Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request, 2491-2496 [E8-531]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2008 / Notices
Web site: https://projects.pechan.com/
epa/coreview/.
Additional questions regarding the
workshop should be directed to Ms.
Chris Trent, U.S. EPA, OAQPS,
telephone: 919–541–5337; facsimile:
919–541–0237; e-mail:
trent.chris@epa.gov or Dr. Tom Long,
U.S. EPA, NCEA, telephone: 919–541–
1880; facsimile: 919–541–2985; e-mail:
long.tom@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
I. Information About the Workshop
The Agency’s last review of the
carbon monoxide (CO) national ambient
air quality standards (NAAQS) was
completed on August 1, 1994 with a
final determination that no revision of
the CO standard was appropriate (59 FR
38906). This review of the CO NAAQS
is consistent with the Clean Air Act’s
requirement that the Agency
periodically review the latest scientific
information and the standards. In
completing this review, the Agency will
apply the Agency’s new NAAQS review
process.1 This workshop is a key step in
this new process. The workshop will
provide an opportunity for internal and
external experts to highlight significant
new and emerging CO research, and to
make recommendations to the Agency
regarding the design and scope of the
review for the primary (health-based)
CO standard to ensure that it addresses
key policy-relevant issues and considers
the new science relevant to informing
our understanding of these issues.2
We intend that workshop discussions
will build upon three prior publications
or events:
1. National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Carbon Monoxide: Final
Rule (59 FR 38906, August 1, 1994). The
preamble to the final rule included
detailed discussions of policy-relevant
issues central to the last review.
2. Air Quality Criteria for Carbon
Monoxide (EPA 600/P–99/001F, June
2000).3
3. December 2006 workshop
sponsored by NCEA, entitled
‘‘Interpretation of Epidemiologic
Studies of Multi-pollutant Exposure and
Health Effects.’’ The workshop dealt
with important issues relevant to this
review, such as the interpretation and
understanding of criteria air pollutant
1 For more information on the NAAQS review
process, please see https://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/.
2 This workshop will not address a secondary
welfare-based standard as the CO NAAQS includes
only a primary standard.
3 Please see https://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/
standards/co/s_co_index.html to obtain a copy of
the 2000 Air Quality Criteria Document, the notice
of final rulemaking from 1994, and other related
documents.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Jan 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
health effects analyses in populationlevel epidemiologic studies, with a
focus on multi-pollutant exposures (71
FR 67566, November 22, 2006).
Workshop participants are
encouraged to review each of these
documents and/or supporting materials
thoroughly before the meeting begins, as
they provide important insights into
new scientific advances and key policyrelevant questions.
Based in large part on the input
received during this workshop, EPA
will develop a draft integrated CO
NAAQS review plan that will outline
the schedule, process, and approaches
for evaluating the relevant scientific
information and addressing the key
policy-relevant issues to be considered
in this review. The Clean Air Scientific
Advisory Committee (CASAC) will be
asked to conduct a consultation with the
Agency on the draft integrated plan later
this year, and the public will have the
opportunity to comment on it as well.
The final integrated plan will be used to
frame each of the major elements of the
CO review under the new NAAQS
process: an integrated science
assessment document, a risk/exposure
assessment report, and a policy
assessment to be published as an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPR).
II. Workshop Information
Members of the public may attend the
workshop as observers. Space is limited,
and reservations will be accepted on a
first-come, first-served basis.
Dated: January 8, 2008.
Jenny N. Edmonds,
Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards.
[FR Doc. E8–543 Filed 1–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities: Comment
Request
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board).
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Board, the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC),
and the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (the ‘‘agencies’’) may not
conduct or sponsor, and the respondent
is not required to respond to, an
information collection unless it displays
a currently valid Office of Management
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2491
and Budget (OMB) control number. The
Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council (FFIEC), of which
the agencies are members, has approved
the agencies’ publication for public
comment of a proposal to extend, with
revision, the Report of Assets and
Liabilities of U.S. Branches and
Agencies of Foreign Banks (FFIEC 002)
and the Report of Assets and Liabilities
of a Non-U.S. Branch That Is Managed
or Controlled by a U.S. Branch or
Agency of a Foreign (Non-U.S.) Bank
(FFIEC 002S), which are currently
approved information collections. The
Board is publishing this proposal on
behalf of the agencies. At the end of the
comment period, the comments and
recommendations received will be
analyzed to determine the extent to
which the FFIEC and the agencies
should modify the reports. The Board
will then submit the reports to OMB for
review and approval.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before March 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments to
the agency listed below. All comments,
which should refer to the OMB control
numbers, will be shared among the
agencies. You may submit comments,
identified by FFIEC 002 (7100–0032) or
FFIEC 002S (7100–0273), by any of the
following methods:
• Agency Web Site: https://
www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on the https://www.federalreserve.gov/
generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail:
regs.comments@federalreserve.gov.
Include the OMB control number in the
subject line of the message.
• FAX: 202–452–3819 or 202–452–
3102.
• Mail: Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary,
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20551.
All public comments are available from
the Board’s Web site at https://
www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/
foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted,
unless modified for technical reasons.
Accordingly, your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or
contact information. Public comments
may also be viewed electronically or in
paper form in Room MP–500 of the
Board’s Martin Building (20th and C
Streets, NW.) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
on weekdays.
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
2492
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2008 / Notices
Additionally, commenters may send a
copy of their comments to the OMB
desk officer for the agencies by mail to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, U.S. Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10235, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, or by fax to
202–395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information or a copy of the
collections may be requested from
Michelle E. Shore, Federal Reserve
Board Clearance Officer, 202–452–3829,
Division of Research and Statistics,
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets,
NW., Washington, DC 20551.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
(TDD) users may call 202–263–4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Proposal To Extend for Three Years
With Revision the Following Currently
Approved Collections of Information
Report Titles: Report of Assets and
Liabilities of U.S. Branches and
Agencies of Foreign Banks; Report of
Assets and Liabilities of a Non-U.S.
Branch That Is Managed or Controlled
by a U.S. Branch or Agency of a Foreign
(Non-U.S.) Bank.
Form Numbers: FFIEC 002; FFIEC
002S.
OMB Numbers: 7100–0032; 7100–
0273.
Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
Affected Public: U.S. branches and
agencies of foreign banks.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
FFIEC 002—264; FFIEC 002S—65.
Estimated Time per Response: FFIEC
002—25 hours; FFIEC 002S—6 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
FFIEC 002—26,400 hours; FFIEC 002S—
1,560 hours.
General Description of Reports: These
information collections are mandatory:
12 U.S.C. 3105(c)(2), 1817(a)(1) and (3),
and 3102(b). Except for select sensitive
items, the FFIEC 002 is not given
confidential treatment and the FFIEC
002S is given confidential treatment [5
U.S.C. 552(b)(4) and (8)].
Abstract: On a quarterly basis, all U.S.
branches and agencies of foreign banks
are required to file the FFIEC 002,
which is a detailed report of condition
with a variety of supporting schedules.
This information is used to fulfill the
supervisory and regulatory requirements
of the International Banking Act of
1978. The data are also used to augment
the bank credit, loan, and deposit
information needed for monetary policy
and other public policy purposes. The
FFIEC 002S is a supplement to the
FFIEC 002 that collects information on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Jan 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
assets and liabilities of any non-U.S.
branch that is managed or controlled by
a U.S. branch or agency of the foreign
bank. Managed or controlled means that
a majority of the responsibility for
business decisions, including but not
limited to decisions with regard to
lending or asset management or funding
or liability management, or the
responsibility for recordkeeping in
respect of assets or liabilities for that
foreign branch, resides at the U.S.
branch or agency. A separate FFIEC
002S must be completed for each
managed or controlled non-U.S. branch.
The FFIEC 002S must be filed quarterly
along with the U.S. branch or agency’s
FFIEC 002. The data from both reports
are used for: (1) Monitoring deposit and
credit transactions of U.S. residents; (2)
monitoring the impact of policy
changes; (3) analyzing structural issues
concerning foreign bank activity in U.S.
markets; (4) understanding flows of
banking funds and indebtedness of
developing countries in connection with
data collected by the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Bank for
International Settlements (BIS) that are
used in economic analysis; and (5)
assisting in the supervision of U.S.
offices of foreign banks. The Federal
Reserve System collects and processes
these reports on behalf of all three
agencies.
Current Actions: The agencies
propose to implement a number of
revisions to the existing reporting
requirements of the FFIEC 002. The
proposed revisions would help to
achieve consistency with the Reports of
Condition and Income (Call Report)
(FFIEC 031 and FFIEC 041) filed by
insured commercial banks and statechartered savings banks. The agencies
are also proposing to combine the FFIEC
002 and FFIEC 002S into one OMB
control number, 7100–0032. The
proposed revisions to the FFIEC 002
summarized below have been approved
for publication by the FFIEC. The
agencies would implement the proposed
changes for the June 30, 2008, reporting
date.
Discussion of Proposed Revisions
A. Officer Signature Requirements and
Contact Information
Considering the importance of data
quality, the agencies believe that it is
most appropriate for the branch or
agency’s chief financial officer (or the
individual performing an equivalent
function) to ensure that the FFIEC 002
and FFIEC 002S are reported accurately.
The agencies are proposing to revise the
existing officer signature requirement so
that the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002S
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
must be signed by the branch or
agency’s chief financial officer rather
than by any authorized officer of the
branch or agency. In signing the FFIEC
002 and FFIEC 002S, the chief financial
officer would attest that the reporting
forms have been prepared in
conformance with the instructions
issued by the FFIEC and are true and
correct to the best of the officer’s
knowledge and belief. The agencies
would also retain the existing
requirement for the branch or agency’s
senior executive officer to sign the
report.
The agencies are also proposing to
add contact information (name, title, email address, telephone number, and
fax number) for the chief financial
officer and another person to whom
questions about the reports should be
directed to facilitate communication
between the agencies and the branch or
agency concerning the FFIEC 002 and
FFIEC 002S.
B. Bankers Acceptances
The FFIEC 002 balance sheet
(Schedule RAL) requires branches and
agencies to separately disclose the
amount of their ‘‘Customers’ liability to
this branch or agency on acceptances
outstanding’’ (data items 1.g.(1) and
1.g.(2)) and their ‘‘Branch or agency
liability on acceptances executed and
outstanding’’ (data item 4.d). On the
loan schedule (Schedule C) branches
and agencies disclose ‘‘Holdings of own
acceptances included in Schedule C,
part I, item 4’’ (data item M.2). On the
derivatives and off-balance-sheet items
schedule (Schedule L) branches and
agencies disclose ‘‘Participations in
acceptances conveyed to others by the
reporting branch or agency’’ (data item
5). On the confidential due from/due to
related institutions in the U.S. and in
Foreign Countries schedule (Schedule
M, Part V) branches and agencies
disclose ‘‘Participations in acceptances
conveyed to related depository
institutions by the reporting branch or
agency’’ (data item 5). Over time, the
volume of acceptance assets and
liabilities as a percentage of industry
assets and liabilities has declined
substantially to a nominal amount, with
only a small number of branches and
agencies submitting these data items.
The agencies are proposing to delete
these six data items and branches and
agencies would be instructed to include
any acceptance assets and liabilities
(other than holdings of the reporting
branch or agency’s own acceptances) in
‘‘Other assets’’ and ‘‘Other liabilities,’’
respectively, on the FFIEC 002 balance
sheet.
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2008 / Notices
C. Scope of Securitizations To Be
Included in Schedule S
In column G of Schedule S,
‘‘Servicing, Securitization, and Asset
Sale Activities,’’ branches and agencies
submit information on securitizations
and on asset sales with recourse or other
seller-provided credit enhancements
involving loans and leases other than
those covered in columns A through F.
Although the scope of Schedule S was
intended to cover all of a branch’s or
agency’s securitizations and creditenhanced asset sales, as currently
structured column G does not capture
transactions involving assets other than
loans and leases. As a result,
securitization transactions involving
such assets as securities, for example,
have not been submitted in Schedule S.
Therefore, the agencies propose to
revise the scope of column G to
encompass ‘‘All Other Loans, All
Leases, and All Other Assets’’ to ensure
that they can identify and monitor the
full range of branches’ and agencies’
involvement in and credit exposure to
securitizations and asset sales. As a
result, column G would begin to reflect
securitization transactions involving
such assets as securities. With fewer
than 5 branches and agencies submitting
data on securitizations in column G of
Schedule S at present, the proposed
change in the scope of column G is
expected to affect only a nominal
number of branches and agencies.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
D. Breakdown of Real Estate Loans by
Category
FFIEC 002 reporters have become
increasingly involved in real estate
lending and the agencies are proposing
that ‘‘Loans secured by real estate’’
(Schedule C, data item 1) be broken out
by category in order to better track this
activity. The proposed change would
also make the FFIEC 002 more
consistent with the Call Report.
Specifically, the agencies are proposing
to add the following categories of loans
secured by real estate:
• Construction, land development,
and other land loans;
• Loans secured by farmland
(including farm residential and other
improvements);
• Revolving, open-ended loans
secured by 1–4 family residential
properties and extended under lines of
credit;
• Closed-end loans secured by 1–4
family residential properties;
• Loans secured by multi-family (5 or
more) residential properties; and
• Loans secured by nonfarm
nonresidential properties.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Jan 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
2493
E. Reporting of Certain Fair Value
Measurements and the Use of the Fair
Value Option
On September 15, 2006, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157), which
generally is effective for banks and other
entities for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. On February 15,
2007, the FASB issued Statement No.
159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (FAS 159), which is effective
for banks and other entities for fiscal
years beginning after November 15,
2007. Earlier adoption of FAS 157 is
permitted as of the beginning of an
earlier fiscal year, provided the entity
has not yet issued a financial statement
or filed an FFIEC 002 for any period of
that fiscal year. Early adoption of FAS
159 was also permitted provided the
entity also elected to apply FAS 157 at
the same date or earlier. In addition, the
FASB also issued Statement No. 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments (FAS 155), and Statement
No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets (FAS 156), in 2006.
The fair value measurements standard
provides guidance on how to measure
fair value and requires entities to
disclose the inputs used to measure fair
value based on a three-level hierarchy
for all assets and liabilities that are
remeasured at fair value on a recurring
basis.1 FAS 155, FAS 156, and FAS 159
allow entities to irrevocably elect to
report certain financial and servicing
assets and liabilities at fair value with
the changes in fair value included in
earnings. This accounting election is
referred to as a fair value option.
The agencies are proposing to add a
new Schedule Q to the FFIEC 002 to
collect data, by major asset and liability
category, on the total fair value of those
assets and liabilities within the category
to which a fair value option has been
applied along with separate disclosure
of the amount of such assets and
liabilities within the category whose fair
values were estimated under Levels 1, 2,
and 3 of the FASB’s fair value hiearchy.
The schedule would also include an
item for each asset and liability category
that would allow branches and agencies
to report any amounts netted in the
determination of total fair value
reported for that category on Schedule
RAL. The categories are:
• Securities held for purposes other
than trading with changes in fair value
reported in current earnings;
• Loans and leases;
• All other financial assets and
servicing assets;
• Deposit liabilities;
• All other financial liabilities and
servicing liabilities; and
• Loan commitments (not accounted
for as derivatives).
In addition, the agencies propose to
collect fair value data on trading assets
and trading liabilities in new Schedule
Q from those branches and agencies that
reported trading assets (the sum of
Schedule RAL, data items 1.f.1 and
1.f.2, column A) of $2 million or more
for any of the four preceding quarters.2
In the proposed new schedule, such
entities would report the total fair value
carrying amount of trading assets and
trading liabilities as well as a
breakdown of these assets and liabilities
into the three fair value levels under
FASB’s fair value hierarchy and any
netted amounts. Trading assets and
trading liabilities are required to be
reported at fair value and, thus, are not
covered under the fair value option. The
proposed change would also make the
FFIEC 002 more consistent with the Call
Report.
The agencies are also proposing to
add memorandum items to capture the
fair value and unpaid principal balance
of loans measured at fair value under a
fair value option. One set of
memorandum items would apply to
such loans that are reported in ‘‘Other
trading assets’’ (data item 1.f.2) on
Schedule RAL and another set would
apply to such loans that are reported on
Schedule C. These proposed
memorandum items would collect data
for the following categories of loans:
• Construction, land development,
and other land loans;
• Loans secured by farmland
(including farm residential and other
improvements);
• Revolving, open-ended loans
secured by 1–4 family residential
1 The FASB’s three-level fair value hierarchy
gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1)
and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs
(Level 3). Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
reporting entity has the ability to access at the
measurement date (e.g., the FFIEC 002 reporting
date). Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted
prices included within Level 1 that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset
or liability.
2 For example, if a branch or agency reported
trading assets of $2 million or more for the first time
in its FFIEC 002 for March 31, 2008, it would begin
to report the proposed fair value data on trading
assets and trading liabilities in Schedule Q in its
FFIEC 002 for June 30, 2008. Assuming the branch
or agency reported trading assets of less than $2
million in its FFIEC 002 for June 30, 2008 and
subsequent report dates, it would complete the
Schedule Q items for trading assets and liabilities
in its FFIEC 002 for June 30, 2008, through March
31, 2009, but would discontinue completing these
items beginning June 30, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
2494
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2008 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
properties and extended under lines of
credit;
• Closed-end loans secured by 1–4
family residential properties;
• Loans secured by multi-family (5 or
more) residential properties;
• Loans secured by nonfarm
nonresidential properties;
• Commercial and industrial loans;
and
• Other loans.
These additional data items are
necessary to enable the agencies to
understand the differences between fair
value and contractual cash flows for
loans to which the fair value option is
applied and to improve the agencies’
ability to make comparisons among
entities that elect a fair value option and
those that do not, consistent with
proposed Call Report changes.
F. Time Deposits Data
The Federal Reserve uses data from
Schedule E, Deposit Liabilities, to
ensure accurate construction of the
monetary aggregates for monetary policy
purposes. In order to more accurately
calculate the monetary aggregates, the
agencies propose to revise ‘‘Total time
deposits of $100,000 or more’’ (data
item M.1.a). Memorandum item 1.a
would be revised to exclude brokered
time deposits issued in denominations
of $100,000 or more that are
participated out by the broker in shares
of less than $100,000 as well as
brokered certificates of deposit issued in
$1,000 amounts under a master
certificate of deposit (when information
on the number of $1,000 amounts held
by each of the broker’s customers is not
readily available to the branch or
agency). A corresponding change would
be made to Memorandum item 1.c,
‘‘Time certificates of deposit of $100,000
or more with remaining maturity of
more than 12 months.’’
In addition, as a result of the increase
in the deposit insurance limit for certain
retirement plan deposit accounts from
$100,000 to $250,000, a new
Memorandum item 1.b, ‘‘Individual
Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and Keogh
Plan accounts included in
Memorandum item 1.a, ‘Total time
deposits of $100,000 or more,’ above,’’
would be added to Schedule E to
separately identify the portion of the
total time deposits of $100,000 or more
reported in Memorandum item 1.a that
represents IRA and Keogh Plan
accounts. This new memorandum item
is also necessary to support the accurate
calculation of the monetary aggregates.
The agencies are proposing a similar
instructional change for Schedule O that
would direct insured branches to
include brokered time deposits, as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Jan 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
discussed above, in Memorandum item
1.a, ‘‘Deposit accounts of $100,000 or
less,’’ and to exclude these brokered
time deposits from Memorandum item
1.b, ‘‘Deposit accounts of more than
$100,000.’’
G. Information on Credit Derivatives
Branches and agencies currently
report the notional amounts of the credit
derivatives on which they are the
guarantor and on which they are the
beneficiary as well as the gross positive
and negative fair values of these credit
derivatives in Memoranda items 1 and
2 of Schedule L, Derivatives and OffBalance Sheet Items, and Schedule M,
Due from/Due to Related Institutions in
the U.S. and in Foreign Countries, Part
V. The agencies propose to revise these
existing items so that branches and
agencies with credit derivatives will
provide a breakdown of these notional
amounts by type of credit derivative:
Credit default swaps, total return swaps,
credit options, and other credit
derivatives, with those where the
branch or agency is the guarantor
reported in column A and those where
the branch or agency is the beneficiary
in column B. Branches and agencies
would continue to separately report the
gross positive and negative fair values of
credit derivatives on which they are the
guarantor and the beneficiary without a
breakdown by type of credit derivative.
The agencies are also proposing to move
credit derivatives from a memoranda
item to a line item on Schedule L and
Schedule M, Part V.
H. Revising the Reporting of Federal
Funds Transactions and Securities
Repurchase/Resale Agreements
On Schedule RAL, the agencies are
proposing to revise the existing
breakdowns of federal funds sold and
securities purchased under agreements
to resell that are reported in data items
1.d.1 and 1.d.2, respectively. First, the
counterparty coverage of the federal
funds sold and securities resale
agreements reported in data items
1.d.1.a and 1.d.2.a would be changed
from depository institutions in the U.S.
to commercial banks in the U.S. This
revision would facilitate the derivation
of interbank loans, used for a weekly
Federal Reserve release.
Second, the agencies are proposing to
add two-way breakdowns of federal
funds sold to others, currently reported
in data item 1.d.1.b, and securities
resale agreements with others, currently
reported in data item 1.d.2.b. In the first
two-way breakdown, branches and
agencies would separately report federal
funds sold to nonbank brokers and
dealers in securities and federal funds
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
sold to others (including depository
institutions in the U.S. other than
commercial banks). Similarly, branches
and agencies would separately report
securities resale agreements with
nonbank brokers and dealers in
securities and securities resale
agreements with others (including
depository institutions in the U.S. other
than commercial banks). This revision
would facilitate the derivation of total
security loans, used for a weekly
Federal Reserve release.
On the liability side, the agencies are
proposing a more limited revision of the
existing breakdowns of federal funds
purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase that are
reported in data items 4.b.1 and 4.b.2,
respectively. Thus, the counterparty
coverage of the federal funds purchased
and securities repurchase agreements
reported in data items 4.b.1.a and 4.b.2.a
would be changed from depository
institutions in the U.S. to commercial
banks in the U.S. As a result, federal
funds purchased from and securities
repurchase agreements with depository
institutions in the U.S. other than
commercial banks would be included in
data item 4.b.1.b, ‘‘Federal funds
purchased from others,’’ and data item
4.b.2.b, ‘‘Securities sold under
agreements to repurchase with others,’’
respectively. This would facilitate the
collection of data on borrowings from
commercial banks in the U.S. and
borrowings from others that is
published weekly in Federal Reserve
releases. A further breakdown of the
‘‘Other borrowed money’’ reported in
data item 4.c of Schedule RAL would
not be required since data on such
borrowings from commercial banks in
the U.S. is already available from
Schedule P of the FFIEC 002.
I. Deposit Insurance Assessment
Revisions for FDIC-Insured Branches
On November 30, 2006, the FDIC
published a final rule amending Part
327 of its regulations, ‘‘Assessments,’’ to
improve and modernize its operational
systems for deposit insurance
assessments (71 FR 69270). These
amendments to Part 327 revised the
definition of the assessment base for
deposit insurance purposes to be
consistent with Section 3(l) of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act).
This was intended to eliminate the need
for periodic updates to the FDIC’s
assessment regulations in response to
outside factors and allow a
simplification of the associated
reporting requirements. In addition, to
address timing issues with quarter-end
reporting, under amended Part 327, the
FDIC will use daily average deposits
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2008 / Notices
and exclusions over the quarter instead
of quarter-end totals for deposits and
exclusions to compute the assessment
base for insured institutions with $1
billion or more in assets and other
institutions that meet specified criteria.
All other insured institutions may opt
permanently to determine their
assessment base using daily averages.
In conjunction with these
amendments to Part 327 of the FDIC’s
regulations, the agencies revised and
reduced the overall reporting
requirements related to deposit
insurance assessments in the Call
Report in order to simplify regulatory
reporting. These assessment data
reporting changes included an interim
transition period during 2007 with final
implementation of the revised Call
Report requirements taking place in
2008. The agencies are proposing to
make comparable changes to the
reporting requirements related to
deposit insurance assessments in
Schedule O of the FFIEC 002 for those
branches of foreign banks that are
insured by the FDIC. These proposed
revised reporting requirements would
contain the following key elements:
• Insured branches would separately
report (a) gross deposits as defined in
Section 3(l) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C.
1813(l)) before any allowable
exclusions, (b) allowable exclusions,
including foreign deposits, and (c)
foreign deposits;
• The same data items would be
reported for both quarter-end and daily
average deposits;
• All insured branches would report
using quarter-end deposits, allowable
exclusions, and foreign deposits; and
• All insured branches with $1
billion or more in total claims on
nonrelated parties, and other insured
branches that meet specified criteria,
would also report daily averages for
deposits, allowable exclusions, and
foreign deposits in addition to quarterend amounts.
The agencies would also provide an
interim transition period covering the
June 30, 2008, through December 31,
2008, report dates during which insured
branches would have the option to
submit Schedule O using either the
current or revised formats for reporting
data for measuring their assessment
base. An insured branch that chooses to
begin reporting under the revised format
in any quarter during the interim period
would be required to continue to report
under the revised format through the
rest of the interim period and would not
be permitted to revert back to the
current reporting format. The revised
reporting format would take effect for all
insured branches on March 31, 2009, at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Jan 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
which time the current reporting format
would be eliminated. Although no
insured branch that chose to report
under the revised format during the
2008 interim period would be required
to report daily averages during this
period, any insured branch could elect
to report daily averages as of any
quarter-end report date (beginning June
30) in 2008. However, once an insured
branch begins to report daily averages
(even during the interim period), it
would be required to continue to report
daily averages each quarter thereafter in
Schedule O of its FFIEC 002.
At present, 20 items are required in
Schedule O of the FFIEC 002 to
determine an insured branch’s
assessment base. As proposed by the
agencies, the changes to Schedule O
would effectively reduce the number of
reported items to as few as two for
certain small insured branches (without
foreign deposits) and no more than six
for other insured branches. Specifically,
the agencies propose to replace items 1
through 7 and Memorandum items 4
and 5 (including their subitems) on
Schedule O, ‘‘Other Data for Deposit
Insurance Assessments,’’ with the
following six items:
• Total deposit liabilities before
exclusions (gross) as defined in Section
3(l) of the FDI Act and FDIC regulations;
• Total allowable exclusions
(including foreign deposits);
• Total foreign deposits (included in
total allowable exclusions);
• Total daily average of deposit
liabilities before exclusions (gross) as
defined in Section 3(l) of the FDI Act
and FDIC regulations;
• Total daily average of allowable
exclusions (including foreign deposits);
and
• Total daily average of foreign
deposits (included in total daily average
of allowable exclusions).
Thus, instead of starting with total
demand deposits and total time and
savings deposits as reported in Schedule
O of the FFIEC 002 and making
adjustments to these reported deposits
for purposes of measuring an insured
branch’s assessment base, which is the
present method, the computation of the
insured branch’s assessment base under
the FDIC’s amended assessment
regulations and these proposed
revisions to the FFIEC 002 would start
with the gross total deposit liabilities
that meet the statutory definition of
deposits in Section 3(l) of the FDI Act
before any allowable exclusions from
the definition. The total amount of
allowable exclusions from the
assessment base would be reported
separately for any insured branch that
maintains such records as will readily
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2495
permit verification of the correctness of
its assessment base. The allowable
exclusions, which are set forth in
Section 3(l)(5) and other sections of the
FDI Act and in the FDIC’s regulations,
include foreign deposits (including
International Banking Facility deposits),
reciprocal balances, drafts drawn on
other depository institutions, passthrough reserve balances, depository
institution investment contracts, and
deposits accumulated for the payment
of personal loans that are assigned or
pledged to assure payment at maturity.
The net amount of unposted debits and
credits would no longer be considered
within the definition of the assessment
base.
The agencies believe that the amount
of gross total deposit liabilities that meet
the statutory definition of deposits is
typically found in and supported by the
control totals in an insured branch’s
deposit systems that provide the detail
sufficient to track, control, and handle
inquiries from depositors about their
specific individual accounts. These
deposit systems can be automated or
manual. In any case, control totals for
deposit liabilities should be readily
available, which should ease an insured
branch’s transition to the revised
Schedule O reporting requirements.
Compared to the amount of information
that an insured branch currently reports
in order to determine its assessment
base, the proposed changes to the
Schedule O reporting requirements
should also facilitate the reporting of
daily averages for deposits and
allowable exclusions since many of the
presently reported adjustments will not
need to be tracked and averaged
separately.
In addition to quarter-end balance
reporting, insured branches that meet
certain criteria would be required to
report average daily deposit liabilities,
average daily allowable exclusions, and
average daily foreign deposits to
determine their assessment base
effective March 31, 2009. The amounts
to be reported would be averages of the
balances as of the close of business for
each day for the calendar quarter. For
days that an insured branch is closed
(e.g., Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays),
the amounts outstanding from the
previous business day would be used.
An insured branch is considered closed
if there are no transactions posted to the
general ledger as of that date.
The agencies are proposing to require
an insured branch to report daily
averages beginning March 31, 2009, if it
reports $1 billion or more in total claims
on nonrelated parties in data item 1.i,
column A, of Schedule RAL of the
FFIEC 002 for March 31, 2008,
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
2496
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 15, 2008 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
regardless of the amount its total claims
on nonrelated parties in subsequent
quarters. In addition, if an insured
branch reports $1 billion or more in
total claims on nonrelated parties in
Schedule RAL in two consecutive FFIEC
002 reports beginning with its June 30,
2008, report, daily average reporting
would begin on the later date of March
31, 2009, or the report date six months
after the second consecutive quarter. An
insured branch reporting less than $1
billion in total claims on nonrelated
parties in Schedule RAL of its FFIEC
002 for March 31, 2008, would be
permitted to continue to determine its
assessment base using quarter-end
balances until it met the twoconsecutive-quarter total claims size test
for reporting daily averages unless it
opted to determine its assessment base
using daily averages. After an insured
branch begins to report daily averages
for its total deposits, allowable
exclusions, and foreign deposits, either
voluntarily or because it is required to
do so, the insured branch would not be
permitted to switch back to reporting
only quarter-end balances.
Under this proposal, insured branches
will continue to report information on
the number and amount of deposit
accounts, the estimated amount of
uninsured deposits (if total claims on
nonrelated parties are $1 billion or
more), and preferred deposits in
Memorandum items 1 through 3 of
Schedule O. However, the agencies are
proposing to reduce the reporting
frequency for the memorandum item for
preferred deposits. This memorandum
item would be reported only as of
December 31 each year, which is
consistent with the reporting frequency
in the Call Report, rather than quarterly
as at present.
J. Instructional Clarifications
For Schedule E, Column D, branches
and agencies report all deposit liabilities
of their International Banking Facilities
(IBF). A footnote on the reporting form
indicates that amounts in this column
should exclude those IBF liabilities to
be reported as federal funds purchased
and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase or as other borrowed money.
In contrast, the FFIEC 002 instructions
for Schedule E state that branches and
agencies should ‘‘[r]eport in column D
all deposit liabilities of the branch or
agency’s International Banking Facility
liabilities, regardless of whether they are
transaction or nontransaction accounts.
For purposes of this report, IBF deposit
liabilities include deposits, placements,
borrowings and similar obligations
represented by promissory notes,
acknowledgements of advance, or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Jan 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
similar instruments that are not issued
in negotiable or bearer form and that are
issued to other IBFs or to nonrelated
non-U.S. addressees, including banks.’’
Since the FFIEC 002 instructional
language conflicts with the language in
the footnote on the reporting form,
which provides correct guidance, the
agencies will clarify the FFIEC 002
instructional language by removing the
second sentence of the current
instruction to Column D and by deleting
the word ‘‘liabilities’’ the second time it
appears in the first sentence of the
current instruction.
Request for Comment
International Financial Reporting
Standards
On November 15, 2007, the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC)
approved amendments to its rules that
would allow foreign private issuers to
file financial statements prepared using
International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) as issued by the
International Accounting Standards
Board without a reconciliation to U.S.
generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). The agencies have
received a number of questions
concerning the potential use of IFRS in
regulatory reports, including the FFIEC
002 and FFIEC 002s.
The current reporting basis for the
FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002s is GAAP.
The agencies are evaluating the
potential use of IFRS in the FFIEC 002
and FFIEC 002S. As part of this
analysis, the agencies request comment
on the following:
(a) The ability of respondents to
prepare the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002s
based on IFRS as issued by the
International Accounting Standards
Board;
(b) The degree to which respondents
would need the agencies to provide
specific reporting instructions to
supplement IFRS to accurately prepare
the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002s; and
(c) The amount of time respondents
would need to prepare their systems,
personnel, and processes to transition
from the current GAAP-based FFIEC 002
and FFIEC 002S to IFRS-based reports.
Paperwork Reduction Act Request for
Comment
Comments are invited on:
a. Whether the information
collections are necessary for the proper
performance of the agencies’ functions,
including whether the information has
practical utility;
b. The accuracy of the agencies’
estimate of the burden of the
information collections, including the
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
c. Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
d. Ways to minimize the burden of the
information collections on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and
e. Estimates of capital or start up costs
and costs of operation, maintenance,
and purchase of services to provide
information.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be shared among the
agencies. All comments will become a
matter of public record. Written
comments should address the accuracy
of the burden estimate and ways to
minimize burden including the use of
automated collection techniques or the
use of other forms of information
technology as well as other relevant
aspects of the information collection
request.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, January 10, 2008.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8–531 Filed 1–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Federal Open Market Committee;
Domestic Policy Directive of December
11, 2007
In accordance with § 271.25 of its
rules regarding availability of
information (12 CFR part 271), there is
set forth below the domestic policy
directive issued by the Federal Open
Market Committee at its meeting held
on December 11, 2007.1
The Federal Open Market Committee
seeks monetary and financial conditions
that will foster price stability and
promote sustainable growth in output.
To further its long-run objectives, the
Committee in the immediate future
seeks conditions in reserve markets
consistent with reducing the federal
funds rate at an average of around 41⁄4
percent.
1 Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open
Market Committee meeting on December 11, 2007,
which includes the domestic policy directive issued
at the meeting, are available upon request to the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
Washington, DC 20551. The minutes are published
in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board’s
annual report.
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2491-2496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-531]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment
Request
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board).
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the Board, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (the ``agencies'') may not conduct or sponsor, and the
respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection
unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The Federal Financial Institutions Examination
Council (FFIEC), of which the agencies are members, has approved the
agencies' publication for public comment of a proposal to extend, with
revision, the Report of Assets and Liabilities of U.S. Branches and
Agencies of Foreign Banks (FFIEC 002) and the Report of Assets and
Liabilities of a Non-U.S. Branch That Is Managed or Controlled by a
U.S. Branch or Agency of a Foreign (Non-U.S.) Bank (FFIEC 002S), which
are currently approved information collections. The Board is publishing
this proposal on behalf of the agencies. At the end of the comment
period, the comments and recommendations received will be analyzed to
determine the extent to which the FFIEC and the agencies should modify
the reports. The Board will then submit the reports to OMB for review
and approval.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to
the agency listed below. All comments, which should refer to the OMB
control numbers, will be shared among the agencies. You may submit
comments, identified by FFIEC 002 (7100-0032) or FFIEC 002S (7100-
0273), by any of the following methods:
Agency Web Site: https://www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments on the https://
www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov. Include the OMB
control number in the subject line of the message.
FAX: 202-452-3819 or 202-452-3102.
Mail: Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20551.
All public comments are available from the Board's Web site at https://
www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted,
unless modified for technical reasons. Accordingly, your comments will
not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information. Public
comments may also be viewed electronically or in paper form in Room MP-
500 of the Board's Martin Building (20th and C Streets, NW.) between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays.
[[Page 2492]]
Additionally, commenters may send a copy of their comments to the
OMB desk officer for the agencies by mail to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, or by fax to 202-395-6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information or a copy of
the collections may be requested from Michelle E. Shore, Federal
Reserve Board Clearance Officer, 202-452-3829, Division of Research and
Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th and
C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551. Telecommunications Device for the
Deaf (TDD) users may call 202-263-4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposal To Extend for Three Years With Revision the Following
Currently Approved Collections of Information
Report Titles: Report of Assets and Liabilities of U.S. Branches
and Agencies of Foreign Banks; Report of Assets and Liabilities of a
Non-U.S. Branch That Is Managed or Controlled by a U.S. Branch or
Agency of a Foreign (Non-U.S.) Bank.
Form Numbers: FFIEC 002; FFIEC 002S.
OMB Numbers: 7100-0032; 7100-0273.
Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
Affected Public: U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks.
Estimated Number of Respondents: FFIEC 002--264; FFIEC 002S--65.
Estimated Time per Response: FFIEC 002--25 hours; FFIEC 002S--6
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: FFIEC 002--26,400 hours; FFIEC
002S--1,560 hours.
General Description of Reports: These information collections are
mandatory: 12 U.S.C. 3105(c)(2), 1817(a)(1) and (3), and 3102(b).
Except for select sensitive items, the FFIEC 002 is not given
confidential treatment and the FFIEC 002S is given confidential
treatment [5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4) and (8)].
Abstract: On a quarterly basis, all U.S. branches and agencies of
foreign banks are required to file the FFIEC 002, which is a detailed
report of condition with a variety of supporting schedules. This
information is used to fulfill the supervisory and regulatory
requirements of the International Banking Act of 1978. The data are
also used to augment the bank credit, loan, and deposit information
needed for monetary policy and other public policy purposes. The FFIEC
002S is a supplement to the FFIEC 002 that collects information on
assets and liabilities of any non-U.S. branch that is managed or
controlled by a U.S. branch or agency of the foreign bank. Managed or
controlled means that a majority of the responsibility for business
decisions, including but not limited to decisions with regard to
lending or asset management or funding or liability management, or the
responsibility for recordkeeping in respect of assets or liabilities
for that foreign branch, resides at the U.S. branch or agency. A
separate FFIEC 002S must be completed for each managed or controlled
non-U.S. branch. The FFIEC 002S must be filed quarterly along with the
U.S. branch or agency's FFIEC 002. The data from both reports are used
for: (1) Monitoring deposit and credit transactions of U.S. residents;
(2) monitoring the impact of policy changes; (3) analyzing structural
issues concerning foreign bank activity in U.S. markets; (4)
understanding flows of banking funds and indebtedness of developing
countries in connection with data collected by the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS)
that are used in economic analysis; and (5) assisting in the
supervision of U.S. offices of foreign banks. The Federal Reserve
System collects and processes these reports on behalf of all three
agencies.
Current Actions: The agencies propose to implement a number of
revisions to the existing reporting requirements of the FFIEC 002. The
proposed revisions would help to achieve consistency with the Reports
of Condition and Income (Call Report) (FFIEC 031 and FFIEC 041) filed
by insured commercial banks and state-chartered savings banks. The
agencies are also proposing to combine the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002S
into one OMB control number, 7100-0032. The proposed revisions to the
FFIEC 002 summarized below have been approved for publication by the
FFIEC. The agencies would implement the proposed changes for the June
30, 2008, reporting date.
Discussion of Proposed Revisions
A. Officer Signature Requirements and Contact Information
Considering the importance of data quality, the agencies believe
that it is most appropriate for the branch or agency's chief financial
officer (or the individual performing an equivalent function) to ensure
that the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002S are reported accurately. The agencies
are proposing to revise the existing officer signature requirement so
that the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002S must be signed by the branch or
agency's chief financial officer rather than by any authorized officer
of the branch or agency. In signing the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002S, the
chief financial officer would attest that the reporting forms have been
prepared in conformance with the instructions issued by the FFIEC and
are true and correct to the best of the officer's knowledge and belief.
The agencies would also retain the existing requirement for the branch
or agency's senior executive officer to sign the report.
The agencies are also proposing to add contact information (name,
title, e-mail address, telephone number, and fax number) for the chief
financial officer and another person to whom questions about the
reports should be directed to facilitate communication between the
agencies and the branch or agency concerning the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC
002S.
B. Bankers Acceptances
The FFIEC 002 balance sheet (Schedule RAL) requires branches and
agencies to separately disclose the amount of their ``Customers'
liability to this branch or agency on acceptances outstanding'' (data
items 1.g.(1) and 1.g.(2)) and their ``Branch or agency liability on
acceptances executed and outstanding'' (data item 4.d). On the loan
schedule (Schedule C) branches and agencies disclose ``Holdings of own
acceptances included in Schedule C, part I, item 4'' (data item M.2).
On the derivatives and off-balance-sheet items schedule (Schedule L)
branches and agencies disclose ``Participations in acceptances conveyed
to others by the reporting branch or agency'' (data item 5). On the
confidential due from/due to related institutions in the U.S. and in
Foreign Countries schedule (Schedule M, Part V) branches and agencies
disclose ``Participations in acceptances conveyed to related depository
institutions by the reporting branch or agency'' (data item 5). Over
time, the volume of acceptance assets and liabilities as a percentage
of industry assets and liabilities has declined substantially to a
nominal amount, with only a small number of branches and agencies
submitting these data items. The agencies are proposing to delete these
six data items and branches and agencies would be instructed to include
any acceptance assets and liabilities (other than holdings of the
reporting branch or agency's own acceptances) in ``Other assets'' and
``Other liabilities,'' respectively, on the FFIEC 002 balance sheet.
[[Page 2493]]
C. Scope of Securitizations To Be Included in Schedule S
In column G of Schedule S, ``Servicing, Securitization, and Asset
Sale Activities,'' branches and agencies submit information on
securitizations and on asset sales with recourse or other seller-
provided credit enhancements involving loans and leases other than
those covered in columns A through F. Although the scope of Schedule S
was intended to cover all of a branch's or agency's securitizations and
credit-enhanced asset sales, as currently structured column G does not
capture transactions involving assets other than loans and leases. As a
result, securitization transactions involving such assets as
securities, for example, have not been submitted in Schedule S.
Therefore, the agencies propose to revise the scope of column G to
encompass ``All Other Loans, All Leases, and All Other Assets'' to
ensure that they can identify and monitor the full range of branches'
and agencies' involvement in and credit exposure to securitizations and
asset sales. As a result, column G would begin to reflect
securitization transactions involving such assets as securities. With
fewer than 5 branches and agencies submitting data on securitizations
in column G of Schedule S at present, the proposed change in the scope
of column G is expected to affect only a nominal number of branches and
agencies.
D. Breakdown of Real Estate Loans by Category
FFIEC 002 reporters have become increasingly involved in real
estate lending and the agencies are proposing that ``Loans secured by
real estate'' (Schedule C, data item 1) be broken out by category in
order to better track this activity. The proposed change would also
make the FFIEC 002 more consistent with the Call Report. Specifically,
the agencies are proposing to add the following categories of loans
secured by real estate:
Construction, land development, and other land loans;
Loans secured by farmland (including farm residential and
other improvements);
Revolving, open-ended loans secured by 1-4 family
residential properties and extended under lines of credit;
Closed-end loans secured by 1-4 family residential
properties;
Loans secured by multi-family (5 or more) residential
properties; and
Loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties.
E. Reporting of Certain Fair Value Measurements and the Use of the Fair
Value Option
On September 15, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157),
which generally is effective for banks and other entities for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. On February 15, 2007, the FASB
issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities (FAS 159), which is effective for banks and
other entities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
Earlier adoption of FAS 157 is permitted as of the beginning of an
earlier fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued a financial
statement or filed an FFIEC 002 for any period of that fiscal year.
Early adoption of FAS 159 was also permitted provided the entity also
elected to apply FAS 157 at the same date or earlier. In addition, the
FASB also issued Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments (FAS 155), and Statement No. 156, Accounting for
Servicing of Financial Assets (FAS 156), in 2006.
The fair value measurements standard provides guidance on how to
measure fair value and requires entities to disclose the inputs used to
measure fair value based on a three-level hierarchy for all assets and
liabilities that are remeasured at fair value on a recurring basis.\1\
FAS 155, FAS 156, and FAS 159 allow entities to irrevocably elect to
report certain financial and servicing assets and liabilities at fair
value with the changes in fair value included in earnings. This
accounting election is referred to as a fair value option.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The FASB's three-level fair value hierarchy gives the
highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (Level 3). Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date
(e.g., the FFIEC 002 reporting date). Level 2 inputs are inputs
other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3
inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are proposing to add a new Schedule Q to the FFIEC 002
to collect data, by major asset and liability category, on the total
fair value of those assets and liabilities within the category to which
a fair value option has been applied along with separate disclosure of
the amount of such assets and liabilities within the category whose
fair values were estimated under Levels 1, 2, and 3 of the FASB's fair
value hiearchy. The schedule would also include an item for each asset
and liability category that would allow branches and agencies to report
any amounts netted in the determination of total fair value reported
for that category on Schedule RAL. The categories are:
Securities held for purposes other than trading with
changes in fair value reported in current earnings;
Loans and leases;
All other financial assets and servicing assets;
Deposit liabilities;
All other financial liabilities and servicing liabilities;
and
Loan commitments (not accounted for as derivatives).
In addition, the agencies propose to collect fair value data on
trading assets and trading liabilities in new Schedule Q from those
branches and agencies that reported trading assets (the sum of Schedule
RAL, data items 1.f.1 and 1.f.2, column A) of $2 million or more for
any of the four preceding quarters.\2\ In the proposed new schedule,
such entities would report the total fair value carrying amount of
trading assets and trading liabilities as well as a breakdown of these
assets and liabilities into the three fair value levels under FASB's
fair value hierarchy and any netted amounts. Trading assets and trading
liabilities are required to be reported at fair value and, thus, are
not covered under the fair value option. The proposed change would also
make the FFIEC 002 more consistent with the Call Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For example, if a branch or agency reported trading assets
of $2 million or more for the first time in its FFIEC 002 for March
31, 2008, it would begin to report the proposed fair value data on
trading assets and trading liabilities in Schedule Q in its FFIEC
002 for June 30, 2008. Assuming the branch or agency reported
trading assets of less than $2 million in its FFIEC 002 for June 30,
2008 and subsequent report dates, it would complete the Schedule Q
items for trading assets and liabilities in its FFIEC 002 for June
30, 2008, through March 31, 2009, but would discontinue completing
these items beginning June 30, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The agencies are also proposing to add memorandum items to capture
the fair value and unpaid principal balance of loans measured at fair
value under a fair value option. One set of memorandum items would
apply to such loans that are reported in ``Other trading assets'' (data
item 1.f.2) on Schedule RAL and another set would apply to such loans
that are reported on Schedule C. These proposed memorandum items would
collect data for the following categories of loans:
Construction, land development, and other land loans;
Loans secured by farmland (including farm residential and
other improvements);
Revolving, open-ended loans secured by 1-4 family
residential
[[Page 2494]]
properties and extended under lines of credit;
Closed-end loans secured by 1-4 family residential
properties;
Loans secured by multi-family (5 or more) residential
properties;
Loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties;
Commercial and industrial loans; and
Other loans.
These additional data items are necessary to enable the agencies to
understand the differences between fair value and contractual cash
flows for loans to which the fair value option is applied and to
improve the agencies' ability to make comparisons among entities that
elect a fair value option and those that do not, consistent with
proposed Call Report changes.
F. Time Deposits Data
The Federal Reserve uses data from Schedule E, Deposit Liabilities,
to ensure accurate construction of the monetary aggregates for monetary
policy purposes. In order to more accurately calculate the monetary
aggregates, the agencies propose to revise ``Total time deposits of
$100,000 or more'' (data item M.1.a). Memorandum item 1.a would be
revised to exclude brokered time deposits issued in denominations of
$100,000 or more that are participated out by the broker in shares of
less than $100,000 as well as brokered certificates of deposit issued
in $1,000 amounts under a master certificate of deposit (when
information on the number of $1,000 amounts held by each of the
broker's customers is not readily available to the branch or agency). A
corresponding change would be made to Memorandum item 1.c, ``Time
certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more with remaining maturity of
more than 12 months.''
In addition, as a result of the increase in the deposit insurance
limit for certain retirement plan deposit accounts from $100,000 to
$250,000, a new Memorandum item 1.b, ``Individual Retirement Accounts
(IRAs) and Keogh Plan accounts included in Memorandum item 1.a, `Total
time deposits of $100,000 or more,' above,'' would be added to Schedule
E to separately identify the portion of the total time deposits of
$100,000 or more reported in Memorandum item 1.a that represents IRA
and Keogh Plan accounts. This new memorandum item is also necessary to
support the accurate calculation of the monetary aggregates.
The agencies are proposing a similar instructional change for
Schedule O that would direct insured branches to include brokered time
deposits, as discussed above, in Memorandum item 1.a, ``Deposit
accounts of $100,000 or less,'' and to exclude these brokered time
deposits from Memorandum item 1.b, ``Deposit accounts of more than
$100,000.''
G. Information on Credit Derivatives
Branches and agencies currently report the notional amounts of the
credit derivatives on which they are the guarantor and on which they
are the beneficiary as well as the gross positive and negative fair
values of these credit derivatives in Memoranda items 1 and 2 of
Schedule L, Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Items, and Schedule M,
Due from/Due to Related Institutions in the U.S. and in Foreign
Countries, Part V. The agencies propose to revise these existing items
so that branches and agencies with credit derivatives will provide a
breakdown of these notional amounts by type of credit derivative:
Credit default swaps, total return swaps, credit options, and other
credit derivatives, with those where the branch or agency is the
guarantor reported in column A and those where the branch or agency is
the beneficiary in column B. Branches and agencies would continue to
separately report the gross positive and negative fair values of credit
derivatives on which they are the guarantor and the beneficiary without
a breakdown by type of credit derivative. The agencies are also
proposing to move credit derivatives from a memoranda item to a line
item on Schedule L and Schedule M, Part V.
H. Revising the Reporting of Federal Funds Transactions and Securities
Repurchase/Resale Agreements
On Schedule RAL, the agencies are proposing to revise the existing
breakdowns of federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell that are reported in data items 1.d.1 and 1.d.2,
respectively. First, the counterparty coverage of the federal funds
sold and securities resale agreements reported in data items 1.d.1.a
and 1.d.2.a would be changed from depository institutions in the U.S.
to commercial banks in the U.S. This revision would facilitate the
derivation of interbank loans, used for a weekly Federal Reserve
release.
Second, the agencies are proposing to add two-way breakdowns of
federal funds sold to others, currently reported in data item 1.d.1.b,
and securities resale agreements with others, currently reported in
data item 1.d.2.b. In the first two-way breakdown, branches and
agencies would separately report federal funds sold to nonbank brokers
and dealers in securities and federal funds sold to others (including
depository institutions in the U.S. other than commercial banks).
Similarly, branches and agencies would separately report securities
resale agreements with nonbank brokers and dealers in securities and
securities resale agreements with others (including depository
institutions in the U.S. other than commercial banks). This revision
would facilitate the derivation of total security loans, used for a
weekly Federal Reserve release.
On the liability side, the agencies are proposing a more limited
revision of the existing breakdowns of federal funds purchased and
securities sold under agreements to repurchase that are reported in
data items 4.b.1 and 4.b.2, respectively. Thus, the counterparty
coverage of the federal funds purchased and securities repurchase
agreements reported in data items 4.b.1.a and 4.b.2.a would be changed
from depository institutions in the U.S. to commercial banks in the
U.S. As a result, federal funds purchased from and securities
repurchase agreements with depository institutions in the U.S. other
than commercial banks would be included in data item 4.b.1.b, ``Federal
funds purchased from others,'' and data item 4.b.2.b, ``Securities sold
under agreements to repurchase with others,'' respectively. This would
facilitate the collection of data on borrowings from commercial banks
in the U.S. and borrowings from others that is published weekly in
Federal Reserve releases. A further breakdown of the ``Other borrowed
money'' reported in data item 4.c of Schedule RAL would not be required
since data on such borrowings from commercial banks in the U.S. is
already available from Schedule P of the FFIEC 002.
I. Deposit Insurance Assessment Revisions for FDIC-Insured Branches
On November 30, 2006, the FDIC published a final rule amending Part
327 of its regulations, ``Assessments,'' to improve and modernize its
operational systems for deposit insurance assessments (71 FR 69270).
These amendments to Part 327 revised the definition of the assessment
base for deposit insurance purposes to be consistent with Section 3(l)
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act). This was intended to
eliminate the need for periodic updates to the FDIC's assessment
regulations in response to outside factors and allow a simplification
of the associated reporting requirements. In addition, to address
timing issues with quarter-end reporting, under amended Part 327, the
FDIC will use daily average deposits
[[Page 2495]]
and exclusions over the quarter instead of quarter-end totals for
deposits and exclusions to compute the assessment base for insured
institutions with $1 billion or more in assets and other institutions
that meet specified criteria. All other insured institutions may opt
permanently to determine their assessment base using daily averages.
In conjunction with these amendments to Part 327 of the FDIC's
regulations, the agencies revised and reduced the overall reporting
requirements related to deposit insurance assessments in the Call
Report in order to simplify regulatory reporting. These assessment data
reporting changes included an interim transition period during 2007
with final implementation of the revised Call Report requirements
taking place in 2008. The agencies are proposing to make comparable
changes to the reporting requirements related to deposit insurance
assessments in Schedule O of the FFIEC 002 for those branches of
foreign banks that are insured by the FDIC. These proposed revised
reporting requirements would contain the following key elements:
Insured branches would separately report (a) gross
deposits as defined in Section 3(l) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(l))
before any allowable exclusions, (b) allowable exclusions, including
foreign deposits, and (c) foreign deposits;
The same data items would be reported for both quarter-end
and daily average deposits;
All insured branches would report using quarter-end
deposits, allowable exclusions, and foreign deposits; and
All insured branches with $1 billion or more in total
claims on nonrelated parties, and other insured branches that meet
specified criteria, would also report daily averages for deposits,
allowable exclusions, and foreign deposits in addition to quarter-end
amounts.
The agencies would also provide an interim transition period
covering the June 30, 2008, through December 31, 2008, report dates
during which insured branches would have the option to submit Schedule
O using either the current or revised formats for reporting data for
measuring their assessment base. An insured branch that chooses to
begin reporting under the revised format in any quarter during the
interim period would be required to continue to report under the
revised format through the rest of the interim period and would not be
permitted to revert back to the current reporting format. The revised
reporting format would take effect for all insured branches on March
31, 2009, at which time the current reporting format would be
eliminated. Although no insured branch that chose to report under the
revised format during the 2008 interim period would be required to
report daily averages during this period, any insured branch could
elect to report daily averages as of any quarter-end report date
(beginning June 30) in 2008. However, once an insured branch begins to
report daily averages (even during the interim period), it would be
required to continue to report daily averages each quarter thereafter
in Schedule O of its FFIEC 002.
At present, 20 items are required in Schedule O of the FFIEC 002 to
determine an insured branch's assessment base. As proposed by the
agencies, the changes to Schedule O would effectively reduce the number
of reported items to as few as two for certain small insured branches
(without foreign deposits) and no more than six for other insured
branches. Specifically, the agencies propose to replace items 1 through
7 and Memorandum items 4 and 5 (including their subitems) on Schedule
O, ``Other Data for Deposit Insurance Assessments,'' with the following
six items:
Total deposit liabilities before exclusions (gross) as
defined in Section 3(l) of the FDI Act and FDIC regulations;
Total allowable exclusions (including foreign deposits);
Total foreign deposits (included in total allowable
exclusions);
Total daily average of deposit liabilities before
exclusions (gross) as defined in Section 3(l) of the FDI Act and FDIC
regulations;
Total daily average of allowable exclusions (including
foreign deposits); and
Total daily average of foreign deposits (included in total
daily average of allowable exclusions).
Thus, instead of starting with total demand deposits and total time
and savings deposits as reported in Schedule O of the FFIEC 002 and
making adjustments to these reported deposits for purposes of measuring
an insured branch's assessment base, which is the present method, the
computation of the insured branch's assessment base under the FDIC's
amended assessment regulations and these proposed revisions to the
FFIEC 002 would start with the gross total deposit liabilities that
meet the statutory definition of deposits in Section 3(l) of the FDI
Act before any allowable exclusions from the definition. The total
amount of allowable exclusions from the assessment base would be
reported separately for any insured branch that maintains such records
as will readily permit verification of the correctness of its
assessment base. The allowable exclusions, which are set forth in
Section 3(l)(5) and other sections of the FDI Act and in the FDIC's
regulations, include foreign deposits (including International Banking
Facility deposits), reciprocal balances, drafts drawn on other
depository institutions, pass-through reserve balances, depository
institution investment contracts, and deposits accumulated for the
payment of personal loans that are assigned or pledged to assure
payment at maturity. The net amount of unposted debits and credits
would no longer be considered within the definition of the assessment
base.
The agencies believe that the amount of gross total deposit
liabilities that meet the statutory definition of deposits is typically
found in and supported by the control totals in an insured branch's
deposit systems that provide the detail sufficient to track, control,
and handle inquiries from depositors about their specific individual
accounts. These deposit systems can be automated or manual. In any
case, control totals for deposit liabilities should be readily
available, which should ease an insured branch's transition to the
revised Schedule O reporting requirements. Compared to the amount of
information that an insured branch currently reports in order to
determine its assessment base, the proposed changes to the Schedule O
reporting requirements should also facilitate the reporting of daily
averages for deposits and allowable exclusions since many of the
presently reported adjustments will not need to be tracked and averaged
separately.
In addition to quarter-end balance reporting, insured branches that
meet certain criteria would be required to report average daily deposit
liabilities, average daily allowable exclusions, and average daily
foreign deposits to determine their assessment base effective March 31,
2009. The amounts to be reported would be averages of the balances as
of the close of business for each day for the calendar quarter. For
days that an insured branch is closed (e.g., Saturdays, Sundays, or
holidays), the amounts outstanding from the previous business day would
be used. An insured branch is considered closed if there are no
transactions posted to the general ledger as of that date.
The agencies are proposing to require an insured branch to report
daily averages beginning March 31, 2009, if it reports $1 billion or
more in total claims on nonrelated parties in data item 1.i, column A,
of Schedule RAL of the FFIEC 002 for March 31, 2008,
[[Page 2496]]
regardless of the amount its total claims on nonrelated parties in
subsequent quarters. In addition, if an insured branch reports $1
billion or more in total claims on nonrelated parties in Schedule RAL
in two consecutive FFIEC 002 reports beginning with its June 30, 2008,
report, daily average reporting would begin on the later date of March
31, 2009, or the report date six months after the second consecutive
quarter. An insured branch reporting less than $1 billion in total
claims on nonrelated parties in Schedule RAL of its FFIEC 002 for March
31, 2008, would be permitted to continue to determine its assessment
base using quarter-end balances until it met the two-consecutive-
quarter total claims size test for reporting daily averages unless it
opted to determine its assessment base using daily averages. After an
insured branch begins to report daily averages for its total deposits,
allowable exclusions, and foreign deposits, either voluntarily or
because it is required to do so, the insured branch would not be
permitted to switch back to reporting only quarter-end balances.
Under this proposal, insured branches will continue to report
information on the number and amount of deposit accounts, the estimated
amount of uninsured deposits (if total claims on nonrelated parties are
$1 billion or more), and preferred deposits in Memorandum items 1
through 3 of Schedule O. However, the agencies are proposing to reduce
the reporting frequency for the memorandum item for preferred deposits.
This memorandum item would be reported only as of December 31 each
year, which is consistent with the reporting frequency in the Call
Report, rather than quarterly as at present.
J. Instructional Clarifications
For Schedule E, Column D, branches and agencies report all deposit
liabilities of their International Banking Facilities (IBF). A footnote
on the reporting form indicates that amounts in this column should
exclude those IBF liabilities to be reported as federal funds purchased
and securities sold under agreements to repurchase or as other borrowed
money. In contrast, the FFIEC 002 instructions for Schedule E state
that branches and agencies should ``[r]eport in column D all deposit
liabilities of the branch or agency's International Banking Facility
liabilities, regardless of whether they are transaction or
nontransaction accounts. For purposes of this report, IBF deposit
liabilities include deposits, placements, borrowings and similar
obligations represented by promissory notes, acknowledgements of
advance, or similar instruments that are not issued in negotiable or
bearer form and that are issued to other IBFs or to nonrelated non-U.S.
addressees, including banks.'' Since the FFIEC 002 instructional
language conflicts with the language in the footnote on the reporting
form, which provides correct guidance, the agencies will clarify the
FFIEC 002 instructional language by removing the second sentence of the
current instruction to Column D and by deleting the word
``liabilities'' the second time it appears in the first sentence of the
current instruction.
Request for Comment
International Financial Reporting Standards
On November 15, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
approved amendments to its rules that would allow foreign private
issuers to file financial statements prepared using International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board without a reconciliation to U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The agencies have received a
number of questions concerning the potential use of IFRS in regulatory
reports, including the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002s.
The current reporting basis for the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002s is
GAAP. The agencies are evaluating the potential use of IFRS in the
FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002S. As part of this analysis, the agencies
request comment on the following:
(a) The ability of respondents to prepare the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC
002s based on IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board;
(b) The degree to which respondents would need the agencies to
provide specific reporting instructions to supplement IFRS to
accurately prepare the FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002s; and
(c) The amount of time respondents would need to prepare their
systems, personnel, and processes to transition from the current GAAP-
based FFIEC 002 and FFIEC 002S to IFRS-based reports.
Paperwork Reduction Act Request for Comment
Comments are invited on:
a. Whether the information collections are necessary for the proper
performance of the agencies' functions, including whether the
information has practical utility;
b. The accuracy of the agencies' estimate of the burden of the
information collections, including the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
c. Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
d. Ways to minimize the burden of the information collections on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
e. Estimates of capital or start up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be shared among
the agencies. All comments will become a matter of public record.
Written comments should address the accuracy of the burden estimate and
ways to minimize burden including the use of automated collection
techniques or the use of other forms of information technology as well
as other relevant aspects of the information collection request.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 10,
2008.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-531 Filed 1-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P