Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Endangered Status for Black Abalone, 1986-1999 [E8-335]
Download as PDF
1986
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
on Federal regulations for which an
analysis was prepared and certification
made that such regulations would not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
Federal regulations.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
AGENCY:
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the
analysis prepared for the Federal
regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based on
Federal regulations for which an
analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulations did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 931
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: December 7, 2007.
Allen D. Klein,
Regional Director, Western Regional
Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. E8–359 Filed 1–10–08; 8:45 am]
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 224
[Docket No. 071128765–7769–01]
RIN 0648–AW32
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Proposed Endangered
Status for Black Abalone
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: We, NMFS, have completed a
review of the status of black abalone
(Haliotis cracherodii) under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA). After
reviewing the best scientific and
commercial information available,
evaluating threats facing the species,
and considering efforts being made to
protect black abalone, we have
concluded that the species is in danger
of extinction throughout all of its range
and are proposing to list the species as
endangered under the ESA. This
proposal is based on information
indicating that: the disease known as
withering syndrome has spread to areas
throughout the range of the species, has
been responsible for the local
extirpation of populations throughout a
large part of the species’ range, and
threatens remaining black abalone
populations; low adult densities below
the critical threshold density required
for successful fertilization exist
throughout a large part of the species’
range; and, a number of interacting
factors (e.g., suboptimal water
temperatures, reduced genetic diversity,
and illegal harvest) may further hamper
natural recovery of the species. A
critical habitat designation is being
considered and may be proposed in a
subsequent Federal Register notice. If
the proposed listing is finalized, a
recovery plan will be prepared and
implemented.
Comments on this proposal must
be received by April 10, 2008. Public
hearing (s) will be held promptly if any
person so requests by February 25, 2008.
Notice of the location (s) and time(s) of
any such hearing(s) will be published in
the Federal Register not less than 15
days before the hearing(s) is(are) held.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by [RIN 0648–AW32], by any
one of the following methods:
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Facsimile (fax): 562–980–4027,
Attn: Melissa Neuman.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Chief, Protected Resources Division,
Southwest Region, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 501 West Ocean
Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA
90802–4213.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
We will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
A draft black abalone status review
report and other reference materials
regarding this determination can be
obtained via the Internet at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov. The draft status
review report and list of references are
also available by submitting a request to
the Assistant Regional Administrator,
Protected Resources Division,
Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802–4213.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Neuman, NMFS, Southwest
Region (562) 980–4115; or Lisa
Manning, NMFS, Office of Protected
Resources (301) 713–1401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Black abalone was added to the
National Marine Fisheries Service’s
(NMFS’) Candidate Species list on June
23, 1999 (64 FR 33466) and remained on
this list after NMFS redefined the term
‘‘candidate species’’ on April 15, 2004
(69 FR 19975). We initiated an informal
ESA status review of black abalone on
July 15, 2003, and formally announced
initiation of a status review on October
17, 2006 (71 FR 61021), at the same time
soliciting information from the public.
On December 27, 2006, we received a
petition from the Center for Biological
Diversity (CBD) to list black abalone as
either an endangered or threatened
species under the ESA and to designate
critical habitat for the species
concurrently with any listing
determination. We published a 90–day
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
finding on April 13, 2007 (72 FR 18616),
stating that the CBD petition presented
substantial scientific and commercial
information indicating that the
petitioned actions may be warranted.
In June 2007, we assembled a Status
Review Team (SRT) to review the
available information, assess the
extinction risk and threats facing the
species, and produce an ESA status
review report for black abalone. The
draft status review report (VanBlaricom
et al., 2007) (hereafter ‘‘status report’’)
provides a thorough account of black
abalone biology and natural history, and
assesses demographic risks, threats and
limiting factors, and overall extinction
risk. The key background information
and findings of the draft status report
are summarized below.
Taxonomy and Species Description
Abalone, members of the gastropod
genus Haliotis, are marine gastropods
that occur throughout most of the world
(Cox, 1962). There are approximately 60
species (Geiger, 1999) found in
temperate to tropical waters from the
intertidal zone (i.e., the area of the
foreshore and seabed that is exposed to
the air at low tide and submerged at
high tide) to depths of over 50 m. All
are benthic, occurring on hard substrate,
relatively sedentary, and generally
herbivorous, feeding on attached or
drifting algal material. There are seven
species of abalone native to the west
coast of North America (Geiger, 1999).
The taxonomic classification of black
abalone is as follows: Phylum Mollusca,
Class Gastropoda, Subclass
Prosobranchia, Order
Archaeogastropoda, Superfamily
Pluerotomariacea, Family Haliotidae,
Genus Haliotis, Species cracherodii.
Leach (1814) gave the first formal
description of this shallow-living
abalone (upper intertidal zone to
subtidal depths of 6 m), describing the
shell as smooth, circular, and black to
slate blue in color. There are five to nine
open respiratory pores that are flush
with the shell’s surface. Typically, the
shell’s interior is white (Haaker et al.,
1986), with a poorly defined or no
muscle scar (Howorth, 1978). Adults
attain a maximum shell length of
approximately 20 cm (throughout this
document we use the maximum
diameter of the elliptical shell as the
index for individual body size). The
muscular foot of the black abalone
allows the animal to clamp tightly to
rocky surfaces without being dislodged
by wave action. Locomotion is
accomplished by an undulating motion
of the foot. A column of shell muscle
attaches the body to the shell. The
mantle and black epipodium, a sensory
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
structure and extension of the foot
which bears lobed tentacles of the same
color (Cox, 1960), circle the foot and
extend beyond the shell of a healthy
black abalone. The internal organs are
arranged around the foot and under the
shell.
Historical and Current Distribution
There is some debate regarding the
northern extent of the historic range of
black abalone. Many have cited the
historic range as extending from Coos
Bay, Oregon, USA to Cabo San Lucas,
Southern Baja California, Mexico
(Geiger, 2000). However, the
northernmost documented record of
black abalone (based on museum
specimens) is from Crescent City (Del
Norte County, California, USA; Geiger,
2004). Most experts agree that the
current range of black abalone extends
from Point Arena (Mendocino County,
California, USA) south to Northern Baja
California, Mexico. Black abalone may
exist, but are considered extremely rare,
north of San Francisco (Morris et al.,
1980) to Crescent City, California, USA
and south of Punta Eugenia to Cabo San
Lucas, Baja California, Mexico (P.
Raimondi, pers. comm.). Within this
broad geographic range, black abalone
generally inhabit coastal and offshore
island intertidal habitats on exposed
rocky shores where bedrock provides
deep, protective crevice shelter
(Leighton, 2005).
Population Structure
Recent studies have evaluated
population structure in black abalone
(Hamm and Burton, 2000; Chambers et
al., 2006; Gruenthal, 2007) using various
methods. These studies indicate: (1)
minimal gene flow among populations;
(2) black abalone populations are
composed predominantly of closely
related individuals produced by local
spawning events; (3) gene flow among
island populations is relatively greater
than between island and mainland
populations; and (4) the overall
connectivity among black abalone
populations is low and likely reflects
limited larval dispersal, and a low
degree of exchange among populations.
Habitat
Black abalone occur over a broad
latitudinal range, though the range
appears to have narrowed somewhat
from historic times. This broad range, in
addition to their small-scale distribution
(high intertidal to 6 m depth), is
associated with an evolved capability to
withstand extreme variation in
environmental conditions such as
temperature, salinity, moisture, and
wave action.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1987
Black abalone occur on a variety of
rock types, including igneous,
metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks at
a number of locations. Complex surfaces
with cracks and crevices in upper and
middle intertidal zones may be crucial
recruitment habitat and appear to be
important for adult survival as well
(Leighton, 1959; Leighton and
Boolootian, 1963; Douros, 1985, 1987;
Miller and Lawrenz-Miller, 1993;
VanBlaricom et al., 1993; Haaker et al.,
1995). Complex configurations of rock
surfaces likely afford protection from
predators, direct impacts of breaking
waves, wave-born projectiles, and
excessive solar heating during daytime
low tides.
Movement
Planktonic larval abalone movement
is almost certainly determined primarily
by patterns of water movement in
nearshore habitats near spawning sites.
Individual larvae may be able to
influence movement to some degree by
adjusting vertical position in the water
column, but to our knowledge the
ability of black abalone larvae to move
in this way has not been documented.
Movement behavior of postmetamorphic juvenile black abalone is
likewise unknown. Leighton (1959) and
Leighton and Boolootian (1963) indicate
that black abalone larvae may settle and
metamorphose in the upper intertidal
zone, using crevices and depressions
(including those formed by abrasive
action of other intertidal mollusks) as
habitat. Leighton and Boolootian (1963)
suggest that young black abalone move
lower in the intertidal zone as they
begin to grow, occupying the undersides
of large boulders. To our knowledge
there is no published information on
direct observations of movement
behavior of small ( <20 mm) juvenile
black abalone in the field. Qualitative
(Leighton, 2005; VanBlaricom,
unpublished observations) and
quantitative (Bergen, 1971; Blecha et al.,
1992; VanBlaricom and Ashworth, in
preparation; Richards, unpublished
observations) studies of movement in
black abalone suggest that smaller
abalone (<65 mm) move more frequently
than larger abalone, movement is more
frequent during night hours compared
to daylight hours, and that larger
abalone may remain in the same
location for many years.
Diet
Larvae are lecithotrophic (i.e., receive
nourishment via an egg yolk) and
apparently do not feed while in the
plankton. From the time of post-larval
metamorphosis to a size of about 20
mm, black abalone are highly cryptic,
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1988
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
occurring primarily on the undersides of
large boulders or in deep narrow
crevices in solid rocky substrata. In such
locations the primary food sources are
thought to be microbial and possibly
diatom films (Leighton, 1959; Leighton
and Boolootian, 1963; Bergen, 1971). At
roughly 20 mm black abalone move to
more open locations, albeit still
relatively cryptic, gaining access to both
attached macrophytes and to pieces of
drift plants cast into the intertidal zone
by waves and currents. As black abalone
continue to grow, the most commonly
observed feeding method is entrapment
of drift plant fragments. Webber and
Giese (1969), Bergen (1971), Hines and
Pearse (1982), and Douros (1987) have
confirmed the importance of large kelps
in the diet of juvenile and adult black
abalone. The primary food species are
said to be Macrocystis pyrifera and
Egregia menziesii in southern California
(i.e., south of Pt. Conception) habitats,
and Nereocystis leutkeana in central
and northern California habitats.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Reproduction
Black abalone have separate sexes and
are ‘‘broadcast’’ spawners. Gametes from
both parents are shed into the sea, and
fertilization is entirely external.
Resulting larvae are minute and
defenseless, receive no parental care or
protection of any kind, and are subject
to a broad array of physical and
biological sources of mortality. Species
with a broadcast-spawning reproductive
strategy are subject to strong selection
for maximum fecundity of both sexes.
Only through production of large
numbers of gametes can broadcast
spawners overcome high mortality of
gametes and larvae and survive across
generations. It is not uncommon for
broadcast-spawning marine species, a
group including many taxa of fish and
invertebrates, to produce millions of
eggs or sperm per individual per year.
Broadcast spawners are also subject to
other kinds of selection for certain traits
associated with reproduction, including
spatial and temporal synchrony in
spawning and mechanisms that increase
probabilities for union of spawned
gametes.
Spawning Density
As intertidal organisms on exposed
rocky shores, black abalone typically
release gametes into environments of
extreme turbulence. As a consequence,
eggs and sperm must be released from
adults in relatively close spatial and
temporal proximity in order to have any
chance of union and fertilization before
rapid dispersal and loss of opportunity.
A central problem for conservation of
black abalone is the dramatic reduction
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
in densities over the past quartercentury in almost the entire geographic
range of the species. Reductions in
density are so extreme and widespread
that considerable attention is now
focused on assessment of critical
density thresholds for successful
reproduction, recruitment, and
population sustainability. A review of
critical density thresholds, below which
recruitment failure occurs, for other
marine, broadcast-spawning
invertebrates (i.e., sea urchins, sea
cucumbers, hard clams, scallops, giant
clams, and geoduck clams) has revealed
that critical density thresholds exist
across a broad taxonomic range.
However, despite apparent risks of local
extinction when populations decline
below critical density thresholds, there
are several cases where combinations of
circumstances allow populations to
recover to densities above the critical
thresholds. Thus, for black abalone the
key conservation issues are
identification of critical density
thresholds and an understanding of
circumstances, if any, that may allow
escape from high risks of local
extinction when thresholds are
breached.
Babcock and Keesing (1999) estimated
critical density thresholds at 0.15–0.20
m–2 for greenlip abalone (Haliotis
laevigata). Tissot (2007) reviewed
recruitment patterns in three long-term
data sets for black abalone in California:
in each case, recruitment failed when
declining population densities fell
below 0.75–1.1 m–2. Tissot (2007) noted
that densities in most black abalone
populations south of Cayucos,
California, have fallen below the
densities noted. Recent evidence
suggests that disease-induced increases
in the mortality rate of black abalone
continue to move northward along the
mainland coast of California (e.g.,
Raimondi et al., 2002; Miner et al.,
2006). Thus, critical density thresholds
are thought to have been violated for
most of the black abalone populations in
California, and because of the spread of
the disease known as withering
syndrome (as explained below), the
number and geographic scope of
populations with densities falling below
sustainable levels is expected to
increase.
Larval Settlement
A sequence of studies and discoveries
by Morse and colleagues (Morse et al.,
1979; Morse and Morse, 1984; TrapidoRosenthal and Morse, 1986; Morse,
1990; Morse, 1992), Douros (1985), and
Miner et al. (2006) suggest that
availability of crustose coralline algae in
appropriate intertidal habitats may be
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
significant to the success of the larval
recruitment process in black abalone;
and, that the presence of adult black
abalone may facilitate larval settlement
and metamorphosis because the
activities and presence of the abalone
favor the maintenance of substantial
substratum cover by crustose coralline
algae. Although crustose coralline algae
are ubiquitous in rocky benthic habitats
along the west coast of North America,
a mechanistic understanding of
processes that sustain these algal
populations has not been established to
our knowledge. If the presence of black
abalone facilitates the abundance of
crustose coralline algae, it follows that
the issue of critical density thresholds
may take on added importance.
Larval Dispersal and Recruitment
Indirect methods for assessing larval
dispersal in abalone (Tegner and Butler,
1985; Prince et al., 1988; Hamm and
Burton, 2000; Chambers et al., 2005;
Chambers et al., 2006; Gruenthal, 2007)
point to consistent results. Given that
most abalone larvae are drifting in the
water for a period of about 3–10 days
before settlement and metamorphosis
(e.g., McShane, 1992), abalone in
general, including black abalone, have
limited capacity for dispersal over
distances beyond a few kilometers, and
are able to do so only rarely.
Tissot (2007) has estimated
empirically that successful recruitment
of black abalone requires the presence of
local adult populations at densities of
0.75–1.1 m¥2 or greater, and that the
number of known populations of adult
black abalone at or above putative
threshold densities is diminishing over
time in a geographically progressive
manner. Tissot (2007) further noted that
virtually all monitored black abalone
populations continue to decrease in
mean density over time. This
combination of observations emphasizes
the importance of critical density
thresholds in the sustainability and
conservation of black abalone
populations throughout their range.
Patterns of aggregation may mitigate
effects of decline below a critical
density threshold (VanBlaricom,
unpublished data). However, only one
or two populations in California that
have sustained mass mortality due to
withering syndrome are known to be
increasing in numbers. Thus, even if an
ability for black abalone to aggregate
exists, it may not be sufficient to
facilitate successful recruitment and
population sustainability under current
environmental conditions.
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Growth and Maximum Size
Available data on black abalone
growth suggest that young animals reach
maximum shell diameters of about 2 cm
in their first year, then grow at rates of
1–2 cm per year for the next several
years. Growth begins to slow at lengths
of about 10 cm, corresponding to an age
range of 4–8 yrs. Beyond this point,
growth is less predictable, shell erosion
may become a significant factor, and
size distributions for older animals may
vary according to local conditions.
Growth and erosion of shells may come
into equilibrium in older black abalone,
such that growth can be viewed as
facultatively determinant.
Maximum recorded shell length for
black abalone was listed at 213 mm by
Wagner and Abbott (1990). Ault (1985)
reported a maximum shell length of
black abalone at 215 mm. Leighton
(2005) indicated a shell length of 216
mm reported by Owen (unpublished
observation). At least two black abalone
of approximately 220 mm maximum
shell length were known to be alive at
San Nicolas Island in January 2007
(VanBlaricom, Neuman, and Witting,
unpublished observations), but the
cryptic locations of the animals have
made measurements awkward and
possibly not accurate. Monitoring and
measurement of these individuals will
continue in association with ongoing
population surveys.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Mortality
Mortality rates caused by withering
syndrome appear to be sensitive to
fluctuations in local sea surface
temperatures (Friedman et al., 1997;
Raimondi et al., 2002; Harley and
Rogers-Bennett, 2004; Vilchis et al.,
2005). There is evidence that, in the
short term, population-scale mortality
rates vary in space and time from near
zero to high proportions of local
populations. The available evidence
suggests that mortality rates driven by
withering syndrome are highest during
periods following elevations in sea
surface temperature (e.g., Raimondi et
al., 2002). Over the long term, all
available evidence indicates substantial
increases in mortality rates, and
consequent reductions in densities, in
populations throughout the range of
black abalone that have been afflicted by
withering syndrome (e.g., Tissot, 2007).
More detail regarding the severe risk
that withering syndrome poses to the
future survival of the species is
presented below (see Summary of
Factors Affecting the Species and
Population Modeling: Geographic
Spread of Disease vs. Disease
Resistance).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
Physical oceanographic conditions,
predation by octopuses, lobsters, sea
stars, fishes, sea otters, and shorebirds,
competition with sea urchins, and food
limitation may all impose mortality at
varying rates depending on black
abalone life stage. The draft status report
(VanBlaricom et al., 2007) provides
additional qualitative information
regarding the relative importance of
these sources of mortality. The
importance of anthropogenic mortality
(i.e., commercial and recreational
harvest, illegal harvest, incidental
losses, pollution) is also discussed in
the draft status report and in other
sections of this proposed rule (see
Summary of Factors Affecting the
Species).
Abundance
There are two types of data that can
be examined to provide a better
understanding of variation in black
abalone abundance over time: fisherydependent and fishery-independent
data. Based on a detailed examination of
these two data types, Tissot (2007)
evaluated trends in black abalone
abundance over the last 3 decades.
Fishery-dependent Information
An intertidal fishery focused on red
(Haliotis rufescens Swainson, 1822),
green (Haliotis fulgens Philippi, 1845),
and black abalone began in the 1850s in
Central California and in the 1880s in
Baja California, Mexico (Bonnot, 1930;
Lundy, 1997). The fishery peaked at
1,860 mt in 1879 (Cox, 1962). By 1913,
the intertidal fishery was closed because
of concerns regarding overfishing
(Bonnot, 1930). From 1913–1928,
commercial and recreational dive
fisheries developed, but black abalone
were not documented prior to 1940.
During the 18th and 19th centuries, two
predatory forces on black abalone
populations in Southern California had
been removed. First, the Native
American Chumash and Gabrielino/
Tongva cultures of the southern
California Islands, who were known to
have harvested black abalones in large
numbers for food over periods of five to
ten millennia, and fur hunters
responsible for the elimination of
southern sea otter populations south of
Point Conception by the time of the U.S.
Civil War. There is uncertainty
regarding the ecological importance of
sea otter predation on black abalone, but
the potential for strong interactions is
substantial given known effects of sea
otter predation on red abalone (for more
detailed information on the effects of
sea otter predation see Summary of
Factors Affecting the Species below).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1989
California Department of Fish and
Game landings data (1940–1993)
indicate that black abalone were
intensively exploited only after other
more marketable species had been
largely depleted. Black abalone landings
peaked in 1973 at 868 mt. During the
peak decade of black abalone fishing
from 1972–1981, Rogers-Bennett et al.
(2002) estimate that approximately 3.5
million individuals were taken in the
commercial fishery, and an additional
6,729 animals were taken in the
recreational fishery. By 1993 both
fisheries for black abalone were closed
due to concerns regarding severe
population declines (Haaker et al.,
1992).
Rogers-Bennett et al. (2002) estimated
baseline abundance, prior to overfishing
and mass mortalities due to withering
syndrome (for more detailed
information on withering syndrome see
Summary of Factors Affecting the
Species below), for black abalone using
landings data from the peak of the
commercial and recreational fisheries
(1972–1981), assuming that the
population was at least as large as the
number taken in the fishery, that the
fishery ‘‘sampled’’ all size classes, and
that no new individuals were added to
the population during the 10–year peak
of the fishery. With these assumptions,
the baseline minimum estimate of
abundance for black abalone prior to
overexploitation and withering
syndrome was 3.54 million animals.
This estimate provides a historic
perspective on patterns in abundance,
defines a relevant baseline abundance
against which to compare modern day
trends, and helps to assess the species’
current status and risks. However, it
should be noted that the estimate was
calculated using data from a period of
time when black abalone reached
extraordinary abundance levels on the
Channel Islands, possibly in response to
the elimination of subsistence harvests
by indigenous peoples, limited public
access in modern times, and regionalscale extinctions of sea otters.
The abalone fishery in Mexico dates
to approximately 1860, but modern
commercial harvests did not develop
until the 1940s. The fishery is pursued
by 22 fishing cooperatives, distributed
across 4 management zones on the
Pacific coast of the Baja California
peninsula. Five cooperatives are present
in management zone 1, which is the
northernmost of the zones and extends
from the U.S.-Mexico border to Punta
Malarrimo, Baja California Sur.
Reported commercial fishery data for
black abalone during 1990–2003 comes
entirely from management zone 1.
During this time period, the commercial
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1990
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
catch of black abalone in Mexico
declined from a high of 28 mt in 1990
to <0.5 mt in 2003, an overall decline of
greater than 98 percent (J. Palleiro,
unpublished data; Sierra-Rodriguez et
al., 2006). These data suggest similar
fishery declines to those in California.
The decline in Mexico is attributed
primarily to large mortality events
associated with withering syndrome,
rather than to overfishing.
Fishery-independent Information
The earliest fishery-independent
black abalone abundance estimates were
generated beginning in 1975 at survey
stations on the Palos Verdes Peninsula
of Los Angeles County, California
(Miller and Lawrenz-Miller, 1993).
Black abalone densities ranged from 1.0
to 6.8 m¥2 from 1975–1976, but
declined during the remainder of the
survey interval to less than 0.3 m¥2 by
1987. Douros (1987) reported densities
as great as 127 m–2 in certain surge
channels at Santa Cruz Island in 1983–
1984, but typical densities within a
study site ranged from 30 to 90 m–2.
Other field studies during the 1980s on
Santa Cruz Island yielded black abalone
densities of 0 to 50 m¥2 (Haaker et al.,
1992). Tissot (1995), also studying black
abalone populations on Santa Cruz
Island, found averages of 43 to 58 m¥2
for surf-exposed and protected
subpopulations, respectively, in 1987.
These densities declined over the next
6 years due to withering syndrome,
dropping to less than 1 m¥2 by 1993. As
of this writing, only one site on Santa
Cruz Island (Willows Anchorage) has
experienced an increase in local density
since 1993.
Several studies monitoring black
abalone abundance at other Channel
Islands found similar declines through
the late 1980s and early 1990s. From
1985 to 1989, mean densities for black
abalone populations on Anacapa, Santa
Rosa, Santa Barbara, and San Miguel
islands were obtained annually along
permanent transects established by the
Channel Islands National Park (Richards
and Davis, 1993). Densities ranged from
20 to 50 m¥2 on early visits, but fell to
<10 m¥2 by 1989 for all islands except
for San Miguel due to mass mortalities
associated with withering syndrome. By
1996, local densities fell to 1.0 m¥2 or
less on San Miguel Island.
At San Nicolas Island, densities of
black abalones averaged >10 m¥2 at
nine monitored sites from 1981 to the
early 1990s. Withering syndrome was
first seen at San Nicolas Island in spring
1992 (VanBlaricom et al., 1993), and
densities declined during the middle
1990s to <1 abalone m¥2 at all sights
except one (VanBlaricom, unpublished
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
data. The highest local density of black
abalone recorded among the several
studies of island populations in the
1980s was 296 individuals, primarily
adults, in a single quadrat of 1 m2 at San
Nicolas Island on November 23, 1988, at
site 7 (VanBlaricom, 1993; unpublished
data).
In recent years, three fisheryindependent surveys for black abalone
have been conducted along the
mainland coast and offshore islands of
Baja California, Mexico. In 2002, a
survey for black abalone was done at
Bahia Tortugas, just south of Punta
Eugenia and located at the north end of
management zone 2. Only four
individuals were found, ranging in
maximum shell diameter from 121 to
152 mm (Sierra Rodriguez et al., 2006).
A second survey was conducted in
2004. Black abalone were found at low
densities where they occurred, with 98
percent of located animals measuring
<120 cm in maximum shell diameter.
No animals were found with symptoms
of withering syndrome during the 2004
survey. Black abalone were found along
the mainland coast of management zone
1, and on Isla Guadalupe and Isla San
Jeronimo. The only black abalone found
in Baja California Sur were at Bahia
Tortugas (Sierra-Rodriguez et al., 2006).
The third study was conducted in
2005 in regions of upwelling on rocky
intertidal benches along the northern
Baja California coast from Costa Azul to
Punta Baja (Raimondi, unpublished
data). Twelve sites, suspected to have
been affected by withering syndrome,
were surveyed for suitable habitat
(rocky crevices) in the mid to low
intertidal zone, and then timed searches
were conducted for black abalone. Black
abalone were not densely aggregated at
any site surveyed in this study;
however, a large proportion of the
individuals found were small (<50 mm).
This evidence of recent recruitment in
northern Baja California is promising
given that there is no evidence of
successful recruitment to mainland
California sites affected by withering
syndrome (south of Pt. Piedras Blancas
in northern San Luis Obispo County).
Raimondi (unpublished data)
hypothesized that the discrepancy
between the patterns of recruitment in
the two regions may be because: (1)
healthy populations exist somewhere in
Mexico (perhaps on offshore islands),
and these are seeding northern areas; or
(2) recruitment dynamics are different
for withering syndrome-impacted sites
in Mexico versus those in California.
Fresh shells, in some cases containing
flesh, were found at three of the twelve
sites, suggesting that withering
syndrome may still be impacting areas
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of Northern Baja California. Large
numbers of older shells were identified
at a few sites, suggesting that black
abalone were abundant in these areas in
the past.
Consideration as a ‘‘Species’’ Under the
ESA
The ESA defines a species as ‘‘any
species or subspecies of wildlife or
plants, or any distinct population
segment of any species of vertebrate fish
or wildlife which interbreeds when
mature.’’ Black abalone is a marine
invertebrate and is not a subspecies;
therefore, it may not be subdivided into
a listable unit below the taxonomic
species level.
Status of Black Abalone
Black abalone have experienced major
declines in abundance that prompted
eventual closure of the commercial and
recreational fisheries and resulted in
local extinctions and low local densities
in the majority of long-term monitoring
studies in California. These declines
have been particularly severe in the
southern California Islands, which were
major foci for the commercial fishery
from 1970–1993 and where abalone
densities were high (>40 m¥2) as late as
the mid–1980s. Although the geographic
range of black abalone extends to
northern California, the vast majority of
abalone populations have historically
occurred south of Monterey, particularly
in the Channel Islands (Cox, 1960;
Karpov et al., 2000). Thus, black
abalone populations have been severely
reduced over an area that covers more
than half of the species’ geographic
range, and black abalone from these
areas historically comprised greater than
90 percent of the commercial fishery
catch and the majority of the adult black
abalone populations in California.
Both the commercial fishery trends
and long-term monitoring studies
indicate that significant declines in
black abalone abundance began in
southern California in the mid–1980s.
The first evidence of decline came from
Palos Verdes in the late 1970s and early
1980s and at Laguna Beach in 1985–
1986 (Tissot, 1988). However, in the
case of Palos Verdes, the decline may
have been due to other factors (Miller
and Lawrenz-Miller, 1993). By 1986,
declining populations and associated
observations of withering syndrome had
spread to the northern Channel Islands,
starting at Anacapa, progressing to Santa
Rosa, Santa Cruz, and Santa Barbara
islands, and finally reaching San Miguel
Island in 1989 (Tissot, 1991; Davis et al.,
1992; Tissot, 1995). By the early 1990s,
declines were observed on San Nicolas
Island (VanBlaricom et al., 1993) and
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
north of Point Conception on the
mainland to Government Point, Santa
Barbara County (Altstatt et al., 1996).
During the 1990s, declines in
abundance were noted north of
Government Point to Cayucos in San
Luis Obispo County (Altstatt et al.,
1996; Raimondi et al., 2002). Noted
declines were also observed in central
Baja California, Mexico, around Bahia
Tortugas during El Nino events in the
late 1980s and 1990s (Altstatt et al.,
1996; Pedro Sierra-Rodriquez, personal
communication) and may be linked to
declines in the fishery that occurred in
the 1990s. Thus, the spread of withering
syndrome is strongly associated with
declines in abundance and with a
pattern of increased northward
expansion co-occurring with increasing
coastal warming and El Nino events
(Tissot, 1995; Altstatt et al., 1996;
Raimondi et al., 2002).
To our knowledge there are no data
available on black abalone populations
north of San Mateo County on the
mainland coast of California. As a
consequence, we lack information on
the remaining stocks of black abalone
not influenced by withering syndrome.
The two northernmost sites have either
not been studied since 1995 (Ano
Nuevo; Tissot, 1995) or have only been
recently established in large, dispersed
areas (Pigeon Point; Raimondi and
Miner, pers. comm.). Establishment of
long-term monitoring studies in
northern California (e.g., in San
Francisco County and north of the
Golden Gate) would serve an important
need in documenting northward
progression of withering syndrome and
mass mortality in the northern limit of
the geographic range of black abalone.
Natural recovery of severely reduced
abalone populations can be a very slow
process (e.g., Tegner, 1992). This is
largely due to the low reproductive
efficiency of widely dispersed adult
populations coupled with short larval
dispersal distances (see Reproduction
and Spawning Density above).
Therefore, severely reduced
populations, in addition to providing
few reproductive adults, also experience
reduced effectiveness of fertilization
and eventual recruitment of larval
abalone.
Moreover, many studies have shown
that abalone larvae generally do not
disperse widely. For example, Prince et
al. (1988) and McShane (1992) showed
a strong correlation between the
abundances of adult and newly
recruited abalone at several sites in
South Australia, which suggests that
larvae are not dispersed very far from
their point of origin. Similarly, Tegner
(1992) showed that recruitment of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
juvenile green abalone was rare in Palos
Verdes, California, where adult abalone
were very uncommon even though
abundant adult stocks were found less
than 30 km away in the Channel
Islands. Thus, although more abundant
black abalone populations occur in
central and perhaps northern California,
decimated stocks in southern California
are unlikely to receive significant
recruitment from these distant
populations (Hamm and Burton, 2000).
Studies indicate that a local adult
density ‘‘threshold’’ exists and
influences local recruitment. Recovery
will largely depend on the density of
local brood stocks and whether this
density is below the critical value
necessary for successful recruitment
(Tegner, 1992). Based on field
experiments, Babcock and Keesing
(1999) showed that recruitment failure
occurred in greenlip abalone at adult
densities of 0.15–0.20 m¥2. Based on
empirical data from three long-term
studies of black abalone in California,
recruitment failure occurred below
adult densities of 0.75–1.10 m¥2. Given
that the majority of populations south of
Cayucos in central California are below
this threshold, many significantly so, it
seems unlikely that these populations
will be able to recover naturally to their
former abundances, at least in the near
future. Moreover, given the continued
decline of most populations and the
continued northward expansion of
withering syndrome with warming
events (Raimondi et al., 2002), it seems
likely that black abalone populations
will continue to decline on a large scale.
Assessment of Risk of Extinction
Analysis of Demographic Risk
The demographic risks that black
abalone face were assessed by
considering four criteria (abundance,
growth rate/productivity, spatial
structure/connectivity, and genetic and
life history diversity) and other key risks
(e.g., threats). These criteria provide a
strong indication of the level of
extinction risk faced by a species. A
species at very low levels of abundance
and with few populations will be less
tolerant to environmental variation,
catastrophic events, genetic processes,
demographic stochasticity, ecological
interactions, and other processes.
Productivity or a growth rate that is
unstable or declining over a long period
of time may reflect a variety of causes,
but indicates poor resiliency to future
environmental variability or change. For
species at low levels of abundance, in
particular, declining or highly variable
productivity confers a high level of
extinction risk. A species with a
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1991
geographic spatial structure that is not
widely distributed across a variety of
well-connected habitats will have a
diminished capacity for recolonizing
locally extirpated populations, and is at
increased risk of extinction due to
environmental perturbations and
catastrophic events. A species that has
lost locally adapted genetic and lifehistory diversity may lack the raw
resources necessary to endure short- and
long-term environmental changes.
The SRT concluded that black
abalone face high levels of risk in each
of the four demographic criteria. The
SRT unanimously scored the species’
abundance as high risk due to critically
low population abundance as indicated
by local density levels. Severe declines
in abundance (greater than 90 percent)
have occurred at the majority (76
percent) of long-term monitoring study
sites, including all sites in southern
California (Tissot, 2007). The high risk
to abundance is attributable to
population densities below the
minimum threshold density necessary
for successful fertilization (0.75 – 1.1
m¥2). Additionally, this factor
contributes significantly to long-term
risk of extinction, and, coupled with
low spatial connectivity between
populations (i.e., making recolonization
unlikely) and the ongoing activity and
expansion of withering syndrome, is
likely to contribute to short-term risk of
extinction in the foreseeable future.
The majority of the SRT concluded
that there is a very high risk of black
abalone extinction due to low growth
and productivity. Population growth is
negative in all areas south of Cayucos,
California, except for two locations in
the southern California Islands.
Furthermore, all sites south of Cayucos,
but for the two isolated island locations,
have exhibited recruitment failure
because of local densities below the
minimum threshold for successful
fertilization. This high level of risk due
to poor growth rate and productivity, by
itself, likely indicates a high risk of
extinction in the near future.
The majority of the SRT concluded
that black abalone are at high to very
high risk because of compromised
spatial structure and population
connectivity. Dispersion data among
local populations indicates that there is
poor connectivity among populations.
Such limited connectivity reduces the
likelihood that disease resistance to
withering syndrome, if it exists, will
spread to other populations.
Furthermore, the poor connectivity
among populations makes it unlikely
that populations extirpated by disease
or catastrophic events will be
recolonized in the foreseeable future.
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1992
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
The SRT unanimously concluded that
black abalone are at high extinction risk
because of low genetic diversity.
Genetic diversity in a population is
determined by estimating the number of
possible alleles that may exist at gene
loci. Genetic diversity provides a
mechanism for populations to adapt to
their changing environment. Thus, the
more genetic variation in a population,
the better the chance that at least some
individuals will have the capability to
adapt to a new environment and will be
able to pass this capability on to
subsequent generations. Loss of genetic
diversity in populations may occur
because of factors that cause a major
reduction in abundance and/or isolate a
subset of individuals from the rest of the
population. Genetic diversity has likely
declined in black abalone populations
because of catastrophic losses that the
species has experienced throughout a
large part of its range. As a result,
populations have become small and
more isolated, exacerbating the effects of
naturally occurring low exchange rates
between populations because of limited
larval dispersal. Overfishing and disease
have contributed to the loss of genetic
diversity within black abalone
populations, and, as a result, the ability
of extant (i.e., currently existing) black
abalone populations to exhibit
resilience in the face of other threats,
such as other diseases, has been
compromised. Low genetic diversity, in
combination with low spatial
connectivity between populations,
suggests that even if some genetic
resiliency exists locally, it is not likely
to spread and establish itself in other
extant populations.
Population Modeling: Geographic
Spread of Disease vs. Disease Resistance
VanBlaricom et al. (2007) calculated
the probability of extinction with time
using a simple formula that accounts for
the main threat that black abalone faces,
withering syndrome. The probability of
extinction is considered as a function of
two parameters (R=the probability that
the northward spread of withering
syndrome will cease very soon and
S=the probability that resistance will
emerge very soon on a large spatial scale
in the host), using the logic that if
withering syndrome alone results in a
high enough risk of extinction in a short
time (i.e., 30 years-the expected life
span of black abalone), then that may
suffice to evaluate whether the species
is in danger of extinction currently or in
the foreseeable future.
Assuming R and S are independent,
the overall probability of functional
extinction (i.e., the reproductive
potential of isolated survivors is zero
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
and no viable populations remain) in 30
years based on the SRT members’ best
professional judgment was 95.7 percent.
The collective view of the SRT is that
the risk is at a level where functional
extinction without active management
has a very high likelihood of occurring.
This probability should not be
interpreted as a prediction of the demise
of the last individual black abalone
within 30 years.
Summary of Factors Affecting the
Species
According to Section 4 of the ESA, the
Secretary of Commerce determines
whether a species is threatened or
endangered because of any (or a
combination) of the following factors:
the present or threatened destruction,
modification, or curtailment of its
habitat or range; overutilization for
commercial, recreational, scientific or
educational purposes; disease or
predation; inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or other natural
or man-made factors affecting its
continued existence. We examined
these factors for their historic, current,
and/or potential impact on black
abalone and considered them, along
with current species distribution and
abundance, to help determine the
species’ present vulnerability to
extinction.
Present or Threatened Destruction,
Modification, or Curtailment of its
Habitat or Range
Most of the threats that result in
substrate destruction, such as coastal
development, recreational access, cable
repairs, nearshore military operations
and benthic community shifts, occur
infrequently, have a narrow geographic
scope, or have uncertain or indirect
effects on black abalone. Some
exceptions may exist in the cases of
sedimentation and sea level rise in that
these threats have the potential to
produce more widespread impacts, but
the certainty that these factors will
affect black abalone is low. For example,
sea level rise may result in loss of
suitable habitat in a preferred depth
range because of increased erosion,
turbidity, and siltation, but we currently
lack information to determine whether
these habitat changes will be important
factors for further decline.
Suboptimal water temperatures are
likely to have contributed to the decline
of black abalone and pose a serious
threat to the ability of the species to
persist because elevated water
temperatures are correlated with
accelerated rates of withering syndrome
transmission and disease-induced
mortality. Water temperatures can
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
become elevated because of
anthropogenic sources of thermal
effluent and long-and short-term climate
change (e.g., global climate change and
El Nino - Southern Oscillation). For
example, discharge from the Diablo
Canyon nuclear power plant in San Luis
Obispo County, California and recent El
Nino - Southern Oscillation
oceanographic events in the Pacific
Ocean have produced short-term
periods of ocean warming and are
associated with increased rates of
mortality due to withering syndrome
over relatively small spatial scales.
Although there is no explicitly
documented causal link between the
existence of withering syndrome and
global climate change, patterns observed
over the past 3 decades suggest that
progression of ocean warming
associated with large-scale climate
change may facilitate further and more
prolonged vulnerability of black abalone
to effects of withering syndrome.
Finally, we view the severity,
geographic scope, and level of certainty
that black abalone are affected by
reduced food quality and quantity as
being relatively low compared to other
factors. Davis et al. (1992) posited that
a key consequence of kelp forest
ecosystem disruption, due to a variety of
reasons such as El Nino events, was
reduced food supply for black abalone.
Although reductions in kelp abundance
occurred in the early 1980s, subsequent
studies (e.g., Friedman et al., 1997) have
suggested that reduced food supply
probably did not trigger the mass
mortalities caused by withering
syndrome. Kelp abundances had
recovered from El Nino effects in
southern California by the time
withering syndrome was first observed
in 1985, and the abundant black abalone
populations at San Nicolas Island
showed no response in density to the
1982–1984 El Nino disturbances,
despite dramatic reductions in kelp
abundance near the Island
(VanBlaricom, 1993). Thus, this factor
has likely not played an important role
in the overall decline of the species,
and, unless new information surfaces,
this factor is not believed to pose a
significant threat in the future.
Overutilization for Commercial,
Recreational, Scientific or Educational
Purposes
Throughout most of the species’
range, local densities are below the
critical threshold density required for
successful spawning and recruitment.
This predicament has occurred because
of mass mortalities due to withering
syndrome (see Disease or Predation
below) and overutilization for
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
commercial and recreational purposes
(i.e., prior to the fishery closure in
1993). Data from abalone fisheries in
California and Baja California, Mexico,
indicate a decline in landings of at least
93 percent during the 1990s. These
reductions, however, may not be
indicative of declines due only to
fishing activities because mass
mortalities caused by withering
syndrome had begun in many locations
at approximately the same time. RogersBennett et al. (2002) estimate that the
California abalone fisheries may have
contributed up to 99 percent of the
reduction in black abalone abundance
in the United States (see Abundance
section above). Thus, the estimated take
of 3.5 million black abalone during
commercial and recreational abalone
fishing likely contributed to the decline
of local densities. This threat no longer
exists in California because the black
abalone fisheries were closed in 1993.
The limited information we have from
Mexico makes it difficult to ascertain
the relative importance of fishing to
overall species decline.
Disease or Predation
Withering syndrome in black abalone
is caused by a Rickettsia-like
prokaryotic organism, Candidatus
Xenohaliotis californiensis’ (Gardner et
al., 1995; Friedman et al., 1997;
Friedman et al., 2000; Friedman et al.,
2002). Candidatus Xenohaliotis
californiensis (hereafter ‘‘abalone
rickettsia’’) occurs in epithelial cells of
the gastrointestinal tract. Infected
symptomatic animals are unable to
transfer digested food materials from the
gut lumen into the epithelial cells and
beyond, resulting in malnutrition,
dramatic loss of tissue mass, and
eventual death. Physiological
manifestations of withering syndrome
include reduced food intake and oxygen
consumption, and increased ammonia
excretion (Kismohandaka et al., 1993).
The same pathogen is known to cause
symptoms of withering syndrome in red
abalone, and mortality rate is positively
associated with water temperature in
both red and black abalone (Moore et
al., 2000a, b; Vilchis et al., 2005).
Andree et al. (2000) have developed a
rapid DNA-based test for the pathogen
that causes withering syndrome,
allowing detection of infections prior to
onset of clinical symptoms in both black
and red abalone. Moore et al. (2001)
have developed a histological method
for rapid quantification of the intensity
of infections by the pathogen that causes
withering syndrome.
In wild animals symptomatic for
withering syndrome, weakness resulting
from the disease may cause the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
individual to lose the typically secure
grip on the rocky substratum in
response to wave impacts, allowing
attack by predators or scavengers before
the individual succumbs to the disease
itself. Transfer of pathogens from animal
to animal is fecal to oral on a local scale,
and is therefore likely facilitated by
aggregation of abalone in natural
habitats. Transmission pathways on
large spatial scales are entirely
unknown at present. The pathogen for
withering syndrome is now reported to
be endemic to all the coastal marine
waters of central (Friedman and Finley,
2003) and southern California (Moore et
al., 2002) south of San Francisco.
Information from Isla de Cedros and
Islas San Benito, Baja California,
Mexico, on pink (Haliotis corrugata
Wood, 1828; termed ‘‘yellow’’ in
Mexico) and green (termed ‘‘blue’’ in
Mexico) abalone indicated the presence
of abalone symptomatic for withering
syndrome, and the presence of abalone
rickettsia in tissue samples, for both
species (Tinajero et al., 2002). Recent
data indicate the presence of abalone
rickettsia in farmed and wild green
ormer (Haliotis tuberculata)
symptomatic for withering syndrome at
a number of locations in the coastal
marine waters of western Europe
(Balseiro et al., 2006).
Evidence of effects of withering
syndrome on black abalone was first
noticed along the south shore of Santa
Cruz Island in 1985, when a fisherman
noticed a large number of dying black
abalone and empty shells (Lafferty and
Kuris, 1993). The primary symptoms of
disease noted at the time included pedal
atrophy and a diminished ability to
maintain a grip on rocky substrata.
Haaker et al. (1992) and Richards and
Davis (1993) described the first
observations of mass mortalities of black
abalone in previously monitored
populations on the island shores of
Channel Islands National Park in 1986,
and broadened the list of recognized
symptoms to include epipodial and
mantle discoloration, and lack of
response to tactile stimulation. Haaker
et al. (1992) were the first authors to
apply the term ‘‘withering syndrome’’ to
the suite of symptoms and consequent
mass mortalities observed in the field.
Between 1985 and 1992, mass
mortalities occurred at San Miguel,
Santa Rosa, Anacapa, Santa Barbara,
and San Clemente Islands, in all cases
with symptoms indicating withering
syndrome (Davis et al., 1992; Haaker et
al., 1992; Lafferty and Kuris, 1993;
Richards and Davis, 1993). Evidence of
withering syndrome was first seen at
San Nicolas Island in spring 1992
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1993
(VanBlaricom et al., 1993) and was
followed by widespread mass
mortalities at the Island in the middle
1990s (Tissot, 2007). The delayed
appearance of withering syndrome at
San Nicolas Island, as compared to the
other southern California Islands,
remains unexplained but may have
reflected patterns of dispersal by disease
propagules. To our knowledge, no effort
has been made to assess effects of
withering syndrome at Santa Catalina
Island, though the Island historically
supported black abalone populations.
The first reported occurrence of
significant numbers of black abalone
with symptoms of withering syndrome
on the California mainland was in San
Luis Obispo County in 1988 (Steinbeck
et al., 1992). Afflicted animals were
found primarily within Diablo Cove,
which receives warmed effluent
seawater from the cooling system of a
nearby nuclear power plant. A mass
mortality of black abalone occurred at
the site between 1988 and 1989, with
mortality rates correlating well to local
patterns of sea temperature elevation
associated with power plant effluent.
Since the mid–1990s withering
syndrome has appeared sequentially in
progressively more northward
populations of black abalone on the
mainland California coast (Altstatt et al.,
1996; Raimondi et al., 2002; Miner et
al., 2006). The most recent observations
available suggest that significant
mortalities of black abalone associated
with withering syndrome have occurred
at least as far north as Pt. Piedras
Blancas in northern San Luis Obispo
County near San Simeon. Surveys for
the microorganism responsible for
withering syndrome have found positive
results as far north as San Francisco
(Finley and Friedman, 2000; Friedman
and Finley, 2003).
In the vast majority of cases where
long-term monitoring data are available,
the appearance of animals symptomatic
for withering syndrome in a population
lead inevitably to rapid and dramatic
declines in population size, most often
in excess of 90 percent (Tissot, 2007).
The pattern has been documented for
black abalone populations throughout
the range in California. Reports indicate
similar trends for black abalone
populations in Mexico. As noted earlier,
the exceptions are at San Miguel Island,
where rates of decline at some long-term
study sites have been atypically slow,
and at one location each on Santa Cruz
and San Nicolas islands. At Santa Cruz
Island, a recruitment event in 2004 at
Willows Anchorage produced an
increase in local densities that persisted
at least until this writing. At San
Nicolas Island, black abalone numbers
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
1994
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
at study site 8 (as described by
VanBlaricom, 1993) have increased and
experienced recruitment each year since
reaching a low point in 2001 due to
withering syndrome, except for a small
decline between surveys in 2006 and
2007. The pattern at this site can be
plausibly interpreted as a possible result
of genetically-based disease resistance
on a local scale. These observations are
exceptions that suggest the potential for
resilience and recovery in populations
reduced dramatically by withering
syndrome. However, Tissot’s (2007)
litany of negative impacts of withering
syndrome in multiple locations across
the entire range of the species, coupled
with evidence of increasing geographic
scope of impact, argues to the contrary.
The preponderance of evidence
indicates that withering syndrome
continues to damage the size and
sustainability of black abalone
populations on a large scale, with little
plausible basis for any predictions of
reversal.
Prior to the appearance of withering
syndrome there was little evidence of
significant diseases in black abalone
(Haaker et al., 1992). There is now
substantial concern among scientists
and marine resource managers about the
emergence of virulent diseases in
marine organisms on a global scale, in
association with ocean warming in
recent decades (e.g., Harvell et al., 1999;
Harvell et al., 2002). Recent surveys of
the literature suggest that the frequency
of reporting of new diseases has
increased for several major marine taxa,
including mollusks (e.g., Ward and
Lafferty, 2004). The appearance of
withering syndrome is consistent with
the reported pattern. As described
above, mortality rates associated with
withering syndrome often correlate to
positive anomalies in sea surface
temperature. Nevertheless, there is no
explicitly documented causal link
between the existence of withering
syndrome and global climate change.
We conclude that withering syndrome
has been and continues to be the
primary threat contributing to the
decline of black abalone. The disease
has caused mass mortality and near
extirpation of populations throughout
most of the species’ range, and the
disease continues to spread to
populations in Monterey County and to
the north. The rate at which the disease
is spreading northward will likely be
exacerbated by suboptimal (i.e., warmer)
water temperatures that may result due
to a variety of factors.
Abalone face non-anthropogenic
predatory pressure from a number of
consumer species such as gastropods,
octopuses, lobsters, sea stars, fishes and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
sea otters (Ault, 1985; Estes and
VanBlaricom, 1985; Shepherd and
Breen, 1992). At San Nicolas Island,
VanBlaricom (unpublished
observations) has observed directed
predation on black abalone in rocky
intertidal habitats by the ochre star
Pisaster ochraceus [Brandt, 1835]), the
octopus Octopus bimaculatus (Verrill,
1883), a large cottid fish, the cabezon
(Scorpaenichthys marmoratus Girard,
1854), and a shorebird, the black
oystercatcher Haematopus bachmani
Audubon, 1838. In addition,
VanBlaricom (unpublished
observations) has observed ingestion of
small black abalone by three taxa
normally viewed as herbivores: the
lined shore crab Pachygrapsus crassipes
(Randall, 1839); the purple sea urchin
Strongylocentrotus purpuratus
(Stimpson, 1857); and the turban snails
Tegula spp.
Despite the large number of identified
predators on abalone, we are aware of
no studies that estimate mortality rates
of black abalone in association with the
predator species that have been
identified. While the effects of sea otter
predation on red abalone are well
documented, there are few data
available to evaluate relationships of sea
otters with other species of abalone in
California. Given that black abalone
overlap in habitat use, size
distributions, and ecological attributes
with red abalone is limited, the
relationship between sea otters and
black abalone is uncertain. Sea otters are
known to feed on black abalone, but the
quantitative ecological strength of the
interaction has not been directly
investigated and remains poorly known.
Black abalone have been exposed to
varying predation pressure through
time, and this pressure is likely to
continue. However, in the past, black
abalone populations were much more
robust and able to absorb losses due to
predation without compromising
viability. Now that the few remaining
populations are smaller, more isolated,
and still declining throughout the range,
predation may pose risk to the future
survival of the species. In addition, nonanthropogenic predation could limit the
effectiveness of future recovery efforts
by interacting with other limiting
factors.
Inadequate Regulatory Mechanisms
There is evidence suggesting that
aquaculture operations have provided a
pathway for the spread of withering
syndrome, and, unless the industry is
carefully regulated in the future, may
continue to do so. Past State and Federal
regulations were not adequate to
prevent the spread of the disease within
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and outside the United States through
importation of infected animals from
one aquaculture facility to another and
outplanting of infected animals from
aquaculture facilities to the wild. It is
through the latter pathway that abalone
rickettsia may have been introduced to
two healthy populations of black
abalone north of San Francisco
(Friedman and Finley, 2003), placing
those populations at higher risk of
extinction.
Recent state regulations to carefully
monitor the health of abalone at
aquaculture facilities and control the
importation/exportation of abalone
between facilities will likely reduce the
threat that the aquaculture industry
poses in the future. Currently, the state
monitors aquaculture facilities for
introduced organisms and disease on a
regular basis. There is also a restriction
on out-planting of abalone from
facilities which have not met
certification standards. If new state
regulations to carefully monitor
aquaculture facilities are effective, the
future threat that they pose to black
abalone will be limited. In fact,
aquaculture may emerge as being an
important, and possibly the only
effective recovery tool, for restoring
black abalone populations through
captive propagation and enhancement
efforts.
Purposeful illegal harvest, typically
termed poaching, has been a source of
mortality for black abalone throughout
their range since the establishment of
harvesting regulations by the State of
California. The chronic virtual absence
of black abalone populations from
highly accessible intertidal habitats near
human population centers in California
during the twentieth century can
plausibly be viewed as evidence for the
importance of poaching as a source of
abalone mortality.
Since the closure of the California
black abalone fishery in 1993, a number
of black abalone poaching cases along
the California mainland coast,
particularly in the northern portion of
the black abalone’s geographic range,
have been documented by the California
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG)
from 1993–2003 (Taniguchi,
unpublished data). Some of these cases
resulted in well-publicized arrests and
trials of black abalone poachers. These
events often involved removals of tens
to hundreds of abalone, across all size
categories present in the exploited
populations, and without regard to
harvest size limits in effect prior to
commercial and recreational fishery
closures. Enforcement effort has varied
over the 10–year time period (1993–
2003), increasing in 2000 because of
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
coordinated efforts between CDFG
marine and coastal regions and planned
overflights along the Central California
coast during low tides. CDFG wardens
approximate that 80 percent of seized
abalone were returned alive to the wild,
but these animals were not monitored
for long-term survival, and thus, these
data are of limited use for calculating
poaching-induced mortality estimates.
The problem of poaching persists, and
there is no evidence that existing
regulatory mechanisms have effectively
reduced the risks posed by illegal take.
Inadequate regulatory mechanisms are
likely to have contributed to the decline
of black abalone and pose a serious
threat to the ability of the species to
recover.
Other Natural or Man-made Factors
Environmental pollutants and toxins
are likely present in areas where black
abalone have occurred and still do
occur, but evidence suggesting causal
and/or indirect negative effects on black
abalone due to exposure to pollutants or
toxins is lacking. Before a causal link
between the bacteria that causes
withering syndrome and mass
mortalities of black abalone was
established, efforts were made to link
mass mortalities to pollutant
concentrations (Gardner et al., 1995);
however, no link could be identified.
There is one instance of abalone
mortality associated with a pollution
event, described by Martin et al. (1977).
Toxic levels of copper in the cooling
water effluent of the Diablo Canyon
nuclear power plant were associated
with abalone mortalities in a nearshore
cove that received significant effluent
flows. Growth and reproduction of black
abalone were reported to have been
impaired on the Palos Verdes Peninsula
(Los Angeles County, California) in the
late 1950s and early 1960s, in
association with apparent combined
effects of a significant El Nino event and
poor water quality resulting from largevolume domestic sewage discharge by
Los Angeles County (Leighton, 1959;
Cox, 1962; Young, 1964; Miller and
Lawrenz-Miller, 1993). There is ongoing
concern that accidentally spilled oil
from offshore drilling platforms or
various types of commercial vessels
could occur near shore in California and
could affect a significant proportion of
black abalone habitat; however, at this
time we are uncertain how such an
event would impact the species’ overall
status. The overall risk that
environmental pollutants and toxins
have posed is probably low, given their
limited geographic scope and uncertain
effects on black abalone; however, a
single event in the future, depending on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
where it occurs, could irreparably
damage the few remaining viable
populations of black abalone.
SRT Assessment of Overall Extinction
Risk
The SRT’s analysis of overall risk to
black abalone used categories that
correspond to definitions in the ESA: in
danger of extinction; likely to become
endangered in the foreseeable future; or
neither. The overall extinction risk
assessment reflected informed
professional judgment by each SRT
member. This assessment was guided by
integrating information about
demographic risks, a consideration of
the interactions among these risks,
population projections over the next 30
years (i.e., time span approximating the
average black abalone life span and a
reasonable horizon for projecting
current conditions into the future), as
well as threats and other factors
affecting black abalone.
The SRT concluded unanimously that
black abalone is in danger of extinction
throughout all of its range. The spread
of withering syndrome poses imminent
and significant risk to the species and
exacerbates the high levels of
demographic risk to which black
abalone are subject, including extremely
low local densities, low levels of growth
and productivity, limited spatial
structure and connectivity, and loss of
genetic diversity. In addition, the SRT
estimated that there is approximately a
96–percent probability that black
abalone will suffer functional extinction
within the next 30 years.
Consideration of ‘‘Significant Portion of
Its Range’’
Because we conclude that black
abalone is in danger of extinction
throughout all of its range, it is not
necessary for us to consider the question
of whether black abalone is at risk
throughout a significant portion of its
range.
Efforts Being Made to Protect the
Species
Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the ESA requires
the Secretary of Commerce to make
listing determinations solely on the
basis of the best scientific and
commercial data available after taking
into account efforts being made to
protect a species. Therefore, in making
a listing determination, we first assess a
species’ level of extinction risk and
identify factors that have led to its
decline. We then assess existing efforts
being made to protect the species to
determine if those measures ameliorate
the risks.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1995
In judging the efficacy of existing
protective efforts, we rely on the joint
NMFS-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) ‘‘Policy for Evaluation of
Conservation Efforts When Making
Listing Decisions’’ (‘‘PECE;’’ 68 FR
15100; March 28, 2003). PECE provides
direction for the consideration of
protective efforts identified in
conservation agreements, conservation
plans, management plans, or similar
documents (developed by Federal
agencies, state and local governments,
Tribal governments, businesses,
organizations, and individuals) that
have not yet been implemented, or have
been implemented but have not yet
demonstrated effectiveness. The policy
articulates several criteria for evaluating
the certainty of implementation and
effectiveness of protective efforts to aid
in determining whether a species
should be listed as threatened or
endangered. Evaluations of the certainty
an effort will be implemented include
whether: the necessary resources (e.g.,
funding and staffing) are available; the
requisite agreements have been
formalized such that the necessary
authority and regulatory mechanisms
are in place; there is a schedule for
completion and evaluation of the stated
objectives; and (for voluntary efforts) the
necessary incentives are in place to
ensure adequate participation. The
evaluation of the certainty of an effort’s
effectiveness is made on the basis of
whether the effort or plan: establishes
specific conservation objectives;
identifies the necessary steps to reduce
threats or factors for decline; includes
quantifiable performance measures for
the monitoring of compliance and
effectiveness; incorporates the
principles of adaptive management; and
is likely to improve the species’ viability
at the time of the listing determination.
PECE also notes several important
caveats. Satisfaction of the above
mentioned criteria for implementation
and effectiveness establishes a given
protective effort as a candidate for
consideration, but does not mean that
an effort will ultimately change the risk
assessment. The policy stresses that just
as listing determinations must be based
on the viability of the species at the time
of review, so they must be based on the
state of protective efforts at the time of
the listing determination. PECE does not
provide explicit guidance on how
protective efforts affecting only a
portion of a species’ range may affect a
listing determination, other than to say
that such efforts will be evaluated in the
context of other efforts being made and
the species’ overall viability. There are
circumstances where threats are so
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1996
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
imminent, widespread, and/or complex
that it may be impossible for any
agreement or plan to include sufficient
efforts to result in a determination that
listing is not warranted.
Conservation measures that may
apply to listed species include
conservation measures implemented by
tribes, states, foreign nations, local
governments, and private organizations.
Also, Federal, tribal, state, and foreign
nations’ recovery actions (16 U.S.C.
1533(f)), Federal consultation
requirements (16 U.S.C. 1536), and
prohibitions on taking (16 U.S.C. 1538)
constitute conservation measures. In
addition, recognition through Federal or
state listing promotes public awareness
and conservation actions by Federal,
state, tribal governments, foreign
nations, private organizations, and
individuals.
As evaluated pursuant to PECE, the
protective efforts described below do
not as yet, individually or collectively,
provide sufficient certainty of
implementation and effectiveness to
counter the extinction risk assessment
conclusion that the species is in danger
of extinction throughout its range.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
National Marine Fisheries ServiceSpecies of Concern Program
Black abalone was added to NMFS’
Candidate Species list on June 23, 1999
(64 FR 33466). The NMFS’ Candidate
Species List was revised and redefined
and the NMFS’ Species of Concern List
was created on April 15, 2004 (69 FR
19975). Species of Concern are those
species about which we have some
concerns regarding status and threats,
but for which insufficient information is
available to indicate a need to list the
species under the ESA. On October 17,
2006 (71 FR 61021), we formally
announced initiation of a black abalone
status review and at that time the
species became a Candidate Species.
Candidate Species are those petitioned
species that are actively being
considered for listing as endangered or
threatened under the ESA, as well as
those species for which we have
initiated an ESA status review that has
been announced in the Federal Register.
Neither ‘‘Candidate Species’’ nor
‘‘Species of Concern’’ designations carry
any procedural or substantive
protections under the ESA, and thus, no
federal measures that provide protection
for black abalone are currently in place.
National Marine Sanctuaries Program
Three coastal national marine
sanctuaries in California contain
intertidal habitat suitable for black
abalone: Channel Islands National
Marine Sanctuary (CINMS), Monterey
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
Bay National Marine Sanctuary
(MBNMS), and Gulf of the Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary (GFNMS).
These sanctuary sites, administered by
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, are protected by federal
regulations pursuant to the National
Marine Sanctuaries Act of 1972 as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.). The
regulations, which are similar at all
three sites, provide protection against
some of the threats to black abalone. At
all three sanctuaries, the inshore
boundary extends to the mean high
water line, thus encompassing intertidal
habitat.
Direct disturbance to or development
of black abalone intertidal habitat is
regulated at all three national marine
sanctuaries by way of a prohibition on
the alteration of, construction upon,
drilling into, or dredging of the seabed
(including the intertidal zone), with
exceptions for anchoring, installing
navigation aids, special dredge disposal
sites (MBNMS only), harbor-related
maintenance, and bottom tending
fishing gear in areas not otherwise
restricted.
Water quality impacts to black
abalone habitat are regulated by strict
discharge regulations at all three
national marine sanctuaries. Essentially,
regulations provide that no discharge or
deposit of pollutants is allowed within
these sanctuaries, except for effluents
required for normal boating operations
(e.g., vessel cooling waters, effluents
from marine sanitation devices, fish
wastes and bait).
Although these national marine
sanctuaries do not regulate the take of
black abalone, networks of marine
reserves and marine conservation areas
have been established by the CDFG
within the CINMS and along portions of
the MBNMS. Within these areas,
especially within CINMS where the
protected areas have been in place since
2003 and are within the Channel Islands
National Park, multi-agency patrols
provide elevated levels of enforcement
presence and increase protection against
poaching of black abalone.
Full texts of the current CINMS,
MBNMS and GFNMS regulations
discussed above can be found at 15
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), parts
922.71, 922.132, and 922.91,
respectively. However, all of these
sanctuary sites are currently undergoing
management plan review processes,
which include reviews of and updates
to the regulations. Although the
regulations may be modified, the level
of protection provided to black abalone
is not expected to decrease from that
described above, and possibly may
increase should proposed prohibitions
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
be adopted for the release of introduced
species, and should stricter regulations
be adopted regarding large vessel
discharges.
In summary, while the Sanctuary
regulations provide protection against
some of the threats to black abalone and
this level of protection may increase if
new management plans are adopted,
these regulations are unlikely to stop the
progression of withering syndrome in
the near future. At best, they may help
slow down the rate at which the disease
is progressing.
State/Local Programs
The depleted condition of abalone
resources prompted the California Fish
and Game Commission to eventually
close all abalone fisheries south of San
Francisco by 1997, beginning with the
black abalone fishery in 1993. The
southern abalone fishery was closed
indefinitely with the passage of the
Thompson bill (AB 663) in 1997. This
bill created a moratorium on taking,
possessing, or landing abalone for
commercial or recreational purposes in
ocean waters south of San Francisco,
including all offshore islands. The
Thompson bill also mandated the
creation of an Abalone Recovery and
Management Plan (ARMP) which was
finalized in December 2005. The bill
further required the Fish and Game
Commission to undertake abalone
management in a manner consistent
with the ARMP.
The CDFG’s ARMP provides a
cohesive framework for the recovery of
depleted abalone populations in
southern California, and for the
management of the northern California
fishery and future fisheries. All of
California’s abalone species are
included in this plan: red, green, pink,
white (Haliotis sorenseni Bartsch, 1940),
pinto (H. kamtschatkana Jonas, 1845,
including H.k. assimilis), black, and flat
abalone (H. walallensis Stearns, 1899).
The plan also refers to a state
aquaculture facility monitoring program
that aims to ensure that aquaculture
facilities in California will not facilitate
transmission of disease and/or invasive/
exotic species within or outside the
State.
Abalone in California vary in status
from populations bordering on
extinction (white abalone) to a
sustainable population with a margin of
harvestable animals that is still being
fished (northern California red abalone).
Recovery of at-risk abalone species and
management of abalone fisheries are
separate but continuous and
complementary processes in the ARMP.
The recovery portion of the plan
addresses all abalone species that are
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
subject to the fishing moratorium. The
management portion of the plan applies
to populations considered sustainable
and fishable, such as the current
northern California red abalone fishery.
The ultimate goal of recovery is to move
species from a perilous condition to a
sustainable one with a margin of
abalone available for fishing. The
ultimate goal of management is to
maintain sustainable fisheries under a
long-term management plan that can be
adapted quickly to respond to
environmental or population changes.
The ARMP provides a mechanism for
helping to slow the progression of
disease and invasive/exotic species
through better monitoring of
aquaculture facilities, however, this
effort may only make a relatively small
difference to the threat that disease
poses given that spread of withering
syndrome is due largely to factors other
than aquaculture operations. The ARMP
also provides a framework for restoring
black abalone populations through
translocation and captive propagation
and enhancement programs; however,
detailed plans and methodologies have
neither been drafted nor tested and
therefore their effectiveness for
conserving black abalone remains
uncertain.
International Programs
The World Conservation Union
(IUCN) publishes a Red List of species
that are at high risk of extinction and,
when data are sufficient, categorizes
species as either Extinct (EX), Extinct in
the Wild (EW), Critically Endangered
(CR), Endangered (EN), Vulnerable (VU),
Near Threatened (NT), or of Least
Concern (LC) (IUCN, 2001). In 2003 the
IUCN, based on an assessment by Smith
et al. (2003), placed black abalone on
the Red List as Critically Endangered
under criterion A4e. Under criterion A4,
a species may be classified as Critically
Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable
when its population size, measured over
the longer of 10 years or three
generations, has declined greater than or
equal to 80, 50, or 30 percent
respectively, due to an ‘‘observed,
estimated, inferred, projected or
suspected population reduction (up to a
maximum of 100 years) where the time
period must include both the past and
the future, and where the causes of
reduction may not have ceased or may
not be understood or may not be
reversible, based on direct observation,
an index of abundance appropriate to
the taxon, a decline in area of
occupancy, extent of occurrence and/or
quality of habitat, actual or potential
levels of exploitation, or the effects of
introduced taxa, hybridization,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
pathogens, pollutants, competitors or
parasites’’ (IUCN, 2006, p. 10). Inclusion
on the IUCN Red List does not
necessarily convey any regulatory
protection for black abalone.
Proposed Determinations
Section 4(b)(1) of the ESA requires
that the listing determination be based
solely on the best scientific and
commercial data available, after
conducting a review of the status of the
species and after taking into account
those efforts, if any, being made by any
state or foreign nation to protect and
conserve the species. We have reviewed
the petition, the draft status report, and
other available published and
unpublished information, and have
consulted with species experts and
other individuals familiar with black
abalone. On the basis of the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we conclude that black
abalone is presently in danger of
extinction throughout all of its range
and should be added to the list of
federally endangered species. The major
risks that black abalone face include: (1)
the spread of a disease called withering
syndrome; (2) low adult densities below
the critical threshold density required
for successful spawning and
recruitment; (3) suboptimal water
temperatures that have accelerated the
spread of withering syndrome; (4)
reduced genetic diversity that will
render extant populations less capable
of dealing with both long- and shortterm environmental or anthropogenic
challenges; and (5) illegal harvest of
black abalone. The principal threat to
black abalone is withering syndrome,
which has caused mass mortality and
near extirpation of populations in the
recent past and threatens extant
populations. The spread of withering
syndrome threatens the species with a
very high probability (96 percent) of
extinction within the next 30 years. This
threat is unlikely to be ameliorated by
current conservation efforts.
Service Policies on Endangered and
Threatened Fish and Wildlife
On July 1, 1994, NMFS and FWS
published a series of policies regarding
listings under the ESA, including a
policy for peer review of scientific data
(59 FR 34270) and a policy to identify,
to the maximum extent possible, those
activities that would or would not
constitute a violation of section 9 of the
ESA (59 FR 34272).
Role of Peer Review
The intent of the 1994 peer review
policy is to ensure that listings are based
on the best scientific and commercial
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1997
data available. Prior to a final listing, we
will solicit the expert opinions of at
least three qualified specialists,
concurrent with the public comment
period. Independent specialists will be
selected from the academic and
scientific community, Federal and state
agencies, and the private sector.
In December 2004, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) issued
a Final Information Quality Bulletin for
Peer Review establishing minimum peer
review standards, a transparent process
for public disclosure of peer review
planning, and opportunities for public
participation. The OMB Bulletin,
implemented under the Information
Quality Act (Public Law 106–554), is
intended to enhance the quality and
credibility of the Federal Government’s
scientific information, and applies to
influential or highly influential
scientific information disseminated on
or after June 16, 2005. To satisfy our
requirements under the OMB Bulletin,
we are obtaining independent peer
review of the draft status review report,
which supports this proposal to list
black abalone as endangered; all peer
reviewer comments will be addressed
prior to dissemination of the final report
and publication of the final rule.
Identification of Activities That Would
Constitute a Violation of Section 9 of the
ESA
The intent of the policy requiring us
to identify, to the maximum extent
practicable at the time a species is
listed, those activities that would or
would not constitute a violation of
section 9 of the ESA, is to increase
public awareness of the effect of listings
on proposed and ongoing activities
within the species’ range.
Section 9 of the ESA prohibits certain
activities (e.g., importation, exportation,
take, sale, and delivery) that directly or
indirectly affect endangered species.
These prohibitions apply to all
individuals, organizations, and agencies
subject to U.S. jurisdiction. Section
7(a)(2) of the ESA requires Federal
agencies to consult with NMFS to
ensure that activities they authorize,
fund, or carry out are not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of a
listed species or to destroy or adversely
modify critical habitat. Under Section
7(a)(4), Federal agencies must confer
with us on any of these activities to
ensure that any such activity is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of a species proposed for
listing or destroy or adversely modify
proposed critical habitat. Examples of
Federal actions that may affect black
abalone include permits and
authorizations relating to coastal
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1998
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
development and habitat alteration, oil
and gas development, military
operations, coastal power plant
operations, toxic waste and other
pollutant discharges, and aquaculture
operations. Sections 10(a)(1)(A) and (B)
of the ESA authorize NMFS to grant
exceptions to the ESA’s Section 9 take
prohibitions. Section 10(a)(1)(A)
scientific research and enhancement
permits may be issued to entities
(Federal and non-federal) for scientific
purposes or to enhance the propagation
or survival of a listed species. Activities
potentially requiring a section
10(a)(1)(A) research/enhancement
permit if black abalone are listed
include scientific research that targets
black abalone. Under section 10(a)(1)(B),
the Secretary may permit takings
otherwise prohibited by section
9(a)(1)(B) if such taking is incidental to,
and not the purpose of, the carrying out
of an otherwise lawful activity,
provided that the requirements of
section 10(a)(2) are met.
Critical Habitat
Critical habitat is defined in section 3
of the ESA as: (i) the specific areas
within the geographical area occupied
by the species, at the time it is listed in
accordance with the ESA, on which are
found those physical or biological
features (I) essential to the conservation
of the species and (II) which may
require special management
considerations or protection; and (ii)
specific areas outside the geographical
area occupied by the species at the time
it is listed upon a determination that
such areas are essential for the
conservation of the species (16 U.S.C.
1532(5)(A)). ‘‘Conservation’’ means the
use of all methods and procedures
needed to bring the species to the point
at which listing under the ESA is no
longer necessary (16 U.S.C. 1532(3)).
Section 4(a)(3)(A) of the ESA requires
that, to the maximum extent prudent
and determinable, critical habitat be
designated concurrently with the listing
of a species (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)(3)(A)(i)).
Designations of critical habitat must be
based on the best scientific data
available and must take into
consideration the economic, national
security, and other relevant impacts of
specifying any particular area as critical
habitat. Once critical habitat is
designated, section 7 of the ESA
requires Federal agencies to ensure that
they do not fund, authorize or carry out
any actions that are likely to destroy or
adversely modify that habitat. This
requirement is in addition to the section
7 requirement that Federal agencies
ensure that their actions do not
jeopardize the continued existence of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
listed species. We are currently
considering a proposal to designate
critical habitat for black abalone, but at
this time a designation is not
determinable because: (1) we currently
lack information sufficient to perform
required analyses of the impacts of the
designation; and (2) the biological needs
of the species are not sufficiently well
known to permit identification of an
area as critical habitat. Thus, we are
seeking public input to assist in
gathering and analyzing the best
available scientific data and other
information to support a critical habitat
designation, which will be proposed in
a subsequent Federal Register notice.
We will continue to meet with comanagers and other stakeholders to
review this information and the overall
designation process.
Joint NMFS/FWS regulations for
listing endangered and threatened
species and designating critical habitat
at section 50 CFR 424.12(b) state that
the agency ‘‘shall consider those
physical and biological features that are
essential to the conservation of a given
species and that may require special
management considerations or
protection’’ (hereafter also referred to as
‘‘essential features’’). Pursuant to the
regulations, such requirements include,
but are not limited to the following: (1)
space for individual and population
growth, and for normal behavior; (2)
food, water, air, light, minerals, or other
nutritional or physiological
requirements; (3) cover or shelter; (4)
sites for breeding, reproduction, rearing
of offspring, germination, or seed
dispersal; and generally; (5) habitats that
are protected from disturbance or are
representative of the historic
geographical and ecological
distributions of a species. These
regulations emphasize that the agency
shall focus on essential features within
the specific areas considered for
designation. These features ‘‘may
include, but are not limited to, the
following: spawning sites, feeding sites,
seasonal wetland or dryland, water
quality or quantity, geological
formation, vegetation type, tide, and
specific soil types.’’
Public Comments Solicited
We have exercised our best
professional judgment in developing
this proposal to list black abalone. To
ensure that the final action resulting
from this proposal will be as accurate
and effective as possible, we are
soliciting comments and suggestions
from the public, other governmental
agencies, the scientific community,
industry, and any other interested
parties (See DATES and ADDRESSES).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Specifically, we are interested in
information regarding: (1) status of black
abalone populations in the northern part
of the range (north of Monterey County)
and in Baja California, Mexico; (2)
current or planned activities within the
range of black abalone and their
possible impact on the species; and (3)
efforts being made to protect black
abalone.
We are also requesting quantitative
evaluations describing the quality and
extent of marine habitats for juvenile
and adult black abalone as well as
information on areas that may qualify as
critical habitat for black abalone in
California. Areas that include the
physical and biological features
essential to the recovery of the species
should be identified. We recognize that
there are areas within the proposed
boundaries of black abalone that
historically contained black abalone
habitat, but may not be currently
occupied by black abalone. For areas
potentially qualifying as critical habitat,
we are requesting information
describing: (1) the activities that affect
the area or could be affected by the
designation; and (2) the economic costs
and benefits of additional requirements
or management measures likely to result
from the designation. The economic cost
to be considered in the critical habitat
designation under the ESA is the
probable economic impact ‘‘of the
[critical habitat] designation upon
proposed or ongoing activities’’ (50 CFR
424.19). Economic effects attributable to
listing include actions resulting from
section 7 consultations under the ESA
to avoid jeopardy to the species and
from the take prohibitions under section
9 of the ESA. Where possible, comments
concerning economic impacts should
distinguish the costs of listing from the
incremental costs that can be directly
attributed to the designation of specific
areas as critical habitat.
We will review all public comments
and any additional information
regarding the status of, and critical
habitat for, black abalone in developing
a final listing determination and a
proposed critical habitat designation.
Public Hearings
If requested by the public by February
25, 2008, hearings will be held in
several locations within the range of
black abalone. If hearings are requested,
details regarding locations, dates, and
times will be published in a
forthcoming Federal Register notice.
References
A complete list of all references cited
herein is available upon request (see
ADDRESSES section).
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1999
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Classification
National Environmental Policy Act
The 1982 amendments to the ESA, in
section 4(b)(1)(A), restrict the
information that may be considered
when assessing species for listing. Based
on this limitation of criteria for a listing
decision and the opinion in Pacific
Legal Foundation v. Andrus, 675 F. 2d
825 (6th Cir. 1981), NMFS has
concluded that ESA listing actions are
not subject to the environmental
assessment requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). (See
NOAA Administrative Order 216-6.)
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Flexibility Act and Paperwork
Reduction Act
As noted in the Conference Report on
the 1982 amendments to the ESA,
economic impacts cannot be considered
when assessing the status of a species.
Therefore, the economic analysis
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act are not applicable to the
listing process. In addition, this
proposed rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866. This
proposed rule does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
for the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
Federalism
In keeping with the intent of the
Administration and Congress to provide
continuing and meaningful dialogue on
issues of mutual state and Federal
interest, this proposed rule will be given
to the relevant state agencies in each
state in which the species is believed to
occur, who will be invited to comment.
NMFS has conferred with the State of
California in the course of assessing the
status of black abalone and considered,
among other things, Federal, state and
local conservation measures. As the
process continues, we intend to
continue engaging in informal and
formal contacts with the States, and
other affected local or regional entities,
giving careful consideration to all
written and oral comments received.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 224
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Transportation.
Species1
Scientific name
Black abalone
Haliotis
cracherodii.
White abalone
Haliotis
sorenseni.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 224 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 224—ENDANGERED MARINE
AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES
1. The authority citation of part 224
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531–1543 and 16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
2. In § 224.101, paragraph (d) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 224.101 Enumeration of endangered
marine and anadromous species.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Marine invertebrates. The
following table lists the common and
scientific names of endangered species,
the locations where they are listed, and
the citations for the listings and critical
habitat designations.
Citation (s) for Listing Determinations
Where Listed
Common name
Dated: January 4, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
USA, CA. From Crescent City,
California, USA to Cape San
Lucas, Baja California, Mexico,
including all offshore islands..
USA, CA. From Point
Conception, California to Punta
Abreojos, Baja California,
Mexico including all offshore
islands and banks..
[FR CITATION WHEN
PUBLISHED AS A FINAL
RULE].
N/A.
NOAA 2001; 66 FR 29054,
May, 29, 2001..
Deemed not
prudent NOAA
2001; 66 FR
29054, May, 29,
2001..
[FR Doc. E8–335 Filed 1–10–08; 8:45 am]
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Citations (s) for
Critical Habitat
Designations
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 8 (Friday, January 11, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1986-1999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-335]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 224
[Docket No. 071128765-7769-01]
RIN 0648-AW32
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed
Endangered Status for Black Abalone
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, NMFS, have completed a review of the status of black
abalone (Haliotis cracherodii) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
After reviewing the best scientific and commercial information
available, evaluating threats facing the species, and considering
efforts being made to protect black abalone, we have concluded that the
species is in danger of extinction throughout all of its range and are
proposing to list the species as endangered under the ESA. This
proposal is based on information indicating that: the disease known as
withering syndrome has spread to areas throughout the range of the
species, has been responsible for the local extirpation of populations
throughout a large part of the species' range, and threatens remaining
black abalone populations; low adult densities below the critical
threshold density required for successful fertilization exist
throughout a large part of the species' range; and, a number of
interacting factors (e.g., suboptimal water temperatures, reduced
genetic diversity, and illegal harvest) may further hamper natural
recovery of the species. A critical habitat designation is being
considered and may be proposed in a subsequent Federal Register notice.
If the proposed listing is finalized, a recovery plan will be prepared
and implemented.
DATES: Comments on this proposal must be received by April 10, 2008.
Public hearing (s) will be held promptly if any person so requests by
February 25, 2008. Notice of the location (s) and time(s) of any such
hearing(s) will be published in the Federal Register not less than 15
days before the hearing(s) is(are) held.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by [RIN 0648-AW32], by
any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov.
Facsimile (fax): 562-980-4027, Attn: Melissa Neuman.
Mail: Submit written comments to Chief, Protected
Resources Division, Southwest Region, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802-4213.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
We will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
A draft black abalone status review report and other reference
materials regarding this determination can be obtained via the Internet
at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov. The draft status review report and list
of references are also available by submitting a request to the
Assistant Regional Administrator, Protected Resources Division,
Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802-4213.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Neuman, NMFS, Southwest Region
(562) 980-4115; or Lisa Manning, NMFS, Office of Protected Resources
(301) 713-1401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Black abalone was added to the National Marine Fisheries Service's
(NMFS') Candidate Species list on June 23, 1999 (64 FR 33466) and
remained on this list after NMFS redefined the term ``candidate
species'' on April 15, 2004 (69 FR 19975). We initiated an informal ESA
status review of black abalone on July 15, 2003, and formally announced
initiation of a status review on October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61021), at the
same time soliciting information from the public. On December 27, 2006,
we received a petition from the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD)
to list black abalone as either an endangered or threatened species
under the ESA and to designate critical habitat for the species
concurrently with any listing determination. We published a 90-day
[[Page 1987]]
finding on April 13, 2007 (72 FR 18616), stating that the CBD petition
presented substantial scientific and commercial information indicating
that the petitioned actions may be warranted.
In June 2007, we assembled a Status Review Team (SRT) to review the
available information, assess the extinction risk and threats facing
the species, and produce an ESA status review report for black abalone.
The draft status review report (VanBlaricom et al., 2007) (hereafter
``status report'') provides a thorough account of black abalone biology
and natural history, and assesses demographic risks, threats and
limiting factors, and overall extinction risk. The key background
information and findings of the draft status report are summarized
below.
Taxonomy and Species Description
Abalone, members of the gastropod genus Haliotis, are marine
gastropods that occur throughout most of the world (Cox, 1962). There
are approximately 60 species (Geiger, 1999) found in temperate to
tropical waters from the intertidal zone (i.e., the area of the
foreshore and seabed that is exposed to the air at low tide and
submerged at high tide) to depths of over 50 m. All are benthic,
occurring on hard substrate, relatively sedentary, and generally
herbivorous, feeding on attached or drifting algal material. There are
seven species of abalone native to the west coast of North America
(Geiger, 1999).
The taxonomic classification of black abalone is as follows:
Phylum Mollusca, Class Gastropoda, Subclass Prosobranchia, Order
Archaeogastropoda, Superfamily Pluerotomariacea, Family Haliotidae,
Genus Haliotis, Species cracherodii. Leach (1814) gave the first formal
description of this shallow-living abalone (upper intertidal zone to
subtidal depths of 6 m), describing the shell as smooth, circular, and
black to slate blue in color. There are five to nine open respiratory
pores that are flush with the shell's surface. Typically, the shell's
interior is white (Haaker et al., 1986), with a poorly defined or no
muscle scar (Howorth, 1978). Adults attain a maximum shell length of
approximately 20 cm (throughout this document we use the maximum
diameter of the elliptical shell as the index for individual body
size). The muscular foot of the black abalone allows the animal to
clamp tightly to rocky surfaces without being dislodged by wave action.
Locomotion is accomplished by an undulating motion of the foot. A
column of shell muscle attaches the body to the shell. The mantle and
black epipodium, a sensory structure and extension of the foot which
bears lobed tentacles of the same color (Cox, 1960), circle the foot
and extend beyond the shell of a healthy black abalone. The internal
organs are arranged around the foot and under the shell.
Historical and Current Distribution
There is some debate regarding the northern extent of the historic
range of black abalone. Many have cited the historic range as extending
from Coos Bay, Oregon, USA to Cabo San Lucas, Southern Baja California,
Mexico (Geiger, 2000). However, the northernmost documented record of
black abalone (based on museum specimens) is from Crescent City (Del
Norte County, California, USA; Geiger, 2004). Most experts agree that
the current range of black abalone extends from Point Arena (Mendocino
County, California, USA) south to Northern Baja California, Mexico.
Black abalone may exist, but are considered extremely rare, north of
San Francisco (Morris et al., 1980) to Crescent City, California, USA
and south of Punta Eugenia to Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico
(P. Raimondi, pers. comm.). Within this broad geographic range, black
abalone generally inhabit coastal and offshore island intertidal
habitats on exposed rocky shores where bedrock provides deep,
protective crevice shelter (Leighton, 2005).
Population Structure
Recent studies have evaluated population structure in black abalone
(Hamm and Burton, 2000; Chambers et al., 2006; Gruenthal, 2007) using
various methods. These studies indicate: (1) minimal gene flow among
populations; (2) black abalone populations are composed predominantly
of closely related individuals produced by local spawning events; (3)
gene flow among island populations is relatively greater than between
island and mainland populations; and (4) the overall connectivity among
black abalone populations is low and likely reflects limited larval
dispersal, and a low degree of exchange among populations.
Habitat
Black abalone occur over a broad latitudinal range, though the
range appears to have narrowed somewhat from historic times. This broad
range, in addition to their small-scale distribution (high intertidal
to 6 m depth), is associated with an evolved capability to withstand
extreme variation in environmental conditions such as temperature,
salinity, moisture, and wave action.
Black abalone occur on a variety of rock types, including igneous,
metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks at a number of locations. Complex
surfaces with cracks and crevices in upper and middle intertidal zones
may be crucial recruitment habitat and appear to be important for adult
survival as well (Leighton, 1959; Leighton and Boolootian, 1963;
Douros, 1985, 1987; Miller and Lawrenz-Miller, 1993; VanBlaricom et
al., 1993; Haaker et al., 1995). Complex configurations of rock
surfaces likely afford protection from predators, direct impacts of
breaking waves, wave-born projectiles, and excessive solar heating
during daytime low tides.
Movement
Planktonic larval abalone movement is almost certainly determined
primarily by patterns of water movement in nearshore habitats near
spawning sites. Individual larvae may be able to influence movement to
some degree by adjusting vertical position in the water column, but to
our knowledge the ability of black abalone larvae to move in this way
has not been documented. Movement behavior of post-metamorphic juvenile
black abalone is likewise unknown. Leighton (1959) and Leighton and
Boolootian (1963) indicate that black abalone larvae may settle and
metamorphose in the upper intertidal zone, using crevices and
depressions (including those formed by abrasive action of other
intertidal mollusks) as habitat. Leighton and Boolootian (1963) suggest
that young black abalone move lower in the intertidal zone as they
begin to grow, occupying the undersides of large boulders. To our
knowledge there is no published information on direct observations of
movement behavior of small ( <20 mm) juvenile black abalone in the
field. Qualitative (Leighton, 2005; VanBlaricom, unpublished
observations) and quantitative (Bergen, 1971; Blecha et al., 1992;
VanBlaricom and Ashworth, in preparation; Richards, unpublished
observations) studies of movement in black abalone suggest that smaller
abalone (<65 mm) move more frequently than larger abalone, movement is
more frequent during night hours compared to daylight hours, and that
larger abalone may remain in the same location for many years.
Diet
Larvae are lecithotrophic (i.e., receive nourishment via an egg
yolk) and apparently do not feed while in the plankton. From the time
of post-larval metamorphosis to a size of about 20 mm, black abalone
are highly cryptic,
[[Page 1988]]
occurring primarily on the undersides of large boulders or in deep
narrow crevices in solid rocky substrata. In such locations the primary
food sources are thought to be microbial and possibly diatom films
(Leighton, 1959; Leighton and Boolootian, 1963; Bergen, 1971). At
roughly 20 mm black abalone move to more open locations, albeit still
relatively cryptic, gaining access to both attached macrophytes and to
pieces of drift plants cast into the intertidal zone by waves and
currents. As black abalone continue to grow, the most commonly observed
feeding method is entrapment of drift plant fragments. Webber and Giese
(1969), Bergen (1971), Hines and Pearse (1982), and Douros (1987) have
confirmed the importance of large kelps in the diet of juvenile and
adult black abalone. The primary food species are said to be
Macrocystis pyrifera and Egregia menziesii in southern California
(i.e., south of Pt. Conception) habitats, and Nereocystis leutkeana in
central and northern California habitats.
Reproduction
Black abalone have separate sexes and are ``broadcast'' spawners.
Gametes from both parents are shed into the sea, and fertilization is
entirely external. Resulting larvae are minute and defenseless, receive
no parental care or protection of any kind, and are subject to a broad
array of physical and biological sources of mortality. Species with a
broadcast-spawning reproductive strategy are subject to strong
selection for maximum fecundity of both sexes. Only through production
of large numbers of gametes can broadcast spawners overcome high
mortality of gametes and larvae and survive across generations. It is
not uncommon for broadcast-spawning marine species, a group including
many taxa of fish and invertebrates, to produce millions of eggs or
sperm per individual per year. Broadcast spawners are also subject to
other kinds of selection for certain traits associated with
reproduction, including spatial and temporal synchrony in spawning and
mechanisms that increase probabilities for union of spawned gametes.
Spawning Density
As intertidal organisms on exposed rocky shores, black abalone
typically release gametes into environments of extreme turbulence. As a
consequence, eggs and sperm must be released from adults in relatively
close spatial and temporal proximity in order to have any chance of
union and fertilization before rapid dispersal and loss of opportunity.
A central problem for conservation of black abalone is the dramatic
reduction in densities over the past quarter-century in almost the
entire geographic range of the species. Reductions in density are so
extreme and widespread that considerable attention is now focused on
assessment of critical density thresholds for successful reproduction,
recruitment, and population sustainability. A review of critical
density thresholds, below which recruitment failure occurs, for other
marine, broadcast-spawning invertebrates (i.e., sea urchins, sea
cucumbers, hard clams, scallops, giant clams, and geoduck clams) has
revealed that critical density thresholds exist across a broad
taxonomic range. However, despite apparent risks of local extinction
when populations decline below critical density thresholds, there are
several cases where combinations of circumstances allow populations to
recover to densities above the critical thresholds. Thus, for black
abalone the key conservation issues are identification of critical
density thresholds and an understanding of circumstances, if any, that
may allow escape from high risks of local extinction when thresholds
are breached.
Babcock and Keesing (1999) estimated critical density thresholds at
0.15-0.20 m-2 for greenlip abalone (Haliotis laevigata). Tissot (2007)
reviewed recruitment patterns in three long-term data sets for black
abalone in California: in each case, recruitment failed when declining
population densities fell below 0.75-1.1 m-2. Tissot (2007) noted that
densities in most black abalone populations south of Cayucos,
California, have fallen below the densities noted. Recent evidence
suggests that disease-induced increases in the mortality rate of black
abalone continue to move northward along the mainland coast of
California (e.g., Raimondi et al., 2002; Miner et al., 2006). Thus,
critical density thresholds are thought to have been violated for most
of the black abalone populations in California, and because of the
spread of the disease known as withering syndrome (as explained below),
the number and geographic scope of populations with densities falling
below sustainable levels is expected to increase.
Larval Settlement
A sequence of studies and discoveries by Morse and colleagues
(Morse et al., 1979; Morse and Morse, 1984; Trapido-Rosenthal and
Morse, 1986; Morse, 1990; Morse, 1992), Douros (1985), and Miner et al.
(2006) suggest that availability of crustose coralline algae in
appropriate intertidal habitats may be significant to the success of
the larval recruitment process in black abalone; and, that the presence
of adult black abalone may facilitate larval settlement and
metamorphosis because the activities and presence of the abalone favor
the maintenance of substantial substratum cover by crustose coralline
algae. Although crustose coralline algae are ubiquitous in rocky
benthic habitats along the west coast of North America, a mechanistic
understanding of processes that sustain these algal populations has not
been established to our knowledge. If the presence of black abalone
facilitates the abundance of crustose coralline algae, it follows that
the issue of critical density thresholds may take on added importance.
Larval Dispersal and Recruitment
Indirect methods for assessing larval dispersal in abalone (Tegner
and Butler, 1985; Prince et al., 1988; Hamm and Burton, 2000; Chambers
et al., 2005; Chambers et al., 2006; Gruenthal, 2007) point to
consistent results. Given that most abalone larvae are drifting in the
water for a period of about 3-10 days before settlement and
metamorphosis (e.g., McShane, 1992), abalone in general, including
black abalone, have limited capacity for dispersal over distances
beyond a few kilometers, and are able to do so only rarely.
Tissot (2007) has estimated empirically that successful recruitment
of black abalone requires the presence of local adult populations at
densities of 0.75-1.1 m-2 or greater, and that the number of
known populations of adult black abalone at or above putative threshold
densities is diminishing over time in a geographically progressive
manner. Tissot (2007) further noted that virtually all monitored black
abalone populations continue to decrease in mean density over time.
This combination of observations emphasizes the importance of critical
density thresholds in the sustainability and conservation of black
abalone populations throughout their range. Patterns of aggregation may
mitigate effects of decline below a critical density threshold
(VanBlaricom, unpublished data). However, only one or two populations
in California that have sustained mass mortality due to withering
syndrome are known to be increasing in numbers. Thus, even if an
ability for black abalone to aggregate exists, it may not be sufficient
to facilitate successful recruitment and population sustainability
under current environmental conditions.
[[Page 1989]]
Growth and Maximum Size
Available data on black abalone growth suggest that young animals
reach maximum shell diameters of about 2 cm in their first year, then
grow at rates of 1-2 cm per year for the next several years. Growth
begins to slow at lengths of about 10 cm, corresponding to an age range
of 4-8 yrs. Beyond this point, growth is less predictable, shell
erosion may become a significant factor, and size distributions for
older animals may vary according to local conditions. Growth and
erosion of shells may come into equilibrium in older black abalone,
such that growth can be viewed as facultatively determinant.
Maximum recorded shell length for black abalone was listed at 213
mm by Wagner and Abbott (1990). Ault (1985) reported a maximum shell
length of black abalone at 215 mm. Leighton (2005) indicated a shell
length of 216 mm reported by Owen (unpublished observation). At least
two black abalone of approximately 220 mm maximum shell length were
known to be alive at San Nicolas Island in January 2007 (VanBlaricom,
Neuman, and Witting, unpublished observations), but the cryptic
locations of the animals have made measurements awkward and possibly
not accurate. Monitoring and measurement of these individuals will
continue in association with ongoing population surveys.
Mortality
Mortality rates caused by withering syndrome appear to be sensitive
to fluctuations in local sea surface temperatures (Friedman et al.,
1997; Raimondi et al., 2002; Harley and Rogers-Bennett, 2004; Vilchis
et al., 2005). There is evidence that, in the short term, population-
scale mortality rates vary in space and time from near zero to high
proportions of local populations. The available evidence suggests that
mortality rates driven by withering syndrome are highest during periods
following elevations in sea surface temperature (e.g., Raimondi et al.,
2002). Over the long term, all available evidence indicates substantial
increases in mortality rates, and consequent reductions in densities,
in populations throughout the range of black abalone that have been
afflicted by withering syndrome (e.g., Tissot, 2007). More detail
regarding the severe risk that withering syndrome poses to the future
survival of the species is presented below (see Summary of Factors
Affecting the Species and Population Modeling: Geographic Spread of
Disease vs. Disease Resistance).
Physical oceanographic conditions, predation by octopuses,
lobsters, sea stars, fishes, sea otters, and shorebirds, competition
with sea urchins, and food limitation may all impose mortality at
varying rates depending on black abalone life stage. The draft status
report (VanBlaricom et al., 2007) provides additional qualitative
information regarding the relative importance of these sources of
mortality. The importance of anthropogenic mortality (i.e., commercial
and recreational harvest, illegal harvest, incidental losses,
pollution) is also discussed in the draft status report and in other
sections of this proposed rule (see Summary of Factors Affecting the
Species).
Abundance
There are two types of data that can be examined to provide a
better understanding of variation in black abalone abundance over time:
fishery-dependent and fishery-independent data. Based on a detailed
examination of these two data types, Tissot (2007) evaluated trends in
black abalone abundance over the last 3 decades.
Fishery-dependent Information
An intertidal fishery focused on red (Haliotis rufescens Swainson,
1822), green (Haliotis fulgens Philippi, 1845), and black abalone began
in the 1850s in Central California and in the 1880s in Baja California,
Mexico (Bonnot, 1930; Lundy, 1997). The fishery peaked at 1,860 mt in
1879 (Cox, 1962). By 1913, the intertidal fishery was closed because of
concerns regarding overfishing (Bonnot, 1930). From 1913-1928,
commercial and recreational dive fisheries developed, but black abalone
were not documented prior to 1940. During the 18\th\ and 19\th\
centuries, two predatory forces on black abalone populations in
Southern California had been removed. First, the Native American
Chumash and Gabrielino/Tongva cultures of the southern California
Islands, who were known to have harvested black abalones in large
numbers for food over periods of five to ten millennia, and fur hunters
responsible for the elimination of southern sea otter populations south
of Point Conception by the time of the U.S. Civil War. There is
uncertainty regarding the ecological importance of sea otter predation
on black abalone, but the potential for strong interactions is
substantial given known effects of sea otter predation on red abalone
(for more detailed information on the effects of sea otter predation
see Summary of Factors Affecting the Species below).
California Department of Fish and Game landings data (1940-1993)
indicate that black abalone were intensively exploited only after other
more marketable species had been largely depleted. Black abalone
landings peaked in 1973 at 868 mt. During the peak decade of black
abalone fishing from 1972-1981, Rogers-Bennett et al. (2002) estimate
that approximately 3.5 million individuals were taken in the commercial
fishery, and an additional 6,729 animals were taken in the recreational
fishery. By 1993 both fisheries for black abalone were closed due to
concerns regarding severe population declines (Haaker et al., 1992).
Rogers-Bennett et al. (2002) estimated baseline abundance, prior to
overfishing and mass mortalities due to withering syndrome (for more
detailed information on withering syndrome see Summary of Factors
Affecting the Species below), for black abalone using landings data
from the peak of the commercial and recreational fisheries (1972-1981),
assuming that the population was at least as large as the number taken
in the fishery, that the fishery ``sampled'' all size classes, and that
no new individuals were added to the population during the 10-year peak
of the fishery. With these assumptions, the baseline minimum estimate
of abundance for black abalone prior to overexploitation and withering
syndrome was 3.54 million animals. This estimate provides a historic
perspective on patterns in abundance, defines a relevant baseline
abundance against which to compare modern day trends, and helps to
assess the species' current status and risks. However, it should be
noted that the estimate was calculated using data from a period of time
when black abalone reached extraordinary abundance levels on the
Channel Islands, possibly in response to the elimination of subsistence
harvests by indigenous peoples, limited public access in modern times,
and regional-scale extinctions of sea otters.
The abalone fishery in Mexico dates to approximately 1860, but
modern commercial harvests did not develop until the 1940s. The fishery
is pursued by 22 fishing cooperatives, distributed across 4 management
zones on the Pacific coast of the Baja California peninsula. Five
cooperatives are present in management zone 1, which is the
northernmost of the zones and extends from the U.S.-Mexico border to
Punta Malarrimo, Baja California Sur.
Reported commercial fishery data for black abalone during 1990-2003
comes entirely from management zone 1. During this time period, the
commercial
[[Page 1990]]
catch of black abalone in Mexico declined from a high of 28 mt in 1990
to <0.5 mt in 2003, an overall decline of greater than 98 percent (J.
Palleiro, unpublished data; Sierra-Rodriguez et al., 2006). These data
suggest similar fishery declines to those in California. The decline in
Mexico is attributed primarily to large mortality events associated
with withering syndrome, rather than to overfishing.
Fishery-independent Information
The earliest fishery-independent black abalone abundance estimates
were generated beginning in 1975 at survey stations on the Palos Verdes
Peninsula of Los Angeles County, California (Miller and Lawrenz-Miller,
1993). Black abalone densities ranged from 1.0 to 6.8 m-2
from 1975-1976, but declined during the remainder of the survey
interval to less than 0.3 m-2 by 1987. Douros (1987)
reported densities as great as 127 m-2 in certain surge channels at
Santa Cruz Island in 1983-1984, but typical densities within a study
site ranged from 30 to 90 m-2. Other field studies during the 1980s on
Santa Cruz Island yielded black abalone densities of 0 to 50
m-2 (Haaker et al., 1992). Tissot (1995), also studying
black abalone populations on Santa Cruz Island, found averages of 43 to
58 m-2 for surf-exposed and protected subpopulations,
respectively, in 1987. These densities declined over the next 6 years
due to withering syndrome, dropping to less than 1 m-2 by
1993. As of this writing, only one site on Santa Cruz Island (Willows
Anchorage) has experienced an increase in local density since 1993.
Several studies monitoring black abalone abundance at other Channel
Islands found similar declines through the late 1980s and early 1990s.
From 1985 to 1989, mean densities for black abalone populations on
Anacapa, Santa Rosa, Santa Barbara, and San Miguel islands were
obtained annually along permanent transects established by the Channel
Islands National Park (Richards and Davis, 1993). Densities ranged from
20 to 50 m-2 on early visits, but fell to <10 m-2
by 1989 for all islands except for San Miguel due to mass mortalities
associated with withering syndrome. By 1996, local densities fell to
1.0 m-2 or less on San Miguel Island.
At San Nicolas Island, densities of black abalones averaged >10
m-2 at nine monitored sites from 1981 to the early 1990s.
Withering syndrome was first seen at San Nicolas Island in spring 1992
(VanBlaricom et al., 1993), and densities declined during the middle
1990s to <1 abalone m-2 at all sights except one
(VanBlaricom, unpublished data. The highest local density of black
abalone recorded among the several studies of island populations in the
1980s was 296 individuals, primarily adults, in a single quadrat of 1
m\2\ at San Nicolas Island on November 23, 1988, at site 7
(VanBlaricom, 1993; unpublished data).
In recent years, three fishery-independent surveys for black
abalone have been conducted along the mainland coast and offshore
islands of Baja California, Mexico. In 2002, a survey for black abalone
was done at Bahia Tortugas, just south of Punta Eugenia and located at
the north end of management zone 2. Only four individuals were found,
ranging in maximum shell diameter from 121 to 152 mm (Sierra Rodriguez
et al., 2006). A second survey was conducted in 2004. Black abalone
were found at low densities where they occurred, with 98 percent of
located animals measuring <120 cm in maximum shell diameter. No animals
were found with symptoms of withering syndrome during the 2004 survey.
Black abalone were found along the mainland coast of management zone 1,
and on Isla Guadalupe and Isla San Jeronimo. The only black abalone
found in Baja California Sur were at Bahia Tortugas (Sierra-Rodriguez
et al., 2006).
The third study was conducted in 2005 in regions of upwelling on
rocky intertidal benches along the northern Baja California coast from
Costa Azul to Punta Baja (Raimondi, unpublished data). Twelve sites,
suspected to have been affected by withering syndrome, were surveyed
for suitable habitat (rocky crevices) in the mid to low intertidal
zone, and then timed searches were conducted for black abalone. Black
abalone were not densely aggregated at any site surveyed in this study;
however, a large proportion of the individuals found were small (<50
mm). This evidence of recent recruitment in northern Baja California is
promising given that there is no evidence of successful recruitment to
mainland California sites affected by withering syndrome (south of Pt.
Piedras Blancas in northern San Luis Obispo County). Raimondi
(unpublished data) hypothesized that the discrepancy between the
patterns of recruitment in the two regions may be because: (1) healthy
populations exist somewhere in Mexico (perhaps on offshore islands),
and these are seeding northern areas; or (2) recruitment dynamics are
different for withering syndrome-impacted sites in Mexico versus those
in California. Fresh shells, in some cases containing flesh, were found
at three of the twelve sites, suggesting that withering syndrome may
still be impacting areas of Northern Baja California. Large numbers of
older shells were identified at a few sites, suggesting that black
abalone were abundant in these areas in the past.
Consideration as a ``Species'' Under the ESA
The ESA defines a species as ``any species or subspecies of
wildlife or plants, or any distinct population segment of any species
of vertebrate fish or wildlife which interbreeds when mature.'' Black
abalone is a marine invertebrate and is not a subspecies; therefore, it
may not be subdivided into a listable unit below the taxonomic species
level.
Status of Black Abalone
Black abalone have experienced major declines in abundance that
prompted eventual closure of the commercial and recreational fisheries
and resulted in local extinctions and low local densities in the
majority of long-term monitoring studies in California. These declines
have been particularly severe in the southern California Islands, which
were major foci for the commercial fishery from 1970-1993 and where
abalone densities were high (>40 m-2) as late as the mid-
1980s. Although the geographic range of black abalone extends to
northern California, the vast majority of abalone populations have
historically occurred south of Monterey, particularly in the Channel
Islands (Cox, 1960; Karpov et al., 2000). Thus, black abalone
populations have been severely reduced over an area that covers more
than half of the species' geographic range, and black abalone from
these areas historically comprised greater than 90 percent of the
commercial fishery catch and the majority of the adult black abalone
populations in California.
Both the commercial fishery trends and long-term monitoring studies
indicate that significant declines in black abalone abundance began in
southern California in the mid-1980s. The first evidence of decline
came from Palos Verdes in the late 1970s and early 1980s and at Laguna
Beach in 1985-1986 (Tissot, 1988). However, in the case of Palos
Verdes, the decline may have been due to other factors (Miller and
Lawrenz-Miller, 1993). By 1986, declining populations and associated
observations of withering syndrome had spread to the northern Channel
Islands, starting at Anacapa, progressing to Santa Rosa, Santa Cruz,
and Santa Barbara islands, and finally reaching San Miguel Island in
1989 (Tissot, 1991; Davis et al., 1992; Tissot, 1995). By the early
1990s, declines were observed on San Nicolas Island (VanBlaricom et
al., 1993) and
[[Page 1991]]
north of Point Conception on the mainland to Government Point, Santa
Barbara County (Altstatt et al., 1996). During the 1990s, declines in
abundance were noted north of Government Point to Cayucos in San Luis
Obispo County (Altstatt et al., 1996; Raimondi et al., 2002). Noted
declines were also observed in central Baja California, Mexico, around
Bahia Tortugas during El Nino events in the late 1980s and 1990s
(Altstatt et al., 1996; Pedro Sierra-Rodriquez, personal communication)
and may be linked to declines in the fishery that occurred in the
1990s. Thus, the spread of withering syndrome is strongly associated
with declines in abundance and with a pattern of increased northward
expansion co-occurring with increasing coastal warming and El Nino
events (Tissot, 1995; Altstatt et al., 1996; Raimondi et al., 2002).
To our knowledge there are no data available on black abalone
populations north of San Mateo County on the mainland coast of
California. As a consequence, we lack information on the remaining
stocks of black abalone not influenced by withering syndrome. The two
northernmost sites have either not been studied since 1995 (Ano Nuevo;
Tissot, 1995) or have only been recently established in large,
dispersed areas (Pigeon Point; Raimondi and Miner, pers. comm.).
Establishment of long-term monitoring studies in northern California
(e.g., in San Francisco County and north of the Golden Gate) would
serve an important need in documenting northward progression of
withering syndrome and mass mortality in the northern limit of the
geographic range of black abalone.
Natural recovery of severely reduced abalone populations can be a
very slow process (e.g., Tegner, 1992). This is largely due to the low
reproductive efficiency of widely dispersed adult populations coupled
with short larval dispersal distances (see Reproduction and Spawning
Density above). Therefore, severely reduced populations, in addition to
providing few reproductive adults, also experience reduced
effectiveness of fertilization and eventual recruitment of larval
abalone.
Moreover, many studies have shown that abalone larvae generally do
not disperse widely. For example, Prince et al. (1988) and McShane
(1992) showed a strong correlation between the abundances of adult and
newly recruited abalone at several sites in South Australia, which
suggests that larvae are not dispersed very far from their point of
origin. Similarly, Tegner (1992) showed that recruitment of juvenile
green abalone was rare in Palos Verdes, California, where adult abalone
were very uncommon even though abundant adult stocks were found less
than 30 km away in the Channel Islands. Thus, although more abundant
black abalone populations occur in central and perhaps northern
California, decimated stocks in southern California are unlikely to
receive significant recruitment from these distant populations (Hamm
and Burton, 2000).
Studies indicate that a local adult density ``threshold'' exists
and influences local recruitment. Recovery will largely depend on the
density of local brood stocks and whether this density is below the
critical value necessary for successful recruitment (Tegner, 1992).
Based on field experiments, Babcock and Keesing (1999) showed that
recruitment failure occurred in greenlip abalone at adult densities of
0.15-0.20 m-2. Based on empirical data from three long-term
studies of black abalone in California, recruitment failure occurred
below adult densities of 0.75-1.10 m-2. Given that the
majority of populations south of Cayucos in central California are
below this threshold, many significantly so, it seems unlikely that
these populations will be able to recover naturally to their former
abundances, at least in the near future. Moreover, given the continued
decline of most populations and the continued northward expansion of
withering syndrome with warming events (Raimondi et al., 2002), it
seems likely that black abalone populations will continue to decline on
a large scale.
Assessment of Risk of Extinction
Analysis of Demographic Risk
The demographic risks that black abalone face were assessed by
considering four criteria (abundance, growth rate/productivity, spatial
structure/connectivity, and genetic and life history diversity) and
other key risks (e.g., threats). These criteria provide a strong
indication of the level of extinction risk faced by a species. A
species at very low levels of abundance and with few populations will
be less tolerant to environmental variation, catastrophic events,
genetic processes, demographic stochasticity, ecological interactions,
and other processes. Productivity or a growth rate that is unstable or
declining over a long period of time may reflect a variety of causes,
but indicates poor resiliency to future environmental variability or
change. For species at low levels of abundance, in particular,
declining or highly variable productivity confers a high level of
extinction risk. A species with a geographic spatial structure that is
not widely distributed across a variety of well-connected habitats will
have a diminished capacity for recolonizing locally extirpated
populations, and is at increased risk of extinction due to
environmental perturbations and catastrophic events. A species that has
lost locally adapted genetic and life-history diversity may lack the
raw resources necessary to endure short- and long-term environmental
changes.
The SRT concluded that black abalone face high levels of risk in
each of the four demographic criteria. The SRT unanimously scored the
species' abundance as high risk due to critically low population
abundance as indicated by local density levels. Severe declines in
abundance (greater than 90 percent) have occurred at the majority (76
percent) of long-term monitoring study sites, including all sites in
southern California (Tissot, 2007). The high risk to abundance is
attributable to population densities below the minimum threshold
density necessary for successful fertilization (0.75 - 1.1
m-2). Additionally, this factor contributes significantly to
long-term risk of extinction, and, coupled with low spatial
connectivity between populations (i.e., making recolonization unlikely)
and the ongoing activity and expansion of withering syndrome, is likely
to contribute to short-term risk of extinction in the foreseeable
future.
The majority of the SRT concluded that there is a very high risk of
black abalone extinction due to low growth and productivity. Population
growth is negative in all areas south of Cayucos, California, except
for two locations in the southern California Islands. Furthermore, all
sites south of Cayucos, but for the two isolated island locations, have
exhibited recruitment failure because of local densities below the
minimum threshold for successful fertilization. This high level of risk
due to poor growth rate and productivity, by itself, likely indicates a
high risk of extinction in the near future.
The majority of the SRT concluded that black abalone are at high to
very high risk because of compromised spatial structure and population
connectivity. Dispersion data among local populations indicates that
there is poor connectivity among populations. Such limited connectivity
reduces the likelihood that disease resistance to withering syndrome,
if it exists, will spread to other populations. Furthermore, the poor
connectivity among populations makes it unlikely that populations
extirpated by disease or catastrophic events will be recolonized in the
foreseeable future.
[[Page 1992]]
The SRT unanimously concluded that black abalone are at high
extinction risk because of low genetic diversity. Genetic diversity in
a population is determined by estimating the number of possible alleles
that may exist at gene loci. Genetic diversity provides a mechanism for
populations to adapt to their changing environment. Thus, the more
genetic variation in a population, the better the chance that at least
some individuals will have the capability to adapt to a new environment
and will be able to pass this capability on to subsequent generations.
Loss of genetic diversity in populations may occur because of factors
that cause a major reduction in abundance and/or isolate a subset of
individuals from the rest of the population. Genetic diversity has
likely declined in black abalone populations because of catastrophic
losses that the species has experienced throughout a large part of its
range. As a result, populations have become small and more isolated,
exacerbating the effects of naturally occurring low exchange rates
between populations because of limited larval dispersal. Overfishing
and disease have contributed to the loss of genetic diversity within
black abalone populations, and, as a result, the ability of extant
(i.e., currently existing) black abalone populations to exhibit
resilience in the face of other threats, such as other diseases, has
been compromised. Low genetic diversity, in combination with low
spatial connectivity between populations, suggests that even if some
genetic resiliency exists locally, it is not likely to spread and
establish itself in other extant populations.
Population Modeling: Geographic Spread of Disease vs. Disease
Resistance
VanBlaricom et al. (2007) calculated the probability of extinction
with time using a simple formula that accounts for the main threat that
black abalone faces, withering syndrome. The probability of extinction
is considered as a function of two parameters (R=the probability that
the northward spread of withering syndrome will cease very soon and
S=the probability that resistance will emerge very soon on a large
spatial scale in the host), using the logic that if withering syndrome
alone results in a high enough risk of extinction in a short time
(i.e., 30 years-the expected life span of black abalone), then that may
suffice to evaluate whether the species is in danger of extinction
currently or in the foreseeable future.
Assuming R and S are independent, the overall probability of
functional extinction (i.e., the reproductive potential of isolated
survivors is zero and no viable populations remain) in 30 years based
on the SRT members' best professional judgment was 95.7 percent. The
collective view of the SRT is that the risk is at a level where
functional extinction without active management has a very high
likelihood of occurring. This probability should not be interpreted as
a prediction of the demise of the last individual black abalone within
30 years.
Summary of Factors Affecting the Species
According to Section 4 of the ESA, the Secretary of Commerce
determines whether a species is threatened or endangered because of any
(or a combination) of the following factors: the present or threatened
destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range;
overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific or educational
purposes; disease or predation; inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; or other natural or man-made factors affecting its
continued existence. We examined these factors for their historic,
current, and/or potential impact on black abalone and considered them,
along with current species distribution and abundance, to help
determine the species' present vulnerability to extinction.
Present or Threatened Destruction, Modification, or Curtailment of its
Habitat or Range
Most of the threats that result in substrate destruction, such as
coastal development, recreational access, cable repairs, nearshore
military operations and benthic community shifts, occur infrequently,
have a narrow geographic scope, or have uncertain or indirect effects
on black abalone. Some exceptions may exist in the cases of
sedimentation and sea level rise in that these threats have the
potential to produce more widespread impacts, but the certainty that
these factors will affect black abalone is low. For example, sea level
rise may result in loss of suitable habitat in a preferred depth range
because of increased erosion, turbidity, and siltation, but we
currently lack information to determine whether these habitat changes
will be important factors for further decline.
Suboptimal water temperatures are likely to have contributed to the
decline of black abalone and pose a serious threat to the ability of
the species to persist because elevated water temperatures are
correlated with accelerated rates of withering syndrome transmission
and disease-induced mortality. Water temperatures can become elevated
because of anthropogenic sources of thermal effluent and long-and
short-term climate change (e.g., global climate change and El Nino -
Southern Oscillation). For example, discharge from the Diablo Canyon
nuclear power plant in San Luis Obispo County, California and recent El
Nino - Southern Oscillation oceanographic events in the Pacific Ocean
have produced short-term periods of ocean warming and are associated
with increased rates of mortality due to withering syndrome over
relatively small spatial scales. Although there is no explicitly
documented causal link between the existence of withering syndrome and
global climate change, patterns observed over the past 3 decades
suggest that progression of ocean warming associated with large-scale
climate change may facilitate further and more prolonged vulnerability
of black abalone to effects of withering syndrome.
Finally, we view the severity, geographic scope, and level of
certainty that black abalone are affected by reduced food quality and
quantity as being relatively low compared to other factors. Davis et
al. (1992) posited that a key consequence of kelp forest ecosystem
disruption, due to a variety of reasons such as El Nino events, was
reduced food supply for black abalone. Although reductions in kelp
abundance occurred in the early 1980s, subsequent studies (e.g.,
Friedman et al., 1997) have suggested that reduced food supply probably
did not trigger the mass mortalities caused by withering syndrome. Kelp
abundances had recovered from El Nino effects in southern California by
the time withering syndrome was first observed in 1985, and the
abundant black abalone populations at San Nicolas Island showed no
response in density to the 1982-1984 El Nino disturbances, despite
dramatic reductions in kelp abundance near the Island (VanBlaricom,
1993). Thus, this factor has likely not played an important role in the
overall decline of the species, and, unless new information surfaces,
this factor is not believed to pose a significant threat in the future.
Overutilization for Commercial, Recreational, Scientific or Educational
Purposes
Throughout most of the species' range, local densities are below
the critical threshold density required for successful spawning and
recruitment. This predicament has occurred because of mass mortalities
due to withering syndrome (see Disease or Predation below) and
overutilization for
[[Page 1993]]
commercial and recreational purposes (i.e., prior to the fishery
closure in 1993). Data from abalone fisheries in California and Baja
California, Mexico, indicate a decline in landings of at least 93
percent during the 1990s. These reductions, however, may not be
indicative of declines due only to fishing activities because mass
mortalities caused by withering syndrome had begun in many locations at
approximately the same time. Rogers-Bennett et al. (2002) estimate that
the California abalone fisheries may have contributed up to 99 percent
of the reduction in black abalone abundance in the United States (see
Abundance section above). Thus, the estimated take of 3.5 million black
abalone during commercial and recreational abalone fishing likely
contributed to the decline of local densities. This threat no longer
exists in California because the black abalone fisheries were closed in
1993. The limited information we have from Mexico makes it difficult to
ascertain the relative importance of fishing to overall species
decline.
Disease or Predation
Withering syndrome in black abalone is caused by a Rickettsia-like
prokaryotic organism, Candidatus Xenohaliotis californiensis' (Gardner
et al., 1995; Friedman et al., 1997; Friedman et al., 2000; Friedman et
al., 2002). Candidatus Xenohaliotis californiensis (hereafter ``abalone
rickettsia'') occurs in epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract.
Infected symptomatic animals are unable to transfer digested food
materials from the gut lumen into the epithelial cells and beyond,
resulting in malnutrition, dramatic loss of tissue mass, and eventual
death. Physiological manifestations of withering syndrome include
reduced food intake and oxygen consumption, and increased ammonia
excretion (Kismohandaka et al., 1993). The same pathogen is known to
cause symptoms of withering syndrome in red abalone, and mortality rate
is positively associated with water temperature in both red and black
abalone (Moore et al., 2000a, b; Vilchis et al., 2005). Andree et al.
(2000) have developed a rapid DNA-based test for the pathogen that
causes withering syndrome, allowing detection of infections prior to
onset of clinical symptoms in both black and red abalone. Moore et al.
(2001) have developed a histological method for rapid quantification of
the intensity of infections by the pathogen that causes withering
syndrome.
In wild animals symptomatic for withering syndrome, weakness
resulting from the disease may cause the individual to lose the
typically secure grip on the rocky substratum in response to wave
impacts, allowing attack by predators or scavengers before the
individual succumbs to the disease itself. Transfer of pathogens from
animal to animal is fecal to oral on a local scale, and is therefore
likely facilitated by aggregation of abalone in natural habitats.
Transmission pathways on large spatial scales are entirely unknown at
present. The pathogen for withering syndrome is now reported to be
endemic to all the coastal marine waters of central (Friedman and
Finley, 2003) and southern California (Moore et al., 2002) south of San
Francisco. Information from Isla de Cedros and Islas San Benito, Baja
California, Mexico, on pink (Haliotis corrugata Wood, 1828; termed
``yellow'' in Mexico) and green (termed ``blue'' in Mexico) abalone
indicated the presence of abalone symptomatic for withering syndrome,
and the presence of abalone rickettsia in tissue samples, for both
species (Tinajero et al., 2002). Recent data indicate the presence of
abalone rickettsia in farmed and wild green ormer (Haliotis
tuberculata) symptomatic for withering syndrome at a number of
locations in the coastal marine waters of western Europe (Balseiro et
al., 2006).
Evidence of effects of withering syndrome on black abalone was
first noticed along the south shore of Santa Cruz Island in 1985, when
a fisherman noticed a large number of dying black abalone and empty
shells (Lafferty and Kuris, 1993). The primary symptoms of disease
noted at the time included pedal atrophy and a diminished ability to
maintain a grip on rocky substrata. Haaker et al. (1992) and Richards
and Davis (1993) described the first observations of mass mortalities
of black abalone in previously monitored populations on the island
shores of Channel Islands National Park in 1986, and broadened the list
of recognized symptoms to include epipodial and mantle discoloration,
and lack of response to tactile stimulation. Haaker et al. (1992) were
the first authors to apply the term ``withering syndrome'' to the suite
of symptoms and consequent mass mortalities observed in the field.
Between 1985 and 1992, mass mortalities occurred at San Miguel, Santa
Rosa, Anacapa, Santa Barbara, and San Clemente Islands, in all cases
with symptoms indicating withering syndrome (Davis et al., 1992; Haaker
et al., 1992; Lafferty and Kuris, 1993; Richards and Davis, 1993).
Evidence of withering syndrome was first seen at San Nicolas Island in
spring 1992 (VanBlaricom et al., 1993) and was followed by widespread
mass mortalities at the Island in the middle 1990s (Tissot, 2007). The
delayed appearance of withering syndrome at San Nicolas Island, as
compared to the other southern California Islands, remains unexplained
but may have reflected patterns of dispersal by disease propagules. To
our knowledge, no effort has been made to assess effects of withering
syndrome at Santa Catalina Island, though the Island historically
supported black abalone populations.
The first reported occurrence of significant numbers of black
abalone with symptoms of withering syndrome on the California mainland
was in San Luis Obispo County in 1988 (Steinbeck et al., 1992).
Afflicted animals were found primarily within Diablo Cove, which
receives warmed effluent seawater from the cooling system of a nearby
nuclear power plant. A mass mortality of black abalone occurred at the
site between 1988 and 1989, with mortality rates correlating well to
local patterns of sea temperature elevation associated with power plant
effluent.
Since the mid-1990s withering syndrome has appeared sequentially in
progressively more northward populations of black abalone on the
mainland California coast (Altstatt et al., 1996; Raimondi et al.,
2002; Miner et al., 2006). The most recent observations available
suggest that significant mortalities of black abalone associated with
withering syndrome have occurred at least as far north as Pt. Piedras
Blancas in northern San Luis Obispo County near San Simeon. Surveys for
the microorganism responsible for withering syndrome have found
positive results as far north as San Francisco (Finley and Friedman,
2000; Friedman and Finley, 2003).
In the vast majority of cases where long-term monitoring data are
available, the appearance of animals symptomatic for withering syndrome
in a population lead inevitably to rapid and dramatic declines in
population size, most often in excess of 90 percent (Tissot, 2007). The
pattern has been documented for black abalone populations throughout
the range in California. Reports indicate similar trends for black
abalone populations in Mexico. As noted earlier, the exceptions are at
San Miguel Island, where rates of decline at some long-term study sites
have been atypically slow, and at one location each on Santa Cruz and
San Nicolas islands. At Santa Cruz Island, a recruitment event in 2004
at Willows Anchorage produced an increase in local densities that
persisted at least until this writing. At San Nicolas Island, black
abalone numbers
[[Page 1994]]
at study site 8 (as described by VanBlaricom, 1993) have increased and
experienced recruitment each year since reaching a low point in 2001
due to withering syndrome, except for a small decline between surveys
in 2006 and 2007. The pattern at this site can be plausibly interpreted
as a possible result of genetically-based disease resistance on a local
scale. These observations are exceptions that suggest the potential for
resilience and recovery in populations reduced dramatically by
withering syndrome. However, Tissot's (2007) litany of negative impacts
of withering syndrome in multiple locations across the entire range of
the species, coupled with evidence of increasing geographic scope of
impact, argues to the contrary. The preponderance of evidence indicates
that withering syndrome continues to damage the size and sustainability
of black abalone populations on a large scale, with little plausible
basis for any predictions of reversal.
Prior to the appearance of withering syndrome there was little
evidence of significant diseases in black abalone (Haaker et al.,
1992). There is now substantial concern among scientists and marine
resource managers about the emergence of virulent diseases in marine
organisms on a global scale, in association with ocean warming in
recent decades (e.g., Harvell et al., 1999; Harvell et al., 2002).
Recent surveys of the literature suggest that the frequency of
reporting of new diseases has increased for several major marine taxa,
including mollusks (e.g., Ward and Lafferty, 2004). The appearance of
withering syndrome is consistent with the reported pattern. As
described above, mortality rates associated with withering syndrome
often correlate to positive anomalies in sea surface temperature.
Nevertheless, there is no explicitly documented causal link between the
existence of withering syndrome and global climate change.
We conclude that withering syndrome has been and continues to be
the primary threat contributing to the decline of black abalone. The
disease has caused mass mortality and near extirpation of populations
throughout most of the species' range, and the disease continues to
spread to populations in Monterey County and to the north. The rate at
which the disease is spreading northward will likely be exacerbated by
suboptimal (i.e., warmer) water temperatures that may result due to a
variety of factors.
Abalone face non-anthropogenic predatory pressure from a number of
consumer species such as gastropods, octopuses, lobsters, sea stars,
fishes and sea otters (Ault, 1985; Estes and VanBlaricom, 1985;
Shepherd and Breen, 1992). At San Nicolas Island, VanBlaricom
(unpublished observations) has observed directed predation on black
abalone in rocky intertidal habitats by the ochre star Pisaster
ochraceus [Brandt, 1835]), the octopus Octopus bimaculatus (Verrill,
1883), a large cottid fish, the cabezon (Scorpaenichthys marmoratus
Girard, 1854), and a shorebird, the black oystercatcher Haematopus
bachmani Audubon, 1838. In addition, VanBlaricom (unpublished
observations) has observed ingestion of small black abalone by three
taxa normally viewed as herbivores: the lined shore crab Pachygrapsus
crassipes (Randall, 1839); the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus
purpuratus (Stimpson, 1857); and the turban snails Tegula spp.
Despite the large number of identified predators on abalone, we are
aware of no studies that estimate mortality rates of black abalone in
association with the predator species that have been identified. While
the effects of sea otter predation on red abalone are well documented,
there are few data available to evaluate relationships of sea otters
with other species of abalone in California. Given that black abalone
overlap in habitat use, size distributions, and ecological attributes
with red abalone is limited, the relationship between sea otters and
black abalone is uncertain. Sea otters are known to feed on black
abalone, but the quantitative ecological strength of the interaction
has not been directly investigated and remains poorly known.
Black abalone have been exposed to varying predation pressure
through time, and this pressure is likely to continue. However, in the
past, black abalone populations were much more robust and able to
absorb losses due to predation without compromising viability. Now that
the few remaining populations are smaller, more isolated, and still
declining throughout the range, predation may pose risk to the future
survival of the species. In addition, non-anthropogenic predation could
limit the effectiveness of future recovery efforts by interacting with
other limiting factors.
Inadequate Regulatory Mechanisms
There is evidence suggesting that aquaculture operations have
provided a pathway for the spread of withering syndrome, and, unless
the industry is carefully regulated in the future, may continue to do
so. Past State and Federal regulations were not adequate to prevent the
spread of the disease within and outside the United States through
importation of infected animals from one aquaculture facility to
another and outplanting of infected animals from aquaculture facilities
to the wild. It is through the latter pathway that abalone rickettsia
may have been introduced to two healthy populations of black abalone
north of San Francisco (Friedman and Finley, 2003), placing those
populations at higher risk of extinction.
Recent state regulations to carefully monitor the health of abalone
at aquaculture facilities and control the importation/exportation of
abalone between facilities will likely reduce the threat that the
aquaculture industry poses in the future. Currently, the state monitors
aquaculture facilities for introduced organisms and disease on a
regular basis. There is also a restriction on out-planting of abalone
from facilities which have not met certification standards. If new
state regulations to carefully monitor aquaculture facilities are
effective, the future threat that they pose to black abalone will be
limited. In fact, aquaculture may emerge as being an important, and
possibly the only effective recovery tool, for restoring black abalone
populations through captive propagation and enhancement efforts.
Purposeful illegal harvest, typically termed poaching, has been a
source of mortality for black abalone throughout their range since the
establishment of harvesting regulations by the State of California. The
chronic virtual absence of black abalone populations from highly
accessible intertidal habitats near human population centers in
California during the twentieth century can plausibly be viewed as
evidence for the importance of poaching as a source of abalone
mortality.
Since the closure of the California black abalone fishery in 1993,
a number of black abalone poaching cases along the California mainland
coast, particularly in the northern portion of the black abalone's
geographic range, have been documented by the California Department of
Fish and Game (CDFG) from 1993-2003 (Taniguchi, unpublished data). Some
of these cases resulted in well-publicized arrests and trials of black
abalone poachers. These events often involved removals of tens to
hundreds of abalone, across al