Notice of availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Permanent Stationing of the 2nd Brigade, 25th Infantry Division Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT), 9779-9780 [08-793]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2008 / Notices
Dated: February 19, 2008.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–3298 Filed 2–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Notice of availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) for the Permanent Stationing of
the 2nd Brigade, 25th Infantry Division
Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT)
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of availability (NOA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
announces the availability of a FEIS for
the permanent stationing of the 2nd
Brigade, 25th Infantry Division (2/25th)
SBCT. Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Department of the Army has prepared
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) to disclose potential impacts to the
natural, physical, and human
environment resulting from the
permanent stationing of the 2/25th
SBCT. Potential impacts have been
analyzed at installations that are capable
of meeting the SBCTs training,
operational, Soldier and Family quality
of life, and strategic deployment
requirements. This FEIS identifies
Schofield Barracks Military Reservation
in Hawaii as the Army’s preferred
alternative for the stationing location of
the 2/25th SBCT. A Record of Decision
(ROD) will announce the final location
decision after the 30-day waiting period
for the FEIS has been completed.
DATES: The waiting period for the FEIS
will end 30 days after publication of an
NOA in the Federal Register by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: Send all written comments
concerning this EIS to: Public Affairs
Office, U.S. Army Environmental
Command, Building E4460, 5179
Hoadley Road, Attention: IMAE–PA,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010–
5401. E-mail comments should be sent
to:
PublicComments@aec.apgea.army.mil.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Affairs Office at (410) 436–2556;
facsimile: (410) 436–1693 during normal
business hours Monday through Friday
9 a.m. to 5 p.m. eastern standard time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed action and analysis within the
FEIS covers those activities required to
implement the stationing of the 2/25th
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Feb 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
SBCT. These activities include garrison
construction, training range
construction, live-fire training, and
maneuver training.
In May 2004, the Department of the
Army (Army) released the FEIS for
Transformation of the 2nd Brigade, 25th
Infantry Division (Light) to the 2/25th
SBCT. The SBCT is a maneuver brigade
that includes approximately 4,100
Soldiers (infantry, artillery, engineers,
and other Army specialties) and 1,000
vehicles (including about 320 Stryker
Combat Vehicles). In July 2004, the
Army released a ROD documenting its
decision to transform the 2/25th from an
Infantry Brigade to an SBCT and
permanently home station it in Hawaii.
The Stryker is an armored infantry
wheeled combat vehicle and provides
Soldiers and commanders with
increased firepower, maneuverability,
and, most importantly, survivability in
a combat environment. The increased
speed and maneuver capabilities of the
SBCT allow operations to be conducted
across much larger areas than the
Army’s traditional legacy brigades.
These capabilities have allowed the
SBCT to successfully conduct a broad
range of missions in support of
Operation Iraqi Freedom.
To be effective when operationally
deployed abroad requires that the SBCT
have the proper training and support
facilities at home station. Such facilities
include training ranges, maneuver land,
housing, administrative, and quality of
life infrastructure for the SBCTs
Soldiers, their Families, vehicles, and
equipment. Without these resources, the
SBCT cannot attain the readiness levels
needed to ensure the successful
accomplishment of its missions and
safety of its Soldiers. In addition to
these requirements, the SBCT must be
stationed in a location from which it can
rapidly deploy to support national
security requirements.
The 2/25th began its transformation to
an SBCT shortly after completion of the
2004 FEIS and signing of the ROD.
Since this time, the Brigade has
completed its transformation in Hawaii
and is currently deployed to Southwest
Asia. The SBCT is scheduled to return
to the permanent stationing location
selected by the Army in early 2009.
In October 2006, the Federal Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
determined that the Army had not fully
complied with NEPA for the
transformation of the 2/25th because it
did not adequately address or analyze
potentially reasonable alternative
locations for the transformation and
training of this unit. In particular, the
Court concluded that the Army had a
duty under NEPA to consider locations
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9779
other than Hawaii for the permanent
stationing of the 2/25th SBCT, and the
Court ordered the Army to prepare an
EIS to address a broader range of
alternatives. The Army has prepared an
EIS in accordance with the Court’s
guidance to examine reasonable
alternative locations for the proposed
action to station the 2/25th SBCT
permanently.
The Army analyzed 140 installations
for their suitability to meet the
appropriate training infrastructure,
maneuver land, compatible mission and
garrison support infrastructure to
support the SBCT. Out of the 140
installations, three Army installations
were determined to have the
appropriate infrastructure capable of
supporting the permanent stationing of
the 2/25th SBCT. The FEIS examines
the three Army installations. The EIS
will provide the Army senior leadership
with a hard look at environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action and better inform their decisionmaking process for selecting the final
stationing location. This effort includes
analysis of all activities (training,
facilities construction, and Soldier and
Family support) required to
permanently station the 2/25th SBCT.
This EIS effort will assist the Army in
arriving at a decision that can
accommodate the Brigade’s training,
operations, and quality of life
requirements while meeting the
strategic defense needs of the nation.
After reviewing the full range of
potential Army stationing locations,
three alternatives for implementing the
proposed action have been identified by
the Army as reasonable alternatives
capable of meeting the Army’s needs
and screening criteria. Alternatives for
implementing the proposed action
included: (1) Permanently stationing the
2/25th SBCT at Schofield Barracks
Military Reservation while conducting
required training at military training
sites in Hawaii; (2) permanently
stationing the 2/25th SBCT at Fort
Richardson while conducting required
training at military training sites in
Alaska; and (3) permanently stationing
the 2/25th SBCT at Fort Carson while
conducting required training at military
training sites in Colorado. In addition to
these alternatives, the No Action
alternative, which provides the baseline
conditions for comparison to the
proposed alternative, was fully assessed
and considered.
Direct, indirect, and cumulative
impacts of the proposed action have
been considered in the FEIS along with
public comments received during
scoping and on the Draft EIS published
in July 2007. The EIS identifies impacts
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
9780
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 36 / Friday, February 22, 2008 / Notices
at each of the three alternative locations
that would occur as a result of
implementing the proposed action and
responds to public comments. Impacts
at alternative sites would result from
construction and training activities.
Each of the impacts can be mitigated.
The Army invited full public
participation to promote open
communication and better decision
making. All persons and organizations
that have an interest in the permanent
stationing of the 2/25th SBCT were
urged to participate in this NEPA
evaluation process. The public has
provided input and comments at
scoping meetings and public meetings
held at all potential alternative
stationing locations for the 2/25th. The
Army held scoping meetings in January
and February 2007 and Draft EIS
meetings in September and October
2007. Responses to the public comments
are addressed in this FEIS.
The FEIS is available for review at
https://www.aec.army.mil.
Dated: February 15, 1008.
Addison D. Davis, IV,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army,
(Environment, Safety and Occupational
Health).
[FR Doc. 08–793 Filed 2–21–08: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3170–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for Updated Water
Control Manuals for the ApalachicolaChattahoochee-Flint River Basin
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps), Mobile District,
intends to prepare an update and
revision of the water control manuals
for the Apalachicola-ChattahoocheeFlint (ACF) River Basin. Concurrent
with that revision, a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
will be prepared, as required by the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). The Draft EIS will address
updated operating criteria and
guidelines for managing the water
storage and release actions of agency
water managers and associated
environmental impacts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the manual update or
NEPA process can be answered by: Mr.
Brian Zettle, Inland Environment Team,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Feb 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
Environment and Resources Branch,
Planning and Environmental Division,
U.S. Army Engineer District-Mobile,
Post Office Box 2288, Mobile, AL
36628–0001; Telephone (251) 690–2115;
or delivered by electronic facsimile at
(251) 694–3815; or E-mail:
brian.a.zettle@usace.army.mil. You may
also request to be included on the
mailing list for public distribution of
notices, meeting announcements and
documents associated with the
preparation and review of the Draft EIS.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. Water control manuals
are guidance documents that assist
Federal water managers in the operation
of individual and multiple
interdependent Federal reservoirs on
the same river system. They provide
technical, historical, hydrological,
geographic, demographic, policy and
other information that guide the proper
management of reservoirs during times
of high water, low water, and normal
conditions. The manuals contain water
control plans for each of the reservoirs
within the basin system and specify
how the various reservoir projects will
be operated as a balanced system. The
manuals also contain drought plans and
zones to assist Federal water managers
in knowing when to reduce or increase
reservoir releases and conserve storage
in the Federal reservoirs, and how to
ensure the safety of dams during
extreme conditions such as floods. The
authority and guidance for the Corps to
prepare and update these manuals may
be found in Section 7 of the 1944 Flood
Control Act, and the following Corps of
Engineer Regulations: ER 1110–2–240,
ER 1110–2–241, ER 1110–2–1941 and
ER 1110–2–8156.
The ACF Basin provides water
resources for multiple purposes from
northwestern GA down, along the
Alabama-Georgia border and then into
Florida and the Gulf Coast at
Apalachicola Bay, extending a distance
of approximately 540 miles along the
Chattahoochee and Apalachicola Rivers
and an additional 350 miles on the Flint
River, and encompassing an area of
approximately 19,600 square miles. The
master operating manual for the ACF
River Basin dates to 1958, prior to the
completion of most of the reservoir
projects in the basin, and the individual
reservoir project water control manuals
were last updated at various dates as far
back as the 1970s and 1980s, with
primarily administrative updates
approved in the 1990s. There are 16
major dams and reservoirs (five Federal
and 11 non-Federal) located in the
basin. The Federal projects owned and
operated by the Corps include Buford
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dam and Lake Lanier, West Point Dam
and Lake, Walter F. George Dam and
Lake, George W. Andrews Dam and
Lake located on the Chattahoochee
River; and Jim Woodruff Dam and Lake
Seminole located on the Apalachicola
River at the confluence of the
Chattahoochee and Flint River. The
authorized project purposes at the Corps
lakes include flood control,
hydropower, navigation, water supply,
water quality, fish and wildlife
conservation, and recreation.
Other non-Federal reservoirs located
on the Chattahoochee River and Flint
River include power projects owned and
operated by the Georgia Power
Company and Crisp County, Georgia.
The non-Federal power lakes are
primarily run-of-river projects that do
not impact Federal project operations
significantly, but operations between
the Georgia Power projects and the
Federal projects are coordinated as
necessary to meet downstream water
quality and water supply demands.
In 1989, a draft master manual for the
ACF basin was proposed which
described operations current at that
time. This draft manual was never
finalized due to the initiation of
litigation by the State of Alabama,
which is still ongoing. However, since
that time, Corps operations have
continued to conform with the
operations described in the 1989 draft
manual and other more recently
updated water control manuals for the
various Federal projects. The new
manuals will eventually replace any
current ones and will address the basinwide management of those water
resources.
Public participation throughout the
water control manual revision process is
essential. The Corps invites full public
participation at all stages to promote
open communication and better
decision making. All persons,
stakeholders, and organizations that
have an interest in water-related
resources in the ACF basin, including
minority, low-income, disadvantaged
and Native American groups, are urged
to participate in this NEPA
environmental analysis process.
Assistance will be provided upon
request to anyone having difficulty
understanding how to participate. Dates
and locations for public scoping
meetings will be announced by future
publication in the Federal Register and
in the local news media. Tentative dates
for publication of the draft water control
manuals and EIS and other
opportunities for public involvement
will also be announced at that time.
Public comments are welcomed anytime
throughout the NEPA process.
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 36 (Friday, February 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9779-9780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-793]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Notice of availability of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) for the Permanent Stationing of the 2nd Brigade, 25th
Infantry Division Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT)
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of availability (NOA).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the availability of a
FEIS for the permanent stationing of the 2nd Brigade, 25th Infantry
Division (2/25th) SBCT. Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), the Department of the Army has prepared an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) to disclose potential impacts to the natural,
physical, and human environment resulting from the permanent stationing
of the 2/25th SBCT. Potential impacts have been analyzed at
installations that are capable of meeting the SBCTs training,
operational, Soldier and Family quality of life, and strategic
deployment requirements. This FEIS identifies Schofield Barracks
Military Reservation in Hawaii as the Army's preferred alternative for
the stationing location of the 2/25th SBCT. A Record of Decision (ROD)
will announce the final location decision after the 30-day waiting
period for the FEIS has been completed.
DATES: The waiting period for the FEIS will end 30 days after
publication of an NOA in the Federal Register by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: Send all written comments concerning this EIS to: Public
Affairs Office, U.S. Army Environmental Command, Building E4460, 5179
Hoadley Road, Attention: IMAE-PA, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-
5401. E-mail comments should be sent to:
PublicComments@aec.apgea.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Public Affairs Office at (410) 436-
2556; facsimile: (410) 436-1693 during normal business hours Monday
through Friday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. eastern standard time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed action and analysis within the
FEIS covers those activities required to implement the stationing of
the 2/25th SBCT. These activities include garrison construction,
training range construction, live-fire training, and maneuver training.
In May 2004, the Department of the Army (Army) released the FEIS
for Transformation of the 2nd Brigade, 25th Infantry Division (Light)
to the 2/25th SBCT. The SBCT is a maneuver brigade that includes
approximately 4,100 Soldiers (infantry, artillery, engineers, and other
Army specialties) and 1,000 vehicles (including about 320 Stryker
Combat Vehicles). In July 2004, the Army released a ROD documenting its
decision to transform the 2/25th from an Infantry Brigade to an SBCT
and permanently home station it in Hawaii.
The Stryker is an armored infantry wheeled combat vehicle and
provides Soldiers and commanders with increased firepower,
maneuverability, and, most importantly, survivability in a combat
environment. The increased speed and maneuver capabilities of the SBCT
allow operations to be conducted across much larger areas than the
Army's traditional legacy brigades. These capabilities have allowed the
SBCT to successfully conduct a broad range of missions in support of
Operation Iraqi Freedom.
To be effective when operationally deployed abroad requires that
the SBCT have the proper training and support facilities at home
station. Such facilities include training ranges, maneuver land,
housing, administrative, and quality of life infrastructure for the
SBCTs Soldiers, their Families, vehicles, and equipment. Without these
resources, the SBCT cannot attain the readiness levels needed to ensure
the successful accomplishment of its missions and safety of its
Soldiers. In addition to these requirements, the SBCT must be stationed
in a location from which it can rapidly deploy to support national
security requirements.
The 2/25th began its transformation to an SBCT shortly after
completion of the 2004 FEIS and signing of the ROD. Since this time,
the Brigade has completed its transformation in Hawaii and is currently
deployed to Southwest Asia. The SBCT is scheduled to return to the
permanent stationing location selected by the Army in early 2009.
In October 2006, the Federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
determined that the Army had not fully complied with NEPA for the
transformation of the 2/25th because it did not adequately address or
analyze potentially reasonable alternative locations for the
transformation and training of this unit. In particular, the Court
concluded that the Army had a duty under NEPA to consider locations
other than Hawaii for the permanent stationing of the 2/25th SBCT, and
the Court ordered the Army to prepare an EIS to address a broader range
of alternatives. The Army has prepared an EIS in accordance with the
Court's guidance to examine reasonable alternative locations for the
proposed action to station the 2/25th SBCT permanently.
The Army analyzed 140 installations for their suitability to meet
the appropriate training infrastructure, maneuver land, compatible
mission and garrison support infrastructure to support the SBCT. Out of
the 140 installations, three Army installations were determined to have
the appropriate infrastructure capable of supporting the permanent
stationing of the 2/25th SBCT. The FEIS examines the three Army
installations. The EIS will provide the Army senior leadership with a
hard look at environmental impacts associated with the proposed action
and better inform their decision-making process for selecting the final
stationing location. This effort includes analysis of all activities
(training, facilities construction, and Soldier and Family support)
required to permanently station the 2/25th SBCT. This EIS effort will
assist the Army in arriving at a decision that can accommodate the
Brigade's training, operations, and quality of life requirements while
meeting the strategic defense needs of the nation.
After reviewing the full range of potential Army stationing
locations, three alternatives for implementing the proposed action have
been identified by the Army as reasonable alternatives capable of
meeting the Army's needs and screening criteria. Alternatives for
implementing the proposed action included: (1) Permanently stationing
the 2/25th SBCT at Schofield Barracks Military Reservation while
conducting required training at military training sites in Hawaii; (2)
permanently stationing the 2/25th SBCT at Fort Richardson while
conducting required training at military training sites in Alaska; and
(3) permanently stationing the 2/25th SBCT at Fort Carson while
conducting required training at military training sites in Colorado. In
addition to these alternatives, the No Action alternative, which
provides the baseline conditions for comparison to the proposed
alternative, was fully assessed and considered.
Direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the proposed action
have been considered in the FEIS along with public comments received
during scoping and on the Draft EIS published in July 2007. The EIS
identifies impacts
[[Page 9780]]
at each of the three alternative locations that would occur as a result
of implementing the proposed action and responds to public comments.
Impacts at alternative sites would result from construction and
training activities. Each of the impacts can be mitigated.
The Army invited full public participation to promote open
communication and better decision making. All persons and organizations
that have an interest in the permanent stationing of the 2/25th SBCT
were urged to participate in this NEPA evaluation process. The public
has provided input and comments at scoping meetings and public meetings
held at all potential alternative stationing locations for the 2/25th.
The Army held scoping meetings in January and February 2007 and Draft
EIS meetings in September and October 2007. Responses to the public
comments are addressed in this FEIS.
The FEIS is available for review at https://www.aec.army.mil.
Dated: February 15, 1008.
Addison D. Davis, IV,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army, (Environment, Safety and
Occupational Health).
[FR Doc. 08-793 Filed 2-21-08: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3170-08-M