Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish Fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, 72994-72996 [E7-24953]

Download as PDF 72994 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Notices The primary issues to be analyzed are the effects of the proposed action and its alternatives on Steller sea lions and Alternatives their designated critical habitat. Additional impacts to the following The SEIS will evaluate a range of components of the biological and alternative management measures for the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands and physical environment may be evaluated: Gulf of Alaska groundfish fisheries. The (1) other species listed under the ESA and their critical habitat, and other Council’s Steller Sea Lion Mitigation species protected under the Marine Committee (SSLMC) is reviewing the Mammal Protection Act; (2) target and latest scientific information regarding non-target fish stocks, including forage Steller sea lions and potential fish and prohibited species; (3) seabirds; groundfish fisheries interactions and and (4) the ecosystem. developing alternative Steller sea lion Social and economic impacts also protection measures. The SSLMC has would be considered in terms of the collected proposals from the public for changes to the Steller sea lion protection effects that changes in the Steller sea lion protection measures would have on measures and is scheduled to evaluate the following groups of individuals: (1) and prioritize these proposals for those who participate in harvesting the Council consideration in June 2008. After Council consideration, the Council groundfish resources; (2) those who may recommend management measures process and market groundfish and groundfish products; (3) those who to the Secretary for evaluation and consume groundfish products; (4) those implementation. Information regarding the SSLMC and the proposal evaluation who rely on living marine resources in the management area, particularly process is available from the Alaska Steller sea lions, for subsistence needs; Region website at https:// www.fakr.noaa.gov/sustainablefisheries/ (5) those who benefit from nonconsumptive uses of Steller sea lions sslmc/default.htm. and other living marine resources; and Alternatives may include those (6) fishing communities. identified here, and those developed through public scoping, Council, and Public Involvement SSLMC processes. Possible alternatives Scoping is an early and open process could include one, or a combination of, for determining the scope of issues to be the following: addressed in an Environmental Impact 1.No action – retain the current suite Statement and for identifying the of Steller sea lion protection measures significant issues related to the as are currently in place for fishing year proposed action. A principal objective 2008. of the scoping and public involvement 2.Change the current spatial process is to identify a reasonable range management of the Atka mackerel, of management alternatives that, with pollock, or Pacific cod fisheries in the adequate analysis, will delineate critical GOA and/or BSAI by opening or closing issues and provide a clear basis for areas near Steller sea lion rookeries, distinguishing between those haulouts, and/or foraging areas. alternatives and for selecting a preferred 3.Change the current temporal alternative. Through this notice, NMFS management of harvests in the GOA is notifying the public that an SEIS and and/or BSAI Atka mackerel, pollock, decision-making process for this and/or Pacific cod fisheries. proposed action has been initiated so 4.Change other management measures that interested or affected people may that currently apply to the GOA and/or participate and contribute to the final BSAI Atka mackerel, pollock, and/or decision. NMFS is seeking written public Pacific cod fisheries, such as changes to comments on the scope of issues, gear restrictions or the Aleutian Islands including potential impacts, and platoon management system for Atka alternatives that should be considered mackerel. in revising the Steller sea lion Preliminary Identification of Issues protection measures. Written comments will be accepted at the address above A principal objective of the scoping (see ADDRESSES). Written comments and public input process is to identify potentially significant impacts to the should be as specific as possible to be human environment that should be the most helpful. Written comments analyzed in the SEIS. The analysis will received during the scoping process, evaluate the effects of the alternatives including the names and addresses of for all resources, species, and issues that those submitting them, will be may directly or indirectly interact with considered part of the public record on Steller sea lions and the groundfish this proposal and will be available for fisheries within the action area. public inspection. pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES minimize potential adverse economic impacts on coastal communities. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:33 Dec 21, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The public is invited to participate in the SSLMC meetings and Council meetings where the latest scientific information regarding Steller sea lions and fisheries interactions are being reviewed and alternative protection measures are being developed and evaluated. Future Council and SSLMC meetings will be noticed in the Federal Register and on the website at https:// www.fakr.noaa.gov/. Additional information regarding regulatory, ESA, and NEPA activities for Steller sea lions is available at the website at https:// stellersealions.noaa.gov. Please visit this website for more information on this SEIS and for guidance on submitting effective public comments. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: December 18, 2007. James P. Burgess, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E7–24951 Filed 12–21–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XD93 Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish Fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; request for written comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: NMFS, in consultation with the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on salmon bycatch reduction measures in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area (BSAI), in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The proposed action would replace the current Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas in the BSAI with new regulatory closures, salmon bycatch limits, or a combination of both. These management measures could incorporate current or new bycatch reduction methods. The scope of the EIS will be to determine the impacts to the human environment resulting from these salmon bycatch reduction measures. NMFS will accept written comments from the public to determine the issues of concern and the E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM 26DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Notices appropriate range of management alternatives for analysis in the EIS. DATES: Written comments must be received by February 15, 2008. ADDRESSES: Written comments on issues and alternatives for the EIS should be sent to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Comments may be submitted by • E-mail: 0648–AW25– SalmonBycatchEIS@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line the following document identifier: Salmon Bycatch EIS. E-mail comments, with or without attachments, are limited to 5 megabytes; • Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802; • Hand Delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK; or • Fax: 907–586–7557. All Personal Identifying Information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe portable document file (pdf) formats only. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Anderson, (907) 586–7228 or jason.anderson@noaa.gov. Under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the United States has exclusive fishery management authority over all living marine resources found within the exclusive economic zone. The management of these marine resources, with the exception of certain marine mammals and birds, is vested in the Secretary of Commerce. The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) has the responsibility to prepare fishery management plans for those marine resources off Alaska requiring conservation and management. Management of the Federal groundfish fishery in the BSAI is carried out under the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (FMP). The FMP, its amendments, and implementing regulations (found at 50 CFR part 679) are developed in accordance with the requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable Federal laws pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:33 Dec 21, 2007 Jkt 214001 and executive orders, notably the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Council is considering replacing the current Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas in the BSAI with new regulatory closures, salmon bycatch limits, or a combination of both. These management measures could incorporate current or new bycatch reduction methods. NMFS and the Council have determined the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) may be required for this action because some important aspects of the impacts of salmon bycatch in the BSAI on the salmon stocks of origin and users of these salmon are uncertain or unknown and may result in significant impacts on the human environment not previously analyzed. Thus, NMFS and the Council are initiating scoping for an EIS in the event that an EIS is needed. NMFS and the Council are seeking information from the public through the EIS scoping process on the range of alternatives to be analyzed, and on the environmental, social, and economic issues to be considered in the analysis. Written comments generated during this scoping process will be provided to the Council and incorporated into the EIS. Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas To address Chinook salmon bycatch concerns, the Council adopted several management measures designed to reduce overall Chinook salmon bycatch in the BSAI trawl fisheries. In 1995, the Council adopted, and NMFS approved, Amendment 21b to the FMP. Based on historic information on salmon bycatch, Amendment 21b established a Chinook Salmon Savings Area (60 FR 61215, November 29, 1995). Under Amendment 21b, the Chinook Salmon Savings Area closed when the bycatch of Chinook salmon in BSAI trawl fisheries reached 48,000 fish. Amendment 58 to the FMP revised the Chinook Salmon Savings Area measures (65 FR 60587, October 12, 2000). Amendment 58 reduced the Chinook salmon bycatch limit from 48,000 fish to 29,000 fish, mandated year-round accounting of Chinook bycatch in the directed pollock fishery, revised the boundaries of the Chinook Salmon Savings Area closure, and implemented new closure dates. The Council also adopted a time-area closure designed to reduce overall nonChinook salmon bycatch in the BSAI trawl fisheries. In 1995, Amendment 35 to the FMP established the Chum Salmon Savings Area (60 FR 34904, July 5, 1995). This area is closed to all trawling from August 1 through August PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 72995 31 of each year. Additionally, if 42,000 non-Chinook salmon are caught in the Catcher Vessel Operational Area during the period August 15 through October 14, the area remains closed for the remainder of the calendar year. The Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas were adopted based on historic observed salmon bycatch rates and were designed to avoid high spatial and temporal levels of salmon bycatch. From 1990 through 2001, the BSAI salmon bycatch average was 37,819 Chinook and 69,332 non-Chinook annually. Recently, however, salmon bycatch numbers have increased substantially. The numbers of Chinook and non-Chinook salmon bycatch in the BSAI groundfish fisheries from 2003 through December 7, 2007, are shown in the following table: Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 through December 7 Number of Chinook 55,422 63,188 74,967 87,730 130,246 Number of non-Chinook 197,287 457,817 711,938 326,445 97,904 NMFS and the Council are concerned with this level of salmon bycatch because of the potential negative impacts on salmon stocks in general, and on western Alaska salmon stocks in particular. Recent Salmon Bycatch Management Measures To address these increasing salmon bycatch amounts, the Council adopted, and NMFS implemented on October 29, 2007, Amendment 84 to the FMP (72 FR 61070, October 29, 2007). Spatial and temporal comparisons of noncommunity development quota (CDQ) vessels fishing outside of the salmon savings areas with CDQ vessels fishing inside of the salmon savings areas indicated that salmon bycatch rates were much higher outside of the savings areas, and closures were displacing vessels to higher bycatch areas. Amendment 84 exempts non-CDQ and CDQ pollock vessels participating in a salmon bycatch reduction intercooperative agreement (ICA) from closures of the Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas in the BSAI. Additionally, vessels participating in trawl fisheries for species other than pollock are exempt from Chum Salmon Savings Area Closures The purpose of the salmon bycatch avoidance ICA is to use real-time salmon bycatch information to avoid areas of high non-Chinook and Chinook E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM 26DEN1 72996 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Notices salmon bycatch rates. The ICA utilizes a system of base bycatch rates, assignment of vessels to tiers based on bycatch rates relative to the base rate, a system of closures for vessels in certain tiers, and monitoring and enforcement through private contractual arrangements. Amendment 84 was adopted by the Council because it was perceived to be relatively simple to implement, with the potential to reduce salmon bycatch rates. Meanwhile, the Council also initiated analysis on this proposed action to further address salmon bycatch issues, and provide additional management measures should ICA members choose not to participate in the ICA in the future. pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES Proposed Action The proposed action is to replace the current Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas in the BSAI with new regulatory closures, salmon bycatch limits, or a combination of both based on current salmon bycatch information. These management measures could incorporate current or new bycatch reduction methods. The purpose of the proposed action is to minimize nonChinook and Chinook salmon bycatch to the extent practicable. The proposed action is necessary to maintain a healthy marine ecosystem, ensure long-term conservation and abundance of salmon, provide maximum benefit to fishermen and communities that depend on these resources, and comply with the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Alternative Management Measures NMFS, in consultation with the Council, will evaluate a range of alternative management measures for the BSAI groundfish fisheries. The Council’s Salmon Bycatch Workgroup is reviewing the latest scientific information regarding the impacts of salmon interactions with groundfish fisheries and developing alternative salmon bycatch reduction measures. Alternatives may be formulated based on the elements identified here, and those developed through the public scoping and Council processes. Possible alternatives could be constructed from one or more of the following measures: 1.Prohibited Species Catch (PSC) limit Establish a PSC limit for non-Chinook and Chinook salmon bycatch in the CDQ and non-CDQ pollock fisheries. PSC limits could be allocated among pollock fishery sectors or fishery cooperatives. Fishery participants would be required to stop fishing when a PSC limit is reached. 2.Fixed closures Establish one or more salmon savings area closures based on VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:33 Dec 21, 2007 Jkt 214001 current salmon bycatch information. These closures would occur on an annual or seasonal basis regardless of salmon bycatch amounts at the time of the closure. 3.Triggered closures Establish one or more salmon savings area closures based on current salmon bycatch information. These closures would occur based on criteria evaluated in the EIS. Criteria could include a threshold salmon bycatch number or rate. 4.PSC accounting period Revise the current PSC accounting period to coincide with the salmon biological year to provide additional protections to salmon in the BSAI. Accounting would begin annually in the ‘‘B’’ season, and continue through the following ‘‘A’’ season. Additionally, the Council may incorporate the current or a new version of the salmon bycatch reduction ICA into one or more alternatives. Preliminary Identification of Issues A principal objective of the scoping and public input process is to identify potentially significant impacts to the human environment that should be analyzed in the EIS. The analysis will evaluate the impacts of the alternatives for all resources, species, and issues that may be directly or indirectly affected by salmon bycatch in the BSAI pollock fisheries. The following components of the biological and physical environment may be evaluated: (1) target and nontarget fish stocks, forage fish, and prohibited species, including salmon species; (2) species listed under the ESA and their critical habitat; (3) seabirds; (4) marine mammals; and (5) the ecosystem. Social and economic impacts also would be considered in terms of the effects that changes to salmon bycatch management measures would have on the following groups of individuals: (1) those who participate in harvesting pollock; (2) those who process and market pollock and pollock products; (3) those who consume pollock products; (4) those who rely on living marine resources caught in the management area, particularly salmon; (5) those who benefit from commercial, subsistence, and recreational salmon fisheries; and (6) fishing communities. Public Involvement Scoping is an early and open process for determining the scope of issues to be addressed in an EIS and for identifying the significant issues related to the proposed action. A principal objective of the scoping and public involvement process is to identify a range of reasonable of management alternatives PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 that, with adequate analysis, will delineate critical issues and provide a clear basis for distinguishing among those alternatives and selecting a preferred alternative. Through this notice, NMFS is notifying the public that an EIS and decision-making process for this proposed action have been initiated so that interested or affected people may participate and contribute to the final decision. NMFS is seeking written public comments on the scope of issues, including potential impacts, and alternatives that should be considered in revising salmon bycatch management measures. Written comments will be accepted at the address above (see ADDRESSES). Written comments should be as specific as possible to be the most helpful. Written comments received during the scoping process, including the names and addresses of those submitting them, will be considered part of the public record of this proposal and will be available for public inspection. The public is invited to participate and provide input at Council and Salmon Bycatch Workgroup meetings where the latest scientific information regarding salmon bycatch in the BSAI groundfish fisheries is reviewed and alternative salmon bycatch reduction measures are developed and evaluated. Notice of future Council and Salmon Bycatch Workgroup meetings will be published in the Federal Register and on the Internet at https://www.fakr.gov. Please visit this website for more information on this EIS and for guidance on submitting effective public comments. Dated: December 18, 2007. James P. Burgess, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E7–24953 Filed 12–21–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XD61 Marine Mammals; File No. 10080 National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Dr. Kathryn A. Ono, Department of Biological Sciences, University of New England, Biddeford, ME, has been E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM 26DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72994-72996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD93


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish 
Fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION:  Notice; request for written comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS, in consultation with the North Pacific Fishery 
Management Council, announces its intent to prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) on salmon bycatch reduction measures in the 
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area (BSAI), in accordance 
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The proposed action 
would replace the current Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas in the 
BSAI with new regulatory closures, salmon bycatch limits, or a 
combination of both. These management measures could incorporate 
current or new bycatch reduction methods. The scope of the EIS will be 
to determine the impacts to the human environment resulting from these 
salmon bycatch reduction measures. NMFS will accept written comments 
from the public to determine the issues of concern and the

[[Page 72995]]

appropriate range of management alternatives for analysis in the EIS.

DATES:  Written comments must be received by February 15, 2008.

ADDRESSES:  Written comments on issues and alternatives for the EIS 
should be sent to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional Administrator, 
Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn: Ellen 
Sebastian. Comments may be submitted by
     E-mail: 0648-AW25-SalmonBycatchEIS@noaa.gov. Include in 
the subject line the following document identifier: Salmon Bycatch EIS. 
E-mail comments, with or without attachments, are limited to 5 
megabytes;
     Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802;
     Hand Delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th 
Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK; or
     Fax: 907-586-7557.
    All Personal Identifying Information (e.g., name, address) 
voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do 
not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or 
protected information.
    NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic 
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or 
Adobe portable document file (pdf) formats only.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Anderson, (907) 586-7228 or 
jason.anderson@noaa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the United 
States has exclusive fishery management authority over all living 
marine resources found within the exclusive economic zone. The 
management of these marine resources, with the exception of certain 
marine mammals and birds, is vested in the Secretary of Commerce. The 
North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) has the 
responsibility to prepare fishery management plans for those marine 
resources off Alaska requiring conservation and management. Management 
of the Federal groundfish fishery in the BSAI is carried out under the 
Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian 
Islands Management Area (FMP). The FMP, its amendments, and 
implementing regulations (found at 50 CFR part 679) are developed in 
accordance with the requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other 
applicable Federal laws and executive orders, notably the National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
    The Council is considering replacing the current Chinook and Chum 
Salmon Savings Areas in the BSAI with new regulatory closures, salmon 
bycatch limits, or a combination of both. These management measures 
could incorporate current or new bycatch reduction methods. NMFS and 
the Council have determined the preparation of an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) may be required for this action because some important 
aspects of the impacts of salmon bycatch in the BSAI on the salmon 
stocks of origin and users of these salmon are uncertain or unknown and 
may result in significant impacts on the human environment not 
previously analyzed. Thus, NMFS and the Council are initiating scoping 
for an EIS in the event that an EIS is needed.
    NMFS and the Council are seeking information from the public 
through the EIS scoping process on the range of alternatives to be 
analyzed, and on the environmental, social, and economic issues to be 
considered in the analysis. Written comments generated during this 
scoping process will be provided to the Council and incorporated into 
the EIS.

Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas

    To address Chinook salmon bycatch concerns, the Council adopted 
several management measures designed to reduce overall Chinook salmon 
bycatch in the BSAI trawl fisheries. In 1995, the Council adopted, and 
NMFS approved, Amendment 21b to the FMP. Based on historic information 
on salmon bycatch, Amendment 21b established a Chinook Salmon Savings 
Area (60 FR 61215, November 29, 1995). Under Amendment 21b, the Chinook 
Salmon Savings Area closed when the bycatch of Chinook salmon in BSAI 
trawl fisheries reached 48,000 fish. Amendment 58 to the FMP revised 
the Chinook Salmon Savings Area measures (65 FR 60587, October 12, 
2000). Amendment 58 reduced the Chinook salmon bycatch limit from 
48,000 fish to 29,000 fish, mandated year-round accounting of Chinook 
bycatch in the directed pollock fishery, revised the boundaries of the 
Chinook Salmon Savings Area closure, and implemented new closure dates.
    The Council also adopted a time-area closure designed to reduce 
overall non-Chinook salmon bycatch in the BSAI trawl fisheries. In 
1995, Amendment 35 to the FMP established the Chum Salmon Savings Area 
(60 FR 34904, July 5, 1995). This area is closed to all trawling from 
August 1 through August 31 of each year. Additionally, if 42,000 non-
Chinook salmon are caught in the Catcher Vessel Operational Area during 
the period August 15 through October 14, the area remains closed for 
the remainder of the calendar year.
    The Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas were adopted based on 
historic observed salmon bycatch rates and were designed to avoid high 
spatial and temporal levels of salmon bycatch. From 1990 through 2001, 
the BSAI salmon bycatch average was 37,819 Chinook and 69,332 non-
Chinook annually. Recently, however, salmon bycatch numbers have 
increased substantially. The numbers of Chinook and non-Chinook salmon 
bycatch in the BSAI groundfish fisheries from 2003 through December 7, 
2007, are shown in the following table:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Number of   Number of
                      Year                         Chinook   non-Chinook
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      2003                           55,422      197,287
                      2004                           63,188      457,817
                      2005                           74,967      711,938
                      2006                           87,730      326,445
             2007 through December 7                130,246       97,904
------------------------------------------------------------------------

NMFS and the Council are concerned with this level of salmon bycatch 
because of the potential negative impacts on salmon stocks in general, 
and on western Alaska salmon stocks in particular.

Recent Salmon Bycatch Management Measures

    To address these increasing salmon bycatch amounts, the Council 
adopted, and NMFS implemented on October 29, 2007, Amendment 84 to the 
FMP (72 FR 61070, October 29, 2007). Spatial and temporal comparisons 
of non-community development quota (CDQ) vessels fishing outside of the 
salmon savings areas with CDQ vessels fishing inside of the salmon 
savings areas indicated that salmon bycatch rates were much higher 
outside of the savings areas, and closures were displacing vessels to 
higher bycatch areas. Amendment 84 exempts non-CDQ and CDQ pollock 
vessels participating in a salmon bycatch reduction inter-cooperative 
agreement (ICA) from closures of the Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings 
Areas in the BSAI. Additionally, vessels participating in trawl 
fisheries for species other than pollock are exempt from Chum Salmon 
Savings Area Closures
    The purpose of the salmon bycatch avoidance ICA is to use real-time 
salmon bycatch information to avoid areas of high non-Chinook and 
Chinook

[[Page 72996]]

salmon bycatch rates. The ICA utilizes a system of base bycatch rates, 
assignment of vessels to tiers based on bycatch rates relative to the 
base rate, a system of closures for vessels in certain tiers, and 
monitoring and enforcement through private contractual arrangements.
    Amendment 84 was adopted by the Council because it was perceived to 
be relatively simple to implement, with the potential to reduce salmon 
bycatch rates. Meanwhile, the Council also initiated analysis on this 
proposed action to further address salmon bycatch issues, and provide 
additional management measures should ICA members choose not to 
participate in the ICA in the future.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action is to replace the current Chinook and Chum 
Salmon Savings Areas in the BSAI with new regulatory closures, salmon 
bycatch limits, or a combination of both based on current salmon 
bycatch information. These management measures could incorporate 
current or new bycatch reduction methods. The purpose of the proposed 
action is to minimize non-Chinook and Chinook salmon bycatch to the 
extent practicable. The proposed action is necessary to maintain a 
healthy marine ecosystem, ensure long-term conservation and abundance 
of salmon, provide maximum benefit to fishermen and communities that 
depend on these resources, and comply with the Magnuson-Stevens Act.

Alternative Management Measures

    NMFS, in consultation with the Council, will evaluate a range of 
alternative management measures for the BSAI groundfish fisheries. The 
Council's Salmon Bycatch Workgroup is reviewing the latest scientific 
information regarding the impacts of salmon interactions with 
groundfish fisheries and developing alternative salmon bycatch 
reduction measures. Alternatives may be formulated based on the 
elements identified here, and those developed through the public 
scoping and Council processes. Possible alternatives could be 
constructed from one or more of the following measures:
1.Prohibited Species Catch (PSC) limit Establish a PSC limit for non-
Chinook and Chinook salmon bycatch in the CDQ and non-CDQ pollock 
fisheries. PSC limits could be allocated among pollock fishery sectors 
or fishery cooperatives. Fishery participants would be required to stop 
fishing when a PSC limit is reached.
2.Fixed closures Establish one or more salmon savings area closures 
based on current salmon bycatch information. These closures would occur 
on an annual or seasonal basis regardless of salmon bycatch amounts at 
the time of the closure.
3.Triggered closures Establish one or more salmon savings area closures 
based on current salmon bycatch information. These closures would occur 
based on criteria evaluated in the EIS. Criteria could include a 
threshold salmon bycatch number or rate.
4.PSC accounting period Revise the current PSC accounting period to 
coincide with the salmon biological year to provide additional 
protections to salmon in the BSAI. Accounting would begin annually in 
the ``B'' season, and continue through the following ``A'' season.
    Additionally, the Council may incorporate the current or a new 
version of the salmon bycatch reduction ICA into one or more 
alternatives.

Preliminary Identification of Issues

    A principal objective of the scoping and public input process is to 
identify potentially significant impacts to the human environment that 
should be analyzed in the EIS. The analysis will evaluate the impacts 
of the alternatives for all resources, species, and issues that may be 
directly or indirectly affected by salmon bycatch in the BSAI pollock 
fisheries. The following components of the biological and physical 
environment may be evaluated: (1) target and non-target fish stocks, 
forage fish, and prohibited species, including salmon species; (2) 
species listed under the ESA and their critical habitat; (3) seabirds; 
(4) marine mammals; and (5) the ecosystem.
    Social and economic impacts also would be considered in terms of 
the effects that changes to salmon bycatch management measures would 
have on the following groups of individuals: (1) those who participate 
in harvesting pollock; (2) those who process and market pollock and 
pollock products; (3) those who consume pollock products; (4) those who 
rely on living marine resources caught in the management area, 
particularly salmon; (5) those who benefit from commercial, 
subsistence, and recreational salmon fisheries; and (6) fishing 
communities.

Public Involvement

    Scoping is an early and open process for determining the scope of 
issues to be addressed in an EIS and for identifying the significant 
issues related to the proposed action. A principal objective of the 
scoping and public involvement process is to identify a range of 
reasonable of management alternatives that, with adequate analysis, 
will delineate critical issues and provide a clear basis for 
distinguishing among those alternatives and selecting a preferred 
alternative. Through this notice, NMFS is notifying the public that an 
EIS and decision-making process for this proposed action have been 
initiated so that interested or affected people may participate and 
contribute to the final decision.
    NMFS is seeking written public comments on the scope of issues, 
including potential impacts, and alternatives that should be considered 
in revising salmon bycatch management measures. Written comments will 
be accepted at the address above (see ADDRESSES). Written comments 
should be as specific as possible to be the most helpful. Written 
comments received during the scoping process, including the names and 
addresses of those submitting them, will be considered part of the 
public record of this proposal and will be available for public 
inspection.
    The public is invited to participate and provide input at Council 
and Salmon Bycatch Workgroup meetings where the latest scientific 
information regarding salmon bycatch in the BSAI groundfish fisheries 
is reviewed and alternative salmon bycatch reduction measures are 
developed and evaluated. Notice of future Council and Salmon Bycatch 
Workgroup meetings will be published in the Federal Register and on the 
Internet at https://www.fakr.gov. Please visit this website for more 
information on this EIS and for guidance on submitting effective public 
comments.

    Dated: December 18, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-24953 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.