Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: The Rhythm Road-American Music Abroad, 6235-6241 [E8-1749]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
FINRA believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with these
requirements because it will provide a
process by which ECNs (in the case of
the ADF) and Trade Reporting Facility
Participants (in the case of TRFs) can
request, and FINRA can properly
allocate, the use of additional MPIDs for
displaying quotes and orders through
the ADF or reporting trades to a TRF.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
FINRA has neither solicited nor
received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not:
(i) Significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest;
(ii) Impose any significant burden on
competition; and
(iii) Become operative for 30 days
from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission
may designate, if consistent with the
protection of investors and public
interest, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 11 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.12
FINRA has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay, which would make the rule
change operative immediately upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission believes waiving the 30day operative date is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest because the proposed rule
change extends without interruption the
benefits of a pilot program that the
Commission approved and previously
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires that a self-regulatory
organization submit to the Commission written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. FINRA has satisfied this requirement.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
12 17
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:22 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
extended.13 Furthermore, the
Commission agrees that extending the
pilot for another year will provide
additional time for FINRA to analyze
the use of multiple MPIDs on the ADR.
For these reasons, the Commission
designates the proposal to be effective
and operative upon filing with the
Commission.14
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.15
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml; or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–FINRA–2008–003 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2008–003. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml. Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
13 See
supra notes 5 through 9.
purposes only of waiving the 30-day preoperative period, the Commission has considered
the impact of the proposed rule change on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
15 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
14 For
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6235
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of FINRA. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2008–003 and
should be submitted on or before
February 22, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–1850 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6086]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: The Rhythm RoadAmerican Music Abroad
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C–CU–08–29.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: March 20,
2008.
Executive Summary: The Cultural
Programs Division in the Office of
Citizen Exchanges in the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)
announces an open competition for a
cooperative agreement to administer
The Rhythm Road-American Music
Abroad program. The program will
consist of up to ten tours for a selected
number of professional American artists
in jazz, urban music, and American
roots music (e.g. country-western,
bluegrass, zydeco, Cajun, etc.) The
musicians selected for this program
must demonstrate high artistic ability
and be conversant with the broader
aspects of contemporary American
society and culture. Tours will include
workshops, master classes, and outreach
activities, in addition to concerts.
16 17
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
01FEN1
6236
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
U.S. public and non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit
proposals that support the goals of The
Rhythm Road-American Music Abroad
program: to promote mutual
understanding and cross-cultural
awareness. The tours accomplish this by
providing an opportunity for
international audiences to experience
American musical life, highlighting our
country’s cultural history as well as the
contemporary cultural scene, and
allowing American performers to learn
about life and culture in the foreign host
countries.
The Bureau is particularly interested
in proposals for the administration of
tours by jazz, urban, and American root
music performers to countries with
significant Muslim or underserved
populations, and countries that engage
youth and/or groups that influence
youth. In the Western Hemisphere, we
are also interested in proposals for
projects that reach indigenous
populations. No guarantee is made or
implied that a grant will be awarded for
tours to any particular region or that
tours will be organized to any particular
region.
For this competition, all organizations
must demonstrate a minimum of five
years’ experience successfully
conducting international performing
arts exchange programs in the music
field to be eligible.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–
256, as amended, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries * * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The Bureau seeks proposals
to engage audiences overseas that do not
normally have regular access to
American cultural performances by
presenting up to ten tours of Rhythm
Road quartets. Musicians must be U.S.
citizens who are at least 21 years old;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:22 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
demonstrate the highest artistic and
musical ability; be conversant with
broader aspects of contemporary
American society and culture; and be
adaptable to unescorted, rigorous
touring through regions where travel
and performance situations may be
difficult. In addition to performances,
Rhythm Road musicians will be
expected to conduct or participate in
master classes, lectures, workshops,
impromptu musical sessions, radio and
TV appearances, and other activities
with local cultural institutions,
musicians, media and students. A
Washington, DC public performance by
each ensemble in connection with the
overseas tour should be included in the
proposal.
Guidelines: The successful applicant
will organize the selection of up to ten
quartets, as well as administer the
international tour program during this
period.
Proposals should reflect a practical
understanding of global issues, and
demonstrate sensitivity to cultural,
political, economic and social
differences in regions where tour groups
may perform. Special attention should
be given to describing the applicant
organization’s experience with planning
and implementing complex and
unpredictable logistical scenarios
overseas. Applicants should outline
their project team’s capacity for doing
projects of this nature and provide a
detailed sample program (to include
itineraries) to illustrate planning
capacity and ability to achieve program
objectives. Applicants must identify all
U.S. and foreign partner organizations
and/or venues with whom they are
proposing to collaborate, and describe
previous cooperative projects in the
section on ‘‘Institutional Capacity.’’ For
this competition, applicants must
include in their proposal supporting
materials or documentation that
demonstrates a minimum of five years
experience in conducting global
exchanges in the music field. Proposals
must include references with name and
contact information for other assistance
awards the applicant has received, in
the event the Bureau chooses to be in
touch directly.
ECA intends to give one assistance
award to a qualified institution or
organization to administer The Rhythm
Road: American Music Abroad program
globally. Activities funded through this
cooperative agreement support the
organization and implementation of up
to ten (10) international tours, and must
include, but are not limited to:
• Selection of artists;
• Advance tour planning;
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Programming educational, media
and other outreach activities in
consultation with U.S. embassies;
• Scheduling public performance
dates in Washington, DC, for each
ensemble;
• Assisting musicians with passport,
visa, immunizations, and other pre-tour
preparations;
• Arranging and providing
orientation sessions and pre-travel
briefings, producing press materials and
providing support for publicity while
the artists are overseas;
• Evaluating program activities;
• Reporting on tour activities to ECA;
• Assisting ensembles and embassies
with follow-on program development.
Applicants must have experience in
global exchange planning and
implementation, and should address the
above elements in the proposal. The
grantee must be highly responsive and
able to work in close consultation with
the Public Affairs Sections of the
participating U.S. embassies.
A pre-tour briefing session for each
ensemble should be held with State
Department regional experts and ECA
program officers in attendance. This
event should be scheduled in
coordination with the Washington, DC
public performance.
Successful applicants will include
with their proposal specific criteria for
the selection of American artists in jazz,
urban, and American root music styles.
The Cultural Programs Division’s
activities and responsibilities for this
program are as follows:
• Participation in the selection of
musicians.
• Determination of the priority
countries to which the tours will travel.
Priority countries will be those in all
world regions of greatest importance to
the Department of State’s public
diplomacy mission to build mutual
understanding.
• Arrangement of participation by
Department of State officers in pre-tour
briefings and any debriefings that might
take place.
• Approval of all tour arrangements.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY–2008.
Approximate Total Funding:
$1,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award:
$1,000,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $1,000,000.
Anticipated Award Date: June 12,
2008.
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
June 30, 2009.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew this cooperative
agreement for two additional fiscal years
before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require
that organizations with less than four
years experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to
$60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA
anticipates giving one award, in an
amount not to exceed $1,000,000 to
support program and administrative
costs required to implement this
exchange program. Therefore,
organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges are ineligible to apply under
this competition. The Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
(b.) Technical Eligibility: All
proposals must comply with the
following: (1) Full adherence to the
guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package; (2) proposal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:22 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
submission deadline date; (3) non-profit
organization status, and; (4) for
purposes of this competition, at least
five years of demonstrated experience in
programming globally in the music
field, or your proposal will be declared
technically ineligible and given no
further consideration in the review
process. Eligible applicants may submit
only ONE proposal (TOTAL) in
response to this RFGP. If multiple
proposals are received, all submissions
will be declared technically ineligible
and will be given no further
consideration in the review process.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1 Contact Information To Request
an Application Package: Please contact
the Cultural Programs Division (ECA/
PE/C/CU) in the Office of Citizen
Exchanges, Room 568, U.S. Department
of State, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, 202/203–7488;
fax 202/203–7525; e-mail
ProctorLM@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/
C–CU–08–29 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Jill Staggs and refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/
PE/C–CU–08–29 located at the top of
this announcement on all other
inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via the Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
rfgps/menu.htm, or from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The original and 14 copies (15 proposals
total) of the application should be sent
per the instructions under IV.3f.
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6237
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory PSI
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa: The Office of
Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is the
official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an
employee of the Bureau will be the
‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the program
under the terms of 22 CFR part 62,
which covers the administration of the
Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR
part 62, organizations receiving grants
under this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of grantee
program organizations shall be
‘‘imputed to the sponsor in evaluating
the sponsor’s compliance with’’ 22 CFR
part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects
that any organization receiving a grant
under this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and
proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
6238
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices
by grantee program organizations and
program participants to all regulations
governing the J visa program status.
Therefore, proposals should explicitly
state in writing that the applicant is
prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting
all requirements governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62.
If your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program
Sponsor, the applicant should discuss
their record of compliance with 22 CFR
part 62 et. seq., including the oversight
of their Responsible Officers and
Alternate Responsible Officers,
screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival
information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203–5029, Fax: (202) 453–8640.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106—113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:22 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
grantee will track participants or
partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including
satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and
effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work
or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding
as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and
evaluation plan will be judged on how well
it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives
clear descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when particular
outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides
a clear description of the data collection
strategies for each outcome (i.e., surveys,
interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the first
level of outcomes [satisfaction] will be
deemed less competitive under the present
evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. The award may not exceed
$1,000,000. There must be a summary
budget, as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. For budgeting purposes,
applicants should estimate costs based
on eight to ten quartets traveling for
approximately four (4) weeks to six (6)
destinations with significant Muslim
and indigenous populations in the
following regions: Africa, East Asia,
Eurasia, Central Europe and the
Balkans, the Near East/North Africa,
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices
Latin America, and South Asia. Final
determination of participating regions
and countries will be made by ECA in
collaboration with U.S. embassies and
the successful applicant after the
assistance award has been given.
IV.3e.3. Allowable costs for the
program include the following: (1)
Program Expenses, including but not
limited to: Domestic and international
travel for the selected ensembles (per
The Fly America Act); visas and
immunizations; airport taxes and
country entrance fees; honoraria;
educational materials and presentation
items; excess and overweight baggage
fees; trip itinerary booklets; press kits
and promotional materials; follow-on
activities; monitoring and evaluation;
and international travel for program
implementation and/or evaluation
purposes.
The following guidelines may be
helpful in developing a proposed
budget:
A. Travel Costs. International and
domestic airfares. (per The Fly America
Act), transit costs, ground
transportation, and visas for The
Rhythm Road: American Music Abroad
participants to travel to the tour
destinations.
B. Per Diem: For the Washington, DC,
portion of the tour, organizations should
use the published Federal per diem
rates, and estimate per diems based on
a two-night stay per ensemble member.
The Public Affairs Sections of the
participating U.S. embassies and
consulates are responsible for per diem
abroad. Domestic per diem rates may be
accessed at: https://www.gsa.gov/Portal/
gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentId=
17943&contentType=GSA_BASIC.
C. Sub-grantees and Consultants. Subgrantee organizations may be used, in
which case the written agreement
between the prospective grantee and
sub-grantee should be included in the
proposal. Sub-grants must be itemized
in the budget under General Program
Expenses. Consultants may be used to
provide specialized expertise. Daily
honoraria cannot exceed $250 per day,
and applicants are strongly encouraged
to use organizational resources, and to
cost share heavily in this area.
D. Health Insurance. Each Rhythm
Road participant will be covered under
the terms of the ECA-sponsored COINS
health insurance policy. The cost for
international travel insurance for staff
travel may be included in the proposal
budget.
E. Honoraria for Rhythm Road
musicians. Daily honorarium is $200
per day for each performer, including
rest and travel days.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:22 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
F. Educational and Promotional Items.
Ensemble members may use these funds
for individual purchases or they may
pool funds for joint purposes. ECA
funds for educational and promotional
items (e.g. CDS, guitar strings, label
pins, etc.) should not exceed $500 per
ensemble.
G. Excess Baggage. Excess baggage
costs are based on the size and weight
of the instrument. Excess baggage
estimates may be subject to change once
actual tour itineraries are scheduled;
however for proposal budget purposes,
costs should be estimated at $3,500 per
ensemble.
H. Immunizations/Visas. For purposes
of a proposed budget, line items for
immunizations should be estimated at
$400 per musician, and visas/visa
photos should be estimated at $600 per
musician.
I. Press Kits. Each relevant U.S.
embassy should receive appropriate
contents for press kits. Items may be
sent electronically with the
understanding that in some cases,
embassies may not be able to access
large files or attachments. This line item
may include funds for shooting and
duplicating B&W publicity photos and
duplicating CDS.
J. Staff Travel. Allowable costs
include domestic staff travel for one
staff member to attend recruitment/
selection events in approximately two
U.S. cities and to pre-tour briefings and
performances in Washington, D.C.
International staff travel will be
allowable, especially if associated with
monitoring and evaluation, as long as
costs for a full four-week tour for each
ensemble are completely covered. Costsharing for staff travel is strongly
encouraged.
2. Administrative Costs. Costs
necessary for the effective
administration of the program may
include salaries for grantee organization
employees, benefits, and other direct
and indirect costs per detailed
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
While there is no rigid ratio of
administrative to program costs,
proposals in which the administrative
costs do not exceed 25% of the total
requested from ECA grant funds will be
more competitive on cost effectiveness.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package
for complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: Thursday,
March 20, 2008.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/CU–
08–29.
Methods of Submission:
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6239
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways: (1) In hard-copy, via a
nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or (2)
electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory PSI of
the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and 14 copies of the
application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/PE/C–CU–08–29, Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on
a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Section(s) at
the U.S. embassies for their review.
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
6240
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
electronically through Grants.gov (
https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘‘Get Started’’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount
of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a
variety of factors including the size of
the application and the speed of your
Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you not wait
until the application deadline to begin
the submission process through
Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process: The Bureau will
review all proposals for technical
eligibility. Proposals will be deemed
ineligible if they do not fully adhere to
the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:22 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative
agreements resides with the Bureau’s
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning and Ability to
Achieve Objectives: Detailed agenda and
relevant work plan should demonstrate
substantive undertakings and logistical
capacity. Agenda and plan should
adhere to the program overview and
guidelines described above. Proposals
should clearly demonstrate how the
institution will meet the program’s
objectives and plan.
2. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages.
3. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
4. Institutional Capacity: Proposals
should include (1) the institution’s
mission and date of establishment; (2)
an outline of prior awards—U.S.
government and/or private support
received for tours abroad; (3)
descriptions of experienced staff
members who will be part of the team
implementing the program, and; (4) all
other documentation requested herein.
Proposed personnel and institutional
resources should be adequate and
appropriate to achieve the program or
project’s goals. The proposal should
reflect the institution’s expertise in the
music management arena and
knowledge of the conditions in the
regions abroad.
5. Institution’s Record/Ability:
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of at least five years
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of international music management
planning and implementation,
including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with
all reporting requirements for past
Bureau grants as determined by Bureau
Grants Staff. The Bureau will consider
the past performance of prior recipients
and the demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
activity’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program. A
draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives is
recommended.
7. Cost-effectiveness and Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Assistance Award Document
(AAD) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications
(if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following
reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) Quarterly program and financial
reports showing activities carried out
and expenses incurred in the calendar
quarter.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Jill Staggs,
Cultural Programs, ECA/PE/C/CU, Room
568, ECA/PE/C–CU–08–29, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
202/203–7493; fax 202/203–7525;
StaggsJJ@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C–
CU–08–29.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions
published in this RFGP are binding and
may not be modified by any Bureau
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:22 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
6241
business hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
e.t. For the USFWS: Mr. Scott Pruitt,
Field Supervisor, Bloomington Field
Office, USFWS, 620 South Walker
Street, Bloomington, IN 47403–2121;
telephone: 812–334–4261; e-mail:
Scott_Pruitt@fws.gov. Normal business
hours for the USFWS Bloomington Field
Office are: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., e.t. You
may also contact Mr. Thomas Seeman,
Project Manager, Indiana Department of
Transportation (INDOT), 100 North
Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46204;
telephone: (317) 232–5336; e-mail:
Dated: January 23, 2008.
TSeeman@indot.IN.gov. Normal
C. Miller Crouch,
business hours for the Indiana
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Department of Transportation are: 8 a.m.
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
to 4:30 p.m., e.t.
of State.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
[FR Doc. E8–1749 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am]
hereby given that the FHWA has
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
approved a Tier 2 Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) for section 1 of
the I–69 highway project from
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Evansville to Indianapolis and issued a
Record of Decision (ROD) for section 1
Federal Highway Administration
on December 12, 2007. Section 1 of the
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions I–69 project extends from the I–64/I–
164/SR 57 interchange north of
on Proposed Highway in Indiana
Evansville to approximately one-half
mile north of SR 64 near Oakland City,
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Indiana. Section 1 is a new alignment,
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
fully access-controlled highway that has
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA an approximately 350-foot-wide rightof-way. The ROD selected Alternative 4
and United States Fish and Wildlife
for section 1, as described in the I–69
Service (USFWS), DOI.
Evansville to Indianapolis, Indiana, Tier
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions 2 Final Environmental Impact
Statement, Evansville to Oakland City
taken by the FHWA and the USFWS
(FEIS). The ROD also approved the
that are final within the meaning of 23
locations of the interchanges, grade
U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to a
separations, and access roads (which
proposed highway project for a 13.1
mile segment of I–69, in the Counties of include new roads, road relocations,
and realignments).
Warrick and Gibson, State of Indiana
The FHWA had previously issued a
and grant licenses, permits, and
Tier 1 FEIS and ROD for the entire I–
approvals for the project.
69 project from Evansville to
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is
Indianapolis, Indiana. A Notice of
advising the public that the FHWA and
Limitation on Claims for Judicial
the USFWS have made decisions that
are subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) and are Review of Actions by FHWA and United
States Fish and Wildlife Service
final within the meaning of that law. A
(USFWS), DOI, was published in the
claim seeking judicial review of those
Federal Register on April 17, 2007. A
Federal agency decisions on the
proposed highway project will be barred claim seeking judicial review of the Tier
1 decisions must have been filed by
unless the claim is filed on or before
October 15, 2007, to avoid being barred
July 30, 2008. If the Federal law that
under 23 U.S.C. 139(l). Decisions in the
authorizes judicial review of a claim
FHWA Tier 1 ROD that were cited in
provides a time period of less than 180
that Federal Register notice included,
days for filing such claim, then the
but were not limited to, the following:
shorter time period applies.
1. Purpose and need for the project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
2. Range of alternatives for analysis.
the FHWA: Mr. Anthony DeSimone,
3. Selection of the Interstate highway
P.E., Federal Highway Administration,
build alternative and highway corridor
Indiana Division, 575 North
for the project, as Alternative 3C,
Pennsylvania Street, Room 254,
4. Elimination of other alternatives
Indianapolis, IN 46204–1576; telephone: from consideration in Tier 2 NEPA
(317) 226–5307; e-mail:
proceedings.
5. Process for completing the Tier 2
Anthony.DeSimone@dot.gov. The
FHWA Indiana Division Office’s normal alternatives analysis and studies for the
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6235-6241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1749]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6086]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: The Rhythm Road-American Music Abroad
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C-CU-08-29.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: March 20, 2008.
Executive Summary: The Cultural Programs Division in the Office of
Citizen Exchanges in the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs
(ECA) announces an open competition for a cooperative agreement to
administer The Rhythm Road-American Music Abroad program. The program
will consist of up to ten tours for a selected number of professional
American artists in jazz, urban music, and American roots music (e.g.
country-western, bluegrass, zydeco, Cajun, etc.) The musicians selected
for this program must demonstrate high artistic ability and be
conversant with the broader aspects of contemporary American society
and culture. Tours will include workshops, master classes, and outreach
activities, in addition to concerts.
[[Page 6236]]
U.S. public and non-profit organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may
submit proposals that support the goals of The Rhythm Road-American
Music Abroad program: to promote mutual understanding and cross-
cultural awareness. The tours accomplish this by providing an
opportunity for international audiences to experience American musical
life, highlighting our country's cultural history as well as the
contemporary cultural scene, and allowing American performers to learn
about life and culture in the foreign host countries.
The Bureau is particularly interested in proposals for the
administration of tours by jazz, urban, and American root music
performers to countries with significant Muslim or underserved
populations, and countries that engage youth and/or groups that
influence youth. In the Western Hemisphere, we are also interested in
proposals for projects that reach indigenous populations. No guarantee
is made or implied that a grant will be awarded for tours to any
particular region or that tours will be organized to any particular
region.
For this competition, all organizations must demonstrate a minimum
of five years' experience successfully conducting international
performing arts exchange programs in the music field to be eligible.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961,
Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act.
The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen
the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of
the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to
assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and the other countries of the
world.'' The funding authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Purpose: The Bureau seeks proposals to engage audiences overseas
that do not normally have regular access to American cultural
performances by presenting up to ten tours of Rhythm Road quartets.
Musicians must be U.S. citizens who are at least 21 years old;
demonstrate the highest artistic and musical ability; be conversant
with broader aspects of contemporary American society and culture; and
be adaptable to unescorted, rigorous touring through regions where
travel and performance situations may be difficult. In addition to
performances, Rhythm Road musicians will be expected to conduct or
participate in master classes, lectures, workshops, impromptu musical
sessions, radio and TV appearances, and other activities with local
cultural institutions, musicians, media and students. A Washington, DC
public performance by each ensemble in connection with the overseas
tour should be included in the proposal.
Guidelines: The successful applicant will organize the selection of
up to ten quartets, as well as administer the international tour
program during this period.
Proposals should reflect a practical understanding of global
issues, and demonstrate sensitivity to cultural, political, economic
and social differences in regions where tour groups may perform.
Special attention should be given to describing the applicant
organization's experience with planning and implementing complex and
unpredictable logistical scenarios overseas. Applicants should outline
their project team's capacity for doing projects of this nature and
provide a detailed sample program (to include itineraries) to
illustrate planning capacity and ability to achieve program objectives.
Applicants must identify all U.S. and foreign partner organizations
and/or venues with whom they are proposing to collaborate, and describe
previous cooperative projects in the section on ``Institutional
Capacity.'' For this competition, applicants must include in their
proposal supporting materials or documentation that demonstrates a
minimum of five years experience in conducting global exchanges in the
music field. Proposals must include references with name and contact
information for other assistance awards the applicant has received, in
the event the Bureau chooses to be in touch directly.
ECA intends to give one assistance award to a qualified institution
or organization to administer The Rhythm Road: American Music Abroad
program globally. Activities funded through this cooperative agreement
support the organization and implementation of up to ten (10)
international tours, and must include, but are not limited to:
Selection of artists;
Advance tour planning;
Programming educational, media and other outreach
activities in consultation with U.S. embassies;
Scheduling public performance dates in Washington, DC, for
each ensemble;
Assisting musicians with passport, visa, immunizations,
and other pre-tour preparations;
Arranging and providing orientation sessions and pre-
travel briefings, producing press materials and providing support for
publicity while the artists are overseas;
Evaluating program activities;
Reporting on tour activities to ECA;
Assisting ensembles and embassies with follow-on program
development.
Applicants must have experience in global exchange planning and
implementation, and should address the above elements in the proposal.
The grantee must be highly responsive and able to work in close
consultation with the Public Affairs Sections of the participating U.S.
embassies.
A pre-tour briefing session for each ensemble should be held with
State Department regional experts and ECA program officers in
attendance. This event should be scheduled in coordination with the
Washington, DC public performance.
Successful applicants will include with their proposal specific
criteria for the selection of American artists in jazz, urban, and
American root music styles.
The Cultural Programs Division's activities and responsibilities
for this program are as follows:
Participation in the selection of musicians.
Determination of the priority countries to which the tours
will travel. Priority countries will be those in all world regions of
greatest importance to the Department of State's public diplomacy
mission to build mutual understanding.
Arrangement of participation by Department of State
officers in pre-tour briefings and any debriefings that might take
place.
Approval of all tour arrangements.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY-2008.
Approximate Total Funding: $1,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award: $1,000,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $1,000,000.
Anticipated Award Date: June 12, 2008.
[[Page 6237]]
Anticipated Project Completion Date: June 30, 2009.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew this cooperative agreement for two additional
fiscal years before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates giving one award,
in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 to support program and
administrative costs required to implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
(b.) Technical Eligibility: All proposals must comply with the
following: (1) Full adherence to the guidelines stated herein and in
the Solicitation Package; (2) proposal submission deadline date; (3)
non-profit organization status, and; (4) for purposes of this
competition, at least five years of demonstrated experience in
programming globally in the music field, or your proposal will be
declared technically ineligible and given no further consideration in
the review process. Eligible applicants may submit only ONE proposal
(TOTAL) in response to this RFGP. If multiple proposals are received,
all submissions will be declared technically ineligible and will be
given no further consideration in the review process.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information To Request an Application Package: Please
contact the Cultural Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/CU) in the Office of
Citizen Exchanges, Room 568, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, 202/203-7488; fax 202/203-7525; e-
mail ProctorLM@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C-CU-08-29 located at
the top of this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Jill Staggs and refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C-CU-08-29 located at the top of this announcement on all
other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via the Internet: The
entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from
the Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The original and 14 copies
(15 proposals total) of the application should be sent per the
instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
PSI document for additional formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa: The
Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange program covered
by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the ``Responsible
Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, which
covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, organizations receiving
grants under this RFGP will be third parties ``cooperating with or
assisting the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor's program.'' The
actions of grantee program organizations shall be ``imputed to the
sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance with'' 22 CFR part 62.
Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization receiving a grant
under this competition will render all assistance necessary to enable
the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
[[Page 6238]]
by grantee program organizations and program participants to all
regulations governing the J visa program status. Therefore, proposals
should explicitly state in writing that the applicant is prepared to
assist the Bureau in meeting all requirements governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part
62. If your organization has experience as a designated Exchange
Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should discuss their record of
compliance with 22 CFR part 62 et. seq., including the oversight of
their Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers,
screening and selection of program participants, provision of pre-
arrival information and orientation to participants, monitoring of
participants, proper maintenance and security of forms, record-keeping,
reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Telephone: (202) 203-5029,
Fax: (202) 453-8640.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the `Support for Diversity' section
for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal.
Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106--113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee
will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as
well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will
be judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives
clear descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3)
identifies when particular outcomes will be measured; and (4)
provides a clear description of the data collection strategies for
each outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please
note that evaluation plans that deal only with the first level of
outcomes [satisfaction] will be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. The award may not exceed $1,000,000. There must be a
summary budget, as well as breakdowns reflecting both administrative
and program budgets. Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for
each program component, phase, location, or activity to provide
clarification.
IV.3e.2. For budgeting purposes, applicants should estimate costs
based on eight to ten quartets traveling for approximately four (4)
weeks to six (6) destinations with significant Muslim and indigenous
populations in the following regions: Africa, East Asia, Eurasia,
Central Europe and the Balkans, the Near East/North Africa,
[[Page 6239]]
Latin America, and South Asia. Final determination of participating
regions and countries will be made by ECA in collaboration with U.S.
embassies and the successful applicant after the assistance award has
been given.
IV.3e.3. Allowable costs for the program include the following: (1)
Program Expenses, including but not limited to: Domestic and
international travel for the selected ensembles (per The Fly America
Act); visas and immunizations; airport taxes and country entrance fees;
honoraria; educational materials and presentation items; excess and
overweight baggage fees; trip itinerary booklets; press kits and
promotional materials; follow-on activities; monitoring and evaluation;
and international travel for program implementation and/or evaluation
purposes.
The following guidelines may be helpful in developing a proposed
budget:
A. Travel Costs. International and domestic airfares. (per The Fly
America Act), transit costs, ground transportation, and visas for The
Rhythm Road: American Music Abroad participants to travel to the tour
destinations.
B. Per Diem: For the Washington, DC, portion of the tour,
organizations should use the published Federal per diem rates, and
estimate per diems based on a two-night stay per ensemble member. The
Public Affairs Sections of the participating U.S. embassies and
consulates are responsible for per diem abroad. Domestic per diem rates
may be accessed at: https://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/
contentView.do?contentId=17943&contentType=GSA_BASIC.
C. Sub-grantees and Consultants. Sub-grantee organizations may be
used, in which case the written agreement between the prospective
grantee and sub-grantee should be included in the proposal. Sub-grants
must be itemized in the budget under General Program Expenses.
Consultants may be used to provide specialized expertise. Daily
honoraria cannot exceed $250 per day, and applicants are strongly
encouraged to use organizational resources, and to cost share heavily
in this area.
D. Health Insurance. Each Rhythm Road participant will be covered
under the terms of the ECA-sponsored COINS health insurance policy. The
cost for international travel insurance for staff travel may be
included in the proposal budget.
E. Honoraria for Rhythm Road musicians. Daily honorarium is $200
per day for each performer, including rest and travel days.
F. Educational and Promotional Items. Ensemble members may use
these funds for individual purchases or they may pool funds for joint
purposes. ECA funds for educational and promotional items (e.g. CDS,
guitar strings, label pins, etc.) should not exceed $500 per ensemble.
G. Excess Baggage. Excess baggage costs are based on the size and
weight of the instrument. Excess baggage estimates may be subject to
change once actual tour itineraries are scheduled; however for proposal
budget purposes, costs should be estimated at $3,500 per ensemble.
H. Immunizations/Visas. For purposes of a proposed budget, line
items for immunizations should be estimated at $400 per musician, and
visas/visa photos should be estimated at $600 per musician.
I. Press Kits. Each relevant U.S. embassy should receive
appropriate contents for press kits. Items may be sent electronically
with the understanding that in some cases, embassies may not be able to
access large files or attachments. This line item may include funds for
shooting and duplicating B&W publicity photos and duplicating CDS.
J. Staff Travel. Allowable costs include domestic staff travel for
one staff member to attend recruitment/selection events in
approximately two U.S. cities and to pre-tour briefings and
performances in Washington, D.C. International staff travel will be
allowable, especially if associated with monitoring and evaluation, as
long as costs for a full four-week tour for each ensemble are
completely covered. Cost-sharing for staff travel is strongly
encouraged.
2. Administrative Costs. Costs necessary for the effective
administration of the program may include salaries for grantee
organization employees, benefits, and other direct and indirect costs
per detailed instructions in the Solicitation Package. While there is
no rigid ratio of administrative to program costs, proposals in which
the administrative costs do not exceed 25% of the total requested from
ECA grant funds will be more competitive on cost effectiveness. Please
refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: Thursday, March 20, 2008.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/CU-08-29.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways: (1) In hard-copy,
via a nationally recognized overnight delivery service (i.e., DHL,
Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or (2) electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory PSI
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and 14 copies of the application should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/C-CU-08-29, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room
534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on a PC-formatted
disk. The Bureau will provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. embassies for their
review.
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
[[Page 6240]]
electronically through Grants.gov ( https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find''
portion of the system. Please follow the instructions available in the
``Get Started'' portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov. Once
registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to
begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726.
Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process: The Bureau will review all proposals for
technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do
not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with
Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau
grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the
Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final
funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative agreements resides with the
Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning and Ability to Achieve Objectives: Detailed
agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive
undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to
the program overview and guidelines described above. Proposals should
clearly demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's
objectives and plan.
2. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
3. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
4. Institutional Capacity: Proposals should include (1) the
institution's mission and date of establishment; (2) an outline of
prior awards--U.S. government and/or private support received for tours
abroad; (3) descriptions of experienced staff members who will be part
of the team implementing the program, and; (4) all other documentation
requested herein. Proposed personnel and institutional resources should
be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program or project's goals.
The proposal should reflect the institution's expertise in the music
management arena and knowledge of the conditions in the regions abroad.
5. Institution's Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of at least five years of international music
management planning and implementation, including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with all reporting requirements for past
Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The Bureau will
consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated
potential of new applicants.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
project objectives is recommended.
7. Cost-effectiveness and Cost-sharing: The overhead and
administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as well as institutional direct
funding contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Assistance
Award Document (AAD) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the
original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient
and the U.S. Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with
[[Page 6241]]
Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) Quarterly program and financial reports showing activities
carried out and expenses incurred in the calendar quarter.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
(Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3)
above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Jill Staggs,
Cultural Programs, ECA/PE/C/CU, Room 568, ECA/PE/C-CU-08-29, U.S.
Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
202/203-7493; fax 202/203-7525; StaggsJJ@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C-CU-08-29.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding
and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory
information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language
will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award
commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right
to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the
needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be
subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section
VI.3 above.
Dated: January 23, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-1749 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P