Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes, 7488-7489 [E8-2353]
Download as PDF
7488
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
917–6437; fax (425) 917–6590; has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
31, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–2352 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0149; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–319–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300,
–400, and –500 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 737–100, –200, –200C,
–300, –400, and –500 series airplanes.
This proposed AD would require
replacing the existing straight-to-90degree hose assembly for the Lavatory
‘‘A’’ water supply. The replacement is a
new straight hose assembly and a
separate 90-degree elbow fitting. This
proposed AD results from a report of a
separated hose assembly for the
passenger water system. We are
proposing this AD to prevent a water
leak into the flight deck ceiling, which
could result in an electrical short and
possible loss of several functions
essential to safe flight.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:33 Feb 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 24, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207.
DATES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marcia Smith, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6484; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0149; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–319–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a report of a
separated hose assembly for the
passenger water system. The hose
assembly supplies potable water
through a 90-degree end fitting to
Lavatory ‘‘A.’’ The break occurred at the
90-degree end fitting when the elbow
separated at a soldered joint adjacent to
the hose assembly sleeve. The break was
located just above and inside the flight
deck entry door, and resulted in water
spilling into the flight deck ceiling,
which affected various radios and the
Aircraft Communications Addressing
and Reporting System (ACARS) and
caused them to become inoperative.
These affected parts had to be replaced
due to water damage. An analysis of the
broken hose assembly showed signs of
previous small leaks. It was concluded
that an incompletely soldered joint
failed and consequently separated. A
broken hose assembly in this location, if
not corrected, could leak into the flight
deck ceiling and result in an electrical
short and possible loss of several
functions essential to safe flight.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–38A1054, dated
August 23, 2007. The service bulletin
describes procedures for replacing the
existing straight-to-90-degree hose
assembly for the Lavatory ‘‘A’’ water
supply. The replacement is a new
straight hose assembly and a separate
90-degree elbow fitting.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all relevant information and
determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other airplanes of the same
type design. This proposed AD would
require accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information
described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 779 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take between 4 and 7 work-hours per
airplane to comply with this proposed
AD, depending on the airplane
configuration. The average labor rate is
$80 per work-hour. Required parts
would cost about $400 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
cost of this proposed AD to the U.S.
operators to be between $560,880 and
$747,840, or between $720 and $960 per
product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2008–0149;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–319–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March
24, 2008.
7489
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model 737–100,
–200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500 series
airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737–38A1054, dated August 23, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of a
separated hose assembly for the passenger
water system. We are issuing this AD to
prevent a water leak into the flight deck
ceiling, which could result in an electrical
short and possible loss of several functions
essential to safe flight.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
Replacement
(f) Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, replace the existing straightto-90-degree hose assembly for the Lavatory
‘‘A’’ water supply with a new straight hose
assembly and a separate 90-degree elbow
fitting, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–38A1054, dated August
23, 2007.
Parts Installation
(g) As of the effective date of this AD, any
hose assembly part having a part number
identified in Table 1 of this AD must not be
used in any location that is subject to the
requirements of this AD. However, those
parts may be used in other locations if not
otherwise prohibited.
TABLE 1.—SPARE PARTS PROHIBITED FOR THIS AD
Airplane group identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–38A1054,
dated August 23, 2007
1 and 2 .....................................................................................................
3 ................................................................................................................
4 ................................................................................................................
Existing part Nos.
10–61998–430, AS4471–08–0401, or AS4471–08–0404.
10–61998–25 or 10–60871–125.
10–61998–31 or 10–60871–139.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN:
Marcia Smith, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin
Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM–150S, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
917–6484; fax (425) 917–6590; has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
31, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–2353 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
Federal Aviation Administration
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:33 Feb 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0151; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–347–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
14 CFR Part 39
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 727 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\08FEP1.SGM
08FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7488-7489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2353]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0149; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-319-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -
300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would require replacing the existing
straight-to-90-degree hose assembly for the Lavatory ``A'' water
supply. The replacement is a new straight hose assembly and a separate
90-degree elbow fitting. This proposed AD results from a report of a
separated hose assembly for the passenger water system. We are
proposing this AD to prevent a water leak into the flight deck ceiling,
which could result in an electrical short and possible loss of several
functions essential to safe flight.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 24, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcia Smith, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6484; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0149;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-319-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a report of a separated hose assembly for the
passenger water system. The hose assembly supplies potable water
through a 90-degree end fitting to Lavatory ``A.'' The break occurred
at the 90-degree end fitting when the elbow separated at a soldered
joint adjacent to the hose assembly sleeve. The break was located just
above and inside the flight deck entry door, and resulted in water
spilling into the flight deck ceiling, which affected various radios
and the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS)
and caused them to become inoperative. These affected parts had to be
replaced due to water damage. An analysis of the broken hose assembly
showed signs of previous small leaks. It was concluded that an
incompletely soldered joint failed and consequently separated. A broken
hose assembly in this location, if not corrected, could leak into the
flight deck ceiling and result in an electrical short and possible loss
of several functions essential to safe flight.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-38A1054, dated
August 23, 2007. The service bulletin describes procedures for
replacing the existing straight-to-90-degree hose assembly for the
Lavatory ``A'' water supply. The replacement is a new straight hose
assembly and a separate 90-degree elbow fitting.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other airplanes of the same type design.
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 779 airplanes of
U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take between 4 and 7
work-hours per airplane to comply with this proposed AD, depending on
the airplane configuration. The average labor rate is $80 per work-
hour. Required parts would cost about $400 per product. Based on these
figures, we estimate the
[[Page 7489]]
cost of this proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be between $560,880
and $747,840, or between $720 and $960 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2008-0149; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
319-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March 24, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400,
and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-38A1054, dated
August 23, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of a separated hose assembly
for the passenger water system. We are issuing this AD to prevent a
water leak into the flight deck ceiling, which could result in an
electrical short and possible loss of several functions essential to
safe flight.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Replacement
(f) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the existing straight-to-90-degree hose assembly for the
Lavatory ``A'' water supply with a new straight hose assembly and a
separate 90-degree elbow fitting, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
38A1054, dated August 23, 2007.
Parts Installation
(g) As of the effective date of this AD, any hose assembly part
having a part number identified in Table 1 of this AD must not be
used in any location that is subject to the requirements of this AD.
However, those parts may be used in other locations if not otherwise
prohibited.
Table 1.--Spare Parts Prohibited for This AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplane group identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-38A1054, Existing part Nos.
dated August 23, 2007
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 and 2................................ 10-61998-430, AS4471-08-0401,
or AS4471-08-0404.
3...................................... 10-61998-25 or 10-60871-125.
4...................................... 10-61998-31 or 10-60871-139.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, ATTN: Marcia Smith, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and
Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6484; fax (425)
917-6590; has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 31, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-2353 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P