Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program, 8838-8843 [E8-2895]
Download as PDF
8838
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
For additional information, see the
direct final rule which is located in the
Rules section of this Federal Register.
Dated: February 1, 2008.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
[FR Doc. E8–2746 Filed 2–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 680
[Docket No. 070718364–7908–02]
RIN 0648–AV19
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization
Program
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations
implementing Amendment 25 to the
Fishery Management Plan for Bering
Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner
Crabs (FMP) and a provision of the
Coast Guard and Maritime
Transportation Act of 2006 (Coast Guard
Act). These proposed regulations would
amend the Crab Rationalization
Program. Amendment 25 to the FMP
satisfies the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management
Reauthorization Act of 2006
requirement for the Secretary of
Commerce to amend the FMP to
authorize conversion of catcher vessel
owner quota shares and processor quota
shares to newly created converted
catcher processor owner quota shares.
The Secretary approved Amendment 25
on April 12, 2007. The Coast Guard Act
mandates the Secretary to issue
processing quota share to Blue Dutch,
LLC, under specific conditions. This
proposed action is necessary to
implement Amendment 25 and the
Coast Guard Act. This action is intended
to promote the goals and objectives of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Feb 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
Coast Guard Act, the FMP, and other
applicable law.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than March 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit
comments, identified by ‘‘RIN 0648–
AV19’’, by any one of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal website at
https://www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Fax: (907) 586–7557.
• Hand delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All Personal Identifying
Information (e.g., name, address)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
portable document file (pdf) formats
only.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this rule may
be submitted to NMFS at the above
address, and by email to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to
202–395–7285.
Copies of Amendment 25 and the
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) for this
action may be obtained from the NMFS
Alaska Region at the address above or
from the Alaska Region website at
https://www.fakr.noaa.gov/
sustainablefisheries.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Glenn Merrill, 907–586–7228,
glenn.merrill@noaa.gov or Gretchen
Harrington, 907–586–7228,
gretchen.harrington@noaa.gov.
The king
and Tanner crab fisheries in the
exclusive economic zone of the Bering
Sea/Aleutian Islands are managed under
the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the
North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) under the Magnuson-
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act as amended by the
Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2004 (Public Law 108–199, section 801).
Amendments 18 and 19 to the FMP
amended the FMP to include the Crab
Rationalization Program. A final rule
implementing these amendments was
published on March 2, 2005 (70 FR
10174).
Crab Rationalization Program
(Program)
To implement the Program in 2005,
NMFS initially issued processing quota
shares (PQS), catcher vessel owner
quota share (CVO QS), and catcher
processor owner quota share (CPO QS)
to eligible applicants. NMFS issued PQS
and QS for nine crab fisheries in the
BSAI. In 2006, NMFS initially issued
Bristol Bay red king crab (Paralithodes
camtschaticus) and snow crab
(Chionoecetes opilio) PQS to the Blue
Dutch, LLC, under the requirements of
section 417 of the Coast Guard Act.
CVO QS represents an exclusive but
revocable privilege that authorizes the
holder to receive an annual allocation to
harvest a specific percentage of the total
allowable catch (TAC) from a fishery.
The annual allocations of TACs, in
pounds, are referred to as individual
fishing quotas (IFQs).
PQS represents an exclusive but
revocable privilege to receive deliveries
of a specific portion of the annual TAC
from a fishery. An annual allocation of
PQS is referred to as individual
processing quota (IPQ) and expressed in
pounds of crab. Harvesters holding CVO
IFQ must deliver a portion of their IFQ
to processors with a like amount of IPQ
available.
For most crab fisheries, CVO QS and
PQS is designated for specific
geographic regions. Crab harvested with
regionally designated CVO QS is
required to be delivered to a processor
in the designated region. Likewise, a
processor with regionally designated
PQS is required to accept delivery of
and process crab in the designated
region. Two regional designations were
created for the snow crab and Bristol
Bay red king crab fisheries. The North
Region consists of all areas in the Bering
Sea north of 56°20′ N. latitude. The
South Region is all other areas. The
regional designation of CVO QS and
PQS preserves the historic geographic
distribution of landings in the fisheries.
CPO QS represents an exclusive but
revocable privilege to harvest a
percentage of the TAC and process that
crab onboard. Under the Program, CPO
QS does not have regional designations
and is not required to be delivered to a
processor holding available IFQ.
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Coast Guard Act
On July 11, 2006, the President signed
the Coast Guard Act which contained in
section 417 a provision mandating the
Secretary of Commerce to issue PQS for
the Bristol Bay red king crab and the
Bering Sea snow crab fisheries to Blue
Dutch, LLC, under two specific
conditions.
First, NMFS must issue Blue Dutch
PQS equal to 0.75 percent of the total
number of PQS units. NMFS issued an
initial administrative determination on
July 31, 2006, to issue Blue Dutch
3,015,229 units of Bristol Bay red king
crab PQS and 7,516,253 units of snow
crab PQS. NMFS assigned a regional
designation to the PQS units issued to
Blue Dutch according to the procedures
established in the regulations at 50 CFR
680.40(b)(2)(iv).
Second, NMFS must issue IPQ for that
PQS whenever the TAC for that fishery
is more than 2 percent higher than the
most recent TAC in effect for that
fishery prior to September 15, 2005. The
TAC used for this calculation is the total
TAC, which includes the CDQ
allocation. Accordingly, NMFS
determined that it will issue Bristol Bay
red king crab IPQ to Blue Dutch when
the TAC for that fishery is greater than
15,732,480 lb (7,136.1 mt). NMFS will
issue snow crab IPQ to Blue Dutch
when the TAC for that fishery is greater
than 21,350,640 lb (9,684.5 mt). This
proposed rule is necessary to specify in
regulations the statutory thresholds for
annually issuing IPQ to Blue Dutch to
ensure the regulations implementing the
Program conform to the Coast Guard
Act. The proposed rule prohibits the
transfer of the PQS units issued under
the Coast Guard Act because the Act
explicitly requires NMFS to issue the
PQS to Blue Dutch.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Amendment 25
On January 12, 2007, the President
signed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management
Reauthorization Act of 2006 (MSRA,
Public Law 109–479), which added a
new requirement in section 122(a) for
the Secretary of Commerce, not later
than 90 days after the date of enactment
of that act, to amend the FMP to modify
the Program to authorize conversion of
North CVO QS and North PQS to newly
created converted CPO QS.
Amendment 25 to the FMP complies
with the MSRA by amending the FMP
to authorize an eligible entity and its
commonly owned affiliates to combine
North PQS and North CVO QS and
exchange these shares for newly created
converted CPO QS. While the MSRA
does not specifically define which
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Feb 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
fisheries are subject to this provision,
converted CPO QS would be created for
only the snow crab and Bristol Bay red
king crab fisheries, because these were
the only fisheries for which the eligible
entities were initially issued North PQS
and North CVO QS, as specified in the
MSRA.
NMFS published the notice of
availability for Amendment 25 on
February 5, 2007 (72 FR 5255), with a
public comment period that closed on
April 6, 2007. NMFS received one
public comment on Amendment 25. The
commenter opposed Amendment 25
because she is quite concerned about
the legislation. The Secretary of
Commerce approved Amendment 25 on
April 12, 2007. This proposed rule is
necessary to implement Amendment 25.
This proposed rule would authorize
two types of quota share conversions
and define the entities eligible to make
those conversions.
First, an eligible entity holding PQS,
along with its commonly owned
affiliates, could combine its North CVO
QS for Bristol Bay red king crab or snow
crab with its North PQS for that fishery
and exchange these shares for converted
CPO QS on an annual basis. Entities
could do this under the following two
conditions: (1) if NMFS initially issued
the entity both CPO QS and PQS under
the Program, and that PQS, in
combination with the PQS of its
commonly owned affiliates, is less than
7 percent of the total PQS pool for that
year; or (2) if NMFS initially issued the
entity CPO QS under the Program and
PQS under the Coast Guard Act. An
eligible entity would be limited to
converting only the PQS that it, along
with its commonly owned affiliates, was
initially issued by NMFS.
Second, an eligible entity holding
CVO QS, along with its commonly
owned affiliates, could combine its
North PQS for Bristol Bay red king crab
or snow crab with its North CVO QS for
that fishery and exchange these shares
for converted CPO QS on an annual
basis. The only entity that could do this
would be an entity to which NMFS
initially issued CPO QS and PQS under
the Program, and that PQS, in
combination with the PQS of its
commonly owned affiliates, is more
than 7 percent of the total PQS pool for
that year. This eligible entity would be
limited to converting only the CVO QS
that it, along with its commonly owned
affiliates, was initially issued by NMFS.
According to the NMFS Official
Record, three individual entities are
eligible for these new provisions.
Yardarm Knot, Inc., and Blue Dutch,
LLC, would be eligible for the first type
of conversion. Trident Seafoods, Inc.,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8839
would be eligible for the second type of
conversion. These entities would elect
on an annual basis whether to receive
converted CPO QS and the amount of
North CVO QS and North PQS they
wish to convert by completing the
annual application for converted CPO
QS/IFQ permit and submitting that
application along with the annual
application for crab IFQ/IPQ permit by
August 1 for that crab fishing year.
Entities applying for a converted CPO
QS permit and resulting CPO IFQ would
be required to provide information on
any person who is affiliated, as the term
‘‘affiliation’’ is defined at § 680.2, to that
entity and indicate the amount of PQS
and CVO QS in either the BBR or BSS
crab QS fishery with a north region
designation for issuance as converted
CPO QS.
The proposed rule specifies a number
of provisions for converted QS/IFQ to
conform with the MSRA and the
Program’s implementing regulations.
Converted CPO QS and the resulting
CPO IFQ would not be transferable. This
restriction on transfers is consistent
with the MSRA eligibility standards that
only entities that meet the specific
requirements of the Act are eligible to
receive converted CPO QS. However,
CPO IFQ derived from converted CPO
QS may be issued to a cooperative.
The proposed rule specifies that (1)
eligible entities would receive one unit
of North CPO QS in exchange for one
unit of North CVO QS and 0.9 units of
North PQS and (2) the amount of IFQ
derived from the converted CPO QS
issued to each entity could not exceed
one million pounds per fishery during
any calendar year.
Additionally, the proposed rule
would implement the area of validity in
section 122(a)(4) of the MSRA by
requiring that any crab harvested under
a CPO IFQ permit derived from
converted CPO QS must be offloaded in
the North Region, defined in the
Program as the Bering Sea subarea north
of 56°20′ N. latitude.
Converting PQS and CVO QS to
converted CPO QS would allow entities
to harvest and process crab onboard a
catcher processor. Conversion could
reduce each eligible entity’s operating
costs associated with purchasing crab,
processing crab on land or in a
stationary floater processor, and
complying with the Program’s
arbitration system. NMFS can not
predict the annual amount of converted
CPO QS that would be annually issued
because the participants would annually
elect to exercise this provision and need
not request conversion of all CVO QS
and PQS held.
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
8840
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Sections 122(b) and (c) of the MSRA
include additional requirements for fees
and off-loading for converted CPO QS;
however, the statute does not require
the Secretary of Commerce to
implement these requirements and
therefore they are not part of
Amendment 25 and will not be
implemented by Federal rulemaking.
The MSRA requires the holder of
converted CPO QS to pay a fee of five
percent of the ex-vessel value of the crab
harvested with those shares to any local
governmental entities in the North
Region, if the PQS used to produce the
converted CPO QS was originally
derived from the processing activities
that occurred in a community under the
jurisdiction of those local governmental
entities. The State of Alaska may collect
from the holder of the converted CPO
QS a fee of one percent of the ex-vessel
value of the crab harvested with those
shares. Additionally, crab harvested
with converted CPO QS shall be offloaded in those communities receiving
the local governmental entities fee
revenue.
Section 122(d) of the MSRA also
provides that, as part of its periodic
review of the Program, the North Pacific
Fishery Management Council may
review the effects on communities in
the North Region of allowing the
conversion to CPO QS. Under this
section, if the Council determines that
Amendment 25 adversely affects the
communities, the Council may
recommend to the Secretary of
Commerce, and the Secretary may
approve, changes to the Program
necessary to mitigate those adverse
effects.
Section 122(e) of the MSRA requires
an additional FMP amendment and rule
making to modify the use caps for
processing North Region snow crab.
Under this section, custom processing
arrangements do not count against any
use cap for the processing of snow crab
in the North Region by a shore-based
crab processor. NMFS issued an
enforcement policy on January 19, 2007,
that provides guidance to the industry
on NMFS’ enforcement and
interpretation of this section, which is
effective until superseded by future
rulemaking. At its December meeting,
the Council adopted Amendment 27 to
the FMP that would implement this
MSRA provision. NMFS intends to
publish a proposed rule for Amendment
27 in the spring of 2008.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA, has determined that
this proposed rule is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Feb 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
Conservation and Management Act and
other applicable laws.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An Environmental Impact Statement/
Regulatory Impact Review/Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis/Social
Impact Assessment was prepared for the
Program that describes the management
background, the purpose and need for
the Program, the management
alternatives, and the environmental,
social, and economic impacts (see
ADDRESSES). With this proposed rule,
NMFS is continuing to implement the
Program.
Department of Commerce Chief
Counsel for Regulations has certified to
the Small Business Administration,
under Section 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. NMFS finds that the proposed
action is not likely to have the potential
to have a significant economic impact
on any small entities participating in
these fisheries because no small entities
will be directly regulated by this action.
Section 122(a) of the MSRA defines
the entities eligible to elect to exercise
this provision. According to the NMFS
Official Record, three individual entities
are eligible under the MSRA for these
new provisions; Yardarm Knot, Inc.,
Blue Dutch, LLC, and Trident Seafoods
Corporation. These three entities do not
qualify as small entities according to the
Small Business Administration criteria.
The Small Business Administration
has established size criteria for all major
industry sectors in the United States,
including fish harvesting and fish
processing businesses. A business
involved in fish harvesting is a small
business if it is independently owned
and operated and not dominant in its
field of operation (including its
affiliates) and if it has combined annual
receipts not in excess of $4 million for
all its affiliated operations worldwide. A
seafood processor is a small business if
it is independently owned and operated,
not dominant in its field of operation,
and employs 500 or fewer persons on a
full-time, part-time, temporary, or other
basis, at all its affiliated operations
worldwide. A business involved in both
the harvesting and processing of seafood
products is a small business if it meets
the $4 million criterion for fish
harvesting operations.
Yardarm Knot and its affiliates own
two large catcher processors, the
Highland Light and the Westward Wind.
The Highland Light primarily targets
pollock, and the Westward Wind
participates in the Bristol Bay red king
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
crab and Bering Sea snow crab and
Tanner crab fisheries. In addition,
Yardarm Knot operates a salmon
processing plant in Naknek that
employs up to 450 people during the
peak season. Yardarm Knot
substantially exceeds the 500 employee
threshold applicable to shore-based
processing entities.
Blue Dutch operates vessels in the
crab and groundfish fisheries in the
North Pacific. Blue North Fisheries (an
affiliate of Blue Dutch) has a fleet of
seven catcher processors, ranging in size
from 124 ft to 180 ft. The fleet primarily
participates in the hook-and-line Pacific
cod fishery in the Bering Sea. Since
Blue Dutch operates no shore-based
facilities, it is not regulated by this
action as a shore-based facility. Instead
it is subject to regulation as an at-sea
operation and as a catcher vessel
operation. Catch by Blue Dutch and its
affiliates substantially exceeds the $4.0
million annual gross receipts threshold
applicable to at-sea operations and
catcher vessels.
Trident Seafoods operates 3 factory
trawlers that primarily target pollock in
the Bering Sea. Trident also owns seven
at-sea processors that produce salmon,
herring, crab, and groundfish products,
eleven catcher vessels that target
pollock and Pacific cod, and five catcher
vessels that primarily catch Bristol Bay
red king crab, Bering Sea snow crab, and
Tanner crab (C. bairdi). Trident operates
large shore-side processing plants in
Akutan, St. Paul, Kodiak, and Sand
Point, Alaska, in addition to smaller
plants in other Alaska communities.
The Akutan facility is the largest
seafood processing plant in North
America, and processes pollock, crab,
and halibut. The St. Paul plant
primarily processes crab, and the Sand
Point and Kodiak facilities process
Pacific cod, sablefish, crab, halibut,
pollock, salmon, and other groundfish.
Trident’s corporate offices are located in
Seattle, Washington, and the company
also operates fish processing facilities in
Seattle, Anacortes, and Bellingham,
Washington; Motley, Minnesota; and
Newport, Oregon. Trident substantially
exceeds the 500 employee threshold
criterion applicable to shore-based
processors.
A Regulatory Impact Review was
prepared to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives. The
Regulatory Impact Review describes the
potential size, distribution, and
magnitude of the economic impacts that
this action may be expected to have.
Copies of the RIR prepared for this
proposed rule are available from NMFS
(see ADDRESSES).
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Collection–of–Information
This proposed rule contains a
collection–of–information requirement
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA). This requirement has been
submitted to OMB for approval. Public
reporting burden for annual application
for converted CPO QS and CPO IFQ
permit is estimated to average 30
minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection–of–information.
Public comment is sought regarding
whether (1) this proposed collection–of–
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate; (2)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (3) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection–of–
information, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Send comments on these or any other
aspects of the collection–of–information
to the National Marine Fisheries Service
(see ADDRESSES), and e–mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
(202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection-of-information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 680
Alaska, Fisheries, Recordkeeping and
reporting requirements.
Dated: February 11, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 680 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
PART 680—SHELLFISH FISHERIES OF
THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE
OFF ALASKA
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 680 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1862; Pub. L. 109–
241; Pub. L 109–479.
2. In § 680.2, add the definition of
‘‘Converted CPO QS’’ in alphabetical
order to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Feb 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
§ 680.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Converted CPO QS means CPO QS for
the BBR and BSS crab QS fisheries that
is issued to the entities defined in
§ 680.40(c)(5)(ii), (c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv)
based on the procedures established in
§ 680.40(c)(5).
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 680.4, revise paragraph (b)(1)
and add paragraphs (b)(3) and (n) to
read as follows:
§ 680.4
Permits.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Crab QS is issued by the Regional
Administrator to persons who qualify
for an initial allocation under § 680.40
or receive QS by transfer under § 680.41.
Once issued, a crab QS permit is valid
until modified under paragraphs (b)(2)
or (b)(3) of this section, or by transfer
under § 680.41; or until the permit is
revoked, suspended, or modified
pursuant to § 679.43 of this chapter or
under 15 CFR part 904. To qualify for
a crab QS permit, the applicant must be
a U.S. citizen.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) A converted CPO QS permit is
valid until the end of the crab fishing
year for which the permit is issued.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) Contents of annual application for
converted CPO QS/IFQ permit. (1)(i) A
complete application must be received
by NMFS no later than August 1 of the
crab fishing year for which a person or
crab harvesting cooperative is applying
to receive converted CPO QS and the
IFQ derived from that converted CPO
QS. If a complete application is not
received by NMFS by this date, that
person or crab harvesting cooperative
will not receive converted CPO QS and
the IFQ derived from that converted
CPO QS for that crab fishing year.
(ii) To receive converted CPO QS/IFQ
this application must be accompanied
by a timely and complete application for
crab IFQ/IPQ described at paragraph (f)
of this section or a timely and complete
application for a crab harvesting
cooperative IFQ permit described at
paragraph (m) of this section.
(2) For the application to be
considered complete, all fees required
by NMFS must be paid, and any EDR
required under § 680.6 must be
submitted to the DCA. In addition, the
applicant must include the following
information:.
(i) Entity identification. Indicate the
entity (Entity A, B, or C) described in
§ 680.40(c)(5)(ii) through (c)(5)(iv) for
which you are applying to receive
converted CPO QS.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8841
(ii) Applicant information. Enter
applicant’s name and NMFS Person ID;
applicant’s permanent business mailing
address and any temporary mailing
address the applicant wishes to use; and
applicant’s business telephone number,
facsimile number, and e-mail address.
(A) For Entity A or B.
(1) Identify the amount of CVO QS in
either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
with a north region designation for
issuance as converted CPO QS; and
(2) Identify the amount of PQS in
either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
initially issued to you by NMFS with a
north region designation for issuance as
converted CPO QS.
(B) For Entity C.
(1) Identify the amount of CVO QS in
either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
initially issued to you by NMFS with a
north region designation for issuance as
converted CPO QS; and
(2) Identify the amount of PQS in
either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
with a north region designation for
issuance as converted CPO QS.
(iii) Affiliate information for Entities
A and B. (A) For Entities A and B
described in § 680.40(c)(5)(ii) and
(c)(5)(iii), indicate the permanent
business mailing address and any
temporary mailing address; business
telephone number, facsimile number,
and e-mail address of any person who
is affiliated with you based on
information provided in an annual
application for IFQ/IPQ that is approved
by the Regional Administrator for that
crab fishing year;
(B) Indicate the amount of PQS in
either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
initially issued to that person with a
north region designation for issuance as
converted CPO QS.
(C) Indicate the amount of CVO QS in
either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
with a north region designation held by
that person for issuance as converted
CPO QS.
(iv) Affiliate information for Entity C.
(A) For Entity C described in
§ 680.40(c)(5)(iv), indicate the
permanent business mailing address
and any temporary mailing address;
business telephone number, facsimile
number, and e-mail address of any
person who is affiliated with you based
on information provided in an annual
application for IFQ/IPQ that is approved
by the Regional Administrator for that
crab fishing year;
(B) Indicate the amount of PQS in
either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
with a north region designation for
issuance as converted CPO QS.
(C) Indicate the amount of CVO QS in
either the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
issued to that person with a north region
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
8842
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
designation for issuance as converted
CPO QS.
(v) Certification of applicant and
affiliates. The applicant and any
persons who are affiliated with the
applicant and named on the application
must sign and date the application
certifying that all information is true,
correct, and complete to the best of his/
her knowledge and belief. If the
application is completed by an
authorized representative, proof of
authorization must accompany the
application.
4. In § 680.7, add paragraph (c)(6) to
read as follows:
§ 680.7
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(6) For any person who is not an
entity defined in § 680.40(c)(5)(ii),
(c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) to:
(i) Hold converted CPO QS.
(ii) Use the CPO IFQ derived from that
converted CPO QS outside of a crab
harvesting cooperative.
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 680.40, add paragraphs (c)(5),
(c)(6), (e)(3), and (j)(4) to read as follows:
§ 680.40 Quota Share (QS), Processor QS
(PQS), Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ), and
Individual Processor Quota (IPQ) issuance.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) Issuance of converted CPO QS. (i)
For each crab fishing year, the Regional
Administrator may issue converted CPO
QS for the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery
with a north region designation to an
entity described in paragraphs (c)(5)(ii),
(c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) of this section if
NMFS has approved an application for
converted CPO QS/IFQ for that crab
fishing year.
(ii) Entity A is comprised only of
Yardarm Knot, Inc. (NMFS ID # 675).
(iii) Entity B is comprised only of
Blue Dutch, LLC (NMFS ID # 3163).
(iv) Entity C is comprised only of
Trident Seafoods, Inc. (NMFS ID #
8184).
(v) NMFS will issue Entity A, B, or C
described in paragraphs (c)(5)(ii)
through (c)(5)(iv) of this section one unit
of converted CPO for each unit of CVO
QS and 0.9 units of PQS indicated in an
approved application for converted CPO
QS/IFQ.
(vi) For each crab fishing year, the
Regional Administrator will not issue
CPO QS for the BBR or BSS crab QS
fishery:
(A) To Entity A described in
paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of this section that is
greater than the amount of converted
CPO QS that may be derived from the
amount of PQS units with a north region
designation initially issued by NMFS to
Yardarm Knot, Inc. (NMFS ID # 675),
and any affiliates of Yardarm Knot Inc.
as listed on an annual application for
converted CPO QS/IFQ for that crab
fishing year;
(B) To Entity B described in paragraph
(c)(5)(iii) of this section that is greater
than the amount of converted CPO QS
that may be derived from the amount of
PQS units with a north region
designation initially issued by NMFS to
Blue Dutch, LLC, (NMFS ID # 3163)
under paragraph (e)(3) of this section
and any affiliates of Blue Dutch, LLC, as
listed on an annual application for
annual application for converted CPO
QS/IFQ for that crab fishing year; and
(C) To Entity C described in paragraph
(c)(5)(iv) of this section that is greater
than the amount of converted CPO QS
that may be derived from the amount of
CVO QS units with a north region
designation initially issued by NMFS to
Trident Seafoods, Inc., (NMFS ID #
8184) and any affiliates of Trident
Seafoods Inc. as listed on an annual
application for converted CPO QS/IFQ
for that crab fishing year;
(vii) CPO IFQ derived from converted
CPO QS may be issued to a crab
harvesting cooperative only if the entity
described in paragraph (c)(5)(ii),
(c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) of this section
holding the converted CPO QS is a
member of that crab harvesting
cooperative.
(6) Offloading requirements for CPO
IFQ derived from converted CPO QS.
Any crab harvested under a CPO IFQ
permit derived from converted CPO QS
Quota type
must be offloaded in the Bering Sea
subarea north of 56°20′ N. lat.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) PQS issued to Blue Dutch, LLC. (i)
Pursuant to Public Law 109–241, NMFS
issued 3,015,229 units of PQS for the
BBR crab QS fishery and 7,516,253 units
of PQS for the BSS crab QS fishery.
(ii) PQS units issued to Blue Dutch,
LLC, under paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this
section were assigned a regional
designation according to the procedures
established in paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of
this section.
(iii) PQS units issued to Blue Dutch,
LLC, under paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this
section may not be transferred to any
other person.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(4) IPQ issued to Blue Dutch, LLC—(i)
BBR IPQ. For each crab fishing year that
the total allowable catch for BBR CR
crab is greater than 15,732,480 lb
(7,136.2 mt), NMFS will issue IPQ for
the 3,015,229 units of PQS issued to
Blue Dutch, LLC, pursuant to Public
Law 109–241.
(ii) BSS PQS. For each crab fishing
year that the total allowable catch for
BSS CR crab is greater than 21,350,640
lb (9,684.6 mt), NMFS will issue IPQ for
the 7,516,253 units of PQS issued to
Blue Dutch, LLC, pursuant to Public
Law 109–241.
*
*
*
*
*
6. In § 680.41:
a. Paragraphs (c)(1)(iv) through
(c)(1)(vi) are redesignated as paragraphs
(c)(1)(vi) through (c)(1)(viii),
respectively.
b. New paragraphs (c)(1)(iv) and
(c)(1)(v) are added.
c. Paragraph (c)(1)(i) is revised.
The additions and revision read as
follows:
§ 680.41
IPQ.
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
Eligible person
(i) PQS not issued under § 680.40(e)(3)(i)
Transfer of QS, PQS, IFQ, and
*
*
Eligibility requirements
Any person
None.
(iv) Converted CPO QS
N/A
Converted CPO QS may not be transferred.
(v) CPO IFQ derived from Converted CPO QS
N/A
CPO IFQ derived from Converted CPO may
not be transferred.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
* * * * * * *
* * * * * * *
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Feb 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2008 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
7. In § 680.42, paragraph (a)(5) is
revised, and paragraph (a)(7) is added to
read as follows:
§ 680.42 Limitations on use of QS, PQS,
IFQ, and IPQ.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
(a) * * *
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Feb 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
(5) IFQ that is used by a crab
harvesting cooperative is not subject to
the use caps in this paragraph (a) except
as provided for in paragraph (a)(7) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) In a calendar year, an entity as
described in § 680.40(c)(5)(ii), (c)(5)(iii),
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8843
or (c)(5)(iv), may not use more than
1,000,000 lb (453.6 mt) of IFQ derived
from converted CPO QS in the BBR or
BSS crab QS fisheries.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–2895 Filed 2–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 32 (Friday, February 15, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8838-8843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2895]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 680
[Docket No. 070718364-7908-02]
RIN 0648-AV19
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations implementing Amendment 25 to the
Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner
Crabs (FMP) and a provision of the Coast Guard and Maritime
Transportation Act of 2006 (Coast Guard Act). These proposed
regulations would amend the Crab Rationalization Program. Amendment 25
to the FMP satisfies the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Reauthorization Act of 2006 requirement for the Secretary of
Commerce to amend the FMP to authorize conversion of catcher vessel
owner quota shares and processor quota shares to newly created
converted catcher processor owner quota shares. The Secretary approved
Amendment 25 on April 12, 2007. The Coast Guard Act mandates the
Secretary to issue processing quota share to Blue Dutch, LLC, under
specific conditions. This proposed action is necessary to implement
Amendment 25 and the Coast Guard Act. This action is intended to
promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the Coast Guard Act, the FMP, and
other applicable law.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than March 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS,
Attn: Ellen Sebastian. You may submit comments, identified by ``RIN
0648-AV19'', by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal website at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Fax: (907) 586-7557.
Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9\th\
Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without change. All
Personal Identifying Information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe portable document file (pdf) formats only.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
rule may be submitted to NMFS at the above address, and by email to
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to 202-395-7285.
Copies of Amendment 25 and the Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) for
this action may be obtained from the NMFS Alaska Region at the address
above or from the Alaska Region website at https://www.fakr.noaa.gov/
sustainablefisheries.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Glenn Merrill, 907-586-7228,
glenn.merrill@noaa.gov or Gretchen Harrington, 907-586-7228,
gretchen.harrington@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The king and Tanner crab fisheries in the
exclusive economic zone of the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands are managed
under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act as amended by the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-199, section 801).
Amendments 18 and 19 to the FMP amended the FMP to include the Crab
Rationalization Program. A final rule implementing these amendments was
published on March 2, 2005 (70 FR 10174).
Crab Rationalization Program (Program)
To implement the Program in 2005, NMFS initially issued processing
quota shares (PQS), catcher vessel owner quota share (CVO QS), and
catcher processor owner quota share (CPO QS) to eligible applicants.
NMFS issued PQS and QS for nine crab fisheries in the BSAI. In 2006,
NMFS initially issued Bristol Bay red king crab (Paralithodes
camtschaticus) and snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) PQS to the Blue
Dutch, LLC, under the requirements of section 417 of the Coast Guard
Act.
CVO QS represents an exclusive but revocable privilege that
authorizes the holder to receive an annual allocation to harvest a
specific percentage of the total allowable catch (TAC) from a fishery.
The annual allocations of TACs, in pounds, are referred to as
individual fishing quotas (IFQs).
PQS represents an exclusive but revocable privilege to receive
deliveries of a specific portion of the annual TAC from a fishery. An
annual allocation of PQS is referred to as individual processing quota
(IPQ) and expressed in pounds of crab. Harvesters holding CVO IFQ must
deliver a portion of their IFQ to processors with a like amount of IPQ
available.
For most crab fisheries, CVO QS and PQS is designated for specific
geographic regions. Crab harvested with regionally designated CVO QS is
required to be delivered to a processor in the designated region.
Likewise, a processor with regionally designated PQS is required to
accept delivery of and process crab in the designated region. Two
regional designations were created for the snow crab and Bristol Bay
red king crab fisheries. The North Region consists of all areas in the
Bering Sea north of 56[deg]20' N. latitude. The South Region is all
other areas. The regional designation of CVO QS and PQS preserves the
historic geographic distribution of landings in the fisheries.
CPO QS represents an exclusive but revocable privilege to harvest a
percentage of the TAC and process that crab onboard. Under the Program,
CPO QS does not have regional designations and is not required to be
delivered to a processor holding available IFQ.
[[Page 8839]]
Coast Guard Act
On July 11, 2006, the President signed the Coast Guard Act which
contained in section 417 a provision mandating the Secretary of
Commerce to issue PQS for the Bristol Bay red king crab and the Bering
Sea snow crab fisheries to Blue Dutch, LLC, under two specific
conditions.
First, NMFS must issue Blue Dutch PQS equal to 0.75 percent of the
total number of PQS units. NMFS issued an initial administrative
determination on July 31, 2006, to issue Blue Dutch 3,015,229 units of
Bristol Bay red king crab PQS and 7,516,253 units of snow crab PQS.
NMFS assigned a regional designation to the PQS units issued to Blue
Dutch according to the procedures established in the regulations at 50
CFR 680.40(b)(2)(iv).
Second, NMFS must issue IPQ for that PQS whenever the TAC for that
fishery is more than 2 percent higher than the most recent TAC in
effect for that fishery prior to September 15, 2005. The TAC used for
this calculation is the total TAC, which includes the CDQ allocation.
Accordingly, NMFS determined that it will issue Bristol Bay red king
crab IPQ to Blue Dutch when the TAC for that fishery is greater than
15,732,480 lb (7,136.1 mt). NMFS will issue snow crab IPQ to Blue Dutch
when the TAC for that fishery is greater than 21,350,640 lb (9,684.5
mt). This proposed rule is necessary to specify in regulations the
statutory thresholds for annually issuing IPQ to Blue Dutch to ensure
the regulations implementing the Program conform to the Coast Guard
Act. The proposed rule prohibits the transfer of the PQS units issued
under the Coast Guard Act because the Act explicitly requires NMFS to
issue the PQS to Blue Dutch.
Amendment 25
On January 12, 2007, the President signed the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006 (MSRA,
Public Law 109-479), which added a new requirement in section 122(a)
for the Secretary of Commerce, not later than 90 days after the date of
enactment of that act, to amend the FMP to modify the Program to
authorize conversion of North CVO QS and North PQS to newly created
converted CPO QS.
Amendment 25 to the FMP complies with the MSRA by amending the FMP
to authorize an eligible entity and its commonly owned affiliates to
combine North PQS and North CVO QS and exchange these shares for newly
created converted CPO QS. While the MSRA does not specifically define
which fisheries are subject to this provision, converted CPO QS would
be created for only the snow crab and Bristol Bay red king crab
fisheries, because these were the only fisheries for which the eligible
entities were initially issued North PQS and North CVO QS, as specified
in the MSRA.
NMFS published the notice of availability for Amendment 25 on
February 5, 2007 (72 FR 5255), with a public comment period that closed
on April 6, 2007. NMFS received one public comment on Amendment 25. The
commenter opposed Amendment 25 because she is quite concerned about the
legislation. The Secretary of Commerce approved Amendment 25 on April
12, 2007. This proposed rule is necessary to implement Amendment 25.
This proposed rule would authorize two types of quota share
conversions and define the entities eligible to make those conversions.
First, an eligible entity holding PQS, along with its commonly
owned affiliates, could combine its North CVO QS for Bristol Bay red
king crab or snow crab with its North PQS for that fishery and exchange
these shares for converted CPO QS on an annual basis. Entities could do
this under the following two conditions: (1) if NMFS initially issued
the entity both CPO QS and PQS under the Program, and that PQS, in
combination with the PQS of its commonly owned affiliates, is less than
7 percent of the total PQS pool for that year; or (2) if NMFS initially
issued the entity CPO QS under the Program and PQS under the Coast
Guard Act. An eligible entity would be limited to converting only the
PQS that it, along with its commonly owned affiliates, was initially
issued by NMFS.
Second, an eligible entity holding CVO QS, along with its commonly
owned affiliates, could combine its North PQS for Bristol Bay red king
crab or snow crab with its North CVO QS for that fishery and exchange
these shares for converted CPO QS on an annual basis. The only entity
that could do this would be an entity to which NMFS initially issued
CPO QS and PQS under the Program, and that PQS, in combination with the
PQS of its commonly owned affiliates, is more than 7 percent of the
total PQS pool for that year. This eligible entity would be limited to
converting only the CVO QS that it, along with its commonly owned
affiliates, was initially issued by NMFS.
According to the NMFS Official Record, three individual entities
are eligible for these new provisions. Yardarm Knot, Inc., and Blue
Dutch, LLC, would be eligible for the first type of conversion. Trident
Seafoods, Inc., would be eligible for the second type of conversion.
These entities would elect on an annual basis whether to receive
converted CPO QS and the amount of North CVO QS and North PQS they wish
to convert by completing the annual application for converted CPO QS/
IFQ permit and submitting that application along with the annual
application for crab IFQ/IPQ permit by August 1 for that crab fishing
year.
Entities applying for a converted CPO QS permit and resulting CPO
IFQ would be required to provide information on any person who is
affiliated, as the term ``affiliation'' is defined at Sec. 680.2, to
that entity and indicate the amount of PQS and CVO QS in either the BBR
or BSS crab QS fishery with a north region designation for issuance as
converted CPO QS.
The proposed rule specifies a number of provisions for converted
QS/IFQ to conform with the MSRA and the Program's implementing
regulations. Converted CPO QS and the resulting CPO IFQ would not be
transferable. This restriction on transfers is consistent with the MSRA
eligibility standards that only entities that meet the specific
requirements of the Act are eligible to receive converted CPO QS.
However, CPO IFQ derived from converted CPO QS may be issued to a
cooperative.
The proposed rule specifies that (1) eligible entities would
receive one unit of North CPO QS in exchange for one unit of North CVO
QS and 0.9 units of North PQS and (2) the amount of IFQ derived from
the converted CPO QS issued to each entity could not exceed one million
pounds per fishery during any calendar year.
Additionally, the proposed rule would implement the area of
validity in section 122(a)(4) of the MSRA by requiring that any crab
harvested under a CPO IFQ permit derived from converted CPO QS must be
offloaded in the North Region, defined in the Program as the Bering Sea
subarea north of 56[deg]20' N. latitude.
Converting PQS and CVO QS to converted CPO QS would allow entities
to harvest and process crab onboard a catcher processor. Conversion
could reduce each eligible entity's operating costs associated with
purchasing crab, processing crab on land or in a stationary floater
processor, and complying with the Program's arbitration system. NMFS
can not predict the annual amount of converted CPO QS that would be
annually issued because the participants would annually elect to
exercise this provision and need not request conversion of all CVO QS
and PQS held.
[[Page 8840]]
Sections 122(b) and (c) of the MSRA include additional requirements
for fees and off-loading for converted CPO QS; however, the statute
does not require the Secretary of Commerce to implement these
requirements and therefore they are not part of Amendment 25 and will
not be implemented by Federal rulemaking. The MSRA requires the holder
of converted CPO QS to pay a fee of five percent of the ex-vessel value
of the crab harvested with those shares to any local governmental
entities in the North Region, if the PQS used to produce the converted
CPO QS was originally derived from the processing activities that
occurred in a community under the jurisdiction of those local
governmental entities. The State of Alaska may collect from the holder
of the converted CPO QS a fee of one percent of the ex-vessel value of
the crab harvested with those shares. Additionally, crab harvested with
converted CPO QS shall be off-loaded in those communities receiving the
local governmental entities fee revenue.
Section 122(d) of the MSRA also provides that, as part of its
periodic review of the Program, the North Pacific Fishery Management
Council may review the effects on communities in the North Region of
allowing the conversion to CPO QS. Under this section, if the Council
determines that Amendment 25 adversely affects the communities, the
Council may recommend to the Secretary of Commerce, and the Secretary
may approve, changes to the Program necessary to mitigate those adverse
effects.
Section 122(e) of the MSRA requires an additional FMP amendment and
rule making to modify the use caps for processing North Region snow
crab. Under this section, custom processing arrangements do not count
against any use cap for the processing of snow crab in the North Region
by a shore-based crab processor. NMFS issued an enforcement policy on
January 19, 2007, that provides guidance to the industry on NMFS'
enforcement and interpretation of this section, which is effective
until superseded by future rulemaking. At its December meeting, the
Council adopted Amendment 27 to the FMP that would implement this MSRA
provision. NMFS intends to publish a proposed rule for Amendment 27 in
the spring of 2008.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and other applicable laws.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An Environmental Impact Statement/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis/Social Impact Assessment was prepared
for the Program that describes the management background, the purpose
and need for the Program, the management alternatives, and the
environmental, social, and economic impacts (see ADDRESSES). With this
proposed rule, NMFS is continuing to implement the Program.
Department of Commerce Chief Counsel for Regulations has certified
to the Small Business Administration, under Section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, that this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
NMFS finds that the proposed action is not likely to have the potential
to have a significant economic impact on any small entities
participating in these fisheries because no small entities will be
directly regulated by this action.
Section 122(a) of the MSRA defines the entities eligible to elect
to exercise this provision. According to the NMFS Official Record,
three individual entities are eligible under the MSRA for these new
provisions; Yardarm Knot, Inc., Blue Dutch, LLC, and Trident Seafoods
Corporation. These three entities do not qualify as small entities
according to the Small Business Administration criteria.
The Small Business Administration has established size criteria for
all major industry sectors in the United States, including fish
harvesting and fish processing businesses. A business involved in fish
harvesting is a small business if it is independently owned and
operated and not dominant in its field of operation (including its
affiliates) and if it has combined annual receipts not in excess of $4
million for all its affiliated operations worldwide. A seafood
processor is a small business if it is independently owned and
operated, not dominant in its field of operation, and employs 500 or
fewer persons on a full-time, part-time, temporary, or other basis, at
all its affiliated operations worldwide. A business involved in both
the harvesting and processing of seafood products is a small business
if it meets the $4 million criterion for fish harvesting operations.
Yardarm Knot and its affiliates own two large catcher processors,
the Highland Light and the Westward Wind. The Highland Light primarily
targets pollock, and the Westward Wind participates in the Bristol Bay
red king crab and Bering Sea snow crab and Tanner crab fisheries. In
addition, Yardarm Knot operates a salmon processing plant in Naknek
that employs up to 450 people during the peak season. Yardarm Knot
substantially exceeds the 500 employee threshold applicable to shore-
based processing entities.
Blue Dutch operates vessels in the crab and groundfish fisheries in
the North Pacific. Blue North Fisheries (an affiliate of Blue Dutch)
has a fleet of seven catcher processors, ranging in size from 124 ft to
180 ft. The fleet primarily participates in the hook-and-line Pacific
cod fishery in the Bering Sea. Since Blue Dutch operates no shore-based
facilities, it is not regulated by this action as a shore-based
facility. Instead it is subject to regulation as an at-sea operation
and as a catcher vessel operation. Catch by Blue Dutch and its
affiliates substantially exceeds the $4.0 million annual gross receipts
threshold applicable to at-sea operations and catcher vessels.
Trident Seafoods operates 3 factory trawlers that primarily target
pollock in the Bering Sea. Trident also owns seven at-sea processors
that produce salmon, herring, crab, and groundfish products, eleven
catcher vessels that target pollock and Pacific cod, and five catcher
vessels that primarily catch Bristol Bay red king crab, Bering Sea snow
crab, and Tanner crab (C. bairdi). Trident operates large shore-side
processing plants in Akutan, St. Paul, Kodiak, and Sand Point, Alaska,
in addition to smaller plants in other Alaska communities. The Akutan
facility is the largest seafood processing plant in North America, and
processes pollock, crab, and halibut. The St. Paul plant primarily
processes crab, and the Sand Point and Kodiak facilities process
Pacific cod, sablefish, crab, halibut, pollock, salmon, and other
groundfish. Trident's corporate offices are located in Seattle,
Washington, and the company also operates fish processing facilities in
Seattle, Anacortes, and Bellingham, Washington; Motley, Minnesota; and
Newport, Oregon. Trident substantially exceeds the 500 employee
threshold criterion applicable to shore-based processors.
A Regulatory Impact Review was prepared to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives. The Regulatory Impact
Review describes the potential size, distribution, and magnitude of the
economic impacts that this action may be expected to have. Copies of
the RIR prepared for this proposed rule are available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
[[Page 8841]]
Collection-of-Information
This proposed rule contains a collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has
been submitted to OMB for approval. Public reporting burden for annual
application for converted CPO QS and CPO IFQ permit is estimated to
average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection-of-information.
Public comment is sought regarding whether (1) this proposed
collection-of-information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; (2) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (3) ways to minimize the burden of the collection-of-
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collection-of-information to the
National Marine Fisheries Service (see ADDRESSES), and e-mail to
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection-of-information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 680
Alaska, Fisheries, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Dated: February 11, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 680 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 680--SHELLFISH FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 680 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1862; Pub. L. 109-241; Pub. L 109-479.
2. In Sec. 680.2, add the definition of ``Converted CPO QS'' in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 680.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Converted CPO QS means CPO QS for the BBR and BSS crab QS fisheries
that is issued to the entities defined in Sec. 680.40(c)(5)(ii),
(c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) based on the procedures established in Sec.
680.40(c)(5).
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 680.4, revise paragraph (b)(1) and add paragraphs
(b)(3) and (n) to read as follows:
Sec. 680.4 Permits.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Crab QS is issued by the Regional Administrator to persons who
qualify for an initial allocation under Sec. 680.40 or receive QS by
transfer under Sec. 680.41. Once issued, a crab QS permit is valid
until modified under paragraphs (b)(2) or (b)(3) of this section, or by
transfer under Sec. 680.41; or until the permit is revoked, suspended,
or modified pursuant to Sec. 679.43 of this chapter or under 15 CFR
part 904. To qualify for a crab QS permit, the applicant must be a U.S.
citizen.
* * * * *
(3) A converted CPO QS permit is valid until the end of the crab
fishing year for which the permit is issued.
* * * * *
(n) Contents of annual application for converted CPO QS/IFQ permit.
(1)(i) A complete application must be received by NMFS no later than
August 1 of the crab fishing year for which a person or crab harvesting
cooperative is applying to receive converted CPO QS and the IFQ derived
from that converted CPO QS. If a complete application is not received
by NMFS by this date, that person or crab harvesting cooperative will
not receive converted CPO QS and the IFQ derived from that converted
CPO QS for that crab fishing year.
(ii) To receive converted CPO QS/IFQ this application must be
accompanied by a timely and complete application for crab IFQ/IPQ
described at paragraph (f) of this section or a timely and complete
application for a crab harvesting cooperative IFQ permit described at
paragraph (m) of this section.
(2) For the application to be considered complete, all fees
required by NMFS must be paid, and any EDR required under Sec. 680.6
must be submitted to the DCA. In addition, the applicant must include
the following information:.
(i) Entity identification. Indicate the entity (Entity A, B, or C)
described in Sec. 680.40(c)(5)(ii) through (c)(5)(iv) for which you
are applying to receive converted CPO QS.
(ii) Applicant information. Enter applicant's name and NMFS Person
ID; applicant's permanent business mailing address and any temporary
mailing address the applicant wishes to use; and applicant's business
telephone number, facsimile number, and e-mail address.
(A) For Entity A or B.
(1) Identify the amount of CVO QS in either the BBR or BSS crab QS
fishery with a north region designation for issuance as converted CPO
QS; and
(2) Identify the amount of PQS in either the BBR or BSS crab QS
fishery initially issued to you by NMFS with a north region designation
for issuance as converted CPO QS.
(B) For Entity C.
(1) Identify the amount of CVO QS in either the BBR or BSS crab QS
fishery initially issued to you by NMFS with a north region designation
for issuance as converted CPO QS; and
(2) Identify the amount of PQS in either the BBR or BSS crab QS
fishery with a north region designation for issuance as converted CPO
QS.
(iii) Affiliate information for Entities A and B. (A) For Entities
A and B described in Sec. 680.40(c)(5)(ii) and (c)(5)(iii), indicate
the permanent business mailing address and any temporary mailing
address; business telephone number, facsimile number, and e-mail
address of any person who is affiliated with you based on information
provided in an annual application for IFQ/IPQ that is approved by the
Regional Administrator for that crab fishing year;
(B) Indicate the amount of PQS in either the BBR or BSS crab QS
fishery initially issued to that person with a north region designation
for issuance as converted CPO QS.
(C) Indicate the amount of CVO QS in either the BBR or BSS crab QS
fishery with a north region designation held by that person for
issuance as converted CPO QS.
(iv) Affiliate information for Entity C. (A) For Entity C described
in Sec. 680.40(c)(5)(iv), indicate the permanent business mailing
address and any temporary mailing address; business telephone number,
facsimile number, and e-mail address of any person who is affiliated
with you based on information provided in an annual application for
IFQ/IPQ that is approved by the Regional Administrator for that crab
fishing year;
(B) Indicate the amount of PQS in either the BBR or BSS crab QS
fishery with a north region designation for issuance as converted CPO
QS.
(C) Indicate the amount of CVO QS in either the BBR or BSS crab QS
fishery issued to that person with a north region
[[Page 8842]]
designation for issuance as converted CPO QS.
(v) Certification of applicant and affiliates. The applicant and
any persons who are affiliated with the applicant and named on the
application must sign and date the application certifying that all
information is true, correct, and complete to the best of his/her
knowledge and belief. If the application is completed by an authorized
representative, proof of authorization must accompany the application.
4. In Sec. 680.7, add paragraph (c)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 680.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(6) For any person who is not an entity defined in Sec.
680.40(c)(5)(ii), (c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) to:
(i) Hold converted CPO QS.
(ii) Use the CPO IFQ derived from that converted CPO QS outside of
a crab harvesting cooperative.
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 680.40, add paragraphs (c)(5), (c)(6), (e)(3), and
(j)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 680.40 Quota Share (QS), Processor QS (PQS), Individual Fishing
Quota (IFQ), and Individual Processor Quota (IPQ) issuance.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) Issuance of converted CPO QS. (i) For each crab fishing year,
the Regional Administrator may issue converted CPO QS for the BBR or
BSS crab QS fishery with a north region designation to an entity
described in paragraphs (c)(5)(ii), (c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) of this
section if NMFS has approved an application for converted CPO QS/IFQ
for that crab fishing year.
(ii) Entity A is comprised only of Yardarm Knot, Inc. (NMFS ID
675).
(iii) Entity B is comprised only of Blue Dutch, LLC (NMFS ID
3163).
(iv) Entity C is comprised only of Trident Seafoods, Inc. (NMFS ID
8184).
(v) NMFS will issue Entity A, B, or C described in paragraphs
(c)(5)(ii) through (c)(5)(iv) of this section one unit of converted CPO
for each unit of CVO QS and 0.9 units of PQS indicated in an approved
application for converted CPO QS/IFQ.
(vi) For each crab fishing year, the Regional Administrator will
not issue CPO QS for the BBR or BSS crab QS fishery:
(A) To Entity A described in paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of this section
that is greater than the amount of converted CPO QS that may be derived
from the amount of PQS units with a north region designation initially
issued by NMFS to Yardarm Knot, Inc. (NMFS ID 675), and any
affiliates of Yardarm Knot Inc. as listed on an annual application for
converted CPO QS/IFQ for that crab fishing year;
(B) To Entity B described in paragraph (c)(5)(iii) of this section
that is greater than the amount of converted CPO QS that may be derived
from the amount of PQS units with a north region designation initially
issued by NMFS to Blue Dutch, LLC, (NMFS ID 3163) under
paragraph (e)(3) of this section and any affiliates of Blue Dutch, LLC,
as listed on an annual application for annual application for converted
CPO QS/IFQ for that crab fishing year; and
(C) To Entity C described in paragraph (c)(5)(iv) of this section
that is greater than the amount of converted CPO QS that may be derived
from the amount of CVO QS units with a north region designation
initially issued by NMFS to Trident Seafoods, Inc., (NMFS ID
8184) and any affiliates of Trident Seafoods Inc. as listed on an
annual application for converted CPO QS/IFQ for that crab fishing year;
(vii) CPO IFQ derived from converted CPO QS may be issued to a crab
harvesting cooperative only if the entity described in paragraph
(c)(5)(ii), (c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv) of this section holding the
converted CPO QS is a member of that crab harvesting cooperative.
(6) Offloading requirements for CPO IFQ derived from converted CPO
QS. Any crab harvested under a CPO IFQ permit derived from converted
CPO QS must be offloaded in the Bering Sea subarea north of 56[deg]20'
N. lat.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) PQS issued to Blue Dutch, LLC. (i) Pursuant to Public Law 109-
241, NMFS issued 3,015,229 units of PQS for the BBR crab QS fishery and
7,516,253 units of PQS for the BSS crab QS fishery.
(ii) PQS units issued to Blue Dutch, LLC, under paragraph (e)(3)(i)
of this section were assigned a regional designation according to the
procedures established in paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section.
(iii) PQS units issued to Blue Dutch, LLC, under paragraph
(e)(3)(i) of this section may not be transferred to any other person.
* * * * *
(j) * * *
(4) IPQ issued to Blue Dutch, LLC--(i) BBR IPQ. For each crab
fishing year that the total allowable catch for BBR CR crab is greater
than 15,732,480 lb (7,136.2 mt), NMFS will issue IPQ for the 3,015,229
units of PQS issued to Blue Dutch, LLC, pursuant to Public Law 109-241.
(ii) BSS PQS. For each crab fishing year that the total allowable
catch for BSS CR crab is greater than 21,350,640 lb (9,684.6 mt), NMFS
will issue IPQ for the 7,516,253 units of PQS issued to Blue Dutch,
LLC, pursuant to Public Law 109-241.
* * * * *
6. In Sec. 680.41:
a. Paragraphs (c)(1)(iv) through (c)(1)(vi) are redesignated as
paragraphs (c)(1)(vi) through (c)(1)(viii), respectively.
b. New paragraphs (c)(1)(iv) and (c)(1)(v) are added.
c. Paragraph (c)(1)(i) is revised.
The additions and revision read as follows:
Sec. 680.41 Transfer of QS, PQS, IFQ, and IPQ.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eligibility
Quota type Eligible person requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) PQS not issued Any person None.
under Sec.
680.40(e)(3)(i)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * ....................... ......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iv) Converted CPO QS N/A Converted CPO QS may
not be transferred.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(v) CPO IFQ derived N/A CPO IFQ derived from
from Converted CPO QS Converted CPO may not
be transferred.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * ....................... ......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 8843]]
* * * * *
7. In Sec. 680.42, paragraph (a)(5) is revised, and paragraph
(a)(7) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 680.42 Limitations on use of QS, PQS, IFQ, and IPQ.
(a) * * *
(5) IFQ that is used by a crab harvesting cooperative is not
subject to the use caps in this paragraph (a) except as provided for in
paragraph (a)(7) of this section.
* * * * *
(7) In a calendar year, an entity as described in Sec.
680.40(c)(5)(ii), (c)(5)(iii), or (c)(5)(iv), may not use more than
1,000,000 lb (453.6 mt) of IFQ derived from converted CPO QS in the BBR
or BSS crab QS fisheries.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-2895 Filed 2-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S