Imposition of Civil Penalty on Contractors and Subcontractors Who Discriminate Against Employees for Engaging in Protected Activities, 1233-1234 [E7-25629]

Download as PDF 1233 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2008 / Notices Matter To Be Considered: 7963 Marine Accident Report— Heeling Accident on M/V Crown Princess, Atlantic Ocean Off POrt Canaveral, Florida, July 18, 2006. News Media Contact: Telephone: (202) 314–6100. Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris Bisett at (202) 314–6305 by Friday, January 4, 2008. The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under ‘‘News & Events’’ on the NTSB home page at www.ntsb.gov. For Further Information Contact: Vicky D’Onofrio, (202) 314–6410. Dated: December 28, 2007. Vicky D’Onofrio, Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 07–6294 Filed 01–04–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7533–01–PM NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Imposition of Civil Penalty on Contractors and Subcontractors Who Discriminate Against Employees for Engaging in Protected Activities Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Policy Statement: Revision. pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is revising its Enforcement Policy to include contractors and subcontractors of a licensee against whom the Commission may impose a civil penalty for discriminating against employees for engaging in protected activities. DATES: Effective date: This action is effective February 6, 2008. Comment date: Comments on this revision should be submitted by March 7, 2008. The Commission will apply the modified Policy to violations that occur after the effective date. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: T6D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001. Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., Federal workdays. Copies of comments received may be examined at the NRC Public Document Room, Room O1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. You may also e-mail comments to nrcrep@nrc.gov. VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:05 Jan 04, 2008 Jkt 214001 The NRC maintains the current Enforcement Policy on its Web site at https://www.nrc.gov; select ‘‘About NRC’’, ‘‘Organization and Functions’’, ‘‘Office of Enforcement’’, ‘‘About Enforcement’’, then ‘‘Enforcement Policy’’. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Starkey, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555–0001; Telephone (301) 415–3456; e-mail drs@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission amended 10 CFR 30.7, 40.7, 50.7, 52.5, 60.9, 61.9, 63.9, 70.7, 71.9, 72.10 and 76.7 to clarify the Commission’s authority to impose civil penalties on contractors and subcontractors for violations of Commission employee protection requirements. The changes to the Enforcement Policy hereunder incorporate the recent clarifying revisions set forth in the referenced employee protection regulations. Paperwork Reduction Act This final change to the NRC Enforcement Policy does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). Public Protection Notification If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act In accordance with the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, the NRC has determined that this action is not a ‘‘major’’ rule and has verified this determination with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Accordingly, the NRC Enforcement Policy is amended to read as follows: General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions * * * * * I. Introduction and Purpose * * * * * Footnote 1 This policy primarily addresses the activities of NRC licensees and applicants for NRC licenses. However, this policy provides for taking enforcement action against nonlicensees and individuals in certain PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 cases. These non-licensees include contractors and subcontractors, holders of, or applicants for, NRC approvals, e.g., certificates of compliance, early site permits, or standard design certificates, and the employees of these nonlicensees. Specific guidance regarding enforcement action against individuals and non-licensees is addressed in Sections VII, VIII and X. * * * * * VI. Enforcement Actions * * * * * C. Civil Penalty A civil penalty is a monetary penalty that may be imposed for violation of (1) certain specified licensing provisions of the Atomic Energy Act or supplementary NRC rules or orders; (2) any requirement for which a license may be revoked; or (3) reporting requirements under section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act. Civil penalties are designed to deter future violations both by the involved licensee, contractor, subcontractor or other person and other licensees, contractors, subcontractors or other persons, conducting similar activities. Civil penalties also emphasize the need for licensees, contractors, subcontractors and other persons to identify violations and take prompt comprehensive corrective action. * * * * * VII. Exercise of Discretion * * * * * B. Mitigation of Enforcement Sanctions * * * * * 5. Violations Involving Certain Discrimination Issues Enforcement discretion may be exercised for discrimination cases when a licensee (including a contractor or subcontractor) who, without the need for government intervention, identifies an issue of discrimination and takes prompt, comprehensive, and effective corrective action to address both the particular situation and the overall work environment for raising safety concerns. Similarly, enforcement may not be warranted where a complaint is filed with the Department of Labor (DOL) under Section 211 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, but the licensee settles the matter before the DOL makes an initial finding of discrimination and addresses the overall work environment. Alternatively, if a finding of discrimination is made, the licensee may choose to settle the case before the evidentiary hearing begins. In such E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM 07JAN1 pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES 1234 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 4 / Monday, January 7, 2008 / Notices cases, the NRC may exercise its discretion not to take enforcement action when the licensee has addressed the overall work environment for raising safety concerns and has publicized that a complaint of discrimination for engaging in protected activity was made to the DOL, that the matter was settled to the satisfaction of the employee (the terms of the specific settlement agreement need not be posted), and that, if the DOL Area Office found discrimination, the licensee has taken action to positively reemphasize that discrimination will not be tolerated. Similarly, the NRC may refrain from taking enforcement action if a licensee settles a matter promptly after a person comes to the NRC without going to the DOL. Such discretion would normally not be exercised in cases in which the licensee does not appropriately address the overall work environment (e.g., by using training, postings, revised policies or procedures, any necessary disciplinary action, etc., to communicate its policy against discrimination) or in cases that involve: Allegations of discrimination as a result of providing information directly to the NRC; allegations of discrimination caused by a manager above first-line supervisor (consistent with current Enforcement Policy classification of Severity Level I or II violations); allegations of discrimination where a history of findings of discrimination (by the DOL or the NRC) or settlements suggests a programmatic rather than an isolated discrimination problem; or allegations of discrimination which appear particularly blatant or egregious. Generally, the NRC holds licensees responsible for maintaining control and oversight of their contractor and subcontractor activities. As such, in cases involving licensee contractors and subcontractors, the NRC will typically take enforcement action against a licensee for violations arising out of the acts of its contractor or subcontractor. In addition, enforcement action (including a civil penalty) may be taken against the licensee contractor or subcontractor. On occasion, however, circumstances may arise where the NRC may refrain from taking enforcement action or imposing a civil penalty against a licensee even though it takes enforcement action or issues a civil penalty, against the licensee contractor or subcontractor. * * * * * Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of December, 2007. VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:05 Jan 04, 2008 Jkt 214001 For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. E7–25629 Filed 1–4–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. ACR2007] FY 2007 Annual Compliance Report; Comment Request Postal Regulatory Commission. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: As required by 39 U.S.C. 3652, the Postal Service has filed an Annual Compliance Report with the Postal Regulatory Commission on the costs, revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with its products in fiscal year 2007. Within 90 days, the Commission must evaluate that information and issue its determination as to whether rates were in compliance with title 39, chapter 36 and whether service standards in effect were met. To assist in this, the Commission seeks public comments on the Postal Service’s FY 2007 Annual Compliance Report. Comments due January 30, 2008; reply comments due February 13, 2008. ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at https:// www.prc.gov. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 202–789–6820 and stephen.sharfman@prc.gov. Section 3652 of title 39 of the United States Code requires the Postal Service to file a report with the Postal Regulatory Commission on the costs, revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with its products within 90 days after the close of each fiscal year. That section requires that the Postal Service’s annual report be sufficiently detailed to allow the Commission and the public to determine whether the rates charged and the service provided comply with all of the requirements of title 39 of the United States Code. See 39 U.S.C. 3652(a)(1) and (e)(1)(A). The Postal Service filed its annual compliance report for FY 2007 with the Commission on December 28, 2007. Appended to it are four major sets of data—the Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA), the International Cost and Revenue Analysis (ICRA), the models of costs SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 avoided by worksharing, and billing determinant information.1 After receiving the FY 2007 Annual Compliance Report, the Commission is required under 39 U.S.C. 3653 to provide an opportunity for comment to the interested public and an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public. The Commission hereby solicits public comment on the degree to which the Postal Service’s operations and financial results comply with the policies of title 39. Comments by interested persons are due on or before January 30, 2008. Reply comments are due on February 13, 2008.2 The Commission is aware that these are shorter comment periods than those that the Commission has provided in other recent notice and comment proceedings. The statute affords the Commission 90 days to digest the report filed by the Postal Service and evaluate the Postal Service’s compliance with the broad range of policies articulated in title 39. Expediting public comment is essential if the Commission is to have sufficient time to take the public’s concerns into account in making its evaluation.3 The context in which the Postal Service has filed its annual report for FY 2007 is unique in several respects. It is the first compliance report that the Postal Service has filed after passage of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (PAEA). Fiscal Year 2007 was a transition period during which the rate-setting criteria of the former Postal Reorganization Act (PRA) remained in force. The Postal Service suggests that FY 2007 rates and service should be analyzed for compliance with the rate-setting criteria of the PRA rather than the PAEA. Id. at 1. In its report, the Postal Service applies the rate-setting criteria of the PRA to the then-existing subclasses and concludes that FY 2007 rates and service fully complied with title 39. Id. at 6 and 22. Emphasizing the difficulty of developing a crosswalk between thenexisting subclasses and the current list of products, the Postal Service does not 1 United States Postal Service FY 2007 Annual Compliance Report, December 28, 2007 (FY 2007 Annual Compliance Report). 2 The officer of the Commission in this matter will be appointed shortly. 3 Expedition may have an additional benefit. There is the possibility that the Postal Service may file notice of a general rate adjustment sometime in February under the provisions of 39 U.S.C. 3622(d)(1)(C). This possibility has been discussed informally throughout the postal community. If public comments on the Postal Service’s annual report identify potential problem areas several weeks in advance of the Postal Service’s rate filing, this may inform or influence the Postal Service’s pricing decisions. E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM 07JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1233-1234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-25629]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Imposition of Civil Penalty on Contractors and Subcontractors Who 
Discriminate Against Employees for Engaging in Protected Activities

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Policy Statement: Revision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is revising its 
Enforcement Policy to include contractors and subcontractors of a 
licensee against whom the Commission may impose a civil penalty for 
discriminating against employees for engaging in protected activities.

DATES: Effective date: This action is effective February 6, 2008. 
Comment date: Comments on this revision should be submitted by March 7, 
2008. The Commission will apply the modified Policy to violations that 
occur after the effective date.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rules 
and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of 
Administration, Mail Stop: T6D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555-0001. Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville 
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., Federal 
workdays. Copies of comments received may be examined at the NRC Public 
Document Room, Room O1F21, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. 
You may also e-mail comments to nrcrep@nrc.gov.
    The NRC maintains the current Enforcement Policy on its Web site at 
https://www.nrc.gov; select ``About NRC'', ``Organization and 
Functions'', ``Office of Enforcement'', ``About Enforcement'', then 
``Enforcement Policy''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Starkey, Office of Enforcement, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001; Telephone 
(301) 415-3456; e-mail drs@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission amended 10 CFR 30.7, 40.7, 
50.7, 52.5, 60.9, 61.9, 63.9, 70.7, 71.9, 72.10 and 76.7 to clarify the 
Commission's authority to impose civil penalties on contractors and 
subcontractors for violations of Commission employee protection 
requirements. The changes to the Enforcement Policy hereunder 
incorporate the recent clarifying revisions set forth in the referenced 
employee protection regulations.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This final change to the NRC Enforcement Policy does not contain 
new or amended information collection requirements subject to the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).

Public Protection Notification

    If a means used to impose an information collection does not 
display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct 
or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information 
collection.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    In accordance with the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996, the NRC has determined that this action is not a 
``major'' rule and has verified this determination with the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget.
    Accordingly, the NRC Enforcement Policy is amended to read as 
follows:
General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions
* * * * *

I. Introduction and Purpose

* * * * *
Footnote 1
    This policy primarily addresses the activities of NRC licensees and 
applicants for NRC licenses. However, this policy provides for taking 
enforcement action against non-licensees and individuals in certain 
cases. These non-licensees include contractors and subcontractors, 
holders of, or applicants for, NRC approvals, e.g., certificates of 
compliance, early site permits, or standard design certificates, and 
the employees of these non-licensees. Specific guidance regarding 
enforcement action against individuals and non-licensees is addressed 
in Sections VII, VIII and X.
* * * * *

VI. Enforcement Actions

* * * * *
C. Civil Penalty
    A civil penalty is a monetary penalty that may be imposed for 
violation of (1) certain specified licensing provisions of the Atomic 
Energy Act or supplementary NRC rules or orders; (2) any requirement 
for which a license may be revoked; or (3) reporting requirements under 
section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act. Civil penalties are 
designed to deter future violations both by the involved licensee, 
contractor, subcontractor or other person and other licensees, 
contractors, subcontractors or other persons, conducting similar 
activities. Civil penalties also emphasize the need for licensees, 
contractors, subcontractors and other persons to identify violations 
and take prompt comprehensive corrective action.
* * * * *

VII. Exercise of Discretion

* * * * *
B. Mitigation of Enforcement Sanctions
* * * * *
5. Violations Involving Certain Discrimination Issues
    Enforcement discretion may be exercised for discrimination cases 
when a licensee (including a contractor or subcontractor) who, without 
the need for government intervention, identifies an issue of 
discrimination and takes prompt, comprehensive, and effective 
corrective action to address both the particular situation and the 
overall work environment for raising safety concerns. Similarly, 
enforcement may not be warranted where a complaint is filed with the 
Department of Labor (DOL) under Section 211 of the Energy 
Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, but the licensee settles the 
matter before the DOL makes an initial finding of discrimination and 
addresses the overall work environment. Alternatively, if a finding of 
discrimination is made, the licensee may choose to settle the case 
before the evidentiary hearing begins. In such

[[Page 1234]]

cases, the NRC may exercise its discretion not to take enforcement 
action when the licensee has addressed the overall work environment for 
raising safety concerns and has publicized that a complaint of 
discrimination for engaging in protected activity was made to the DOL, 
that the matter was settled to the satisfaction of the employee (the 
terms of the specific settlement agreement need not be posted), and 
that, if the DOL Area Office found discrimination, the licensee has 
taken action to positively reemphasize that discrimination will not be 
tolerated. Similarly, the NRC may refrain from taking enforcement 
action if a licensee settles a matter promptly after a person comes to 
the NRC without going to the DOL. Such discretion would normally not be 
exercised in cases in which the licensee does not appropriately address 
the overall work environment (e.g., by using training, postings, 
revised policies or procedures, any necessary disciplinary action, 
etc., to communicate its policy against discrimination) or in cases 
that involve: Allegations of discrimination as a result of providing 
information directly to the NRC; allegations of discrimination caused 
by a manager above first-line supervisor (consistent with current 
Enforcement Policy classification of Severity Level I or II 
violations); allegations of discrimination where a history of findings 
of discrimination (by the DOL or the NRC) or settlements suggests a 
programmatic rather than an isolated discrimination problem; or 
allegations of discrimination which appear particularly blatant or 
egregious.
    Generally, the NRC holds licensees responsible for maintaining 
control and oversight of their contractor and subcontractor activities. 
As such, in cases involving licensee contractors and subcontractors, 
the NRC will typically take enforcement action against a licensee for 
violations arising out of the acts of its contractor or subcontractor. 
In addition, enforcement action (including a civil penalty) may be 
taken against the licensee contractor or subcontractor. On occasion, 
however, circumstances may arise where the NRC may refrain from taking 
enforcement action or imposing a civil penalty against a licensee even 
though it takes enforcement action or issues a civil penalty, against 
the licensee contractor or subcontractor.
* * * * *

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of December, 2007.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E7-25629 Filed 1-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.