Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts, 4939-4940 [E8-1426]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2008 / Notices
(II) a forcible sex offense; or (III) sexual
abuse of a minor, except that this term
does not include statutory rape.
(vii) ‘‘Sentence of imprisonment’’ has
the meaning given that term in
Application Note 2 and subsection (b) of
§ 4A1.2 (Definitions and Instructions for
Computing Criminal History), without
regard to the date of the conviction. The
length of the sentence imposed includes
any term of imprisonment imposed
upon revocation of probation, parole, or
supervised release.
(viii) ‘‘Terrorism offense’’ means any
offense involving, or intending to
promote, a ‘‘Federal crime of terrorism’’,
as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C.
§ 2332b(g)(5).
2. Aiding and Abetting, Conspiracies,
and Attempts.—Prior convictions of
offenses counted under subsection (b)(1)
include the offenses of aiding and
abetting, conspiracy to commit, and
attempting to commit such offenses.
3. Multiple Prior Sentences.—
Sentences of imprisonment are counted
separately or as a single sentence as
provided by § 4A1.2.
4. Interaction with Chapter Four.—A
conviction taken into account under
subsection (b)(1) is not excluded from
consideration of whether that
conviction receives criminal history
points pursuant to Chapter Four, Part A
(Criminal History).’’.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Issue for Comment
1. Should any of the specific offense
characteristics and departure provisions
in one option be adopted by the
Commission as part of another option?
If so, which provisions should be
incorporated into which option?
Court Security Improvement Act of
2007
8. Issue for Comment
1. The Commission requests comment
regarding two new offenses created by
the Court Security Improvement Act of
2007, Public Law 110–177. Specifically,
the Commission requests comment
regarding whether the Commission
should amend Appendix A (Statutory
Index) to refer these new provisions to
existing guidelines, and if so, to what
guideline(s) should each new offense be
referenced?
The new provision at 18 U.S.C. 1521
prohibits the filing of, attempts, or
conspiracies to file, any false lien or
encumbrance against the real or
personal property of officers or
employees of the United States
Government, on account of that
individual’s performance of official
duties. The offense is punishable by a
maximum term of 10 years of
imprisonment. Are there existing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Jan 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
guidelines that would be appropriate to
cover violations of the new provision at
18 U.S.C. 1521? For example, should
violations of 18 U.S.C. 1521 be
referenced to § 2J1.2 (Obstruction of
Justice), or alternatively or additionally
to § 2B1.1 (Larceny, Embezzlement, and
Other Forms of Theft; Offenses
Involving Stolen Property; Property
Damage or Destruction; Fraud and
Deceit; Forgery; Offenses Involving
Altered or Counterfeit Instruments
Other than Counterfeit Bearer
Obligations of the United States)? What,
if any, specific offense characteristics
should be added? Should an application
note be added instructing courts to
apply § 3A1.2 (Official Victim)?
The new provision at 18 U.S.C. 119
prohibits the public disclosure of
restricted personal information about a
federal officer or employee, witness,
juror, or the immediate family member
of such persons, with the intent to
threaten or facilitate a crime of violence
against such person. The offense is
punishable by a maximum term of 5
years of imprisonment. Are there
existing guidelines that would be
appropriate to cover violations of the
new provision at 18 U.S.C. 119
(Protection of individuals performing
certain official duties)? For example,
should the new provision be referenced
to § 2H3.1 (Interception of
Communications; Eavesdropping;
Disclosure of Certain Private or
Protected Information); or alternatively
or additionally to the assault guidelines
in Chapter Two, Part A (Offenses
Against the Person)? What, if any,
specific offense characteristics should
be added? Should an application note
be added instructing courts to apply
§ 3A1.2 (Official Victim)?
2. Section 209 of the Act directs the
Commission to ‘‘review the Sentencing
Guidelines as they apply to threats
punishable under section 115 of title 18,
United States Code, that occur over the
Internet, and determine whether and by
how much that circumstance should
aggravate the punishment pursuant to
section 994 of title 28, United States
Code. In conducting the study, the
Commission shall take into
consideration the number of such
threats made, the intended number of
recipients of such threats, and whether
the initial senders of such threats were
acting in an individual capacity or as
part of a larger group.’’ How should the
Commission respond to the directive?
What are the aggravating circumstances
in such offenses, and how should the
PO 00000
Frm 00173
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4939
Commission address those
circumstances?
[FR Doc. E8–1425 Filed 1–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2211–01–P
UNITED STATES SENTENCING
COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United
States Courts
United States Sentencing
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments
to the Sentencing Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure. Request for
public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth
proposed amendments to the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure and a related issue for
comment. The Commission invites
public comment on these proposed
amendments.
Public comment should be
received by the Commission not later
than March 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to: United
States Sentencing Commission, One
Columbus Circle, NE., Suite 2–500,
South Lobby, Washington, DC 20002–
8002, Attention: Public Affairs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, Telephone: (202) 502–4590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
995(a)(1) of title 28, United States Code,
authorizes the Commission to establish
general policies and promulgate rules
and regulations as necessary for the
Commission to carry out the purposes of
the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The
Commission originally adopted the
Rules of Practice and Procedure in July
1997 and now proposes to make
amendments to these rules as they
pertain to retroactivity consideration. In
accordance with Rule 1.2 of its Rules of
Practice and Procedure, the Commission
hereby invites the public to provide
comment on the proposed amendments.
DATES:
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 995(a)(1); USSC Rules
of Practice and Procedure 1.2.
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
1. Synopsis of Proposed Amendment:
This proposed amendment modifies the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure pertaining to retroactivity
consideration. Currently, Rule 4.1
(Promulgation of Amendments)
provides that ‘‘in those cases in which
the Commission considers an
amendment for retroactive application
to previously sentenced, imprisoned
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
4940
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 18 / Monday, January 28, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
defendants, it shall decide whether to
make the amendment retroactive at the
same meeting at which it decides to
promulgate the amendment.’’. Deciding
whether to make an amendment
retroactive at the same meeting at which
the amendment is promulgated,
however, often is impracticable. A
complete retroactivity analysis typically
cannot be prepared until the
Commission has decided to promulgate
a specific amendment option, which
may not occur until the meeting at
which the amendment is promulgated.
Similarly, the public often cannot
provide fully informed comment on
possible retroactivity until the
Commission has narrowed its
consideration of a proposed amendment
to a specific option, again a decision
which may not occur until the meeting
at which the amendment is
promulgated. As a result, the proposed
amendment deletes the requirement in
Rule 4.1 that the retroactivity decision
be made at the same meeting as
promulgation of an amendment.
The proposed amendment also
amends Rule 4.1 to more clearly set
forth the Commission’s statutory
requirement to consider retroactivity
under 28 U.S.C. 994(u).
The proposed amendment also
modifies the process by which the
Commission instructs staff to prepare a
retroactivity impact analysis. Currently,
Rule 2.2 (Voting Rules for Action by the
Commission) provides that ‘‘[t]he
decision to instruct staff to prepare a
retroactivity impact analysis for a
proposed amendment shall require the
affirmative vote of at least three
members at a public meeting.’’ The
proposed amendment would delete this
requirement by amending Rule 4.1 to
provide that ‘‘[p]rior to final action on
the retroactive application of an
amendment, staff shall prepare and the
Commission shall review a retroactivity
impact analysis of the amendment’’. The
proposed amendment therefore, deletes
the procedural requirement that the
Commission instruct staff to prepare a
retroactivity analysis and instead
requires that such an analysis be
prepared prior to final action on
retroactivity.
Finally, one issue for comment follows
the proposed amendment.
Part II of the Rules of Practice and
Procedure is amended in Rule 2.2 is
amended in the third paragraph by
striking the last sentence.
Part IV of the Rules of Practice and
Procedure is amended in Rule 4.1 in the
second paragraph by striking the last
two sentences and inserting the
following:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Jan 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
‘‘The Commission shall, however,
consider whether to give retroactive
application to an amendment that
reduces the term of imprisonment
recommended in the guidelines
applicable to a particular offense or
category of offenses. See 28
U.S.C. 994(u). Prior to final action on the
retroactive application of an
amendment, staff shall prepare and the
Commission shall review a retroactivity
impact analysis of the amendment.’’.
Issue for Comment
Should the Commission amend the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure to provide a specified time
frame governing final action with
respect to retroactive application of an
amendment pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
994(u), and, if so, what should the time
frame be? For example, should the rules
provide a time frame that begins at the
date of promulgation or the effective
date of the amendment? Should the time
frame specify a certain period of days by
which final action should be taken, or
should the time frame be more general
in nature?
[FR Doc. E8–1426 Filed 1–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2211–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Small Business Size Standards:
Waiver of the Nonmanufacturer Rule
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of Waiver of the
Nonmanufacturer Rule for All Other
Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and
Component Manufacturing product
number 6240.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) is granting a
waiver of the Nonmanufacturer Rule for
All Other Miscellaneous Electrical
Equipment and Component
Manufacturing (Fluorescent Lamps,
Incandescent Lamps, etc). The basis for
waiver is that no small business
manufacturers are supplying this class
of product to the Federal government.
The effect of a waiver would be to allow
otherwise qualified regular dealers to
supply the products of any domestic
manufacturer on a Federal contract set
aside for small businesses; servicedisabled veteran-owned small
businesses or SBA’s 8(a) Business
Development Program.
DATES: This waiver is effective February
12, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pamela M. McClam, Program Analyst,
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
by telephone at (202) 205–7408; by FAX
at (202) 481–4783; or by e-mail at
Pamela.McClam@sba.gov.
Section
8(a)(17) of the Small Business Act, (Act)
15 U.S.C. 637(a)(17), requires that
recipients of Federal contracts set aside
for small businesses, service-disabled
veteran-owned small businesses, or
SBA’s 8(a) Business Development
Program provide the product of a small
business manufacturer or processor, if
the recipient is other than the actual
manufacturer or processor of the
product. This requirement is commonly
referred to as the Nonmanufacturer
Rule. The SBA regulations imposing
this requirement are found at 13 CFR
121.406(b). Section 8(a)(17)(b)(iv) of the
Act authorizes SBA to waive the
Nonmanufacturer Rule for any ‘‘class of
products’’ for which there are no small
business manufacturers or processors
available to participate in the Federal
market.
As implemented in SBA’s regulations
at 13 CFR 121.1202(c), in order to be
considered available to participate in
the Federal market for a class of
products, a small business manufacturer
must have submitted a proposal for a
contract solicitation or received a
contract from the Federal government
within the last 24 months. The SBA
defines ‘‘class of products’’ based on six
digit coding systems. The first coding
system is the Office of Management and
Budget North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS). The
second is the Product and Service Code
required as a data entry field by the
Federal Procurement Data System.
The SBA received a request on
December 3, 2007, to waive the
Nonmanufacturer Rule for All Other
Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and
Component Manufacturing (Fluorescent
Lamps, Incandescent Lamps, etc).
In response, on December 14, 2007,
SBA published in the Federal Register
a notice of intent to waive the
Nonmanufacturer Rule for All Other
Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and
Component Manufacturing (Fluorescent
Lamps, Incandescent Lamps, etc). SBA
explained in the notice that it was
soliciting comments and sources of
small business manufacturers of this
class of products. No comments were
received in response to this notice. SBA
has determined that there are no small
business manufacturers of this class of
products, and is therefore granting the
waiver of the Nonmanufacturer Rule for
All Other Miscellaneous Electrical
Equipment and Component
Manufacturing (Fluorescent Lamps,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2008)]
[NOTI]
[Pages 4939-4940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1426]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts
AGENCY: United States Sentencing Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments to the Sentencing Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure. Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth proposed amendments to the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure and a related issue for comment. The
Commission invites public comment on these proposed amendments.
DATES: Public comment should be received by the Commission not later
than March 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to: United States Sentencing Commission, One
Columbus Circle, NE., Suite 2-500, South Lobby, Washington, DC 20002-
8002, Attention: Public Affairs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, Telephone: (202) 502-4590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 995(a)(1) of title 28, United States
Code, authorizes the Commission to establish general policies and
promulgate rules and regulations as necessary for the Commission to
carry out the purposes of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The
Commission originally adopted the Rules of Practice and Procedure in
July 1997 and now proposes to make amendments to these rules as they
pertain to retroactivity consideration. In accordance with Rule 1.2 of
its Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Commission hereby invites the
public to provide comment on the proposed amendments.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 995(a)(1); USSC Rules of Practice and
Procedure 1.2.
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
1. Synopsis of Proposed Amendment: This proposed amendment modifies
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure pertaining to
retroactivity consideration. Currently, Rule 4.1 (Promulgation of
Amendments) provides that ``in those cases in which the Commission
considers an amendment for retroactive application to previously
sentenced, imprisoned
[[Page 4940]]
defendants, it shall decide whether to make the amendment retroactive
at the same meeting at which it decides to promulgate the amendment.''.
Deciding whether to make an amendment retroactive at the same meeting
at which the amendment is promulgated, however, often is impracticable.
A complete retroactivity analysis typically cannot be prepared until
the Commission has decided to promulgate a specific amendment option,
which may not occur until the meeting at which the amendment is
promulgated. Similarly, the public often cannot provide fully informed
comment on possible retroactivity until the Commission has narrowed its
consideration of a proposed amendment to a specific option, again a
decision which may not occur until the meeting at which the amendment
is promulgated. As a result, the proposed amendment deletes the
requirement in Rule 4.1 that the retroactivity decision be made at the
same meeting as promulgation of an amendment.
The proposed amendment also amends Rule 4.1 to more clearly set
forth the Commission's statutory requirement to consider retroactivity
under 28 U.S.C. 994(u).
The proposed amendment also modifies the process by which the
Commission instructs staff to prepare a retroactivity impact analysis.
Currently, Rule 2.2 (Voting Rules for Action by the Commission)
provides that ``[t]he decision to instruct staff to prepare a
retroactivity impact analysis for a proposed amendment shall require
the affirmative vote of at least three members at a public meeting.''
The proposed amendment would delete this requirement by amending Rule
4.1 to provide that ``[p]rior to final action on the retroactive
application of an amendment, staff shall prepare and the Commission
shall review a retroactivity impact analysis of the amendment''. The
proposed amendment therefore, deletes the procedural requirement that
the Commission instruct staff to prepare a retroactivity analysis and
instead requires that such an analysis be prepared prior to final
action on retroactivity.
Finally, one issue for comment follows the proposed amendment.
Part II of the Rules of Practice and Procedure is amended in Rule
2.2 is amended in the third paragraph by striking the last sentence.
Part IV of the Rules of Practice and Procedure is amended in Rule
4.1 in the second paragraph by striking the last two sentences and
inserting the following:
``The Commission shall, however, consider whether to give
retroactive application to an amendment that reduces the term of
imprisonment recommended in the guidelines applicable to a particular
offense or category of offenses. See 28 U.S.C. 994(u). Prior to final
action on the retroactive application of an amendment, staff shall
prepare and the Commission shall review a retroactivity impact analysis
of the amendment.''.
Issue for Comment
Should the Commission amend the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure to provide a specified time frame governing final action with
respect to retroactive application of an amendment pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 994(u), and, if so, what should the time frame be? For example,
should the rules provide a time frame that begins at the date of
promulgation or the effective date of the amendment? Should the time
frame specify a certain period of days by which final action should be
taken, or should the time frame be more general in nature?
[FR Doc. E8-1426 Filed 1-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2211-01-P
