Klamath National Forest, CA; Thom-Seider Vegetation Management and Fuel Reduction Project, 6109-6111 [E8-1726]
Download as PDF
6109
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 22
Friday, February 1, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
January 28, 2008.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology should be addressed to: Desk
Officer for Agriculture, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB),
OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or
fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail
Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250–
7602. Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received
within 30 days of this notification.
Copies of the submission(s) may be
obtained by calling (202) 720–8958.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:22 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Frequency Of Responses: Reporting:
Other (one time).
Total Burden Hours: 461.
Food and Nutrition Service
Title: WIC Breastfeeding Peer
Counseling Study.
OMB Control Number: 0584–NEW.
Summary of Collection: The Special
Supplemental Nutrition Program for
Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
was designed to improve the health of
nutritionally at-risk, low-income
pregnant, breastfeeding, and postpartum
women, infants, and children up to five
years of age. The program provides
supplemental foods that are rich in
nutrients known to be lacking in the
target population; health and social
service referrals; and nutrition
education, including information about
breastfeeding. Current recommendations
of the American Academy of Pediatrics,
the American Dietetic Association, the
World Health Organization, and the U.S.
government’s Healthy People 2010 goals
call for increases in the proportion of
U.S. mothers who breastfeed their
babies. WIC encourages breastfeeding as
the best source of infant nutrition, and
is working to meet the 2010 goals and
improve the breastfeeding rates of WIC
women relative to non-WIC
participants.
Need and Use of the Information: The
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) will
use an on-line survey to collect data
from 86 State WIC agencies receiving
FNS peer counseling grants on the
implementation of the Loving Support
peer counseling program. Results of the
study will be used to: (1) capture and
disseminate information on
implementing peer counseling programs
using the Loving Support model,
including lessons learned and
successful approaches used by State
agencies; (2) assess the additional
technical and training needs of State
agencies; and (3) provide information to
FNS and other Stakeholders on how
State agencies are using the peer
counseling funding. Without this effort,
FNS will not have the comprehensive,
systematic description of the
implementation of the Loving Support
peer counseling program required to
inform the future program decisions
including expenditures of peer
counseling funds.
Description of Respondents: State,
Local, or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 618.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–1822 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Klamath National Forest, CA; ThomSeider Vegetation Management and
Fuel Reduction Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Land managers propose the
Thom-Seider Vegetation Management
and Fuel Reduction Project to reduce
fuel hazard and restore forest health on
Klamath National Forest System lands.
The project area is situated on both
sides of the Klamath River between
Hamburg and Happy Camp, California.
Thinning and understory burning
(underburning) is proposed for
approximately 30,000 acres of strategic
areas selected for their location,
topography, stand structure, density, age
and condition. The project is intended
to reduce the potential for high-severity
wildland fires to harm people, private
and public land, and older forest
habitats.
DATES: Comments postmarked or
received by March 7, 2008 are assured
of being considered in the
environmental analysis. The Draft
Environmental Impact Statement is
expected to be published Summer 2008
and the Final Environmental Impact
Statement is scheduled for Winter 2009.
ADDRESSES: Address Comments to:
Happy Camp and Oak Knoll Districts
Ranger, Attn: Thom-Seider Project,
Klamath National Forest, 63822
Highway 96, PO Box 377, Happy Camp,
California 96039. You may also send
electronic comments to the project email box: comments-pacificsouthwestklamath-happy-camp@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please contact District Ranger Donald M
Hall or Interdisciplinary Team Leader
Rochelle Desser if you have questions,
concerns or suggestions relating to this
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
6110
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices
proposal. You may contact Don at
Happy Camp Ranger District Office at
530–493–1723 or at
donaldhall@fs.fed.us. Rochelle is
available by phone at 531–596–2453 or
at rdesser@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Purpose and Need for Action
The Thom-Seider project area
contains an overabundance of early- and
mid-successional stands that provide
limited habitat for species dependent on
older forests. Many of these stands are
not structurally diverse and are
overdense. In some cases, remnant large
older trees in the stands have lost
vitality due to competition for light and
water from the dense understory. In the
event of a wildland fire, these dense
early- and mid-successional forests are
more susceptible to stand replacement
fire because of their continuous crowns
and the presence of ladder fuels.
Actions to help early to mid
successional stands develop old growth
characteristics and be less vulnerable to
damaging wildland fire include
reducing stand density and ground and
ladder fuels, and prescribed fire. These
actions would also help maintain the
older trees currently living in the stand.
The project area is on both sides of
the Klamath River and includes river
communities such as Hamburg, Seiad
Valley, and Happy Camp. The areas that
interface between private land and
National Forest System lands are a high
priority for fuels reduction. Fuels
reduction is also important along roads
that provide evacuation routes or can be
used as fuel breaks in the event of a fire.
Action is needed to reduce tree
density and forest competition; reduce
ladder fuels that lead to canopy fires;
reduce crown fire potential, improve
wildlife habitat; and improve
probability that early to midsuccessional stands will develop into
old growth. These actions are
particularly important in LateSuccessional Reserves established for
development of older forest habitats,
and in the Wildland Urban Interface
(WUI) where the National Forest abuts
private property and communities.
Management Direction
The project area includes latesuccessional reserves, riparian reserves,
a wild and scenic river, and roadless
areas. Plans, policies and regulations
that provide management direction for
this project include (not limited to): the
Klamath National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan of 1995; the
Section 7(a)(1) of the Endangered
Species Act; the Healthy Forest
Restoration Act; the National Fire Plan;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:22 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
the Roadless Rule of 2001; the Clean
Water Act; and the Clean Air Act.
This project is authorized under
section 102 of the Healthy Forest
Restoration Act of 2003 because it
would provide ‘‘enhanced protection
from catastrophic wildland fire’’ for the
habitat of a threatened species, the
northern spotted owl; and a candidate
species, the Pacific fisher. Commercial
thinning is an allowable exception
under Section 294.13(b) of the 2001
Roadless Rule because it involves
removal of timber to improve threatened
species habitat, it would maintain and
restore ecosystem composition and
structure, and it would reduce the
hazard of uncharacteristic wildland fire
effects.
The project is designed to be
consistent with all applicable policies
and plans. The type of thinning
proposed follows Late-Successional
Reserve Assessment and Watershed
Analysis recommendations. Riparian
reserves would be treated where needed
to meet Aquatic Conservation Strategy
objectives.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action includes about
22,000 acres of underburning; 2,450
acres of variable density thinning
(includes commercial and noncommercial), 2,700 acres of roadside
fuels treatment, and 6,150 acres of
understory thinning around private
properties.
Underburning refers to a range of
prescribed burning activities including
hand piling, burning small
concentrations of debris and slash
(jackpot) and low intensity burning
under a forest canopy. Approximately
22,000 acres of underburning is
proposed. Non-commercial thinning
small trees and brush would occur
within the underburns as needed to
promote effective fuel consumption.
Underburning reduces both natural and
activity fuel loading, consumes the
build up of forest debris and litter,
promotes the growth of browse species,
encourages grass and forbs, and thins
out smaller shade tolerant trees (ladder
fuels), thus reducing fire behavior and
negative effects from wildland fire. In
some cases, small jackpots of trees are
consumed to provide a break in the
canopy. Burning operations would be
accomplished to follow a prescribed
burn plan that meets land management
objectives and public concerns. A burn
and smoke management plan would be
implemented to minimize the effects of
smoke on adjacent communities and the
public.
Variable Density Thinning includes
commercial and non-commercial
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
thinning that reduces forest competition
and increases diversity in early- to midsuccessional forests. It also is intended
to increase the longevity of larger, older
trees in the stands. Thinning is
proposed for the smallest trees in the
stand, around individual large trees and
in unevenly spaced clumps. Snags
would be retained except where there
are safety hazards. Approximately 2,450
acres of variable density thinning is
proposed.
Commercial thinning is proposed in
stands that are accessible from the
existing road system and are of a size,
age, terrain and structure suitable for
logging. Within commercial thinning
units, trees greater than 8 inches in
diameter would be cut, along with the
smaller trees and brush. A total of about
1,950 acres of commercial thinning is
currently proposed, including about
1,000 acres within Late-Successional
Reserves and about 130 acres within the
outer portions of Riparian Reserves.
Commercial thinning would be accessed
by a combination of the existing road
network and helicopters. Approximately
2.6 miles of temporary road in 12
segments located throughout the project
area are proposed to more efficiently
remove thinned logs.
The land used for temporary roads
would be rehabilitated after the project
was completed. Logging systems
include helicopter and ground based
systems. Non-commercial thinning is
proposed on about 500 acres, mainly
within Late-Successional Reserves.
These stands are high priority for
thinning because they have overdense
understories or excessive ladder fuels;
however, the trees are smaller than
commercial size (8 inches or less in
diameter). These areas may be treated as
funds become available.
Roadside Fuel Treatments are
proposed along strategic roads that may
provide anchors for fire suppression in
the event of a wildland fire or access in
the event of an evacuation.
Approximately 2,700 acres (about 77
miles of roads) are proposed for
roadside fuels treatments. Roadside
treatments include thinning and
pruning of small understory trees
(generally < 10″ diameter at breast
height, or DBH) and brush with
chainsaws along forest roads. The
treatment would be on both sides of the
roads, generally within 250 feet above
roads and 150 feet below roads.
Treatment areas along the roads include
plantations and natural stands of
varying ages and structures. Trees less
than 6 inches DBH would generally be
left at a spacing of 15 to 20 feet apart,
and larger diameter conifers (7″ to 12″
DBH) and most hardwoods would be
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
left 20 to 25 feet apart. The slash created
will be hand piled and burned,
converted to chips, processed with a
masticator if accessible from an existing
road, or removed from the site as
firewood or other forest products. In
areas where fuels objectives cannot be
met because there is an excess amount
of dead material on the ground, some of
this material may also be burned or
removed from the site. In addition,
incidental larger hazard trees would be
felled, if deemed hazards to the crews
working on the project. The hazard trees
would be felled and left in place, or
removed to disposal sites on or adjacent
to roads.
The proposed treatments will reduce
ladder and ground fuels, providing for
reduced fire intensity, rate of spread,
and flame lengths in the event of a
wildland fire. After the project is
completed, the roads will be passable
for emergency vehicles during a
wildland fire. Treatments are also
designed so that the roads could be used
as effective fire lines under moderate
wildland fire conditions. Fire
suppression activities will be safer and
more successful in areas that receive
this treatment.
The project areas that are adjacent to
roads are in a particularly hazardous
condition because the road openings
allow growing space and additional
sunlight to the vegetation, and the bare
mineral soil on the road banks makes an
excellent bed for thick regeneration.
These conditions stimulate the growth
of a tree and brush thicket along roads,
and larger vegetation often can maintain
limbs near ground level with out being
shaded out.
Understory Thinning Around Private
Land Boundaries is proposed where
landowners are willing to perform noncommercial fuels reduction (thinning,
brushing and hand piling) on a strip of
Forest land 500 feet wide adjacent to
their property. Approximately 6,000
acres of private land boundary
understory treatments are proposed. The
proposed treatment is intended to
reduce existing ladder and ground fuels
to provide for low intensity fire
behavior. These zones create corridors
in which the fire hazard is reduced to
allow firefighters relatively safe access
for wildland fire suppression activities
and to allow for increased options
during wildland fire suppression
activities to reduce fire severity.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Forest Services is the lead
agency. Representatives from the Fish
and Wildlife Service and NOAA
Fisheries are core members of the
Interdisciplinary Team.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:22 Jan 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official for this
project is the Forest Supervisor for the
Klamath National Forest, 1312 Fairlane
Road, Yreka, California 96097.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. The public is
encouraged to take part in the process
and visit with Forest Service and Fish
and Wildlife officials at any time during
the analysis and prior to the decision.
The Forest Service will be seeking
information, comments and assistance
from Federal, State, and local agencies
and other individuals or organizations
that may be interested in, or affected by,
the proposed thinning and
underburning project. Three public
scoping meetings have been scheduled
for February 11, 12 and 13, 2008 in
Happy Camp, Seiad Valley and
Hamburg respectively. Please contact
District Ranger Donald Hall (see
previous contact info) for details about
the meeting.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment.
The comment period on the draft
environmental impact statement will be
45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register. The Forest Service
believes, at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of
several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental
review process. First, reviewers of draft
environmental impact statements must
structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so
that it is meaningful and alerts an
agency to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 533
(1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis 1980). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day
comment period so that substantive
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6111
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the
statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: January 24, 2008.
Patricia A. Grantham,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Klamath National
Forest.
[FR Doc. E8–1726 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
United States Standards for Beans
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of reopening of comment
period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We published a notice in the
Federal Register on April 17, 2007 (72
FR 19169), inviting comments regarding
the revision of the U.S. Standards for
Beans. The proposed revisions would
provide applicants for service with an
optional grade designation for bean
certification; and remove the
requirements that the percentage of high
moisture and, for Mixed beans, the
percentage of each class in the mixture,
be shown on the grade line. The notice
provided an opportunity for interested
parties to forward written comments to
the Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration (GIPSA)
until May 17, 2007. Due to the
continued high level of interest in this
E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM
01FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6109-6111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1726]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Klamath National Forest, CA; Thom-Seider Vegetation Management
and Fuel Reduction Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Land managers propose the Thom-Seider Vegetation Management
and Fuel Reduction Project to reduce fuel hazard and restore forest
health on Klamath National Forest System lands. The project area is
situated on both sides of the Klamath River between Hamburg and Happy
Camp, California. Thinning and understory burning (underburning) is
proposed for approximately 30,000 acres of strategic areas selected for
their location, topography, stand structure, density, age and
condition. The project is intended to reduce the potential for high-
severity wildland fires to harm people, private and public land, and
older forest habitats.
DATES: Comments postmarked or received by March 7, 2008 are assured of
being considered in the environmental analysis. The Draft Environmental
Impact Statement is expected to be published Summer 2008 and the Final
Environmental Impact Statement is scheduled for Winter 2009.
ADDRESSES: Address Comments to: Happy Camp and Oak Knoll Districts
Ranger, Attn: Thom-Seider Project, Klamath National Forest, 63822
Highway 96, PO Box 377, Happy Camp, California 96039. You may also send
electronic comments to the project e-mail box: comments-
pacificsouthwest-klamath-happy-camp@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact District Ranger Donald
M Hall or Interdisciplinary Team Leader Rochelle Desser if you have
questions, concerns or suggestions relating to this
[[Page 6110]]
proposal. You may contact Don at Happy Camp Ranger District Office at
530-493-1723 or at donaldhall@fs.fed.us. Rochelle is available by phone
at 531-596-2453 or at rdesser@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The Thom-Seider project area contains an overabundance of early-
and mid-successional stands that provide limited habitat for species
dependent on older forests. Many of these stands are not structurally
diverse and are overdense. In some cases, remnant large older trees in
the stands have lost vitality due to competition for light and water
from the dense understory. In the event of a wildland fire, these dense
early- and mid-successional forests are more susceptible to stand
replacement fire because of their continuous crowns and the presence of
ladder fuels.
Actions to help early to mid successional stands develop old growth
characteristics and be less vulnerable to damaging wildland fire
include reducing stand density and ground and ladder fuels, and
prescribed fire. These actions would also help maintain the older trees
currently living in the stand.
The project area is on both sides of the Klamath River and includes
river communities such as Hamburg, Seiad Valley, and Happy Camp. The
areas that interface between private land and National Forest System
lands are a high priority for fuels reduction. Fuels reduction is also
important along roads that provide evacuation routes or can be used as
fuel breaks in the event of a fire.
Action is needed to reduce tree density and forest competition;
reduce ladder fuels that lead to canopy fires; reduce crown fire
potential, improve wildlife habitat; and improve probability that early
to mid-successional stands will develop into old growth. These actions
are particularly important in Late-Successional Reserves established
for development of older forest habitats, and in the Wildland Urban
Interface (WUI) where the National Forest abuts private property and
communities.
Management Direction
The project area includes late-successional reserves, riparian
reserves, a wild and scenic river, and roadless areas. Plans, policies
and regulations that provide management direction for this project
include (not limited to): the Klamath National Forest Land and Resource
Management Plan of 1995; the Section 7(a)(1) of the Endangered Species
Act; the Healthy Forest Restoration Act; the National Fire Plan; the
Roadless Rule of 2001; the Clean Water Act; and the Clean Air Act.
This project is authorized under section 102 of the Healthy Forest
Restoration Act of 2003 because it would provide ``enhanced protection
from catastrophic wildland fire'' for the habitat of a threatened
species, the northern spotted owl; and a candidate species, the Pacific
fisher. Commercial thinning is an allowable exception under Section
294.13(b) of the 2001 Roadless Rule because it involves removal of
timber to improve threatened species habitat, it would maintain and
restore ecosystem composition and structure, and it would reduce the
hazard of uncharacteristic wildland fire effects.
The project is designed to be consistent with all applicable
policies and plans. The type of thinning proposed follows Late-
Successional Reserve Assessment and Watershed Analysis recommendations.
Riparian reserves would be treated where needed to meet Aquatic
Conservation Strategy objectives.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action includes about 22,000 acres of underburning;
2,450 acres of variable density thinning (includes commercial and non-
commercial), 2,700 acres of roadside fuels treatment, and 6,150 acres
of understory thinning around private properties.
Underburning refers to a range of prescribed burning activities
including hand piling, burning small concentrations of debris and slash
(jackpot) and low intensity burning under a forest canopy.
Approximately 22,000 acres of underburning is proposed. Non-commercial
thinning small trees and brush would occur within the underburns as
needed to promote effective fuel consumption. Underburning reduces both
natural and activity fuel loading, consumes the build up of forest
debris and litter, promotes the growth of browse species, encourages
grass and forbs, and thins out smaller shade tolerant trees (ladder
fuels), thus reducing fire behavior and negative effects from wildland
fire. In some cases, small jackpots of trees are consumed to provide a
break in the canopy. Burning operations would be accomplished to follow
a prescribed burn plan that meets land management objectives and public
concerns. A burn and smoke management plan would be implemented to
minimize the effects of smoke on adjacent communities and the public.
Variable Density Thinning includes commercial and non-commercial
thinning that reduces forest competition and increases diversity in
early- to mid-successional forests. It also is intended to increase the
longevity of larger, older trees in the stands. Thinning is proposed
for the smallest trees in the stand, around individual large trees and
in unevenly spaced clumps. Snags would be retained except where there
are safety hazards. Approximately 2,450 acres of variable density
thinning is proposed.
Commercial thinning is proposed in stands that are accessible from
the existing road system and are of a size, age, terrain and structure
suitable for logging. Within commercial thinning units, trees greater
than 8 inches in diameter would be cut, along with the smaller trees
and brush. A total of about 1,950 acres of commercial thinning is
currently proposed, including about 1,000 acres within Late-
Successional Reserves and about 130 acres within the outer portions of
Riparian Reserves. Commercial thinning would be accessed by a
combination of the existing road network and helicopters. Approximately
2.6 miles of temporary road in 12 segments located throughout the
project area are proposed to more efficiently remove thinned logs.
The land used for temporary roads would be rehabilitated after the
project was completed. Logging systems include helicopter and ground
based systems. Non-commercial thinning is proposed on about 500 acres,
mainly within Late-Successional Reserves. These stands are high
priority for thinning because they have overdense understories or
excessive ladder fuels; however, the trees are smaller than commercial
size (8 inches or less in diameter). These areas may be treated as
funds become available.
Roadside Fuel Treatments are proposed along strategic roads that
may provide anchors for fire suppression in the event of a wildland
fire or access in the event of an evacuation. Approximately 2,700 acres
(about 77 miles of roads) are proposed for roadside fuels treatments.
Roadside treatments include thinning and pruning of small understory
trees (generally < 10'' diameter at breast height, or DBH) and brush
with chainsaws along forest roads. The treatment would be on both sides
of the roads, generally within 250 feet above roads and 150 feet below
roads. Treatment areas along the roads include plantations and natural
stands of varying ages and structures. Trees less than 6 inches DBH
would generally be left at a spacing of 15 to 20 feet apart, and larger
diameter conifers (7'' to 12'' DBH) and most hardwoods would be
[[Page 6111]]
left 20 to 25 feet apart. The slash created will be hand piled and
burned, converted to chips, processed with a masticator if accessible
from an existing road, or removed from the site as firewood or other
forest products. In areas where fuels objectives cannot be met because
there is an excess amount of dead material on the ground, some of this
material may also be burned or removed from the site. In addition,
incidental larger hazard trees would be felled, if deemed hazards to
the crews working on the project. The hazard trees would be felled and
left in place, or removed to disposal sites on or adjacent to roads.
The proposed treatments will reduce ladder and ground fuels,
providing for reduced fire intensity, rate of spread, and flame lengths
in the event of a wildland fire. After the project is completed, the
roads will be passable for emergency vehicles during a wildland fire.
Treatments are also designed so that the roads could be used as
effective fire lines under moderate wildland fire conditions. Fire
suppression activities will be safer and more successful in areas that
receive this treatment.
The project areas that are adjacent to roads are in a particularly
hazardous condition because the road openings allow growing space and
additional sunlight to the vegetation, and the bare mineral soil on the
road banks makes an excellent bed for thick regeneration. These
conditions stimulate the growth of a tree and brush thicket along
roads, and larger vegetation often can maintain limbs near ground level
with out being shaded out.
Understory Thinning Around Private Land Boundaries is proposed
where landowners are willing to perform non-commercial fuels reduction
(thinning, brushing and hand piling) on a strip of Forest land 500 feet
wide adjacent to their property. Approximately 6,000 acres of private
land boundary understory treatments are proposed. The proposed
treatment is intended to reduce existing ladder and ground fuels to
provide for low intensity fire behavior. These zones create corridors
in which the fire hazard is reduced to allow firefighters relatively
safe access for wildland fire suppression activities and to allow for
increased options during wildland fire suppression activities to reduce
fire severity.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Forest Services is the lead agency. Representatives from the
Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA Fisheries are core members of the
Interdisciplinary Team.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official for this project is the Forest Supervisor
for the Klamath National Forest, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, California
96097.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. The public is
encouraged to take part in the process and visit with Forest Service
and Fish and Wildlife officials at any time during the analysis and
prior to the decision. The Forest Service will be seeking information,
comments and assistance from Federal, State, and local agencies and
other individuals or organizations that may be interested in, or
affected by, the proposed thinning and underburning project. Three
public scoping meetings have been scheduled for February 11, 12 and 13,
2008 in Happy Camp, Seiad Valley and Hamburg respectively. Please
contact District Ranger Donald Hall (see previous contact info) for
details about the meeting.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement
will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The
Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
533 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis 1980). Because of these court rulings, it
is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement.
Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental
impact or the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in
addressing these points. Comments received, including the names and
addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public
record on this proposal and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: January 24, 2008.
Patricia A. Grantham,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Klamath National Forest.
[FR Doc. E8-1726 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P