Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Clean Air Interstate Rule, 6034-6041 [E8-1804]
Download as PDF
6034
120
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Priority Mail
123
Rates and Eligibility
1.0
Priority Mail Rates and Fees
[Delete 1.1 in its entirety. Renumber
current 1.2 through 1.10 as new 1.1
through 1.9.]
[Revise the heading of renumbered 1.1
as follows:]
1.1
Rate Application
*
*
*
*
*
1.2 Minimum Rate for Parcels to
Zones 1–4
*
*
*
Exhibit 1.2
*
*
700
Priority Mail Rates
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise footnote number 2 to reflect
new numbering:]
2. Parcels addressed for delivery to
zones 5–8 that exceed 1 cubic foot
(1,728 cubic inches) are charged based
on the actual weight (under 1.1), or the
dimensional weight (as calculated in
1.3.1 or 1.3.2), whichever is greater.
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise footnote number 5 to add new
flat-rate box as follows:]
5. Priority Mail flat-rate boxes
provided by the USPS, regardless of
weight or destination:
• $8.95 is charged for material sent in
Priority Mail regular flat-rate boxes
(FRB–2) or (FRB–1) to domestic and
APO/FPO addresses.
• $10.95 is charged for material sent
in a Priority Mail large flat-rate box to
APO/FPO destination addresses.
• $12.95 is charged for material sent
in a Priority Mail large flat-rate box to
domestic destinations.
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise the heading of renumbered 1.4
as follows:]
1.4
c. $12.95 for material sent in a Priority
Mail large flat-rate box to domestic
destinations.
Items to an APO/FPO address may be
shipped in the Priority Mail large flatrate box or in a special version of the
box identified with the additional logo:
‘‘Americasupportsyou.mil.’’ If the
special version of the APO/FPO flat-rate
box is used for non-APO/FPO addresses,
the domestic or international large flatrate box prices will apply. Only USPSproduced flat-rate boxes are eligible for
the flat-rate box prices.
*
*
*
*
*
Flat-Rate Envelopes and Boxes
*
*
*
*
*
[Reverse the order of renumbered
1.4.1 and 1.4.2.]
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise renumbered 1.4.2 as follows:]
Special Standards
703 Nonprofit Standard Mail and
Other Unique Eligibility
*
*
*
*
*
2.0
Overseas Military Mail
2.1
Basic Standards
*
*
*
*
*
[Renumber current 2.1.2 through 2.1.6
as new 2.1.3 through 2.1.7 and add new
2.1.2 as follows:]
2.1.2 APO/FPO Priority Mail Large
Flat-Rate Box
A USPS-produced APO/FPO Priority
Mail large flat-rate box sent to an APO/
FPO destination address, regardless of
the actual weight of the piece, is
charged $10.95. Items to an APO/FPO
address may be shipped in a special
version of the box identified with the
additional logo:
‘‘Americasupportsyou.mil.’’ If the
special version of the APO/FPO flat-rate
box is used for non-APO/FPO addresses,
the domestic or international large flatrate box prices will apply. Articles
mailed to an APO/FPO address in one
of the regular flat-rate boxes (FRB–1 or
FRB–2) are charged $8.95. Only USPSproduced flat-rate boxes are eligible for
the flat-rate box prices.
*
*
*
*
*
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E8–1780 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
1.4.2 Flat-Rate Boxes—Rates and
Eligibility
Each USPS-produced Priority Mail
flat-rate box, regardless of the actual
weight of the piece or its destination, is
charged:
a. $8.95 for material sent in Priority
Mail regular flat-rate boxes (FRB–2) or
(FRB–1) to domestic and APO/FPO
addresses.
b. $10.95 for material sent in a
Priority Mail large flat-rate box to APO/
FPO destination addresses (see 703.2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R05–OAR–2007–0390; FRL–8519–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
Clean Air Interstate Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This action approves a
revision to the Ohio State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on
April 17, 2007, and revised on
September 26, 2007. This SIP revision
incorporates provisions related to the
implementation of EPA’s Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR), promulgated on
May 12, 2005, and revised on April 28,
2006, and December 13, 2006, and the
CAIR Federal Implementation Plan
(CAIR SIP) concerning sulphur dioxide
(SO2), oxides of nitrogen (NOX) annual
and NOX ozone season emissions for the
State of Ohio, promulgated on April 28,
2006, and revised on December 13,
2006. EPA is not making any changes to
the CAIR FIP but is amending, to the
extent EPA approves Ohio’s SIP
revision, the appropriate appendices in
the CAIR FIP trading rules simply to
note that approval.
The Ohio SIP revision that was
submitted on April 17, 2007, was a full
CAIR SIP revision. In a letter submitted
on September 26, 2007, Ohio requested
that EPA consider the September 26,
2007, submittal as two separate
submittals, i.e., as a full CAIR SIP and
as an abbreviated CAIR SIP. Ohio
requested that EPA act on specific
portions of the September 26, 2007,
submittal as an abbreviated CAIR SIP.
EPA approves Ohio’s abbreviated SIP
revision that addresses the methodology
used to allocate annual and ozone
season NOX allowances to affected
electric generating units (EGUs), and the
opt-in provisions, under the CAIR
trading programs and the CAIR SIP.
This action also contains EPA’s
response to a comment from the State of
Connecticut following publication of the
original direct final approval of the Ohio
plan on October 16, 2007. We withdrew
the original direct final rule on
December 5, 2007, because of receipt of
this comment. For reasons expressed in
the body of this rule, EPA believes the
comment from Connecticut is not
relevant to this final action and,
therefore, we are moving forward to
approve the Ohio plan. As such, EPA
will populate the compliance accounts
of units affected by the State’s rule
shortly after the effective date of this
rule.
This final rule is effective on
February 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2007–0390. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
DATES:
40 CFR Parts 52 and 97
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\01FER1.SGM
01FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you contact the person
listed below before visiting the Region
5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Paskevicz, Engineer, Criteria Pollutant
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6084.
E-mail at paskevicz.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
Table of Contents
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
II. What Is the Regulatory History of CAIR
and the CAIR FIPs?
III. What Are the General Requirements of
CAIR and the CAIR FIPs?
IV. What Are the Types of CAIR SIP
Submittals?
V. Analysis of Ohio’s CAIR SIP Submittal
A. State Budgets for Allowance Allocations
B. CAIR Cap-and-Trade Programs
C. Applicability Provisions for non-EGUs
NOX SIP Call Sources
D. NOX Allowance Allocations
E. Allocation of NOX Allowances From the
Compliance Supplement Pool
F. Individual Opt-in Units
VI. Public Comment
VII. Final Action
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
CAIR SIP Approval
EPA is approving a revision to Ohio’s
SIP, submitted on September 26, 2007,
that modifies the application of certain
provisions of the CAIR FIP concerning
SO2, NOX annual, and NOX ozone
season emissions. (As discussed below,
this less comprehensive CAIR SIP is
termed an abbreviated SIP.) Ohio is
subject to the CAIR FIPs that implement
the CAIR requirements by requiring
certain EGUs to participate in the EPAadministered Federal CAIR SO2, NOX
annual, and NOX ozone season cap-andtrade programs. The SIP revision
provides a methodology for allocating
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
NOX allowances for the NOX annual and
NOX ozone season trading programs.
The CAIR FIPs provide that this
methodology will be used to allocate
NOX allowances to sources in Ohio,
instead of the Federal allocation
methodology otherwise provided in the
FIP. The SIP revision provides a
methodology for allocating the
compliance supplement pool in the
CAIR NOX annual trading program. The
SIP also allows for individual units not
otherwise subject to the CAIR trading
programs to opt into such trading
programs in accordance with opt-in
provisions of the CAIR FIP. Consistent
with the flexibility provided in the FIPs,
these provisions will be used to replace
or supplement, as appropriate, the
corresponding provisions in the CAIR
FIPs for Ohio. EPA is not making any
changes to the CAIR FIP, but is
amending to the extent EPA approves
Ohio’s SIP revision, the appropriate
appendices in the CAIR FIP trading
rules simply to note that approval.
II. What Is the Regulatory History of the
CAIR and the CAIR FIPs?
The CAIR was published by EPA on
May 12, 2005 (70 FR 25162). In this
rule, EPA determined that 28 States and
the District of Columbia contribute
significantly to nonattainment and
interfere with maintenance of the
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS) for fine particles (PM2.5) and/
or 8-hour ozone in downwind States in
the eastern part of the country. As a
result, EPA required those upwind
States to revise their SIPs to include
control measures that reduce emissions
of SO2, which is a precursor to PM2.5
formation, and/or NOX, which is a
precursor to both ozone and PM2.5
formation. For jurisdictions that
contribute significantly to downwind
PM2.5 nonattainment, CAIR sets annual
State-wide emission reduction
requirements (i.e., budgets) for SO2 and
annual State-wide emission reduction
requirements for NOX. Similarly, for
jurisdictions that contribute
significantly to 8-hour ozone
nonattainment, CAIR sets State-wide
emission reduction requirements for
NOX for the ozone season (May 1st to
September 30th). Under CAIR, States
may implement these emission budgets
by participating in the EPAadministered cap-and-trade programs or
by adopting any other control measures.
CAIR explains to subject States what
must be included in SIPs to address the
requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D) of
the Clean Air Act (CAA) with regard to
interstate transport with respect to the
8-hour ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA
made national findings, effective May
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6035
25, 2005, that the States had failed to
submit SIPs meeting the requirements of
section 110(a)(2)(D). The SIPs were due
in July 2000, 3 years after the
promulgation of the 8-hour ozone and
PM2.5 NAAQS. These findings started a
2-year clock for EPA to promulgate a
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to
address the requirements of section
110(a)(2)(D). Under CAA section
110(c)(1), EPA may issue a FIP anytime
after such findings are made and must
do so within two years unless a SIP
revision correcting the deficiency is
approved by EPA before the FIP is
promulgated.
On April 28, 2006, EPA promulgated
FIPs for all States covered by CAIR in
order to ensure the emissions reductions
required by CAIR are achieved on
schedule. Each CAIR State is subject to
the FIPs until the State fully adopts, and
EPA approves, a SIP revision meeting
the requirements of CAIR. The CAIR
FIPs require certain EGUs to participate
in the EPA-administered CAIR SO2,
NOX annual, and NOX ozone-season
model trading programs, as appropriate.
The CAIR FIP SO2, NOX annual, and
NOX ozone season trading programs
impose essentially the same
requirements as, and are integrated
with, the respective CAIR SIP trading
programs. The integration of the CAIR
FIP and SIP trading programs means
that these trading programs will work
together to create effectively a single
trading program for each regulated
pollutant (SO2, NOX annual, and NOX
ozone season) in all States covered by
CAIR FIP or SIP trading program for that
pollutant. The CAIR FIPs also allow
States to submit abbreviated SIP
revisions that, if approved by EPA, will
automatically replace or supplement the
corresponding CAIR FIP provisions
(e.g., the methodology for allocating
NOX allowances to sources in the state),
while the CAIR FIP remains in place for
all other provisions.
On April 28, 2006, EPA published
two more CAIR-related final rules that
added the States of Delaware and New
Jersey to the list of States subject to
CAIR for PM2.5 and announced EPA’s
final decisions on reconsideration of
five issues without making any
substantive changes to the CAIR
requirements.
III. What Are the General Requirements
of CAIR and the CAIR FIPs?
CAIR establishes State-wide emission
budgets for SO2 and NOX and is to be
implemented in two phases. The first
phase of NOX reductions starts in 2009
and continues through 2014, while the
first phase of SO2 reductions starts in
2010 and continues through 2014. The
E:\FR\FM\01FER1.SGM
01FER1
6036
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
second phase of reductions for both
NOX and SO2 starts in 2015 and
continues thereafter. CAIR requires
States to implement the budgets by
either requiring EGUs to participate in
the EPA-administered cap-and-trade
programs or adopting other control
measures of the State’s choosing and
demonstrating that such control
measures will result in compliance with
the applicable State SO2 and NOX
budgets.
The May 12, 2005, and April 28, 2006,
CAIR rules provide model rules that
States must adopt (with certain limited
changes, if desired) if they want to
participate in the EPA-administered
trading programs. With two exceptions,
only States that choose to meet the
requirements of CAIR through methods
that exclusively regulate EGUs are
allowed to participate in the EPAadministered trading programs. One
exception is for States that adopt the
opt-in provisions of the model rules to
allow non-EGUs individually to opt into
the EPA-administered trading programs.
The other exception is for States that
include all non-EGUs from their NOX
SIP Call trading programs in their CAIR
NOX ozone season trading programs.
IV. What Are the Types of CAIR SIP
Submittals?
States have the flexibility to choose
the type of control measures they will
use to meet the requirements of CAIR.
EPA anticipates that most States will
choose to meet the CAIR requirements
by selecting an option that requires
EGUs to participate in the EPAadministered CAIR cap-and-trade
programs. For such States, EPA has
provided two approaches for submitting
and obtaining approval for CAIR SIP
revisions. States may submit full SIP
revisions that adopt the model CAIR
cap-and-trade rules. If approved, these
SIP revisions will fully replace the CAIR
FIPs. Alternatively, States may submit
abbreviated SIP revisions. These SIP
revisions will not replace the CAIR FIPs;
however, the CAIR FIPs provide that,
when approved, the provisions in these
abbreviated SIP revisions will be used
instead of or in conjunction with, as
appropriate, the corresponding
provisions of the CAIR FIPs (e.g., the
NOX allowance allocation
methodology).
A State submitting an abbreviated SIP
revision, may submit limited SIP
revisions to tailor the CAIR FIP cap-andtrade programs to the state submitting
the revision. Specifically, an
abbreviated SIP revision may establish
certain applicability and allowance
allocation provisions that, the CAIR
FIPs provide, will be used instead of or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
in conjunction with the corresponding
provisions in the CAIR FIP rules in that
State. Specifically, the abbreviated SIP
revisions may:
1. Include NOX SIP Call trading
sources that are not EGUs under CAIR
in the CAIR FIP NOX ozone season
trading program;
2. Provide for allocation of NOX
annual or ozone season allowances by
the State, rather than the Administrator,
and using a methodology chosen by the
State;
3. Provide for allocation of NOX
annual allowances from the CSP by the
State, rather than by the Administrator,
and using the State’s choice of allowed,
alternative methodologies; and/or
4. Allow units that are not otherwise
CAIR units to opt individually into the
CAIR FIP cap-and-trade programs under
the opt-in provisions in the CAIR FIP
rules.
With approval of an abbreviated SIP
revision, the CAIR FIP remains in place,
as tailored to sources in the State by that
approved SIP revision. Abbreviated SIP
revisions can be submitted in lieu of, or
as part of, CAIR full SIP revisions. States
may want to designate part of their full
SIP as an abbreviated SIP for EPA to act
on first when the timing of the State’s
submission might not provide EPA with
sufficient time to approve the full SIP
prior to the deadline for recording NOX
allocations. This will help ensure that
the elements of the trading programs
where flexibility is allowed are
implemented according to the State’s
decisions. Submission of an abbreviated
SIP revision does not preclude future
submission of a CAIR full SIP revision.
In this case, the September 26, 2007,
submittal from Ohio has been submitted
as an abbreviated SIP revision. As
discussed below, Ohio requested three
of the four provisions for which a State
may request an abbreviated SIP. The
State requested that its allocation of
NOX annual and NOX ozone season
allowances for EGUs under the FIP be
used instead of the corresponding
provisions of the CAIR FIPs in effect in
the State. The State requested that its
allocation by the State of NOX annual
allowances from the CSP be used
instead of the corresponding provisions
of the CAIR FIPs in effect in the State.
Finally, the State also provided that
units that are not otherwise CAIR units
may opt individually into the CAIR FIP
cap-and-trade program under the opt-in
provisions in the CAIR FIP rules.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
V. Analysis of Ohio’s CAIR SIP
Submittal
A. State Budgets for Allowance
Allocations
The CAIR NOX annual and ozone
season budgets were developed from
historical heat input data for EGUs.
Using these data, EPA calculated annual
and ozone season regional heat input
values, which were multiplied by 0.15
lb/mmBtu, for phase 1, and 0.125 lb/
mmBtu, for phase 2, to obtain regional
NOX budgets for 2009–2014 and for
2015 and thereafter, respectively. EPA
derived the State NOX annual and ozone
season budgets from the regional
budgets using State heat input data
adjusted by fuel factors.
The CAIR State SO2 budgets were
derived by discounting the tonnage of
emissions authorized by annual
allowance allocations under the Acid
Rain Program under title IV of the CAA.
Under CAIR, each allowance allocated
under the Acid Rain Program for the
years in phase 1 of CAIR (2010 through
2014) authorizes 0.5 ton of SO2
emissions in the CAIR trading program,
and each Acid Rain Program allowance
allocated for the years in phase 2 of
CAIR (2015 and thereafter) authorizes
0.35 ton of SO2 emissions in the CAIR
trading program.
The CAIR FIPs established the
budgets for Ohio as 108,667 tons for
NOX annual emissions, 45,664 tons for
NOX ozone season emissions, and
333,520 tons for SO2 emissions. Ohio’s
SIP revision, approved in today’s action,
does not affect these budgets, which are
total amounts of allowances available
for allocation for each year under the
EPA-administered cap-and-trade
programs under the CAIR FIPs. In short,
the abbreviated SIP revision only affects
allocations of allowances under the
established budgets.
B. CAIR Cap-and-Trade Programs
The CAIR NOX annual and ozoneseason FIPs both largely mirror the
structure of the NOX SIP Call model
trading rule in 40 CFR part 96, subparts
A through I. While the provisions of the
NOX annual and ozone-season FIPs are
similar, there are some differences. For
example, the NOX annual FIP (but not
the NOX ozone season FIP) provides for
a CSP, which is discussed below and
under which allowances may be
awarded for early reductions of NOX
annual emissions. As a further example,
the NOX ozone season FIP reflects the
fact that the CAIR NOX ozone season
trading program replaces the NOX SIP
Call trading program after the 2008
ozone season and is coordinated with
the NOX SIP Call program. The NOX
E:\FR\FM\01FER1.SGM
01FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
ozone season FIP provides incentives
for early emissions reductions by
allowing banked, pre-2009 NOX SIP Call
allowances to be used for compliance in
the CAIR NOX ozone-season trading
program. In addition, States have the
option of continuing to meet their NOX
SIP Call requirement by participating in
the CAIR NOX ozone season trading
program and including all of their NOX
SIP Call trading sources in that program.
The provisions of the CAIR SO2 FIP
are also similar to the provisions of the
NOX annual and ozone season FIPs.
However, the SO2 FIP is coordinated
with the ongoing Acid Rain SO2 capand-trade program under CAA title IV.
The SO2 FIP uses the title IV allowances
for compliance, with each allowance
allocated for 2010–2014 authorizing
only 0.50 ton of emissions and each
allowance allocated for 2015 and
thereafter authorizing only 0.35 ton of
emissions. Banked title IV allowances
allocated for years before 2010 can be
used at any time in the CAIR SO2 capand-trade program, with each such
allowance authorizing 1 ton of
emissions. Title IV allowances are to be
freely transferable among sources
covered by the Acid Rain Program and
sources covered by the CAIR SO2 capand-trade program.
EPA used the CAIR model trading
rules as the basis for the trading
programs in the CAIR FIPs. The CAIR
FIP trading rules are virtually identical
to the CAIR model trading rules, with
changes made to account for Federal
rather than state implementation. The
CAIR model SO2, NOX annual, and NOX
ozone season trading rules and the
respective CAIR FIP trading rules are
designed to work together as integrated
SO2, NOX annual, and NOX ozone
season trading programs.
Ohio is subject to the CAIR FIPs
concerning SO2, NOX annual, and NOX
ozone season emissions, and the CAIR
FIP trading programs for SO2, NOX
annual, and NOX ozone season apply to
sources in Ohio. Consistent with the
flexibility they give to States, the CAIR
FIPs provide that States may submit
abbreviated SIP revisions that will
replace or supplement, as appropriate,
certain provisions of the CAIR FIP
trading programs. The Ohio EPA
September 26, 2007, submission is such
an abbreviated SIP revision.
C. Applicability Provisions for nonEGUs NOX SIP Call Sources
In general, the CAIR FIP trading
programs apply to any stationary, fossilfuel-fired boiler or stationary, fossilfuel-fired combustion turbine serving at
any time, since the later of November
15, 1990, or the start-up of the unit’s
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
combustion chamber, a generator with
nameplate capacity of more than 25
MWe producing electricity for sale.
States have the option of bringing in,
for the CAIR NOX ozone season program
only, those units in the State’s NOX SIP
Call trading program that are not EGUs
as defined under CAIR. EPA advises
States exercising this option to use
provisions for applicability that are
substantively identical to the provisions
in 40 CFR 96.304 and add the
applicability provisions in the State’s
NOX SIP Call trading rule for non-EGUs
to the applicability provisions in 40 CFR
96.304 in order to include in the CAIR
NOX ozone season trading program all
units required to be in the State’s NOX
SIP Call trading program that are not
already included under 40 CFR 96.304.
Under this option, the CAIR NOX ozone
season program must cover all large
industrial boilers and combustion
turbines, as well as any small EGUs (i.e.
units serving a generator with a
nameplate capacity of 25 MWe or less),
that the State currently requires to be in
the NOX SIP Call trading program.
Consistent with the flexibility given to
States in the CAIR FIP, Ohio has not
chosen, in the abbreviated CAIR SIP
approved here, to expand the
applicability provisions of the CAIR
NOX ozone season trading program to
include all non-EGUs in the State’s NOX
SIP Call trading program. However, EPA
notes that Ohio has indicated that the
full SIP revision submitted on
September 26, 2007, expands the
applicability provisions of CAIR NOX
ozone season trading program in this
manner. As such, EPA is not taking final
action on the non-EGU portion of the
State’s September 26, 2007, full CAIR
SIP revision. The full CAIR SIP revision
including actions to approve the nonEGU portions of the State’s CAIR rule
will be the subject of a separate future
action.
D. NOX Allowance Allocations
Under the NOX allowance allocation
methodology in the CAIR model trading
rules and in the CAIR FIP, NOX annual
and ozone season allowances are
allocated to units that have operated for
five years, based on heat input data from
a three-year period that are adjusted for
fuel type by using fuel factors of 1.0 for
coal, 0.6 for oil, and 0.4 for other fuels.
The CAIR model trading rules and the
CAIR FIP also provide a new unit setaside from which units without five
years of operation are allocated
allowances based on the units’ prior
year emissions.
The CAIR FIP provides States the
flexibility to establish a different NOX
allowance allocation methodology that
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6037
will be used to allocate allowances to
sources in the States if certain
requirements are met concerning the
timing of submission of units’
allocations to the Administrator for
recordation and the total amount of
allowances allocated for each control
period. In adopting alternative NOX
allowance allocation methodologies,
States have flexibility with regard to:
1. The cost to recipients of the
allowances, which may be distributed
for free or auctioned;
2. The frequency of allocations;
3. The basis for allocating allowances,
which may be distributed, for example,
based on historical heat input or electric
and thermal output; and
4. The use of allowance set-asides
and, if used, the size of the set-aside.
Consistent with the flexibility given to
States in the CAIR FIPs, Ohio has
chosen to replace the provisions of the
CAIR NOX annual FIP concerning the
allocation of NOX annual allowances
with its own methodology. Ohio has
chosen to distribute NOX annual
allowances based upon heat input data
from a three year period adjusted for
fuel type by using fuel adjustment
factors of 1.0 for coal, 0.6 for oil, and 0.4
for other fuels. Based on this
methodology, Ohio determined NOX
allocations for EGUs in the State under
the CAIR FIP, and submitted its
allocations to EPA on April 24, 2007.
Ohio also has included, in the
abbreviated SIP revision, provisions
regarding set-aside programs for energy
efficiency/renewable energy and
innovative technology projects under
the CAIR NOX Ozone Season program.
The State’s energy-efficiency/renewable
energy (EE/RE) and innovative
technology set-aside program provisions
establish two set-asides for each control
period—one set-aside for EE/RE projects
and one set-aside for innovative
technology projects—and specify
procedures for allocating the allowances
in the set-asides. Each set-aside is
limited to one percent of the state
trading budget for NOX ozone season
allowance allocations. Beginning with
the end of 2009 and every three years
thereafter, Ohio EPA will review the
number of allowances allocated from
the set-asides and will, under certain
circumstances, increase the size of each
set-aside in future years as necessary, up
to a maximum of five percent of the
state trading budget.
EPA notes that the set-aside
provisions do not explicitly state how
allowances will be reserved in the setasides if the total amount of allowances
requested from a set-aside exceeds the
total amount of allowances in that setaside. However, set-aside provisions
E:\FR\FM\01FER1.SGM
01FER1
6038
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
explicitly limit the amount of
allowances available from each set-aside
to one percent of the state trading
budget unless Ohio EPA expands the
set-asides in future years. In addition,
Ohio informed EPA, in the September
26, 2007, letter, that its guidance for the
set-asides provides that set-aside
allowances will be reserved on a prorata basis if the total requested
allowances exceed the size of the setaside. Ohio has indicated that it will
clarify its set-aside provisions consistent
with this guidance.
The set-aside provisions also do not
explicitly state how a set-aside will be
increased up to five percent of the state
trading budget if the existing set-aside
amounts plus the total amounts
allocated to units with and without
baseline heat input under Ohio’s other
allocation provisions for NOX ozone
season allowances already equal the
state trading budget. However, Ohio’s
CAIR NOX ozone season allocation
provisions clearly limit the total
allocations for each control period of
CAIR NOX ozone season allowances to
the amount of the state trading budget
for that control period. Further, as
written, the provisions for expanding
the set-asides cannot have any effect on
the current allocations, which Ohio has
already submitted to the Administrator
for phase 1 of the trading program. In
addition, Ohio informed EPA, in the
September 28, 2007 letter, that Ohio
EPA will reduce the total amount of
allowances allocated to existing units
under the other allocation provisions to
the extent the size of a set-aside is
increased in the future. Ohio has
indicated that it will clarify its
allocation provisions consistent with
this statement in the September 28,
2007, letter.
Consequently, EPA interprets Ohio’s
abbreviated SIP to limit, consistent with
the requirements of 40 CFR
51.123(ee)(2)(ii)(B), the total allocations
for each control period of CAIR NOX
ozone season allowances—whether from
current or expanded set-asides or under
the other allocation provisions in the
abbreviated SIP—to the state trading
budget.
E. Allocation of NOX Allowances From
the Compliance Supplement Pool
The CSP provides an incentive for
early reductions in NOX annual
emissions. The CSP consists of 200,000
CAIR NOX annual allowances of vintage
2009 for the entire CAIR region, and a
State’s share of the CSP is based upon
the State’s share of the projected
emission reductions under CAIR. States
may distribute CSP allowances, one
allowance for each ton of early
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
reduction, to sources that make NOX
reductions during 2007 or 2008 beyond
what is required by any applicable State
or Federal emission limitation. States
also may distribute CSP allowances
based upon a demonstration of need for
an extension of the 2009 deadline for
implementing emission controls.
The CAIR NOX annual FIP establishes
specific methodologies for allocations of
CSP allowances. States may choose an
allowed, alternative CSP allocation
methodology to be used to allocate CSP
allowances to sources in those States.
Consistent with the flexibility given to
States in the FIP, Ohio has chosen to
modify the provisions of the CAIR NOX
annual FIP concerning the allocation of
allowances from the CSP. Ohio has
chosen to distribute CSP allowances
using an allocation methodology that
provides more certainty to unit owners
and operators that a known quantity of
allowances per unit will be available for
distribution at the beginning of the
control period. Ohio also provides
owners and operators with an incentive
for the operation of expensive postcombustion control equipment yearround and provides incentives for early
reductions in emissions before 2009.
Ohio EPA is required to submit
allocations from the CSP to the
Administrator by July 1, 2009, or such
time when unit’s 2008 emissions data
are available so that the allocations can
be determined. Ohio’s abbreviated SIP
also states that the Administrator will
record the allocations by January 1,
2010. While Ohio’s abbreviated SIP does
not explicitly state that allocations will
be submitted to the Administrator by
November 30, 2009, EPA notes that
units’ 2008 emissions data should
certainly be available before that date
and that the allocations need to be
submitted by that date in order to
ensure that the Administrator will
complete recordation of allowances by
January 1, 2010. Further, Ohio has
indicated, in the September 26, 2007,
letter, that it will clarify its CSP
provisions to provide for a November
30, 2009, deadline for submission of
CSP allocations to the Administrator.
Consequently, EPA considers the Ohio
abbreviated SIP to meet the
requirements of 40 CFR 51.123(p)(2).
F. Individual Opt-in Units
The opt-in provisions allow for
certain non-EGUs (i.e., boilers,
combustion turbines, and other
stationary fossil-fuel-fired devices) that
do not meet the applicability criteria for
a CAIR trading program to participate
voluntarily in (i.e., opt into) the CAIR
trading program. A non-EGU may opt
into one or more of the CAIR trading
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
programs. In order to qualify to opt into
a CAIR trading program, a unit must
vent all emissions through a stack and
be able to meet monitoring,
recordkeeping, and recording
requirements of 40 CFR part 75. The
owners and operators seeking to opt a
unit into a CAIR trading program must
apply for a CAIR opt-in permit. If the
unit is issued a CAIR opt-in permit, the
unit becomes a CAIR unit, is allocated
allowances, and must meet the same
allowance-holding and emissions
monitoring and reporting requirements
as other units subject to the CAIR
trading program. The opt-in provisions
provide for two methodologies for
allocating allowances for opt-in units,
one methodology that applies to opt-in
units in general and a second
methodology that allocates allowances
only to opt-in units that the owners and
operators intend to re-power before
January 1, 2015.
States have several options
concerning the opt-in provisions. The
rules for each of the CAIR FIP trading
programs include opt-in provisions that
are essentially the same as those in the
respective CAIR SIP model rules, except
that the CAIR FIP opt-in provisions
become effective in a State only if the
State’s abbreviated SIP revision adopts
the opt-in provisions. The State may
adopt the opt-in provisions entirely or
may adopt them but exclude one of the
allowance allocation methodologies.
The State also has the option of not
adopting any opt-in provisions in the
abbreviated SIP revision and thereby
providing for the CAIR FIP trading
program to be implemented in the State
without the ability for units to opt into
the program.
Consistent with the flexibility given to
States in the FIPs, Ohio has chosen to
allow non-EGUs meeting certain
requirements to participate in the CAIR
NOX annual trading program, the CAIR
NOX ozone season trading program and
the CAIR SO2 trading program. Ohio
EPA submitted the CAIR SIP program
rules, OAC 3745–109–08 and OAC
3745–109–14 and OAC 3745–109–21,
which incorporate the opt-in provisions
as provided in the final EPA CAIR rule
of April 28, 2006. These rules address
opt-ins for NOX ozone season, NOX
annual, and SO2 annual programs.
VI. Public Comments
Comment: On November 9, 2007, the
Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection (CTDEP)
submitted comments on EPA’s direct
final rule (DFR) notice approving Ohio’s
abbreviated CAIR SIP. CTDEP
encourages EPA to approve the state’s
CAIR program adopted to meet the
E:\FR\FM\01FER1.SGM
01FER1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
emission reduction requirements of
CAIR. However, it argues that before
approving state plans, EPA should
evaluate individually and in the
aggregate each state’s clean air
programs. CTDEP argues that such
evaluation is necessary to ensure that
each state’s emissions do not
significantly contribute to ozone
nonattainment in Connecticut. CTDEP
asserts its belief that the CAIR program
does not ensure that the CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) requirements to prohibit
transported emissions that significantly
contribute to nonattainment in
Connecticut and other states will be
met. CTDEP expresses concern that EPA
is determining through this and other
similar rulemakings that CAIR programs
are sufficient to meet States’ section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) obligations. CTDEP
asserts, based on EPA and State
modeling for CAIR, that the levels of
transported pollution remaining after
CAIR implementation are large enough
that, even with local controls, it may be
difficult for Connecticut to attain the 8hour ozone NAAQS by 2010. Finally,
CTDEP questions EPA’s determination
that highly cost effective controls are
adequate to address States’ section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) obligations as compared
to ‘‘reasonable cost’’ controls that could
be achieved to effect more stringent
NOX reductions.
Response: EPA does not agree that it
is appropriate or necessary for EPA to
conduct additional analysis before
approving the Ohio abbreviated CAIR
SIP for NOX allowances and NOX
allowance methodology. Ohio has
chosen an abbreviated SIP for NOX
allowances and NOX allocation
methodology, one of four SIP elements
for which states may request an
abbreviated SIP. With an abbreviated
SIP, the CAIR FIP remains in place for
Ohio. EPA’s proposed approval of
Ohio’s abbreviated SIP would therefore
only have the effect of replacing, as
provided for in the CAIR FIP, the
corresponding FIP provisions with the
State’s preferred allocations and
methodology. EPA has evaluated this
abbreviated SIP revision and
determined that it complies with the
requirements of the CAIR FIP provisions
regarding abbreviated SIPs. CTDEP does
not challenge this determination. Thus,
CTDEP’s comments do not specifically
pertain to any aspect of EPA’s proposed
specific action to approve the Ohio
CAIR SIP revision. Rather, the
comments appear to be directed broadly
at EPA’s decisions with regard to States’
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) obligations. These
decisions were made by EPA in the
context of the CAIR rulemaking, which
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
was promulgated on May 12, 2005 (70
FR 25162), not in the EPA action to
approve Ohio’s abbreviated CAIR SIP
revision. Therefore, CTDEP’s comments
are not relevant to this final action.
CTDEP had ample opportunity to
submit comments both during the
comment period for the proposed CAIR
rulemaking of January 30, 2004 (69 FR
4566), and during the comment period
for the proposed CAIR FIP of August 24,
2005 (70 FR 49708). EPA’s action to
approve Ohio’s abbreviated CAIR SIP
did not reopen either the CAIR or CAIR
FIP rulemakings. Consequently,
CTDEP’s comments are not relevant to
this rulemaking, or timely with respect
to the CAIR and CAIR FIP rulemakings.
Thus, EPA does not believe it is
necessary to conduct additional analysis
on whether Ohio or any other state
satisfies the requirements of 110(a)(2)(D)
before approving the Ohio abbreviated
CAIR SIP submission.
VII. Final Action
EPA is promulgating the rules
contained in Ohio’s abbreviated CAIR
SIP revision submitted on September
26, 2007. Ohio is covered by the CAIR
FIPs, which require participation in the
EPA-administered CAIR FIP cap-andtrade programs for SO2, NOX annual,
and NOX ozone season emissions.
Under this abbreviated SIP revision, and
consistent with the flexibility given to
States in the FIPs, Ohio adopts
provisions for allocating allowances
under the CAIR FIP NOX annual and
ozone season trading programs. In
addition, Ohio adopts in the abbreviated
SIP revision provisions that establish a
methodology for allocating allowances
in the CSP and allow for individual
non-EGUs to opt into the CAIR FIP SO2,
NOX annual, NOX ozone season capand-trade programs. As provided for in
the CAIR FIPs, these provisions in the
abbreviated SIP revision will replace or
supplement the corresponding
provisions of the CAIR FIPs in Ohio.
The abbreviated SIP revision meets the
applicable requirements in 40 CFR
51.123(p) and (ee), with regard to NOX
annual and NOX ozone season
emissions, and 40 CFR 51.124(r), with
regard to SO2 emissions. EPA is not
making any changes to the CAIR FIP,
but is amending the appropriate
appendices in the CAIR FIP trading
rules simply to note that approval.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C 553(d),
EPA finds that there is good cause for
these actions to become effective
immediately upon publication.
Ordinarily, a delay in the effective date
is provided to give affected sources
more time to plan for meeting
applicable requirements. In this case,
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6039
the various requirements under Ohio’s
rule take effect at fixed times, and an
immediate effective date (and nearly
immediate issuance of allowances under
Ohio’s allocation rules) will provide
sources more time to plan for meeting
the rules’ requirements. Thus, an
immediate effective date better serves
the purposes of 5 U.S.C. 553 than would
a delayed effective date. An immediate
effective date will provide positive
impact from the final rule on sources
which can utilize the allowances
methodology under the State’s rule. EPA
concluded that the Connecticut
comment did not oppose approval of
Ohio’s rule and was not intended to
delay implementation of the Ohio CAIR
program. The immediate effective date
for this action is authorized under both
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that
rulemaking actions may become
effective less than 30 days after
publication if the rule ‘‘* * * grants or
recognizes an exemption or relieves a
restriction,’’ and section 553(d)(3)e
which allows an effective date less than
30 days after publication ‘‘* * * as
otherwise provided by the agency for
good cause found and published with
the rule.’’ The purpose of the 30-day
waiting period prescribed in 553(d) is to
give the affected parties a reasonable
time to adjust their planning actions as
the final rule takes effect. Today’s rule,
however, does not create any new
regulatory requirements such that
affected parties would need time to
prepare before the rule takes effect.
Rather, today’s ‘‘immediate effective’’
action provides sufficient time for
affected sources to plan the use of
allowances under the State rule through
the implementation of the Ohio
abbreviated CAIR implementation plan.
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
and, therefore, is not subject to review
by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and would impose no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
action approves pre-existing
E:\FR\FM\01FER1.SGM
01FER1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
6040
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
requirements under state law and would
not impose any additional enforceable
duty beyond that required by state law,
it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it would not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
federal standard and to amend the
appropriate appendices in the CAIR FIP
trading rules to note that approval. It
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it would approve a state
rule implementing a federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
state to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the CAA. Thus, the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply. This rule would not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 1, 2008. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this rule for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Electric utilities,
Incorporate by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
oxides, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
40 CFR Part 97
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Electric utilities,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
oxides, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
(c) * * *
(140) Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency submitted amendments on
September 26, 2007, to the State
Implementation Plan to control
emissions from electric generating units
(EGU). Rules affecting these units
include: Ohio Administrative Code
(OAC) 3745–109–01 (B)(59) and (72),
3745–109–04, 3745–109–08, 3745–109–
14, 3745–109–17 (except the following:
the language in paragraph (A)
referencing the state trading budget for
non-EGUs in 3745–109–17–01(C)(4),
paragraphs (C)(1)(a)(i)(d), (C)(2)(b),
(C)(2)(d), (C)(2)(e), and (C)(2)(f), and the
language in paragraph (C)(3)(a)
referencing non-EGUs), and 3745–109–
21.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The
following sections of the Ohio
Administrative Code (OAC) are
incorporated by reference.
(A) OAC 3745–109–01(B)(59) ‘‘Energy
efficiency/renewable energy project’’;
OAC 3745–109–01(B)(72) ‘‘Innovative
technology project’’; OAC 3745–109–04
‘‘CAIR NOX allowance allocations’’;
OAC 3745–109–08 ‘‘CAIR NOX opt-in
units’’; OAC 3745–109–14 ‘‘CAIR SO2
opt-in units’’; and OAC 3745–109–21
‘‘CAIR NOX ozone season opt-in units’’;
effective on September 27, 2007.
(B) OAC 3745–109–17 ‘‘CAIR NOX
ozone season allowance allocations’’;
effective on September 27, 2007, except
the following: the language in paragraph
(A) referencing the state trading budget
for non-EGUs in 3745–109–17–01(C)(4),
paragraphs (C)(1)(a)(i)(d), (C)(2)(b),
(C)(2)(d), (C)(2)(e), and (C)(2)(f), and the
language in paragraph (C)(3)(a)
referencing non-EGUs.
PART 97—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for part 97
continues to read as follows:
I
Dated: January 11, 2008.
Gary Gulezian,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, 7403, 7410,
7426, 7601, and 7651, et seq.
I
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, parts 52 and 97 of chapter 1
of title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations are amended as follows:
4. Appendix A to subpart EE is
amended by adding in alphabetical
order the entry ‘‘Ohio’’ under
paragraphs 1. and 2. to read as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
Appendix A to Subpart EE of Part 97—
States With Approved State
Implementation Plan Revisions
Concerning Allocations
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
1. * * *
Ohio
Subpart KK—Ohio
2. Section 52.1870 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(140) to read as
follows:
I
§ 52.1870
Identification of plan.
*
*
PO 00000
*
Frm 00034
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2. * * *
Ohio
*
*
5. Appendix A to subpart II is
amended by adding in alphabetical
I
E:\FR\FM\01FER1.SGM
01FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
order the entry ‘‘Ohio’’ under
paragraphs 1. and 2. to read as follows:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Appendix A to Subpart II of Part 97—
States With Approved State
Implementation Plan Revisions
Concerning CAIR NOX Opt-In Units
47 CFR Part 64
1. * * *
Ohio
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Clarification.
*
6. Appendix A to subpart III of part 97
is amended by adding in alphabetical
order the entry ‘‘Ohio’’ under
paragraphs 1. and 2. to read as follows:
I
Appendix A to Subpart III of Part 97—
States With Approved State
Implementation Plan Revisions
Concerning CAIR SO2 Opt-In Units
1. * * *
Ohio
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2. * * *
Ohio
*
*
7. Appendix A to subpart EEEE of part
97 is amended by adding in alphabetical
order the entry ‘‘Ohio’’ to read as
follows:
I
Appendix A to Subpart EEEE of Part
97—States With Approved State
Implementation Plan Revisions
Concerning Allocations
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Ohio
*
*
8. Appendix A to subpart IV of part
97 is amended by adding in alphabetical
order the entry ‘‘Ohio’’ under
paragraphs 1. and 2. to read as follows:
I
Appendix A to Subpart IV of Part 97—
States With Approved State
Implementation Plan Revisions
Concerning CAIR NOX Ozone Season
Opt-In Units
1. * * *
Ohio
2. * * *
Ohio
*
*
*
*
*
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
[FR Doc. E8–1804 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:27 Jan 31, 2008
Rules and Regulations Implementing
the Telephone Consumer Protection
Act of 1991
AGENCY:
2. * * *
Ohio
*
[CG Docket No. 02–278; FCC 07–232]
Jkt 214001
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission addresses a Petition for
Expedited Clarification and Declaratory
Ruling filed by ACA International
(ACA). Specifically, the Commission
clarifies that autodialed and
prerecorded message calls to wireless
numbers that are provided by the called
party to a creditor in connection with an
existing debt are permissible as calls
made with the ‘‘prior express consent’’
of the called party.
DATES: Effective February 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Erica McMahon, Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0346 (voice), or e-mail
Erica.McMahon@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 4, 2005, ACA filed a petition for
expedited clarification and declaratory
ruling against the Commission’s Rules
and Regulations Implementing the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act of
1991, Report and Order, FCC 03–153,
published at 68 FR 44144 (July 25,
2003). This is a summary of the
Commission’s document, FCC 07–232,
adopted December 28, 2007, released
January 4, 2008, addressing a Petition
for Expedited Clarification and
Declaratory Ruling filed by ACA
International (ACA).
Copies of document FCC 07–232 and
any subsequently filed documents in
this matter will be available for public
inspection and copying during regular
business hours at the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. Document FCC
07–232 and any subsequently filed
documents in this matter may also be
purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor at Portals II, 445
12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554. Customers may
contact the Commission’s duplicating
contractor at their Web site:
www.bcpiweb.com or call 1–800–378–
3160. To request materials in accessible
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6041
formats for people with disabilities
(Braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format), send an e-mail to
fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice) or (202) 418–0432
(TTY). Document FCC 07–232 can also
be downloaded in Word and Portable
Document Format (PDF) at: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Analysis
Document FCC 07–232 does not
contain new information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public
Law 104–13. In addition, it does not
contain any new or modified
‘‘information collection burden for
small business concerns with fewer than
25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198. See 47 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Synopsis
On October 4, 2005, ACA filed a
petition seeking clarification that the
prohibition against autodialed or
prerecorded calls to wireless telephone
numbers in 47 CFR 64.1200(a)(1)(iii) of
the Commission’s rules does not apply
to creditors and collectors when calling
wireless telephone numbers to recover
payments for goods and services
received by consumers.
Although the TCPA generally
prohibits autodialed calls to wireless
phones, it also provides an exception for
autodialed and prerecorded message
calls for emergency purposes or made
with the prior express consent of the
called party. Because the Commission
finds that autodialed and prerecorded
message calls to wireless numbers
provided by the called party in
connection with an existing debt are
made with the ‘‘prior express consent’’
of the called party, the Commission
clarifies that such calls are permissible.
The Commission concludes that the
provision of a cell phone number to a
creditor, e.g., as part of a credit
application, reasonably evidences prior
express consent by the cell phone
subscriber to be contacted at that
number regarding the debt. In the 1992
TCPA Order (FCC 92–443) published at
57 FR 48333 (October 23, 1992), the
Commission determined that ‘‘persons
who knowingly release their phone
numbers have in effect given their
invitation or permission to be called at
the number which they have given,
absent instructions to the contrary.’’ The
legislative history in the TCPA provides
support for this interpretation.
Specifically, the House report on what
E:\FR\FM\01FER1.SGM
01FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6034-6041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1804]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 97
[EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0390; FRL-8519-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Ohio; Clean Air Interstate Rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action approves a revision to the Ohio State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on April 17, 2007, and revised on
September 26, 2007. This SIP revision incorporates provisions related
to the implementation of EPA's Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR),
promulgated on May 12, 2005, and revised on April 28, 2006, and
December 13, 2006, and the CAIR Federal Implementation Plan (CAIR SIP)
concerning sulphur dioxide (SO2), oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) annual and NOX ozone season emissions for
the State of Ohio, promulgated on April 28, 2006, and revised on
December 13, 2006. EPA is not making any changes to the CAIR FIP but is
amending, to the extent EPA approves Ohio's SIP revision, the
appropriate appendices in the CAIR FIP trading rules simply to note
that approval.
The Ohio SIP revision that was submitted on April 17, 2007, was a
full CAIR SIP revision. In a letter submitted on September 26, 2007,
Ohio requested that EPA consider the September 26, 2007, submittal as
two separate submittals, i.e., as a full CAIR SIP and as an abbreviated
CAIR SIP. Ohio requested that EPA act on specific portions of the
September 26, 2007, submittal as an abbreviated CAIR SIP. EPA approves
Ohio's abbreviated SIP revision that addresses the methodology used to
allocate annual and ozone season NOX allowances to affected
electric generating units (EGUs), and the opt-in provisions, under the
CAIR trading programs and the CAIR SIP.
This action also contains EPA's response to a comment from the
State of Connecticut following publication of the original direct final
approval of the Ohio plan on October 16, 2007. We withdrew the original
direct final rule on December 5, 2007, because of receipt of this
comment. For reasons expressed in the body of this rule, EPA believes
the comment from Connecticut is not relevant to this final action and,
therefore, we are moving forward to approve the Ohio plan. As such, EPA
will populate the compliance accounts of units affected by the State's
rule shortly after the effective date of this rule.
DATES: This final rule is effective on February 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0390. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
[[Page 6035]]
i.e., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
We recommend that you contact the person listed below before visiting
the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Paskevicz, Engineer, Criteria
Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6084. E-mail at paskevicz.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
Table of Contents
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
II. What Is the Regulatory History of CAIR and the CAIR FIPs?
III. What Are the General Requirements of CAIR and the CAIR FIPs?
IV. What Are the Types of CAIR SIP Submittals?
V. Analysis of Ohio's CAIR SIP Submittal
A. State Budgets for Allowance Allocations
B. CAIR Cap-and-Trade Programs
C. Applicability Provisions for non-EGUs NOX SIP Call
Sources
D. NOX Allowance Allocations
E. Allocation of NOX Allowances From the Compliance
Supplement Pool
F. Individual Opt-in Units
VI. Public Comment
VII. Final Action
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
CAIR SIP Approval
EPA is approving a revision to Ohio's SIP, submitted on September
26, 2007, that modifies the application of certain provisions of the
CAIR FIP concerning SO2, NOX annual, and NOX
ozone season emissions. (As discussed below, this less comprehensive
CAIR SIP is termed an abbreviated SIP.) Ohio is subject to the CAIR
FIPs that implement the CAIR requirements by requiring certain EGUs to
participate in the EPA-administered Federal CAIR SO2,
NOX annual, and NOX ozone season cap-and-trade
programs. The SIP revision provides a methodology for allocating
NOX allowances for the NOX annual and NOX
ozone season trading programs. The CAIR FIPs provide that this
methodology will be used to allocate NOX allowances to
sources in Ohio, instead of the Federal allocation methodology
otherwise provided in the FIP. The SIP revision provides a methodology
for allocating the compliance supplement pool in the CAIR NOX
annual trading program. The SIP also allows for individual units not
otherwise subject to the CAIR trading programs to opt into such trading
programs in accordance with opt-in provisions of the CAIR FIP.
Consistent with the flexibility provided in the FIPs, these provisions
will be used to replace or supplement, as appropriate, the
corresponding provisions in the CAIR FIPs for Ohio. EPA is not making
any changes to the CAIR FIP, but is amending to the extent EPA approves
Ohio's SIP revision, the appropriate appendices in the CAIR FIP trading
rules simply to note that approval.
II. What Is the Regulatory History of the CAIR and the CAIR FIPs?
The CAIR was published by EPA on May 12, 2005 (70 FR 25162). In
this rule, EPA determined that 28 States and the District of Columbia
contribute significantly to nonattainment and interfere with
maintenance of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for
fine particles (PM2.5) and/or 8-hour ozone in downwind
States in the eastern part of the country. As a result, EPA required
those upwind States to revise their SIPs to include control measures
that reduce emissions of SO2, which is a precursor to
PM2.5 formation, and/or NOX, which is a precursor
to both ozone and PM2.5 formation. For jurisdictions that
contribute significantly to downwind PM2.5 nonattainment,
CAIR sets annual State-wide emission reduction requirements (i.e.,
budgets) for SO2 and annual State-wide emission reduction
requirements for NOX. Similarly, for jurisdictions that
contribute significantly to 8-hour ozone nonattainment, CAIR sets
State-wide emission reduction requirements for NOX for the
ozone season (May 1st to September 30th). Under CAIR, States may
implement these emission budgets by participating in the EPA-
administered cap-and-trade programs or by adopting any other control
measures.
CAIR explains to subject States what must be included in SIPs to
address the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) with regard to interstate transport with respect to the 8-hour
ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA made national findings, effective
May 25, 2005, that the States had failed to submit SIPs meeting the
requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D). The SIPs were due in July 2000, 3
years after the promulgation of the 8-hour ozone and PM2.5
NAAQS. These findings started a 2-year clock for EPA to promulgate a
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address the requirements of
section 110(a)(2)(D). Under CAA section 110(c)(1), EPA may issue a FIP
anytime after such findings are made and must do so within two years
unless a SIP revision correcting the deficiency is approved by EPA
before the FIP is promulgated.
On April 28, 2006, EPA promulgated FIPs for all States covered by
CAIR in order to ensure the emissions reductions required by CAIR are
achieved on schedule. Each CAIR State is subject to the FIPs until the
State fully adopts, and EPA approves, a SIP revision meeting the
requirements of CAIR. The CAIR FIPs require certain EGUs to participate
in the EPA-administered CAIR SO2, NOX annual, and
NOX ozone-season model trading programs, as appropriate. The
CAIR FIP SO2, NOX annual, and NOX
ozone season trading programs impose essentially the same requirements
as, and are integrated with, the respective CAIR SIP trading programs.
The integration of the CAIR FIP and SIP trading programs means that
these trading programs will work together to create effectively a
single trading program for each regulated pollutant (SO2,
NOX annual, and NOX ozone season) in all States
covered by CAIR FIP or SIP trading program for that pollutant. The CAIR
FIPs also allow States to submit abbreviated SIP revisions that, if
approved by EPA, will automatically replace or supplement the
corresponding CAIR FIP provisions (e.g., the methodology for allocating
NOX allowances to sources in the state), while the CAIR FIP
remains in place for all other provisions.
On April 28, 2006, EPA published two more CAIR-related final rules
that added the States of Delaware and New Jersey to the list of States
subject to CAIR for PM2.5 and announced EPA's final
decisions on reconsideration of five issues without making any
substantive changes to the CAIR requirements.
III. What Are the General Requirements of CAIR and the CAIR FIPs?
CAIR establishes State-wide emission budgets for SO2 and
NOX and is to be implemented in two phases. The first phase
of NOX reductions starts in 2009 and continues through 2014,
while the first phase of SO2 reductions starts in 2010 and
continues through 2014. The
[[Page 6036]]
second phase of reductions for both NOX and SO2
starts in 2015 and continues thereafter. CAIR requires States to
implement the budgets by either requiring EGUs to participate in the
EPA-administered cap-and-trade programs or adopting other control
measures of the State's choosing and demonstrating that such control
measures will result in compliance with the applicable State SO2
and NOX budgets.
The May 12, 2005, and April 28, 2006, CAIR rules provide model
rules that States must adopt (with certain limited changes, if desired)
if they want to participate in the EPA-administered trading programs.
With two exceptions, only States that choose to meet the requirements
of CAIR through methods that exclusively regulate EGUs are allowed to
participate in the EPA-administered trading programs. One exception is
for States that adopt the opt-in provisions of the model rules to allow
non-EGUs individually to opt into the EPA-administered trading
programs. The other exception is for States that include all non-EGUs
from their NOX SIP Call trading programs in their CAIR
NOX ozone season trading programs.
IV. What Are the Types of CAIR SIP Submittals?
States have the flexibility to choose the type of control measures
they will use to meet the requirements of CAIR. EPA anticipates that
most States will choose to meet the CAIR requirements by selecting an
option that requires EGUs to participate in the EPA-administered CAIR
cap-and-trade programs. For such States, EPA has provided two
approaches for submitting and obtaining approval for CAIR SIP
revisions. States may submit full SIP revisions that adopt the model
CAIR cap-and-trade rules. If approved, these SIP revisions will fully
replace the CAIR FIPs. Alternatively, States may submit abbreviated SIP
revisions. These SIP revisions will not replace the CAIR FIPs; however,
the CAIR FIPs provide that, when approved, the provisions in these
abbreviated SIP revisions will be used instead of or in conjunction
with, as appropriate, the corresponding provisions of the CAIR FIPs
(e.g., the NOX allowance allocation methodology).
A State submitting an abbreviated SIP revision, may submit limited
SIP revisions to tailor the CAIR FIP cap-and-trade programs to the
state submitting the revision. Specifically, an abbreviated SIP
revision may establish certain applicability and allowance allocation
provisions that, the CAIR FIPs provide, will be used instead of or in
conjunction with the corresponding provisions in the CAIR FIP rules in
that State. Specifically, the abbreviated SIP revisions may:
1. Include NOX SIP Call trading sources that are not
EGUs under CAIR in the CAIR FIP NOX ozone season trading
program;
2. Provide for allocation of NOX annual or ozone season
allowances by the State, rather than the Administrator, and using a
methodology chosen by the State;
3. Provide for allocation of NOX annual allowances from
the CSP by the State, rather than by the Administrator, and using the
State's choice of allowed, alternative methodologies; and/or
4. Allow units that are not otherwise CAIR units to opt
individually into the CAIR FIP cap-and-trade programs under the opt-in
provisions in the CAIR FIP rules.
With approval of an abbreviated SIP revision, the CAIR FIP remains
in place, as tailored to sources in the State by that approved SIP
revision. Abbreviated SIP revisions can be submitted in lieu of, or as
part of, CAIR full SIP revisions. States may want to designate part of
their full SIP as an abbreviated SIP for EPA to act on first when the
timing of the State's submission might not provide EPA with sufficient
time to approve the full SIP prior to the deadline for recording
NOX allocations. This will help ensure that the elements of
the trading programs where flexibility is allowed are implemented
according to the State's decisions. Submission of an abbreviated SIP
revision does not preclude future submission of a CAIR full SIP
revision. In this case, the September 26, 2007, submittal from Ohio has
been submitted as an abbreviated SIP revision. As discussed below, Ohio
requested three of the four provisions for which a State may request an
abbreviated SIP. The State requested that its allocation of NOX
annual and NOX ozone season allowances for EGUs under the
FIP be used instead of the corresponding provisions of the CAIR FIPs in
effect in the State. The State requested that its allocation by the
State of NOX annual allowances from the CSP be used instead
of the corresponding provisions of the CAIR FIPs in effect in the
State. Finally, the State also provided that units that are not
otherwise CAIR units may opt individually into the CAIR FIP cap-and-
trade program under the opt-in provisions in the CAIR FIP rules.
V. Analysis of Ohio's CAIR SIP Submittal
A. State Budgets for Allowance Allocations
The CAIR NOX annual and ozone season budgets were
developed from historical heat input data for EGUs. Using these data,
EPA calculated annual and ozone season regional heat input values,
which were multiplied by 0.15 lb/mmBtu, for phase 1, and 0.125 lb/
mmBtu, for phase 2, to obtain regional NOX budgets for 2009-
2014 and for 2015 and thereafter, respectively. EPA derived the State
NOX annual and ozone season budgets from the regional
budgets using State heat input data adjusted by fuel factors.
The CAIR State SO2 budgets were derived by discounting
the tonnage of emissions authorized by annual allowance allocations
under the Acid Rain Program under title IV of the CAA. Under CAIR, each
allowance allocated under the Acid Rain Program for the years in phase
1 of CAIR (2010 through 2014) authorizes 0.5 ton of SO2
emissions in the CAIR trading program, and each Acid Rain Program
allowance allocated for the years in phase 2 of CAIR (2015 and
thereafter) authorizes 0.35 ton of SO2 emissions in the CAIR
trading program.
The CAIR FIPs established the budgets for Ohio as 108,667 tons for
NOX annual emissions, 45,664 tons for NOX ozone
season emissions, and 333,520 tons for SO2 emissions. Ohio's
SIP revision, approved in today's action, does not affect these
budgets, which are total amounts of allowances available for allocation
for each year under the EPA-administered cap-and-trade programs under
the CAIR FIPs. In short, the abbreviated SIP revision only affects
allocations of allowances under the established budgets.
B. CAIR Cap-and-Trade Programs
The CAIR NOX annual and ozone-season FIPs both largely
mirror the structure of the NOX SIP Call model trading rule
in 40 CFR part 96, subparts A through I. While the provisions of the
NOX annual and ozone-season FIPs are similar, there are some
differences. For example, the NOX annual FIP (but not the
NOX ozone season FIP) provides for a CSP, which is discussed
below and under which allowances may be awarded for early reductions of
NOX annual emissions. As a further example, the NOX
ozone season FIP reflects the fact that the CAIR NOX ozone
season trading program replaces the NOX SIP Call trading
program after the 2008 ozone season and is coordinated with the
NOX SIP Call program. The NOX
[[Page 6037]]
ozone season FIP provides incentives for early emissions
reductions by allowing banked, pre-2009 NOX SIP Call
allowances to be used for compliance in the CAIR NOX ozone-
season trading program. In addition, States have the option of
continuing to meet their NOX SIP Call requirement by
participating in the CAIR NOX ozone season trading program
and including all of their NOX SIP Call trading sources in
that program.
The provisions of the CAIR SO2 FIP are also similar to
the provisions of the NOX annual and ozone season FIPs.
However, the SO2 FIP is coordinated with the ongoing Acid
Rain SO2 cap-and-trade program under CAA title IV. The
SO2 FIP uses the title IV allowances for compliance, with
each allowance allocated for 2010-2014 authorizing only 0.50 ton of
emissions and each allowance allocated for 2015 and thereafter
authorizing only 0.35 ton of emissions. Banked title IV allowances
allocated for years before 2010 can be used at any time in the CAIR
SO2 cap-and-trade program, with each such allowance
authorizing 1 ton of emissions. Title IV allowances are to be freely
transferable among sources covered by the Acid Rain Program and sources
covered by the CAIR SO2 cap-and-trade program.
EPA used the CAIR model trading rules as the basis for the trading
programs in the CAIR FIPs. The CAIR FIP trading rules are virtually
identical to the CAIR model trading rules, with changes made to account
for Federal rather than state implementation. The CAIR model
SO2, NOX annual, and NOX ozone season
trading rules and the respective CAIR FIP trading rules are designed to
work together as integrated SO2, NOX annual, and
NOX ozone season trading programs.
Ohio is subject to the CAIR FIPs concerning SO2,
NOX annual, and NOX ozone season emissions, and
the CAIR FIP trading programs for SO2, NOX
annual, and NOX ozone season apply to sources in Ohio.
Consistent with the flexibility they give to States, the CAIR FIPs
provide that States may submit abbreviated SIP revisions that will
replace or supplement, as appropriate, certain provisions of the CAIR
FIP trading programs. The Ohio EPA September 26, 2007, submission is
such an abbreviated SIP revision.
C. Applicability Provisions for non-EGUs NOX SIP Call Sources
In general, the CAIR FIP trading programs apply to any stationary,
fossil-fuel-fired boiler or stationary, fossil-fuel-fired combustion
turbine serving at any time, since the later of November 15, 1990, or
the start-up of the unit's combustion chamber, a generator with
nameplate capacity of more than 25 MWe producing electricity for sale.
States have the option of bringing in, for the CAIR NOX ozone
season program only, those units in the State's NOX SIP Call
trading program that are not EGUs as defined under CAIR. EPA advises
States exercising this option to use provisions for applicability that
are substantively identical to the provisions in 40 CFR 96.304 and add
the applicability provisions in the State's NOX SIP Call
trading rule for non-EGUs to the applicability provisions in 40 CFR
96.304 in order to include in the CAIR NOX ozone season
trading program all units required to be in the State's NOX
SIP Call trading program that are not already included under 40 CFR
96.304. Under this option, the CAIR NOX ozone season program
must cover all large industrial boilers and combustion turbines, as
well as any small EGUs (i.e. units serving a generator with a nameplate
capacity of 25 MWe or less), that the State currently requires to be in
the NOX SIP Call trading program.
Consistent with the flexibility given to States in the CAIR FIP,
Ohio has not chosen, in the abbreviated CAIR SIP approved here, to
expand the applicability provisions of the CAIR NOX ozone
season trading program to include all non-EGUs in the State's NOX
SIP Call trading program. However, EPA notes that Ohio has indicated
that the full SIP revision submitted on September 26, 2007, expands the
applicability provisions of CAIR NOX ozone season trading
program in this manner. As such, EPA is not taking final action on the
non-EGU portion of the State's September 26, 2007, full CAIR SIP
revision. The full CAIR SIP revision including actions to approve the
non-EGU portions of the State's CAIR rule will be the subject of a
separate future action.
D. NOX Allowance Allocations
Under the NOX allowance allocation methodology in the
CAIR model trading rules and in the CAIR FIP, NOX annual and
ozone season allowances are allocated to units that have operated for
five years, based on heat input data from a three-year period that are
adjusted for fuel type by using fuel factors of 1.0 for coal, 0.6 for
oil, and 0.4 for other fuels. The CAIR model trading rules and the CAIR
FIP also provide a new unit set-aside from which units without five
years of operation are allocated allowances based on the units' prior
year emissions.
The CAIR FIP provides States the flexibility to establish a
different NOX allowance allocation methodology that will be
used to allocate allowances to sources in the States if certain
requirements are met concerning the timing of submission of units'
allocations to the Administrator for recordation and the total amount
of allowances allocated for each control period. In adopting
alternative NOX allowance allocation methodologies, States
have flexibility with regard to:
1. The cost to recipients of the allowances, which may be
distributed for free or auctioned;
2. The frequency of allocations;
3. The basis for allocating allowances, which may be distributed,
for example, based on historical heat input or electric and thermal
output; and
4. The use of allowance set-asides and, if used, the size of the
set-aside.
Consistent with the flexibility given to States in the CAIR FIPs,
Ohio has chosen to replace the provisions of the CAIR NOX
annual FIP concerning the allocation of NOX annual
allowances with its own methodology. Ohio has chosen to distribute
NOX annual allowances based upon heat input data from a
three year period adjusted for fuel type by using fuel adjustment
factors of 1.0 for coal, 0.6 for oil, and 0.4 for other fuels. Based on
this methodology, Ohio determined NOX allocations for EGUs
in the State under the CAIR FIP, and submitted its allocations to EPA
on April 24, 2007.
Ohio also has included, in the abbreviated SIP revision, provisions
regarding set-aside programs for energy efficiency/renewable energy and
innovative technology projects under the CAIR NOX Ozone
Season program. The State's energy-efficiency/renewable energy (EE/RE)
and innovative technology set-aside program provisions establish two
set-asides for each control period--one set-aside for EE/RE projects
and one set-aside for innovative technology projects--and specify
procedures for allocating the allowances in the set-asides. Each set-
aside is limited to one percent of the state trading budget for
NOX ozone season allowance allocations. Beginning with the
end of 2009 and every three years thereafter, Ohio EPA will review the
number of allowances allocated from the set-asides and will, under
certain circumstances, increase the size of each set-aside in future
years as necessary, up to a maximum of five percent of the state
trading budget.
EPA notes that the set-aside provisions do not explicitly state how
allowances will be reserved in the set-asides if the total amount of
allowances requested from a set-aside exceeds the total amount of
allowances in that set-aside. However, set-aside provisions
[[Page 6038]]
explicitly limit the amount of allowances available from each set-aside
to one percent of the state trading budget unless Ohio EPA expands the
set-asides in future years. In addition, Ohio informed EPA, in the
September 26, 2007, letter, that its guidance for the set-asides
provides that set-aside allowances will be reserved on a pro-rata basis
if the total requested allowances exceed the size of the set-aside.
Ohio has indicated that it will clarify its set-aside provisions
consistent with this guidance.
The set-aside provisions also do not explicitly state how a set-
aside will be increased up to five percent of the state trading budget
if the existing set-aside amounts plus the total amounts allocated to
units with and without baseline heat input under Ohio's other
allocation provisions for NOX ozone season allowances
already equal the state trading budget. However, Ohio's CAIR NOX
ozone season allocation provisions clearly limit the total allocations
for each control period of CAIR NOX ozone season allowances
to the amount of the state trading budget for that control period.
Further, as written, the provisions for expanding the set-asides cannot
have any effect on the current allocations, which Ohio has already
submitted to the Administrator for phase 1 of the trading program. In
addition, Ohio informed EPA, in the September 28, 2007 letter, that
Ohio EPA will reduce the total amount of allowances allocated to
existing units under the other allocation provisions to the extent the
size of a set-aside is increased in the future. Ohio has indicated that
it will clarify its allocation provisions consistent with this
statement in the September 28, 2007, letter.
Consequently, EPA interprets Ohio's abbreviated SIP to limit,
consistent with the requirements of 40 CFR 51.123(ee)(2)(ii)(B), the
total allocations for each control period of CAIR NOX ozone
season allowances--whether from current or expanded set-asides or under
the other allocation provisions in the abbreviated SIP--to the state
trading budget.
E. Allocation of NOX Allowances From the Compliance Supplement Pool
The CSP provides an incentive for early reductions in NOX
annual emissions. The CSP consists of 200,000 CAIR NOX
annual allowances of vintage 2009 for the entire CAIR region, and a
State's share of the CSP is based upon the State's share of the
projected emission reductions under CAIR. States may distribute CSP
allowances, one allowance for each ton of early reduction, to sources
that make NOX reductions during 2007 or 2008 beyond what is
required by any applicable State or Federal emission limitation. States
also may distribute CSP allowances based upon a demonstration of need
for an extension of the 2009 deadline for implementing emission
controls.
The CAIR NOX annual FIP establishes specific
methodologies for allocations of CSP allowances. States may choose an
allowed, alternative CSP allocation methodology to be used to allocate
CSP allowances to sources in those States.
Consistent with the flexibility given to States in the FIP, Ohio
has chosen to modify the provisions of the CAIR NOX annual
FIP concerning the allocation of allowances from the CSP. Ohio has
chosen to distribute CSP allowances using an allocation methodology
that provides more certainty to unit owners and operators that a known
quantity of allowances per unit will be available for distribution at
the beginning of the control period. Ohio also provides owners and
operators with an incentive for the operation of expensive post-
combustion control equipment year-round and provides incentives for
early reductions in emissions before 2009. Ohio EPA is required to
submit allocations from the CSP to the Administrator by July 1, 2009,
or such time when unit's 2008 emissions data are available so that the
allocations can be determined. Ohio's abbreviated SIP also states that
the Administrator will record the allocations by January 1, 2010. While
Ohio's abbreviated SIP does not explicitly state that allocations will
be submitted to the Administrator by November 30, 2009, EPA notes that
units' 2008 emissions data should certainly be available before that
date and that the allocations need to be submitted by that date in
order to ensure that the Administrator will complete recordation of
allowances by January 1, 2010. Further, Ohio has indicated, in the
September 26, 2007, letter, that it will clarify its CSP provisions to
provide for a November 30, 2009, deadline for submission of CSP
allocations to the Administrator. Consequently, EPA considers the Ohio
abbreviated SIP to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 51.123(p)(2).
F. Individual Opt-in Units
The opt-in provisions allow for certain non-EGUs (i.e., boilers,
combustion turbines, and other stationary fossil-fuel-fired devices)
that do not meet the applicability criteria for a CAIR trading program
to participate voluntarily in (i.e., opt into) the CAIR trading
program. A non-EGU may opt into one or more of the CAIR trading
programs. In order to qualify to opt into a CAIR trading program, a
unit must vent all emissions through a stack and be able to meet
monitoring, recordkeeping, and recording requirements of 40 CFR part
75. The owners and operators seeking to opt a unit into a CAIR trading
program must apply for a CAIR opt-in permit. If the unit is issued a
CAIR opt-in permit, the unit becomes a CAIR unit, is allocated
allowances, and must meet the same allowance-holding and emissions
monitoring and reporting requirements as other units subject to the
CAIR trading program. The opt-in provisions provide for two
methodologies for allocating allowances for opt-in units, one
methodology that applies to opt-in units in general and a second
methodology that allocates allowances only to opt-in units that the
owners and operators intend to re-power before January 1, 2015.
States have several options concerning the opt-in provisions. The
rules for each of the CAIR FIP trading programs include opt-in
provisions that are essentially the same as those in the respective
CAIR SIP model rules, except that the CAIR FIP opt-in provisions become
effective in a State only if the State's abbreviated SIP revision
adopts the opt-in provisions. The State may adopt the opt-in provisions
entirely or may adopt them but exclude one of the allowance allocation
methodologies. The State also has the option of not adopting any opt-in
provisions in the abbreviated SIP revision and thereby providing for
the CAIR FIP trading program to be implemented in the State without the
ability for units to opt into the program.
Consistent with the flexibility given to States in the FIPs, Ohio
has chosen to allow non-EGUs meeting certain requirements to
participate in the CAIR NOX annual trading program, the CAIR
NOX ozone season trading program and the CAIR SO2
trading program. Ohio EPA submitted the CAIR SIP program rules, OAC
3745-109-08 and OAC 3745-109-14 and OAC 3745-109-21, which incorporate
the opt-in provisions as provided in the final EPA CAIR rule of April
28, 2006. These rules address opt-ins for NOX ozone season,
NOX annual, and SO2 annual programs.
VI. Public Comments
Comment: On November 9, 2007, the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection (CTDEP) submitted comments on EPA's direct
final rule (DFR) notice approving Ohio's abbreviated CAIR SIP. CTDEP
encourages EPA to approve the state's CAIR program adopted to meet the
[[Page 6039]]
emission reduction requirements of CAIR. However, it argues that before
approving state plans, EPA should evaluate individually and in the
aggregate each state's clean air programs. CTDEP argues that such
evaluation is necessary to ensure that each state's emissions do not
significantly contribute to ozone nonattainment in Connecticut. CTDEP
asserts its belief that the CAIR program does not ensure that the CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) requirements to prohibit transported emissions
that significantly contribute to nonattainment in Connecticut and other
states will be met. CTDEP expresses concern that EPA is determining
through this and other similar rulemakings that CAIR programs are
sufficient to meet States' section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) obligations. CTDEP
asserts, based on EPA and State modeling for CAIR, that the levels of
transported pollution remaining after CAIR implementation are large
enough that, even with local controls, it may be difficult for
Connecticut to attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS by 2010. Finally, CTDEP
questions EPA's determination that highly cost effective controls are
adequate to address States' section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) obligations as
compared to ``reasonable cost'' controls that could be achieved to
effect more stringent NOX reductions.
Response: EPA does not agree that it is appropriate or necessary
for EPA to conduct additional analysis before approving the Ohio
abbreviated CAIR SIP for NOX allowances and NOX
allowance methodology. Ohio has chosen an abbreviated SIP for NOX
allowances and NOX allocation methodology, one of four SIP
elements for which states may request an abbreviated SIP. With an
abbreviated SIP, the CAIR FIP remains in place for Ohio. EPA's proposed
approval of Ohio's abbreviated SIP would therefore only have the effect
of replacing, as provided for in the CAIR FIP, the corresponding FIP
provisions with the State's preferred allocations and methodology. EPA
has evaluated this abbreviated SIP revision and determined that it
complies with the requirements of the CAIR FIP provisions regarding
abbreviated SIPs. CTDEP does not challenge this determination. Thus,
CTDEP's comments do not specifically pertain to any aspect of EPA's
proposed specific action to approve the Ohio CAIR SIP revision. Rather,
the comments appear to be directed broadly at EPA's decisions with
regard to States' section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) obligations. These decisions
were made by EPA in the context of the CAIR rulemaking, which was
promulgated on May 12, 2005 (70 FR 25162), not in the EPA action to
approve Ohio's abbreviated CAIR SIP revision. Therefore, CTDEP's
comments are not relevant to this final action. CTDEP had ample
opportunity to submit comments both during the comment period for the
proposed CAIR rulemaking of January 30, 2004 (69 FR 4566), and during
the comment period for the proposed CAIR FIP of August 24, 2005 (70 FR
49708). EPA's action to approve Ohio's abbreviated CAIR SIP did not
reopen either the CAIR or CAIR FIP rulemakings. Consequently, CTDEP's
comments are not relevant to this rulemaking, or timely with respect to
the CAIR and CAIR FIP rulemakings. Thus, EPA does not believe it is
necessary to conduct additional analysis on whether Ohio or any other
state satisfies the requirements of 110(a)(2)(D) before approving the
Ohio abbreviated CAIR SIP submission.
VII. Final Action
EPA is promulgating the rules contained in Ohio's abbreviated CAIR
SIP revision submitted on September 26, 2007. Ohio is covered by the
CAIR FIPs, which require participation in the EPA-administered CAIR FIP
cap-and-trade programs for SO2, NOX annual, and
NOX ozone season emissions. Under this abbreviated SIP
revision, and consistent with the flexibility given to States in the
FIPs, Ohio adopts provisions for allocating allowances under the CAIR
FIP NOX annual and ozone season trading programs. In
addition, Ohio adopts in the abbreviated SIP revision provisions that
establish a methodology for allocating allowances in the CSP and allow
for individual non-EGUs to opt into the CAIR FIP SO2,
NOX annual, NOX ozone season cap-and-trade
programs. As provided for in the CAIR FIPs, these provisions in the
abbreviated SIP revision will replace or supplement the corresponding
provisions of the CAIR FIPs in Ohio. The abbreviated SIP revision meets
the applicable requirements in 40 CFR 51.123(p) and (ee), with regard
to NOX annual and NOX ozone season emissions, and
40 CFR 51.124(r), with regard to SO2 emissions. EPA is not
making any changes to the CAIR FIP, but is amending the appropriate
appendices in the CAIR FIP trading rules simply to note that approval.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C 553(d), EPA finds that there is good
cause for these actions to become effective immediately upon
publication. Ordinarily, a delay in the effective date is provided to
give affected sources more time to plan for meeting applicable
requirements. In this case, the various requirements under Ohio's rule
take effect at fixed times, and an immediate effective date (and nearly
immediate issuance of allowances under Ohio's allocation rules) will
provide sources more time to plan for meeting the rules' requirements.
Thus, an immediate effective date better serves the purposes of 5
U.S.C. 553 than would a delayed effective date. An immediate effective
date will provide positive impact from the final rule on sources which
can utilize the allowances methodology under the State's rule. EPA
concluded that the Connecticut comment did not oppose approval of
Ohio's rule and was not intended to delay implementation of the Ohio
CAIR program. The immediate effective date for this action is
authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that
rulemaking actions may become effective less than 30 days after
publication if the rule ``* * * grants or recognizes an exemption or
relieves a restriction,'' and section 553(d)(3)e which allows an
effective date less than 30 days after publication ``* * * as otherwise
provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the
rule.'' The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in 553(d)
is to give the affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their
planning actions as the final rule takes effect. Today's rule, however,
does not create any new regulatory requirements such that affected
parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes effect.
Rather, today's ``immediate effective'' action provides sufficient time
for affected sources to plan the use of allowances under the State rule
through the implementation of the Ohio abbreviated CAIR implementation
plan.
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and, therefore, is
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and would
impose no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this action approves pre-existing
[[Page 6040]]
requirements under state law and would not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain
any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it would
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it would not have substantial direct effects on
the states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a federal standard and to amend the appropriate appendices
in the CAIR FIP trading rules to note that approval. It does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities
established in the CAA. This rule also is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks
and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it would
approve a state rule implementing a federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the state
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule would not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 1, 2008. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Electric
utilities, Incorporate by reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
40 CFR Part 97
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Electric
utilities, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
dioxide.
Dated: January 11, 2008.
Gary Gulezian,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, parts 52 and 97 of chapter 1
of title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart KK--Ohio
0
2. Section 52.1870 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(140) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.1870 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(140) Ohio Environmental Protection Agency submitted amendments on
September 26, 2007, to the State Implementation Plan to control
emissions from electric generating units (EGU). Rules affecting these
units include: Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 3745-109-01 (B)(59) and
(72), 3745-109-04, 3745-109-08, 3745-109-14, 3745-109-17 (except the
following: the language in paragraph (A) referencing the state trading
budget for non-EGUs in 3745-109-17-01(C)(4), paragraphs
(C)(1)(a)(i)(d), (C)(2)(b), (C)(2)(d), (C)(2)(e), and (C)(2)(f), and
the language in paragraph (C)(3)(a) referencing non-EGUs), and 3745-
109-21.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the Ohio
Administrative Code (OAC) are incorporated by reference.
(A) OAC 3745-109-01(B)(59) ``Energy efficiency/renewable energy
project''; OAC 3745-109-01(B)(72) ``Innovative technology project'';
OAC 3745-109-04 ``CAIR NOX allowance allocations''; OAC
3745-109-08 ``CAIR NOX opt-in units''; OAC 3745-109-14
``CAIR SO2 opt-in units''; and OAC 3745-109-21 ``CAIR
NOX ozone season opt-in units''; effective on September 27,
2007.
(B) OAC 3745-109-17 ``CAIR NOX ozone season allowance
allocations''; effective on September 27, 2007, except the following:
the language in paragraph (A) referencing the state trading budget for
non-EGUs in 3745-109-17-01(C)(4), paragraphs (C)(1)(a)(i)(d),
(C)(2)(b), (C)(2)(d), (C)(2)(e), and (C)(2)(f), and the language in
paragraph (C)(3)(a) referencing non-EGUs.
PART 97--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, 7403, 7410, 7426, 7601, and 7651, et
seq.
0
4. Appendix A to subpart EE is amended by adding in alphabetical order
the entry ``Ohio'' under paragraphs 1. and 2. to read as follows:
Appendix A to Subpart EE of Part 97--States With Approved State
Implementation Plan Revisions Concerning Allocations
1. * * *
Ohio
* * * * *
2. * * *
Ohio
* * * * *
0
5. Appendix A to subpart II is amended by adding in alphabetical
[[Page 6041]]
order the entry ``Ohio'' under paragraphs 1. and 2. to read as follows:
Appendix A to Subpart II of Part 97--States With Approved State
Implementation Plan Revisions Concerning CAIR NOX Opt-In
Units
1. * * *
Ohio
* * * * *
2. * * *
Ohio
* * * * *
0
6. Appendix A to subpart III of part 97 is amended by adding in
alphabetical order the entry ``Ohio'' under paragraphs 1. and 2. to
read as follows:
Appendix A to Subpart III of Part 97--States With Approved State
Implementation Plan Revisions Concerning CAIR SO2 Opt-In
Units
1. * * *
Ohio
* * * * *
2. * * *
Ohio
* * * * *
0
7. Appendix A to subpart EEEE of part 97 is amended by adding in
alphabetical order the entry ``Ohio'' to read as follows:
Appendix A to Subpart EEEE of Part 97--States With Approved State
Implementation Plan Revisions Concerning Allocations
* * * * *
Ohio
* * * * *
0
8. Appendix A to subpart IV of part 97 is amended by adding in
alphabetical order the entry ``Ohio'' under paragraphs 1. and 2. to
read as follows:
Appendix A to Subpart IV of Part 97--States With Approved State
Implementation Plan Revisions Concerning CAIR NOX Ozone
Season Opt-In Units
1. * * *
Ohio
2. * * *
Ohio
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-1804 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P