Medicaid Program; Fiscal Year Disproportionate Share Hospital Allotments and Disproportionate Share Hospital Institutions for Mental Disease Limits, 73831-73841 [E7-24486]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
Deadline for Nominations by
Regular Mail: Friday, January 18, 2008
at 5 p.m., e.s.t.
Deadline for Nominations by
Electronic Mail: Friday, January 25,
2008 at 5 p.m., e.s.t.
ADDRESSES: Regular Mail: Lynne G.
Johnson, Office of External Affairs,
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, S1–
05–06, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
Electronic Mail:
Lynne.Johnson@cms.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynne G. Johnson, Health Insurance
Specialist, Division of Forum and
Conference Development, (410) 786–
0090. Please refer to the CMS Advisory
Committees Information Line (1–877–
449–5659 toll free)/(410–786–9379
local) or the Internet (https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/FACA/04_APME.asp)
for additional information and updates
on committee activities, or contact Ms.
Johnson via e-mail at
Lynne.Johnson@cms.hhs.gov. Press
inquiries are handled through the CMS
Press Office at (202) 690–6145.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
DATES:
I. Background
Section 9(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act authorizes the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
(the Secretary) to establish an advisory
panel if the Secretary determines that
the panel is ‘‘in the public interest in
connection with the performance of
duties imposed * * * by law.’’ Section
1804 of the Social Security Act (the Act)
requires the Secretary to provide
informational materials to Medicare
beneficiaries about the Medicare
program, and section 1851(d) of the Act,
requiring the Secretary to provide for
‘‘activities * * * to broadly disseminate
information to Medicare beneficiaries
* * * on the coverage options provided
under [Medicare Advantage] in order to
promote an active, informed selection
among such options.’’ To help inform
these activities, section 1114(f) of the
Act and section 222 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 217a) authorize
the creation of an advisory panel. The
Secretary signed the charter establishing
this Panel on January 21, 1999 and
approved the renewal of the charter on
November 14, 2006. The establishment
of the charter and the renewal of charter
were announced in the February 17,
1999 Federal Register (64 FR 7899), and
the March 23, 2007 Federal Register (72
FR 13796), respectively. The Panel
advises and makes recommendations to
the Secretary and the Administrator of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (the Administrator) on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
opportunities to enhance the
effectiveness of consumer education
strategies concerning the Medicare
program. The Secretary delegates
authority to the Administrator.
The goals of the Panel are as follows:
• To provide recommendations on
the development and implementation of
a national Medicare education program
that describes the options for selecting
a health plan and prescription drug
benefits under Medicare.
• To enhance the Federal
government’s effectiveness in informing
the Medicare consumer, including the
appropriate use of public-private
partnerships.
• To make recommendations on how
to expand outreach to vulnerable and
underserved communities, including
racial and ethnic minorities, in the
context of a national Medicare
education program.
• To assemble an information base of
best practices for helping consumers
evaluate health plan options and build
a community infrastructure for
information, counseling, and assistance.
The Panel shall consist of a maximum
of 20 members. The Chair shall either be
appointed from among the 20 members,
or a Federal official will be designated
to serve as the Chair. The charter
requires that meetings shall be held
approximately 4 times per year.
Members will be expected to attend all
meetings. The members and the Chair
shall be selected from authorities
knowledgeable in the fields of senior
citizen advocacy; outreach to minority
communities; health communications;
disease-related health advocacy;
disability policy and access; health
economics research; health insurers and
plans; providers and clinicians; labor
and retirement, and web education.
Members of the general public are
invited to apply.
This notice is an invitation to
interested organizations or individuals
to submit their nominations for
membership on the Panel. The Secretary
or his designee will appoint new
members to the Panel from among those
candidates determined to have the
expertise required to meet specific
agency needs and in a manner to ensure
an appropriate balance of membership.
II. Nomination Requirements
Each nomination must state that the
nominee has expressed a willingness to
serve as a Panel member and must be
accompanied by a resume or description
of the nominee’s experience and a brief
biographical summary. In order to
permit an evaluation of possible sources
of conflict of interest, potential
candidates will be asked to provide
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73831
detailed information concerning such
matters as financial holdings,
consultancies, and research grants or
contracts. Self-nominations will also be
accepted. All nominations must be
received at the appropriate address
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
notice by the date specified in the DATES
section of this notice.
Authority: Sections 9(a) and 10 of Public
L. 92–463 (5 U.S.C. App. 2, sections 9(a) and
10); 41 CFR Part 102–3; Sections 1114(f),
1804, and 1851(d) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 1314(f), 1395b–2, and 1394w–
21(d)); and Section 222 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 217a).
Dated: December 3, 2007.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E7–24273 Filed 12–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–2269–N]
RIN 0938–AO75
Medicaid Program; Fiscal Year
Disproportionate Share Hospital
Allotments and Disproportionate Share
Hospital Institutions for Mental
Disease Limits
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
final Federal share disproportionate
share hospital (DSH) allotments for
Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2006 and the
preliminary Federal share DSH
allotments for FFY 2008. This notice
also announces the final FFY 2006 and
the preliminary FFY 2008 limitations on
aggregate DSH payments that States may
make to institutions for mental disease
and other mental health facilities. In
addition, this notice includes
background information describing the
methodology for determining the
amounts of States’ FFY DSH allotments.
DATES: Effective Date: December 28,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Strauss, (410) 786–2019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Disproportionate Share Hospital
Allotments for Federal Fiscal Year 2003
Under section 1923(f)(3) of the Social
Security Act (the Act), States’ Federal
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
73832
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
C. DSH Allotments for Non-Low DSH
States for FFY 2005, and Fiscal Years
Thereafter
Under the methodology contained in
section 1923(f)(3)(C) of the Act, as
amended by section 1001(a)(2) of the
MMA, the non-Low-DSH States’ DSH
allotments for FFY 2005 and subsequent
fiscal years continue at the same level
as the States’ DSH allotments for FFY
2004 until a ‘‘fiscal year specified’’
occurs. The ‘‘fiscal year specified’’ is the
first fiscal year for which the Secretary
estimates that a State’s DSH allotment
equals (or no longer exceeds) the DSH
allotment as would have been
determined under the statute in effect
before the enactment of the MMA. We
determine whether the fiscal year
specified has occurred under a special
parallel process. Specifically, under this
parallel process, a ‘‘parallel’’ DSH
allotment is determined for FFYs after
2003 by increasing the State’s DSH
allotment for the previous fiscal year by
the percentage change in the CPI–U for
the prior fiscal year, subject to the 12
percent limit. This is the methodology
as would otherwise have been applied
under section 1923(f)(3)(A) of the Act
notwithstanding the application of the
provisions of MMA. The ‘‘fiscal year
specified,’’ is the fiscal year in which
the parallel DSH allotment calculated
under this special parallel process
finally equals or exceeds the FY 2004
DSH allotment, as determined under the
MMA provisions. Once the fiscal year
specified occurs for a State, that State’s
fiscal year DSH allotment will be
calculated by increasing the State’s
previous actual fiscal year DSH
allotment (which would be equal to the
FY 2004 DSH allotment) by the
percentage change in the CPI–U for the
previous fiscal year, subject to the 12
percent limit. The following example
illustrates how the fiscal year DSH
allotment would be calculated for fiscal
years after FFY 2004.
B. DSH Allotments for FFY 2004
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
fiscal year (FFY) 2003 disproportionate
share hospital (DSH) allotments were
calculated by increasing the amounts of
the FFY 2002 allotments for each State
(as specified in the chart, entitled ‘‘DSH
Allotment (in millions of dollars),’’
contained in section 1923(f)(2) of the
Act) by the percentage change in the
Consumer Price Index for all Urban
Consumers (CPI–U) for the prior fiscal
year. The allotment, determined in this
way, is subject to the limitation that an
increase to a State’s DSH allotment for
a fiscal year cannot result in the DSH
allotment exceeding the greater of the
State’s DSH allotment for the previous
fiscal year or 12 percent of the State’s
total medical assistance expenditures
for the allotment year (this is referred to
as the 12 percent limit).
Most States’ actual FY 2002
allotments were determined in
accordance with the provisions of
section 1923(f)(4) of the Act. However,
as indicated previously, the calculation
of States’ FFY 2003 allotments was not
based on the actual FFY 2002 DSH
allotments; rather, section 1923(f)(3) of
the Act requires that the States’ FY 2003
allotments be determined using the
amount of the States’ FY 2002
allotments specified in the chart in
section 1923(f)(2) of the Act. The
exception to this is the calculation of
the FFY 2003 DSH allotments for certain
‘‘Low–DSH States’’ (defined in section
1923(f)(5) of the Act). Under the Low–
DSH State provision, there is a special
calculation methodology for the Low–
DSH States only. Under this
methodology, the FFY 2003 allotments
were determined by using (that is,
increasing) States’ actual FFY 2002 DSH
allotments (not their FFY 2002
allotments specified in the chart in
section 1923(f)(2) of the Act) by the
percentage change in the CPI–U for the
previous fiscal year.
Example —In this example, we are
determining the parallel FFY 2008 DSH
allotment. A State’s actual FFY 2003 DSH
allotment is $100 million. Under the MMA,
this State’s actual FFY 2004 DSH allotment
would be $116 million ($100 million
increased by 16 percent). The State’s DSH
allotment for FFY 2005 and subsequent fiscal
years would continue at the $116 million
FFY 2004 DSH allotment for fiscal years
following FFY 2004 until the ‘‘fiscal year
specified’’ occurs. In the separate parallel
process, we determine whether the fiscal year
specified has occurred by calculating the
State’s DSH allotments in accordance with
the statute in effect before the enactment of
the MMA. Under this special process, we
would continue to determine the State’s
parallel DSH allotment for each fiscal year by
increasing the State’s parallel DSH allotment
Section 1001(a) of the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) (Pub.
L. 108–173, enacted on December 8,
2003) amended section 1923(f)(3) of the
Act to provide for a ‘‘Special,
Temporary Increase In Allotments On A
One-Time, Non-Cumulative Basis.’’
Under this provision, States’ FFY 2004
DSH allotments were determined by
increasing their FFY 2003 allotments by
16 percent, and the fiscal year DSH
allotment amounts so determined were
not subject to the 12 percent limit.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for the previous fiscal year (as also
determined under the special parallel
process) by the percentage change in the CPI–
U for the previous fiscal year, and subject to
the 12 percent limit. Assume for purposes of
this example that, in accordance with this
special parallel process, the State’s parallel
FFY 2007 DSH allotment was determined to
be $115 million and the percentage change in
the CPI–U for FFY 2007 (the previous fiscal
year) relevant for the calculation of the FFY
2008 DSH allotment was 2.3 percent. That is,
the percentage change for the CPI–U for FFY
2007, the year before FFY 2008, was 2.3
percent. Therefore, the State’s special parallel
process FFY 2008 DSH allotment amount
would be calculated by increasing the special
parallel process FFY 2007 DSH allotment
amount of $115 million by 2.3 percent; this
results in a special DSH allotment process
amount for FFY 2008 of $117.6 million.
Since $117.6 million is greater than $116
million (the actual FFY 2004 DSH allotment
calculated under the MMA), we would
determine that FFY 2008 is the ‘‘fiscal year
specified’’ (the first year that the FFY 2004
allotment equals or no longer exceeds the
parallel process allotment). We would then
determine the State’s FFY 2008 allotment as
the State’s actual FFY 2007 DSH allotment
($116 million) increased by the percentage
change in the CPI–U for FFY 2007 (2.3
percent). Therefore, the State’s FFY 2008
DSH allotment would be $118.67 million
($116 million increased by 2.3 percent); for
purposes of this example, the application of
the 12 percent limit has no effect.
Furthermore, for FFY 2009 and thereafter, the
State’s DSH allotment would be calculated by
increasing the State’s previous fiscal year’s
DSH allotment by the percentage change in
the CPI–U for the previous fiscal year, subject
to the 12 percent limit.
However, as amended by section
1001(b)(4) of the MMA, section
1923(f)(5)(B) of the Act also contains
new criteria for determining whether a
State is a Low-DSH State, beginning
with FFY 2004. This provision is
described in section I.D.
Finally, the provisions of section 6054
of the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of
2005 Public Law 109–171, enacted
February 8, 2006) affected the
determination of the DSH allotment for
the District of Columbia. Under section
6054 of the DRA, for purposes of
determining only the FFY 2006 and
subsequent fiscal year DSH allotments
for the District of Columbia, the table in
section 1923(f)(2) of the Act is amended
by increasing the FFY DSH allotment
amounts indicated in that table for the
District of Columbia for FFYs 2000,
2001, and 2002 to $49 million for each
of those fiscal years. Before the DRA
amendment, the amount in the chart in
section 1923(f)(2) of the Act for the
District of Columbia for each of those
fiscal years was $32 million. This DRA
provision increases the fiscal year DSH
allotment for the District of Columbia
effective with the FFY 2006 DSH
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
allotment. This change is because the
DSH allotments for FFY 2003 were
based on the amounts of States’ DSH
allotments for FFY 2002 as contained in
the chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act.
Since (for purposes of ultimately
determining the FFY 2006 allotment)
the DRA provision increased the FFY
2002 allotment for the District of
Columbia, as indicated above, the FFY
2003 allotment was increased.
Furthermore, for this purpose, the FFY
2004 allotment for the District of
Columbia would then have been
determined by increasing the FFY 2003
allotment (as so determined) by 16
percent. For fiscal years subsequent to
FFY 2006, the DSH allotments are
determined as described above. The
final FFY 2006 DSH allotment and the
preliminary FFY 2008 DSH allotment
for the District of Columbia contained in
this notice reflect the provision of
section 6054 of the DRA.
As described below, in accordance
with section 6054 of the DRA, the final
FFY 2006 DSH allotment for the District
of Columbia is $57,692,600. As
amended by section 6054 of the DRA,
the FFY 2002 DSH allotment amount for
the District of Columbia contained in
the chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act
was increased to $49,000,000. In
accordance with section 1923(f)(3)(A) of
the Act, the FFY 2003 DSH allotment is
determined by increasing the
$49,000,000 DSH Allotment for FFY
2002 (as referenced in section 1923(f)(2)
of the Act) by the percentage change in
the CPI–U for 2002 (in this case, 1.5
percent) to $49,735,000. In accordance
with section 1923(f)(3)(C)(i) of the Act,
the FFY 2004 DSH allotment is
determined by increasing the
$49,735,000 FFY 2003 DSH allotment
amount by 16 percent to $57,692,600. In
accordance with the provisions of
section 1923(f)(3)(C) of the Act, the
District of Columbia’s DSH allotments
for FFYs 2005, 2006, and 2007 are also
$57,692,600. Finally, in accordance
with section 6054 of the DRA, the
District of Columbia’s DSH allotment is
increased as described above, effective
beginning with FFY 2006.
D. DSH Allotments for Low–DSH States
for FFY 2004 and Fiscal Years
Thereafter
Section 1001(b)(1) of the MMA
amended section 1923(f)(5) of the Act
regarding the calculation of the fiscal
year DSH allotments for ‘‘Low–DSH’’
States for FFY 2004 and subsequent
fiscal years. Specifically, under section
1923(f)(5)(B) of the Act, as amended by
section 1001(b)(4) of the MMA, a State
is considered a Low–DSH State for FFY
2004 if its total DSH payments under its
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
State plan for FFY 2000 (including
Federal and State shares) as reported to
CMS as of August 31, 2003, are greater
than 0 percent and less than 3 percent
of the State’s total FFY 2000
expenditures under its State plan for
medical assistance. For States that meet
the new Low–DSH criteria, their FFY
2004 DSH allotments are calculated by
increasing their FFY 2003 DSH
allotments by 16 percent. Therefore, for
FFY 2004, Low–DSH States’ fiscal year
DSH allotments are calculated in the
same way as the DSH allotments for
regular States, which under section
1923(f)(3) of the Act, get the special
temporary increase for FFY 2004.
Furthermore, for States meeting the
MMA’s Low-DSH definition, the DSH
allotments for FFYs 2005 through 2008
will continue to be determined by
increasing the previous fiscal year’s
DSH allotment by 16 percent. The LowDSH States’ DSH allotments for FFYs
2004 through 2008 are not subject to the
12 percent limit. The Low-DSH States’
DSH allotments for FFYs 2009 and
subsequent fiscal years are calculated by
increasing those States’ DSH allotments
for the prior fiscal year by the
percentage change in the CPI–U for that
prior fiscal year. For FFYs 2009 and
thereafter, the DSH allotments so
determined would be subject to the 12
percent limit.
E. Institutions for Mental Diseases DSH
Limits for FFYs 1998 and Thereafter
Under section 1923(h) to the Act,
Federal financial participation (FFP) is
not available for DSH payments to
institutions for mental diseases (IMDs)
and other mental health facilities that
are in excess of State-specific aggregate
limits. Under this provision, this
aggregate limit for DSH payments to
IMDs and other mental health facilities
is the lesser of a State’s FFY 1995 total
computable (State and Federal share)
IMD and other mental health facility
DSH expenditures applicable to the
State’s FFY 1995 DSH allotment (as
reported on the Form CMS–64 as of
January 1, 1997), or the amount equal to
the product of the State’s current year
total computable DSH allotment and the
applicable percentage.
Each State’s IMD limit on DSH
payments to IMDs and other mental
health facilities was calculated by first
determining the State’s total computable
DSH expenditures attributable to the
FFY 1995 DSH allotment for mental
health facilities and inpatient hospitals.
This calculation was based on the total
computable DSH expenditures reported
by the State on the Form CMS–64 as
mental health DSH and inpatient
hospital as of January 1, 1997. We then
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73833
calculate an ‘‘applicable percentage.’’
The applicable percentage for FFY 1998
through FFY 2000 (1995 IMD DSH
percentage) is calculated by dividing the
total computable amount of IMD and
mental health DSH expenditures
applicable to the State’s FFY 1995 DSH
allotment by the total computable
amount of all DSH expenditures (mental
health facility plus inpatient hospital)
applicable to the FFY 1995 DSH
allotment. For FFY 2001 and thereafter,
the applicable percentage is defined as
the lesser of the applicable percentage
as calculated above (for FFYs 1998
through 2001) or 50 percent for FFY
2001; 40 percent for FFY 2002; and 33
percent for each subsequent FFY.
The applicable percentage is then
applied to each State’s total computable
FFY DSH allotment for the current FFY.
The State’s total computable FFY DSH
allotment is calculated by dividing the
State’s Federal share DSH allotment for
the FFY by the State’s Federal medical
assistance percentage (FMAP) for that
FFY.
In the final step of the calculation of
the IMD DSH Limit, the State’s total
computable IMD DSH limit for the FFY
is set at the lesser of the product of a
State’s current fiscal year total
computable DSH allotment and the
applicable percentage for that fiscal
year, or the State’s FFY 1995 total
computable IMD and other mental
health facility DSH expenditures
applicable to the State’s FFY 1995 DSH
allotment as reported on the Form
CMS–64.
The MMA legislation did not amend
the Medicaid statute with respect to the
calculation of the IMD DSH limit.
F. DSH Allotments and IMD DSH Limits
Published in the Federal Register on
October 3, 2006
On October 3, 2006, we published a
notice (71 FR 58398) in the Federal
Register that announced the final
Federal share DSH allotments for
Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2005, and the
preliminary Federal share DSH
allotments for FFY 2006 and FFY 2007.
It also announced the final FFY 2005,
and the preliminary FFY 2006 and FFY
2007, limitations on aggregate DSH
payments that States may make to
institutions for mental disease (IMDs)
and other mental health facilities.
G. Publication in the Federal Register
of Preliminary and Final Notice for DSH
Allotments and IMD DSH Limits
In general, we initially determine
States’ DSH allotments and IMD DSH
limits for a fiscal year using estimates of
medical assistance expenditures,
including DSH expenditures in their
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
73834
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
Medicaid programs. These estimates are
provided by States each year on the
August quarterly Medicaid budget
reports (Form CMS–37) before the
Federal fiscal year for which the DSH
allotments and IMD DSH limits are
being determined. The DSH allotments
and IMD DSH limits determined using
these estimates are referred to as
‘‘preliminary.’’ Only after we receive
States’’ reports of the actual related
medical assistance expenditures
through the quarterly expenditure report
(Form CMS–64), which occurs after the
end of the fiscal year, are the ‘‘final’’
DSH Allotments and IMD DSH limits
determined.
As indicated in section I.F. of this
notice, the notice published in the
Federal Register on October 3, 2006
announced the final FFY 2005 DSH
allotments and the final FFY 2005 IMD
DSH limits (since they were based on
the actual expenditures related to those
years), the preliminary FFYs 2006 and
2007 DSH allotments (based on
estimates), and the preliminary FFYs
2006 and 2007 IMD DSH limits (since
they were based on the preliminary DSH
allotments for FFYs 2006 and 2007).
This notice announces the final FFY
2006 DSH allotments and the final FFY
2006 IMD DSH limits (since these are
now based on the actual expenditures
for those fiscal years), the preliminary
FFY 2008 DSH allotments (based on
estimates), and the preliminary IMD
DSH limits for FFY 2008 (since they are
based on the preliminary DSH
allotments for FFY 2008). This notice
does not include the final FFY 2007
DSH allotments or the final FFY 2007
IMD DSH limits, since the associated
actual expenditures for FFY 2007 are
not available at this time.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
II. Provisions of the Notice
A. Calculation of the Final FFY 2006
Federal Share State DSH Allotments the
Preliminary FFY 2008 Federal Share
State DSH Allotments
Chart 1 of the Addendum to this
notice provides the States’ ‘‘final’’ FFY
2006 DSH allotments. The final FFY
2006 DSH allotments for each State
were computed in accordance with the
provisions of the Medicaid statute as
amended by the MMA. As required by
the provisions of the MMA, the final
FFY 2004 DSH allotments for the ‘‘LowDSH’’ States and all the other States
were calculated by increasing the FFY
2003 DSH allotments by 16 percent. In
the notice published on March 26, 2004
in the Federal Register, we explained
the definition and determination of the
‘‘Low-DSH’’ States under the MMA
provisions. However, for following
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
fiscal years, the DSH allotments are
determined under a process which
incorporates a parallel process
described in section I.C. of this notice.
Under that parallel process, States final
FFY 2006 DSH allotments were
determined using the States’
expenditure reports (Form CMS–64) for
FFY 2006.
Chart 2 of the Addendum to this
notice provides the States’
‘‘preliminary’’ FFY 2008 DSH
allotments. These preliminary
allotments were determined using the
States’ August 2007 expenditure
estimates submitted by the States on the
Form CMS–37. We will publish the final
FFY 2008 DSH allotments for each State
following receipt of the States’ four
quarterly Medicaid expenditure reports
(Form CMS–64) for FFY 2008.
B. Calculation of the FFYs 2006 and
FFY 2008 IMD DSH Limits
Section 1923(h) of the Act specifies
the methodology to be used to establish
the limits on the amount of DSH
payments that a State can make to IMDs
and other mental health facilities. FFP
is not available for IMD or DSH
payments that exceed the lesser of the
State’s FFY 1995 total computable
mental health DSH expenditures
applicable to the State’s FFY 1995 DSH
allotment as reported to us on the Form
CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997; or the
amount equal to the product of the
State’s current FFY total computable
DSH allotment and the applicable
percentage. We are publishing the final
FFY 2006 IMD DSH limit, and the
preliminary FFY 2008 IMD DSH limit,
along with an explanation of the
calculation of these limits.
For FFY 2003 and following fiscal
years, the applicable percentage is the
lesser of 33 percent or the 1995 DSH
IMD percentage of the amount
computed for FFY 2000. This
percentage was applied to the State’s
fiscal year total computable DSH
allotment. This result was then
compared to the State’s FFY 1995 total
computable mental health DSH
expenditures applicable to the State’s
FFY 1995 DSH allotment as reported on
the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997.
The lesser of these two amounts was the
State’s limitation on total computable
IMD/DSH expenditures for FFY 2003
and following fiscal years.
Charts 3 and 4 of the Addendum to
this notice detail each State’s final IMD/
DSH limitation for FFY 2006 and the
preliminary IMD/DSH limitation for
FFY 2008, respectively, in accordance
with section 1923(h) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Collection of Information
Requirements
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 35).
IV. Regulatory Impact Statement
We have examined the impact of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 (September 1993, Regulatory
Planning and Review), the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19,
1980, Pub. L. 96–354), section 1102(b) of
the Social Security Act, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), and Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for
major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more
in any 1 year). This notice does not
reach the economic threshold and thus
is not considered a major rule.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze
options for regulatory relief of small
businesses. For purposes of the RFA,
small entities include small businesses,
nonprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. Most
hospitals and most other providers and
suppliers are small entities, either by
nonprofit status or by having revenues
of $6.5 million to $31 million in any 1
year. Individuals and States are not
included in the definition of a small
entity. We are not preparing an analysis
for the RFA because we have
determined, and the Secretary certifies,
that this notice will not have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Specifically
the effects of the various controlling
statutes on providers are not impacted
by a result of any independent
regulatory impact and not this notice.
The purpose of the notice is to
announce the latest distributions as
required by the statute.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act
requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis if a rule may have a
significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural
hospitals. This analysis must conform to
the provisions of section 604 of the
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of
the Act, we define a small rural hospital
as a hospital that is located outside of
a Core-Based Statistical Area for
Medicaid payment regulations and has
fewer than 100 beds. We are not
preparing analysis for section 1102(b) of
the Act because we have determined
and the Secretary certifies that this
notice will not have a significant impact
on the operations of a substantial
number of small rural hospitals.
In addition, the MMA set statutorily
defined limits on the amount of Federal
share DSH expenditures available for
FFY 2004 and subsequent fiscal years.
Specifically, section 1001 of the MMA
increased the DSH allotment for States
beginning with fiscal year 2004. While
overall the statute mandated some
increases in DSH payments, we do not
believe that this notice will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule whose mandates require spending
in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation.
That threshold level is currently
approximately $140 million. This notice
will have no consequential effect on
State, local, or tribal governments or on
the private sector.
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
73835
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
Since this notice does not impose any
costs on State or local governments, the
requirements of E.O. 13132 are not
applicable.
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this notice was
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Addendum
This addendum contains the charts 1
through 4 (preceeded by associated
keys) that are referred to in the preamble
of this notice.
KEY TO CHART 1.—FINAL DSH ALLOTMENTS FOR FY 2006
[Key to the Chart of the Final FFY 2005 DSH Allotments. The final FFY 2006 DSH Allotments for the regular States Are Presented in the Top
Section of this chart and the final FFY 2005 DSH Allotments for the Low-DSH States Are presented in the Bottom Section of the chart.]
Column
Description
For Non-Low-DSH States:
Column A .................................
Column B .................................
Column C .................................
Column D .................................
For Low-DSH States:
Column A .................................
Column B .................................
Column C .................................
Column D .................................
State.
Final FY 2004 DSH Allotment Federal Share—This column contains the final FFY 2004 DSH Allotments.
FY 2006 DSH Allotment Federal Share—This column contains the final FFY 2006 DSH Allotments.
MMA Low-DSH Status—This column indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of each State.
State.
Prior FY DSH Allotment—This column contains the final FFY 2005 DSH Allotments.
FY 2006 DSH Allotments Federal Share—This column contains the final FFY 2006 DSH Allotments = Column B multiplied by 1.16.
MMA Low-DSH Status—This column indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of each State.
KEY TO CHART 2.—PRELIMINARY DSH ALLOTMENTS FOR FY 2008
[Key to the Chart of the Preliminary FFY 2008 DSH Allotments. The preliminary FFY 2008 DSH Allotments for the regular States are presented
in the top section of this chart and the preliminary FFY 2008 DSH Allotments for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of
the chart.]
Column
Description
For Non-Low-DSH States:
Column A .................................
Column B .................................
Column C .................................
Column D .................................
For Low-DSH States:
Column A .................................
Column B .................................
Column C .................................
Column D .................................
State.
Final FY 2004 DSH Allotment Federal Share—This column contains the final FFY 2004 DSH Allotments.
FY 2008 DSH Allotment Federal Share—This column contains the preliminary FFY 2008 DSH Allotments.
MMA Low-DSH Status—This column indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of each State.
State.
Prior FY DSH Allotment—This column contains the preliminary FFY 2007 DSH Allotments.
FY 2008 DSH Allotments Federal Share—This column contains the preliminary FFY 2008 DSH Allotments
= Column B multiplied by 1.16.
MMA Low-DSH Status—This column indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of each State.
KEY TO CHART 3.—FINAL FFY 2006 IMD DSH LIMITS
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2006 IMD Limitations.—The final FFY 2006 IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top section
of this chart and the Final FFY IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States are presented in the Bottom Section of the chart.]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Column
Description
Column A ........................................
Column B ........................................
State.
Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the States’ total computable FFY 1995 inpatient hospital DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64.
IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the total computable
FFY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1,
1997.
Column C ........................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
73836
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
KEY TO CHART 3.—FINAL FFY 2006 IMD DSH LIMITS—Continued
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2006 IMD Limitations.—The final FFY 2006 IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top section
of this chart and the Final FFY IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States are presented in the Bottom Section of the chart.]
Column
Description
Column D ........................................
Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable, Col B + C. This column contains the
total computation of all inpatient hospital DSH expenditures and mental health facility DSH expenditures
for FFY 1995 as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997 (representing the sum of Column
B and Column C).
Applicable Percentage Col C/D. This column contains the ‘‘applicable percentage’’ representing the total
computable FFY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures divided by total computable all inpatient
hospital and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FFY 1995 (the amount in Column C divided by
the amount in Column D) Per section 1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act, for FFYs after FY 2002, the applicable percentage can be no greater than 33 percent.
FY 2006 Federal Share DSH Allotment. This column contains the States’ final FFY 2005 DSH allotments.
FFY 2006 FMAP.
FY 2006 DSH Allotments in TC. Col. F/G. This column contains FFY 2006 total computable DSH allotment
(determined as Column F/Column G).
Col E * Col H in TC. This column contains the applicable percent of FFY 2006 total computable DSH allotment (calculated as Column E × Column H).
FY 2006 IMD DSH Limit Total Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I. The column contains the lesser of the
lesser of Column I or C.
FY 2006 IMD DSH Limit Federal Share, Col. G × J. This column contains the total computable IMD DSH
Limit from Col. J and converts that amount into a Federal share (calculated as Col. G × Col. J).
LOW DSH Status. This column contains Low DSH status for each State.
Column E ........................................
Column F ........................................
Column G ........................................
Column H ........................................
Column I ..........................................
Column J .........................................
Column K ........................................
Column L .........................................
KEY TO CHART 4.—PRELIMINARY FFY 2008 IMD DSH LIMITS
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2008 IMD Limitations.—The preliminary FFY 2008 IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top
section of this chart and the preliminary FFY 2008 IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States are presented in the Bottom Section of the Chart
Column
Description
Column A ........................................
Column B ........................................
State.
Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the States’ total computable FFY 1995 inpatient hospital DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64.
IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95 DSH Total Computable. This column contains the total computable
FFY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1,
1997.
Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable, Col. B + C. This column contains the
total computation of all inpatient hospital DSH expenditures and mental health facility DSH expenditures
for FFY 1995 as reported on the Form CMS–64 as of January 1, 1997 (representing the sum of Column
B and Column C).
Applicable Percentage Col. C/D. This column contains the ‘‘applicable percentage’’ representing the total
computable FFY 1995 mental health facility DSH expenditures divided by total computable all inpatient
hospital and mental health facility DSH expenditures for FFY 1995 (the amount in Column C divided by
the amount in Column D) Per section 1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act, for FFYs after FY 2002, the applicable percentage can be no greater than 33 percent.
FY 2008 Federal Share DSH Allotment. This column contains the States’ preliminary FFY 2008 DSH allotments.
FFY 2008 FMAP.
FY 2008 DSH Allotment Total Computable Col. F/G. This column contains FFY 2008 total computable
DSH allotment (determined as Column F/Column G).
Col E * Col H in TC. This column contains the applicable percent of FFY 2008 total computable DSH allotment (calculated as Column E × Column H)
FY 2008 IMD DSH Limit Total Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I. The column contains the lesser of the
lesser of Column I or C.
FY 2008 IMD DSH Limit Federal Share, Col. G × J. This column contains the total computable IMD DSH
Limit from Col. J and converts that amount into a Federal share (calculated as Col. G × Col. J).
Low DSH Status. This column contains Low DSH status for each State.
Column C ........................................
Column D ........................................
Column E ........................................
Column F ........................................
Column G ........................................
Column H ........................................
Column I ..........................................
Column J .........................................
Column K ........................................
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Column L .........................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
73837
EN28DE07.000
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
EN28DE07.001
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
73838
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
73839
EN28DE07.002
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
EN28DE07.003
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
73840
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2007 / Notices
Authority: Section 1923(a)(2), (f), and (h) of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r4(a)(2), (f), and (h), and Pub. L. 105–33)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
Dated: October 23, 3007.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Dated: November 8, 2007.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–24486 Filed 12–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–C
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–1556–N]
Medicare Program; Notice of
Supplemental Election Period for
Participation in the Calendar Year (CY)
2008 Competitive Acquisition Program
for Part B Drugs
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: This notice announces an
additional physician election period for
physicians who are not currently
participating in the competitive
acquisition program (CAP) for Medicare
Part B drugs for calendar year (CY)
2008. The additional physician election
period begins on January 15, 2008 and
ends on February 15, 2008. Physicians
who elect to join the CAP during this
additional election period will enter
into a physician election agreement
effective April 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2008.
DATES: The additional CAP physician
election period will begin on January
15, 2008 and end on February 15, 2008.
Physicians electing to join the CAP
during this period will participate in the
CAP effective April 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edmund Kasaitis (410) 786–0477.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act of
2003 (Pub. L. 108–173) (MMA) requires
the implementation of a competitive
acquisition program (CAP) for certain
Medicare Part B drugs not paid on a cost
or prospective payment system basis.
Physicians who elect to participate in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:27 Dec 27, 2007
Jkt 214001
the CAP obtain certain Part B covered
drugs from vendors selected through a
competitive bidding process. Physicians
who do not elect to participate in the
CAP purchase these drugs themselves
and are paid under the average sales
price (ASP) system. (For more
information on the CAP, see the March
4, 2005 proposed rule (70 FR 10746),
interim final rule with comment period
(70 FR 39022), November 21, 2005 final
rule (70 FR 70116), and the November
27, 2007 final rule with comment period
(72 FR 66222)). In accordance with
section 1874B(a) of the Social Security
Act (the Act), statute and our
regulations, the annual CAP physician
election period for CY 2009 will occur
in the fall of 2008.
II. Provisions of the Notice
Under the authority described in
section 1847B(a)(5)(A)(i) of the Act and
§ 414.908(a)(2) of our regulations, which
allows for physician election at times
other than the regular, annual election
period in such exigent circumstances as
defined by CMS, we are designating an
additional election period for
physicians who wish to join the CAP for
2008. We are providing for this
additional election period in recognition
of the statutory changes we recently
made to § 414.908(a)(2)(v) of our
regulations. These changes were
described and published in the
November 27, 2007 final rule with
comment period (72 FR 66265) with
comment period. The changes will
become effective on January 1, 2008.
In the November 27, 2007 Federal
Register (72 FR 66256), we published a
final rule, that defined a new exigent
circumstance that would allow a
participating CAP physician to opt out
of the CAP due to the burden that the
CAP places on the physician’s practice.
We established a two-tiered process,
under which a physician may opt out of
the CAP up to and including the first 60
days after the effective date of his or her
CAP election agreement if continuing
participation will impose a burden on
the physician’s practice. A participating
CAP physician may also opt out of CAP
participation more than 60 days after
the effective date of his or her CAP
election agreement based on a change of
circumstances which creates a new
burden to the practice.
The two-tiered process was developed
in response to public comments to the
CY 2008 Physician Fee Schedule
proposed rule. However, the CY 2008
Physician Fee Schedule final rule was
not issued until the end of the CY 2008
CAP physician election period, and
therefore, we were not able to
disseminate sufficient information to
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73841
make the large number of Medicare
physicians aware of this new and
desirable program change before the
election period closed. Thus, we believe
this is an ‘‘exigent circumstance’’ for
which we should allow physicians an
additional opportunity to join the CAP
for CY 2008. The additional election
period—
• Takes place from January 15, 2008
until February 15, 2008.
• Is open to physicians as defined in
section 1861(r) of the Act (The term
‘‘physician’’ includes persons who are
authorized to provide services under the
Act and who can, within their State’s
scope of practice, prescribe and order
drugs covered under Medicare Part B.
• Does not affect the terms of CAP
participation for physicians who have
already elected to participate in the CAP
for 2008.
• Uses the same procedures, forms,
etc. as the regular, annual 2008 election
period.
Physicians who elect to participate in
the CAP during the additional CY 2008
election period will have their CAP
election agreement effective from April
1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. We
note that participation in the CAP for
CY 2009 requires renewal of CAP
election during the regular fall election
period, which will run from October 1,
2008 to November 15, 2008.
Completed and signed forms must be
returned by mail to the physician’s local
carrier (the carrier that processes the
physician’s Part B claims). Forms must
be postmarked no later than February
15, 2008. Additional details about CAP
physician election will be available on
the CMS Web site at https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/
CompetitiveAcquisforBios/
02_infophys.asp#TopOfPage.
Authority: Section 1847B(a)(5)(A)(i) of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C 1395w–
3b(a)(5)(A)(i).)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.774, MedicareSupplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: December 18, 2007.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E7–25037 Filed 12–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73831-73841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24486]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-2269-N]
RIN 0938-AO75
Medicaid Program; Fiscal Year Disproportionate Share Hospital
Allotments and Disproportionate Share Hospital Institutions for Mental
Disease Limits
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the final Federal share disproportionate
share hospital (DSH) allotments for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2006 and
the preliminary Federal share DSH allotments for FFY 2008. This notice
also announces the final FFY 2006 and the preliminary FFY 2008
limitations on aggregate DSH payments that States may make to
institutions for mental disease and other mental health facilities. In
addition, this notice includes background information describing the
methodology for determining the amounts of States' FFY DSH allotments.
DATES: Effective Date: December 28, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Strauss, (410) 786-2019.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Disproportionate Share Hospital Allotments for Federal Fiscal Year
2003
Under section 1923(f)(3) of the Social Security Act (the Act),
States' Federal
[[Page 73832]]
fiscal year (FFY) 2003 disproportionate share hospital (DSH) allotments
were calculated by increasing the amounts of the FFY 2002 allotments
for each State (as specified in the chart, entitled ``DSH Allotment (in
millions of dollars),'' contained in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act) by
the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) for the prior fiscal year. The allotment, determined
in this way, is subject to the limitation that an increase to a State's
DSH allotment for a fiscal year cannot result in the DSH allotment
exceeding the greater of the State's DSH allotment for the previous
fiscal year or 12 percent of the State's total medical assistance
expenditures for the allotment year (this is referred to as the 12
percent limit).
Most States' actual FY 2002 allotments were determined in
accordance with the provisions of section 1923(f)(4) of the Act.
However, as indicated previously, the calculation of States' FFY 2003
allotments was not based on the actual FFY 2002 DSH allotments; rather,
section 1923(f)(3) of the Act requires that the States' FY 2003
allotments be determined using the amount of the States' FY 2002
allotments specified in the chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act. The
exception to this is the calculation of the FFY 2003 DSH allotments for
certain ``Low-DSH States'' (defined in section 1923(f)(5) of the Act).
Under the Low-DSH State provision, there is a special calculation
methodology for the Low-DSH States only. Under this methodology, the
FFY 2003 allotments were determined by using (that is, increasing)
States' actual FFY 2002 DSH allotments (not their FFY 2002 allotments
specified in the chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act) by the
percentage change in the CPI-U for the previous fiscal year.
B. DSH Allotments for FFY 2004
Section 1001(a) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) (Pub. L. 108-173, enacted on December
8, 2003) amended section 1923(f)(3) of the Act to provide for a
``Special, Temporary Increase In Allotments On A One-Time, Non-
Cumulative Basis.'' Under this provision, States' FFY 2004 DSH
allotments were determined by increasing their FFY 2003 allotments by
16 percent, and the fiscal year DSH allotment amounts so determined
were not subject to the 12 percent limit.
C. DSH Allotments for Non-Low DSH States for FFY 2005, and Fiscal Years
Thereafter
Under the methodology contained in section 1923(f)(3)(C) of the
Act, as amended by section 1001(a)(2) of the MMA, the non-Low-DSH
States' DSH allotments for FFY 2005 and subsequent fiscal years
continue at the same level as the States' DSH allotments for FFY 2004
until a ``fiscal year specified'' occurs. The ``fiscal year specified''
is the first fiscal year for which the Secretary estimates that a
State's DSH allotment equals (or no longer exceeds) the DSH allotment
as would have been determined under the statute in effect before the
enactment of the MMA. We determine whether the fiscal year specified
has occurred under a special parallel process. Specifically, under this
parallel process, a ``parallel'' DSH allotment is determined for FFYs
after 2003 by increasing the State's DSH allotment for the previous
fiscal year by the percentage change in the CPI-U for the prior fiscal
year, subject to the 12 percent limit. This is the methodology as would
otherwise have been applied under section 1923(f)(3)(A) of the Act
notwithstanding the application of the provisions of MMA. The ``fiscal
year specified,'' is the fiscal year in which the parallel DSH
allotment calculated under this special parallel process finally equals
or exceeds the FY 2004 DSH allotment, as determined under the MMA
provisions. Once the fiscal year specified occurs for a State, that
State's fiscal year DSH allotment will be calculated by increasing the
State's previous actual fiscal year DSH allotment (which would be equal
to the FY 2004 DSH allotment) by the percentage change in the CPI-U for
the previous fiscal year, subject to the 12 percent limit. The
following example illustrates how the fiscal year DSH allotment would
be calculated for fiscal years after FFY 2004.
Example --In this example, we are determining the parallel FFY
2008 DSH allotment. A State's actual FFY 2003 DSH allotment is $100
million. Under the MMA, this State's actual FFY 2004 DSH allotment
would be $116 million ($100 million increased by 16 percent). The
State's DSH allotment for FFY 2005 and subsequent fiscal years would
continue at the $116 million FFY 2004 DSH allotment for fiscal years
following FFY 2004 until the ``fiscal year specified'' occurs. In
the separate parallel process, we determine whether the fiscal year
specified has occurred by calculating the State's DSH allotments in
accordance with the statute in effect before the enactment of the
MMA. Under this special process, we would continue to determine the
State's parallel DSH allotment for each fiscal year by increasing
the State's parallel DSH allotment for the previous fiscal year (as
also determined under the special parallel process) by the
percentage change in the CPI-U for the previous fiscal year, and
subject to the 12 percent limit. Assume for purposes of this example
that, in accordance with this special parallel process, the State's
parallel FFY 2007 DSH allotment was determined to be $115 million
and the percentage change in the CPI-U for FFY 2007 (the previous
fiscal year) relevant for the calculation of the FFY 2008 DSH
allotment was 2.3 percent. That is, the percentage change for the
CPI-U for FFY 2007, the year before FFY 2008, was 2.3 percent.
Therefore, the State's special parallel process FFY 2008 DSH
allotment amount would be calculated by increasing the special
parallel process FFY 2007 DSH allotment amount of $115 million by
2.3 percent; this results in a special DSH allotment process amount
for FFY 2008 of $117.6 million. Since $117.6 million is greater than
$116 million (the actual FFY 2004 DSH allotment calculated under the
MMA), we would determine that FFY 2008 is the ``fiscal year
specified'' (the first year that the FFY 2004 allotment equals or no
longer exceeds the parallel process allotment). We would then
determine the State's FFY 2008 allotment as the State's actual FFY
2007 DSH allotment ($116 million) increased by the percentage change
in the CPI-U for FFY 2007 (2.3 percent). Therefore, the State's FFY
2008 DSH allotment would be $118.67 million ($116 million increased
by 2.3 percent); for purposes of this example, the application of
the 12 percent limit has no effect. Furthermore, for FFY 2009 and
thereafter, the State's DSH allotment would be calculated by
increasing the State's previous fiscal year's DSH allotment by the
percentage change in the CPI-U for the previous fiscal year, subject
to the 12 percent limit.
However, as amended by section 1001(b)(4) of the MMA, section
1923(f)(5)(B) of the Act also contains new criteria for determining
whether a State is a Low-DSH State, beginning with FFY 2004. This
provision is described in section I.D.
Finally, the provisions of section 6054 of the Deficit Reduction
Act (DRA) of 2005 Public Law 109-171, enacted February 8, 2006)
affected the determination of the DSH allotment for the District of
Columbia. Under section 6054 of the DRA, for purposes of determining
only the FFY 2006 and subsequent fiscal year DSH allotments for the
District of Columbia, the table in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act is
amended by increasing the FFY DSH allotment amounts indicated in that
table for the District of Columbia for FFYs 2000, 2001, and 2002 to $49
million for each of those fiscal years. Before the DRA amendment, the
amount in the chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act for the District
of Columbia for each of those fiscal years was $32 million. This DRA
provision increases the fiscal year DSH allotment for the District of
Columbia effective with the FFY 2006 DSH
[[Page 73833]]
allotment. This change is because the DSH allotments for FFY 2003 were
based on the amounts of States' DSH allotments for FFY 2002 as
contained in the chart in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act. Since (for
purposes of ultimately determining the FFY 2006 allotment) the DRA
provision increased the FFY 2002 allotment for the District of
Columbia, as indicated above, the FFY 2003 allotment was increased.
Furthermore, for this purpose, the FFY 2004 allotment for the District
of Columbia would then have been determined by increasing the FFY 2003
allotment (as so determined) by 16 percent. For fiscal years subsequent
to FFY 2006, the DSH allotments are determined as described above. The
final FFY 2006 DSH allotment and the preliminary FFY 2008 DSH allotment
for the District of Columbia contained in this notice reflect the
provision of section 6054 of the DRA.
As described below, in accordance with section 6054 of the DRA, the
final FFY 2006 DSH allotment for the District of Columbia is
$57,692,600. As amended by section 6054 of the DRA, the FFY 2002 DSH
allotment amount for the District of Columbia contained in the chart in
section 1923(f)(2) of the Act was increased to $49,000,000. In
accordance with section 1923(f)(3)(A) of the Act, the FFY 2003 DSH
allotment is determined by increasing the $49,000,000 DSH Allotment for
FFY 2002 (as referenced in section 1923(f)(2) of the Act) by the
percentage change in the CPI-U for 2002 (in this case, 1.5 percent) to
$49,735,000. In accordance with section 1923(f)(3)(C)(i) of the Act,
the FFY 2004 DSH allotment is determined by increasing the $49,735,000
FFY 2003 DSH allotment amount by 16 percent to $57,692,600. In
accordance with the provisions of section 1923(f)(3)(C) of the Act, the
District of Columbia's DSH allotments for FFYs 2005, 2006, and 2007 are
also $57,692,600. Finally, in accordance with section 6054 of the DRA,
the District of Columbia's DSH allotment is increased as described
above, effective beginning with FFY 2006.
D. DSH Allotments for Low-DSH States for FFY 2004 and Fiscal Years
Thereafter
Section 1001(b)(1) of the MMA amended section 1923(f)(5) of the Act
regarding the calculation of the fiscal year DSH allotments for ``Low-
DSH'' States for FFY 2004 and subsequent fiscal years. Specifically,
under section 1923(f)(5)(B) of the Act, as amended by section
1001(b)(4) of the MMA, a State is considered a Low-DSH State for FFY
2004 if its total DSH payments under its State plan for FFY 2000
(including Federal and State shares) as reported to CMS as of August
31, 2003, are greater than 0 percent and less than 3 percent of the
State's total FFY 2000 expenditures under its State plan for medical
assistance. For States that meet the new Low-DSH criteria, their FFY
2004 DSH allotments are calculated by increasing their FFY 2003 DSH
allotments by 16 percent. Therefore, for FFY 2004, Low-DSH States'
fiscal year DSH allotments are calculated in the same way as the DSH
allotments for regular States, which under section 1923(f)(3) of the
Act, get the special temporary increase for FFY 2004.
Furthermore, for States meeting the MMA's Low-DSH definition, the
DSH allotments for FFYs 2005 through 2008 will continue to be
determined by increasing the previous fiscal year's DSH allotment by 16
percent. The Low-DSH States' DSH allotments for FFYs 2004 through 2008
are not subject to the 12 percent limit. The Low-DSH States' DSH
allotments for FFYs 2009 and subsequent fiscal years are calculated by
increasing those States' DSH allotments for the prior fiscal year by
the percentage change in the CPI-U for that prior fiscal year. For FFYs
2009 and thereafter, the DSH allotments so determined would be subject
to the 12 percent limit.
E. Institutions for Mental Diseases DSH Limits for FFYs 1998 and
Thereafter
Under section 1923(h) to the Act, Federal financial participation
(FFP) is not available for DSH payments to institutions for mental
diseases (IMDs) and other mental health facilities that are in excess
of State-specific aggregate limits. Under this provision, this
aggregate limit for DSH payments to IMDs and other mental health
facilities is the lesser of a State's FFY 1995 total computable (State
and Federal share) IMD and other mental health facility DSH
expenditures applicable to the State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment (as
reported on the Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997), or the amount equal
to the product of the State's current year total computable DSH
allotment and the applicable percentage.
Each State's IMD limit on DSH payments to IMDs and other mental
health facilities was calculated by first determining the State's total
computable DSH expenditures attributable to the FFY 1995 DSH allotment
for mental health facilities and inpatient hospitals. This calculation
was based on the total computable DSH expenditures reported by the
State on the Form CMS-64 as mental health DSH and inpatient hospital as
of January 1, 1997. We then calculate an ``applicable percentage.'' The
applicable percentage for FFY 1998 through FFY 2000 (1995 IMD DSH
percentage) is calculated by dividing the total computable amount of
IMD and mental health DSH expenditures applicable to the State's FFY
1995 DSH allotment by the total computable amount of all DSH
expenditures (mental health facility plus inpatient hospital)
applicable to the FFY 1995 DSH allotment. For FFY 2001 and thereafter,
the applicable percentage is defined as the lesser of the applicable
percentage as calculated above (for FFYs 1998 through 2001) or 50
percent for FFY 2001; 40 percent for FFY 2002; and 33 percent for each
subsequent FFY.
The applicable percentage is then applied to each State's total
computable FFY DSH allotment for the current FFY. The State's total
computable FFY DSH allotment is calculated by dividing the State's
Federal share DSH allotment for the FFY by the State's Federal medical
assistance percentage (FMAP) for that FFY.
In the final step of the calculation of the IMD DSH Limit, the
State's total computable IMD DSH limit for the FFY is set at the lesser
of the product of a State's current fiscal year total computable DSH
allotment and the applicable percentage for that fiscal year, or the
State's FFY 1995 total computable IMD and other mental health facility
DSH expenditures applicable to the State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment as
reported on the Form CMS-64.
The MMA legislation did not amend the Medicaid statute with respect
to the calculation of the IMD DSH limit.
F. DSH Allotments and IMD DSH Limits Published in the Federal Register
on October 3, 2006
On October 3, 2006, we published a notice (71 FR 58398) in the
Federal Register that announced the final Federal share DSH allotments
for Federal fiscal year (FFY) 2005, and the preliminary Federal share
DSH allotments for FFY 2006 and FFY 2007. It also announced the final
FFY 2005, and the preliminary FFY 2006 and FFY 2007, limitations on
aggregate DSH payments that States may make to institutions for mental
disease (IMDs) and other mental health facilities.
G. Publication in the Federal Register of Preliminary and Final Notice
for DSH Allotments and IMD DSH Limits
In general, we initially determine States' DSH allotments and IMD
DSH limits for a fiscal year using estimates of medical assistance
expenditures, including DSH expenditures in their
[[Page 73834]]
Medicaid programs. These estimates are provided by States each year on
the August quarterly Medicaid budget reports (Form CMS-37) before the
Federal fiscal year for which the DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits are
being determined. The DSH allotments and IMD DSH limits determined
using these estimates are referred to as ``preliminary.'' Only after we
receive States'' reports of the actual related medical assistance
expenditures through the quarterly expenditure report (Form CMS-64),
which occurs after the end of the fiscal year, are the ``final'' DSH
Allotments and IMD DSH limits determined.
As indicated in section I.F. of this notice, the notice published
in the Federal Register on October 3, 2006 announced the final FFY 2005
DSH allotments and the final FFY 2005 IMD DSH limits (since they were
based on the actual expenditures related to those years), the
preliminary FFYs 2006 and 2007 DSH allotments (based on estimates), and
the preliminary FFYs 2006 and 2007 IMD DSH limits (since they were
based on the preliminary DSH allotments for FFYs 2006 and 2007).
This notice announces the final FFY 2006 DSH allotments and the
final FFY 2006 IMD DSH limits (since these are now based on the actual
expenditures for those fiscal years), the preliminary FFY 2008 DSH
allotments (based on estimates), and the preliminary IMD DSH limits for
FFY 2008 (since they are based on the preliminary DSH allotments for
FFY 2008). This notice does not include the final FFY 2007 DSH
allotments or the final FFY 2007 IMD DSH limits, since the associated
actual expenditures for FFY 2007 are not available at this time.
II. Provisions of the Notice
A. Calculation of the Final FFY 2006 Federal Share State DSH Allotments
the Preliminary FFY 2008 Federal Share State DSH Allotments
Chart 1 of the Addendum to this notice provides the States'
``final'' FFY 2006 DSH allotments. The final FFY 2006 DSH allotments
for each State were computed in accordance with the provisions of the
Medicaid statute as amended by the MMA. As required by the provisions
of the MMA, the final FFY 2004 DSH allotments for the ``Low-DSH''
States and all the other States were calculated by increasing the FFY
2003 DSH allotments by 16 percent. In the notice published on March 26,
2004 in the Federal Register, we explained the definition and
determination of the ``Low-DSH'' States under the MMA provisions.
However, for following fiscal years, the DSH allotments are determined
under a process which incorporates a parallel process described in
section I.C. of this notice. Under that parallel process, States final
FFY 2006 DSH allotments were determined using the States' expenditure
reports (Form CMS-64) for FFY 2006.
Chart 2 of the Addendum to this notice provides the States'
``preliminary'' FFY 2008 DSH allotments. These preliminary allotments
were determined using the States' August 2007 expenditure estimates
submitted by the States on the Form CMS-37. We will publish the final
FFY 2008 DSH allotments for each State following receipt of the States'
four quarterly Medicaid expenditure reports (Form CMS-64) for FFY 2008.
B. Calculation of the FFYs 2006 and FFY 2008 IMD DSH Limits
Section 1923(h) of the Act specifies the methodology to be used to
establish the limits on the amount of DSH payments that a State can
make to IMDs and other mental health facilities. FFP is not available
for IMD or DSH payments that exceed the lesser of the State's FFY 1995
total computable mental health DSH expenditures applicable to the
State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment as reported to us on the Form CMS-64 as
of January 1, 1997; or the amount equal to the product of the State's
current FFY total computable DSH allotment and the applicable
percentage. We are publishing the final FFY 2006 IMD DSH limit, and the
preliminary FFY 2008 IMD DSH limit, along with an explanation of the
calculation of these limits.
For FFY 2003 and following fiscal years, the applicable percentage
is the lesser of 33 percent or the 1995 DSH IMD percentage of the
amount computed for FFY 2000. This percentage was applied to the
State's fiscal year total computable DSH allotment. This result was
then compared to the State's FFY 1995 total computable mental health
DSH expenditures applicable to the State's FFY 1995 DSH allotment as
reported on the Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997. The lesser of these
two amounts was the State's limitation on total computable IMD/DSH
expenditures for FFY 2003 and following fiscal years.
Charts 3 and 4 of the Addendum to this notice detail each State's
final IMD/DSH limitation for FFY 2006 and the preliminary IMD/DSH
limitation for FFY 2008, respectively, in accordance with section
1923(h) of the Act.
III. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35).
IV. Regulatory Impact Statement
We have examined the impact of this rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review), the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96-354),
section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act, the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), and Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). This notice
does not reach the economic threshold and thus is not considered a
major rule.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief
of small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include
small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions. Most hospitals and most other providers and suppliers
are small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of
$6.5 million to $31 million in any 1 year. Individuals and States are
not included in the definition of a small entity. We are not preparing
an analysis for the RFA because we have determined, and the Secretary
certifies, that this notice will not have significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. Specifically the effects of
the various controlling statutes on providers are not impacted by a
result of any independent regulatory impact and not this notice. The
purpose of the notice is to announce the latest distributions as
required by the statute.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a
regulatory impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on
the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This
analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the
[[Page 73835]]
RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small
rural hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a Core-Based
Statistical Area for Medicaid payment regulations and has fewer than
100 beds. We are not preparing analysis for section 1102(b) of the Act
because we have determined and the Secretary certifies that this notice
will not have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial
number of small rural hospitals.
In addition, the MMA set statutorily defined limits on the amount
of Federal share DSH expenditures available for FFY 2004 and subsequent
fiscal years. Specifically, section 1001 of the MMA increased the DSH
allotment for States beginning with fiscal year 2004. While overall the
statute mandated some increases in DSH payments, we do not believe that
this notice will have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. That threshold
level is currently approximately $140 million. This notice will have no
consequential effect on State, local, or tribal governments or on the
private sector.
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State
and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism
implications. Since this notice does not impose any costs on State or
local governments, the requirements of E.O. 13132 are not applicable.
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this
notice was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Addendum
This addendum contains the charts 1 through 4 (preceeded by
associated keys) that are referred to in the preamble of this notice.
Key to Chart 1.--Final DSH Allotments for FY 2006
[Key to the Chart of the Final FFY 2005 DSH Allotments. The final FFY
2006 DSH Allotments for the regular States Are Presented in the Top
Section of this chart and the final FFY 2005 DSH Allotments for the Low-
DSH States Are presented in the Bottom Section of the chart.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column Description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Non-Low-DSH States:
Column A...................... State.
Column B...................... Final FY 2004 DSH Allotment Federal
Share--This column contains the
final FFY 2004 DSH Allotments.
Column C...................... FY 2006 DSH Allotment Federal Share--
This column contains the final FFY
2006 DSH Allotments.
Column D...................... MMA Low-DSH Status--This column
indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of
each State.
For Low-DSH States:
Column A...................... State.
Column B...................... Prior FY DSH Allotment--This column
contains the final FFY 2005 DSH
Allotments.
Column C...................... FY 2006 DSH Allotments Federal
Share--This column contains the
final FFY 2006 DSH Allotments =
Column B multiplied by 1.16.
Column D...................... MMA Low-DSH Status--This column
indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of
each State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key to Chart 2.--Preliminary DSH Allotments for FY 2008
[Key to the Chart of the Preliminary FFY 2008 DSH Allotments. The
preliminary FFY 2008 DSH Allotments for the regular States are presented
in the top section of this chart and the preliminary FFY 2008 DSH
Allotments for the Low-DSH States are presented in the bottom section of
the chart.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column Description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Non-Low-DSH States:
Column A...................... State.
Column B...................... Final FY 2004 DSH Allotment Federal
Share--This column contains the
final FFY 2004 DSH Allotments.
Column C...................... FY 2008 DSH Allotment Federal Share--
This column contains the
preliminary FFY 2008 DSH
Allotments.
Column D...................... MMA Low-DSH Status--This column
indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of
each State.
For Low-DSH States:
Column A...................... State.
Column B...................... Prior FY DSH Allotment--This column
contains the preliminary FFY 2007
DSH Allotments.
Column C...................... FY 2008 DSH Allotments Federal
Share--This column contains the
preliminary FFY 2008 DSH Allotments
= Column B multiplied by 1.16.
Column D...................... MMA Low-DSH Status--This column
indicates the MMA Low-DSH Status of
each State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key to Chart 3.--Final FFY 2006 IMD DSH Limits
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2006 IMD Limitations.--The final FFY 2006
IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top section
of this chart and the Final FFY IMD DSH Limits for the Low-DSH States
are presented in the Bottom Section of the chart.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column Description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column A.......................... State.
Column B.......................... Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95
DSH Total Computable. This column
contains the States' total
computable FFY 1995 inpatient
hospital DSH expenditures as
reported on the Form CMS-64.
Column C.......................... IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95
DSH Total Computable. This column
contains the total computable FFY
1995 mental health facility DSH
expenditures as reported on the
Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997.
[[Page 73836]]
Column D.......................... Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental
Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable,
Col B + C. This column contains the
total computation of all inpatient
hospital DSH expenditures and
mental health facility DSH
expenditures for FFY 1995 as
reported on the Form CMS-64 as of
January 1, 1997 (representing the
sum of Column B and Column C).
Column E.......................... Applicable Percentage Col C/D. This
column contains the ``applicable
percentage'' representing the total
computable FFY 1995 mental health
facility DSH expenditures divided
by total computable all inpatient
hospital and mental health facility
DSH expenditures for FFY 1995 (the
amount in Column C divided by the
amount in Column D) Per section
1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act,
for FFYs after FY 2002, the
applicable percentage can be no
greater than 33 percent.
Column F.......................... FY 2006 Federal Share DSH Allotment.
This column contains the States'
final FFY 2005 DSH allotments.
Column G.......................... FFY 2006 FMAP.
Column H.......................... FY 2006 DSH Allotments in TC. Col. F/
G. This column contains FFY 2006
total computable DSH allotment
(determined as Column F/Column G).
Column I.......................... Col E * Col H in TC. This column
contains the applicable percent of
FFY 2006 total computable DSH
allotment (calculated as Column E x
Column H).
Column J.......................... FY 2006 IMD DSH Limit Total
Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I.
The column contains the lesser of
the lesser of Column I or C.
Column K.......................... FY 2006 IMD DSH Limit Federal Share,
Col. G x J. This column contains
the total computable IMD DSH Limit
from Col. J and converts that
amount into a Federal share
(calculated as Col. G x Col. J).
Column L.......................... LOW DSH Status. This column contains
Low DSH status for each State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key to Chart 4.--Preliminary FFY 2008 IMD DSH Limits
[Key to the Chart of the FFY 2008 IMD Limitations.--The preliminary FFY
2008 IMD DSH Limits for the regular States are presented in the top
section of this chart and the preliminary FFY 2008 IMD DSH Limits for
the Low-DSH States are presented in the Bottom Section of the Chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column Description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column A.......................... State.
Column B.......................... Inpatient Hospital Services FY 95
DSH Total Computable. This column
contains the States' total
computable FFY 1995 inpatient
hospital DSH expenditures as
reported on the Form CMS-64.
Column C.......................... IMD and Mental Health Services FY 95
DSH Total Computable. This column
contains the total computable FFY
1995 mental health facility DSH
expenditures as reported on the
Form CMS-64 as of January 1, 1997.
Column D.......................... Total Inpatient & IMD & Mental
Health FY 95 DSH Total Computable,
Col. B + C. This column contains
the total computation of all
inpatient hospital DSH expenditures
and mental health facility DSH
expenditures for FFY 1995 as
reported on the Form CMS-64 as of
January 1, 1997 (representing the
sum of Column B and Column C).
Column E.......................... Applicable Percentage Col. C/D. This
column contains the ``applicable
percentage'' representing the total
computable FFY 1995 mental health
facility DSH expenditures divided
by total computable all inpatient
hospital and mental health facility
DSH expenditures for FFY 1995 (the
amount in Column C divided by the
amount in Column D) Per section
1923(h)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of the Act,
for FFYs after FY 2002, the
applicable percentage can be no
greater than 33 percent.
Column F.......................... FY 2008 Federal Share DSH Allotment.
This column contains the States'
preliminary FFY 2008 DSH
allotments.
Column G.......................... FFY 2008 FMAP.
Column H.......................... FY 2008 DSH Allotment Total
Computable Col. F/G. This column
contains FFY 2008 total computable
DSH allotment (determined as Column
F/Column G).
Column I.......................... Col E * Col H in TC. This column
contains the applicable percent of
FFY 2008 total computable DSH
allotment (calculated as Column E x
Column H)
Column J.......................... FY 2008 IMD DSH Limit Total
Computable. Lesser of Col. C or I.
The column contains the lesser of
the lesser of Column I or C.
Column K.......................... FY 2008 IMD DSH Limit Federal Share,
Col. G x J. This column contains
the total computable IMD DSH Limit
from Col. J and converts that
amount into a Federal share
(calculated as Col. G x Col. J).
Column L.......................... Low DSH Status. This column contains
Low DSH status for each State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 73837]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28DE07.000
[[Page 73838]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28DE07.001
[[Page 73839]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28DE07.002
[[Page 73840]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28DE07.003
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
[[Page 73841]]
Authority: Section 1923(a)(2), (f), and (h) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-4(a)(2), (f), and (h), and Pub. L.
105-33)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical
Assistance Program)
Dated: October 23, 3007.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Dated: November 8, 2007.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-24486 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-C