Independent Public Accountant Roster, 7170-7177 [E8-2097]
Download as PDF
7170
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. FR–5054–P–01]
RIN 2501–AD20
Independent Public Accountant Roster
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
establish a roster of approved
independent public accountants and
public accounting firms (IPAs) that
would be permitted to perform audits or
related services required by participants
in certain HUD programs and submitted
to HUD. The proposed rule would also
establish eligibility, application, and
removal procedures for IPAs listed on
the IPA Roster. HUD believes this
proposed rule would implement an
additional protection to ensure the
accuracy of financial data submitted to
HUD by its program participants.
DATES: Comment Due Date: April 7,
2008.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule. There are two
methods for comments to be submitted
as public comments and to be included
in the public comment docket for this
rule. Additionally, all submissions must
refer to the above docket number and
title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail.
Comments may be submitted by mail to
the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0001.
2. Electronic Submission of
Comments. Interested persons may
submit comments electronically through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to
make them immediately available to the
public. Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
pwalker on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS2
ADDRESSES:
Note: To receive consideration as public
comments, comments must be submitted
through one of the two methods specified
above. Again, all submissions must refer to
the docket number and title of the rule.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile
(FAX) comments are not acceptable.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 211001
Public Inspection of Public
Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications
submitted to HUD will be available,
without charge, for public inspection
and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.
weekdays at the above address. Due to
security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, an advance
appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled by calling
the Regulations Division at (202) 708–
3055 (this is not a toll-free number).
Individuals with speech or hearing
impairments may access this number
via TTY by calling the Federal
Information Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339. Copies of all comments submitted
are available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Public and Indian Housing,
Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC),
Attention: Elizabeth Hanson, Deputy
Assistant Secretary, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, Office
of Public and Indian Housing Real
Estate Assessment Center, 550 12th
Street, SW., Suite 100, Washington, DC
20410; telephone number (888) 245–
4860 (this is a toll-free number). Persons
with hearing or speech impairments
may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
Additional information is available from
the PIH–REAC Internet site at https://
www.hud.gov/reac/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
HUD’s regulations at 24 CFR part 5,
subpart H (currently consisting of a
single section, 24 CFR 5.801) establish
uniform financial reporting standards
for the Department’s public housing,
Section 8 housing, and insured housing
programs. The uniform financial
reporting standards apply to those
entities or individuals identified in 24
CFR 5.801. They are: (1) Public housing
agencies (PHAs); (2) owners of housing
assisted under any Section 8 projectbased housing assistance payments
program; (3) owners of multifamily
projects receiving HUD assistance or
with mortgages insured, coinsured, or
held by HUD; and (4) HUD-approved
Title I and Title II nonsupervised
lenders, nonsupervised mortgagees, and
nonsupervised loan correspondents
(collectively referred to as ‘‘covered
entities’’). The uniform financial
reporting standards require these
entities or individuals to submit annual
financial information electronically and
in accordance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP). HUD
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
relies on this audited financial
information to ensure the integrity of
financial data submitted to HUD.
II. This Proposed Rule
For the financial information required
of HUD program participants, as
described in 24 CFR 5.801, HUD is
proposing to establish an independent
public accountant (IPA) roster (IPA
Roster or Roster) and to provide
eligibility, application, and removal
procedures for the IPA Roster. The
quality and accuracy of financial data
submitted to HUD begins with selecting
qualified IPAs who agree to comply
with HUD’s requirements with respect
to the provision of audits or related
services. The IPA Roster would list IPAs
that have been approved to perform
audits or related services for covered
entities. IPAs include individuals
employed by public accounting firms
(including a solo practice) or a State
Auditor’s Office who are licensed by a
regulatory authority of a State or other
political subdivision of the United
States both before and after December
31, 1970. IPAs also include certified
public accountants. As proposed,
covered entities or individuals would be
required to select an IPA that is listed
on the IPA Roster for their particular
jurisdiction to perform the audits or
related services required by HUD. Any
IPA seeking to perform audits or related
services for the entities or individuals
noted above would be required to be a
listed IPA sole practitioner, be a
member or partner of a listed IPA, or be
a full-time employee of a listed IPA.
It is important to note, however, that
while HUD is committed to improving
the quality and accuracy of the financial
information submitted to it, the
inclusion of an IPA on the IPA Roster
would not create or imply any warranty
or endorsement by HUD of a listed IPA
to the entities listed in 24 CFR 5.801, or
to any other organization or individual
user of the resulting audited financial
statements. Nor would such inclusion
represent a warranty of the specific
audits or related services performed by
a listed IPA. Such inclusion would
mean only that the IPA has met the
qualifications and conditions prescribed
by the Secretary for placement on the
IPA Roster.
A. IPA Roster Placement Procedure
This proposed rule would establish
the requirements for listing on the IPA
Roster. In order to be placed on the IPA
Roster, each IPA would be required to
submit an application to HUD
identifying the specific state(s),
territory(ies), Commonwealth(s), or
District of the United States in which
E:\FR\FM\06FEP2.SGM
06FEP2
pwalker on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
the IPA wishes to be considered for
listing. HUD would review each IPA’s
application to ensure that each
requirement for eligibility is met for
each of the specific jurisdictions in
which the IPA has requested to be
considered for listing. If HUD’s review
of an IPA’s application demonstrates
that the IPA is eligible in a particular
jurisdiction, the IPA’s name would be
placed on the IPA Roster for that
jurisdiction. If HUD denies the IPA’s
application, the IPA can request
reconsideration, and the IPA would
have 30 days in which to demonstrate
that it was in fact eligible as of the date
of its initial application. Should the IPA
not be able to demonstrate eligibility as
of the date of the IPA’s application, the
IPA would not be listed, but could
reapply at any time in the future.
To be eligible for listing on the IPA
Roster, an IPA would be required to:
1. Be licensed or authorized to
practice in each of the specific
jurisdictions for which the IPA is to be
listed;
2. Not be, nor employ or contract with
anyone for the performance of audits or
related services who is, suspended,
debarred, voluntarily excluded, subject
to a limited denial of participation, or
subject to any order of disbarment or
other denial of right to practice before
the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or subject to a
jurisdiction’s disciplinary action that
has resulted in the revocation,
suspension, or surrender of a license or
authorization to practice public
accounting;
3. Agree to accept only those
engagements for audits or related
services where it meets the minimum
qualifications specified by the Generally
Accepted Government Auditing
Standards (GAGAS);
4. Agree to accept engagements for
only those entities listed in 24 CFR
5.801 that are located in jurisdictions in
which the IPA is listed;
5. Agree to establish and implement
quality control procedures sufficient to
satisfy the quality control standards of
GAGAS;
6. Agree to comply with the
professional standards applicable to any
audit or related service performed;
7. Agree to comply with any
accountancy laws and rules of each
jurisdiction for which the IPA is to be
listed;
8. Agree to comply with all applicable
HUD rules and instructions relating to
financial reporting, audits, and related
services performed for the entities listed
in 24 CFR 5.801;
9. Agree to submit to and cooperate
with reviews by HUD of the IPA’s
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 211001
performance of audits or related services
for those entities listed in 24 CFR 5.801;
10. Agree to notify HUD if the IPA or
any member or employee of the firm is,
or has been, within the previous 5 years,
indicted or otherwise charged with or
convicted of any offense listed in 24
CFR 24.800(a);
11. Agree to notify HUD if the IPA or
any member or employee of the firm is,
or has been, within the previous 5 years,
adjudged to be civilly liable for any of
the offenses listed in 24 CFR 24.800(a);
and
12. Agree to comply with any requests
for information made by HUD. The IPA
would be required to comply with all
agreements required to be listed on the
IPA Roster immediately upon approval
for such listing.
B. Responsibilities of Listed IPAs
An IPA who is eligible to perform
audits or related services, and who is
engaged by a covered entity or entities,
has a contractual responsibility to those
entities. Furthermore, the IPA also has
a responsibility to HUD, whenever a
covered entity or entities for which the
IPA provides audits or related services
are required to submit those audits to
HUD. Therefore, IPAs listed on the IPA
roster will be responsible for: (1)
Complying with any agreements with
HUD immediately upon their approval
for listing on the IPA Roster and
continually thereafter, including, but
not limited to, agreements required for
listing on the IPA Roster; (2)
maintaining compliance with any other
eligibility requirements for listing on the
IPA Roster for each jurisdiction in
which they are listed; and (3) notifying
HUD within 30 days of any change in
their continued compliance with
eligibility requirements.
C. IPA Roster Removal Procedure
In order to safeguard the continued
quality and accuracy of the audits and
related services performed by listed
IPAs and, ultimately, the integrity of the
financial data submitted to HUD, this
proposed rule would establish a
removal process by which the listed
IPAs may be removed from the IPA
Roster. Removal of an IPA from the IPA
Roster would not preclude HUD or the
federal government from also bringing a
false claims action, taking action against
an IPA under 24 CFR part 24
(‘‘Government Debarment and
Suspension and Governmentwide
Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace
(Grants)’’), or from seeking any other
remedy against an IPA available to HUD
or the federal government by statute or
otherwise.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
7171
This proposed rule would allow HUD
to remove an IPA from the IPA Roster
who fails to fulfill its responsibilities as
a listed IPA, for cause at any time. Cause
for removal would include, but would
not be limited to: (1) Failing to comply
with any agreements with HUD,
including, but not limited to,
agreements identified at proposed new
24 CFR 5.810(a) as requirements for
eligibility; (2) failing to maintain
compliance with any other eligibility
requirements for listing on the IPA
Roster for each jurisdiction in which the
IPA is listed; (3) failing to notify HUD
within 30 days of any change in their
continued compliance with eligibility
requirements; or (4) making, or causing
to be made, any false certification to
HUD.
In certain circumstances described
below, the proposed rule would require
the automatic removal of an IPA from
the IPA Roster, while in other
circumstances the proposed rule would
provide the IPA with an opportunity to
respond and attend a conference before
the IPA’s removal from the IPA Roster.
The proposed rule would require the
automatic removal of an IPA from the
IPA Roster: (1) When the IPA fails to
maintain compliance with eligibility
requirements by being debarred,
suspended, voluntarily excluded,
subject to a limited denial of
participation, or subject to any order of
disbarment or other denial of right to
practice before the Securities and
Exchange Commission; or (2) when the
IPA fails to maintain compliance with
eligibility requirements by losing,
whether by revocation, suspension,
surrender, or other means, its license or
authorization to practice in any
particular jurisdiction. However, if the
IPA’s license or authorization to
practice lapsed or expired for reasons
other than disciplinary actions, the IPA
would be removed from the IPA Roster
only for that specific jurisdiction. Under
any of these automatic removal
circumstances, the procedures for
contestable removal set forth in 24 CFR
5.814(d) would not be applicable.
Except in the above cases of automatic
removals, the removal procedures
proposed by this rule would require
HUD to give an IPA written notice of the
proposed removal from the IPA Roster.
Such notice would include the reasons
for the proposed removal. The IPA
would then be given 30 calendar days
from the date of the removal notice to
submit a written response opposing the
removal. During this period, the IPA
would also have the ability to submit a
written request for a conference to
discuss the proposed removal. If the IPA
does not submit a response opposing the
E:\FR\FM\06FEP2.SGM
06FEP2
pwalker on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS2
7172
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
proposed removal within 30 calendar
days, the removal would become
effective 30 calendar days after the date
of HUD’s initial removal notice.
If the IPA opposes the proposed
removal, the Deputy Assistant Secretary
of the Real Estate Assessment Center
(REAC), or a designee (‘‘Reviewing
Official’’), would: (1) Review the
proposed removal notice along with any
supporting information and the
response to the notice; and (2) conduct
the conference with the IPA, if
requested, before making a
determination as to whether the IPA
should be removed from the IPA Roster.
When a request for a conference is
received, the Reviewing Official would
schedule the conference within 30
calendar days of the date the request is
received. The Reviewing Official would
be required to issue a determination
within 30 calendar days of receiving the
IPA’s written response, or, if a
conference is requested, within 30
calendar days of the closing of the
conference. The Reviewing Official may
affirm or deny the IPA’s proposed
removal from the IPA Roster, or the
Reviewing Official may find cause for
removal but order the removal held in
abeyance. In no instance would the
Reviewing Official be the individual
who made the initial determination to
propose the IPA’s removal from the IPA
Roster.
The removal of the IPA would become
effective on the date of HUD’s notice
affirming its initial removal decision.
When the IPA’s removal is held in
abeyance, the effective date of the IPA’s
removal would be set for a date
specified in the future to allow the IPA
to demonstrate that all causes for
removal have been eliminated. If the
IPA successfully demonstrates that all
causes for removal have been
eliminated, the order of termination
would be withdrawn; however, if the
IPA fails to demonstrate that all causes
for removal have been eliminated, the
IPA would be removed from the IPA
Roster as of the effective date listed in
the order of abeyance.
Where HUD is considering the
removal of an IPA who has, during the
previous 3 years, performed audits or
related services for covered entities
covered by this rule, HUD will endeavor
to ascertain whether those covered
entities receive funds from other federal
agencies. Where HUD determines that
the IPA has performed audits or related
services for covered entities receiving
federal funds from other agencies, HUD
will notify the agencies providing such
funding prior to taking any removal
action.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 211001
D. Effect of Removal From IPA Roster
An IPA who has been removed from
the IPA Roster would not be permitted
to enter into any contract or engagement
for audits or related services with
covered entities. While the IPA would
be permitted to continue performance
under any contract or engagement in
effect at the time of the removal, the IPA
would not be permitted to extend or
renew any contract or engagement, with
the exception of no-cost time
extensions, unless the Reviewing
Official were to grant an exception. The
granting of any such exception would be
within the sole discretion of the
Reviewing Official and would be
granted only when determined to be in
the interest of HUD. Additionally,
nothing in this rule would affect an
entity’s discretion to terminate an
existing contract or engagement as a
result of the IPA’s removal, or due to the
circumstances precipitating such
removal.
III. Implementation of This Rule and
Cost Benefits of the Rule
To ensure that IPAs affected by this
rule have adequate time to register with
HUD, HUD plans to delay, at the final
rule stage, the implementation date of
this rule for a period of 12 months
following publication of the final rule.
During this phase-in period, HUD plans
to undertake outreach to covered
entities and IPAs that have registered for
a unique IPA identifier (UII) under the
existing Uniform Financial Reporting
Standards (UFRS) regulation of the
transition to the new requirements that
provide for listing on the IPA Roster.
HUD intends to undertake such
outreach utilizing email notifications,
website postings, mailings, system
messages, presentations at industry
conferences and seminars, press
releases, and, to the extent necessary,
targeted phone calls, to ensure that all
IPAs registered under existing
regulations, and other interested IPAs,
are aware of this new rule. HUD intends
to begin its outreach efforts by ensuring
that IPAs and covered entities are
notified of this proposed rule, when
published. HUD plans to increase these
efforts following the publication of the
final rule, continuing through the oneyear phase-in period following
publication of the final rule. Thirty days
prior to the expiration of the phase-in
period, HUD plans to contact all IPAs
registered with HUD under the current
UFRS regulation and all covered entities
notifying them of the expiration of the
phase-in period and reminding them of
the approaching implementation date of
the IPA Roster regulation. HUD has set
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
a goal of receiving applications from 90
percent of currently registered IPAs
during the phase-in period.
Upon the implementation date of the
final IPA Roster rule, the UIIs of IPAs
registered under the existing UFRS
regulation that have failed to seek and
obtain approval for listing on the IPA
Roster will be deactivated. Any IPA
whose UII has been deactivated remains
able to apply for placement on the IPA
Roster, in accordance with the
procedures of any final IPA Roster rule.
HUD recognizes the costs, in terms of
time and resources, that will be
committed to the implementation of an
IPA Roster rule. However, the
Department believes that the benefits to
both the Department and the entities
covered by this rule far outweigh any
costs associated with an IPA Roster rule.
Specifically, if adopted, the IPA Roster
rule would provide the Department a
significant measure of confidence that
the audits being submitted to it have
been performed by licensed IPAs in
accordance with professional standards.
Audits are a critical management tool
for both the federal government and the
recipients of federal funding, and it is
essential to the effective oversight and
monitoring of billions of federal dollars
that these audits be performed properly.
At this time, the Department does not
have the ability to verify that IPAs are
licensed or competent before an IPA is
engaged to perform a covered service.
Once implemented, the IPA Roster rule
would provide the Department with a
tool to ensure that those auditors being
engaged to perform work for covered
entities are, at a minimum, licensed in
the jurisdictions in which they are
performing those covered services and
are willing to perform the covered
services in accordance with professional
standards.
Additionally, the remedies currently
available to the Department to address
unlicensed or unprofessional auditors
are the costly and very time-consuming
actions for debarment or suspension. In
the Department’s experience, such
actions are generally complex and
technical, and require an excessive
amount of time and resources to
prosecute. Once implemented, the IPA
Roster rule would result in significant
savings of departmental enforcement
resources by enabling the Department to
take action in a timely and efficient
manner if it identifies an IPA that is not
performing in accordance with
established auditing standards or the
provisions of the IPA Roster rule. Thus,
the Department believes that the
improved oversight of federal funds and
program performance resulting from this
rule, along with the time and monetary
E:\FR\FM\06FEP2.SGM
06FEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
savings associated with enforcement
actions against IPAs, justify the
establishment of this roster.
HUD recognizes that this proposed
rule, which would establish a roster of
approved independent public
accountants and public accounting
firms, is an innovative method to
attempt to improve the quality of the
audits submitted to HUD and improve
HUD’s oversight of federal funds and
program performance. Establishing such
a roster would also be unique to the
federal government. For these reasons,
HUD encourages the public to submit
comments on the potential effectiveness
of the rule and on the general concept
of establishing a roster of approved
independent public accountants and
public accounting firms as a means to
improve the quality of the audit of
federal funds and program performance.
IV. Small Business Concerns Related to
Independent Public Accountant Roster
In creating and maintaining the IPA
Roster, or in taking action to remove a
listed IPA, HUD is cognizant that
section 222 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Pub. L. 104–121) (SBREFA)
requires the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement
Ombudsman to ‘‘work with each agency
with regulatory authority over small
businesses to ensure that small business
concerns that receive or are subject to an
audit, on-site inspection, compliance
assistance effort or other enforcementrelated communication or contact by
agency personnel are provided with a
means to comment on the enforcement
activity conducted by this personnel.’’
To implement this statutory provision,
the Small Business Administration has
requested that agencies include the
following language on agency
publications and notices that are
provided to small business concerns at
the time the enforcement action is
undertaken. The language is as follows:
7173
Executive Order 12866 (entitled
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’).
OMB determined that this rule is a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of the Order
(although not economically significant,
as provided in section 3(f)(1) of the
Order). The docket file is available for
public inspection between the hours of
8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays in the
Regulations Division, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street,
SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC
20410–0500. Due to security measures
at the HUD Headquarters building, an
advance appointment to review the
docket file must be scheduled by calling
the Regulations Division at (202) 708–
3055.
Your Comments Are Important
The Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and 10
Regional Fairness Boards were established to
receive comments from small businesses
about federal agency enforcement actions.
The Ombudsman will annually evaluate the
enforcement activities and rate each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you wish
to comment on the enforcement actions of
[insert agency name], you will find the
necessary comment forms at
www.sba.gov.ombudsman or call 1–888–
REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this rule have
been submitted to OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520). In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information, unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Interested persons are invited
to submit comments regarding the
information collection requirements in
this rule. Comments must be received
within 60 days from the date of this
rule. The burden of the information
collections in this proposed rule is
estimated as follows:
As HUD stated in its notice describing
HUD’s actions on the implementation of
SBREFA, which was published on May
21, 1998 (63 FR 28214), HUD will work
with the Small Business Administration
to provide small entities with
information on the Fairness Boards and
National Ombudsman program, at the
time enforcement actions are taken, to
ensure that small entities have the full
means to comment on the enforcement
activity conducted by HUD.
V. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) reviewed this rule under
REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING BURDEN
Number of
responses per
respondent
Estimated
average time
for
requirement
(in hours)
Estimated
annual burden
(in hours)
24 CFR 5.812 ..................................................................................................
pwalker on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS2
Section reference
Number of
parties
7,137
1
1
7,137
In accordance with 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1), HUD is soliciting
comments from members of the public
and affected agencies concerning this
collection of information to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 211001
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Under the provisions of 5 CFR part
1320, OMB is required to make a
decision concerning this collection of
information between 30 and 60 days
after today’s publication date. Therefore,
a comment on the information
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
collection requirements is best assured
of having its full effect if OMB receives
the comment within 30 days of today’s
publication. This time frame does not
affect the deadline for comments to the
agency on the proposed rule, however.
Comments must refer to the proposal by
name and docket number FR–5054–P–
01 and must be sent to: HUD Desk
Officer, Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503, Fax: (202) 395–
6974, and Directives Management
Officer, Office of Public and Indian
Housing, U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
E:\FR\FM\06FEP2.SGM
06FEP2
7174
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Street, SW., Room 4116, Washington,
DC 20410–8000.
pwalker on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS2
Environmental Impact
This proposed rule establishes
placement and removal procedures for
HUD’s IPA Roster. This proposed rule
does not direct, provide for assistance or
loan and mortgage insurance for, or
otherwise govern or regulate, real
property acquisition, disposition,
leasing, rehabilitation, alteration,
demolition, or new construction, or
establish, revise, or provide for
standards for construction or
construction materials, manufactured
housing, or occupancy. Accordingly,
under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this proposed
rule is categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) generally requires
an agency to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The proposed
rule establishes the procedure by which
an IPA who has violated professional
auditing or other HUD requirements
may be removed from HUD’s IPA
Roster. Accordingly, to the extent that
this proposed rule impacts small
entities, it is as a result of actions taken
by small entities themselves; that is,
violation of professional auditing, HUD,
or other requirements. The proposed
rule provides several procedural
safeguards designed to minimize any
potential impact on small entities. For
example, the rule grants IPAs selected
for removal from the IPA Roster with
the opportunity to provide a written
response and to request a conference
regarding a proposed removal. The rule
also specifies that the official designated
by HUD to review an appeal may not be
the same HUD official involved in the
initial removal decision.
Notwithstanding HUD’s
determination that this rule does not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
HUD specifically invites comments from
all entities, including small entities,
regarding less burdensome alternatives
to this rule that will meet HUD’s
objectives as described in this preamble.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538) (UMRA) requires federal agencies
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 211001
to assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on state, local, and tribal
governments, and on the private sector.
This proposed rule does not impose any
federal mandate on any state, local, or
tribal governments, or on the private
sector within the meaning of UMRA.
PART 5—GENERAL HUD PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS; WAIVERS
owners; and Title I and Title II
nonsupervised lenders, nonsupervised
mortgagees, and loan correspondents
that are subject to the requirements of
24 CFR 5.801, for which HUD is the
cognizant or oversight agency under the
Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996.
Independent Public Accountant (IPA).
An accountant is an individual
employed by a public accounting firm
(including a solo practice) or a State
Auditor’s Office, and licensed by a
regulatory authority of a State or other
political subdivision of the United
States both before and after December
31, 1970. All certified public
accountants are considered to be
independent public accountants.
Jurisdiction. Any State, territory,
Commonwealth, or District of the
United States.
Professional standards. (1)
Accounting principles that are:
(i) Established by the Government
Accounting Standards Board or
Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP), as applicable;
(ii) Established by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB);
(iii) Established by HUD; or
(iv) Applicable to audit reports for
particular covered entities or covered by
the quality control system of a particular
IPA listed on the IPA Roster.
(2) Auditing standards. Standards for
attestation engagements, quality control
policies and procedures, ethical and
competency standards, and
independence standards that are issued
or adopted by:
(i) The American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants (Generally Accepted
Auditing Standards (GAAS));
(ii) The Government Accountability
Office (Generally Accepted Government
Auditing Standards (GAGAS));
(iii) The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB Circular A–133); or
(iv) HUD.
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR
part 5 continues to read as follows:
§ 5.804 The Independent Public
Accountant Roster (IPA Roster).
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), unless
otherwise noted.
(a) Independent Public Accountant
Roster. HUD maintains a roster of
independent public accountants and
public accounting firms (IPAs) who are
approved to perform audits or related
services in specified jurisdictions for
those entities that are required to submit
audited financial statements to HUD
under this subpart, and for which HUD
is the cognizant or oversight agency
under the Single Audit Act
Amendments of 1996.
(b) Disclaimer. The inclusion of an
IPA on the IPA Roster does not create
or imply any warranty or endorsement
to any organization or individual,
including any other potential user of the
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits, to the extent
practicable and permitted by law, an
agency from publishing any rule that
has federalism implications and either
imposes substantial direct compliance
costs on state and local governments
and is not required by statute, or that
preempts state law, unless the agency
meets the consultation and funding
requirements of section 6 of the
Executive Order. This rule does not
have federalism implications and does
not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive
Order.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and
procedure; Aged; Claims; Crime;
Government contracts; Grant
programs—housing and community
development; Individuals with
disabilities; Intergovernmental relations;
Loan programs—housing and
community development; Low and
moderate income housing; Mortgage
insurance; Penalties; Pets; Public
housing; Rent subsidies; Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements; Social
security; Unemployment compensation;
Wages.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in
the preamble, HUD proposes to amend
24 CFR part 5 as follows:
2. Add new §§ 5.802, 5.804, 5.806,
5.808, 5.810, 5.812, 5.814, 5.816, 5.818,
and 5.820 to read as follows:
§ 5.802
Definitions.
The following definitions apply to
this subpart:
Audit(s) or related service(s). Any
audit, attestation, compilation, review,
or other service that an IPA is required
to perform in accordance with those
financial reporting standards described
in § 5.801.
Covered entity(ies). Public housing
agencies; contract administrators;
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\06FEP2.SGM
06FEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
audited financial statements, by HUD of
a listed IPA, nor does it represent a
warranty of any audits or related
services performed by the listed IPA.
The inclusion of an IPA on the IPA
Roster means only that the IPA has met
the qualifications and conditions,
prescribed in this part, for inclusion on
the IPA Roster.
§ 5.806 Responsibilities of an IPA listed on
the IPA Roster.
An IPA listed on the IPA Roster is
responsible for:
(a) Complying with any agreements
with HUD, including, but not limited to,
agreements identified at § 5.810(a);
(b) Maintaining any other eligibility
requirements and compliance for each
state or jurisdiction in which the IPA is
listed;
(c) Notifying HUD within 30 days of
any change in the continued compliance
of the IPA with eligibility requirements;
and
(d) Not making, or causing to be
made, any false certifications to HUD.
§ 5.808
Applicability of IPA Roster.
(a) Any IPA that seeks to perform
audits or related services in a particular
jurisdiction for covered entities must be
listed on the IPA Roster for that state or
jurisdiction.
(b) When the IPA wishes to perform
audits or related services for covered
entities with offices in numerous
jurisdictions, the IPA need only be
listed in the jurisdiction in which the
covered entity maintains its
headquarters.
(c) Every IPA that is engaged to
perform audits or related services, or
who contracts with an IPA to perform
any portion of audits or related services,
must be listed on the IPA Roster
individually or be an employee or
member of an auditing firm listed on the
IPA Roster.
pwalker on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS2
§ 5.810 Eligibility requirements for
placement on the IPA Roster.
To be eligible for placement on the
IPA Roster:
(a) Public accounting firms and State
Auditor’s Offices must:
(1) Be licensed or authorized to
practice in each of the specific
jurisdiction(s) for which the IPA is to be
listed;
(2) Not be, or employ or contract with
anyone for the performance of audits or
related services who is: suspended,
debarred, voluntarily excluded, subject
to a limited denial of participation, or
subject to any order of disbarment or
other denial of right to practice before
the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or subject to a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 211001
jurisdiction’s disciplinary action that
has resulted in the revocation,
suspension, or surrender of a license or
authorization to practice public
accounting;
(3) Agree upon approval for
placement on the IPA Roster, to comply
with the following to maintain
placement on the IPA Roster:
(i) Accept only those engagements for
audits or related services that meet the
minimum qualifications specified by the
Generally Accepted Government
Auditing Standards (GAGAS);
(ii) In servicing covered entities,
accept only those engagements for
audits or related services for covered
entities located in jurisdictions in which
the IPA is listed on the IPA Roster;
(iii) Establish and implement quality
control procedures sufficient to satisfy
the quality control standards of GAGAS;
(iv) Comply with the professional
standards applicable to any audits or
related services performed for covered
entities;
(v) Comply with any accountancy
laws and rules of each jurisdiction for
which the IPA is to be listed;
(vi) Comply with all applicable HUD
rules and instructions relating to
financial reporting, audits, or related
services;
(vii) Submit to and cooperate with
reviews by HUD of the IPA’s
performance of audits or related services
for covered entities;
(viii) Notify HUD if the IPA or any
member or employee of the firm is, or
has been within the previous 5 years,
indicted or otherwise charged with or
convicted of any offense listed in 24
CFR 24.800(a);
(ix) Notify HUD if the IPA or any
member or employee of the firm is, or
has been within the previous 5 years,
adjudged to be civilly liable for any of
the offenses listed in 24 CFR 24.800(a);
and
(x) Comply with any requests for
information made by HUD.
(b) Individual public accountants that
wish to be listed on the IPA Roster must
either:
(1) Meet the eligibility requirements
specified in § 5.810(a); or
(2) Be a partner or member of a public
accounting firm listed on the IPA
Roster, or be a full-time employee of
such a firm.
§ 5.812
IPA Roster Placement Procedures.
(a) Application. An IPA seeking to be
listed on the IPA Roster must submit an
application to HUD. The application
must specifically identify each
jurisdiction in which the IPA seeks to be
listed, and must demonstrate that the
IPA meets the eligibility requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
7175
described in § 5.810 for listing in each
such jurisdiction. The application must
be in a form, and delivered in a manner,
prescribed by HUD.
(b) Approval for listing on the IPA
Roster. Once received by HUD, the
application will be reviewed and a
decision issued within 45 days of HUD’s
receipt of the application, unless HUD
extends this time by providing notice to
the IPA.
(1) Approval. If HUD determines that
the IPA meets the eligibility
requirements described in § 5.810 for
listing in a particular jurisdiction, the
IPA will be listed on the IPA Roster for
that particular jurisdiction.
(2) Denial. If the IPA fails to
demonstrate that it meets all the
eligibility requirements described in
§ 5.810, the application will be denied.
(i) If a denial of the application is
issued, the IPA will be notified of the
reasons for the denial and will be given
30 days from the date of the denial to
request reconsideration and
demonstrate that the IPA did meet all
eligibility requirements for listing in a
particular jurisdiction at the time of the
initial application.
(ii) If the IPA demonstrates that it did
meet all eligibility requirements for
listing in a particular jurisdiction at the
time of the initial application, the IPA
will be listed on the IPA Roster for that
particular jurisdiction.
(iii) If the IPA fails to demonstrate
that it met all eligibility requirements,
the denial of the application is final and
the IPA will be required to submit a new
application to be considered for future
placement on the IPA Roster.
§ 5.814
IPA Roster Removal Procedures.
(a) Removal from the IPA Roster.
(1) An IPA may be voluntarily
removed from the IPA Roster by
notifying the Department in writing, and
specifying from which jurisdiction(s)
the IPA wishes to be removed.
(2) An IPA that fails to fulfill its
responsibilities as a listed IPA is subject
to involuntary removal from the IPA
Roster.
(b) Involuntary automatic removal.
HUD may automatically remove an IPA
from the IPA Roster for all applicable
jurisdictions, without the benefit of a
conference or other opportunity to
respond, if the IPA:
(1) Fails to maintain compliance with
eligibility requirements by being
debarred, suspended, voluntarily
excluded, subject to a limited denial of
participation, or subject to any order of
disbarment or other denial of right to
practice before the Securities and
Exchange Commission;
E:\FR\FM\06FEP2.SGM
06FEP2
pwalker on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS2
7176
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(2) Fails to maintain compliance with
eligibility requirements by incurring a
jurisdiction’s disciplinary action that
results in the revocation, suspension, or
surrender of a license or authorization
to practice; or
(3) Fails to maintain compliance with
eligibility requirements by allowing
licensing or authorization to practice to
expire, not due to jurisdiction
disciplinary action in any jurisdiction
for which the IPA is listed on the IPA
Roster.
(4) Automatic removal of an IPA from
the IPA Roster for any jurisdiction will
constitute automatic removal from the
IPA Rosters for all jurisdictions.
However, automatic removal under
paragraph (b)(3) of this section for
failure to maintain licensing or
authorization constitutes removal for
only the jurisdictions in which the IPA
has allowed its licensing or
authorization to practice to lapse, and
does not affect the listing of the IPA on
the IPA Roster for any other jurisdiction
in which the IPA remains eligible.
(c) Causes for contestable removal.
Causes for contestable removal include,
but are not limited to:
(1) Failing to comply with any
agreements with HUD, including, but
not limited to, agreements identified at
§ 5.810(a);
(2) Failing to maintain compliance
with any other eligibility requirements
for listing on the IPA Roster for each
jurisdiction in which the IPA is listed;
(3) Failing to notify HUD within 30
days of any change in the continued
compliance of the IPA with eligibility
requirements; or
(4) Making, or causing to be made,
any false certification to HUD.
(d) Procedure for contestable removal.
Unless an IPA is subject to automatic
removal from the IPA Roster under
paragraph (b) of this section, the
following procedures apply:
(1) HUD will provide the IPA with
written notice of the proposed removal
from the IPA Roster. The notice of
proposed removal will include the
reasons for the proposed removal of the
IPA from the IPA Roster.
(2) The IPA has 30 calendar days from
the date of the notice of proposed
removal to submit a written response
objecting to the proposed removal and/
or requesting a conference. If an IPA
submits a timely written objection to the
proposed removal, the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Departmental Real
Estate Assessment Center (REAC) or a
designee (‘‘Reviewing Official’’), will
review the proposed removal and the
IPA objection, and conduct a conference
with the IPA, if requested. When a
request for a conference is received, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 211001
Reviewing Official will schedule the
conference within 30 calendar days of
the date the request is received. In no
instance will the Reviewing Official be
the same individual who made the
initial determination to propose removal
of the IPA from the IPA Roster.
(3) The Reviewing Official will issue
a determination within 30 days of
receiving the IPA’s written response, or,
if a conference is requested, within 30
days of the closing of the conference.
The Reviewing Official may extend the
time for issuance of a final decision by
providing the IPA with notice.
(4) The Reviewing Official may affirm
or deny the proposed removal from the
IPA Roster, or the Reviewing Official
may, in his or her sole discretion, find
cause for the removal but order that the
removal be held in abeyance pending
further action.
(e) Removal held in abeyance. (1)
When the Reviewing Official has
determined that cause for removal
exists, the Reviewing Official may,
instead, in his or her sole discretion,
issue an order of abeyance, deferring the
removal of the IPA from the IPA Roster
until a future date specified in the order
of abeyance.
(2) The order of abeyance provides the
IPA with the opportunity to
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Reviewing Official that all causes for the
removal have been addressed prior to
the effective date for removal specified
in the order of abeyance.
(3) The Reviewing Official shall
consider any relevant evidence
submitted by an IPA as of the date
specified in the order of abeyance, to
determine whether all causes for
removal have been addressed. Upon
request by the IPA, the Reviewing
Official, in his or her discretion, may
review such evidence at any time prior
to the date specified in the order of
abeyance.
(f) Other action. Nothing in this
subpart prohibits HUD or the federal
government from taking such other
action against an IPA as provided under
24 CFR part 24, or from seeking any
other remedy against an IPA available to
HUD or the federal government by
statute or otherwise.
(g) Effective dates of removal from the
IPA Roster. (1) Unless an IPA is subject
to automatic removal from the IPA
Roster under paragraph (b) of this
section, the following effective dates
apply.
(i) If the IPA does not submit a written
response within 30 calendar days of the
date of the notice of proposed removal,
the removal becomes effective 30
calendar days after the date of HUD’s
removal notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(ii) If the IPA submits a written
response within 30 calendar days of the
date of the notice of proposed removal,
and the removal decision is affirmed,
the effective date of the removal is the
date of HUD’s notice affirming its initial
removal decision.
(2) If the IPA is subject to automatic
removal, the removal is effective as of
the date the IPA receives notice of the
removal.
(3) If the removal is held in abeyance,
the order of abeyance will specify the
effective date of the removal, which will
be effective should the IPA fail to
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Reviewing Official that all causes for the
removal have been eliminated by the
effective date.
(h) Notification of other federal
agencies. Where HUD is considering the
removal of an IPA who has, during the
previous 3 years, performed audits or
related services for a covered entity,
HUD will endeavor to ascertain whether
any audited covered entity receives
funds from any other federal agency.
Where HUD determines that the IPA has
performed audits or related services for
a covered entity receiving federal funds
from another agency, HUD will notify
that agency prior to taking any removal
action against the IPA.
§ 5.816 Consequences of removal from the
IPA Roster.
(a) If an IPA is removed from the IPA
Roster, the IPA can no longer be
engaged to perform audits or related
services for covered entities.
(b) If the IPA is currently engaged to
perform audits or related services for
covered entities, the IPA is not
prohibited from completing those
contracts or engagements. However, the
IPA may not renew or extend (other
than no-cost time extensions) any
contract or engagement, unless the
Reviewing Official grants an exception.
The granting of any such exception lies
within the sole discretion of the
Reviewing Official and will be granted
only when the Reviewing Official
determines that an exception is in the
interest of HUD.
(c) HUD’s action to remove an IPA
from the IPA Roster does not affect the
ability of covered entities to, in their
discretion, terminate an existing
contract or engagement as a result of the
removal of the IPA from the IPA Roster
or the circumstances precipitating the
removal of the IPA.
§ 5.818 Consequences of a removal action
that is held in abeyance.
(a) If the IPA demonstrates, to the
satisfaction of the Reviewing Official,
that all causes for removal have been
E:\FR\FM\06FEP2.SGM
06FEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Proposed Rules
eliminated within the specified time
period before the effective date of the
removal, the removal action against the
IPA will be terminated and the IPA will
remain listed on the IPA Roster, subject
to continued eligibility.
(b) If the IPA fails to demonstrate
elimination of all causes for removal, to
the satisfaction of the Reviewing
Official, before the effective date, the
IPA will be removed from the IPA
Roster as of the effective date.
§ 5.820
Reinstatement to the IPA Roster.
pwalker on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS2
(a) Reinstatement. Except as specified
in paragraph (b) of this section, an IPA
may request reinstatement of its listing
on the IPA Roster no earlier than one
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:35 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 211001
year following the effective date of the
removal from the IPA Roster.
(1) The request for reinstatement must
contain all the information and comply
with all the requirements for initial
application for placement on the IPA
Roster.
(2) The IPA must submit a written
explanation of the circumstances
surrounding the removal from the IPA
Roster.
(3) The IPA must submit
documentation demonstrating that all
causes resulting in the removal from the
IPA Roster have been eliminated.
(b) Reinstatement following automatic
removal due to expiration of license or
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
7177
authorization to practice. If the IPA has
been automatically removed due to the
expiration of licensing or authorization
to practice in a jurisdiction, not due to
disciplinary action, the IPA may request
reinstatement and be reinstated at any
time by submitting evidence
demonstrating the renewal of licensing
or authorization to practice in that
particular jurisdiction.
Dated: January 7, 2008.
Roy A. Bernardi,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–2097 Filed 2–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
E:\FR\FM\06FEP2.SGM
06FEP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7170-7177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2097]
[[Page 7169]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III
Department of Housing and Urban Development
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
24 CFR Part 5
Independent Public Accountant Roster; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 7170]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. FR-5054-P-01]
RIN 2501-AD20
Independent Public Accountant Roster
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would establish a roster of approved
independent public accountants and public accounting firms (IPAs) that
would be permitted to perform audits or related services required by
participants in certain HUD programs and submitted to HUD. The proposed
rule would also establish eligibility, application, and removal
procedures for IPAs listed on the IPA Roster. HUD believes this
proposed rule would implement an additional protection to ensure the
accuracy of financial data submitted to HUD by its program
participants.
DATES: Comment Due Date: April 7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule. There are two methods for comments to be submitted
as public comments and to be included in the public comment docket for
this rule. Additionally, all submissions must refer to the above docket
number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by
mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410-0001.
2. Electronic Submission of Comments. Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them immediately available to
the public. Commenters should follow the instructions provided on that
site to submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments must
be submitted through one of the two methods specified above. Again,
all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of the
rule.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile (FAX) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications submitted to HUD will be available, without
charge, for public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.
weekdays at the above address. Due to security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, an advance appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled by calling the Regulations Division at (202)
708-3055 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with speech or
hearing impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the
Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Copies of all
comments submitted are available for inspection and downloading at
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Public and Indian
Housing, Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC), Attention: Elizabeth
Hanson, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, Office of Public and Indian Housing Real Estate Assessment
Center, 550 12th Street, SW., Suite 100, Washington, DC 20410;
telephone number (888) 245-4860 (this is a toll-free number). Persons
with hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY
by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at (800)
877-8339. Additional information is available from the PIH-REAC
Internet site at https://www.hud.gov/reac/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
HUD's regulations at 24 CFR part 5, subpart H (currently consisting
of a single section, 24 CFR 5.801) establish uniform financial
reporting standards for the Department's public housing, Section 8
housing, and insured housing programs. The uniform financial reporting
standards apply to those entities or individuals identified in 24 CFR
5.801. They are: (1) Public housing agencies (PHAs); (2) owners of
housing assisted under any Section 8 project-based housing assistance
payments program; (3) owners of multifamily projects receiving HUD
assistance or with mortgages insured, coinsured, or held by HUD; and
(4) HUD-approved Title I and Title II nonsupervised lenders,
nonsupervised mortgagees, and nonsupervised loan correspondents
(collectively referred to as ``covered entities''). The uniform
financial reporting standards require these entities or individuals to
submit annual financial information electronically and in accordance
with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). HUD relies on
this audited financial information to ensure the integrity of financial
data submitted to HUD.
II. This Proposed Rule
For the financial information required of HUD program participants,
as described in 24 CFR 5.801, HUD is proposing to establish an
independent public accountant (IPA) roster (IPA Roster or Roster) and
to provide eligibility, application, and removal procedures for the IPA
Roster. The quality and accuracy of financial data submitted to HUD
begins with selecting qualified IPAs who agree to comply with HUD's
requirements with respect to the provision of audits or related
services. The IPA Roster would list IPAs that have been approved to
perform audits or related services for covered entities. IPAs include
individuals employed by public accounting firms (including a solo
practice) or a State Auditor's Office who are licensed by a regulatory
authority of a State or other political subdivision of the United
States both before and after December 31, 1970. IPAs also include
certified public accountants. As proposed, covered entities or
individuals would be required to select an IPA that is listed on the
IPA Roster for their particular jurisdiction to perform the audits or
related services required by HUD. Any IPA seeking to perform audits or
related services for the entities or individuals noted above would be
required to be a listed IPA sole practitioner, be a member or partner
of a listed IPA, or be a full-time employee of a listed IPA.
It is important to note, however, that while HUD is committed to
improving the quality and accuracy of the financial information
submitted to it, the inclusion of an IPA on the IPA Roster would not
create or imply any warranty or endorsement by HUD of a listed IPA to
the entities listed in 24 CFR 5.801, or to any other organization or
individual user of the resulting audited financial statements. Nor
would such inclusion represent a warranty of the specific audits or
related services performed by a listed IPA. Such inclusion would mean
only that the IPA has met the qualifications and conditions prescribed
by the Secretary for placement on the IPA Roster.
A. IPA Roster Placement Procedure
This proposed rule would establish the requirements for listing on
the IPA Roster. In order to be placed on the IPA Roster, each IPA would
be required to submit an application to HUD identifying the specific
state(s), territory(ies), Commonwealth(s), or District of the United
States in which
[[Page 7171]]
the IPA wishes to be considered for listing. HUD would review each
IPA's application to ensure that each requirement for eligibility is
met for each of the specific jurisdictions in which the IPA has
requested to be considered for listing. If HUD's review of an IPA's
application demonstrates that the IPA is eligible in a particular
jurisdiction, the IPA's name would be placed on the IPA Roster for that
jurisdiction. If HUD denies the IPA's application, the IPA can request
reconsideration, and the IPA would have 30 days in which to demonstrate
that it was in fact eligible as of the date of its initial application.
Should the IPA not be able to demonstrate eligibility as of the date of
the IPA's application, the IPA would not be listed, but could reapply
at any time in the future.
To be eligible for listing on the IPA Roster, an IPA would be
required to:
1. Be licensed or authorized to practice in each of the specific
jurisdictions for which the IPA is to be listed;
2. Not be, nor employ or contract with anyone for the performance
of audits or related services who is, suspended, debarred, voluntarily
excluded, subject to a limited denial of participation, or subject to
any order of disbarment or other denial of right to practice before the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or subject to a jurisdiction's
disciplinary action that has resulted in the revocation, suspension, or
surrender of a license or authorization to practice public accounting;
3. Agree to accept only those engagements for audits or related
services where it meets the minimum qualifications specified by the
Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS);
4. Agree to accept engagements for only those entities listed in 24
CFR 5.801 that are located in jurisdictions in which the IPA is listed;
5. Agree to establish and implement quality control procedures
sufficient to satisfy the quality control standards of GAGAS;
6. Agree to comply with the professional standards applicable to
any audit or related service performed;
7. Agree to comply with any accountancy laws and rules of each
jurisdiction for which the IPA is to be listed;
8. Agree to comply with all applicable HUD rules and instructions
relating to financial reporting, audits, and related services performed
for the entities listed in 24 CFR 5.801;
9. Agree to submit to and cooperate with reviews by HUD of the
IPA's performance of audits or related services for those entities
listed in 24 CFR 5.801;
10. Agree to notify HUD if the IPA or any member or employee of the
firm is, or has been, within the previous 5 years, indicted or
otherwise charged with or convicted of any offense listed in 24 CFR
24.800(a);
11. Agree to notify HUD if the IPA or any member or employee of the
firm is, or has been, within the previous 5 years, adjudged to be
civilly liable for any of the offenses listed in 24 CFR 24.800(a); and
12. Agree to comply with any requests for information made by HUD.
The IPA would be required to comply with all agreements required to be
listed on the IPA Roster immediately upon approval for such listing.
B. Responsibilities of Listed IPAs
An IPA who is eligible to perform audits or related services, and
who is engaged by a covered entity or entities, has a contractual
responsibility to those entities. Furthermore, the IPA also has a
responsibility to HUD, whenever a covered entity or entities for which
the IPA provides audits or related services are required to submit
those audits to HUD. Therefore, IPAs listed on the IPA roster will be
responsible for: (1) Complying with any agreements with HUD immediately
upon their approval for listing on the IPA Roster and continually
thereafter, including, but not limited to, agreements required for
listing on the IPA Roster; (2) maintaining compliance with any other
eligibility requirements for listing on the IPA Roster for each
jurisdiction in which they are listed; and (3) notifying HUD within 30
days of any change in their continued compliance with eligibility
requirements.
C. IPA Roster Removal Procedure
In order to safeguard the continued quality and accuracy of the
audits and related services performed by listed IPAs and, ultimately,
the integrity of the financial data submitted to HUD, this proposed
rule would establish a removal process by which the listed IPAs may be
removed from the IPA Roster. Removal of an IPA from the IPA Roster
would not preclude HUD or the federal government from also bringing a
false claims action, taking action against an IPA under 24 CFR part 24
(``Government Debarment and Suspension and Governmentwide Requirements
for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants)''), or from seeking any other remedy
against an IPA available to HUD or the federal government by statute or
otherwise.
This proposed rule would allow HUD to remove an IPA from the IPA
Roster who fails to fulfill its responsibilities as a listed IPA, for
cause at any time. Cause for removal would include, but would not be
limited to: (1) Failing to comply with any agreements with HUD,
including, but not limited to, agreements identified at proposed new 24
CFR 5.810(a) as requirements for eligibility; (2) failing to maintain
compliance with any other eligibility requirements for listing on the
IPA Roster for each jurisdiction in which the IPA is listed; (3)
failing to notify HUD within 30 days of any change in their continued
compliance with eligibility requirements; or (4) making, or causing to
be made, any false certification to HUD.
In certain circumstances described below, the proposed rule would
require the automatic removal of an IPA from the IPA Roster, while in
other circumstances the proposed rule would provide the IPA with an
opportunity to respond and attend a conference before the IPA's removal
from the IPA Roster. The proposed rule would require the automatic
removal of an IPA from the IPA Roster: (1) When the IPA fails to
maintain compliance with eligibility requirements by being debarred,
suspended, voluntarily excluded, subject to a limited denial of
participation, or subject to any order of disbarment or other denial of
right to practice before the Securities and Exchange Commission; or (2)
when the IPA fails to maintain compliance with eligibility requirements
by losing, whether by revocation, suspension, surrender, or other
means, its license or authorization to practice in any particular
jurisdiction. However, if the IPA's license or authorization to
practice lapsed or expired for reasons other than disciplinary actions,
the IPA would be removed from the IPA Roster only for that specific
jurisdiction. Under any of these automatic removal circumstances, the
procedures for contestable removal set forth in 24 CFR 5.814(d) would
not be applicable.
Except in the above cases of automatic removals, the removal
procedures proposed by this rule would require HUD to give an IPA
written notice of the proposed removal from the IPA Roster. Such notice
would include the reasons for the proposed removal. The IPA would then
be given 30 calendar days from the date of the removal notice to submit
a written response opposing the removal. During this period, the IPA
would also have the ability to submit a written request for a
conference to discuss the proposed removal. If the IPA does not submit
a response opposing the
[[Page 7172]]
proposed removal within 30 calendar days, the removal would become
effective 30 calendar days after the date of HUD's initial removal
notice.
If the IPA opposes the proposed removal, the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC), or a designee
(``Reviewing Official''), would: (1) Review the proposed removal notice
along with any supporting information and the response to the notice;
and (2) conduct the conference with the IPA, if requested, before
making a determination as to whether the IPA should be removed from the
IPA Roster. When a request for a conference is received, the Reviewing
Official would schedule the conference within 30 calendar days of the
date the request is received. The Reviewing Official would be required
to issue a determination within 30 calendar days of receiving the IPA's
written response, or, if a conference is requested, within 30 calendar
days of the closing of the conference. The Reviewing Official may
affirm or deny the IPA's proposed removal from the IPA Roster, or the
Reviewing Official may find cause for removal but order the removal
held in abeyance. In no instance would the Reviewing Official be the
individual who made the initial determination to propose the IPA's
removal from the IPA Roster.
The removal of the IPA would become effective on the date of HUD's
notice affirming its initial removal decision. When the IPA's removal
is held in abeyance, the effective date of the IPA's removal would be
set for a date specified in the future to allow the IPA to demonstrate
that all causes for removal have been eliminated. If the IPA
successfully demonstrates that all causes for removal have been
eliminated, the order of termination would be withdrawn; however, if
the IPA fails to demonstrate that all causes for removal have been
eliminated, the IPA would be removed from the IPA Roster as of the
effective date listed in the order of abeyance.
Where HUD is considering the removal of an IPA who has, during the
previous 3 years, performed audits or related services for covered
entities covered by this rule, HUD will endeavor to ascertain whether
those covered entities receive funds from other federal agencies. Where
HUD determines that the IPA has performed audits or related services
for covered entities receiving federal funds from other agencies, HUD
will notify the agencies providing such funding prior to taking any
removal action.
D. Effect of Removal From IPA Roster
An IPA who has been removed from the IPA Roster would not be
permitted to enter into any contract or engagement for audits or
related services with covered entities. While the IPA would be
permitted to continue performance under any contract or engagement in
effect at the time of the removal, the IPA would not be permitted to
extend or renew any contract or engagement, with the exception of no-
cost time extensions, unless the Reviewing Official were to grant an
exception. The granting of any such exception would be within the sole
discretion of the Reviewing Official and would be granted only when
determined to be in the interest of HUD. Additionally, nothing in this
rule would affect an entity's discretion to terminate an existing
contract or engagement as a result of the IPA's removal, or due to the
circumstances precipitating such removal.
III. Implementation of This Rule and Cost Benefits of the Rule
To ensure that IPAs affected by this rule have adequate time to
register with HUD, HUD plans to delay, at the final rule stage, the
implementation date of this rule for a period of 12 months following
publication of the final rule. During this phase-in period, HUD plans
to undertake outreach to covered entities and IPAs that have registered
for a unique IPA identifier (UII) under the existing Uniform Financial
Reporting Standards (UFRS) regulation of the transition to the new
requirements that provide for listing on the IPA Roster. HUD intends to
undertake such outreach utilizing email notifications, website
postings, mailings, system messages, presentations at industry
conferences and seminars, press releases, and, to the extent necessary,
targeted phone calls, to ensure that all IPAs registered under existing
regulations, and other interested IPAs, are aware of this new rule. HUD
intends to begin its outreach efforts by ensuring that IPAs and covered
entities are notified of this proposed rule, when published. HUD plans
to increase these efforts following the publication of the final rule,
continuing through the one-year phase-in period following publication
of the final rule. Thirty days prior to the expiration of the phase-in
period, HUD plans to contact all IPAs registered with HUD under the
current UFRS regulation and all covered entities notifying them of the
expiration of the phase-in period and reminding them of the approaching
implementation date of the IPA Roster regulation. HUD has set a goal of
receiving applications from 90 percent of currently registered IPAs
during the phase-in period.
Upon the implementation date of the final IPA Roster rule, the UIIs
of IPAs registered under the existing UFRS regulation that have failed
to seek and obtain approval for listing on the IPA Roster will be
deactivated. Any IPA whose UII has been deactivated remains able to
apply for placement on the IPA Roster, in accordance with the
procedures of any final IPA Roster rule.
HUD recognizes the costs, in terms of time and resources, that will
be committed to the implementation of an IPA Roster rule. However, the
Department believes that the benefits to both the Department and the
entities covered by this rule far outweigh any costs associated with an
IPA Roster rule. Specifically, if adopted, the IPA Roster rule would
provide the Department a significant measure of confidence that the
audits being submitted to it have been performed by licensed IPAs in
accordance with professional standards. Audits are a critical
management tool for both the federal government and the recipients of
federal funding, and it is essential to the effective oversight and
monitoring of billions of federal dollars that these audits be
performed properly.
At this time, the Department does not have the ability to verify
that IPAs are licensed or competent before an IPA is engaged to perform
a covered service. Once implemented, the IPA Roster rule would provide
the Department with a tool to ensure that those auditors being engaged
to perform work for covered entities are, at a minimum, licensed in the
jurisdictions in which they are performing those covered services and
are willing to perform the covered services in accordance with
professional standards.
Additionally, the remedies currently available to the Department to
address unlicensed or unprofessional auditors are the costly and very
time-consuming actions for debarment or suspension. In the Department's
experience, such actions are generally complex and technical, and
require an excessive amount of time and resources to prosecute. Once
implemented, the IPA Roster rule would result in significant savings of
departmental enforcement resources by enabling the Department to take
action in a timely and efficient manner if it identifies an IPA that is
not performing in accordance with established auditing standards or the
provisions of the IPA Roster rule. Thus, the Department believes that
the improved oversight of federal funds and program performance
resulting from this rule, along with the time and monetary
[[Page 7173]]
savings associated with enforcement actions against IPAs, justify the
establishment of this roster.
HUD recognizes that this proposed rule, which would establish a
roster of approved independent public accountants and public accounting
firms, is an innovative method to attempt to improve the quality of the
audits submitted to HUD and improve HUD's oversight of federal funds
and program performance. Establishing such a roster would also be
unique to the federal government. For these reasons, HUD encourages the
public to submit comments on the potential effectiveness of the rule
and on the general concept of establishing a roster of approved
independent public accountants and public accounting firms as a means
to improve the quality of the audit of federal funds and program
performance.
IV. Small Business Concerns Related to Independent Public Accountant
Roster
In creating and maintaining the IPA Roster, or in taking action to
remove a listed IPA, HUD is cognizant that section 222 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121)
(SBREFA) requires the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman to ``work with each agency with regulatory
authority over small businesses to ensure that small business concerns
that receive or are subject to an audit, on-site inspection, compliance
assistance effort or other enforcement-related communication or contact
by agency personnel are provided with a means to comment on the
enforcement activity conducted by this personnel.'' To implement this
statutory provision, the Small Business Administration has requested
that agencies include the following language on agency publications and
notices that are provided to small business concerns at the time the
enforcement action is undertaken. The language is as follows:
Your Comments Are Important
The Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement
Ombudsman and 10 Regional Fairness Boards were established to
receive comments from small businesses about federal agency
enforcement actions. The Ombudsman will annually evaluate the
enforcement activities and rate each agency's responsiveness to
small business. If you wish to comment on the enforcement actions of
[insert agency name], you will find the necessary comment forms at
www.sba.gov.ombudsman or call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
As HUD stated in its notice describing HUD's actions on the
implementation of SBREFA, which was published on May 21, 1998 (63 FR
28214), HUD will work with the Small Business Administration to provide
small entities with information on the Fairness Boards and National
Ombudsman program, at the time enforcement actions are taken, to ensure
that small entities have the full means to comment on the enforcement
activity conducted by HUD.
V. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12866 (entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'').
OMB determined that this rule is a ``significant regulatory action,''
as defined in section 3(f) of the Order (although not economically
significant, as provided in section 3(f)(1) of the Order). The docket
file is available for public inspection between the hours of 8 a.m. and
5 p.m. weekdays in the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Due to security measures at the
HUD Headquarters building, an advance appointment to review the docket
file must be scheduled by calling the Regulations Division at (202)
708-3055.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements contained in this rule have
been submitted to OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501-3520). In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information, unless the collection displays a currently
valid OMB control number. Interested persons are invited to submit
comments regarding the information collection requirements in this
rule. Comments must be received within 60 days from the date of this
rule. The burden of the information collections in this proposed rule
is estimated as follows:
Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
Number of Number of average time Estimated
Section reference parties responses per for requirement annual burden
respondent (in hours) (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24 CFR 5.812................................ 7,137 1 1 7,137
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), HUD is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected agencies concerning this
collection of information to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
Under the provisions of 5 CFR part 1320, OMB is required to make a
decision concerning this collection of information between 30 and 60
days after today's publication date. Therefore, a comment on the
information collection requirements is best assured of having its full
effect if OMB receives the comment within 30 days of today's
publication. This time frame does not affect the deadline for comments
to the agency on the proposed rule, however. Comments must refer to the
proposal by name and docket number FR-5054-P-01 and must be sent to:
HUD Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, Fax: (202) 395-6974, and Directives
Management Officer, Office of Public and Indian Housing, U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
[[Page 7174]]
Street, SW., Room 4116, Washington, DC 20410-8000.
Environmental Impact
This proposed rule establishes placement and removal procedures for
HUD's IPA Roster. This proposed rule does not direct, provide for
assistance or loan and mortgage insurance for, or otherwise govern or
regulate, real property acquisition, disposition, leasing,
rehabilitation, alteration, demolition, or new construction, or
establish, revise, or provide for standards for construction or
construction materials, manufactured housing, or occupancy.
Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this proposed rule is
categorically excluded from environmental review under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.)
generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The proposed rule establishes the procedure by which an IPA who has
violated professional auditing or other HUD requirements may be removed
from HUD's IPA Roster. Accordingly, to the extent that this proposed
rule impacts small entities, it is as a result of actions taken by
small entities themselves; that is, violation of professional auditing,
HUD, or other requirements. The proposed rule provides several
procedural safeguards designed to minimize any potential impact on
small entities. For example, the rule grants IPAs selected for removal
from the IPA Roster with the opportunity to provide a written response
and to request a conference regarding a proposed removal. The rule also
specifies that the official designated by HUD to review an appeal may
not be the same HUD official involved in the initial removal decision.
Notwithstanding HUD's determination that this rule does not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
HUD specifically invites comments from all entities, including small
entities, regarding less burdensome alternatives to this rule that will
meet HUD's objectives as described in this preamble.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) (UMRA) requires federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal governments, and
on the private sector. This proposed rule does not impose any federal
mandate on any state, local, or tribal governments, or on the private
sector within the meaning of UMRA.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits, to the
extent practicable and permitted by law, an agency from publishing any
rule that has federalism implications and either imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on state and local governments and is not
required by statute, or that preempts state law, unless the agency
meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the
Executive Order. This rule does not have federalism implications and
does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments or preempt state law within the meaning of the Executive
Order.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and procedure; Aged; Claims; Crime;
Government contracts; Grant programs--housing and community
development; Individuals with disabilities; Intergovernmental
relations; Loan programs--housing and community development; Low and
moderate income housing; Mortgage insurance; Penalties; Pets; Public
housing; Rent subsidies; Reporting and recordkeeping requirements;
Social security; Unemployment compensation; Wages.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, HUD proposes
to amend 24 CFR part 5 as follows:
PART 5--GENERAL HUD PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS; WAIVERS
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR part 5 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), unless otherwise noted.
2. Add new Sec. Sec. 5.802, 5.804, 5.806, 5.808, 5.810, 5.812,
5.814, 5.816, 5.818, and 5.820 to read as follows:
Sec. 5.802 Definitions.
The following definitions apply to this subpart:
Audit(s) or related service(s). Any audit, attestation,
compilation, review, or other service that an IPA is required to
perform in accordance with those financial reporting standards
described in Sec. 5.801.
Covered entity(ies). Public housing agencies; contract
administrators; owners; and Title I and Title II nonsupervised lenders,
nonsupervised mortgagees, and loan correspondents that are subject to
the requirements of 24 CFR 5.801, for which HUD is the cognizant or
oversight agency under the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996.
Independent Public Accountant (IPA). An accountant is an individual
employed by a public accounting firm (including a solo practice) or a
State Auditor's Office, and licensed by a regulatory authority of a
State or other political subdivision of the United States both before
and after December 31, 1970. All certified public accountants are
considered to be independent public accountants.
Jurisdiction. Any State, territory, Commonwealth, or District of
the United States.
Professional standards. (1) Accounting principles that are:
(i) Established by the Government Accounting Standards Board or
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), as applicable;
(ii) Established by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB);
(iii) Established by HUD; or
(iv) Applicable to audit reports for particular covered entities or
covered by the quality control system of a particular IPA listed on the
IPA Roster.
(2) Auditing standards. Standards for attestation engagements,
quality control policies and procedures, ethical and competency
standards, and independence standards that are issued or adopted by:
(i) The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS));
(ii) The Government Accountability Office (Generally Accepted
Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS));
(iii) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB Circular A-133); or
(iv) HUD.
Sec. 5.804 The Independent Public Accountant Roster (IPA Roster).
(a) Independent Public Accountant Roster. HUD maintains a roster of
independent public accountants and public accounting firms (IPAs) who
are approved to perform audits or related services in specified
jurisdictions for those entities that are required to submit audited
financial statements to HUD under this subpart, and for which HUD is
the cognizant or oversight agency under the Single Audit Act Amendments
of 1996.
(b) Disclaimer. The inclusion of an IPA on the IPA Roster does not
create or imply any warranty or endorsement to any organization or
individual, including any other potential user of the
[[Page 7175]]
audited financial statements, by HUD of a listed IPA, nor does it
represent a warranty of any audits or related services performed by the
listed IPA. The inclusion of an IPA on the IPA Roster means only that
the IPA has met the qualifications and conditions, prescribed in this
part, for inclusion on the IPA Roster.
Sec. 5.806 Responsibilities of an IPA listed on the IPA Roster.
An IPA listed on the IPA Roster is responsible for:
(a) Complying with any agreements with HUD, including, but not
limited to, agreements identified at Sec. 5.810(a);
(b) Maintaining any other eligibility requirements and compliance
for each state or jurisdiction in which the IPA is listed;
(c) Notifying HUD within 30 days of any change in the continued
compliance of the IPA with eligibility requirements; and
(d) Not making, or causing to be made, any false certifications to
HUD.
Sec. 5.808 Applicability of IPA Roster.
(a) Any IPA that seeks to perform audits or related services in a
particular jurisdiction for covered entities must be listed on the IPA
Roster for that state or jurisdiction.
(b) When the IPA wishes to perform audits or related services for
covered entities with offices in numerous jurisdictions, the IPA need
only be listed in the jurisdiction in which the covered entity
maintains its headquarters.
(c) Every IPA that is engaged to perform audits or related
services, or who contracts with an IPA to perform any portion of audits
or related services, must be listed on the IPA Roster individually or
be an employee or member of an auditing firm listed on the IPA Roster.
Sec. 5.810 Eligibility requirements for placement on the IPA Roster.
To be eligible for placement on the IPA Roster:
(a) Public accounting firms and State Auditor's Offices must:
(1) Be licensed or authorized to practice in each of the specific
jurisdiction(s) for which the IPA is to be listed;
(2) Not be, or employ or contract with anyone for the performance
of audits or related services who is: suspended, debarred, voluntarily
excluded, subject to a limited denial of participation, or subject to
any order of disbarment or other denial of right to practice before the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or subject to a jurisdiction's
disciplinary action that has resulted in the revocation, suspension, or
surrender of a license or authorization to practice public accounting;
(3) Agree upon approval for placement on the IPA Roster, to comply
with the following to maintain placement on the IPA Roster:
(i) Accept only those engagements for audits or related services
that meet the minimum qualifications specified by the Generally
Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS);
(ii) In servicing covered entities, accept only those engagements
for audits or related services for covered entities located in
jurisdictions in which the IPA is listed on the IPA Roster;
(iii) Establish and implement quality control procedures sufficient
to satisfy the quality control standards of GAGAS;
(iv) Comply with the professional standards applicable to any
audits or related services performed for covered entities;
(v) Comply with any accountancy laws and rules of each jurisdiction
for which the IPA is to be listed;
(vi) Comply with all applicable HUD rules and instructions relating
to financial reporting, audits, or related services;
(vii) Submit to and cooperate with reviews by HUD of the IPA's
performance of audits or related services for covered entities;
(viii) Notify HUD if the IPA or any member or employee of the firm
is, or has been within the previous 5 years, indicted or otherwise
charged with or convicted of any offense listed in 24 CFR 24.800(a);
(ix) Notify HUD if the IPA or any member or employee of the firm
is, or has been within the previous 5 years, adjudged to be civilly
liable for any of the offenses listed in 24 CFR 24.800(a); and
(x) Comply with any requests for information made by HUD.
(b) Individual public accountants that wish to be listed on the IPA
Roster must either:
(1) Meet the eligibility requirements specified in Sec. 5.810(a);
or
(2) Be a partner or member of a public accounting firm listed on
the IPA Roster, or be a full-time employee of such a firm.
Sec. 5.812 IPA Roster Placement Procedures.
(a) Application. An IPA seeking to be listed on the IPA Roster must
submit an application to HUD. The application must specifically
identify each jurisdiction in which the IPA seeks to be listed, and
must demonstrate that the IPA meets the eligibility requirements
described in Sec. 5.810 for listing in each such jurisdiction. The
application must be in a form, and delivered in a manner, prescribed by
HUD.
(b) Approval for listing on the IPA Roster. Once received by HUD,
the application will be reviewed and a decision issued within 45 days
of HUD's receipt of the application, unless HUD extends this time by
providing notice to the IPA.
(1) Approval. If HUD determines that the IPA meets the eligibility
requirements described in Sec. 5.810 for listing in a particular
jurisdiction, the IPA will be listed on the IPA Roster for that
particular jurisdiction.
(2) Denial. If the IPA fails to demonstrate that it meets all the
eligibility requirements described in Sec. 5.810, the application will
be denied.
(i) If a denial of the application is issued, the IPA will be
notified of the reasons for the denial and will be given 30 days from
the date of the denial to request reconsideration and demonstrate that
the IPA did meet all eligibility requirements for listing in a
particular jurisdiction at the time of the initial application.
(ii) If the IPA demonstrates that it did meet all eligibility
requirements for listing in a particular jurisdiction at the time of
the initial application, the IPA will be listed on the IPA Roster for
that particular jurisdiction.
(iii) If the IPA fails to demonstrate that it met all eligibility
requirements, the denial of the application is final and the IPA will
be required to submit a new application to be considered for future
placement on the IPA Roster.
Sec. 5.814 IPA Roster Removal Procedures.
(a) Removal from the IPA Roster.
(1) An IPA may be voluntarily removed from the IPA Roster by
notifying the Department in writing, and specifying from which
jurisdiction(s) the IPA wishes to be removed.
(2) An IPA that fails to fulfill its responsibilities as a listed
IPA is subject to involuntary removal from the IPA Roster.
(b) Involuntary automatic removal. HUD may automatically remove an
IPA from the IPA Roster for all applicable jurisdictions, without the
benefit of a conference or other opportunity to respond, if the IPA:
(1) Fails to maintain compliance with eligibility requirements by
being debarred, suspended, voluntarily excluded, subject to a limited
denial of participation, or subject to any order of disbarment or other
denial of right to practice before the Securities and Exchange
Commission;
[[Page 7176]]
(2) Fails to maintain compliance with eligibility requirements by
incurring a jurisdiction's disciplinary action that results in the
revocation, suspension, or surrender of a license or authorization to
practice; or
(3) Fails to maintain compliance with eligibility requirements by
allowing licensing or authorization to practice to expire, not due to
jurisdiction disciplinary action in any jurisdiction for which the IPA
is listed on the IPA Roster.
(4) Automatic removal of an IPA from the IPA Roster for any
jurisdiction will constitute automatic removal from the IPA Rosters for
all jurisdictions. However, automatic removal under paragraph (b)(3) of
this section for failure to maintain licensing or authorization
constitutes removal for only the jurisdictions in which the IPA has
allowed its licensing or authorization to practice to lapse, and does
not affect the listing of the IPA on the IPA Roster for any other
jurisdiction in which the IPA remains eligible.
(c) Causes for contestable removal. Causes for contestable removal
include, but are not limited to:
(1) Failing to comply with any agreements with HUD, including, but
not limited to, agreements identified at Sec. 5.810(a);
(2) Failing to maintain compliance with any other eligibility
requirements for listing on the IPA Roster for each jurisdiction in
which the IPA is listed;
(3) Failing to notify HUD within 30 days of any change in the
continued compliance of the IPA with eligibility requirements; or
(4) Making, or causing to be made, any false certification to HUD.
(d) Procedure for contestable removal. Unless an IPA is subject to
automatic removal from the IPA Roster under paragraph (b) of this
section, the following procedures apply:
(1) HUD will provide the IPA with written notice of the proposed
removal from the IPA Roster. The notice of proposed removal will
include the reasons for the proposed removal of the IPA from the IPA
Roster.
(2) The IPA has 30 calendar days from the date of the notice of
proposed removal to submit a written response objecting to the proposed
removal and/or requesting a conference. If an IPA submits a timely
written objection to the proposed removal, the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Departmental Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC) or a
designee (``Reviewing Official''), will review the proposed removal and
the IPA objection, and conduct a conference with the IPA, if requested.
When a request for a conference is received, the Reviewing Official
will schedule the conference within 30 calendar days of the date the
request is received. In no instance will the Reviewing Official be the
same individual who made the initial determination to propose removal
of the IPA from the IPA Roster.
(3) The Reviewing Official will issue a determination within 30
days of receiving the IPA's written response, or, if a conference is
requested, within 30 days of the closing of the conference. The
Reviewing Official may extend the time for issuance of a final decision
by providing the IPA with notice.
(4) The Reviewing Official may affirm or deny the proposed removal
from the IPA Roster, or the Reviewing Official may, in his or her sole
discretion, find cause for the removal but order that the removal be
held in abeyance pending further action.
(e) Removal held in abeyance. (1) When the Reviewing Official has
determined that cause for removal exists, the Reviewing Official may,
instead, in his or her sole discretion, issue an order of abeyance,
deferring the removal of the IPA from the IPA Roster until a future
date specified in the order of abeyance.
(2) The order of abeyance provides the IPA with the opportunity to
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Reviewing Official that all
causes for the removal have been addressed prior to the effective date
for removal specified in the order of abeyance.
(3) The Reviewing Official shall consider any relevant evidence
submitted by an IPA as of the date specified in the order of abeyance,
to determine whether all causes for removal have been addressed. Upon
request by the IPA, the Reviewing Official, in his or her discretion,
may review such evidence at any time prior to the date specified in the
order of abeyance.
(f) Other action. Nothing in this subpart prohibits HUD or the
federal government from taking such other action against an IPA as
provided under 24 CFR part 24, or from seeking any other remedy against
an IPA available to HUD or the federal government by statute or
otherwise.
(g) Effective dates of removal from the IPA Roster. (1) Unless an
IPA is subject to automatic removal from the IPA Roster under paragraph
(b) of this section, the following effective dates apply.
(i) If the IPA does not submit a written response within 30
calendar days of the date of the notice of proposed removal, the
removal becomes effective 30 calendar days after the date of HUD's
removal notice.
(ii) If the IPA submits a written response within 30 calendar days
of the date of the notice of proposed removal, and the removal decision
is affirmed, the effective date of the removal is the date of HUD's
notice affirming its initial removal decision.
(2) If the IPA is subject to automatic removal, the removal is
effective as of the date the IPA receives notice of the removal.
(3) If the removal is held in abeyance, the order of abeyance will
specify the effective date of the removal, which will be effective
should the IPA fail to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Reviewing
Official that all causes for the removal have been eliminated by the
effective date.
(h) Notification of other federal agencies. Where HUD is
considering the removal of an IPA who has, during the previous 3 years,
performed audits or related services for a covered entity, HUD will
endeavor to ascertain whether any audited covered entity receives funds
from any other federal agency. Where HUD determines that the IPA has
performed audits or related services for a covered entity receiving
federal funds from another agency, HUD will notify that agency prior to
taking any removal action against the IPA.
Sec. 5.816 Consequences of removal from the IPA Roster.
(a) If an IPA is removed from the IPA Roster, the IPA can no longer
be engaged to perform audits or related services for covered entities.
(b) If the IPA is currently engaged to perform audits or related
services for covered entities, the IPA is not prohibited from
completing those contracts or engagements. However, the IPA may not
renew or extend (other than no-cost time extensions) any contract or
engagement, unless the Reviewing Official grants an exception. The
granting of any such exception lies within the sole discretion of the
Reviewing Official and will be granted only when the Reviewing Official
determines that an exception is in the interest of HUD.
(c) HUD's action to remove an IPA from the IPA Roster does not
affect the ability of covered entities to, in their discretion,
terminate an existing contract or engagement as a result of the removal
of the IPA from the IPA Roster or the circumstances precipitating the
removal of the IPA.
Sec. 5.818 Consequences of a removal action that is held in abeyance.
(a) If the IPA demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the Reviewing
Official, that all causes for removal have been
[[Page 7177]]
eliminated within the specified time period before the effective date
of the removal, the removal action against the IPA will be terminated
and the IPA will remain listed on the IPA Roster, subject to continued
eligibility.
(b) If the IPA fails to demonstrate elimination of all causes for
removal, to the satisfaction of the Reviewing Official, before the
effective date, the IPA will be removed from the IPA Roster as of the
effective date.
Sec. 5.820 Reinstatement to the IPA Roster.
(a) Reinstatement. Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this
section, an IPA may request reinstatement of its listing on the IPA
Roster no earlier than one year following the effective date of the
removal from the IPA Roster.
(1) The request for reinstatement must contain all the information
and comply with all the requirements for initial application for
placement on the IPA Roster.
(2) The IPA must submit a written explanation of the circumstances
surrounding the removal from the IPA Roster.
(3) The IPA must submit documentation demonstrating that all causes
resulting in the removal from the IPA Roster have been eliminated.
(b) Reinstatement following automatic removal due to expiration of
license or authorization to practice. If the IPA has been automatically
removed due to the expiration of licensing or authorization to practice
in a jurisdiction, not due to disciplinary action, the IPA may request
reinstatement and be reinstated at any time by submitting evidence
demonstrating the renewal of licensing or authorization to practice in
that particular jurisdiction.
Dated: January 7, 2008.
Roy A. Bernardi,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-2097 Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P