control cables and linkages for flight
control. These manual controls allowed
the crew to maintain aerodynamic
control of the airplane for an indefinite
period of time after loss of all electrical
power. Under those conditions, the
mechanical flight control system
provided the crew with the ability to fly
the airplane while attempting to identify
the cause of the electrical failure, start
the engine(s) if necessary, and
reestablish some of the electrical power
generation capability, if possible.
To maintain the same level of safety
associated with traditional designs,
Boeing must design the 787 for
operation with the normal sources of
engine- and auxiliary-power-unit (APU)generated electrical power not working.
Service experience has shown that loss
of all electrical power from the
airplane’s engine- and APU-driven
generators is not extremely improbable.
Thus, Boeing must show that the
E:\FR\FM\27FER1.SGM
27FER1
10380
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
airplane is capable of recovering
adequate primary electrical power
generation for safe flight and landing.
This demonstration would provide that
the ability to restore operation of
portions of the electrical power
generation capability would be
considered if unrecoverable loss of
those portions is shown to be extremely
improbable. An alternative source of
electrical power would have to be
provided for the time necessary to
restore the minimum power generation
capability necessary for safe flight and
landing.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of Proposed Special
Conditions No. 25–07–11–SC for the
787 was published in the Federal
Register on October 16, 2007 (72 FR
58560). No comments were received on
this proposal, and we are issuing these
special conditions as proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the 787.
Should Boeing apply at a later date for
a change to the type certificate to
include another model on the same type
certificate incorporating the same novel
or unusual design features, these special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features of the 787. It
is not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for the Boeing Model
787–8 airplane.
In lieu of the requirements of 14 CFR
25.1351(d), the following special
conditions apply:
(1) The applicant must show by test
or a combination of test and analysis
that the airplane is capable of continued
safe flight and landing with all normal
sources of engine- and auxiliary-powerunit (APU)-generated electrical power
inoperative, as prescribed by paragraphs
(1)(a) and (1)(b) below. For purposes of
this special condition, normal sources of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:57 Feb 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
electrical power generation do not
include any alternate power sources
such as the battery, ram air turbine
(RAT), or independent power systems
such as the flight control permanent
magnet generating system. In showing
capability for continued safe flight and
landing, consideration must be given to
systems capability, effects on crew
workload and operating conditions, and
the physiological needs of the flightcrew
and passengers for the longest diversion
time for which approval is sought.
(a) Common cause failures, cascading
failures, and zonal physical threats must
be considered in showing compliance
with this requirement.
(b) In showing compliance with this
requirement, the ability to restore
operation of portions of the electrical
power generation and distribution
system may be considered if it can be
shown that unrecoverable loss of those
portions of the system is extremely
improbable. An alternative source of
electrical power must be provided for
the time required to restore the
minimum electrical power generation
capability required for safe flight and
landing. (Unrecoverable loss of all
engines may be excluded when showing
that unrecoverable loss of critical
portions of the electrical system is
extremely improbable.)
(2) Regardless of any electrical
generation and distribution system
recovery capability shown under
paragraph 1, sufficient electrical system
capability must be provided—
(a) to allow time to descend, with all
engines inoperative, at the speed that
provides the best glide slope, from the
maximum operating altitude to the
altitude at which the soonest possible
engine restart could be accomplished,
and
(b) to subsequently allow multiple
start attempts of the engines and APU.
This capability must be provided in
addition to the electrical capability
required by existing part 25
requirements related to operation with
all engines inoperative.
(3) The electrical energy used by the
airplane in descending with engines
inoperative from the maximum
operating altitude at the best glide slope,
and in making multiple attempts to start
the engines and APU, must be
considered when showing compliance
with paragraphs (1) and (2) of these
special conditions and with existing 14
CFR part 25 requirements related to
continued safe flight and landing.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
13, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–3714 Filed 2–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Office of the Secretary
15 CFR Part 4
[Docket No. 050516131–5131–01]
RIN 0605–AA19
Disclosure of Government Information
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document amends the
Department of Commerce’s
(Department) Privacy Act (PA)
regulations (15 CFR Part 4) by adding an
additional method of authorization to
determine the identification of
individuals seeking access to records
under the Privacy Act, consistent with
28 U.S.C. 1746, which permits
statements to be made under penalty of
perjury as a substitute for notarization.
DATES: Effective February 27, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda Dolan, 202–482–3258.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 15 CFR
4.24(d)(2) of the Department of
Commerce’s regulations implementing
the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) provides
that individuals seeking access to their
records under the Privacy Act must
provide notarized proof of identity. In
order to create an additional method of
verifying identity, we are amending
section 4.24(d)(2) to provide that
statements made under penalty of
perjury may be submitted as a substitute
for notarization to determine the
identification of individuals seeking
access to records under the Privacy Act,
consistent with 28 U.S.C. 1746.
Classification
It has been determined that this notice
is not significant for purposes of E.O.
12866.
Administrative Procedure Act: The
rulemaking requirements pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553 do not apply to rules of
agency organization, procedure or
practice. This rule amends the
Department’s Privacy Act regulations by
adding an additional method of
authorization to determine the
identification of individuals seeking
access to records under the Privacy Act.
E:\FR\FM\27FER1.SGM
27FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 27, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10379-10380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3714]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 27, 2008 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 10379]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM378 Special Conditions No. 25-365-SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing Model 787-8 Airplane; Operation
Without Normal Electrical Power
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final Special Conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Boeing Model 787-8
airplane. This airplane will have novel or unusual design features when
compared to the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category airplanes. The Boeing Model 787-8
airplane will have numerous electrically operated systems whose
function is needed for continued safe flight and landing of the
airplane. For these design features, the applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards.
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that
the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing standards. Additional
special conditions have been issued for other novel or unusual design
features of the Boeing Model 787-8 airplanes.
DATES: Effective Date: March 28, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Slotte, FAA, Airplane & Flight
Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2315; facsimile (425) 227-
1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 28, 2003, Boeing applied for an FAA type certificate for
its new Boeing Model 787-8 passenger airplane. The Boeing Model 787-8
airplane will be an all-new, two-engine jet transport airplane with a
two-aisle cabin. The maximum takeoff weight will be 476,000 pounds,
with a maximum passenger count of 381 passengers.
Type Certification Basis
Under provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 21.17,
Boeing must show that Boeing Model 787-8 airplanes (hereafter referred
to as ``the 787'') meet the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as
amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-117, except Sec. Sec. 25.809(a)
and 25.812, which will remain at Amendment 25-115. If the Administrator
finds that the applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards for the 787 because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under
provisions of 14 CFR 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the 787 must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification requirements
of part 36. The FAA must also issue a finding of regulatory adequacy
pursuant to section 611 of Public Law 92-574, the ``Noise Control Act
of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, under
Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type certification basis under
Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also
apply to the other model under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The 787 will incorporate a number of novel or unusual design
features, some of which have not been previously installed on large
commercial aircraft. Because of these design features, these special
conditions differ from similar previous special conditions for other
airplane models. Because of rapid improvements in airplane technology,
the applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for these design features. These special
conditions for the 787 contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
In addition to an electronic flight control system, a number of
systems that have traditionally been pneumatically or mechanically
operated have been implemented as electrically powered systems on the
787. Examples include the hydraulic power, equipment cooling, wing
anti-ice, and auxiliary power unit (APU) and engine start systems. The
criticality of some of these systems is such that their failure would
either reduce the capability of the airplane or the ability of the crew
to cope with adverse operating conditions, or prevent continued safe
flight and landing of the airplane. The airworthiness standards of part
25 do not contain adequate or appropriate standards for protection of
these systems from the adverse effects of operation without normal
electrical power.
The current rule, 14 CFR 25.1351(d), Amendment 25-72, requires safe
operation under visual flight rules (VFR) conditions for at least five
minutes after loss of all normal electrical power. This rule was
structured around traditional airplane designs that used mechanical
control cables and linkages for flight control. These manual controls
allowed the crew to maintain aerodynamic control of the airplane for an
indefinite period of time after loss of all electrical power. Under
those conditions, the mechanical flight control system provided the
crew with the ability to fly the airplane while attempting to identify
the cause of the electrical failure, start the engine(s) if necessary,
and reestablish some of the electrical power generation capability, if
possible.
To maintain the same level of safety associated with traditional
designs, Boeing must design the 787 for operation with the normal
sources of engine- and auxiliary-power-unit (APU)-generated electrical
power not working. Service experience has shown that loss of all
electrical power from the airplane's engine- and APU-driven generators
is not extremely improbable. Thus, Boeing must show that the
[[Page 10380]]
airplane is capable of recovering adequate primary electrical power
generation for safe flight and landing. This demonstration would
provide that the ability to restore operation of portions of the
electrical power generation capability would be considered if
unrecoverable loss of those portions is shown to be extremely
improbable. An alternative source of electrical power would have to be
provided for the time necessary to restore the minimum power generation
capability necessary for safe flight and landing.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of Proposed Special Conditions No. 25-07-11-SC for the 787
was published in the Federal Register on October 16, 2007 (72 FR
58560). No comments were received on this proposal, and we are issuing
these special conditions as proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
787. Should Boeing apply at a later date for a change to the type
certificate to include another model on the same type certificate
incorporating the same novel or unusual design features, these special
conditions would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
of the 787. It is not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for the Boeing Model 787-8 airplane.
In lieu of the requirements of 14 CFR 25.1351(d), the following
special conditions apply:
(1) The applicant must show by test or a combination of test and
analysis that the airplane is capable of continued safe flight and
landing with all normal sources of engine- and auxiliary-power-unit
(APU)-generated electrical power inoperative, as prescribed by
paragraphs (1)(a) and (1)(b) below. For purposes of this special
condition, normal sources of electrical power generation do not include
any alternate power sources such as the battery, ram air turbine (RAT),
or independent power systems such as the flight control permanent
magnet generating system. In showing capability for continued safe
flight and landing, consideration must be given to systems capability,
effects on crew workload and operating conditions, and the
physiological needs of the flightcrew and passengers for the longest
diversion time for which approval is sought.
(a) Common cause failures, cascading failures, and zonal physical
threats must be considered in showing compliance with this requirement.
(b) In showing compliance with this requirement, the ability to
restore operation of portions of the electrical power generation and
distribution system may be considered if it can be shown that
unrecoverable loss of those portions of the system is extremely
improbable. An alternative source of electrical power must be provided
for the time required to restore the minimum electrical power
generation capability required for safe flight and landing.
(Unrecoverable loss of all engines may be excluded when showing that
unrecoverable loss of critical portions of the electrical system is
extremely improbable.)
(2) Regardless of any electrical generation and distribution system
recovery capability shown under paragraph 1, sufficient electrical
system capability must be provided--
(a) to allow time to descend, with all engines inoperative, at the
speed that provides the best glide slope, from the maximum operating
altitude to the altitude at which the soonest possible engine restart
could be accomplished, and
(b) to subsequently allow multiple start attempts of the engines
and APU. This capability must be provided in addition to the electrical
capability required by existing part 25 requirements related to
operation with all engines inoperative.
(3) The electrical energy used by the airplane in descending with
engines inoperative from the maximum operating altitude at the best
glide slope, and in making multiple attempts to start the engines and
APU, must be considered when showing compliance with paragraphs (1) and
(2) of these special conditions and with existing 14 CFR part 25
requirements related to continued safe flight and landing.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 13, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-3714 Filed 2-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P