Information Collection; Transfer of Farm Records Between Counties, 1316-1317 [E8-34]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
1316
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2008 / Notices
FY 2008 OVERALL BEET SUGAR AND CANE SUGAR ALLOTMENTS AND ALLOCATIONS
Initial FY 2008
allotments or
allocations
Distribution
Changes due to
reassignments
Adjusted initial
FY 2008
allotments or
allocations
Beet Sugar .......................................................................................................................
Cane Sugar ......................................................................................................................
Reassignment to Imports .................................................................................................
4,592,575
3,857,425
0
0
¥70,000
70,000
4,592,575
3,787,425
70,000
Total OAQ .................................................................................................................
Beet Processors’ Marketing Allocations:
Amalgamated Sugar Co ...........................................................................................
American Crystal Sugar Co ......................................................................................
Michigan Sugar Co ...................................................................................................
Minn-Dak Farmers Co-op .........................................................................................
So. Minn Beet Sugar Co-op .....................................................................................
Western Sugar Co ....................................................................................................
Wyoming Sugar Co ..................................................................................................
8,450,000
0
8,450,000
956,839
1,766,076
461,535
286,518
603,168
457,172
61,266
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
956,839
1,766,076
461,535
286,518
603,168
457,172
61,266
Total Beet Sugar ...............................................................................................
State Cane Sugar Allotments:
Florida .......................................................................................................................
Louisiana ..................................................................................................................
Texas ........................................................................................................................
Hawaii .......................................................................................................................
4,592,575
0
4,592,575
1,902,014
1,471,422
165,345
318,644
¥81,411
2,155
32,755
¥23,499
1,820,603
1,473,577
198,100
295,145
Total Cane Sugar ..............................................................................................
Cane Processors’ Marketing Allocations:
Florida:
Florida Crystals .................................................................................................
Growers Co-op. of FL .......................................................................................
U.S. Sugar Corp ................................................................................................
3,857,425
¥70,000
3,787,425
783,109
342,144
776,761
¥45,673
¥12,101
¥23,636
737,436
330,043
753,124
Total ...........................................................................................................
Louisiana:
Alma Plantation .................................................................................................
Cajun Sugar Co-op ...........................................................................................
Cora-Texas Mfg. Co ..........................................................................................
Lafourche Sugars Corp .....................................................................................
Louisiana Sugarcane Co-op ..............................................................................
Lula Westfield, LLC ...........................................................................................
M.A. Patout & Sons ...........................................................................................
St. Mary Sugar Co-op .......................................................................................
So. Louisiana Sugars Co-op .............................................................................
1,902,014
¥81,411
1,820,603
123,219
148,785
153,514
80,143
113,143
173,759
413,376
149,867
115,617
14,061
¥26,285
36,367
29,574
¥14,018
57,850
33,590
¥13,367
¥115,617
137,280
122,500
189,881
109,717
99,124
231,608
446,966
136,500
0
Total ...........................................................................................................
Texas:
Rio Grande Valley .............................................................................................
Hawaii:
Gay & Robinson, Inc .........................................................................................
Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Company ........................................................
1,471,422
2,155
1,473,577
165,345
32,755
198,100
73,145
245,499
¥1,718
¥21,781
71,428
223,718
Total ...........................................................................................................
318,644
¥23,499
295,145
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 2,
2008.
Glen L. Keppy,
Acting Executive Vice President, Commodity
Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. E8–35 Filed 1–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Farm Service Agency
Information Collection; Transfer of
Farm Records Between Counties
AGENCY:
Farm Service Agency, USDA.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Jan 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
ACTION:
Notice; request for comments.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Farm Service Agency (FSA) is seeking
comments from interested individuals
and organizations on an extension of a
currently approved information
collection associated with transferring
of farm records from one administrative
county office to another.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received on or before March 10, 2008 to
be assured consideration.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this
notice should be addressed to Farm
Service Agency, USDA, Attn: Alison
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Groenwoldt, Agricultural Program
Specialist, Common Provisions Branch,
1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250. Comments
should also be sent to the Desk Officer
for Agriculture, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503. Comments also may be
submitted by e-mail to:
alison.groenwoldt@wdc.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alison Groenwoldt, Agricultural
Program Specialist, (202) 720–4213 and
alison.groenwoldt@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM
08JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Title: Transfer of Farm Records
Between Counties.
OMB Control Number: 0560–0253.
Type of Request: Extension with no
revision.
Abstract: Farm owners or operators
may elect to transfer farm records
between counties when the principal
dwelling of the farm operator has
changed, a change has occurred in the
operation of the land, or a change that
would cause the receiving
administrative county office to be more
accessible such as a new highway and
relocation of the county office building
site. The transfer of farm records is also
required when an FSA county office
closes. FSA County Committees from
both the transferring and receiving
county must approve or disapprove all
proposed farm transfers. In some cases,
the State Committee and/or the National
Office must also approve or disapprove
proposed farm transfers.
Estimate of Burden: Average 10
minutes per response.
Type of Respondents: Owners and
operators.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
25,000.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 2,500 hours.
Comment is invited on: (1) Whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information from those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
All comments received in response to
this notice, including names and
addresses when provided, will be a
matter of public record. Comments will
be summarized and included in the
submission for Office of Management
and Budget Approval.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Description of Information Collection
Forest Service
Signed at Washington, DC, on January 2,
2008.
Glen L. Keyyp,
Acting Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. E8–34 Filed 1–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Jan 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, OR;
Westside Rangeland Analysis
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service
will prepare an environmental impact
statement to authorize livestock grazing
within the Westside Rangeland Analysis
Area on the Wallowa Valley Ranger
District of the Wallowa-Whitman
National Forest.
DATES: Written comments concerning
the proposed action should be received
by February 11, 2008. Send written
comments and suggestions to Wallowa
Valley District Ranger, WallowaWhitman National Forest, 88401
Highway 82, Box A, Enterprise, OR
97828.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alicia Glassford, Interdisciplinary Team
Leader, Wallowa-Whitman National
Forest, Wallowa Mountains Office,
88401 Hwy 82, Box A, Enterprise, OR,
Phone: (541) 426–5689.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need
The purpose of and need for this
action is to allocate forage for
commercial livestock grazing. The
Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Land
and Resource Management Plan allows
for livestock forage production where
forage is in excess to basic plant and soil
needs, wildlife needs, and where other
specific resource conditions are to be
achieved or maintained. While livestock
grazing has been ongoing for many years
in the Westside Rangeland Analysis
Area, this grazing has been addressed
through annual operating instructions
which have not been subjected to a
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) analysis process. Thus, the
NEPA process for this group of
allotments is being initiated.
Proposed Action
The Westside Rangeland Analysis
Area (63,507 acres) is located
approximately 20 miles north of
Enterprise, Oregon and is the portion of
National Forest System lands within the
Wallowa Valley Ranger District
generally located west of State Highway
3. The proposal will result in Allotment
Management Plans for the six allotments
within the Westside Rangeland Analysis
Area: Buck Creek Allotment, Day Ridge
Allotment, Mud Creek Allotment, North
Powwatka Allotment, South Powwatka
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1317
Allotment, and Tope Creek Allotment.
Specific elements of the Proposed
Action are as follows:
Authorize a total of 1579 head-months
of livestock grazing on the 22,718-acre
Buck Creek Allotment between June 1
and October 31.
Authorize a total of 100 head-months
of livestock grazing on the 2,765-acre
Day Ridge Allotment between May 15
and June 15.
Authorize a total of 3,528 headmonths of livestock grazing on the
11,032-acre Mud Creek Allotment
between May 15 and September 15.
Authorize a total of 774 head-months
of livestock grazing on the 8074-acre
North Powwatka Allotment between
April 15 and November 15.
Authorize a total of 1171 head-months
of livestock grazing on the 11,455-acre
South Powwatka Allotment between
June 1 and October 31.
Authorize a total of 429 head-months
of livestock grazing on the 7,463-acre
Tope Creek Allotment between June 1
and September 30.
Responsible Official
The Wallowa Valley District Ranger,
Barbara C. Van Alstine, will be the
responsible official for making the
decision and providing direction for the
analysis.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The responsible official will decide
whether or not to authorize commercial
livestock grazing within the Westside
Rangeland Area. The responsible official
will also decide whether or not to select
the proposed action as stated or
modified, or to select an alternative to
it, any mitigation measures needed and
any monitoring that may be required.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent begins the
scoping process in the development of
the environmental impact statement.
Public participation is especially
important at several points during the
development of the EIS. The Forest
Service is seeking information,
comments, and coordination with the
Federal, State, and local agencies and
tribal governments and individuals or
organizations who may be interested in
or affected by the proposed action. The
public is asked to provide the
responsible official with written
comments describing their concerns
about this project. The most useful
comments to developing or refining the
proposed action would be site specific
concerns and those that pertain to
authorizing livestock grazing within the
Westside Rangeland Analysis Area that
meets the Purpose of and Need for
E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM
08JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1316-1317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-34]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Farm Service Agency
Information Collection; Transfer of Farm Records Between Counties
AGENCY: Farm Service Agency, USDA.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Farm Service Agency (FSA) is seeking comments from interested
individuals and organizations on an extension of a currently approved
information collection associated with transferring of farm records
from one administrative county office to another.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received on or before March 10,
2008 to be assured consideration.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this notice should be addressed to Farm
Service Agency, USDA, Attn: Alison Groenwoldt, Agricultural Program
Specialist, Common Provisions Branch, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250. Comments should also be sent to the Desk Officer
for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. Comments also may be
submitted by e-mail to: alison.groenwoldt@wdc.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alison Groenwoldt, Agricultural
Program Specialist, (202) 720-4213 and alison.groenwoldt@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 1317]]
Description of Information Collection
Title: Transfer of Farm Records Between Counties.
OMB Control Number: 0560-0253.
Type of Request: Extension with no revision.
Abstract: Farm owners or operators may elect to transfer farm
records between counties when the principal dwelling of the farm
operator has changed, a change has occurred in the operation of the
land, or a change that would cause the receiving administrative county
office to be more accessible such as a new highway and relocation of
the county office building site. The transfer of farm records is also
required when an FSA county office closes. FSA County Committees from
both the transferring and receiving county must approve or disapprove
all proposed farm transfers. In some cases, the State Committee and/or
the National Office must also approve or disapprove proposed farm
transfers.
Estimate of Burden: Average 10 minutes per response.
Type of Respondents: Owners and operators.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 25,000.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 2,500 hours.
Comment is invited on: (1) Whether the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information from those who are to respond, including the
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
All comments received in response to this notice, including names
and addresses when provided, will be a matter of public record.
Comments will be summarized and included in the submission for Office
of Management and Budget Approval.
Signed at Washington, DC, on January 2, 2008.
Glen L. Keyyp,
Acting Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-34 Filed 1-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
