Announcement of Value-Added Producer Grant Application Deadlines, 5157-5167 [E8-1532]

Download as PDF sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices considered to pose an even greater threat to trees and forested areas. Unlike the flightless European gypsy moth female adult, the Asian gypsy moth female adult is capable of strong directed flight between mating and egg deposition, significantly increasing its ability to spread over a much greater area and become widely established within a short time. To determine the presence and extent of a European gypsy moth or an Asian gypsy moth infestation, we set traps in high-risk areas to collect specimens. Once an infestation is identified, control and eradication work (usually involving State cooperation) is initiated to eliminate the moths. APHIS personnel, with assistance from State agriculture personnel, check traps for the presence of gypsy moths. If a suspicious moth is found in the trap, it is sent to APHIS laboratories at the Otis Methods Development Center in Massachusetts so that it can be correctly identified through DNA analysis. (Since the European gypsy moth and the Asian gypsy moth are strains of the same species, they cannot be visually distinguished from each other. DNA analysis is the only way to accurately identify these insects.) The PPQ or State employee submitting the moth for analysis completes a gypsy moth identification worksheet (PPQ Form 305), which accompanies the insect to the laboratory. The worksheet enables both Federal and State regulatory officials to identify and track specific specimens through the DNA identification tests that we conduct. The information provided by the gypsy moth identification worksheets is vital to our ability to monitor, detect, and eradicate gypsy moth infestations. We are asking the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve our use of this information collection activity for an additional 3 years. The purpose of this notice is to solicit comments from the public (as well as affected agencies) concerning our information collection. These comments will help us: (1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the information collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 (4) Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who are to respond, through use, as appropriate, of automated, electronic, mechanical, and other collection technologies, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Estimate of burden: The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.1708 hours per response. Respondents: State cooperators. Estimated annual number of respondents: 120. Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 2. Estimated annual number of responses: 240. Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 41 hours. (Due to averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per response.) All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also become a matter of public record. 5157 for FY 2008 grant funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2008 grant funding. Electronic copies must be received by March 31, 2008, to be eligible for FY 2008 grant funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2008 grant funding. An application guide and other materials may be obtained at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/ vadg.htm or by contacting the applicant’s USDA Rural Development State Office. The State Office can be reached by calling (202) 720–4323 and pressing ‘‘1.’’ Paper applications must be submitted to the Rural Development State Office for the State in which the Project will primarily take place. Addresses are as follows: ADDRESSES: Alabama USDA Rural Development, Sterling Centre, Suite 601, 4121 Carmichael Road, Montgomery, AL 36106–3683, (334) 279– 3623. Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of January 2008. Kevin Shea, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. E8–1529 Filed 1–28–08; 8:45 am] Alaska BILLING CODE 3410–34–P USDA Rural Development, 230 North First Avenue, Suite 206, Phoenix, AZ 85003– 1706, (602) 280–8717. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Arkansas Rural Business-Cooperative Service USDA Rural Development, 700 West Capitol Avenue, Room 3416, Little Rock, AR 72201–3225, (501) 301–3280. Announcement of Value-Added Producer Grant Application Deadlines Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of solicitation of applications. AGENCY: The Rural BusinessCooperative Service (RBS) announces the availability of approximately $18.4 million in competitive grant funds for fiscal year (FY) 2008 to help independent agricultural producers enter into value-added activities. Awards may be made for planning activities or for working capital expenses, but not for both. The maximum grant amount for a planning grant is $100,000 and the maximum grant amount for a working capital grant is $300,000. DATES: Applications for grants must be submitted on paper or electronically according to the following deadlines: Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent overnight no later than March 31, 2008, to be eligible SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 USDA Rural Development, 800 West Evergreen, Suite 201, Palmer, AK 99645– 6539, (907) 761–7722. Arizona California USDA Rural Development, 430 G Street, AGCY 4169, Davis, CA 95616, (530) 792– 5829. Colorado USDA Rural Development, 655 Parfet Street, Room E–100, Lakewood, CO 80215, (720) 544–2903. Connecticut USDA Rural Development, 451 West Street, Suite 2, Amherst, MA 01002–2999, (413) 253–4319. Delaware USDA Rural Development, 1221 College Park Drive, Suite 200, Dover, DE 19904, (302) 857–3580. Florida USDA Rural Development, 4440 NW. 25th Place, Gainesville, FL 32606, (352) 338– 3482. Georgia USDA Rural Development, 111 East Spring St., Monroe, GA 30655, (770) 267–1413, Ext. 113. E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 5158 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices Hawaii USDA Rural Development, Federal Building, Room 311, 154 Waianuenue Avenue, Hilo, HI 96720, (808) 933–8313. Nebraska USDA Rural Development, 100 Centennial Mall North, Room 152, Federal Building, Lincoln, NE 68508, (402) 437–5554. South Dakota USDA Rural Development, Federal Building, Room 210, 200 4th Street, SW., Huron, SD 57350, (605) 352–1142. Idaho USDA Rural Development, 9173 West Barnes Drive, Suite A1, Boise, ID 83709, (208) 378–5623. Nevada USDA Rural Development, 1390 S. Curry St., Carson City, NV 89703, (775) 887–1222, Ext. 19. Tennessee USDA Rural Development, 3322 West End Avenue, Suite 300, Nashville, TN 37203– 1084, (615) 783–1341. Illinois USDA Rural Development, 2118 West Park Court, Suite A, Champaign, IL 61821, (217) 403–6202. New Hampshire USDA Rural Development, City Center, 3rd Floor, 89 Main Street, Montpelier, VT 05602, (802) 828–6069. Texas USDA Rural Development, 101 South Main Street, Suite 102, Temple, TX 76501, (254) 742–9780. Indiana USDA Rural Development, 5975 Lakeside Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46278, (317) 290– 3100. New Jersey USDA Rural Development, 8000 Midlantic Drive, Suite 500N, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054, (856) 787–7753. Iowa USDA Rural Development, 873 Federal Building, 210 Walnut Street, Des Moines, IA 50309, (515) 284–4714. New Mexico USDA Rural Development, 6200 Jefferson Street, NE., Room 255, Albuquerque, NM 87109, (505) 761–4952. Utah USDA Rural Development, Wallace F. Bennett Federal Building, 125 South State Street, Room 4311, Salt Lake City, UT 84138, (801) 524–4328. Kansas USDA Rural Development, 1303 SW. First American Place, Suite 100, Topeka, KS 66604–4040, (785) 271–2744. New York USDA Rural Development, 441 S. Salina St., Suite 357, Syracuse, NY 13202, (315) 477– 6400. Kentucky USDA Rural Development, 771 Corporate Drive, Suite 200, Lexington, KY 40503, (859) 224–7435. North Carolina USDA Rural Development, 4405 Bland Road, Suite 260, Raleigh, NC 27609, (919) 873– 2040. Louisiana USDA Rural Development, 3727 Government St., Alexandria, LA 71302, (318) 473–7960. North Dakota USDA Rural Development, Federal Building, Room 208, 220 East Rosser Avenue, P.O. Box 1737, Bismarck, ND 58502–1737, (701) 530–2065. Maine USDA Rural Development, 967 Illinois Avenue, Suite 4, P.O. Box 405, Bangor, ME 04402–0405, (207) 990–9168. Maryland USDA Rural Development, 1221 College Park Drive, Suite 200, Dover, DE 19904, (302) 857–3580. Massachusetts USDA Rural Development, 451 West Street, Suite 2, Amherst, MA 01002–2999, (413) 253–4319. Michigan USDA Rural Development, 3001 Coolidge Road, Suite 200, East Lansing, MI 48823, (517) 324–5157. Minnesota USDA Rural Development, 375 Jackson St., Suite 410, St. Paul, MN 55101, (651) 602– 7814. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Mississippi USDA Rural Development, Federal Building, Suite 831, 100 West Capitol Street, Jackson, MS 39269, (601) 965–5457. Missouri USDA Rural Development, 601 Business Loop 70 West, Parkade Center, Suite 235, Columbia, MO 65203, (573) 876–9320. Montana USDA Rural Development, 900 Technology Blvd., Suite B, P.O. Box 850, Bozeman, MT 59771, (406) 585–2540. VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 Vermont USDA Rural Development, City Center, 3rd Floor, 89 Main Street, Montpelier, VT 05602, (802) 828–6069. Virgin Islands USDA Rural Development, 4440 NW. 25th Place, P.O. Box 147010, Gainesville, FL 32606, (352) 338–3482. Virginia USDA Rural Development, 1606 Santa Rosa Road, Suite 238, Richmond, VA 23229, (804) 287–1594. Washington USDA Rural Development, 1835 Black Lake Blvd. SW., Suite B, Olympia, WA 98512, (360) 704–7729. Ohio USDA Rural Development, Federal Building, Room 507, 200 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43215–2418, (614) 255– 2425. West Virginia USDA Rural Development, 75 High Street, Room 320, Morgantown, WV 26505–7500, (304) 252–8644, Ext. 146. Oklahoma USDA Rural Development, 100 USDA, Suite 108, Stillwater, OK 74074–2654, (405) 742– 1036. Wisconsin USDA Rural Development, 4949 Kirschling Court, Stevens Point, WI 54481, (715) 345– 7610. Oregon USDA Rural Development, 1201 NE. Lloyd Blvd., Suite 801, Portland, OR 97232–1274, (503) 414–3366. Wyoming USDA Rural Development, Dick Cheney Federal Building, 100 East B Street, Room 1005, P.O. Box 11005, Casper, WY 82602– 5006, (307) 233–6700. Pennsylvania USDA Rural Development, One Credit Union Place, Suite 330, Harrisburg, PA 17110– 2996, (717) 237–2182 . Puerto Rico USDA Rural Development, IBM Building, 654 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 601, Hato Rey, PR 00918–6106, (787) 766–5091, Ext. 251. Rhode Island USDA Rural Development, 451 West Street, Suite 2, Amherst, MA 01002–2999, (413) 253–4319. South Carolina USDA Rural Development, Strom Thurmond Federal Building, 1835 Assembly Street, Room 1007, Columbia, SC 29201, (803) 765–5881. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Electronic applications must be submitted through the Grants.gov Web site at: https://www.grants.gov, following the instructions found on this Web site. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Applicants should visit the program Web site at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/ rbs/coops/vadg.htm, which contains application guidance, including Frequently Asked Questions and an Application Guide. Or applicants may contact their USDA Rural Development State Office. The State Office can be reached by calling (202) 720–4323 and pressing ‘‘1,’’ or by selecting the Contact Information link at the above Web site. Applicants are encouraged to contact their State Offices well in advance of the E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices deadline to discuss their projects and ask any questions about the application process. Also, applicants may submit drafts of their applications to their State Offices for a preliminary review anytime prior to February 15, 2008. The preliminary review will only assess the eligibility of the application and its completeness. The results of the preliminary review are not binding on the Agency. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Overview Federal Agency: USDA Rural Development. Funding Opportunity Title: ValueAdded Producer Grants. Announcement Type: Initial announcement. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 10.352. Dates: Application Deadline: Applications for grants must be submitted on paper or electronically according to the following deadlines: Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent overnight no later than March 31, 2008 to be eligible for FY 2008 grant funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2008 grant funding. Electronic copies must be received by March 31, 2008 to be eligible for FY 2008 grant funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2008 grant funding. I. Funding Opportunity Description This solicitation is issued pursuant to section 231 of the Agriculture Risk Protection Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–224) as amended by section 6401 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–171 (see 7 U.S.C. 1621 note)) authorizing the establishment of the Value-Added Agricultural Product Market Development grants, also known as Value-Added Producer Grants. The Secretary of Agriculture has delegated the program’s administration to USDA Rural Development Cooperative Programs. The primary objective of this grant program is to help Independent Producers of Agricultural Commodities, Agriculture Producer Groups, Farmer and Rancher Cooperatives, and Majority-Controlled Producer-Based Business Ventures develop strategies to create marketing opportunities and to help develop Business Plans for viable marketing opportunities regarding production of bio-based products from agricultural commodities. Cooperative Programs will competitively award funds for Planning Grants and Working Capital Grants. In order to provide VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 program benefits to as many eligible applicants as possible, applicants must apply only for a Planning Grant or for a Working Capital Grant, but not both. Applicants other than Independent Producers must limit their Projects to Emerging Markets. Grants will only be awarded if Projects are determined to be economically viable and sustainable. No more than 10 percent of program funds can go to applicants that are MajorityControlled Producer-Based Business Ventures. It should also be noted that businesses of all sizes may apply and that there is no restriction on the minimum grant size that will be awarded. In FY 2007, 35 percent of awards were $50,000 or less. Definitions The definitions at 7 CFR 4284.3 and 4284.904 are incorporated by reference. In addition, the Agency uses the following terms in this NOSA: Agricultural Commodity, Bio-energy Project, Biomass, Business Plan, Conflict of Interest, Farm or Ranch, Feasibility Study, Project, Renewable Energy, and Venture. It is the Agency’s position that those terms are defined as follows. Agricultural Commodity—An unprocessed product of farms, ranches, nurseries, and forests. Agricultural Commodities include: Livestock, poultry, and fish; fruits and vegetables; grains, such as wheat, barley, oats, rye, triticale, rice, corn, and sorghum; legumes, such as field beans and peas; animal feed and forage crops; seed crops; fiber crops, such as cotton; oil crops, such as safflower, sunflower, corn, and cottonseed; trees grown for lumber and wood products; nursery stock grown commercially; Christmas trees; ornamentals and cut flowers; and turf grown commercially for sod. Agricultural Commodities do not include horses or animals raised as pets, such as cats, dogs, and ferrets. Bio-energy Project—A Renewable Energy system that produces fuel, thermal energy, or electric power from a Biomass source. Biomass—Any organic material that is available on a renewable or recurring basis, including agricultural crops; trees grown for energy production; wood waste and wood residues; plants, including aquatic plants and grasses; fibers; animal waste and other waste materials; and fats, oils, and greases, including recycled fats, oils, and greases. It does not include paper that is commonly recycled or un-segregated solid waste. Business Plan—A plan for Venture implementation that includes key PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5159 management personnel, business location, the financial package, product flow, and possible customers. It also includes at least three years of pro forma financial statements. The plan is usually developed by the business with assistance from third parties. Conflict of Interest—A situation in which a person or entity has competing professional or personal interests that make it difficult for the person or business to act impartially. An example of a Conflict of Interest is a grant recipient or an employee of a recipient that conducts or significantly participates in conducting a Feasibility Study for the recipient. Farm or Ranch—Any place from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products (crops and livestock) were raised and sold or normally would have been raised and sold during the previous year. Feasibility Study—An independent, third party analysis that shows how the Venture would operate under a set of assumptions—the technology used (the facilities, equipment, production process, etc.), the qualifications of the management team, and the financial aspects (capital needs, volume, cost of goods, wages, etc.). The analysis should answer the following questions about the Venture. (1) Where is it now? (2) Where does the group want to go? (3) Why does the group want to go forward with the Venture? (4) How will the group accomplish the Venture? (5) What resources are needed? (6) Who will provide assistance? (7) When will the Venture be completed? (8) How much will the Venture cost? (9) What are the risks? Project—Includes all proposed activities to be funded by the VAPG and Matching Funds. Renewable Energy—Energy derived from a wind, solar, biomass, or geothermal source; or hydrogen derived from biomass or water using wind, solar, biomass, or geothermal energy sources. Venture—Includes the Project and any other activities related to the production, processing, and marketing of the Value-Added product that is the subject of the VAPG grant request. II. Award Information Type of Award: Grant. Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2008. Approximate Total Funding: $18.4 million. Approximate Number of Awards: 130. Approximate Average Award: $140,000. E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 5160 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices Floor of Award Range: None. Ceiling of Award Range: $100,000 for Planning Grants and $300,000 for Working Capital Grants. Anticipated Award Date: September 1, 2008. Budget Period Length: 12 months. Project Period Length: 12 months. III. Eligibility Information A. Eligible Applicants Applicants must be an Independent Producer, Agriculture Producer Group, Farmer or Rancher Cooperative, or Majority-Controlled Producer-Based Business Venture as defined in 7 CFR part 4284, subpart A. If the applicant is an unincorporated group (steering committee), it must form a legal entity before grant funds can be obligated. Please note that a steering committee may only apply as an Independent Producer. Therefore, the steering committee must be composed of 100 percent Independent Producers and the business to be formed must meet the definition of Independent Producer. Entities that contract out the production of an Agricultural Commodity are not considered Independent Producers. In addition, note that Farmer or Rancher Cooperatives that are 100 percent owned by farmers and ranchers are not considered under the Independent Producer category; these applicants must apply as Farmer or Rancher Cooperatives. It is the Agency’s position that if a cooperative is 100 percent owned and controlled by agricultural harvesters (e.g., fishermen, loggers), it is eligible only as an Independent Producer and not as a Farmer- or Rancher-Cooperative. If a cooperative is not 100 percent owned and controlled by farmers and ranchers or 100 percent owned and controlled by agricultural harvesters, it may still be eligible to apply as a Majority-Controlled Producer-Based Business Venture, provided it meets the definition in 7 CFR part 4284, subpart A. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES B. Cost Sharing or Matching Matching Funds are required. Applicants must verify in their applications that Matching Funds are available for the time period of the grant. Matching Funds must be at least equal to the amount of grant funds requested. Unless provided by other authorizing legislation, other Federal grant funds cannot be used as Matching Funds. Matching Funds must be spent at a rate equal to or greater than the rate at which grant funds are expended. Matching Funds must be provided by either the applicant or by a third party in the form of cash or in-kind VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 contributions. Matching Funds must be spent on eligible expenses and must be from eligible sources. C. Other Eligibility Requirements Product Eligibility: The project proposed must involve a Value-Added product as defined in 7 CFR part 4284, subpart A. The definition of ValueAdded includes four categories that increase the value that is realized by the producer from an Agricultural Commodity or product as the result of: 1. A change in its physical state; 2. Differentiated production or marketing, as demonstrated in a Business Plan; 3. Product segregation; or 4. The economic benefit realized from the production of Farm- or Ranch-based Renewable Energy. Purpose Eligibility: The application must specify whether grant funds are requested for planning activities or for working capital. Applicants may not request funds for both types of activities in one application. Applications requesting more than the maximum grant amount will be considered ineligible. Please note that working capital expenses are not considered eligible for Planning Grants and planning expenses are not considered eligible for Working Capital Grants. It is the Agency’s position that applicants other than Independent Producers applying for a Working Capital Grant must demonstrate that the venture has not been in operation more than two years at the time of application in order to show that they are entering an Emerging Market. Grant Period Eligibility: Applications that have a timeframe of more than 365 days will be considered ineligible. Applications that request funds for a time period beginning prior to October 1, 2008 and/or ending after November 30, 2009, will be considered ineligible. Multiple Grant Eligibility: An applicant can only submit one application per funding cycle. Applicants who have already received a Planning Grant for the proposed Project cannot receive another Planning Grant for the same Project. Applicants who have already received a Working Capital Grant for a Project cannot receive any additional grants for that Project. Current Grant Eligibility: If an applicant currently has a VAPG, that grant period must be scheduled to expire by November 30, 2008. Judgment Eligibility: In accordance with 7 CFR part 4284.6. PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 IV. Application and Submission Information A. Address To Request Application Package The application package for applying on paper for this funding opportunity can be obtained at https:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/ vadg.htm. Alternatively, applicants may contact their USDA Rural Development State Office. The State Office can be reached by calling (202) 720–4323 and pressing ‘‘1.’’ For electronic applications, applicants must visit https://www.grants.gov and follow the instructions. B. Content and Form of Submission Applications must be submitted on paper or electronically. An Application Guide may be viewed at https:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/ vadg.htm. It is strongly recommended that applicants use the template provided on the Web site. The template can be filled out electronically and printed out for submission with the required forms for a paper submission or it can be filled out electronically and submitted as an attachment through Grants.gov. If an application is submitted on paper, one signed original of the complete application must be submitted. If the application is submitted electronically, the applicant must follow the instructions given at https:// www.grants.gov. Applicants are strongly advised to visit the site well in advance of the application deadline if they plan to apply electronically to insure that they have obtained the proper authentication and have sufficient computer resources to complete the application. Applicants must complete and submit the following elements. Please note that the requirements in the following locations within 7 CFR part 4284 have been combined with other requirements to simplify the application and reduce duplication: Sec. 4284.910(b)(5)(i), Sec. 4284.910(b)(5)(ii), and Sec. 4284.910(b)(5)(iv). The Agency will conduct an initial screening of all application for eligibility and to determine whether the application is complete and sufficiently responsive to the requirements set forth in this Notice to allow for an informed review. Information submitted as part of the application will be protected from disclosure to the extent permitted by law. 1. Form SF–424, ‘‘Application for Federal Assistance.’’ The form must be completed, signed and submitted as part E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices of the application package. Please note that applicants are required to have an Employer Identification Number (or a Social Security Number if the applicant is an individual or steering committee) and a DUNS number (unless the applicant is an individual). The DUNS number is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities. To obtain a DUNS number, access https://www.dnb.com/us, or call (866) 705–5711. Additional information on the VAPG program can be obtained at https:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/ vadg.htm or by contacting the applicant’s Rural Development State Office. The State Office can be reached by calling (202) 720–4323 and pressing ‘‘1.’’ 2. Form SF–424A, ‘‘Budget Information—Non-Construction Programs.’’ This form must be completed and submitted as part of the application package. 3. Form SF–424B, ‘‘Assurances—NonConstruction Programs.’’ This form must be completed, signed, and submitted as part of the application package. 4. Title Page (limited to one page). The title page must include the title of the project and may include other relevant identifying information. 5. Table of Contents. For ease of locating information, each application must contain a detailed Table of Contents (TOC) immediately following the title page. 6. Executive Summary (limited to one page). The Executive Summary should briefly describe the Project, including goals, tasks to be completed and other relevant information that provides a general overview of the Project. In this element, the applicant must clearly state whether the application is for a Planning Grant or a Working Capital Grant and the grant amount requested. 7. Eligibility Discussion (limited to four pages). The applicant must describe in detail how the eligibility requirements are met. i. Applicant Eligibility. The applicant must first describe how it meets the definition of an Independent Producer, Agriculture Producer Group, Farmer or Rancher Cooperative, or a MajorityControlled Producer-Based Business Venture as defined in 7 CFR 4284.3. The applicant must apply in only one of the following categories. It is the Agency’s position that an applicant must provide information that it meets all of the requirements in the selected category in order to be eligible in that category. a. Independent Producer. The application must provide the following information: VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 1. A discussion of how 100 percent of the owners of the applicant organization meet the definition of an Independent Producer; 2. A discussion that demonstrates these owners currently own and produce more than 50 percent of the raw commodity that will be used for the Value-Added product; and 3. A discussion that demonstrates the product will be owned by the Independent Producers from its raw commodity state through the production of the Value-Added product during the Project. b. Agriculture Producer Group. The application must provide the following information: 1. The mission of the applicant, including how the organization works on behalf of Independent Producers; 2. A statement demonstrating that the majority of the applicant’s membership and board of directors meet the definition of Independent Producer; 3. An identification (either by name or by class) of the Independent Producers on whose behalf the work will be done; 4. A discussion demonstrating that these Independent Producers currently own and produce more than 50 percent of the raw commodity that will be used for the Value-Added product; and 5. A discussion demonstrating that the Value-Added product will be owned by the Independent Producers from its raw commodity state through the production of the Value-Added product during the Project. Note that applicants tentatively selected for a grant award must verify that the work will be done on behalf of the Independent Producers identified in the application. c. Farmer or Rancher Cooperative. The application must provide the following information: 1. The applicant must reference the business’ good standing as a cooperative in its state of incorporation; 2. The applicant must also explain how the cooperative is 100 percent owned and controlled by farmers and ranchers; 3. If the applicant is applying on behalf of only a portion of its membership, that portion must be identified, and the applicant must explain how all members in this portion of its membership meet the definition of an Independent Producer; 4. A discussion demonstrating that these Independent Producers currently own and produce more than 50 percent of the raw commodity that will be used for the Value-Added product; and 5. A discussion demonstrating that the Value-Added product will be owned by the Independent Producers from its PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5161 raw commodity state through the production of the Value-Added product during the Project. d. Majority-Controlled ProducerBased Business Venture. The application must provide the following information: 1. A statement demonstrating that the majority of the number of owners of the applicant organization meets the definition of an Independent Producer; 2. A statement demonstrating that the majority of the financial interest in the applicant organization is owned by Independent Producers; 3. A statement demonstrating that the majority of voting members on the governing board meets the definition of Independent Producer; 4. A discussion demonstrating that these Independent Producers currently own and produce more than 50 percent of the raw commodity that will be used for the Value-Added product; and 5. A discussion demonstrating that the Value-Added product will be owned by the Independent Producers from its raw commodity state through the production of the Value-Added product during the Project. ii. Product Eligibility. The applicant must next describe how the ValueAdded product to be produced meets at least one of the categories in the definition of Value-Added as defined in 7 CFR part 4284, subpart A. Regardless of category, the applicant must describe the raw commodity that will be used, the process used to add value, and the Value-Added product that will be marketed. a. Change in physical state. The application must explain how the change in physical state or form of the product enhances its value. A change in physical state is only achieved if the product cannot be returned to its original state. Examples of this type of product include: Fish fillets, diced tomatoes, ethanol, bio-diesel, and wool rugs. Common production or harvesting methods are not considered ValueAdded. The following examples are not eligible under this category: Dehydrated corn, raw fiber, and cut flowers. b. Differentiated production or marketing (as demonstrated in a Business Plan). The application must explain how the production or marketing of the commodity enhances its value. The enhancement of value must be quantified by using a comparison with products produced or marketed in the standard manner, using information from the Feasibility Study and Business Plan developed for the Venture. Examples of this type of product include: Organic carrots, identity-preserved apples, and branded E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES 5162 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices milk. The following example is not eligible under this category: Marketing a non-standard variety of produce. Also, a Business Plan that has been developed for the applicant for the Venture must be referenced by indicating who developed the Business Plan and when it was completed. c. Physical segregation. The application must explain how the physical segregation of a commodity enhances its value. The enhancement of value should be quantified to the extent possible by using a comparison with products marketed without segregation. Applicants must demonstrate that a physical barrier (i.e. distance or a structure) separates the commodity from other varieties of the same commodity during production, that the commodity will continue to be separated during processing, and that the Value-Added product produced will be separated from similar products during marketing. An example of this type of product is non-genetically-modified corn that is produced on the same Farm as genetically-modified corn where an increase in incremental value is realized for either one or both of the types of corn that is attributed to physical segregation. The following examples are not eligible under this category: Livestock sorted by grade, produce sorted by size or grade. d. Farm- or ranch-based renewable energy. The application must explain how the Renewable Energy will be generated on a Farm or a Ranch owned or leased by the owners of the Venture. Please note that the owners/leasers of the Farm or Ranch must currently produce an Agricultural Commodity on the Farm or Ranch and the Farm or Ranch must meet the definition of a Farm or a Ranch as defined in the ‘‘Definitions’’ section of this notice. Examples of this type of product are wind energy, solar energy, and anaerobic digesters. The following examples are not eligible under this category: Any type of fuel, such as ethanol, bio-diesel, and switchgrass pellets, that is not generated on a Farm or Ranch owned or leased by the owners of the Venture. iii. Purpose Eligibility. The applicant must describe how the Project purpose is eligible for funding. The project purpose is comprised of two components. First, the applicant must describe how the proposed Project consists of eligible planning activities or eligible working capital activities. Second, the applicant must demonstrate that the activities are directly related to the processing and/or marketing of a Value-Added product. VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 Applicants applying for a Working Capital Grants, must reference a thirdparty, independent Feasibility Study and a Business Plan completed specifically for the proposed Venture. The reference must include the name of the party who conducted the Feasibility Study and developed the Business Plan as well as the dates the Feasibility Study and Business Plan were completed. Applicants applying for Working Capital Grants, and which are an Agriculture Producer Group, a Farmer or Rancher Cooperative, or a MajorityControlled Producer-Based Business Venture, must also demonstrate that the proposed Venture has been in operation for less than two years at the time of application, in order to show that the applicant is entering an Emerging Market. 8. Proposal Narrative (limited to 35 pages). i. Goals of the Project. The application must include a clear statement of the ultimate goals of the Project. There must be an explanation of how a market will be expanded and the degree to which incremental revenue will accrue to the benefit of the Agricultural Producer(s). ii. Performance Evaluation Criteria. Applicants applying for Planning Grants must suggest at least one criterion by which their performance under a grant could be evaluated. Applicants applying for Working Capital Grants must identify the projected increase in customer base, revenue accruing to Independent Producers, and number of jobs attributed to the Project. Working capital projects with significant energy components must also identify the projected increase in capacity (e.g. gallons of ethanol produced annually, megawatt hours produced annually) attributed to the Project. Please note that these criteria are different from the Proposal Evaluation Criteria and are a separate requirement. iii. Proposal Evaluation Criteria. Each of the proposal evaluation criteria referenced in this funding announcement must be addressed, specifically and individually, in narrative form. Applications that do not address the appropriate criteria (Planning Grant applications must address Planning Grant evaluation criteria and Working Capital Grant applications must address Working Capital Grant evaluation criteria) will be considered ineligible. 9. Certification of Matching Funds. Applicants must certify that Matching Funds will be available at the same time grant funds are anticipated to be spent and that Matching Funds will be spent in advance of grant funding, such that for every dollar of grant funds advanced, PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 not less than an equal amount of Matching Funds will have been expended prior to submitting the request for reimbursement. Please note that this certification is a separate requirement from the verification of Matching Funds requirement. Applicants must include a statement for this section that reads as follows: ‘‘[INSERT NAME OF APPLICANT] certifies that matching funds will be available at the same time grant funds are anticipated to be spent and that matching funds will be spent in advance of grant funding, such that for every dollar of grant funds advanced, not less than an equal amount of matching funds will have been expended prior to submitting the request for reimbursement.’’ A separate signature is not required. 10. Verification of Matching Funds. Applicants must provide documentation of all proposed Matching Funds, both cash and in-kind. The documentation below must be included in the Appendix. i. Matching Funds provided by the applicant in cash. A copy of a bank statement with an ending date within one month of the application submission and showing an ending balance equal to or greater than the amount of cash Matching Funds proposed is required. ii. Matching Funds provided through a loan or line of credit. The applicant must include a signed letter from the lending institution verifying the amount available, the purposes for which funds may be used, and the time period of availability of the funds. Specific dates (month/day/year) corresponding to the proposed grant period or to dates within the grant period when matching funds will be made available, must be included. iii. Matching Funds provided by the applicant through an in-kind contribution. The application must include a signed letter from the applicant verifying the goods or services to be donated, the value of the goods or services, and when the goods and services will be donated. Specific dates (month/day/year) corresponding to the proposed grant period or to dates within the grant period when matching contributions will be made available, must be included. Please note that if the applicant organization is purchasing goods or services for the grant (e.g. salaries, inventory), the contribution is considered a cash contribution and must be verified as described in paragraph i. above. Also, if an owner or employee of the applicant organization is donating goods or services, the contribution is considered a third-party E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices in-kind contribution and must be verified as described in paragraph v. below. iv. Matching Funds provided by a third party in cash. The application must include a signed letter from that third party verifying how much cash will be donated and when it will be donated. Specific dates (month/day/ year) corresponding to the proposed grant period or to dates within the grant period when matching funds will be made available, must be included. v. Matching Funds provided by a third party in-kind donation. The application must include a signed letter from the third party verifying the goods or services to be donated, the value of the goods or services, and when the goods and services will be donated. Specific dates (month/day/year) corresponding to the proposed grant period or to dates within the grant period when matching contributions will be made available, must be included. Verification for cash or in-kind contributions donated outside the proposed time period of the grant will not be accepted. Verification for in-kind contributions that are over-valued will not be accepted. The valuation process for the in-kind funds does not need to be included in the application, especially if it is lengthy, but the applicant must be able to demonstrate how the valuation was achieved at the time of notification of tentative selection for the grant award. If the applicant cannot satisfactorily demonstrate how the valuation was determined, the grant award may be withdrawn or the amount of the grant may be reduced. If Matching Funds are in cash, they must be spent on goods and services that are eligible expenditures for this grant program. If Matching Funds are inkind contributions, the donated goods or services must be considered eligible expenditures for this grant program. Matching Funds must be spent or donated during the grant period and the funds must be expended at a rate equal to or greater than the rate grant funds are expended. Some examples of acceptable uses for matching funds are: Skilled labor performing work required for the proposed Project, office supplies, and purchasing inventory. Some examples of unacceptable uses of matching funds are: Real property, fixed equipment, buildings, and vehicles. Expected program income may not be used to fulfill the Matching Funds requirement at the time of application. If program income is earned during the time period of the grant, it is subject to the requirements of 7 CFR part 3015, subpart F and 7 CFR 3019.24 and any provisions in the Grant Agreement. VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 C. Submission Dates and Times Application Deadline Date: March 31, 2008. Explanation of Deadlines: Paper applications must be postmarked by the deadline date (see Section IV.F. for the address). Final electronic applications must be received by Grants.gov by the deadline date. If an application does not meet the deadline above, it will not be considered for funding. Applicants will be notified that their applications did not meet the submission deadline. D. Intergovernmental Review of Applications Executive Order (EO) 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs, applies to this program. This EO requires that Federal agencies provide opportunities for consultation on proposed assistance with State and local governments. Many states have established a Single Point of Contact (SPOC) to facilitate this consultation. A list of states that maintain an SPOC may be obtained at https:// www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/ spoc.html. If an applicant’s state has an SPOC, the applicant may submit the application directly for review. Any comments obtained through the SPOC must be provided to Rural Development for consideration as part of the application. If the applicant’s state has not established an SPOC, or the applicant does not want to submit the application, Rural Development will submit the application to the SPOC or other appropriate agency or agencies. Applicants are also encouraged to contact their Rural Development State Office for assistance and questions on this process. The Rural Development State Office can be reached by calling (202) 720–4323 and selecting option ‘‘1’’ or by viewing the following Web site: https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/. E. Funding Restrictions Funding restrictions apply to both grant funds and matching funds. Funds may only be used for planning activities or working capital for Projects focusing on processing and marketing a valueadded product. 1. Examples of acceptable planning activities include: i. Obtaining legal advice and assistance related to the proposed Venture; ii. Conducting a Feasibility Study of a proposed Value-Added Venture to help determine the potential marketing success of the Venture; iii. Developing a Business Plan that provides comprehensive details on the management, planning, and other PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5163 operational aspects of a proposed Venture; and iv. Developing a marketing plan for the proposed Value-Added product, including the identification of a market window, the identification of potential buyers, a description of the distribution system, and possible promotional campaigns. 2. Examples of acceptable working capital uses include: i. Designing or purchasing an accounting system for the proposed Venture; ii. Paying for salaries, utilities, and rental of office space; iii. Purchasing inventory, office equipment (e.g., computers, printers, copiers, scanners), and office supplies (e.g., paper, pens, file folders); and iv. Conducting a marketing campaign for the proposed Value-Added product. 3. No funds made available under this solicitation shall be used to: i. Plan, repair, rehabilitate, acquire, or construct a building or facility, including a processing facility; ii. Purchase, rent, or install fixed equipment, including processing equipment; iii. Purchase vehicles, including boats; iv. Pay for the preparation of the grant application; v. Pay expenses not directly related to the funded Venture; vi. Fund political or lobbying activities; vii. Fund any activities prohibited by 7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019; viii. Fund architectural or engineering design work for a specific physical facility; ix. Fund any expenses related to the production of any commodity or product to which value will be added, including seed, rootstock, labor for harvesting the crop, and delivery of the commodity to a processing facility. The Agency considers these expenses to be ineligible because the intent of the program is to assist producers with marketing value-added products rather than producing Agricultural Commodities; x. Fund research and development; xi. Purchase land; xii. Duplicate current services or replace or substitute support previously provided; xiii. Pay costs of the Project incurred prior to the date of grant approval; xiv. Pay for assistance to any private business enterprise which does not have at least 51 percent ownership by those who are either citizens of the United States or reside in the United States after being legally admitted for permanent residence; or E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 5164 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices xv. Pay any judgment or debt owed to the United States; or xvi. Conduct activities on behalf of anyone other than a specific Independent Producer or group of Independent Producers. The Agency considers conducting industry-level Feasibility Studies and Business Plans that are also known as feasibility study templates or guides or business plan templates or guides to be ineligible because the assistance is not provided to a specific group of Independent Producers. xvii. Pay for any goods or services provided by a person or entity who has a Conflict of Interest. Also, note that inkind Matching Funds may not be provided by a person or entity that has a Conflict of Interest. F. Other Submission Requirements Paper applications must be submitted to the Rural Development State Office for the State in which the Project will primarily take place. Addresses can be found online at: https:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/recd_map.html or in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this Notice. Applications can also be submitted electronically at https://www.grants.gov. Applications submitted by electronic mail or facsimile will not be accepted. Each application submission must contain all required documents in one envelope, if by mail or courier delivery service. V. Application Review Information sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES A. Criteria All eligible and complete applications will be evaluated based on the following criteria. Applications for Planning Grants have different criteria to address than applications for Working Capital Grants. 1. Criteria for Planning Grant applications: i. Nature of the proposed venture (0– 8 points). Projects will be evaluated for technological feasibility, operational efficiency, profitability, sustainability and the likely improvement to the local rural economy. Evaluators may rely on their own knowledge and examples of similar ventures described in the proposal to form conclusions regarding this criterion. Points will be awarded based on the greatest expansion of markets and increased returns to producers. ii. Qualifications of those doing work (0–8 points). Proposals will be reviewed for whether the personnel who are responsible for doing proposed tasks, including those hired to do the studies, have the necessary qualifications. If a VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 consultant or others are to be hired, more points may be awarded if the proposal includes evidence of their availability and commitment as well. If staff or consultants have not been selected at the time of application, the application should include specific descriptions of the qualifications required for the positions to be filled. Qualifications of the personnel and consultants should be discussed directly within the response to this criterion. If resumes are included, those pages will count toward the page limit for the narrative. iii. Commitments and support (0–8 points). Producer commitments will be evaluated on the basis of the number of Independent Producers currently involved as well as how many may potentially be involved, and the nature, level and quality of their contributions. End-user commitments will be evaluated on the basis of potential markets and the potential amount of output to be purchased. Proposals will be reviewed for evidence that the project enjoys third party support and endorsement, with emphasis placed on financial and in-kind support as well as technical assistance. Support should be discussed directly within the response to this criterion. If support letters are included, those pages will count toward the page limit for the narrative. Points will be awarded based on the greatest level of documented and referenced commitment. iv. Project leadership (0–8 points). The leadership abilities of individuals who are proposing the Venture will be evaluated as to whether they are sufficient to support a conclusion of likely project success. Credit may be given for leadership evidenced in community or volunteer efforts. Leadership abilities should be discussed directly within the response to this criterion. If resumes are attached at the end of the application, those pages will count toward the page limit for the narrative. v. Work plan/budget (0–8 points). Applicants must submit a work plan and budget. The work plan will be reviewed to determine whether it provides specific and detailed descriptions of tasks that will accomplish the project’s goals. The budget must present a detailed breakdown of all estimated costs associated with the planning activities and allocate these costs among the listed tasks. Points may not be awarded unless sufficient detail is provided to determine if funds are being used for qualified purposes. Matching funds as well as grant funds must be accounted for in the budget to receive points. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 vi. Amount requested (0 or 2 points). Two points will be awarded for grant requests of $50,000 or less. To determine the number of points to award, the Agency will use the amount indicated in the work plan and budget. vii. Project cost per owner-producer (0–3 points). The applicant must state the number of Independent Producers that are owners of the Venture. Points will be calculated by dividing the amount of Federal funds requested by the total number of Independent Producers that are owners of the Venture. The allocation of points for this criterion shall be as follows: • 0 points will be awarded to applications without enough information to determine the number of owner-producers. • 1 point will be awarded to applications with a project cost per owner-producer of $70,001–$100,000. • 2 points will be awarded to applications with a project cost per owner-producer of $35,001–$70,000. • 3 points will be awarded to applications with a project cost per owner-producer of $1–$35,000. An owner cannot be considered an Independent Producer unless he/she is a producer of the Agricultural Commodity to which value will be added as part of this Project. For Agriculture Producer Groups, the number used must be the number of Independent Producers represented who produce the commodity to which value will be added. In cases where family members (including husband and wife) are owners and producers in a Venture, each family member shall count as one owner-producer. Applicants must be prepared to prove that the numbers and individuals identified meet the requirements specified upon notification of a grant award. Failure to do so shall result in withdrawal of the grant award. viii. Business management capabilities (0–10 points). Applicants must discuss their financial management system, procurement procedures, personnel policies, property management system, and travel procedures. Up to two points can be awarded for each component of this criterion, based on the appropriateness of the system, procedures or policies to the size and structure of the business applying. Larger, more complex businesses will be expected to have more complex systems, procedures, and policies than smaller, less complex businesses. ix. Sustainability and economic impact (0–15 points). Projects will be evaluated based on the expected sustainability of the Venture and the E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices expected economic impact on the local economy. x. Business size (5 points if the application meets the criterion or 0 points if the application does not meet the criterion). Applicants must state the amount of gross sales earned for their most recent complete fiscal year or startup operations must state that they have not completed a fiscal year. Points will be awarded as follows: • 0 points will be awarded to applicants that have $10 million or more in gross sales OR to applicants that do not provide enough information to determine gross sales. • 5 points will be awarded to applicants that have less than $10 million in gross sales. If an applicant is tentatively selected for funding, the applicant will need to verify the gross sales amount at the time of award. Failure to verify the amount stated in the application will be grounds for withdrawing the award. xi. Administrator points (up to 5 points, but not to exceed 10 percent of the total points awarded for the other 10 criteria). The Administrator of USDA Rural Development Business and Cooperative Programs may award additional points to recognize innovative technologies, insure geographic distribution of grants, or encourage Value-Added Projects in under-served areas. Applicants may submit an explanation of how the technology proposed is innovative and/ or specific information verifying that the project is in an under-served area. 2. Criteria for Working Capital applications: i. Business viability (0–8 points). Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of the technical and economic feasibility and sustainability of the Venture and the efficiency of operations. ii. Customer base/increased returns (0–8 points). Describe in detail how the customer base for the product being produced will expand because of the Value-Added Venture. Provide documented estimates of this expansion. Describe in detail how a greater portion of the revenue derived from the venture will be returned to the producers that are owners of the Venture. Applicants should also reference the pro forma financial statements developed for the Venture. Applications that demonstrate strong growth in a market or customer base and greater Value-Added revenue accruing to producer-owners will receive more points than those that demonstrate less growth in markets and realized ValueAdded returns. iii. Commitments and support (0–8 points). Producer commitments will be VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 evaluated on the basis of the number of Independent Producers currently involved as well as how many may potentially be involved, and the nature, level and quality of their contributions. End-user commitments will be evaluated on the basis of identified markets, letters of intent or contracts from potential buyers and the amount of output to be purchased. Applications will be reviewed for evidence that the Project enjoys third-party support and endorsement, with emphasis placed on financial and in-kind support as well as technical assistance. Support should be discussed directly within the response to this criterion. If support letters are included, those pages will count toward the page limit for the narrative. Points will be awarded based on the greatest level of documented and referenced commitment. iv. Management team/work force (0–8 points). The education and capabilities of project managers and those who will operate the Venture must reflect the skills and experience necessary to affect Project success. The availability and quality of the labor force needed to operate the Venture will also be evaluated. Applicants must provide the information necessary to make these determinations. Applications that reflect successful track records managing similar projects will receive higher points for this criterion than those that do not reflect successful track records. v. Work plan/budget (0–8 points). The work plan will be reviewed to determine whether it provides specific and detailed descriptions of tasks that will accomplish the project’s goals and the budget will be reviewed for a detailed breakdown of estimated costs associated with the proposed activities and allocation of these costs among the listed tasks. Points may not be awarded unless sufficient detail is provided to determine if funds are being used for qualified purposes. Matching Funds as well as grant funds must be accounted for in the budget to receive points. vi. Amount requested (0 or 2 points). Two points will be awarded for grant requests of $150,000 or less. To determine the number of points to award, the Agency will use the amount indicated in the work plan and budget. vii. Project cost per owner-producer (0–3 points). The applicant must state the number of Independent Producers that are owners of the Venture. Points will be calculated by dividing the amount of Federal funds requested by the total number of Independent Producers that are owners of the Venture. The allocation of points for this criterion shall be as follows: PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5165 • 0 points will be awarded to applications without enough information to determine the number of owner-producers. • 1 point will be awarded to applications with a project cost per owner-producer of $200,001–$300,000. • 2 points will be awarded to applications with a project cost per owner-producer of $100,001–$200,000. • 3 points will be awarded to applications with a project cost per owner-producer of $1–$100,000. An owner cannot be considered an Independent Producer unless he/she is a producer of the Agricultural Commodity to which value will be added as part of this Project. For Agriculture Producer Groups, the number used must be the number of Independent Producers represented who produce the commodity to which value will be added. In cases where family members (including husband and wife) are owners and producers in a Venture, each family member shall count as one owner-producer. Applicants must be prepared to prove that the numbers and individuals identified meet the requirements specified upon notification of a grant award. Failure to do so shall result in withdrawal of the grant award. viii. Business management capabilities (0–10 points). Applicants should discuss their financial management system, procurement procedures, personnel policies, property management system, and travel procedures. Up to two points can be awarded for each component of this criterion, based on the appropriateness of the system, procedures or policies to the size and structure of business applying. Larger, more complex businesses will be expected to have more complex systems, procedures, and policies than smaller, less complex businesses. ix. Sustainability and economic impact (0–15 points). Projects will be evaluated based on the expected sustainability of the Venture and the expected economic impact on the local economy. x. Business size (5 points if the application meets the criterion or 0 points if the application does meet the criterion). Applicants must state the amount of gross sales earned for their most recent complete fiscal year or startup operations must state that they have not completed a fiscal year. Points will be awarded as follows: • 0 points will be awarded to applicants that have $10 million or more in gross sales or to applicants that do not provide enough information to determine gross sales. E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 5166 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES • 5 points will be awarded to applicants that have less than $10 million in gross sales. If an applicant is tentatively selected for funding, the applicant will need to verify the gross sales amount at the time of award. Failure to verify the amount stated in the application will be grounds for withdrawing the award. xi. Administrator points (up to 5 points, but not to exceed 10 percent of the total points awarded for the other 10 criteria). The Administrator of USDA Rural Development Business and Cooperative Programs may award additional points to recognize innovative technologies, insure geographic distribution of grants, or encourage Value-Added projects in under-served areas. Applicants may submit an explanation of how the technology proposed is innovative and/ or specific information verifying that the project is in an under-served area. B. Review and Selection Process The Agency will conduct an initial screening of all applications for eligibility and to determine whether the application is complete and sufficiently responsive to the requirements set forth in this Notice to allow for an informed review. As part of this review, the Rural Development State Office may require Working Capital applicants to submit their Feasibility Studies and Business Plans after the application deadline, but prior to the selection of grantees to facilitate the eligibility review process. All eligible and complete proposals will be evaluated by three reviewers based on criteria i through v described in Section V(A) (1) or (2). One of these reviewers will be a Rural Development employee not from the servicing State Office and the other two reviewers will be non-Federal persons. All reviewers must either: (1) Possess at least five years of working experience in an agriculture-related field, or (2) have obtained at least a bachelors degree in one or more of the following fields: Agri-business, business, economics, finance, or marketing and have a minimum of three years of experience in an agriculture-related field (e.g. farming, marketing, consulting, university professor, research, officer for trade association, government employee for an agricultural program). Once the scores for criteria i through v have been completed by the three reviewers, they will be averaged to obtain the independent reviewer score. The application will also receive one score from the Rural Development servicing State Office based on criteria vi through x. This score will be added to the independent reviewer score. VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 Finally, the Administrator of USDA Rural Development Business and Cooperative Programs will award any Administrator points based on Proposal Evaluation Criterion xi. These points will be added to the cumulative score for criteria i through x. A final ranking will be obtained based solely on the scores received for criteria i through xi. After the award selections are made, all applicants will be notified of the status of their applications by mail. Grantees must meet all statutory and regulatory program requirements in order to receive their award. In the event that a grantee cannot meet the requirements, the award will be withdrawn. Applicants for Working Capital Grants must submit complete, independent third-party Feasibility Studies and Business Plans before the grant award can be finalized. All Projects will be evaluated by the servicing State Office prior to finalizing the award to ensure that funded Projects are likely to be feasible in the proposed project area. Regardless of scoring, a Project determined to be unlikely to be feasible by the servicing State Office with concurrence by the National Office will not be funded. C. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates Award Date: The announcement of award selections is expected to occur on or about September 1, 2008. VI. Award Administration Information A. Award Notices Successful applicants will receive a notification of tentative selection for funding from Rural Development. Applicants must comply with all applicable statutes, regulations, and this notice before the grant award will receive final approval. Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification, including dispute resolution alternatives, by mail. B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements 7 CFR parts 3015, 3019, and 4284 are applicable and may be accessed at https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfrtable-search.html#page1. The following additional requirements apply to grantees selected for this program: Grant Agreement. Letter of Conditions. Form RD 1940–1, ‘‘Request for Obligation of Funds.’’ Form RD 1942–46, ‘‘Letter of Intent to Meet Conditions.’’ Form AD–1047, ‘‘Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered Transactions.’’ Form AD–1048, ‘‘Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary ExclusionLower Tier Covered Transactions.’’ Form AD–1049, ‘‘Certification Regarding a Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (Grants).’’ Form RD 400–4, ‘‘Assurance Agreement.’’ Additional information on these requirements can be found at https:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/ vadg.htm. Reporting Requirements: Grantees must provide Rural Development with a paper or electronic copy that includes all required signatures of the following reports. The reports must be submitted to the Agency contact listed on the Grant Agreement and Letter of Conditions. Failure to submit satisfactory reports on time may result in suspension or termination of the grant. 1. Form SF–269 or SF–269A. A ‘‘Financial Status Report,’’ listing expenditures according to agreed upon budget categories, on a semi-annual basis. Reporting periods end each March 31 and September 30, regardless of when the grant period begins. Reports are due 30 days after the reporting period ends. 2. Semi-annual performance reports that compare accomplishments to the objectives stated in the Grant Agreement. Identify all tasks completed to date and provide documentation supporting the reported results. If the original schedule provided in the work plan is not being met, the report should discuss the problems or delays that may affect completion of the project. Objectives for the next reporting period should be listed. Compliance with any special condition on the use of award funds should be discussed. Reports are due as provided in paragraph 1. of this section. Supporting documentation must also be submitted for completed tasks. The supporting documentation for completed tasks include, but are not limited to, Feasibility Studies, marketing plans, Business Plans, articles of incorporation and bylaws and an accounting of how working capital funds were spent. 3. Final Project performance reports that compare accomplishments to the objectives stated in the proposal. Identify all tasks completed and provide documentation supporting the reported results. If the original schedule provided in the work plan was not met, the report must discuss the problems or delays that affected completion of the project. Compliance with any special condition E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 29, 2008 / Notices sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES on the use of award funds should be discussed. Supporting documentation for completed tasks must also be submitted. The supporting documentation for completed tasks include, but are not limited to, Feasibility Studies, marketing plans, Business Plans, articles of incorporation and bylaws and an accounting of how working capital funds were spent. Planning Grant Projects must also report the estimated increase in revenue, increase in customer base, number of jobs created, and any other relevant economic indicators generated by continuing the project into its operational phase. Working Capital Grants must report the increase in revenue, increase in customer base, number of jobs created, any other relevant economic indicators generated by the project during the grant period in addition to the total funds used for the Venture during the grant period. These total funds must include other federal, state, local, and other funds used for the venture. Projects with significant energy components must also report expected or actual capacity (e.g. gallons of ethanol produced annually, megawatt hours produced annually) and any emissions reductions incurred during the project. The final performance report is due within 90 days of the completion of the project. VII. Agency Contacts For general questions about this announcement and for program technical assistance, applicants should contact their USDA Rural Development State Office at https:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/ vadg.htm. The State Office can also be reached by calling (202) 720–4323 and pressing ‘‘1.’’ If an applicant is unable to contact their State Office, a nearby State Office may be contacted or the RBS National Office can be reached at Mail STOP 3250, Room 4016–South, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–3250, Telephone: (202) 720–7558, e-mail: cpgrants@wdc.usda.gov. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:52 Jan 28, 2008 Jkt 214001 print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720– 2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (866) 632–9992 (voice) or (202) 401– 0216 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Dated: January 18, 2008. Ben Anderson, Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service. [FR Doc. E8–1532 Filed 1–28–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Housing Service Request for Proposals (RFP): Farm Labor Housing Technical Assistance Grants Rural Housing Service, USDA. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: This RFP announces an availability of funds and the timeframe to submit proposals for Farm Labor Housing Technical Assistance (FLH– TA) grants. USDA Rural Development administers the programs of the Rural Housing Service. Section 516(i) of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended, authorizes the Rural Development to provide financial assistance (grants) to eligible private and public nonprofit agencies, which includes faith-based organizations, and to encourage the development of domestic and migrant farm labor housing projects. This RFP solicits proposals from qualified private and public nonprofit agencies on how they will provide technical assistance to groups who qualify for FLH loans and grants. Work performed under these grants is expected to result in an increased submission of applications for farm labor housing loans and grants under the section 514 and 516 programs. DATES: The deadline for receipt of all applications in response to this RFP is 5 p.m., Eastern Time, March 14, 2008. The application closing deadline is firm as to date and hour. USDA Rural Development will not consider any application that is received after the closing deadline. Applicants intending to mail applications must provide sufficient time to permit delivery on or before the closing deadline. Acceptance by the Postal Service or private mailer does not constitute delivery. Facsimile PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5167 (FAX), COD, and postage due applications, will not be accepted. ADDRESSES: Applications should be submitted to the USDA Rural Development; Attention: William K. Coles, Multi-Family Housing Processing Division, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0781, Washington, DC 20250–0781. USDA Rural Development will date and time stamp incoming applications to evidence timely receipt and, upon request, will provide the applicant with a written acknowledgement of receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue M. Harris-Green, Deputy Director, Multi-Family Housing Processing Division—Direct Loans, USDA Rural Development, 1400 Independence Ave. SW., STOP 0781, Washington, DC 20250–0781, Telephone: (202) 720– 1604. (This is not a toll free number.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The technical assistance grants authorized under section 516 are for the purpose of encouraging the development of domestic and migrant farm labor housing projects under sections 514 and 516 of the Act. USDA Rural Development regulations for section 514 and 516 farm labor housing program are published at 7 CFR part 3560. Proposals must demonstrate the ability to provide the intended technical assistance. USDA Rural Development intends to award one grant for each of three geographic regions listed below. When establishing the three regions and amounts of funding available for each, consideration was given to such factors as farmworker migration patterns and the similarity of agricultural products and labor needs within certain areas of the United States. A single applicant may submit grant proposals for more than one region; however, separate proposals must be submitted for each region. Eastern Region: AL, CT, DE, FL, GA, IN, KY, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, NC, OH, PA, PR, RI, SC, TN, VI, VT, VA, and WV. Central Region: AR, IL, IA, KS, LA, MI, MN, MS, MO, NE, ND, OK, SD, TX, and WI. Western Region: AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY, and the Pacific Territories. Funding USDA Rural Development has the authority under section 516(i) of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended to utilize up to ten (10) percent of its section 516 appropriation for FLH–TA grants. The amount USDA Rural Development has made available for FLH–TA grants is $1,386,000 for Fiscal E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5157-5167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1532]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Business-Cooperative Service


Announcement of Value-Added Producer Grant Application Deadlines

AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of solicitation of applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS) announces the 
availability of approximately $18.4 million in competitive grant funds 
for fiscal year (FY) 2008 to help independent agricultural producers 
enter into value-added activities.
    Awards may be made for planning activities or for working capital 
expenses, but not for both. The maximum grant amount for a planning 
grant is $100,000 and the maximum grant amount for a working capital 
grant is $300,000.

DATES: Applications for grants must be submitted on paper or 
electronically according to the following deadlines:
    Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent 
overnight no later than March 31, 2008, to be eligible for FY 2008 
grant funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2008 grant 
funding.
    Electronic copies must be received by March 31, 2008, to be 
eligible for FY 2008 grant funding. Late applications are not eligible 
for FY 2008 grant funding.

ADDRESSES: An application guide and other materials may be obtained at 
https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/vadg.htm or by contacting the 
applicant's USDA Rural Development State Office. The State Office can 
be reached by calling (202) 720-4323 and pressing ``1.''
    Paper applications must be submitted to the Rural Development State 
Office for the State in which the Project will primarily take place. 
Addresses are as follows:

Alabama

USDA Rural Development, Sterling Centre, Suite 601, 4121 Carmichael 
Road, Montgomery, AL 36106-3683, (334) 279-3623.

Alaska

USDA Rural Development, 800 West Evergreen, Suite 201, Palmer, AK 
99645-6539, (907) 761-7722.

Arizona

USDA Rural Development, 230 North First Avenue, Suite 206, Phoenix, 
AZ 85003-1706, (602) 280-8717.

Arkansas

USDA Rural Development, 700 West Capitol Avenue, Room 3416, Little 
Rock, AR 72201-3225, (501) 301-3280.

California

USDA Rural Development, 430 G Street, AGCY 4169, Davis, CA 95616, 
(530) 792-5829.

Colorado

USDA Rural Development, 655 Parfet Street, Room E-100, Lakewood, CO 
80215, (720) 544-2903.

Connecticut

USDA Rural Development, 451 West Street, Suite 2, Amherst, MA 01002-
2999, (413) 253-4319.

Delaware

USDA Rural Development, 1221 College Park Drive, Suite 200, Dover, 
DE 19904, (302) 857-3580.

Florida

USDA Rural Development, 4440 NW. 25th Place, Gainesville, FL 32606, 
(352) 338-3482.

Georgia

USDA Rural Development, 111 East Spring St., Monroe, GA 30655, (770) 
267-1413, Ext. 113.

[[Page 5158]]

Hawaii

USDA Rural Development, Federal Building, Room 311, 154 Waianuenue 
Avenue, Hilo, HI 96720, (808) 933-8313.

Idaho

USDA Rural Development, 9173 West Barnes Drive, Suite A1, Boise, ID 
83709, (208) 378-5623.

Illinois

USDA Rural Development, 2118 West Park Court, Suite A, Champaign, IL 
61821, (217) 403-6202.

Indiana

USDA Rural Development, 5975 Lakeside Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46278, 
(317) 290-3100.

Iowa

USDA Rural Development, 873 Federal Building, 210 Walnut Street, Des 
Moines, IA 50309, (515) 284-4714.

Kansas

USDA Rural Development, 1303 SW. First American Place, Suite 100, 
Topeka, KS 66604-4040, (785) 271-2744.

Kentucky

USDA Rural Development, 771 Corporate Drive, Suite 200, Lexington, 
KY 40503, (859) 224-7435.

Louisiana

USDA Rural Development, 3727 Government St., Alexandria, LA 71302, 
(318) 473-7960.

Maine

USDA Rural Development, 967 Illinois Avenue, Suite 4, P.O. Box 405, 
Bangor, ME 04402-0405, (207) 990-9168.

Maryland

USDA Rural Development, 1221 College Park Drive, Suite 200, Dover, 
DE 19904, (302) 857-3580.

Massachusetts

USDA Rural Development, 451 West Street, Suite 2, Amherst, MA 01002-
2999, (413) 253-4319.

Michigan

USDA Rural Development, 3001 Coolidge Road, Suite 200, East Lansing, 
MI 48823, (517) 324-5157.

Minnesota

USDA Rural Development, 375 Jackson St., Suite 410, St. Paul, MN 
55101, (651) 602-7814.

Mississippi

USDA Rural Development, Federal Building, Suite 831, 100 West 
Capitol Street, Jackson, MS 39269, (601) 965-5457.

Missouri

USDA Rural Development, 601 Business Loop 70 West, Parkade Center, 
Suite 235, Columbia, MO 65203, (573) 876-9320.

Montana

USDA Rural Development, 900 Technology Blvd., Suite B, P.O. Box 850, 
Bozeman, MT 59771, (406) 585-2540.

Nebraska

USDA Rural Development, 100 Centennial Mall North, Room 152, Federal 
Building, Lincoln, NE 68508, (402) 437-5554.

Nevada

USDA Rural Development, 1390 S. Curry St., Carson City, NV 89703, 
(775) 887-1222, Ext. 19.

New Hampshire

USDA Rural Development, City Center, 3rd Floor, 89 Main Street, 
Montpelier, VT 05602, (802) 828-6069.

New Jersey

USDA Rural Development, 8000 Midlantic Drive, Suite 500N, Mt. 
Laurel, NJ 08054, (856) 787-7753.

New Mexico

USDA Rural Development, 6200 Jefferson Street, NE., Room 255, 
Albuquerque, NM 87109, (505) 761-4952.

New York

USDA Rural Development, 441 S. Salina St., Suite 357, Syracuse, NY 
13202, (315) 477-6400.

North Carolina

USDA Rural Development, 4405 Bland Road, Suite 260, Raleigh, NC 
27609, (919) 873-2040.

North Dakota

USDA Rural Development, Federal Building, Room 208, 220 East Rosser 
Avenue, P.O. Box 1737, Bismarck, ND 58502-1737, (701) 530-2065.

Ohio

USDA Rural Development, Federal Building, Room 507, 200 North High 
Street, Columbus, OH 43215-2418, (614) 255-2425.

Oklahoma

USDA Rural Development, 100 USDA, Suite 108, Stillwater, OK 74074-
2654, (405) 742-1036.

Oregon

USDA Rural Development, 1201 NE. Lloyd Blvd., Suite 801, Portland, 
OR 97232-1274, (503) 414-3366.

Pennsylvania

USDA Rural Development, One Credit Union Place, Suite 330, 
Harrisburg, PA 17110-2996, (717) 237-2182 .

Puerto Rico

USDA Rural Development, IBM Building, 654 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 
601, Hato Rey, PR 00918-6106, (787) 766-5091, Ext. 251.

Rhode Island

USDA Rural Development, 451 West Street, Suite 2, Amherst, MA 01002-
2999, (413) 253-4319.

South Carolina

USDA Rural Development, Strom Thurmond Federal Building, 1835 
Assembly Street, Room 1007, Columbia, SC 29201, (803) 765-5881.

South Dakota

USDA Rural Development, Federal Building, Room 210, 200 4th Street, 
SW., Huron, SD 57350, (605) 352-1142.

Tennessee

USDA Rural Development, 3322 West End Avenue, Suite 300, Nashville, 
TN 37203-1084, (615) 783-1341.

Texas

USDA Rural Development, 101 South Main Street, Suite 102, Temple, TX 
76501, (254) 742-9780.

Utah

USDA Rural Development, Wallace F. Bennett Federal Building, 125 
South State Street, Room 4311, Salt Lake City, UT 84138, (801) 524-
4328.

Vermont

USDA Rural Development, City Center, 3rd Floor, 89 Main Street, 
Montpelier, VT 05602, (802) 828-6069.

Virgin Islands

USDA Rural Development, 4440 NW. 25th Place, P.O. Box 147010, 
Gainesville, FL 32606, (352) 338-3482.

Virginia

USDA Rural Development, 1606 Santa Rosa Road, Suite 238, Richmond, 
VA 23229, (804) 287-1594.

Washington

USDA Rural Development, 1835 Black Lake Blvd. SW., Suite B, Olympia, 
WA 98512, (360) 704-7729.

West Virginia

USDA Rural Development, 75 High Street, Room 320, Morgantown, WV 
26505-7500, (304) 252-8644, Ext. 146.

Wisconsin

USDA Rural Development, 4949 Kirschling Court, Stevens Point, WI 
54481, (715) 345-7610.

Wyoming

USDA Rural Development, Dick Cheney Federal Building, 100 East B 
Street, Room 1005, P.O. Box 11005, Casper, WY 82602-5006, (307) 233-
6700.

    Electronic applications must be submitted through the Grants.gov 
Web site at: https://www.grants.gov, following the instructions found on 
this Web site.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Applicants should visit the program 
Web site at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/vadg.htm, which 
contains application guidance, including Frequently Asked Questions and 
an Application Guide. Or applicants may contact their USDA Rural 
Development State Office. The State Office can be reached by calling 
(202) 720-4323 and pressing ``1,'' or by selecting the Contact 
Information link at the above Web site.
    Applicants are encouraged to contact their State Offices well in 
advance of the

[[Page 5159]]

deadline to discuss their projects and ask any questions about the 
application process. Also, applicants may submit drafts of their 
applications to their State Offices for a preliminary review anytime 
prior to February 15, 2008. The preliminary review will only assess the 
eligibility of the application and its completeness. The results of the 
preliminary review are not binding on the Agency.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Overview

    Federal Agency: USDA Rural Development.
    Funding Opportunity Title: Value-Added Producer Grants.
    Announcement Type: Initial announcement.
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 10.352.
    Dates: Application Deadline: Applications for grants must be 
submitted on paper or electronically according to the following 
deadlines:
    Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent 
overnight no later than March 31, 2008 to be eligible for FY 2008 grant 
funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2008 grant funding.
    Electronic copies must be received by March 31, 2008 to be eligible 
for FY 2008 grant funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 
2008 grant funding.

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    This solicitation is issued pursuant to section 231 of the 
Agriculture Risk Protection Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-224) as amended by 
section 6401 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 
(Pub. L. 107-171 (see 7 U.S.C. 1621 note)) authorizing the 
establishment of the Value-Added Agricultural Product Market 
Development grants, also known as Value-Added Producer Grants. The 
Secretary of Agriculture has delegated the program's administration to 
USDA Rural Development Cooperative Programs.
    The primary objective of this grant program is to help Independent 
Producers of Agricultural Commodities, Agriculture Producer Groups, 
Farmer and Rancher Cooperatives, and Majority-Controlled Producer-Based 
Business Ventures develop strategies to create marketing opportunities 
and to help develop Business Plans for viable marketing opportunities 
regarding production of bio-based products from agricultural 
commodities. Cooperative Programs will competitively award funds for 
Planning Grants and Working Capital Grants. In order to provide program 
benefits to as many eligible applicants as possible, applicants must 
apply only for a Planning Grant or for a Working Capital Grant, but not 
both. Applicants other than Independent Producers must limit their 
Projects to Emerging Markets. Grants will only be awarded if Projects 
are determined to be economically viable and sustainable. No more than 
10 percent of program funds can go to applicants that are Majority-
Controlled Producer-Based Business Ventures.
    It should also be noted that businesses of all sizes may apply and 
that there is no restriction on the minimum grant size that will be 
awarded. In FY 2007, 35 percent of awards were $50,000 or less.

Definitions

    The definitions at 7 CFR 4284.3 and 4284.904 are incorporated by 
reference. In addition, the Agency uses the following terms in this 
NOSA: Agricultural Commodity, Bio-energy Project, Biomass, Business 
Plan, Conflict of Interest, Farm or Ranch, Feasibility Study, Project, 
Renewable Energy, and Venture. It is the Agency's position that those 
terms are defined as follows.
    Agricultural Commodity--An unprocessed product of farms, ranches, 
nurseries, and forests. Agricultural Commodities include: Livestock, 
poultry, and fish; fruits and vegetables; grains, such as wheat, 
barley, oats, rye, triticale, rice, corn, and sorghum; legumes, such as 
field beans and peas; animal feed and forage crops; seed crops; fiber 
crops, such as cotton; oil crops, such as safflower, sunflower, corn, 
and cottonseed; trees grown for lumber and wood products; nursery stock 
grown commercially; Christmas trees; ornamentals and cut flowers; and 
turf grown commercially for sod. Agricultural Commodities do not 
include horses or animals raised as pets, such as cats, dogs, and 
ferrets.
    Bio-energy Project--A Renewable Energy system that produces fuel, 
thermal energy, or electric power from a Biomass source.
    Biomass--Any organic material that is available on a renewable or 
recurring basis, including agricultural crops; trees grown for energy 
production; wood waste and wood residues; plants, including aquatic 
plants and grasses; fibers; animal waste and other waste materials; and 
fats, oils, and greases, including recycled fats, oils, and greases. It 
does not include paper that is commonly recycled or un-segregated solid 
waste.
    Business Plan--A plan for Venture implementation that includes key 
management personnel, business location, the financial package, product 
flow, and possible customers. It also includes at least three years of 
pro forma financial statements. The plan is usually developed by the 
business with assistance from third parties.
    Conflict of Interest--A situation in which a person or entity has 
competing professional or personal interests that make it difficult for 
the person or business to act impartially. An example of a Conflict of 
Interest is a grant recipient or an employee of a recipient that 
conducts or significantly participates in conducting a Feasibility 
Study for the recipient.
    Farm or Ranch--Any place from which $1,000 or more of agricultural 
products (crops and livestock) were raised and sold or normally would 
have been raised and sold during the previous year.
    Feasibility Study--An independent, third party analysis that shows 
how the Venture would operate under a set of assumptions--the 
technology used (the facilities, equipment, production process, etc.), 
the qualifications of the management team, and the financial aspects 
(capital needs, volume, cost of goods, wages, etc.). The analysis 
should answer the following questions about the Venture.
    (1) Where is it now?
    (2) Where does the group want to go?
    (3) Why does the group want to go forward with the Venture?
    (4) How will the group accomplish the Venture?
    (5) What resources are needed?
    (6) Who will provide assistance?
    (7) When will the Venture be completed?
    (8) How much will the Venture cost?
    (9) What are the risks?
    Project--Includes all proposed activities to be funded by the VAPG 
and Matching Funds.
    Renewable Energy--Energy derived from a wind, solar, biomass, or 
geothermal source; or hydrogen derived from biomass or water using 
wind, solar, biomass, or geothermal energy sources.
    Venture--Includes the Project and any other activities related to 
the production, processing, and marketing of the Value-Added product 
that is the subject of the VAPG grant request.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Grant.
    Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2008.
    Approximate Total Funding: $18.4 million.
    Approximate Number of Awards: 130.
    Approximate Average Award: $140,000.

[[Page 5160]]

    Floor of Award Range: None.
    Ceiling of Award Range: $100,000 for Planning Grants and $300,000 
for Working Capital Grants.
    Anticipated Award Date: September 1, 2008.
    Budget Period Length: 12 months.
    Project Period Length: 12 months.

III. Eligibility Information

A. Eligible Applicants

    Applicants must be an Independent Producer, Agriculture Producer 
Group, Farmer or Rancher Cooperative, or Majority-Controlled Producer-
Based Business Venture as defined in 7 CFR part 4284, subpart A. If the 
applicant is an unincorporated group (steering committee), it must form 
a legal entity before grant funds can be obligated. Please note that a 
steering committee may only apply as an Independent Producer. 
Therefore, the steering committee must be composed of 100 percent 
Independent Producers and the business to be formed must meet the 
definition of Independent Producer. Entities that contract out the 
production of an Agricultural Commodity are not considered Independent 
Producers. In addition, note that Farmer or Rancher Cooperatives that 
are 100 percent owned by farmers and ranchers are not considered under 
the Independent Producer category; these applicants must apply as 
Farmer or Rancher Cooperatives. It is the Agency's position that if a 
cooperative is 100 percent owned and controlled by agricultural 
harvesters (e.g., fishermen, loggers), it is eligible only as an 
Independent Producer and not as a Farmer- or Rancher-Cooperative. If a 
cooperative is not 100 percent owned and controlled by farmers and 
ranchers or 100 percent owned and controlled by agricultural 
harvesters, it may still be eligible to apply as a Majority-Controlled 
Producer-Based Business Venture, provided it meets the definition in 7 
CFR part 4284, subpart A.

B. Cost Sharing or Matching

    Matching Funds are required. Applicants must verify in their 
applications that Matching Funds are available for the time period of 
the grant. Matching Funds must be at least equal to the amount of grant 
funds requested. Unless provided by other authorizing legislation, 
other Federal grant funds cannot be used as Matching Funds. Matching 
Funds must be spent at a rate equal to or greater than the rate at 
which grant funds are expended. Matching Funds must be provided by 
either the applicant or by a third party in the form of cash or in-kind 
contributions. Matching Funds must be spent on eligible expenses and 
must be from eligible sources.

C. Other Eligibility Requirements

    Product Eligibility: The project proposed must involve a Value-
Added product as defined in 7 CFR part 4284, subpart A. The definition 
of Value-Added includes four categories that increase the value that is 
realized by the producer from an Agricultural Commodity or product as 
the result of:
    1. A change in its physical state;
    2. Differentiated production or marketing, as demonstrated in a 
Business Plan;
    3. Product segregation; or
    4. The economic benefit realized from the production of Farm- or 
Ranch-based Renewable Energy.
    Purpose Eligibility: The application must specify whether grant 
funds are requested for planning activities or for working capital. 
Applicants may not request funds for both types of activities in one 
application. Applications requesting more than the maximum grant amount 
will be considered ineligible. Please note that working capital 
expenses are not considered eligible for Planning Grants and planning 
expenses are not considered eligible for Working Capital Grants.
    It is the Agency's position that applicants other than Independent 
Producers applying for a Working Capital Grant must demonstrate that 
the venture has not been in operation more than two years at the time 
of application in order to show that they are entering an Emerging 
Market.
    Grant Period Eligibility: Applications that have a timeframe of 
more than 365 days will be considered ineligible. Applications that 
request funds for a time period beginning prior to October 1, 2008 and/
or ending after November 30, 2009, will be considered ineligible.
    Multiple Grant Eligibility: An applicant can only submit one 
application per funding cycle.
    Applicants who have already received a Planning Grant for the 
proposed Project cannot receive another Planning Grant for the same 
Project. Applicants who have already received a Working Capital Grant 
for a Project cannot receive any additional grants for that Project.
    Current Grant Eligibility: If an applicant currently has a VAPG, 
that grant period must be scheduled to expire by November 30, 2008.
    Judgment Eligibility: In accordance with 7 CFR part 4284.6.

IV. Application and Submission Information

A. Address To Request Application Package

    The application package for applying on paper for this funding 
opportunity can be obtained at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
vadg.htm. Alternatively, applicants may contact their USDA Rural 
Development State Office. The State Office can be reached by calling 
(202) 720-4323 and pressing ``1.'' For electronic applications, 
applicants must visit https://www.grants.gov and follow the 
instructions.

B. Content and Form of Submission

    Applications must be submitted on paper or electronically. An 
Application Guide may be viewed at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/
coops/vadg.htm. It is strongly recommended that applicants use the 
template provided on the Web site. The template can be filled out 
electronically and printed out for submission with the required forms 
for a paper submission or it can be filled out electronically and 
submitted as an attachment through Grants.gov.
    If an application is submitted on paper, one signed original of the 
complete application must be submitted.
    If the application is submitted electronically, the applicant must 
follow the instructions given at https://www.grants.gov. Applicants are 
strongly advised to visit the site well in advance of the application 
deadline if they plan to apply electronically to insure that they have 
obtained the proper authentication and have sufficient computer 
resources to complete the application.
    Applicants must complete and submit the following elements. Please 
note that the requirements in the following locations within 7 CFR part 
4284 have been combined with other requirements to simplify the 
application and reduce duplication: Sec. 4284.910(b)(5)(i), Sec. 
4284.910(b)(5)(ii), and Sec. 4284.910(b)(5)(iv). The Agency will 
conduct an initial screening of all application for eligibility and to 
determine whether the application is complete and sufficiently 
responsive to the requirements set forth in this Notice to allow for an 
informed review. Information submitted as part of the application will 
be protected from disclosure to the extent permitted by law.
    1. Form SF-424, ``Application for Federal Assistance.'' The form 
must be completed, signed and submitted as part

[[Page 5161]]

of the application package. Please note that applicants are required to 
have an Employer Identification Number (or a Social Security Number if 
the applicant is an individual or steering committee) and a DUNS number 
(unless the applicant is an individual). The DUNS number is a nine-
digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business 
entities. To obtain a DUNS number, access https://www.dnb.com/us, or 
call (866) 705-5711. Additional information on the VAPG program can be 
obtained at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/vadg.htm or by 
contacting the applicant's Rural Development State Office. The State 
Office can be reached by calling (202) 720-4323 and pressing ``1.''
    2. Form SF-424A, ``Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs.'' 
This form must be completed and submitted as part of the application 
package.
    3. Form SF-424B, ``Assurances--Non-Construction Programs.'' This 
form must be completed, signed, and submitted as part of the 
application package.
    4. Title Page (limited to one page). The title page must include 
the title of the project and may include other relevant identifying 
information.
    5. Table of Contents. For ease of locating information, each 
application must contain a detailed Table of Contents (TOC) immediately 
following the title page.
    6. Executive Summary (limited to one page). The Executive Summary 
should briefly describe the Project, including goals, tasks to be 
completed and other relevant information that provides a general 
overview of the Project. In this element, the applicant must clearly 
state whether the application is for a Planning Grant or a Working 
Capital Grant and the grant amount requested.
    7. Eligibility Discussion (limited to four pages). The applicant 
must describe in detail how the eligibility requirements are met.
    i. Applicant Eligibility. The applicant must first describe how it 
meets the definition of an Independent Producer, Agriculture Producer 
Group, Farmer or Rancher Cooperative, or a Majority-Controlled 
Producer-Based Business Venture as defined in 7 CFR 4284.3. The 
applicant must apply in only one of the following categories. It is the 
Agency's position that an applicant must provide information that it 
meets all of the requirements in the selected category in order to be 
eligible in that category.
    a. Independent Producer. The application must provide the following 
information:
    1. A discussion of how 100 percent of the owners of the applicant 
organization meet the definition of an Independent Producer;
    2. A discussion that demonstrates these owners currently own and 
produce more than 50 percent of the raw commodity that will be used for 
the Value-Added product; and
    3. A discussion that demonstrates the product will be owned by the 
Independent Producers from its raw commodity state through the 
production of the Value-Added product during the Project.
    b. Agriculture Producer Group. The application must provide the 
following information:
    1. The mission of the applicant, including how the organization 
works on behalf of Independent Producers;
    2. A statement demonstrating that the majority of the applicant's 
membership and board of directors meet the definition of Independent 
Producer;
    3. An identification (either by name or by class) of the 
Independent Producers on whose behalf the work will be done;
    4. A discussion demonstrating that these Independent Producers 
currently own and produce more than 50 percent of the raw commodity 
that will be used for the Value-Added product; and
    5. A discussion demonstrating that the Value-Added product will be 
owned by the Independent Producers from its raw commodity state through 
the production of the Value-Added product during the Project.
    Note that applicants tentatively selected for a grant award must 
verify that the work will be done on behalf of the Independent 
Producers identified in the application.
    c. Farmer or Rancher Cooperative. The application must provide the 
following information:
    1. The applicant must reference the business' good standing as a 
cooperative in its state of incorporation;
    2. The applicant must also explain how the cooperative is 100 
percent owned and controlled by farmers and ranchers;
    3. If the applicant is applying on behalf of only a portion of its 
membership, that portion must be identified, and the applicant must 
explain how all members in this portion of its membership meet the 
definition of an Independent Producer;
    4. A discussion demonstrating that these Independent Producers 
currently own and produce more than 50 percent of the raw commodity 
that will be used for the Value-Added product; and
    5. A discussion demonstrating that the Value-Added product will be 
owned by the Independent Producers from its raw commodity state through 
the production of the Value-Added product during the Project.
    d. Majority-Controlled Producer-Based Business Venture. The 
application must provide the following information:
    1. A statement demonstrating that the majority of the number of 
owners of the applicant organization meets the definition of an 
Independent Producer;
    2. A statement demonstrating that the majority of the financial 
interest in the applicant organization is owned by Independent 
Producers;
    3. A statement demonstrating that the majority of voting members on 
the governing board meets the definition of Independent Producer;
    4. A discussion demonstrating that these Independent Producers 
currently own and produce more than 50 percent of the raw commodity 
that will be used for the Value-Added product; and
    5. A discussion demonstrating that the Value-Added product will be 
owned by the Independent Producers from its raw commodity state through 
the production of the Value-Added product during the Project.
    ii. Product Eligibility. The applicant must next describe how the 
Value-Added product to be produced meets at least one of the categories 
in the definition of Value-Added as defined in 7 CFR part 4284, subpart 
A. Regardless of category, the applicant must describe the raw 
commodity that will be used, the process used to add value, and the 
Value-Added product that will be marketed.
    a. Change in physical state. The application must explain how the 
change in physical state or form of the product enhances its value. A 
change in physical state is only achieved if the product cannot be 
returned to its original state. Examples of this type of product 
include: Fish fillets, diced tomatoes, ethanol, bio-diesel, and wool 
rugs. Common production or harvesting methods are not considered Value-
Added. The following examples are not eligible under this category: 
Dehydrated corn, raw fiber, and cut flowers.
    b. Differentiated production or marketing (as demonstrated in a 
Business Plan). The application must explain how the production or 
marketing of the commodity enhances its value. The enhancement of value 
must be quantified by using a comparison with products produced or 
marketed in the standard manner, using information from the Feasibility 
Study and Business Plan developed for the Venture. Examples of this 
type of product include: Organic carrots, identity-preserved apples, 
and branded

[[Page 5162]]

milk. The following example is not eligible under this category: 
Marketing a non-standard variety of produce. Also, a Business Plan that 
has been developed for the applicant for the Venture must be referenced 
by indicating who developed the Business Plan and when it was 
completed.
    c. Physical segregation. The application must explain how the 
physical segregation of a commodity enhances its value. The enhancement 
of value should be quantified to the extent possible by using a 
comparison with products marketed without segregation. Applicants must 
demonstrate that a physical barrier (i.e. distance or a structure) 
separates the commodity from other varieties of the same commodity 
during production, that the commodity will continue to be separated 
during processing, and that the Value-Added product produced will be 
separated from similar products during marketing. An example of this 
type of product is non-genetically-modified corn that is produced on 
the same Farm as genetically-modified corn where an increase in 
incremental value is realized for either one or both of the types of 
corn that is attributed to physical segregation. The following examples 
are not eligible under this category: Livestock sorted by grade, 
produce sorted by size or grade.
    d. Farm- or ranch-based renewable energy. The application must 
explain how the Renewable Energy will be generated on a Farm or a Ranch 
owned or leased by the owners of the Venture. Please note that the 
owners/leasers of the Farm or Ranch must currently produce an 
Agricultural Commodity on the Farm or Ranch and the Farm or Ranch must 
meet the definition of a Farm or a Ranch as defined in the 
``Definitions'' section of this notice. Examples of this type of 
product are wind energy, solar energy, and anaerobic digesters. The 
following examples are not eligible under this category: Any type of 
fuel, such as ethanol, bio-diesel, and switchgrass pellets, that is not 
generated on a Farm or Ranch owned or leased by the owners of the 
Venture.
    iii. Purpose Eligibility. The applicant must describe how the 
Project purpose is eligible for funding. The project purpose is 
comprised of two components. First, the applicant must describe how the 
proposed Project consists of eligible planning activities or eligible 
working capital activities. Second, the applicant must demonstrate that 
the activities are directly related to the processing and/or marketing 
of a Value-Added product.
    Applicants applying for a Working Capital Grants, must reference a 
third-party, independent Feasibility Study and a Business Plan 
completed specifically for the proposed Venture. The reference must 
include the name of the party who conducted the Feasibility Study and 
developed the Business Plan as well as the dates the Feasibility Study 
and Business Plan were completed.
    Applicants applying for Working Capital Grants, and which are an 
Agriculture Producer Group, a Farmer or Rancher Cooperative, or a 
Majority-Controlled Producer-Based Business Venture, must also 
demonstrate that the proposed Venture has been in operation for less 
than two years at the time of application, in order to show that the 
applicant is entering an Emerging Market.
    8. Proposal Narrative (limited to 35 pages).
    i. Goals of the Project. The application must include a clear 
statement of the ultimate goals of the Project. There must be an 
explanation of how a market will be expanded and the degree to which 
incremental revenue will accrue to the benefit of the Agricultural 
Producer(s).
    ii. Performance Evaluation Criteria. Applicants applying for 
Planning Grants must suggest at least one criterion by which their 
performance under a grant could be evaluated. Applicants applying for 
Working Capital Grants must identify the projected increase in customer 
base, revenue accruing to Independent Producers, and number of jobs 
attributed to the Project. Working capital projects with significant 
energy components must also identify the projected increase in capacity 
(e.g. gallons of ethanol produced annually, megawatt hours produced 
annually) attributed to the Project. Please note that these criteria 
are different from the Proposal Evaluation Criteria and are a separate 
requirement.
    iii. Proposal Evaluation Criteria. Each of the proposal evaluation 
criteria referenced in this funding announcement must be addressed, 
specifically and individually, in narrative form. Applications that do 
not address the appropriate criteria (Planning Grant applications must 
address Planning Grant evaluation criteria and Working Capital Grant 
applications must address Working Capital Grant evaluation criteria) 
will be considered ineligible.
    9. Certification of Matching Funds. Applicants must certify that 
Matching Funds will be available at the same time grant funds are 
anticipated to be spent and that Matching Funds will be spent in 
advance of grant funding, such that for every dollar of grant funds 
advanced, not less than an equal amount of Matching Funds will have 
been expended prior to submitting the request for reimbursement. Please 
note that this certification is a separate requirement from the 
verification of Matching Funds requirement. Applicants must include a 
statement for this section that reads as follows: ``[INSERT NAME OF 
APPLICANT] certifies that matching funds will be available at the same 
time grant funds are anticipated to be spent and that matching funds 
will be spent in advance of grant funding, such that for every dollar 
of grant funds advanced, not less than an equal amount of matching 
funds will have been expended prior to submitting the request for 
reimbursement.'' A separate signature is not required.
    10. Verification of Matching Funds. Applicants must provide 
documentation of all proposed Matching Funds, both cash and in-kind. 
The documentation below must be included in the Appendix.
    i. Matching Funds provided by the applicant in cash. A copy of a 
bank statement with an ending date within one month of the application 
submission and showing an ending balance equal to or greater than the 
amount of cash Matching Funds proposed is required.
    ii. Matching Funds provided through a loan or line of credit. The 
applicant must include a signed letter from the lending institution 
verifying the amount available, the purposes for which funds may be 
used, and the time period of availability of the funds. Specific dates 
(month/day/year) corresponding to the proposed grant period or to dates 
within the grant period when matching funds will be made available, 
must be included.
    iii. Matching Funds provided by the applicant through an in-kind 
contribution. The application must include a signed letter from the 
applicant verifying the goods or services to be donated, the value of 
the goods or services, and when the goods and services will be donated. 
Specific dates (month/day/year) corresponding to the proposed grant 
period or to dates within the grant period when matching contributions 
will be made available, must be included. Please note that if the 
applicant organization is purchasing goods or services for the grant 
(e.g. salaries, inventory), the contribution is considered a cash 
contribution and must be verified as described in paragraph i. above. 
Also, if an owner or employee of the applicant organization is donating 
goods or services, the contribution is considered a third-party

[[Page 5163]]

in-kind contribution and must be verified as described in paragraph v. 
below.
    iv. Matching Funds provided by a third party in cash. The 
application must include a signed letter from that third party 
verifying how much cash will be donated and when it will be donated. 
Specific dates (month/day/year) corresponding to the proposed grant 
period or to dates within the grant period when matching funds will be 
made available, must be included.
    v. Matching Funds provided by a third party in-kind donation. The 
application must include a signed letter from the third party verifying 
the goods or services to be donated, the value of the goods or 
services, and when the goods and services will be donated. Specific 
dates (month/day/year) corresponding to the proposed grant period or to 
dates within the grant period when matching contributions will be made 
available, must be included.
    Verification for cash or in-kind contributions donated outside the 
proposed time period of the grant will not be accepted. Verification 
for in-kind contributions that are over-valued will not be accepted. 
The valuation process for the in-kind funds does not need to be 
included in the application, especially if it is lengthy, but the 
applicant must be able to demonstrate how the valuation was achieved at 
the time of notification of tentative selection for the grant award. If 
the applicant cannot satisfactorily demonstrate how the valuation was 
determined, the grant award may be withdrawn or the amount of the grant 
may be reduced.
    If Matching Funds are in cash, they must be spent on goods and 
services that are eligible expenditures for this grant program. If 
Matching Funds are in-kind contributions, the donated goods or services 
must be considered eligible expenditures for this grant program. 
Matching Funds must be spent or donated during the grant period and the 
funds must be expended at a rate equal to or greater than the rate 
grant funds are expended. Some examples of acceptable uses for matching 
funds are: Skilled labor performing work required for the proposed 
Project, office supplies, and purchasing inventory. Some examples of 
unacceptable uses of matching funds are: Real property, fixed 
equipment, buildings, and vehicles.
    Expected program income may not be used to fulfill the Matching 
Funds requirement at the time of application. If program income is 
earned during the time period of the grant, it is subject to the 
requirements of 7 CFR part 3015, subpart F and 7 CFR 3019.24 and any 
provisions in the Grant Agreement.

C. Submission Dates and Times

    Application Deadline Date: March 31, 2008.
    Explanation of Deadlines: Paper applications must be postmarked by 
the deadline date (see Section IV.F. for the address). Final electronic 
applications must be received by Grants.gov by the deadline date. If an 
application does not meet the deadline above, it will not be considered 
for funding. Applicants will be notified that their applications did 
not meet the submission deadline.

D. Intergovernmental Review of Applications

    Executive Order (EO) 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal 
Programs, applies to this program. This EO requires that Federal 
agencies provide opportunities for consultation on proposed assistance 
with State and local governments. Many states have established a Single 
Point of Contact (SPOC) to facilitate this consultation. A list of 
states that maintain an SPOC may be obtained at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html. If an applicant's state has an 
SPOC, the applicant may submit the application directly for review. Any 
comments obtained through the SPOC must be provided to Rural 
Development for consideration as part of the application. If the 
applicant's state has not established an SPOC, or the applicant does 
not want to submit the application, Rural Development will submit the 
application to the SPOC or other appropriate agency or agencies.
    Applicants are also encouraged to contact their Rural Development 
State Office for assistance and questions on this process. The Rural 
Development State Office can be reached by calling (202) 720-4323 and 
selecting option ``1'' or by viewing the following Web site: https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/.

E. Funding Restrictions

    Funding restrictions apply to both grant funds and matching funds. 
Funds may only be used for planning activities or working capital for 
Projects focusing on processing and marketing a value-added product.
    1. Examples of acceptable planning activities include:
    i. Obtaining legal advice and assistance related to the proposed 
Venture;
    ii. Conducting a Feasibility Study of a proposed Value-Added 
Venture to help determine the potential marketing success of the 
Venture;
    iii. Developing a Business Plan that provides comprehensive details 
on the management, planning, and other operational aspects of a 
proposed Venture; and
    iv. Developing a marketing plan for the proposed Value-Added 
product, including the identification of a market window, the 
identification of potential buyers, a description of the distribution 
system, and possible promotional campaigns.
    2. Examples of acceptable working capital uses include:
    i. Designing or purchasing an accounting system for the proposed 
Venture;
    ii. Paying for salaries, utilities, and rental of office space;
    iii. Purchasing inventory, office equipment (e.g., computers, 
printers, copiers, scanners), and office supplies (e.g., paper, pens, 
file folders); and
    iv. Conducting a marketing campaign for the proposed Value-Added 
product.
    3. No funds made available under this solicitation shall be used 
to:
    i. Plan, repair, rehabilitate, acquire, or construct a building or 
facility, including a processing facility;
    ii. Purchase, rent, or install fixed equipment, including 
processing equipment;
    iii. Purchase vehicles, including boats;
    iv. Pay for the preparation of the grant application;
    v. Pay expenses not directly related to the funded Venture;
    vi. Fund political or lobbying activities;
    vii. Fund any activities prohibited by 7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019;
    viii. Fund architectural or engineering design work for a specific 
physical facility;
    ix. Fund any expenses related to the production of any commodity or 
product to which value will be added, including seed, rootstock, labor 
for harvesting the crop, and delivery of the commodity to a processing 
facility. The Agency considers these expenses to be ineligible because 
the intent of the program is to assist producers with marketing value-
added products rather than producing Agricultural Commodities;
    x. Fund research and development;
    xi. Purchase land;
    xii. Duplicate current services or replace or substitute support 
previously provided;
    xiii. Pay costs of the Project incurred prior to the date of grant 
approval;
    xiv. Pay for assistance to any private business enterprise which 
does not have at least 51 percent ownership by those who are either 
citizens of the United States or reside in the United States after 
being legally admitted for permanent residence; or

[[Page 5164]]

    xv. Pay any judgment or debt owed to the United States; or
    xvi. Conduct activities on behalf of anyone other than a specific 
Independent Producer or group of Independent Producers. The Agency 
considers conducting industry-level Feasibility Studies and Business 
Plans that are also known as feasibility study templates or guides or 
business plan templates or guides to be ineligible because the 
assistance is not provided to a specific group of Independent 
Producers.
    xvii. Pay for any goods or services provided by a person or entity 
who has a Conflict of Interest. Also, note that in-kind Matching Funds 
may not be provided by a person or entity that has a Conflict of 
Interest.

F. Other Submission Requirements

    Paper applications must be submitted to the Rural Development State 
Office for the State in which the Project will primarily take place. 
Addresses can be found online at: https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/recd_
map.html or in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this Notice.
    Applications can also be submitted electronically at https://
www.grants.gov. Applications submitted by electronic mail or facsimile 
will not be accepted. Each application submission must contain all 
required documents in one envelope, if by mail or courier delivery 
service.

V. Application Review Information

A. Criteria

    All eligible and complete applications will be evaluated based on 
the following criteria. Applications for Planning Grants have different 
criteria to address than applications for Working Capital Grants.
    1. Criteria for Planning Grant applications:
    i. Nature of the proposed venture (0-8 points). Projects will be 
evaluated for technological feasibility, operational efficiency, 
profitability, sustainability and the likely improvement to the local 
rural economy. Evaluators may rely on their own knowledge and examples 
of similar ventures described in the proposal to form conclusions 
regarding this criterion. Points will be awarded based on the greatest 
expansion of markets and increased returns to producers.
    ii. Qualifications of those doing work (0-8 points). Proposals will 
be reviewed for whether the personnel who are responsible for doing 
proposed tasks, including those hired to do the studies, have the 
necessary qualifications. If a consultant or others are to be hired, 
more points may be awarded if the proposal includes evidence of their 
availability and commitment as well. If staff or consultants have not 
been selected at the time of application, the application should 
include specific descriptions of the qualifications required for the 
positions to be filled. Qualifications of the personnel and consultants 
should be discussed directly within the response to this criterion. If 
resumes are included, those pages will count toward the page limit for 
the narrative.
    iii. Commitments and support (0-8 points). Producer commitments 
will be evaluated on the basis of the number of Independent Producers 
currently involved as well as how many may potentially be involved, and 
the nature, level and quality of their contributions. End-user 
commitments will be evaluated on the basis of potential markets and the 
potential amount of output to be purchased. Proposals will be reviewed 
for evidence that the project enjoys third party support and 
endorsement, with emphasis placed on financial and in-kind support as 
well as technical assistance. Support should be discussed directly 
within the response to this criterion. If support letters are included, 
those pages will count toward the page limit for the narrative. Points 
will be awarded based on the greatest level of documented and 
referenced commitment.
    iv. Project leadership (0-8 points). The leadership abilities of 
individuals who are proposing the Venture will be evaluated as to 
whether they are sufficient to support a conclusion of likely project 
success. Credit may be given for leadership evidenced in community or 
volunteer efforts. Leadership abilities should be discussed directly 
within the response to this criterion. If resumes are attached at the 
end of the application, those pages will count toward the page limit 
for the narrative.
    v. Work plan/budget (0-8 points). Applicants must submit a work 
plan and budget. The work plan will be reviewed to determine whether it 
provides specific and detailed descriptions of tasks that will 
accomplish the project's goals. The budget must present a detailed 
breakdown of all estimated costs associated with the planning 
activities and allocate these costs among the listed tasks. Points may 
not be awarded unless sufficient detail is provided to determine if 
funds are being used for qualified purposes. Matching funds as well as 
grant funds must be accounted for in the budget to receive points.
    vi. Amount requested (0 or 2 points). Two points will be awarded 
for grant requests of $50,000 or less. To determine the number of 
points to award, the Agency will use the amount indicated in the work 
plan and budget.
    vii. Project cost per owner-producer (0-3 points). The applicant 
must state the number of Independent Producers that are owners of the 
Venture. Points will be calculated by dividing the amount of Federal 
funds requested by the total number of Independent Producers that are 
owners of the Venture. The allocation of points for this criterion 
shall be as follows:
     0 points will be awarded to applications without enough 
information to determine the number of owner-producers.
     1 point will be awarded to applications with a project 
cost per owner-producer of $70,001-$100,000.
     2 points will be awarded to applications with a project 
cost per owner-producer of $35,001-$70,000.
     3 points will be awarded to applications with a project 
cost per owner-producer of $1-$35,000.
    An owner cannot be considered an Independent Producer unless he/she 
is a producer of the Agricultural Commodity to which value will be 
added as part of this Project. For Agriculture Producer Groups, the 
number used must be the number of Independent Producers represented who 
produce the commodity to which value will be added. In cases where 
family members (including husband and wife) are owners and producers in 
a Venture, each family member shall count as one owner-producer.
    Applicants must be prepared to prove that the numbers and 
individuals identified meet the requirements specified upon 
notification of a grant award. Failure to do so shall result in 
withdrawal of the grant award.
    viii. Business management capabilities (0-10 points). Applicants 
must discuss their financial management system, procurement procedures, 
personnel policies, property management system, and travel procedures. 
Up to two points can be awarded for each component of this criterion, 
based on the appropriateness of the system, procedures or policies to 
the size and structure of the business applying. Larger, more complex 
businesses will be expected to have more complex systems, procedures, 
and policies than smaller, less complex businesses.
    ix. Sustainability and economic impact (0-15 points). Projects will 
be evaluated based on the expected sustainability of the Venture and 
the

[[Page 5165]]

expected economic impact on the local economy.
    x. Business size (5 points if the application meets the criterion 
or 0 points if the application does not meet the criterion). Applicants 
must state the amount of gross sales earned for their most recent 
complete fiscal year or start-up operations must state that they have 
not completed a fiscal year. Points will be awarded as follows:
     0 points will be awarded to applicants that have $10 
million or more in gross sales OR to applicants that do not provide 
enough information to determine gross sales.
     5 points will be awarded to applicants that have less than 
$10 million in gross sales.
    If an applicant is tentatively selected for funding, the applicant 
will need to verify the gross sales amount at the time of award. 
Failure to verify the amount stated in the application will be grounds 
for withdrawing the award.
    xi. Administrator points (up to 5 points, but not to exceed 10 
percent of the total points awarded for the other 10 criteria). The 
Administrator of USDA Rural Development Business and Cooperative 
Programs may award additional points to recognize innovative 
technologies, insure geographic distribution of grants, or encourage 
Value-Added Projects in under-served areas. Applicants may submit an 
explanation of how the technology proposed is innovative and/or 
specific information verifying that the project is in an under-served 
area.
    2. Criteria for Working Capital applications:
    i. Business viability (0-8 points). Proposals will be evaluated on 
the basis of the technical and economic feasibility and sustainability 
of the Venture and the efficiency of operations.
    ii. Customer base/increased returns (0-8 points). Describe in 
detail how the customer base for the product being produced will expand 
because of the Value-Added Venture. Provide documented estimates of 
this expansion. Describe in detail how a greater portion of the revenue 
derived from the venture will be returned to the producers that are 
owners of the Venture. Applicants should also reference the pro forma 
financial statements developed for the Venture. Applications that 
demonstrate strong growth in a market or customer base and greater 
Value-Added revenue accruing to producer-owners will receive more 
points than those that demonstrate less growth in markets and realized 
Value-Added returns.
    iii. Commitments and support (0-8 points). Producer commitments 
will be evaluated on the basis of the number of Independent Producers 
currently involved as well as how many may potentially be involved, and 
the nature, level and quality of their contributions. End-user 
commitments will be evaluated on the basis of identified markets, 
letters of intent or contracts from potential buyers and the amount of 
output to be purchased. Applications will be reviewed for evidence that 
the Project enjoys third-party support and endorsement, with emphasis 
placed on financial and in-kind support as well as technical 
assistance. Support should be discussed directly within the response to 
this criterion. If support letters are included, those pages will count 
toward the page limit for the narrative. Points will be awarded based 
on the greatest level of documented and referenced commitment.
    iv. Management team/work force (0-8 points). The education and 
capabilities of project managers and those who will operate the Venture 
must reflect the skills and experience necessary to affect Project 
success. The availability and quality of the labor force needed to 
operate the Venture will also be evaluated. Applicants must provide the 
information necessary to make these determinations. Applications that 
reflect successful track records managing similar projects will receive 
higher points for this criterion than those that do not reflect 
successful track records.
    v. Work plan/budget (0-8 points). The work plan will be reviewed to 
determine whether it provides specific and detailed descriptions of 
tasks that will accomplish the project's goals and the budget will be 
reviewed for a detailed breakdown of estimated costs associated with 
the proposed activities and allocation of these costs among the listed 
tasks. Points may not be awarded unless sufficient detail is provided 
to determine if funds are being used for qualified purposes. Matching 
Funds as well as grant funds must be accounted for in the budget to 
receive points.
    vi. Amount requested (0 or 2 points). Two points will be awarded 
for grant requests of $150,000 or less. To determine the number of 
points to award, the Agency will use the amount indicated in the work 
plan and budget.
    vii. Project cost per owner-producer (0-3 points). The applicant 
must state the number of Independent Producers that are owners of the 
Venture. Points will be calculated by dividing the amount of Federal 
funds requested by the total number of Independent Producers that are 
owners of the Venture. The allocation of points for this criterion 
shall be as follows:
     0 points will be awarded to applications without enough 
information to determine the number of owner-producers.
     1 point will be awarded to applications with a project 
cost per owner-producer of $200,001-$300,000.
     2 points will be awarded to applications with a project 
cost per owner-producer of $100,001-$200,000.
     3 points will be awarded to applications with a project 
cost per owner-producer of $1-$100,000.
    An owner cannot be considered an Independent Producer unless he/she 
is a producer of the Agricultural Commodity to which value will be 
added as part of this Project. For Agriculture Producer Groups, the 
number used must be the number of Independent Producers represented who 
produce the commodity to which value will be added. In cases where 
family members (including husband and wife) are owners and producers in 
a Venture, each family member shall count as one owner-producer.
    Applicants must be prepared to prove that the numbers and 
individuals identified meet the requirements specified upon 
notification of a grant award. Failure to do so shall result in 
withdrawal of the grant award.
    viii. Business management capabilities (0-10 points). Applicants 
should discuss their financial management system, procurement 
procedures, personnel policies, property management system, and travel 
procedures. Up to two points can be awarded for each component of this 
criterion, based on the appropriateness of the system, procedures or 
policies to the size and structure of business applying. Larger, more 
complex businesses will be expected to have more complex systems, 
procedures, and policies than smaller, less complex businesses.
    ix. Sustainability and economic impact (0-15 points). Projects will 
be evaluated based on the expected sustainability of the Venture and 
the expected economic impact on the local economy.
    x. Business size (5 points if the application meets the criterion 
or 0 points if the application does meet the criterion). Applicants 
must state the amount of gross sales earned for their most recent 
complete fiscal year or start-up operations must state that they have 
not completed a fiscal year. Points will be awarded as follows:
     0 points will be awarded to applicants that have $10 
million or more in gross sales or to applicants that do not provide 
enough information to determine gross sales.

[[Page 5166]]

     5 points will be awarded to applicants that have less than 
$10 million in gross sales.
    If an applicant is tentatively selected for funding, the applicant 
will need to verify the gross sales amount at the time of award. 
Failure to verify the amount stated in the application will be grounds 
for withdrawing the award.
    xi. Administrator points (up to 5 points, but not to exceed 10 
percent of the total points awarded for the other 10 criteria). The 
Administrator of USDA Rural Development Business and Cooperative 
Programs may award additional points to recognize innovative 
technologies, insure geographic distribution of grants, or encourage 
Value-Added projects in under-served areas. Applicants may submit an 
explanation of how the technology proposed is innovative and/or 
specific information verifying that the project is in an under-served 
area.

B. Review and Selection Process

    The Agency will conduct an initial screening of all applications 
for eligibility and to determine whether the application is complete 
and sufficiently responsive to the requirements set forth in this 
Notice to allow for an informed review. As part of this review, the 
Rural Development State Office may require Working Capital applicants 
to submit their Feasibility Studies and Business Plans after the 
application deadline, but prior to the selection of grantees to 
facilitate the eligibility review process.
    All eligible and complete proposals will be evaluated by three 
reviewers based on criteria i through v described in Section V(A) (1) 
or (2). One of these reviewers will be a Rural Development employee not 
from the servicing State Office and the other two reviewers will be 
non-Federal persons. All reviewers must either: (1) Possess at least 
five years of working experience in an agriculture-related field, or 
(2) have obtained at least a bachelors degree in one or more of the 
following fields: Agri-business, business, economics, finance, or 
marketing and have a minimum of three years of experience in an 
agriculture-related field (e.g. farming, marketing, consulting, 
university professor, research, officer for trade association, 
government employee for an agricultural program). Once the scores for 
criteria i through v have been completed by the three reviewers, they 
will be averaged to obtain the independent reviewer score.
    The application will also receive one score from the Rural 
Development servicing State Office based on criteria vi through x. This 
score will be added to the independent reviewer score.
    Finally, the Administrator of USDA Rural Development Business and 
Cooperative Programs will award any Administrator points based on 
Proposal Evaluation Criterion xi. These points will be added to the 
cumulative score for criteria i through x. A final ranking will be 
obtained based solely on the scores received for criteria i through xi.
    After the award selections are made, all applicants will be 
notified of the status of their applications by mail. Grantees must 
meet all statutory and regulatory program requirements in order to 
receive their award. In the event that a grantee cannot meet the 
requirements, the award will be withdrawn. Applicants for Working 
Capital Grants must submit complete, independent third-party 
Feasibility Studies and Business Plans before the grant award can be 
finalized. All Projects will be evaluated by the servicing State Office 
prior to finalizing the award to ensure that funded Projects are likely 
to be feasible in the proposed project area. Regardless of scoring, a 
Project determined to be unlikely to be feasible by the servicing State 
Office with concurrence by the National Office will not be funded.

C. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates

    Award Date: The announcement of award selections is expected to 
occur on or about September 1, 2008.

VI. Award Administration Information

A. Award Notices

    Successful applicants will receive a notification of tentative 
selection for funding from Rural Development. Applicants must comply 
with all applicable statutes, regulations, and this notice before the 
grant award will receive final approval.
    Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification, including 
dispute resolution alternatives, by mail.

B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

    7 CFR parts 3015, 3019, and 4284 are applicable and may be accessed 
at https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-table-search.html#page1.
    The following additional requirements apply to grantees selected 
for this program:
    Grant Agreement.
    Letter of Conditions.
    Form RD 1940-1, ``Request for Obligation of Funds.''
    Form RD 1942-46, ``Letter of Intent to Meet Conditions.''
    Form AD-1047, ``Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and 
Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered Transactions.''
    Form AD-1048, ``Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, 
Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered 
Transactions.''
    Form AD-1049, ``Certification Regarding a Drug-Free Workplace 
Re

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.