Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year 2008, 73885-73887 [E7-25312]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
Status: Open to the public.
Matters To Be Considered:
1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Inv. Nos. 731–TA–1112 and 1113
(Final) (Glycine from Japan and
Korea)—briefing and vote. (The
Commission is currently scheduled to
transmit its determinations and
Commissioners’ opinions to the
Secretary of Commerce on or before
January 10, 2008).
5. Outstanding action jackets: (1)
Document No. GC–07–225
(Administrative matter).
In accordance with Commission
policy, subject matter listed above, not
disposed of at the scheduled meeting,
may be carried over to the agenda of the
following meeting.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 20, 2007.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E7–25099 Filed 12–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
Maritime Advisory Committee for
Occupational Safety and Health
(MACOSH); Request for Nominations
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for nominations for
persons to serve on MACOSH.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: OSHA intends to recharter the
Maritime Advisory Committee for
Occupational Safety and Health
(MACOSH), which expires on June 26,
2008. MACOSH advises the Secretary of
Labor on matters relating to
occupational safety and health
programs, new initiatives, and standards
for the maritime industries of the United
States which include Longshoring,
Marine Terminals, and Shipyard
Employment. The Committee will
consist of 15 members and will be
chosen from among a cross-section of
individuals who represent the following
interests: employers; employees; Federal
and State safety and health
organizations; professional
organizations specializing in
occupational safety and health; national
standards setting groups; and academia.
OSHA invites persons interested in
serving on MACOSH to submit their
names for consideration for committee
membership.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
Nominations for MACOSH
membership should be postmarked by
February 11, 2008
ADDRESSES: Nominations for MACOSH
membership should be sent to: Dorothy
Dougherty, Director, Directorate of
Standards and Guidance, Room N–3718,
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph V. Daddura, Acting Director,
Office of Maritime, U.S. Department of
Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Room N–3621, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; Telephone: (202) 693–2086.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: OSHA intends to
recharter MACOSH for another 2 years.
MACOSH was established to advise the
Secretary on various issues pertaining to
providing safe and healthful
employment in the maritime industries.
The Secretary consults with MACOSH
on various related subjects, including:
ways to increase the effectiveness of
safety and health standards that apply to
the maritime industries, injury and
illness prevention, the use of
stakeholder partnerships to improve
training and outreach initiatives, and
ways to increase the national dialogue
on occupational safety and health. In
addition, MACOSH provides advice on
enforcement initiatives that will help
improve the working conditions and the
safety and health of men and women
employed in the maritime industries.
Nominations: OSHA is looking for
committed MACOSH members who
have a strong interest in the safety and
health of workers in the maritime
industries. The Agency is looking for
nominees to represent the following
interests and categories: employees;
employers; State or Federal safety and
health organizations; professional
organizations; national standards setting
groups; and academia. OSHA seeks a
broad-based and diverse membership
for MACOSH. Nominations of women
and minorities are encouraged.
Nominations of new members or
resubmissions of former or current
members will be accepted in all
categories of membership. Interested
persons may nominate themselves or
may submit the name of another person
who they believe to be interested in and
qualified to serve on MACOSH.
Nominations may also be submitted by
organizations from one of the categories
listed above. Nominations should
include the name, address, and
telephone number of the candidate.
Each nomination should include a
DATE:
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73885
summary of the candidate’s training or
experience relating to safety and health
in maritime industries and the interest
the candidate represents. In addition to
listing the candidate’s qualifications to
serve on the committee, each
nomination should state that the person
consents to the nomination and
acknowledges the commitment and
responsibilities of serving on MACOSH.
Authority: Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health,
directed the preparation of this notice
under the authority granted by Sections
6(b)(1) and 7(b) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C.
655, 656), the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2),
Secretary of Labor’s Order 5–2007 (72
FR 31159), and 29 CFR part 1912.
Signed at Washington, DC on December 21,
2007.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E7–25144 Filed 12–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE
CORPORATION
[MCC FR 07–16]
Report on the Selection of Eligible
Countries for Fiscal Year 2008
Millennium Challenge
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This report is provided in
accordance with section 608(d)(1) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003,
Public Law 108–199, Division D, (the
‘‘Act’’).
The Act authorizes the provision of
Millennium Challenge Account
(‘‘MCA’’) assistance under section 605
of the Act to countries that enter into
compacts with the United States to
support policies and programs that
advance the progress of such countries
in achieving lasting economic growth
and poverty reduction, and are in
furtherance of the Act. The Act requires
the Millennium Challenge Corporation
(‘‘MCC’’) to take steps to determine the
countries that, based to the maximum
extent possible on objective and
quantifiable indicators of a country’s
demonstrated commitment to just and
democratic governance, economic
freedom, and investing in their people,
will be eligible to receive MCA
assistance for a fiscal year. These steps
include the submission of reports to
appropriate congressional committees
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
73886
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
and the publication of notices in the
Federal Register that identify, among
other things:
1. The ‘‘candidate countries’’ for MCA
assistance for a fiscal year, and all
countries that would be candidate
countries if they met the requirement of
section 606(a)(1)(B) (section 608(a) of
the Act);
2. The eligibility criteria and
methodology that the MCC Board of
Directors (the ‘‘Board’’) will use to select
‘‘eligible countries’’ from among the
‘‘candidate countries’’ (section 608(b) of
the Act); and
3. The countries determined by the
Board to be ‘‘eligible countries’’ for a
fiscal year, the countries on the list of
eligible countries with which the Board
will seek to enter into a compact, and
a justification for the decisions
regarding eligibility and selection for
negotiation (section 608(d)(1) of the
Act).
This is the third of the abovedescribed reports by MCC for fiscal year
2008 (FY08). It identifies countries
determined by the Board to be eligible
under section 607 of the Act for FY08
and those that the Board will seek to
enter into compacts under section 609
of the Act, and the justification for such
decisions.
Eligible Countries
The Board met on December 12, 2007
to select countries that will be eligible
for MCA compact assistance under
section 607 of the Act for FY08. The
Board determined the following
countries eligible for such assistance for
FY08: Armenia, Benin, Bolivia, Burkina
Faso, El Salvador, Georgia, Ghana,
Honduras, Jordan, Lesotho, Madagascar,
Malawi, Mali, Moldova, Mongolia,
Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia,
Nicaragua, Senegal, Tanzania, Timor
Leste, Ukraine and Vanuatu, and with
which MCC may seek to enter into a
compact: Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Jordan,
Malawi, Moldova, Namibia, Senegal,
Tanzania, Timor Leste, and Ukraine.
In accordance with the Act and with
the ‘‘Report on the Criteria and
Methodology for Determining the
Eligibility of Candidate Countries for
Millennium Challenge Account
Assistance in Fiscal Year 2008’’
submitted to the Congress on September
17, 2007, selection was based primarily
on a country’s overall performance in
relation to three broad policy categories:
(1) ‘‘Ruling justly’’; (2) ‘‘encouraging
economic freedom’’; and (3) ‘‘investing
in people.’’ The Board relied upon 17
publicly available and independent
indicators to assess policy performance
and demonstrated commitment in these
three areas, to the maximum extent
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
possible, for determining which
countries would be eligible for MCA
compact assistance. In determining
eligibility, the Board considered if a
country performed above the median in
relation to its peers on at least half of
the indicators in each of the three policy
categories, and above the median on
‘‘control of corruption’’ and, if the
country performed substantially below
the median on any indictor, whether it
is taking appropriate action to address
the shortcomings. Scorecards reflecting
each country’s performance on the
indicators are available on MCC’s Web
site at www.mcc.gov.
The Board also considered whether
any adjustments should be made for
data gaps, lags, trends, or recent events
since the indicators were published, as
well as strengths or weaknesses in
particular indicators. Where
appropriate, the Board took into account
additional quantitative and qualitative
information, such as evidence of a
country’s commitment to fighting
corruption and promoting democratic
governance, its economic policies to
promote the sustainable management of
natural resources, and its effective
protection of human rights and the
rights of people with disabilities. In
addition, the Board considered the
opportunity to reduce poverty, promote
economic growth and poverty reduction
in a country, in light of the overall
context of the information available to it
as well as the availability of
appropriated funds.
One country was selected as eligible
for the first time in FY08: Malawi, a low
income candidate, was selected under
section 606(a) of the Act. Malawi (1)
performed above the median in relation
to their peers on at least half of the
indicators in each of the three policy
categories; (2) performed above the
median on corruption; and (3) in cases
where they performed substantially
below the median on an indicator, there
was either evidence that the data did
not adequately reflect their policy
performance or that the government is
taking corrective action to address the
problem.
Malawi is currently participating in
the threshold program. Malawi meets
the eligibility criteria for the first time
in FY08, scoring above the median on
13 of 17 indicators, including the
corruption indicator. The government of
Malawi has demonstrated a strong
commitment to fighting corruption, and
is well into the implementation of a
threshold program focused on
accelerating anticorruption reforms and
improving fiscal policy. There is a
significant opportunity for a compact
with Malawi to reduce poverty and
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
promote economic growth. Roughly
seven million people (over half the
population) live on less than $2 a day.
Although Malawi now meets the MCA
eligibility criteria for compact
assistance, successful implementation of
its threshold program—and of the
corresponding reform commitments—
remains critical. Hence, the government
of Malawi will be required to
demonstrate successful implementation
of the threshold program during the
compact development process in order
to reach a compact and then to continue
to receive MCA funding under a
compact.
Seventeen of the countries selected
eligible for MCA assistance for FY08
were in the ‘‘low income country’’
category and were previously selected
as eligible in at least one prior fiscal
year—Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso,
Ghana, Georgia, Honduras, Lesotho,
Madagascar, Mali, Moldova, Mongolia,
Mozambique, Nicaragua, Senegal,
Tanzania, Timor Leste and Vanuatu. Six
of the countries selected as eligible for
MCA assistance for FY08 were in the
‘‘lower middle income country’’
category and were previously selected
as eligible in at least one prior fiscal
year—Armenia, El Salvador, Jordan,
Morocco, Namibia, and Ukraine.
On December 12, 2007, the Board
reselected these countries based on their
continued performance since their prior
selection. The Board also determined
that no material change has occurred in
the performance of these countries on
the selection criteria since the FY07
selection that would justify not
including them in the FY08 eligible
country list. Eleven countries—
Armenia, Benin, El Salvador, Honduras,
Madagascar, Mali, Morocco,
Mozambique, Namibia, Timor Leste,
and Ukraine—either did not perform
above the median on control of
corruption or did not perform above the
median in relation to their peers on at
least half of the indicators in each of the
three policy categories. Cape Verde was
not reselected as eligible, as this is the
third year it does not meet the criteria
in its new lower middle income country
competition. MCC does not believe that
a serious policy reversal or a pattern of
actions inconsistent with the selection
criteria has occurred in any of these
countries. In analyzing performance,
MCC found that these countries did not
meet the criteria, due to one or a
combination of the following factors:
• Graduation from the ‘‘low income
country’’ to the ‘‘lower middle income
country’’ category,
• Data improvements and revisions,
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
• The introduction of two new
indicators and a new methodology in
the ‘‘iInvesting in people’’ category,
• Slight declines in performance, and
• Score changes within the margin of
error.
Therefore, all of the 12 countries can
continue with compact implementation
or compact development, providing
they demonstrate progress toward
meeting the criteria. These MCC
countries will be required to develop
and implement a remediation plan to
address policy performance and/or data
issues which prevent countries from
meeting the eligibility criteria. The
remediation process will give MCC and
other U.S. Government agencies a basis
for policy dialogue with the country
about how to improve performance
while allowing the country to
demonstrate commitment to and
progress toward meeting the eligibility
criteria.
The Board also did not reselect Sri
Lanka and the Gambia. Sri Lanka was
not reselected this year due to the
ongoing conflict in the country, which
has escalated to a level that precludes
MCC activities and which is
inconsistent with the performance of an
MCC-eligible country. The Gambia’s
eligibility was suspended in previous
years and it was not considered this
year for eligibility.
Finally, a number of countries that
performed well on the quantitative
elements of the selection criteria (i.e., on
the policy indicators) were not chosen
as eligible countries for FY08. As
discussed above, the Board considered a
variety of factors in addition to the
country’s performance on the policy
indicators in determining whether they
were appropriate candidates for
assistance (e.g., the country’s
commitment to fighting corruption and
promoting democratic governance; the
availability of appropriated funds; and
the countries in which MCC would
likely have the best opportunity to
reduce poverty and generate economic
growth).
Selection for Compact Negotiation
The Board also authorized MCC to
invite Malawi to submit a proposal for
a compact, as described in section 609
of the Act. MCC will initiate the process
by inviting Malawi to submit a program
proposal to MCC for due diligence
review (previously eligible countries
will not be asked to submit another
proposal for FY08 assistance). MCC has
posted guidance on the MCC Web site
(www.mcc.gov) regarding the
development and submission of MCA
program proposals. Submission of a
proposal is not a guarantee that MCC
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
will finalize a compact with an eligible
country. Any MCA assistance provided
under section 605 of the Act will be
contingent on the successful negotiation
of a mutually agreeable compact
between the eligible country and MCC,
approval of the compact by the Board,
and availability of funds.
Dated: December 21, 2007.
William G. Anderson, Jr.,
Vice President and General Counsel,
Millennium Challenge Corporation.
Henry Pitney,
Alternate Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–25312 Filed 12–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9210–01–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (07–098)]
NASA Advisory Council; Science
Committee; Earth Science
Subcommittee; Meeting
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA)
announces a meeting of the Earth
Science Subcommittee of the NASA
Advisory Council (NAC). This
Subcommittee reports to the Science
Committee of the NAC. The Meeting
will be held for the purpose of soliciting
from the scientific community and other
persons scientific and technical
information relevant to program
planning.
DATES: Thursday, January 17, 2008, 8
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Friday, January 18,
2008, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern
Daylight Time.
ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, room
6H45, 300 E Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20546.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Marian Norris, Science Mission
Directorate, NASA Headquarters,
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358–4452,
fax (202) 358–4118, or
mnorris@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting will be open to the public up
to the capacity of the room. The agenda
for the meeting includes the following
topics:
–Earth Science Division Update
–NASA Planning for the Earth
Science Decadal Survey Implementation
–Cost Estimates of the Decadal Survey
Proposed Missions
–Earth Science Data and Information
Systems
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73887
It is imperative that the meeting be
held on these dates to accommodate the
scheduling priorities of the key
participants. Attendees will be
requested to sign a register and to
comply with NASA security
requirements, including the
presentation of a valid picture ID, before
receiving an access badge. Foreign
nationals attending this meeting will be
required to provide the following
information no less than 5 working days
prior to the meeting: full name; gender;
date/place of birth; citizenship; visa/
green card information (number, type,
expiration date); passport information
(number, country, expiration date);
employer/affiliation information (name
of institution, address, country,
telephone); title/position of attendee. To
expedite admittance, attendees with
U.S. citizenship can provide identifying
information 5 working days in advance
by contacting Marian Norris via e-mail
at mnorris@nasa.gov or by telephone at
(202) 358–4452.
Dated: December 20, 2007.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–25301 Filed 12–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF
NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
National Counterterrorism Center
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
National Counterterrorism
Center, Office of the Director of National
Intelligence.
ACTION: Notice to establish systems of
records.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of the Director of
National Intelligence (ODNI) National
Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) is
establishing several systems of records
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 552a. These systems
of records are maintained by NCTC.
DATES: This action will be effective on
February 6, 2008, unless comments
received result in a contrary
determination.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN number, by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Director, Information
Management Office, Office of the
Director of National Intelligence,
Washington, DC 20511.
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73885-73887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-25312]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION
[MCC FR 07-16]
Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year
2008
AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This report is provided in accordance with section 608(d)(1)
of the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, Public Law 108-199, Division
D, (the ``Act'').
The Act authorizes the provision of Millennium Challenge Account
(``MCA'') assistance under section 605 of the Act to countries that
enter into compacts with the United States to support policies and
programs that advance the progress of such countries in achieving
lasting economic growth and poverty reduction, and are in furtherance
of the Act. The Act requires the Millennium Challenge Corporation
(``MCC'') to take steps to determine the countries that, based to the
maximum extent possible on objective and quantifiable indicators of a
country's demonstrated commitment to just and democratic governance,
economic freedom, and investing in their people, will be eligible to
receive MCA assistance for a fiscal year. These steps include the
submission of reports to appropriate congressional committees
[[Page 73886]]
and the publication of notices in the Federal Register that identify,
among other things:
1. The ``candidate countries'' for MCA assistance for a fiscal
year, and all countries that would be candidate countries if they met
the requirement of section 606(a)(1)(B) (section 608(a) of the Act);
2. The eligibility criteria and methodology that the MCC Board of
Directors (the ``Board'') will use to select ``eligible countries''
from among the ``candidate countries'' (section 608(b) of the Act); and
3. The countries determined by the Board to be ``eligible
countries'' for a fiscal year, the countries on the list of eligible
countries with which the Board will seek to enter into a compact, and a
justification for the decisions regarding eligibility and selection for
negotiation (section 608(d)(1) of the Act).
This is the third of the above-described reports by MCC for fiscal
year 2008 (FY08). It identifies countries determined by the Board to be
eligible under section 607 of the Act for FY08 and those that the Board
will seek to enter into compacts under section 609 of the Act, and the
justification for such decisions.
Eligible Countries
The Board met on December 12, 2007 to select countries that will be
eligible for MCA compact assistance under section 607 of the Act for
FY08. The Board determined the following countries eligible for such
assistance for FY08: Armenia, Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, El
Salvador, Georgia, Ghana, Honduras, Jordan, Lesotho, Madagascar,
Malawi, Mali, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia,
Nicaragua, Senegal, Tanzania, Timor Leste, Ukraine and Vanuatu, and
with which MCC may seek to enter into a compact: Bolivia, Burkina Faso,
Jordan, Malawi, Moldova, Namibia, Senegal, Tanzania, Timor Leste, and
Ukraine.
In accordance with the Act and with the ``Report on the Criteria
and Methodology for Determining the Eligibility of Candidate Countries
for Millennium Challenge Account Assistance in Fiscal Year 2008''
submitted to the Congress on September 17, 2007, selection was based
primarily on a country's overall performance in relation to three broad
policy categories: (1) ``Ruling justly''; (2) ``encouraging economic
freedom''; and (3) ``investing in people.'' The Board relied upon 17
publicly available and independent indicators to assess policy
performance and demonstrated commitment in these three areas, to the
maximum extent possible, for determining which countries would be
eligible for MCA compact assistance. In determining eligibility, the
Board considered if a country performed above the median in relation to
its peers on at least half of the indicators in each of the three
policy categories, and above the median on ``control of corruption''
and, if the country performed substantially below the median on any
indictor, whether it is taking appropriate action to address the
shortcomings. Scorecards reflecting each country's performance on the
indicators are available on MCC's Web site at www.mcc.gov.
The Board also considered whether any adjustments should be made
for data gaps, lags, trends, or recent events since the indicators were
published, as well as strengths or weaknesses in particular indicators.
Where appropriate, the Board took into account additional quantitative
and qualitative information, such as evidence of a country's commitment
to fighting corruption and promoting democratic governance, its
economic policies to promote the sustainable management of natural
resources, and its effective protection of human rights and the rights
of people with disabilities. In addition, the Board considered the
opportunity to reduce poverty, promote economic growth and poverty
reduction in a country, in light of the overall context of the
information available to it as well as the availability of appropriated
funds.
One country was selected as eligible for the first time in FY08:
Malawi, a low income candidate, was selected under section 606(a) of
the Act. Malawi (1) performed above the median in relation to their
peers on at least half of the indicators in each of the three policy
categories; (2) performed above the median on corruption; and (3) in
cases where they performed substantially below the median on an
indicator, there was either evidence that the data did not adequately
reflect their policy performance or that the government is taking
corrective action to address the problem.
Malawi is currently participating in the threshold program. Malawi
meets the eligibility criteria for the first time in FY08, scoring
above the median on 13 of 17 indicators, including the corruption
indicator. The government of Malawi has demonstrated a strong
commitment to fighting corruption, and is well into the implementation
of a threshold program focused on accelerating anticorruption reforms
and improving fiscal policy. There is a significant opportunity for a
compact with Malawi to reduce poverty and promote economic growth.
Roughly seven million people (over half the population) live on less
than $2 a day. Although Malawi now meets the MCA eligibility criteria
for compact assistance, successful implementation of its threshold
program--and of the corresponding reform commitments--remains critical.
Hence, the government of Malawi will be required to demonstrate
successful implementation of the threshold program during the compact
development process in order to reach a compact and then to continue to
receive MCA funding under a compact.
Seventeen of the countries selected eligible for MCA assistance for
FY08 were in the ``low income country'' category and were previously
selected as eligible in at least one prior fiscal year--Benin, Bolivia,
Burkina Faso, Ghana, Georgia, Honduras, Lesotho, Madagascar, Mali,
Moldova, Mongolia, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Senegal, Tanzania, Timor
Leste and Vanuatu. Six of the countries selected as eligible for MCA
assistance for FY08 were in the ``lower middle income country''
category and were previously selected as eligible in at least one prior
fiscal year--Armenia, El Salvador, Jordan, Morocco, Namibia, and
Ukraine.
On December 12, 2007, the Board reselected these countries based on
their continued performance since their prior selection. The Board also
determined that no material change has occurred in the performance of
these countries on the selection criteria since the FY07 selection that
would justify not including them in the FY08 eligible country list.
Eleven countries--Armenia, Benin, El Salvador, Honduras, Madagascar,
Mali, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Timor Leste, and Ukraine--either
did not perform above the median on control of corruption or did not
perform above the median in relation to their peers on at least half of
the indicators in each of the three policy categories. Cape Verde was
not reselected as eligible, as this is the third year it does not meet
the criteria in its new lower middle income country competition. MCC
does not believe that a serious policy reversal or a pattern of actions
inconsistent with the selection criteria has occurred in any of these
countries. In analyzing performance, MCC found that these countries did
not meet the criteria, due to one or a combination of the following
factors:
Graduation from the ``low income country'' to the ``lower
middle income country'' category,
Data improvements and revisions,
[[Page 73887]]
The introduction of two new indicators and a new
methodology in the ``iInvesting in people'' category,
Slight declines in performance, and
Score changes within the margin of error.
Therefore, all of the 12 countries can continue with compact
implementation or compact development, providing they demonstrate
progress toward meeting the criteria. These MCC countries will be
required to develop and implement a remediation plan to address policy
performance and/or data issues which prevent countries from meeting the
eligibility criteria. The remediation process will give MCC and other
U.S. Government agencies a basis for policy dialogue with the country
about how to improve performance while allowing the country to
demonstrate commitment to and progress toward meeting the eligibility
criteria.
The Board also did not reselect Sri Lanka and the Gambia. Sri Lanka
was not reselected this year due to the ongoing conflict in the
country, which has escalated to a level that precludes MCC activities
and which is inconsistent with the performance of an MCC-eligible
country. The Gambia's eligibility was suspended in previous years and
it was not considered this year for eligibility.
Finally, a number of countries that performed well on the
quantitative elements of the selection criteria (i.e., on the policy
indicators) were not chosen as eligible countries for FY08. As
discussed above, the Board considered a variety of factors in addition
to the country's performance on the policy indicators in determining
whether they were appropriate candidates for assistance (e.g., the
country's commitment to fighting corruption and promoting democratic
governance; the availability of appropriated funds; and the countries
in which MCC would likely have the best opportunity to reduce poverty
and generate economic growth).
Selection for Compact Negotiation
The Board also authorized MCC to invite Malawi to submit a proposal
for a compact, as described in section 609 of the Act. MCC will
initiate the process by inviting Malawi to submit a program proposal to
MCC for due diligence review (previously eligible countries will not be
asked to submit another proposal for FY08 assistance). MCC has posted
guidance on the MCC Web site (www.mcc.gov) regarding the development
and submission of MCA program proposals. Submission of a proposal is
not a guarantee that MCC will finalize a compact with an eligible
country. Any MCA assistance provided under section 605 of the Act will
be contingent on the successful negotiation of a mutually agreeable
compact between the eligible country and MCC, approval of the compact
by the Board, and availability of funds.
Dated: December 21, 2007.
William G. Anderson, Jr.,
Vice President and General Counsel, Millennium Challenge Corporation.
Henry Pitney,
Alternate Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-25312 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9210-01-P