Acquisition Regulation: Guidance on Use of Award Term Incentives; Administrative Amendments, 1978-1982 [E8-356]
Download as PDF
1978
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104-4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
V. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Pesticide Chemical
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
148–79–8
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.2010 is amended by
adding text to read as follows:
I
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
§ 180.2010 Threshold of regulation
determinations.
The following pesticide chemical uses
on food or feed, or food or feed crops,
do not need a tolerance or exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance, and
may be registered under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., without
obtaining such tolerance or exemption,
based on EPA’s determination that the
uses are below the threshold of
regulation.
Dated: December 31, 2007.
Debra Edwards,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
CAS Reg.
No.
Thiabendazole .................
PART 180—[AMENDED]
Use/Limits
Analytical Method
As a seed treatment for dry pea (including field
pea, pigeon pea, chickpea or lentil), using a
maximum application rate of 0.075 pounds of
active ingredient per 100 pounds of seed.
Vines or hay grown from treated seed may not
be fed to livestock..
High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Florescence Detector method1; Modification of IonPairing Liquid Chromatographic Determination
of Benzimidazole Fungicides in Foods, Gilvydis
and Walters, JAOAC, vol. 73, no. 5, 1990.
1Available from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350; telephone
number: (410) 305–2905; e-mail address: residuemethods@epa.gov
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
48 CFR Parts 1516, 1533, and 1552
[Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OARM–2003–0001;
FRL–8515–8]
RIN 2030–AA89
Acquisition Regulation: Guidance on
Use of Award Term Incentives;
Administrative Amendments
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) amends the EPA
Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR) to add
policy, procedures, and contract clauses
for the use of award term incentives.
This rule makes two administrative
changes to the EPAAR. One change is to
reflect the Civilian Board of Contract
Appeals as EPA’s new forum for appeals
under the Contract Disputes Act of
1978. The other change corrects a
numbering error in Subpart 1516.4.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
February 11, 2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OARM–2003–0001. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Docket Center, OEI Docket, EPA/
DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OEI
Docket is (202) 566–1752.
ADDRESSES:
[FR Doc. E8–267 Filed 1–10–08; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marilyn E. Chambers, U.S. EPA, Office
of Acquisition Management, Mail Code
(3802R), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 564–4398; fax number:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(202) 565–2474; e-mail address:
chambers.marilyn@epa.gov.
I. Supplementary Information
A. Background
EPA published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 72 FR 56708,
October 4, 2007 to add guidance to the
EPAAR on the use of award term
contracts and make two administrative
changes. The comment period closed on
December 3, 2007. One comment was
received. The respondent pointed out,
effective January 6, 2007, the Board of
Contract Appeals that existed at the
General Services Administration was
terminated and the cases were
transferred to the Civilian Board of
Contract Appeals. Our proposed rule
stated EPA has changed its forum for
appeals under the Contract Disputes Act
of 1978 from the Department of Interior
Board of Contract Appeals to the
General Services Administration Board
of Contract Appeals. The rule should
have stated EPA has changed its forum
for appeals under the Contract Disputes
Act of 1978 from the Department of
Interior Board of Contract Appeals to
the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals.
The final rule is revised to substitute the
Civilian Board of Contract Appeals for
the General Services Administration
Board of Contract Appeals in section
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
1533.203. No other changes were made
to the proposed rule.
II. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866; therefore, no
review is required by the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
within the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because this rule does not
contain information requirements that
require the approval of OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as
Amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
The RFA generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impact
of today’s rule on small entities, ‘‘small
entity’’ is defined as: (1) A small
business that meets the definition of a
small business found in the Small
Business Act and codified at 13 CFR
121.201; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of today’s rule on small entities,
I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. In
determining whether a rule has a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the
impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small
entities, because the primary purpose of
the regulatory flexibility analyses is to
identify and address regulatory
alternatives ‘‘which minimize any
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
significant economic impact of the
proposed rule on small entities.’’ 5
U.S.C. 603 and 604. Thus, an agency
may certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves regulatory burden, or
otherwise has a positive economic effect
on all of the small entities subject to the
rule. Since award term incentives will
be available equally to large and small
entities, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on small
entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess their
regulatory actions on State, local, and
Tribal governments, and the private
sector. This proposed rule does not
contain a Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures of $100 million or
more for State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or the
private sector in one year. Any private
sector costs for this action relate to
paperwork requirements and associated
expenditures that are far below the level
established for UMRA applicability.
Thus, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045, entitled
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
applies to any rule that: (1) Is
determined to be economically
significant as defined under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
EPA has reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria,
the Agency must evaluate the
environmental health or safety effects of
the planned rule on children, and
explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective
and reasonably feasible alternatives
considered by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because it is not an
economically significant rule as defined
by Executive Order 12866, and because
it does not involve decisions on
environmental health or safety risks.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled,
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), requires EPA to develop an
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1979
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ are defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’
Under section 6 of Executive Order
13132, EPA may not issue a regulation
that has federalism implications, that
imposes substantial direct compliance
costs, and that is not required by statute,
unless the Federal Government provides
the funds necessary to pay the direct
compliance costs incurred by State and
local governments, or EPA consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation. EPA also may not issue a
regulation that has federalism
implications and that preempts State
law, unless the Agency consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation.
This rule does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. This rule
amends the EPAAR to provide guidance
on the use of award term incentives and
make other administrative changes.
Thus, the requirements of section 6 of
the Executive Order do not apply to this
rule.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000), requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ are defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
1980
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
This rule does not have tribal
implications. It does not have
substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this proposed rule.
EPA has determined that this rule
does not have disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations because it does
not affect the level of protection
provided to human health or the
environment. This rule does not involve
human health or environmental effects.
H. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will be effective on February 11, 2008.
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104–
113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note),
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities,
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law, or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to
provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards.
This rule does not involve technical
standards. Therefore, EPA is not
considering use of any voluntary
consensus standards.
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution or Use’’ (66
FR 28335 (May 22, 2001)), because it is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Jkt 214001
Government procurement.
Therefore, 48 CFR Chapter 15 is
amended as set forth below:
I
PART 1516—TYPES OF CONTRACTS
1. The authority citation for part 1516
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: The provisions of this
regulation are issued under 5 U.S.C. 301; Sec.
205(c), 63 Stat. 390, as amended, 40 U.S.C.
486(c); and 41 U.S.C. 418b.
2. Add section 1516.401–1 to read as
follows:
I
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629
(Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1516,
1533 and 1552
Dated: December 26, 2007.
John C. Gherardini,
Acting Director, Office of Acquisition
Management.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
VerDate Aug<31>2005
K. Submission to Congress and the
Government Accountability Office
1516.401–1
General.
3. Add section 1516.401–170 to read
as follows:
I
1516.401–70
Award term incentives.
(a) Award term incentives enable a
contractor to become eligible for
additional periods of performance under
a current contract by achieving
prescribed performance measures under
that contract.
(b) Award term incentives are
designed to motivate contractors to
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
superior performance. Accordingly, the
prescribed performance measures, i.e.,
acceptable quality levels (AQL) which
must be achieved by a contractor to
become eligible for an award term
typically will be in excess of the AQLs
necessary for Government acceptance of
contract deliverables.
(c) The Award Term Incentive Plan
sets forth the evaluation process,
including the evaluation criteria and
performance measures, and serves as the
basis for award term decisions. The
Award Term Incentive Plan may be
unilaterally revised by the Government.
(d) Award term incentives may be
used in conjunction with options. The
Federal Acquisition Regulation does not
prescribe a level of performance for the
exercise of options, as contrasted with
award term incentives, which should
require superior performance as
discussed in paragraph (b) of this
subsection. Award term incentive
periods will follow any option periods.
(e)(1) The Government has the
unilateral right not to grant or to cancel
award term incentive periods and the
associated award term incentive plans
if—
(i) The Contracting Officer has failed
to initiate an award term incentive
period, regardless of whether the
contractor’s performance permitted the
Contracting Officer to consider initiating
the award term incentive period; or
(ii) The contractor has failed to
achieve the performance measures for
the corresponding evaluation period; or
(iii) The Government notifies the
contractor in writing it does not have
funds available for the award term; or
(iv) The Government no longer has a
need for the award term incentive
period at or before the time an award
term incentive period is to commence.
(2) When an award term incentive
period is not granted or cancelled, any—
(i) Prior award term incentive periods
for which the contractor remains
otherwise eligible are unaffected.
(ii) Subsequent award term incentive
periods are thereby also cancelled.
(f) Award term incentives may be
appropriate for any type of service
contract.
I 4. Add section 1516.401–270 to read
as follows:
1516.401–270
Definition.
Acceptable quality level (AQL) as
used in this subpart means the
minimum percent of deliverables which
are compliant with a given performance
standard that would permit a contractor
to become eligible for an award term
incentive. Because the performance
necessary for eligibility for the award
term incentive may be in excess of that
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
necessary for the Government
acceptance of contract deliverables, the
AQLs associated with the award term
incentive may exceed the AQLs
associated with the acceptance of
contract deliverables. For example,
under contract X, acceptable
performance is 75 percent of reports
submitted to the Government within
five days. However, to be eligible for an
award term incentive, 85 percent of
reports must be submitted to the
Government within five days.
1516.405
[Redesignated as 1516.406]
5. Redesignate section 1516.405 as
section 1516.406.
I
1516.404–2
[Redesignated as 1516.405–2]
[Redesignated as 1516.405–
I 7. Redesignate section 1516.404–272
as section 1516.405–270.
[Redesignated as 1516.405–
[Redesignated as 1516.405–
I 9. Redesignate section 1516.404–274
as section 1516.405–272.
I 10. Amend newly designated section
1516.406 to add new paragraphs (c) and
(d) to read as follows:
1516.406
Contract clauses.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The Contracting Officer shall insert
the clauses at 1552.216-77, Award Term
Incentive, 1552.216–78, Award Term
Incentive Plan, and 1552.216–79 Award
Term Availability of Funds in
solicitations and contracts when award
term incentives are contemplated. The
clauses at 1552.216–77 and 1552.216–78
may be used on substantially the same
basis.
(d) If the Contracting Officer wishes to
use the ratings set forth in the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) Contractor
Performance System (CPS) on the
contract at hand as the basis for
contractor eligibility for an award term
incentive, the Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause at 1552.216–78 with its
Alternate I.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
PART 1533—PROTESTS, DISPUTES
AND APPEALS
11. The authority citation for part
1533 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Sec. 205(c), 63
Stat. 390, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 486(c); and
41 U.S.C. 418b.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
PART 1552—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Sec. 205(c), 63
Stat. 390, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 486(c); and
41 U.S.C. 418b.
14. Add section 1552.216–77 to read
as follows:
I
1552.216–77
Award term incentive.
As prescribed in 1515.406(c), insert a
clause substantially the same as follows:
Award Term Incentive (FEB 2008)
8. Redesignate section 1516.404–273
as section 1516.405–271.
I
1516.404–274
272]
Applicability.
The Civilian Board of Contract
Appeals (CBCA) will hear appeals from
final decisions of EPA Contracting
Officers issued pursuant to the
Contracts Disputes Act. The rules and
regulations of the CBCA appear in 48
CFR Chapter 61.
13. The authority citation for part
1552 continues to read as follows:
6. Redesignate section 1516.404–2 as
section 1516.405–2.
1516.404–273
271]
1533.203
I
I
1516.404–272
270]
12. Revise section 1533.203 to read as
follows:
I
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
(a) General. This contract may be extended
as set forth in paragraph (b) based on overall
contractor performance as evaluated in
accordance with the Clause entitled ‘‘Award
Term Incentive Plan,’’ provided the Agency
has a need for the effort at or before the time
an award term is to commence, and if the
contractor receives notice of the availability
of funding for an award term period pursuant
to the ‘‘Award Term Availability of Funds’’
clause. The Contracting Officer is responsible
for the overall award term evaluation and
award term decision. The Contracting Officer
will unilaterally decide whether or not the
contractor is eligible for an award term
extension, and in conjunction with the
Contracting Officer’s Representative, will
determine the need for continued
performance and funding availability.
(b) Period of performance. Provided the
contractor has achieved the performance
measures, e.g., acceptable quality levels, set
forth in the clause ‘‘Award Term Incentive
Plan,’’ the Contracting Officer may extend the
contract by exercising llll [insert the
total award term incentive periods]
additional award term incentive period(s) of
llll [insert the award term incentive
period] months each. The total maximum
period of performance under this contract, if
the Government exercises any option periods
and all award term incentive periods is
llll [insert the total of the base period,
option periods (if any), and award term
incentive periods] years.
(c) Right not to grant or cancel the award
term incentive. (1) The Government has the
unilateral right not to grant or to cancel
award term incentive periods and the
associated award term incentive plans if—
(i) The Contracting Officer has failed to
initiate an award term incentive period,
regardless of whether the contractor’s
performance permitted the Contracting
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1981
Officer to consider initiating the award term
incentive period; or
(ii) The contractor has failed to achieve the
performance measures for the corresponding
evaluation period; or
(iii) The Government notifies the
contractor in writing it does not have funds
available for the award term incentive
periods; or
(iv) The Government no longer has a need
for the award term incentive period at or
before the time an award term incentive
period is to commence.
(2) When an award term incentive period
is not granted or cancelled, any—
(i) Prior award term incentive periods for
which the contractor remains otherwise
eligible are unaffected.
(ii) Subsequent award term incentive
periods are thereby also cancelled.
(d) Cancellation of an award term incentive
period that has not yet commenced for any
of the reasons set forth in paragraph (c) of
this clause shall not be considered either a
termination for convenience or termination
for default, and shall not entitle the
contractor to any termination settlement or
any other compensation. If the award term
incentive is cancelled, a unilateral
modification will cite this clause as the
authority.
(e) Award term incentive administration.
The award term incentive evaluation(s) will
be completed in accordance with the
schedule in the Award Term Incentive Plan.
The contractor will be notified of the results
and their eligibility to be considered for the
respective award term incentive no later than
120 days after an evaluation period.
(f) Review process. The contractor may
request a review of an award term incentive
evaluation which has resulted in the
contractor being ineligible for the award term
incentive. The request shall be submitted in
writing to the Contracting Officer within 15
days after notification of the results of the
evaluation.
(end of clause)
I 15. Add section 1552.216–78 to read
as follows:
1552.216–78
Award Term Incentive Plan.
As prescribed in 1515.406(c), insert a
clause substantially the same as follows:
Award Term Incentive Plan (FEB 2008)
(a) The Award Term Incentive Plan
provides for the evaluation of performance,
and, together with Agency need and
availability of funding, serves as the basis for
award term decisions. The Award Term
Incentive Plan may be unilaterally revised by
the Government. Any changes to the Award
Term Incentive Plan will be made in writing
and incorporated into the contract through a
unilateral modification citing this clause. The
Government will consult with the contractor
prior to the issuance of a revised Award
Term Incentive Plan, but is not required to
obtain the contractor’s consent to the
revisions.
(b) [describe the evaluation periods and
associated award term incentive periods, e.g.,
months 1–18 for award term incentive period
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
1982
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
I, and months 19–36 for award term incentive
period II]
(c) [describe the evaluation schedule, e.g.,
90 days after the end of the evaluation
period]
(d) In order to be eligible for an award term
incentive period the contractor must achieve
all of the acceptable quality levels (AQL) for
the evaluated tasks, both individual and
aggregate, for that evaluation period. Failure
to achieve any AQL renders the contractor
ineligible for the associated award term
incentive period. [identify the most
significant tasks. Describe the AQL for each
task as well as an overall AQL for the
associated evaluation periods, e.g., an AQL of
90% each for tasks 1 and 3, and an AQL of
85% for task 7, and an overall AQL of 90%
for the months 1–18 evaluation period]
(e) [If the contract will contain a quality
assurance surveillance plan (QASP),
reference the QASP, e.g., attachment 2.
Typically, the performance standards and
AQLs will be defined in the QASP]
(end of clause)
Alternate 1 (FEB 2008)
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
As prescribed in 1516.406(d), substitute
paragraphs substantially the same as
following paragraphs (b) through (e) for
paragraphs (b) through (e) in the basic clause:
(b) At the conclusion of each contract year,
an average contract rating shall be
determined by using the numerical ratings
entered into the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) Contractor Performance System (CPS)
for this contract. The NIHCPS is an
interactive database located on the Internet
which EPA uses to record contractor
performance evaluations.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
(c) The contract year average rating shall be
obtained by dividing the combined ratings by
the number of ratings, for example:
Criteria
Rating
Quality of Product or
Service.
Cost Control ..............
Timeliness of Performance.
Business Relations ...
5.
4.
4.
5.
18 (combined rating).
/ 4 (number of ratings).
= 4.5 contract year
average rating.
(d) The contractor shall be evaluated for
performance from the start of the contract
through Year ll [identify the evaluation
period, e.g., year three]. The average rating
for each contract year (as derived in
paragraph (c) above) will be combined and
divided by [insert the number of evaluation
periods] to obtain an overall average rating,
for example:
Evaluation period
Year One ...................
Year Two ...................
Year Three ................
PO 00000
Average rating
4.5.
4.75.
4.75.
14 (combined average rating).
/ 3 (number of evaluation periods).
= 4.66 overall average rating.
(e) Based on the overall average rating as
determined under paragraph (d), provided
that no individual rating, i.e., Quality of
Product or Service, Cost Control, Timeliness
of Performance, or Business Relations is
below a 3, the contractor shall be eligible for
the following award term periods:
(1) Overall average rating of 4.6 to 5.0—
Two award term incentive periods of ll
[insert the number of months] months.
(2) Overall average rating of 4.0 to 4.6—
One award term incentive period of ll
[insert the number of months] months.
16. Add section 1552.216–79 to read
as follows:
I
1552.216–79
Funds.
Award Term Availability of
As prescribed in 1515.406(c), insert
the following clause:
Award Term Availability of Funds (FEB
2008)
Funds are not presently available for any
award term. The Government’s obligation
under any award term is contingent upon the
availability of appropriated funds from
which payment can be made. No legal
liability on the part of the Government for
any award term payment may arise until
funds are made available to the Contracting
Officer for an award term and until the
Contractor receives notice of such
availability, to be confirmed in writing by the
Contracting Officer.
(end of clause)
[FR Doc. E8–356 Filed 1–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 8 (Friday, January 11, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1978-1982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-356]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
48 CFR Parts 1516, 1533, and 1552
[Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OARM-2003-0001; FRL-8515-8]
RIN 2030-AA89
Acquisition Regulation: Guidance on Use of Award Term Incentives;
Administrative Amendments
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) amends the EPA
Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR) to add policy, procedures, and contract
clauses for the use of award term incentives. This rule makes two
administrative changes to the EPAAR. One change is to reflect the
Civilian Board of Contract Appeals as EPA's new forum for appeals under
the Contract Disputes Act of 1978. The other change corrects a
numbering error in Subpart 1516.4.
DATES: This final rule is effective on February 11, 2008.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OARM-2003-0001. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Docket Center, OEI Docket,
EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the
OEI Docket is (202) 566-1752.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn E. Chambers, U.S. EPA, Office
of Acquisition Management, Mail Code (3802R), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 564-4398; fax number: (202) 565-2474; e-mail address:
chambers.marilyn@epa.gov.
I. Supplementary Information
A. Background
EPA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 72 FR
56708, October 4, 2007 to add guidance to the EPAAR on the use of award
term contracts and make two administrative changes. The comment period
closed on December 3, 2007. One comment was received. The respondent
pointed out, effective January 6, 2007, the Board of Contract Appeals
that existed at the General Services Administration was terminated and
the cases were transferred to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals.
Our proposed rule stated EPA has changed its forum for appeals under
the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 from the Department of Interior Board
of Contract Appeals to the General Services Administration Board of
Contract Appeals. The rule should have stated EPA has changed its forum
for appeals under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 from the Department
of Interior Board of Contract Appeals to the Civilian Board of Contract
Appeals. The final rule is revised to substitute the Civilian Board of
Contract Appeals for the General Services Administration Board of
Contract Appeals in section
[[Page 1979]]
1533.203. No other changes were made to the proposed rule.
II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866; therefore, no review is required by
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs within the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because this rule does
not contain information requirements that require the approval of OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq.
The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impact of today's rule on small
entities, ``small entity'' is defined as: (1) A small business that
meets the definition of a small business found in the Small Business
Act and codified at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school
district or special district with a population of less than 50,000; and
(3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.
After considering the economic impacts of today's rule on small
entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In
determining whether a rule has a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the impact of concern is any
significant adverse economic impact on small entities, because the
primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility analyses is to identify
and address regulatory alternatives ``which minimize any significant
economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604. Thus, an agency may certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
if the rule relieves regulatory burden, or otherwise has a positive
economic effect on all of the small entities subject to the rule. Since
award term incentives will be available equally to large and small
entities, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess
their regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments, and
the private sector. This proposed rule does not contain a Federal
mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for
State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private
sector in one year. Any private sector costs for this action relate to
paperwork requirements and associated expenditures that are far below
the level established for UMRA applicability. Thus, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), applies to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be economically
significant as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may
have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action
meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health
or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and
reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is not
an economically significant rule as defined by Executive Order 12866,
and because it does not involve decisions on environmental health or
safety risks.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled, ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to
ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in
the development of regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism implications'' are
defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have
``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
Under section 6 of Executive Order 13132, EPA may not issue a
regulation that has federalism implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not required by statute, unless
the Federal Government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct
compliance costs incurred by State and local governments, or EPA
consults with State and local officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation. EPA also may not issue a regulation
that has federalism implications and that preempts State law, unless
the Agency consults with State and local officials early in the process
of developing the proposed regulation.
This rule does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. This rule amends the EPAAR to
provide guidance on the use of award term incentives and make other
administrative changes. Thus, the requirements of section 6 of the
Executive Order do not apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal
implications'' are defined in the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.''
[[Page 1980]]
This rule does not have tribal implications. It does not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this proposed rule.
H. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note), directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its
regulatory activities, unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law, or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures and business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA
to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
This rule does not involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA is
not considering use of any voluntary consensus standards.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use'' (66 FR 28335 (May 22, 2001)), because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this rule does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or the environment. This rule does
not involve human health or environmental effects.
K. Submission to Congress and the Government Accountability Office
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This rule will be effective on February 11, 2008.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1516, 1533 and 1552
Government procurement.
Dated: December 26, 2007.
John C. Gherardini,
Acting Director, Office of Acquisition Management.
0
Therefore, 48 CFR Chapter 15 is amended as set forth below:
PART 1516--TYPES OF CONTRACTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1516 continues to read as follows:
Authority: The provisions of this regulation are issued under 5
U.S.C. 301; Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390, as amended, 40 U.S.C. 486(c);
and 41 U.S.C. 418b.
0
2. Add section 1516.401-1 to read as follows:
1516.401-1 General.
0
3. Add section 1516.401-170 to read as follows:
1516.401-70 Award term incentives.
(a) Award term incentives enable a contractor to become eligible
for additional periods of performance under a current contract by
achieving prescribed performance measures under that contract.
(b) Award term incentives are designed to motivate contractors to
superior performance. Accordingly, the prescribed performance measures,
i.e., acceptable quality levels (AQL) which must be achieved by a
contractor to become eligible for an award term typically will be in
excess of the AQLs necessary for Government acceptance of contract
deliverables.
(c) The Award Term Incentive Plan sets forth the evaluation
process, including the evaluation criteria and performance measures,
and serves as the basis for award term decisions. The Award Term
Incentive Plan may be unilaterally revised by the Government.
(d) Award term incentives may be used in conjunction with options.
The Federal Acquisition Regulation does not prescribe a level of
performance for the exercise of options, as contrasted with award term
incentives, which should require superior performance as discussed in
paragraph (b) of this subsection. Award term incentive periods will
follow any option periods.
(e)(1) The Government has the unilateral right not to grant or to
cancel award term incentive periods and the associated award term
incentive plans if--
(i) The Contracting Officer has failed to initiate an award term
incentive period, regardless of whether the contractor's performance
permitted the Contracting Officer to consider initiating the award term
incentive period; or
(ii) The contractor has failed to achieve the performance measures
for the corresponding evaluation period; or
(iii) The Government notifies the contractor in writing it does not
have funds available for the award term; or
(iv) The Government no longer has a need for the award term
incentive period at or before the time an award term incentive period
is to commence.
(2) When an award term incentive period is not granted or
cancelled, any--
(i) Prior award term incentive periods for which the contractor
remains otherwise eligible are unaffected.
(ii) Subsequent award term incentive periods are thereby also
cancelled.
(f) Award term incentives may be appropriate for any type of
service contract.
0
4. Add section 1516.401-270 to read as follows:
1516.401-270 Definition.
Acceptable quality level (AQL) as used in this subpart means the
minimum percent of deliverables which are compliant with a given
performance standard that would permit a contractor to become eligible
for an award term incentive. Because the performance necessary for
eligibility for the award term incentive may be in excess of that
[[Page 1981]]
necessary for the Government acceptance of contract deliverables, the
AQLs associated with the award term incentive may exceed the AQLs
associated with the acceptance of contract deliverables. For example,
under contract X, acceptable performance is 75 percent of reports
submitted to the Government within five days. However, to be eligible
for an award term incentive, 85 percent of reports must be submitted to
the Government within five days.
1516.405 [Redesignated as 1516.406]
0
5. Redesignate section 1516.405 as section 1516.406.
1516.404-2 [Redesignated as 1516.405-2]
0
6. Redesignate section 1516.404-2 as section 1516.405-2.
1516.404-272 [Redesignated as 1516.405-270]
0
7. Redesignate section 1516.404-272 as section 1516.405-270.
1516.404-273 [Redesignated as 1516.405-271]
0
8. Redesignate section 1516.404-273 as section 1516.405-271.
1516.404-274 [Redesignated as 1516.405-272]
0
9. Redesignate section 1516.404-274 as section 1516.405-272.
0
10. Amend newly designated section 1516.406 to add new paragraphs (c)
and (d) to read as follows:
1516.406 Contract clauses.
* * * * *
(c) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clauses at 1552.216-
77, Award Term Incentive, 1552.216-78, Award Term Incentive Plan, and
1552.216-79 Award Term Availability of Funds in solicitations and
contracts when award term incentives are contemplated. The clauses at
1552.216-77 and 1552.216-78 may be used on substantially the same
basis.
(d) If the Contracting Officer wishes to use the ratings set forth
in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Contractor Performance
System (CPS) on the contract at hand as the basis for contractor
eligibility for an award term incentive, the Contracting Officer shall
insert the clause at 1552.216-78 with its Alternate I.
PART 1533--PROTESTS, DISPUTES AND APPEALS
0
11. The authority citation for part 1533 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390, as amended,
40 U.S.C. 486(c); and 41 U.S.C. 418b.
0
12. Revise section 1533.203 to read as follows:
1533.203 Applicability.
The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) will hear appeals
from final decisions of EPA Contracting Officers issued pursuant to the
Contracts Disputes Act. The rules and regulations of the CBCA appear in
48 CFR Chapter 61.
PART 1552--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
13. The authority citation for part 1552 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390, as amended,
40 U.S.C. 486(c); and 41 U.S.C. 418b.
0
14. Add section 1552.216-77 to read as follows:
1552.216-77 Award term incentive.
As prescribed in 1515.406(c), insert a clause substantially the
same as follows:
Award Term Incentive (FEB 2008)
(a) General. This contract may be extended as set forth in
paragraph (b) based on overall contractor performance as evaluated
in accordance with the Clause entitled ``Award Term Incentive
Plan,'' provided the Agency has a need for the effort at or before
the time an award term is to commence, and if the contractor
receives notice of the availability of funding for an award term
period pursuant to the ``Award Term Availability of Funds'' clause.
The Contracting Officer is responsible for the overall award term
evaluation and award term decision. The Contracting Officer will
unilaterally decide whether or not the contractor is eligible for an
award term extension, and in conjunction with the Contracting
Officer's Representative, will determine the need for continued
performance and funding availability.
(b) Period of performance. Provided the contractor has achieved
the performance measures, e.g., acceptable quality levels, set forth
in the clause ``Award Term Incentive Plan,'' the Contracting Officer
may extend the contract by exercising -------- [insert the total
award term incentive periods] additional award term incentive
period(s) of -------- [insert the award term incentive period]
months each. The total maximum period of performance under this
contract, if the Government exercises any option periods and all
award term incentive periods is -------- [insert the total of the
base period, option periods (if any), and award term incentive
periods] years.
(c) Right not to grant or cancel the award term incentive. (1)
The Government has the unilateral right not to grant or to cancel
award term incentive periods and the associated award term incentive
plans if--
(i) The Contracting Officer has failed to initiate an award term
incentive period, regardless of whether the contractor's performance
permitted the Contracting Officer to consider initiating the award
term incentive period; or
(ii) The contractor has failed to achieve the performance
measures for the corresponding evaluation period; or
(iii) The Government notifies the contractor in writing it does
not have funds available for the award term incentive periods; or
(iv) The Government no longer has a need for the award term
incentive period at or before the time an award term incentive
period is to commence.
(2) When an award term incentive period is not granted or
cancelled, any--
(i) Prior award term incentive periods for which the contractor
remains otherwise eligible are unaffected.
(ii) Subsequent award term incentive periods are thereby also
cancelled.
(d) Cancellation of an award term incentive period that has not
yet commenced for any of the reasons set forth in paragraph (c) of
this clause shall not be considered either a termination for
convenience or termination for default, and shall not entitle the
contractor to any termination settlement or any other compensation.
If the award term incentive is cancelled, a unilateral modification
will cite this clause as the authority.
(e) Award term incentive administration. The award term
incentive evaluation(s) will be completed in accordance with the
schedule in the Award Term Incentive Plan. The contractor will be
notified of the results and their eligibility to be considered for
the respective award term incentive no later than 120 days after an
evaluation period.
(f) Review process. The contractor may request a review of an
award term incentive evaluation which has resulted in the contractor
being ineligible for the award term incentive. The request shall be
submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer within 15 days after
notification of the results of the evaluation.
(end of clause)
0
15. Add section 1552.216-78 to read as follows:
1552.216-78 Award Term Incentive Plan.
As prescribed in 1515.406(c), insert a clause substantially the
same as follows:
Award Term Incentive Plan (FEB 2008)
(a) The Award Term Incentive Plan provides for the evaluation of
performance, and, together with Agency need and availability of
funding, serves as the basis for award term decisions. The Award
Term Incentive Plan may be unilaterally revised by the Government.
Any changes to the Award Term Incentive Plan will be made in writing
and incorporated into the contract through a unilateral modification
citing this clause. The Government will consult with the contractor
prior to the issuance of a revised Award Term Incentive Plan, but is
not required to obtain the contractor's consent to the revisions.
(b) [describe the evaluation periods and associated award term
incentive periods, e.g., months 1-18 for award term incentive period
[[Page 1982]]
I, and months 19-36 for award term incentive period II]
(c) [describe the evaluation schedule, e.g., 90 days after the
end of the evaluation period]
(d) In order to be eligible for an award term incentive period
the contractor must achieve all of the acceptable quality levels
(AQL) for the evaluated tasks, both individual and aggregate, for
that evaluation period. Failure to achieve any AQL renders the
contractor ineligible for the associated award term incentive
period. [identify the most significant tasks. Describe the AQL for
each task as well as an overall AQL for the associated evaluation
periods, e.g., an AQL of 90% each for tasks 1 and 3, and an AQL of
85% for task 7, and an overall AQL of 90% for the months 1-18
evaluation period]
(e) [If the contract will contain a quality assurance
surveillance plan (QASP), reference the QASP, e.g., attachment 2.
Typically, the performance standards and AQLs will be defined in the
QASP]
(end of clause)
Alternate 1 (FEB 2008)
As prescribed in 1516.406(d), substitute paragraphs
substantially the same as following paragraphs (b) through (e) for
paragraphs (b) through (e) in the basic clause:
(b) At the conclusion of each contract year, an average contract
rating shall be determined by using the numerical ratings entered
into the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Contractor Performance
System (CPS) for this contract. The NIHCPS is an interactive
database located on the Internet which EPA uses to record contractor
performance evaluations.
(c) The contract year average rating shall be obtained by
dividing the combined ratings by the number of ratings, for example:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Criteria Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quality of Product or Service............. 5.
Cost Control.............................. 4.
Timeliness of Performance................. 4.
Business Relations........................ 5.
18 (combined rating).
/ 4 (number of ratings).
= 4.5 contract year average
rating.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) The contractor shall be evaluated for performance from the
start of the contract through Year ---- [identify the evaluation
period, e.g., year three]. The average rating for each contract year
(as derived in paragraph (c) above) will be combined and divided by
[insert the number of evaluation periods] to obtain an overall
average rating, for example:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluation period Average rating
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year One.................................. 4.5.
Year Two.................................. 4.75.
Year Three................................ 4.75.
14 (combined average
rating).
/ 3 (number of evaluation
periods).
= 4.66 overall average
rating.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Based on the overall average rating as determined under
paragraph (d), provided that no individual rating, i.e., Quality of
Product or Service, Cost Control, Timeliness of Performance, or
Business Relations is below a 3, the contractor shall be eligible
for the following award term periods:
(1) Overall average rating of 4.6 to 5.0--Two award term
incentive periods of ---- [insert the number of months] months.
(2) Overall average rating of 4.0 to 4.6--One award term
incentive period of ---- [insert the number of months] months.
0
16. Add section 1552.216-79 to read as follows:
1552.216-79 Award Term Availability of Funds.
As prescribed in 1515.406(c), insert the following clause:
Award Term Availability of Funds (FEB 2008)
Funds are not presently available for any award term. The
Government's obligation under any award term is contingent upon the
availability of appropriated funds from which payment can be made.
No legal liability on the part of the Government for any award term
payment may arise until funds are made available to the Contracting
Officer for an award term and until the Contractor receives notice
of such availability, to be confirmed in writing by the Contracting
Officer.
(end of clause)
[FR Doc. E8-356 Filed 1-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P