Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6-80C2 and CF6-80E1 Series Turbofan Engines, 9970-9971 [E8-3463]
Download as PDF
9970
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 37 / Monday, February 25, 2008 / Proposed Rules
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Sarjapur Nagarajan, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329–4145; fax: (816)
329–4090. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(i) Refer to MCAI French AD 2003–375(A),
dated October 1, 2003; Avions Mudry & CIE
Service Bulletin CAP10B No. 16, dated April
27, 1992, APEX Aircraft Document No.
1000913GB, dated February 4, 2002; APEX
Aircraft Document No. 1000914GB, dated
February 4, 2002; and APEX Aircraft
Document No. 1000915GB, dated February 4,
2002, for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
February 14, 2008.
David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–3411 Filed 2–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0242; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NE–51–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company CF6–80C2 and CF6–
80E1 Series Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
General Electric Company (GE) CF6–
80C2 and CF6–80E1 series turbofan
engines. This proposed AD would
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:22 Feb 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
require replacement of all clevis pins
installed on the thrust reverser central
drive units and upper and lower
actuators, or replacement of pins that
fail an on-wing rebound hardness test.
This proposed AD results from failure of
a thrust reverser during landing due to
unapproved clevis pins being installed.
The failure was due to lack of clevis pin
hardness. We are proposing this AD to
prevent thrust reverser failure, which
could lead to damage to the thrust
reverser and airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by April 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Richards, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
Christopher.j.richards@faa.gov;
telephone: (781) 238–7133, fax: (781)
238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposal. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2007–0242; Directorate Identifier 2007–
NE–51–AD’’ in the subject line of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the Web
site, anyone can find and read the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the
individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
Discussion
In January 2007, an MD–11 airplane
landed with one actuator on a thrust
reverser inoperative. When a single
actuator is inoperative, the thrust
reversers are designed to continue
normal operation until the next
inspection. Upon landing, the thrust
reversers deployed and two of the clevis
pins failed on the thrust reverser with
one actuator inoperative. These failures
caused a transcowl to separate from the
thrust reverser damaging the thrust
reverser and airplane, and causing the
transcowl to become hazardous debris
on the runway. Investigation revealed
that:
• The lower actuator on the affected
thrust reverser had failed some time
before the incident; and
• Of the three thrust reverser central
drive unit clevis pins affected, one
clevis pin was found sheared in half,
with part of the pin still in place in the
rod-end bearing and clevis. The pin was
an unapproved part, made of carbon
steel alloy, which had too low a strength
and hardness for this application.
• One of the clevis pins remained
installed, and was found to be an
approved part clevis pin and with the
correct hardness of 31 to 38 Rockwell
Hardness (C Scale).
• The third clevis pin was not found.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in thrust reverser failure, which
could lead to damage to the thrust
reverser and airplane.
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 37 / Monday, February 25, 2008 / Proposed Rules
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. We are proposing this AD,
which would require replacement of all
clevis pins installed on the thrust
reverser central drive units and upper
and lower actuators, or replacement of
pins that fail a rebound hardness test.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 802 CF6–80C2 series
turbofan engines installed on airplanes
of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
would take about one work-hour per
engine to perform the proposed rebound
hardness test and three work-hours per
engine to replace the six pins. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Pins cost about $144 per pin. If all pins
are replaced, we estimate the total cost
of the proposed AD to U.S. operators to
be $949,568. CF6–80E1 series turbofan
engines are not currently installed on
U.S. registered airplanes, so we did not
estimate any cost for them.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed AD:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:22 Feb 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. You may get a copy
of this summary at the address listed
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me
by the Administrator, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA–
2007–0242; Directorate Identifier 2007–
NE–51–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by April
25, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric
Company (GE) CF6–80C2 and CF6–80E1
series turbofan engines. These engines are
installed on, but not limited to, Airbus A300–
600/R/F, A310–200/–300, and A330–200/–
300 airplanes, Boeing 747–300/–400/–400ER,
and 767–200/–200ER/–300/–300ER/–400ER
airplanes, and MD–11 airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from failure of a thrust
reverser during landing due to unapproved
clevis pins being installed. The failure was
due to lack of clevis pin hardness. We are
issuing this AD to prevent thrust reverser
failure, which could lead to damage to the
thrust reverser and airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
18 months or 4,500 flight hours after the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9971
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
first, unless the actions have already been
done.
(f) Replace the six clevis pins installed on
the thrust reverser central drive units and
actuators with clevis pins that pass the
hardness test identified in paragraphs (g)(1)
through (g)(4) below; or
(g) Perform a rebound hardness test of
installed thrust reverser central drive unit
and actuator clevis pins as follows:
(1) Remove any corrosion from the head of
the pin.
(2) Perform the rebound hardness test on
the head of the clevis pin.
(3) If the hardness measured is outside of
the range of 31 to 38 Rockwell Hardness (C
Scale), replace the clevis pin with an
approved part clevis pin.
(4) If the hardness measured is within the
range of 31 to 38 Rockwell Hardness (C
Scale), and the pin has no visible defects, the
clevis pin can remain in service, as allowed
per the engine maintenance manual.
(5) Perform the steps in paragraphs (g)(1)
through (g)(4) to all six clevis pins on the
thrust reverser.
Install Approved Part Clevis Pins
(h) After the effective date of this AD, do
not install any thrust reverser central drive
unit and actuator clevis pins that do not pass
the hardness test of paragraphs (g)(1) through
(g)(4) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(i) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(j) Contact Christopher Richards,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803;
e-mail: Christopher.richards@faa.gov;
telephone: (781) 238–7133, fax: (781) 238–
7199, for more information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
February 15, 2008.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–3463 Filed 2–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–107592–00]
RIN 1545–BA11
Consolidated Returns; Intercompany
Obligations
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 37 (Monday, February 25, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9970-9971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3463]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-0242; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-51-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6-80C2 and
CF6-80E1 Series Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80C2 and CF6-80E1 series turbofan
engines. This proposed AD would require replacement of all clevis pins
installed on the thrust reverser central drive units and upper and
lower actuators, or replacement of pins that fail an on-wing rebound
hardness test. This proposed AD results from failure of a thrust
reverser during landing due to unapproved clevis pins being installed.
The failure was due to lack of clevis pin hardness. We are proposing
this AD to prevent thrust reverser failure, which could lead to damage
to the thrust reverser and airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by April 25,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Richards, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-
mail: Christopher.j.richards@faa.gov; telephone: (781) 238-7133, fax:
(781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0242; Directorate
Identifier 2007-NE-51-AD'' in the subject line of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD
in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
the same as the mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
In January 2007, an MD-11 airplane landed with one actuator on a
thrust reverser inoperative. When a single actuator is inoperative, the
thrust reversers are designed to continue normal operation until the
next inspection. Upon landing, the thrust reversers deployed and two of
the clevis pins failed on the thrust reverser with one actuator
inoperative. These failures caused a transcowl to separate from the
thrust reverser damaging the thrust reverser and airplane, and causing
the transcowl to become hazardous debris on the runway. Investigation
revealed that:
The lower actuator on the affected thrust reverser had
failed some time before the incident; and
Of the three thrust reverser central drive unit clevis
pins affected, one clevis pin was found sheared in half, with part of
the pin still in place in the rod-end bearing and clevis. The pin was
an unapproved part, made of carbon steel alloy, which had too low a
strength and hardness for this application.
One of the clevis pins remained installed, and was found
to be an approved part clevis pin and with the correct hardness of 31
to 38 Rockwell Hardness (C Scale).
The third clevis pin was not found.
This condition, if not corrected, could result in thrust reverser
failure, which could lead to damage to the thrust reverser and
airplane.
[[Page 9971]]
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. We are proposing this AD, which would require
replacement of all clevis pins installed on the thrust reverser central
drive units and upper and lower actuators, or replacement of pins that
fail a rebound hardness test.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 802 CF6-80C2 series
turbofan engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about one work-hour per engine to perform
the proposed rebound hardness test and three work-hours per engine to
replace the six pins. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Pins
cost about $144 per pin. If all pins are replaced, we estimate the
total cost of the proposed AD to U.S. operators to be $949,568. CF6-
80E1 series turbofan engines are not currently installed on U.S.
registered airplanes, so we did not estimate any cost for them.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2007-0242; Directorate
Identifier 2007-NE-51-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by April 25,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80C2
and CF6-80E1 series turbofan engines. These engines are installed
on, but not limited to, Airbus A300-600/R/F, A310-200/-300, and
A330-200/-300 airplanes, Boeing 747-300/-400/-400ER, and 767-200/-
200ER/-300/-300ER/-400ER airplanes, and MD-11 airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from failure of a thrust reverser during
landing due to unapproved clevis pins being installed. The failure
was due to lack of clevis pin hardness. We are issuing this AD to
prevent thrust reverser failure, which could lead to damage to the
thrust reverser and airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within 18 months or 4,500 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, unless the
actions have already been done.
(f) Replace the six clevis pins installed on the thrust reverser
central drive units and actuators with clevis pins that pass the
hardness test identified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4) below;
or
(g) Perform a rebound hardness test of installed thrust reverser
central drive unit and actuator clevis pins as follows:
(1) Remove any corrosion from the head of the pin.
(2) Perform the rebound hardness test on the head of the clevis
pin.
(3) If the hardness measured is outside of the range of 31 to 38
Rockwell Hardness (C Scale), replace the clevis pin with an approved
part clevis pin.
(4) If the hardness measured is within the range of 31 to 38
Rockwell Hardness (C Scale), and the pin has no visible defects, the
clevis pin can remain in service, as allowed per the engine
maintenance manual.
(5) Perform the steps in paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4) to all
six clevis pins on the thrust reverser.
Install Approved Part Clevis Pins
(h) After the effective date of this AD, do not install any
thrust reverser central drive unit and actuator clevis pins that do
not pass the hardness test of paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4) of
this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(i) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(j) Contact Christopher Richards, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
Christopher.richards@faa.gov; telephone: (781) 238-7133, fax: (781)
238-7199, for more information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 15, 2008.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-3463 Filed 2-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P