Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB-120 Series Airplanes, 5775-5776 [E8-1706]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2008 / Proposed Rules
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2008–0090;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–312–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by March
17, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model
747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD,
747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–
300, 747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F,
747SR, and 747SP series airplanes,
certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–28A2292, dated September
14, 2007.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to
certain operator maintenance documents to
include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR
91.403(c). For airplanes that have been
previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by these inspections, the
operator may not be able to accomplish the
inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c),
the operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (j) of this AD. The request
should include a description of changes to
the required inspections that will ensure the
continued operational safety of the airplane.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer.
We are issuing this AD to prevent
electrical current from flowing through
a motor operated valve (MOV) actuator
into a fuel tank, which could create a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:23 Jan 30, 2008
Jkt 214001
potential ignition source inside the fuel
tank. This condition, in combination
with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in a fuel tank explosion and consequent
loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless
already done.
Measurement and Corrective Action
(f) For all airplanes: Within 60 months
after the effective date of this AD,
measure the electrical bond resistance
between the MOV actuators and
airplane structure for the main, center,
and auxiliary fuel tanks as applicable,
and do all the applicable corrective
actions, by accomplishing all of the
applicable actions specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747–28A2292,
dated September 14, 2007. The
corrective actions must be accomplished
before further flight.
(g) For Model 747–400 series
airplanes identified in paragraph 1.A of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
28A2294, dated September 21, 2007:
Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, measure the electrical
bond resistance between the MOV
actuators and airplane structure for the
horizontal stabilizer fuel tanks, and do
all the applicable corrective actions, by
accomplishing all of the applicable
actions specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
service bulletin. The corrective actions
must be accomplished before further
flight.
Maintenance Program Revision
(h) For Model 747–100, 747–100B,
747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C,
747–200F, 747–300, 747SR, and 747SP
series airplanes: Concurrently with
accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (f) of this AD, revise the FAAapproved maintenance program by
incorporating AWL No. 28–AWL–21 of
Section D of the Boeing 747–100/200/
300/SP Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs) and Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs), D6–13747–CMR,
Revision January 2007. Accomplishing
the revision in accordance with a later
revision of Document D6–13747–CMR is
an acceptable method of compliance if
the revision is approved by the
Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA.
(i) For Model 747–400, 747–400D, and
747–400F series airplanes: Concurrently
with accomplishing the applicable
actions required by paragraph (f) and (g)
of this AD, revise the FAA-approved
maintenance program by incorporating
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5775
AWL No. 28–AWL–27 of Subsection D
of the Boeing 747–400 Maintenance
Planning Data (MPD) Document,
D621U400–9, Section 9, Revision
December 2006 R1. Accomplishing the
revision in accordance with a later
revision of the MPD is an acceptable
method of compliance if the revision is
approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO,
FAA.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA,
ATTN: Sulmo Mariano, Aerospace
Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM–
140S, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6501; fax (425) 917–6590; has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance
time for this AD, follow the procedures
in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in
the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
14, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–1705 Filed 1–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Directorate Identifier 2000–NM–120–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB–120 Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that proposed a new airworthiness
directive (AD), applicable to certain
EMBRAER Model EMB–120 series
airplanes. That action would have
required repetitive calibration testing of
potentiometers to detect noisy signals,
replacement of only those with noisy
signals, and reporting results of the
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
5776
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 21 / Thursday, January 31, 2008 / Proposed Rules
calibration tests of the potentiometers
and the readouts of the flight data
recorder (FDR) to the airplane
manufacturer. Since the issuance of the
NPRM, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) has determined
that while a noisy or defective
potentiometer may hamper the ability to
access certain aircraft data in support of
either an accident or incident
investigation or just general
maintenance activities, there is no direct
effect on the aircraft’s ability to be
operated safely. Accordingly, the
proposed rule is withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
add a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain EMBRAER Model
EMB–120 series airplanes, was
published in the Federal Register as a
second supplemental Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on
February 1, 2005 (70 FR 5070). The
proposed rule would have required
repetitive calibration testing of
potentiometers to detect noisy signals,
replacement of only those with noisy
signals, and reporting results of the
calibration tests of the potentiometers
and the readouts of the flight data
recorder (FDR) to the airplane
manufacturer. The proposed actions
were intended to prevent the
potentiometers that provide information
on the positions of the primary flight
controls to the FDR from transmitting
noisy signals or becoming improperly
calibrated, resulting in the transmission
of incomplete or inaccurate data to the
FDR.
ailerons, elevators, and rudder of the
subject airplanes, which is part of the
manufacturer’s recommended
maintenance program.
FAA’s Conclusions
Upon further consideration, the FAA
has determined that no unsafe condition
exists. Accordingly, the proposed rule is
hereby withdrawn.
Withdrawal of this second
supplemental NPRM constitutes only
such action, and does not preclude the
agency from issuing another action in
the future, nor does it commit the
agency to any course of action in the
future.
Regulatory Impact
Since this action only withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking, it is
neither a proposed nor a final rule and
therefore is not covered under Executive
Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, or DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, the second
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking, Directorate Identifier 2000–
NM–120–AD, published in the Federal
Register on February 1, 2005 (70 FR
5070), is withdrawn.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
15, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–1706 Filed 1–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Actions That Occurred Since the
Second Supplemental NPRM Was
Issued
Federal Aviation Administration
Since the issuance of the second
supplemental NPRM, the FAA has
determined that while a noisy or
defective potentiometer may hamper the
ability to access certain aircraft data in
support of either an accident or incident
investigation or just general
maintenance activities, there is no direct
effect on the aircraft’s ability to be
operated safely.
On December 7, 2007, we issued
Special Airworthiness Information
Bulletin (SAIB) NM–08/10 to
recommend calibrating, testing, and
replacing certain potentiometers to the
[Docket No. FAA–2007–29260; Airspace
Docket 07–ASO–24]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:23 Jan 30, 2008
Jkt 214001
14 CFR Part 71
Proposed Establishment of Class E
Airspace; Winona, MS
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action proposes to
establish Class E airspace at Winona,
MS. An Area Navigation (RNAV) Global
Positioning System (GPS) Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP)
Runways (RWY) 03–21 has been
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
developed for Winona-Montgomery
County Airport. As a result, controlled
airspace extending upward from 700
feet Above Ground Level (AGL) is
needed to contain the SIAP and for
Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations
at Winona-Montgomery County Airport.
The operating status of the airport will
change from Visual Flight Rules (VFR)
to include IFR operations concurrent
with the publication of the SIAP. This
action enhances the safety and airspace
management of Winona-Montgomery
County Airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 17. 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE. West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
1–800–647–5527. You must identify the
docket number FAA–2007–29260;
Airspace Docket 07–ASO–24, at the
beginning of your comments. You may
also submit comments on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov. You may
review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and
any final disposition in person in the
Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
An informal docket may also be
examined during normal business hours
at the office of the Eastern Service
Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, Room 210, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melinda Giddens, System Support,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, P.O. Box 20636,
Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–5610.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, view or
arguments as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above.
Those wishing the FAA to acknowledge
E:\FR\FM\31JAP1.SGM
31JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5775-5776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1706]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Directorate Identifier 2000-NM-120-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB-120 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that proposed a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain
EMBRAER Model EMB-120 series airplanes. That action would have required
repetitive calibration testing of potentiometers to detect noisy
signals, replacement of only those with noisy signals, and reporting
results of the
[[Page 5776]]
calibration tests of the potentiometers and the readouts of the flight
data recorder (FDR) to the airplane manufacturer. Since the issuance of
the NPRM, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has determined that
while a noisy or defective potentiometer may hamper the ability to
access certain aircraft data in support of either an accident or
incident investigation or just general maintenance activities, there is
no direct effect on the aircraft's ability to be operated safely.
Accordingly, the proposed rule is withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to add a new airworthiness
directive (AD), applicable to certain EMBRAER Model EMB-120 series
airplanes, was published in the Federal Register as a second
supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on February 1, 2005
(70 FR 5070). The proposed rule would have required repetitive
calibration testing of potentiometers to detect noisy signals,
replacement of only those with noisy signals, and reporting results of
the calibration tests of the potentiometers and the readouts of the
flight data recorder (FDR) to the airplane manufacturer. The proposed
actions were intended to prevent the potentiometers that provide
information on the positions of the primary flight controls to the FDR
from transmitting noisy signals or becoming improperly calibrated,
resulting in the transmission of incomplete or inaccurate data to the
FDR.
Actions That Occurred Since the Second Supplemental NPRM Was Issued
Since the issuance of the second supplemental NPRM, the FAA has
determined that while a noisy or defective potentiometer may hamper the
ability to access certain aircraft data in support of either an
accident or incident investigation or just general maintenance
activities, there is no direct effect on the aircraft's ability to be
operated safely.
On December 7, 2007, we issued Special Airworthiness Information
Bulletin (SAIB) NM-08/10 to recommend calibrating, testing, and
replacing certain potentiometers to the ailerons, elevators, and rudder
of the subject airplanes, which is part of the manufacturer's
recommended maintenance program.
FAA's Conclusions
Upon further consideration, the FAA has determined that no unsafe
condition exists. Accordingly, the proposed rule is hereby withdrawn.
Withdrawal of this second supplemental NPRM constitutes only such
action, and does not preclude the agency from issuing another action in
the future, nor does it commit the agency to any course of action in
the future.
Regulatory Impact
Since this action only withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking,
it is neither a proposed nor a final rule and therefore is not covered
under Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, or DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, the second supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking,
Directorate Identifier 2000-NM-120-AD, published in the Federal
Register on February 1, 2005 (70 FR 5070), is withdrawn.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 15, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-1706 Filed 1-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P