Michigan DNR: Application for an Incidental Take Permit, 4619-4620 [E8-1237]

Download as PDF jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 17 / Friday, January 25, 2008 / Notices proposed for Wilderness designation. However, only off-site drilling would be allowed; there would be no surface occupancy by Doyon. From Doyon, the U.S. would receive title to a minimum of 115,000 acres, but the actual amount could be adjusted upward to equalize values. The land consolidation exchange and 12(b) reallocation provisions of Phase I would proceed as detailed in the Agreement in Principle. Phase II of the exchange would proceed as detailed in the Agreement, however Doyon’s commitment to sell additional lands to the U.S. would be reduced from about 120,000 acres to about 81,000 acres. Potential access rights-of-way would cross the proposed White-Crazy Mountains Wilderness Area. If Doyon were to produce oil or gas on the lands received in the exchange, the Service would receive a perpetual production payment equal to 1.25% of the value at the wellhead. Alternative 3: No action (no exchange). The U.S. would not enter into a land exchange with Doyon. Doyon currently owns about 1.055 million acres of land with oil and gas potential inside the Refuge. Therefore, any alternative, including the ‘‘no action’’ alternative, could result in oil and/or gas development on Doyonowned lands. If Doyon develops any of its lands, including those received through exchange, the resulting infrastructure could facilitate development on other private lands in the Refuge. The impacts of development on Doyon’s current land holdings, with or without a land exchange, are analyzed as Cumulative Effects in the DEIS. In most cases, access to Doyon lands would cross federally-owned lands. In these cases, Doyon would be required to apply for a right-of-way permit under Title XI of ANILCA. At that time, a separate NEPA process would evaluate various transportation/ pipeline corridor alternatives as well as the proposed oil field development. During scoping, the Service identified a number of issues that are analyzed in detail in the DEIS. Most of the public scoping comments focused on the potential impacts of oil and gas development in the Yukon Flats rather than the land exchange itself. Therefore much of the DEIS focuses on development impacts. Specifically, the DEIS addresses how the proposed alternatives could affect fish and wildlife; wetlands and aquatic habitats; the physical environment (water quality and quantity, hydrology, air quality, climate); subsistence; cultural/ archaeological resources; socioeconomics; refuge purposes; biological integrity, diversity and VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:59 Jan 24, 2008 Jkt 214001 environmental health; land use (including special designation areas, recreation, visual resources) and environmental justice (including human health). Section 810 of ANILCA requires the Service to evaluate the effects of the alternatives on subsistence activities and to hold public hearings if any alternative may significantly restrict subsistence activities. The Service analysis finds that the cumulative effects, considered in conjunction with the alternatives, meet the ‘‘may significantly restrict’’ threshold. Therefore, the Service will hold subsistence hearings in conjunction with the DEIS public hearings. Public availability of comments: Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment-including your personal identifying information-may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Dated: January 17, 2008. Thomas O. Melius, Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska. [FR Doc. E8–1277 Filed 1–24–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Michigan DNR: Application for an Incidental Take Permit Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Draft Habitat Conservation Plan and Draft Environmental Assessment for the Karner blue butterfly; receipt of application for an incidental take permit; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (Applicant) has applied to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for a 20-year incidental take permit (ITP) for the federally endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) (KBB) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The ITP would allow the Applicant to engage in habitat management, right-of-way maintenance, and certain development activities in occupied KBB habitat on non-Federal PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4619 land in Michigan. The permit application includes a draft Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and draft Environmental Assessment (EA) that describes the proposed action and measures the Applicant will undertake to minimize and mitigate take of KBB. Section 9 of the Act and its implementing regulations prohibit the take of animal species listed as endangered or threatened. The definition of take under the Act includes the following activities: to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect listed animal species, or attempt to engage in such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1538). Section 10 of the Act, 16 U.S.C. 1539, establishes a program whereby persons seeking to pursue activities that otherwise could give rise to liability for unlawful ‘‘take’’ of federally protected species may receive an ITP, which protects them from such liability. To obtain an ITP, an applicant must submit a HCP containing appropriate minimization and mitigation measures and ensure that the taking is incidental to, and not the purpose of, an otherwise lawful activity (16 U.S.C. 1539(a)(1)(B) and 1539(a)(2)(A). Once we have determined the applicant has satisfied these and other statutory criteria, we may issue the ITP. This notice, provided pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act, as amended, advises the public and other agencies of the availability of the draft HCP and draft EA for review and comment. DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments on or before March 25, 2008. ADDRESSES: Send your comments or request information by any of the following methods: • U.S. Mail: Comments should be sent to the Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Ecological Services, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111–4056. • Facsimile: 612–713–5292. • E-Mail: hcp_MichiganKBB@fws.gov. All comments received become part of the official public record. Public requests for comments submitted will be handled in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act and the Council on Environmental Quality’s NEPA regulations [40 CFR 1506.6(f)]. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular business hours. Individual respondents may request we withhold their home address from the record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. If a respondent E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM 25JAN1 4620 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 17 / Friday, January 25, 2008 / Notices wishes us to withhold his/her name and/or address, this must be stated prominently at the beginning of the comment. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Fasbender at 612–713–5343 or peter_fasbender@fws.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Availability of Documents Individuals requesting copies of the draft EA and draft HCP should contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by telephone at (612) 713–5343 or by letter (see ADDRESSES above). Copies of the draft EA and draft HCP also are available for public review during normal business hours (8–4:30) at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Regional Office, located at 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111, and at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s East Lansing Field Office, located at 2651 Coolidge Road, Suite 101, East Lansing, Michigan 48823. Both documents are also available for review at the Service’s Regional Web site at: https://www.fws.gov/midwest/ Endangered/permits/hcp/. Draft Habitat Conservation Plan The purpose of the draft HCP is to manage habitat to promote recovery of the species and to minimize incidental take of KBB, mitigate the effects of any such take to the maximum extent practicable, and otherwise avoid any appreciable reduction in the likelihood of the survival and recovery of the KBB in the wild. The Applicant developed the draft HCP to facilitate conservation of oak savanna ecosystems (KBB habitat) and to help maintain occupied KBB habitat on both public and private land in Michigan. The goals of the HCP are to: (1) Support persistence of a functioning oak savanna ecosystem in Michigan; (2) support maintenance of oak-savanna habitats in a condition and configuration necessary to sustain existing populations of KBB and other associated species of concern; and (3) integrate diverse land uses with the conservation of the oak savanna ecosystem, KBB and other associated species of concern. Active management of KBB habitat is necessary for the conservation of KBB and oak savanna. However, some management practices (e.g., prescribed burning, mowing) necessary for maintaining early-successional habitats may result in incidental take of KBB, and section 9 of the ESA prohibits take of an endangered species. Therefore, to obtain the legal authority to manage KBB habitat with the potential resultant take of KBB, the Applicant has applied VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:59 Jan 24, 2008 Jkt 214001 for an ITP which would allow habitat management, utility and transportation right-of-way maintenance, and certain development activities that avoid or minimize and mitigate take when conducted in occupied KBB habitat. The Applicant has applied for a statewide ITP and developed a statewide HCP with the intent that other land managers and/or landowners may participate as sub-permittees, subject to the conditions of the final permit, in the event their otherwise lawful activities result in take of KBB. Currently, land managers and landowners need to obtain authorization on a project-byproject basis to conduct legally the activities listed above. This situation results in a patchwork of projects conducted with little coordinated planning or consideration of range-wide impacts to KBB and other species of concern. By contrast, projects implemented under the HCP would be done according to consistent procedures in a highly coordinated effort. The HCP will facilitate efforts to evaluate and minimize the cumulative adverse impacts of individual projects to KBB populations. Actions conducted under the HCP are not intended or expected to either increase or decrease the amount of occupied KBB habitat in Michigan. Rather, management action will be conducted to help prevent the loss of occupied habitat on non-Federal land. Maintenance of existing populations is a critical component of the KBB conservation program in Michigan. It is also consistent with objectives of the Federal Recovery Plan, which outlines a strategy for ‘‘maintaining extant populations’’ and ‘‘improving and stabilizing populations where the butterfly is imperiled.’’ Nevertheless, other management actions may take place on non-federal lands in Michigan not occupied by KBB that result in an increase in occupied habitat. The ITP and HCP described herein also are intended to cover any occupied KBB habitat that may develop in the future. Draft Environmental Assessment The purpose of the draft EA is to evaluate and publicly disclose the possible environmental consequences issuance of an ITP and implementation of the draft HCP could have on the quality of the physical, biological, and human environment, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Prior to issuing the ITP, the Service is required to analyze alternatives considered in the development of the HCP. This analysis is contained in the draft EA, as required by the National PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), for the Federal action of issuing an ITP under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. The draft EA considers two ‘‘action’’ alternatives and one ‘‘no action’’ alternative. The area encompassed by the HCP may contain facilities eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places and other historical or archeological resources may be present. The National Historic Preservation Act and other laws require these properties and resources be identified and considered in project planning. The public is requested to inform the Service of concerns about archeological sites, buildings and structures, historic events, sacred and traditional areas, and other historic preservation concerns. Decisions The public process for the proposed Federal action will be completed after the public comment period, at which time the Service will evaluate the permit application (if appropriate to the selected alternative), the HCP, and comments submitted thereon to determine whether the application meets the requirements of 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. If the requirements are met, the Service will issue an ITP to the Applicant for incidental take of KBB. Dated: December 13, 2007. Lynn Lewis, Deputy Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3. [FR Doc. E8–1237 Filed 1–24–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Geological Survey Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Interior. ACTION: Proposed extension of an information collection (1028–0078). AGENCY: SUMMARY: To comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), we are notifying the public that we will submit to the Office of management and Budget (OMB) an information collection request (ICR) to renew approval of the paperwork requirements for the North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP). This notice provides the public an opportunity to comment on the ICR. DATES: Submit written comments by March 25, 2007. E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM 25JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 17 (Friday, January 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4619-4620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Michigan DNR: Application for an Incidental Take Permit

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Draft Habitat Conservation Plan and 
Draft Environmental Assessment for the Karner blue butterfly; receipt 
of application for an incidental take permit; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (Applicant) has 
applied to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for a 20-year 
incidental take permit (ITP) for the federally endangered Karner blue 
butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) (KBB) pursuant to section 
10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). 
The ITP would allow the Applicant to engage in habitat management, 
right-of-way maintenance, and certain development activities in 
occupied KBB habitat on non-Federal land in Michigan. The permit 
application includes a draft Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and draft 
Environmental Assessment (EA) that describes the proposed action and 
measures the Applicant will undertake to minimize and mitigate take of 
KBB. Section 9 of the Act and its implementing regulations prohibit the 
take of animal species listed as endangered or threatened. The 
definition of take under the Act includes the following activities: to 
harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or 
collect listed animal species, or attempt to engage in such conduct (16 
U.S.C. 1538). Section 10 of the Act, 16 U.S.C. 1539, establishes a 
program whereby persons seeking to pursue activities that otherwise 
could give rise to liability for unlawful ``take'' of federally 
protected species may receive an ITP, which protects them from such 
liability. To obtain an ITP, an applicant must submit a HCP containing 
appropriate minimization and mitigation measures and ensure that the 
taking is incidental to, and not the purpose of, an otherwise lawful 
activity (16 U.S.C. 1539(a)(1)(B) and 1539(a)(2)(A). Once we have 
determined the applicant has satisfied these and other statutory 
criteria, we may issue the ITP.
    This notice, provided pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the 
Endangered Species Act, as amended, advises the public and other 
agencies of the availability of the draft HCP and draft EA for review 
and comment.

DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments 
on or before March 25, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Send your comments or request information by any of the 
following methods:
     U.S. Mail: Comments should be sent to the Regional 
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Ecological 
Services, 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111-4056.
     Facsimile: 612-713-5292.
     E-Mail: hcp_MichiganKBB@fws.gov.
    All comments received become part of the official public record. 
Public requests for comments submitted will be handled in accordance 
with the Freedom of Information Act and the Council on Environmental 
Quality's NEPA regulations [40 CFR 1506.6(f)]. Our practice is to make 
comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available 
for public review during regular business hours. Individual respondents 
may request we withhold their home address from the record, which we 
will honor to the extent allowable by law. If a respondent

[[Page 4620]]

wishes us to withhold his/her name and/or address, this must be stated 
prominently at the beginning of the comment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Fasbender at 612-713-5343 or 
peter_fasbender@fws.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Availability of Documents

    Individuals requesting copies of the draft EA and draft HCP should 
contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by telephone at (612) 713-
5343 or by letter (see ADDRESSES above). Copies of the draft EA and 
draft HCP also are available for public review during normal business 
hours (8-4:30) at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Regional Office, 
located at 1 Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111, and at the 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's East Lansing Field Office, located at 
2651 Coolidge Road, Suite 101, East Lansing, Michigan 48823. Both 
documents are also available for review at the Service's Regional Web 
site at: https://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangered/permits/hcp/.

Draft Habitat Conservation Plan

    The purpose of the draft HCP is to manage habitat to promote 
recovery of the species and to minimize incidental take of KBB, 
mitigate the effects of any such take to the maximum extent 
practicable, and otherwise avoid any appreciable reduction in the 
likelihood of the survival and recovery of the KBB in the wild. The 
Applicant developed the draft HCP to facilitate conservation of oak 
savanna ecosystems (KBB habitat) and to help maintain occupied KBB 
habitat on both public and private land in Michigan. The goals of the 
HCP are to: (1) Support persistence of a functioning oak savanna 
ecosystem in Michigan; (2) support maintenance of oak-savanna habitats 
in a condition and configuration necessary to sustain existing 
populations of KBB and other associated species of concern; and (3) 
integrate diverse land uses with the conservation of the oak savanna 
ecosystem, KBB and other associated species of concern.
    Active management of KBB habitat is necessary for the conservation 
of KBB and oak savanna. However, some management practices (e.g., 
prescribed burning, mowing) necessary for maintaining early-
successional habitats may result in incidental take of KBB, and section 
9 of the ESA prohibits take of an endangered species. Therefore, to 
obtain the legal authority to manage KBB habitat with the potential 
resultant take of KBB, the Applicant has applied for an ITP which would 
allow habitat management, utility and transportation right-of-way 
maintenance, and certain development activities that avoid or minimize 
and mitigate take when conducted in occupied KBB habitat.
    The Applicant has applied for a statewide ITP and developed a 
statewide HCP with the intent that other land managers and/or 
landowners may participate as sub-permittees, subject to the conditions 
of the final permit, in the event their otherwise lawful activities 
result in take of KBB. Currently, land managers and landowners need to 
obtain authorization on a project-by-project basis to conduct legally 
the activities listed above. This situation results in a patchwork of 
projects conducted with little coordinated planning or consideration of 
range-wide impacts to KBB and other species of concern. By contrast, 
projects implemented under the HCP would be done according to 
consistent procedures in a highly coordinated effort. The HCP will 
facilitate efforts to evaluate and minimize the cumulative adverse 
impacts of individual projects to KBB populations.
    Actions conducted under the HCP are not intended or expected to 
either increase or decrease the amount of occupied KBB habitat in 
Michigan. Rather, management action will be conducted to help prevent 
the loss of occupied habitat on non-Federal land. Maintenance of 
existing populations is a critical component of the KBB conservation 
program in Michigan. It is also consistent with objectives of the 
Federal Recovery Plan, which outlines a strategy for ``maintaining 
extant populations'' and ``improving and stabilizing populations where 
the butterfly is imperiled.'' Nevertheless, other management actions 
may take place on non-federal lands in Michigan not occupied by KBB 
that result in an increase in occupied habitat. The ITP and HCP 
described herein also are intended to cover any occupied KBB habitat 
that may develop in the future.

Draft Environmental Assessment

    The purpose of the draft EA is to evaluate and publicly disclose 
the possible environmental consequences issuance of an ITP and 
implementation of the draft HCP could have on the quality of the 
physical, biological, and human environment, as required by the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
    Prior to issuing the ITP, the Service is required to analyze 
alternatives considered in the development of the HCP. This analysis is 
contained in the draft EA, as required by the National Environmental 
Policy Act (NEPA), for the Federal action of issuing an ITP under 
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. The draft EA considers two ``action'' 
alternatives and one ``no action'' alternative.
    The area encompassed by the HCP may contain facilities eligible to 
be listed on the National Register of Historic Places and other 
historical or archeological resources may be present. The National 
Historic Preservation Act and other laws require these properties and 
resources be identified and considered in project planning. The public 
is requested to inform the Service of concerns about archeological 
sites, buildings and structures, historic events, sacred and 
traditional areas, and other historic preservation concerns.

Decisions

    The public process for the proposed Federal action will be 
completed after the public comment period, at which time the Service 
will evaluate the permit application (if appropriate to the selected 
alternative), the HCP, and comments submitted thereon to determine 
whether the application meets the requirements of 10(a)(1)(B) of the 
Act. If the requirements are met, the Service will issue an ITP to the 
Applicant for incidental take of KBB.

    Dated: December 13, 2007.
Lynn Lewis,
Deputy Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3.
[FR Doc. E8-1237 Filed 1-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.