Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Dry Pea Crop Provisions, 3411-3417 [E8-321]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules with a specific individual in an automated environment; * * * * * 3. In § 293.105, paragraphs (b)(3) through (13) are added to read as follows: § 293.105 Restrictions on collection and use of information. rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS * * * * * (b) * * * (3) If Social Security Numbers are collected, they will be collected only at the time of the employee’s appointment to be entered into the human resources and payroll systems. The collection tool (if paper-based) will be stored in a protected location to guard against exposure until it is no longer required. The Guide to Personnel Recordkeeping will be used to determine retention requirements for certain paper-based collection tools. Disposal of all paperbased collection tools (i.e., forms, letters, and other correspondence) will be in accordance with the General Record Schedule issued by the National Archives and Records Administration. (4) Agencies may not use the Social Security Number as an employee’s primary key, i.e., unique identifier, in internal or external data processing activities. (5) Agencies must ensure that Social Security Numbers are not printed, e.g., on forms, or reports, or displayed on computer display screens. (6) Access to Social Security Numbers must be restricted to those individuals whose official duties require such access. A listing of all individuals with access authorization based on legitimate business needs must be maintained and reviewed for continued applicability. (7) Agencies must ensure, through appropriate annual training and educational programs, including training on Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act requirements, that those individuals who are authorized to access Social Security Numbers understand their responsibility to protect sensitive and personal information. This responsibility includes securing this information when working from home or another remote location. (8) Agencies must use privacy and confidentiality statements that describe accountability clearly and warn of possible disciplinary action for unauthorized release of the Social Security Number and other personally identifiable information. These statements must be signed by all individuals who have access to Social Security Numbers. (9) Agencies must ensure their telework policies and written VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:11 Jan 17, 2008 Jkt 214001 agreements are in compliance with Federal privacy protection policies, including policies governing protection of personally identifiable information, e.g., Social Security Numbers. (10) Agencies must require supervisory approval before authorized individuals may access, transport, or transmit information containing a Social Security Number outside of the agencies’ facilities. Electronic records containing Social Security Numbers must be transported or transmitted in an encrypted or protected format as prescribed in all established guidance regarding the protection of sensitive agency information. Paper-based records containing Social Security Numbers must be transported in wheeled containers, portfolios, briefcases, or similar devices that can be locked when not in use. In addition, these containers must be identifiable by tag or decal with contact and mailing address information. (11) Agencies must ensure access to Social Security Numbers, including access involving data entry, printing, and screen displays, occurs in a protected location to guard against exposure. (12) Agencies must ensure all security incidents involving personally identifiable information, especially Social Security Numbers, are reported in accordance with all established guidance regarding the reporting of incidents involving personally identifiable information. In addition, agencies must inform all employees of all established incident reporting requirements annually. (13) Agencies must ensure all authorized disclosures of information containing Social Security Numbers and other personally identifiable data are made in accordance with established regulations and procedures. 4. In § 293.107, paragraphs (a)(8) through (10) are added to read as follows: § 293.107 Special safeguards for automated records. (a) * * * (8) Minimize the risk of unauthorized disclosure of Social Security Numbers during data entry activities by concealing the Social Security Number on the screens. (9) Assure adequate internal control procedures to properly monitor authorized and unauthorized access to Social Security Numbers and other personally identifiable data. (10) Assure all Social Security Number safeguards and protection rules PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 3411 are enforced in both test and production environments. * * * * * [FR Doc. E8–858 Filed 1–17–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325–39–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Federal Crop Insurance Corporation 7 CFR Part 457 RIN 0563–AC14 Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Dry Pea Crop Provisions Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) proposes to amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions to include the insurability of additional types of dry peas, to offer winter coverage, to allow replanting payments, and to make chickpeas insurable under the Dry Pea Crop Provisions rather than the Dry Bean Crop Provisions. The intended effect of this action is to provide policy changes, to clarify existing policy provisions to better meet the needs of the producers, and to reduce vulnerability to program fraud, waste, and abuse. The changes will apply for the 2009 and succeeding crop years. DATES: Written comments and opinions on this proposed rule will be accepted until close of business March 18, 2008 and will be considered when the rule is to be made final. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments, titled ‘‘Dry Pea Crop Provisions’’, by any of the following methods: • By Mail to: Director, Product Administration and Standards Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812, Room 421, PO Box 419205, Kansas City, MO 64141–6205. • By Express Mail to: Director, Product Administration and Standards Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812, 9240 Troost Avenue, Kansas City, MO 64131–3055. • E-mail: DirectorPDD@rma.usda.gov. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. A copy of each response will be available for public inspection and copying from 7 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., CST, E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM 18JAP1 3412 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules Monday through Friday, except holidays, at the above address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Claire Elsea, Economist, Product Management, Product Administration and Standards Division, Risk Management Agency, at the Kansas City, MO, address listed above, telephone (816) 926–7730. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order 12866 The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this rule is non-significant for the purpose of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it has not been reviewed by OMB. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of information in this rule have been approved by OMB under control number 0563–0053 through June 30, 2008. E-Government Act Compliance FCIC is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA. Executive Order 13132 It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132, Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, or on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Regulatory Flexibility Act FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:11 Jan 17, 2008 Jkt 214001 on a substantial number of small entities. Program requirements for the Federal crop insurance program are the same for all producers regardless of the size of their farming operation. For instance, all producers are required to submit an application and acreage report to establish their insurance guarantees and compute premium amounts, and all producers are required to submit a notice of loss and production information to determine the amount of an indemnity payment in the event of an insured cause of crop loss. Whether a producer has 10 acres or 1000 acres, there is no difference in the kind of information collected. To ensure crop insurance is available to small entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act authorizes FCIC to waive collection of administrative fees from limited resource farmers. FCIC believes this waiver helps to ensure that small entities are given the same opportunities as large entities to manage their risks through the use of crop insurance. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been prepared since this regulation does not have an impact on small entities, and therefore, this regulation is exempt from the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605). Federal Assistance Program This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.450. Executive Order 12372 This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983. Executive Order 12988 This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will not have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will preempt State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are inconsistent herewith. With respect to any direct action taken by FCIC or to require the insurance provider to take specific action under the terms of the crop insurance policy, the administrative appeal provisions published at 7 CFR part 11 must be exhausted before any action against FCIC for judicial review may be brought. Environmental Evaluation This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact on the quality of the human environment, PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 health, or safety. Therefore, neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement is needed. Background FCIC proposes to revise 7 CFR part 457, Common Crop Insurance Regulations, by amending § 457.140 Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions, to be effective for the 2009 and succeeding crop years. Several requests have been made for changes to improve the coverage offered, address program integrity issues, simplify program administration, and improve clarity of the policy provisions. The proposed changes are as follows: 1. Section 1—FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ‘‘base price’’ to delete the word ‘‘processor’’ and add ‘‘seed company’’ since the contract is with a seed company, not a processor. FCIC also proposes to revise the definition of ‘‘contract seed peas.’’ Proposed language makes coverage available to fall and spring planted acreage. FCIC now proposes to insure fall planted acreage. Therefore, it must be included in the definition of ‘‘contract seed peas.’’ FCIC also proposes to remove the requirement that acreage must be enrolled in the seed certification program administered by the state in which the peas are produced because some states no longer administer seed certification programs. Therefore, enforcing this requirement could limit the availability of crop insurance for contract seed pea producers. FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ‘‘dry peas’’ to allow insurability of additional types of dry peas. Currently, only spring planted smooth green and yellow types of commercial dry peas, peas grown for seed, fall planted types of Austrian Winter peas if provided for in the Special Provisions, all spring planted types of lentils, and all types of contract seed peas are insurable. FCIC proposes to amend these provisions to remove the specific types that are insurable and to specify that the insurable types will be contained in the Special Provisions. FCIC also proposes to insure chickpeas (a.k.a. garbanzo beans) under the Dry Pea Crop Provisions. Chickpeas are currently insurable under the Dry Bean Crop Provisions only. However, the agronomical and physiological traits of chickpeas are more similar to dry peas and lentils than dry beans. This change will also simplify the crop insurance program by allowing producers of dry peas, lentils and chickpeas to purchase coverage for these crops under one policy. E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM 18JAP1 rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules FCIC proposes to clarify the definition of ‘‘harvest’’ by adding the following sentence ‘‘Dry peas that are swathed prior to combining are not considered harvested.’’ Swathing is a step in the harvest process but the seed is not removed from the plant until the crop is combined. FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ‘‘local market price’’ to specify that factors not associated with grading under United States Standards for Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas and the Lentils will not be considered unless otherwise specified on the Special Provisions. The intent of this change is to standardize the grading standards to be used in quality adjustment, recognizing that there may be circumstances where it may be necessary to deviate from such standards. If such circumstances arise, the proposed change provides the flexibility to make changes through the Special Provisions, if necessary. FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ‘‘nurse crop (companion crop)’’ for clarity and to be consistent with the definition of ‘‘nurse crop (companion crop)’’ in the Small Grains Crop Provisions. FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ‘‘practical to replant’’ to reference the addition of fall planted dry peas. As stated above, insurance coverage will now be provided for fall planted dry peas. Therefore, the conditions under which it will not be considered practical to replant fall planted dry peas must be specified because the conditions are not the same as for spring planted dry peas. FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ‘‘price election’’ to provide clarification that the price election is used to determine premium and any indemnity for contract seed peas under this policy. FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ‘‘seed company contract’’ to remove the word ‘‘varieties’’ and add the word ‘‘types’’ in both places. This change is necessary because FCIC has proposed to insure categories of dry peas that will be contained in the Special Provisions to allow the flexibility to add new types as appropriate. FCIC proposes to add a definition of ‘‘swathed’’ to describe the process that is used by producers prior to combining the crop because a crop that has only been swathed is not considered harvested. FCIC proposes to add a definition of ‘‘type’’ because FCIC has proposed to refer to the categories that may be insured as ‘‘types,’’ and specify that the insured types will be contained in the Special Provisions, which will allow VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:11 Jan 17, 2008 Jkt 214001 additional types to be quickly added as appropriate. FCIC proposed to add a definition of ‘‘windrow’’ because the term is used in the definition of ‘‘swathed.’’ 2. Section 2—FCIC proposes to revise the language in section 2 to specify optional units may be established for each type specified in the Special Provisions because different types may have significantly different characteristics and risks, making it more appropriate to have separate guarantees, premium, and loss adjustment for each type. 3. Section 3—FCIC proposes to revise section 3 to allow the insured to select a separate coverage level and price percentage for each insurable type listed on the Special Provisions. Previously, only coverage levels could be selected by type but because the types may have significantly different characteristics with different risks, allowing separate price elections is appropriate. 4. Section 7—FCIC proposes to revise section 7 to add provisions that state dry peas planted to plow down, graze, harvest as hay or to otherwise not harvest as a mature dry pea crop are not insurable. The Dry Pea Crop Provisions allow coverage for dry peas that have reached maturity. These practices do not commonly take place when the dry peas have reached maturity. Also, FCIC has not established premium rates for dry peas that are plowed down, grazed or harvested as hay. Therefore, dry peas that are planted to plow down, graze, harvest as hay or to otherwise not harvest as a mature crop are not insurable under the Dry Pea Crop Provisions. FCIC also proposes to revise section 7 to allow insurability of fall planted acreage of dry peas, and to allow for coverage for fall seeded acreage of dry peas between the time coverage begins and the spring final planting date under the Winter Coverage Option. More producers are planting in the fall and FCIC has sufficient data to assess the risks and provide appropriate coverage. Without the availability of such coverage, producers who plant in the fall are at risk until the spring coverage takes affect. 5. Section 9—FCIC proposes to add provisions to specify the criteria for insurance coverage when the Special Provisions designate only a spring final planting date or both a fall and spring final planting date. This change is necessary because fall planted acreage is now insurable under the Dry Pea Crop Provisions. 6. Section 11—FCIC proposes to add a new section 11 authorizing replanting payments for dry peas. Adding PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 3413 replanting payments for dry peas makes the Dry Pea Crop Provisions consistent with the coverage available for other similar crops. 7. Redesignated section 13—FCIC proposes to revise the introductory text in 13(a) to be consistent with the provisions in the Small Grain Crop Provisions. FCIC also proposes to revise redesignated sections 13(c)(1) to add the word ‘‘mature.’’ Adding the word ‘‘mature’’ is necessary because only mature production is eligible for quality adjustments. FCIC also proposes to specify measurable standards in the seed company contract when discussing dry peas that meet or fail to meet the standards in the seed company contract. FCIC has had problems in the past with contract standards that contained standards that were not objective or measurable, which made it very difficult to determine whether the insured crop met such standards. This language will make it clear that FCIC is only providing quality adjustments for dry peas that do not meet the objective measurable standards in the seed company contract. FCIC proposes to revise redesignated section (d)(1)(iii) to remove the phrase ‘‘excluding Austrian Winter Peas’’ and add the phrase ‘‘in accordance with the following unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions.’’ Adding the phrase ‘‘in accordance with the following unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions’’ is necessary because there may be situations where other quality adjustment procedures are more appropriate and this language provides the flexibility to quickly make such changes. FCIC proposes to revise the introductory text of redesignated section 13(e) by removing the specifically listed types of dry peas. The insured types will now be specified in the Special Provisions to allow the flexibility to add new types, as applicable, more quickly. FCIC also proposes to revise the introductory text of redesignated section 13(e) by clarifying that seed peas that do not meet the objective, measurable terms of the contract (e.g., size, germination percentage) are eligible for quality adjustment. As stated above, there had been problems in the past with subjective standards in these contracts, which made quality adjustment difficult. This change will clarify that only those objective, measurable standards in the contract will be used to determine whether the dry peas meet the standards in the contract. FCIC proposes to revise the introductory text of redesignated section 13(e)(1) by allowing deficiencies in E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM 18JAP1 3414 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules quality to be specified in the Special Provisions. This revision is consistent with the proposed change in section 13(d)(1)(iii). 8. Section 15—FCIC proposes to add a new section 15 Winter Coverage Option. This option allows optional coverage during the over-wintering period for fall planted acreage. Currently, there is a period during which the crop may be in the field and coverage is not available. The Winter Coverage Option will permit coverage during this risk period. FCIC proposes the Winter Coverage Option be available in counties for which the actuarial table provides a premium rate. The option provides coverage on fall planted dry peas from the time the insurance attaches until the spring final planting date, unless otherwise provided by a written agreement. This coverage will allow insureds who have winter damage on their fall planted dry peas to continue to care for the crop, replant the crop, or destroy the crop in accordance with the provisions. FCIC proposes the Winter Coverage Option also provides replant payments. 9. FCIC also proposes to remove those provisions that are now duplicative of provisions contained in the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions and revise certain provisions for clarity. No substantive changes are made to such provisions. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457 Crop insurance, Dry peas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Proposed Rule. Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR part 457 effective for the 2009 and succeeding crop years as follows: PART 457—COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as follows: rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1506(p). 2. Amend § 457.140 as follows: a. Revise the introductory text: b. Remove the paragraph immediately preceding section 1; c. Amend section 1 by revising the definitions of ‘‘base price,’’ ‘‘contract seed peas,’’ ‘‘dry peas,’’ ‘‘harvest,’’ ‘‘local market price,’’ ‘‘nurse crop (companion crop),’’ ‘‘practical to replant,’’ ‘‘price election,’’ ‘‘seed company contract,’’ and add definitions of ‘‘swathed,’’ ‘‘type,’’ and ‘‘windrow;’’ d. Revise section 2; e. Revise section 3; f. Revise section 7; g. Revise section 9; VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:11 Jan 17, 2008 Jkt 214001 h. Redesignate sections 11 through 13 as 12 through 14, respectively, and add a new section 11; i. Revise redesignated section 12; j. Amend redesignated section 13 by removing the phrase ‘‘section 12’’ and adding the phrase ‘‘section 13’’ in its place everywhere it appears; k. Revise redesignated section 13(a) introductory text, (a)(1), and (a)(2); l. Revise the introductory text in redesignated section 13(c)(1); m. Revise redesignated section 13(d)(1)(iii); n. Revise the introductory text of redesignated sections 13(e) and 13(e)(1); and o. Add a new section 15. The revised and added text reads as follows: § 457.140 Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions. The Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions for the 2009 and succeeding crop years are as follows: * * * * * 1. Definitions * * * * * Base contract price. The price per pound stipulated in the seed company contract without regard to discounts or incentives that may apply, and that will be paid to the producer for at least 50 percent of the total production under contract with the seed company. * * * * * Contract seed peas. Dry peas grown under the terms of a seed company contract for the purpose of producing seed to be used for producing dry pea crops in a future crop year. Dry peas. Peas (Pisum sativum L.), Austrian peas (Pisum sativum spp arvense), lentils (Lens culinaris Medik.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and those types listed on the Special Provisions. Harvest. Combining of dry peas. Dry peas that are swathed prior to combining are not considered harvested. Local market price. The cash price per pound for the U.S. No. 1 grade of dry peas as determined by us. Such price will be the prevailing dollar amount buyers are willing to pay for dry peas containing the maximum limits of quality deficiencies allowable for the U.S. No. 1 grade. Factors not associated with grading under the United States Standards for Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas and Lentils will not be considered, unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions. Nurse crop (companion crop). A crop planted into the same acreage as another crop to improve the growing conditions for the crop with which it is grown, and PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 that is intended to be harvested separately. * * * * * Practical to replant. In addition to the definition contained in the Basic Provisions, it will not be considered practical to replant dry peas, except for seed peas and fall planted dry peas, more than 25 days after the final planting date unless replanting is generally occurring in the area. For seed peas, it will not be considered practical to replant unless the seed company will accept the production under the terms of the seed company contract. For fall planted dry peas, it will not be considered practical to replant more than 25 days after the final planting date for the corresponding spring planted type of dry pea. Price election. In addition to the provisions of the definition contained in the Basic Provisions, the price election for contract seed peas will be the percentage you elect (not to exceed 100 percent) of the base price and used for the purposes of determining premium and indemnity for contract seed peas under this policy. * * * * * Seed company contract. A written agreement between the producer and the seed company, executed by the acreage reporting date, containing at a minimum: (a) The producer’s promise to plant and grow one or more specific types of contract seed peas, and deliver the production from those types to the seed company; (b) The seed company’s promise to purchase all the production stated in the contract; and (c) A fixed price, or a method to determine such price based on published information compiled by a third party, that will be paid to the producer for at least 50 percent of the production stated in the contract. Swathed. Severance of the stem and pods from the ground without removal of the seeds from the pods and placing such into a windrow. Type. A category of dry peas identified as a type in the Special Provisions. Windrow. Dry peas where the plants are cut and placed in a row. 2. Unit Division In addition to, or instead of, establishing optional units by section, section equivalent, or FSA farm serial number and by irrigated and nonirrigated acreage as provided in the unit division provisions contained in the Basic Provisions, separate optional units may be established for each dry pea type as specified on the Special Provisions. E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM 18JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules 3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage Levels, and Prices for Determining Indemnities (a) In lieu of the requirements of section 3 of the Basic Provisions, you may select only one coverage level for each type listed on the Special Provisions. (b) In addition to the requirements of section 3 of the Basic Provisions, you may select only one price election for all dry peas in the county insured under this policy unless the Special Provisions provide different price elections for a particular type, in which case you may select one price election for each dry pea type so designated in the Special Provisions. (1) If the Special Provisions designate different price elections by type, the price elections you choose for each type are not required to have the same percentage relationship to the maximum price offered by us for each type. For example, if you choose 100 percent of the maximum price for one type, you may also choose 75 percent of the maximum price for another type; (2) If you elect the Catastrophic Risk Protection level of insurance for any of the above, the same level of coverage will be applicable to all insured dry pea acreage in the county; (3) If the Special Provisions do not designate different price elections by type, the price election you choose for each type is required to have the same percentage relationship to the maximum price offered by us for each price. For example, if you choose 100 percent of the maximum price election for one type, the 100 percent election will apply to all other types you produce. * * * * * rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS 7. Insured Crop (a) In accordance with section 8 of the Basic Provisions, the crop insured will be all the dry pea types in the county for which a premium rate is provided by the actuarial documents: (1) In which you have a share; (2) That are planted for harvesting once maturity is reached as: (i) Dry peas; or (ii) Contract seed peas, if a seed company contract is executed on or before the acreage reporting date; and (3) That are not (unless allowed by the Special Provisions or by written agreement): (i) Interplanted with another crop; (ii) Planted into an established grass or legume; (iii) Planted as a nurse crop; or (iv) Planted to plow down, graze, harvest as hay, or to otherwise not harvest as a mature dry pea crop. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:11 Jan 17, 2008 Jkt 214001 (b) You will be considered to have a share in the insured crop if, under the seed company contract, you retain control of the acreage on which the dry peas are grown, you are at risk of loss (i.e., if there is a reduction in quantity or quality of your dry pea production, you will receive less income under the contract), and the seed company contract is in effect for the entire insurance period. (c) In counties for which the actuarial documents provide premium rates for the Winter Coverage Option (see section 15), coverage is available for dry peas between the time coverage begins and the spring final planting date. Coverage under the option is effective only if you qualify under the terms of the option and you elect the option by the sales closing date. * * * * * 9. Insurance Period In accordance with the provisions of section 11 of the Basic Provisions and subject to provisions provided by the Winter Coverage Option (see section 15) if you elect such option, the insurance period is as follows: (a) Coverage for fall planted dry peas not covered by the Winter Coverage Option will begin on the earlier of April 15 or the date we agree to accept the acreage for insurance, but not before March 1, unless otherwise specified on the Special Provisions. (b) The calendar date for the end of the insurance period for all insurable types of dry peas in the county is September 30 of the crop year in which the crop is normally harvested, unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions. (c) Any acreage of the insured crop damaged before the final planting date, to the extent that producers in the surrounding area would not further care for the crop, must be replanted unless we agree that it is not practical to replant. (d) Whenever the Special Provisions designate both fall and spring final planting dates: (1) Any fall planted dry peas that are damaged before the spring final planting date, to the extent that growers in the area would normally not further care for the crop, must be replanted to a fall planted type of dry peas to maintain insurance based on the fall planted type unless we agree that replanting is not practical. If it is not practical to replant to a fall planted type of dry peas but it is practical to replant to a spring planted type, you must replant to a spring planted type to keep your insurance coverage based on the fall planted type in force. PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 3415 (2) Any fall planted dry pea acreage that is replanted to a spring planted type when it was practical to replant the fall planted type will be insured as the spring planted type and the production guarantee, premium and price election applicable to the spring planted type will be used. In this case, the acreage will be considered to be initially planted to the spring planted type. (3) Notwithstanding sections 9(d)(1) and (2), if you have elected coverage under the Winter Coverage Option (if available in the county), insurance will be in accordance with the option. (e) Whenever the Special Provisions designate only a spring final planting date, any acreage of a fall planted dry pea crop is not insured unless you request such coverage on or before the spring sales closing date, and we agree in writing that the acreage has an adequate stand in the spring to produce the yield used to determine your production guarantee. (1) The fall planted dry pea crop will be insured as a spring planted type for the purpose of the production guarantee, premium and price election. (2) Insurance will attach to such acreage on the date we determine an adequate stand exists or on the spring final planting date if we do not determine adequacy of the stand prior to the spring final planting date. (3) Any acreage of such fall planted dry peas that is damaged after it is accepted for insurance but before the spring final planting date, to the extent that growers in the area would normally not further care for the crop, must be replanted to a spring planted type of dry pea unless we agree it is not practical to replant. (4) If fall planted acreage is not to be insured it must be recorded on the acreage report as uninsured fall planted acreage. * * * * * 11. Replanting Payments (a) A replanting payment is allowed as follows: (1) In lieu of provisions in section 13 of the Basic Provisions that limit the amount of a replant payment to the actual cost of replanting, the amount of any replanting payment will be determined in accordance with these Crop Provisions; (2) You must comply with all requirements regarding replanting payments contained in section 13 of the Basic Provisions (except as allowed in section 11(a)(1)) and in the Winter Coverage Option for which you are eligible and which you have elected; (3) The insured crop must be damaged by an insurable cause of loss to the E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM 18JAP1 rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS 3416 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules extent that the remaining stand will not produce at least 90 percent of the production guarantee for the acreage. (4) The acreage must have been initially planted to a spring type of the insured crop in those counties with only a spring final planting date; (5) Damage must occur after the fall final planting date in those counties where both a fall and spring final planting date is designated (if the Special Provisions provide more than one fall final planting date, the fall final planting date applicable to policies with the Winter Coverage Option (see section 15) will be used for this purpose, regardless of whether or not the option is actually in effect); and (6) The replanted crop must be seeded at a rate sufficient to achieve a total (undamaged and new seeding) plant population that will produce at least the yield used to determine your production guarantee. (b) The maximum amount of the replanting payment per acre will be the lesser of 20.0 percent of the production guarantee or 200 pounds, multiplied by your price election, multiplied by your share, unless otherwise stated in the Special Provisions. (c) When the crop is replanted using a practice that is uninsurable for an original planting, the liability on the unit will be reduced by the amount of the replanting payment. The premium amount will not be reduced. (d) Replanting payments will be calculated using the price election and production guarantee for the dry pea type that is replanted and insured. For example, if damaged smooth green and yellow pea acreage is replanted to lentils, the price election and production guarantee applicable to lentils will be used to calculate any replanting payment that may be due. A revised acreage report will be required to reflect the replanted type. Notwithstanding the previous two sentences, the following will have a replanting payment based on the guarantee and price election for the crop type initially planted: (1) Any damaged fall planted crop type replanted to a spring planted type that retains insurance based on the production guarantee and price election for the fall planted type; and (2) Any acreage replanted at a reduced seeding rate into a partially damaged stand of the insured crop. 12. Duties in the Event of Damage or Loss Representative samples are required in accordance with section 14 of the Basic Provisions. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:11 Jan 17, 2008 Jkt 214001 13. Settlement of Claim (a) We will determine your loss on a unit basis. In the event you are unable to provide records of production that are acceptable to us for any: (1) Optional units, we will combine all optional units for which acceptable records of production were not provided; or (2) Basic units, we will allocate any commingled production to such units in proportion to our liability on the harvested acreage for each unit. * * * * * (c) * * * (1) For mature production meeting the objective, measurable minimum quality requirements (e.g., size, germination percentage) contained in the seed company contract, and for production that does not meet such requirements due to uninsured causes: * * * * * (d) * * * (1) * * * (iii) Unharvested production (mature unharvested production of dry peas may be adjusted for quality deficiencies in accordance with section 13I or (e), or as specified in the Special Provisions); and * * * * * (e) Mature dry pea production that does not qualify as contract seed peas under the policy terms or does not meet the objective, measurable terms of the contract (e.g., size, germination percentage), may be adjusted for quality deficiencies. (1) Production will be eligible for quality adjustment in accordance with the following, unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions: * * * * * 15. Winter Coverage Option (This is a continuous endorsement) (a) In the event of a conflict between this section and sections 1–14 of these Crop Provisions, this section will control. (b) Catastrophic Risk Protection Coverage is not available under this option. (c) In return for payment of the additional premium designated in the actuarial documents, this option is available in counties for which the actuarial documents provide premium rates for the winter coverage option, coverage is available for dry peas between the time coverage begins and the spring final planting date. (d) You must have a Dry Pea Crop Insurance Policy in effect and elect to insure the dry pea type under such policy. (e) You must select this coverage on your application for insurance on or PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 before the sales closing date. Failure to do so means you have rejected this coverage for the dry pea crop planted in the fall and this option is void. (f) Coverage under this option begins on the later of the date we accept your application for coverage or on the fall final planting date designated in the Special Provisions. Coverage ends on the spring final planting date designated in the Special Provisions. (g) In addition to the provisions of section 34(b) of the Basic Provisions and section 2 of the Dry Pea Crop Provisions, optional units may be established for dry peas if each optional unit contains only dry peas initially planted in the fall or only dry peas initially planted in the spring. (h) In lieu of sections 4 and 5 of these Crop Provisions, if you elect this option for the dry pea crop initially planted in the fall, the following dates will be applicable to all your fall planted and spring planted dry pea crop in the county: (1) Contract change date is June 30 preceding the cancellation date; (2) Cancellation date is September 30; and (3) Termination date is November 30. (i) In lieu of the provisions in section 14 of the Basic Provisions, all notices of damage must be provided to us not later than 15 days after the spring final planting date designated in the Special Provisions. (j) All insurable acreage of each fall planted dry pea type covered under this option must be insured. (k) The amount of any indemnity paid under the terms of this option will be subject to any reduction specified in the Basic Provisions for multiple crop benefits in the same crop year. (l) Whenever any acreage of a dry pea crop planted in the fall is damaged during the insurance period and at least 20 acres or 20 percent of the insured planted acreage in the unit, whichever is less, does not have an adequate stand to produce at least 90 percent of the production guarantee for the acreage, you may, at your option, take one of the following actions: (1) Continue to care for the damaged crop. By doing so, coverage will continue under the terms of the Basic Provisions, the Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions and this option; (2) Replant the acreage to an appropriate type of the insured crop, if it is practical, and receive a replanting payment in accordance with the terms of section 11. By doing so, coverage will continue under the terms of the Basic Provisions, the Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions and this option, and the production guarantee for the dry pea E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM 18JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules type planted in the fall will remain in effect; or (3) Destroy the remaining crop on such acreage: (i) By destroying the remaining crop, you agree to accept an appraised amount of production determined in accordance with section 13(d)(1) of the Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions to count against the unit production guarantee. This amount will be considered production to count in determining any final indemnity on the unit and will be used to settle your claim as described in section 13. (ii) You may use such acreage for any purpose, including planting and separately insuring any other crop if such insurance is available. (iii) If you elect to plant and elect to insure spring planted acreage of the same dry pea type (you must elect whether or not you want insurance on the spring planted acreage of the same dry pea type at the time we release the fall planted acreage), you must pay additional premium for the insurance. Such acreage will be insured in accordance with the policy provisions that are applicable to acreage that is initially planted in the spring to the same dry pea type, and you must: (A) Plant the spring planted acreage in a manner which results in a clear and discernible break in the planting pattern at the boundary between it and any remaining acreage of the fall planted dry pea acreage; and (B) Store or market the production in a manner which permits us to verify the amount of spring planted production separately from any fall planted production. In the event you are unable to provide records of production that are acceptable to us, the spring planted acreage will be considered to be a part of the original fall planted unit. * * * * * Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2008–0034; Directorate Identifier 2007–CE–097–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Pacific Aerospace Limited Model 750XL Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: SUMMARY: DCA/750XL/3A is prompted by a report from the manufacturer of the possibility that wiring loom protective sleeving is not fitted to aircraft S/N 107 through to 134. AD applicability revised to include aircraft up to S/N 134. To prevent fretting damage to the wiring loom that may lead to arcing in proximity to the fuel vent lines and the possibility of fire * * * The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 19, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816) 329–4090. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2008–0034; Directorate Identifier 2007–CE–097–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), which is the airworthiness authority for New Zealand, has issued AD DCA/ 750XL/3A, dated November 28, 2007 (referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: Examining the AD Docket BILLING CODE 3410–08–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:11 Jan 17, 2008 Jkt 214001 DCA/750XL/3A is prompted by a report from the manufacturer of the possibility that wiring loom protective sleeving is not fitted to aircraft S/N 107 through to 134. AD applicability revised to include aircraft up to S/N 134. To prevent fretting damage to the wiring loom that may lead to arcing in proximity to the fuel vent lines and the possibility of fire, inspect the main wiring loom on the right hand side of the aircraft adjacent to the frames at station 114.34’’ and 118.84’’, per PACSB/XL/009 issue 2, to ensure that two pieces of protective sleeving are fitted. You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 Signed in Washington, DC, on January 7, 2008. Eldon Gould, Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. [FR Doc. E8–321 Filed 1–17–08; 8:45 am] rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 3417 The effectivity of the service information is serial number (S/N) 102 through 106. The MCAI expanded the applicability to S/N 102 through 134. PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18JAP1.SGM 18JAP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 13 (Friday, January 18, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3411-3417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-321]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

7 CFR Part 457

RIN 0563-AC14


Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Dry Pea Crop Provisions

AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) proposes to 
amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Dry Pea Crop Insurance 
Provisions to include the insurability of additional types of dry peas, 
to offer winter coverage, to allow replanting payments, and to make 
chickpeas insurable under the Dry Pea Crop Provisions rather than the 
Dry Bean Crop Provisions. The intended effect of this action is to 
provide policy changes, to clarify existing policy provisions to better 
meet the needs of the producers, and to reduce vulnerability to program 
fraud, waste, and abuse. The changes will apply for the 2009 and 
succeeding crop years.

DATES: Written comments and opinions on this proposed rule will be 
accepted until close of business March 18, 2008 and will be considered 
when the rule is to be made final.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments, 
titled ``Dry Pea Crop Provisions'', by any of the following methods:
     By Mail to: Director, Product Administration and Standards 
Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of 
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812, Room 421, PO Box 419205, 
Kansas City, MO 64141-6205.
     By Express Mail to: Director, Product Administration and 
Standards Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of 
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812, 9240 Troost Avenue, Kansas 
City, MO 64131-3055.
     E-mail: DirectorPDD@rma.usda.gov.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    A copy of each response will be available for public inspection and 
copying from 7 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., CST,

[[Page 3412]]

Monday through Friday, except holidays, at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Claire Elsea, Economist, Product 
Management, Product Administration and Standards Division, Risk 
Management Agency, at the Kansas City, MO, address listed above, 
telephone (816) 926-7730.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this 
rule is non-significant for the purpose of Executive Order 12866 and, 
therefore, it has not been reviewed by OMB.

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of information in this rule 
have been approved by OMB under control number 0563-0053 through June 
30, 2008.

E-Government Act Compliance

    FCIC is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to 
promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to 
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government 
information and services, and for other purposes.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) 
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of 
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and 
the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the 
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and 
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not 
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.

Executive Order 13132

    It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to 
warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this 
rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, or on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Program 
requirements for the Federal crop insurance program are the same for 
all producers regardless of the size of their farming operation. For 
instance, all producers are required to submit an application and 
acreage report to establish their insurance guarantees and compute 
premium amounts, and all producers are required to submit a notice of 
loss and production information to determine the amount of an indemnity 
payment in the event of an insured cause of crop loss. Whether a 
producer has 10 acres or 1000 acres, there is no difference in the kind 
of information collected. To ensure crop insurance is available to 
small entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act authorizes FCIC to waive 
collection of administrative fees from limited resource farmers. FCIC 
believes this waiver helps to ensure that small entities are given the 
same opportunities as large entities to manage their risks through the 
use of crop insurance. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been 
prepared since this regulation does not have an impact on small 
entities, and therefore, this regulation is exempt from the provisions 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).

Federal Assistance Program

    This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under No. 10.450.

Executive Order 12372

    This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order 
12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and 
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V, 
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.

Executive Order 12988

    This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive 
Order 12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will 
not have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will preempt 
State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are 
inconsistent herewith. With respect to any direct action taken by FCIC 
or to require the insurance provider to take specific action under the 
terms of the crop insurance policy, the administrative appeal 
provisions published at 7 CFR part 11 must be exhausted before any 
action against FCIC for judicial review may be brought.

Environmental Evaluation

    This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact 
on the quality of the human environment, health, or safety. Therefore, 
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact 
Statement is needed.

Background

    FCIC proposes to revise 7 CFR part 457, Common Crop Insurance 
Regulations, by amending Sec.  457.140 Dry Pea Crop Insurance 
Provisions, to be effective for the 2009 and succeeding crop years. 
Several requests have been made for changes to improve the coverage 
offered, address program integrity issues, simplify program 
administration, and improve clarity of the policy provisions.
    The proposed changes are as follows:
    1. Section 1--FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``base 
price'' to delete the word ``processor'' and add ``seed company'' since 
the contract is with a seed company, not a processor.
    FCIC also proposes to revise the definition of ``contract seed 
peas.'' Proposed language makes coverage available to fall and spring 
planted acreage. FCIC now proposes to insure fall planted acreage. 
Therefore, it must be included in the definition of ``contract seed 
peas.'' FCIC also proposes to remove the requirement that acreage must 
be enrolled in the seed certification program administered by the state 
in which the peas are produced because some states no longer administer 
seed certification programs. Therefore, enforcing this requirement 
could limit the availability of crop insurance for contract seed pea 
producers.
    FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``dry peas'' to allow 
insurability of additional types of dry peas. Currently, only spring 
planted smooth green and yellow types of commercial dry peas, peas 
grown for seed, fall planted types of Austrian Winter peas if provided 
for in the Special Provisions, all spring planted types of lentils, and 
all types of contract seed peas are insurable. FCIC proposes to amend 
these provisions to remove the specific types that are insurable and to 
specify that the insurable types will be contained in the Special 
Provisions. FCIC also proposes to insure chickpeas (a.k.a. garbanzo 
beans) under the Dry Pea Crop Provisions. Chickpeas are currently 
insurable under the Dry Bean Crop Provisions only. However, the 
agronomical and physiological traits of chickpeas are more similar to 
dry peas and lentils than dry beans. This change will also simplify the 
crop insurance program by allowing producers of dry peas, lentils and 
chickpeas to purchase coverage for these crops under one policy.

[[Page 3413]]

    FCIC proposes to clarify the definition of ``harvest'' by adding 
the following sentence ``Dry peas that are swathed prior to combining 
are not considered harvested.'' Swathing is a step in the harvest 
process but the seed is not removed from the plant until the crop is 
combined.
    FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``local market price'' to 
specify that factors not associated with grading under United States 
Standards for Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas and the Lentils will not be 
considered unless otherwise specified on the Special Provisions. The 
intent of this change is to standardize the grading standards to be 
used in quality adjustment, recognizing that there may be circumstances 
where it may be necessary to deviate from such standards. If such 
circumstances arise, the proposed change provides the flexibility to 
make changes through the Special Provisions, if necessary.
    FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``nurse crop (companion 
crop)'' for clarity and to be consistent with the definition of ``nurse 
crop (companion crop)'' in the Small Grains Crop Provisions.
    FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``practical to replant'' 
to reference the addition of fall planted dry peas. As stated above, 
insurance coverage will now be provided for fall planted dry peas. 
Therefore, the conditions under which it will not be considered 
practical to replant fall planted dry peas must be specified because 
the conditions are not the same as for spring planted dry peas.
    FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``price election'' to 
provide clarification that the price election is used to determine 
premium and any indemnity for contract seed peas under this policy.
    FCIC proposes to revise the definition of ``seed company contract'' 
to remove the word ``varieties'' and add the word ``types'' in both 
places. This change is necessary because FCIC has proposed to insure 
categories of dry peas that will be contained in the Special Provisions 
to allow the flexibility to add new types as appropriate.
    FCIC proposes to add a definition of ``swathed'' to describe the 
process that is used by producers prior to combining the crop because a 
crop that has only been swathed is not considered harvested.
    FCIC proposes to add a definition of ``type'' because FCIC has 
proposed to refer to the categories that may be insured as ``types,'' 
and specify that the insured types will be contained in the Special 
Provisions, which will allow additional types to be quickly added as 
appropriate.
    FCIC proposed to add a definition of ``windrow'' because the term 
is used in the definition of ``swathed.''
    2. Section 2--FCIC proposes to revise the language in section 2 to 
specify optional units may be established for each type specified in 
the Special Provisions because different types may have significantly 
different characteristics and risks, making it more appropriate to have 
separate guarantees, premium, and loss adjustment for each type.
    3. Section 3--FCIC proposes to revise section 3 to allow the 
insured to select a separate coverage level and price percentage for 
each insurable type listed on the Special Provisions. Previously, only 
coverage levels could be selected by type but because the types may 
have significantly different characteristics with different risks, 
allowing separate price elections is appropriate.
    4. Section 7--FCIC proposes to revise section 7 to add provisions 
that state dry peas planted to plow down, graze, harvest as hay or to 
otherwise not harvest as a mature dry pea crop are not insurable. The 
Dry Pea Crop Provisions allow coverage for dry peas that have reached 
maturity. These practices do not commonly take place when the dry peas 
have reached maturity. Also, FCIC has not established premium rates for 
dry peas that are plowed down, grazed or harvested as hay. Therefore, 
dry peas that are planted to plow down, graze, harvest as hay or to 
otherwise not harvest as a mature crop are not insurable under the Dry 
Pea Crop Provisions.
    FCIC also proposes to revise section 7 to allow insurability of 
fall planted acreage of dry peas, and to allow for coverage for fall 
seeded acreage of dry peas between the time coverage begins and the 
spring final planting date under the Winter Coverage Option. More 
producers are planting in the fall and FCIC has sufficient data to 
assess the risks and provide appropriate coverage. Without the 
availability of such coverage, producers who plant in the fall are at 
risk until the spring coverage takes affect.
    5. Section 9--FCIC proposes to add provisions to specify the 
criteria for insurance coverage when the Special Provisions designate 
only a spring final planting date or both a fall and spring final 
planting date. This change is necessary because fall planted acreage is 
now insurable under the Dry Pea Crop Provisions.
    6. Section 11--FCIC proposes to add a new section 11 authorizing 
replanting payments for dry peas. Adding replanting payments for dry 
peas makes the Dry Pea Crop Provisions consistent with the coverage 
available for other similar crops.
    7. Redesignated section 13--FCIC proposes to revise the 
introductory text in 13(a) to be consistent with the provisions in the 
Small Grain Crop Provisions.
    FCIC also proposes to revise redesignated sections 13(c)(1) to add 
the word ``mature.'' Adding the word ``mature'' is necessary because 
only mature production is eligible for quality adjustments. FCIC also 
proposes to specify measurable standards in the seed company contract 
when discussing dry peas that meet or fail to meet the standards in the 
seed company contract. FCIC has had problems in the past with contract 
standards that contained standards that were not objective or 
measurable, which made it very difficult to determine whether the 
insured crop met such standards. This language will make it clear that 
FCIC is only providing quality adjustments for dry peas that do not 
meet the objective measurable standards in the seed company contract.
    FCIC proposes to revise redesignated section (d)(1)(iii) to remove 
the phrase ``excluding Austrian Winter Peas'' and add the phrase ``in 
accordance with the following unless otherwise specified in the Special 
Provisions.'' Adding the phrase ``in accordance with the following 
unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions'' is necessary 
because there may be situations where other quality adjustment 
procedures are more appropriate and this language provides the 
flexibility to quickly make such changes.
    FCIC proposes to revise the introductory text of redesignated 
section 13(e) by removing the specifically listed types of dry peas. 
The insured types will now be specified in the Special Provisions to 
allow the flexibility to add new types, as applicable, more quickly.
    FCIC also proposes to revise the introductory text of redesignated 
section 13(e) by clarifying that seed peas that do not meet the 
objective, measurable terms of the contract (e.g., size, germination 
percentage) are eligible for quality adjustment. As stated above, there 
had been problems in the past with subjective standards in these 
contracts, which made quality adjustment difficult. This change will 
clarify that only those objective, measurable standards in the contract 
will be used to determine whether the dry peas meet the standards in 
the contract.
    FCIC proposes to revise the introductory text of redesignated 
section 13(e)(1) by allowing deficiencies in

[[Page 3414]]

quality to be specified in the Special Provisions. This revision is 
consistent with the proposed change in section 13(d)(1)(iii).
    8. Section 15--FCIC proposes to add a new section 15 Winter 
Coverage Option. This option allows optional coverage during the over-
wintering period for fall planted acreage. Currently, there is a period 
during which the crop may be in the field and coverage is not 
available. The Winter Coverage Option will permit coverage during this 
risk period. FCIC proposes the Winter Coverage Option be available in 
counties for which the actuarial table provides a premium rate. The 
option provides coverage on fall planted dry peas from the time the 
insurance attaches until the spring final planting date, unless 
otherwise provided by a written agreement. This coverage will allow 
insureds who have winter damage on their fall planted dry peas to 
continue to care for the crop, replant the crop, or destroy the crop in 
accordance with the provisions. FCIC proposes the Winter Coverage 
Option also provides replant payments.
    9. FCIC also proposes to remove those provisions that are now 
duplicative of provisions contained in the Common Crop Insurance Policy 
Basic Provisions and revise certain provisions for clarity. No 
substantive changes are made to such provisions.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457

    Crop insurance, Dry peas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Proposed Rule.
    Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop 
Insurance Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR part 457 effective for 
the 2009 and succeeding crop years as follows:

PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS

    1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1506(p).

    2. Amend Sec.  457.140 as follows:
    a. Revise the introductory text:
    b. Remove the paragraph immediately preceding section 1;
    c. Amend section 1 by revising the definitions of ``base price,'' 
``contract seed peas,'' ``dry peas,'' ``harvest,'' ``local market 
price,'' ``nurse crop (companion crop),'' ``practical to replant,'' 
``price election,'' ``seed company contract,'' and add definitions of 
``swathed,'' ``type,'' and ``windrow;''
    d. Revise section 2;
    e. Revise section 3;
    f. Revise section 7;
    g. Revise section 9;
    h. Redesignate sections 11 through 13 as 12 through 14, 
respectively, and add a new section 11;
    i. Revise redesignated section 12;
    j. Amend redesignated section 13 by removing the phrase ``section 
12'' and adding the phrase ``section 13'' in its place everywhere it 
appears;
    k. Revise redesignated section 13(a) introductory text, (a)(1), and 
(a)(2);
    l. Revise the introductory text in redesignated section 13(c)(1);
    m. Revise redesignated section 13(d)(1)(iii);
    n. Revise the introductory text of redesignated sections 13(e) and 
13(e)(1); and
    o. Add a new section 15.
    The revised and added text reads as follows:


Sec.  457.140  Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions.

    The Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions for the 2009 and succeeding 
crop years are as follows:
* * * * *
1. Definitions
* * * * *
    Base contract price. The price per pound stipulated in the seed 
company contract without regard to discounts or incentives that may 
apply, and that will be paid to the producer for at least 50 percent of 
the total production under contract with the seed company.
* * * * *
    Contract seed peas. Dry peas grown under the terms of a seed 
company contract for the purpose of producing seed to be used for 
producing dry pea crops in a future crop year.
    Dry peas. Peas (Pisum sativum L.), Austrian peas (Pisum sativum spp 
arvense), lentils (Lens culinaris Medik.) and chickpeas (Cicer 
arietinum L.) and those types listed on the Special Provisions.
    Harvest. Combining of dry peas. Dry peas that are swathed prior to 
combining are not considered harvested.
    Local market price. The cash price per pound for the U.S. No. 1 
grade of dry peas as determined by us. Such price will be the 
prevailing dollar amount buyers are willing to pay for dry peas 
containing the maximum limits of quality deficiencies allowable for the 
U.S. No. 1 grade. Factors not associated with grading under the United 
States Standards for Whole Dry Peas, Split Peas and Lentils will not be 
considered, unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions.
    Nurse crop (companion crop). A crop planted into the same acreage 
as another crop to improve the growing conditions for the crop with 
which it is grown, and that is intended to be harvested separately.
* * * * *
    Practical to replant. In addition to the definition contained in 
the Basic Provisions, it will not be considered practical to replant 
dry peas, except for seed peas and fall planted dry peas, more than 25 
days after the final planting date unless replanting is generally 
occurring in the area. For seed peas, it will not be considered 
practical to replant unless the seed company will accept the production 
under the terms of the seed company contract. For fall planted dry 
peas, it will not be considered practical to replant more than 25 days 
after the final planting date for the corresponding spring planted type 
of dry pea.
    Price election. In addition to the provisions of the definition 
contained in the Basic Provisions, the price election for contract seed 
peas will be the percentage you elect (not to exceed 100 percent) of 
the base price and used for the purposes of determining premium and 
indemnity for contract seed peas under this policy.
* * * * *
    Seed company contract. A written agreement between the producer and 
the seed company, executed by the acreage reporting date, containing at 
a minimum:
    (a) The producer's promise to plant and grow one or more specific 
types of contract seed peas, and deliver the production from those 
types to the seed company;
    (b) The seed company's promise to purchase all the production 
stated in the contract; and
    (c) A fixed price, or a method to determine such price based on 
published information compiled by a third party, that will be paid to 
the producer for at least 50 percent of the production stated in the 
contract.
    Swathed. Severance of the stem and pods from the ground without 
removal of the seeds from the pods and placing such into a windrow.
    Type. A category of dry peas identified as a type in the Special 
Provisions.
    Windrow. Dry peas where the plants are cut and placed in a row.
2. Unit Division
    In addition to, or instead of, establishing optional units by 
section, section equivalent, or FSA farm serial number and by irrigated 
and non-irrigated acreage as provided in the unit division provisions 
contained in the Basic Provisions, separate optional units may be 
established for each dry pea type as specified on the Special 
Provisions.

[[Page 3415]]

3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage Levels, and Prices for Determining 
Indemnities
    (a) In lieu of the requirements of section 3 of the Basic 
Provisions, you may select only one coverage level for each type listed 
on the Special Provisions.
    (b) In addition to the requirements of section 3 of the Basic 
Provisions, you may select only one price election for all dry peas in 
the county insured under this policy unless the Special Provisions 
provide different price elections for a particular type, in which case 
you may select one price election for each dry pea type so designated 
in the Special Provisions.
    (1) If the Special Provisions designate different price elections 
by type, the price elections you choose for each type are not required 
to have the same percentage relationship to the maximum price offered 
by us for each type. For example, if you choose 100 percent of the 
maximum price for one type, you may also choose 75 percent of the 
maximum price for another type;
    (2) If you elect the Catastrophic Risk Protection level of 
insurance for any of the above, the same level of coverage will be 
applicable to all insured dry pea acreage in the county;
    (3) If the Special Provisions do not designate different price 
elections by type, the price election you choose for each type is 
required to have the same percentage relationship to the maximum price 
offered by us for each price. For example, if you choose 100 percent of 
the maximum price election for one type, the 100 percent election will 
apply to all other types you produce.
* * * * *
7. Insured Crop
    (a) In accordance with section 8 of the Basic Provisions, the crop 
insured will be all the dry pea types in the county for which a premium 
rate is provided by the actuarial documents:
    (1) In which you have a share;
    (2) That are planted for harvesting once maturity is reached as:
    (i) Dry peas; or
    (ii) Contract seed peas, if a seed company contract is executed on 
or before the acreage reporting date; and
    (3) That are not (unless allowed by the Special Provisions or by 
written agreement):
    (i) Interplanted with another crop;
    (ii) Planted into an established grass or legume;
    (iii) Planted as a nurse crop; or
    (iv) Planted to plow down, graze, harvest as hay, or to otherwise 
not harvest as a mature dry pea crop.
    (b) You will be considered to have a share in the insured crop if, 
under the seed company contract, you retain control of the acreage on 
which the dry peas are grown, you are at risk of loss (i.e., if there 
is a reduction in quantity or quality of your dry pea production, you 
will receive less income under the contract), and the seed company 
contract is in effect for the entire insurance period.
    (c) In counties for which the actuarial documents provide premium 
rates for the Winter Coverage Option (see section 15), coverage is 
available for dry peas between the time coverage begins and the spring 
final planting date. Coverage under the option is effective only if you 
qualify under the terms of the option and you elect the option by the 
sales closing date.
* * * * *
9. Insurance Period
    In accordance with the provisions of section 11 of the Basic 
Provisions and subject to provisions provided by the Winter Coverage 
Option (see section 15) if you elect such option, the insurance period 
is as follows:
    (a) Coverage for fall planted dry peas not covered by the Winter 
Coverage Option will begin on the earlier of April 15 or the date we 
agree to accept the acreage for insurance, but not before March 1, 
unless otherwise specified on the Special Provisions.
    (b) The calendar date for the end of the insurance period for all 
insurable types of dry peas in the county is September 30 of the crop 
year in which the crop is normally harvested, unless otherwise 
specified in the Special Provisions.
    (c) Any acreage of the insured crop damaged before the final 
planting date, to the extent that producers in the surrounding area 
would not further care for the crop, must be replanted unless we agree 
that it is not practical to replant.
    (d) Whenever the Special Provisions designate both fall and spring 
final planting dates:
    (1) Any fall planted dry peas that are damaged before the spring 
final planting date, to the extent that growers in the area would 
normally not further care for the crop, must be replanted to a fall 
planted type of dry peas to maintain insurance based on the fall 
planted type unless we agree that replanting is not practical. If it is 
not practical to replant to a fall planted type of dry peas but it is 
practical to replant to a spring planted type, you must replant to a 
spring planted type to keep your insurance coverage based on the fall 
planted type in force.
    (2) Any fall planted dry pea acreage that is replanted to a spring 
planted type when it was practical to replant the fall planted type 
will be insured as the spring planted type and the production 
guarantee, premium and price election applicable to the spring planted 
type will be used. In this case, the acreage will be considered to be 
initially planted to the spring planted type.
    (3) Notwithstanding sections 9(d)(1) and (2), if you have elected 
coverage under the Winter Coverage Option (if available in the county), 
insurance will be in accordance with the option.
    (e) Whenever the Special Provisions designate only a spring final 
planting date, any acreage of a fall planted dry pea crop is not 
insured unless you request such coverage on or before the spring sales 
closing date, and we agree in writing that the acreage has an adequate 
stand in the spring to produce the yield used to determine your 
production guarantee.
    (1) The fall planted dry pea crop will be insured as a spring 
planted type for the purpose of the production guarantee, premium and 
price election.
    (2) Insurance will attach to such acreage on the date we determine 
an adequate stand exists or on the spring final planting date if we do 
not determine adequacy of the stand prior to the spring final planting 
date.
    (3) Any acreage of such fall planted dry peas that is damaged after 
it is accepted for insurance but before the spring final planting date, 
to the extent that growers in the area would normally not further care 
for the crop, must be replanted to a spring planted type of dry pea 
unless we agree it is not practical to replant.
    (4) If fall planted acreage is not to be insured it must be 
recorded on the acreage report as uninsured fall planted acreage.
* * * * *
11. Replanting Payments
    (a) A replanting payment is allowed as follows:
    (1) In lieu of provisions in section 13 of the Basic Provisions 
that limit the amount of a replant payment to the actual cost of 
replanting, the amount of any replanting payment will be determined in 
accordance with these Crop Provisions;
    (2) You must comply with all requirements regarding replanting 
payments contained in section 13 of the Basic Provisions (except as 
allowed in section 11(a)(1)) and in the Winter Coverage Option for 
which you are eligible and which you have elected;
    (3) The insured crop must be damaged by an insurable cause of loss 
to the

[[Page 3416]]

extent that the remaining stand will not produce at least 90 percent of 
the production guarantee for the acreage.
    (4) The acreage must have been initially planted to a spring type 
of the insured crop in those counties with only a spring final planting 
date;
    (5) Damage must occur after the fall final planting date in those 
counties where both a fall and spring final planting date is designated 
(if the Special Provisions provide more than one fall final planting 
date, the fall final planting date applicable to policies with the 
Winter Coverage Option (see section 15) will be used for this purpose, 
regardless of whether or not the option is actually in effect); and
    (6) The replanted crop must be seeded at a rate sufficient to 
achieve a total (undamaged and new seeding) plant population that will 
produce at least the yield used to determine your production guarantee.
    (b) The maximum amount of the replanting payment per acre will be 
the lesser of 20.0 percent of the production guarantee or 200 pounds, 
multiplied by your price election, multiplied by your share, unless 
otherwise stated in the Special Provisions.
    (c) When the crop is replanted using a practice that is uninsurable 
for an original planting, the liability on the unit will be reduced by 
the amount of the replanting payment. The premium amount will not be 
reduced.
    (d) Replanting payments will be calculated using the price election 
and production guarantee for the dry pea type that is replanted and 
insured. For example, if damaged smooth green and yellow pea acreage is 
replanted to lentils, the price election and production guarantee 
applicable to lentils will be used to calculate any replanting payment 
that may be due. A revised acreage report will be required to reflect 
the replanted type. Notwithstanding the previous two sentences, the 
following will have a replanting payment based on the guarantee and 
price election for the crop type initially planted:
    (1) Any damaged fall planted crop type replanted to a spring 
planted type that retains insurance based on the production guarantee 
and price election for the fall planted type; and
    (2) Any acreage replanted at a reduced seeding rate into a 
partially damaged stand of the insured crop.
12. Duties in the Event of Damage or Loss
    Representative samples are required in accordance with section 14 
of the Basic Provisions.
13. Settlement of Claim
    (a) We will determine your loss on a unit basis. In the event you 
are unable to provide records of production that are acceptable to us 
for any:
    (1) Optional units, we will combine all optional units for which 
acceptable records of production were not provided; or
    (2) Basic units, we will allocate any commingled production to such 
units in proportion to our liability on the harvested acreage for each 
unit.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) For mature production meeting the objective, measurable minimum 
quality requirements (e.g., size, germination percentage) contained in 
the seed company contract, and for production that does not meet such 
requirements due to uninsured causes:
* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (iii) Unharvested production (mature unharvested production of dry 
peas may be adjusted for quality deficiencies in accordance with 
section 13I or (e), or as specified in the Special Provisions); and
* * * * *
    (e) Mature dry pea production that does not qualify as contract 
seed peas under the policy terms or does not meet the objective, 
measurable terms of the contract (e.g., size, germination percentage), 
may be adjusted for quality deficiencies.
    (1) Production will be eligible for quality adjustment in 
accordance with the following, unless otherwise specified in the 
Special Provisions:
* * * * *
15. Winter Coverage Option
    (This is a continuous endorsement)
    (a) In the event of a conflict between this section and sections 1-
14 of these Crop Provisions, this section will control.
    (b) Catastrophic Risk Protection Coverage is not available under 
this option.
    (c) In return for payment of the additional premium designated in 
the actuarial documents, this option is available in counties for which 
the actuarial documents provide premium rates for the winter coverage 
option, coverage is available for dry peas between the time coverage 
begins and the spring final planting date.
    (d) You must have a Dry Pea Crop Insurance Policy in effect and 
elect to insure the dry pea type under such policy.
    (e) You must select this coverage on your application for insurance 
on or before the sales closing date. Failure to do so means you have 
rejected this coverage for the dry pea crop planted in the fall and 
this option is void.
    (f) Coverage under this option begins on the later of the date we 
accept your application for coverage or on the fall final planting date 
designated in the Special Provisions. Coverage ends on the spring final 
planting date designated in the Special Provisions.
    (g) In addition to the provisions of section 34(b) of the Basic 
Provisions and section 2 of the Dry Pea Crop Provisions, optional units 
may be established for dry peas if each optional unit contains only dry 
peas initially planted in the fall or only dry peas initially planted 
in the spring.
    (h) In lieu of sections 4 and 5 of these Crop Provisions, if you 
elect this option for the dry pea crop initially planted in the fall, 
the following dates will be applicable to all your fall planted and 
spring planted dry pea crop in the county:
    (1) Contract change date is June 30 preceding the cancellation 
date;
    (2) Cancellation date is September 30; and
    (3) Termination date is November 30.
    (i) In lieu of the provisions in section 14 of the Basic 
Provisions, all notices of damage must be provided to us not later than 
15 days after the spring final planting date designated in the Special 
Provisions.
    (j) All insurable acreage of each fall planted dry pea type covered 
under this option must be insured.
    (k) The amount of any indemnity paid under the terms of this option 
will be subject to any reduction specified in the Basic Provisions for 
multiple crop benefits in the same crop year.
    (l) Whenever any acreage of a dry pea crop planted in the fall is 
damaged during the insurance period and at least 20 acres or 20 percent 
of the insured planted acreage in the unit, whichever is less, does not 
have an adequate stand to produce at least 90 percent of the production 
guarantee for the acreage, you may, at your option, take one of the 
following actions:
    (1) Continue to care for the damaged crop. By doing so, coverage 
will continue under the terms of the Basic Provisions, the Dry Pea Crop 
Insurance Provisions and this option;
    (2) Replant the acreage to an appropriate type of the insured crop, 
if it is practical, and receive a replanting payment in accordance with 
the terms of section 11. By doing so, coverage will continue under the 
terms of the Basic Provisions, the Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions 
and this option, and the production guarantee for the dry pea

[[Page 3417]]

type planted in the fall will remain in effect; or
    (3) Destroy the remaining crop on such acreage:
    (i) By destroying the remaining crop, you agree to accept an 
appraised amount of production determined in accordance with section 
13(d)(1) of the Dry Pea Crop Insurance Provisions to count against the 
unit production guarantee. This amount will be considered production to 
count in determining any final indemnity on the unit and will be used 
to settle your claim as described in section 13.
    (ii) You may use such acreage for any purpose, including planting 
and separately insuring any other crop if such insurance is available.
    (iii) If you elect to plant and elect to insure spring planted 
acreage of the same dry pea type (you must elect whether or not you 
want insurance on the spring planted acreage of the same dry pea type 
at the time we release the fall planted acreage), you must pay 
additional premium for the insurance. Such acreage will be insured in 
accordance with the policy provisions that are applicable to acreage 
that is initially planted in the spring to the same dry pea type, and 
you must:
    (A) Plant the spring planted acreage in a manner which results in a 
clear and discernible break in the planting pattern at the boundary 
between it and any remaining acreage of the fall planted dry pea 
acreage; and
    (B) Store or market the production in a manner which permits us to 
verify the amount of spring planted production separately from any fall 
planted production. In the event you are unable to provide records of 
production that are acceptable to us, the spring planted acreage will 
be considered to be a part of the original fall planted unit.
* * * * *

    Signed in Washington, DC, on January 7, 2008.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. E8-321 Filed 1-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.