Nebraska Travel Management Rule Implementation Project; Nebraska National Forest, Nebraska and South Dakota, 2002-2003 [08-80]
Download as PDF
2002
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Notices
mineral water. The Committee is hosted
by Switzerland.
Issues To Be Discussed at the Public
Meeting
The following items will be discussed
during the public meeting:
• Matters Referred to the Committee
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission
and Other Codex Committees.
• Consideration of the Health-Related
Limits for Certain Substances in the
Codex Standard on Natural Mineral
Waters (CODEX STAN 108–1981).
• Substances listed as having
discrepancies that exist between the
Codex Standard and the WHO
Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality,
3rd edition (guideline values for
chemicals of health significance).
• Discrepancies between the Codex
Standards and WHO Guidelines exist
for
—Antimony
—Borate
—Copper
—Manganese
—Nitrite
—Mercury
—Nickel
Each item listed above will be fully
described in documents distributed, or
to be distributed, by the Swiss
Secretariat prior to the February 11–15,
2008 meeting in Lugano, Switzerland.
Members of the public may access
copies of these documents at https://
www.codexalimentarius.net/
current.asp.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Public Meeting
At the January 16, 2008, public
meeting, draft U.S. positions on the
agenda items will be described and
discussed, and attendees will have the
opportunity to pose questions and offer
comments. Written comments may be
offered at the meeting or sent to the
Acting U.S. Delegate for the 8th Session
of the CCNMW, Dr. Henry Kim, at
henry.kim@fda.hhs.gov. Written
comments should state that they relate
to activities of the 8th Session of the
CCNMW.
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of
rulemaking and policy development is
important. Consequently, in an effort to
ensure that minorities, women, and
persons with disabilities are aware of
this notice, FSIS will announce it online
through the FSIS Web page located at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations/
2008_Notices_Index/. FSIS will also
make copies of this Federal Register
publication available through the FSIS
Constituent Update, which is used to
provide information regarding FSIS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:33 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
policies, procedures, regulations,
Federal Register notices, FSIS public
meetings, and other types of information
that could affect or would be of interest
to constituents and stakeholders. The
Update is communicated via Listserv, a
free electronic mail subscription service
for industry, trade groups, consumer
interest groups, health professionals,
and other individuals who have asked
to be included. The Update is also
available on the FSIS Web page.
Through the Listserv and Web page,
FSIS is able to provide information to a
much broader and more diverse
audience. In addition, FSIS offers an
electronic mail subscription service
which provides automatic and
customized access to selected food
safety news and information. This
service is available at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/news_and_events/
email_subscription/. Options range from
recalls to export information to
regulations, directives and notices.
Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves, and have the
option to password protect their
accounts.
Done at Washington, DC, on January 7,
2008.
Paulo Almeida,
Acting U.S. Manager for Codex Alimentarius.
[FR Doc. E8–310 Filed 1–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Nebraska Travel Management Rule
Implementation Project; Nebraska
National Forest, Nebraska and South
Dakota
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice; Intent to Prepare
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The purpose of the Nebraska
Travel Management Rule
Implementation project is to implement
direction in the Travel Management;
Designated Routes and Areas for Motor
Vehicle Use; Final Rule, (36 CFR Parts
212, 251, 261, 295) commonly known as
the Travel Management Rule and
designate roads, trails, and areas open to
motor vehicle use.
The Forest Service will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) to
document the analysis and disclose the
environmental impacts of proposed land
management activities, and
corresponding alternatives, within the
Nebraska Travel Management Project
area. The Nebraska Travel Management
Rule Implementation project area is
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
located primarily on National Forest
System lands, administered by the
Nebraska National Forest in
northwestern Nebraska and
southwestern South Dakota.
DATES: Comments concerning the
proposed land management activities
should be received within 30 days
following publication of this notice to
receive timely consideration in the
preparation of the draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments
concerning the proposed land
management activities or requests to be
placed on the project mailing list to:
Mark Reichert, Project Leader;
Attention: Nebraska Travel Management
Project, ACT2 Enterprise Unit, 1312
Fairlane Road, Yreka, California 96097–
9549. You are welcome and encouraged
to submit electronic comments in
acceptable formats [plain text (.txt), rich
text (.rtf) or Word (.doc)] to:
mreichert@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Reichert, Project Leader, ACT2
Enterprise Unit, 1312 Fairlane Road,
Yreka, California 96097–9549, phone
(530) 841–4422, e-mail:
mreichert@fs.fed.us.
The
information presented in this notice is
included to help the reviewer determine
if they are interested in or potentially
affected by proposed land management
activities. Information presented in this
notice is summarized. Those who wish
to provide comments, or are otherwise
interested in or affected by the project,
are encouraged to obtain additional
information from the contact identified
in the previous section titles: FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Proposed Action—Proposed land
management activities (Proposed
Action) include the following, with
approximate mileage and acreage
values: (1) Designation of 552 miles of
motorized travel, which includes 514
miles of roads (303 miles for both
Highway Legal Vehicles (HLV) and OffHighway Legal Vehicles (OHV) use, and
211 miles for HLV use only) and 38
miles of trails for OHV use (2)
Designation of 5,441 acres of motorized
travel.
Project History—On November 2,
2005, the Forest Service announced the
Travel Management; Designated Routes
and Areas for Motor Vehicle Use; Final
Rule governing OHV and other motor
vehicle use on national forests and
grasslands. Commonly known as
National Travel Management Rule, it
directs all national forests and national
grasslands to allow wheeled motorized
vehicle travel only on designated roads,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 8 / Friday, January 11, 2008 / Notices
trails, and areas. This changes OHV
rules on national forests to a ‘‘closed
unless designated open’’ policy. In
January of 2008, the Nebraska Travel
Management Route Implementation
Project is being presented to the public
for comment (scoping) prior to
undertaking preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement.
Responsible Officials—Four District
Rangers of the Nebraska National Forest,
Patti Barney, for the Bessey District
Ranger, Michael McNeill, for the Fall
River District Ranger, Charlie Marsh, for
the Pine Ridge District Ranger, Kevin
Atchley, for the Wall District Ranger,
will serve in the capacity of responsible
officials throughout this process. These
Responsible Officials will be making
project-level decisions from the project.
Decision Space—Decision-making
will be limited to specific activities
relating to the Proposed Action. The
primary decision to be made will be
whether or not to implement the
Proposed Action or another alternative
that responds to the project’s purpose
and needs.
Preliminary Issues—Comments from
American Indian tribes, the public, and
other agencies will be considered in
identifying preliminary issues. Issues
raised in similar projects have included:
effects on hunting, recreation, and
conflicts between different user groups.
Public Participation—The Forest
Service is seeking comments from
Federal, State, and local agencies, as
well as local Native American tribes and
other individuals or organizations that
may be interested in or affected by the
Proposed Action. Comments received in
response to this notice will become a
matter of public record. While public
participation is welcome at any time,
comments on the Proposed Action
received within 30 days of this notice
will be especially useful in the
preparation of the draft EIS. Timely
comments will be used to identify:
Potential issues with the Proposed
Action, development of alternatives to
the Proposed Action that respond to
identified needs and significant issues,
and potential environmental effects of
the Proposed Action and alternatives
considered in detail. In addition, the
public is encouraged to contact and/or
visit Forest Service officials at any time
during the planning process.
Estimated Dates for Filing—The draft
EIS is expected to be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency and
available for public review in August
2008. A 45-day comment period will
follow publication of a Notice of
Availability of the draft EIS in the
Federal Register. Comments received on
the draft EIS will be used in preparation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:33 Jan 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
of the final EIS, expected in January
2009. Four different Record of Decisions
(RODs) will also be issued at that time,
one for each Ranger District, along with
publication of a Notice of Availability of
the final EIS and RODs in the Federal
Register.
Reviewer’s Obligations to Comment—
The Forest Service believes it is
important at this early stage to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of the draft EIS must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal in such a way
that is meaningful and alerts an agency
to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S.C. 519,
513 (1978). Also, environmental
objections that could be raised at the
draft EIS stage but are not raised until
after completion of the final EIS may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir, 1986), and Wisconsin
Heritages Inc. v. Harris, 490 F.Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis., 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this Proposed
Action participate by the close of the 45day comment period of the draft EIS in
order that comments and objections are
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final EIS. To
assist the Forest Service in identifying
and considering issues and concerns on
the Proposed Action, comments should
be as specific as possible. Reviewers
may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
these points.
Dated: December 18, 2007.
Don Bright,
Forest Supervisor, Nebraska National Forest,
125 North Main, Chadron, NE 69337.
[FR Doc. 08–80 Filed 1–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
Procurement List; Proposed Addition
and Deletions
Proposed Addition to and
Deletions from Procurement List.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing
to add to the Procurement List a service
to be furnished by nonprofit agencies
employing persons who are blind or
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2003
have other severe disabilities, and to
delete a product and services previously
furnished by such agencies.
Comments Must be Received on or
Before: February 10, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800,
1421 Jefferson Davis Highway,
Arlington, Virginia, 22202–3259.
For Further Information or to Submit
Comments Contact: Kimberly M. Zeich,
Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703)
603–0655, or e-mail
CMTEFedReg@jwod.gov.
This
notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C
47(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its purpose
is to provide interested persons an
opportunity to submit comments on the
proposed actions.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Addition
If the Committee approves the
proposed addition, the entities of the
Federal Government identified in this
notice for each service will be required
to procure the service listed below from
nonprofit agencies employing persons
who are blind or have other severe
disabilities.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
I certify that the following action will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The major factors considered for this
certification were:
1. If approved, the action will not
result in any additional reporting,
recordkeeping or other compliance
requirements for small entities other
than the small organizations that will
furnish the service to the Government.
2. If approved, the action will result
in authorizing small entities to furnish
the service to the Government.
3. There are no known regulatory
alternatives which would accomplish
the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in
connection with the service proposed
for addition to the Procurement List.
Comments on this certification are
invited. Commenters should identify the
statement(s) underlying the certification
on which they are providing additional
information.
End of Certification
The following service is proposed for
addition to Procurement List for
production by the nonprofit agencies
listed:
Service
Service Type/Location: Warehousing &
Distribution of the IRS Incentive
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 8 (Friday, January 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2002-2003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-80]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Nebraska Travel Management Rule Implementation Project; Nebraska
National Forest, Nebraska and South Dakota
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice; Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The purpose of the Nebraska Travel Management Rule
Implementation project is to implement direction in the Travel
Management; Designated Routes and Areas for Motor Vehicle Use; Final
Rule, (36 CFR Parts 212, 251, 261, 295) commonly known as the Travel
Management Rule and designate roads, trails, and areas open to motor
vehicle use.
The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact statement
(EIS) to document the analysis and disclose the environmental impacts
of proposed land management activities, and corresponding alternatives,
within the Nebraska Travel Management Project area. The Nebraska Travel
Management Rule Implementation project area is located primarily on
National Forest System lands, administered by the Nebraska National
Forest in northwestern Nebraska and southwestern South Dakota.
DATES: Comments concerning the proposed land management activities
should be received within 30 days following publication of this notice
to receive timely consideration in the preparation of the draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments concerning the proposed land
management activities or requests to be placed on the project mailing
list to: Mark Reichert, Project Leader; Attention: Nebraska Travel
Management Project, ACT2 Enterprise Unit, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka,
California 96097-9549. You are welcome and encouraged to submit
electronic comments in acceptable formats [plain text (.txt), rich text
(.rtf) or Word (.doc)] to: mreichert@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Reichert, Project Leader, ACT2
Enterprise Unit, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, California 96097-9549,
phone (530) 841-4422, e-mail: mreichert@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information presented in this notice is
included to help the reviewer determine if they are interested in or
potentially affected by proposed land management activities.
Information presented in this notice is summarized. Those who wish to
provide comments, or are otherwise interested in or affected by the
project, are encouraged to obtain additional information from the
contact identified in the previous section titles: FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Proposed Action--Proposed land management activities (Proposed
Action) include the following, with approximate mileage and acreage
values: (1) Designation of 552 miles of motorized travel, which
includes 514 miles of roads (303 miles for both Highway Legal Vehicles
(HLV) and Off-Highway Legal Vehicles (OHV) use, and 211 miles for HLV
use only) and 38 miles of trails for OHV use (2) Designation of 5,441
acres of motorized travel.
Project History--On November 2, 2005, the Forest Service announced
the Travel Management; Designated Routes and Areas for Motor Vehicle
Use; Final Rule governing OHV and other motor vehicle use on national
forests and grasslands. Commonly known as National Travel Management
Rule, it directs all national forests and national grasslands to allow
wheeled motorized vehicle travel only on designated roads,
[[Page 2003]]
trails, and areas. This changes OHV rules on national forests to a
``closed unless designated open'' policy. In January of 2008, the
Nebraska Travel Management Route Implementation Project is being
presented to the public for comment (scoping) prior to undertaking
preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement.
Responsible Officials--Four District Rangers of the Nebraska
National Forest, Patti Barney, for the Bessey District Ranger, Michael
McNeill, for the Fall River District Ranger, Charlie Marsh, for the
Pine Ridge District Ranger, Kevin Atchley, for the Wall District
Ranger, will serve in the capacity of responsible officials throughout
this process. These Responsible Officials will be making project-level
decisions from the project.
Decision Space--Decision-making will be limited to specific
activities relating to the Proposed Action. The primary decision to be
made will be whether or not to implement the Proposed Action or another
alternative that responds to the project's purpose and needs.
Preliminary Issues--Comments from American Indian tribes, the
public, and other agencies will be considered in identifying
preliminary issues. Issues raised in similar projects have included:
effects on hunting, recreation, and conflicts between different user
groups.
Public Participation--The Forest Service is seeking comments from
Federal, State, and local agencies, as well as local Native American
tribes and other individuals or organizations that may be interested in
or affected by the Proposed Action. Comments received in response to
this notice will become a matter of public record. While public
participation is welcome at any time, comments on the Proposed Action
received within 30 days of this notice will be especially useful in the
preparation of the draft EIS. Timely comments will be used to identify:
Potential issues with the Proposed Action, development of alternatives
to the Proposed Action that respond to identified needs and significant
issues, and potential environmental effects of the Proposed Action and
alternatives considered in detail. In addition, the public is
encouraged to contact and/or visit Forest Service officials at any time
during the planning process.
Estimated Dates for Filing--The draft EIS is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency and available for public
review in August 2008. A 45-day comment period will follow publication
of a Notice of Availability of the draft EIS in the Federal Register.
Comments received on the draft EIS will be used in preparation of the
final EIS, expected in January 2009. Four different Record of Decisions
(RODs) will also be issued at that time, one for each Ranger District,
along with publication of a Notice of Availability of the final EIS and
RODs in the Federal Register.
Reviewer's Obligations to Comment--The Forest Service believes it
is important at this early stage to give reviewers notice of several
court rulings related to public participation in the environmental
review process. First, reviewers of the draft EIS must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal in such a way
that is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S.C.
519, 513 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at
the draft EIS stage but are not raised until after completion of the
final EIS may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v.
Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir, 1986), and Wisconsin Heritages
Inc. v. Harris, 490 F.Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis., 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this
Proposed Action participate by the close of the 45-day comment period
of the draft EIS in order that comments and objections are available to
the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final EIS. To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and concerns on the Proposed Action,
comments should be as specific as possible. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Dated: December 18, 2007.
Don Bright,
Forest Supervisor, Nebraska National Forest, 125 North Main, Chadron,
NE 69337.
[FR Doc. 08-80 Filed 1-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M