Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Falcon 2000 Airplanes, 6618-6620 [E8-1984]
Download as PDF
6618
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 24
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0116; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–257–AD]
Examining the AD Docket
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Model Falcon 2000 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Wing anti ice telescopic tubes (P/N [part
number] 5035–400 and 5035–500) ball joints
were originally designed with high
temperature polymer (Kynel TM) sealing rings.
Temperature induced cracking of these rings
associated with long term wear has been
encountered in a small number of cases. This
degradation may lead to binding of the ball
joint and high swiveling forces which may
result in improper operation of the leading
edge slats and also in failure of the ball joint
mounting bracket with possible friction on
the aileron control rod, which could lead, if
combined with a failure of the aileron
emergency actuator, to an aileron jamming.
The unsafe condition is a jammed
aileron, which results in reduced
controllability of the airplane. The
proposed AD would require actions that
are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 6, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Feb 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0116; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–257–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2006–0276,
dated September 6, 2006 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Wing anti ice telescopic tubes (P/N [part
number] 5035–400 and 5035–500) ball joints
were originally designed with high
temperature polymer (Kynel TM) sealing rings.
Temperature induced cracking of these rings
associated with long term wear has been
encountered in a small number of cases. This
degradation may lead to binding of the ball
joint and high swiveling forces which may
result in improper operation of the leading
edge slats and also in failure of the ball joint
mounting bracket with possible friction on
the aileron control rod, which could lead, if
combined with a failure of the aileron
emergency actuator, to an aileron jamming.
A replacement carbon based material has
been defined by the telescopic tube
manufacturer Zodiac and can be applied per
Zodiac Service bulletins (SB) 5035–30–001
and 5035–30–002, resulting in P/N redesignations 5035–600 Amdt.A and 5035–
700 Amdt.A, respectively.
The purpose of this Airworthiness
Directive (AD), by requiring modification of
the wing anti-ice telescopic tubes in
accordance with the Zodiac service bulletins,
is to ensure that no old definition sealing
rings remain in operation beyond a life limit
of 2,400 flight hours (FH) or 2,000 flight
cycles (FC).
The unsafe condition is a jammed
aileron, which results in reduced
controllability of the airplane. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Zodiac has issued Service Bulletins
5035–30–001 and 5035–30–002, both
dated April 15, 2002. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2008 / Proposed Rules
6619
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Subject
Regulatory Findings
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Wing anti ice telescopic tubes (P/N [part
number] 5035–400 and 5035–500) ball joints
were originally designed with high
temperature polymer (Kynel TM) sealing rings.
Temperature induced cracking of these rings
associated with long term wear has been
encountered in a small number of cases. This
degradation may lead to binding of the ball
joint and high swiveling forces which may
result in improper operation of the leading
edge slats and also in failure of the ball joint
mounting bracket with possible friction on
the aileron control rod, which could lead, if
combined with a failure of the aileron
emergency actuator, to an aileron jamming.
A replacement carbon based material has
been defined by the telescopic tube
manufacturer Zodiac and can be applied per
Zodiac Service bulletins (SB) 5035–30–001
and 5035–30–002, resulting in P/N redesignations 5035–600 Amdt.A and 5035–
700 Amdt.A, respectively.
The purpose of this Airworthiness
Directive (AD), by requiring modification of
the wing anti-ice telescopic tubes in
accordance with the Zodiac service bulletins,
is to ensure that no old definition sealing
rings remain in operation beyond a life limit
of 2,400 flight hours (FH) or 2,000 flight
cycles (FC).
The unsafe condition is a jammed aileron,
which results in reduced controllability of
the airplane.
The Proposed Amendment
Actions and Compliance
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) At the later of the compliance times
specified in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii)
of this AD, remove and modify the affected
tubes in accordance with instructions
contained in Zodiac Service Bulletins 5035–
30–001 and 5035–30–002, both dated April
15, 2002.
(i) Before the telescopic tubes, P/N 5035–
400 and 5035–500, exceed the limit of 2,400
flight hours, or 2,000 flight cycles, time-inservice since new, whichever occurs first.
(ii) At the earlier of the times specified in
paragraphs (f)(1)(ii)(A) and (f)(1)(ii)(B) of this
AD.
(A) Within 330 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD.
(B) Within 7 months after the effective date
of this AD.
(2) As of 7 months after the effective date
of this AD, no person may install an affected
telescopic tube P/N 5035–400 or 5035–500 in
any aircraft as a replacement part, unless it
has been modified in accordance with
instructions contained in Zodiac Service
Bulletins 5035–30–001 and 5035–30–002,
both dated April 15, 2002.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 159 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 4 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $1,423 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these costs. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$277,137, or $1,743 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Feb 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA–2008–
0116; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–
257–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March 6,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model
Falcon 2000 airplanes, certificated in any
category; all serial numbers; equipped with
wing anti-ice telescopic tubes having part
number (P/N) 5035–400 or 5035–500.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 30: Ice and rain protection.
Reason
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
6620
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2006–0276, dated September 6,
2006; and Zodiac Service Bulletins 5035–30–
001 and 5035–30–002, both dated April 15,
2002; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
24, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–1984 Filed 2–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0118; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–289–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Model Mystere-Falcon 50 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Feb 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
issued following the discovery of a risk of
chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel.
Most of the time, this possible chafing would
be dormant and would lead to an uneventful
loss of segregation within the different
electrical system components. However,
missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair
flight safety.
*
*
*
*
*
Chafing between an electrical feeder
bundle and a bus bar under the circuit
breaker panel could lead to electrical
arcing, which could result in smoke and
fire in the cockpit. The proposed AD
would require actions that are intended
to address the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 6, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1137;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0118; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–289–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued Airworthiness
Directive 2007–0175, dated June 28,
2007 (referred to after this as ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
issued following the discovery of a risk of
chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel.
Most of the time, this possible chafing would
be dormant and would lead to an uneventful
loss of segregation within the different
electrical system components. However,
missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair
flight safety.
This AD mandates inspection of the
electrical feeder bundle, and modification of
its routing under the circuit breaker panel
through implementation of modification
M3093.
Chafing between an electrical feeder
bundle and a bus bar under the circuit
breaker panel could lead to electrical
arcing, which could result in smoke and
fire in the cockpit.
The corrective action includes
repairing or replacing damaged wiring;
re-routing the feeder cables above the
wiring of the ‘‘Avionic Master’’ and
‘‘Aux Bat’’ relays; installing a protective
sheath on the feeder cables; adding
spacers to separate the bus bar wiring
assemblies from the feeder cables; and
adding Teflon protection on the feeder
cables and securing the feeder cables
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 5, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6618-6620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1984]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2008 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 6618]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0116; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-257-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Falcon 2000 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Wing anti ice telescopic tubes (P/N [part number] 5035-400 and
5035-500) ball joints were originally designed with high temperature
polymer (Kynel TM) sealing rings. Temperature induced
cracking of these rings associated with long term wear has been
encountered in a small number of cases. This degradation may lead to
binding of the ball joint and high swiveling forces which may result
in improper operation of the leading edge slats and also in failure
of the ball joint mounting bracket with possible friction on the
aileron control rod, which could lead, if combined with a failure of
the aileron emergency actuator, to an aileron jamming.
The unsafe condition is a jammed aileron, which results in reduced
controllability of the airplane. The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 6, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0116;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-257-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2006-0276, dated September 6, 2006 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Wing anti ice telescopic tubes (P/N [part number] 5035-400 and
5035-500) ball joints were originally designed with high temperature
polymer (Kynel TM) sealing rings. Temperature induced
cracking of these rings associated with long term wear has been
encountered in a small number of cases. This degradation may lead to
binding of the ball joint and high swiveling forces which may result
in improper operation of the leading edge slats and also in failure
of the ball joint mounting bracket with possible friction on the
aileron control rod, which could lead, if combined with a failure of
the aileron emergency actuator, to an aileron jamming.
A replacement carbon based material has been defined by the
telescopic tube manufacturer Zodiac and can be applied per Zodiac
Service bulletins (SB) 5035-30-001 and 5035-30-002, resulting in P/N
re-designations 5035-600 Amdt.A and 5035-700 Amdt.A, respectively.
The purpose of this Airworthiness Directive (AD), by requiring
modification of the wing anti-ice telescopic tubes in accordance
with the Zodiac service bulletins, is to ensure that no old
definition sealing rings remain in operation beyond a life limit of
2,400 flight hours (FH) or 2,000 flight cycles (FC).
The unsafe condition is a jammed aileron, which results in reduced
controllability of the airplane. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Zodiac has issued Service Bulletins 5035-30-001 and 5035-30-002,
both dated April 15, 2002. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information
[[Page 6619]]
referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all
pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 159 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 4 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $1,423 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $277,137, or $1,743 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA-2008-0116; Directorate Identifier
2007-NM-257-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March 6, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model Falcon 2000 airplanes,
certificated in any category; all serial numbers; equipped with wing
anti-ice telescopic tubes having part number (P/N) 5035-400 or 5035-
500.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 30: Ice and
rain protection.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Wing anti ice telescopic tubes (P/N [part number] 5035-400 and
5035-500) ball joints were originally designed with high temperature
polymer (Kynel TM) sealing rings. Temperature induced
cracking of these rings associated with long term wear has been
encountered in a small number of cases. This degradation may lead to
binding of the ball joint and high swiveling forces which may result
in improper operation of the leading edge slats and also in failure
of the ball joint mounting bracket with possible friction on the
aileron control rod, which could lead, if combined with a failure of
the aileron emergency actuator, to an aileron jamming.
A replacement carbon based material has been defined by the
telescopic tube manufacturer Zodiac and can be applied per Zodiac
Service bulletins (SB) 5035-30-001 and 5035-30-002, resulting in P/N
re-designations 5035-600 Amdt.A and 5035-700 Amdt.A, respectively.
The purpose of this Airworthiness Directive (AD), by requiring
modification of the wing anti-ice telescopic tubes in accordance
with the Zodiac service bulletins, is to ensure that no old
definition sealing rings remain in operation beyond a life limit of
2,400 flight hours (FH) or 2,000 flight cycles (FC).
The unsafe condition is a jammed aileron, which results in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) At the later of the compliance times specified in paragraphs
(f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, remove and modify the affected
tubes in accordance with instructions contained in Zodiac Service
Bulletins 5035-30-001 and 5035-30-002, both dated April 15, 2002.
(i) Before the telescopic tubes, P/N 5035-400 and 5035-500,
exceed the limit of 2,400 flight hours, or 2,000 flight cycles,
time-in-service since new, whichever occurs first.
(ii) At the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs
(f)(1)(ii)(A) and (f)(1)(ii)(B) of this AD.
(A) Within 330 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.
(B) Within 7 months after the effective date of this AD.
(2) As of 7 months after the effective date of this AD, no
person may install an affected telescopic tube P/N 5035-400 or 5035-
500 in any aircraft as a replacement part, unless it has been
modified in accordance with instructions contained in Zodiac Service
Bulletins 5035-30-001 and 5035-30-002, both dated April 15, 2002.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
[[Page 6620]]
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2006-0276, dated September 6, 2006; and
Zodiac Service Bulletins 5035-30-001 and 5035-30-002, both dated
April 15, 2002; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 24, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-1984 Filed 2-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P