Notice of Availability of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Kaycee Flood Protection Project, Middle Fork Powder River Watershed, Johnson County, Wyoming, 9763-9765 [E8-3296]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Notice of New Fee; Federal Lands
Recreation Enhancement Act, (Title
VIII, Pub. L. 108–447)
Sumter National Forest, USDA
Forest Service.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice of New Fee Site.
The proposed fee would be
initiated October 1, 2008. Comments,
concerns or questions about this new fee
must be submitted by August 11, 2008.
DATES:
ADDRESS: Submit comments, concerns
or questions about the new fee
associated with FORKS Mountain Bike
Trail to: Forest Supervisor, Sumter
National Forest, 4931 Broad River Road,
Columbia, SC 29212–3530.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Libby Meadows, Outdoor Recreation
Planner, 864–746–6120.
The
Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement
Act (Title VIII, Pub. L. 108–447)
directed the Secretary of Agriculture to
publish a six-month advance notice in
the Federal Register whenever new
recreation fee areas are established. The
Sumter National Forest, Long Cane
Ranger District, currently has a large
mountain biking community. The
Recreation Resource Advisory
Committee will review consideration for
a new fee at least three months prior to
proposed initiation date.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Dated: February 8, 2008.
Glen Kansanback,
District Ranger, Long Cane Ranger District
[FR Doc. 08–760 Filed 2–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Feb 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a
Finding of No Significant Impact for the
Kaycee Flood Protection Project, Middle
Fork Powder River Watershed, Johnson
County, Wyoming.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Sumter National Forest
proposes to begin charging a $3.00 fee
per vehicle per day and $25.00 per
vehicle for annual pass for the use of the
FORKS Mountain Bike Trail. Continued
interest in mountain bike trails,
especially in this area, have shown the
public’s interest in this activity will be
appreciated and well received. Funds
derived from this fee will be used for
the continued maintenance of the trail,
provide cleaning of the bathrooms,
provide drinking water to meet DHEC
standards and maintain the trailhead.
This project was made possible through
a cooperative effort between the Forest
Service, South Carolina Parks
Recreation and Tourism, Southern Off
Road Biking Association, Long Cane
Trails, Michelin and Upper Savannah
Land Trust.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice of Availability of a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for the
Kaycee Flood Protection Project,
Middle Fork Powder River Watershed,
Johnson County, Wyoming
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969; Public Law 91–190, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.), the
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations (40 CFR Part 1500); and the
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Regulations (7 CFR Part 650); the
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives
notice that an Environmental Impact
Statement is not being prepared for the
Kaycee Flood Protection Project, Middle
Fork Powder River Watershed, Johnson
County, Wyoming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J.
Xavier Montoya, State Conservationist,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
100 East B Street, Room 3124, PO Box
33124, Casper, Wyoming 82602–5011,
telephone (307) 233–6750.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Environmental Assessment (EA) of this
federally assisted action indicates that
the project will not cause significant
local, regional, or national impacts on
the human environment. As a result of
these findings, J. Xavier Montoya, State
Conservationist, has determined that the
preparation and review of an
Environmental Impact Statement are not
needed for this project.
The project purpose is flood control.
The need for the recommended plan is
for the protection of life and property by
reducing the threat of future flooding to
Kaycee’s residential, business, and
community structures up to a 100-year
storm frequency event on the Middle
Fork Powder River, Johnson County,
Wyoming. The recommended plan is to
construct flood control dikes, a flood
wall, and strengthen some existing rock
rip-rap along the north side, and dikes
and grade work on the south side of the
Middle Fork Powder River through the
town of Kaycee, Wyoming.
The Notice of a Finding of No
Significant Impact has been forwarded
to the Environmental Protection Agency
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9763
and to various federal, state, county, and
local agencies, and interested parties. A
limited number of copies of the FONSI
are available to fill single copy requests
at the above address. Basic data
developed during the assessment are on
file and may be reviewed by contacting
J. Xavier Montoya.
No administrative action on
implementation of the proposal will be
taken until 30 days after the date of this
publication in the Federal Register.
Dated: February 11, 2008.
Jay T. Mar,
Acting State Conservationist.
(This activity is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance under NO.
10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention, and is subject to the provisions
of Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with state
and local officials.)
Finding of No Significant Impact for
Kaycee Flood Protection Project,
Middle Fork Powder River Watershed,
Johnson, County, Wyoming
Introduction
The Kaycee Flood Protection Project,
Middle Fork Powder River Watershed,
is a federally assisted action authorized
for planning under Public Law 83–566,
the Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention Act. An Environmental
Assessment (EA) was undertaken in
conjunction with the development of
the watershed project plan. This
assessment was conducted in
consultation with federal, state, county,
and local agencies, including section
7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (50 CFR 402.13)
consultation, as well as with interested
organizations and individuals. Data
developed during the assessment is
available for public review at the
following location:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, 100
East B Street, Room 3124, P.O. Box
33124, Casper, Wyoming 82602–5011.
Recommended Action
The recommended action, Alternative
2—Dikes/Flood Wall/Relocation, will
provide safety to the residents of Kaycee
and protect the residential, business,
and community structures from flooding
of a 100-year storm frequency event.
The recommended plan is to construct
flood control dikes and a flood wall
along the north side, and dikes and
grade work on the south side of the
Middle Fork Powder River through the
town of Kaycee, Wyoming. There will
be one property buyout and eleven
structures relocated along the river to
allow for the construction of the dike
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
9764
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2008 / Notices
locations. The area between the dikes
will become the 100-year floodplain.
The proposed dikes would be
constructed adjacent to the stream
channel and will not affect wetlands
adjacent to the stream in the project area
or downstream outside of the project
area.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Effect of Recommended Action
The recommended action will
improve human health and safety and
maintain wildlife habitat. The affected
environment of this project is the
community of Kaycee and the area
within and downstream of Kaycee that
is impacted under the 100-year
floodplain. Water quality would remain
unchanged if the recommended plan is
implemented. Sediment from upstream
will continue to flow through the
project area, with no effect to the
current sediment loads. Downstream
effects will not be changed from existing
conditions.
The recommended action will have
little or no effect on wetlands. Small
areas of wetlands adjacent to the
channel would not be impacted by the
action of the recommended plan. There
are 16.2 acres of wetlands, of which 10.0
acres are water. The remaining 6.2 acres
of wetlands are 0.041 percent of the
project area.
A file search of the State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) records was
conducted for the project area. Three
sections showed known sites, eligibility
unknown, or noncontributing segment.
Most of the sites reported are connected
with the Bozeman Trail. As there are
very few segments of the Bozeman Trail
that are identifiable, any trace or records
found of the trail will require an
evaluation by either the NRCS and/or
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE)
archeologists. The NRCS State
Archeologist conducted a
reconnaissance survey of the proposed
dike locations for possible cultural
resources. No sites were identified
within the town of Kaycee boundaries.
The survey and file search concludes
that no significant adverse impacts will
occur to cultural resources in the project
area should the recommended plan be
implemented. However, construction of
the dikes and flood wall do have the
potential to disrupt possible individual
sites. Therefore, caution shall be
exercised in planning and installing the
recommended plan to avoid serious
disruption of areas having potential as
individual cultural sites. NRCS cultural
resource procedures, as described in the
NRCS Northern Plains Region
procedures, will be followed when
ground disturbances are planned.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Feb 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
Significant cultural resources
identified during implementation will
be avoided or otherwise preserved in
place to the fullest practical extent. If
significant cultural resources cannot be
avoided or preserved, pertinent
information will be recovered before
construction. If there is a significant
cultural resource discovery during
construction, appropriate notice will be
made by NRCS to the State Historic
Preservation Officer. Consultation and
coordination have been, and will
continue to be, used to ensure the
provisions of Section 106 of Public Law
89–665 have been met and to include
provisions of Public Law 89–523, as
amended by Public Law 93–291. NRCS
will take necessary action to be in
compliance with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
protection rules and will follow the
procedures in the NRCS General
Manual, section 190 and 420,
respectively.
No wilderness areas are in the
watershed.
There are no known resident
threatened or endangered animals
within the project area. This
determination was arrived at with
section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (50
CFR 402.13) consultation with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service. The
recommended action will increase
vegetative cover suitable for wildlife
and reduce noxious and invasive
Russian olive. Fish habitat will not be
affected. The recommended action will
not disproportionately affect any
protected groups.
No significant adverse environmental
impacts will result from installation of
the recommended action.
Alternatives
All alternatives brought forward
through the assessment process were
analyzed for four criteria: Completeness,
effectiveness, efficiency, and
acceptability and against the following
five factors: Satisfaction of purpose and
needs statement, relative costs,
technological feasibility, logistics, and
environmental consequences.
Alternatives that failed to meet the
criteria were eliminated from further
study.
The No Action Alternative and
Alternative 2-Dikes/Flood Wall/
Relocation were evaluated and studied
in detail as presented in the EA. The
recommended action meets the four
criteria and five factors listed above and
is the most practical means of protecting
the citizens of the town of Kaycee,
Wyoming.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Consultation—Public participation
A Letter of Request was received on
November 13, 2002, from the Project
Sponsors for the development of a
watershed planning effort to construct
flood protection under the authority of
the Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention Act, Public Law (Pub. L.)
83–566, as amended (126 U.S.C.
10011008).
In August 2004, the Wyoming Board
of Agriculture reviewed the Public Law
83–566 Application for Federal
Assistance, ranked the project as a high
priority, and recommended the project
for planning assistance.
Through a collaborative effort the
NRCS and the COE completed the Flood
Damage Reduction Preliminary
Investigation Report (PIR) in December
2004.
Scoping meetings were held in March
2005 and March 2006 and
interdisciplinary efforts were used in
the scoping process. Several federal,
state, county, and local agencies were
involved in part, or all, of the scoping
and planning process.
Specific consultation was conducted
with the State Historic Preservation
Officer concerning cultural resources in
the project area of the watershed.
The draft Watershed Project Plan—EA
was distributed or made available to all
participating and interested agencies,
groups, and individuals for review and
comment from November 5 to December
20, 2007. On December 6, 2007, the
Sponsors held a public meeting to
identify concerns of the local citizens
regarding the draft Watershed Project
Plan—EA.
Agency consultation and public
participation to date have shown no
unresolved conflicts with the
implementation of the selected plan.
Conclusion
The EA summarized above indicates
that this federal action will not cause
significant local, regional, or national
impacts on the environment. Therefore,
based on the above findings, I have
determined that an Environmental
Impact Statement for the Kaycee Flood
Protection Project, Middle Fork Powder
River Watershed, Johnson County,
Wyoming, is not required.
Additional Information or questions
can be directed to:
J. Xavier Montoya, State
Conservationist, USDA—Natural
Resources Conservation Service, 100
East B Street, Room 3124, P.O. Box
33124, Casper, WY 82602–5011,
Phone: 307–233–6750, E-mail:
xavier.montoya@wy.usda.gov.
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2008 / Notices
Dated: February 11, 2008.
Jay T. Mar,
Acting State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. E8–3296 Filed 2–21–08; 8:45 am]
comments and a final determination of
change will be made to the subject
standard(s).
Dated: February 4, 2008.
Mary K. Combs,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. E8–3382 Filed 2–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Notice of Proposed Change to Section
IV of the North Carolina State
Technical Guide
Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
ACTION: Notice of availability of
proposed changes in the North Carolina
NRCS State Technical Guide for review
and comment.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: It has been determined by the
NRCS State Conservationist for North
Carolina that changes must be made in
the NRCS State Technical Guide
specifically in practice standard #330,
Contour Farming to account for
improved technology. This practice can
be used in systems that treat highly
erodible land.
DATES: Comments will be received for a
30-day period commencing with this
date of publication.
ADDRESSES: Address all requests and
comments to Mary K. Combs, State
Conservationist, Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), 4405
Bland Rd., Ste. 205, Raleigh, NC 27609.
Copies of this standard will be available
online for viewing at ftp://ftpfc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NC/NCweb/
Technical/draft-standards/Draft_
NC330ContourFarming.pdf.
You may submit electronic
requests and comments to
evelyn.whitesides@nc.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Mary K. Combs, State Conservationist,
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
4405 Bland Rd, Ste. 205, Raleigh, NC
27609; 919–873–2101; 919–873–2156.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
343 of the Federal Agriculture
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996
states that revisions made after
enactment of the law to NRCS State
technical guides used to carry out
highly erodible land and wetland
provisions of the law shall be made
available for public review and
comment. For the next 30 days the
NRCS will receive comments relative to
the proposed changes. Following that
period a determination will be made by
the NRCS regarding disposition of those
18:08 Feb 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
and a final determination of change will
be made to the subject standards.
Dated: February 13, 2008.
W. Ray Dorsett,
Acting State Conservationist, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, Richmond,
Virginia.
[FR Doc. E8–3384 Filed 2–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
VerDate Aug<31>2005
9765
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Notice of Proposed Change to Section
IV of the Virginia State Technical Guide
Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of
proposed changes in the Virginia NRCS
State Technical Guide for review and
comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: It has been determined by the
NRCS State Conservationist for Virginia
that changes must be made in the NRCS
State Technical Guide specifically to
add practice standard: #395, Stream
Habitat Improvement and Management.
This practice will be used to maintain,
improve or restore stream habitat
necessary for meeting the life history
requirements of desired aquatic species.
DATES: Comments will be received for a
30-day period commencing with the
date of this publication.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Inquire in writing to John A. Bricker,
State Conservationist, Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), 1606
Santa Rosa Road, Suite 209, Richmond,
Virginia 23229–5014; Telephone
number (804) 287–1691; Fax number
(804) 287–1737. Copies of the practice
standards will be made available upon
written request to the address shown
above or on the Virginia NRCS Web site:
https://www.va.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/
draftstandards.html.
Section
343 of the Federal Agriculture
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996
states that revisions made after
enactment of the law to NRCS State
technical guides used to carry out
highly erodible land and wetland
provisions of the law shall be made
available for public review and
comment. For the next 30 days, the
NRCS in Virginia will receive comments
relative to the proposed changes.
Following that period, a determination
will be made by the NRCS in Virginia
regarding disposition of those comments
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Webber Pond Fish Passage, Webber
Pond Watershed, Vassalboro, ME
Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability of Finding
of No Significant Impact.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has
prepared an Environmental assessment
(EA) for the Webber Pond Fish Passage
Project, Vassalboro, Maine. NRCS has
found that the installation of an Alaska
Steep Pass Fishway, American eel
passage ladder and water control
structure would not result in a
significant impact on the quality of the
human environment, particularly when
focusing on the significant adverse
effects that National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) is intended to help
decision makers avoid and mitigate.
Therefore, NRCS has prepared a Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI) in
compliance with the (NEPA), as
amended, and gives notice that an
environmental impact statement is not
being prepared.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Single copies of the EA and FONSI
documents, may be obtained by
contacting Amanda Burton, Soil
Conservationist, USDA–NRCS, 21
Enterprise Drive, Suite 1, Augusta, ME
04330, (207) 622–7847 ext. 3. For
additional information related to this
notice, contact Dianne C. Guidry, Acting
State Conservationist, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, 967 Illinois
Avenue, Suite 3, Bangor, Maine 04401–
2700; telephone (207) 990–9100 ext. 3.
DATES: Effective Date: Comments on the
EA and FONSI must be received on or
before the effective date on March 28,
2008.
The
sponsoring local organization, Maine
Department of Marine Resources
(MDMR), concurs with this
determination and agrees with carrying
forward the proposed project. The
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 36 (Friday, February 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9763-9765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3296]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Notice of Availability of a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) for the Kaycee Flood Protection Project, Middle Fork Powder
River Watershed, Johnson County, Wyoming
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Finding of No Significant Impact
for the Kaycee Flood Protection Project, Middle Fork Powder River
Watershed, Johnson County, Wyoming.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969; Public Law 91-190, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321, et
seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations (40 CFR Part
1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service Regulations (7
CFR Part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an Environmental Impact
Statement is not being prepared for the Kaycee Flood Protection
Project, Middle Fork Powder River Watershed, Johnson County, Wyoming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Xavier Montoya, State
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 100 East B
Street, Room 3124, PO Box 33124, Casper, Wyoming 82602-5011, telephone
(307) 233-6750.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Environmental Assessment (EA) of this
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the human
environment. As a result of these findings, J. Xavier Montoya, State
Conservationist, has determined that the preparation and review of an
Environmental Impact Statement are not needed for this project.
The project purpose is flood control. The need for the recommended
plan is for the protection of life and property by reducing the threat
of future flooding to Kaycee's residential, business, and community
structures up to a 100-year storm frequency event on the Middle Fork
Powder River, Johnson County, Wyoming. The recommended plan is to
construct flood control dikes, a flood wall, and strengthen some
existing rock rip-rap along the north side, and dikes and grade work on
the south side of the Middle Fork Powder River through the town of
Kaycee, Wyoming.
The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact has been forwarded
to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various federal, state,
county, and local agencies, and interested parties. A limited number of
copies of the FONSI are available to fill single copy requests at the
above address. Basic data developed during the assessment are on file
and may be reviewed by contacting J. Xavier Montoya.
No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal
Register.
Dated: February 11, 2008.
Jay T. Mar,
Acting State Conservationist.
(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under NO. 10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention, and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with state and
local officials.)
Finding of No Significant Impact for Kaycee Flood Protection Project,
Middle Fork Powder River Watershed, Johnson, County, Wyoming
Introduction
The Kaycee Flood Protection Project, Middle Fork Powder River
Watershed, is a federally assisted action authorized for planning under
Public Law 83-566, the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act.
An Environmental Assessment (EA) was undertaken in conjunction with the
development of the watershed project plan. This assessment was
conducted in consultation with federal, state, county, and local
agencies, including section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (50 CFR 402.13) consultation, as well as with
interested organizations and individuals. Data developed during the
assessment is available for public review at the following location:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service,
100 East B Street, Room 3124, P.O. Box 33124, Casper, Wyoming 82602-
5011.
Recommended Action
The recommended action, Alternative 2--Dikes/Flood Wall/Relocation,
will provide safety to the residents of Kaycee and protect the
residential, business, and community structures from flooding of a 100-
year storm frequency event. The recommended plan is to construct flood
control dikes and a flood wall along the north side, and dikes and
grade work on the south side of the Middle Fork Powder River through
the town of Kaycee, Wyoming. There will be one property buyout and
eleven structures relocated along the river to allow for the
construction of the dike
[[Page 9764]]
locations. The area between the dikes will become the 100-year
floodplain. The proposed dikes would be constructed adjacent to the
stream channel and will not affect wetlands adjacent to the stream in
the project area or downstream outside of the project area.
Effect of Recommended Action
The recommended action will improve human health and safety and
maintain wildlife habitat. The affected environment of this project is
the community of Kaycee and the area within and downstream of Kaycee
that is impacted under the 100-year floodplain. Water quality would
remain unchanged if the recommended plan is implemented. Sediment from
upstream will continue to flow through the project area, with no effect
to the current sediment loads. Downstream effects will not be changed
from existing conditions.
The recommended action will have little or no effect on wetlands.
Small areas of wetlands adjacent to the channel would not be impacted
by the action of the recommended plan. There are 16.2 acres of
wetlands, of which 10.0 acres are water. The remaining 6.2 acres of
wetlands are 0.041 percent of the project area.
A file search of the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
records was conducted for the project area. Three sections showed known
sites, eligibility unknown, or noncontributing segment. Most of the
sites reported are connected with the Bozeman Trail. As there are very
few segments of the Bozeman Trail that are identifiable, any trace or
records found of the trail will require an evaluation by either the
NRCS and/or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) archeologists. The
NRCS State Archeologist conducted a reconnaissance survey of the
proposed dike locations for possible cultural resources. No sites were
identified within the town of Kaycee boundaries. The survey and file
search concludes that no significant adverse impacts will occur to
cultural resources in the project area should the recommended plan be
implemented. However, construction of the dikes and flood wall do have
the potential to disrupt possible individual sites. Therefore, caution
shall be exercised in planning and installing the recommended plan to
avoid serious disruption of areas having potential as individual
cultural sites. NRCS cultural resource procedures, as described in the
NRCS Northern Plains Region procedures, will be followed when ground
disturbances are planned.
Significant cultural resources identified during implementation
will be avoided or otherwise preserved in place to the fullest
practical extent. If significant cultural resources cannot be avoided
or preserved, pertinent information will be recovered before
construction. If there is a significant cultural resource discovery
during construction, appropriate notice will be made by NRCS to the
State Historic Preservation Officer. Consultation and coordination have
been, and will continue to be, used to ensure the provisions of Section
106 of Public Law 89-665 have been met and to include provisions of
Public Law 89-523, as amended by Public Law 93-291. NRCS will take
necessary action to be in compliance with National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) protection rules and will follow the procedures in the NRCS
General Manual, section 190 and 420, respectively.
No wilderness areas are in the watershed.
There are no known resident threatened or endangered animals within
the project area. This determination was arrived at with section
7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (50 CFR
402.13) consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The
recommended action will increase vegetative cover suitable for wildlife
and reduce noxious and invasive Russian olive. Fish habitat will not be
affected. The recommended action will not disproportionately affect any
protected groups.
No significant adverse environmental impacts will result from
installation of the recommended action.
Alternatives
All alternatives brought forward through the assessment process
were analyzed for four criteria: Completeness, effectiveness,
efficiency, and acceptability and against the following five factors:
Satisfaction of purpose and needs statement, relative costs,
technological feasibility, logistics, and environmental consequences.
Alternatives that failed to meet the criteria were eliminated from
further study.
The No Action Alternative and Alternative 2-Dikes/Flood Wall/
Relocation were evaluated and studied in detail as presented in the EA.
The recommended action meets the four criteria and five factors listed
above and is the most practical means of protecting the citizens of the
town of Kaycee, Wyoming.
Consultation--Public participation
A Letter of Request was received on November 13, 2002, from the
Project Sponsors for the development of a watershed planning effort to
construct flood protection under the authority of the Watershed
Protection and Flood Prevention Act, Public Law (Pub. L.) 83-566, as
amended (126 U.S.C. 10011008).
In August 2004, the Wyoming Board of Agriculture reviewed the
Public Law 83-566 Application for Federal Assistance, ranked the
project as a high priority, and recommended the project for planning
assistance.
Through a collaborative effort the NRCS and the COE completed the
Flood Damage Reduction Preliminary Investigation Report (PIR) in
December 2004.
Scoping meetings were held in March 2005 and March 2006 and
interdisciplinary efforts were used in the scoping process. Several
federal, state, county, and local agencies were involved in part, or
all, of the scoping and planning process.
Specific consultation was conducted with the State Historic
Preservation Officer concerning cultural resources in the project area
of the watershed.
The draft Watershed Project Plan--EA was distributed or made
available to all participating and interested agencies, groups, and
individuals for review and comment from November 5 to December 20,
2007. On December 6, 2007, the Sponsors held a public meeting to
identify concerns of the local citizens regarding the draft Watershed
Project Plan--EA.
Agency consultation and public participation to date have shown no
unresolved conflicts with the implementation of the selected plan.
Conclusion
The EA summarized above indicates that this federal action will not
cause significant local, regional, or national impacts on the
environment. Therefore, based on the above findings, I have determined
that an Environmental Impact Statement for the Kaycee Flood Protection
Project, Middle Fork Powder River Watershed, Johnson County, Wyoming,
is not required.
Additional Information or questions can be directed to:
J. Xavier Montoya, State Conservationist, USDA--Natural Resources
Conservation Service, 100 East B Street, Room 3124, P.O. Box 33124,
Casper, WY 82602-5011, Phone: 307-233-6750, E-mail:
xavier.montoya@wy.usda.gov.
[[Page 9765]]
Dated: February 11, 2008.
Jay T. Mar,
Acting State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. E8-3296 Filed 2-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P