Action Affecting Export Privileges: AR-AM Medical Services LLC; In the Matter of AR-AM Medical Services LLC; Case No. 06-08, 7525-7526 [08-522]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices
incorporated places also constitute
MCDs.
Nonvisible feature—A map feature
that is not visible on the ground, such
as a city or county boundary through
space, a property line running through
space, a short line-of-sight extension of
a road to another visible feature, or a
point-to-point line of sight.
Visible feature—A map feature that
can be seen on the ground, such as a
road, railroad track, major above-ground
transmission line or pipeline, river or
stream, shoreline, fence, sharply defined
mountain ridge, or cliff. A nonstandard
visible feature is a feature that may not
be clearly defined on the ground (such
as a ridge), may be seasonal (such as an
intermittent stream), or may be
relatively impermanent (such as a
fence). The Census Bureau generally
requests verification that nonstandard
features pose no problem in their
location during fieldwork by Census
Bureau staff.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be
not significant under Executive Order
12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This program notice does not
represent a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.,
Chapter 35.
Dated: February 5, 2008.
Steve H. Murdock,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. E8–2348 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Economic Analysis
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Correction
Bureau of Economic Analysis
(BEA), Department of Commerce.
This notice corrects the notice
published on February 1, 2008, Volume
73, Number 22, page 6114. The
following items are corrected and
replaced—
Title: Biomedical Research and
Development Price Index (BRDPI)
Survey.
OMB Control Number: 0608–0069.
All other information stated in the
February 1, 2008 notice remains
effective.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Feb 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
Dated: February 5, 2008.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–2373 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privileges:
AR–AM Medical Services LLC; In the
Matter of AR–AM Medical Services
LLC; Case No. 06–08
Order
The Office of Antiboycott
Compliance, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
(‘‘BIS’’), having determined to initiate
an administrative proceeding pursuant
to Section 11(c) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended
(50 U.S.C. 2401–2420 (2000)) (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and the Export Administration
Regulations (currently codified at 15
CFR Parts 730–774 (2007) (the
‘‘Regulations’’), against AR–AM Medical
Services LLC (‘‘AR–AM’’), a domestic
concern, based on allegations set forth
in the Proposed Charging Letter, dated
April 17, 2006, that alleged that AR–AM
committed three violations of the
Regulations;
*
*
*
*
*
Specifically, the charges are:
1. Three Violations of 15 CFR
760.2(d)—Furnishing Information about
Business Relationships With Boycotted
Countries or Blacklisted Persons: During
the years 2001 and 2002, AR–AM
engaged in transaction(s) involving the
sale and/or transfer of goods or services
(including information) from the United
States to Syria. In connection with these
activities, on three occasions, AR–AM,
with intent to comply with, further or
support an unsanctioned foreign
boycott, furnished information
concerning its or another person’s
business relationships with or in a
1 From August 21, 1994 through November 12,
2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the
President, through Executive Order 12924, which
had been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3
CFR 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–
1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On November 13, 2000, the
Act was reauthorized by Pub. L. 106–508 (114 Stat.
2360 (2000)) and remained in effect through August
20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been
in lapse. Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001
(3 CFR 2001 Comp 783 (2002)), which has been
extended by successive Presidential Notices, the
most recent of which was August 15, 2007 (72 FR
46137 (August 16, 2007)), continues the Regulations
in effect under IEEPA.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7525
boycotted country, an activity
prohibited by Section 760.2(d) of the
Regulations, and not excepted.
BIS and AR–AM having entered into
a Settlement Agreement pursuant to
Section 766.18(a) of the Regulations
whereby the parties have agreed to settle
this matter in accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth therein and the
terms of the Settlement Agreement
having been approved by me;
It is therefore ordered that:
First, a civil penalty of $7,200 is
assessed against AR–AM. Payment shall
be suspended for a period of two years
from the date of entry of this Order and
thereafter shall be waived, provided
that, during the period of suspension,
AR–AM has committed no violation of
the Act and Regulations or any order
issued thereunder.
Second, for a period of two years from
the date of entry of this Order, AR–AM
Medical Services LLC (Great Neck, New
York) (‘‘Denied Person’’) may not
participate, directly or indirectly, in any
way in any transaction involving any
commodity, software or technology
(collectively, ‘‘item’’) exported or to be
exported from the United States to
Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya,
Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the
United Arab Emirates or the Republic of
Yemen (collectively, the ‘‘Territory’’)
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity relating to the
Territory that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document, relating to the
Territory;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported fro the United States to the
Territory that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
relating to the Territory subject to the
Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
to the Territory that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
relating to the Territory subject to the
Regulations.
Third, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations from the United States
to the Territory;
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
7526
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession or control of any item subject
to the Regulations that has been or will
be exported from the United States to
the Territory, including financing or
other support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States to the Territory;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States to the Territory; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States to the Territory, and
which is owned, possessed or controlled
by the Denied Person or service any
item, of whatever origin, that is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person if such service involves the use
of any item subject to the Regulations
that has been or will be exported from
the United States to the Territory. For
the purposes of this paragraph, service
means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
Fourth, after notice and opportunity
for comment as provided in Section
766.23 of the Regulations, any person,
firm, corporation or business
organization related to the Denied
Person by affiliation, ownership, control
or position of responsibility in the
conduct or trade or related services may
also be made subject to the provisions
of this Order.
Fifth, this Order does not prohibit any
export, reexport, or other transaction
subject to the Regulations where the
only items involved that are subject to
the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of the U.S.origin technology.
Sixth, the Proposed Charging Letter,
the Settlement Agreement and this
Order shall be made available to the
public, and a copy of this Order shall be
served on the Denied Person and on
BIS, and shall be published in the
Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the
final agency action in this matter, is
effective immediately.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:11 Feb 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
Entered this 14th day of January, 2008.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 08–522 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privileges:
DMA Med-Chem Corporation; In the
Matter of DMA Med-Chem Corporation,
Case No. 02–10
Order
The Office of Antiboycott
Compliance, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
(‘‘BIS’’), having determined to initiate
an administrative proceeding pursuant
to Section 11(c) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended
(50 U.S.C. 2401–2420 (2000)) (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and the Export Administration
Regulations (currently codified as 15
CFR Parts 730–774 (2007)) (the
‘‘Regulations’’), against DMA Med-Chem
Corporation (‘‘DMA’’), a domestic
concern, based on allegations set forth
in the Proposed Charging Letter, dated
April 17, 2006, that alleged that DMA
committed one violation of the
Regulations;
Specifically, the charge is:
1. One Violation of 15 CFR 760.2(d)—
Furnishing Information about Business
Relationships with Boycotted Countries
or Blacklisted Persons: During the year
2001, DMA engaged in a transaction
involving the sale and/or transfer of
goods or services (including
information) from the United States to
Syria. In connection with these
activities, on one occasion, DMA, with
intent to comply with, further or
support an unsanctioned foreign
boycott, furnished information
concerning its or another person’s
business relationships with or in a
boycotted country, an activity
1 From August 21, 1994 through November 12,
2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the
President, through Executive Order 12924, which
had been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3
CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the
Regulations in effect under the Internal Emergency
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706 (2000))
(IEEPA). On November 13, 2000, the Act was
reauthorized by Pub. L. No. 106–508 (114 Stat. 2360
(2000)) and remained in effect through August 20,
2001. Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in
lapse. Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3
CFR 2001 Comp 783 (2002)), which has been
extended by successive Presidential Notices, the
most recent of which was August 15, 2007 (72 FR
46137 (August 16, 2007)), continues the Regulations
in effect under IEEPA.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
prohibited by Section 760.2(d) of the
Regulations, and not excepted.
BIS and DMA having entered into a
Settlement Agreement pursuant to
Section 766.18(a) of the Regulations
whereby the parties have agreed to settle
this matter in accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth therein and the
terms of the Settlement Agreement
having been approved by me;
It is therefore ordered that:
First, a civil penalty of $2,400 is
assessed against DMA. Payment shall be
suspended for a period of two years
from the date of entry of this Order and
thereafter shall be waived, provided
that, during the period of suspension,
DMA has committed no violation of the
Act and Regulations or any order issued
thereunder.
Second, for a period of two years from
the date of entry of this Order, DMA
Med-Chem Corporation (Great Neck,
New York) (‘‘Denied Person’’) may not
participate, directly or indirectly, in any
way in any transaction involving any
commodity, software or technology
(collectively, ‘‘item’’) exported or to be
exported from the United States to
Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya,
Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the
United Arab Emirates or the Republic of
Yemen (collectively, the ‘‘Territory’’)
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity relating to the
Territory that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document, relating to the
Territory.
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, other otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States to the
Territory that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
relating to the Territory subject to the
Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
to the Territory that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
relating to the Territory subject to the
Regulations.
Third, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations from the United States
to the Territory;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7525-7526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-522]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privileges: AR-AM Medical Services LLC;
In the Matter of AR-AM Medical Services LLC; Case No. 06-08
Order
The Office of Antiboycott Compliance, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce (``BIS''), having determined to
initiate an administrative proceeding pursuant to Section 11(c) of the
Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. 2401-2420
(2000)) (the ``Act'') \1\ and the Export Administration Regulations
(currently codified at 15 CFR Parts 730-774 (2007) (the
``Regulations''), against AR-AM Medical Services LLC (``AR-AM''), a
domestic concern, based on allegations set forth in the Proposed
Charging Letter, dated April 17, 2006, that alleged that AR-AM
committed three violations of the Regulations;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ From August 21, 1994 through November 12, 2000, the Act was
in lapse. During that period, the President, through Executive Order
12924, which had been extended by successive Presidential Notices,
the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3 CFR 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)),
continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000))
(``IEEPA''). On November 13, 2000, the Act was reauthorized by Pub.
L. 106-508 (114 Stat. 2360 (2000)) and remained in effect through
August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse.
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp 783
(2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential Notices,
the most recent of which was August 15, 2007 (72 FR 46137 (August
16, 2007)), continues the Regulations in effect under IEEPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Specifically, the charges are:
1. Three Violations of 15 CFR 760.2(d)--Furnishing Information
about Business Relationships With Boycotted Countries or Blacklisted
Persons: During the years 2001 and 2002, AR-AM engaged in
transaction(s) involving the sale and/or transfer of goods or services
(including information) from the United States to Syria. In connection
with these activities, on three occasions, AR-AM, with intent to comply
with, further or support an unsanctioned foreign boycott, furnished
information concerning its or another person's business relationships
with or in a boycotted country, an activity prohibited by Section
760.2(d) of the Regulations, and not excepted.
BIS and AR-AM having entered into a Settlement Agreement pursuant
to Section 766.18(a) of the Regulations whereby the parties have agreed
to settle this matter in accordance with the terms and conditions set
forth therein and the terms of the Settlement Agreement having been
approved by me;
It is therefore ordered that:
First, a civil penalty of $7,200 is assessed against AR-AM. Payment
shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date of entry of
this Order and thereafter shall be waived, provided that, during the
period of suspension, AR-AM has committed no violation of the Act and
Regulations or any order issued thereunder.
Second, for a period of two years from the date of entry of this
Order, AR-AM Medical Services LLC (Great Neck, New York) (``Denied
Person'') may not participate, directly or indirectly, in any way in
any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology
(collectively, ``item'') exported or to be exported from the United
States to Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Oman, Qatar, Saudi
Arabia, Syria, the United Arab Emirates or the Republic of Yemen
(collectively, the ``Territory'') that is subject to the Regulations,
or in any other activity relating to the Territory that is subject to
the Regulations, including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document, relating to the Territory;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported fro the
United States to the Territory that is subject to the Regulations, or
in any other activity relating to the Territory subject to the
Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States to the Territory that
is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity relating to the
Territory subject to the Regulations.
Third, no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations from the United States to the Territory;
[[Page 7526]]
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States to the Territory, including financing
or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied
Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or
control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States to the
Territory;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States to
the Territory; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States to
the Territory, and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the
Denied Person or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves
the use of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States to the Territory. For the purposes of
this paragraph, service means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
Fourth, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation or
business organization related to the Denied Person by affiliation,
ownership, control or position of responsibility in the conduct or
trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of
this Order.
Fifth, this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved
that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced direct
product of the U.S.-origin technology.
Sixth, the Proposed Charging Letter, the Settlement Agreement and
this Order shall be made available to the public, and a copy of this
Order shall be served on the Denied Person and on BIS, and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the final agency action in this
matter, is effective immediately.
Entered this 14th day of January, 2008.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 08-522 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M