Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for Bear Butte National Wildlife Refuge, South Dakota, 5867-5868 [E8-1729]
Download as PDF
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2008 / Notices
In our general refuge regulations, we
provide for public entry for specialized
purposes, including economic activities
such as the operation of guiding and
other visitor services on refuges by
concessionaires or cooperators under
the appropriate legal instrument or
special use permits (50 CFR 25.41,
25.61, 26.36, 27.71, 27.91, 27.97, 29.1,
29.2, 30.11, 31.2, 31.13, 31.14, 31.16,
and 32.2(1), and 43 CFR 5). These
regulations provide the authorities and
procedures for allowing permits on
refuges outside of Alaska.
We will issue special use permits for
a specific period as determined by the
type and location of the use or visitor
service provided. These permits
authorize activities such as:
(1) Farming operations (haying and
grazing, 50 CFR 29.2).
(2) Beneficial management tools that
we use to provide the best habitat
possible on some refuges (50 CFR 30.11,
31.14, and 31.16).
(3) Recreational visitor service
operations (50 CFR 25.41 and 25.61).
(4) Commercial filming (50 CFR
27.71) and other commercial activities
(50 CFR 29.1).
(5) Research and other
noncommercial activities (50 CFR
26.36).
We collect the following information
in both form (FWS Form 3–1383) and
nonform format:
(1) Identifying data (name,
organization, address, and telephone
number);
(2) Activity for which the permit is
being requested (agriculture,
commercial, research/monitoring,
commercial visitor services, commercial
filming, special event, etc.);
(3) Description of the activity
including:
(a) Where it will take place (units,
trails, roads);
(b) When (seasons, days, hours);
(c) How (methods, techniques,
transportation);
(d) Frequency (one time, daily,
occasionally);
(e) Number of people/vehicles/boats;
(f) Special needs/access.
In addition to the above, we may
require researchers to provide a copy of
their research proposal. This
information helps us to:
(1) Determine if requested activities
are compatible and appropriate with the
purpose for which the refuge was
established.
(2) Ensure that the applicant is
eligible for the permit.
Comments: On November 28, 2007,
we published in the Federal Register (72
FR 67313) a notice of our intent to
request that OMB renew this ICR. In that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:10 Jan 30, 2008
Jkt 214001
notice, we solicited comments for 60
days, ending on January 28, 2008. We
received one comment. The commenter
did not address the information
collection requirements, but stated that
there should be no economic use on
national wildlife refuges and requested
a list of all permits granted in the past
year. As stated in item 1 above, the
Administration Act authorizes us to
permit public accommodations,
including commercial visitor services,
on lands of the System when we find
that the activity is compatible and
appropriate with the purpose for which
the refuge was established. We do not
maintain a consolidated list of special
use permits. We encouraged the
commenter to contact individual refuges
to obtain the desired information and
provided a website that lists contact
information. We did not make any
changes to our information collection
requirements as a result of this
comment.
We again invite comments concerning
this information collection on:
(1) whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
(3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask OMB in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that it will be done.
Dated: January 8, 2008
Hope Grey,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Fish and Wildlife Service.
FR Doc. E8–1669 Filed 1–30–08; 8:45 pm
BILLING CODE 4310–55–S
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5867
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Final Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment
for Bear Butte National Wildlife Refuge,
South Dakota
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) announce the
availability of our Final Comprehensive
Conservation Plan (Plan),
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) for Bear Butte National Wildlife
Refuge (Refuge). This Final Plan
describes how the Service intends to
manage the Refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Plan may be
obtained by writing to U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Division of Refuge
Planning, P.O. Box 25486, Denver
Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225;
or by download from https://mountainprairie.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Spratt, at (303) 236–4366, (303)
236–4792 (fax), or e-mail
Michael_Spratt@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
Refuge was established as a Limitedinterest Refuge in the late 1930s with
the acquisition of easements from
private landowners, the State of South
Dakota (State) and the War Department
(now transferred to the Bureau of Land
Management at Fort Meade), to maintain
an area for ‘‘migratory bird, wildlife
conservation, and other purposes.’’ The
Refuge is 374.20 acres and has no fee
title. The easement obtained from the
State only applies to lands below the
ordinary high-water mark of the lake. A
Cooperative Agreement was entered into
with the State on July 12, 1967, to
administer, operate, and maintain the
Refuge pursuant to the rights and
interest in real property acquired by the
United States, and more particularly
described in the easement agreements.
The draft Plan and EA was made
available for public review and
comment following the announcement
in the Federal Register on February 8,
2007 (72 FR 5990). The draft Plan and
EA identified and evaluated two
alternatives for managing the Refuge for
the next 15 years. Under the No Action
Alternative (Current Management), the
Service would continue to manage the
Refuge within the parameters of the
Cooperative Agreement with South
Dakota Game, Fish and Parks. Existing
habitat within the easement and all
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
5868
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2008 / Notices
public programs would continue to be
administered and maintained by the
State. Current habitat and wildlife
management practices would be carried
out by State Game, Fish, and Parks
personnel and levels of public use
would remain the same. The facilities
and activities (hiking, picnicking,
designated camping, fishing and a horse
camp) would remain the same.
Alternative B, the Proposed Action
(Relinquish Easement to Current
Landowners), would take the Refuge out
of the National Wildlife Refuge System
and transfer the easements to current
landowners. Under this Alternative, the
habitat, public use, cultural resources
and operations would be managed by
the landowners (primarily the State).
The Service’s easement requirements
would no longer exist. The Service
would divest its interest in the Refuge.
This would be carried out within the 15year life of the Plan. Once the Plan was
approved, the managing station would
work with the Division of Realty and the
Division of Planning to prepare a
proposal to divest this Refuge. The
proposal would be submitted to the
Migratory Bird Conservation
Commission for concurrence and then
submitted for Congressional approval.
The Service evaluated whether or not
to divest the Refuge. After careful
consideration of tribal concerns and
issues raised by the public, the Preferred
Alternative was changed from
Alternative B: Proposed Action
(Relinquish Easement to Current
Landowners) to Alternative A: No
Action (Current Management). A large
number of comments were received
from tribal governments expressing
concern regarding divesting this
Limited-interest Refuge. While there
was recognition that the Service
interests are extremely limited, there
was overwhelming support for the
Service to continue its presence,
particularly in light of the National
significance of Bear Butte itself (not part
of the Refuge). Therefore, the Refuge
will continue to be managed according
to its 1967 Cooperative Agreement with
the State. According to Refuge Planning
Policy (May 25, 2000), the Plan and EA
should be revised when significant new
information becomes available. This
should occur every 15 years or sooner,
if necessary. It is important to note, that
if conditions change, the Service could
reconsider actions approved in the Plan.
If revisions were considered, full
disclosure through extensive public
involvement utilizing the requirements
of the National Environmental Policy
Act and other compliance procedures
would be closely followed.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:07 Jan 30, 2008
Jkt 214001
The Service is furnishing this Notice
to advise other agencies and the public
of the availability of the final Plan and
EA, to provide information on the
desired conditions for the Refuge, and to
detail how the Service will implement
management strategies. Based on the
review and evaluation of the
information contained in the EA, the
Regional Director has determined that
implementation of the Final Plan does
not constitute a major Federal action
that would significantly affect the
quality of the human environment
within the meaning of Section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act. Therefore, an Environmental
Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Dated: January 24, 2008.
Gary G. Mowad,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8–1729 Filed 1–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2008–N0008; 80221–1113–
0000–F5]
Endangered Species Recovery Permit
Applications
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of permit
applications; request for comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We invite the public to
comment on the following applications
to conduct certain activities with
endangered species.
DATES: Comments on these permit
applications must be received on or
before March 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written data or comments
should be submitted to the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Endangered
Species Program Manager, Region 8,
2800 Cottage Way, Room W–2606,
Sacramento, CA 95825 (telephone: 916–
414–6464; fax: 916–414–6486). Please
refer to the respective permit number for
each application when submitting
comments. All comments received,
including names and addresses, will
become part of the official
administrative record and may be made
available to the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Marquez, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, see ADDRESSES, (telephone:
760–431–9440; fax: 760–431–9624).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following applicants have applied for
scientific research permits to conduct
certain activities with endangered
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
species pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A)
of the Endangered Species Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (‘‘we’’) solicits review
and comment from local, State, and
Federal agencies, and the public on the
following permit requests. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Permit No. TE–085026
Applicant: Jeff Steinman, San Juan
Capistrano, California
The applicant requests an amendment
to take (locate and monitor nests) the
least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus)
in conjunction with surveys and
population monitoring throughout the
range of the species in California, for the
purpose of enhancing its survival.
Permit No. TE–172629
Applicant: Kirsten Sellheim, Davis,
California
The applicant requests an amendment
to take (capture, collect, and kill) the
Conservancy fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
conservatio), the longhorn fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta longiantenna), and the
vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus
packardi) in conjunction with research
and genetic analysis in Lassen, Plumas,
Mendocino, Lake Colusa, Sacramento,
Napa, Alameda, Merced, Stanislaus,
Fresno, Solano, San Luis Obispo, and
Santa Barbara Counties, California, and
in Jackson County, Oregon, for the
purpose of enhancing their survival.
Permit No. TE–035879
Applicant: Wildlands Incorporated,
Rocklin, California
The permittee requests an amendment
to take (harass by survey, capture,
handle, and release) the California tiger
salamander (Ambystoma californiense)
in conjunction with surveys throughout
the range of the species in California, for
the purpose of enhancing its survival.
Permit No. TE–809232
Applicant: Bio-West, Incorporated,
Logan, Utah
The applicant requests an amendment
to remove/reduce to possession
Nitrophila mohavensis (Amargosa
nitorphila) from Federal lands in
conjunction with research in Nye
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5867-5868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1729]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment for Bear Butte National Wildlife Refuge, South Dakota
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announce the
availability of our Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan (Plan),
Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) for Bear Butte National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). This Final
Plan describes how the Service intends to manage the Refuge for the
next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Plan may be obtained by writing to U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Division of Refuge Planning, P.O. Box 25486,
Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225; or by download from
https://mountain-prairie.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Spratt, at (303) 236-4366,
(303) 236-4792 (fax), or e-mail Michael_Spratt@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Refuge was established as a Limited-
interest Refuge in the late 1930s with the acquisition of easements
from private landowners, the State of South Dakota (State) and the War
Department (now transferred to the Bureau of Land Management at Fort
Meade), to maintain an area for ``migratory bird, wildlife
conservation, and other purposes.'' The Refuge is 374.20 acres and has
no fee title. The easement obtained from the State only applies to
lands below the ordinary high-water mark of the lake. A Cooperative
Agreement was entered into with the State on July 12, 1967, to
administer, operate, and maintain the Refuge pursuant to the rights and
interest in real property acquired by the United States, and more
particularly described in the easement agreements.
The draft Plan and EA was made available for public review and
comment following the announcement in the Federal Register on February
8, 2007 (72 FR 5990). The draft Plan and EA identified and evaluated
two alternatives for managing the Refuge for the next 15 years. Under
the No Action Alternative (Current Management), the Service would
continue to manage the Refuge within the parameters of the Cooperative
Agreement with South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks. Existing habitat
within the easement and all
[[Page 5868]]
public programs would continue to be administered and maintained by the
State. Current habitat and wildlife management practices would be
carried out by State Game, Fish, and Parks personnel and levels of
public use would remain the same. The facilities and activities
(hiking, picnicking, designated camping, fishing and a horse camp)
would remain the same.
Alternative B, the Proposed Action (Relinquish Easement to Current
Landowners), would take the Refuge out of the National Wildlife Refuge
System and transfer the easements to current landowners. Under this
Alternative, the habitat, public use, cultural resources and operations
would be managed by the landowners (primarily the State). The Service's
easement requirements would no longer exist. The Service would divest
its interest in the Refuge. This would be carried out within the 15-
year life of the Plan. Once the Plan was approved, the managing station
would work with the Division of Realty and the Division of Planning to
prepare a proposal to divest this Refuge. The proposal would be
submitted to the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission for concurrence
and then submitted for Congressional approval.
The Service evaluated whether or not to divest the Refuge. After
careful consideration of tribal concerns and issues raised by the
public, the Preferred Alternative was changed from Alternative B:
Proposed Action (Relinquish Easement to Current Landowners) to
Alternative A: No Action (Current Management). A large number of
comments were received from tribal governments expressing concern
regarding divesting this Limited-interest Refuge. While there was
recognition that the Service interests are extremely limited, there was
overwhelming support for the Service to continue its presence,
particularly in light of the National significance of Bear Butte itself
(not part of the Refuge). Therefore, the Refuge will continue to be
managed according to its 1967 Cooperative Agreement with the State.
According to Refuge Planning Policy (May 25, 2000), the Plan and EA
should be revised when significant new information becomes available.
This should occur every 15 years or sooner, if necessary. It is
important to note, that if conditions change, the Service could
reconsider actions approved in the Plan. If revisions were considered,
full disclosure through extensive public involvement utilizing the
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act and other
compliance procedures would be closely followed.
The Service is furnishing this Notice to advise other agencies and
the public of the availability of the final Plan and EA, to provide
information on the desired conditions for the Refuge, and to detail how
the Service will implement management strategies. Based on the review
and evaluation of the information contained in the EA, the Regional
Director has determined that implementation of the Final Plan does not
constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the
quality of the human environment within the meaning of Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act. Therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Dated: January 24, 2008.
Gary G. Mowad,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8-1729 Filed 1-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P