Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Request for Extension and Change of Title of a Currently Approved Information Collection, 73966-73968 [E7-25205]
Download as PDF
73966
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
statements at the meeting. Persons
wishing to present statements or obtain
information should contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the
committee at any time.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
14, 2007.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee (Acting).
[FR Doc. 07–6190 Filed 12–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2007–0030]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Notice of Request for
Extension of Currently Approved
Information Collection
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of request for extension
of currently approved information
collection.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FHWA has forwarded the
information collection request described
in this notice to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval of an extension of a currently
approved information collection. We
published a Federal Register. Notice
with a 60-day public comment period
on this information collection on
August 17, 2007. We are required to
publish this notice in the Federal
Register by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by
January 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments
within 30 days to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Washington, DC,
20503, or e-mail at
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov,
Attention DOT Desk Officer. You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways for the FHWA to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
All comments should include the
Docket number FHWA–2007–0030.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
For
information regarding Emergency Relief
Funding Applications, contact Greg
Wolf, 202–366–4655, Office of Program
Administration, Federal Highway
Administration, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office
hours are from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Emergency Relief Funding
Applications.
Background: Section 125 of Title 23
United States Code requires States to
submit applications to the FHWA for
emergency relief (ER) funds. The ER
funds are established for the repair or
reconstruction of Federal-aid highways
and Federally-owned roads, which have
suffered serious damage from natural
disasters over a wide area or a
catastrophic failure from an external
cause. The information is needed by the
FHWA to fulfill its statutory obligations
regarding funding determinations for
emergency work to repair damaged
highway facilities. The requirements
covering the FHWA ER program are
contained in 23 CFR Part 668.
Respondents: 50 State Transportation
Departments, the District of Columbia,
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and the Territories of Guam, the
Virgin Islands and American Samoa.
Frequency: As required.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: The estimated burden to
complete the application is 250 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: Approximately 7,500 hours
annually.
Electronic Access: Internet users may
access all comments received by the
U.S. DOT Dockets, Room PL–401, by
using the universal resource locator
(URL): https://dms.dot.gov, 24 hours
each day, 365 days each year. Please
follow the instructions online for more
information and help.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: December 20, 2007.
James R. Kabel,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis
Division.
[FR Doc. E7–25131 Filed 12–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00210
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2007–0031]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Notice of Request for
Extension and Change of Title of a
Currently Approved Information
Collection
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of request for extension
and change of title of a currently
approved information collection. —
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FHWA has forwarded the
information collection request described
in this notice to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval of an extension and change of
title of a currently approved information
collection. We published a Federal
Register
Notice with a 60-day public comment
period on this information collection on
August 31, 2007.
We are required to publish this notice
in the Federal Register by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. As
part of FHWA’s ongoing effort to reduce
the overall burden on the public, four
information collections associated with
the accommodation or relocation of
utility facilities in the right-of-way of
highway facilities are being combined
into a single collection (2125–0519)
with a new title of Utility Adjustments,
Agreements, Eligibility Statements, and
Accommodation Policies. The four
affected information collections are:
2125–0514: Develop and Submit Utility
Accommodation Policies; 2125–0515:
Eligibility Statement for Utility
Adjustments; 2125–0519: Developing
and Recording Costs for Utility
Adjustments; and 2125–0522: Utility
Use and Occupancy Agreements.
DATES: Please submit comments by
January 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments
within 30 days to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW, Washington, DC,
20503, or e-mail at
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov,
Attention DOT Desk Officer. You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways for the FHWA to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
All comments should include the
Docket number FHWA–2007–0031.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Jon Obenberger, 202–366–2221, Office
of Infrastructure, Federal Highway
Administration, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Office hours are from 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Utility Adjustments,
Agreements, Eligibility Statements, and
Accommodation Policies; formerly
titled ‘‘Developing and Recording Costs
for Utility Adjustments.’’
Background: Federal laws dealing
with the relocation and accommodation
of utility facilities associated with the
right-of-way of highway facilities are
contained in the United States Code
(U.S.C.) 23, Sections 123 and 109(I)(1).
Regulations dealing with the utility
facility accommodation and relocation
are based upon the laws contained in 23
U.S.C. and are found in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 23,
Chapter I, Subchapter G, Part 645,
subparts A and B.
The FHWA requires (23 CFR 645
subpart A—Utility Relocations,
Adjustments, and Reimbursement)
developing and recording costs for
utility adjustments, as the basis for
reimbursing State Departments of
Transportation (SDOTs) and local
agency transportation departments,
when they have paid the costs of utility
facilities relocations that were required
by the construction of Federal-aid
highway projects. The FHWA requires
the utility companies to document the
costs or expenses for adjusting their
facilities. These utility companies must
have a system for recording labor,
materials, supplies and equipment costs
incurred when undertaking adjustments
to accommodate the highway projects.
This record of costs forms the basis for
payment by the SDOT or local
transportation department to the utility
company. In turn the FHWA reimburses
the SDOT or local transportation
department for its payment to the utility
company. The utility company is
required to maintain these records of
costs for 3 years after final payment is
received.
The SDOT and/or local agency
transportation departments are
responsible for maintaining the highway
rights-of-way, including the control of
its use by the utility companies. In
managing the use of the highway rights-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
of-way, the SDOT and/or local agency
transportation department is required
(23 CFR 645.205 and 23 CFR 645.213)
to document the terms under which
utility facilities are allowed to cross or
otherwise occupy the highway rights-ofway, in the form of utility use and
occupancy agreements (formerly OMB
Control #: 2125–0522) with each utility
company. This documentation,
consisting of a use and occupancy
agreement (permit), must be in writing
and must be maintained in the SDOT
and/or local agency transportation
department. Each SDOTs is required (23
CFR 615.215) to submit to the FHWA a
utility adjustment eligibility statement
(formerly OMB Control #: 2125–0515)
that establishes the SDOT’s legal
authority and policies it employs for
accommodating utilities within highway
rights-of-way or obligation to pay for
utility adjustments. FHWA has
previously reviewed and approved these
eligibility statements for each State
DOT. The statements are used as a basis
for Federal-aid reimbursement in utility
relocation costs under the provisions of
23 U.S.C. 123. Updated statements may
be submitted for review at the States
discretion where circumstances have
modified (for example, a change in State
statute) the extent to which utility
adjustments are eligible for
reimbursement by the State or those
instances where a local SDOT’s legal
basis for payment of utility adjustments
differs from that of the State.
Each SDOT is also required (23 CFR
645.215) to develop and submit to
FHWA their utility accommodation
policies (formerly OMB Control #:
2125–0514) that will be used to regulate
and manage the utility facilities within
the rights-of-way of Federal-aid highway
projects. The agencies utility
accommodation policies need to address
the basis for utility facilities to use and
occupy highway rights-of-way; the
State’s authority to regulate such use;
and the policies and/or procedures
employed for managing and
accommodating utilities within the
rights-of-way of Federal-aid highway
projects. Upon FHWA’s approval of the
policy statement, the SDOT may take
any action required in accordance with
the approved policy statement without
a case-by-case review by the FHWA. In
addition, the utility accommodation
policy statements that have been
approved previously by the FHWA are
periodically reviewed by the SDOTs to
determine if updating is necessary to
reflect policy changes.
Respondents: 52 SDOTs, including
the District of Columbia and Puerto
Rico, local agency transportation
departments, and utility companies.
PO 00000
Frm 00211
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73967
Frequency: The SDOTs and local
agency transportation departments are
each involved in an average of 15 utility
use and occupancy agreements (or
permits) per year for an annual
frequency of 46,000. SDOTs are allowed
to submit their eligibility statement for
utility adjustments and their utility
accommodation policies when
warranted by changes or when updates
occur, or at the SDOT’s discretion. It is
estimated 10 SDOTs will update either
their eligibility statement for utility
agreements or utility accommodation
policies per year.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: The estimated average
amount of time required to develop and
record the costs for each utility
adjustment is 8 hours. The estimated
amount of time required by the SDOTs
and local agency transportation
departments to process each utility use
and occupancy agreement (permit) is 8
hours. The estimated amount of time for
each update to the SDOT’s eligibility
statement for utility adjustments has an
average burden of 18 hours. The
estimated amount of time for each
update and submittal of a SDOT’s utility
accommodation policy has an average
burden of 280 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: The annual burden associated
with developing and recording the costs
for adjusting utility facilities is 72,000
hours based on an estimate of 9,000
adjustments that utility companies
perform annually that may be eligible
for Federal-aid highway funding
allowing SDOTs or local agency
transportation departments to request
reimbursement from FHWA. The annual
burden associated with preparing,
submitting and approving utility use
and occupancy agreements (permits) is
552,000 burden-hours. The annual
burden associated with developing and
approving updates to a SDOT’s
eligibility statement for utility
adjustments is 90 hours. The annual
burden associated with developing and
approving updates to SDOTs’ utility
accommodation policies is 1,400 hours.
The accumulated burden for the
combined information collection is
625,490.
Electronic Access: Internet users may
access all comments received by the
U.S. DOT Dockets, Room PL–401, by
using the universal resource locator
(URL): https://dms.dot.gov, 24 hours
each day, 365 days each year. Please
follow the instructions online for more
information and help.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1.48.
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
73968
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
Issued on: December 20, 2007.
James R. Kabel,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis
Division.
[FR Doc. E7–25205 Filed 12–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for a Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) §§ 211.9 and
211.41, notice is hereby given that the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
received a request for a waiver of
compliance with certain requirements of
its safety standards. The individual
petition is described below, including
the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the
relief being requested, and the
petitioner’s arguments in favor of relief.
Canadian Pacific Railway
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA–2007–
0008]
The Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)
seeks a waiver from the requirements of
49 CFR 240.117(e)(1) through (4),
240.305, and 240.307, in connection
with implementation of a Close Call
Reporting System (C3RS) Demonstration
Pilot Project (Pilot Project) sponsored by
FRA’s Office of Research and
Development. These sections of the
regulation relate to punitive actions that
are required to be taken against
locomotive engineers for the violation of
certain railroad operating rules. Refer to
Part 240 for a detailed listing of these
sections.
CP and the employees of CP’s Chicago
Service Area, represented by the
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
and Trainmen (BLET) and the United
Transportation Union (UTU), desire to
participate in the Pilot Project, which is
one of the action items included in
FRA’s Action Plan for Addressing
Critical Railroad Safety Issues (Action
Plan) announced on January 25, 2006.
As noted in the Action Plan, in other
industries such as aviation and mining,
as well as in the European railway
industry, implementation of ‘‘close call’’
reporting systems that shield the
reporting employee from discipline (and
the employer from punitive sanctions
levied by the regulation) have
contributed to major reductions in
accidents. In March of 2005, FRA
completed an overarching memorandum
of understanding with railroad labor
organizations and management to
develop pilot programs to document
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
close calls, i.e., unsafe events that do
not result in a reportable accident but
very well could have. Participating
railroads will be expected to develop
corrective actions to address the
problems that may be revealed. The
aggregate data may prove useful in
FRA’s decision-making concerning
regulatory and other options to address
human factor-caused accidents.
CP, BLET, and UTU have developed
and signed an implementing
memorandum of understanding (IMOU),
based on the FRA’s overarching
memorandum of understanding, as a
first step in commencing the
demonstration pilot project. The project
would involve approximately 350 yard
and road service employees operating
between Newport, Minnesota, (Mile
Post (MP) 402.5C, River Subdivision)
and Tower A–20 (MP 20.5, C&M
Subdivision), and all track between
those mileposts, including track on the
following subdivisions: River, Tomah,
Watertown, M&P, the CN Valley, and
C&M. This IMOU was sent to FRA for
consideration and acceptance on
October 8, 2007. As referenced in the
IMOU, certain ‘‘close calls’’ may be
properly reported by the employee(s)
involved and later discovered by CP, for
example, through subsequent
retrospective analysis of locomotive
event recorder data, etc. In order to
encourage employee reporting of close
calls, the IMOU contains provisions to
shield the reporting employee from CP
discipline. CP, BLET, and UTU also
desire to shield the reporting
employee(s) and CP from punitive
sanctions that would otherwise arise as
provided in selected sections of Part 240
for properly reported close call events as
defined in the C3RS IMOU.
The waiver petition is requested for
the duration of the C3RS Pilot Project (5
years from implementation or until the
Pilot Project is completed or parties to
the IMOU withdraw as described in the
IMOU, whichever comes first).
Note: According to Article 7.2 of the
IMOU, ‘‘Conditions under which a reporting
employee is not protected from CP discipline
and/or decertification and from FRA
enforcement,’’ CP employees included in this
C3RS/IMOU receive no protection from
discipline and/or decertification or from FRA
enforcement action when one or more of the
following conditions occur:
• The employee’s action or lack of action
was intended to damage CP or another
entity’s operations or equipment, or to injure
other individuals or purposely place others
in danger (e.g., sabotage);
• The employee’s action or lack of action
involved a criminal offense;
• The employee’s behavior involved
substance abuse or inappropriate use of
controlled substances;
PO 00000
Frm 00212
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• The report is rejected by the Bureau of
Transportation Statistics Peer Review Team;
• The event resulted in a railroad accident/
incident that qualifies as reportable under
§ 225.11;
• The event resulted in an identifiable
release of a hazardous material; or
• The event was observed in real-time and
reported to CP management (such as a train
dispatcher or operator observing a signal
violation) or was observed as part of
proficiency testing.
Proficiency testing (e.g., operating
rule efficiency testing, signal
compliance testing) generally consists of
real-time observations and do not
qualify for exemption. Similarly, an
employee is not exempt from discipline
and/or decertification for a violation
that CP or FRA identifies
contemporaneously (e.g., a block circuit
is occupied by a train without authority,
and the train dispatcher notices it before
the train backs off the circuit) before the
employee files a close call report. In
such situations, CP or FRA may use
event recorder information to support
discipline and/or decertification and/or
enforcement. For example, a CP official
who observes a train operate past a
signal that requires a stop may use any
relevant data recorded by the
locomotive’s event recorder in pursuing
disciplinary action against the train
crew, regardless of whether a member of
the crew timely files a close call report.
In its petition, CP indicated that the
parties signatory to the IMOU, dated
August 21, 2007, believe the data from
these properly reported close call
incidents, as defined in the IMOU, will
be invaluable in the analysis and
development of effective corrective
actions. CP expressed the view that
without the requested waiver the
employee(s) involved in incidents such
as those described above will not file
reports of the incidents and that the
incident(s) will likely go undetected,
resulting in no opportunity for analysis,
data trending, or appropriate corrective
actions. Noting the success of close call
reporting systems in other industries
(e.g., aviation and maritime), CP further
indicated that all parties signatory to the
IMOU and participating in the Pilot
Project believe that the Pilot Project and
requested regulatory relief is in the
public interest and consistent with
railroad safety.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73966-73968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-25205]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA-2007-0031]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Notice of Request for
Extension and Change of Title of a Currently Approved Information
Collection
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of request for extension and change of title of a
currently approved information collection. --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA has forwarded the information collection request
described in this notice to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for approval of an extension and change of title of a currently
approved information collection. We published a Federal Register
Notice with a 60-day public comment period on this information
collection on August 31, 2007.
We are required to publish this notice in the Federal Register by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. As part of FHWA's ongoing effort
to reduce the overall burden on the public, four information
collections associated with the accommodation or relocation of utility
facilities in the right-of-way of highway facilities are being combined
into a single collection (2125-0519) with a new title of Utility
Adjustments, Agreements, Eligibility Statements, and Accommodation
Policies. The four affected information collections are: 2125-0514:
Develop and Submit Utility Accommodation Policies; 2125-0515:
Eligibility Statement for Utility Adjustments; 2125-0519: Developing
and Recording Costs for Utility Adjustments; and 2125-0522: Utility Use
and Occupancy Agreements.
DATES: Please submit comments by January 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments within 30 days to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,
725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20503, or e-mail at oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov, Attention DOT Desk Officer. You are asked to
comment on any aspect of this information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is necessary for the FHWA's
performance; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways for the
FHWA to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the collected
information; and (4) ways that the burden could be
[[Page 73967]]
minimized, including the use of electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information. All comments should include
the Docket number FHWA-2007-0031.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jon Obenberger, 202-366-2221,
Office of Infrastructure, Federal Highway Administration, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Office hours are from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Utility Adjustments, Agreements, Eligibility Statements, and
Accommodation Policies; formerly titled ``Developing and Recording
Costs for Utility Adjustments.''
Background: Federal laws dealing with the relocation and
accommodation of utility facilities associated with the right-of-way of
highway facilities are contained in the United States Code (U.S.C.) 23,
Sections 123 and 109(I)(1). Regulations dealing with the utility
facility accommodation and relocation are based upon the laws contained
in 23 U.S.C. and are found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
Title 23, Chapter I, Subchapter G, Part 645, subparts A and B.
The FHWA requires (23 CFR 645 subpart A--Utility Relocations,
Adjustments, and Reimbursement) developing and recording costs for
utility adjustments, as the basis for reimbursing State Departments of
Transportation (SDOTs) and local agency transportation departments,
when they have paid the costs of utility facilities relocations that
were required by the construction of Federal-aid highway projects. The
FHWA requires the utility companies to document the costs or expenses
for adjusting their facilities. These utility companies must have a
system for recording labor, materials, supplies and equipment costs
incurred when undertaking adjustments to accommodate the highway
projects. This record of costs forms the basis for payment by the SDOT
or local transportation department to the utility company. In turn the
FHWA reimburses the SDOT or local transportation department for its
payment to the utility company. The utility company is required to
maintain these records of costs for 3 years after final payment is
received.
The SDOT and/or local agency transportation departments are
responsible for maintaining the highway rights-of-way, including the
control of its use by the utility companies. In managing the use of the
highway rights-of-way, the SDOT and/or local agency transportation
department is required (23 CFR 645.205 and 23 CFR 645.213) to document
the terms under which utility facilities are allowed to cross or
otherwise occupy the highway rights-of-way, in the form of utility use
and occupancy agreements (formerly OMB Control : 2125-0522)
with each utility company. This documentation, consisting of a use and
occupancy agreement (permit), must be in writing and must be maintained
in the SDOT and/or local agency transportation department. Each SDOTs
is required (23 CFR 615.215) to submit to the FHWA a utility adjustment
eligibility statement (formerly OMB Control : 2125-0515) that
establishes the SDOT's legal authority and policies it employs for
accommodating utilities within highway rights-of-way or obligation to
pay for utility adjustments. FHWA has previously reviewed and approved
these eligibility statements for each State DOT. The statements are
used as a basis for Federal-aid reimbursement in utility relocation
costs under the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 123. Updated statements may be
submitted for review at the States discretion where circumstances have
modified (for example, a change in State statute) the extent to which
utility adjustments are eligible for reimbursement by the State or
those instances where a local SDOT's legal basis for payment of utility
adjustments differs from that of the State.
Each SDOT is also required (23 CFR 645.215) to develop and submit
to FHWA their utility accommodation policies (formerly OMB Control
: 2125-0514) that will be used to regulate and manage the
utility facilities within the rights-of-way of Federal-aid highway
projects. The agencies utility accommodation policies need to address
the basis for utility facilities to use and occupy highway rights-of-
way; the State's authority to regulate such use; and the policies and/
or procedures employed for managing and accommodating utilities within
the rights-of-way of Federal-aid highway projects. Upon FHWA's approval
of the policy statement, the SDOT may take any action required in
accordance with the approved policy statement without a case-by-case
review by the FHWA. In addition, the utility accommodation policy
statements that have been approved previously by the FHWA are
periodically reviewed by the SDOTs to determine if updating is
necessary to reflect policy changes.
Respondents: 52 SDOTs, including the District of Columbia and
Puerto Rico, local agency transportation departments, and utility
companies.
Frequency: The SDOTs and local agency transportation departments
are each involved in an average of 15 utility use and occupancy
agreements (or permits) per year for an annual frequency of 46,000.
SDOTs are allowed to submit their eligibility statement for utility
adjustments and their utility accommodation policies when warranted by
changes or when updates occur, or at the SDOT's discretion. It is
estimated 10 SDOTs will update either their eligibility statement for
utility agreements or utility accommodation policies per year.
Estimated Average Burden per Response: The estimated average amount
of time required to develop and record the costs for each utility
adjustment is 8 hours. The estimated amount of time required by the
SDOTs and local agency transportation departments to process each
utility use and occupancy agreement (permit) is 8 hours. The estimated
amount of time for each update to the SDOT's eligibility statement for
utility adjustments has an average burden of 18 hours. The estimated
amount of time for each update and submittal of a SDOT's utility
accommodation policy has an average burden of 280 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: The annual burden associated
with developing and recording the costs for adjusting utility
facilities is 72,000 hours based on an estimate of 9,000 adjustments
that utility companies perform annually that may be eligible for
Federal-aid highway funding allowing SDOTs or local agency
transportation departments to request reimbursement from FHWA. The
annual burden associated with preparing, submitting and approving
utility use and occupancy agreements (permits) is 552,000 burden-hours.
The annual burden associated with developing and approving updates to a
SDOT's eligibility statement for utility adjustments is 90 hours. The
annual burden associated with developing and approving updates to
SDOTs' utility accommodation policies is 1,400 hours. The accumulated
burden for the combined information collection is 625,490.
Electronic Access: Internet users may access all comments received
by the U.S. DOT Dockets, Room PL-401, by using the universal resource
locator (URL): https://dms.dot.gov, 24 hours each day, 365 days each
year. Please follow the instructions online for more information and
help.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.
[[Page 73968]]
Issued on: December 20, 2007.
James R. Kabel,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis Division.
[FR Doc. E7-25205 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P