Avocados Grown in South Florida; Order Amending Marketing Order No. 915, 6834-6838 [08-536]
Download as PDF
6834
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
date of service of the petition or cross
petition.
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. Amend § 1201.154 by revising
paragraphs (a), (b)(2), and (d) to read as
follows:
§ 1201.154 Time for filing appeal; closing
record in cases involving grievance
decisions.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Where the appellant has been
subject to an action appealable to the
Board, he or she may either file a timely
complaint of discrimination with the
agency or file an appeal with the Board
no later than 30 days after the effective
date, if any, of the action being
appealed, or 30 days after the date of the
appellant’s receipt of the agency’s
decision on the appealable action,
whichever is later.
(b) * * *
(2) If the agency has not resolved the
matter or issued a final decision on the
formal complaint within 120 days, the
appellant may appeal the matter directly
to the Board at any time after the
expiration of 120 calendar days. Once
the agency resolves the matter or issues
a final decision on the formal
complaint, an appeal must be filed
within 30 days after the appellant
receives the agency resolution or final
decision on the discrimination issue.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) This paragraph does not apply to
employees of the Postal Service or to
other employees excluded from the
coverage of the federal labormanagement relations laws at chapter
71 of title 5, United States Code. If the
appellant has filed a grievance with the
agency under a negotiated grievance
procedure, he may ask the Board to
review the final decision on the
grievance if he alleges before the Board
that he is the victim of prohibited
discrimination. Usually, the final
decision on a grievance is the decision
of an arbitrator. A full description of an
individual’s right to pursue a grievance
and to request Board review of a final
decision on the grievance is found at 5
U.S.C. 7121 and 7702. The appellant’s
request for Board review must be filed
within 35 days after the date of issuance
of the decision or, if the appellant
shows that he or she received the
decision more than 5 days after the date
of issuance, within 30 days after the
date the appellant received the decision.
The appellant must file the request with
the Clerk of the Board, Merit Systems
Protection Board, Washington, DC
20419. The request for review must
contain:
(1) A statement of the grounds on
which review is requested;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
(2) References to evidence of record or
rulings related to the issues before the
Board;
(3) Arguments in support of the stated
grounds that refer specifically to
relevant documents, and that include
relevant citations of authority; and
(4) Legible copies of the final
grievance or arbitration decision, the
agency decision to take the action, and
other relevant documents. Those
documents may include a transcript or
tape recording of the hearing.
*
*
*
*
*
I 6. Amend § 1201.182 as follows:
I a. Redesignate paragraphs (c)(3) and
(c)(4) as paragraphs (c)(4) and (c)(5)
respectively.
I b. Add new paragraph (c)(3) and
revise newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(5) to read as follows:
§ 1201.182
Petition for enforcement.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Under § 1201.37(e) of this part, a
nonparty witness who has obtained an
order requiring the payment of witness
fees and travel costs may petition the
Board for enforcement of the order.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) A petition for enforcement under
paragraph (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3) or (c)(4) of
this section must be filed promptly with
the regional or field office that issued
the order or, if the order was issued by
the Board, with the Clerk of the Board.
The petitioner must serve a copy of the
petition on each party or the party’s
representative. If the petition is filed
under paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
the motion to intervene must be filed
and served with the petition.
PART 1207—[AMENDED]
7. The authority citation for part 1207
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 794.
8. Amend § 1207.170 by revising
paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(4) to read as
follows:
I
§ 1207.170
Compliance procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) An allegation of discrimination in
the adjudication of a Board case must be
raised within 10 days of the alleged act
of discrimination or within 10 days
from the date the complainant should
reasonably have known of the alleged
discrimination. If the complainant does
not submit a complaint within that time
period, it will be dismissed as untimely
filed unless a good reason for the delay
is shown. The pleading must be clearly
marked ‘‘5 CFR part 1207 allegation of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
discrimination in the adjudication of a
Board case.’’
*
*
*
*
*
(4) If the judge to whom the case was
assigned has issued the initial decision,
recommended decision, or
recommendation by the time the party
learns of the alleged discrimination, the
party may raise the allegation in a
petition for review, cross petition for
review, or response to the petition or
cross petition. The petition for review,
cross petition for review or response to
the petition or cross petition must be
clearly marked ‘‘5 CFR part 1207
allegation of discrimination in the
adjudication of a Board case.’’
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 31, 2008.
William D. Spencer,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8–2104 Filed 2–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7400–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 915
[Docket No. AO–254–A10; AMS–FV–06–
0220; FV06–915–2]
Avocados Grown in South Florida;
Order Amending Marketing Order No.
915
Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS), USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule amends
Marketing Order No. 915 (order), which
regulates the handling of avocados
grown in South Florida. The
amendments are based on those
proposed by the Florida Avocado
Administrative Committee (committee),
which is responsible for local
administration of the order. The
amendments will: Add authority for the
committee to borrow funds; revise
voting requirements for changing the
assessment rate; allow for District 1
nominations to be conducted by mail;
and, add authority for the committee to
accept voluntary contributions. All of
the proposals were favored by avocado
growers in a mail referendum, held July
23 through August 6, 2007. The
amendments are intended to improve
the operation and functioning of the
marketing order program.
DATES: This rule is effective February 7,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marc McFetridge or Melissa
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Schmaedick, Marketing Specialists,
Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
Marketing Order Administration Branch
(MOAB), AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Marc.McFetridge@usda.gov or
Melissa.Schmaedick@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on this proceeding by
contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
Prior
documents in this proceeding: Notice of
Hearing issued on July 18, 2006, and
published in the July 24, 2006 issue of
the Federal Register (71 FR 41740);
Recommended Decision issued on
March 23, 2007 and published in the
March 30, 2007 issue of the Federal
Register (72 FR 15056); and, a
Secretary’s Decision and Referendum
Order issued on July 9, 2007, and
published in the Federal Register on
July 12, 2007 (72 FR 38027).
This action is governed by the
provisions of sections 556 and 557 of
title 5 of the United States Code and is
therefore excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Preliminary Statement
This final rule was formulated on the
record of a public hearing held in
Homestead, Florida on August 16, 2006.
Notice of this hearing was issued on
July 18, 2006, and published in the July
24, 2006 issue of the Federal Register
(71 FR 41740). The hearing was held to
consider the proposed amendment of
Marketing Order No. 915, hereinafter
collectively referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The hearing was held pursuant to the
provisions of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act,’’ and the applicable rules of
practice and procedure governing the
formulation of marketing agreements
and marketing orders (7 CFR part 900).
The Notice of Hearing contained four
proposals submitted by the Avocado
Administrative Committee (committee),
which is responsible for local
administration of the order.
Upon the basis of evidence
introduced at the hearing and the record
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on
March 23, 2007, filed with the Hearing
Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, a
Recommended Decision and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
Opportunity to File Written Exceptions
thereto by April 30, 2007. None were
filed.
That document also announced
AMS’s intent to request approval of new
information collection requirements to
implement the program. Written
exceptions on the proposed information
collection requirements were due by
May 29, 2007. None were filed.
A Secretary’s Decision and
Referendum Order was issued on July 9,
2007, directing that a referendum be
conducted during the period of July 23,
2007 to August 6, 2007, among growers
of avocados in South Florida to
determine whether they favored the
proposed amendments to the order. To
become effective, the amendments had
to be approved by at least two-thirds of
those growers voting, or by voters
representing at least two-thirds of the
volume of avocados represented by
voters voting in the referendum. Voters
voting in the referendum favored all of
the proposed amendments.
The amendments favored by voters
and included in this order will: Add
authority for the committee to borrow
funds; revise voting requirements for
changing the assessment rate; allow for
District 1 nominations to be conducted
by mail; and, add authority for the
committee to accept voluntary
contributions.
USDA also made such changes as
were necessary to the order so that all
of the order’s provisions conform to the
effectuated amendments.
The amended marketing agreement
was subsequently mailed to all avocado
handlers in the production area for their
approval. The marketing agreement was
not approved by handlers representing
more than 50 percent of the volume of
avocados handled by all handlers
during the representative period of
April 1, 2006, through March 31, 2007.
Small Business Consideration
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
AMS has considered the economic
impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions so that
small businesses will not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened. Marketing
orders and amendments thereto are
unique in that they are normally
brought about through group action of
essentially small entities for their own
benefit.
Small agricultural growers have been
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201)
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6835
as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000. Small agricultural
service firms, which include handlers
regulated under the order, are defined as
those with annual receipts of less than
$6,500,000.
Avocado Industry Background and
Overview
The record indicates that there are an
estimated 352 growers of avocados in
the production area and 32 handlers
subject to regulation under the order.
According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
and committee data, the average price
for Florida avocados during the 2005–06
season was around $46.75 per 55-pound
bushel container, and total shipments
were near 470,000 55-pound bushel
equivalent. Using this average price and
shipment information, the majority of
avocado handlers could be considered
small businesses under the SBA
definition. In addition, based on
avocado production, grower prices, and
the total number of Florida avocado
growers, the average annual grower
revenue is less than $750,000. Thus, the
majority of Florida avocado growers
may also be classified as small entities.
The NASS reported that in 2005, total
Florida avocado bearing acres were
5,300 and the average yield per acre was
2.26 tons. The total Florida production
reported in 2005 was 12,000 tons, with
growers receiving an average (farm gate)
price of $940/ton. The estimated total
value of 2005 Florida avocado
production was $11.28 million.
Over the past 30 years, the U.S.
avocado industry has seen many
changes. According to NASS, the total
U.S. production acres for avocados have
decreased by 13 percent, from 78,000
acres in 1982 to 67,600 acres in 2005.
Prices have trended upward from 1959
to 2005, although there has been
significant variability in prices from
year to year. The average grower price
for the U.S. in 1959 was $109 per ton
and in 2005 the average grower price
was $1,280 per ton. The total value of
U.S. avocado production has increased
dramatically since 1959, reaching a peak
of $394 million in 2003. The per capital
consumption of fresh avocados has risen
significantly since 1970. Between 1970
and 2004, per capital consumption
increased almost five-fold to 2.9 pounds
per person in 2004. According to the
hearing record, one of the factors that
may be contributing to this increase is
the new year-round availability of
avocados due to the volume of imported
avocados in addition to domestically
produced avocados.
Comparatively, Florida’s avocado
industry has seen similar trends.
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
6836
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
According to NASS, the production
acreage has decreased by 53 percent
over the last three decades. According to
record evidence, the rapid decrease in
Florida production acreage compared to
that of U.S. acreage can be directly
associated with crop damage resulting
from hurricanes. Florida’s production
trended upward to 34,700 tons in the
early 1980’s and has shown great
variability since. Production in 2005
was at a 10 year low of 12,000 tons.
Prices for Florida avocados have also
trended upward from 1959 to 2005. The
average grower price for Florida
avocados in 1959 was $88 per ton and
in 2005 the average grower price was
$940 per ton, which was the highest
average grower price over the time span.
The total value of Florida avocado
production was $620,000 in 1959. After
Hurricane Andrew, which affected the
value of production in 1992 and 1993,
the value of Florida’s production has
ranged from a high of $17.2 million in
2003 to a low of $11.3 million in 2005.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Material Issues
This action amends the order to: Add
authority for the committee to borrow
funds; revise voting requirements for
changing the assessment rate; allow for
District 1 nominations to be conducted
by mail; and, add authority for the
committee to accept voluntary
contributions.
These amendments will streamline
program organization, but are not
expected to result in a significant
change in industry production, handling
or distribution activities. In discussing
the impacts of the amendments on
growers and handlers, record evidence
indicates that the changes are expected
to be positive because the
administration of the programs would
be more efficient, and therefore more
effective, in executing committee duties
and responsibilities. There would be no
significant cost impact on either small
or large growers or handlers.
Interested persons were invited to
present evidence at the hearing on the
probable regulatory and informational
impact of the proposed amendments to
the order on small entities. The record
evidence shows that the amendments
are designed to increase efficiency in
the functioning of the order.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this proposed rule. These
amendments are designed to enhance
the administration and functioning of
the order to the benefit of the Florida
avocado industry.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection
continued in this action was submitted
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and has been approved under
OMB No. 0581–0243, Avocados Grown
in South Florida. The burden and
associated forms in this collection were
also included in the renewal submission
of OMB No. 0581–0189, Generic OMB
Fruit Crops, currently at OMB for
review. Upon approval of OMB No.
0581–0189, a discontinuation notice
will be submitted to OMB to retire OMB
No. 0581–0243.
The amendment authorizing mail
nominations for District 1 requires a
nomination form and ballot to conduct
mail nominations. It is estimated that
there are 384 growers and handlers who
will be entitled to vote by mail ballot
once every two years. The estimated
burden to each grower and handler is
0.083 hour per response.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E–Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Civil Justice Reform
The amendments to Marketing Order
No. 915 proposed herein have been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. They are not
intended to have retroactive effect. If
adopted, the proposed amendments
would not preempt any State or local
laws, regulations, or policies, unless
they present an irreconcilable conflict
with this proposal.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United Sates in any district in which the
handler is an inhabitant, or has his or
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
no later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
Order Amending the Order Regulating
the Handling of Avocados Grown in
Florida
Findings and Determinations
The findings and determinations
hereinafter set forth are supplementary
and in addition to the findings and
determinations previously made in
connection with the issuance of the
order; and all of said previous findings
and determinations are hereby ratified
and affirmed, except insofar as such
findings and determinations may be in
conflict with the findings and
determinations set forth herein.
(a) Findings and Determinations Upon
the Basis of the Hearing Record.
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
and the applicable rules of practice and
procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR
part 900), a public hearing was held
upon the proposed amendments to the
Marketing Order No. 915 (7 CFR part
915), regulating the handling of
avocados grown in Florida.
Upon the basis of the evidence
introduced at such hearing and the
record thereof, it is found that:
(1) The marketing order, as amended,
and as hereby further amended, and all
of the terms and conditions thereof, will
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act;
(2) The marketing order, as amended,
and as hereby further amended,
regulates the handling of avocados
grown in the production area in the
same manner as, and is applicable only
to persons in the respective classes of
commercial and industrial activity
specified in the marketing order upon
which hearings have been held;
(3) The marketing order, as amended,
and as hereby further amended, is
limited in application to the smallest
regional production area which is
practicable, consistent with carrying out
the declared policy of the Act, and the
issuance of several orders applicable to
subdivision of the production area
would not effectively carry out the
declared policy of the Act;
(4) The marketing order, as amended,
and as hereby further amended,
prescribes, insofar as practicable, such
different terms applicable to different
parts of the production area as are
necessary to give due recognition to the
differences in the production and
marketing of avocados grown in the
production area; and,
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(5) All handling of avocados grown in
the production area is in the current of
interstate or foreign commerce or
directly burdens, obstructs, or affects
such commerce.
(b) Additional findings.
It is necessary and in the public
interest to make these amendments to
the order effective not later than one day
after publication in the Federal
Register. A later effective date would
unnecessarily delay implementation of
the amendments for the new crop year.
These amendments should be in place
as soon as possible as the new crop year
begins April 1. Therefore, making the
effective date one day after publication
in the Federal Register will allow the
amendments, which are expected to be
beneficial to the industry, to be
implemented as soon as possible.
In view of the foregoing, it is hereby
found and determined that good cause
exists for making these amendments
effective one day after publication in the
Federal Register, and that it would be
contrary to the public interest to delay
the effective date for 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (Sec.
553(d), Administrative Procedure Act; 5
U.S.C. 551–559).
(c) Determinations. It is hereby
determined that:
(1) Handlers (excluding cooperative
associations of growers who are not
engaged in processing, distributing, or
shipping avocados covered by the order
as hereby amended) who, during the
period April 1, 2006, through March 31,
2007, handled 50 percent or more of the
volume of such avocados covered by
said order, as hereby amended, have not
signed an amended marketing
agreement;
(2) The issuance of this amendatory
order, further amending the aforesaid
order, is favored or approved by at least
two-thirds of the growers who
participated in a referendum on the
question of approval and who, during
the period of April 1, 2006, through
March 31, 2007 (which has been
deemed to be a representative period),
have been engaged within the
production area in the production of
such avocados, such growers having
also produced for market at least twothirds of the volume of such commodity
represented in the referendum; and
(3) In the absence of a signed
marketing agreement, the issuance of
this amendatory order is the only
practical means pursuant to the
declared policy of the Act of advancing
the interests of growers of avocados in
the production area.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
Order Relative to Handling of Avocados
Grown in South Florida
I
It is therefore ordered, That on and
after the effective date hereof, all
handling of avocados grown in Florida,
shall be in conformity to, and in
compliance with, the terms and
conditions of the said order as hereby
amended as follows:
The provisions of the proposed
marketing agreement and order further
amending the order contained in the
Secretary’s Decision issued by the
Administrator on July 9, 2007, and
published in the Federal Register on
July 12, 2007, shall be and are the terms
and provision of this order amending
the order and are set forth in full herein.
§ 915.30
6837
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 915
Avocados, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 915—AVOCADOS GROWN IN
SOUTH FLORIDA
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, Title 7 of Chapter XI of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
by amending part 915 as follows:
I 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 915 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 915.11, paragraphs (a) and (b)
are revised to read as follows:
I
§ 915.11
District.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) District 1 shall include MiamiDade County.
(b) District 2 shall include all of the
production area except Miami-Dade
County.
I 3. In § 915.22, paragraph (b)(1) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 915.22
Nomination.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Successor members. (1) The
committee shall hold or cause to be held
a meeting or meetings of growers and
handlers in each district to designate
nominees for successor members and
alternate members of the committee; or
the committee may conduct
nominations in Districts 1 and 2 by mail
in a manner recommended by the
committee and approved by the
Secretary. Such nominations shall be
submitted to the Secretary by the
committee not later than March 1 of
each year. The committee shall
prescribe procedural rules, not
inconsistent with the provisions of this
section, for the conduct of nomination.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4. In § 915.30, paragraph (c) is revised
to read as follows:
Procedure.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) For any recommendation of the
committee for an assessment rate
change, a quorum of seven committee
members and a two-thirds majority vote
of approval of those in attendance is
required.
I 5. In § 915.41, paragraph (b) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 915.41
Assessments.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Secretary shall fix the rate of
assessment per 55-pounds of fruit or
equivalent in any container or in bulk,
to be paid by each such handler. At any
time during or after a fiscal year, the
Secretary may increase the rate of
assessment, in order to secure sufficient
funds to cover any later finding by the
Secretary relative to the expense which
may be incurred. Such increase shall be
applied to all fruit handled during the
applicable fiscal year. In order to
provide funds for the administration of
the provisions of this part, the
committee may accept the payment of
assessments in advance, or borrow
money on an emergency short-term
basis. The authority of the committee to
borrow money is subject to approval of
the Secretary and may be used only to
meet financial obligations as the
obligations occur or to allow the
committee to adjust its reserve funds to
meet such obligations.
I 6. Add a new § 915.43 to read as
follows:
§ 915.43
Contributions.
The committee may accept voluntary
contributions. Such contributions shall
be free from any encumbrances by the
donor and the committee shall retain
complete control of their use.
I 7. Revise § 915.45 to read as follows:
§ 915.45 Production research, marketing
research and development.
The committee may, with the
approval of the Secretary, establish or
provide for the establishment of
production research, marketing research
and development projects designed to
assist, improve or promote the
marketing, distribution, and
consumption or efficient production of
avocados. Such products may provide
for any form of marketing promotion,
including paid advertising. The
expenses of such projects shall be paid
from funds collected pursuant to the
applicable provisions of § 915.41, or
from such other funds as approved by
the USDA.
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
6838
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: February 1, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 08–536 Filed 2–4–08; 9:46 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–27824; Directorate
Identifier 2003–NE–12–AD; Amendment 39–
15364; AD 2006–11–05R2]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
plc RB211 Series Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is revising an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211–22B series,
RB211–524B, –524C2, –524D4, –524G2,
–524G3, and –524H series, and RB211–
535C and –535E series turbofan engines
with high pressure compressor (HPC)
stage 3 disc assemblies, part numbers
(P/Ns) LK46210, LK58278, LK67634,
LK76036, UL11706, UL15358, UL22577,
UL22578, and UL24738 installed. That
AD currently requires removing from
service certain disc assemblies before
they reach their full published life if not
modified with anticorrosion protection.
This AD requires the same actions but
relaxes the removal compliance time for
certain disc assemblies that have a
record of detailed inspection. This AD
results from the FAA allowing certain
affected disc assemblies that have a
record of a detailed inspection, to
remain in service for a longer period
than the previous AD allowed. We are
issuing this AD to relax the compliance
time for disc assemblies manufactured
both ‘‘before and after 1990’’ by
providing an option to track the disc life
based on a record of a detailed
inspection rather than by its entry into
service date, while continuing to
prevent corrosion-induced uncontained
disc assembly failure, resulting in
damage to the airplane.
DATES: Effective February 21, 2008. The
Director of the Federal Register
previously approved the incorporation
by reference of certain publications
listed in the regulations as of February
24, 2004 (69 FR 2661, January 20, 2004).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Feb 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
We must receive any comments on
this AD by April 7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this AD.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: U.S. Docket Management
Facility, Department of Transportation,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Contact Rolls-Royce plc, PO Box 31,
Derby, England, DE248BJ; telephone:
011–44–1332–242424; fax: 011–44–
1332–245–418, for the service
information identified in this AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian
Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park; Burlington, MA 01803;
e-mail: ian.dargin@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7178; fax (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
15, 2006, the FAA issued AD 2006–11–
05, Amendment 39–14609 (71 FR
29586, May 23, 2006). We also issued a
correction to that AD on September 26,
2006 (71 FR 58254, October 3, 2006) and
a revision to that AD on April 9, 2007
(72 FR 18862, April 16, 2007). That AD
revision requires removing from service
certain disc assemblies before they
reach their full published life if not
modified with anticorrosion protection.
That AD was the result of the
manufacturer’s reassessment of the
corrosion risk on HPC stage 3 disc
assemblies that have not yet been
modified with sufficient application of
anticorrosion protection. That
condition, if not corrected, could result
in corrosion-induced uncontained disc
assembly failure, resulting in damage to
the airplane.
Actions Since AD 2006–11–05R1 Was
Issued
Since AD 2006–11–05R1 was issued,
we discovered that the population of
affected disc assemblies identified in
that AD was incorrect. That AD allowed
affected disc assemblies that entered
into service ‘‘before 1990’’ that have a
record of a detailed inspection, to
remain in service for a longer period
than the previous AD, AD 2006–11–05,
allowed. This revised AD allows disc
assemblies manufactured both ‘‘before
and after 1990’’ that have a record of a
detailed inspection, to remain in service
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for 17 years from last overhaul
inspection date. But the discs are not to
exceed the manufacturer’s published
cyclic limit in the time limits section of
the manual. We are issuing this AD to
relax the compliance time for certain
disc assemblies by providing an option
to track the disk life based on a record
of a detailed inspection rather than by
its entry into service date, while
continuing to prevent corrosion-induced
uncontained disc assembly failure,
resulting in damage to the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed and approved the
technical contents of RR MSB No.
RB.211–72–9661, Revision 5, dated
December 22, 2006. That MSB allows
affected disc assemblies and that have a
record of detailed inspection:
• To remain in service for 17 years
from last overhaul inspection date; but
• Not to exceed the manufacturer’s
published cyclic limit in the time limits
section of the manual.
We do not incorporate by reference this
MSB, but we list it in the Related
Information section.
Bilateral Airworthiness Agreement
This engine model is manufactured in
the United Kingdom (UK), and is type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of section
21.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
applicable bilateral airworthiness
agreement. Under this bilateral
airworthiness agreement, the Civil
Aviation Authority (CAA), which is the
airworthiness authority for the UK, has
kept the FAA informed of the situation
described above. We have examined the
findings of the CAA, reviewed all
available information, and determined
that AD action is necessary for products
of this type design that are certificated
for operation in the United States.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This AD
The unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
on other RR RB211–22B series, RB211–
524B, –524C2, –524D4, –524G2,
–524G3, and –524H series, and RB211–
535C and –535E series turbofan engines
of the same type design. We are issuing
this AD to relax the compliance time for
certain disc assemblies by providing an
option to track the disk life based on a
record of a detailed inspection rather
than by its entry into service date, while
continuing to prevent corrosion-induced
uncontained disc assembly failure,
resulting in damage to the airplane. This
AD requires the following for affected
HPC stage 3 rotor disc assemblies:
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6834-6838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-536]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 915
[Docket No. AO-254-A10; AMS-FV-06-0220; FV06-915-2]
Avocados Grown in South Florida; Order Amending Marketing Order
No. 915
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends Marketing Order No. 915 (order), which
regulates the handling of avocados grown in South Florida. The
amendments are based on those proposed by the Florida Avocado
Administrative Committee (committee), which is responsible for local
administration of the order. The amendments will: Add authority for the
committee to borrow funds; revise voting requirements for changing the
assessment rate; allow for District 1 nominations to be conducted by
mail; and, add authority for the committee to accept voluntary
contributions. All of the proposals were favored by avocado growers in
a mail referendum, held July 23 through August 6, 2007. The amendments
are intended to improve the operation and functioning of the marketing
order program.
DATES: This rule is effective February 7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc McFetridge or Melissa
[[Page 6835]]
Schmaedick, Marketing Specialists, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
Marketing Order Administration Branch (MOAB), AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Marc.McFetridge@usda.gov or
Melissa.Schmaedick@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on this proceeding by
contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202)
720-8938, E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior documents in this proceeding: Notice
of Hearing issued on July 18, 2006, and published in the July 24, 2006
issue of the Federal Register (71 FR 41740); Recommended Decision
issued on March 23, 2007 and published in the March 30, 2007 issue of
the Federal Register (72 FR 15056); and, a Secretary's Decision and
Referendum Order issued on July 9, 2007, and published in the Federal
Register on July 12, 2007 (72 FR 38027).
This action is governed by the provisions of sections 556 and 557
of title 5 of the United States Code and is therefore excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
Preliminary Statement
This final rule was formulated on the record of a public hearing
held in Homestead, Florida on August 16, 2006. Notice of this hearing
was issued on July 18, 2006, and published in the July 24, 2006 issue
of the Federal Register (71 FR 41740). The hearing was held to consider
the proposed amendment of Marketing Order No. 915, hereinafter
collectively referred to as the ``order.''
The hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act,'' and the applicable rules of
practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing
agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR part 900).
The Notice of Hearing contained four proposals submitted by the
Avocado Administrative Committee (committee), which is responsible for
local administration of the order.
Upon the basis of evidence introduced at the hearing and the record
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on March 23, 2007, filed with the
Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, a Recommended Decision
and Opportunity to File Written Exceptions thereto by April 30, 2007.
None were filed.
That document also announced AMS's intent to request approval of
new information collection requirements to implement the program.
Written exceptions on the proposed information collection requirements
were due by May 29, 2007. None were filed.
A Secretary's Decision and Referendum Order was issued on July 9,
2007, directing that a referendum be conducted during the period of
July 23, 2007 to August 6, 2007, among growers of avocados in South
Florida to determine whether they favored the proposed amendments to
the order. To become effective, the amendments had to be approved by at
least two-thirds of those growers voting, or by voters representing at
least two-thirds of the volume of avocados represented by voters voting
in the referendum. Voters voting in the referendum favored all of the
proposed amendments.
The amendments favored by voters and included in this order will:
Add authority for the committee to borrow funds; revise voting
requirements for changing the assessment rate; allow for District 1
nominations to be conducted by mail; and, add authority for the
committee to accept voluntary contributions.
USDA also made such changes as were necessary to the order so that
all of the order's provisions conform to the effectuated amendments.
The amended marketing agreement was subsequently mailed to all
avocado handlers in the production area for their approval. The
marketing agreement was not approved by handlers representing more than
50 percent of the volume of avocados handled by all handlers during the
representative period of April 1, 2006, through March 31, 2007.
Small Business Consideration
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), AMS has considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final
regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders and amendments
thereto are unique in that they are normally brought about through
group action of essentially small entities for their own benefit.
Small agricultural growers have been defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000. Small agricultural service firms, which include
handlers regulated under the order, are defined as those with annual
receipts of less than $6,500,000.
Avocado Industry Background and Overview
The record indicates that there are an estimated 352 growers of
avocados in the production area and 32 handlers subject to regulation
under the order.
According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
and committee data, the average price for Florida avocados during the
2005-06 season was around $46.75 per 55-pound bushel container, and
total shipments were near 470,000 55-pound bushel equivalent. Using
this average price and shipment information, the majority of avocado
handlers could be considered small businesses under the SBA definition.
In addition, based on avocado production, grower prices, and the total
number of Florida avocado growers, the average annual grower revenue is
less than $750,000. Thus, the majority of Florida avocado growers may
also be classified as small entities.
The NASS reported that in 2005, total Florida avocado bearing acres
were 5,300 and the average yield per acre was 2.26 tons. The total
Florida production reported in 2005 was 12,000 tons, with growers
receiving an average (farm gate) price of $940/ton. The estimated total
value of 2005 Florida avocado production was $11.28 million.
Over the past 30 years, the U.S. avocado industry has seen many
changes. According to NASS, the total U.S. production acres for
avocados have decreased by 13 percent, from 78,000 acres in 1982 to
67,600 acres in 2005. Prices have trended upward from 1959 to 2005,
although there has been significant variability in prices from year to
year. The average grower price for the U.S. in 1959 was $109 per ton
and in 2005 the average grower price was $1,280 per ton. The total
value of U.S. avocado production has increased dramatically since 1959,
reaching a peak of $394 million in 2003. The per capital consumption of
fresh avocados has risen significantly since 1970. Between 1970 and
2004, per capital consumption increased almost five-fold to 2.9 pounds
per person in 2004. According to the hearing record, one of the factors
that may be contributing to this increase is the new year-round
availability of avocados due to the volume of imported avocados in
addition to domestically produced avocados.
Comparatively, Florida's avocado industry has seen similar trends.
[[Page 6836]]
According to NASS, the production acreage has decreased by 53 percent
over the last three decades. According to record evidence, the rapid
decrease in Florida production acreage compared to that of U.S. acreage
can be directly associated with crop damage resulting from hurricanes.
Florida's production trended upward to 34,700 tons in the early 1980's
and has shown great variability since. Production in 2005 was at a 10
year low of 12,000 tons. Prices for Florida avocados have also trended
upward from 1959 to 2005. The average grower price for Florida avocados
in 1959 was $88 per ton and in 2005 the average grower price was $940
per ton, which was the highest average grower price over the time span.
The total value of Florida avocado production was $620,000 in 1959.
After Hurricane Andrew, which affected the value of production in 1992
and 1993, the value of Florida's production has ranged from a high of
$17.2 million in 2003 to a low of $11.3 million in 2005.
Material Issues
This action amends the order to: Add authority for the committee to
borrow funds; revise voting requirements for changing the assessment
rate; allow for District 1 nominations to be conducted by mail; and,
add authority for the committee to accept voluntary contributions.
These amendments will streamline program organization, but are not
expected to result in a significant change in industry production,
handling or distribution activities. In discussing the impacts of the
amendments on growers and handlers, record evidence indicates that the
changes are expected to be positive because the administration of the
programs would be more efficient, and therefore more effective, in
executing committee duties and responsibilities. There would be no
significant cost impact on either small or large growers or handlers.
Interested persons were invited to present evidence at the hearing
on the probable regulatory and informational impact of the proposed
amendments to the order on small entities. The record evidence shows
that the amendments are designed to increase efficiency in the
functioning of the order.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this proposed rule. These amendments are
designed to enhance the administration and functioning of the order to
the benefit of the Florida avocado industry.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection continued in this action was
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and has been
approved under OMB No. 0581-0243, Avocados Grown in South Florida. The
burden and associated forms in this collection were also included in
the renewal submission of OMB No. 0581-0189, Generic OMB Fruit Crops,
currently at OMB for review. Upon approval of OMB No. 0581-0189, a
discontinuation notice will be submitted to OMB to retire OMB No. 0581-
0243.
The amendment authorizing mail nominations for District 1 requires
a nomination form and ballot to conduct mail nominations. It is
estimated that there are 384 growers and handlers who will be entitled
to vote by mail ballot once every two years. The estimated burden to
each grower and handler is 0.083 hour per response.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Civil Justice Reform
The amendments to Marketing Order No. 915 proposed herein have been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. They are
not intended to have retroactive effect. If adopted, the proposed
amendments would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
proposal.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United Sates in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed no later than 20 days after the date of the
entry of the ruling.
Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Avocados Grown in
Florida
Findings and Determinations
The findings and determinations hereinafter set forth are
supplementary and in addition to the findings and determinations
previously made in connection with the issuance of the order; and all
of said previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified and
affirmed, except insofar as such findings and determinations may be in
conflict with the findings and determinations set forth herein.
(a) Findings and Determinations Upon the Basis of the Hearing
Record.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and the applicable rules of
practice and procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR part 900), a public
hearing was held upon the proposed amendments to the Marketing Order
No. 915 (7 CFR part 915), regulating the handling of avocados grown in
Florida.
Upon the basis of the evidence introduced at such hearing and the
record thereof, it is found that:
(1) The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby further amended,
and all of the terms and conditions thereof, will tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act;
(2) The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby further amended,
regulates the handling of avocados grown in the production area in the
same manner as, and is applicable only to persons in the respective
classes of commercial and industrial activity specified in the
marketing order upon which hearings have been held;
(3) The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby further amended,
is limited in application to the smallest regional production area
which is practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy
of the Act, and the issuance of several orders applicable to
subdivision of the production area would not effectively carry out the
declared policy of the Act;
(4) The marketing order, as amended, and as hereby further amended,
prescribes, insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable to
different parts of the production area as are necessary to give due
recognition to the differences in the production and marketing of
avocados grown in the production area; and,
[[Page 6837]]
(5) All handling of avocados grown in the production area is in the
current of interstate or foreign commerce or directly burdens,
obstructs, or affects such commerce.
(b) Additional findings.
It is necessary and in the public interest to make these amendments
to the order effective not later than one day after publication in the
Federal Register. A later effective date would unnecessarily delay
implementation of the amendments for the new crop year. These
amendments should be in place as soon as possible as the new crop year
begins April 1. Therefore, making the effective date one day after
publication in the Federal Register will allow the amendments, which
are expected to be beneficial to the industry, to be implemented as
soon as possible.
In view of the foregoing, it is hereby found and determined that
good cause exists for making these amendments effective one day after
publication in the Federal Register, and that it would be contrary to
the public interest to delay the effective date for 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (Sec. 553(d), Administrative
Procedure Act; 5 U.S.C. 551-559).
(c) Determinations. It is hereby determined that:
(1) Handlers (excluding cooperative associations of growers who are
not engaged in processing, distributing, or shipping avocados covered
by the order as hereby amended) who, during the period April 1, 2006,
through March 31, 2007, handled 50 percent or more of the volume of
such avocados covered by said order, as hereby amended, have not signed
an amended marketing agreement;
(2) The issuance of this amendatory order, further amending the
aforesaid order, is favored or approved by at least two-thirds of the
growers who participated in a referendum on the question of approval
and who, during the period of April 1, 2006, through March 31, 2007
(which has been deemed to be a representative period), have been
engaged within the production area in the production of such avocados,
such growers having also produced for market at least two-thirds of the
volume of such commodity represented in the referendum; and
(3) In the absence of a signed marketing agreement, the issuance of
this amendatory order is the only practical means pursuant to the
declared policy of the Act of advancing the interests of growers of
avocados in the production area.
Order Relative to Handling of Avocados Grown in South Florida
It is therefore ordered, That on and after the effective date
hereof, all handling of avocados grown in Florida, shall be in
conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of the
said order as hereby amended as follows:
The provisions of the proposed marketing agreement and order
further amending the order contained in the Secretary's Decision issued
by the Administrator on July 9, 2007, and published in the Federal
Register on July 12, 2007, shall be and are the terms and provision of
this order amending the order and are set forth in full herein.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 915
Avocados, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 915--AVOCADOS GROWN IN SOUTH FLORIDA
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, Title 7 of Chapter XI of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended by amending part 915 as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 915 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 915.11, paragraphs (a) and (b) are revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 915.11 District.
* * * * *
(a) District 1 shall include Miami-Dade County.
(b) District 2 shall include all of the production area except
Miami-Dade County.
0
3. In Sec. 915.22, paragraph (b)(1) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 915.22 Nomination.
* * * * *
(b) Successor members. (1) The committee shall hold or cause to be
held a meeting or meetings of growers and handlers in each district to
designate nominees for successor members and alternate members of the
committee; or the committee may conduct nominations in Districts 1 and
2 by mail in a manner recommended by the committee and approved by the
Secretary. Such nominations shall be submitted to the Secretary by the
committee not later than March 1 of each year. The committee shall
prescribe procedural rules, not inconsistent with the provisions of
this section, for the conduct of nomination.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 915.30, paragraph (c) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 915.30 Procedure.
* * * * *
(c) For any recommendation of the committee for an assessment rate
change, a quorum of seven committee members and a two-thirds majority
vote of approval of those in attendance is required.
0
5. In Sec. 915.41, paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 915.41 Assessments.
* * * * *
(b) The Secretary shall fix the rate of assessment per 55-pounds of
fruit or equivalent in any container or in bulk, to be paid by each
such handler. At any time during or after a fiscal year, the Secretary
may increase the rate of assessment, in order to secure sufficient
funds to cover any later finding by the Secretary relative to the
expense which may be incurred. Such increase shall be applied to all
fruit handled during the applicable fiscal year. In order to provide
funds for the administration of the provisions of this part, the
committee may accept the payment of assessments in advance, or borrow
money on an emergency short-term basis. The authority of the committee
to borrow money is subject to approval of the Secretary and may be used
only to meet financial obligations as the obligations occur or to allow
the committee to adjust its reserve funds to meet such obligations.
0
6. Add a new Sec. 915.43 to read as follows:
Sec. 915.43 Contributions.
The committee may accept voluntary contributions. Such
contributions shall be free from any encumbrances by the donor and the
committee shall retain complete control of their use.
0
7. Revise Sec. 915.45 to read as follows:
Sec. 915.45 Production research, marketing research and development.
The committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, establish or
provide for the establishment of production research, marketing
research and development projects designed to assist, improve or
promote the marketing, distribution, and consumption or efficient
production of avocados. Such products may provide for any form of
marketing promotion, including paid advertising. The expenses of such
projects shall be paid from funds collected pursuant to the applicable
provisions of Sec. 915.41, or from such other funds as approved by the
USDA.
[[Page 6838]]
Dated: February 1, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 08-536 Filed 2-4-08; 9:46 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P