Stehekin River Corridor Implementation Plan: North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Lake Chelan National Recreation Area, Chelan County, WA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Enviornmental Impact Statement, 10465-10467 [08-841]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 27, 2008 / Notices
10465
BURDEN BREAKDOWN—Continued
Fee(s)
Citation 30 CFR 250
Subpart I and related NTLs
Reporting and/or recordkeeping requirement
919(b) ...................................
Submit annual (November 1 of each year) report on inspection of platforms or floating production facilities,
including summary of testing results.
80
130 lessees ...........
10,400
Subtotal .........................
...........................................................................................
........................
260 .........................
16,900
Hour burden
Average No. of
annual reponses
Annual burden
hours
General Departure
900 thru 921 .........................
General departure and alternative compliance requests
not specifically covered elsewhere in Subpart I regulations.
10
10 requests ............
100
Subtotal .........................
...........................................................................................
........................
791 Responses .....
60,260
$926,150 Fees
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
* The records required to be retained are such that respondents would keep them as usual and customary business practice. The burden
would be to make them available to MMS for review.
Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’
Burden: We have identified four nonhour cost burdens (see Burden
Breakdown). Section 250.905(k) requires
four specific fees for various platform
applications/installations. One fee is for
installation under the Platform
Verification Program; one fee is for
installation of fixed structures under the
Platform Approval Program; one fee is
for installation of Caisson/Well
Protectors; and one fee is for
modifications and/or repairs. We have
not identified any other ‘‘non-hour cost’’
burdens associated with this collection
of information.
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Until OMB approves a
collection of information, you are not
obligated to respond.
Comments: Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.)
requires each agency ‘‘* * * to provide
notice * * * and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information * * *’’
Agencies must specifically solicit
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the agency to perform its
duties, including whether the
information is useful; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
minimize the burden on the
respondents, including the use of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:49 Feb 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
To comply with the public
consultation process, on June 25, 2007,
we published a Federal Register notice
(72 FR 34717) announcing that we
would submit this ICR to OMB for
approval. The notice provided the
required 60-day comment period. In
addition, § 250.199 provides the OMB
control number for the information
collection requirements imposed by the
30 CFR 250 regulations and forms. The
regulation also informs the public that
they may comment at any time on the
collections of information and provides
the address to which they should send
comments. We have received no
comments in response to these efforts.
If you wish to comment in response
to this notice, you may send your
comments to the offices listed under the
ADDRESSES section of this notice. The
OMB has up to 60 days to approve or
disapprove the information collection
but may respond after 30 days.
Therefore, to ensure maximum
consideration, OMB should receive
public comments by March 28, 2008.
Public Availability of Comments:
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
MMS Information Collection
Clearance Officer: Arlene Bajusz, (202)
208–7744.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: December 20, 2007.
E.P. Danenberger,
Chief, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs.
[FR Doc. E8–3654 Filed 2–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Stehekin River Corridor
Implementation Plan: North Cascades
National Park Service Complex, Lake
Chelan National Recreation Area,
Chelan County, WA; Notice of Intent To
Prepare an Enviornmental Impact
Statement
Summary: In accord with § 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.) and
the Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
the National Park Service (in
cooperation with the Western Federal
Lands Division of Federal Highway
Administration) is undertaking a
conservation planning and
environmental impact analysis process
to determine future management of
public and inter-mingled private lands
in the lower Stehekin River Valley
within Lake Chelan National Recreation
Area. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) will be prepared for a
Stehekin River Corridor Implementation
Plan, in conjunction with revising the
current Land Protection Plan, which
will guide land protection and Stehekin
River management within Lake Chelan
NRA.
Background: The National Park
Service (NPS) collectively manages
North Cascades National Park, Lake
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
10466
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 27, 2008 / Notices
Chelan NRA, and Ross Lake National
Recreation Area as North Cascades
National Park Service Complex (North
Cascades). The Stehekin Valley is a
glacial valley that begins at the crest of
Cascade Pass within North Cascades
National Park and ends where the river
flows into Lake Chelan, the third
deepest natural lake in the United
States. Lake Chelan is a 55-mile-long,
1,500-foot-deep lake with exceptionally
steep valley walls reminiscent of a fjord.
The natural level of the lake was raised
21 feet by a hydroelectric/flood-control
dam in the 1920s. Approximately the
upper five miles of Lake Chelan and the
lower nine miles of the Stehekin River
are within Lake Chelan NRA.
Geographically this remote area is a
long, narrow corridor, within which
numerous private homes and public
facilities are located. People have been
living in the Stehekin area since the
valley was homesteaded in the mid1800s. Approximately 100 people live
in the Stehekin Community year-round,
while many others visit periodically,
most in summer. In addition, the
Stehekin area draws visitors from
around the world to camp, fish, swim,
raft, kayak, bicycle, hike and engage in
other activities. Some stay for only a few
hours (between ferry landings), while
some stay for days or weeks hosted by
the park and the Stehekin Community.
Prior to the late 20th century, like
most rivers on the east slope of the
Cascade Range, the Stehekin River had
flooded primarily due to spring
snowmelt. Since the 1960s, however,
flooding appears to have become more
likely during fall rain-on-snow events,
which rise quickly and occur from midOctober through December. The
unprecedented occurrence of several
100-year fall floods and one 500-year
flood since 1995 has substantially
altered the river channel and floodplain,
resulting in channel migration, erosion
of river banks, and flooding in some
areas during even relatively low flood
conditions. As a result, private
landowners and NPS facilities in the
lower Valley have repeately been
threatened or damaged by recent
flooding. Since the 1960s, the number of
river channelization and bank
stabilization structures has increased to
some 1.5 miles at 41 sites.
Purpose and Need: The three largest
recorded floods on the Stehekin River
have occurred within the past 12
years—in 1995, 2003, and 2006. Prior to
this, the last large flood of similar
magnitude occurred in 1948. Because of
ongoing impacts to federal lands and
private property from the increased
magnitude and frequency of flooding,
sustainable management strategies and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:49 Feb 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
actions are needed to fulfill the intent of
the 1995 Lake Chelan NRA General
Management Plan (GMP) to allow for
natural processes associated with the
Stehekin River to occur, to maintain
park facilities (including the road
system, nearby campgrounds, and
administrative areas), and to help
ensure the sustainability of visitor
services provided by the Stehekin
community.
Some of these management strategies
and actions were identified by the Lake
Chelan GMP. Among other actions, the
GMP called for the relocation of park
facilities out of the floodplain. The GMP
and accompanying 1995 Lake Chelan
Land Protection Plan (LPP) also called
for the continued purchase and/or
exchange of private lands within the
floodplain. Although tiered to the GMP,
this Stehekin River Corridor
Impementation Plan would provide
more detailed management guidance. As
a result, this implementation plan will
identify additional sustainable
management strategies and actions
related to or clarified from the Lake
Chelan GMP and will review and refine
existing management strategies and
actions based on continuing research
applicable to river management
practices. This conservation planning
and environmental impact analysis
process is also intended to update the
LPP.
Changes in the origin, magnitude, and
frequency of floods have led to a shift
in floodplain boundaries, and a
recurring threat to public and private
facilities. It is possible that the Stehekin
River system may be evolving from a
spring snowmelt dominated system to
one dominated by bigger, more frequent
fall rain-on-snow floods. Because of
channel changes associated with the
three most recent large floods, smaller
floods now inundate areas that were not
within the 100-year floodplain prior to
1995. Other areas that were within the
floodplain have now become part of the
active river channel. These changing
hydrological conditions and the rapid
accumulation of large woody debris and
flood-deposited sediment along the
Stehekin River have led to a landscape
that requires management changes not
envisioned by previous plans or treated
holistically in actions on federal lands
or private property to date. This
implementation plan will identify the
most effective and sustainable strategies
and actions for future management of
the Stehekin River corridor based upon
the laws, regulations and policies that
guide the administration of NPS lands.
Preliminary Issues: NPS personnel,
interagency staff, and area residents
have begun to internally evaluate the
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
state of knowledge about the Stehekin
River and to review past management
actions to identify a variety of
preliminary issues and potential future
management actions. The following
issues and actions constitute a starting
point for engaging the public in the
conservation planning process:
Comprehensive analysis of the
sustainability of public and
administrative roads within the Lower
Stehekin Valley: Because of channel
changes associated with the three most
recent large floods, public and
administrative roads in several locations
now become inundated during smaller
flood events and bank erosion threatens
road networks at additional sites,
cutting off access. There is a need for a
comprehensive analysis of what steps
would be needed to maintain the public
and administrative road system,
including identifying possible reroute
locations out of the floodplain and the
associated environmental effect. The
analysis of any reroutes will need to
include potential effects on federal or
state listed species.
Possible relocation or modification of
recreational and administrative
facilities within the Lower Stehekin
Valley: Changes in the river have caused
significant shifts in floodplain
boundaries for the 100-year flood.
Development areas which did not flood
before 2003 now flood frequently,
placing some recreational and
administrative sites and facilities in the
Lower Stehekin Valley at risk. Among
the affected facilities are the group
campsites at Harlequin Campground
and several formerly private cabins that
have been destroyed by flooding, yet
remain as dilapidated structures or
debris piles along the river, diminishing
scenic qualities.
Updating the Lake Chelan Land
Protection Plan: The Land Protection
Plan was designed in large part to
protect the river corridor from
development. Since the Land Protection
Plan was approved in 1995, the NPS has
exchanged several parcels of land. An
update is needed to determine how
previous land protection priorities
would be modified by new information
associated with preliminary changes to
floodplain mapping and by lands
acquired since the plan was developed.
The update would likely include
refining criteria used to evaluate land
purchases and exchanges and
acquisition priorities.
Providing guidance for future river
bank and flood protection measures in
the Lower Stehekin Valley, including
management of large, woody debris and
restoration of riparian areas: Despite
erosion and flood protection efforts by
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 27, 2008 / Notices
the NPS and private landowners, bank
erosion continues to threaten public and
private property. Channel changes
associated with the floods have placed
more pressure on some sites, while
decreasing erosion rates at others. As
certain channel reaches fill with gravel,
large logjams have formed at side
channel openings. Large wood affects
flooding issues and recreational use of
the river. Future actions if inappropriate
could impact federal and state listed
species or/and increase the spread of
non-native plans.
While recent changes in flooding and
erosion are occurring throughout the
lower Stehekin River Valley, two key
points in the valley that have undergone
major changes are the river mouth and
McGregor Meadows: At the valley
mouth, the changing level of Lake
Chelan influences the gradient and
velocity of the river as far as a 1⁄4 mile
upstream. The slowing of the river in
turn triggers deposition of sediment and
large woody debris. At McGregor
Meadows, the valley widens three-fold,
triggering a loss in river gradient, the
deposition of massive amounts of
gravel, and the accumulation of large log
jams. These changes in the river system
lead to impacts to roads, visitor
facilities, and private property.
Response has been on an event-by-event
basis. The resulting outcomes as well as
public understanding gained over the
last 10 years underscores the need for
developing comprehensive, sustainable
guidance for future bank erosion and
flood protection measures, including
management of large, woody debris and
restoration of riparian areas.
NPS personnel, interagency staff, and
Stehekin landowners have begun to
identify preliminary components of a
comprehensive implementation plan.
Possible management actions may
include combinations of the following
(or other feasible actions as may be
identified by the public during the
scoping phase):
Continue current management
practices, such as reacting to periodic
flooding by installing bank erosion
protection devices or relocating the
Stehekin Valley Road on a case-by-case
basis; considering requests from private
landowners regarding appropriate
actions to take so as to avoid
consequences of flooding, including
elevating their homes; responding to
private property owners as they seek
permission to take action on NPS land
to protect adjacent private property;
continue to evaluate the suitability of
lands for exchange as requests for
exchanges are made or as the NPS
acquires new land; continue research to
determine the efficacy of long-term bank
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:49 Feb 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
stabilization (erosion protection)
measures.
In addition to maintaining some
current management activities, new
practices which may be evaluated
include:
• Use new floodplain mapping to
identify new threats to private and
public structures and to identify what
lands can be managed sustainably under
existing conditions (with structures or
facilities);
• Update land exchange criteria/
priorities to reinvigorate land exchange
process;
• Analyze the amount and movement
of large woody debris to determine if
management changes are needed
(potentially refining GMP direction to
allow for limited manipulation of large
woody debris in an effort to protect
certain areas from large flood damage);
• Relocate parts of private and public
roads, campgrounds, or campsites from
the floodplain;
• Work with landowners to remove
private facilities from the floodplain;
• Remove derelict structures, debris
piles, or non-native plants from
floodplain;
• Encourage moving or reconstructing
private homes outside of the floodplain;
• Restore native riparian edge near
Buckner Orchard to slow erosion rate;
and
• Accept some facilities in floodplain.
Scoping Process: As a key step in the
overall conservation planning and
environmental impact analysis process
necessary for achieving the goal of
partnering to implement coordinated
Stehekin River management, the NPS is
seeking public comments and relevant
information to guide the preparation of
a Draft EIS. The objectives of the public
scoping phase include: (1) Invite
participation from federal, tribal, state,
local governments and other interested
parties; (2) Inform all interested parties
about the scope of the problem and the
need to find solutions; (3) Identify a
preliminary range of management
alternatives (in addition to a no-action
alternative that will be used as a
baseline of existing conditions from
which to evaluate proposed changes in
management); (4) Identify relevant
natural and cultural resources,
recreational uses, socioeconomic and
other issues which warrant detailed
environmental impact analysis, and
eliminate issues or topics which do not
require analysis; (5) Identify potential
environmental consequences and
suitable mitigation strategies.
Any parties wishing to express
concerns about management issues or
provide relevant environmental
information that should be addressed in
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10467
preparing the forthcoming EIS are
strongly encouraged to submit written
comments. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information, we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to do so. All written
comments must be postmarked or
transmitted not later than March 31,
2008. Written comments should be
mailed to North Cascades National Park
Service Complex, Attn: SRCIP–EIS, 810
State Route 20, Sedro-Woolley, WA
98284 (or e-mailed to
NOCA_planning@nps.gov—please
include ‘‘Stehekin River Corridor
Implementation Plan’’ in the subject
header). Comments may also be
submitted via the NPS Planning
Environment & Public Comment Web
site at www.parkplanning.nps.gov/
NOCA.
Several public scoping workshops are
anticipated to be held, including
February 25 (Concrete), February 26
(Sedro-Woolley), March 4 (Bellingham),
and March 5 (Seattle). Details regarding
the workshops including times and
meeting locations will be announced
widely through local and regional news
media, direct park mailings, and posted
on the park’s Web site at www.nps.gov/
noca.
Decision Process: At this time, the
Draft EIS is expected to be available for
public review in spring 2009. Formal
announcement of its availability will be
published in the Federal Register, and
through local and regional news media,
as well as distribution to public
libraries. Following due consideration
of all comments as may be received, a
Final EIS will be prepared. As a
delegated EIS, the official responsible
for a final decision is the Regional
Director, Pacific West Region.
Subsequently the official responsible for
implementing the approved plan and for
monitoring results is the
Superintendent, North Cascades
National Park Service Complex.
Dated: December 18, 2007.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 08–841 Filed 2–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–T6–M
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10465-10467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-841]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Stehekin River Corridor Implementation Plan: North Cascades
National Park Service Complex, Lake Chelan National Recreation Area,
Chelan County, WA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Enviornmental Impact
Statement
Summary: In accord with Sec. 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.) and the
Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508),
the National Park Service (in cooperation with the Western Federal
Lands Division of Federal Highway Administration) is undertaking a
conservation planning and environmental impact analysis process to
determine future management of public and inter-mingled private lands
in the lower Stehekin River Valley within Lake Chelan National
Recreation Area. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be
prepared for a Stehekin River Corridor Implementation Plan, in
conjunction with revising the current Land Protection Plan, which will
guide land protection and Stehekin River management within Lake Chelan
NRA.
Background: The National Park Service (NPS) collectively manages
North Cascades National Park, Lake
[[Page 10466]]
Chelan NRA, and Ross Lake National Recreation Area as North Cascades
National Park Service Complex (North Cascades). The Stehekin Valley is
a glacial valley that begins at the crest of Cascade Pass within North
Cascades National Park and ends where the river flows into Lake Chelan,
the third deepest natural lake in the United States. Lake Chelan is a
55-mile-long, 1,500-foot-deep lake with exceptionally steep valley
walls reminiscent of a fjord. The natural level of the lake was raised
21 feet by a hydroelectric/flood-control dam in the 1920s.
Approximately the upper five miles of Lake Chelan and the lower nine
miles of the Stehekin River are within Lake Chelan NRA.
Geographically this remote area is a long, narrow corridor, within
which numerous private homes and public facilities are located. People
have been living in the Stehekin area since the valley was homesteaded
in the mid-1800s. Approximately 100 people live in the Stehekin
Community year-round, while many others visit periodically, most in
summer. In addition, the Stehekin area draws visitors from around the
world to camp, fish, swim, raft, kayak, bicycle, hike and engage in
other activities. Some stay for only a few hours (between ferry
landings), while some stay for days or weeks hosted by the park and the
Stehekin Community.
Prior to the late 20th century, like most rivers on the east slope
of the Cascade Range, the Stehekin River had flooded primarily due to
spring snowmelt. Since the 1960s, however, flooding appears to have
become more likely during fall rain-on-snow events, which rise quickly
and occur from mid-October through December. The unprecedented
occurrence of several 100-year fall floods and one 500-year flood since
1995 has substantially altered the river channel and floodplain,
resulting in channel migration, erosion of river banks, and flooding in
some areas during even relatively low flood conditions. As a result,
private landowners and NPS facilities in the lower Valley have
repeately been threatened or damaged by recent flooding. Since the
1960s, the number of river channelization and bank stabilization
structures has increased to some 1.5 miles at 41 sites.
Purpose and Need: The three largest recorded floods on the Stehekin
River have occurred within the past 12 years--in 1995, 2003, and 2006.
Prior to this, the last large flood of similar magnitude occurred in
1948. Because of ongoing impacts to federal lands and private property
from the increased magnitude and frequency of flooding, sustainable
management strategies and actions are needed to fulfill the intent of
the 1995 Lake Chelan NRA General Management Plan (GMP) to allow for
natural processes associated with the Stehekin River to occur, to
maintain park facilities (including the road system, nearby
campgrounds, and administrative areas), and to help ensure the
sustainability of visitor services provided by the Stehekin community.
Some of these management strategies and actions were identified by
the Lake Chelan GMP. Among other actions, the GMP called for the
relocation of park facilities out of the floodplain. The GMP and
accompanying 1995 Lake Chelan Land Protection Plan (LPP) also called
for the continued purchase and/or exchange of private lands within the
floodplain. Although tiered to the GMP, this Stehekin River Corridor
Impementation Plan would provide more detailed management guidance. As
a result, this implementation plan will identify additional sustainable
management strategies and actions related to or clarified from the Lake
Chelan GMP and will review and refine existing management strategies
and actions based on continuing research applicable to river management
practices. This conservation planning and environmental impact analysis
process is also intended to update the LPP.
Changes in the origin, magnitude, and frequency of floods have led
to a shift in floodplain boundaries, and a recurring threat to public
and private facilities. It is possible that the Stehekin River system
may be evolving from a spring snowmelt dominated system to one
dominated by bigger, more frequent fall rain-on-snow floods. Because of
channel changes associated with the three most recent large floods,
smaller floods now inundate areas that were not within the 100-year
floodplain prior to 1995. Other areas that were within the floodplain
have now become part of the active river channel. These changing
hydrological conditions and the rapid accumulation of large woody
debris and flood-deposited sediment along the Stehekin River have led
to a landscape that requires management changes not envisioned by
previous plans or treated holistically in actions on federal lands or
private property to date. This implementation plan will identify the
most effective and sustainable strategies and actions for future
management of the Stehekin River corridor based upon the laws,
regulations and policies that guide the administration of NPS lands.
Preliminary Issues: NPS personnel, interagency staff, and area
residents have begun to internally evaluate the state of knowledge
about the Stehekin River and to review past management actions to
identify a variety of preliminary issues and potential future
management actions. The following issues and actions constitute a
starting point for engaging the public in the conservation planning
process:
Comprehensive analysis of the sustainability of public and
administrative roads within the Lower Stehekin Valley: Because of
channel changes associated with the three most recent large floods,
public and administrative roads in several locations now become
inundated during smaller flood events and bank erosion threatens road
networks at additional sites, cutting off access. There is a need for a
comprehensive analysis of what steps would be needed to maintain the
public and administrative road system, including identifying possible
reroute locations out of the floodplain and the associated
environmental effect. The analysis of any reroutes will need to include
potential effects on federal or state listed species.
Possible relocation or modification of recreational and
administrative facilities within the Lower Stehekin Valley: Changes in
the river have caused significant shifts in floodplain boundaries for
the 100-year flood. Development areas which did not flood before 2003
now flood frequently, placing some recreational and administrative
sites and facilities in the Lower Stehekin Valley at risk. Among the
affected facilities are the group campsites at Harlequin Campground and
several formerly private cabins that have been destroyed by flooding,
yet remain as dilapidated structures or debris piles along the river,
diminishing scenic qualities.
Updating the Lake Chelan Land Protection Plan: The Land Protection
Plan was designed in large part to protect the river corridor from
development. Since the Land Protection Plan was approved in 1995, the
NPS has exchanged several parcels of land. An update is needed to
determine how previous land protection priorities would be modified by
new information associated with preliminary changes to floodplain
mapping and by lands acquired since the plan was developed. The update
would likely include refining criteria used to evaluate land purchases
and exchanges and acquisition priorities.
Providing guidance for future river bank and flood protection
measures in the Lower Stehekin Valley, including management of large,
woody debris and restoration of riparian areas: Despite erosion and
flood protection efforts by
[[Page 10467]]
the NPS and private landowners, bank erosion continues to threaten
public and private property. Channel changes associated with the floods
have placed more pressure on some sites, while decreasing erosion rates
at others. As certain channel reaches fill with gravel, large logjams
have formed at side channel openings. Large wood affects flooding
issues and recreational use of the river. Future actions if
inappropriate could impact federal and state listed species or/and
increase the spread of non-native plans.
While recent changes in flooding and erosion are occurring
throughout the lower Stehekin River Valley, two key points in the
valley that have undergone major changes are the river mouth and
McGregor Meadows: At the valley mouth, the changing level of Lake
Chelan influences the gradient and velocity of the river as far as a
\1/4\ mile upstream. The slowing of the river in turn triggers
deposition of sediment and large woody debris. At McGregor Meadows, the
valley widens three-fold, triggering a loss in river gradient, the
deposition of massive amounts of gravel, and the accumulation of large
log jams. These changes in the river system lead to impacts to roads,
visitor facilities, and private property. Response has been on an
event-by-event basis. The resulting outcomes as well as public
understanding gained over the last 10 years underscores the need for
developing comprehensive, sustainable guidance for future bank erosion
and flood protection measures, including management of large, woody
debris and restoration of riparian areas.
NPS personnel, interagency staff, and Stehekin landowners have
begun to identify preliminary components of a comprehensive
implementation plan. Possible management actions may include
combinations of the following (or other feasible actions as may be
identified by the public during the scoping phase):
Continue current management practices, such as reacting to periodic
flooding by installing bank erosion protection devices or relocating
the Stehekin Valley Road on a case-by-case basis; considering requests
from private landowners regarding appropriate actions to take so as to
avoid consequences of flooding, including elevating their homes;
responding to private property owners as they seek permission to take
action on NPS land to protect adjacent private property; continue to
evaluate the suitability of lands for exchange as requests for
exchanges are made or as the NPS acquires new land; continue research
to determine the efficacy of long-term bank stabilization (erosion
protection) measures.
In addition to maintaining some current management activities, new
practices which may be evaluated include:
Use new floodplain mapping to identify new threats to
private and public structures and to identify what lands can be managed
sustainably under existing conditions (with structures or facilities);
Update land exchange criteria/priorities to reinvigorate
land exchange process;
Analyze the amount and movement of large woody debris to
determine if management changes are needed (potentially refining GMP
direction to allow for limited manipulation of large woody debris in an
effort to protect certain areas from large flood damage);
Relocate parts of private and public roads, campgrounds,
or campsites from the floodplain;
Work with landowners to remove private facilities from the
floodplain;
Remove derelict structures, debris piles, or non-native
plants from floodplain;
Encourage moving or reconstructing private homes outside
of the floodplain;
Restore native riparian edge near Buckner Orchard to slow
erosion rate; and
Accept some facilities in floodplain.
Scoping Process: As a key step in the overall conservation planning
and environmental impact analysis process necessary for achieving the
goal of partnering to implement coordinated Stehekin River management,
the NPS is seeking public comments and relevant information to guide
the preparation of a Draft EIS. The objectives of the public scoping
phase include: (1) Invite participation from federal, tribal, state,
local governments and other interested parties; (2) Inform all
interested parties about the scope of the problem and the need to find
solutions; (3) Identify a preliminary range of management alternatives
(in addition to a no-action alternative that will be used as a baseline
of existing conditions from which to evaluate proposed changes in
management); (4) Identify relevant natural and cultural resources,
recreational uses, socioeconomic and other issues which warrant
detailed environmental impact analysis, and eliminate issues or topics
which do not require analysis; (5) Identify potential environmental
consequences and suitable mitigation strategies.
Any parties wishing to express concerns about management issues or
provide relevant environmental information that should be addressed in
preparing the forthcoming EIS are strongly encouraged to submit written
comments. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should
be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. All
written comments must be postmarked or transmitted not later than March
31, 2008. Written comments should be mailed to North Cascades National
Park Service Complex, Attn: SRCIP-EIS, 810 State Route 20, Sedro-
Woolley, WA 98284 (or e-mailed to NOCA_planning@nps.gov--please
include ``Stehekin River Corridor Implementation Plan'' in the subject
header). Comments may also be submitted via the NPS Planning
Environment & Public Comment Web site at www.parkplanning.nps.gov/NOCA.
Several public scoping workshops are anticipated to be held,
including February 25 (Concrete), February 26 (Sedro-Woolley), March 4
(Bellingham), and March 5 (Seattle). Details regarding the workshops
including times and meeting locations will be announced widely through
local and regional news media, direct park mailings, and posted on the
park's Web site at www.nps.gov/noca.
Decision Process: At this time, the Draft EIS is expected to be
available for public review in spring 2009. Formal announcement of its
availability will be published in the Federal Register, and through
local and regional news media, as well as distribution to public
libraries. Following due consideration of all comments as may be
received, a Final EIS will be prepared. As a delegated EIS, the
official responsible for a final decision is the Regional Director,
Pacific West Region. Subsequently the official responsible for
implementing the approved plan and for monitoring results is the
Superintendent, North Cascades National Park Service Complex.
Dated: December 18, 2007.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 08-841 Filed 2-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-T6-M