Imposition of Civil Penalty on Contractors and Subcontractors Who Discriminate Against Employees for Engaging in Protected Activities, 1233-1234 [E7-25629]
Download as PDF
1233
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2008 / Notices
Matter To Be Considered:
7963 Marine Accident Report—
Heeling Accident on M/V Crown
Princess, Atlantic Ocean Off POrt
Canaveral, Florida, July 18, 2006.
News Media Contact: Telephone:
(202) 314–6100.
Individuals requesting specific
accommodations should contact Chris
Bisett at (202) 314–6305 by Friday,
January 4, 2008.
The public may view the meeting via
a live or archived webcast by accessing
a link under ‘‘News & Events’’ on the
NTSB home page at www.ntsb.gov.
For Further Information Contact:
Vicky D’Onofrio, (202) 314–6410.
Dated: December 28, 2007.
Vicky D’Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07–6294 Filed 01–04–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533–01–PM
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Imposition of Civil Penalty on
Contractors and Subcontractors Who
Discriminate Against Employees for
Engaging in Protected Activities
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Policy Statement: Revision.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is revising its
Enforcement Policy to include
contractors and subcontractors of a
licensee against whom the Commission
may impose a civil penalty for
discriminating against employees for
engaging in protected activities.
DATES: Effective date: This action is
effective February 6, 2008. Comment
date: Comments on this revision should
be submitted by March 7, 2008. The
Commission will apply the modified
Policy to violations that occur after the
effective date.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rules and
Directives Branch, Division of
Administrative Services, Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: T6D59, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001. Hand
deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, between
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., Federal
workdays. Copies of comments received
may be examined at the NRC Public
Document Room, Room O1F21, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
You may also e-mail comments to
nrcrep@nrc.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Jan 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
The NRC maintains the current
Enforcement Policy on its Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov; select ‘‘About
NRC’’, ‘‘Organization and Functions’’,
‘‘Office of Enforcement’’, ‘‘About
Enforcement’’, then ‘‘Enforcement
Policy’’.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Starkey, Office of Enforcement,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington DC 20555–0001; Telephone
(301) 415–3456; e-mail drs@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission amended 10 CFR 30.7,
40.7, 50.7, 52.5, 60.9, 61.9, 63.9, 70.7,
71.9, 72.10 and 76.7 to clarify the
Commission’s authority to impose civil
penalties on contractors and
subcontractors for violations of
Commission employee protection
requirements. The changes to the
Enforcement Policy hereunder
incorporate the recent clarifying
revisions set forth in the referenced
employee protection regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final change to the NRC
Enforcement Policy does not contain
new or amended information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.).
Public Protection Notification
If a means used to impose an
information collection does not display
a currently valid OMB control number,
the NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, the information collection.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
In accordance with the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, the NRC has
determined that this action is not a
‘‘major’’ rule and has verified this
determination with the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget.
Accordingly, the NRC Enforcement
Policy is amended to read as follows:
General Statement of Policy and
Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions
*
*
*
*
*
I. Introduction and Purpose
*
*
*
*
*
Footnote 1
This policy primarily addresses the
activities of NRC licensees and
applicants for NRC licenses. However,
this policy provides for taking
enforcement action against nonlicensees and individuals in certain
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cases. These non-licensees include
contractors and subcontractors, holders
of, or applicants for, NRC approvals,
e.g., certificates of compliance, early site
permits, or standard design certificates,
and the employees of these nonlicensees. Specific guidance regarding
enforcement action against individuals
and non-licensees is addressed in
Sections VII, VIII and X.
*
*
*
*
*
VI. Enforcement Actions
*
*
*
*
*
C. Civil Penalty
A civil penalty is a monetary penalty
that may be imposed for violation of (1)
certain specified licensing provisions of
the Atomic Energy Act or
supplementary NRC rules or orders; (2)
any requirement for which a license
may be revoked; or (3) reporting
requirements under section 206 of the
Energy Reorganization Act. Civil
penalties are designed to deter future
violations both by the involved licensee,
contractor, subcontractor or other
person and other licensees, contractors,
subcontractors or other persons,
conducting similar activities. Civil
penalties also emphasize the need for
licensees, contractors, subcontractors
and other persons to identify violations
and take prompt comprehensive
corrective action.
*
*
*
*
*
VII. Exercise of Discretion
*
*
*
*
*
B. Mitigation of Enforcement Sanctions
*
*
*
*
*
5. Violations Involving Certain
Discrimination Issues
Enforcement discretion may be
exercised for discrimination cases when
a licensee (including a contractor or
subcontractor) who, without the need
for government intervention, identifies
an issue of discrimination and takes
prompt, comprehensive, and effective
corrective action to address both the
particular situation and the overall work
environment for raising safety concerns.
Similarly, enforcement may not be
warranted where a complaint is filed
with the Department of Labor (DOL)
under Section 211 of the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, as
amended, but the licensee settles the
matter before the DOL makes an initial
finding of discrimination and addresses
the overall work environment.
Alternatively, if a finding of
discrimination is made, the licensee
may choose to settle the case before the
evidentiary hearing begins. In such
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
1234
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2008 / Notices
cases, the NRC may exercise its
discretion not to take enforcement
action when the licensee has addressed
the overall work environment for raising
safety concerns and has publicized that
a complaint of discrimination for
engaging in protected activity was made
to the DOL, that the matter was settled
to the satisfaction of the employee (the
terms of the specific settlement
agreement need not be posted), and that,
if the DOL Area Office found
discrimination, the licensee has taken
action to positively reemphasize that
discrimination will not be tolerated.
Similarly, the NRC may refrain from
taking enforcement action if a licensee
settles a matter promptly after a person
comes to the NRC without going to the
DOL. Such discretion would normally
not be exercised in cases in which the
licensee does not appropriately address
the overall work environment (e.g., by
using training, postings, revised policies
or procedures, any necessary
disciplinary action, etc., to
communicate its policy against
discrimination) or in cases that involve:
Allegations of discrimination as a result
of providing information directly to the
NRC; allegations of discrimination
caused by a manager above first-line
supervisor (consistent with current
Enforcement Policy classification of
Severity Level I or II violations);
allegations of discrimination where a
history of findings of discrimination (by
the DOL or the NRC) or settlements
suggests a programmatic rather than an
isolated discrimination problem; or
allegations of discrimination which
appear particularly blatant or egregious.
Generally, the NRC holds licensees
responsible for maintaining control and
oversight of their contractor and
subcontractor activities. As such, in
cases involving licensee contractors and
subcontractors, the NRC will typically
take enforcement action against a
licensee for violations arising out of the
acts of its contractor or subcontractor. In
addition, enforcement action (including
a civil penalty) may be taken against the
licensee contractor or subcontractor. On
occasion, however, circumstances may
arise where the NRC may refrain from
taking enforcement action or imposing a
civil penalty against a licensee even
though it takes enforcement action or
issues a civil penalty, against the
licensee contractor or subcontractor.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day
of December, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Jan 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–25629 Filed 1–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. ACR2007]
FY 2007 Annual Compliance Report;
Comment Request
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: As required by 39 U.S.C.
3652, the Postal Service has filed an
Annual Compliance Report with the
Postal Regulatory Commission on the
costs, revenues, rates, and quality of
service associated with its products in
fiscal year 2007. Within 90 days, the
Commission must evaluate that
information and issue its determination
as to whether rates were in compliance
with title 39, chapter 36 and whether
service standards in effect were met. To
assist in this, the Commission seeks
public comments on the Postal Service’s
FY 2007 Annual Compliance Report.
Comments due January 30, 2008;
reply comments due February 13, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
Section
3652 of title 39 of the United States
Code requires the Postal Service to file
a report with the Postal Regulatory
Commission on the costs, revenues,
rates, and quality of service associated
with its products within 90 days after
the close of each fiscal year. That
section requires that the Postal Service’s
annual report be sufficiently detailed to
allow the Commission and the public to
determine whether the rates charged
and the service provided comply with
all of the requirements of title 39 of the
United States Code. See 39 U.S.C.
3652(a)(1) and (e)(1)(A). The Postal
Service filed its annual compliance
report for FY 2007 with the Commission
on December 28, 2007. Appended to it
are four major sets of data—the Cost and
Revenue Analysis (CRA), the
International Cost and Revenue
Analysis (ICRA), the models of costs
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
avoided by worksharing, and billing
determinant information.1
After receiving the FY 2007 Annual
Compliance Report, the Commission is
required under 39 U.S.C. 3653 to
provide an opportunity for comment to
the interested public and an officer of
the Commission to represent the
interests of the general public. The
Commission hereby solicits public
comment on the degree to which the
Postal Service’s operations and financial
results comply with the policies of title
39. Comments by interested persons are
due on or before January 30, 2008. Reply
comments are due on February 13,
2008.2
The Commission is aware that these
are shorter comment periods than those
that the Commission has provided in
other recent notice and comment
proceedings. The statute affords the
Commission 90 days to digest the report
filed by the Postal Service and evaluate
the Postal Service’s compliance with the
broad range of policies articulated in
title 39. Expediting public comment is
essential if the Commission is to have
sufficient time to take the public’s
concerns into account in making its
evaluation.3
The context in which the Postal
Service has filed its annual report for FY
2007 is unique in several respects. It is
the first compliance report that the
Postal Service has filed after passage of
the Postal Accountability and
Enhancement Act of 2006 (PAEA).
Fiscal Year 2007 was a transition period
during which the rate-setting criteria of
the former Postal Reorganization Act
(PRA) remained in force. The Postal
Service suggests that FY 2007 rates and
service should be analyzed for
compliance with the rate-setting criteria
of the PRA rather than the PAEA. Id. at
1. In its report, the Postal Service
applies the rate-setting criteria of the
PRA to the then-existing subclasses and
concludes that FY 2007 rates and
service fully complied with title 39. Id.
at 6 and 22. Emphasizing the difficulty
of developing a crosswalk between thenexisting subclasses and the current list
of products, the Postal Service does not
1 United States Postal Service FY 2007 Annual
Compliance Report, December 28, 2007 (FY 2007
Annual Compliance Report).
2 The officer of the Commission in this matter
will be appointed shortly.
3 Expedition may have an additional benefit.
There is the possibility that the Postal Service may
file notice of a general rate adjustment sometime in
February under the provisions of 39 U.S.C.
3622(d)(1)(C). This possibility has been discussed
informally throughout the postal community. If
public comments on the Postal Service’s annual
report identify potential problem areas several
weeks in advance of the Postal Service’s rate filing,
this may inform or influence the Postal Service’s
pricing decisions.
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1233-1234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-25629]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Imposition of Civil Penalty on Contractors and Subcontractors Who
Discriminate Against Employees for Engaging in Protected Activities
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Policy Statement: Revision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is revising its
Enforcement Policy to include contractors and subcontractors of a
licensee against whom the Commission may impose a civil penalty for
discriminating against employees for engaging in protected activities.
DATES: Effective date: This action is effective February 6, 2008.
Comment date: Comments on this revision should be submitted by March 7,
2008. The Commission will apply the modified Policy to violations that
occur after the effective date.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rules
and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: T6D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001. Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., Federal
workdays. Copies of comments received may be examined at the NRC Public
Document Room, Room O1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
You may also e-mail comments to nrcrep@nrc.gov.
The NRC maintains the current Enforcement Policy on its Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov; select ``About NRC'', ``Organization and
Functions'', ``Office of Enforcement'', ``About Enforcement'', then
``Enforcement Policy''.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Starkey, Office of Enforcement,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001; Telephone
(301) 415-3456; e-mail drs@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission amended 10 CFR 30.7, 40.7,
50.7, 52.5, 60.9, 61.9, 63.9, 70.7, 71.9, 72.10 and 76.7 to clarify the
Commission's authority to impose civil penalties on contractors and
subcontractors for violations of Commission employee protection
requirements. The changes to the Enforcement Policy hereunder
incorporate the recent clarifying revisions set forth in the referenced
employee protection regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final change to the NRC Enforcement Policy does not contain
new or amended information collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).
Public Protection Notification
If a means used to impose an information collection does not
display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information
collection.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
In accordance with the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, the NRC has determined that this action is not a
``major'' rule and has verified this determination with the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget.
Accordingly, the NRC Enforcement Policy is amended to read as
follows:
General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions
* * * * *
I. Introduction and Purpose
* * * * *
Footnote 1
This policy primarily addresses the activities of NRC licensees and
applicants for NRC licenses. However, this policy provides for taking
enforcement action against non-licensees and individuals in certain
cases. These non-licensees include contractors and subcontractors,
holders of, or applicants for, NRC approvals, e.g., certificates of
compliance, early site permits, or standard design certificates, and
the employees of these non-licensees. Specific guidance regarding
enforcement action against individuals and non-licensees is addressed
in Sections VII, VIII and X.
* * * * *
VI. Enforcement Actions
* * * * *
C. Civil Penalty
A civil penalty is a monetary penalty that may be imposed for
violation of (1) certain specified licensing provisions of the Atomic
Energy Act or supplementary NRC rules or orders; (2) any requirement
for which a license may be revoked; or (3) reporting requirements under
section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act. Civil penalties are
designed to deter future violations both by the involved licensee,
contractor, subcontractor or other person and other licensees,
contractors, subcontractors or other persons, conducting similar
activities. Civil penalties also emphasize the need for licensees,
contractors, subcontractors and other persons to identify violations
and take prompt comprehensive corrective action.
* * * * *
VII. Exercise of Discretion
* * * * *
B. Mitigation of Enforcement Sanctions
* * * * *
5. Violations Involving Certain Discrimination Issues
Enforcement discretion may be exercised for discrimination cases
when a licensee (including a contractor or subcontractor) who, without
the need for government intervention, identifies an issue of
discrimination and takes prompt, comprehensive, and effective
corrective action to address both the particular situation and the
overall work environment for raising safety concerns. Similarly,
enforcement may not be warranted where a complaint is filed with the
Department of Labor (DOL) under Section 211 of the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, but the licensee settles the
matter before the DOL makes an initial finding of discrimination and
addresses the overall work environment. Alternatively, if a finding of
discrimination is made, the licensee may choose to settle the case
before the evidentiary hearing begins. In such
[[Page 1234]]
cases, the NRC may exercise its discretion not to take enforcement
action when the licensee has addressed the overall work environment for
raising safety concerns and has publicized that a complaint of
discrimination for engaging in protected activity was made to the DOL,
that the matter was settled to the satisfaction of the employee (the
terms of the specific settlement agreement need not be posted), and
that, if the DOL Area Office found discrimination, the licensee has
taken action to positively reemphasize that discrimination will not be
tolerated. Similarly, the NRC may refrain from taking enforcement
action if a licensee settles a matter promptly after a person comes to
the NRC without going to the DOL. Such discretion would normally not be
exercised in cases in which the licensee does not appropriately address
the overall work environment (e.g., by using training, postings,
revised policies or procedures, any necessary disciplinary action,
etc., to communicate its policy against discrimination) or in cases
that involve: Allegations of discrimination as a result of providing
information directly to the NRC; allegations of discrimination caused
by a manager above first-line supervisor (consistent with current
Enforcement Policy classification of Severity Level I or II
violations); allegations of discrimination where a history of findings
of discrimination (by the DOL or the NRC) or settlements suggests a
programmatic rather than an isolated discrimination problem; or
allegations of discrimination which appear particularly blatant or
egregious.
Generally, the NRC holds licensees responsible for maintaining
control and oversight of their contractor and subcontractor activities.
As such, in cases involving licensee contractors and subcontractors,
the NRC will typically take enforcement action against a licensee for
violations arising out of the acts of its contractor or subcontractor.
In addition, enforcement action (including a civil penalty) may be
taken against the licensee contractor or subcontractor. On occasion,
however, circumstances may arise where the NRC may refrain from taking
enforcement action or imposing a civil penalty against a licensee even
though it takes enforcement action or issues a civil penalty, against
the licensee contractor or subcontractor.
* * * * *
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of December, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-25629 Filed 1-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P