Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Construction and Operation of a Liquefied Natural Gas Facility off Massachusetts, 9092-9100 [E8-3021]
Download as PDF
9092
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices
Chlorinated isocyanurates are
currently classifiable under subheadings
2933.69.6015, 2933.69.6021,
2933.69.6050, 3808.40.50, 3808.50.40
and 3808.94.50.00 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). The tariff classification
2933.69.6015 covers sodium
dichloroisocyanurates (anhydrous and
dihydrate forms) and
trichloroisocyanuric acid. The tariff
classifications 2933.69.6021 and
2933.69.6050 represent basket categories
that include chlorinated isocyanurates
and other compounds including an
unfused triazine ring. Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive.
Ministerial Errors
A ministerial error as defined in
section 751(h) of the Act ‘‘includes an
error in addition, subtraction, or other
arithmetic function, clerical error
resulting from inaccurate copying,
duplication, or the like, and any other
type of unintentional error which the
Secretary considers ministerial.’’ See
also 19 CFR 351.224(f).
After analyzing all interested parties’
comments, we have determined, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e), that
ministerial errors existed in certain
calculations for Jiheng Chemical in the
Final Results. Correction of these errors
results in a change to Jiheng Chemical’s
final antidumping duty margin. The rate
for the PRC–wide entity remains
unchanged. For a detailed discussion of
Original Weighted Average Margin
Percentage
Exporter/Manufacturer
Hebei Jiheng Chemical Company Ltd. ............................................
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 15 days
after the date of publication of these
amended final results of review. In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
we have calculated importer–specific
assessment rates for merchandise
subject to this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
this notice of amended final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for subject
merchandise exported by Jiheng
Chemical, the cash deposit rate will be
20.10 percent; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated exporters not
listed above that have separate rates, the
cash–deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter–specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise, which
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash–deposit rate will
be the PRC–wide rate of 285.63 percent;
and (4) for all non–PRC exporters of
subject merchandise that have not
received their own rate, the cash–
deposit rate will be the rate applicable
to the PRC exporter that supplied that
non–PRC exporter. These deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Feb 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
these ministerial errors, as well as the
Department’s analysis, see
Memorandum to Wendy J. Frankel,
Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8,
from Katharine G. Huang, International
Trade Compliance Analyst, through
Charles Riggle, Program Manager, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8: Analysis of
Ministerial Error Allegations in Final
Results for Antidumping Duty Review
on Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the
People’s Republic of China, dated
February 11, 2008. Therefore, in
accordance with section 751(h) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are
amending the Final Results of the
administrative review of chlorinated
isocyanurates from the PRC. The revised
final weighted–average dumping margin
for Jiheng Chemical is as follows:
18.44
Notification of Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties. This notice also serves as a
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders
(‘‘APOs’’) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305, which continues to govern
business proprietary information in this
segment of the proceeding. Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation that is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
determination and notice in accordance
with sections 751(a) and 777(i) of the
Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Amended Weighted- Average margin
Percentage
Sfmt 4703
20.10
Dated: February 11, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–3014 Filed 2–15–08; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510–DR–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XA81
Small Takes of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities;
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to
Construction and Operation of a
Liquefied Natural Gas Facility off
Massachusetts
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
harassment authorization; receipt of
application for letter of authorization;
request for comments and information.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS received an
application from Neptune LNG, L.L.C.
(Neptune) for take of marine mammals,
by Level B harassment, incidental to
construction and operation of an
offshore liquefied natural gas (LNG)
facility in Massachusetts Bay. Under the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments
on its proposal to issue an incidental
harassment authorization (IHA) to
Neptune to incidentally take, by
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
harassment, small numbers of several
species of marine mammals for a period
of 1 year. NMFS is also requesting
comments on its intent to promulgate
regulations in 2008, governing the take
of marine mammals over a 5–year
period incidental to the same activities
described herein.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than March 20,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
application should be addressed to: P.
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation, and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225. The mailbox address for
providing email comments is
PR1.XA81@noaa.gov. Comments sent
via email, including all attachments,
must not exceed a 10–megabyte file size.
A copy of the application containing a
list of references used in this document
may be obtained by writing to this
address, by telephoning the contact
listed here (FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT) or online at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm. Documents cited in this
notice may be viewed, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at the
aforementioned address.
The Maritime Administration
(MARAD) and U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(Final EIS) on the Neptune LNG
Deepwater Port License Application is
available for viewing at https://
dms.dot.gov under the docket number
22611.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Candace Nachman or Ken Hollingshead,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
(301) 713–2289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
may be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Feb 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
availability of the species or stock(s) for
subsistence uses, and that the
permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such taking are set forth.
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected
to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
establishes an expedited process by
which citizens of the U.S. can apply for
an authorization to incidentally take
small numbers of marine mammals by
harassment. Except for certain
categories of activities not pertinent
here, the MMPA defines ‘‘harassment’’
as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[‘‘Level A harassment’’]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[‘‘Level B harassment’’].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of small numbers
of marine mammals. Within 45 days of
the close of the comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny the
authorization.
Summary of Request
On December 27, 2007, NMFS
received an application from Neptune
requesting an IHA to take small
numbers of several species of marine
mammals, by Level B (behavioral)
harassment, for a period of 1 year,
incidental to construction of an offshore
LNG facility. Since construction will not
be completed before expiration of the
IHA, additional construction and
operational activities will need to be
covered by a future MMPA
authorization. Consequently, Neptune’s
application also serves as a request for
a 5–year rule governing the issuance of
letters of authorization for construction
and operation of the port facility.
Neptune is requesting to take several
species of marine mammals, by Level B
(behavioral) harassment, incidental to
Port operations. During Port operations,
the use of thrusters during docking will
emit sounds that exceed the 120–dB
threshold. More detailed information
regarding Port operations and related
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9093
effects will be described in NMFS’
proposed rule Federal Register notice.
Description of the Project
On March 23, 2007, Neptune received
a license to own, construct, and operate
a deepwater port (Port or Neptune Port)
from MARAD. The Port, which will be
located in Massachusetts Bay, will
consist of a submerged buoy system to
dock specifically designed LNG carriers
approximately 22 mi (35 km) northeast
of Boston, Massachusetts, in Federal
waters approximately 260 ft (79 m) in
depth. The two buoys will be separated
by a distance of approximately 2.1 mi
(3.4 km).
Neptune will be capable of mooring
LNG shuttle and regasification vessels
(SRVs) with a capacity of approximately
140,000 cubic meters (m3). Up to two
SRVs will temporarily moor at the
proposed deepwater port by means of a
submerged unloading buoy system. Two
separate buoys will allow natural gas to
be delivered in a continuous flow,
without interruption, by having a brief
overlap between arriving and departing
SRVs. The annual average throughput
capacity will be around 500 million
standard cubic feet per day (mmscfd)
with an initial throughput of 400
mmscfd, and a peak capacity of
approximately 750 mmscfd.
The SRVs will be equipped to store,
transport, and vaporize LNG, and to
odorize, meter and send out natural gas
by means of two 16–in (40.6–cm)
flexible risers and one 24–in (61–cm)
subsea flowline. These risers and
flowline will lead to a proposed 24–in
(61–cm) gas transmission pipeline
connecting the deepwater port to the
existing 30–in (76.2–cm) Algonquin
HublineSM (HublineSM) located
approximately 9 mi (14.5 km) west of
the proposed deepwater port location.
The Port will have an expected
operating life of approximately 20 years.
Figure 1–1 of Neptune’s application
shows an isometric view of the Port.
On February 15, 2005, Neptune
submitted an application to the USCG
and MARAD under the Deepwater Port
Act for all Federal authorizations
required for a license to own, construct,
and operate a deepwater port for the
import and regasification of LNG off the
coast of Massachusetts. Because, as
described later in this document, there
is a potential for marine mammals to be
taken by harassment, incidental to
construction of the facility and its
pipeline and by the transport and
regasification of LNG, Neptune has
applied for a 1–year IHA and a
subsequent 5–year letter of
authorization for activities commencing
in June 2008. The following sections
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
9094
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices
briefly describe the activities that might
harass marine mammals. Detailed
information on these activities can be
found in the MARAD/USCG Final EIS
on the Neptune Project (see ADDRESSES
for availability).
Construction Activities
The offshore installation effort for
Neptune will be accomplished in the
following sequence: mobilize an
anchored lay barge (or a dynamic
positioning derrick barge) and support
vessels (i.e., anchor handling tugs,
oceangoing tugs, and survey/diver
support vessel) for the Proposed
Pipeline Route; install the flowline
between the riser mainfolds; install the
new gas transmission pipeline from the
northern riser manifold to the transition
manifold and the hot tap to the
HubLineSM; install the two riser
manifolds and the transition manifold;
conduct pipeline hydrostatic testing;
install the anchor piles and the lower
portion of the mooring lines; connect
the mooring lines to the unloading
buoys and properly tension the mooring
lines; and connect the two risers and
control umbilicals between the
unloading buoys and the riser
manifolds. Construction will take place
between June 2008 and June 2009 over
approximately seven months. No
construction activities will occur from
December 2008 through April 2009. See
Figure 1–2 of Neptune’s application for
a full construction schedule.
Description of Construction Activities
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Flowline and Manifolds
A pipelaying vessel will install the
two rise manifolds and install the
flowline between the riser manifolds.
The flowline will be a 24–in-diameter
(61–cm) line pipe with concrete weight
coating and have a length of
approximately 2.5 mi (4 km). The
flowline will be buried to the top of the
pipe. Trenching will begin
approximately 300 ft (91.4 ft) from the
southern riser manifold and end
approximately 300 ft (91.4 ft) from the
northern manifold to avoid damaging
such structures. Transition sections will
use suction pumps, jetting machines,
airlifts, or submersible pumps as
required. A post-trenching survey will
be performed to verify that the proper
depth is achieved. Subsequent trenching
runs might be performed to further
lower section that do not meet burial
depth requirements.
Gas Transmission Pipeline to the
HubLineSM
The gas transmission pipeline would
begin at the existing HublineSM pipeline
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Feb 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
approximately 3 mi (4.8 km) east of
Marblehead Neck, Massachusetts. From
this point, the pipeline would extend
toward the northeast crossing the
territorial waters of the town of
Marblehead, the city of Salem, the city
of Beverly, and the town of Manchesterby-the-Sea for approximately 6.4 mi
(10.3 km). The transmission line route
would continue to the southeast for
approximately 4.5 mi (7.2 km) crossing
state and Federal waters. The proposed
location of the pipeline is shown in
Figure 2–1 of Neptune’s application.
The transmission pipe (with concrete
weight coating) will be transported from
the temporary shore base to the
operating site. The construction
sequence for the transmission line will
begin with plowing of the pipeline
trench. A pipelaying vessel will install
the 24–in-diameter (61–cm) pipeline
(which will be buried 3 ft (0.9 m) to the
top of the pipe) from the northern riser
manifold to the location of the transition
manifold near the connection point to
the HubLineSM. A site for the transition
manifold will be dredged adjacent to the
HubLineSM, the manifold will be laid in
place, and the tie-in HubLineSM to the
will be completed. The gas transmission
line will be buried from the transition
manifold to the northern riser manifold.
Trenching will begin approximately 300
ft (91.4 m) from the northern riser
manifold and end approximately 300 ft
(91.4 m) from the transition manifold to
avoid damaging such structures. A posttrenching survey will be performed to
verify that the proper depth is achieved.
Subsequent trenching runs might be
performed to further lower sections that
do not meet burial depth requirements.
Pipeline Hot Tap Installation
The hot tap fitting, which will not
require welding, will provide full
structural reinforcement where the hole
will be cut in the HubLineSM. The
tapping tool and actual hot tap
procedure will be supplied and
supervised by a specialist from the
manufacturer. Prior to construction of
the hot tap, divers will excavate the
HubLineSM tie-in location using suction
pumps. The concrete weight coating
will be removed from the HubLineSM
and inspected for suitability of the hot
tap. The hinged hot tap fitting will then
be lowered and opened to fit over the
30–in (76.2–cm) HubLineSM. The hot
tap fitting will then be closed around
the pipeline, the clam studs and packing
flanges will be tightened, and the fitting
leak will be tested. The HubLineSM then
will be tapped, and the valves will be
closed. The hot tap and exposed
sections of the HubLineSM will be
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
protected with concrete mats until the
tie-in to the transition manifold occurs.
Hydrostatic Pipeline Integrity Testing
There will be one combined gas
transmission line and flowline
hydrotest, including flooding, cleaning,
and gauging following pipelay,
trenching, and burial. The whole system
will be in-line and piggable, meaning
that the pipeline can accept pigs, which
are gauging/cleaning devices that are
driven by pressure from one end of the
pipe segment to the other without
obstruction. The gas transmission line
and flowline will require approximately
three million gallons of filtered
seawater, including complete flushing
of the system and 676 gallons (2,559
liters) of fluorescent dye (TADCO Tracer
Fluro Yellow XL500–50 Liquid Dye or
an approved equivalent). This volume
assumes that no water will bypass the
pigs and will include approximately
1,700 gallons (6,435 liters) of water in
front of the flooding pig and
approximately 1,700 gallons (6,435
liters) of water between other pigs
(reduced from two hydrotests to one
hydrotest). Flooding will take place
from the southern riser manifold to the
HubLineSM hot tap manifold. All
hydrotest water discharges will be in
Federal waters, near the unloading
buoys. The total pipeline system will be
swab-dried using a pig train with slugs
or glycol or similar fluid. The water
content of the successive slugs will be
sampled to verify that the total pipeline
has been properly dried.
Anchor Installation
The prefabricated anchor piles will be
installed offshore with a dynamic
positioning derrick/anchored barge,
anchor-handling vessel, or similar
offshore construction equipment. The
anchor points will be within a radius of
1,600 to 3,600 ft (487.7 to 1,097.3 m) of
the center of each unloading buoy. The
anchor system will be installed using
suction pile anchors.
Unloading Buoys
The unloading buoys will be
offloaded near the designated site. An
anchor-handling vessel or small derrick
barge will connect the mooring lines
from the anchor points to each
unloading buoy and then adjust the
mooring line tensions to the desired
levels.
Risers
The anchor-handling vessel or small
derrick barge also will connect the riser
and the control umbilical between each
unloading buoy and the associated riser
manifold, complete the hydrostatic
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices
testing and dewatering of the risers, and
test the control umbilicals.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Demobilization
Upon completion of the offshore
construction effort, sidescan sonar will
be used to check the area. Divers will
remove construction debris from the
ocean floor. All construction equipment
will leave the site.
Construction Vessels
The derrick/lay barge, anchorhandling vessels, and survey/diver
support vessel will each make two trips
(one round trip) to and from the area of
origin (likely the Gulf of Mexico) and
will stay on station for the majority of
the construction period. The supply
vessels (or oceangoing tugs with cargo
barges) and crew/survey vessel will
make regular trips between the
construction sites and mainly the port of
Gloucester (approximately 8 mi (12.9
km)). During project installation, the
supply vessel will make approximately
102 trips (51 round trips), and the crew/
survey vessel will make approximately
720 trips (360 round trips) for a
combined total of 822 constructionsupport-related transits (411 round
trips).
All of the construction and support
vessels will be transiting Massachusetts
Bay en route to the Port. While
transiting to and from the construction
sites, the supply vessel and crew/survey
vessel will travel at approximately 10
knots (18.5 km/hr). While transiting to
and from the Gulf of Mexico, the
derrick/lay barge and anchor handling
vessels will travel up to 12 and 14 knots
(22.2 and 25.9 km/hr), respectively, but
will operate either in place or at very
slow speeds during construction. The
survey/diver support vessel will travel
at speeds up to 10 knots (18.5 km/hr)
transiting to and from the construction
area and between dive sites.
Materials, including unloading buoys,
mooring lines, risers, and control
umbilicals, will be transported from the
shore-based storage area to the operating
site on deck cargo barges pulled by
oceangoing tugs. Cargo barges will
transport the concrete-coated line pipe
and manifolds to the operating site.
Approved construction procedures
will be delivered to each construction
vessel, and a kick-off meeting to review
construction procedures, health and
safety procedures, and environmental
limitations will be held with key
personnel prior to starting each
construction activity.
Construction Sound
Underwater acoustic analyses were
completed for activities related to all
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Feb 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
aspects of Neptune construction.
Activities considered to be potential
sound sources during construction
include: installation (plowing) of
flowline and main transmission
pipeline routes; lowering of materials
(pipe, anchors, and chains); and
installation of the suction pile anchors.
Construction-related activities for the
Port and the pipeline will generate
sound exceeding the 120–dB threshold
for continuous and intermittent noise at
the source. The loudest source of
underwater noise during construction of
the Neptune Port will be the use of
thrusters for dynamic positioning.
Marine Mammals Affected by the
Activity
Marine mammal species that
potentially occur within the Neptune
facility impact area include several
species of cetaceans and pinnipeds:
North Atlantic right whale, blue whale,
fin whale, sei whale, minke whale,
humpback whale, killer whale, longfinned pilot whale, sperm whale,
Atlantic white-beaked dolphin, Atlantic
white-sided dolphin, bottlenose
dolphin, common dolphin, harbor
porpoise, Risso’s dolphin, striped
dolphin, gray seal, harbor seal, harp
seal, and hooded seal. Table 3–1 in the
IHA application outlines the marine
mammal species that occur in
Massachusetts Bay and the likelihood of
occurrence of each species. Information
on those species that may be impacted
by this activity are discussed in detail
in the MARAD/USCG Final EIS on the
Neptune LNG proposal. Please refer to
that document for more information on
these species and potential impacts
from construction and operation of this
LNG facility. In addition, general
information on these marine mammal
species can also be found in the NMFS
Stock Assessment Reports (Waring et
al., 2007), which is available at: https://
www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/
tm/tm201/.
In addition to the 16 species listed in
Table 3–1 of Neptune’s application,
Massachusetts Bay is considered an
extralimital habitat for ten other
cetacean species, or their presence has
only been recorded from strandings
(Cardoza et al., 1999). The following six
species of beaked whales are all pelagic
and recorded mostly as strandings the
northern bottlenose whale (Hyperoodon
ampullatus), Cuvier’s beaked whale
(Ziphius cavirostris), Sowerby’s beaked
whale (Mesoplodon bidens), Blainville’s
beaked whale (M. densirostris), Gervais’
beaked whale (M. europaeus), and true’s
beaked whale (M. mirus). Vagrants
include the beluga whale
(Delphinapterus leucas), a northern
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9095
species with rare vagrants reported as
far south as Long Island (Katona et al.,
1993); the pantropical spotted dolphin
(Stenella attenuata) and false killer
whale (Pseudorca crassidens), which
are primarily tropical species with rare
sightings in Massachusetts waters
(Cardoza et al., 1999); and the pygmy
sperm whale (Kogia breviceps), which is
generally an offshore species that
occasionally wanders inshore. These
vagrant species are not considered
further in the analysis.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
The effects of sound on marine
mammals are highly variable and can be
categorized as follows (based on
Richardson et al., 1995): (1) The sound
may be too weak to be heard at the
location of the animal (i.e., lower than
the prevailing ambient noise level, the
hearing threshold of the animal at
relevant frequencies, or both); (2) The
sound may be audible but not strong
enough to elicit any overt behavioral
response; (3) The sound may elicit
reactions of variable conspicuousness
and variable relevance to the well being
of the marine mammal; these can range
from temporary alert responses to active
avoidance reactions, such as vacating an
area at least until the sound ceases; (4)
Upon repeated exposure, a marine
mammal may exhibit diminishing
responsiveness (habituation) or
disturbance effects may persist; the
latter is most likely with sounds that are
highly variable in characteristics,
infrequent, and unpredictable in
occurrence, and associated with
situations that a marine mammal
perceives as a threat; (5) Any
anthropogenic sound that is strong
enough to be heard has the potential to
reduce (mask) the ability of a marine
mammal to hear natural sounds at
similar frequencies, including calls from
conspecifics, and underwater
environmental sounds such as surf
noise; (6) If mammals remain in an area
because it is important for feeding,
breeding, or some other biologically
important purpose even though there is
chronic exposure to sound, it is possible
that there could be sound-induced
physiological stress; this might in turn
have negative effects on the well-being
or reproduction of the animals involved;
and (7) Very strong sounds have the
potential to cause temporary or
permanent reduction in hearing
sensitivity. In terrestrial mammals, and
presumably marine mammals, received
sound levels must far exceed the
animal’s hearing threshold for there to
be any temporary threshold shift (TTS)
in its hearing ability. For transient
sounds, the sound level necessary to
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
9096
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices
cause TTS is inversely related to the
duration of the sound. Received sound
levels must be even higher for there to
be risk of permanent hearing
impairment. In addition, intense
acoustic (or explosive events) may cause
trauma to tissue associated with organs
vital for hearing, sound production,
respiration, and other functions. This
trauma may include minor to severe
hemorrhage.
Construction and operation of the
Neptune Port will occur consecutively,
with no overlap in activities. During
construction, the project activities will
occur over a 2–year period with sound
from Port and pipeline construction
causing some possible disturbance to
small numbers of both baleen and
toothed whales. Pinnipeds are unlikely
to be present during summer and will
not be affected. The installation of the
suction piles will produce only low
levels of sound during the construction
period and will not increase the
numbers of animals affected. Modeling
results indicate that noise levels would
be below 90 dB re 1 µPa within 0.2 mi
(0.3 km) of the source.
During construction of the Port and
pipeline, underwater sound levels will
be temporarily elevated. These elevated
sound levels may cause some species to
temporarily disperse from or avoid
construction areas, but they are
expected to return shortly after
construction is completed.
The likelihood of a vessel strike of a
marine mammal during pipe laying and
trenching operations is low since
equipment will be towed at very slow
speeds (approximately 5 ft (1.5 m) per
minute). Any whales foraging near the
bottom would be able to avoid collision
or interaction with the equipment and
displacement would be temporary for
the duration of the plow pass.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Estimates of Take by Harassment
There are three general types of
sounds recognized by NMFS:
continuous, intermittent (or transient),
and pulsive. Sounds of short duration
that are produced intermittently or at
regular intervals, such as sounds from
pile driving, are classified as ‘‘pulsed.’’
Sounds produced for extended periods,
such as sound from generators, are
classified as ‘‘continuous.’’ Sounds from
moving sources, such as ships, can be
continuous, but for an animal at a given
location, these sounds are ‘‘transient’’
(i.e., increasing in level as the ship
approaches and then diminishing as it
moves away). Neither the construction
nor operation of the Port will cause
pulsive sound activities, including pile
driving, seismic activities, or blasting.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Feb 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
The sound sources of potential
concern are continuous and intermittent
sound sources, including underwater
noise generated during pipeline/
flowline construction. Both continuous
and intermittent noise sources are
subject to NMFS’ 120 dB re 1 µPa
threshold for determining levels of
continuous underwater noise that may
result in the disturbance of marine
mammals.
Construction-related Underwater Sound
Effects
• Pipe-laying activities will generate
continuous but transient sound and will
likely result in variable sound levels
during the construction period.
Depending on water depth, the 120–dB
contour during pipe-laying activities
will extend from the source (the Port) in
varying directions from 3.8 to 5.9 nm (7
to 10.9 km), encompassing an area
ranging from 37 to 47 nm2 for the
flowline at the Port and will extend
from the pipeline route out 3.5 to 4.1
nm (6.5 to 7.6 km), encompassing an
area from 35 to 44 nm2 for the pipeline
route.
• Installation of the suction pile
anchors at the Port will produce only
low levels of underwater sound with no
levels above the 120–dB criterion for
continuous sound. The 120–dB
threshold would not be exceeded, and
the 90–dB contour would occur only out
to 300–1,000 ft (91.4–305 m) from the
sound source. (See Appendix B of
Neptune’s application for a more
detailed description.)
The basis for Neptune’s ‘‘take’’
estimate is the number of marine
mammals that potentially could be
exposed to sound levels in excess of 120
dB. Typically, this is determined by
applying the modeled zone of influence
(e.g., the area ensonified by the 120–dB
contour) to the seasonal use (density) of
the area by marine mammals and
correcting for seasonal duration of
sound-generating activities and
estimated duration of individual
activities when the maximum soundgenerating activities are intermittent to
occasional. Nearly all of the required
information is readily available in the
MARAD/USCG Final EIS, with the
exception of marine mammal density
estimates for the project area.
For the assessment of the biological
noise effects of the Neptune Port
construction and operation, LGL
Limited (LGL; 2005 and 2006) evaluated
the marine mammal density data
available from the Cetacean and Turtle
Assessment Program (1982) and the U.S.
Navy’s (USN) Marine Resources
Assessment (MRA) for the Northeast
Operating Areas (Dept. of the Navy,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2005). The results and methodologies
used by both surveys are discussed in
detail in Appendix B of Neptune’s
application.
Using the results from the USN (2005)
geospatial analysis model, LGL
developed average density-indices for
marine mammals known to occur in the
proposed project area. The LGL analysis
assumed that the USN-adopted method
of converting linear density-indices into
areal density estimates was reasonable
and assumed that the highest numbers
of marine mammals in the density-index
ranges would be present during Port
construction and operations. Table 6–1
in the IHA application provides
estimated densities for Massachusetts
Bay. LGL cautions that the linear data
identified by the USN in its MRA (2005)
provide an index of abundance based on
all of the usable available data. To
convert the linear data into densities for
the purpose of assessing the underwater
sound effects of the construction and
operation of the Neptune Port, it was
assumed that the effective survey width
was a 0.3–mi (0.5–km) strip on each
side of the survey vehicle. Thus, each
linear kilometer of survey would
encompass an area of 1 km2. This is a
gross oversimplification of reality. For
most whale species, individuals are
sighted well beyond the assumed
distance of 0.3–mi (0.5 km) on each side
of the trackline. Thus, the adopted
approach overestimates the actual
numbers of animals per square
kilometer because the linear estimates
actually include animals beyond the
0.3–mi (0.5–km) strip width. However,
all surveys fail to detect a portion of the
animals that are actually present on the
surface or underwater. Therefore, the
approach adopted here accounts for an
unknown fraction of the missed
animals. Because these biases cannot be
quantified, it is important to treat the
following numerical assessments as
approximations.
For construction-related effects,
Neptune is requesting take of eight
cetacean species. Table 6–1 in the IHA
application and Table 1 here provide
Neptune’s estimate of the number of
marine mammals that could potentially
be harassed during Port construction
activities.
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices
they reduce growth, reproduction, and
survival rates of benthic organisms, and
in extreme cases, smother benthic flora
and fauna. Plankton will not be affected
North Atlantic right
4
by resettled sediment. The project area
whale
is largely devoid of vegetation and
Humpback whale
5
consists of sand, silt, clay, or mixtures
Fin whale
3
of the three.
Sei whale
3
Minke whale
1
Recovery of soft-bottom benthic
Long-finned pilot whale
44
communities impacted by project
Atlantic white-sided
43
installation is expected to be similar to
dolphin1
the recovery of the soft habitat
Harbor porpoise1
23
associated with the construction of the
Table 1. Requested take levels for marine HubLineSM (Algonquin Gas
mammals in Massachusetts Bay from con- Transmission L.L.C., 2004). Poststruction of the Neptune Port
construction monitoring of the
1 Dolphin distribution is generally patchy
and with a few large pods being present rather HubLineSM indicates that areas that
than an even distribution.
were bucket-dredged showed the least
Based on weekly construction reports disturbance. Displaced organisms will
return shortly after construction ceases,
submitted to NMFS by another LNG
and disrupted communities will easily
facility in Massachusetts Bay, the take
re-colonize from surrounding
levels requested by Neptune seem a bit
communities of similar organisms.
low. It is likely based on the observer
Similarly, disturbance to hard-bottom
data and further analysis, the numbers
pebble/cobble and piled boulder habitat
that would be authorized in the final
is not expected to be significant. Some
IHA may be slightly higher than those
organisms could be temporarily
in this notice of proposed IHA. NMFS
displaced from existing shelter, thereby
biologists will analyze area density, the
exposing them to increased predation,
area to be ensonified to 160 dB, and the
but the overall structural integrity of
number of days that construction
these areas will not be reduced (Auster
activities will occur in order to derive
and Langton, 1998).
more accurate take numbers during the
Short-term impacts on phytoplankton,
time of Port construction. However, the
numbers are expected to be small based zooplankton (holoplankton), and
planktonic fish and shellfish eggs and
on population sizes.
larvae (meroplankton) will occur as a
Potential Impact on Habitat from Port
result of the project. Turbidity
Construction
associated with Port and pipeline
Construction of the Neptune Port and installation will result in temporary
direct impacts on productivity, growth,
pipeline will affect marine mammal
and development. Phytoplankton and
habitat in several ways: seafloor
zooplankton abundance will be greatest
disturbance, increased turbidity, and
during the summer construction
generation of additional underwater
schedule. Fish eggs and larvae are
sound in the area. Proposed
present in the project area throughout
construction activities will temporarily
the year. Different species of fish and
disturb 418 acres (1.7 km2) of seafloor
(11 acres (0.04 km2) at the Port, 85 acres invertebrate eggs and larvae will be
affected by the different construction
(0.3 km2) along the pipeline route, and
schedules.
an estimated 322 acres (1.3 km2) due to
anchoring of construction and
The temporary disturbance of benthic
installation vessels). Of the proposed
habitat from trenching for and burial of
construction activities, pipeline
the transmission pipeline will result in
installation, including trenching,
direct, minor, adverse impacts from the
plowing, jetting, and backfill, is
dispersion of fish from the area and the
expected to generate the most
burying or crushing of shellfish. In the
disturbance of bottom sediments.
short-term, there will be a temporary,
Sediment transport modeling conducted indirect, and beneficial impact from
by Neptune indicates that initial
exposing benthic food sources. Seafloor
turbidity from pipeline installation
disturbance could also occur as a result
could reach 100 milligrams per liter
of resettling of suspended sediments
(mg/L) but will subside to 20 mg/L after during installation and construction of
4 hours. Turbidity associated with the
the proposed Port and pipeline.
flowline and hot-tap will be
Redeposited sediments will potentially
considerably less and also will settle
reduce viability of demersal fish eggs
within hours of the work being
and growth, reproduction, and survival
completed. Resettled sediments also
rates of benthic shellfish. In extreme
will constitute to seafloor disturbance.
cases, resettled sediments could
When re-suspended sediments resettle,
smother benthic shellfish, although
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Species
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Requested Take
Levels for Construction Activities
16:52 Feb 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9097
many will be able to burrow vertically
through resettled sediments.
Construction activities will not create
long-term habitat changes, and marine
mammals displaced by the disturbance
to the seafloor are expected to return
soon after construction ceases. Marine
mammals also could be indirectly
affected if benthic prey species were
displaced or destroyed by construction
activities. Affected species are expected
to recover soon after construction ceases
and will represent only a small portion
of food available to marine mammals in
the area.
Marine Mammal Mitigation,
Monitoring, and Reporting
Port Construction Minimization
Measures
General
Construction activities will be limited
to a May through November time frame
so that acoustic disturbance to the
endangered North Atlantic right whale
can largely be avoided.
Proposed Visual Monitoring Program
The Neptune Project will employ two
marine mammal observers (MMOs) on
each lay barge, bury barge, and diving
support vessel for visual shipboard
surveys during construction activities.
Qualifications for these individuals will
include direct field experience on a
marine mammal/sea turtle observation
vessel and/or aerial surveys in the
Atlantic Ocean/Gulf of Mexico. The
observers (one primary, one secondary)
are responsible for visually locating
marine mammals at the ocean’s surface,
and, to the extent possible, identifying
the species. The primary observer will
act as the identification specialist, and
the secondary observer will serve as
data recorder and also assist with
identification. Both observers will have
responsibility for monitoring for the
presence of marine mammals. All
observers will receive NMFS-approved
MMO training and be approved in
advance by NMFS after review of their
resumes.
The MMOs will be on duty at all
times when each vessel is moving and
at selected periods when the vessel is
idle, including when other vessels move
around the construction lay barge. The
MMOs will monitor the construction
area beginning at daybreak using 25x
power binoculars and/or hand-held
binoculars, resulting in a conservative
effective search range of 0.5 mi (0.8 km)
during clear weather conditions for the
shipboard observers. The MMO will
scan the ocean surface by eye for a
minimum of 40 minutes every hour. All
sightings will be recorded in marine
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
9098
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
mammal field sighting logs.
Observations of marine mammals will
be identified to species or the lowest
taxanomic level and their relative
position will be recorded. Night vision
devices will be standard equipment for
monitoring during low-light hours and
at night.
During all phases of construction,
MMOs will be required to scan for and
report all marine mammal sightings to
the vessel captain. The captain will then
alert the environmental coordinator that
a marine mammal is near the
construction area. The MMO will have
the authority to bring the vessel to idle
or to temporarily suspend operations if
a baleen whale is seen within 0.6 mi (1
km) of the moving pipelay vessel or
construction area. The MMO or
environmental coordinator will
determine whether there is a potential
for harm to an individual animal and
will be charged with responsibility for
determining when it is safe to resume
activity. A vessel will not increase
power again until the marine
mammal(s) leave(s) the area or has/have
not been sighted for 30 minutes. The
vessel will then power up slowly.
Construction and support vessels will
be required to display lights when
operating at night, and deck lights will
be required to illuminate work areas.
However, use of lights will be limited to
areas where work is actually occurring,
and all other lights will be extinguished.
Lights will be downshielded to
illuminate the deck and will not
intentionally illuminate surrounding
waters, so as not to attract whales or
their prey to the area.
Distance and Noise Level for Cut-Off
(1) During construction, if a marine
mammal is detected within 0.5 mi (0.8
km) of a construction vessel, the vessel
superintendent or on-deck supervisor
will be notified immediately. The
vessel’s crew will be put on a
heightened state of alert. The marine
mammal will be monitored constantly
to determine if it is moving toward the
construction area. The observer is
required to report all North Atlantic
right whale sightings to NMFS, as soon
as possible.
(2) Construction vessels will cease
any movement in the construction area
if a marine mammal other than a right
whale is sighted within or approaching
to a distance of 100 yd (91 m) from the
operating construction vessel.
Construction vessels will cease any
movement in the construction area if a
right whale is sighted within or
approaching to a distance of 500 yd (457
m) from the operating construction
vessel. Vessels transiting the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Feb 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
construction area such as pipe haul
barge tugs will also be required to
maintain these separation distances.
Activities will cease within these safety
radii in order to avoid injury or
mortality of any marine mammal.
(3) Construction vessels will cease all
activities that emit sounds reaching a
received level of 120 dB re 1 µPa or
higher at 100 yd (91 m) if a marine
mammal other than a right whale is
sighted within or approaching to this
distance, or if a right whale is sighted
within or approaching to a distance of
500 yd (457 m), from the operating
construction vessel. The back-calculated
source level, based on the most
conservative cylindrical model of
acoustic energy spreading, is estimated
to be 139 dB re 1 µPa. Activities will
cease within these safety radii in order
to avoid injury or mortality of any
marine mammal.
(4) Construction may resume after the
marine mammal is positively
reconfirmed outside the established
zones (either 500 yd (457 m) or 100 yd
(91 m), depending upon species).
Vessel Strike Avoidance
(1) While under way, all construction
vessels will remain 0.6 mi (1 km) away
from right whales and all other whales
to the extent possible and 100 yd (91 m)
away from all other marine mammals to
the extent physically feasible given
navigational constraints as required by
NMFS.
(2) MMOs will direct a moving vessel
to slow to idle if a baleen whale is seen
within 0.6 mi (1 km) of the vessel.
(3) All construction vessels 300 gross
tons or greater will maintain a speed of
10 knots (18.5 km/hr) or less. Vessels
less than 300 gross tons carrying
supplies or crew between the shore and
the construction site must contact the
appropriate authority or the
construction site before leaving shore
for reports of recent right whale sighting
and, consistent with navigation safety,
restrict speeds to 10 knots (18.5 km/hr)
or less within 5 mi (8 km) of any recent
sighting location.
(4) Vessels transiting through the
Cape Cod Canal and Cape Cod Bay
(CCB) between January 1 and May 15
will reduce speeds to 10 knots (18.5 km/
hr) or less, follow the recommended
routes charted by NOAA to reduce
interactions between right whales and
shipping traffic, and avoid aggregations
of right whales in the eastern portion of
CCB. To the extent practicable, pipe
deliveries will be avoided during the
January to May time frame. In the
unlikely event the Canal is closed
during construction, the pipe haul
barges will transit around Cape Cod
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
following the Boston Traffic Separation
Scheme and all measures for the SRVs
when transiting to the Port (see
Appendix D of Neptune’s application
for Port Operation Minimization
Measures).
(5) Construction and support vessels
will transit at 10 knots or less in the
following seasons and areas:
• Southeast U.S. Seasonal
Management Area (SMA) from
November 15 through April 15, which is
bounded by the shoreline, 31° 27’ N.
(i.e., the northern edge of the Mandatory
Ship Reporting System (MSRS)
boundary) to the north, 29° 45’ N. to the
south, and 80° 51.6’ W. (i.e., the eastern
edge of the MSRS boundary);
• Mid-Atlantic SMAs from
November 1 through April 30, which
encompass the waters within a 30 nm
(55.6 km) area with an epicenter at the
midpoint of the COLREG demarcation
line crossing the entry into the
following designated ports or bays: (a)
Ports of New York/New Jersey; (b)
Delaware Bay (Ports of Philadelphia and
Wilmington); (c) Entrance to the
Chesapeake Bay (Ports of Hampton
Roads and Baltimore) (d) Ports of
Morehead City and Beaufort, North
Carolina; (e) Port of Wilmington, North
Carolina; (f) Port of Georgetown, South
Carolina; (g) Port of Charleston, South
Carolina; and (h) Port of Savannah,
Georgia;
• CCB SMA from January 1 through
May 15, which includes all waters in
CCB, extending to all shorelines of the
Bay, with a northern boundary of 42°
12’ N.;
• Off Race Point SMA year round,
which is bounded by straight lines
connecting the following coordinates in
the order stated:
42° 30’ N. 70° 30’ W.
42° 30’ N. 69° 45’ W.
41° 40’ N. 69° 45’ W.
41° 40’ N. 69° 57’ W.
42° 04.8’ N. 70° 10’ W.
42° 12’ N. 70° 15’ W.
42° 12’ N. 70° 30’ W.
42° 30’ N. 70° 30’ W.; and
• Great South Channel SMA from
April 1 through July 31, which is
bounded by straight lines connecting
the following coordinates in the order
stated:
42° 30’ N. 69° 45’ W.
42° 30’ N. 67° 27’ W.
42° 09’ N. 67° 08.4’ W.
41° 00’ N. 69° 05’ W.
41° 40’ N. 69° 45’ W.
42° 30’ N. 69° 45’ W.
Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM)
Program
In addition to visual monitoring,
Neptune will utilize a PAM system to
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices
aid in the monitoring and detection of
vocalizing marine mammals in the
proposed project area. Neptune has
engaged personnel from NMFS and the
Stellwagen Bank National Marine
Sanctuary (SBNMS) regarding available
passive acoustic technology that could
be used to enhance the PAM program.
The proposed PAM system will be
capable of detecting, localizing (range
and bearing), and classifying marine
mammals in real-time. When combined
with an action and communication
plan, Neptune will have the capability
to make timely decisions and undertake
steps to minimize the potential for
collisions between marine mammals
and construction vessels. The PAM
system proposed for the Neptune project
will involve the installation of an array
of auto-detection monitoring buoys
moored at regular intervals in a circle
surrounding the site of the terminal and
associated pipeline construction. Buoys
will be arranged to maximize auto
detection and provide localization
capability. With the existing technology,
this would require six buoys moored
every 5 nm (9.3 km) to provide some
overlap in coverage. The buoys are
designed to monitor the sound output
from construction activities to ensure
predicted levels are not exceeded and to
detect the presence of vocally active
marine mammals. Passive acoustic
devices will be actively monitored for
detections by a NMFS-approved
bioacoustic technician.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Other Measures
Mesh grates will be used during
flooding and hydrostatic testing of the
pipeline and flowlines to minimize
impingement and entrainment of marine
mammals. Operations involving
excessively noisy equipment will
‘‘ramp-up’’ sound sources, as long as
this does not jeopardize the safety of
vessels or construction workers,
allowing whales a chance to leave the
area before sounds reach maximum
levels. Contractors will be required to
utilize vessel-quieting technologies that
minimize sound. Contractors will be
required to maintain individual Spill
Prevention, Control, and Containment
Plans in place for construction vessels
during construction.
An environmental coordinator with
experience coordinating projects to
monitor and minimize impacts to
marine mammals will be onsite to
coordinate all issues concerning marine
protected species, following all of the
latest real-time marine mammal
movements. The coordinator will work
to ensure that environmental standards
are adhered to and adverse interactions
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Feb 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
between project equipment and marine
mammals do not occur.
Reporting
During construction, weekly status
reports will be provided to NMFS
utilizing standardized reporting forms.
In addition, the Neptune Port Project
area is within the MSRA, so all
construction and support vessels will
report their activities to the mandatory
reporting section of the USCG to remain
apprised of North Atlantic right whale
movements within the area. All vessels
entering and exiting the MSRA will
report their activities to
WHALESNORTH. During all phases of
project construction, sightings of any
injured or dead marine mammals will
be reported immediately to the USCG
and NMFS, regardless of whether the
injury or death is caused by project
activities. Any right whale sightings will
be reported to the NMFS Sighting
Advisory System.
During all phases of Port construction,
sightings of any injured or dead marine
mammals must be reported to NMFS
immediately, regardless of whether or
not the injury or death was caused by
project activities. Sightings of injured or
dead marine mammals not associated
with project activities can be reported to
the USCG on VHF Channel 16 or to
NMFS Stranding and Entanglement
Hotline. In addition, if the injury or
death was caused by a project vessel
(e.g., SRV, support vessel, or
construction vessel), USCG must be
notified immediately, and a full report
must be provided to NMFS, Northeast
Regional Office. The report must
include the following information: (1)
the time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the incident; (2) the name
and type of vessel involved; (3) the
vessel’s speed during the incident; (4) a
description of the incident; (5) water
depth; (6) environmental conditions
(e.g., wind speed and direction, sea
state, cloud cover, and visibility); (7) the
species identification or description of
the animal; and (8) the fate of the
animal.
An annual report on marine mammal
monitoring and mitigation will be
submitted to NMFS Office of Protected
Resources and NMFS Northeast
Regional Office within 90 days after the
expiration of the IHA. The weekly
reports and the annual report should
include data collected for each distinct
marine mammal species observed in the
project area in the Massachusetts Bay
during the period of LNG facility
construction. Description of marine
mammal behavior, overall numbers of
individuals observed, frequency of
observation, and any behavioral changes
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9099
and the context of the changes relative
to construction activities shall also be
included in the annual report.
Additional information that will be
recorded during construction and
contained in the reports include: date
and time of marine mammal detections
(visually or acoustically), weather
conditions, species identification,
approximate distance from the source,
activity of the vessel or at the
construction site when a marine
mammal is sighted, and whether or not
thrusters were in use and how many at
the time of the sighting.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
On January 12, 2007, NMFS
concluded consultation with MARAD
and USCG under section 7 of the ESA
on the proposed construction and
operation of the Neptune LNG facility.
The finding of that consultation was
that the construction and operation of
the Neptune LNG terminal may
adversely affect, but is not likely to
jeopardize, the continued existence of
northern right, humpback, and fin
whales, and is not likely to adversely
affect sperm, sei, or blue whales and
Kemp’s ridley, loggerhead, green, or
leatherback sea turtles. Because the
issuance of an IHA to Neptune under
section 101(a)(5) of the MMPA is a
Federal action, NMFS has section 7
responsibilities for its action.
Consultation on the NMFS action will
be concluded prior to its determination
on the issuance of an IHA to Neptune.
National Environmental Policy Act
MARAD and the USCG released a
Final EIS/Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the proposed Neptune LNG
Deepwater Port. A notice of availability
was published by MARAD on November
2, 2006 (71 FR 64606). The Final EIS/
EIR provides detailed information on
the proposed project facilities,
construction methods, and analysis of
potential impacts on marine mammals.
The Final EIS/EIR is incorporated as
part of the MMPA record of decision on
this action.
NMFS was a cooperating agency in
the preparation of the EIS based on a
Memorandum of Understanding related
to the Licensing of Deepwater Ports
entered into by the U.S. Department of
Commerce along with 10 other
government agencies. NMFS is currently
reviewing the Final EIS and will either
adopt it or prepare its own NEPA
document before making a
determination on the issuance of an IHA
for the Neptune Project.
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
9100
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Notices
Preliminary Determinations
NMFS has preliminarily determined
that the impact of construction of the
Neptune Port Project may result, at
worst, in a temporary modification in
behavior of small numbers of certain
species of marine mammals that may be
in close proximity to the Neptune LNG
facility and associated pipeline during
its construction. These activities are
expected to result in some local shortterm displacement, resulting in no more
than a negligible impact on the affected
species or stocks of marine mammals.
The provision requiring that the activity
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the affected
species or stock for subsistence use does
not apply for this proposed action.
This preliminary determination is
supported by measures described earlier
in this document under ‘‘Marine
Mammal Mitigation, Monitoring, and
Reporting’’ and MARAD’s Record of
Decision (and NMFS’ Biological
Opinion on this action). As a result of
the described mitigation measures, no
take by injury or death is requested,
anticipated, or proposed to be
authorized, and the potential for
temporary or permanent hearing
impairment is very unlikely due to the
relatively low noise levels (and
consequently small zone of impact). The
likelihood of such effects would be
avoided through the incorporation of
the proposed shut-down mitigation
measures mentioned in this document.
While the number of marine mammals
that may be harassed will depend on the
distribution and abundance of marine
mammals in the vicinity of the Port
construction, the estimated number of
marine mammals to be harassed is
small.
Office of the Secretary
Proposed Authorization
As a result of these preliminary
determinations, NMFS proposes to issue
an IHA to Neptune for the taking (by
Level B harassment only) during
construction of the Neptune Port
provided the previously mentioned
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are incorporated.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Dated: February 12, 2008.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–3021 Filed 2–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Feb 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
[DoD–2008–OS–0008]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
Office of the Secretary, DoD.
Notice to reinstate two systems
of records.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of
Defense is reinstating and transferring
two systems of records notices, that
were inadvertently deleted, to its
existing inventory of record systems
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5
U.S.C. 552a), as amended.
DATES: This proposed action will be
effective without further notice on
March 20, 2008 unless comments are
received which result in a contrary
determination.
Send comments to the OSD
Privacy Act Coordinator, Records
Management Section, Washington
Headquarters Services, 1155 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–1155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cindy Allard at (703) 588–2386.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 11, 2008 (73 FR 7720) the DoD
published a system of records notice
which deleted two systems of records.
This notice is to reinstate and transfer
from the Defense Logistics Agency
(DLA) to Office of the Secretary of
Defense (OSD) inventory of system of
records.
The following two systems (DMDC 09
and DMDC 10) are reinstated and
transferred.
ADDRESSES:
Dated: February 12, 2008.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternative OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
DMDC 09
SYSTEM NAME:
The system includes cardholder
name, credit purchase card account
number, billing address, work telephone
number, and merchant data; approving
official name, account number, work
telephone number and addresses; and
account processing and management
information, including charge purchase
card transactions, purchase and credit
limitations, and card cancellation status
indictor.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
5 U.S.C. 301, Departmental
Regulations; 10 U.S.C. 136, Under
Secretary of Defense for Personnel and
Readiness; 10 U.S.C. 2358, Research and
Development Projects; and 10 U.S.C.
2784, Management of Credit Cards.
PURPOSE(S):
The purpose of the system of records
is to provide a single central file of
credit purchases within the Department
of Defense to assess historical purchase
card data.
For card recovery purposes, the
system is used to identify former card
holders who failed to properly turn in
cards. Data from the system is also
provided to the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service for reporting credit
purchase card transactions to
appropriate authorities. Statistical data
is used by management for planning,
evaluation, and program administration
purposes.
ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE
SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND
THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES:
In addition to those disclosures
generally permitted under 5 U.S.C.
552a(b) of the Privacy Act, these records
or information contained therein may
specifically be disclosed outside the
DoD as a routine use pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as follows:
The DoD ‘Blanket Routine Uses’ set
forth at the beginning of the OSD
compilation of systems of records
notices apply to this system.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Archival Purchase Card File
SYSTEM LOCATION:
Defense Manpower Data Center, DoD
Center Monterey Bay, 400 Gigling Road,
Seaside, CA 93955–6771.
STORAGE:
Electronic storage media.
RETRIEVABILITY:
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
All DoD military members and
civilian purchasing agents who have
been issued credit purchase cards and/
or granted approving authorization for
the procurement of supplies,
equipment, and services for official
business.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Retrieved by name or credit purchase
card account number.
SAFEGUARDS:
Access to personal information is
restricted to those who require access to
the records in the performance of their
official duties. Access to personal
information is further restricted by the
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9092-9100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-3021]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XA81
Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Construction and Operation of a
Liquefied Natural Gas Facility off Massachusetts
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; receipt
of application for letter of authorization; request for comments and
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS received an application from Neptune LNG, L.L.C.
(Neptune) for take of marine mammals, by Level B harassment, incidental
to construction and operation of an offshore liquefied natural gas
(LNG) facility in Massachusetts Bay. Under the Marine Mammal Protection
Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments on its proposal to issue an
incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to Neptune to incidentally
take, by
[[Page 9093]]
harassment, small numbers of several species of marine mammals for a
period of 1 year. NMFS is also requesting comments on its intent to
promulgate regulations in 2008, governing the take of marine mammals
over a 5-year period incidental to the same activities described
herein.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than March
20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the application should be addressed to:
P. Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation, and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225. The mailbox address
for providing email comments is PR1.XA81@noaa.gov. Comments sent via
email, including all attachments, must not exceed a 10-megabyte file
size. A copy of the application containing a list of references used in
this document may be obtained by writing to this address, by
telephoning the contact listed here (FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT)
or online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm.
Documents cited in this notice may be viewed, by appointment, during
regular business hours, at the aforementioned address.
The Maritime Administration (MARAD) and U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS) on the Neptune LNG
Deepwater Port License Application is available for viewing at https://
dms.dot.gov under the docket number 22611.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candace Nachman or Ken Hollingshead,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings may be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses, and that
the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such taking are set forth.
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA establishes an expedited process
by which citizens of the U.S. can apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment. Except
for certain categories of activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [``Level A harassment'']; or (ii) has the potential to disturb
a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[``Level B harassment''].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS
review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment
period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of
small numbers of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the
comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny the authorization.
Summary of Request
On December 27, 2007, NMFS received an application from Neptune
requesting an IHA to take small numbers of several species of marine
mammals, by Level B (behavioral) harassment, for a period of 1 year,
incidental to construction of an offshore LNG facility. Since
construction will not be completed before expiration of the IHA,
additional construction and operational activities will need to be
covered by a future MMPA authorization. Consequently, Neptune's
application also serves as a request for a 5-year rule governing the
issuance of letters of authorization for construction and operation of
the port facility. Neptune is requesting to take several species of
marine mammals, by Level B (behavioral) harassment, incidental to Port
operations. During Port operations, the use of thrusters during docking
will emit sounds that exceed the 120-dB threshold. More detailed
information regarding Port operations and related effects will be
described in NMFS' proposed rule Federal Register notice.
Description of the Project
On March 23, 2007, Neptune received a license to own, construct,
and operate a deepwater port (Port or Neptune Port) from MARAD. The
Port, which will be located in Massachusetts Bay, will consist of a
submerged buoy system to dock specifically designed LNG carriers
approximately 22 mi (35 km) northeast of Boston, Massachusetts, in
Federal waters approximately 260 ft (79 m) in depth. The two buoys will
be separated by a distance of approximately 2.1 mi (3.4 km).
Neptune will be capable of mooring LNG shuttle and regasification
vessels (SRVs) with a capacity of approximately 140,000 cubic meters
(m3). Up to two SRVs will temporarily moor at the proposed deepwater
port by means of a submerged unloading buoy system. Two separate buoys
will allow natural gas to be delivered in a continuous flow, without
interruption, by having a brief overlap between arriving and departing
SRVs. The annual average throughput capacity will be around 500 million
standard cubic feet per day (mmscfd) with an initial throughput of 400
mmscfd, and a peak capacity of approximately 750 mmscfd.
The SRVs will be equipped to store, transport, and vaporize LNG,
and to odorize, meter and send out natural gas by means of two 16-in
(40.6-cm) flexible risers and one 24-in (61-cm) subsea flowline. These
risers and flowline will lead to a proposed 24-in (61-cm) gas
transmission pipeline connecting the deepwater port to the existing 30-
in (76.2-cm) Algonquin Hubline\SM\ (Hubline\SM\) located approximately
9 mi (14.5 km) west of the proposed deepwater port location. The Port
will have an expected operating life of approximately 20 years. Figure
1-1 of Neptune's application shows an isometric view of the Port.
On February 15, 2005, Neptune submitted an application to the USCG
and MARAD under the Deepwater Port Act for all Federal authorizations
required for a license to own, construct, and operate a deepwater port
for the import and regasification of LNG off the coast of
Massachusetts. Because, as described later in this document, there is a
potential for marine mammals to be taken by harassment, incidental to
construction of the facility and its pipeline and by the transport and
regasification of LNG, Neptune has applied for a 1-year IHA and a
subsequent 5-year letter of authorization for activities commencing in
June 2008. The following sections
[[Page 9094]]
briefly describe the activities that might harass marine mammals.
Detailed information on these activities can be found in the MARAD/USCG
Final EIS on the Neptune Project (see ADDRESSES for availability).
Construction Activities
The offshore installation effort for Neptune will be accomplished
in the following sequence: mobilize an anchored lay barge (or a dynamic
positioning derrick barge) and support vessels (i.e., anchor handling
tugs, oceangoing tugs, and survey/diver support vessel) for the
Proposed Pipeline Route; install the flowline between the riser
mainfolds; install the new gas transmission pipeline from the northern
riser manifold to the transition manifold and the hot tap to the
HubLine\SM\; install the two riser manifolds and the transition
manifold; conduct pipeline hydrostatic testing; install the anchor
piles and the lower portion of the mooring lines; connect the mooring
lines to the unloading buoys and properly tension the mooring lines;
and connect the two risers and control umbilicals between the unloading
buoys and the riser manifolds. Construction will take place between
June 2008 and June 2009 over approximately seven months. No
construction activities will occur from December 2008 through April
2009. See Figure 1-2 of Neptune's application for a full construction
schedule.
Description of Construction Activities
Flowline and Manifolds
A pipelaying vessel will install the two rise manifolds and install
the flowline between the riser manifolds. The flowline will be a 24-in-
diameter (61-cm) line pipe with concrete weight coating and have a
length of approximately 2.5 mi (4 km). The flowline will be buried to
the top of the pipe. Trenching will begin approximately 300 ft (91.4
ft) from the southern riser manifold and end approximately 300 ft (91.4
ft) from the northern manifold to avoid damaging such structures.
Transition sections will use suction pumps, jetting machines, airlifts,
or submersible pumps as required. A post-trenching survey will be
performed to verify that the proper depth is achieved. Subsequent
trenching runs might be performed to further lower section that do not
meet burial depth requirements.
Gas Transmission Pipeline to the HubLine\SM\
The gas transmission pipeline would begin at the existing
Hubline\SM\ pipeline approximately 3 mi (4.8 km) east of Marblehead
Neck, Massachusetts. From this point, the pipeline would extend toward
the northeast crossing the territorial waters of the town of
Marblehead, the city of Salem, the city of Beverly, and the town of
Manchester-by-the-Sea for approximately 6.4 mi (10.3 km). The
transmission line route would continue to the southeast for
approximately 4.5 mi (7.2 km) crossing state and Federal waters. The
proposed location of the pipeline is shown in Figure 2-1 of Neptune's
application.
The transmission pipe (with concrete weight coating) will be
transported from the temporary shore base to the operating site. The
construction sequence for the transmission line will begin with plowing
of the pipeline trench. A pipelaying vessel will install the 24-in-
diameter (61-cm) pipeline (which will be buried 3 ft (0.9 m) to the top
of the pipe) from the northern riser manifold to the location of the
transition manifold near the connection point to the HubLine\SM\. A
site for the transition manifold will be dredged adjacent to the
HubLine\SM\, the manifold will be laid in place, and the tie-in
HubLine\SM\ to the will be completed. The gas transmission line will be
buried from the transition manifold to the northern riser manifold.
Trenching will begin approximately 300 ft (91.4 m) from the northern
riser manifold and end approximately 300 ft (91.4 m) from the
transition manifold to avoid damaging such structures. A post-trenching
survey will be performed to verify that the proper depth is achieved.
Subsequent trenching runs might be performed to further lower sections
that do not meet burial depth requirements.
Pipeline Hot Tap Installation
The hot tap fitting, which will not require welding, will provide
full structural reinforcement where the hole will be cut in the
HubLine\SM\. The tapping tool and actual hot tap procedure will be
supplied and supervised by a specialist from the manufacturer. Prior to
construction of the hot tap, divers will excavate the HubLine\SM\ tie-
in location using suction pumps. The concrete weight coating will be
removed from the HubLine\SM\ and inspected for suitability of the hot
tap. The hinged hot tap fitting will then be lowered and opened to fit
over the 30-in (76.2-cm) HubLine\SM\. The hot tap fitting will then be
closed around the pipeline, the clam studs and packing flanges will be
tightened, and the fitting leak will be tested. The HubLine\SM\ then
will be tapped, and the valves will be closed. The hot tap and exposed
sections of the HubLine\SM\ will be protected with concrete mats until
the tie-in to the transition manifold occurs.
Hydrostatic Pipeline Integrity Testing
There will be one combined gas transmission line and flowline
hydrotest, including flooding, cleaning, and gauging following pipelay,
trenching, and burial. The whole system will be in-line and piggable,
meaning that the pipeline can accept pigs, which are gauging/cleaning
devices that are driven by pressure from one end of the pipe segment to
the other without obstruction. The gas transmission line and flowline
will require approximately three million gallons of filtered seawater,
including complete flushing of the system and 676 gallons (2,559
liters) of fluorescent dye (TADCO Tracer Fluro Yellow XL500-50 Liquid
Dye or an approved equivalent). This volume assumes that no water will
bypass the pigs and will include approximately 1,700 gallons (6,435
liters) of water in front of the flooding pig and approximately 1,700
gallons (6,435 liters) of water between other pigs (reduced from two
hydrotests to one hydrotest). Flooding will take place from the
southern riser manifold to the HubLine\SM\ hot tap manifold. All
hydrotest water discharges will be in Federal waters, near the
unloading buoys. The total pipeline system will be swab-dried using a
pig train with slugs or glycol or similar fluid. The water content of
the successive slugs will be sampled to verify that the total pipeline
has been properly dried.
Anchor Installation
The prefabricated anchor piles will be installed offshore with a
dynamic positioning derrick/anchored barge, anchor-handling vessel, or
similar offshore construction equipment. The anchor points will be
within a radius of 1,600 to 3,600 ft (487.7 to 1,097.3 m) of the center
of each unloading buoy. The anchor system will be installed using
suction pile anchors.
Unloading Buoys
The unloading buoys will be offloaded near the designated site. An
anchor-handling vessel or small derrick barge will connect the mooring
lines from the anchor points to each unloading buoy and then adjust the
mooring line tensions to the desired levels.
Risers
The anchor-handling vessel or small derrick barge also will connect
the riser and the control umbilical between each unloading buoy and the
associated riser manifold, complete the hydrostatic
[[Page 9095]]
testing and dewatering of the risers, and test the control umbilicals.
Demobilization
Upon completion of the offshore construction effort, sidescan sonar
will be used to check the area. Divers will remove construction debris
from the ocean floor. All construction equipment will leave the site.
Construction Vessels
The derrick/lay barge, anchor-handling vessels, and survey/diver
support vessel will each make two trips (one round trip) to and from
the area of origin (likely the Gulf of Mexico) and will stay on station
for the majority of the construction period. The supply vessels (or
oceangoing tugs with cargo barges) and crew/survey vessel will make
regular trips between the construction sites and mainly the port of
Gloucester (approximately 8 mi (12.9 km)). During project installation,
the supply vessel will make approximately 102 trips (51 round trips),
and the crew/survey vessel will make approximately 720 trips (360 round
trips) for a combined total of 822 construction-support-related
transits (411 round trips).
All of the construction and support vessels will be transiting
Massachusetts Bay en route to the Port. While transiting to and from
the construction sites, the supply vessel and crew/survey vessel will
travel at approximately 10 knots (18.5 km/hr). While transiting to and
from the Gulf of Mexico, the derrick/lay barge and anchor handling
vessels will travel up to 12 and 14 knots (22.2 and 25.9 km/hr),
respectively, but will operate either in place or at very slow speeds
during construction. The survey/diver support vessel will travel at
speeds up to 10 knots (18.5 km/hr) transiting to and from the
construction area and between dive sites.
Materials, including unloading buoys, mooring lines, risers, and
control umbilicals, will be transported from the shore-based storage
area to the operating site on deck cargo barges pulled by oceangoing
tugs. Cargo barges will transport the concrete-coated line pipe and
manifolds to the operating site.
Approved construction procedures will be delivered to each
construction vessel, and a kick-off meeting to review construction
procedures, health and safety procedures, and environmental limitations
will be held with key personnel prior to starting each construction
activity.
Construction Sound
Underwater acoustic analyses were completed for activities related
to all aspects of Neptune construction. Activities considered to be
potential sound sources during construction include: installation
(plowing) of flowline and main transmission pipeline routes; lowering
of materials (pipe, anchors, and chains); and installation of the
suction pile anchors.
Construction-related activities for the Port and the pipeline will
generate sound exceeding the 120-dB threshold for continuous and
intermittent noise at the source. The loudest source of underwater
noise during construction of the Neptune Port will be the use of
thrusters for dynamic positioning.
Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
Marine mammal species that potentially occur within the Neptune
facility impact area include several species of cetaceans and
pinnipeds: North Atlantic right whale, blue whale, fin whale, sei
whale, minke whale, humpback whale, killer whale, long-finned pilot
whale, sperm whale, Atlantic white-beaked dolphin, Atlantic white-sided
dolphin, bottlenose dolphin, common dolphin, harbor porpoise, Risso's
dolphin, striped dolphin, gray seal, harbor seal, harp seal, and hooded
seal. Table 3-1 in the IHA application outlines the marine mammal
species that occur in Massachusetts Bay and the likelihood of
occurrence of each species. Information on those species that may be
impacted by this activity are discussed in detail in the MARAD/USCG
Final EIS on the Neptune LNG proposal. Please refer to that document
for more information on these species and potential impacts from
construction and operation of this LNG facility. In addition, general
information on these marine mammal species can also be found in the
NMFS Stock Assessment Reports (Waring et al., 2007), which is available
at: https://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/tm/tm201/.
In addition to the 16 species listed in Table 3-1 of Neptune's
application, Massachusetts Bay is considered an extralimital habitat
for ten other cetacean species, or their presence has only been
recorded from strandings (Cardoza et al., 1999). The following six
species of beaked whales are all pelagic and recorded mostly as
strandings the northern bottlenose whale (Hyperoodon ampullatus),
Cuvier's beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris), Sowerby's beaked whale
(Mesoplodon bidens), Blainville's beaked whale (M. densirostris),
Gervais' beaked whale (M. europaeus), and true's beaked whale (M.
mirus). Vagrants include the beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas), a
northern species with rare vagrants reported as far south as Long
Island (Katona et al., 1993); the pantropical spotted dolphin (Stenella
attenuata) and false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens), which are
primarily tropical species with rare sightings in Massachusetts waters
(Cardoza et al., 1999); and the pygmy sperm whale (Kogia breviceps),
which is generally an offshore species that occasionally wanders
inshore. These vagrant species are not considered further in the
analysis.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
The effects of sound on marine mammals are highly variable and can
be categorized as follows (based on Richardson et al., 1995): (1) The
sound may be too weak to be heard at the location of the animal (i.e.,
lower than the prevailing ambient noise level, the hearing threshold of
the animal at relevant frequencies, or both); (2) The sound may be
audible but not strong enough to elicit any overt behavioral response;
(3) The sound may elicit reactions of variable conspicuousness and
variable relevance to the well being of the marine mammal; these can
range from temporary alert responses to active avoidance reactions,
such as vacating an area at least until the sound ceases; (4) Upon
repeated exposure, a marine mammal may exhibit diminishing
responsiveness (habituation) or disturbance effects may persist; the
latter is most likely with sounds that are highly variable in
characteristics, infrequent, and unpredictable in occurrence, and
associated with situations that a marine mammal perceives as a threat;
(5) Any anthropogenic sound that is strong enough to be heard has the
potential to reduce (mask) the ability of a marine mammal to hear
natural sounds at similar frequencies, including calls from
conspecifics, and underwater environmental sounds such as surf noise;
(6) If mammals remain in an area because it is important for feeding,
breeding, or some other biologically important purpose even though
there is chronic exposure to sound, it is possible that there could be
sound-induced physiological stress; this might in turn have negative
effects on the well-being or reproduction of the animals involved; and
(7) Very strong sounds have the potential to cause temporary or
permanent reduction in hearing sensitivity. In terrestrial mammals, and
presumably marine mammals, received sound levels must far exceed the
animal's hearing threshold for there to be any temporary threshold
shift (TTS) in its hearing ability. For transient sounds, the sound
level necessary to
[[Page 9096]]
cause TTS is inversely related to the duration of the sound. Received
sound levels must be even higher for there to be risk of permanent
hearing impairment. In addition, intense acoustic (or explosive events)
may cause trauma to tissue associated with organs vital for hearing,
sound production, respiration, and other functions. This trauma may
include minor to severe hemorrhage.
Construction and operation of the Neptune Port will occur
consecutively, with no overlap in activities. During construction, the
project activities will occur over a 2-year period with sound from Port
and pipeline construction causing some possible disturbance to small
numbers of both baleen and toothed whales. Pinnipeds are unlikely to be
present during summer and will not be affected. The installation of the
suction piles will produce only low levels of sound during the
construction period and will not increase the numbers of animals
affected. Modeling results indicate that noise levels would be below 90
dB re 1 microPa within 0.2 mi (0.3 km) of the source.
During construction of the Port and pipeline, underwater sound
levels will be temporarily elevated. These elevated sound levels may
cause some species to temporarily disperse from or avoid construction
areas, but they are expected to return shortly after construction is
completed.
The likelihood of a vessel strike of a marine mammal during pipe
laying and trenching operations is low since equipment will be towed at
very slow speeds (approximately 5 ft (1.5 m) per minute). Any whales
foraging near the bottom would be able to avoid collision or
interaction with the equipment and displacement would be temporary for
the duration of the plow pass.
Estimates of Take by Harassment
There are three general types of sounds recognized by NMFS:
continuous, intermittent (or transient), and pulsive. Sounds of short
duration that are produced intermittently or at regular intervals, such
as sounds from pile driving, are classified as ``pulsed.'' Sounds
produced for extended periods, such as sound from generators, are
classified as ``continuous.'' Sounds from moving sources, such as
ships, can be continuous, but for an animal at a given location, these
sounds are ``transient'' (i.e., increasing in level as the ship
approaches and then diminishing as it moves away). Neither the
construction nor operation of the Port will cause pulsive sound
activities, including pile driving, seismic activities, or blasting.
The sound sources of potential concern are continuous and
intermittent sound sources, including underwater noise generated during
pipeline/flowline construction. Both continuous and intermittent noise
sources are subject to NMFS' 120 dB re 1 microPa threshold for
determining levels of continuous underwater noise that may result in
the disturbance of marine mammals.
Construction-related Underwater Sound Effects
Pipe-laying activities will generate continuous but
transient sound and will likely result in variable sound levels during
the construction period. Depending on water depth, the 120-dB contour
during pipe-laying activities will extend from the source (the Port) in
varying directions from 3.8 to 5.9 nm (7 to 10.9 km), encompassing an
area ranging from 37 to 47 nm\2\ for the flowline at the Port and will
extend from the pipeline route out 3.5 to 4.1 nm (6.5 to 7.6 km),
encompassing an area from 35 to 44 nm\2\ for the pipeline route.
Installation of the suction pile anchors at the Port will
produce only low levels of underwater sound with no levels above the
120-dB criterion for continuous sound. The 120-dB threshold would not
be exceeded, and the 90-dB contour would occur only out to 300-1,000 ft
(91.4-305 m) from the sound source. (See Appendix B of Neptune's
application for a more detailed description.)
The basis for Neptune's ``take'' estimate is the number of marine
mammals that potentially could be exposed to sound levels in excess of
120 dB. Typically, this is determined by applying the modeled zone of
influence (e.g., the area ensonified by the 120-dB contour) to the
seasonal use (density) of the area by marine mammals and correcting for
seasonal duration of sound-generating activities and estimated duration
of individual activities when the maximum sound-generating activities
are intermittent to occasional. Nearly all of the required information
is readily available in the MARAD/USCG Final EIS, with the exception of
marine mammal density estimates for the project area.
For the assessment of the biological noise effects of the Neptune
Port construction and operation, LGL Limited (LGL; 2005 and 2006)
evaluated the marine mammal density data available from the Cetacean
and Turtle Assessment Program (1982) and the U.S. Navy's (USN) Marine
Resources Assessment (MRA) for the Northeast Operating Areas (Dept. of
the Navy, 2005). The results and methodologies used by both surveys are
discussed in detail in Appendix B of Neptune's application.
Using the results from the USN (2005) geospatial analysis model,
LGL developed average density-indices for marine mammals known to occur
in the proposed project area. The LGL analysis assumed that the USN-
adopted method of converting linear density-indices into areal density
estimates was reasonable and assumed that the highest numbers of marine
mammals in the density-index ranges would be present during Port
construction and operations. Table 6-1 in the IHA application provides
estimated densities for Massachusetts Bay. LGL cautions that the linear
data identified by the USN in its MRA (2005) provide an index of
abundance based on all of the usable available data. To convert the
linear data into densities for the purpose of assessing the underwater
sound effects of the construction and operation of the Neptune Port, it
was assumed that the effective survey width was a 0.3-mi (0.5-km) strip
on each side of the survey vehicle. Thus, each linear kilometer of
survey would encompass an area of 1 km\2\. This is a gross
oversimplification of reality. For most whale species, individuals are
sighted well beyond the assumed distance of 0.3-mi (0.5 km) on each
side of the trackline. Thus, the adopted approach overestimates the
actual numbers of animals per square kilometer because the linear
estimates actually include animals beyond the 0.3-mi (0.5-km) strip
width. However, all surveys fail to detect a portion of the animals
that are actually present on the surface or underwater. Therefore, the
approach adopted here accounts for an unknown fraction of the missed
animals. Because these biases cannot be quantified, it is important to
treat the following numerical assessments as approximations.
For construction-related effects, Neptune is requesting take of
eight cetacean species. Table 6-1 in the IHA application and Table 1
here provide Neptune's estimate of the number of marine mammals that
could potentially be harassed during Port construction activities.
[[Page 9097]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requested Take
Levels for
Species Construction
Activities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
North Atlantic right whale 4
Humpback whale 5
Fin whale 3
Sei whale 3
Minke whale 1
Long-finned pilot whale 44
Atlantic white-sided dolphin\1\ 43
Harbor porpoise1 23
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1. Requested take levels for marine mammals in Massachusetts Bay
from construction of the Neptune Port
\1\ Dolphin distribution is generally patchy and with a few large pods
being present rather than an even distribution.
Based on weekly construction reports submitted to NMFS by another
LNG facility in Massachusetts Bay, the take levels requested by Neptune
seem a bit low. It is likely based on the observer data and further
analysis, the numbers that would be authorized in the final IHA may be
slightly higher than those in this notice of proposed IHA. NMFS
biologists will analyze area density, the area to be ensonified to 160
dB, and the number of days that construction activities will occur in
order to derive more accurate take numbers during the time of Port
construction. However, the numbers are expected to be small based on
population sizes.
Potential Impact on Habitat from Port Construction
Construction of the Neptune Port and pipeline will affect marine
mammal habitat in several ways: seafloor disturbance, increased
turbidity, and generation of additional underwater sound in the area.
Proposed construction activities will temporarily disturb 418 acres
(1.7 km\2\) of seafloor (11 acres (0.04 km\2\) at the Port, 85 acres
(0.3 km\2\) along the pipeline route, and an estimated 322 acres (1.3
km\2\) due to anchoring of construction and installation vessels). Of
the proposed construction activities, pipeline installation, including
trenching, plowing, jetting, and backfill, is expected to generate the
most disturbance of bottom sediments. Sediment transport modeling
conducted by Neptune indicates that initial turbidity from pipeline
installation could reach 100 milligrams per liter (mg/L) but will
subside to 20 mg/L after 4 hours. Turbidity associated with the
flowline and hot-tap will be considerably less and also will settle
within hours of the work being completed. Resettled sediments also will
constitute to seafloor disturbance. When re-suspended sediments
resettle, they reduce growth, reproduction, and survival rates of
benthic organisms, and in extreme cases, smother benthic flora and
fauna. Plankton will not be affected by resettled sediment. The project
area is largely devoid of vegetation and consists of sand, silt, clay,
or mixtures of the three.
Recovery of soft-bottom benthic communities impacted by project
installation is expected to be similar to the recovery of the soft
habitat associated with the construction of the HubLine\SM\ (Algonquin
Gas Transmission L.L.C., 2004). Post-construction monitoring of the
HubLine\SM\ indicates that areas that were bucket-dredged showed the
least disturbance. Displaced organisms will return shortly after
construction ceases, and disrupted communities will easily re-colonize
from surrounding communities of similar organisms. Similarly,
disturbance to hard-bottom pebble/cobble and piled boulder habitat is
not expected to be significant. Some organisms could be temporarily
displaced from existing shelter, thereby exposing them to increased
predation, but the overall structural integrity of these areas will not
be reduced (Auster and Langton, 1998).
Short-term impacts on phytoplankton, zooplankton (holoplankton),
and planktonic fish and shellfish eggs and larvae (meroplankton) will
occur as a result of the project. Turbidity associated with Port and
pipeline installation will result in temporary direct impacts on
productivity, growth, and development. Phytoplankton and zooplankton
abundance will be greatest during the summer construction schedule.
Fish eggs and larvae are present in the project area throughout the
year. Different species of fish and invertebrate eggs and larvae will
be affected by the different construction schedules.
The temporary disturbance of benthic habitat from trenching for and
burial of the transmission pipeline will result in direct, minor,
adverse impacts from the dispersion of fish from the area and the
burying or crushing of shellfish. In the short-term, there will be a
temporary, indirect, and beneficial impact from exposing benthic food
sources. Seafloor disturbance could also occur as a result of
resettling of suspended sediments during installation and construction
of the proposed Port and pipeline. Redeposited sediments will
potentially reduce viability of demersal fish eggs and growth,
reproduction, and survival rates of benthic shellfish. In extreme
cases, resettled sediments could smother benthic shellfish, although
many will be able to burrow vertically through resettled sediments.
Construction activities will not create long-term habitat changes,
and marine mammals displaced by the disturbance to the seafloor are
expected to return soon after construction ceases. Marine mammals also
could be indirectly affected if benthic prey species were displaced or
destroyed by construction activities. Affected species are expected to
recover soon after construction ceases and will represent only a small
portion of food available to marine mammals in the area.
Marine Mammal Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting
Port Construction Minimization Measures
General
Construction activities will be limited to a May through November
time frame so that acoustic disturbance to the endangered North
Atlantic right whale can largely be avoided.
Proposed Visual Monitoring Program
The Neptune Project will employ two marine mammal observers (MMOs)
on each lay barge, bury barge, and diving support vessel for visual
shipboard surveys during construction activities. Qualifications for
these individuals will include direct field experience on a marine
mammal/sea turtle observation vessel and/or aerial surveys in the
Atlantic Ocean/Gulf of Mexico. The observers (one primary, one
secondary) are responsible for visually locating marine mammals at the
ocean's surface, and, to the extent possible, identifying the species.
The primary observer will act as the identification specialist, and the
secondary observer will serve as data recorder and also assist with
identification. Both observers will have responsibility for monitoring
for the presence of marine mammals. All observers will receive NMFS-
approved MMO training and be approved in advance by NMFS after review
of their resumes.
The MMOs will be on duty at all times when each vessel is moving
and at selected periods when the vessel is idle, including when other
vessels move around the construction lay barge. The MMOs will monitor
the construction area beginning at daybreak using 25x power binoculars
and/or hand-held binoculars, resulting in a conservative effective
search range of 0.5 mi (0.8 km) during clear weather conditions for the
shipboard observers. The MMO will scan the ocean surface by eye for a
minimum of 40 minutes every hour. All sightings will be recorded in
marine
[[Page 9098]]
mammal field sighting logs. Observations of marine mammals will be
identified to species or the lowest taxanomic level and their relative
position will be recorded. Night vision devices will be standard
equipment for monitoring during low-light hours and at night.
During all phases of construction, MMOs will be required to scan
for and report all marine mammal sightings to the vessel captain. The
captain will then alert the environmental coordinator that a marine
mammal is near the construction area. The MMO will have the authority
to bring the vessel to idle or to temporarily suspend operations if a
baleen whale is seen within 0.6 mi (1 km) of the moving pipelay vessel
or construction area. The MMO or environmental coordinator will
determine whether there is a potential for harm to an individual animal
and will be charged with responsibility for determining when it is safe
to resume activity. A vessel will not increase power again until the
marine mammal(s) leave(s) the area or has/have not been sighted for 30
minutes. The vessel will then power up slowly.
Construction and support vessels will be required to display lights
when operating at night, and deck lights will be required to illuminate
work areas. However, use of lights will be limited to areas where work
is actually occurring, and all other lights will be extinguished.
Lights will be downshielded to illuminate the deck and will not
intentionally illuminate surrounding waters, so as not to attract
whales or their prey to the area.
Distance and Noise Level for Cut-Off
(1) During construction, if a marine mammal is detected within 0.5
mi (0.8 km) of a construction vessel, the vessel superintendent or on-
deck supervisor will be notified immediately. The vessel's crew will be
put on a heightened state of alert. The marine mammal will be monitored
constantly to determine if it is moving toward the construction area.
The observer is required to report all North Atlantic right whale
sightings to NMFS, as soon as possible.
(2) Construction vessels will cease any movement in the
construction area if a marine mammal other than a right whale is
sighted within or approaching to a distance of 100 yd (91 m) from the
operating construction vessel. Construction vessels will cease any
movement in the construction area if a right whale is sighted within or
approaching to a distance of 500 yd (457 m) from the operating
construction vessel. Vessels transiting the construction area such as
pipe haul barge tugs will also be required to maintain these separation
distances. Activities will cease within these safety radii in order to
avoid injury or mortality of any marine mammal.
(3) Construction vessels will cease all activities that emit sounds
reaching a received level of 120 dB re 1 microPa or higher at 100 yd
(91 m) if a marine mammal other than a right whale is sighted within or
approaching to this distance, or if a right whale is sighted within or
approaching to a distance of 500 yd (457 m), from the operating
construction vessel. The back-calculated source level, based on the
most conservative cylindrical model of acoustic energy spreading, is
estimated to be 139 dB re 1 microPa. Activities will cease within these
safety radii in order to avoid injury or mortality of any marine
mammal.
(4) Construction may resume after the marine mammal is positively
reconfirmed outside the established zones (either 500 yd (457 m) or 100
yd (91 m), depending upon species).
Vessel Strike Avoidance
(1) While under way, all construction vessels will remain 0.6 mi (1
km) away from right whales and all other whales to the extent possible
and 100 yd (91 m) away from all other marine mammals to the extent
physically feasible given navigational constraints as required by NMFS.
(2) MMOs will direct a moving vessel to slow to idle if a baleen
whale is seen within 0.6 mi (1 km) of the vessel.
(3) All construction vessels 300 gross tons or greater will
maintain a speed of 10 knots (18.5 km/hr) or less. Vessels less than
300 gross tons carrying supplies or crew between the shore and the
construction site must contact the appropriate authority or the
construction site before leaving shore for reports of recent right
whale sighting and, consistent with navigation safety, restrict speeds
to 10 knots (18.5 km/hr) or less within 5 mi (8 km) of any recent
sighting location.
(4) Vessels transiting through the Cape Cod Canal and Cape Cod Bay
(CCB) between January 1 and May 15 will reduce speeds to 10 knots (18.5
km/hr) or less, follow the recommended routes charted by NOAA to reduce
interactions between right whales and shipping traffic, and avoid
aggregations of right whales in the eastern portion of CCB. To the
extent practicable, pipe deliveries will be avoided during the January
to May time frame. In the unlikely event the Canal is closed during
construction, the pipe haul barges will transit around Cape Cod
following the Boston Traffic Separation Scheme and all measures for the
SRVs when transiting to the Port (see Appendix D of Neptune's
application for Port Operation Minimization Measures).
(5) Construction and support vessels will transit at 10 knots or
less in the following seasons and areas:
Southeast U.S. Seasonal Management Area (SMA) from
November 15 through April 15, which is bounded by the shoreline,
31[deg] 27' N. (i.e., the northern edge of the Mandatory Ship Reporting
System (MSRS) boundary) to the north, 29[deg] 45' N. to the south, and
80[deg] 51.6' W. (i.e., the eastern edge of the MSRS boundary);
Mid-Atlantic SMAs from November 1 through April 30, which
encompass the waters within a 30 nm (55.6 km) area with an epicenter at
the midpoint of the COLREG demarcation line crossing the entry into the
following designated ports or bays: (a) Ports of New York/New Jersey;
(b) Delaware Bay (Ports of Philadelphia and Wilmington); (c) Entrance
to the Chesapeake Bay (Ports of Hampton Roads and Baltimore) (d) Ports
of Morehead City and Beaufort, North Carolina; (e) Port of Wilmington,
North Carolina; (f) Port of Georgetown, South Carolina; (g) Port of
Charleston, South Carolina; and (h) Port of Savannah, Georgia;
CCB SMA from January 1 through May 15, which includes all
waters in CCB, extending to all shorelines of the Bay, with a northern
boundary of 42[deg] 12' N.;
Off Race Point SMA year round, which is bounded by
straight lines connecting the following coordinates in the order
stated:
42[deg] 30' N. 70[deg] 30' W.
42[deg] 30' N. 69[deg] 45' W.
41[deg] 40' N. 69[deg] 45' W.
41[deg] 40' N. 69[deg] 57' W.
42[deg] 04.8' N. 70[deg] 10' W.
42[deg] 12' N. 70[deg] 15' W.
42[deg] 12' N. 70[deg] 30' W.
42[deg] 30' N. 70[deg] 30' W.; and
Great South Channel SMA from April 1 through July 31,
which is bounded by straight lines connecting the following coordinates
in the order stated:
42[deg] 30' N. 69[deg] 45' W.
42[deg] 30' N. 67[deg] 27' W.
42[deg] 09' N. 67[deg] 08.4' W.
41[deg] 00' N. 69[deg] 05' W.
41[deg] 40' N. 69[deg] 45' W.
42[deg] 30' N. 69[deg] 45' W.
Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) Program
In addition to visual monitoring, Neptune will utilize a PAM system
to
[[Page 9099]]
aid in the monitoring and detection of vocalizing marine mammals in the
proposed project area. Neptune has engaged personnel from NMFS and the
Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary (SBNMS) regarding available
passive acoustic technology that could be used to enhance the PAM
program.
The proposed PAM system will be capable of detecting, localizing
(range and bearing), and classifying marine mammals in real-time. When
combined with an action and communication plan, Neptune will have the
capability to make timely decisions and undertake steps to minimize the
potential for collisions between marine mammals and construction
vessels. The PAM system proposed for the Neptune project will involve
the installation of an array of auto-detection monitoring buoys moored
at regular intervals in a circle surrounding the site of the terminal
and associated pipeline construction. Buoys will be arranged to
maximize auto detection and provide localization capability. With the
existing technology, this would require six buoys moored every 5 nm
(9.3 km) to provide some overlap in coverage. The buoys are designed to
monitor the sound output from construction activities to ensure
predicted levels are not exceeded and to detect the presence of vocally
active marine mammals. Passive acoustic devices will be actively
monitored for detections by a NMFS-approved bioacoustic technician.
Other Measures
Mesh grates will be used during flooding and hydrostatic testing of
the pipeline and flowlines to minimize impingement and entrainment of
marine mammals. Operations involving excessively noisy equipment will
``ramp-up'' sound sources, as long as this does not jeopardize the
safety of vessels or construction workers, allowing whales a chance to
leave the area before sounds reach maximum levels. Contractors will be
required to utilize vessel-quieting technologies that minimize sound.
Contractors will be required to maintain individual Spill Prevention,
Control, and Containment Plans in place for construction vessels during
construction.
An environmental coordinator with experience coordinating projects
to monitor and minimize impacts to marine mammals will be onsite to
coordinate all issues concerning marine protected species, following
all of the latest real-time marine mammal movements. The coordinator
will work to ensure that environmental standards are adhered to and
adverse interactions between project equipment and marine mammals do
not occur.
Reporting
During construction, weekly status reports will be provided to NMFS
utilizing standardized reporting forms. In addition, the Neptune Port
Project area is within the MSRA, so all construction and support
vessels will report their activities to the mandatory reporting section
of the USCG to remain apprised of North Atlantic right whale movements
within the area. All vessels entering and exiting the MSRA will report
their activities to WHALESNORTH. During all phases of project
construction, sightings of any injured or dead marine mammals will be
reported immediately to the USCG and NMFS, regardless of whether the
injury or death is caused by project activities. Any right whale
sightings will be reported to the NMFS Sighting Advisory System.
During all phases of Port construction, sightings of any injured or
dead marine mammals must be reported to NMFS immediately, regardless of
whether or not the injury or death was caused by project activities.
Sightings of injured or dead marine mammals not associated with project
activities can be reported to the USCG on VHF Channel 16 or to NMFS
Stranding and Entanglement Hotline. In addition, if the injury or death
was caused by a project vessel (e.g., SRV, support vessel, or
construction vessel), USCG must be notified immediately, and a full
report must be provided to NMFS, Northeast Regional Office. The report
must include the following information: (1) the time, date, and
location (latitude/longitude) of the incident; (2) the name and type of
vessel involved; (3) the vessel's speed during the incident; (4) a
description of the incident; (5) water depth; (6) environmental
conditions (e.g., wind speed and direction, sea state, cloud cover, and
visibility); (7) the species identification or description of the
animal; and (8) the fate of the animal.
An annual report on marine mammal monitoring and mitigation will be
submitted to NMFS Office of Protected Resources and NMFS Northeast
Regional Office within 90 days after the expiration of the IHA. The
weekly reports and the annual report should include data collected for
each distinct marine mammal species observed in the project area in the
Massachusetts Bay during the period of LNG facility construction.
Description of marine mammal behavior, overall numbers of individuals
observed, frequency of observation, and any behavioral changes and the
context of the changes relative to construction activities shall also
be included in the annual report. Additional information that will be
recorded during construction and contained in the reports include: date
and time of marine mammal detections (visually or acoustically),
weather conditions, species identification, approximate distance from
the source, activity of the vessel or at the construction site when a
marine mammal is sighted, and whether or not thrusters were in use and
how many at the time of the sighting.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
On January 12, 2007, NMFS concluded consultation with MARAD and
USCG under section 7 of the ESA on the proposed construction and
operation of the Neptune LNG facility. The finding of that consultation
was that the construction and operation of the Neptune LNG terminal may
adversely affect, but is not likely to jeopardize, the continued
existence of northern right, humpback, and fin whales, and is not
likely to adversely affect sperm, sei, or blue whales and Kemp's
ridley, loggerhead, green, or leatherback sea turtles. Because the
issuance of an IHA to Neptune under section 101(a)(5) of the MMPA is a
Federal action, NMFS has section 7 responsibilities for its action.
Consultation on the NMFS action will be concluded prior to its
determination on the issuance of an IHA to Neptune.
National Environmental Policy Act
MARAD and the USCG released a Final EIS/Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the proposed Neptune LNG Deepwater Port. A notice of
availability was published by MARAD on November 2, 2006 (71 FR 64606).
The Final EIS/EIR provides detailed information on the proposed project
facilities, construction methods, and analysis of potential impacts on
marine mammals. The Final EIS/EIR is incorporated as part of the MMPA
record of decision on this action.
NMFS was a cooperating agency in the preparation of the EIS based
on a Memorandum of Understanding related to the Licensing of Deepwater
Ports entered into by the U.S. Department of Commerce along with 10
other government agencies. NMFS is currently reviewing the Final EIS
and will either adopt it or prepare its own NEPA document before making
a determination on the issuance of an IHA for the Neptune Project.
[[Page 9100]]
Preliminary Determinations
NMFS has preliminarily determined that the impact of construction
of the Neptune Port Project may result, at worst, in a temporary
modification in behavior of small numbers of certain species of marine
mammals that may be in close proximity to the Neptune LNG facility and
associated pipeline during its construction. These activities are
expected to result in some local short-term displacement, resulting in
no more than a negligible impact on the affected species or stocks of
marine mammals. The provision requiring that the activity not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the affected species
or stock for subsistence use does not apply for this proposed action.
This preliminary determination is supported by measures described
earlier in this document under ``Marine Mammal Mitigation, Monitoring,
and Reporting'' and MARAD's Record of Decision (and NMFS' Biological
Opinion on this action). As a result of the described mitigation
measures, no take by injury or death is requested, anticipated, or
proposed to be authorized, and the potential for temporary or permanent
hearing impairment is very unlikely due to the relatively low noise
levels (and consequently small zone of impact). The likelihood of such
effects would be avoided through the incorporation of the proposed
shut-down mitigation measures mentioned in this document. While the
number of marine mammals that may be harassed will depend on the
distribution and abundance of marine mammals in the vicinity of the
Port construction, the estimated number of marine mammals to be
harassed is small.
Proposed Authorization
As a result of these preliminary determinations, NMFS proposes to
issue an IHA to Neptune for the taking (by Level B harassment only)
during construction of the Neptune Port provided the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements are
incorporated.
Dated: February 12, 2008.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-3021 Filed 2-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S