Operation of Civil Aircraft of U.S. Registry Outside of the United States, 10140-10143 [E8-3583]

Download as PDF 10140 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: I PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended]. 2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 by removing amendment 39–11793 (65 FR 37480, June 15, 2000) and by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): I 2008–04–14 Dassault Aviation (Formerly Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet Aviation (AMD/BA)): Amendment 39– 15386. Docket No. FAA–2007–28941; Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–276–AD. Effective Date (a) This AD becomes effective April 1, 2008. airplanes: Within 30 days after July 20, 2000 (the effective date of AD 2000–12–15), perform an operational test and detailed inspection of the overwing emergency exit from inside the cabin to detect discrepancies (including separation, tearing, wearing, arcing, cracking) in the areas and components listed in Chapter 5 (ATA Code 52) of the applicable airplane maintenance manual (AMM). Accomplish the actions in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent). If any discrepancy is detected during any test or inspection required by this paragraph, prior to further flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International Branch; or EASA (or its delegated agent). Chapter 5 (ATA Code 52) of the applicable AMM is one approved method for the actions required by this paragraph. Repeat the operational test and inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 24 months. Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning and elaborate procedures may be required.’’ New Requirements of This AD Operational Test and Inspection Affected ADs (b) This AD supersedes AD 2000–12–15. Applicability (c) This AD applies to all Dassault Model Falcon 2000, Falcon 2000EX, Mystere-Falcon 900, Falcon 900EX, Fan Jet Falcon, MystereFalcon 50, Mystere-Falcon 20, MystereFalcon 200, and Falcon 10 airplanes, certificated in any category. Unsafe Condition (d) This AD results from a report of incorrect operation of the overwing emergency exit due to interference between the emergency exit and the interior accommodation. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the overwing emergency exits to open, and consequent injury to passengers or crewmembers during an emergency evacuation. (g) For Dassault Model Falcon 2000EX airplanes: Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, perform the operational test and detailed inspection of the overwing emergency exit required by paragraph (f) of this AD. If any discrepancy is detected during any test or inspection required by this paragraph, prior to further flight, repair as required by paragraph (f). Repeat the operational test and inspection at intervals not to exceed 24 months. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) Restatement of Requirements of AD 2000– 12–15 With Revised Repetitive Interval pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES Compliance (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. (h)(1) The Manager, International Branch, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. Special Flight Permits Operational Test and Inspection (f) For Dassault Model Falcon 2000, Mystere-Falcon 900, Falcon 900EX, Fan Jet Falcon, Mystere-Falcon 50, Mystere-Falcon 20, Mystere-Falcon 200, and Falcon 10 VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:04 Feb 25, 2008 Jkt 214001 (i) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Related Information (j) EASA airworthiness directives 2006– 0147, 2006–0148, 2006–0149, and 2006– 0156, all dated June 7, 2006, also address the subject of this AD. Material Incorporated by Reference (k) None. Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 13, 2008. Stephen P. Boyd, Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E8–3403 Filed 2–25–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 91 [Docket No.: FAA–2007–0020; Amdt. No. 91–299] RIN 2120–AJ14 Operation of Civil Aircraft of U.S. Registry Outside of the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This action amends certain regulations governing U.S. registered aircraft operating beyond the territorial airspace of the United States. This action is necessary to correct an error in the recodification of the regulations concerning general operating and flight rules. The intended effect of this action is to correct an inadvertent error in the regulations. DATES: This action is effective February 26, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Lauck Claussen, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8166; facsimile (202) 267–5229, e-mail nancy.l.claussen@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Availability of Rulemaking Documents You can get an electronic copy using the Internet by: (1) Searching the Federal eRulemaking portal at https:// www.regulations.gov; (2) Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and Policies Web page at https:// www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/; or (3) Accessing the Government Printing Office’s Web page at https:// www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/. You can also get a copy by sending a request to the Federal Aviation E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM 26FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267–9680. Make sure to identify the amendment number or docket number of this rulemaking. Authority for This Rulemaking The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Acting Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Section 44701(a)(5), General Requirements. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations and minimum standards for other practices, methods, and procedure the Acting Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce and national security. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses operational requirements that support aviation safety. pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES Background In August 1966, the FAA amended 14 CFR part 91 to prescribe rules that apply to civil aircraft of U.S. registry operating outside of the United States. This final rule made the general operating rules of Subpart A and the maintenance rules of Subpart C of Part 91 applicable to U.S. registered civil aircraft operations outside of, as well as within, the United States. (See 31 FR 8354; June 15, 1966.) Section 91.1, Applicability, was amended by adding paragraph (b)(3), which provided that ‘‘Each person operating a civil aircraft of U.S. registry outside of the United States shall * * * Except for §§ 91.15(b), 91.17, 91.38, and 91.43, comply with Subparts A and C of this part so far as they are not inconsistent with applicable regulations of the foreign country where the aircraft is operated or Annex 2 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.’’ On August 18, 1989, the FAA issued a final rule that recodified Part 91 (54 FR 34284). The purpose of this action was to reorganize and clarify existing rules.1 The FAA designated new § 91.703—Operations of civil aircraft of U.S. registry outside of the United States, and moved several paragraphs from § 91.1 relating to the operation of U.S. registered aircraft outside the U.S. 1 The FAA also made four substantive changes to the regulations during this rulemaking that are not at issue in this rule. VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:04 Feb 25, 2008 Jkt 214001 to the newly established § 91.703. Specifically, paragraph (b)(3) of § 91.1 was moved to § 91.703(a)(3). The FAA did not intend any substantive change to this paragraph. As recodified, § 91.703 provides that ‘‘Each person operating a civil aircraft of U.S. registry outside of the United States shall * * * (3) Except for §§ 91.307(b), 91.309, 91.323, and 91.711, comply with this part so far as it is not inconsistent with applicable regulations of the foreign country where the aircraft is operated or annex 2 of the Convention of International Civil Aviation.’’ Referring to ‘‘this part’’ instead of referring specifically to subparts A and C in part 91 substantively affects the regulatory requirements. Under the current language, except for the four noted exceptions, all the provisions of part 91 apply to U.S. registered aircraft operating outside of the United States. The FAA has reviewed this matter, as it applies to the speed restrictions articulated in § 91.117(a).2 The current regulatory text of § 91.703(a)(3) makes the speed restrictions of § 91.117(a) applicable to U.S registered civil aircraft when operating outside the United States (and not within a foreign country). We conclude that the final rule in 1989 erroneously changed the requirements and that this result was unintended. This rule corrects that error. The FAA will further review Part 91 to determine whether there are similar issues that need to be addressed. Good Cause for Immediate Adoption of This Final Rule On the basis of the above information, the FAA finds that immediate action is necessary to correct the regulations to accurately depict the agency’s intentions. As a practical matter, the FAA is aware that most of the affected industry was unaware of the literal effect of the recodification with respect to the speed restrictions contained in § 91.117(a). Until recently, the FAA was not aware of the error, and has proceeded from an operational perspective that the speed restrictions of § 91.117(a) do not apply to U.S. registered aircraft, via § 91.703(a)(3), when operating outside the U.S. (and not within another country’s territorial airspace).3 2 Section 91.117(a) provides that unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may operate an aircraft below 10,000 feet mean sea level (MSL) at an indicated airspeed of more than 250 knots (288 m.p.h.). 3 The FAA’s Office of the Chief Counsel realized this issue in issuing an interpretation dated October 12, 2005 to Mr. Michael Di Marco, which concludes appropriately that the speed restriction of § 91.117(a) does in fact apply to U.S. registered civil aircraft when operating over the high seas under the PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 10141 Because the circumstances described in this notice warrant immediate action by the FAA to correct and accurately depict the regulatory requirements, I find that notice and public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and contrary to the public interest. Further, I find that good cause exists for making this rule effective immediately upon publication. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 1996 requires FAA to comply with small entity requests for information or advice about compliance with statutes and regulations within its jurisdiction. Therefore, any small entity that has a question regarding this document may contact their local FAA official, or the person listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. You can find out more about SBREFA on the Internet at our site, https://www.faa.gov/ regulations_policies/rulemaking/ sbre_act/. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information collection burdens imposed on the public. We have determined that there is no new information collection requirement associated with this direct final rule. An agency may not collect or sponsor the collection of information, nor may it impose an information collection requirement unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. International Compatibility In keeping with U.S. obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to comply with ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices to the maximum extent practicable. The FAA has reviewed the corresponding ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices and has identified no differences with these regulations. Economic Evaluation, Regulatory Flexibility Determination, International Trade Impact Assessment, and Unfunded Mandates Assessment Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 directs that current regulations. This interpretation was reaffirmed on April 10, 2007, in the agency’s response to Mr. David Shacknai. Concurrent with the adoption of this final rule, the FAA will rescind the interpretation as it is no longer valid. E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM 26FER1 pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES 10142 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations each Federal agency shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354) requires agencies to analyze the economic impact of regulatory changes on small entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act (Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits agencies from setting standards that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. In developing U.S. standards, this Trade Act requires agencies to consider international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs, benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that include a Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with base year of 1995). In conducting these analyses, FAA has determined this rule— (1) Has benefits which do justify its costs, is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as defined in the Executive Order and is not ‘‘significant’’ as defined in DOT’s Regulatory Policies and Procedures; (2) will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities; (3) reduces barriers to international trade; and (4) does not impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector. These analyses, available in the docket, are summarized below. Department of Transportation Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies and procedures for simplification, analysis, and review of regulations. If the expected cost impact is so minimal that a proposed or final rule does not warrant a full evaluation, this order permits that a statement to that effect and the basis for it be included in the preamble if a full regulatory evaluation of the cost and benefits is not prepared. Such a determination has been made for this final rule. The reasoning for this determination follows: Since this final rule merely corrects an inadvertent error in the regulations, the expected outcome will be a minimal impact with positive net benefits, and a regulatory evaluation was not prepared. FAA has, therefore, determined that this final rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as defined in section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, and is not ‘‘significant’’ as defined in DOT’s Regulatory Policies and Procedures. VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:04 Feb 25, 2008 Jkt 214001 Regulatory Flexibility Determination The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354) (RFA) establishes ‘‘as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals are given serious consideration.’’ The RFA covers a wide range of small entities, including small businesses, not-forprofit organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA. However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. The certification must include a statement providing the factual basis for this determination, and the reasoning should be clear. This final rule corrects an inadvertent error in the regulations. Its economic impact is minimal. Therefore, we certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, as the FAA Acting Administrator, I certify that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. International Trade Impact Assessment The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any standards or engaging in related activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. Legitimate domestic objectives, such as safety, are not considered unnecessary obstacles. The statute also requires consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed the potential effect of this final rule and has determined that it will impose no costs on domestic and international PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 entities and thus has a neutral trade impact. Unfunded Mandates Assessment Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation with the base year 1995) in any one year by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently uses an inflation-adjusted value of $128.1 million in lieu of $100 million. This final rule does not contain such a mandate. Executive Order 13132, Federalism The FAA has analyzed this final rule under the principles and criteria of Executive Order 13132, Federalism. We determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, or the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, we determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications. Environmental Analysis FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA actions that are categorically excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has determined this proposed rulemaking action qualifies for the categorical exclusion identified in paragraph 312f and involves no extraordinary circumstances. Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use The FAA has analyzed this final rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). We have determined that it is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under the executive order because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, and it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM 26FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91 Air traffic control, Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. The Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends Chapter I of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations as follows: I PART 91—GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES 1. The authority citation for part 91 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1155, 40103, 40113, 40120, 44101, 44111, 44701, 44704, 44709, 44711, 44712, 44715, 44716, 44717, 44722, 46306, 46315, 46316, 46504, 46506– 46507, 47122, 47508, 47528–47531, articles 12 and 29 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation (61 Stat. 1180). 2. Amend § 91.703 by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows: I § 91.703 Operations of civil aircraft of U.S. registry outside of the United States. (a) * * * (3) Except for §§ 91.117(a), 91.307(b), 91.309, 91.323, and 91.711, comply with this part so far as it is not inconsistent with applicable regulations of the foreign country where the aircraft is operated or annex 2 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation; and * * * * * Issued in Washington, DC on February 15, 2008. Robert A. Sturgell, Acting Administrator. [FR Doc. E8–3583 Filed 2–25–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 14 CFR Part 1266 [NOTICE: (08–014)] RIN 2700–AB51 Cross-Waiver of Liability National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ACTION: Final rule. pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES AGENCY: SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is amending its regulations which provide the regulatory basis for cross-waiver provisions used in the following two categories of NASA agreements: agreements for International Space Station (ISS) activities pursuant to the ‘‘Agreement Among the Government of VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:04 Feb 25, 2008 Jkt 214001 Canada, Governments of Member States of the European Space Agency, the Government of Japan, the Government of the Russian Federation, and the Government of the United States of America concerning Cooperation on the Civil International Space Station’’ (commonly referred to as the ISS Intergovernmental Agreement, or IGA); and launch agreements for science or space exploration activities unrelated to the ISS. DATES: Effective Date: These amendments become effective April 28, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven A. Mirmina, Senior Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546; telephone: 202/ 358–2432; e-mail: steve.mirmina@nasa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On October 23, 2006, NASA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), Cross-Waiver of Liability, 71 FR (Federal Register) 62061 (October 23, 2006), which discussed the background of Part 1266 and the use of cross-waivers in various NASA agreements. The NPRM also explained the considerations underlying NASA’s proposed amendments to Part 1266, which were: (1) To update and ensure consistency in the use of crosswaiver of liability provisions in NASA agreements; and (2) to address shifts in areas of NASA mission and program emphases that warrant an adjustment of the NASA cross-waiver provisions so that they remain current. II. Description of Final Rule and Discussion of Comments In this Final Rule, NASA makes clerical edits to the wording in sections 1266.100 (Purpose) and 1266.101 (Scope). In sections 1266.102 (Crosswaiver of liability for agreements for activities related to the International Space Station) and 1266.104 (Crosswaiver of liability for launch agreements for science or space exploration activities unrelated to the International Space Station), NASA generally makes clerical changes, adds a new definition of the term ‘‘transfer vehicle,’’ defines the term ‘‘Party’’ in section 1266.102 and revises the term’s definition in section 1266.104, clarifies the scope of the sixth group of potential claims to which the cross-waiver of liability shall not apply, and deletes the specific reference to Expendable and Reusable Launch Vehicles (ELVs and RLVs, respectively) from section 1266.104. PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 10143 In response to the NPRM of October 23, 2006, NASA received comments from four entities: The Boeing Company (Boeing); Marsh USA, Inc. (Marsh); United Space Alliance (USA); and the European Space Agency, which subsequently withdrew its comments. In general, the commenters supported the proposed amendments, but with several suggested changes. The commenters also submitted some general questions about the Rule. In an effort to provide additional information on its intentions and plans, NASA will address these questions in section M in this document. A. Deleting Section 14 CFR 1266.103 In the NPRM, NASA proposed deleting section 1266.103, regarding the cross-waiver of liability during Space Shuttle (Shuttle) operations, in light of direction from President George W. Bush that the Shuttle be retired from service by 2010 and the fact that, with the exception of the fifth Hubble Servicing Mission, currently scheduled for August 2008, current mission plans envision no other Shuttle missions unrelated to the ISS. Because the ISS cross-waiver in section 1266.102 covers Shuttle operations for missions to the ISS, NASA determines that there is no longer a need to retain the section of Part 1266 requiring a separate crosswaiver of liability to be used during Shuttle operations. The commenters urged NASA to retain section 1266.103 for as long as Shuttle operations continue and prime contracts and subcontracts with cross-waiver and indemnity provisions remain in place. The commenters contend that although current mission plans envision no other non-ISS missions for the Shuttle, those plans could change and therefore it would be premature to delete section 1266.103. One commenter noted that the Shuttle program ‘‘may be extended for up to an additional five years if the options under the current Space Program Operations Contract are fully exercised, with unknown missions into the future.’’ (Marsh at page 2) Having reviewed and considered the points raised by the commenters, NASA will proceed with the removal of section 1266.103 for several legal and policy reasons. With the exception of the fifth Hubble Servicing Mission, NASA has stated that the remaining Shuttle flights will be dedicated solely to ISS missions.1 Since any NASA agreements 1 See, for example, the Written Statement of Michael D. Griffin, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM Continued 26FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 26, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10140-10143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 91

[Docket No.: FAA-2007-0020; Amdt. No. 91-299]
RIN 2120-AJ14


Operation of Civil Aircraft of U.S. Registry Outside of the 
United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends certain regulations governing U.S. 
registered aircraft operating beyond the territorial airspace of the 
United States. This action is necessary to correct an error in the 
recodification of the regulations concerning general operating and 
flight rules. The intended effect of this action is to correct an 
inadvertent error in the regulations.

DATES: This action is effective February 26, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Lauck Claussen, Flight Standards 
Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-8166; facsimile (202) 267-
5229, e-mail nancy.l.claussen@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Availability of Rulemaking Documents

    You can get an electronic copy using the Internet by:
    (1) Searching the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov;
    (2) Visiting the FAA's Regulations and Policies Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/; or
    (3) Accessing the Government Printing Office's Web page at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
    You can also get a copy by sending a request to the Federal 
Aviation

[[Page 10141]]

Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-9680. Make sure to 
identify the amendment number or docket number of this rulemaking.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is 
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 
describes the authority of the FAA Acting Administrator. Subtitle VII, 
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's 
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Section 44701(a)(5), General Requirements. Under 
that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations and 
minimum standards for other practices, methods, and procedure the 
Acting Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce and 
national security. This regulation is within the scope of that 
authority because it addresses operational requirements that support 
aviation safety.

Background

    In August 1966, the FAA amended 14 CFR part 91 to prescribe rules 
that apply to civil aircraft of U.S. registry operating outside of the 
United States. This final rule made the general operating rules of 
Subpart A and the maintenance rules of Subpart C of Part 91 applicable 
to U.S. registered civil aircraft operations outside of, as well as 
within, the United States. (See 31 FR 8354; June 15, 1966.) Section 
91.1, Applicability, was amended by adding paragraph (b)(3), which 
provided that ``Each person operating a civil aircraft of U.S. registry 
outside of the United States shall * * * Except for Sec. Sec.  
91.15(b), 91.17, 91.38, and 91.43, comply with Subparts A and C of this 
part so far as they are not inconsistent with applicable regulations of 
the foreign country where the aircraft is operated or Annex 2 to the 
Convention on International Civil Aviation.''
    On August 18, 1989, the FAA issued a final rule that recodified 
Part 91 (54 FR 34284). The purpose of this action was to reorganize and 
clarify existing rules.\1\ The FAA designated new Sec.  91.703--
Operations of civil aircraft of U.S. registry outside of the United 
States, and moved several paragraphs from Sec.  91.1 relating to the 
operation of U.S. registered aircraft outside the U.S. to the newly 
established Sec.  91.703. Specifically, paragraph (b)(3) of Sec.  91.1 
was moved to Sec.  91.703(a)(3). The FAA did not intend any substantive 
change to this paragraph.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The FAA also made four substantive changes to the 
regulations during this rulemaking that are not at issue in this 
rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As recodified, Sec.  91.703 provides that ``Each person operating a 
civil aircraft of U.S. registry outside of the United States shall * * 
* (3) Except for Sec. Sec.  91.307(b), 91.309, 91.323, and 91.711, 
comply with this part so far as it is not inconsistent with applicable 
regulations of the foreign country where the aircraft is operated or 
annex 2 of the Convention of International Civil Aviation.'' Referring 
to ``this part'' instead of referring specifically to subparts A and C 
in part 91 substantively affects the regulatory requirements. Under the 
current language, except for the four noted exceptions, all the 
provisions of part 91 apply to U.S. registered aircraft operating 
outside of the United States.
    The FAA has reviewed this matter, as it applies to the speed 
restrictions articulated in Sec.  91.117(a).\2\ The current regulatory 
text of Sec.  91.703(a)(3) makes the speed restrictions of Sec.  
91.117(a) applicable to U.S registered civil aircraft when operating 
outside the United States (and not within a foreign country). We 
conclude that the final rule in 1989 erroneously changed the 
requirements and that this result was unintended. This rule corrects 
that error. The FAA will further review Part 91 to determine whether 
there are similar issues that need to be addressed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Section 91.117(a) provides that unless otherwise authorized 
by the Administrator, no person may operate an aircraft below 10,000 
feet mean sea level (MSL) at an indicated airspeed of more than 250 
knots (288 m.p.h.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Good Cause for Immediate Adoption of This Final Rule

    On the basis of the above information, the FAA finds that immediate 
action is necessary to correct the regulations to accurately depict the 
agency's intentions. As a practical matter, the FAA is aware that most 
of the affected industry was unaware of the literal effect of the 
recodification with respect to the speed restrictions contained in 
Sec.  91.117(a). Until recently, the FAA was not aware of the error, 
and has proceeded from an operational perspective that the speed 
restrictions of Sec.  91.117(a) do not apply to U.S. registered 
aircraft, via Sec.  91.703(a)(3), when operating outside the U.S. (and 
not within another country's territorial airspace).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The FAA's Office of the Chief Counsel realized this issue in 
issuing an interpretation dated October 12, 2005 to Mr. Michael Di 
Marco, which concludes appropriately that the speed restriction of 
Sec.  91.117(a) does in fact apply to U.S. registered civil aircraft 
when operating over the high seas under the current regulations. 
This interpretation was reaffirmed on April 10, 2007, in the 
agency's response to Mr. David Shacknai. Concurrent with the 
adoption of this final rule, the FAA will rescind the interpretation 
as it is no longer valid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because the circumstances described in this notice warrant 
immediate action by the FAA to correct and accurately depict the 
regulatory requirements, I find that notice and public comment under 5 
U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and contrary to the public interest. 
Further, I find that good cause exists for making this rule effective 
immediately upon publication.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 
1996 requires FAA to comply with small entity requests for information 
or advice about compliance with statutes and regulations within its 
jurisdiction. Therefore, any small entity that has a question regarding 
this document may contact their local FAA official, or the person 
listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. You can find out more 
about SBREFA on the Internet at our site, https://www.faa.gov/
regulations_policies/rulemaking/sbre_act/.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires 
that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information 
collection burdens imposed on the public. We have determined that there 
is no new information collection requirement associated with this 
direct final rule.
    An agency may not collect or sponsor the collection of information, 
nor may it impose an information collection requirement unless it 
displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
control number.

International Compatibility

    In keeping with U.S. obligations under the Convention on 
International Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to comply with ICAO 
Standards and Recommended Practices to the maximum extent practicable. 
The FAA has reviewed the corresponding ICAO Standards and Recommended 
Practices and has identified no differences with these regulations.

Economic Evaluation, Regulatory Flexibility Determination, 
International Trade Impact Assessment, and Unfunded Mandates Assessment

    Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic 
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 directs that

[[Page 10142]]

each Federal agency shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon a 
reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation 
justify its costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. 
L. 96-354) requires agencies to analyze the economic impact of 
regulatory changes on small entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act 
(Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits agencies from setting standards that create 
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. In 
developing U.S. standards, this Trade Act requires agencies to consider 
international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis 
of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
(Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of 
the costs, benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that 
include a Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, 
local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private 
sector, of $100 million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with 
base year of 1995).
    In conducting these analyses, FAA has determined this rule-- (1) 
Has benefits which do justify its costs, is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' as defined in the Executive Order and is not 
``significant'' as defined in DOT's Regulatory Policies and Procedures; 
(2) will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small 
entities; (3) reduces barriers to international trade; and (4) does not 
impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or tribal governments, or 
on the private sector. These analyses, available in the docket, are 
summarized below.
    Department of Transportation Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies 
and procedures for simplification, analysis, and review of regulations. 
If the expected cost impact is so minimal that a proposed or final rule 
does not warrant a full evaluation, this order permits that a statement 
to that effect and the basis for it be included in the preamble if a 
full regulatory evaluation of the cost and benefits is not prepared. 
Such a determination has been made for this final rule. The reasoning 
for this determination follows:
    Since this final rule merely corrects an inadvertent error in the 
regulations, the expected outcome will be a minimal impact with 
positive net benefits, and a regulatory evaluation was not prepared. 
FAA has, therefore, determined that this final rule is not a 
``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of 
Executive Order 12866, and is not ``significant'' as defined in DOT's 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures.

Regulatory Flexibility Determination

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA) 
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall 
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable 
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale 
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions 
subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required 
to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain 
the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals are given 
serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide range of small entities, 
including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small 
governmental jurisdictions.
    Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must 
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
    However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the 
agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not 
required. The certification must include a statement providing the 
factual basis for this determination, and the reasoning should be 
clear.
    This final rule corrects an inadvertent error in the regulations. 
Its economic impact is minimal. Therefore, we certify that this action 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    Therefore, as the FAA Acting Administrator, I certify that this 
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities.

International Trade Impact Assessment

    The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits Federal 
agencies from establishing any standards or engaging in related 
activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of 
the United States. Legitimate domestic objectives, such as safety, are 
not considered unnecessary obstacles. The statute also requires 
consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that 
they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed the 
potential effect of this final rule and has determined that it will 
impose no costs on domestic and international entities and thus has a 
neutral trade impact.

Unfunded Mandates Assessment

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement 
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final 
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more 
(adjusted annually for inflation with the base year 1995) in any one 
year by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by 
the private sector; such a mandate is deemed to be a ``significant 
regulatory action.'' The FAA currently uses an inflation-adjusted value 
of $128.1 million in lieu of $100 million.
    This final rule does not contain such a mandate.

Executive Order 13132, Federalism

    The FAA has analyzed this final rule under the principles and 
criteria of Executive Order 13132, Federalism. We determined that this 
action will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, or the 
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. Therefore, we determined that this final rule does not have 
federalism implications.

Environmental Analysis

    FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA actions that are categorically 
excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or 
environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy 
Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has 
determined this proposed rulemaking action qualifies for the 
categorical exclusion identified in paragraph 312f and involves no 
extraordinary circumstances.

Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use

    The FAA has analyzed this final rule under Executive Order 13211, 
Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). We have determined that it is not 
a ``significant energy action'' under the executive order because it is 
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, 
and it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the 
supply, distribution, or use of energy.

[[Page 10143]]

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91

    Air traffic control, Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements.

The Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration 
amends Chapter I of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 91--GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES

0
1. The authority citation for part 91 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1155, 40103, 40113, 40120, 44101, 
44111, 44701, 44704, 44709, 44711, 44712, 44715, 44716, 44717, 
44722, 46306, 46315, 46316, 46504, 46506-46507, 47122, 47508, 47528-
47531, articles 12 and 29 of the Convention on International Civil 
Aviation (61 Stat. 1180).


0
2. Amend Sec.  91.703 by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:


Sec.  91.703  Operations of civil aircraft of U.S. registry outside of 
the United States.

    (a) * * *
    (3) Except for Sec. Sec.  91.117(a), 91.307(b), 91.309, 91.323, and 
91.711, comply with this part so far as it is not inconsistent with 
applicable regulations of the foreign country where the aircraft is 
operated or annex 2 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation; 
and
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC on February 15, 2008.
Robert A. Sturgell,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-3583 Filed 2-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.