Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Dry Pea Crop Provisions, 3411-3417 [E8-321]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
with a specific individual in an
automated environment;
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 293.105, paragraphs (b)(3)
through (13) are added to read as
follows:
§ 293.105 Restrictions on collection and
use of information.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) If Social Security Numbers are
collected, they will be collected only at
the time of the employee’s appointment
to be entered into the human resources
and payroll systems. The collection tool
(if paper-based) will be stored in a
protected location to guard against
exposure until it is no longer required.
The Guide to Personnel Recordkeeping
will be used to determine retention
requirements for certain paper-based
collection tools. Disposal of all paperbased collection tools (i.e., forms,
letters, and other correspondence) will
be in accordance with the General
Record Schedule issued by the National
Archives and Records Administration.
(4) Agencies may not use the Social
Security Number as an employee’s
primary key, i.e., unique identifier, in
internal or external data processing
activities.
(5) Agencies must ensure that Social
Security Numbers are not printed, e.g.,
on forms, or reports, or displayed on
computer display screens.
(6) Access to Social Security Numbers
must be restricted to those individuals
whose official duties require such
access. A listing of all individuals with
access authorization based on legitimate
business needs must be maintained and
reviewed for continued applicability.
(7) Agencies must ensure, through
appropriate annual training and
educational programs, including
training on Privacy Act and Freedom of
Information Act requirements, that
those individuals who are authorized to
access Social Security Numbers
understand their responsibility to
protect sensitive and personal
information. This responsibility
includes securing this information when
working from home or another remote
location.
(8) Agencies must use privacy and
confidentiality statements that describe
accountability clearly and warn of
possible disciplinary action for
unauthorized release of the Social
Security Number and other personally
identifiable information. These
statements must be signed by all
individuals who have access to Social
Security Numbers.
(9) Agencies must ensure their
telework policies and written
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jan 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
agreements are in compliance with
Federal privacy protection policies,
including policies governing protection
of personally identifiable information,
e.g., Social Security Numbers.
(10) Agencies must require
supervisory approval before authorized
individuals may access, transport, or
transmit information containing a Social
Security Number outside of the
agencies’ facilities. Electronic records
containing Social Security Numbers
must be transported or transmitted in an
encrypted or protected format as
prescribed in all established guidance
regarding the protection of sensitive
agency information. Paper-based records
containing Social Security Numbers
must be transported in wheeled
containers, portfolios, briefcases, or
similar devices that can be locked when
not in use. In addition, these containers
must be identifiable by tag or decal with
contact and mailing address
information.
(11) Agencies must ensure access to
Social Security Numbers, including
access involving data entry, printing,
and screen displays, occurs in a
protected location to guard against
exposure.
(12) Agencies must ensure all security
incidents involving personally
identifiable information, especially
Social Security Numbers, are reported
in accordance with all established
guidance regarding the reporting of
incidents involving personally
identifiable information. In addition,
agencies must inform all employees of
all established incident reporting
requirements annually.
(13) Agencies must ensure all
authorized disclosures of information
containing Social Security Numbers and
other personally identifiable data are
made in accordance with established
regulations and procedures.
4. In § 293.107, paragraphs (a)(8)
through (10) are added to read as
follows:
§ 293.107 Special safeguards for
automated records.
(a) * * *
(8) Minimize the risk of unauthorized
disclosure of Social Security Numbers
during data entry activities by
concealing the Social Security Number
on the screens.
(9) Assure adequate internal control
procedures to properly monitor
authorized and unauthorized access to
Social Security Numbers and other
personally identifiable data.
(10) Assure all Social Security
Number safeguards and protection rules
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3411
are enforced in both test and production
environments.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–858 Filed 1–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
RIN 0563–AC14
Common Crop Insurance Regulations;
Dry Pea Crop Provisions
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC) proposes to amend
the Common Crop Insurance
Regulations; Dry Pea Crop Insurance
Provisions to include the insurability of
additional types of dry peas, to offer
winter coverage, to allow replanting
payments, and to make chickpeas
insurable under the Dry Pea Crop
Provisions rather than the Dry Bean
Crop Provisions. The intended effect of
this action is to provide policy changes,
to clarify existing policy provisions to
better meet the needs of the producers,
and to reduce vulnerability to program
fraud, waste, and abuse. The changes
will apply for the 2009 and succeeding
crop years.
DATES: Written comments and opinions
on this proposed rule will be accepted
until close of business March 18, 2008
and will be considered when the rule is
to be made final.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments,
titled ‘‘Dry Pea Crop Provisions’’, by any
of the following methods:
• By Mail to: Director, Product
Administration and Standards Division,
Risk Management Agency, United States
Department of Agriculture, Beacon
Facility, Stop 0812, Room 421, PO Box
419205, Kansas City, MO 64141–6205.
• By Express Mail to: Director,
Product Administration and Standards
Division, Risk Management Agency,
United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812,
9240 Troost Avenue, Kansas City, MO
64131–3055.
• E-mail: DirectorPDD@rma.usda.gov.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
A copy of each response will be
available for public inspection and
copying from 7 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., CST,
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
3412
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Monday through Friday, except
holidays, at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Claire Elsea, Economist, Product
Management, Product Administration
and Standards Division, Risk
Management Agency, at the Kansas City,
MO, address listed above, telephone
(816) 926–7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
non-significant for the purpose of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it
has not been reviewed by OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of
information in this rule have been
approved by OMB under control
number 0563–0053 through June 30,
2008.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, or on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jan 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
on a substantial number of small
entities. Program requirements for the
Federal crop insurance program are the
same for all producers regardless of the
size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to
submit an application and acreage
report to establish their insurance
guarantees and compute premium
amounts, and all producers are required
to submit a notice of loss and
production information to determine the
amount of an indemnity payment in the
event of an insured cause of crop loss.
Whether a producer has 10 acres or
1000 acres, there is no difference in the
kind of information collected. To ensure
crop insurance is available to small
entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act
authorizes FCIC to waive collection of
administrative fees from limited
resource farmers. FCIC believes this
waiver helps to ensure that small
entities are given the same opportunities
as large entities to manage their risks
through the use of crop insurance. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not
been prepared since this regulation does
not have an impact on small entities,
and therefore, this regulation is exempt
from the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
in accordance with Executive Order
12988 on civil justice reform. The
provisions of this rule will not have a
retroactive effect. The provisions of this
rule will preempt State and local laws
to the extent such State and local laws
are inconsistent herewith. With respect
to any direct action taken by FCIC or to
require the insurance provider to take
specific action under the terms of the
crop insurance policy, the
administrative appeal provisions
published at 7 CFR part 11 must be
exhausted before any action against
FCIC for judicial review may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
quality of the human environment,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
health, or safety. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed.
Background
FCIC proposes to revise 7 CFR part
457, Common Crop Insurance
Regulations, by amending § 457.140 Dry
Pea Crop Insurance Provisions, to be
effective for the 2009 and succeeding
crop years. Several requests have been
made for changes to improve the
coverage offered, address program
integrity issues, simplify program
administration, and improve clarity of
the policy provisions.
The proposed changes are as follows:
1. Section 1—FCIC proposes to revise
the definition of ‘‘base price’’ to delete
the word ‘‘processor’’ and add ‘‘seed
company’’ since the contract is with a
seed company, not a processor.
FCIC also proposes to revise the
definition of ‘‘contract seed peas.’’
Proposed language makes coverage
available to fall and spring planted
acreage. FCIC now proposes to insure
fall planted acreage. Therefore, it must
be included in the definition of
‘‘contract seed peas.’’ FCIC also
proposes to remove the requirement that
acreage must be enrolled in the seed
certification program administered by
the state in which the peas are produced
because some states no longer
administer seed certification programs.
Therefore, enforcing this requirement
could limit the availability of crop
insurance for contract seed pea
producers.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘dry peas’’ to allow insurability of
additional types of dry peas. Currently,
only spring planted smooth green and
yellow types of commercial dry peas,
peas grown for seed, fall planted types
of Austrian Winter peas if provided for
in the Special Provisions, all spring
planted types of lentils, and all types of
contract seed peas are insurable. FCIC
proposes to amend these provisions to
remove the specific types that are
insurable and to specify that the
insurable types will be contained in the
Special Provisions. FCIC also proposes
to insure chickpeas (a.k.a. garbanzo
beans) under the Dry Pea Crop
Provisions. Chickpeas are currently
insurable under the Dry Bean Crop
Provisions only. However, the
agronomical and physiological traits of
chickpeas are more similar to dry peas
and lentils than dry beans. This change
will also simplify the crop insurance
program by allowing producers of dry
peas, lentils and chickpeas to purchase
coverage for these crops under one
policy.
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
FCIC proposes to clarify the definition
of ‘‘harvest’’ by adding the following
sentence ‘‘Dry peas that are swathed
prior to combining are not considered
harvested.’’ Swathing is a step in the
harvest process but the seed is not
removed from the plant until the crop
is combined.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘local market price’’ to specify that
factors not associated with grading
under United States Standards for
Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas and the
Lentils will not be considered unless
otherwise specified on the Special
Provisions. The intent of this change is
to standardize the grading standards to
be used in quality adjustment,
recognizing that there may be
circumstances where it may be
necessary to deviate from such
standards. If such circumstances arise,
the proposed change provides the
flexibility to make changes through the
Special Provisions, if necessary.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘nurse crop (companion crop)’’ for
clarity and to be consistent with the
definition of ‘‘nurse crop (companion
crop)’’ in the Small Grains Crop
Provisions.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘practical to replant’’ to reference the
addition of fall planted dry peas. As
stated above, insurance coverage will
now be provided for fall planted dry
peas. Therefore, the conditions under
which it will not be considered practical
to replant fall planted dry peas must be
specified because the conditions are not
the same as for spring planted dry peas.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘price election’’ to provide
clarification that the price election is
used to determine premium and any
indemnity for contract seed peas under
this policy.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘seed company contract’’ to remove
the word ‘‘varieties’’ and add the word
‘‘types’’ in both places. This change is
necessary because FCIC has proposed to
insure categories of dry peas that will be
contained in the Special Provisions to
allow the flexibility to add new types as
appropriate.
FCIC proposes to add a definition of
‘‘swathed’’ to describe the process that
is used by producers prior to combining
the crop because a crop that has only
been swathed is not considered
harvested.
FCIC proposes to add a definition of
‘‘type’’ because FCIC has proposed to
refer to the categories that may be
insured as ‘‘types,’’ and specify that the
insured types will be contained in the
Special Provisions, which will allow
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jan 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
additional types to be quickly added as
appropriate.
FCIC proposed to add a definition of
‘‘windrow’’ because the term is used in
the definition of ‘‘swathed.’’
2. Section 2—FCIC proposes to revise
the language in section 2 to specify
optional units may be established for
each type specified in the Special
Provisions because different types may
have significantly different
characteristics and risks, making it more
appropriate to have separate guarantees,
premium, and loss adjustment for each
type.
3. Section 3—FCIC proposes to revise
section 3 to allow the insured to select
a separate coverage level and price
percentage for each insurable type listed
on the Special Provisions. Previously,
only coverage levels could be selected
by type but because the types may have
significantly different characteristics
with different risks, allowing separate
price elections is appropriate.
4. Section 7—FCIC proposes to revise
section 7 to add provisions that state dry
peas planted to plow down, graze,
harvest as hay or to otherwise not
harvest as a mature dry pea crop are not
insurable. The Dry Pea Crop Provisions
allow coverage for dry peas that have
reached maturity. These practices do
not commonly take place when the dry
peas have reached maturity. Also, FCIC
has not established premium rates for
dry peas that are plowed down, grazed
or harvested as hay. Therefore, dry peas
that are planted to plow down, graze,
harvest as hay or to otherwise not
harvest as a mature crop are not
insurable under the Dry Pea Crop
Provisions.
FCIC also proposes to revise section 7
to allow insurability of fall planted
acreage of dry peas, and to allow for
coverage for fall seeded acreage of dry
peas between the time coverage begins
and the spring final planting date under
the Winter Coverage Option. More
producers are planting in the fall and
FCIC has sufficient data to assess the
risks and provide appropriate coverage.
Without the availability of such
coverage, producers who plant in the
fall are at risk until the spring coverage
takes affect.
5. Section 9—FCIC proposes to add
provisions to specify the criteria for
insurance coverage when the Special
Provisions designate only a spring final
planting date or both a fall and spring
final planting date. This change is
necessary because fall planted acreage is
now insurable under the Dry Pea Crop
Provisions.
6. Section 11—FCIC proposes to add
a new section 11 authorizing replanting
payments for dry peas. Adding
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3413
replanting payments for dry peas makes
the Dry Pea Crop Provisions consistent
with the coverage available for other
similar crops.
7. Redesignated section 13—FCIC
proposes to revise the introductory text
in 13(a) to be consistent with the
provisions in the Small Grain Crop
Provisions.
FCIC also proposes to revise
redesignated sections 13(c)(1) to add the
word ‘‘mature.’’ Adding the word
‘‘mature’’ is necessary because only
mature production is eligible for quality
adjustments. FCIC also proposes to
specify measurable standards in the
seed company contract when discussing
dry peas that meet or fail to meet the
standards in the seed company contract.
FCIC has had problems in the past with
contract standards that contained
standards that were not objective or
measurable, which made it very difficult
to determine whether the insured crop
met such standards. This language will
make it clear that FCIC is only providing
quality adjustments for dry peas that do
not meet the objective measurable
standards in the seed company contract.
FCIC proposes to revise redesignated
section (d)(1)(iii) to remove the phrase
‘‘excluding Austrian Winter Peas’’ and
add the phrase ‘‘in accordance with the
following unless otherwise specified in
the Special Provisions.’’ Adding the
phrase ‘‘in accordance with the
following unless otherwise specified in
the Special Provisions’’ is necessary
because there may be situations where
other quality adjustment procedures are
more appropriate and this language
provides the flexibility to quickly make
such changes.
FCIC proposes to revise the
introductory text of redesignated section
13(e) by removing the specifically listed
types of dry peas. The insured types
will now be specified in the Special
Provisions to allow the flexibility to add
new types, as applicable, more quickly.
FCIC also proposes to revise the
introductory text of redesignated section
13(e) by clarifying that seed peas that do
not meet the objective, measurable
terms of the contract (e.g., size,
germination percentage) are eligible for
quality adjustment. As stated above,
there had been problems in the past
with subjective standards in these
contracts, which made quality
adjustment difficult. This change will
clarify that only those objective,
measurable standards in the contract
will be used to determine whether the
dry peas meet the standards in the
contract.
FCIC proposes to revise the
introductory text of redesignated section
13(e)(1) by allowing deficiencies in
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
3414
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
quality to be specified in the Special
Provisions. This revision is consistent
with the proposed change in section
13(d)(1)(iii).
8. Section 15—FCIC proposes to add
a new section 15 Winter Coverage
Option. This option allows optional
coverage during the over-wintering
period for fall planted acreage.
Currently, there is a period during
which the crop may be in the field and
coverage is not available. The Winter
Coverage Option will permit coverage
during this risk period. FCIC proposes
the Winter Coverage Option be available
in counties for which the actuarial table
provides a premium rate. The option
provides coverage on fall planted dry
peas from the time the insurance
attaches until the spring final planting
date, unless otherwise provided by a
written agreement. This coverage will
allow insureds who have winter damage
on their fall planted dry peas to
continue to care for the crop, replant the
crop, or destroy the crop in accordance
with the provisions. FCIC proposes the
Winter Coverage Option also provides
replant payments.
9. FCIC also proposes to remove those
provisions that are now duplicative of
provisions contained in the Common
Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions
and revise certain provisions for clarity.
No substantive changes are made to
such provisions.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Dry peas, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Proposed Rule.
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR
part 457 effective for the 2009 and
succeeding crop years as follows:
PART 457—COMMON CROP
INSURANCE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 457 continues to read as follows:
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1506(p).
2. Amend § 457.140 as follows:
a. Revise the introductory text:
b. Remove the paragraph immediately
preceding section 1;
c. Amend section 1 by revising the
definitions of ‘‘base price,’’ ‘‘contract
seed peas,’’ ‘‘dry peas,’’ ‘‘harvest,’’
‘‘local market price,’’ ‘‘nurse crop
(companion crop),’’ ‘‘practical to
replant,’’ ‘‘price election,’’ ‘‘seed
company contract,’’ and add definitions
of ‘‘swathed,’’ ‘‘type,’’ and ‘‘windrow;’’
d. Revise section 2;
e. Revise section 3;
f. Revise section 7;
g. Revise section 9;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jan 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
h. Redesignate sections 11 through 13
as 12 through 14, respectively, and add
a new section 11;
i. Revise redesignated section 12;
j. Amend redesignated section 13 by
removing the phrase ‘‘section 12’’ and
adding the phrase ‘‘section 13’’ in its
place everywhere it appears;
k. Revise redesignated section 13(a)
introductory text, (a)(1), and (a)(2);
l. Revise the introductory text in
redesignated section 13(c)(1);
m. Revise redesignated section
13(d)(1)(iii);
n. Revise the introductory text of
redesignated sections 13(e) and 13(e)(1);
and
o. Add a new section 15.
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
§ 457.140 Dry Pea Crop Insurance
Provisions.
The Dry Pea Crop Insurance
Provisions for the 2009 and succeeding
crop years are as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
1. Definitions
*
*
*
*
*
Base contract price. The price per
pound stipulated in the seed company
contract without regard to discounts or
incentives that may apply, and that will
be paid to the producer for at least 50
percent of the total production under
contract with the seed company.
*
*
*
*
*
Contract seed peas. Dry peas grown
under the terms of a seed company
contract for the purpose of producing
seed to be used for producing dry pea
crops in a future crop year.
Dry peas. Peas (Pisum sativum L.),
Austrian peas (Pisum sativum spp
arvense), lentils (Lens culinaris Medik.)
and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and
those types listed on the Special
Provisions.
Harvest. Combining of dry peas. Dry
peas that are swathed prior to
combining are not considered harvested.
Local market price. The cash price per
pound for the U.S. No. 1 grade of dry
peas as determined by us. Such price
will be the prevailing dollar amount
buyers are willing to pay for dry peas
containing the maximum limits of
quality deficiencies allowable for the
U.S. No. 1 grade. Factors not associated
with grading under the United States
Standards for Whole Dry Peas, Split
Peas and Lentils will not be considered,
unless otherwise specified in the
Special Provisions.
Nurse crop (companion crop). A crop
planted into the same acreage as another
crop to improve the growing conditions
for the crop with which it is grown, and
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that is intended to be harvested
separately.
*
*
*
*
*
Practical to replant. In addition to the
definition contained in the Basic
Provisions, it will not be considered
practical to replant dry peas, except for
seed peas and fall planted dry peas,
more than 25 days after the final
planting date unless replanting is
generally occurring in the area. For seed
peas, it will not be considered practical
to replant unless the seed company will
accept the production under the terms
of the seed company contract. For fall
planted dry peas, it will not be
considered practical to replant more
than 25 days after the final planting date
for the corresponding spring planted
type of dry pea.
Price election. In addition to the
provisions of the definition contained in
the Basic Provisions, the price election
for contract seed peas will be the
percentage you elect (not to exceed 100
percent) of the base price and used for
the purposes of determining premium
and indemnity for contract seed peas
under this policy.
*
*
*
*
*
Seed company contract. A written
agreement between the producer and
the seed company, executed by the
acreage reporting date, containing at a
minimum:
(a) The producer’s promise to plant
and grow one or more specific types of
contract seed peas, and deliver the
production from those types to the seed
company;
(b) The seed company’s promise to
purchase all the production stated in the
contract; and
(c) A fixed price, or a method to
determine such price based on
published information compiled by a
third party, that will be paid to the
producer for at least 50 percent of the
production stated in the contract.
Swathed. Severance of the stem and
pods from the ground without removal
of the seeds from the pods and placing
such into a windrow.
Type. A category of dry peas
identified as a type in the Special
Provisions.
Windrow. Dry peas where the plants
are cut and placed in a row.
2. Unit Division
In addition to, or instead of,
establishing optional units by section,
section equivalent, or FSA farm serial
number and by irrigated and nonirrigated acreage as provided in the unit
division provisions contained in the
Basic Provisions, separate optional units
may be established for each dry pea type
as specified on the Special Provisions.
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage
Levels, and Prices for Determining
Indemnities
(a) In lieu of the requirements of
section 3 of the Basic Provisions, you
may select only one coverage level for
each type listed on the Special
Provisions.
(b) In addition to the requirements of
section 3 of the Basic Provisions, you
may select only one price election for all
dry peas in the county insured under
this policy unless the Special Provisions
provide different price elections for a
particular type, in which case you may
select one price election for each dry
pea type so designated in the Special
Provisions.
(1) If the Special Provisions designate
different price elections by type, the
price elections you choose for each type
are not required to have the same
percentage relationship to the maximum
price offered by us for each type. For
example, if you choose 100 percent of
the maximum price for one type, you
may also choose 75 percent of the
maximum price for another type;
(2) If you elect the Catastrophic Risk
Protection level of insurance for any of
the above, the same level of coverage
will be applicable to all insured dry pea
acreage in the county;
(3) If the Special Provisions do not
designate different price elections by
type, the price election you choose for
each type is required to have the same
percentage relationship to the maximum
price offered by us for each price. For
example, if you choose 100 percent of
the maximum price election for one
type, the 100 percent election will apply
to all other types you produce.
*
*
*
*
*
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
7. Insured Crop
(a) In accordance with section 8 of the
Basic Provisions, the crop insured will
be all the dry pea types in the county
for which a premium rate is provided by
the actuarial documents:
(1) In which you have a share;
(2) That are planted for harvesting
once maturity is reached as:
(i) Dry peas; or
(ii) Contract seed peas, if a seed
company contract is executed on or
before the acreage reporting date; and
(3) That are not (unless allowed by the
Special Provisions or by written
agreement):
(i) Interplanted with another crop;
(ii) Planted into an established grass
or legume;
(iii) Planted as a nurse crop; or
(iv) Planted to plow down, graze,
harvest as hay, or to otherwise not
harvest as a mature dry pea crop.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jan 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
(b) You will be considered to have a
share in the insured crop if, under the
seed company contract, you retain
control of the acreage on which the dry
peas are grown, you are at risk of loss
(i.e., if there is a reduction in quantity
or quality of your dry pea production,
you will receive less income under the
contract), and the seed company
contract is in effect for the entire
insurance period.
(c) In counties for which the actuarial
documents provide premium rates for
the Winter Coverage Option (see section
15), coverage is available for dry peas
between the time coverage begins and
the spring final planting date. Coverage
under the option is effective only if you
qualify under the terms of the option
and you elect the option by the sales
closing date.
*
*
*
*
*
9. Insurance Period
In accordance with the provisions of
section 11 of the Basic Provisions and
subject to provisions provided by the
Winter Coverage Option (see section 15)
if you elect such option, the insurance
period is as follows:
(a) Coverage for fall planted dry peas
not covered by the Winter Coverage
Option will begin on the earlier of April
15 or the date we agree to accept the
acreage for insurance, but not before
March 1, unless otherwise specified on
the Special Provisions.
(b) The calendar date for the end of
the insurance period for all insurable
types of dry peas in the county is
September 30 of the crop year in which
the crop is normally harvested, unless
otherwise specified in the Special
Provisions.
(c) Any acreage of the insured crop
damaged before the final planting date,
to the extent that producers in the
surrounding area would not further care
for the crop, must be replanted unless
we agree that it is not practical to
replant.
(d) Whenever the Special Provisions
designate both fall and spring final
planting dates:
(1) Any fall planted dry peas that are
damaged before the spring final planting
date, to the extent that growers in the
area would normally not further care for
the crop, must be replanted to a fall
planted type of dry peas to maintain
insurance based on the fall planted type
unless we agree that replanting is not
practical. If it is not practical to replant
to a fall planted type of dry peas but it
is practical to replant to a spring planted
type, you must replant to a spring
planted type to keep your insurance
coverage based on the fall planted type
in force.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3415
(2) Any fall planted dry pea acreage
that is replanted to a spring planted type
when it was practical to replant the fall
planted type will be insured as the
spring planted type and the production
guarantee, premium and price election
applicable to the spring planted type
will be used. In this case, the acreage
will be considered to be initially
planted to the spring planted type.
(3) Notwithstanding sections 9(d)(1)
and (2), if you have elected coverage
under the Winter Coverage Option (if
available in the county), insurance will
be in accordance with the option.
(e) Whenever the Special Provisions
designate only a spring final planting
date, any acreage of a fall planted dry
pea crop is not insured unless you
request such coverage on or before the
spring sales closing date, and we agree
in writing that the acreage has an
adequate stand in the spring to produce
the yield used to determine your
production guarantee.
(1) The fall planted dry pea crop will
be insured as a spring planted type for
the purpose of the production
guarantee, premium and price election.
(2) Insurance will attach to such
acreage on the date we determine an
adequate stand exists or on the spring
final planting date if we do not
determine adequacy of the stand prior to
the spring final planting date.
(3) Any acreage of such fall planted
dry peas that is damaged after it is
accepted for insurance but before the
spring final planting date, to the extent
that growers in the area would normally
not further care for the crop, must be
replanted to a spring planted type of dry
pea unless we agree it is not practical to
replant.
(4) If fall planted acreage is not to be
insured it must be recorded on the
acreage report as uninsured fall planted
acreage.
*
*
*
*
*
11. Replanting Payments
(a) A replanting payment is allowed
as follows:
(1) In lieu of provisions in section 13
of the Basic Provisions that limit the
amount of a replant payment to the
actual cost of replanting, the amount of
any replanting payment will be
determined in accordance with these
Crop Provisions;
(2) You must comply with all
requirements regarding replanting
payments contained in section 13 of the
Basic Provisions (except as allowed in
section 11(a)(1)) and in the Winter
Coverage Option for which you are
eligible and which you have elected;
(3) The insured crop must be damaged
by an insurable cause of loss to the
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
3416
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
extent that the remaining stand will not
produce at least 90 percent of the
production guarantee for the acreage.
(4) The acreage must have been
initially planted to a spring type of the
insured crop in those counties with only
a spring final planting date;
(5) Damage must occur after the fall
final planting date in those counties
where both a fall and spring final
planting date is designated (if the
Special Provisions provide more than
one fall final planting date, the fall final
planting date applicable to policies with
the Winter Coverage Option (see section
15) will be used for this purpose,
regardless of whether or not the option
is actually in effect); and
(6) The replanted crop must be seeded
at a rate sufficient to achieve a total
(undamaged and new seeding) plant
population that will produce at least the
yield used to determine your production
guarantee.
(b) The maximum amount of the
replanting payment per acre will be the
lesser of 20.0 percent of the production
guarantee or 200 pounds, multiplied by
your price election, multiplied by your
share, unless otherwise stated in the
Special Provisions.
(c) When the crop is replanted using
a practice that is uninsurable for an
original planting, the liability on the
unit will be reduced by the amount of
the replanting payment. The premium
amount will not be reduced.
(d) Replanting payments will be
calculated using the price election and
production guarantee for the dry pea
type that is replanted and insured. For
example, if damaged smooth green and
yellow pea acreage is replanted to
lentils, the price election and
production guarantee applicable to
lentils will be used to calculate any
replanting payment that may be due. A
revised acreage report will be required
to reflect the replanted type.
Notwithstanding the previous two
sentences, the following will have a
replanting payment based on the
guarantee and price election for the crop
type initially planted:
(1) Any damaged fall planted crop
type replanted to a spring planted type
that retains insurance based on the
production guarantee and price election
for the fall planted type; and
(2) Any acreage replanted at a reduced
seeding rate into a partially damaged
stand of the insured crop.
12. Duties in the Event of Damage or
Loss
Representative samples are required
in accordance with section 14 of the
Basic Provisions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jan 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
13. Settlement of Claim
(a) We will determine your loss on a
unit basis. In the event you are unable
to provide records of production that are
acceptable to us for any:
(1) Optional units, we will combine
all optional units for which acceptable
records of production were not
provided; or
(2) Basic units, we will allocate any
commingled production to such units in
proportion to our liability on the
harvested acreage for each unit.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) For mature production meeting the
objective, measurable minimum quality
requirements (e.g., size, germination
percentage) contained in the seed
company contract, and for production
that does not meet such requirements
due to uninsured causes:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Unharvested production (mature
unharvested production of dry peas may
be adjusted for quality deficiencies in
accordance with section 13I or (e), or as
specified in the Special Provisions); and
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Mature dry pea production that
does not qualify as contract seed peas
under the policy terms or does not meet
the objective, measurable terms of the
contract (e.g., size, germination
percentage), may be adjusted for quality
deficiencies.
(1) Production will be eligible for
quality adjustment in accordance with
the following, unless otherwise
specified in the Special Provisions:
*
*
*
*
*
15. Winter Coverage Option
(This is a continuous endorsement)
(a) In the event of a conflict between
this section and sections 1–14 of these
Crop Provisions, this section will
control.
(b) Catastrophic Risk Protection
Coverage is not available under this
option.
(c) In return for payment of the
additional premium designated in the
actuarial documents, this option is
available in counties for which the
actuarial documents provide premium
rates for the winter coverage option,
coverage is available for dry peas
between the time coverage begins and
the spring final planting date.
(d) You must have a Dry Pea Crop
Insurance Policy in effect and elect to
insure the dry pea type under such
policy.
(e) You must select this coverage on
your application for insurance on or
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
before the sales closing date. Failure to
do so means you have rejected this
coverage for the dry pea crop planted in
the fall and this option is void.
(f) Coverage under this option begins
on the later of the date we accept your
application for coverage or on the fall
final planting date designated in the
Special Provisions. Coverage ends on
the spring final planting date designated
in the Special Provisions.
(g) In addition to the provisions of
section 34(b) of the Basic Provisions and
section 2 of the Dry Pea Crop
Provisions, optional units may be
established for dry peas if each optional
unit contains only dry peas initially
planted in the fall or only dry peas
initially planted in the spring.
(h) In lieu of sections 4 and 5 of these
Crop Provisions, if you elect this option
for the dry pea crop initially planted in
the fall, the following dates will be
applicable to all your fall planted and
spring planted dry pea crop in the
county:
(1) Contract change date is June 30
preceding the cancellation date;
(2) Cancellation date is September 30;
and
(3) Termination date is November 30.
(i) In lieu of the provisions in section
14 of the Basic Provisions, all notices of
damage must be provided to us not later
than 15 days after the spring final
planting date designated in the Special
Provisions.
(j) All insurable acreage of each fall
planted dry pea type covered under this
option must be insured.
(k) The amount of any indemnity paid
under the terms of this option will be
subject to any reduction specified in the
Basic Provisions for multiple crop
benefits in the same crop year.
(l) Whenever any acreage of a dry pea
crop planted in the fall is damaged
during the insurance period and at least
20 acres or 20 percent of the insured
planted acreage in the unit, whichever
is less, does not have an adequate stand
to produce at least 90 percent of the
production guarantee for the acreage,
you may, at your option, take one of the
following actions:
(1) Continue to care for the damaged
crop. By doing so, coverage will
continue under the terms of the Basic
Provisions, the Dry Pea Crop Insurance
Provisions and this option;
(2) Replant the acreage to an
appropriate type of the insured crop, if
it is practical, and receive a replanting
payment in accordance with the terms
of section 11. By doing so, coverage will
continue under the terms of the Basic
Provisions, the Dry Pea Crop Insurance
Provisions and this option, and the
production guarantee for the dry pea
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
type planted in the fall will remain in
effect; or
(3) Destroy the remaining crop on
such acreage:
(i) By destroying the remaining crop,
you agree to accept an appraised
amount of production determined in
accordance with section 13(d)(1) of the
Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions to
count against the unit production
guarantee. This amount will be
considered production to count in
determining any final indemnity on the
unit and will be used to settle your
claim as described in section 13.
(ii) You may use such acreage for any
purpose, including planting and
separately insuring any other crop if
such insurance is available.
(iii) If you elect to plant and elect to
insure spring planted acreage of the
same dry pea type (you must elect
whether or not you want insurance on
the spring planted acreage of the same
dry pea type at the time we release the
fall planted acreage), you must pay
additional premium for the insurance.
Such acreage will be insured in
accordance with the policy provisions
that are applicable to acreage that is
initially planted in the spring to the
same dry pea type, and you must:
(A) Plant the spring planted acreage in
a manner which results in a clear and
discernible break in the planting pattern
at the boundary between it and any
remaining acreage of the fall planted dry
pea acreage; and
(B) Store or market the production in
a manner which permits us to verify the
amount of spring planted production
separately from any fall planted
production. In the event you are unable
to provide records of production that are
acceptable to us, the spring planted
acreage will be considered to be a part
of the original fall planted unit.
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0034; Directorate
Identifier 2007–CE–097–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pacific
Aerospace Limited Model 750XL
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
DCA/750XL/3A is prompted by a report
from the manufacturer of the possibility that
wiring loom protective sleeving is not fitted
to aircraft S/N 107 through to 134. AD
applicability revised to include aircraft up to
S/N 134.
To prevent fretting damage to the wiring
loom that may lead to arcing in proximity to
the fuel vent lines and the possibility of fire
* * *
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by February 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816)
329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0034; Directorate Identifier
2007–CE–097–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA),
which is the airworthiness authority for
New Zealand, has issued AD DCA/
750XL/3A, dated November 28, 2007
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Examining the AD Docket
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:11 Jan 17, 2008
Jkt 214001
DCA/750XL/3A is prompted by a report
from the manufacturer of the possibility that
wiring loom protective sleeving is not fitted
to aircraft S/N 107 through to 134. AD
applicability revised to include aircraft up to
S/N 134.
To prevent fretting damage to the wiring
loom that may lead to arcing in proximity to
the fuel vent lines and the possibility of fire,
inspect the main wiring loom on the right
hand side of the aircraft adjacent to the
frames at station 114.34’’ and 118.84’’, per
PACSB/XL/009 issue 2, to ensure that two
pieces of protective sleeving are fitted.
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 7,
2008.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E8–321 Filed 1–17–08; 8:45 am]
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
3417
The effectivity of the service
information is serial number (S/N) 102
through 106. The MCAI expanded the
applicability to S/N 102 through 134.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM
18JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 13 (Friday, January 18, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3411-3417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-321]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
RIN 0563-AC14
Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Dry Pea Crop Provisions
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) proposes to
amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Dry Pea Crop Insurance
Provisions to include the insurability of additional types of dry peas,
to offer winter coverage, to allow replanting payments, and to make
chickpeas insurable under the Dry Pea Crop Provisions rather than the
Dry Bean Crop Provisions. The intended effect of this action is to
provide policy changes, to clarify existing policy provisions to better
meet the needs of the producers, and to reduce vulnerability to program
fraud, waste, and abuse. The changes will apply for the 2009 and
succeeding crop years.
DATES: Written comments and opinions on this proposed rule will be
accepted until close of business March 18, 2008 and will be considered
when the rule is to be made final.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments,
titled ``Dry Pea Crop Provisions'', by any of the following methods:
By Mail to: Director, Product Administration and Standards
Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812, Room 421, PO Box 419205,
Kansas City, MO 64141-6205.
By Express Mail to: Director, Product Administration and
Standards Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812, 9240 Troost Avenue, Kansas
City, MO 64131-3055.
E-mail: DirectorPDD@rma.usda.gov.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
A copy of each response will be available for public inspection and
copying from 7 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., CST,
[[Page 3412]]
Monday through Friday, except holidays, at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Claire Elsea, Economist, Product
Management, Product Administration and Standards Division, Risk
Management Agency, at the Kansas City, MO, address listed above,
telephone (816) 926-7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule is non-significant for the purpose of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, it has not been reviewed by OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of information in this rule
have been approved by OMB under control number 0563-0053 through June
30, 2008.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to
promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to
warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this
rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, or on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Program
requirements for the Federal crop insurance program are the same for
all producers regardless of the size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to submit an application and
acreage report to establish their insurance guarantees and compute
premium amounts, and all producers are required to submit a notice of
loss and production information to determine the amount of an indemnity
payment in the event of an insured cause of crop loss. Whether a
producer has 10 acres or 1000 acres, there is no difference in the kind
of information collected. To ensure crop insurance is available to
small entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act authorizes FCIC to waive
collection of administrative fees from limited resource farmers. FCIC
believes this waiver helps to ensure that small entities are given the
same opportunities as large entities to manage their risks through the
use of crop insurance. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been
prepared since this regulation does not have an impact on small
entities, and therefore, this regulation is exempt from the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will
not have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will preempt
State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to any direct action taken by FCIC
or to require the insurance provider to take specific action under the
terms of the crop insurance policy, the administrative appeal
provisions published at 7 CFR part 11 must be exhausted before any
action against FCIC for judicial review may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact
on the quality of the human environment, health, or safety. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed.
Background
FCIC proposes to revise 7 CFR part 457, Common Crop Insurance
Regulations, by amending Sec. 457.140 Dry Pea Crop Insurance
Provisions, to be effective for the 2009 and succeeding crop years.
Several requests have been made for changes to improve the coverage
offered, address program integrity issues, simplify program
administration, and improve clarity of the policy provisions.
The proposed changes are as follows:
1. Section 1--FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``base
price'' to delete the word ``processor'' and add ``seed company'' since
the contract is with a seed company, not a processor.
FCIC also proposes to revise the definition of ``contract seed
peas.'' Proposed language makes coverage available to fall and spring
planted acreage. FCIC now proposes to insure fall planted acreage.
Therefore, it must be included in the definition of ``contract seed
peas.'' FCIC also proposes to remove the requirement that acreage must
be enrolled in the seed certification program administered by the state
in which the peas are produced because some states no longer administer
seed certification programs. Therefore, enforcing this requirement
could limit the availability of crop insurance for contract seed pea
producers.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``dry peas'' to allow
insurability of additional types of dry peas. Currently, only spring
planted smooth green and yellow types of commercial dry peas, peas
grown for seed, fall planted types of Austrian Winter peas if provided
for in the Special Provisions, all spring planted types of lentils, and
all types of contract seed peas are insurable. FCIC proposes to amend
these provisions to remove the specific types that are insurable and to
specify that the insurable types will be contained in the Special
Provisions. FCIC also proposes to insure chickpeas (a.k.a. garbanzo
beans) under the Dry Pea Crop Provisions. Chickpeas are currently
insurable under the Dry Bean Crop Provisions only. However, the
agronomical and physiological traits of chickpeas are more similar to
dry peas and lentils than dry beans. This change will also simplify the
crop insurance program by allowing producers of dry peas, lentils and
chickpeas to purchase coverage for these crops under one policy.
[[Page 3413]]
FCIC proposes to clarify the definition of ``harvest'' by adding
the following sentence ``Dry peas that are swathed prior to combining
are not considered harvested.'' Swathing is a step in the harvest
process but the seed is not removed from the plant until the crop is
combined.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``local market price'' to
specify that factors not associated with grading under United States
Standards for Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas and the Lentils will not be
considered unless otherwise specified on the Special Provisions. The
intent of this change is to standardize the grading standards to be
used in quality adjustment, recognizing that there may be circumstances
where it may be necessary to deviate from such standards. If such
circumstances arise, the proposed change provides the flexibility to
make changes through the Special Provisions, if necessary.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``nurse crop (companion
crop)'' for clarity and to be consistent with the definition of ``nurse
crop (companion crop)'' in the Small Grains Crop Provisions.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``practical to replant''
to reference the addition of fall planted dry peas. As stated above,
insurance coverage will now be provided for fall planted dry peas.
Therefore, the conditions under which it will not be considered
practical to replant fall planted dry peas must be specified because
the conditions are not the same as for spring planted dry peas.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``price election'' to
provide clarification that the price election is used to determine
premium and any indemnity for contract seed peas under this policy.
FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``seed company contract''
to remove the word ``varieties'' and add the word ``types'' in both
places. This change is necessary because FCIC has proposed to insure
categories of dry peas that will be contained in the Special Provisions
to allow the flexibility to add new types as appropriate.
FCIC proposes to add a definition of ``swathed'' to describe the
process that is used by producers prior to combining the crop because a
crop that has only been swathed is not considered harvested.
FCIC proposes to add a definition of ``type'' because FCIC has
proposed to refer to the categories that may be insured as ``types,''
and specify that the insured types will be contained in the Special
Provisions, which will allow additional types to be quickly added as
appropriate.
FCIC proposed to add a definition of ``windrow'' because the term
is used in the definition of ``swathed.''
2. Section 2--FCIC proposes to revise the language in section 2 to
specify optional units may be established for each type specified in
the Special Provisions because different types may have significantly
different characteristics and risks, making it more appropriate to have
separate guarantees, premium, and loss adjustment for each type.
3. Section 3--FCIC proposes to revise section 3 to allow the
insured to select a separate coverage level and price percentage for
each insurable type listed on the Special Provisions. Previously, only
coverage levels could be selected by type but because the types may
have significantly different characteristics with different risks,
allowing separate price elections is appropriate.
4. Section 7--FCIC proposes to revise section 7 to add provisions
that state dry peas planted to plow down, graze, harvest as hay or to
otherwise not harvest as a mature dry pea crop are not insurable. The
Dry Pea Crop Provisions allow coverage for dry peas that have reached
maturity. These practices do not commonly take place when the dry peas
have reached maturity. Also, FCIC has not established premium rates for
dry peas that are plowed down, grazed or harvested as hay. Therefore,
dry peas that are planted to plow down, graze, harvest as hay or to
otherwise not harvest as a mature crop are not insurable under the Dry
Pea Crop Provisions.
FCIC also proposes to revise section 7 to allow insurability of
fall planted acreage of dry peas, and to allow for coverage for fall
seeded acreage of dry peas between the time coverage begins and the
spring final planting date under the Winter Coverage Option. More
producers are planting in the fall and FCIC has sufficient data to
assess the risks and provide appropriate coverage. Without the
availability of such coverage, producers who plant in the fall are at
risk until the spring coverage takes affect.
5. Section 9--FCIC proposes to add provisions to specify the
criteria for insurance coverage when the Special Provisions designate
only a spring final planting date or both a fall and spring final
planting date. This change is necessary because fall planted acreage is
now insurable under the Dry Pea Crop Provisions.
6. Section 11--FCIC proposes to add a new section 11 authorizing
replanting payments for dry peas. Adding replanting payments for dry
peas makes the Dry Pea Crop Provisions consistent with the coverage
available for other similar crops.
7. Redesignated section 13--FCIC proposes to revise the
introductory text in 13(a) to be consistent with the provisions in the
Small Grain Crop Provisions.
FCIC also proposes to revise redesignated sections 13(c)(1) to add
the word ``mature.'' Adding the word ``mature'' is necessary because
only mature production is eligible for quality adjustments. FCIC also
proposes to specify measurable standards in the seed company contract
when discussing dry peas that meet or fail to meet the standards in the
seed company contract. FCIC has had problems in the past with contract
standards that contained standards that were not objective or
measurable, which made it very difficult to determine whether the
insured crop met such standards. This language will make it clear that
FCIC is only providing quality adjustments for dry peas that do not
meet the objective measurable standards in the seed company contract.
FCIC proposes to revise redesignated section (d)(1)(iii) to remove
the phrase ``excluding Austrian Winter Peas'' and add the phrase ``in
accordance with the following unless otherwise specified in the Special
Provisions.'' Adding the phrase ``in accordance with the following
unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions'' is necessary
because there may be situations where other quality adjustment
procedures are more appropriate and this language provides the
flexibility to quickly make such changes.
FCIC proposes to revise the introductory text of redesignated
section 13(e) by removing the specifically listed types of dry peas.
The insured types will now be specified in the Special Provisions to
allow the flexibility to add new types, as applicable, more quickly.
FCIC also proposes to revise the introductory text of redesignated
section 13(e) by clarifying that seed peas that do not meet the
objective, measurable terms of the contract (e.g., size, germination
percentage) are eligible for quality adjustment. As stated above, there
had been problems in the past with subjective standards in these
contracts, which made quality adjustment difficult. This change will
clarify that only those objective, measurable standards in the contract
will be used to determine whether the dry peas meet the standards in
the contract.
FCIC proposes to revise the introductory text of redesignated
section 13(e)(1) by allowing deficiencies in
[[Page 3414]]
quality to be specified in the Special Provisions. This revision is
consistent with the proposed change in section 13(d)(1)(iii).
8. Section 15--FCIC proposes to add a new section 15 Winter
Coverage Option. This option allows optional coverage during the over-
wintering period for fall planted acreage. Currently, there is a period
during which the crop may be in the field and coverage is not
available. The Winter Coverage Option will permit coverage during this
risk period. FCIC proposes the Winter Coverage Option be available in
counties for which the actuarial table provides a premium rate. The
option provides coverage on fall planted dry peas from the time the
insurance attaches until the spring final planting date, unless
otherwise provided by a written agreement. This coverage will allow
insureds who have winter damage on their fall planted dry peas to
continue to care for the crop, replant the crop, or destroy the crop in
accordance with the provisions. FCIC proposes the Winter Coverage
Option also provides replant payments.
9. FCIC also proposes to remove those provisions that are now
duplicative of provisions contained in the Common Crop Insurance Policy
Basic Provisions and revise certain provisions for clarity. No
substantive changes are made to such provisions.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Dry peas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Proposed Rule.
Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR part 457 effective for
the 2009 and succeeding crop years as follows:
PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1506(p).
2. Amend Sec. 457.140 as follows:
a. Revise the introductory text:
b. Remove the paragraph immediately preceding section 1;
c. Amend section 1 by revising the definitions of ``base price,''
``contract seed peas,'' ``dry peas,'' ``harvest,'' ``local market
price,'' ``nurse crop (companion crop),'' ``practical to replant,''
``price election,'' ``seed company contract,'' and add definitions of
``swathed,'' ``type,'' and ``windrow;''
d. Revise section 2;
e. Revise section 3;
f. Revise section 7;
g. Revise section 9;
h. Redesignate sections 11 through 13 as 12 through 14,
respectively, and add a new section 11;
i. Revise redesignated section 12;
j. Amend redesignated section 13 by removing the phrase ``section
12'' and adding the phrase ``section 13'' in its place everywhere it
appears;
k. Revise redesignated section 13(a) introductory text, (a)(1), and
(a)(2);
l. Revise the introductory text in redesignated section 13(c)(1);
m. Revise redesignated section 13(d)(1)(iii);
n. Revise the introductory text of redesignated sections 13(e) and
13(e)(1); and
o. Add a new section 15.
The revised and added text reads as follows:
Sec. 457.140 Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions.
The Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions for the 2009 and succeeding
crop years are as follows:
* * * * *
1. Definitions
* * * * *
Base contract price. The price per pound stipulated in the seed
company contract without regard to discounts or incentives that may
apply, and that will be paid to the producer for at least 50 percent of
the total production under contract with the seed company.
* * * * *
Contract seed peas. Dry peas grown under the terms of a seed
company contract for the purpose of producing seed to be used for
producing dry pea crops in a future crop year.
Dry peas. Peas (Pisum sativum L.), Austrian peas (Pisum sativum spp
arvense), lentils (Lens culinaris Medik.) and chickpeas (Cicer
arietinum L.) and those types listed on the Special Provisions.
Harvest. Combining of dry peas. Dry peas that are swathed prior to
combining are not considered harvested.
Local market price. The cash price per pound for the U.S. No. 1
grade of dry peas as determined by us. Such price will be the
prevailing dollar amount buyers are willing to pay for dry peas
containing the maximum limits of quality deficiencies allowable for the
U.S. No. 1 grade. Factors not associated with grading under the United
States Standards for Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas and Lentils will not be
considered, unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions.
Nurse crop (companion crop). A crop planted into the same acreage
as another crop to improve the growing conditions for the crop with
which it is grown, and that is intended to be harvested separately.
* * * * *
Practical to replant. In addition to the definition contained in
the Basic Provisions, it will not be considered practical to replant
dry peas, except for seed peas and fall planted dry peas, more than 25
days after the final planting date unless replanting is generally
occurring in the area. For seed peas, it will not be considered
practical to replant unless the seed company will accept the production
under the terms of the seed company contract. For fall planted dry
peas, it will not be considered practical to replant more than 25 days
after the final planting date for the corresponding spring planted type
of dry pea.
Price election. In addition to the provisions of the definition
contained in the Basic Provisions, the price election for contract seed
peas will be the percentage you elect (not to exceed 100 percent) of
the base price and used for the purposes of determining premium and
indemnity for contract seed peas under this policy.
* * * * *
Seed company contract. A written agreement between the producer and
the seed company, executed by the acreage reporting date, containing at
a minimum:
(a) The producer's promise to plant and grow one or more specific
types of contract seed peas, and deliver the production from those
types to the seed company;
(b) The seed company's promise to purchase all the production
stated in the contract; and
(c) A fixed price, or a method to determine such price based on
published information compiled by a third party, that will be paid to
the producer for at least 50 percent of the production stated in the
contract.
Swathed. Severance of the stem and pods from the ground without
removal of the seeds from the pods and placing such into a windrow.
Type. A category of dry peas identified as a type in the Special
Provisions.
Windrow. Dry peas where the plants are cut and placed in a row.
2. Unit Division
In addition to, or instead of, establishing optional units by
section, section equivalent, or FSA farm serial number and by irrigated
and non-irrigated acreage as provided in the unit division provisions
contained in the Basic Provisions, separate optional units may be
established for each dry pea type as specified on the Special
Provisions.
[[Page 3415]]
3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage Levels, and Prices for Determining
Indemnities
(a) In lieu of the requirements of section 3 of the Basic
Provisions, you may select only one coverage level for each type listed
on the Special Provisions.
(b) In addition to the requirements of section 3 of the Basic
Provisions, you may select only one price election for all dry peas in
the county insured under this policy unless the Special Provisions
provide different price elections for a particular type, in which case
you may select one price election for each dry pea type so designated
in the Special Provisions.
(1) If the Special Provisions designate different price elections
by type, the price elections you choose for each type are not required
to have the same percentage relationship to the maximum price offered
by us for each type. For example, if you choose 100 percent of the
maximum price for one type, you may also choose 75 percent of the
maximum price for another type;
(2) If you elect the Catastrophic Risk Protection level of
insurance for any of the above, the same level of coverage will be
applicable to all insured dry pea acreage in the county;
(3) If the Special Provisions do not designate different price
elections by type, the price election you choose for each type is
required to have the same percentage relationship to the maximum price
offered by us for each price. For example, if you choose 100 percent of
the maximum price election for one type, the 100 percent election will
apply to all other types you produce.
* * * * *
7. Insured Crop
(a) In accordance with section 8 of the Basic Provisions, the crop
insured will be all the dry pea types in the county for which a premium
rate is provided by the actuarial documents:
(1) In which you have a share;
(2) That are planted for harvesting once maturity is reached as:
(i) Dry peas; or
(ii) Contract seed peas, if a seed company contract is executed on
or before the acreage reporting date; and
(3) That are not (unless allowed by the Special Provisions or by
written agreement):
(i) Interplanted with another crop;
(ii) Planted into an established grass or legume;
(iii) Planted as a nurse crop; or
(iv) Planted to plow down, graze, harvest as hay, or to otherwise
not harvest as a mature dry pea crop.
(b) You will be considered to have a share in the insured crop if,
under the seed company contract, you retain control of the acreage on
which the dry peas are grown, you are at risk of loss (i.e., if there
is a reduction in quantity or quality of your dry pea production, you
will receive less income under the contract), and the seed company
contract is in effect for the entire insurance period.
(c) In counties for which the actuarial documents provide premium
rates for the Winter Coverage Option (see section 15), coverage is
available for dry peas between the time coverage begins and the spring
final planting date. Coverage under the option is effective only if you
qualify under the terms of the option and you elect the option by the
sales closing date.
* * * * *
9. Insurance Period
In accordance with the provisions of section 11 of the Basic
Provisions and subject to provisions provided by the Winter Coverage
Option (see section 15) if you elect such option, the insurance period
is as follows:
(a) Coverage for fall planted dry peas not covered by the Winter
Coverage Option will begin on the earlier of April 15 or the date we
agree to accept the acreage for insurance, but not before March 1,
unless otherwise specified on the Special Provisions.
(b) The calendar date for the end of the insurance period for all
insurable types of dry peas in the county is September 30 of the crop
year in which the crop is normally harvested, unless otherwise
specified in the Special Provisions.
(c) Any acreage of the insured crop damaged before the final
planting date, to the extent that producers in the surrounding area
would not further care for the crop, must be replanted unless we agree
that it is not practical to replant.
(d) Whenever the Special Provisions designate both fall and spring
final planting dates:
(1) Any fall planted dry peas that are damaged before the spring
final planting date, to the extent that growers in the area would
normally not further care for the crop, must be replanted to a fall
planted type of dry peas to maintain insurance based on the fall
planted type unless we agree that replanting is not practical. If it is
not practical to replant to a fall planted type of dry peas but it is
practical to replant to a spring planted type, you must replant to a
spring planted type to keep your insurance coverage based on the fall
planted type in force.
(2) Any fall planted dry pea acreage that is replanted to a spring
planted type when it was practical to replant the fall planted type
will be insured as the spring planted type and the production
guarantee, premium and price election applicable to the spring planted
type will be used. In this case, the acreage will be considered to be
initially planted to the spring planted type.
(3) Notwithstanding sections 9(d)(1) and (2), if you have elected
coverage under the Winter Coverage Option (if available in the county),
insurance will be in accordance with the option.
(e) Whenever the Special Provisions designate only a spring final
planting date, any acreage of a fall planted dry pea crop is not
insured unless you request such coverage on or before the spring sales
closing date, and we agree in writing that the acreage has an adequate
stand in the spring to produce the yield used to determine your
production guarantee.
(1) The fall planted dry pea crop will be insured as a spring
planted type for the purpose of the production guarantee, premium and
price election.
(2) Insurance will attach to such acreage on the date we determine
an adequate stand exists or on the spring final planting date if we do
not determine adequacy of the stand prior to the spring final planting
date.
(3) Any acreage of such fall planted dry peas that is damaged after
it is accepted for insurance but before the spring final planting date,
to the extent that growers in the area would normally not further care
for the crop, must be replanted to a spring planted type of dry pea
unless we agree it is not practical to replant.
(4) If fall planted acreage is not to be insured it must be
recorded on the acreage report as uninsured fall planted acreage.
* * * * *
11. Replanting Payments
(a) A replanting payment is allowed as follows:
(1) In lieu of provisions in section 13 of the Basic Provisions
that limit the amount of a replant payment to the actual cost of
replanting, the amount of any replanting payment will be determined in
accordance with these Crop Provisions;
(2) You must comply with all requirements regarding replanting
payments contained in section 13 of the Basic Provisions (except as
allowed in section 11(a)(1)) and in the Winter Coverage Option for
which you are eligible and which you have elected;
(3) The insured crop must be damaged by an insurable cause of loss
to the
[[Page 3416]]
extent that the remaining stand will not produce at least 90 percent of
the production guarantee for the acreage.
(4) The acreage must have been initially planted to a spring type
of the insured crop in those counties with only a spring final planting
date;
(5) Damage must occur after the fall final planting date in those
counties where both a fall and spring final planting date is designated
(if the Special Provisions provide more than one fall final planting
date, the fall final planting date applicable to policies with the
Winter Coverage Option (see section 15) will be used for this purpose,
regardless of whether or not the option is actually in effect); and
(6) The replanted crop must be seeded at a rate sufficient to
achieve a total (undamaged and new seeding) plant population that will
produce at least the yield used to determine your production guarantee.
(b) The maximum amount of the replanting payment per acre will be
the lesser of 20.0 percent of the production guarantee or 200 pounds,
multiplied by your price election, multiplied by your share, unless
otherwise stated in the Special Provisions.
(c) When the crop is replanted using a practice that is uninsurable
for an original planting, the liability on the unit will be reduced by
the amount of the replanting payment. The premium amount will not be
reduced.
(d) Replanting payments will be calculated using the price election
and production guarantee for the dry pea type that is replanted and
insured. For example, if damaged smooth green and yellow pea acreage is
replanted to lentils, the price election and production guarantee
applicable to lentils will be used to calculate any replanting payment
that may be due. A revised acreage report will be required to reflect
the replanted type. Notwithstanding the previous two sentences, the
following will have a replanting payment based on the guarantee and
price election for the crop type initially planted:
(1) Any damaged fall planted crop type replanted to a spring
planted type that retains insurance based on the production guarantee
and price election for the fall planted type; and
(2) Any acreage replanted at a reduced seeding rate into a
partially damaged stand of the insured crop.
12. Duties in the Event of Damage or Loss
Representative samples are required in accordance with section 14
of the Basic Provisions.
13. Settlement of Claim
(a) We will determine your loss on a unit basis. In the event you
are unable to provide records of production that are acceptable to us
for any:
(1) Optional units, we will combine all optional units for which
acceptable records of production were not provided; or
(2) Basic units, we will allocate any commingled production to such
units in proportion to our liability on the harvested acreage for each
unit.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) For mature production meeting the objective, measurable minimum
quality requirements (e.g., size, germination percentage) contained in
the seed company contract, and for production that does not meet such
requirements due to uninsured causes:
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Unharvested production (mature unharvested production of dry
peas may be adjusted for quality deficiencies in accordance with
section 13I or (e), or as specified in the Special Provisions); and
* * * * *
(e) Mature dry pea production that does not qualify as contract
seed peas under the policy terms or does not meet the objective,
measurable terms of the contract (e.g., size, germination percentage),
may be adjusted for quality deficiencies.
(1) Production will be eligible for quality adjustment in
accordance with the following, unless otherwise specified in the
Special Provisions:
* * * * *
15. Winter Coverage Option
(This is a continuous endorsement)
(a) In the event of a conflict between this section and sections 1-
14 of these Crop Provisions, this section will control.
(b) Catastrophic Risk Protection Coverage is not available under
this option.
(c) In return for payment of the additional premium designated in
the actuarial documents, this option is available in counties for which
the actuarial documents provide premium rates for the winter coverage
option, coverage is available for dry peas between the time coverage
begins and the spring final planting date.
(d) You must have a Dry Pea Crop Insurance Policy in effect and
elect to insure the dry pea type under such policy.
(e) You must select this coverage on your application for insurance
on or before the sales closing date. Failure to do so means you have
rejected this coverage for the dry pea crop planted in the fall and
this option is void.
(f) Coverage under this option begins on the later of the date we
accept your application for coverage or on the fall final planting date
designated in the Special Provisions. Coverage ends on the spring final
planting date designated in the Special Provisions.
(g) In addition to the provisions of section 34(b) of the Basic
Provisions and section 2 of the Dry Pea Crop Provisions, optional units
may be established for dry peas if each optional unit contains only dry
peas initially planted in the fall or only dry peas initially planted
in the spring.
(h) In lieu of sections 4 and 5 of these Crop Provisions, if you
elect this option for the dry pea crop initially planted in the fall,
the following dates will be applicable to all your fall planted and
spring planted dry pea crop in the county:
(1) Contract change date is June 30 preceding the cancellation
date;
(2) Cancellation date is September 30; and
(3) Termination date is November 30.
(i) In lieu of the provisions in section 14 of the Basic
Provisions, all notices of damage must be provided to us not later than
15 days after the spring final planting date designated in the Special
Provisions.
(j) All insurable acreage of each fall planted dry pea type covered
under this option must be insured.
(k) The amount of any indemnity paid under the terms of this option
will be subject to any reduction specified in the Basic Provisions for
multiple crop benefits in the same crop year.
(l) Whenever any acreage of a dry pea crop planted in the fall is
damaged during the insurance period and at least 20 acres or 20 percent
of the insured planted acreage in the unit, whichever is less, does not
have an adequate stand to produce at least 90 percent of the production
guarantee for the acreage, you may, at your option, take one of the
following actions:
(1) Continue to care for the damaged crop. By doing so, coverage
will continue under the terms of the Basic Provisions, the Dry Pea Crop
Insurance Provisions and this option;
(2) Replant the acreage to an appropriate type of the insured crop,
if it is practical, and receive a replanting payment in accordance with
the terms of section 11. By doing so, coverage will continue under the
terms of the Basic Provisions, the Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions
and this option, and the production guarantee for the dry pea
[[Page 3417]]
type planted in the fall will remain in effect; or
(3) Destroy the remaining crop on such acreage:
(i) By destroying the remaining crop, you agree to accept an
appraised amount of production determined in accordance with section
13(d)(1) of the Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions to count against the
unit production guarantee. This amount will be considered production to
count in determining any final indemnity on the unit and will be used
to settle your claim as described in section 13.
(ii) You may use such acreage for any purpose, including planting
and separately insuring any other crop if such insurance is available.
(iii) If you elect to plant and elect to insure spring planted
acreage of the same dry pea type (you must elect whether or not you
want insurance on the spring planted acreage of the same dry pea type
at the time we release the fall planted acreage), you must pay
additional premium for the insurance. Such acreage will be insured in
accordance with the policy provisions that are applicable to acreage
that is initially planted in the spring to the same dry pea type, and
you must:
(A) Plant the spring planted acreage in a manner which results in a
clear and discernible break in the planting pattern at the boundary
between it and any remaining acreage of the fall planted dry pea
acreage; and
(B) Store or market the production in a manner which permits us to
verify the amount of spring planted production separately from any fall
planted production. In the event you are unable to provide records of
production that are acceptable to us, the spring planted acreage will
be considered to be a part of the original fall planted unit.
* * * * *
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 7, 2008.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. E8-321 Filed 1-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P