Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish Fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, 72994-72996 [E7-24953]
Download as PDF
72994
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Notices
The primary issues to be analyzed are
the effects of the proposed action and its
alternatives on Steller sea lions and
Alternatives
their designated critical habitat.
Additional impacts to the following
The SEIS will evaluate a range of
components of the biological and
alternative management measures for
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands and physical environment may be evaluated:
Gulf of Alaska groundfish fisheries. The (1) other species listed under the ESA
and their critical habitat, and other
Council’s Steller Sea Lion Mitigation
species protected under the Marine
Committee (SSLMC) is reviewing the
Mammal Protection Act; (2) target and
latest scientific information regarding
non-target fish stocks, including forage
Steller sea lions and potential
fish and prohibited species; (3) seabirds;
groundfish fisheries interactions and
and (4) the ecosystem.
developing alternative Steller sea lion
Social and economic impacts also
protection measures. The SSLMC has
would be considered in terms of the
collected proposals from the public for
changes to the Steller sea lion protection effects that changes in the Steller sea
lion protection measures would have on
measures and is scheduled to evaluate
the following groups of individuals: (1)
and prioritize these proposals for
those who participate in harvesting the
Council consideration in June 2008.
After Council consideration, the Council groundfish resources; (2) those who
may recommend management measures process and market groundfish and
groundfish products; (3) those who
to the Secretary for evaluation and
consume groundfish products; (4) those
implementation. Information regarding
the SSLMC and the proposal evaluation who rely on living marine resources in
the management area, particularly
process is available from the Alaska
Steller sea lions, for subsistence needs;
Region website at https://
www.fakr.noaa.gov/sustainablefisheries/ (5) those who benefit from nonconsumptive uses of Steller sea lions
sslmc/default.htm.
and other living marine resources; and
Alternatives may include those
(6) fishing communities.
identified here, and those developed
through public scoping, Council, and
Public Involvement
SSLMC processes. Possible alternatives
Scoping is an early and open process
could include one, or a combination of,
for determining the scope of issues to be
the following:
addressed in an Environmental Impact
1.No action – retain the current suite
Statement and for identifying the
of Steller sea lion protection measures
significant issues related to the
as are currently in place for fishing year proposed action. A principal objective
2008.
of the scoping and public involvement
2.Change the current spatial
process is to identify a reasonable range
management of the Atka mackerel,
of management alternatives that, with
pollock, or Pacific cod fisheries in the
adequate analysis, will delineate critical
GOA and/or BSAI by opening or closing issues and provide a clear basis for
areas near Steller sea lion rookeries,
distinguishing between those
haulouts, and/or foraging areas.
alternatives and for selecting a preferred
3.Change the current temporal
alternative. Through this notice, NMFS
management of harvests in the GOA
is notifying the public that an SEIS and
and/or BSAI Atka mackerel, pollock,
decision-making process for this
and/or Pacific cod fisheries.
proposed action has been initiated so
4.Change other management measures that interested or affected people may
that currently apply to the GOA and/or
participate and contribute to the final
BSAI Atka mackerel, pollock, and/or
decision.
NMFS is seeking written public
Pacific cod fisheries, such as changes to
comments on the scope of issues,
gear restrictions or the Aleutian Islands
including potential impacts, and
platoon management system for Atka
alternatives that should be considered
mackerel.
in revising the Steller sea lion
Preliminary Identification of Issues
protection measures. Written comments
will be accepted at the address above
A principal objective of the scoping
(see ADDRESSES). Written comments
and public input process is to identify
potentially significant impacts to the
should be as specific as possible to be
human environment that should be
the most helpful. Written comments
analyzed in the SEIS. The analysis will
received during the scoping process,
evaluate the effects of the alternatives
including the names and addresses of
for all resources, species, and issues that those submitting them, will be
may directly or indirectly interact with
considered part of the public record on
Steller sea lions and the groundfish
this proposal and will be available for
fisheries within the action area.
public inspection.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
minimize potential adverse economic
impacts on coastal communities.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:33 Dec 21, 2007
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The public is invited to participate in
the SSLMC meetings and Council
meetings where the latest scientific
information regarding Steller sea lions
and fisheries interactions are being
reviewed and alternative protection
measures are being developed and
evaluated. Future Council and SSLMC
meetings will be noticed in the Federal
Register and on the website at https://
www.fakr.noaa.gov/. Additional
information regarding regulatory, ESA,
and NEPA activities for Steller sea lions
is available at the website at https://
stellersealions.noaa.gov. Please visit this
website for more information on this
SEIS and for guidance on submitting
effective public comments.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 18, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–24951 Filed 12–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD93
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish Fisheries
in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for written
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS, in consultation with
the North Pacific Fishery Management
Council, announces its intent to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) on salmon bycatch reduction
measures in the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands management area (BSAI), in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The
proposed action would replace the
current Chinook and Chum Salmon
Savings Areas in the BSAI with new
regulatory closures, salmon bycatch
limits, or a combination of both. These
management measures could
incorporate current or new bycatch
reduction methods. The scope of the EIS
will be to determine the impacts to the
human environment resulting from
these salmon bycatch reduction
measures. NMFS will accept written
comments from the public to determine
the issues of concern and the
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Notices
appropriate range of management
alternatives for analysis in the EIS.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by February 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on issues
and alternatives for the EIS should be
sent to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Comments may be
submitted by
• E-mail: 0648–AW25–
SalmonBycatchEIS@noaa.gov. Include
in the subject line the following
document identifier: Salmon Bycatch
EIS. E-mail comments, with or without
attachments, are limited to 5 megabytes;
• Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802;
• Hand Delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK; or
• Fax: 907–586–7557.
All Personal Identifying Information
(e.g., name, address) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
portable document file (pdf) formats
only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Anderson, (907) 586–7228 or
jason.anderson@noaa.gov.
Under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), the United
States has exclusive fishery
management authority over all living
marine resources found within the
exclusive economic zone. The
management of these marine resources,
with the exception of certain marine
mammals and birds, is vested in the
Secretary of Commerce. The North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) has the responsibility to
prepare fishery management plans for
those marine resources off Alaska
requiring conservation and
management. Management of the
Federal groundfish fishery in the BSAI
is carried out under the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area (FMP). The FMP, its
amendments, and implementing
regulations (found at 50 CFR part 679)
are developed in accordance with the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act and other applicable Federal laws
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:33 Dec 21, 2007
Jkt 214001
and executive orders, notably the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act
(ESA).
The Council is considering replacing
the current Chinook and Chum Salmon
Savings Areas in the BSAI with new
regulatory closures, salmon bycatch
limits, or a combination of both. These
management measures could
incorporate current or new bycatch
reduction methods. NMFS and the
Council have determined the
preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) may be required for this
action because some important aspects
of the impacts of salmon bycatch in the
BSAI on the salmon stocks of origin and
users of these salmon are uncertain or
unknown and may result in significant
impacts on the human environment not
previously analyzed. Thus, NMFS and
the Council are initiating scoping for an
EIS in the event that an EIS is needed.
NMFS and the Council are seeking
information from the public through the
EIS scoping process on the range of
alternatives to be analyzed, and on the
environmental, social, and economic
issues to be considered in the analysis.
Written comments generated during this
scoping process will be provided to the
Council and incorporated into the EIS.
Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings
Areas
To address Chinook salmon bycatch
concerns, the Council adopted several
management measures designed to
reduce overall Chinook salmon bycatch
in the BSAI trawl fisheries. In 1995, the
Council adopted, and NMFS approved,
Amendment 21b to the FMP. Based on
historic information on salmon bycatch,
Amendment 21b established a Chinook
Salmon Savings Area (60 FR 61215,
November 29, 1995). Under Amendment
21b, the Chinook Salmon Savings Area
closed when the bycatch of Chinook
salmon in BSAI trawl fisheries reached
48,000 fish. Amendment 58 to the FMP
revised the Chinook Salmon Savings
Area measures (65 FR 60587, October
12, 2000). Amendment 58 reduced the
Chinook salmon bycatch limit from
48,000 fish to 29,000 fish, mandated
year-round accounting of Chinook
bycatch in the directed pollock fishery,
revised the boundaries of the Chinook
Salmon Savings Area closure, and
implemented new closure dates.
The Council also adopted a time-area
closure designed to reduce overall nonChinook salmon bycatch in the BSAI
trawl fisheries. In 1995, Amendment 35
to the FMP established the Chum
Salmon Savings Area (60 FR 34904, July
5, 1995). This area is closed to all
trawling from August 1 through August
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72995
31 of each year. Additionally, if 42,000
non-Chinook salmon are caught in the
Catcher Vessel Operational Area during
the period August 15 through October
14, the area remains closed for the
remainder of the calendar year.
The Chinook and Chum Salmon
Savings Areas were adopted based on
historic observed salmon bycatch rates
and were designed to avoid high spatial
and temporal levels of salmon bycatch.
From 1990 through 2001, the BSAI
salmon bycatch average was 37,819
Chinook and 69,332 non-Chinook
annually. Recently, however, salmon
bycatch numbers have increased
substantially. The numbers of Chinook
and non-Chinook salmon bycatch in the
BSAI groundfish fisheries from 2003
through December 7, 2007, are shown in
the following table:
Year
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007 through
December 7
Number
of Chinook
55,422
63,188
74,967
87,730
130,246
Number of
non-Chinook
197,287
457,817
711,938
326,445
97,904
NMFS and the Council are concerned
with this level of salmon bycatch
because of the potential negative
impacts on salmon stocks in general,
and on western Alaska salmon stocks in
particular.
Recent Salmon Bycatch Management
Measures
To address these increasing salmon
bycatch amounts, the Council adopted,
and NMFS implemented on October 29,
2007, Amendment 84 to the FMP (72 FR
61070, October 29, 2007). Spatial and
temporal comparisons of noncommunity development quota (CDQ)
vessels fishing outside of the salmon
savings areas with CDQ vessels fishing
inside of the salmon savings areas
indicated that salmon bycatch rates
were much higher outside of the savings
areas, and closures were displacing
vessels to higher bycatch areas.
Amendment 84 exempts non-CDQ and
CDQ pollock vessels participating in a
salmon bycatch reduction intercooperative agreement (ICA) from
closures of the Chinook and Chum
Salmon Savings Areas in the BSAI.
Additionally, vessels participating in
trawl fisheries for species other than
pollock are exempt from Chum Salmon
Savings Area Closures
The purpose of the salmon bycatch
avoidance ICA is to use real-time
salmon bycatch information to avoid
areas of high non-Chinook and Chinook
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
72996
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2007 / Notices
salmon bycatch rates. The ICA utilizes
a system of base bycatch rates,
assignment of vessels to tiers based on
bycatch rates relative to the base rate, a
system of closures for vessels in certain
tiers, and monitoring and enforcement
through private contractual
arrangements.
Amendment 84 was adopted by the
Council because it was perceived to be
relatively simple to implement, with the
potential to reduce salmon bycatch
rates. Meanwhile, the Council also
initiated analysis on this proposed
action to further address salmon bycatch
issues, and provide additional
management measures should ICA
members choose not to participate in
the ICA in the future.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to replace the
current Chinook and Chum Salmon
Savings Areas in the BSAI with new
regulatory closures, salmon bycatch
limits, or a combination of both based
on current salmon bycatch information.
These management measures could
incorporate current or new bycatch
reduction methods. The purpose of the
proposed action is to minimize nonChinook and Chinook salmon bycatch to
the extent practicable. The proposed
action is necessary to maintain a healthy
marine ecosystem, ensure long-term
conservation and abundance of salmon,
provide maximum benefit to fishermen
and communities that depend on these
resources, and comply with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Alternative Management Measures
NMFS, in consultation with the
Council, will evaluate a range of
alternative management measures for
the BSAI groundfish fisheries. The
Council’s Salmon Bycatch Workgroup is
reviewing the latest scientific
information regarding the impacts of
salmon interactions with groundfish
fisheries and developing alternative
salmon bycatch reduction measures.
Alternatives may be formulated based
on the elements identified here, and
those developed through the public
scoping and Council processes. Possible
alternatives could be constructed from
one or more of the following measures:
1.Prohibited Species Catch (PSC) limit
Establish a PSC limit for non-Chinook
and Chinook salmon bycatch in the
CDQ and non-CDQ pollock fisheries.
PSC limits could be allocated among
pollock fishery sectors or fishery
cooperatives. Fishery participants
would be required to stop fishing when
a PSC limit is reached.
2.Fixed closures Establish one or more
salmon savings area closures based on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:33 Dec 21, 2007
Jkt 214001
current salmon bycatch information.
These closures would occur on an
annual or seasonal basis regardless of
salmon bycatch amounts at the time of
the closure.
3.Triggered closures Establish one or
more salmon savings area closures
based on current salmon bycatch
information. These closures would
occur based on criteria evaluated in the
EIS. Criteria could include a threshold
salmon bycatch number or rate.
4.PSC accounting period Revise the
current PSC accounting period to
coincide with the salmon biological year
to provide additional protections to
salmon in the BSAI. Accounting would
begin annually in the ‘‘B’’ season, and
continue through the following ‘‘A’’
season.
Additionally, the Council may
incorporate the current or a new version
of the salmon bycatch reduction ICA
into one or more alternatives.
Preliminary Identification of Issues
A principal objective of the scoping
and public input process is to identify
potentially significant impacts to the
human environment that should be
analyzed in the EIS. The analysis will
evaluate the impacts of the alternatives
for all resources, species, and issues that
may be directly or indirectly affected by
salmon bycatch in the BSAI pollock
fisheries. The following components of
the biological and physical environment
may be evaluated: (1) target and nontarget fish stocks, forage fish, and
prohibited species, including salmon
species; (2) species listed under the ESA
and their critical habitat; (3) seabirds;
(4) marine mammals; and (5) the
ecosystem.
Social and economic impacts also
would be considered in terms of the
effects that changes to salmon bycatch
management measures would have on
the following groups of individuals: (1)
those who participate in harvesting
pollock; (2) those who process and
market pollock and pollock products;
(3) those who consume pollock
products; (4) those who rely on living
marine resources caught in the
management area, particularly salmon;
(5) those who benefit from commercial,
subsistence, and recreational salmon
fisheries; and (6) fishing communities.
Public Involvement
Scoping is an early and open process
for determining the scope of issues to be
addressed in an EIS and for identifying
the significant issues related to the
proposed action. A principal objective
of the scoping and public involvement
process is to identify a range of
reasonable of management alternatives
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that, with adequate analysis, will
delineate critical issues and provide a
clear basis for distinguishing among
those alternatives and selecting a
preferred alternative. Through this
notice, NMFS is notifying the public
that an EIS and decision-making process
for this proposed action have been
initiated so that interested or affected
people may participate and contribute
to the final decision.
NMFS is seeking written public
comments on the scope of issues,
including potential impacts, and
alternatives that should be considered
in revising salmon bycatch management
measures. Written comments will be
accepted at the address above (see
ADDRESSES). Written comments should
be as specific as possible to be the most
helpful. Written comments received
during the scoping process, including
the names and addresses of those
submitting them, will be considered
part of the public record of this proposal
and will be available for public
inspection.
The public is invited to participate
and provide input at Council and
Salmon Bycatch Workgroup meetings
where the latest scientific information
regarding salmon bycatch in the BSAI
groundfish fisheries is reviewed and
alternative salmon bycatch reduction
measures are developed and evaluated.
Notice of future Council and Salmon
Bycatch Workgroup meetings will be
published in the Federal Register and
on the Internet at https://www.fakr.gov.
Please visit this website for more
information on this EIS and for
guidance on submitting effective public
comments.
Dated: December 18, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–24953 Filed 12–21–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD61
Marine Mammals; File No. 10080
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Dr.
Kathryn A. Ono, Department of
Biological Sciences, University of New
England, Biddeford, ME, has been
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72994-72996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-24953]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XD93
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish
Fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for written comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS, in consultation with the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council, announces its intent to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) on salmon bycatch reduction measures in the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands management area (BSAI), in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The proposed action
would replace the current Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas in the
BSAI with new regulatory closures, salmon bycatch limits, or a
combination of both. These management measures could incorporate
current or new bycatch reduction methods. The scope of the EIS will be
to determine the impacts to the human environment resulting from these
salmon bycatch reduction measures. NMFS will accept written comments
from the public to determine the issues of concern and the
[[Page 72995]]
appropriate range of management alternatives for analysis in the EIS.
DATES: Written comments must be received by February 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on issues and alternatives for the EIS
should be sent to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional Administrator,
Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn: Ellen
Sebastian. Comments may be submitted by
E-mail: 0648-AW25-SalmonBycatchEIS@noaa.gov. Include in
the subject line the following document identifier: Salmon Bycatch EIS.
E-mail comments, with or without attachments, are limited to 5
megabytes;
Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802;
Hand Delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th
Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK; or
Fax: 907-586-7557.
All Personal Identifying Information (e.g., name, address)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do
not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe portable document file (pdf) formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Anderson, (907) 586-7228 or
jason.anderson@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the United
States has exclusive fishery management authority over all living
marine resources found within the exclusive economic zone. The
management of these marine resources, with the exception of certain
marine mammals and birds, is vested in the Secretary of Commerce. The
North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) has the
responsibility to prepare fishery management plans for those marine
resources off Alaska requiring conservation and management. Management
of the Federal groundfish fishery in the BSAI is carried out under the
Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands Management Area (FMP). The FMP, its amendments, and
implementing regulations (found at 50 CFR part 679) are developed in
accordance with the requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable Federal laws and executive orders, notably the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
The Council is considering replacing the current Chinook and Chum
Salmon Savings Areas in the BSAI with new regulatory closures, salmon
bycatch limits, or a combination of both. These management measures
could incorporate current or new bycatch reduction methods. NMFS and
the Council have determined the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) may be required for this action because some important
aspects of the impacts of salmon bycatch in the BSAI on the salmon
stocks of origin and users of these salmon are uncertain or unknown and
may result in significant impacts on the human environment not
previously analyzed. Thus, NMFS and the Council are initiating scoping
for an EIS in the event that an EIS is needed.
NMFS and the Council are seeking information from the public
through the EIS scoping process on the range of alternatives to be
analyzed, and on the environmental, social, and economic issues to be
considered in the analysis. Written comments generated during this
scoping process will be provided to the Council and incorporated into
the EIS.
Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas
To address Chinook salmon bycatch concerns, the Council adopted
several management measures designed to reduce overall Chinook salmon
bycatch in the BSAI trawl fisheries. In 1995, the Council adopted, and
NMFS approved, Amendment 21b to the FMP. Based on historic information
on salmon bycatch, Amendment 21b established a Chinook Salmon Savings
Area (60 FR 61215, November 29, 1995). Under Amendment 21b, the Chinook
Salmon Savings Area closed when the bycatch of Chinook salmon in BSAI
trawl fisheries reached 48,000 fish. Amendment 58 to the FMP revised
the Chinook Salmon Savings Area measures (65 FR 60587, October 12,
2000). Amendment 58 reduced the Chinook salmon bycatch limit from
48,000 fish to 29,000 fish, mandated year-round accounting of Chinook
bycatch in the directed pollock fishery, revised the boundaries of the
Chinook Salmon Savings Area closure, and implemented new closure dates.
The Council also adopted a time-area closure designed to reduce
overall non-Chinook salmon bycatch in the BSAI trawl fisheries. In
1995, Amendment 35 to the FMP established the Chum Salmon Savings Area
(60 FR 34904, July 5, 1995). This area is closed to all trawling from
August 1 through August 31 of each year. Additionally, if 42,000 non-
Chinook salmon are caught in the Catcher Vessel Operational Area during
the period August 15 through October 14, the area remains closed for
the remainder of the calendar year.
The Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings Areas were adopted based on
historic observed salmon bycatch rates and were designed to avoid high
spatial and temporal levels of salmon bycatch. From 1990 through 2001,
the BSAI salmon bycatch average was 37,819 Chinook and 69,332 non-
Chinook annually. Recently, however, salmon bycatch numbers have
increased substantially. The numbers of Chinook and non-Chinook salmon
bycatch in the BSAI groundfish fisheries from 2003 through December 7,
2007, are shown in the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Number of
Year Chinook non-Chinook
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 55,422 197,287
2004 63,188 457,817
2005 74,967 711,938
2006 87,730 326,445
2007 through December 7 130,246 97,904
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NMFS and the Council are concerned with this level of salmon bycatch
because of the potential negative impacts on salmon stocks in general,
and on western Alaska salmon stocks in particular.
Recent Salmon Bycatch Management Measures
To address these increasing salmon bycatch amounts, the Council
adopted, and NMFS implemented on October 29, 2007, Amendment 84 to the
FMP (72 FR 61070, October 29, 2007). Spatial and temporal comparisons
of non-community development quota (CDQ) vessels fishing outside of the
salmon savings areas with CDQ vessels fishing inside of the salmon
savings areas indicated that salmon bycatch rates were much higher
outside of the savings areas, and closures were displacing vessels to
higher bycatch areas. Amendment 84 exempts non-CDQ and CDQ pollock
vessels participating in a salmon bycatch reduction inter-cooperative
agreement (ICA) from closures of the Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings
Areas in the BSAI. Additionally, vessels participating in trawl
fisheries for species other than pollock are exempt from Chum Salmon
Savings Area Closures
The purpose of the salmon bycatch avoidance ICA is to use real-time
salmon bycatch information to avoid areas of high non-Chinook and
Chinook
[[Page 72996]]
salmon bycatch rates. The ICA utilizes a system of base bycatch rates,
assignment of vessels to tiers based on bycatch rates relative to the
base rate, a system of closures for vessels in certain tiers, and
monitoring and enforcement through private contractual arrangements.
Amendment 84 was adopted by the Council because it was perceived to
be relatively simple to implement, with the potential to reduce salmon
bycatch rates. Meanwhile, the Council also initiated analysis on this
proposed action to further address salmon bycatch issues, and provide
additional management measures should ICA members choose not to
participate in the ICA in the future.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to replace the current Chinook and Chum
Salmon Savings Areas in the BSAI with new regulatory closures, salmon
bycatch limits, or a combination of both based on current salmon
bycatch information. These management measures could incorporate
current or new bycatch reduction methods. The purpose of the proposed
action is to minimize non-Chinook and Chinook salmon bycatch to the
extent practicable. The proposed action is necessary to maintain a
healthy marine ecosystem, ensure long-term conservation and abundance
of salmon, provide maximum benefit to fishermen and communities that
depend on these resources, and comply with the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Alternative Management Measures
NMFS, in consultation with the Council, will evaluate a range of
alternative management measures for the BSAI groundfish fisheries. The
Council's Salmon Bycatch Workgroup is reviewing the latest scientific
information regarding the impacts of salmon interactions with
groundfish fisheries and developing alternative salmon bycatch
reduction measures. Alternatives may be formulated based on the
elements identified here, and those developed through the public
scoping and Council processes. Possible alternatives could be
constructed from one or more of the following measures:
1.Prohibited Species Catch (PSC) limit Establish a PSC limit for non-
Chinook and Chinook salmon bycatch in the CDQ and non-CDQ pollock
fisheries. PSC limits could be allocated among pollock fishery sectors
or fishery cooperatives. Fishery participants would be required to stop
fishing when a PSC limit is reached.
2.Fixed closures Establish one or more salmon savings area closures
based on current salmon bycatch information. These closures would occur
on an annual or seasonal basis regardless of salmon bycatch amounts at
the time of the closure.
3.Triggered closures Establish one or more salmon savings area closures
based on current salmon bycatch information. These closures would occur
based on criteria evaluated in the EIS. Criteria could include a
threshold salmon bycatch number or rate.
4.PSC accounting period Revise the current PSC accounting period to
coincide with the salmon biological year to provide additional
protections to salmon in the BSAI. Accounting would begin annually in
the ``B'' season, and continue through the following ``A'' season.
Additionally, the Council may incorporate the current or a new
version of the salmon bycatch reduction ICA into one or more
alternatives.
Preliminary Identification of Issues
A principal objective of the scoping and public input process is to
identify potentially significant impacts to the human environment that
should be analyzed in the EIS. The analysis will evaluate the impacts
of the alternatives for all resources, species, and issues that may be
directly or indirectly affected by salmon bycatch in the BSAI pollock
fisheries. The following components of the biological and physical
environment may be evaluated: (1) target and non-target fish stocks,
forage fish, and prohibited species, including salmon species; (2)
species listed under the ESA and their critical habitat; (3) seabirds;
(4) marine mammals; and (5) the ecosystem.
Social and economic impacts also would be considered in terms of
the effects that changes to salmon bycatch management measures would
have on the following groups of individuals: (1) those who participate
in harvesting pollock; (2) those who process and market pollock and
pollock products; (3) those who consume pollock products; (4) those who
rely on living marine resources caught in the management area,
particularly salmon; (5) those who benefit from commercial,
subsistence, and recreational salmon fisheries; and (6) fishing
communities.
Public Involvement
Scoping is an early and open process for determining the scope of
issues to be addressed in an EIS and for identifying the significant
issues related to the proposed action. A principal objective of the
scoping and public involvement process is to identify a range of
reasonable of management alternatives that, with adequate analysis,
will delineate critical issues and provide a clear basis for
distinguishing among those alternatives and selecting a preferred
alternative. Through this notice, NMFS is notifying the public that an
EIS and decision-making process for this proposed action have been
initiated so that interested or affected people may participate and
contribute to the final decision.
NMFS is seeking written public comments on the scope of issues,
including potential impacts, and alternatives that should be considered
in revising salmon bycatch management measures. Written comments will
be accepted at the address above (see ADDRESSES). Written comments
should be as specific as possible to be the most helpful. Written
comments received during the scoping process, including the names and
addresses of those submitting them, will be considered part of the
public record of this proposal and will be available for public
inspection.
The public is invited to participate and provide input at Council
and Salmon Bycatch Workgroup meetings where the latest scientific
information regarding salmon bycatch in the BSAI groundfish fisheries
is reviewed and alternative salmon bycatch reduction measures are
developed and evaluated. Notice of future Council and Salmon Bycatch
Workgroup meetings will be published in the Federal Register and on the
Internet at https://www.fakr.gov. Please visit this website for more
information on this EIS and for guidance on submitting effective public
comments.
Dated: December 18, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-24953 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S