Notice of Decision Under Section 127(f) of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, 5840-5842 [E8-1769]
Download as PDF
5840
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2008 / Notices
or compromise. No information will be
provided to the System Research and
Application Corporation, until the
requirements in this document have
been fully satisfied. Records of
information provided under this IAG
will be maintained by EPA Project
Officers for this contract. All
information supplied to the System
Research and Application Corporation,
by EPA for use in connection with this
IAG will be returned to EPA when the
System Research and Application
Corporation, have completed their work.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Business
and industry, Government contracts,
Government property, Security
measures.
Dated: January 23, 2008.
Oscar Morales,
Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E8–1796 Filed 1–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission.
DATE AND TIME: Thursday, February 7,
2008, 2 p.m. Eastern Time.
PLACE: Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr.
Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of
the EEOC Office Building, 1801 ‘‘L’’
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.
STATUS: The meeting will be open to the
public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
Open Session:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
1. Announcement of Notation Votes,
and
2. Obligation of Funds for a
Temporary Interactive Voice Response/
Automatic Call Distribution (IVR/ACD)
Non-competitive Hosting Contract and a
Competitive Contract for Technology
Support of Customer Response
Function.
Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act,
the meeting will be open to public
observation of the Commission’s
deliberations and voting. (In addition to
publishing notices on EEOC Commission
meetings in the Federal Register the
Commission also provides a recorded
announcement a full week in advance on
future Commission sessions.)
Please telephone (202) 663–7100
(voice) and (202) 663–4074 (TTY) at any
time for information on these meetings.
The EEOC provides sign language
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:07 Jan 30, 2008
Jkt 214001
interpretation at Commission meetings
for the hearing impaired. Requests for
other reasonable accommodations may
be made by using the voice and TTY
numbers listed above. Contact Person
For More Information: Stephen
Llewellyn, Executive Officer on (202)
663–4070.
Dated: January 29, 2008.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 08–454 Filed 1–29–08; 11:41 am]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–M
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Notice of Decision Under Section
127(f) of the Public Health Security and
Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002
Office of Science and
Technology Policy, Executive Office of
the President.
ACTION: Notice of Decision to Waive
Requirements of Sections 127(a) and (d)
of the Public Health Security and
Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002. Notice of
Availability of Associated OSTP
Director’s Decision Memorandum and
Interagency Technical Evaluation
Report.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
determination, under Section 127(f) of
the Public Health Security and
Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002 (the Act), to waive
the requirements of Section 127(a) and
(d) of the Act. Notice is also given that
the Associated Decision Memorandum
and an interagency technical analysis
report are available on the Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
Web site at https://www.ostp.gov/KI.
Section 127(a) of the Act directed the
President to establish a Potassium
Iodide (KI) distribution program, under
which State and local governments
could receive KI tablets for distribution
to the population in the 20 mile radius
surrounding nuclear power plants
(NPPs). The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) already has such a
program for the 10 mile emergency
planning zones surrounding NPPs, so
Section 127(a) effectively extended that
program to the 10–20 mile range.
Through Section 127(f), Congress
authorized the President to waive this
distribution requirement if there exists
‘‘an alternative and more effective
prophylaxis or preventive measures for
adverse thyroid conditions that may
result from the release of radionuclides
from nuclear power plants.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On July 3, 2007, the President
delegated the Section 127(f) waiver
authority to the Director of the Office of
Science and Technology Policy.
On July 30, 2007, to help inform his
decision, the OSTP Director requested
the Federal Radiological Policy
Coordinating Committee (FRPCC) to
provide a technical evaluation of the
issues surrounding Section 127. The
FRPCC is an interagency organization,
with membership from 17 Federal
agencies, established to coordinate
Federal responsibilities for assisting
State and local governments in
emergency planning and preparedness
for peacetime nuclear emergencies. The
FRPCC transmitted its final technical
evaluation paper to the OSTP Director
on October 23, 2007.
On January 22, 2008, the OSTP
Director executed his final decision
pursuant to the Section 127(f)
delegation. The complete Decision
Memorandum, as well as the FRPCC
technical information paper, is available
on the OSTP Web site at https://
www.ostp.gov/KI.
The OSTP Director’s determination
waived Section 127(f) because a more
effective preventive measure does exist
for the extended zone covered by the
Act, namely avoidance of exposure
altogether through evacuation of the
potentially affected population and
interdiction of contaminated food.
Analysis of radiological release events
that could lead to adverse thyroid
conditions beyond the current 10 mile
zone shows that limiting or avoiding
exposure to radiation through these
mechanisms is practical and much more
effective than the administration of KI
in the proposed extended zone.
DATES: The Decision Memorandum was
executed on January 22, 2008.
Associated documents will be available
on the OSTP Web site on January 31,
2008.
Questions concerning this
Notice should be sent to OSTP by e-mail
at comments@ostp.eop.gov or by Fax at
202–456–6027.
ADDRESSES:
Background
Section 127(a) of the Act directs the
President to establish a KI distribution
program as discussed above. Section
127(b) of the Act calls for State and local
authorities to submit their KI stockpile
plans to the President. Section 127(c)
requires the President to issue
guidelines for the stockpiling of KI
tablets. Section 127(d) requires the
Federal government to undertake efforts
to make states and localities aware of
the availability of KI under 127(a).
Section 127(e) requires the President to
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2008 / Notices
submit a progress report to Congress no
later than 6 months after the guidelines
under (c) are issued, and requires the
President to request the National
Academies of Science to conduct a
study to determine the most effective
and safe way to distribute and
administer KI on a mass scale.
In Section 127(f), Congress authorized
the President to waive the requirements
of Sections 127(a) and (d) if there exists
‘‘an alternative and more effective
prophylaxis or preventive measures for
adverse thyroid conditions that may
result from the release of radionuclides
from nuclear power plants.’’
On July 3, 2007, the President
delegated the authority to make a
determination whether to invoke
Section 127(f) to the Director of the
Office of Science and Technology
Policy, and the authority to implement
the remaining subsections of Section
127 to the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC), which established
and implements the existing 10 mile KI
distribution program.
On July 30, 2007, the OSTP Director
requested the FRPCC to provide a
technical evaluation of the issues
surrounding Section 127(f). The FRPCC
is an interagency organization, with
membership from 17 Federal agencies,
established to coordinate Federal
responsibilities for assisting State and
local governments in emergency
planning and preparedness for
peacetime nuclear emergencies. Member
agencies include the NRC, the Federal
Emergency Response Agency (FEMA),
the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), the
Environmental Protection Agency, and
others. The OSTP Director asked the
FRPCC to provide him with technical
background information only; the
FRPCC was not asked to provide any
findings or recommendations
concerning the invocation of Section
127(f). The FRPCC asked their
Potassium Iodide Working Group to
conduct the work of drafting this
document.
As part of this process, OSTP
specifically requested that agencies with
expertise in topical subjects in the
technical evaluation take the lead on the
subjects of their particular expertise—to
be responsible for carefully reviewing
and approving the information
presented. For example, FDA was asked
to take the lead on the sections dealing
with the effects of Potassium Iodide,
HHS was asked to take the lead on the
sections dealing with the health effects
of radiation including radioiodine, and
FEMA was asked to take the lead on the
sections dealing with evacuations, etc.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:07 Jan 30, 2008
Jkt 214001
In addition, each agency had the
opportunity to review and approve the
entire document, both at the working
group and full FRPCC levels. If
irreconcilable disputes existed between
the various Federal agencies while
drafting the document, OSTP requested
that this information, along with the
reasons why, be presented to the OSTP
Director as well.
The FRPCC transmitted its final
technical evaluation paper to the OSTP
Director on October 23, 2007.
On January 22, 2008, the OSTP
Director executed his decision on the
127(f) delegation. The analysis
underlying the decision to invoke the
Section 127(f) waiver is presented in a
Decision Memorandum. The complete
Decision Memorandum, as well as the
supporting interagency FRPCC technical
information paper, is available on the
OSTP Web site at https://www.ostp.gov/
KI.
To provide additional background on
the basis for the decision in this Notice,
the ‘‘Decision Summary’’ section of the
Decision Memorandum is presented in
full below:
Decision Summary
On July 3, 2007, the President
delegated to me his authority to invoke,
if appropriate, the waiver provision in
the Potassium Iodide (KI) distribution
program enacted through Section 127 of
the Public Health Security and
Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002 (the Act).1 In that
Section of the Act, Congress authorized
the President to waive the program if he
determines that there exists ‘‘an
alternative and more effective
prophylaxis or preventive measures for
adverse thyroid conditions that may
result from the release of radionuclides
from nuclear power plants.’’ Under the
Act, the Federal government would
provide KI to be distributed by state and
local governments to populations living
in a zone extending an additional 10
miles beyond the existing 10 mile
emergency planning zone near nuclear
power plants (NPPs), in which a KI
distribution program already exists. The
Background section below describes the
process I used to make the necessary
determination.
After a thorough review of the
technical issues, and as explained in
detail below, I have decided to invoke
the Section 127(f) waiver. I have
determined that a more effective
preventive measure does exist for the
extended zone covered by the Act,
namely avoidance of exposure
altogether through evacuation of the
1 Pub.
PO 00000
L. 107–188, 42 U.S.C. 300hh–12 (Notes).
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5841
potentially affected population and
interdiction of contaminated food.
Analysis of radiological release events
that could lead to adverse thyroid
conditions beyond the current 10 mile
zone shows that such limiting or
avoiding exposure to radiation through
these mechanisms is practical and much
more effective than the administration
of KI in the proposed extended zone.
Key facts leading to this conclusion
are the existence of Federal support for
KI distribution programs within 10
miles of an NPP, the long advance
warning available to potentially affected
populations given the type of event that
could possibly lead to actionable
radionuclide concentrations beyond 10
miles, and the existence of tested
operational plans for effectively
interdicting contaminated agricultural
products in this extended zone.
For the types of nuclear reactors in
use within the United States, there are
very few accident scenarios that
produce such effects. These very severe
events have been well-analyzed, and
none lead to the rapid appearance of
thyroid-threatening radioiodines beyond
10 miles. Experience with major
evacuations (approximately one every
three weeks in the U.S.), and detailed
analysis for a typical nuclear power
plant (NPP), show that populations in
the extended zone likely to be affected
by such an event can be evacuated in
time to avoid adverse thyroid
conditions. Moreover, KI is only
effective in decreasing thyroid exposure
to radioactive isotopes of iodine, and
the events in question would produce
health effects from radionuclides other
than the isotopes of iodine. Evacuation
and interdiction of contaminated food
products are the preferred actions to
prevent exposures to these other
radionuclides, and will have to be taken
in response to such an event in any
case.
While the Section 127(f) authority
delegated to me primarily concerns
distribution of KI beyond the current 10
mile Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) program, the review brought to
my attention weaknesses in the
implementation of existing programs
within 10 miles that deserve attention.
States distribute KI currently provided
by the NRC in diverse programs with
disparate characteristics, suggesting that
many are not based on best practices for
prevention of adverse thyroid
conditions. Accordingly, while not a
pre-condition of my decision to invoke
the Section 127(f) waiver, I strongly
recommend that the NRC, in
conjunction with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA), the
Department of Health and Human
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
5842
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2008 / Notices
Services (HHS), State and local health
authorities and relevant public and
private sector stakeholders develop and
promulgate ‘‘best practice’’ guidelines
for the existing state-level KI
distribution programs within the 10
mile emergency planning zones.
Stanley S. Sokul,
Chief of Staff and General Counsel, Office
of Science and Technology Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–1769 Filed 1–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3170–W8–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Submitted for
Review to the Office of Management
and Budget
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
January 17, 2008.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before March 3, 2008.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, (202) 395–
5887, or via fax at 202–395–5167 or via
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:07 Jan 30, 2008
Jkt 214001
Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov, Federal
Communications Commission, or an email to PRA@fcc.gov. To view a copy of
this information collection request (ICR)
submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the web
page https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the
web page called ‘‘Currently Under
Review’’, (3) click on the downwardpointing arrow in the ‘‘Select Agency’’
box below the ‘‘Currently Under
Review’’ heading, (4) select ‘‘Federal
Communications Commission’’ from the
list of agencies presented in the ‘‘Select
Agency’’ box, (5) click the ‘‘Submit’’
button to the right of the ‘‘Select
Agency’’ box, and (6) when the list of
FCC ICRs currently under review
appears, look for the title of this ICR (or
its OMB Control Number, if there is one)
and then click on the ICR Reference
Number to view detailed information
about this ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collection(s), contact Judith
B. Herman at 202–418–0214 or via the
Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0262.
Title: Section 90.179, Shared Use of
Radio Stations.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit, not-for-profit institutions, and
state, local or tribal government.
Number of Respondents: 42,000
respondents; 42,000 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: .75
hours reporting requirement; .25 hours
recordkeeping requirement.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement and
recordkeeping requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Total Annual Burden: 42,000 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality.
Needs and Uses: The Commission
will submit this information collection
to the OMB as an extension during this
comment period to obtain the full threeyear clearance from them. There is an
increase in the number of respondents/
responses and burden hours due a
recalculation of the burden estimates.
Section 90.179 requires Part 90
licensees that share use of their private
land mobile radio (PLMR) facility on a
non-profit, cost-shared basis keep a
written sharing agreement as part of the
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
station records. The written agreement
would set out: (1) The method of
sharing, (2) the components of the
system which are covered by the sharing
arrangements, (3) the method by which
costs are to be apportioned, (4) and
acknowledgement that all shared
transmitter use must be subject to the
licensee’s control.
These requirements are necessary to
identify users of the systems should
interference problems develop. This
information is used by the Commission
to investigate interference complaints
and resolve interference and operational
complaints that may arise among the
users.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–1691 Filed 1–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission
for Extension Under Delegated
Authority, Comments Requested
January 15, 2008.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Persons wishing to comment on
this information collection should
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5840-5842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1769]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Notice of Decision Under Section 127(f) of the Public Health
Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002
AGENCY: Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of
the President.
ACTION: Notice of Decision to Waive Requirements of Sections 127(a) and
(d) of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002. Notice of Availability of Associated OSTP
Director's Decision Memorandum and Interagency Technical Evaluation
Report.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the determination, under Section
127(f) of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002 (the Act), to waive the requirements of Section
127(a) and (d) of the Act. Notice is also given that the Associated
Decision Memorandum and an interagency technical analysis report are
available on the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) Web
site at https://www.ostp.gov/KI.
Section 127(a) of the Act directed the President to establish a
Potassium Iodide (KI) distribution program, under which State and local
governments could receive KI tablets for distribution to the population
in the 20 mile radius surrounding nuclear power plants (NPPs). The
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) already has such a program for the
10 mile emergency planning zones surrounding NPPs, so Section 127(a)
effectively extended that program to the 10-20 mile range.
Through Section 127(f), Congress authorized the President to waive
this distribution requirement if there exists ``an alternative and more
effective prophylaxis or preventive measures for adverse thyroid
conditions that may result from the release of radionuclides from
nuclear power plants.''
On July 3, 2007, the President delegated the Section 127(f) waiver
authority to the Director of the Office of Science and Technology
Policy.
On July 30, 2007, to help inform his decision, the OSTP Director
requested the Federal Radiological Policy Coordinating Committee
(FRPCC) to provide a technical evaluation of the issues surrounding
Section 127. The FRPCC is an interagency organization, with membership
from 17 Federal agencies, established to coordinate Federal
responsibilities for assisting State and local governments in emergency
planning and preparedness for peacetime nuclear emergencies. The FRPCC
transmitted its final technical evaluation paper to the OSTP Director
on October 23, 2007.
On January 22, 2008, the OSTP Director executed his final decision
pursuant to the Section 127(f) delegation. The complete Decision
Memorandum, as well as the FRPCC technical information paper, is
available on the OSTP Web site at https://www.ostp.gov/KI.
The OSTP Director's determination waived Section 127(f) because a
more effective preventive measure does exist for the extended zone
covered by the Act, namely avoidance of exposure altogether through
evacuation of the potentially affected population and interdiction of
contaminated food. Analysis of radiological release events that could
lead to adverse thyroid conditions beyond the current 10 mile zone
shows that limiting or avoiding exposure to radiation through these
mechanisms is practical and much more effective than the administration
of KI in the proposed extended zone.
DATES: The Decision Memorandum was executed on January 22, 2008.
Associated documents will be available on the OSTP Web site on January
31, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Questions concerning this Notice should be sent to OSTP by
e-mail at comments@ostp.eop.gov or by Fax at 202-456-6027.
Background
Section 127(a) of the Act directs the President to establish a KI
distribution program as discussed above. Section 127(b) of the Act
calls for State and local authorities to submit their KI stockpile
plans to the President. Section 127(c) requires the President to issue
guidelines for the stockpiling of KI tablets. Section 127(d) requires
the Federal government to undertake efforts to make states and
localities aware of the availability of KI under 127(a). Section 127(e)
requires the President to
[[Page 5841]]
submit a progress report to Congress no later than 6 months after the
guidelines under (c) are issued, and requires the President to request
the National Academies of Science to conduct a study to determine the
most effective and safe way to distribute and administer KI on a mass
scale.
In Section 127(f), Congress authorized the President to waive the
requirements of Sections 127(a) and (d) if there exists ``an
alternative and more effective prophylaxis or preventive measures for
adverse thyroid conditions that may result from the release of
radionuclides from nuclear power plants.''
On July 3, 2007, the President delegated the authority to make a
determination whether to invoke Section 127(f) to the Director of the
Office of Science and Technology Policy, and the authority to implement
the remaining subsections of Section 127 to the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC), which established and implements the existing 10 mile
KI distribution program.
On July 30, 2007, the OSTP Director requested the FRPCC to provide
a technical evaluation of the issues surrounding Section 127(f). The
FRPCC is an interagency organization, with membership from 17 Federal
agencies, established to coordinate Federal responsibilities for
assisting State and local governments in emergency planning and
preparedness for peacetime nuclear emergencies. Member agencies include
the NRC, the Federal Emergency Response Agency (FEMA), the Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency, and others. The OSTP
Director asked the FRPCC to provide him with technical background
information only; the FRPCC was not asked to provide any findings or
recommendations concerning the invocation of Section 127(f). The FRPCC
asked their Potassium Iodide Working Group to conduct the work of
drafting this document.
As part of this process, OSTP specifically requested that agencies
with expertise in topical subjects in the technical evaluation take the
lead on the subjects of their particular expertise--to be responsible
for carefully reviewing and approving the information presented. For
example, FDA was asked to take the lead on the sections dealing with
the effects of Potassium Iodide, HHS was asked to take the lead on the
sections dealing with the health effects of radiation including
radioiodine, and FEMA was asked to take the lead on the sections
dealing with evacuations, etc. In addition, each agency had the
opportunity to review and approve the entire document, both at the
working group and full FRPCC levels. If irreconcilable disputes existed
between the various Federal agencies while drafting the document, OSTP
requested that this information, along with the reasons why, be
presented to the OSTP Director as well.
The FRPCC transmitted its final technical evaluation paper to the
OSTP Director on October 23, 2007.
On January 22, 2008, the OSTP Director executed his decision on the
127(f) delegation. The analysis underlying the decision to invoke the
Section 127(f) waiver is presented in a Decision Memorandum. The
complete Decision Memorandum, as well as the supporting interagency
FRPCC technical information paper, is available on the OSTP Web site at
https://www.ostp.gov/KI.
To provide additional background on the basis for the decision in
this Notice, the ``Decision Summary'' section of the Decision
Memorandum is presented in full below:
Decision Summary
On July 3, 2007, the President delegated to me his authority to
invoke, if appropriate, the waiver provision in the Potassium Iodide
(KI) distribution program enacted through Section 127 of the Public
Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002
(the Act).\1\ In that Section of the Act, Congress authorized the
President to waive the program if he determines that there exists ``an
alternative and more effective prophylaxis or preventive measures for
adverse thyroid conditions that may result from the release of
radionuclides from nuclear power plants.'' Under the Act, the Federal
government would provide KI to be distributed by state and local
governments to populations living in a zone extending an additional 10
miles beyond the existing 10 mile emergency planning zone near nuclear
power plants (NPPs), in which a KI distribution program already exists.
The Background section below describes the process I used to make the
necessary determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Pub. L. 107-188, 42 U.S.C. 300hh-12 (Notes).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After a thorough review of the technical issues, and as explained
in detail below, I have decided to invoke the Section 127(f) waiver. I
have determined that a more effective preventive measure does exist for
the extended zone covered by the Act, namely avoidance of exposure
altogether through evacuation of the potentially affected population
and interdiction of contaminated food. Analysis of radiological release
events that could lead to adverse thyroid conditions beyond the current
10 mile zone shows that such limiting or avoiding exposure to radiation
through these mechanisms is practical and much more effective than the
administration of KI in the proposed extended zone.
Key facts leading to this conclusion are the existence of Federal
support for KI distribution programs within 10 miles of an NPP, the
long advance warning available to potentially affected populations
given the type of event that could possibly lead to actionable
radionuclide concentrations beyond 10 miles, and the existence of
tested operational plans for effectively interdicting contaminated
agricultural products in this extended zone.
For the types of nuclear reactors in use within the United States,
there are very few accident scenarios that produce such effects. These
very severe events have been well-analyzed, and none lead to the rapid
appearance of thyroid-threatening radioiodines beyond 10 miles.
Experience with major evacuations (approximately one every three weeks
in the U.S.), and detailed analysis for a typical nuclear power plant
(NPP), show that populations in the extended zone likely to be affected
by such an event can be evacuated in time to avoid adverse thyroid
conditions. Moreover, KI is only effective in decreasing thyroid
exposure to radioactive isotopes of iodine, and the events in question
would produce health effects from radionuclides other than the isotopes
of iodine. Evacuation and interdiction of contaminated food products
are the preferred actions to prevent exposures to these other
radionuclides, and will have to be taken in response to such an event
in any case.
While the Section 127(f) authority delegated to me primarily
concerns distribution of KI beyond the current 10 mile Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) program, the review brought to my attention
weaknesses in the implementation of existing programs within 10 miles
that deserve attention. States distribute KI currently provided by the
NRC in diverse programs with disparate characteristics, suggesting that
many are not based on best practices for prevention of adverse thyroid
conditions. Accordingly, while not a pre-condition of my decision to
invoke the Section 127(f) waiver, I strongly recommend that the NRC, in
conjunction with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the
Department of Health and Human
[[Page 5842]]
Services (HHS), State and local health authorities and relevant public
and private sector stakeholders develop and promulgate ``best
practice'' guidelines for the existing state-level KI distribution
programs within the 10 mile emergency planning zones.
Stanley S. Sokul,
Chief of Staff and General Counsel, Office of Science and Technology
Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-1769 Filed 1-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3170-W8-P